Slashdot Mirror


Linksys Debuts Cordless Skype Handset

An anonymous reader writes "A new cordless Skype-based VoIP handset will hit Internet and retail stores next week. According to Linksys, the CIT200 handset will allow users to make VoIP phone calls as easily as today's cordless handsets make conventional land line calls. The device uses DECT wireless protocol, claimed to eliminate interference with 2.4GHz phones or devices. It comes with a DECT dongle that plugs into a PC's USB port. It's expected sell for around $130. Initially, Linksys is requiring that the PC run Windows XP or 2000, so no Linux yet."

15 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Can I use the Dongle with *any* DECT-enabled phone by webperf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got some spare 'regular' DECT phones.. can I use them instead of the linksys one? and if so .. does anyone know if you can buy the USB dongle seperately? TIA

  2. VOIP is still not worth it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why should I go to a service that 1) requires me to own a computer, 3) requires me to have a broadband conection, 3) is dependent on my electricity not going out, and 3) requires me to purchase an expensive phone when I could simply get Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS - with better sound quality and no dropouts) for a mere $8 monthly (yes, that's really what I pay)?

    At the price VOIP costs, I might as well just get a cell phone, and not be tethered to only being able to use it in my home.

    1. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by Trejkaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's all about cost of investment vs. ongoing costs. Phone calls are a great deal cheaper on VOIP, especially if you regularly make calls internationally, or even interstate.

      But that being said, forking out for something which just runs Skype is a waste of money, because you miss out on free calls to the much larger number of accounts using the (more standard) SIP. That is, unless Skype have properly opened up their SIP interface lately and not informed Slashdot. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should I go to a service that 1) requires me to own a computer, 3) requires me to have a broadband conection, 3) is dependent on my electricity not going out, and 3) requires me to purchase an expensive phone when I could simply get Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS - with better sound quality and no dropouts) for a mere $8 monthly (yes, that's really what I pay)?

      Well lets see:

      1. Skype is free with other skype users so that means unlimited worldwide calls. How much do you think your $8 phone plan with the default long distance provider is going to charge for a call from the US to India?
      2. Your local plan will probably still charge you for local extended calls so enjoying calling the place across the street from you for free but you'll get charged in 6 second increments for everything else.
      3. Most people own a computer that has USB support
      4. A lot of people have broadband.
      5. A one time cost of $130 is not excessive.
      6. Skypeout is extremely cheap when you need to call regular folk with their own line. I bet I can call a lot of far off places for awhile on that $8 you spend just keeping the phone line active.

    3. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by eclectro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I used to pay $35 a month for POTS (and that's as low as it got) and I get a skype-in number for a YEAR for what it cost me ONE month with POTS.

      So I am saving $385 dollars plus I don't get all the crap calls I was receiving before.

      VOIP is VERY worth it.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You only pay $8? Strange, in order to get a phone line with just Caller ID and Voicemail, my phone bill was cracking $40. And that was before any calls, or any long distance. I got my first bill, then immediately signed up with Vonage. Now I pay $25 for dozens of services I'd never afford on a standard line, and use every day. Plus I don't pay any long distance charges.

      Of course, if you have no one to call, it doesn't seem very impressive.

  3. Welcome to another let down by the FCC. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Informative

    DECT is and area where the FCC has let you down.

    In Europe, the EEC set aside spectrum (1900Mhz) for the purpose of running DECT. The protocol is neat, it does TDD, pi/4 DQPSK and phones have enough smarts to share the spectrum amongst themselves without interfering.

    In the USA, your cordless phones are thrown to the dogs in the unlicensed bands. No predetermined spectrum for the application, so phones have to fight it out at 2.4 and 5Ghz with 802.11, microwave ovens and anything else that uses the band. Better still, since there is no uniform standard for interoperability, your handset will only work with the base it came with and not with another manufacturer's.

    DECT in 2.4Ghz (achieved with frequency hopping, so it's not true DECT) does interfere with 802.11. I've done the tests. I've designed both DECT silicon and 802.11 silicon and I can assure you they interfere when they share the same unlicensed band.

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
    1. Re:Welcome to another let down by the FCC. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Informative

      Someone else will probably point this out, but this year the FCC did in fact approve a band for DECT in the US. Not the same one as in Europe, so the same gear doesn't work and it's ooh.. about 10 years too late.

      --
      Evil people are out to get you.
  4. One step forward...... by daemonenwind · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in the day, my girlfriend had a Motorola cell phone. The phone + battery was the size of a purse and needed to stay plugged into the cigarette lighter of her car to work. The signal was pretty spotty, too.

    A few weeks ago, I bought a Sanyo cell phone from Sprint. It can stay on for several days with light talking, and is easily pocket-sized. I have 700 prime-time minutes a month, and unlimited calls after 7 and on weekends for about 50USD/month. Coverage is excellent anywhere I take it.

    Today, the latest advancement in phone technology is a phone with a minimum 6 pound battery/transceiver combo, and unlimited calling provided I have a non-existant wimax connection, or spotty service from the nearest Starbucks?

    What a country!

  5. Re:A year too late? by O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O · · Score: 3, Informative

    Almost one year :-)

    Here's the joint press release from Siemens and Skype:

    http://www.skype.com/company/news/2004/siemens.htm l

    There may still be a market because Gizmodo states that Siemens does not deliver their adapter to the U.S.:

    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/siemens-sk ype-usb-adapter-not-coming-to-us-025688.php

  6. Use real VoIP and this has been around forever by terminal.dk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you use real VoIP, for which there is a provider on every corner, and ones like Sipphone.com, Vonage etc operates in the USA, there IP wireless phones has been around forever. And with voipbuster.com european phone calls to real telephone is free.

    And if you like most people using VoIP is having an adapter box, you can talk even when the computer is turned off, and you can use a standard $20 DECT telephone with the box. And I had the "skype in" equivalent from before skype announced it.

    I do not understand this wow about skype. It is bloatware (requires the PC to be on), quality supposedly sucks etc. I looked at it, and dismissed it as a closed network of old technology. But again, I want things that works, is cheap, and I do not care if 15 year olds can use if for filesharing.

  7. Requires PC? Skype? Yawn... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first read the headline I got excited...but then it turned out to be a huge letdown. We VOIP users have been waiting for a good mainstream SIP based Wifi handset for a long time now and having one from Linksys would have been great. But this is nothing of the sort. Just yet another "dongle" for your PC for making PC to PC calls. You are still tethered to your PC (just through a wireless tether) meaning it has the cool factor but is not practical for most real-world users to replace their traditional cordless phone. Come up with a SIP standard device that uses my existing Wi-fi access point and can support multiple access point profiles and then you will have something.

  8. Re:I hate computers by ReformedExCon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a tablet that I can pick up any time and just start writing or drawing or doodling. It costs less than a dollar. And it doesn't require my computer to be on. But that's besides the point.

    If you really think that you need a computer to surf the web, or need a PC to use a tablet, or ought to be locked down to a single site in order to use a phone, you are either part of the problem or are significantly behind the times.

    The goal should not be to require this 300W heating unit to be the focal point of your computing needs. As I said earlier, I don't want to be tied to this box. I don't want to have to wait 5 minutes for XP to boot up just so I can make calls; I want to pick up the phone and dial.

    The PC as a computing device is a lot like the horseshoe crab. It's been around forever, it'll be around forever, but it's way past its evolutionary prime. The problem is that people think "Computing == PC", so they don't see the possibilities of breaking away from that dead-end paradigm.

    It's a dead end because it relies on being stationary. Even laptops require that you be stationary for limited amounts of time. Palmtop devices go a long way to removing that restriction, and cellular phones do the same. These small devices pack a lot of computing power into very small, low-power units that you can take with you anywhere. This is the new paradigm.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  9. There are others available by _Laban_ · · Score: 3, Informative

    The TopCom Butler 4012 USB has been around for a while and it features Skype and regular PSTN communication in the same unit. It's also a wireless DECT phone and is sold for around 800SEK (circa 102USD) in Sweden.

  10. Re:Can I use the Dongle with *any* DECT-enabled ph by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here in France, the problem is different. Every DSL ISP is providing you with a "box" (freebox, neufbox, aolbox, etc...) that includes:
    1. A DSL modem. Unlimited bandwidth (the closest to the DSLAM the better) Up to 20MB/s if you are lucky enough. I get 6MB dn / 600KB up.
    2. A phone plug. You can plug any regular phone to it. landline national calls are free, others incredibly cheap: US is EUR0.03/minute !!!
    3. A TV-out (scart + optical out) with ~25 channels (actually 100 but only ~25 are worth something).

    Plus, when you subscribe to kick out the old national operator, you can transfer your landline number to the box.

    All that costs me EUR30/month. I don't see VOIP anywhere close to me with such a service.