Slashdot Mirror


Identity Theft-What Can Really be Done w/o a SSN?

TheItalianGuy asks: "Many of us that work in the financial sector are bombarded with daily security threats. One of the biggest these days is Identity Theft. My fellow comrades and I have been really grilling each other on differing scenarios on what could be done with what information. However, it all seems to come back the the Social Security Number. Financial companies have other controls in place (customer service verification checking, account passwords, etc) to ensure identification. But in order to be of any use, a bad guy would really need someone's SSN. Absent of that, other information would be useless. Right? That's what I would like to ask Slashdot folks. What could be realistically done with customer information without a SSN? Account numbers, address, maybe a phone or payment amount. Is that really dangerous to the customer if only those get compromised?"

85 of 533 comments (clear)

  1. Tons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stalking

  2. Social engineering by DerekJ212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that SSN would be of moot importance if you have everything else. Especially for lower age victims where "Im sorry sir, i dont know my social security number" might be a valid answer..

    1. Re:Social engineering by ToezEre · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One might argue that, considering most people who receive email still respond to phishing attacks (I cannot quote the number off-hand, but I know it was recently posted on a major), that any other seemingly innocuous information could be used to fashion target-specific phishing attacks. It seems probable that a regular person (my grandmother, aunt, father, etc.), already succeptible to scams, would be doubly so if transaction/account/address-specific information were included. All scams rely on the illusion of credibility and the addition of ANY specific information, regardless of source, gives credence to what should be dismissed offhand.

    2. Re:Social engineering by Xiaran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Odd. Im an Australian citizen that lived for a short time in California. I have an American Citibank account that I opened using my passport and nuttin more. Dont have a SSN or greencard(I was working remotely... wasnt breaking any immigrantion laws).

  3. Considering... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering so many uses only request the last four digits, that makes the SSN a really insecure PIN in some cases. Insecure because it's only 4 digits, and because it never changes.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    1. Re:Considering... by shanen · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Anyone who is dumb enough to use part of their SSN as a PIN deserves whatever happens. My own policy is to generate a random number each time I need a new PIN. (Four coin tosses per digit, converting from hex to decimal. Actually less, since 11 and 101 are terminators.)

      Anyway, the entire question of personal privacy is rapidly becoming moot. It's not just that our fear-mongering overlords want more power over each of us, but also that we have no barrier to protect privacy in this modern age. Do you have any idea how much of your personal data is stored out there? Of course not--but the organizations storing it (mostly companies and governments) can do whatever they want with it. My contention is that we need to extend the Bill of Rights to explicitly state that your personal information is part of your property and should be protected from search or seizure without probable cause.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    2. Re:Considering... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone who is dumb enough to use part of their SSN as a PIN deserves whatever happens.

      I agree. However, that hasn't stopped many services from requiring the last 4 digits of a SSN# for identity verification.

      It's idiotic.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    3. Re:Considering... by l3prador · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm pretty sure the grandparent post meant that the SSN is used as a Personal Identification Number, in that services require you to give them the last four digits of your SSN in order to verify that you are who you say you are (which is what a PIN does), and for that purpose it is a poor form of personal identification. I don't think that GP meant it's a bad idea to use your SSN as a PIN number... that's pretty much a given (I hope).

    4. Re:Considering... by GeckoX · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just did the toin coss myself, anyone want his PIN? ;)

      --
      No Comment.
  4. credit card info? by Exocrist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you had someone's credit card, you usually dont need any other type of ID at all.

    Or if you were buying something online, and you had someone's credit card info and what not, you could make purchases without the SSN.

    1. Re:credit card info? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I talked with a few lawyer and cop friends about this and put on the back of my check card (I don't use credit cards), "ASK FOR PHOTO ID" in big, red letters. My understanding is since I've notified the Credit Union of this, in writing, if anyone uses a fake card in person, or steals it and doesn't show an ID, the merchant is at fault, since they did not check the signature and ask for the ID, as stated in place of the signature. I don't worry too much about it, though. They are excellent at detecting any sign of fraud activity, and have called me several times to verify transactions outside of my normal purchase habits. I'd much rather get false alarms like that then have them ignore it.

    2. Re:credit card info? by davevr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you hear this on daytime talk radio or something? This is stupid for several reasons:

      First, contrary to popular belief, the sig on the back of the card is not there for identification purposes, but rather to indicate that you accept the terms of your cardholder agreement. If you do not sign the card, you cannot legally use it. Period.

      Second, if you want to protect yourself, you are much better using a credit card than a debit card. A typical credit card has a much better fraud protection policy than a debit card (might want to read the terms of service). Also, if your account is accessed illegally, with a credit card they have the credit card company's money (or actually, the store's money) while for a debit card they have drained real money from your personal checking account.

      Third, the merchant is not required to obey your stupid writing on the back. In fact, if they are doing their job they would require you to sign the card for real to make sure you have agreed to the terms of service. That is why it is perfectly reasonable for a clerk to ask you to sign a card that you present to them unsigned - because your signature is not for ID purposes.

      Lastly - most identity theft happens WITHOUT STEALING YOUR PHYSICAL CARD. Geez.

      Your cop and lawyer friends either don't like you, or perhaps have merely assumed the identity of lawyers and cops in order to get personal information out of you. You didn't show them your card, did you?

    3. Re:credit card info? by uspsguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you try to use such a card at my company (just a little one - the Post Office) you will be refused because it is not considered a valid card. That policy is posted at most of our counters.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    4. Re:credit card info? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First: You seem to miss the part that I notified the Credit Union about it. Without going into details, they supported me.

      Second: The one time I had to deal with fraud, it was useful in pinpointing that all the fraudulent purchases were online.

      Third: As for terms, I go through a credit union, which is great on service and protection, and they have great terms for protecting members, so maybe credit cards help for many, but it doesn't make much of a difference in this case.

      Fourth: You bring up 2 points about the signature. You say, the merchant is not required to obey your stupid writing on the back. Then, in the same paragraph (actually, the next sentence), you say, In fact, if they are doing their job they would require you to sign the card for real to make sure you have agreed to the terms of service. Do you always go back and forth on everything like that? Yes, it is supposed to be signed, and my note requires them to check for ID, which is signed. I checked, and it counts. So, in line with your 2nd sentence, yes, they are supposed to check -- which contradicts your 1st sentence.

      Fifth: Yes, most theft happens without stealing my card. So I guess I should just give up and not do anything and not care if it is physically stolen, right?

      Sixth: The lawyer friends are my clients, and are thrilled with the service I provide them because it has helped one start a business, another add scads of new customers, and others increase their profit margin and add enough new clients that some have had to hire more people. Some are family friends. As for cops, one, in particular, was talking to me and his cousin, and showed us his card and the note he put on it, as well as giving us a good background explanation, specifically for his cousin.

      So you may think it is stupid, but you couldn't provide a reason that stands up to examination for that.

      But that's okay -- I wasn't telling you that you had to do it. If you think it's stupid, don't do it. But don't give us a bunch of shallow and invalid reasons why it is stupid when the reasons are less supported than the suggestion.

    5. Re:credit card info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've done the same, but I have all the angles covered. I put "SEE ID" on the back, front, and side of my credit card.

    6. Re:credit card info? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Funny

      That has all the SIDES covered. So how did you cover the angles?

    7. Re:credit card info? by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fourth: You bring up 2 points about the signature. You say, "the merchant is not required to obey your stupid writing on the back." Then, in the same paragraph (actually, the next sentence), you say, "In fact, if they are doing their job they would require you to sign the card for real to make sure you have agreed to the terms of service." Do you always go back and forth on everything like that? Yes, it is supposed to be signed, and my note requires them to check for ID, which is signed. I checked, and it counts. So, in line with your 2nd sentence, yes, they are supposed to check -- which contradicts your 1st sentence.

      ---

      There is no flip-flopping involved. I'm going to call you Bob, and your bank CitiJoe for clarity. The merchant (as in, the person that you are paying money, which CitiJoe will transfer them money, knowing they can collect from Bob, which is you) has no obligation to follow any instruction written by Bob on the credit card. They are under no contract with you. You present your card, and since it has the visa logo on it, they understand that they can figure out that your bank is CitiJoe and that CitiJoe will pay them the money. The merchant could care less who you are, as long as someone pays for their merchandise. In this case, it is CitiJoe. In the meantime, there are contractual obligations between the merchant and Visa that requires all credit cards presented to be signed by the user of the card. By signing the card, you are agreeing to the terms of service of the card, as was mentioned in the GP. If you look at the back of the card, it says "Authorized Signature - Not valid unless signed." This means that the Credit card is not valid to be used in any facility if it is not signed. Since it is not signed, it is not valid, and cannot be used. If you write "SEE ID," then you have not signed the card, and have not agreed to the terms of the card, and cannot use the card. Is this clear? No flip-flopping involved.

      In fact, merchants are not supposed to require your ID at all. Somewhere along the line, the credit card execs wanted to make credit cards "easier" than checks, and not require presenting identification because that makes it less easy than checks. However, this regulation is usually relaxed because of paranoid people like you.

      --
      bananas like monkeys.
    8. Re:credit card info? by thc69 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, I'll be a monkey's bare-assed uncle. You, sir, are almost entirely correct.

      From http://usa.visa.com/download/business/accepting_vi sa/ops_risk_management/rules_for_visa_merchants.pd f?it=search :

      Unsigned Cards
      While checking card security features, you should also make sure that the card is signed. An unsigned card is considered invalid and should not be accepted. If a customer gives you an unsigned card, the following steps must be taken:
        Check the cardholders ID. Ask the cardholder for some form of official government identification, such as a drivers license or passport. Where permissible by law, the ID serial number and expiration date should be written on the sales receipt before you complete the transaction.
        Ask the customer to sign the card. The card should be signed within your full view, and the signature checked against the customers signature on the ID. A refusal to sign means the card is still invalid and cannot be accepted. Ask the customer for another signed Visa card.
        Compare the signature on the card to the signature on the ID. If the cardholder refuses to sign the card, and you accept it, you may end up with financial liability for the transaction should the cardholder later dispute the charge.

      See ID Some customers write See ID or Ask for ID in the signature panel, thinking that this is a deterrent against fraud or forgery; that is, if their signature is not on the card, a fraudster will not be able to forge it. In reality, criminals dont take the time to practice signatures: they use cards as quickly as possible after a theft and prior to the accounts being blocked. They are actually counting on you not to look at the back of the card and compare signaturesthey may even have access to counterfeit identification with a signature in their own handwriting. See ID or Ask for ID is not a valid substitute for a signature. The customer must sign the card in your presence, as stated above.

      Requesting Cardholder ID
      When should you ask a cardholder for an official government ID? In most cases, merchants may not ask for an ID as part of their regular card acceptance procedures, either when a valid card is first presented or to complete a sale. Laws in several states also make it illegal for merchants to write a cardholder's personal information, such as an address or phone number, on a sales receipt.

      You may ask for an official government ID or other personal information whenever you are suspicious about a card or a transaction. If the cardholder refuses the request or you are still suspicious, make a Code 10 call.


      That doesn't say you must seize the card if it's presented unsigned or signed "ask for id", but it does say to not accept it. Further, it even says merchants are disallowed from asking for ID...huh. I guess I'll sign my damned card now.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    9. Re:credit card info? by Havok219 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IANAL, however, I am a financial crimes investigator for the local Sheriff's Office. Identity theft, at its root, is not using someone elses credit card against their will, that is "fraudulent use of a credit card." Identity theft in the Florida statutes, is called "fraudulent use of personal identification." It more or less means name, date of birth, ssn, and any other biographical/biometrical information that can be used to determine your identity from another person.
      That being said, I think the original post is aimed at actual fraudulent use of personal ID, or as it is listed on my case files "FUPID" The original poster is correct in asserting that without the SSN, your identity most likely will not be stolen. It is very difficult to open any type of credit account without the SSN, because that is how the credit reporting companies list you. Contrary to its original "intent" the SSN has become a serial number for US citizens. If you don't believe me, try to enroll in college, or get a credit card, or loan, or anything else.
      Since this thread is about credit cards, I will touch on that. The parent is correct, in that most credit card fraud happens without the suspect in actual physical possession of the card. 90% of the cases that I work involve a victim that still has possession of the card. They have been victimized by either someone digging through the trash to get their statements, or using their card at an unsecure (pr0n) site, or by some other type of mishandling of the card. Once in awhile, I will get a case where the victim did not use the card in an insecure manner, and I have no clue how the suspect got the information. Furthermore, contrary to our popular belief here at Slashdot, solving a fraudulent use of credit card case is extremely difficult, and proving it in court is that much more difficult. Believe me when I say, the criminals of this world have found a niche here, and they know it, that is why this crime is so rampant. If you don't think this crime is rampant, wake up, and get out of your dream world.
      While the parent is correct in his assertion that your signature on the card is only an agreement to the usage of the card, I would argue that writing "see ID" on the back is an added security feature, and can't hurt. There are cases here where someone has taken a card, and used it all over God's creation. While we would love to blame the merchants for not taking the proper security measures, that doesn't get the victim his/her money back. So, in order to try to avert that problem in my personal life, the back of my credit card reads, "see ID."
      I will post my thoughts on actual identity theft will appear in another more appropriate thread.

  5. Depends on the institution by arootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think a lot has to do with knowing who to talk to; the problem of not having a SSN can also be solved via identity theft. At the school I'm getting my Master's from, you can call the financial aid office and get information on your account by using your name. I've always thought it was convenient, but I can certainly see how it's very dangerous.

  6. How hard is it to get the SSN by pvt_medic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember watching a specail about identity theft, and basically the point of the special was that with just a name and address, they were able to gather basically everything about the person. So with enough dedication and the right resources, getting a SSN is possible. Which is why i have since moved to 123 fake street.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  7. Birth Certificate by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you had someones birth certificate you could then find out their SSN. As well as apply for a passport.

    1. Re:Birth Certificate by Mad+Alchemist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How? The SSN is nowhere on the birth certificate. If your statement was true an identity thief could walk into the county registrar's office and get the SSNs of everyone born in the county.

      Also, a passport application requires proof of US citizenship (for which a birth certificate will work) AND proof of identity (which includes a government-issued photo ID). If you have someone else's birth certificate, the info on that won't match the photo on the ID with your picture on it. (I'm assuming here that they do some checking to make sure the ID is real.)

    2. Re:Birth Certificate by beacher · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's not even that hard - apparently all you had to do was buy a wallet from Woolworth. Interesting read - In a nutshell, a wallet manufacturer used a sample SSN in each wallet. Company Vice President and Treasurer Douglas Patterson thought it would be a clever idea to use the actual SSN of his secretary, Mrs. Hilda Schrader Whitcher. Over 5700 people adopted the SSN in 1943.

      Heh
      B

  8. Aggregation Attack by camusflage · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's called an aggregation attack. If you have all the pieces but the SSN, not only is it relatively trivial to obtain access to the SSN, but it's pretty much superceded by everything else.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    1. Re:Aggregation Attack by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 3, Informative

      Want to save thousands of dollars on MSDN? [macrocosmictech.com]

      Why are you charging $17 for this link?

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    2. Re:Aggregation Attack by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why are you charging $17 for this link?

      Because more than zero people are willing to pay $17 for that link?

      Welcome to capitalism. Incidentally, could the grandparent poster please send me a copy of his customer list? I've got some excellent opportunities for them in cross-river mass transit real estate...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  9. A corrolary .... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why does every company still legally insist you provide that information? Isn't it illegal to ask if you're NOT a federal institution.

    I've worked for companies who game my SSN to my health-insurance company as my member ID. Why do they need it, and what the hell is it being used for as my member ID? Yes, with you SSN, people can do a lot of evil things. Handing it out willy-nilly (without asking you) is jut as bad.

    But why is it legal for an employer to just hand this out to third parties? I think the abuses of how people use SSNs stems from the fact that way too many companies ask for it, and way too many companies hand it out to their vendors without any real regulatory restraints.

    IMO, it should be illegal to pass out that information without my consent. But I've seen too many examples of my employer passing it on without asking me.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:A corrolary .... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah. Long term, I think that SSNs should be considered public information. Somebody finding out your SSN should be about as harmful as somebody finding out your hair color.

      What should be illegal is using a person's SSN as an authentication mechanism. If it's considered public knowledge, then companies wouldn't be running around going, "Well, if you're really Bob Smith of Trenton, NJ then what... is.... yoursocialsecuritynumber????"

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  10. SSN by PresidentEnder · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's actually never legally allowed to require a social security number; "they" can request it, but not demand it, unless "they" are a government agency (and at least in MT, the DMV doesn't make you give them one for a driver's license). Most things are therefore doable without; in fact, on various forms, I give any of three different names (with or without my middle name, or with middle and first transposed) with my SSN. Nobody ever gets mad at me for it, even though my social security card only lists the "right" one.

    Incidentally, Richard Nixon's social security number is 567-68-0515; there are many cases where a given agency doesn't actually need your number, and it's perfectly appropriate to give them his instead. Have fun.

    --
    I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    1. Re:SSN by happynut · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's actually never legally allowed to require a social security number; "they" can request it, but not demand it, unless "they" are a government agency
      This is somewhat true, but pretty misleading. Private companies cannot require a social security number, but they can make providing it a condition of doing business with you.

      For more info, see:

      http://www.faqs.org/faqs/privacy/ssn-faq/
      http://archive.cpsr.net/cpsr/privacy/ssn/SSN-Priva te.html

    2. Re:SSN by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It drives me nuts when people spout off about something they know precisely nothing about because they overheard it in a conversation. Or, more likely, on Slashdot.

      I run a business myself. I don't collect SSNs but I could. Someone could tell me they wouldn't provide it and then I could tell them that I wouldn't do business with them.

      And it's 100% legal.

      Hell, I could demand their blood type under the same logic and result.

      Sure, it would be suicide for me as a business but for a bank? They don't need you, you need them.

      PLEASE. For the love of fuck, STOP MISINFORMING PEOPLE JUST SO YOU CAN HEAR YOURSELF TYPE.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    3. Re:SSN by cenobyte40k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry man, you are completely wrong here. SS law is specific in the fact that no one is allowed to use your SS# for anything other than as an ID number to the SS admin. As a result when you ask for the SS number for your W4 form you are within your legal rights. (In fact you are required by law to see proof of such when the form is filled out) If you ask for it or use it for any other reason you are running the risk of being called to task for it. I have found that it is almost impossible to get any agency to go after someone for this crime unless the SS# was used to cause harm(ID theft for example). However if you refuse employment or a bank refuses an account they are running the risk of finding themselves sued over it. (Note that in some case banks have a right to the number because they need to report information to the SS admin) So please for the love of.... Oh never mind just ready the last line of your post.

  11. a more pressing question..... by tloh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hate to flip the question at hand on its head, but a friend of mine got himself into a potential landmine of a problem last week when he possibly *LOST* his SS ID card at the subway station. (We're all still praying for him to find it elsewhere, but the chances of that are pretty grim. Guess that'll teach him to start using a wallet like us normal people. But a better lesson would probably be to just not carry the damn thing around - how hard is it to memorize 9 digits anyway?) He said he didn't think a person's SSN could be changed. Any advice on what he should do or be prepared to deal with?

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:a more pressing question..... by Unleashd · · Score: 3, Informative

      He needs to start by contacting the three big credit agencies and alert them to potential identity theft this will make opening a new CC or any new line of credit more difficult with only his SSN.

      Contact info:
      # Equifax: 1-800-525-6285; www.equifax.com; P.O. Box 740241, Atlanta, GA 30374-0241
      # Experian: 1-888-EXPERIAN (397-3742); www.experian.com; P.O. Box 9532, Allen, TX 75013
      # TransUnion: 1-800-680-7289; www.transunion.com; Fraud Victim Assistance Division, P.O. Box 6790, Fullerton, CA 92834-6790

      More information about what to do is at the FTC's website
      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/idtheft mini.htm

      Please check out the section titled: "IDENTITY THEFT VICTIMS: IMMEDIATE STEPS". Tell him not to wait on this ... get on it immediately because the theives will as well.

      --
      We don't need no stinking sig!
  12. Not Valid. by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By college age you have used your social to fill out god-knows-how-many college applications, college loans, car loans, drivers license, etc. Before 18 you shouldn't be in the position to have access to something requiring a social security number unless you have access to it (IE: a bank account)

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:Not Valid. by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An SSN is not a password. This focus on SSN secreacy is fucking stupid. SSN should not be used they way it is. If I become a victim, you can bet id sue the organizations that lend credit or anything in my name with a mere SSN...

      And of course were going the other way. Credit cards require less and less verification. I wonder whats their source of income when they loose money, that encourages them to be so lax. Its not odd that the media keeps pushing the idea that identity theft forces the victim to pay up as opposed to the company that allowed it ;)

    2. Re:Not Valid. by trentblase · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you paying for cable/internet/games/eating out with a credit card then you can't afford them; stop buying them.

      That's pure bullshit. I pay for EVERYTHING I can with my credit card. Including my $2 fast food purchase. Why? I have enough cash to pay my balance in full at the end of every month. On top of that, I get at least %1 cash back. That's an instant %1 discount on everything I buy. Some places I get up to %5 back. Since I've never missed a payment, my credit is awesome, and I've run enough money through those cards to have earned an awesome rebate each year. Why give people your hard earned cash up front when you can get a free 30-day float on the money?

    3. Re:Not Valid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      As part of my studies on "How easy is it to steal you"... I walked the UT Quad in Austin on the first day of school with some fake credit card apps... I had 100 apps in the first hour all with SSN, mothers maiden name, birthdays, the whole shebang. we found out that all you have to do is offer a t-shirt and some candy and these kids will give you anything you ask for. We tried asking for absurd stuff like bank account numbers,"This card can also act as a debit card if we have your bank information...", paypal info, "We can tie your new credit card into your paypal account too... all we need is your username and password."... we got everything we needed to totally rob someone... Here is the best part... you know all the disclaimer text on the CC apps... we worded ours to say EXACTLY what we were doing... Not a single person read the information... had they they would have seen that...
      "I certify that the information above is correct and that this application is not a real credit card application. I hear by grant the final holder of this document all rights to this information to use as needed to assume my identity. All information requested on this document can be used to assume my identity. Never give our your personal information out to anyone who does not have direct cause to have this information known."
      its insane what you can get people to give you...
    4. Re:Not Valid. by chrissam · · Score: 2, Informative
      Credit cards require less and less verification. I wonder whats their source of income when they lose money, that encourages them to be so lax.

      In addition to the late fees and interest charged to the customer as the previous poster mentioned, the CC companies aren't held liable for any of the fraudulent purchases made with a card. It's an absolute racket. When a fraudulent transaction is disputed, the CC company just pulls the money back out of the merchant's account, and usually charges an additional $10-25 chargeback fee just to add insult to injury. So the CC companies have no incentive to limit fraud since it doesn't hurt them.

      Of course, I'm speaking from the position of a merchant so I'm biased that way.

      --
      Is it okay to cry "Movie!" in a crowded firehouse? --Steve Martin
    5. Re:Not Valid. by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do the exact same thing.

      Get a Citibank Dividend Platinum Select, pay off the balance every month, and after a few months (depending on the credit limit and the charges run through them), receive a $50 rebate check that can be then used to buy other stuff on the same card (true, it's to the 1% rebate tune of a whopping $0.50, or $2.50 at 5% if in a grocery store or gas station, but it's still better than nothing). :-)

  13. Let me tell you... by soren42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I never thought I'd have an issue with identity theft, as a Vice President at a top 5 U.S. bank (in IT, of course). Two years ago, I was building a MythTV DVR PC, and wanted to get a good deal. I scoured the internet for the lowest prices on every individual component, and along the way, apparently ended up giving my Visa CheckCard number to the wrong person.

    Suffice to say, they did not need my SSN, or anything beyond what would normally be used to purchase items online. I found out when my card was denied at a store - the theif had emptied my primary checking account, and because I had overdraft protection, the attached savings account in one night. Nice thing was, the bank immediately reimbursed me for the fraudlent purchases, followed up with the police, and prosecuted. (Not simply because I am an employee, mind you - but I did get something most people in my situation don't, follow-up. Typically, the bank reimburses a customer and follows up with the authorities separately - without ever contacting the customer again unless required.)

    Now, I use a random card number service associated with my credit card to purchase anything on the internet. It may not be the worst form of identity theft, but it can be inconvient, expensive, and time-consuming to recover. I had to deal with bounced checks for bills, and set the fraud alert on my credit bureaus as a result of this. It's certainly worth using a temporary card service if your bank or credit card company offer it.

    Just my "It happened to me" tale, but it's one we hear over and over again these days.

    --

    "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
    1. Re:Let me tell you... by ericbg05 · · Score: 5, Informative
      What's a "random card number service"?

      (Disclaimer: I am not a security expert. I am not a financial expert. I am not any kind of expert. Don't blame me if sh?t hits your fan.)

      Let's say you want to purchase something online with credit. But you don't want your credit card number floating around in various databases on the internet. And you don't like entering it multiple times into multiple websites; this increases the chances that someone will attack you successfully.

      So you go to your credit card's website (which you trust). You tell them you want to make an online purchase of no more than $500 (let's say), and you want to do it this month. They give you a fake credit card number X and tie it to your real credit account.

      When you go to pay for your item from company foo.com, you give them credit card number X. Now foo.com alerts your credit card company you've used X to make a purchase of (let's say) $400.

      The credit card company notes this transaction, and from now on, X can only be used to make purchases from foo.com. So if Mallory was sniffing your traffic and decides to make a porn site purchase two hours later, he will be unsuccessful. Or if the folks at foo.com try to cheat you and charge you twice for your $400 purchase, they too will be unsuccessful (because that would put X over the $500 limit you set).

      Also, after that one month time limit, the X itself expires so that even foo.com can't use it anymore.

      You can make a separate fake credit card number for every company you intend to buy something from online. If any one of them is sniffed, the damage is minimal. I know for a fact that CitiBank offers this service -- I'm sure plenty of others do as well.

    2. Re:Let me tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the debit card you use has a Visa or MasterCard logo, it means your bank must give you all of the fraud protections you would get with any Visa or MasterCard credit card. There are some banks running TV ads about how you should use their card because they don't hold you liable for fraud and how quickly they reimburse you. However, by law they cannot hold you liable for more than $50 in fraudulent purchases anyway, and the Visa/MasterCard association rules probably dictate how quickly they must remove the charges from your account, so the protections should be about the same with any bank issuing a Visa/MasterCard debit card. If it is just the bank's debit card (without a credit card logo), the policies may differ somewhat, but the legal liability limit is probably the same.

  14. ask slashdot... by know1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "So how exactly do I own if all i have are these few details from a romanian site?"

    Many scri^W^W^Wsecurity professionals await your responses

  15. What the Navy says about SSNs by katana · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Attack submarine, designed to seek and destroy enemy submarines and surface ships. Their other missions range from intelligence collection and special forces delivery to anti-ship and strike warfare. It is a multi-mission vessel, capable of deploying to forward ocean areas to search out and destroy enemy submarines and surface ships and to fire missiles in support of other forces."

    Sounds pretty serious. If you have an SSN, you should definitely not let another person or country get hold of it. Frankly, I'm amazed that anyone in America can get an SSN, but that's liberty for you.

  16. I'm already using a Fake ID with no SS number by microcars · · Score: 3, Funny
    after years of signing up with different on-line thingies that insist on making me use a "secret" question and answer and won't let me leave it blank I now have a separate ID for on-line anonymous usage.

    Different Year/Month/Day Born
    Different town I was BORN in (yes that was one of the "secret" questions)
    Different Mother's Maiden Name (actually I have several of these and rotate them or combine them...)
    Different Town and ZipCode where I live
    A non-existant Favorite Pet
    Same Gender though....

    I did sign on to Classmates.com as one of the kids I hated.
    I started getting emails from all the girls that would never go out with me in High School!

    I couldn't reply though because it was the "free" version of Classmates.com, however, I took comfort knowing the guy I was impersonating could not sign up as himself as I had already taken that position!

    karma's a bitch ain't it?

    --
    I like microcars
    1. Re:I'm already using a Fake ID with no SS number by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ohh damn, you lucky bastard! If I were you, I would be sending this e-mail to all of these chicks.

      "Remember the time you sucked my dick in back of the art building? Well everytime I think of that day, it makes me want to ram-rod. That's right! I want to joust you like a loose mule in heat. Common, let me slap dat ASS!!!

      PS. You have the face of a horse. At least it's good for a nice deep throat"

      Okay now. You have your marching orders soldier. You may CUT-N-PASTE at will!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  17. Just having their bills is enough by Crash+Gordon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been helping a relative with Alzheimer's, and I've been able to do pretty much anything I wanted, aside from dealing with actual money.

    Telephone service is particularly easy to mess with; I just called repairs and ordered service changes and no attempt was ever made to check on me. I was able to add and delete services, change phone numbers and billing addresses, etc. I didn't even have be at the service location to order any changes.

    For utility accounts, all the info I've ever needed was on the bills. Again, I was able to change services, update billing records, etc. all without any difficulty. It's been very convenient for me to be able to set things up without having to muck around with Powers of Attorney and so on, but it gives me the shivers to realize what must be possible to one "skilled in the arts".

    Once you have utility bills with your address on them you can establish a residence and a lot of stuff follows from that. For instance, I could easily get a library card and enroll my kids in school in the town where this relative lives.

    With a little bit of creativity I could probably do stuff with money, too. I guess it's a good thing I'm honest, huh?

    1. Re:Just having their bills is enough by patio11 · · Score: 2, Informative
      One elderly woman compatriot plus a smooth talking scam artist can social engineer their way past any telephone droid known to man. I know, as a former telephone droid (somebody fell for this hook line and sucker at my place of employment, and I swear if I heard the script today I would fall for it, too). Here's how it works: you get a list of easily publicly available information like, say, names and addresses from a source of your choice -- maybe buy a direct mail list, maybe use a public directory, whatever. Then, you search the list for Ethel, Gertrude, etc -- names which indicate women of a certain age. Then, you have your old woman compatriot call $TARGET (you can just cold call people randomly or make an educated guess -- if she's in a certain neighborhood in Chicago, she probably has an account with LaSalle Bank, etc). She acts very polite but just a little bit on the senile side. "Hello, this is Ethel Victim and I just had a question about my account. Oh, the number? Lets see... it had a two in it, I think. Or was that my insurance. Insurance, such a nasty business, you pay them every month and never see a dime while you're still alive! Haha, I guess I shouldn't be too sad about not having collected then. What were we talking about again, Dearie? Account number? Oh, let me get my boy Jimmie, he knows a lot about banks. He went to school, you know. Thirty-seventh in his class. Jimmy, come over here and talk to Susan from the bank for a minute" *swap to scammer* "Oh, hello. Listen, I'm really sorry but Mom is moving to a home this week and we're trying to get all her affairs straightened out. I put all the documents in my safe deposit box but forgot to get statements stopped to this address. Social security number? Oh, shoot, her card is in the box, too, and thats the other side of town. Listen, we're sort of busy today... I don't suppose I could ask you to look up her account number for me? Thanks Susan, you're a lifesaver. Yeah, Ethel Victim. V-I-C-T-I-M. 101 Oak Place. Want our phone number? OK, I'll get a pencil. Got it, thanks Susan. You have a nice day, too. Oh, I'll tell mom you said that, she'll be so pleased."

      Next time/place you call up you can use the bit of information you gleaned as sort of a privilege escalation attack. i.e. Ethel has her account number written on the paper in front of her but... birthday? Jimmy was born on January 18th, 1974 -- it was the happiest day of her life, save marrying Harold on the 13th of November. But birthday. When was it? I should know my own birthday, but we never really had a party. I lived for the children. Oh, I'm getting old. Just another shriveled old prune who can't remember her own birthday? *sniff* Dearie, you won't tell anyone about this? I wouldn't want Jimmy to worry about me. I'm sure it will come back to me, let me call you back when it does... oh, you can look it up for me? You're so sweet.

  18. Why is that even the question? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering that acquiring the SSNs of large groups of people is as easy as getting a desk job in certain businesses or educational institutions, I'd say getting an SSN is probably the EASY part of identity theft. How much can be done without having one would seem to be a moot point.

  19. Re:Mine is... by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mine is 000-00-0002 (Damn Roosevelt!)

  20. Define Dangerous by fortunate_monk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suppose it all depends on what you consider to be potentially damaging information. You may not be able to run up my credit card if you possess my account number with my cellphone company but you will have access to information I consider private. Imagine, for example, an employer suspecting you of having contact with a rival company. It would be possible, with information other than your SSN, to obtain copies of your call records. I would consider this a breach of privacy and potentially damaging.
    I expect (though I don't always trust) any company I give my personal information to keep that information private no matter what that company perceives the potential damage of that information to be. The bad guys are often more inovative than the good guys and who knows what they can do with any given piece of data?

  21. Missing the point by caller9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You guys know this SSN thing was dictated by db schema developers. What's a good primary key...hmmmm...SSN! yeah that'll do. Hey that could also be a good default password. Yeah or login name! This is great as long as every other financial or educational institution doesn't pick up our idea.

    SSN isn't the problem. Anytime you have a national universal "user id come password" you're asking for it. Inside a state DL#s are probably somewhat a commodity in dark hat circles. Though not as usefull in financial situations.

    Isn't SSN and other more personal info available from credit reporting agencies with some $$ and a name for any jackass?

    1. Re:Missing the point by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read about this a while back. The SSA does not recycle old (i.e. DEAD) SSNs. The SSA is actually in the process of updating the system IIRC for a 14 digit system versus the out dated 9 digit system which only allows for 999,999,999 numbers. The SSA also refuses to assign any number that contains 666 as well as a few others so the actual number of possible SSNs is less than 999,999,999. Additionally, in certain circumstances, people can request that their number be changed. If this is done, the SSA's record for the new number points to the old number/record. Therefore certain people may have more than one SSN, but must use the newer SSN for taxation purposes.

      Somebody who works for the SSA also once told me that the SSA wants to take legal ownership of all SSNs so that IIRC it would be a crime for a non-governmental entity to require the number for any reason or something along those lines.

      (For those who don't know or are dense: SSA == Social Security Administration, SSN == Social Security Number)

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  22. Re:SSN is the problem by axonal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously - almost every financial transaction needs this number

    I don't need an SSN to withdraw money from my ATM, or make a deposit. And it should be kept that way. Anything that has a frequent transaction rate (financial transactions, university logins, bank logins, etc) should never use anything involving a SSN. By increasing the frequency of transactions involving SSN, you remove the user's will to protect this number. It begins to become more of a hassle for them to use this number, thus they'll do anything they want to make it easier for them to use the number (writing it down on notes, cards, sharing is easily to get from step A to step B). By making it rare to use the number, you also increase the user's protectiveness towards the number as well as the amount of information in exsistence using the number (transaction receipets, database entries, etc), causing eless things to become compromised. So if we apply the same ideas, any number, or piece of information that is used freequently, can be easily obtained. While information that is not frequently used, is harder to obtain, and more easier to secure since you have less of a paper-trail.

  23. while at the bank today.. by Sfing_ter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A little old lady had moved a year earlier, and a credit card co. sent her "checks" to use against her credit card... to the old address. So, whoever moved in there (or whoever stole the mail) was using the checks before they expired for things that were nondescript. Wrote the checks to pay some bills and buy some things, local address sure come on in no id required.Yes it is that easy and that simple. However, if you have all the pieces it gets much worse.

    I'm waiting for RIDS - Retinal Identification System, gonna use my glass eye, eh Sammy?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  24. It's the concept... by mrBoB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know about anyone else, however I view information such as you've listed as being privileged. Said information may not be so described legally as being privileged or confidential, but that's just how I feel about them. SSN is the most critical of course, but you said discount it. Account numbers, mailing address, Names, birthdates, familial relations and phone numbers could all be gleaned by some amount of investigation by a person or persons so inclined at getting it; it'd be a lot of work, but it could be done. You then have a picture of "me," who I am, what I do, why I do, etc. You might be able to do something with this, like call up Dominoes and order a pizza, or get online and buy a book from Amazon. If you call the right guy at 1st National Bank of Bumfuck, you might just be able to break into my account and steal my money; how much is that guy getting paid to look out for my interests?

          All this being said, if a company doesn't do what I consider adequate protection of my information, I don't want to do business with them. It's not that a malicious user couldn't get it any other way; I just don't want to make it any easier for them to get to me. Let them go hog-heaven on the blue-hairs that don't know any better.

          And I haven't even talked about your real question. What could one do with a "lowly" account number? Well you tell me. Let's say that's all Joey Malicious has on me. Has he hacked in to your network? Does he have access to your applications and know how to use them? Do you KNOW he hasn't? All I know is that when I call the credit card company, they want the account number and SSN. Are they typing it in with me and can't proceed without me, or are they verifying my answers against what they see on the screen?

          What if Joe Malicious works for your company? I'd say you, as a member in the financial industry, are in a much better place to answer this question. YOU need to tell ME that my fears are unfounded, that technically Jane Helper can't review my account info and do a transfer without my account number AND SSN AND mothers maiden name AND first-born sons' DNA because she has to enter it into the system as well. Of course, most financial institutions don't disclose their security practices (or lack thereof) for obvious reasons. None of us outside your "closed-source" way of operating can truly trust the process. All we know is that the threat is real, and we have little control of the problem.

  25. I realise that this if for the Americans... by aaza · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...but I feel like giving a different perspective.

    In Australia, the closest equivalent we have is the TFN (Tax File Number). The only people that end up with it are:

    • The Australian Tax Office
    • Your current employer(s)
    • Any bank (credit union, building society etc) that pays interest
    • Possibly private health insurance (due to tax breaks for those that have it) - note: private health is voluntary here

    As far as I can tell, it is NOT an offence to refuse to give it to any of these groups. That includes the Tax Office themselves. There are consequences of not quoting it, however. Namely, all tax payable is taken out at the maximum tax rate. To not give it to the ATO means that your tax return can be delayed while they search for you by name and DOB.

    Also, it's pretty crap as ID for banks, because all they get is a small note on the screen of your account details that says "TFN received" or similar. This makes much more sense, IMHO.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, however, there is.
  26. Re:Bank card number by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    At least in Texas, the checking account-linked debit cards offer no protection, and no recompense in the case of fraud.
    I'm not sure what you mean by "check card" in the above, but the protections on ATM debit cards in Texas are similar, though not the same, as the protections afforded to credit cards. You are not liable above $50, provided you report the card stolen in a timely fashion.
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  27. A good con by erikharrison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All you need is one piece of information if you are a good con man.

    In other words, the SSN may in fact be critical to most realy disastrous identity thefts, but a smart thief can get the SSN based on very little prior information.

    For example, you can get a official copy of a birth certificate with a wink and a smile. With that you can register for classes at the local community college. A student ID with your birth certificate is enough to get your Social Security card, even if you don't know the number. Student ID can also qualify as proof of residence in an area, which combined with the aforementioned social security card and birth certificate is enough to get a state ID or drivers license.

    Badda boom, you have a complete identity, including paper trail, without anything more complicated than forging a signature

  28. Re:Mine is... by ceconix · · Score: 3, Funny

    I also know your IP is 127.0.0.1

  29. We need a private-key credit card. by kabloom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From my ideas page.

    A private-key credit/debit card.

    Prevent identity theft (if you can keep your hands on your card) by using challenge-response authentication. The POS terminal sends your card a challenge, the card encrypts the challenge and sends it back, and the POS terminal checks it using your card's public key (which it fetches from the credit card company). Bonus points: put a key pad on the card, so that your key is protected with a password, and you know your password isn't going into random hostile machines.

  30. Non-Randomness by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Social Security numbers are non-random, could they be sourced? The first 3 digits are where you were born geographically, and if you knew the year, you could narrow it down to a few thousand possibilities, right? then use death records or something to narrow that further?

    I don't know what impact this has on the discussion, but it seemed important to consider.

  31. Are the financial institutions really at fault? by flaflashr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    First, credit card fraud or theft is not the same thing as identity theft, (even though the credit card banks have tried to spin it that way.)

    True identity theft is when somebody opens new accounts using your identity, obtained using surreptitious means.

    Now having said that, isn't the fault really with the credit issuers for making it too simple for credit to be obtained fraudulently? Why should it fall back on the poor, unsuspecting consumer, when the credit issuers are really to blame?

  32. Re:I would love to help with this experiment by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative
    The credit card companies will give you your money back, but they still loose money that way and the theif gets away with thousands if not millions of dollars.

    Huh? You don't think the credit card company is going to issue /mass/ chargebacks /after/ reconciliation to a single merchant account and not go after them tooth and nail for obtaining financial advantage by deception?

  33. Re:Considering how much data is out there? by shanen · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Well, thanks for your kind reaction. Actually, part of the source of that comment was the realization that cheap HDDs have made it quite reasonable that we keep all of our personal information in our own machines. Remember that "Possession is nine points of the law." I have at least 100 GB available at home, and I'm still sure my personal information is way less than that.

    To elaborate (but at risk of going off-topic), the basic idea is that if someone wants to store information about you, you should have the right to make them store it on your machine. They can sign it or whatever to prevent you from tampering with it, but if they want to see it again, they should have to ask your permission. As long as it's reasonable, you can let them see it--unless you change your mind. Even including your SSN.

    This is not really as radical as it might seem. Only a few years ago, pretty much all of your personal information was stored in your punkin head, so to speak. If someone wanted to know about you, they HAD to ask you. From that perspective, the essential principle of the Fifth Amendment is that you didn't have to tell them if you don't feel like it. However, these days it is increasingly less necessary to ask you anything--someone else already owns your data.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  34. What can be done? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, for total identity theft you probably need the SSN. However, a lot can be done without the SSN. Given someone's name, address and birthdate you can get a forged driver's license that'll fool most clerks. If you also have their driver's license number, it'll fool most electronic checking systems as well. Know their checking account number and that gives you enough to write checks in their name. Know their credit-card number and expiration date and you've got enough to run most credit-card transactions. Just knowing the name and checking account number gives you enough to submit an electronic check against their account (you'll have to move fast to get the money out of your account and disappear before they notice the discrepancy, but if you've got that forged driver's license you can probably open a throwaway account easily enough).

    Looking at it, a name and date and place of birth seems to be enough in most cases to get an official, certified birth certificate for that person sent to you. Just make sure to pay by money order, not credit card. A birth certificate's a stepping-stone to a lot of... interesting things.

  35. How To Steal ID by Grail · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) Walk into registrar of Births/Deaths/Marriages
    2) Claims to be Joe Bloggs, citing correct date and place of birth
    3) Walk out with birth certificate for Joe Bloggs
    4) Get driver's licence in name of Joe Bloggs
    5) Get bank account in name of Joe Bloggs
    6) Engage in fraud as Joe Bloggs, getting hold of $500k worth of stuff on 7-day invoices
    8) Ditch all identifying material, returning to your old identity
    9) Watch in the news some weeks later about some poor sucker called Joe Bloggs who is up on counts of fraud totalling $1M odd.

  36. Re:Mine is... by Ksisanth · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first three numbers refer to the area. There was a 001-01-0001, although it wasn't the "first issued". Read all about it: First SSN & Lowest Number.

  37. Getting acct info by vinn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, one thing that comes to mind are two different major telco's I deal with. I have a great working relationship with both of the companies. (I'll give you a hint, one starts with a "V" and the other with a "Q".) I've done things with both of these companies you should never be able to get away with. I'm not doing it illegally - I could get permission from the folks who actually want the work done. However, neither of these carriers asks for enough identifying information to be useful. We have backchannel phone numbers into God-Knows-Who call centers. If we need a line to be moved, we just provide addresses and phone numbers. Once in a while we'll get hassled a bit, but it's just a matter of giving a line of BS to get past them.

    In the event we need something strange done, we have reps we work with. If we asked for some info on the account, such as a SSN, I wouldn't be surprised if the reps would quietly provide it.

    So, don't give your SSN to utilities folks. Your electric company doesn't need it.

    --
    ----- obSig
  38. What I feel by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is we need to stop treating SSNs like proof of identity. Just because you know my name, doesn't prove you are me, neither should knowing my SSN. I mean what is it, after all? It's an identifier. The problem we face is that there is no gaurentee of uniqueness in names. If you are John Paul Smith, I'd be willing to bet you can find another person in the same city with that precise name, never mind the whole US.

    So, we need something more to allow us to uniquely identify a person for various things. It is important, for example, for a bank to be sure you are the John Paul Smith they are thinking about when considering your creditworthniess for a loan. Well, since everyone in the US has, at least in theory, a unique SSN, that solves the problem. Name + SSN = a near certianty that you are dealing with the person you think you are.

    However, much as a name isn't a proof of identity, neither should an SSN be. SSNs should be something that it doesn't matter if someone knows any more than if they know your name. It should be used just to establish who you claim to be, something else then is needed to verify that, indeed, you are that person.

    1. Re:What I feel by Eivind · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just because you know my name, doesn't prove you are me, neither should knowing my SSN

      Bingo.

      It's two different problems really. One is: How do you get a unique handle on a person ? As you say, name won't work, there's more than one "John Smith", adding in physical adress leads to duplication, because people move, so "John Smith, Bourbon Street" can very well be the same person as "John Smith, Pennsylvania Avenue".

      Adding birthdate helps, but is still no guarantee, there could be two John Smiths both born on say 9.9.1979

      For this problem the SSN is a decent solution. If we're talking of the person with SSN XXXXXXXX it's pretty likely we're talking of the same person, assuming every person has exactly one SSN (which ain't true, but it's atleast sorta close)

      However SSN is a *lousy* way of verifying identity. Knowing it is no evidence at all that you are the person to which the number belongs.

      Over the course of a life you hand out your SSN to several dozens or even several hundred different entities, you don't want all of those to later be able to pretend to be you. (or someone breaking into the computer of one of those)

  39. random card number services by David+Jao · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's another major advantage of one-time-use credit card numbers, one that often goes unappreciated by the customer using the number -- namely, if a one-time-use credit card number is compromised, you know exactly which retailer was responsible for the breach, because each retailer will have a different credit card number of yours on file.

    Not only does this information jump start a police investigation, but it also tells you which database was broken into and thus which set of customers to warn about possible impending credit card fraud.

  40. Having Your Identity Stolen Sucks by shoma-san · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had my identity stolen without the use of my SSN and it took me several years to clear my name. In short, a small, scrawy, red-headed meth-head tweaker got a drivers license issued by the state in my name. I was lucky enough to have a detective on the other side of the state alert me a day before a warrant was to be issued in my name.

    So in a six month period this idiot was able to get my license suspended in three counties, multiple traffic violations, driving without insurance infractions, driving a stolen vehicle, and countless drug dealing and drug possession charges.

    Can someone do damage without your SSN? F$CKiN A! I spend countless hours appearing in front of Judges, DA's, Court Clerks, Law Enforcement Officers, and lawyers and regardless of how much evidence I had, I was regarded with contempt and suspicion until someone could verify I wasn't lying and pardon me.

    In the end they caught the son of a bitch and he did 18 months for the Identity Theft charges (He's still in pound me in the ass state prison due to all the other charges in his name and my name). The interesting point is that I had to argue in front of a judge that it would be pointless to keep a drug charge on my record that I didn't commit just so that they could track the crime back to me from his record. By the way, they dropped the drug charges because he pled guilty to ID theft (that's how I got the last stain on my record removed). Government...

    The time I lost in wages (I was a contractor at the time) and the hell he put me through trying to clear my name which isn't easy when people look at their computer screens and think your a drug dealin dope fiend is enough for me to hope he's still being anal raped by some large man named Bubba. So you ask the question can someone cause damage without your SSN? They could send you to prison if you don't find out in time and clear your name. All they need is a few corrupt government employees and your first and last name.

    1. Re:Having Your Identity Stolen Sucks by BushCheney08 · · Score: 2, Funny

      All they need is a few corrupt government employees...

      Phew, good thing those are hard to come by...

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    2. Re:Having Your Identity Stolen Sucks by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... enough for me to hope he's still being anal raped by some large man named Bubba.

      Dude. Regardless of him getting caught, its pretty clear that you were and are much better off, even considering what he did "to you". Even though (I'm assuming here) he didn't know you or do it intentionally to you.

      Nobody deserves to be raped. To me its the most degrading thing you can do to a person. The only thing I can think of thats in the same ballpark or worse is torture over time. Rape is not a sexual thing, its a power thing. In prison, you don't have too much power over jack anymore, so establishing dominance over others that is not easily punishable is a thing to do. Rape is one best way to establish said power, and there are few consequences involved.

      I've been in jail once for a nonviolent offense in which nobody was hurt, and one morning I was brushing my teeth and out of corner of my right eye I saw a large man, maybe named Bubba, that was looking out of my cell door "to see if the coast was clear". I was terrified, but I had to do something, so I asked him "What's up?" He kept looking, and I heard some people outside in the common area picking a fight or whatever. He was just trying to stay out of it, but let me tell you, I was very scared.

      As I said, the whole time you were indirectly and directly involved with this guy, he was already worse off than you. There is no reason to add insult to injury. Maybe this happened to you to teach you some compassion for people. I dunno. But wishing rape on anybody, is pretty fucked up in my opinion.

    3. Re:Having Your Identity Stolen Sucks by Maltheus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and I've read at least one case where the judge used the Bubba phrase while sentencing someone. I remember thinking that that person should have been able to get off if the judge was knowingly sentencing someone to get raped up the ass. Surely rape falls under the "cruel and unusual" prohibitions in the 8th amendment.

      It amazes me how some many people in this country smile with glee as they talk about some prisoner getting raped up the ass. People don't even speak of getting sent to prison anymore, they just talk about the butt buddies that person is going to have. Rape has become synonomous with prison, in our society, and in my mind this invalidates the entire legal system.

  41. Re:parent is correct by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Funny

    ---well i guess amex just sucks balls then, i called visa when some drawing software company sold me a $20 download (not a problem) then called my dorm and told me the software i bought was shit (a problem) tried to get me to 'upgrade' to the $100 version (a problem) then wouldn't cancel the order (a problem) they took care of me even though i'm just a lowly college student with an $800 credit limit

    Living in a dorm and BUYING SOFTWARE?!?! What kind of fucking fruitcake are you????

    You really are sad.

    --
  42. Triad Support System (TSS) by Dark+Coder · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The best conceptual system to replace SSN is the three-public key system.

    1. Initiator (consumer) public key
    2. Receiver (merchant) public key
    3. Arbitrator (government) public key

    Each and every entity above can revoke the key at any time.

    Merchant can revoke a transaction or deny a consumer (due to poor credit). Consumer can revoke identity if stolen with assurance it won't be used again ever. Arbitrator can authenticate/reject for both parties.

    Zero identity theft.

    This would require a smartcard that generates rotating public key protected by a PIN/fingerprint (I'm not big on biometric, but consumer ease of use is the key here).

    Significant technical hurdles remains with regard to "WHOM" process the public-private key verification as it takes CPU-time. Perhaps the smartcard has advanced enough to the point where it can sign the keys.

  43. The Straight Dope Disagrees with you by still_sick · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mcredit.html

    Thanks for playing. You lose.

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re:The Straight Dope Disagrees with you by hymie! · · Score: 2, Informative
      And of course, the Straight Dope is never wrong.

      Here, read it from the horse's mouth.

      http://www.usa.visa.com/business/accepting_visa/op s_risk_management/card_present.html

      About three paragraphs from the bottom, it says:

        If the card has a "See ID" in place of a signature...
      http://www.usa.visa.com/img/other/card_see_id.gif
            1. Request a signature. Ask the cardholder to sign the card and provide current government identification, such as a driver's license or passport (if local law permits).
            2. Check the signature. Be sure that the signature on the card matches the one on the transaction receipt and the additional identification.

      Now, I'm not going to claim that ALL stores WILL do this. Just that VISA is not obligated to honor a request for payment made with a card that is not signed, and the merchant might not be willing to take the risk.
  44. you will be hasselled by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My grandmother was paranoid about her SSN and its privacy. She did not give it out to anyone. Most people's drivers license numbers are their ssn too, but hers was a different number by her request.

    She spent about an hour at Sears one day, trying to apply for a Sears charge card. They requested her ssn, but she would not give it. After about an hour of them calling around to figure out what to do about it, she did get the charge card and did not have to give her ssn, but the drones at the counter had to scramble for an entire hour to figure out how to get her the card without her ssn.

    So while this may be possible, it is not always easy.

    Also remember, for things like business transactions, in most cases they can require you to do anything short of violate your civil rights. Your option of course is to just not do business with them. AFAIK, not having to give out your ssn is not a civil right, so they could make this a requirement for them to do business with you?

    Also, it's possible that what you are getting (cc, or whatever) is using your ssn as a unique identifier. So if you use a popular ssn, or really anything short of your ssn, you are risking duplication in their database. It won't be so funny when you start receiving credit card bills from 10 other people that are all using Nixon's ssn for their IDs. It looks reasonably safe to make up a number starting with 000, since that region code was not used. For simplicity sake you might just change the first three to 000. Again this could potentially produce database duplication, but the odds would be greatly reduced.

    It's also possible that some automated processing may choke on a number that starts with 000, simply because according to the rules it's not supposed to exist. (that could actually be somewhat humorous, I bet you could crash numerous data processing systems with an array-out-of-bounds error when it tries to hash sort your SSN)

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  45. Do you really mean that? by anomaly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't mean to minimize the life experience you describe, and there is absolutely no justification for the actions of the drugged idiot who screwed up your ID, but I have to ask this:

    Analytically, can you really make an equivalence between the hours of your life that were 'stolen' from you, the angst, frustration, and contempt that you felt, and having someone anally rape the perpetrator?

    You are justifiably angry with the person who selfishly stole your identity so that he could live without consequences, but would it be just for him to be sexually abused while doing his prison time?

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  46. Re:Considering how much data is out there? by jgc7 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    To elaborate (but at risk of going off-topic), the basic idea is that if someone wants to store information about you, you should have the right to make them store it on your machine. They can sign it or whatever to prevent you from tampering with it, but if they want to see it again, they should have to ask your permission. As long as it's reasonable, you can let them see it--unless you change your mind. Even including your SSN.

    This would be scary. One of my least interesting work assignments is to send the FICA payroll to the federal govenment for 130,000+ US employees. If our HR and payroll systems didn't store the SSN, this trivial assignment would take years.

    --
    70% of statistics are made up.