Slashdot Mirror


Two New Linux Phones to Ship in Japan

An anonymous reader writes "Japan's largest mobile carrier has announced two new Linux phones with support for push-to-talk, multiple numbers, and other advanced features. Of the six models models in NTT DoCoMo's new 902i-series, the two running embedded Linux are made by NEC and Panasonic, who have been collaborating on a Linux-based software platform for 3G mobile phones. The NEC-manufactured N902i boasts a four megapixel camera, while the Panasonic-made P902i aims to appeal to music lovers, with music jukebox software and an available 1GB MiniSD card. Between these and Motorola's Linux mobile phones, Linux seems to be doing well in Asia, in the rapidly growing feature-phone space, which is projected to comprise the majority of global mobile phone shipments by 2010."

83 comments

  1. Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "while the Panasonic-made P902i aims to appeal to music lovers, with music jukebox software and an available 1GB MiniSD card" My phone from nearly 3 years ago did this.

  2. Push to talk? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    Push-to-Talk? What countries have telecoms that offer that? The US is far behind in cellular technology, but this feature has existed on at least 2 US carriers (Nextel/Sprint and Verizon wireless) for some time now.

    1. Re:Push to talk? by rathehun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, India for one. The large phone companies - Hutchisson, Orange and Airtel all provide Push-to-talk.

    2. Re:Push to talk? by yogix · · Score: 1


      Well, we've had it here in India since mid-2004 atleast -- it's not very popular though. In fact most people probably haven't even heard of it. But then cell-to-cell rates in India are as low as 50 paise per minute (that's about 1 cent per minute).

      Also, service providers offer a 'Friends & Family' type plan where you can make absolutely free calls within a group of users (and those are proper duplex calls, unlike PoC ones)

      -YoGiX

    3. Re:Push to talk? by m_member · · Score: 3, Informative

      They are closed, proprietary protocols. The future of PTT is PoC/PAG as defined by the OMA.

      PoC - Push to Talk Over Cellular
      PAG - Presence & Group Management
      OMA - Open Mobile Alliance

      TLA overload :-S

    4. Re:Push to talk? by musakko · · Score: 1
      this feature has existed on at least 2 US carriers (Nextel/Sprint and Verizon wireless) for some time now.

      And before that we had Pull-to-Talk..

      http://www.photospin.com/search/?page=single&id=79 60

    5. Re:Push to talk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in brasil, nextel and claro offers PTT.

      nextel in in brasil since mid 90's.

      you merkins think your country is tho whole of the world. well, it's not. just because something exists there, doesn't mean other countries don't have it too.

    6. Re:Push to talk? by croddy · · Score: 1

      now, if only someone would spring a sleeper patent and shut those bloody things off forever!

    7. Re:Push to talk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I thought it was funny...

    8. Re:Push to talk? by bazorg · · Score: 2, Informative

      All 3 mobile telecoms here in Portugal do. Every now and then they make TV ads with real life situations where they imagine people would use it.

    9. Re:Push to talk? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand what the usecase for push to talk is - I can't see any reason I'd want it over a traditional phone call or SMS. Anyone care to enlighten?

    10. Re:Push to talk? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Netel HAD a patent on the PTT thing but they did not sleep on it (it expired) why do you think that in the US Verizon and Sprint only "just" got PTT?

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    11. Re:Push to talk? by torpor · · Score: 2, Informative


      its useful for when you don't need to have a full-blown fire-up/tear-down conversation, and only need to use the cell phone to provide info/updates.

      its good for taxi companies, for example; they just outfit their cabbies with cell phones with this feature, and one of their traditionally biggest expenses [airtime] is now cheap as pie.

      i for one welcome these new 'communication modes' that our machines are forcing upon us. maybe we'll all get along.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    12. Re:Push to talk? by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      its useful for when...

      Unfortunately, the majority of people I've seen using push-to-talk are fairly abusive with it. There's really no reason people need to be having full-on conversations in walkie-talkie mode on public transportaion, which is quite common, unfortunately.

    13. Re:Push to talk? by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I remember, push-to-talk was how early two-way radios worked. The same circuit would act as a receiver or -- at the push of a button -- a transmitter. The same frequency was used for speech in both directions. The advent of cheap transistors with a few MHz of bandwidth led to cheap two-way radios being marketed as kids' toys. They were probably illegal as hell; but then, the batteries would barely last long enough for The Authorities to find anyone using them.

      The very early VHF mobile phones {where you actually had to dial a different STD code, depending on the approximate location of the called party} were half-duplex, using a push-to-talk button embedded in a normal telephone handset {so more like a squeeze-to-talk}. Later VHF mobiles were still half-duplex, but used to autodetect a signal in the mic.

      We have had full-duplex mobile voice calling for ages, so this seems like a backward step to me. Almost nobody uses a mobile phone for voice anyway in the UK, because it canes your credit.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    14. Re:Push to talk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess it's cool for militaristic Duhmuricans.

    15. Re:Push to talk? by GreekPimpSlap · · Score: 0
    16. Re:Push to talk? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Funny, in America all we saw were ads in situations where people would NEVER use it, like giving wedding vows to the priest while standing next to him.

    17. Re:Push to talk? by croddy · · Score: 1

      I prefer Cingular. I also prefer not hearing people bark into their PTT phones like dogs when I am on the train or out walking.

  3. I heard that before by Walkiry · · Score: 1

    > rapidly growing feature-phone space, which is projected to
    > comprise the majority of global mobile phone shipments by 2010.

    I think I heard that before... something about trying to sell us something... Hmmmm, "3G" rings a bell for some reason...

    As an aside, the fact that there're wizzier mobile phones capable of doing weird stuff is great because there're obviously people who like them. The leap to being the "majority of the market," however, seems to me like a bit of a leap of faith. Or maybe desire.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  4. Asia by manojar · · Score: 1

    > Linux seems to be doing well in Asia

    Seriously, some distinction has to be made between Asia and South Asia (Orient and Asia, for centuries).

    1. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried looking for a Linux phone in Bangalore, but I couldn't find ant. Does anyone know of a shop in Bangalore that sells Linux phones? (I am just curious to see what they look like)

    2. Re:Asia by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Unless you do your homework, a linux phone will look like any other phone. Linux runs on the back end, and the interface hides it well.

    3. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did do my homework, and some websites said that the Motorola Linux phones were for sale in India, but now I have been here for half a year and I haven't found them.

    4. Re:Asia by KH · · Score: 1

      I agree that there should be some distinctions between various parts of Asia. But dividing it into two would be just silly. What about Central Asia (various -sthans in ex-USSR and parts of China), Southeast Asia (Indochina peninsula, Indonesia, Philippins, etc.)? And Middle-East used to be part of Asia as well (Near East). And North Asia (Siberia, and possibly Mongol?).

      From the European (Greco-Roman) perspective, anything beyond the Bosporus strait was Orient/Asia.

      From the modern "North American" (not to offend Canadians) common usage, Asia typically means East Asia (China, including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, typically South Korea, and Japan). I've even heard of Northeast Asia (Japan, Korea?). Darn, It's very hard to be politically correct.

    5. Re:Asia by manojar · · Score: 1

      >I agree that there should be some distinctions between various parts of Asia. But >dividing it into two would be just silly.

      Well, I did not want to go that far into time! I just wanted differentiation between the 'Asia' we talk about: We already have Central Asia (Mongolia would be here!), Orient (Br.) (or Asia (Am.)) - we would have Indo-China, Japan, China, et al, and Middle-east for any country from Afghanistan to Israel/Palestein-Turkey.

  5. 4MP camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "NEC's N902i features a four megapixel camera..."

    ...And Nokia just got owned.

  6. All I care about is... by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

    How much will it $ave me?

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
    1. Re:All I care about is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      How much will it $ave me?

      I'm guessing nothing. The appeal for manufacturers is how much it will save them.

    2. Re:All I care about is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't save you anything. Unless you count 'not having to carry around a cell phone AND pda'.

      What it will do, however, if your a teenager in Japan it may make it more likely for you to get laid. Depending on many other criteria also, of course.

      Not, of course, becuase of the "Linux", but just because lots-of-features gadgets are fasionable. The manufacturers just use Linux as a means to a end.

      You, know. A means to a end.. which is what OSes are for, after all.

  7. apt-get cellphone by digitallysick · · Score: 1

    haha, cingular supports push to talk, the new LG and samsung push to talk phones will be out soon, ive used them a few times, not bad at all! the LG phone i used for the PTT is setup kind of like a buddy list, you can pull up the list, and see everyone who is "avail" which is a nice feature

  8. Push-to-talk by myspys · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what this is, so help yourselves:

    Push to walk at Wikipedia.

    1. Re:Push-to-talk by Equis · · Score: 1

      BAH! They can keep the stupid Push to Talk. The only thing worse than someone yelling on their cellphone in the supermarket (sidetone, anyone?) is someone yelling while using PTT in the supermarket. I really *don't* want to hear you on the phone and I certainly don't need to hear the person on the other end of the line.

      I think PTT has its places, though. I think it could be very valuable in the construction business where you could put all kinds of contractors and consultants in the same list. I'm sure there are other applications similar to this, but for noraml use? No, thank you.

      Now that I think of it, this is more of a social problem than a tech problem.

      Another poster pointed out the convenience of a "buddy list" showing the availability of a PTT friend. That would be pretty cool. I'd like to know if someone is available before I call them, but what if we were to use that to *instantly* connect a call (forget dialing) to them privately, skipping the PTT part?

      ;-)

    2. Re:Push-to-talk by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the annoying 'chirp' every damned time they press the button, between the periods of shouting into their cell phone.

      We had Nextel at my last job -- other people seemed to love it ... I thought it was just plain obnoxious

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    3. Re:Push-to-talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Push to walk? In case anyone was wondering about this, it frequently occurs on Pirate ships when one is put on the plank.

    4. Re:Push-to-talk by Myself · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a giant leap backward in communications. Half-duplex means there's no way to interrupt a rag-chewer. You know the old comedian's line "stop me if you've heard this one"? Sabotaged by PTT!

      I hate not being able to hear the listener's reactions as I'm talking. No sigh, no laugh, no "what?", leaves me without crucial tidbits of information that are so essential to human communication.

      Furthermore, PTT doesn't include a way to leave a message if the victim doesn't answer. Most implementations even use a separate numbering space, so knowing someone's phone number doesn't tell you their PTT number, and vice versa.

      What's ironic is that the original motivation behind PTT (the benefits of statistical multiplexing) doesn't even hold true anymore, because cellphone codecs are so good at compressing the quiet side of a conversation, you get almost the same efficiency with a full-duplex call as you do with the horrible PTT.

      The typical implementation of PTT as speakerphone is just poor etiquette on the seller's part. It works the same with the regular earpiece instead of the loudspeaker, but holding the phone is infinitely more awkward because you have to press the damn button.

  9. Stronger? by dawhippersnapper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm really happy that the technology is progressing, but I wished they'd progress some in making these expensive phones out of expensive less breakable materials. Maybe some of that aluminum glass over the LCD? In the past couple of years I've bought two expensive phones that both had LCD damage that warranty didn't cover once shipped back.

    --
    Freedom is fragile and must be protected. To sacrifice it, even as a temporary measure, is to betray it.
  10. Market Share by putko · · Score: 2, Informative

    Symbian is the dominant OS. Linux is second.
    Something Called "Windows" is in there too.
    Here is the article

    I'm confused though -- are the Symbian phones not feature rich compared to Linux? I figured that was the whole point; it has better phone features (power management?). I'm guessing that the article is trumpeting Linux's success when it isn't exactly warranted (but at least it is kicking Windows ass).

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Market Share by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Symbian is not the easiest OS to write for. Also, Symbian is dominated by Nokia, who bought out Motorola's share a couple of years back (which allowed Motorola to work on developing Microsoft Smartphone devices). See the Wikipedia entry for Symbian OS for more. Over time, I'm sure the power management features of Linux phones will be just as sophisticated.

      Eric
      BlackBerry programming information (speaking of non-Symbian)

    2. Re:Market Share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over time, I'm sure that Symbian's power management features has improved further. But Symbian is totally braindead system to write code on.

    3. Re:Market Share by LaughingCoder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having done cellphone development for quite a few years, I can attest to the difficulty in developing for Symbian. The tools are buggy, and no 2 Symbian phones are the same - we had a different executable for each and every model. The Microsoft phones were much better to develop for. The tools were free and quite good. And we ran the same executable on every Microsoft-based phone, including both Smartphones (non-stylus button phones) and Pocket PC derivatives (stylus/touch screen). Further, we had the luxury of building and testing the exact same source tree on the desktop, which really accelerated development.

      All of that said, I think Linux could pretty quickly dominate the mobile space. I have done some embedded Linux development and it has many of the attributes of the Microsoft environment (good tools, lots of "sample" code, ability to do parallel desktop builds). And since Linux has a much smaller footprint the phones can be cheaper, which will help with adoption. Now hopefully the phone vendors will standardize on a common API so the poor application developers don't have to create a separate install package for every model. Unfortunately, past history is not very encouraging in this regard.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    4. Re:Market Share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that Symbian is a true RTOS, it can run on one processor which makes it ideal for the mid-range phone market. Phone manufacturers plan to use Linux in low-end phones.

    5. Re:Market Share by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What does a "linux-powered" mobile phone mean, actually? How different is embedded linux from what I'm running on my computer right now? Basically, what I'm tryin to ask is,

      Could I hook one of these up to my SuSE box with way less problems than I would have with a phone with another OS?

    6. Re:Market Share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dolt. Linux extended with RTAI or RTLinux patches now commonly used in the embedded computing industry is also a true RTOS.

      Symbian is dying, it's only a matter of time before it's gone.

      Though why people on /. are saying it's hard to program for I don't know. EPOC32 was never "hard". Sure, it's _different_ to Linux, but only as much as Windows or Amiga or Classic-Mac was.

  11. What's the advantage? by Dr.Sweety · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disclaimer: this is NOT a flamebait, I'm a Linux user and Opensource fan!
    I was wondering why they actually use Linux on a mobilephone. Linux is open - which is great - but isn't the GNU license pretty unattractive for something as closed as a mobile phone? I mean the mobile phone companies and providers probably have no interest in opening the source and thus making it available to the competition and allowing people to easily hack the phone.
    I would be really interested why a mobile phone company should choose Linux over something like Symbian (or even Windows Mobile :) which of course costs license fee but on the other hand is a very customised plattform for mobile phone devices.

    1. Re:What's the advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Disclaimer: this is NOT a flamebait, I'm a Linux user and Opensource fan!"
      'Tis a shame that such an insightful comment as your's could be considered flamebait just because it isn't completely anti-Windows.

    2. Re:What's the advantage? by epaton · · Score: 1

      the manufactures dont really have anything to lose with the underlying os, very few people care and its not like their competitors can just take their work since the competitors phones will probably use different chips etc.

      the apps they install on top of the os may be locked down but they dont need to be opensource.

    3. Re:What's the advantage? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      thus making it available to the competition and allowing people to easily hack the phone.

      I don't think manufacturers would mind that at all. Would you mind if a competing manufacturer bought your phone at retail only to change the OS and sell it at what they paid you+some profit?

      You don't think that phone manufacturers don't know how their competition's phones work, do you? They all use commodity parts. The chips that they're using are well documented, and for DSPs, an assembly call can be almost as involved as a function call; reversing is fairly trivial (and serves almost no purpose since the chips are well documented).

      What you really want to have an edge over the competition is the ability to swap out parts of your code base really fast to fit with whatever the latest chip to come along is so that you can beat your competitors to the market with the new models. With linux's support of many devices it is an ideal choice for this.

      Of course, if you do foolishly decide to make some ASICs, you can write your own kernel module and install it alongside. Linux is quite compatible with that.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:What's the advantage? by ickleberry · · Score: 0

      The cheap teenyboppers will buy the cheap low-end locked-down crippled phones, while the *real* power users like me will always buy a factory unlocked phone so i can do what I like without jumping through the operator's hoops. I have no time for over-priced content services integrated with my phone so the operator can extract "more revenue per customer". I want to send emails, download a few files, ssh into my machine with it, maybe send a few pictures. I couldnt care less about their $5 a pop low-quality big brother updates. I dont want to buy a new phone when I go abroad or pay there ridiculous roaming charges. I want a phone that is truly mine, not something that is designed from the ground up to scam me.

    5. Re:What's the advantage? by Dr.Sweety · · Score: 1
      What you really want to have an edge over the competition is the ability to swap out parts of your code base really fast to fit with whatever the latest chip to come along is so that you can beat your competitors to the market with the new models. With linux's support of many devices it is an ideal choice for this.

      I totally agree on that, but does linux support such specialized chips as used in mobile phones? I could imagine, that you would have to write your own driver for it anyway and I was just wondering, what makes this more attractive over Symbian for example. But if there's already a driver available your argument wouldn't count as the competitors could you this driver too. Again, don't get me wrong on this, I'm just not that convinced that Linux on a mobile phone is such a good idea at the moment, I would love to see it on a PDA but on a mobile phone...

    6. Re:What's the advantage? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      does linux support such specialized chips as used in mobile phones

      Yes and no. In general, GCC supports nearly every chipset used by mobile phones. Also in general, linux supports nearly everything that GCC does. Getting Linux to work on whatever you've got, therefore, only requires tweaking the kernel.

      A lot of the I/O type chips used in mobile phones are used elsewhere in drivers that you get from Linux. So you may not have to do anything as far as module development goes.

      The big thing that you'd have to do is the bootloader and a lot of times the hardware interfaces between chips. These may also require you to tweak Linux - enough so that reversing things require some work on the part of your competitors.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    7. Re:What's the advantage? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      isn't the GNU license pretty unattractive for something as closed as a mobile phone?

      Besides the other reasons already mentioned, the GPL license only applies to the GPL parts, that is, the kernel including drivers (some drivers might be in the binary-module grey area); utilities; and popular GPL applications. The manufacturer can run as many closed binary programs on the phone as they wish. This is where most of the value add for the phone is, kernel mods are not.

      In fact, manufacturers tend to be eager to share their kernel mods because it takes less manpower to maintain that way.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  12. Brings new meaning to.... by Shakes268 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that a penguin in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

  13. see what can happen by suezz · · Score: 1

    when vendors don't have an agreement with microsoft that punishes them if they ship a competing product.

    Hello - DOJ are you watching?

  14. Possible because geeks can't assemble them by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NEC and Panasonic can think of shipping these phones because geeks cannot easily assemble these phones from legacy parts. If this ever becomes possible, NEC and Panasonic will jump ship on the effort, just like other OEMs in the computer world. That's one of the reasons why it's very hard to find a Linux-ready and loaded notebook.

  15. Freedom by eraserewind · · Score: 1

    What's interesting about the Japanese manufacturers use of Linux is that it uses Linux to completely eliminate the users freedom to run whatever software they want, and use their phones in the way they want. Japanese phones are locked up tighter than something very tight indeed, with no installing or using anything you didn't pay for. It's ironic given Linux uses the Free Software GPL even if the project itself is more "Open Source" than "Free Software".

    1. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the horrible conundrum: Linux is ready for the desktop. But companies want to use Linux for their own betterment. But... Linux is ready for the desktop! But... closed. Free as in beer! Costly, as in parking in front of the bar! Beer! Parking ticket! Who'da ever thunk Linux might be used for corporate gain?

  16. yeah... by n00tz · · Score: 1

    but does it run lin... oh, nevermind.

    --
    I had college once, but I drank some fluids and got a lot of rest and eventually it was cured.
    1. Re:yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just when you thought the horse was bloodied, dead, and bashed in, you go and beat it some more, can't you come up with something a bit more original?

  17. Microsoft Smartphone All the way baby by frankcow · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm a fan of Linux as well. But I gotta say, M$ has done a great job on smartphone, and has made it incredibly easy to program for it. Not to mention the interop with the most popular OS in the world...

  18. Win CE not out of the game by Surur · · Score: 1

    Your linuxdevices article is misleading, as it only includes windows mobile smartphones, not the more powerful windows mobile pocketpc phones, such as the HTC Jam / XDA mini, which I am seeing all over the place these days. If you add those devices WM at least matches the numbers of the linux phones, and the phones are less locked down, making them a better choice for people who actually want to do more than make phone calls with their WAN-enabled mobile device. Its actually funny that these devices are being trumpeted here, when at least 20 Windows Mobile phone devices have been anounced/released in the last 2 months (inlcuding 3 with VGA screens and wifi plus 3G).

    Surur

    --
    Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
    1. Re:Win CE not out of the game by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The problem is these devices tend to make pretty poor phones. Really read the reviews on phonescoop sometimes. They are good to okay PDAs but crummy phones.
      I think the ideal solution will be PDA/Notebook + bluetooth cellphone. The problem is that the cell phones have not gotten their act together on cheap data plans yet. Sometimes convergence is not a good thing. Just think about it a PDA/Cellphone/Ipod will cost more than just a cell phone and their are times when you may not want to have all three functions.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Win CE not out of the game by inu_maru · · Score: 1

      I worked in the last generation of this phone (the n900i... the one with dragon quest) and, as a phone, it worked perfectly. The rest of features where a nice bonus too. Not enough to spend my money buying it, but, hey, I am just a poor gaijin anyway.

      The only thing I never really tough well of was the penchant for 3D java avatars to use while TV-phoning. What's the point of using an avatar in video-conference, anyway?

      That and the lousy boot time... but it's not like the phone has to be off all the time.

      --
      Mu
  19. Western Versions? by gregarican · · Score: 1

    Why does Asia get all of this Linux mobile technology first? It seems as if most Linux embedded technology either fails to hit the Western world or else it gets withdrawn. Case in point the Sharp Zaurus line of handhelds. cooler than anything, but the only way you can get one in the U.S. is to import one from a company that reprograms them for Western keyboard functions and whatnot.

  20. Dupe-lex by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Why do people like "push to talk"? If all we had were still walkie talkies like that, the intro of regular mobile phones would make everyone heave a sigh of relief. No more people shouting at their phones and beeping sharply every 3 seconds as they walk around. No more missing people's first/last words as we work an unnecessary button. I understand the appeal of "free". but we've also got free in-network calling with normal phones that don't require we talk like 7 year olds rudely playing "cockpit" in front of every stranger we pass.

    I thought Japanese people were more sophisticated phone users, happily phoning without all the beeping/shouting. Will they prove to be just as idiotic as Americans?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Dupe-lex by fearspooky · · Score: 0

      naa, they aren't rude like the people living in the states. people in trains are expected to put their cell phones on manner mode and everybody is usually mailing because of it. when my friend and i were in the car, she got a phone call; she immediately told the person that she was in the car and that she'll call back. thats a pretty rare thing to see over here...

    2. Re:Dupe-lex by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      That's true, but why do they want "push to talk", which is really "wait to talk", when they've got regular phones? And when they get PTT, if it includes the "clear to talk" beep, they'll be just as rude.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  21. Access Palm by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I('m watching the phones from Japan's Access. They bought the PalmOS division from Palm right before Palm went Microsoft this year. That was right after PalmOS acquired China Mobilesoft and announced the next PalmOS would be Linux, with old PalmOS compatibility for the GUI and all the legacy apps. Any clues to which HW that little dream OS will run on?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  22. Breakable Schmakable by carguy84 · · Score: 0

    Can it run Apache is what I want to know! Or at the very least SMTP. That way I can have a roaming SPAM cannon and never be caught for selling you ][0M3 m0r7g4g3z and p3n1s p1llz via email.

  23. ATTN: Slashdot posters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux gets used as an embedded OS. Big whoop.
    How is this newsworthy?

    Who am I kidding. Look at all these clueless posts.
    And this is what passes for in-depth technical knowledge amongst you nerds?

  24. Qt/Embedded? by Sam+Haine+'95 · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know whether the NEC/Panasonic platform uses Qt/Embedded? Thanks.

    1. Re:Qt/Embedded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they don't run Qt embedded. I have heard that they are gtk based.

  25. A Linux phone is only any use if you can get to... by caluml · · Score: 1

    The only advantage of a phone being Linux is if you can actually get access to the Linux-y bits of it. I have a Linux handset in my drawer at work, and the fact it's Linux is completely irrelevant as I can't get a bash prompt. However, I have seen a Siemens phone running on Linux, and you can actually telnet or minicom to it. It's pretty cool to be able to run bash, ps, ping etc on a phone. It doesn't have a compiler on it though, so I won't be trying to put Gentoo on it.

  26. Re:A Linux phone is only any use if you can get to by runninggel · · Score: 1

    I have a Motorola E860i. The kernel is available and many people have edited it. You can run bash, telnet to the phone etc. If I mess it up, just load it in 'Safe Mode' & reflash. Found this site to be quite useful: http://www.rcsc.sisrs.com/mfc/

  27. Does the customers know/care it's linux? by Oxide · · Score: 1

    Really.... do the phone customers in Asia whom are buying these phones know or care that it is running Linux? Ask Joe user what OS is his phone running... chances are you will get a reply like "OS?". Only us nerds care about the phone OS. Normal people just care that their phone runs stable and do the features that they bought it to do regardless of OS.