Slashdot Mirror


Italy To Build World's Longest Suspension Bridge

Rei writes "According to the BBC, Italy has just granted contracts to begin work on the world's longest suspension bridge, connecting the island of Sicily to the mainland. The nearly four kilometer-long bridge across the Messina Straits is to carry a double six-lane highway and four high-speed railway tracks. Its main span will be 3.3 kilometers long; this would over 1.5x the current record-holder, the 1991-meter Akashi-Kaikyo bridge."

146 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Here's a hint for anyone travelling on it. by nihilistcanada · · Score: 5, Funny

    If your name is Sonny, don't stop at the tollbooth.

    1. Re:Here's a hint for anyone travelling on it. by jcr · · Score: 1

      That's only in New York.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  2. Is that Prudent? by imstanny · · Score: 1
    It's impressive, but I think that the goal of bridges is to be as short as possible (although in this case, that's obviously the shortest length it can be).

    But, consider having a car accident or car trouble on the a bridge... it'll cause havoc. And the longer it is, the harder it will be to mediate such problems.

    In either case, it's still cool.

    1. Re:Is that Prudent? by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      why would it cause "havoc"? Surely it will be heavily monitored live by camera and other methods. It's going to be a double six-lane highway!! There's no reason one of the lanes couldn't be reserved for emergency traffic. Also, it's only 2.5 miles long. Huge for a bridge but nothing special otherwise. You could therefore reach any point on the bridge in about a minute. I have to say I'm not seeing any show-stoppers here.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    2. Re:Is that Prudent? by bedroll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are plenty of bridges that are longer than that and they serve their purpose well. This is just the longest suspension bridge. I've personally used the 23-mile bridge-tunnel across the Chesapeake Bay. Also consider the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, it's 23 miles all above water. Neither of them are as wide as this bridge is proposed to be, either.

    3. Re:Is that Prudent? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There are many bridges that are longer than this; for example, the Lake Ponchartrain causeway, for example, is (or was, if they haven't fixed it yet) 24 miles long! Moreover, it's only 2 lanes in each direction, so accidents clog it up much more easily.

      The only thing special about the Messina bridge is the span -- the long causeways in America cross shallow water, and therefore can be supported at much more frequent intervals.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Is that Prudent? by Enti · · Score: 2, Funny

      And just consider having to resurface that beast. But the probable issues aside, it will make for some beautiful photo opportunities.

      --
      In these days, bleeps and bloops mean something more
    5. Re:Is that Prudent? by TAZ6416 · · Score: 1

      "It's impressive, but I think that the goal of bridges is to be as short as possible (although in this case, that's obviously the shortest length it can be)."

      Hmm, I wonder if Northern Ireland holds the record for shortest bridge :)

      http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits /w-findaplace/w-carrickarede/

      Jonathan

      Oscar The Grouch Does America - http://www.mccormackj.fsnet.co.uk/oscarthegrouch/

    6. Re:Is that Prudent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Also consider the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, it's 23 miles all above water.

      You want to update this. Since end of August, it's 23 miles all below water...

    7. Re:Is that Prudent? by night_it · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Surely it will be heavily monitored live by camera and other methods. It's going to be a double six-lane highway!! There's no reason one of the lanes couldn't be reserved for emergency traffic. Also, it's only 2.5 miles long. Huge for a bridge but nothing special otherwise. You could therefore reach any point on the bridge in about a minute. I have to say I'm not seeing any show-stoppers here.

      Ok guy, you weren't born in Sicily..

    8. Re:Is that Prudent? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Italy, nobody ever uses the rightmost lane, so emergency traffic shouldn't have any problems moving about (unless they also refuse to use that lane for the same mysterious reason as the other drivers).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    9. Re:Is that Prudent? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Is that any different from motorways in dense fog or snow blizzards? Impossible for helicopters to fly and tricky for emergency vehicles.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Is that Prudent? by night_it · · Score: 1

      In Italy this one is the emergency lane and it's correct that none uses that. The problem is that Sicily is not Italy and a sicilian motorist (expecially a woman) could dive into water with his own car to evade the road traffic; so do you think that none will take possession of emergency lane in a NORMAL condition? Try to think what could happen in a emergency condition..

    11. Re:Is that Prudent? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, there's the emergency lane, as in most european countries (at least on highways), then there's the rightmost traffic lane. Which is empty.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    12. Re:Is that Prudent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can see the Chesapeak Bay Bridge tunnel from my bedroom and I can assure you accidents on that thing create miles of traffic.

      As an aside my most unusual experience was heading in to the tunnel and noticing I was headed *under* a US Navy submarine.

    13. Re:Is that Prudent? by bedroll · · Score: 2, Informative
      I can see the Chesapeak Bay Bridge tunnel from my bedroom and I can assure you accidents on that thing create miles of traffic.

      I don't doubt that at all. Being two lanes in either direction it doesn't lend itself to allowing traffic to flow around them. Though, a bridge as wide as the one proposed, with the (comparatively) short distance proposed, shouldn't have as much of a problem.

      As an aside my most unusual experience was heading in to the tunnel and noticing I was headed *under* a US Navy submarine.

      I can imagine. It's a very surreal span of roadway. I've only been on it once, but I was quite astonished. For those who haven't crossed it: After you're a couple miles into crossing it you can't see land at all. Then, approaching the tunnels, the bridge looks to disappear into the water until you get closer and see the mouth of the tunnel.

    14. Re:Is that Prudent? by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      Well, the worlds shortest international foot bridge is in the 1000 islands between canada and the US. http://www.ontournet.com/media/images/a7pic.jpg. I can vouche for the carrick-a-rede also, but I don't know if it is shorter. Great way to start a day trip. Bridge -> causeway -> bushmills -> nap.

    15. Re:Is that Prudent? by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      No, the Causeway is many feet above the level of Lake Pontchartrain. The bridge never was under water.

      (No, you're not funny either.)

  3. Don't be so excited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We're italian and that's only an announce. Do you really believe that we can build something like that? Well, an interesting reading about it on grillo's blog

    1. Re:Don't be so excited... by Mantees+de+Tara · · Score: 1

      How come this is rated Insightful instead than Troll or Flamebait?

  4. math? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    the nearly 4 km bridge is over 1.5x the 1.991 km japanese bridge?

    well, that's a logically accurate statement, but so is the statement that gw bush is 1.5x smarter than your average chimpanzee

    the truth is he is more like 2x as smart, and same with the bridges

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:math? by destx · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Its main span will be 3.3 kilometers long"

      duh.

    2. Re:math? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That comparison is highly unfair.... to the chimpanzee.

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    3. Re:math? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      But you see, they need bigger numbers... they have a recent loss (-> Chineese noodles) to cover.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:math? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      That comparison is highly unfair.... to the chimpanzee.

      After seeing the National Geographic show "Chimps: The Dark Side",
      I think GWB has a lot in common with the chimpanzee.

    5. Re:math? by toetagger1 · · Score: 1
      "the nearly 4 km bridge is over 1.5x the 1.991 km japanese bridge?"
      Last time I checked, 4 > 1.5 x 1.991 was a mathematically correct statement.
      --
      who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  5. electrical transmission lines by Keith+McClary · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember they had electrical transmission lines across there, decades ago, pretty impressive.

  6. Linux role - any? by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is to request slashdotters in Italy to track and tell us the role of Linux/OSS if any, in this project. If one knows how Linux can be of use, I'd welcome the information too. I wonder whether Linux/OSS can play a role.

    1. Re:Linux role - any? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Why, electronic traffic signs of course!

      What? No, they're not necessary, but since when has the Linux community focused on "necessary" rather than "because we can"?

    2. Re:Linux role - any? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not much--infrastructure-wise. Electrical systems are almost all PLC/Scada and nobody in that market is interested(I've asked.) Video monitoring could be done(multiple streams, real-time display, history, multiplexed displays) but I haven't seen anything. Most of the vertical market management systems are done in Access or VB.

      Toll collection is interesting. All the new stuff is on Windows and there is quite a bit of legacy DOS/Netware stuff out there but magnetic/smart/proximity/RFID card readers are open, most banks will open up for EFT, lane control is simple with digital I/O, and bill readers are open. Automatic coin machines are the main problem because manufacturers either tie them to their own toll collection systems or deal in exclusive contracts. The next problem is incorporating something like EZ-Pass--I haven't looked into them and don't know how open they are.

    3. Re:Linux role - any? by bogado · · Score: 1

      Witch makes me wonder if this bridge is being built on a "need" based or on a more mundane "because we can" spirit. :-D

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    4. Re:Linux role - any? by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1
      Since you asked, I just found this page

      "A Linux bridge is more powerful than a pure hardware bridge because it can also filter and shape traffic"

      Just imagine how that could relieve congestion in the rush hour!

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    5. Re:Linux role - any? by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      "A Linux bridge is more powerful than a pure hardware bridge because it can also filter and shape traffic"

      Can it block the (stsp)state trooper smokey protocol?

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  7. Almost there... by Slashdiddly · · Score: 2, Funny

    If only they made it a little longer, say, 42,000 km. And also up instead of sideways.

  8. Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by guacamole · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am slightly surprised that this project is expected to cost at most as much, if not less, than the extected cost of seismic retrofit for the relatively shorter San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (that project involves the construction of a completely new replacement for the eastern span of the bridge). How come? I suppose one reason is that the cost of everything in Bay Area is much much higher than in southern Italy. What about other factors? Is there something that makes the Italian design inherently cheaper to implement?

    1. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What about other factors? Is there something that makes the Italian design inherently cheaper to implement?
      Different constraints - the portion of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge has to fit with the rest of it and the bridge will presumably be in use while construction is going on. The Italy-Sicily bridge just has to cover the distance, doesn't have to fit to a pre-existing design and doesn't have to be used until it's finished.

      In a lot of places you will see bridges built next to each other - sometimes it's cheaper to build a whole new bridge instead of tacking another bit on the side.

      The cost of stuff in the Bay area are most likely irrelevant to the project, since stuff will come in from elsewhere.

    2. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by kevcol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How come?"

      Italy doesn't have to deal with CalTrans, or the fifty gazillion other state and Bay Area agencies with noses in the project. I believe California's nuthouse approval processes have long eclipsed even the famed Italian bureaucracy.

    3. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by guacamole · · Score: 1

      This doesn't explain it as the eastern span of bridge is supposed to cost $6B and it will be an entirely new bridge built parallel to the existing one.

    4. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Filiks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Instead of a concrete skyway like in the Florida Keys, the mayors of Oakland and SF, with the general backing of the Bay Area residents, wanted a signature span instead. The final design has never actually been built anywhere in the world on this scale. Consequently when bids went out for contractors, only one company decided to bid and get involved in this very political situation. Well that bids was far more than expected. Meanwhile over the years the cost of steel has increased dramatically, particularly steel made in the USA, which was a requirement for this project.

    5. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by TeXMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Other factors are:
      • eveything in Italy is cheaper than in the USA (about half, although the gap is diminishing)
      • in the South, this is especially more true
      • local labour
      • cheating: with this I mean that the prospected cost will grow much higher as time goes by; since Berlusconi is likely to lose the next elections and who knows, probably the ones after those too, it'll be the left-wing parties that'll have to dig for that money, or stop the works; all the best for Mr. B
      • contrary to the use in most civilized nations (Italy included) the private company that builds it will not be held responsible for defects; this means that if the bridge collapses (wanna bet?) the State will be held liable, not the company that's building it
      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    6. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't blame those of us in SF and the peninsula for the "signature span"... our side of the Bay Bridge looks awesome (when it's not being retrofitted).

      Blame the east bay. They're to blame for this stupid mess.

      Odd are it was spearheaded by some hummer driving morons from Blackhawk. But don't hold me to that.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    7. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      I am slightly surprised that this project is expected to cost at most as much, if not less, than the extected cost of seismic retrofit for the relatively shorter San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (that project involves the construction of a completely new replacement for the eastern span of the bridge).

      You give the reason in your own question.
      seismic retrofit
      Italy doesn't have to worry about Earthquakes. The seismic retrofit is really the building of an entirely new bridge to replace the old one.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    8. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "They [critics] also point to the dangers associated with building a bridge in an area that has been hit by earthquakes."

    9. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Trailwalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Italy does indeed have earthquakes. They have been recorded from earliest Roman times to the present.

      Some information

    10. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

      No earthquakes?

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    11. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Italy doesn't have to worry about Earthquakes.

      Really? How do you think that so many of the ancient ruins got ruined?

    12. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      local labour

      This is Sicily. You know who's going to be providing the local labour? The construction firms you're going to find down there are, shall we say, family businesses.

      Might not work out all that cheap, but at least they won't have to worry about union trouble ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    13. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by bwy · · Score: 1

      What about other factors?

      Rumor on the street is that Italy openly embraced Linux/OSS which led to the cost savings. I also heard that Open Office led to productivity gains, and using Gnome for an interface made their employees more or less immune to the influenza virus.

    14. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      LOL, reminds me of a joke I heard about the bridge. It'll never hold up because it'll contain more mafia enemies than cement. It'll be like swiss cheese.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    15. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Wow. Someone just modded me flamebait. They obviously don't come from California.

    16. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by mikefe · · Score: 1

      They can of course swim with the fishies to cool off though.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    17. Re:Cost vs Bay Bridge retrofit by Filiks · · Score: 1

      Why should only your side get a nice suspension tower(s)? :)

  9. Re:Suspension bridge by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hey, don't knock it. The Akashi Strait bridge -- which, as the article mentions, is the current record holder -- is built directly across a major fault line. They actually had a big earthquake during construction, and had to make the section in the middle a few feet longer to compensate! : S

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  10. Re:Sing along, folks by cjsm · · Score: 1

    A more appropriate Paul Simon song to parody would be Bridge Over Troubled Water. Good parody though.

    --
    This ad space for rent.
  11. election campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's election time again in Italy and Berlusconi needs the votes of Sicilies citizens.
    So he pulls out the old bridge plans like he did the last time and the time before.
    Don't expect to travel to Sicily on try feet too soon.

    1. Re:election campaign by TeXMaster · · Score: 1
      Well, Berlusconi is very likely to get the votes from Sicily anyway, due to his well-known connections. But yes, it's also an electoral move.

      It's also a totally useless bridge, considering the state of road and railway communications across souther Italy. Believe me: the Messina striat is scarely the bottleneck, except perhaps for reaching the major cities in Sicily (or conversely when traving from the major cities in Sicily).

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    2. Re:election campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      the bridge was planned a lot of time ago, and projects and deployment began right after the last elections results. So it is not an electoral move.

      The messina striat is quite efficient, and the status of high-traffic roads in south italy is not as bad as you are trying to present. I personally saw the Salerno-Reggio Calabria and it's completely new. Also in sicily from messina to palermo the road is perfect.

      The main problem in south and central italy are the inhabitants.

    3. Re:election campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      From www.beppegrillo.it

      A bridge costing 3,880,000,000 Euro to save 20 minutes

      Attacking the Messina Bridge is like attacking the Red Cross. This is plain even to an idiot who is completely useless, even though he is useful to the interests of someone.

      After the ad hoc laws, we now have the ad hoc construction work.

      The bridge is of no use to the Italians, including those from Reggio and from Messina, divided by nature for a million years. To go from Salerno to Reggio Calabria, it takes 48 hours. Then the bridge will allow you to save 20 minutes to get to Sicily.

      The country has other priorities that are real. Motorways and railways are in an abysmal state.

      The 3,880,000,000 Euro are ours. Why should we spend them for a useless construction? Our employees, incapable of managing our public debt, before spending the money for the bridge should explain how we will get a return on the money, and explain the utility, the environmental impact and the do-ability.

      A 3,000 metre bridge with an aerodynamic profile, has never been constructed up to now.
      There's no guarantee that it will stand up, especially if you consider that it's in a zone of major seismic activity (remember the Messina earthquake?) and with incredibly strong currents.

      On this point refer to the interview with the Professor of architectural construction, Massimo Majowiecki. Some of his conclusions are given here.

      "The Delegations of Superintendence of ANAS {Roads}, of FF.SS {railways} and the Ministry of Public
      Works, in July 1995 conclude: " that the Progetto di Massima Definitivo {the final project plan} presented in December 1992, even given the undoubted value of the information supplied, it is not yet possible to indicate which project is definitely the one to be developed into a construction project, to be translated into the building of a bridge and a global passage across."
      In present conditions, the technical uncertainties stil remain...."

      But the bridge will create jobs and contracts and will get the approval of the Confindustria {employers' organisation} and of the Unions. Perhaps it would be better to get them to dig holes and fill them in again. It's a useless activity, but at least it wouldn't cause harm.

      Beppe Grillo

    4. Re:election campaign by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      yeah... unfortunately this bridge has been under planning for *years* now, so i don't really understand how this could be an electoral move. +5, conspiracy.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    5. Re:election campaign by xlyz · · Score: 1

      I'll not discount Berlusconi own pride

      what else he could be remembered for?

    6. Re:election campaign by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Obviously the Sicilian fishermen lobbyists have a hand in this...

      Imagine having 4km of nice bridge to fish from...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    7. Re:election campaign by Vreejack · · Score: 1

      It never got out of planning because it was useless and expensive.

      The use of infrastructure construction to get get votes is a very old ploy in Italy. Usually construction stops forever right after the election. The only surprise here is that Italians seem to fall for it over and over again. I suppose it it the triumph of hope over experience.

      To summarize what others have already pointed out, this project will cut twenty minutes off of a two day drive. If the money were spent on roads, instead, then they might cut two days off a two day drive.

      The rail connection is interesting, however, since ferries are awkward for short-distance transferral of containers. This will give Sicily a rail connection to the rest of Europe, which is hard to shake a stick at.

      Nevertheless, I'll believe when traffic starts flowing.

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
    8. Re:election campaign by TeXMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      the bridge was planned a lot of time ago, and projects and deployment began right after the last elections results. So it is not an electoral move.

      Actually yes, it was an electoral move. But it was an electoral move two elections ago.

      The messina striat is quite efficient, and the status of high-traffic roads in south italy is not as bad as you are trying to present. I personally saw the Salerno-Reggio Calabria and it's completely new. Also in sicily from messina to palermo the road is perfect. Is that a joke or something? I live in Catania, my father has worked near Siracusa for tens of years, my girlfriend is from Matera, I have relatives all over Sicily, and some others that have moved (some temporarily, some permanently) to cities northern of Rome. I think this entitles me to a more thorough knowledge about the conditions of "high-traffic roads" in the South in general and in Sicily in particular.

      And for sure "high-traffic roads" are scarcer and in much worse conditions than they are in the rest of Italy. As I mentioned, most (surely not all) the major cities are reached by these "high-traffic" roads, but this is scarcely significant for most of the population. Some of the most important high-traffic roads (e.g. SS 114) are still in abysmal conditions, and the ones that exist can in no way hold a comparison with what they have up north; or did you happen to pass by in one of the lucky days in which the one-lane-per-direction in the SA-RC and ME-PA is less than 50%, and you had no truck or caravan in front of you?

      And let's not even get started on the railroads systems.

      The main problem in south and central italy are the inhabitants.

      This, I can related to.

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    9. Re:election campaign by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for explaining how things work in my country. I can see things so much better now...
      Back to the main point, it might be true that massive construction works are a ploy to get votes; the same might be said of *most* works, promises, prospects, political plans etc. Election time comes and the left wing will promise money falling down from the sky for the Workers(tm) while the right wing will focus on security, fiscal reform etc. Unfortunately both kinds of promises will never be kept, as we know. But this project has been under study for a long time, since the times before Berlusconi entered politics. Progress has been made year after year re funding, engineering work etc. and anybody who reads newspapers targeted at engineers has been able to follow this. So, I'm the first one to despise vague promises that aim for a quick vote but this is simply not the case.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
  12. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by xDSoMX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Yeah, well I sure beat the Italians wish they spent more money on their army after WWII. Its a shame they had to rebuild their entire freaking country. History, >doesn't teach us anything.

    hi, i write from italy, emh, the bridge is new, is not rebuilded after the WWII, its a shame that the US Gov spent too much money in army to make war all around the world instead spending in istruction and story book.

    BWT the bridge is not a good things, many of the people living in Sicilia and Calabria don't want it, cos will be devastating for enviroment.. but the Italy "president" Silvio Berlusconi (bleah!!) need to do this for glory and ammiration of people who don't know the real story of the bridge.

    ok. sorry from my bad english, shame that italian gov didnt spent some money in english book .... :)

    greetings from the Family ;)

  13. Supposed to finish in 2012 by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had heard Rumours that the project may be suspended

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Supposed to finish in 2012 by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Due to conflicts?
      By then, i'm sure they could bridge it out.

      --
      ^_^
  14. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1, Informative

    The US does build them, except they don't lead from anywhere to anywhere.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&si d=aWA7joXO0bRk&refer=us

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  15. Re:Critical Failure by 55555+Manbabies! · · Score: 1

    Organized crime and terrorism are nearly opposite things. I think the Mafia will keep any terrorists from getting too uppity, and I am pretty sure they wont blow up the bridge themselves.

  16. Re:Critical Failure by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

    "Given its length, and the presumably large number of people that could be on it at a time, I presume it would be a potential target for terrorists or organized crime (hey, it's Sicily...) based on past threats against bridges and tunnels by terrorist groups."

    Right, because Japan has neither of those things to worry about! wtf? what a dumb argument.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  17. And in a tunnel ? by AwaxSlashdot · · Score: 1

    having a trouble in a tunnel is even scarier than having a trouble on a bridge !

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  18. Re:Critical Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How would they prevent against this?

    Exactly the same way they prevent terrorist attacks against anything else - a combination of physical security and intelligence. Is it infallible? Of course not. But everything, everywhere is vulnerable to terrorist attacks, nothing new there.

  19. Re:Critical Failure by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Given its length, and the presumably large number of people that could be on it at a time, I presume it would be a potential target for terrorists or organized crime (hey, it's Sicily...) based on past threats against bridges and tunnels by terrorist groups.

    How would they prevent against this? It seems such a bridge has two critical failure points at both ends and one or more in the middle.

    I know they have water to cross, so its size doesn't appear to be the motivation, as say for the tallest building etc. but I think these are issues which (sadly) need to be considered.


    Jesus Christ on a pogo stick! Can we even mention constructing a structure larger than a Taco Bell without someone saying "Well, that's a nice idea, but The Terrorists could just blow it up." Here's a whack from The Reality Stick for you. The Terrorists can (and will) Blow Stuff Up. They're generally going to do it where there are a lot of people in order to maximize Body Count (aka Terror). Fortunately, for The Terrorists, the world is a target rich environment because for the past 10,000 years people have not advanced "Well, that's a nice idea, but The Terrorists could just blow it up" as a credible reason to abandon major projects. A new world's longest bridge or World's Blankest Blank will be yet another target and life will go on.


    Now, I'm not advancing this bridge as a good idea. There may be, and probably are, many legitimate reasons why it should be built differently or even not at all. However, suggesting that every new structure should be terrorist proof is delusional.


    Peter

  20. Politican vapourware by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just a political manoeuvre by the Governemt.
    They don't have the money to support it.
    None seems to be really interested in such a thing (not even in Sicilia).
    Scientists warn against it: the Etna volcano is just 50 Km far from there.

    But stock quotes of the company that should build the bridge are going up any time someone quotes the bridge.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    1. Re:Politican vapourware by mincognito · · Score: 5, Funny
      This is just a political manoeuvre by the Governemt.

      Precisely. They need to create a sense of national pride after losing the whole noodle issue with the chinese.

    2. Re:Politican vapourware by quest(answer)ion · · Score: 1

      losing the whole noodle issue?

      try "failing to sweep it under the rug that they stole the whole business from china in the first place."

      marco! [cups hand to ear]

      --
      /. is what happens when geeks talk. get used to it.
    3. Re:Politican vapourware by dedioste · · Score: 1

      national pride

      National pride in Italy? oh my God...

      For the Mods: I'm Italian, or so my id-card says

    4. Re:Politican vapourware by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Ofcourse the same thing was said about the Channel Tunnel [Wikipedia] (linking the UK to France) when it was built in the early 90's. Apparently there wasn't enough money to build the 50 km undersea tunnel, there was no need for it and it would probably collapse.

      ...11 years since completion it carries well over 7 million passangers a year, huge amounts of freight and is widely considered to be one of the 7 wonders of the modern world [Wikipedia].

      Not all huge, ground-breaking projects fail and while the company which runs the tunnel has struggled with debt (mainly due to minimal government spending and unfair government policies, especially when compared with the incentives given to competing airports (e.g. no tax on aviation fuel)) the project can't really be called anything but an amazing success. Maybe the same will be said of this bridge in 15 years time.

  21. Just for the record by broothal · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a short period of time, Storebaeltsbroen held the record, until Akashi was built.

    I actually crossed them both at the same day a few years ago. I wonder if that entitles me to a place in the Guiness book of records :)

  22. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
    hi, i write from italy, emh, the bridge is new, is not rebuilded after the WWII, its a shame that the US Gov spent too much money in army to make war all around the world instead spending in istruction and story book.
    Not to knock your poor English, but he wasn't implying that he thought y'all were trying to rebuild the bridge. He was just trying to argue that if you Italians had spent more money on your military in WWII, you wouldn't have lost to begin with, and therefore wouldn't have had to rebuild the country. Don't mind him; he was just pissed off at the original poster.
    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  23. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we needed 'em, we'd build 'em. I'm not into pouring money into pet projects that gain us nothing but a world record that'll last for just a few years, especially at the cost of something like a military.

  24. In corporate Italia... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    ... State sponsored construction projects are never completed in time. IF they ever get completed. The Guinness book of records editors should't hold their breath.

    Also, an enormous amount of public money has been dumped for decades into the southern regions, ("Cassa per il Mezzogiorno") to improve its economic situation, ending up to serve the interests of the mafia controlled building firms.
    As reported here and as most Italians recall, a couple years ago a guy called Pietro Lunardi said that things like the mafia will always exist and we must live with them and they cannot stop us from spending money on public projects.
    This guy was, and still is, the Italian Minister of Infrastructures and Transport.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  25. Previous attempts have failed by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 3, Informative

    This project may fail. But then not for technological reasons.

    Several previous attempts of multibillion-dollar, EU-funded projects in that region have failed somewhere between Rome and Palermo. Money, people, and concrete have disappeared and there were never any witnesses. Hope things have changed.

  26. 4 railway lines and 6 auto lanes by rheotaxis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when did any new bridge like this in America include more than one rail line, if any?

    --
    Software freedom...I love it!
    1. Re:4 railway lines and 6 auto lanes by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Since when did any new bridge like this in America include more than one rail line, if any?

      Usually in the US trains get their own seperate bridge.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:4 railway lines and 6 auto lanes by jahknow · · Score: 1

      Probably for a number of years up to the time Standard Oil killed the U.S. railroad industry.

      --
      ^^
    3. Re:4 railway lines and 6 auto lanes by RecordHigh · · Score: 1

      The new Wilson Bridge that is currently being constructed over the Potomac River between MD and VA has 2 lanes that are reserved for a future Metro rail line:

      http://www.wilsonbridge.com/po-projectDescription2 .htm

      Of course, these lanes will only be used for Metro trains if a new Metro rail line is built, which is a dubious proposition at best given the current state of funding for Metro.

    4. Re:4 railway lines and 6 auto lanes by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Forgotten by many is that the Bay Bridge to Oakland (mentioned in another thread) was built with 2 tracks to carry the Key System rail cars between San Francisco and Oakland. Up into that point, they ran part way across on the bay on a pier, and then people road a ferry the rest of the way to San Francisco.

      http://world.nycsubway.org/us/sf/keysystem.html

      The system lasted until 1958.

      Of course, this is commuter rail, not heavy freight rail. The dead weight of a train requires a much more sturdy bridge.

      Another reason would be that railroads in the US are privately owned businesses and vehicle bridges are built by the government.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  27. Mafia target by DavidNWelton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, it's a "mafia target". Who do you think will be siphoning off a lot of the contracting money going into building it? They're not interested in blowing it up.

    1. Re:Mafia target by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Yes they are. As the old saying goes:

      Build a bridge once, and you launder money for a decade. But if you blow it up and get the contract to rebuild you can be laundering money for the rest of your life.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
  28. Huh 4km aka 2.5m long total (FTFA)? by sm00f · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Mackinac Bridge here in michigan is 5 miles long, and held the record for longest suspension span until 1998 at 3/4 mile or so... Is this bridge just being built with NO middle column?? Anyways are some fun links for the Mackinac Bridge (that nobody knows exists it seems): here's all the stats and one pic: http://bridgepros.com/projects/Mackinac/Mackinac.h tm here's the google images link for nice pics: http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&c2c off=1&safe=off&q=mackinac+bridge&spell=1 ^^^ and why in the hell doesnt slashdot support carriage returns on win2k + mozilla 1.7???

    1. Re:Huh 4km aka 2.5m long total (FTFA)? by JeffSh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i too, being a michagamaniac, am very proud of our bridge. it doesn't seem to get the credit that is due to it. most likely this is because the bridge is in a very much "out of the way" place. i mean, you really do have to take a trip to see it, but it's got to be near the top of the list of "cool engineering tourist destinations"

      i love it and used to walk it on labor day every year with my parents when i was younger and lived up up north. im a troll, so not that far up north, but still the mighty mac is a fine span to be proud of.

      its total length still surpasses any suspension bridge i think, but i guess in engineering circles it is the main span that "counts". it's pretty incredible how long it held all the records; it was built in the 50s.

    2. Re:Huh 4km aka 2.5m long total (FTFA)? by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      and why in the hell doesnt slashdot support carriage returns on win2k + mozilla 1.7???

      Are you writing your posts in "HTML Formatted" mode (see drop down next to the submit button)? If so, then you should include the appropriate html tags for paragraphs or line breaks to your post...

      -- Pete.

  29. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by yobbo · · Score: 1

    Can you find Italy on a map?

  30. Re:Critical Failure by kfg · · Score: 1

    How would they prevent against this?

    They can't. That's the whole point of performing terrorist acts in the first place. The promotion of terror. Evidence at hand seems to suggest that it's working.

    Do the questions get any harder later on in the test? That one was too easy.

    KFG

  31. With a BIG grain of salt... by mano78 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please be aware that this is a plan that's been around for more than twenty years now, and it's not feasible. The wind is just too strong (been there last month, I saw it), the zone is a sismic one and generally noone cares anyway, because the roads that would bring people to the bridge (the infamous Salerno-Reggio Calabria) are ancient to be kind and generally a wreck.

    Be also aware that this is election time, and our prime citizen Berlusconi will lose. So he bring out this old project, to gain some thousands of votes, and will leave it to the next administration to realize. Same old story...

    (see the Mose project to protect Venice from floodings)

    1. Re:With a BIG grain of salt... by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Ah well, I'm sure that your word (because, I mean, you've been there!) is more important than any civil engineer's who's involved in the project. Thanks for warning the world. Besides, you say there are quakes there? Like the ones in Japan? You know, the country with some of the best bridges in the world? Oh my. I wonder why they didn't just consult you before starting the project years and years ago. So much money wasted...

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:With a BIG grain of salt... by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

      The Mackinac bridge is 5 miles long (suspension) and is capable of surviving winds greater than mach 1, in wind tunnel tests.

      I highly doubt that it's impossible to engineer a bridge to sustain whatever winds may be in the area.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
  32. Re:Critical Failure by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

    I presume it would be a potential target for terrorists

    FUD.

    Please read the constitution. Please read your bill of rights. Please get some perspective. Please understand that when people decide to build a bridge, it's very sad that the only thing you can come up with is FUD.

  33. Re:Critical Failure by Rei · · Score: 1

    or World's Blankest Blank

    Just you wait! In five years, I'll have an even blanker blank, and then we'll see who's the terrorist magnet here!

    --
    Santa Ana Winds: Like the Dustbowl, but with awards shows.
  34. Science? by andyrock · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Please, call it engineering... Some of us, civil eng also read /.

  35. French claims to have the longuest one by lonedroid · · Score: 1

    No, it's not what you think.

    The Japanese one got finished in 1998. But the "viaduc de Millau" opened to the public late 2004 and claims 2.440 meters.

    French Wikipedia article: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viaduc_de_Millau/

    Or "Google image" on : "viaduc de Millau"

    Now, I don't say it's longer than the Golden Gate or the Japanese one, but here in Europe french people brag quite a lot about this bridge, which I've seen and is for sure very impressive...

    1. Re:French claims to have the longuest one by LeninZhiv · · Score: 1

      1) The viaduc de Millau is the world's highest bridge; no one claims it's the longest.

      2) The viaduc de Millau is not a suspension bridge in the first place, and this article is about suspension bridges.

    2. Re:French claims to have the longuest one by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederation_Bridge

      I'm sure there's something longer out there though. (Yes yes, this has nothing to do with suspension bridges)

  36. Not the Japanese... by CoolCat23 · · Score: 1

    The recently built viaduc of Milllau, France, is bigger : 2 460 m !
    See the impressive pics at http://www.leviaducdemillau.com/ .

    1. Re:Not the Japanese... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Without wishing in any way to denigrate the Viaduc de Millau, it is not comparable to the Japanese bridge in engineering difficulty. The French effort is the highest bridge, but the Japanese bridge consists of three spans of 960, 1991 and 960 metres respectively. A main span of almost two kilometres is a formidible challenge under any circumstances, and especially when it must be built to withstand an 8.5 magnitude earthquake with an epicentre within 150 kilometres.

    2. Re:Not the Japanese... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The Akashi Kaikyo is 3910m in total. 1991m is just the length of the middle span. While impressive, the Millau viaduct has 8 spans over its 2460m length. And to the other poster who followed up, yes it is a suspension bridge.

    3. Re:Not the Japanese... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      And to the other poster who followed up, yes it is a suspension bridge.

      Sorry, no its not. Its a cable stayed bridge.

  37. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by DoctorBit · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well I sure beat the Italians wish they spent more money on their army after WWII. Its a shame they had to rebuild their entire freaking country. History, doesn't teach us anything.

    Are all Republicans idiots? Mussolini's Italy entered WWII as an ally of Hitler's Germany! From Wikipedia:

    "Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini ... led Italy from 1922 to 1943. He created a fascist state through the use of state terror and propaganda. Using his charisma, total control of the media and intimidation of political rivals, he disassembled the existing democratic government system. His entry into World War II on the side of Nazi Germany made Italy a target for Allied attacks and ultimately led to his downfall and death."

    And who the hell is going to destroy the U.S. anyway? Mexico? Face it: the more countries the U.S. unnecessarily attacks and bullies, the more anti-american fear and hatred grows in the rest of the world.

  38. It's the highest by lovebyte · · Score: 1

    The BBC got it slightly wrong. The Italian bridge will be the highest bridge in the world. The current record is the Millau bridge in France (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millau_viaduct) build by the company that was created by Eiffel!

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    1. Re:It's the highest by Ireneo+Funes · · Score: 1

      That Millau viaduct sure is an eyesore, who'll be snapping the worst looking piece of *cof* engineering record from them?

      --
      Three tings I hate about stars: -Wars -Treks -Gates
  39. Re:Critical Failure by dbIII · · Score: 1
    I presume it would be a potential target for terrorists
    They can appoint someone to deal with it - I'm sure they judge Arabian horses in Italy too so they can get someone that can handle the big issues.
  40. Mafia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    With Italy's economy in deep trouble right now, and the prime minister's popularity sliding, big infrastructure is an instant financial kick-starter.

    The government estimates that construction could provide 40,000 local business opportunities in Sicily and southern Italy.

    The problem is that any big infrastructure work is also of interest to organised criminals.

    Magistrate Vincenzo Barbaro
    The mafia could cash in, says magistrate Vincenzo Barbaro

    "The mafia is likely to try to get involved in secondary activities like putting tarmac on the roads or providing concrete," says magistrate Vincenzo Barbaro in Messina's elegant courthouse.

    "We're already working with the anti-mafia commission on a project to monitor suspicious business activity, so we hope we can prevent this."

    In a restaurant overlooking the cloudless strait of Messina, locals enjoy fish caught fresh from these waters. They have heard arguments about the bridge for nearly 30 years.

    "It won't be beautiful for us," says one woman.

    "It's too big and I don't want to live in its shadow."

    "We have water shortages here. Why don't they sort those out before building a bridge?" says her husband.

    "It's a dream, nothing more."

  41. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by drsquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    Four kilometres long.

    That's a lot of places to throw bodies off...

  42. One nation? by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has trumpeted the project as a vital driver of development in the south, which will finally make Italy one nation by linking Sicily to the mainland.

    I wonder if Mr. Berlusconi has heard of a place called Sardinia.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    1. Re:One nation? by xlyz · · Score: 1

      sshhh!

      he could hear you and plan a tunnel
  43. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

    good god, your English is exactly the kind of thing that make me ashamed to be from italy. somehow, everybody seems to expect me to speak like you do. i suggest you stop blaming your sorry life on the government and pick up a book or take some lesson, or something.

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
  44. Re:Critical Failure by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Funny
    I would not worry too much about terrorists.

    Beer kills more people than terrorists.

    George Bush kills more people than terroists (of course some people think he is a terrorist.)

    Terrorists kill people in particularly nasty ways, and get heaps of "the oxygen of publicity".

    However, the Mafia (Based in Sicily) almost certaily kill more people than the terrorists, and if the terrorists mess with this bridge, then I am sure the Mafia will "make them an offer they can't refuse"

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  45. nusefull by silian87 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am an italian guy, and I think this bridge is simple unuseful!!! It cost a lot of money to a country that have money problems, and maiby it is dangerous too! Boat exist!

    --
    Free As In Freedom
  46. Kinda sad if it happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I lived in Sicily for a few years and loved riding the traghette when traveling to Calabria. Sure, it's insanely inconvenient, expensive, slow, etc., but that's what made it so much fun. Nothing like a half hour break to stand out and enjoy the sea breeze.

    Some other points--

    There is a fairly major fault line between Sicily and the mainland. Crossing this with a bridge, regardless of how well built it is, may not be the best idea.

    It's fairly well understood that hte Mafia is involved in the ferry business. Many Sicilians believe that hte mob would never allow a bridge to be built, and I would tend to agree with them.

    Burlusconi may well be making empty promises. I don't remember him being too popular in the South when I was living there.

    If a bridge IS built, despite the many difficulties, it would help the economic situation in Sicily, or at the very least alleviate the high price of shipping goods there.

    But if I ever make it back and they're still there, I can promise you that no matter how nice the bridge is, I'll take the ferry.

  47. * groan * by benhocking · · Score: 1
    Now if you want to use the actual OS for something then perhaps someone could set up a cluster to run simulations of oscillations under various conditions and designs. Anyone want to sine on for the project?
    I can't believe you buried this gem.
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  48. Re:Suspension bridge by arcanumas · · Score: 1
    Isn't the current record holder the Rion-Antirion bridge in Greece?
    It's about 2500 meters
    http://www.gefyra.gr/English/framesetbig.htm

    I am no bridge expert but the two bridges seem similar in design...

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
  49. Sicilian mafia dies unless it halts the project! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This bridge 99% likely will not be built. If this bridge stood over the straits the power of Mafia in Sicily would collapse. They couldn't keep the local population in poverty and opression by selling drinking water (under their exclusive mafia control) for hyper-inflated prices, because this bridge is planned to carry two giant aquaducts inside its deck, too.

    With this bridge, Sicily would be integrated into Italy and central government and police would have much better access to the island to keep the order and uphold the law. Five years after this bridge is completed the mafia would be history! Godfathers will not allow that, they will terrorize the population so nobody dares to work on the bridge construction and importing foreign labour will drive costs up. There will be sabotage, bad concrete mixed, load-cable wires cut, improper steel used, etc.

    Unless military law is imposed in Sicily and enforced with the same cruel determination as dictator mussolini did in the 1930s, the mafia will manage to halt the bridge's construction. As soon as the brdige is ready, lotsa northern cops could be moved into the island and organized crime rooted up in a normal civil manner, no need for the italian army any more.

    I hope the italians will have that 1% luck and the bridge completes. It would be a tremendous GLOBAL achievement to get rid of the sicilian mafia, the capo of all mafii. The calabrians would break then and finally the US-based italian mafia could be destroyed, too. Judge Giovanni Falcone did not die in vain if this giant bridge is indeed built by 2012!

  50. What about the Danish "Storebaeltsbro"? by Daath · · Score: 1

    I was vaguely aware that the japanese bridge was the biggest. The second biggest being the danish Storebaeltsbro - That bridge is over 6 km long?! Or do they measure it a different way?

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  51. humber bridge was the longest by cridanb · · Score: 1

    humber bridge was the longest bridge built for political reasons , goes from nowhere to nowhere , here is a link http://bridgepros.com/projects/Humber/HumberBridge .htm

    --
    men will do for beer ,that which they would not for love or money
  52. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

    History, doesn't teach us anything.

    Especially not punctuation ;)

    --
    One good turn - gets all the covers.
  53. When you visit Messina by mattr · · Score: 1

    I can tell you I had a wonderful time in Sicily for 10 days about 20 years ago.

    A 25 hour train ride from Paris over the Alps with a beautiful Amherst prospective Italian teacher got me some basic grammar, we stayed with her Italian teacher.

    Messina, on the tip of the mainland has a beautiful Carravagio museum with a massive work that shows gorgeous gold highlights (Carravagio's specialty) with artful lighting.

    I recommend going before the bridge is completed, assuming it is a train bridge as well. The reason is that the train from Paris actually got itself onto a ferry (!) and then proceded to trundle off onto the rails in Sicily where it would continue around the perimeter in a clockwise fashion. One famous city it goes by is Syracusa, another is Taormina, the vacation spot.

    Sicily has welcomed centuries upon centuries of intentional and nonintentional ship crossings so it has ruins going back to the Byzantine Empire I believe.

    It has amazing food especially if you can stay with an Italian family with a grandma who will not stop making endless courses at the stove even though you are full - "Mangea, Mangea" (Eat, eat!). The vegetables and fruits are incredible.

    At home people drink water with a small amount of smoky tasting wine in the bottom, which is quite refreshing.

    People do not stop at traffic lights and apparently you must accompany a woman outdoors at night. Women must not show their shoulders in summertime for fear of being mistaken about their line of work.

    There is a wonderful island called Volcan with black volcanic sand. A hydroski ferry will take you there. Apparently the week before we went there, the other ferry exploded. The family was so kind they didn't tell me about it in advance, on the other hand the fact was ignored. Sicily is that kind of place. If you are a couple, go. In the evening at twilight which comes late in summer, couples will "fare passagiata", walking slowly by the water with an arm through an elbow. I remember it very well.

  54. Re:Critical Failure by Reverberant · · Score: 1
    So, Taco Bells are safe from terrorist attacks?

    They gotta eat somewhere...

  55. Re:Suspension bridge by Yeochee · · Score: 1

    The Rion-Antirion bridge is not a suspension bridge. A suspension bridge has 2 main cables, beneath which the bridge is suspended by lots of smaller cables. The bridge you mention has all cables connected to the top of the towers: it's a cable-stayed bridge. See this page for different types of bridges.

  56. Re:Political vapourware by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the Channel Tunnel (linking the UK to France)
    It's not actually the same situation.
    Do you know how many people and tons of goods used to cross the channel by ship?
    A couple of magnitude orders more than the Canale di Messina!
    The distance between the two sides is 20 times larger in the British Channel.
    And, moreover, there is no active volcano snoring close to the tunnel.
    I'd spend those money and efforts in something more useful or less useless at least.
    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  57. ramps by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    They include the length of the "ramps" to and from the actual suspension bridge.

  58. Yeah, the 'protection' check is mailed by bluGill · · Score: 1

    No need to stop and bother the poor collectors. We mail the check every month. We wouldn't mind if you stopped by the post office and got them to deliver it in a reasonable amount of time.

  59. The American perspective by Viadd · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the US, our government has allocated $223 million for a 6300 foot long, 200 foot high (~2 km, 60 meter) bridge Not too far out of line when you scale down the Italian bridge.

    They are going to put it between Ketchican, Alaska (population 14500) and Gravina Island (population 50).

    Sicilians may have invented organized crime, but the US Congress has perfected it.

  60. Re:Suspension bridge by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

    This is one thing I don't understand about these ginormous bridges. Yeah ok there was an earthquake during construction and they added a few feet to the span to compensate. But what if one happens now?? Wouldn't such an event that expands the length of the main span by FEET put tremendous tensile stress on the roadway? How would it not just rip apart in such a circumstance?

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  61. deja vous - railroad tycoon 3 by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    i built that same bridge already in the demo version of railroad tycoon 3. =D

    (free download of the game)

    http://www.download.com/Railroad-Tycoon-3-demo/300 0-7496_4-10242381.html

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  62. First bridge linking Europe to Africa by fbonnet · · Score: 1

    Yes, Sicilia is on the African tectonic plate: http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/EarthSC102Notes/102PTEa rthHist.htm

  63. Re:Critical Failure by Zibblsnrt · · Score: 1
    Given its length, and the presumably large number of people that could be on it at a time, I presume it would be a potential target for terrorists

    Ahhh, you mean like all those other major suspension bridges that have been easily attacked and destroyed by the omnipresent Terrorist in the past few years.

    Oh, wait.

    -PS

    --
    "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
  64. Longest suspension bridge in Japan? by thanasakis · · Score: 1

    I thought that the Rio-Antirio bridge which was completed in 2004 in Greece had surpassed that record.

    1. Re:Longest suspension bridge in Japan? by mok000 · · Score: 1

      As seen from the image on the website you link to, Rio-Antirio is not a suspension bridge, it is a cable stayed bridge, with 4 pylons.

      Look HERE for a comprehensive list of long suspension bridges.

  65. Re:Political vapourware by malsdavis · · Score: 1

    "The distance between the two sides is 20 times larger in the British Channel."

    Don't you mean 20 times smaller than the Channel Tunnel?
    The Channel Tunnel is approximatly 50 km's long wheras the proposed bridge will be just under 4 km's long (and only 3.3 km's over the main span).

    Also, while the area does get earthquakes (although less frequently than in the area of Japan where the current longest bridge in the world is located), I am unsure exactly which 'ative' volcano you are referring to.

  66. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by klokan · · Score: 1

    If I spoke as good English as you do, I would be more grateful to poor speakers like the rest of us. Indeed, it is thanks to our English that yours stands out and you can impress your interlocutor, right? You are right, though, that the poster should not blame the State but just do something about it. If he cares, that is.

  67. Re:Wow.. if only we americans didn't spend on defe by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Good; it was intended to be! After all, saying it is one thing, but who the heck would write it, if not on purpose? I've gotta stick to my (Georgia) roots somehow...

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  68. Re:Suspension bridge by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Presumably, the engineers take this sort of thing into account. The article mentions something about Japanese contractors; maybe the reason why they're there is because of their experience building things in earthquake zones.

    Just because you or I can't figure out how it could stay up, doesn't mean nobody can. ; )

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  69. Re:Suspension bridge by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Aside from the fact that it's a cable-stayed bridge (as the other poster mentioned), it also doesn't have a span longer than the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge. The span of a bridge is the length between the supports. If you notice the picture in the page you linked to, there are actually four towers and four sets of cables, so there are four spans, not one.

    The Akashi Kaikyo Bridge wins because covers a distance of 1991 meters in a single span, whereas the Rion-Anitrion Bridge only covers 625 meters (2500/4) per span. The fact that it has four of them doesn't count.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  70. It'll be fifty years before they even start work. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    This is Italy, after all. Maybe in a couple of hundred years it will be finished.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  71. Re:Critical Failure by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1

    So, Taco Bells are safe from terrorist attacks?

    From my experiences with Taco Bell, I could be convinced that Taco Bells are terrorist attacks!

    Peter