Slashdot Mirror


Linksys Debuts Cordless Skype Handset

An anonymous reader writes "A new cordless Skype-based VoIP handset will hit Internet and retail stores next week. According to Linksys, the CIT200 handset will allow users to make VoIP phone calls as easily as today's cordless handsets make conventional land line calls. The device uses DECT wireless protocol, claimed to eliminate interference with 2.4GHz phones or devices. It comes with a DECT dongle that plugs into a PC's USB port. It's expected sell for around $130. Initially, Linksys is requiring that the PC run Windows XP or 2000, so no Linux yet."

33 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Can I use the Dongle with *any* DECT-enabled phone by webperf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got some spare 'regular' DECT phones.. can I use them instead of the linksys one? and if so .. does anyone know if you can buy the USB dongle seperately? TIA

  2. VOIP is still not worth it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why should I go to a service that 1) requires me to own a computer, 3) requires me to have a broadband conection, 3) is dependent on my electricity not going out, and 3) requires me to purchase an expensive phone when I could simply get Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS - with better sound quality and no dropouts) for a mere $8 monthly (yes, that's really what I pay)?

    At the price VOIP costs, I might as well just get a cell phone, and not be tethered to only being able to use it in my home.

    1. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by Trejkaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's all about cost of investment vs. ongoing costs. Phone calls are a great deal cheaper on VOIP, especially if you regularly make calls internationally, or even interstate.

      But that being said, forking out for something which just runs Skype is a waste of money, because you miss out on free calls to the much larger number of accounts using the (more standard) SIP. That is, unless Skype have properly opened up their SIP interface lately and not informed Slashdot. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should I go to a service that 1) requires me to own a computer, 3) requires me to have a broadband conection, 3) is dependent on my electricity not going out, and 3) requires me to purchase an expensive phone when I could simply get Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS - with better sound quality and no dropouts) for a mere $8 monthly (yes, that's really what I pay)?

      Well lets see:

      1. Skype is free with other skype users so that means unlimited worldwide calls. How much do you think your $8 phone plan with the default long distance provider is going to charge for a call from the US to India?
      2. Your local plan will probably still charge you for local extended calls so enjoying calling the place across the street from you for free but you'll get charged in 6 second increments for everything else.
      3. Most people own a computer that has USB support
      4. A lot of people have broadband.
      5. A one time cost of $130 is not excessive.
      6. Skypeout is extremely cheap when you need to call regular folk with their own line. I bet I can call a lot of far off places for awhile on that $8 you spend just keeping the phone line active.

    3. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by eclectro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I used to pay $35 a month for POTS (and that's as low as it got) and I get a skype-in number for a YEAR for what it cost me ONE month with POTS.

      So I am saving $385 dollars plus I don't get all the crap calls I was receiving before.

      VOIP is VERY worth it.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You only pay $8? Strange, in order to get a phone line with just Caller ID and Voicemail, my phone bill was cracking $40. And that was before any calls, or any long distance. I got my first bill, then immediately signed up with Vonage. Now I pay $25 for dozens of services I'd never afford on a standard line, and use every day. Plus I don't pay any long distance charges.

      Of course, if you have no one to call, it doesn't seem very impressive.

    5. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dont forget adding in the cost of the computer, cost of the power running the computer, cost of the broadband. Get those numbers and then tell me what's cheaper.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    6. Re:VOIP is still not worth it. by berj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well.. I've already got a computer, I've already got it on and I've already got broadband. So there's no net increase for me to move to Skype.

      Even if I were to factor those costs in, I would only pro-rate them based on the amount of time I'd use the phone/skype which is maybe 20 minutes a day (if that) out of a day of 5 hours of computer use at home the factor is pretty minimal. eg. say 1/15th of my time on the computer is Skyping, my broadband bill is $40 a month. So the Skype portion of that is: $2.67. My computer is paid for so there's no extra cost there. The thing will last for years more so I'm not going to factor that in. My electricity bill is something like $30/month. Assuming again, 20 minutes of VOIP usage in a 16-hour waking day that's 1/48th of my power usage (it should actually be MUCH lower.. my laptop uses MUCH less power than my lights and fridge but be that as it may) that's a whopping $0.63.

      So... my extra computing cost for using VOIP: $3.30
      My phone bill: $34.00 -- barebones, no call answer, no call waiting.

      It gets worse when I factor in long distance... MUCH worse.

      So.. what were you asking about again?

  3. Welcome to another let down by the FCC. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Informative

    DECT is and area where the FCC has let you down.

    In Europe, the EEC set aside spectrum (1900Mhz) for the purpose of running DECT. The protocol is neat, it does TDD, pi/4 DQPSK and phones have enough smarts to share the spectrum amongst themselves without interfering.

    In the USA, your cordless phones are thrown to the dogs in the unlicensed bands. No predetermined spectrum for the application, so phones have to fight it out at 2.4 and 5Ghz with 802.11, microwave ovens and anything else that uses the band. Better still, since there is no uniform standard for interoperability, your handset will only work with the base it came with and not with another manufacturer's.

    DECT in 2.4Ghz (achieved with frequency hopping, so it's not true DECT) does interfere with 802.11. I've done the tests. I've designed both DECT silicon and 802.11 silicon and I can assure you they interfere when they share the same unlicensed band.

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
    1. Re:Welcome to another let down by the FCC. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Informative

      Someone else will probably point this out, but this year the FCC did in fact approve a band for DECT in the US. Not the same one as in Europe, so the same gear doesn't work and it's ooh.. about 10 years too late.

      --
      Evil people are out to get you.
  4. One step forward...... by daemonenwind · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in the day, my girlfriend had a Motorola cell phone. The phone + battery was the size of a purse and needed to stay plugged into the cigarette lighter of her car to work. The signal was pretty spotty, too.

    A few weeks ago, I bought a Sanyo cell phone from Sprint. It can stay on for several days with light talking, and is easily pocket-sized. I have 700 prime-time minutes a month, and unlimited calls after 7 and on weekends for about 50USD/month. Coverage is excellent anywhere I take it.

    Today, the latest advancement in phone technology is a phone with a minimum 6 pound battery/transceiver combo, and unlimited calling provided I have a non-existant wimax connection, or spotty service from the nearest Starbucks?

    What a country!

  5. Haven't these been around? by THotze · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can seem to remember Skype selling phones (one corded, one cordless) that would work with a PC via Windows and USB - but I think the cordless one wasn't available in North America.

    Still, although WAY to expensive for me to pay for a handset, I might actually consider buying one - especially as Skype adds more countries for SkypeIn. Two things, though:

    1) how hard would it be to make drivers for Linux and Mac OS X?
    2) Isn't this a problem just WAITING for Bluetooth? I mean, couldn't you make a Bluetooth handset? It wouldn't be very different from a bluetooth hands-free device, all you'd really need to add would be some kind of communication for the caller display and the dial pad. And then you wouldn't need the USB dongle - saves a USB port, makes it more practical for laptop users, etc.
          The obvious limit of this is the highly limited range of Bluetooth - much less than a 2.4GHz cordless phone.

    Tim

  6. I hate computers by ReformedExCon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate them for trying to do all the things that other things already do better.

    I hate Windows Media Center.

    I hate things that require my computer be on to work.

    I want a cordless VoIP handset that doesn't need a computer. Ideally, I'd like to have a wireless VoIP handset that doesn't need a localized base station (something along the lines of cellular, but with free long distance).

    I don't want to sit in front of my computer when I use the phone. I don't want to sit in front of my computer when I want to watch TV. I don't want my computer to be on.

    The computer is a great tool for what it does, but the dominant paradigm seems to be to build more functionality into this heavy hunk of metal rather than build up the functionality of smaller, better-suited devices.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:I hate computers by ReformedExCon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a tablet that I can pick up any time and just start writing or drawing or doodling. It costs less than a dollar. And it doesn't require my computer to be on. But that's besides the point.

      If you really think that you need a computer to surf the web, or need a PC to use a tablet, or ought to be locked down to a single site in order to use a phone, you are either part of the problem or are significantly behind the times.

      The goal should not be to require this 300W heating unit to be the focal point of your computing needs. As I said earlier, I don't want to be tied to this box. I don't want to have to wait 5 minutes for XP to boot up just so I can make calls; I want to pick up the phone and dial.

      The PC as a computing device is a lot like the horseshoe crab. It's been around forever, it'll be around forever, but it's way past its evolutionary prime. The problem is that people think "Computing == PC", so they don't see the possibilities of breaking away from that dead-end paradigm.

      It's a dead end because it relies on being stationary. Even laptops require that you be stationary for limited amounts of time. Palmtop devices go a long way to removing that restriction, and cellular phones do the same. These small devices pack a lot of computing power into very small, low-power units that you can take with you anywhere. This is the new paradigm.

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  7. Re:A year too late? by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ooops, here's a link Gigaset M34

    I know because for the last year I have been using this very same phone, and wondering why there are no other alternatives. Could this extra recognition from manufacturers come due to eBay's recent purchase of Skype?

  8. Re:A year too late? by O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O · · Score: 3, Informative

    Almost one year :-)

    Here's the joint press release from Siemens and Skype:

    http://www.skype.com/company/news/2004/siemens.htm l

    There may still be a market because Gizmodo states that Siemens does not deliver their adapter to the U.S.:

    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/siemens-sk ype-usb-adapter-not-coming-to-us-025688.php

  9. Use real VoIP and this has been around forever by terminal.dk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you use real VoIP, for which there is a provider on every corner, and ones like Sipphone.com, Vonage etc operates in the USA, there IP wireless phones has been around forever. And with voipbuster.com european phone calls to real telephone is free.

    And if you like most people using VoIP is having an adapter box, you can talk even when the computer is turned off, and you can use a standard $20 DECT telephone with the box. And I had the "skype in" equivalent from before skype announced it.

    I do not understand this wow about skype. It is bloatware (requires the PC to be on), quality supposedly sucks etc. I looked at it, and dismissed it as a closed network of old technology. But again, I want things that works, is cheap, and I do not care if 15 year olds can use if for filesharing.

  10. My family will convert by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone in my family has a PC with broadband. Now I just need to get everyone one of these phones and setup a free skype to spype account. Then, everyone can just pick up the phone and make direct calls as though they were using the local teleco system.

    I've been waiting for something like this to come out. Now I have. If Linksys makes this easy to use, I expect this to really sting the vonage and lingo customer base in the next few years.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  11. Why is it only a VOIP Skype handset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At first glance, and being a product from linksys I assumed this had the Skype technology built in and you just plug it into your network. That would just make sense. It looks like you need to run Skype on the PC though.

    Why not make this just a wireless microphone/speaker for your PC with the ability to launch apllications and press keys. Then you could use it as a phone for ANY other voice application...teamspeak, MSN, Goodle talk, Skype, etc.

  12. Requires PC? Skype? Yawn... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first read the headline I got excited...but then it turned out to be a huge letdown. We VOIP users have been waiting for a good mainstream SIP based Wifi handset for a long time now and having one from Linksys would have been great. But this is nothing of the sort. Just yet another "dongle" for your PC for making PC to PC calls. You are still tethered to your PC (just through a wireless tether) meaning it has the cool factor but is not practical for most real-world users to replace their traditional cordless phone. Come up with a SIP standard device that uses my existing Wi-fi access point and can support multiple access point profiles and then you will have something.

  13. Actually, Bluetooth isn't so bad by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    The range of their phone is 300m outdoors and 50m indoors. With Class 1 Bluetooth, it should be about 100m outdoors and 15m indoors. 15m is enough for the majority of houses, I'm sure.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  14. Re:Wireless Radio by m00j · · Score: 2, Funny
    Is there such a thing as non-wireless radio?

    yes, but it is extremely unpopular as you have to be within a few metres of the radio station and the quality is poor :D

    well okay, a I made the up, a man can dream though, a man can dream...
  15. Pocket PC by linsys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For those who don't know, you can download a PocketPC version of Skype and put it on a Wifi enabled PDA with PocketPC so you can use skype wirelessly with no computer having to be turned on just your PocketPC..

    Also since there is a linux client, you can also run this on a PDA that runs linux...

    I would rather invest my money in having a WiFi Enabled PocketPC PDA/Cellphone which runs skype so I can make free calls from home to other skype users, as well as use my cell phone functions for local calls from Non Skype Users..

    This is the BEST way to use skype In My Opinion.

  16. What about support for Mac OS X? by Kunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Initially, Linksys is requiring that the PC run Windows XP or 2000, so no Linux yet." What about support for the second biggest platform, Mac OS X?

  17. There are others available by _Laban_ · · Score: 3, Informative

    The TopCom Butler 4012 USB has been around for a while and it features Skype and regular PSTN communication in the same unit. It's also a wireless DECT phone and is sold for around 800SEK (circa 102USD) in Sweden.

  18. Re:Requires PC? Skype? Yawn... by Pretor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Such devices are allready on the market or coming in the near future, here what I found using google for 20 seconds:

    Hint: Search for "VOIP WLAN phone"

    UTStarCom F1000 WiFi Voip phone, using 802.11b and SIP, DHCP and etc.
    http://www.voipexchangeusa.com/docs/snom/F1000Data Sheet.pdf

    Siemens Gigaset SL75. That is a VOIP handset using WLAN. It is unclear if it's using SIP for the VOIP part, but lets hope. It's coming in November with the steep price of 299. Siemens is a well known maker of quality(!) wireless phones for the homes, and also a major supplier of phone internals to other brands, so this is becoming main stream. A nice thing about this phone is that it can store a list of wireless hot spots and use this when you are traveling.

  19. Re:Can I use the Dongle with *any* DECT-enabled ph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got some spare 'regular' DECT phones.. can I use them instead of the linksys one?

    At least here in europe, there is DECT and there is GAP. Phones only supporting DECT are supposed to work together, although this is apparently often not the case...
    GAP specifies interoperability, I never had a problem with different GAP phones on a GAP-compliant base station.

    But many phones not declared as GAP compliant seem to work together anyway. For the cheapest handheld/base combinations, there are often hidden buttons etc. which can enable 'search mode' etc.

    BTW, I think this is a good location to blatantly advertise a hardware modification to DECT phones for asterisk-soundcard/VoIP (that was featured on hackaday.com on saturday).

    Onno

  20. Been around for awhile by SirSnapperHead · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought one of these a few months ago: http://www.skypejournal.com/blog/archives/2005/08/ i_like_going_co.php and am very satisfied. Two buttons so you can choose to dial via landline or Skype, and with the Skype In number I can receive calls like a normal landline...

    --
    It's the year of Linux! To celebrate I have x free hotmail accounts to give away
  21. Re:Can I use the Dongle with *any* DECT-enabled ph by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here in France, the problem is different. Every DSL ISP is providing you with a "box" (freebox, neufbox, aolbox, etc...) that includes:
    1. A DSL modem. Unlimited bandwidth (the closest to the DSLAM the better) Up to 20MB/s if you are lucky enough. I get 6MB dn / 600KB up.
    2. A phone plug. You can plug any regular phone to it. landline national calls are free, others incredibly cheap: US is EUR0.03/minute !!!
    3. A TV-out (scart + optical out) with ~25 channels (actually 100 but only ~25 are worth something).

    Plus, when you subscribe to kick out the old national operator, you can transfer your landline number to the box.

    All that costs me EUR30/month. I don't see VOIP anywhere close to me with such a service.

  22. I call *baloney* - better phones available already by B747SP · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Methinks this doesn't exactly count as news. Wireless telephones and wireless PC audio devices (what this product really is) have been around in assorted shapes and forms for quite a while.

    A company here in Sydney, Australia is selling (to Australia and NZ only, sorry) a combination cordless telephone (ie: it works on the telephone network) and USB PC audio device with drivers that speak Skype. Apparently you choose whether you want POTS (plain old telephone system) or USB audio (and thus, I suspect, not just skype but any voip thing you want to run on your computer) from the keypad on the handset. For the same price as the Linksys one in the Slashdot story (those dollars on the Australian web site are Australian dollars), my money goes with the one that is actually a telephone! :-)

    They also have the ZyXel Voice-Over-IP Wifi Phone, a device that speaks 802.11b and SIP out of the box - no proprietary Skype restrictions, it's the real deal. The Zyxel device has been around for quite a while IIRC.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  23. Skype is history by dybdahl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Skype is to internet telephony as Netscape was to web browsing.

    Once the old telephony companies introduce SIP based telephony, people will remember skype as the old age. I already use SIP telephony, and:
    - It's cheaper than skype, because I don't need to pay to call 100 million phone numbers, and other tariffs are the same.
    - It's much easier than skype, because I just use my normal phone and dial a number, no matter what.
    - Sound quality is better, because SIP uses A-law (or mu-law) codecs.
    - It's more compatible with tools like asterisk.org and other telephony related technologies.

    And the most important:
    - The marketing budgets of the world's telephone companies are much bigger than skypes and will eventually make skype history.

    The only people that benefit from Skype are the terrorists, because skype calls are virtually untraceable.

  24. Skype phone stats - 50m range indoors by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some facts about the phone, sounds pretty nice:
    300m range outdoors, 50m range indoors
    USB 1.1
    10hr talk time
    5 Channels in US, 10 channels in EU and SA
    32kbps speech coding
    Plug & Dial
    Can connect to regular phone lines
    'Free' calls

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  25. Re:Encryption? by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Skype relies on security through obscurity. It doesn't matter what kind of encryption they are using; it could be as weak as ASI for all anyone knows. They won't let anybody read the source code in order to prove how secure the system is. So we must assume, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that Skype -- and anyone they choose, even h4x0rz who get lucky -- have the ability to listen to any calls you make through their network.

    If you would not shout it out loud in a bus station, don't say it over Skype.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!