Slashdot Mirror


Italy To Build World's Longest Suspension Bridge

Rei writes "According to the BBC, Italy has just granted contracts to begin work on the world's longest suspension bridge, connecting the island of Sicily to the mainland. The nearly four kilometer-long bridge across the Messina Straits is to carry a double six-lane highway and four high-speed railway tracks. Its main span will be 3.3 kilometers long; this would over 1.5x the current record-holder, the 1991-meter Akashi-Kaikyo bridge."

49 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Here's a hint for anyone travelling on it. by nihilistcanada · · Score: 5, Funny

    If your name is Sonny, don't stop at the tollbooth.

  2. math? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    the nearly 4 km bridge is over 1.5x the 1.991 km japanese bridge?

    well, that's a logically accurate statement, but so is the statement that gw bush is 1.5x smarter than your average chimpanzee

    the truth is he is more like 2x as smart, and same with the bridges

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:math? by destx · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Its main span will be 3.3 kilometers long"

      duh.

    2. Re:math? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That comparison is highly unfair.... to the chimpanzee.

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  3. Linux role - any? by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is to request slashdotters in Italy to track and tell us the role of Linux/OSS if any, in this project. If one knows how Linux can be of use, I'd welcome the information too. I wonder whether Linux/OSS can play a role.

  4. Almost there... by Slashdiddly · · Score: 2, Funny

    If only they made it a little longer, say, 42,000 km. And also up instead of sideways.

  5. Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by guacamole · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am slightly surprised that this project is expected to cost at most as much, if not less, than the extected cost of seismic retrofit for the relatively shorter San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (that project involves the construction of a completely new replacement for the eastern span of the bridge). How come? I suppose one reason is that the cost of everything in Bay Area is much much higher than in southern Italy. What about other factors? Is there something that makes the Italian design inherently cheaper to implement?

    1. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What about other factors? Is there something that makes the Italian design inherently cheaper to implement?
      Different constraints - the portion of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge has to fit with the rest of it and the bridge will presumably be in use while construction is going on. The Italy-Sicily bridge just has to cover the distance, doesn't have to fit to a pre-existing design and doesn't have to be used until it's finished.

      In a lot of places you will see bridges built next to each other - sometimes it's cheaper to build a whole new bridge instead of tacking another bit on the side.

      The cost of stuff in the Bay area are most likely irrelevant to the project, since stuff will come in from elsewhere.

    2. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by kevcol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How come?"

      Italy doesn't have to deal with CalTrans, or the fifty gazillion other state and Bay Area agencies with noses in the project. I believe California's nuthouse approval processes have long eclipsed even the famed Italian bureaucracy.

    3. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Filiks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Instead of a concrete skyway like in the Florida Keys, the mayors of Oakland and SF, with the general backing of the Bay Area residents, wanted a signature span instead. The final design has never actually been built anywhere in the world on this scale. Consequently when bids went out for contractors, only one company decided to bid and get involved in this very political situation. Well that bids was far more than expected. Meanwhile over the years the cost of steel has increased dramatically, particularly steel made in the USA, which was a requirement for this project.

    4. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by TeXMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Other factors are:
      • eveything in Italy is cheaper than in the USA (about half, although the gap is diminishing)
      • in the South, this is especially more true
      • local labour
      • cheating: with this I mean that the prospected cost will grow much higher as time goes by; since Berlusconi is likely to lose the next elections and who knows, probably the ones after those too, it'll be the left-wing parties that'll have to dig for that money, or stop the works; all the best for Mr. B
      • contrary to the use in most civilized nations (Italy included) the private company that builds it will not be held responsible for defects; this means that if the bridge collapses (wanna bet?) the State will be held liable, not the company that's building it
      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    5. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Trailwalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Italy does indeed have earthquakes. They have been recorded from earliest Roman times to the present.

      Some information

    6. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      local labour

      This is Sicily. You know who's going to be providing the local labour? The construction firms you're going to find down there are, shall we say, family businesses.

      Might not work out all that cheap, but at least they won't have to worry about union trouble ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  6. Re:Suspension bridge by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hey, don't knock it. The Akashi Strait bridge -- which, as the article mentions, is the current record holder -- is built directly across a major fault line. They actually had a big earthquake during construction, and had to make the section in the middle a few feet longer to compensate! : S

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  7. Re:Is that Prudent? by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why would it cause "havoc"? Surely it will be heavily monitored live by camera and other methods. It's going to be a double six-lane highway!! There's no reason one of the lanes couldn't be reserved for emergency traffic. Also, it's only 2.5 miles long. Huge for a bridge but nothing special otherwise. You could therefore reach any point on the bridge in about a minute. I have to say I'm not seeing any show-stoppers here.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  8. election campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's election time again in Italy and Berlusconi needs the votes of Sicilies citizens.
    So he pulls out the old bridge plans like he did the last time and the time before.
    Don't expect to travel to Sicily on try feet too soon.

    1. Re:election campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      From www.beppegrillo.it

      A bridge costing 3,880,000,000 Euro to save 20 minutes

      Attacking the Messina Bridge is like attacking the Red Cross. This is plain even to an idiot who is completely useless, even though he is useful to the interests of someone.

      After the ad hoc laws, we now have the ad hoc construction work.

      The bridge is of no use to the Italians, including those from Reggio and from Messina, divided by nature for a million years. To go from Salerno to Reggio Calabria, it takes 48 hours. Then the bridge will allow you to save 20 minutes to get to Sicily.

      The country has other priorities that are real. Motorways and railways are in an abysmal state.

      The 3,880,000,000 Euro are ours. Why should we spend them for a useless construction? Our employees, incapable of managing our public debt, before spending the money for the bridge should explain how we will get a return on the money, and explain the utility, the environmental impact and the do-ability.

      A 3,000 metre bridge with an aerodynamic profile, has never been constructed up to now.
      There's no guarantee that it will stand up, especially if you consider that it's in a zone of major seismic activity (remember the Messina earthquake?) and with incredibly strong currents.

      On this point refer to the interview with the Professor of architectural construction, Massimo Majowiecki. Some of his conclusions are given here.

      "The Delegations of Superintendence of ANAS {Roads}, of FF.SS {railways} and the Ministry of Public
      Works, in July 1995 conclude: " that the Progetto di Massima Definitivo {the final project plan} presented in December 1992, even given the undoubted value of the information supplied, it is not yet possible to indicate which project is definitely the one to be developed into a construction project, to be translated into the building of a bridge and a global passage across."
      In present conditions, the technical uncertainties stil remain...."

      But the bridge will create jobs and contracts and will get the approval of the Confindustria {employers' organisation} and of the Unions. Perhaps it would be better to get them to dig holes and fill them in again. It's a useless activity, but at least it wouldn't cause harm.

      Beppe Grillo

    2. Re:election campaign by TeXMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      the bridge was planned a lot of time ago, and projects and deployment began right after the last elections results. So it is not an electoral move.

      Actually yes, it was an electoral move. But it was an electoral move two elections ago.

      The messina striat is quite efficient, and the status of high-traffic roads in south italy is not as bad as you are trying to present. I personally saw the Salerno-Reggio Calabria and it's completely new. Also in sicily from messina to palermo the road is perfect. Is that a joke or something? I live in Catania, my father has worked near Siracusa for tens of years, my girlfriend is from Matera, I have relatives all over Sicily, and some others that have moved (some temporarily, some permanently) to cities northern of Rome. I think this entitles me to a more thorough knowledge about the conditions of "high-traffic roads" in the South in general and in Sicily in particular.

      And for sure "high-traffic roads" are scarcer and in much worse conditions than they are in the rest of Italy. As I mentioned, most (surely not all) the major cities are reached by these "high-traffic" roads, but this is scarcely significant for most of the population. Some of the most important high-traffic roads (e.g. SS 114) are still in abysmal conditions, and the ones that exist can in no way hold a comparison with what they have up north; or did you happen to pass by in one of the lucky days in which the one-lane-per-direction in the SA-RC and ME-PA is less than 50%, and you had no truck or caravan in front of you?

      And let's not even get started on the railroads systems.

      The main problem in south and central italy are the inhabitants.

      This, I can related to.

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
  9. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by xDSoMX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Yeah, well I sure beat the Italians wish they spent more money on their army after WWII. Its a shame they had to rebuild their entire freaking country. History, >doesn't teach us anything.

    hi, i write from italy, emh, the bridge is new, is not rebuilded after the WWII, its a shame that the US Gov spent too much money in army to make war all around the world instead spending in istruction and story book.

    BWT the bridge is not a good things, many of the people living in Sicilia and Calabria don't want it, cos will be devastating for enviroment.. but the Italy "president" Silvio Berlusconi (bleah!!) need to do this for glory and ammiration of people who don't know the real story of the bridge.

    ok. sorry from my bad english, shame that italian gov didnt spent some money in english book .... :)

    greetings from the Family ;)

  10. Supposed to finish in 2012 by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had heard Rumours that the project may be suspended

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Supposed to finish in 2012 by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Due to conflicts?
      By then, i'm sure they could bridge it out.

      --
      ^_^
  11. Re:Is that Prudent? by bedroll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are plenty of bridges that are longer than that and they serve their purpose well. This is just the longest suspension bridge. I've personally used the 23-mile bridge-tunnel across the Chesapeake Bay. Also consider the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, it's 23 miles all above water. Neither of them are as wide as this bridge is proposed to be, either.

  12. Re:Critical Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How would they prevent against this?

    Exactly the same way they prevent terrorist attacks against anything else - a combination of physical security and intelligence. Is it infallible? Of course not. But everything, everywhere is vulnerable to terrorist attacks, nothing new there.

  13. Re:Critical Failure by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Given its length, and the presumably large number of people that could be on it at a time, I presume it would be a potential target for terrorists or organized crime (hey, it's Sicily...) based on past threats against bridges and tunnels by terrorist groups.

    How would they prevent against this? It seems such a bridge has two critical failure points at both ends and one or more in the middle.

    I know they have water to cross, so its size doesn't appear to be the motivation, as say for the tallest building etc. but I think these are issues which (sadly) need to be considered.


    Jesus Christ on a pogo stick! Can we even mention constructing a structure larger than a Taco Bell without someone saying "Well, that's a nice idea, but The Terrorists could just blow it up." Here's a whack from The Reality Stick for you. The Terrorists can (and will) Blow Stuff Up. They're generally going to do it where there are a lot of people in order to maximize Body Count (aka Terror). Fortunately, for The Terrorists, the world is a target rich environment because for the past 10,000 years people have not advanced "Well, that's a nice idea, but The Terrorists could just blow it up" as a credible reason to abandon major projects. A new world's longest bridge or World's Blankest Blank will be yet another target and life will go on.


    Now, I'm not advancing this bridge as a good idea. There may be, and probably are, many legitimate reasons why it should be built differently or even not at all. However, suggesting that every new structure should be terrorist proof is delusional.


    Peter

  14. Politican vapourware by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just a political manoeuvre by the Governemt.
    They don't have the money to support it.
    None seems to be really interested in such a thing (not even in Sicilia).
    Scientists warn against it: the Etna volcano is just 50 Km far from there.

    But stock quotes of the company that should build the bridge are going up any time someone quotes the bridge.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    1. Re:Politican vapourware by mincognito · · Score: 5, Funny
      This is just a political manoeuvre by the Governemt.

      Precisely. They need to create a sense of national pride after losing the whole noodle issue with the chinese.

  15. Just for the record by broothal · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a short period of time, Storebaeltsbroen held the record, until Akashi was built.

    I actually crossed them both at the same day a few years ago. I wonder if that entitles me to a place in the Guiness book of records :)

  16. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we needed 'em, we'd build 'em. I'm not into pouring money into pet projects that gain us nothing but a world record that'll last for just a few years, especially at the cost of something like a military.

  17. Previous attempts have failed by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 3, Informative

    This project may fail. But then not for technological reasons.

    Several previous attempts of multibillion-dollar, EU-funded projects in that region have failed somewhere between Rome and Palermo. Money, people, and concrete have disappeared and there were never any witnesses. Hope things have changed.

  18. 4 railway lines and 6 auto lanes by rheotaxis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when did any new bridge like this in America include more than one rail line, if any?

    --
    Software freedom...I love it!
  19. Mafia target by DavidNWelton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, it's a "mafia target". Who do you think will be siphoning off a lot of the contracting money going into building it? They're not interested in blowing it up.

  20. Huh 4km aka 2.5m long total (FTFA)? by sm00f · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Mackinac Bridge here in michigan is 5 miles long, and held the record for longest suspension span until 1998 at 3/4 mile or so... Is this bridge just being built with NO middle column?? Anyways are some fun links for the Mackinac Bridge (that nobody knows exists it seems): here's all the stats and one pic: http://bridgepros.com/projects/Mackinac/Mackinac.h tm here's the google images link for nice pics: http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&c2c off=1&safe=off&q=mackinac+bridge&spell=1 ^^^ and why in the hell doesnt slashdot support carriage returns on win2k + mozilla 1.7???

    1. Re:Huh 4km aka 2.5m long total (FTFA)? by JeffSh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i too, being a michagamaniac, am very proud of our bridge. it doesn't seem to get the credit that is due to it. most likely this is because the bridge is in a very much "out of the way" place. i mean, you really do have to take a trip to see it, but it's got to be near the top of the list of "cool engineering tourist destinations"

      i love it and used to walk it on labor day every year with my parents when i was younger and lived up up north. im a troll, so not that far up north, but still the mighty mac is a fine span to be proud of.

      its total length still surpasses any suspension bridge i think, but i guess in engineering circles it is the main span that "counts". it's pretty incredible how long it held all the records; it was built in the 50s.

  21. With a BIG grain of salt... by mano78 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please be aware that this is a plan that's been around for more than twenty years now, and it's not feasible. The wind is just too strong (been there last month, I saw it), the zone is a sismic one and generally noone cares anyway, because the roads that would bring people to the bridge (the infamous Salerno-Reggio Calabria) are ancient to be kind and generally a wreck.

    Be also aware that this is election time, and our prime citizen Berlusconi will lose. So he bring out this old project, to gain some thousands of votes, and will leave it to the next administration to realize. Same old story...

    (see the Mose project to protect Venice from floodings)

  22. Re:Is that Prudent? by Enti · · Score: 2, Funny

    And just consider having to resurface that beast. But the probable issues aside, it will make for some beautiful photo opportunities.

    --
    In these days, bleeps and bloops mean something more
  23. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by drsquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    Four kilometres long.

    That's a lot of places to throw bodies off...

  24. Re:Is that Prudent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Also consider the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, it's 23 miles all above water.

    You want to update this. Since end of August, it's 23 miles all below water...

  25. Re:Not the Japanese... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Without wishing in any way to denigrate the Viaduc de Millau, it is not comparable to the Japanese bridge in engineering difficulty. The French effort is the highest bridge, but the Japanese bridge consists of three spans of 960, 1991 and 960 metres respectively. A main span of almost two kilometres is a formidible challenge under any circumstances, and especially when it must be built to withstand an 8.5 magnitude earthquake with an epicentre within 150 kilometres.

  26. One nation? by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has trumpeted the project as a vital driver of development in the south, which will finally make Italy one nation by linking Sicily to the mainland.

    I wonder if Mr. Berlusconi has heard of a place called Sardinia.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  27. Re:Critical Failure by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Funny
    I would not worry too much about terrorists.

    Beer kills more people than terrorists.

    George Bush kills more people than terroists (of course some people think he is a terrorist.)

    Terrorists kill people in particularly nasty ways, and get heaps of "the oxygen of publicity".

    However, the Mafia (Based in Sicily) almost certaily kill more people than the terrorists, and if the terrorists mess with this bridge, then I am sure the Mafia will "make them an offer they can't refuse"

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  28. nusefull by silian87 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am an italian guy, and I think this bridge is simple unuseful!!! It cost a lot of money to a country that have money problems, and maiby it is dangerous too! Boat exist!

    --
    Free As In Freedom
  29. Re:Is that Prudent? by night_it · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Surely it will be heavily monitored live by camera and other methods. It's going to be a double six-lane highway!! There's no reason one of the lanes couldn't be reserved for emergency traffic. Also, it's only 2.5 miles long. Huge for a bridge but nothing special otherwise. You could therefore reach any point on the bridge in about a minute. I have to say I'm not seeing any show-stoppers here.

    Ok guy, you weren't born in Sicily..

  30. Re:Is that Prudent? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Italy, nobody ever uses the rightmost lane, so emergency traffic shouldn't have any problems moving about (unless they also refuse to use that lane for the same mysterious reason as the other drivers).

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  31. Sicilian mafia dies unless it halts the project! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This bridge 99% likely will not be built. If this bridge stood over the straits the power of Mafia in Sicily would collapse. They couldn't keep the local population in poverty and opression by selling drinking water (under their exclusive mafia control) for hyper-inflated prices, because this bridge is planned to carry two giant aquaducts inside its deck, too.

    With this bridge, Sicily would be integrated into Italy and central government and police would have much better access to the island to keep the order and uphold the law. Five years after this bridge is completed the mafia would be history! Godfathers will not allow that, they will terrorize the population so nobody dares to work on the bridge construction and importing foreign labour will drive costs up. There will be sabotage, bad concrete mixed, load-cable wires cut, improper steel used, etc.

    Unless military law is imposed in Sicily and enforced with the same cruel determination as dictator mussolini did in the 1930s, the mafia will manage to halt the bridge's construction. As soon as the brdige is ready, lotsa northern cops could be moved into the island and organized crime rooted up in a normal civil manner, no need for the italian army any more.

    I hope the italians will have that 1% luck and the bridge completes. It would be a tremendous GLOBAL achievement to get rid of the sicilian mafia, the capo of all mafii. The calabrians would break then and finally the US-based italian mafia could be destroyed, too. Judge Giovanni Falcone did not die in vain if this giant bridge is indeed built by 2012!

  32. Re:Is that Prudent? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, there's the emergency lane, as in most european countries (at least on highways), then there's the rightmost traffic lane. Which is empty.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  33. Re:Political vapourware by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the Channel Tunnel (linking the UK to France)
    It's not actually the same situation.
    Do you know how many people and tons of goods used to cross the channel by ship?
    A couple of magnitude orders more than the Canale di Messina!
    The distance between the two sides is 20 times larger in the British Channel.
    And, moreover, there is no active volcano snoring close to the tunnel.
    I'd spend those money and efforts in something more useful or less useless at least.
    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  34. Re:Is that Prudent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see the Chesapeak Bay Bridge tunnel from my bedroom and I can assure you accidents on that thing create miles of traffic.

    As an aside my most unusual experience was heading in to the tunnel and noticing I was headed *under* a US Navy submarine.

  35. Re:Is that Prudent? by bedroll · · Score: 2, Informative
    I can see the Chesapeak Bay Bridge tunnel from my bedroom and I can assure you accidents on that thing create miles of traffic.

    I don't doubt that at all. Being two lanes in either direction it doesn't lend itself to allowing traffic to flow around them. Though, a bridge as wide as the one proposed, with the (comparatively) short distance proposed, shouldn't have as much of a problem.

    As an aside my most unusual experience was heading in to the tunnel and noticing I was headed *under* a US Navy submarine.

    I can imagine. It's a very surreal span of roadway. I've only been on it once, but I was quite astonished. For those who haven't crossed it: After you're a couple miles into crossing it you can't see land at all. Then, approaching the tunnels, the bridge looks to disappear into the water until you get closer and see the mouth of the tunnel.

  36. The American perspective by Viadd · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the US, our government has allocated $223 million for a 6300 foot long, 200 foot high (~2 km, 60 meter) bridge Not too far out of line when you scale down the Italian bridge.

    They are going to put it between Ketchican, Alaska (population 14500) and Gravina Island (population 50).

    Sicilians may have invented organized crime, but the US Congress has perfected it.