Slashdot Mirror


Drink Decaf and Die

jose parinas writes "Decaffeinated -- not caffeinated -- coffee may cause an increase in harmful LDL cholesterol by increasing a specific type of blood fat linked to the metabolic syndrome, hints a new study presented at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2005."

98 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. Robust == Robust flavor? This is incorrect by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article:

    quote:
    "Whether coffee has caffeine is not the only thing that differentiates caffeinated from decaffeinated types," Superko said. "Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffees are often made from different species of beans. Caffeinated coffee, by and large, comes from a bean species called coffee Arabica, while many decaffeinated coffees are made from coffee Robusta. The decaffeination process can extract flavonoids and ingredients that give coffee flavor. So decaffeinated brands usually use a bean that has a more robust flavor."
    / end quote

    Robusto is named not because it has a more robust flavor than Arabica, but because it is a hardier species. In fact, the taste of robusto coffee is so heinous that only people without the sense to drink freshly ground coffee are susceptible to this travesty. I suppose that also includes decaf drinkers, but it also includes those who drink freeze dried coffees and mass produced brown powder that comes in cans.

    To be blunt, Starbucks coffee would actually be a step up in quality from robusto beans.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  2. Thats it, I quit everything by Snamh+Da+Ean · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the last straw - I quite drinkng tea and coffee because caffeine is bad for health, quite smoking because nicotine is bad, quite drinking soft drinks because sugar and all that stuff that makes the drink fizzy is bad for you, and now freaking decaff has been sliently killing me. From now on, all bets are off, I'm just going to smoke crack and to hell with the consequences.

    1. Re:Thats it, I quit everything by johnhoward666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I also read once that sunscreen can give you skin cancer too, if used too much. I think these days dying is the ONLY safe option.

    2. Re:Thats it, I quit everything by Sheriff+Fatman · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're misinterpreting their results.

      All they've actually proved, over and over again, is that research is bad for you, and that 'new studies' cause cancer in rats.

      --
      -- Open Source: It's mad, but you don't have to work here to help.
    3. Re:Thats it, I quit everything by Snamh+Da+Ean · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm bound to use the preview button one day. Did your post make you happy?

    4. Re:Thats it, I quit everything by Scarblac · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you ever owned rats? Existence causes cancer in rats.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    5. Re:Thats it, I quit everything by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 2, Informative

      There may actually some truth to the "sunscreen causes cancer" theory, although to my knowledge nothing conclusive has been proven outside of a laboratory environment (disclaimer: I have studied and researched this topic in some depth).

      PABA (para-aminobenzoic acid) used to be a common ingredient in sunscreens, and has been found to mutate cells. It has generally been removed from sunscreens nowadays anyway, ostensibly because it caused allergic and/or photosensitive reactions in some people.

      Metal (usually zinc or titanium) dioxides have been the "flavour of the month" since, as they excel at reflecting UV light and are less irritating to the skin. However, some studies suggest that the photocatalytic properties of these oxides may potentially result in mutations of contacted skin cells.

      Having said all that, going out in the sun without sunscreen is still orders-of-magnitude more likely to result in cancer.

  3. Old is much better by freedom_india · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Old products are always much better healthwise than the new fangled ones.

    For instance coconut water is better than Soda, Old Coke is better than New Coke, Coffee is better than the decaf crap.

    Scientists are re-discovering that age-old medicines like Turmeric, etc., are in fact much safer and healthier than the new fangled ones on market today.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:Old is much better by McCarrum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is very true. Take for example, how bleeding the body is healthy. Or kissing a toad can cure the cold.

      There is a middle ground, and thats what we need. It's called balance, or moderation. Simple example, a glass of red wine is good for you. A glass of red wine every half hour is not.

      Myself, I think the only way we're going to start to "scientifically" prove this is when we finally get quantum computers up and running, and can being to use a virtual human in close to real time. Start to feed in the variety of the bazillion different theories that come out of the single focus scientific groups and begin to understand the holistic solution.

      For now, I'm going back to my few glasses of wine.

    2. Re:Old is much better by Doc+Everett · · Score: 3, Funny
      " Myself, I think the only way we're going to start to "scientifically" prove this is when we finally get quantum computers up and running, and can being to use a virtual human in close to real time. Start to feed in the variety of the bazillion different theories that come out of the single focus scientific groups and begin to understand the holistic solution. "
      We already have this - you're one of the test subjects.
    3. Re:Old is much better by mattspammail · · Score: 2, Funny
      Other items to stay away from:
      • Tap water
      • Anything that is actually labeled as a "drink"
      • Chicken byproduct puree (darned mad cow disease)
      • Anything on this page
      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    4. Re:Old is much better by tigersha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sigh. Mother nature is always right. Right.

      Everytime I hear that crap from techno-luddites (and I do, I work in an environimental org) I have two questions

      a) Mother nature also made poisonous spiders, Ebola viruses and gamma rays. Why are natural things better again?
      b) If modern technology and modern medicine is so bad and evil and god knows what else, please explain to me why life expectancy in Humans today is about 30-40% more than 100 years ago. Its about living better for a longer time, or what am I missing?

      Mother nature is a bitch. She operates by building 1 million prototypes and killing off every one except the 10 best. Its always been like that, and allways will. And oyu are one of those protypes, whether you like it or not.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    5. Re:Old is much better by McCarrum · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tell me about it, I dance across it daily :P

      And I do agree, there are many things in the herb world (for example) that have been practised for ages, that science is beginning to "discover". Mind you, there's plenty there that science has said "are you CRAZY?!"

      Tis a long and puzzling path, and it won't be solved for some time to come me thinks.

      Unless aliens are involved.

      Aliens with kitten2poptart powered drives.

    6. Re:Old is much better by RocketRainbow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The parent asserts that traditional remedies are healthier and is flamed with talk of leaches and bibles under the bed.

      The parent is from India and speaks of Turmeric. India was never Christian and didn't have a European style dark age. Instead, doctors slowly experimented with herbs and dosages to create a manual of natural medicine.

      The research done that established that turmeric and ginger are healthy was much better than the research that asserts that decaf is not. If looking for a dietary change, I'll take the advice of the ayurveda over Science By Press Release any day.

      --
      *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
    7. Re:Old is much better by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to see you saying that while eating a bowl of lightly sauteed venomous spiders (on a bed of wild California rice and garnished with cilantro).

  4. It is a matter of equilibrium by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Life could be more a matter of equilibrium. It is known that a small quantity of caffeine is not poison for our bodies rather it has a number of good effects on it.
    When we start to do things out of the equilibrium, the situations become unstable (as seen in physiscs).
    It is the same as sugar, fat, proteins, vitamins alcohol and the likes.
    Maybe the right move could be to get small amounts of plain coffee with a little of sugar (thus no sweeteners and no decaffeinated powders). If it is not healthy, it will be by little.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    1. Re:It is a matter of equilibrium by aug24 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like I keep pointing out to people who say "I read today that too much X will kill you":

      Yes of course it fucking will! That's what *too* fucking *much* means!

      Find out where 'too much' and 'too little' are for everything, and get on with enjoying life.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:It is a matter of equilibrium by indifferent+children · · Score: 5, Funny
      "I read today that too much X will kill you"

      That's just vicious FUD spread by Apple and Microsoft. X is no more likely to kill you than any other GUI technology.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  5. Everything bad for you is good for you again by pubjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Things that have recently been found to have positive health properties: beer, chocolate, coffee. In moderation of course.

    Personally I follow a very simple rule - eat and drink everything, just don't eat or drink too much of any one thing.

    There was an interesting study recently - the French (yes, we hate them, yawn) apparently eat lots of stuff that is supposed to be bad for you, and yet remain healthy and slim. How do they do it? Basically, eat in moderation and don't snack between meals.

    1. Re:Everything bad for you is good for you again by remmelt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very true. Forget the low carb and light and decaf stuff, just don't eat and drink so much. I never ever eat light stuff because I think it doesn't taste as good as regular. I don't get fat though, because I don't eat twenty in-betweens and little snacks and I don't drink fizz. Plus I take my bike to work. It works, really. There is no need for the latest fad. Just eat vegetables. Without sauce.

      I was amused to find out that when that lo-carb fad was going on (is it still?) doctors who had patients with kidney troubles upped the carbs first thing, and most of it went away... Haha.

      Moderation is the word. Eat in moderation, drink in moderation, even diet in moderation. Just don't live moderately, OK.

  6. Move and die by external400kdiskette · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everything in one way or another in some sort of situation or in excess is going to make us "die" ... but generally I don't see anyone a shortened life for the sole reason that they drank a cup of decaf every day or normal coffee for that matter.

  7. I guess Garfield was right by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shame he's rarely funny.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  8. Re:Everything by Tragamor · · Score: 2, Informative
    In small doses, nicotine may not kill but it does elicit autonomic and somatic responses; Dizziness, nausea, and/or vomiting are commonly experienced by non-smokers after low doses of nicotine, however it is toxic in greater doses.

    There are documented cases where people have died from the ingestion of nicotine (generally in the form of nicotine pesticides). In adults, the lethal dose has been quoted as 40-60mg (although not well documented).

    However with those facts aside, nicotine is of course not the only toxic chemical inhaled from cigarettes, so whether the cigarettes contain nicotine or not is moot. (yes, yes... I am aware the parent post is tongue-in-cheek, but have decided to answer to it anyway).

    FTA:
    The Coffee and Lipoprotein Metabolism (CALM) study included 187 people, randomized to three groups: one that drank three to six cups of caffeinated coffee a day; another that drank three to six cups of decaffeinated coffee a day; and a third, the control group, that drank no coffee.

    IMHO, I don't think this is a large enough set to draw accurate data from, as an initial study, these results should lead to further tests - but it seems to me, too early to apply wide sweeping statements - hey, but this is what the press is good at - right?

    Wasn't there a study a few years ago that proved oxygen was bad for us? increased radicals causing cellular breakdown and ageing... As a New Years resolution, try giving that up!!

    --
    To be is to do - Descartes. To do is to be - Sartre. Dooby dooby do - Frank Sinatra.
  9. Bernard was right! by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
    "He's already unconscious - decaf might kill him!"
    -- Bernard Bernoulli, on attempting to revive Dr. Fred Edison after rescuing him from the IRS.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  10. Re:Robust == Robust flavor? This is incorrect by RocketRainbow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always understood that the reason decaffeination removes flavour is that the caffeine tastes bitter. The solution is not to use different beans, but to roast a little darker to restore the strong bitter taste.

    My favourite decaf comes from a little boutique that measures it out at the point of sale. Next to their darkest roast coffee, it is clearly even darker still!

    I think the reason most decaf is so bad is that you have to get it pre-ground (even at restaurants and cafes) and thus it's stale and the wrong grind anyway, or else it's such a fringe item that it sits around longer on the shelf going stale between roasting batches.

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  11. Part of the problem with the study by Potato+Battery · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You raise up a good point about stale coffee, which also may have some bearing on the study. From the article:

    "In this study researchers gave participants a nationally popular home-brewed caffeinated coffee and decaffeinated coffee brand."

    Granted, they wanted to do a study researching the health effects of regular versus decaffeinated coffee on the general population, so they went for what most people use, which is probably canned pre-ground. But it's probably a poor reflection of what fresher coffee does. Kind of like comparing the health difference of between boiled or steamed reconstituted dehydrated food.

    Plus, drinking all that average coffee is most likely dampening their joie de vivre. I think that little things that brighten your day can have a lot of benefits, health-wise.

  12. Newspaper article by pubjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read a newspaper article the other day decrying MacDonalds again - criticising their fruit salads. The article (in the UK Guardian as I remember) said that MacDonalds fruit salads had been bathed in artificial chemicals, and how dare MacDonalds feed such dangerous stuff to our children etc. etc. Reading futher into the article, the chemicals in question were citric acid and ascorbic acid (vitamin C).

    1. Re:Newspaper article by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Informative
      Correct, and the most likely reason is to keep the cut fruit from browning (oxidizing). You can do this at home by dunking your freshly-cut fruit into a bowl of water containing a tablespoon of lemon juice.

      Isn't food science wonderful? {Thank you Alton Brown.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  13. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This just in, being born will kill you. A study by like 10 bajillion genius Harvard researchers and shit said that 100% of people who are born, die. Scientists suggest that this is based on genes inherited from victim's parents and are working on a test to detect it.

  14. Re:I've always known... by ooze · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, there is actually only once rule for food. The more it is processed the more likely it is that it is useless or even harmful for your metabolism. Our metablosism is just best adapted to that. Soylent Green is probably better for you than anything packaged from a supermarket. Eat the fattest meat, eat all fried, revel in carbs whatever. But don't eat it once a food corporation had it's chemistry fingers on it.

    Just a reminder...the only plant fat that is solid in room temperature is coco fat. Can you imagine what chemicals are needed to turn plant fats into something you can put on your bread? Just eat butter instead.

    --
    Just because I can imagine doing a hippopotamus, doesn't mean I'd like to do it.
  15. thanks by Use+Psychology · · Score: 5, Funny

    Decaffeinated -- not caffeinated
    thanks for that clarification!

    1. Re:thanks by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Especially that it's doubly redundant: No coffee is ever caffeinated.
      Coffee, as opposed to "caffeinated drinks" contains natural caffeine, different doses depending on brand, preparation, etc. but I haven't heard yet of coffee that would have to be caffeinated. Decaffeinated coffee on the other hand is subject to decaffeination, process opposite to caffeination - removing the drug.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  16. I wonder... by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    my BMI is way over "reasonable" index, I drink beer, sometimes liquors, normal coffee, a range of foods including these rather unhealthy, don't move too much, yet my blood pressure is perfectly within norm, the "bad cholesterol" detector device displayed LO meaning the levels were undetectably low, I don't have any serious health problems... I wonder why :)

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because you're 17 years old. Give it time.

  17. Re:I've always known... by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Can you imagine what chemicals are needed to turn plant fats into something you can put on your bread?



    Yep, some really nasty stuff, like, um, hydrogen.

  18. Fatties only by RocketRainbow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Interesting that the decaf was only "theoretically harmful" to fatties. To normal or skinny people it has the reverse effect and the level of the naughty chemical dropped.

    So maybe if you happen to be normal or skinny, decaf is even better for you than you thought.

    Of course we puritanical vegan types aren't dying of a heart attack anyway because we barely eat enough saturated fat to make the cholesterol we need to bind our cells together (yay coconuts and avocadoes: necessary to bind our cells together).

    Does anyone else have trouble actually bringing up the article without a bunch of stuff all over the top of it? (Say, in Firefox?)

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  19. Moderation is Key by kripkenstein · · Score: 5, Funny

    I also try to do everything in moderation. I even moderate in moderation, so I end up doing some stuff to the extreme, just so I won't be an extremist at moderation, also known as an extremist moderationist. Or is that a moderate extremist. I give up, time for another cup of coffee.

  20. Re:As usual, by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't you know how dangerous that is? http://www.dhmo.org/

  21. Re:I've always known... by RocketRainbow · · Score: 5, Informative
    Grandparent:Can you imagine what chemicals are needed to turn plant fats into something you can put on your bread?

    Parent replied:hydrogen

    Problem is, once you bind the hydrogen it's trans fat and no longer vegetable oil - it's gone from super yummy and healthy to ugly grey goo that happens to be one of the unhealthiest things you can eat.

    Personally, I prefer to make my sandwiches with hommus and dip my bread roll in fresh olive oil.

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  22. Yellow snow by rev_karol · · Score: 4, Funny

    You don't drink decaf for the same reason as you don't eat yellow snow. They're both piss. End of story.

  23. Somebody has to remember this by Keichann · · Score: 4, Funny

    From Garfield sometime...

    John walks into the room, yawning, and picks up a mug of coffee.
    Garfield: No, don't do it John!
    John takes a sip and promptly collapses, asleep.
    Garfield: I warned you! That was decaf...

  24. sensationalism by dancallaghan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Drink decaf and die"? Gee I wonder why Slashdot gets accused of headline sensationalism ...

  25. Re:di-hydrogen monoxide by orzetto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Di-hydrogen monoxide is the main cause of death in drowning. Di-hydrogen monoxide, in large quantities, can harbour aggressive biological agents ("sharks") that can be lethal to your health.

    More seriously, I was told some college students had a challenge on who could drink most water. Similar competition with beer normally result in someone dropping drunk, but with water no such effect appeared, of course. So, someone discovered the hard way that there is a lethal dose of water, about 20 liters, beyond which synapses lose their conductivity due to dilution, and you die of heart failure. Can't really be sure on most details and this could be a urban legend, but in general there is always a quantity of anything that will kill you.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  26. Starbucks is good coffee by xtermin8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I beleive Starbucks was one of the first chains to insist on only selling Arabica beans. Its decaf coffees have always been made with Arabica beans. Basically Starbucks was a leading voice in the trade for discouraging the use of Robusta. You may not like Starbucks, but to criticize their large selection of various coffees as being second rate is barking up the wrong tree.

    1. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by Levilprivateer · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a former barista at a Starbucks competitor, I have to disagree. While Starbucks coffee might not be the premium coffee on the planet, it is no worse (and oftentimes, better) that competing specialty shops. Granted, you are right about people adding so much to the coffee that it becomes a dessert rather than coffee. Still, I can get a good Americano or French press at Starbucks too... and they pull the shots properly, unlike a few other places around here.

      The prioes are, alas, competitive too.

    2. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm curious to know what you think an "Americano" is. Just in case an Americano ever asks me for one...

      Not to speak for the parent, but an Americano is a shot of espresso with 6-8 oz. of steamed (hot) water added. Definitely a lot more "forgiving" cup of coffee than a straight espresso and much nicer than a dripped or pressed cup. I usually have one in the morning after my ristretto. Nice to have cup that lasts longer than it takes to make. But wouldn't you know, the first really good espresso shot that I've pulled this week happened to be for an Americano. Sigh...

      I've got to agree, if you've had a fresh-roasted, carefully prepared coffee, Starbucks just sucks. Ditto for all of the extra crap. No, I -don't- want "French Vanilla" in my coffee!!!!

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    4. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by theblueprint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing that I hate about Starbucks is that they burn the hell out of the coffee when they roast it. I can only guess this is so that it actually tastes like coffee after you fill it with a pound of cream and sugar.

      --
      "from the bricks to the booth...I predict the future like Cleo the psychic..."
    5. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by Rxke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The guy might be rated informative, but he's just a coffee or food snob, dissing Starbucks because it's too regular. I drink my coffe because it has caffeine in it. All the rest is just posing.

    6. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by drsquare · · Score: 3, Funny

      Barista? Why do Starbucks workers get fancy foreign names but McDonald's workers don't, when they're effectively doing the same job?

    7. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by rajafarian · · Score: 2, Informative

      I drink my coffe because it has caffeine in it.

      Dude, have you considered just buying caffeine pills ? Or alternatively,you should try guarana/caffeine pills from GNC or alternatively to that, have you tried coffee from a local shop that roasts their own bean, i.e. have you tasted "good" coffee (NOT Starbucks, of course) and didn't like it, or didn't care?

    8. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by The+Phantom+Mensch · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're missing something here. If you pull a long shot of espresso to make an Americano you're doing it wrong and you'll get dishwater since you're overextracting the coffee in your group head. To get a good Americano you pull a normal espresso, then pour it into a larger cup and add hot water. This gives you something with some of the flavor of a good espresso, diluted for someone who likes big gulps.

    9. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I assume what you've said is essentially a troll, but I can't resist. You are actually a poseur, in the most basic sense - you are projecting an attitude about something in a way that implies it is the only correct attitude. Lamers who drink coffee because they like the way it tastes are simply deluded, from the view you present.

      I will admit that there is some justice to your view - the amount of effort I spend making coffee in the morning is kind of bizarre. However, for what it's worth, the ritual evolved naturally, and I can in fact taste and enjoy the difference between the coffee I brew and what is typically served in a restaurant. I am sorry that you do not share this enjoyment, but as long as coffee does for you what you want, it's all good, right?

      As for the whole robusta vs. arabica thing, espresso fiends should be aware that a lot of espresso includes robusta beans to sharpen the flavor. Robusta has a bad rep because a lot of cheap coffee is made with robusta, but it is a legitimate bean with a legitimate flavor that works well in some blends.

    10. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe if you treated McDonalds workers better, you'd enjoy the food there more?

      I've noticed over the years that there's this strong stratification in society, where some jobs are "okay", and some are "lower class." A person who sees themselves as "in" expects peopel with "lower class" jobs to provide them with good service, but has no respect for those who provide them that service.

      Calling an espresso maker a "barista" adds some cachet to the job, and maybe gives some respect to the barista that is missing from the term "burger flipper". I have trouble seeing that as a bad thing. People who make food for you deserve your respect. The fact that you don't respect them is why it's so hard to find a decent food experience anymore these days.

    11. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's so hard to find a decent food experience anymore these days

      If you're ever in Southern California, go to In-N-Out. It's a fast food joint that only serves Burgers, Fries, Shakes, and Drinks (no fancy curly fries, onion rings, chicken sandwiches, no breakfast). Every different one I've been to (and I've been to well over 50 of them) has employees that always seem happy and cheerful, making it a great experience. They don't act ridiculous as if they're reading from a training script, but overall they seem like they enjoy their job and they're happier overall.

      Maybe it's because thir starting pay is over $7 an hour, who knows? I do know that it's fairly difficult to get a job there, compared to a place like McDonalds. They're very selective on who they hire, and the overall employee attitude is proabably a result.

    12. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by clem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh oh. The sophisticates are arguing about coffee. Can a slap fight be far behind?

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    13. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by Proteus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, don't assume. I cannot stand the regular Starbucks coffees -- I find them absolutely rank. I can barely deal with their espresso, but only in a milk-containing beverage. This doesn't mean I'm a coffee snob.

      I think, like most things, it's a matter of taste. Some people like Starbucks, and find it worth the cost. I find it repulsive at any cost. Fortunately for me, my local coffee shop roasts and brews coffee much more to my liking, and even happen to be cheaper than the major chains.

      The difference between a snob and not a snob, here, is evangelism: a coffee snob will not only be convinced Starbucks is bad, but will deride anyone who likes it. A non-snob might hate Starbucks and simply not care if other people like it.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    14. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by John+Miles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Starbucks recently (within the last couple years) bought one of the major local chains, called Seattle's Best Coffee. The obvious fear was that SBC, which wasn't a bad place at all, would start serving burned coffee. While that didn't happen, their franchises have been slowly disappearing... which sucks, because I always liked their coffee much better than Starbucks'.

      However, the other side of the equation is that at least here in Seattle, the Starbucks espresso blend seems to be growing closer and closer over time to SBC's. When I drink Starbucks, I'm finding that I no longer notice the charred/burned taste to any great extent. I've almost reached the point at which I don't really care if I'm drinking Starbucks or SBC. Not that I'm any sort of coffee connoisseur like some of the posters in this thread... but still. Whether the change is in Starbucks' coffee or my perception of it, it does seem to be tasting better these days.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    15. Re:Starbucks is good coffee by mellon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you say this, the long form of your argument goes like this:

      1. There is a way that people should act. They should be respectful towards each other.
      2. This person has been disrespectful to me - they have acted contrary to the way people should act.
      3. Because of this, I am going to act the same way they have decided to act - I am going to disrespect them back.

      Consider what would happen if every single person in the world thought this way. Would it ever be possible that people would stop disrespecting each other? Now consider this line of reasoning:

      1. There is a way that people should act. They should be respectful towards each other.
      2. This person has been disrespectful to me - they have acted contrary to the way people should act.
      3. Just because this person doesn't know how to act properly doesn't mean that I should also act improperly, so I am going to treat them with respect even though they haven't treated me that way.

      What would happen if 10% of the people in the world held to this way of thinking? How would the world change?

  27. Re:I've always known... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you imagine what chemicals are needed to turn plant fats into something you can put on your bread?

    Water. Or some sort of gloopy liquid protein, like oh, maybe, egg. Then you'd need some kind of acid, like vinegar perhaps, and something to help nucleate the emulsion - maybe a tiny drop of mustard powder.

    Congratulations, we've just invented mayonnaise

  28. Re:As usual, by Toutatis · · Score: 2, Funny

    It all can be true. I don't know any dead people suffering from cancer, hunger or hemorrhoids.

  29. Slashdot Headline by krygny · · Score: 5, Funny

    "DRINK DECAF AND DIE!!"



    When the hell did Rupert Murdoch buy Slashdot?!!

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  30. gaming... bad!, coffee..... bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope they won't research my third addiction. I haven't spend years building my porn collection just to hear it's unhealty.

    1. Re:gaming... bad!, coffee..... bad! by Google85 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I hope they won't research my third addiction. I haven't spend years building my porn collection just to hear it's unhealty.
      Too late... "Porn makes you blind: official"
  31. Re:As usual, by shrewd · · Score: 2, Funny

    *clicks link*
    PFFFFFT!!! (spits out water)

  32. Roasting decreases caffeine by xtermin8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is a common misconception that darker, stronger coffees have more caffeine. Actually the lightest roast coffees have the most caffeine. In fact espresso roast, pound for pound, has less caffeine than regular coffees. It is only the brewing process that makes the drink more caffeinated than regular coffee. This fact doesn't contradict you're theory, but you might find decaf roasted dark for reasons other than flavour

    1. Re:Roasting decreases caffeine by Icculus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's also a misconception that there is such a thing as 'espresso roast', and, if such a thing did exist, that it is a very dark roast. Typically espresso freaks will roast a bit lighter (a 'full city' roast) for the best flavor, but different roasts suit different varieties better. I think it's the big coffee houses that have made this 'espresso roast' so prevalant. But you are 100% correct on the ligher=more caffeine front

  33. Re:Not really news by ti-coune · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Attention !

    Not all decaf process use chemicals. Some only use water to remove the caffeine, yes, just water.

    If you read the article carefully you will see that they don't link the cholesterol change to the decaf process but they say on average manufacturers use different type of green coffee (robusta) to produce decaf and it's this green coffee that brings in more fat components, nothing to do with the decaf process.

    You could use arabica to produce decaf as well and you could not conclude anythinh then. The title of the article is misleading, once more.

    ANd don't forget that anti-oxidant are present in coffee, more than tea, and these are good for the health.

    It's not all that simple I'm afraid.

    my two cents,

  34. I don't care about these crap articles anymore ... by raulfragoso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once I read that smoking could kill me, then I stopped smoking

    Then I read that drinking alcohol is bad, so I stopped drinking

    Then I read that too much sex could cause a heart stroke ... so I stop reading !

  35. Life is a Lethal Disease by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Funny

    A study I conducted in private has found that life is a lethal disease. In fact, it has been identified as the leading cause of death in nations around the world. The disease is slowly degenerative, with some individuals surviving for over a hundred years; but eventually, the disease exhausts the body's resources, resulting in organ failure, followed by death. The incubation time of the disease is about 9 months, and it spreads through unprotected sexual intercourse.

    Symptoms of the disease vary wildly from individual to individual, but generally include excessive motion, episodes of sadness as well as happiness, aggression, anxiousness, nervosity, and compulsive eating and drinking.

    Various drugs have been found to weaken the symptoms of the disease, and some substances can even slow the progress of the disease, but a definite cure has not been found, despite elaborate research. So for now the only remedy is prevention.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  36. And yet, the real cause is ignored..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real cause of death doesn't lie in food or beverage. Here's a recent study that explains everything:

    "We all know that Heart Disease is the #1 cause of death in the U.S. But think hard about this: In Japan, they've got a diet that is low in fat and they have less heart disease than the US. While in France, the diet is very high in fat, and they also have less heart disease than in the US. In India, almost nobody drinks red wine and the heart disease rate is lower than in the US. But in Spain, everybody drinks too much red wine and sure enough they have less heart disease than the US. Algeria has the lowest sexual activity rate, and they've got less heart disease than in the US. But Brazil has the highest sexual activity rate and sure enough...the heart disease ratio is lower than in the US. His sage wisdom to me? Drink, eat and make merry all you want. It's speaking English that kills you."

    1. Re:And yet, the real cause is ignored..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My hypothesis: We have more heart disease due to the aggravating factors, due to obesity increasing the bad effects of those factors in the U.S. In the US, people drive their cars and watch their televisions a lot more than in those other countries. (As opposed to walking more, to get around.)
      Someone I met from the Netherlands told me he went to Chicago and expected to be amazed by the size of the huge skyscrapers... instead he was amazed by the size of the huge people. When I travelled in the Netherlands, and in France, I saw very few obese people. This is waaay different than the situation in the U.S. midwest.

  37. axiom LDL==bad. Really? by javaxjb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, this presumes that LDL is actually bad for you, i.e. the correlation between LDL and heart disease is strong and that those proposing the correlation is significant have actually proven causation as well. There are those who believe otherwise (http://www.thincs.org/). But hey, why buck the multibillion dollar drug industry? They will bury you.

    --
    Programmers in mirror are brighter than they appear
    1. Re:axiom LDL==bad. Really? by HyTronix · · Score: 2, Informative

      LDL, in and of itself, may not be harmful. Oxidized LDL, particularly
      oxidized Lipoprotein-A, is quite damaging to arterial walls. An amino acid called Homocysteine *may* play a role in this: http://www.homocysteine.com./

      Others have asserted that high triglyceride is an independant factor as well. Considering what I've seen in my own family, I'd say it could be any or all of the above.

      My father has low LDL, low triglyceride, and high HDL. Low cardiac risk ratio. Has high homocysteine. Has had two bypass operations.

      My mother has high Triglyceride, high LDL, low HDL, and normal homocysteine levels. Has had three bypass operations.

      My aunt has high LDL, low HDL, and *very* low homocysteine. She's 87 and has never had heart trouble.

      I think that in all likelyhood, high LDL levels (that are mostly Lp-A) are probably dangerous alone, and especially so if there's an oxidizing factor present. High HDL definitely looks protective, as long as other factors (high homocysteine) are not present. High homocysteine may be able to cause "low" levels of LDL to clog your arteries.

      Certainly, more study is needed that includes factors other than just LDL.

      My $0.02.

  38. Drink Water. by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nothing is bad in moderation. Or at least worrying about. Drink water most of the time and I doubt you have to worry what the occasional cup of coffee, wine, hard liquor, soda does to you.

    I repeat simple common sense - drink water most of the time. It seems nothing else is safe these days. Some weeks it comes out that red wine/coca-cola/coffee is good because of X and then the next week it's bad because of Y.

    Above all - don't drink the shit that has 'corn syrup' or 'high fruchtose corn syrup' or whatever 'syrup' in it. It'll just get you diabetes faster. This includes most sweet drinks not diet. Like Starbucks Frappacinos at the next 7-eleven.

    I'm serious about water. Up to 50 years ago, most people had water most of the time. It's good for you body and there is nothing for your kidneys/liver has to filter. Now, I know people who wouldn't look at a glass water - much less have one for days on end - instead ingesting endless gallons of soda. I hate to see their health 20 years down the road.

    It's probably going to get worse in the future as this generation are accustomed to the friendly coca-cola vending machines besides the non-working water founta in schools these days.

    Coffee is bad because it encourages you to consume more calories through milk and sugar, plus it has caffiene and the various crap that goes with it. I think caffeine is more of a addiction - I seen people who never had coffee before turn into caffeine addicts who needed a cup 'to wake up' and then one at lunch and then another at 4pm. I wouldn't care but they actually became cranky if they didn't get their fix.

    Not that I don't like a good cappacino at lunch myself. But if common sense prevailed and people didn't have an insatiable want of drinking something more 'tasty' or sugary or exotic or whatever at every turn - I doubt reports of this kind would worry anybody.

    *I'd say unsweetended green tea is okay too in mass quantities but then there will be a report out next week:)

    1. Re:Drink Water. by naich · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Up to 50 years ago, most people had water most of the time."

      Not really. Ordinary water tended to have nasty bugs in it, so the way to get rid of them was to either boil it (and make tea, as they did in the East) or ferment it (as they did in the West).

      Because people in the East used the boiling method, rather than the fermentation method of purifying water, they didn't develop the same tolerance to alcohol that people in the West have.

  39. Re:Decaf - what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, if I drink decaf, other people may die.

  40. No JNI by trollable · · Score: 3, Funny

    I always advocated pure Java.

  41. Re:Blame Evolution: It's In Our Genes by kirkols · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, our ancestors were eating their enemies. You are what you eat.

  42. Re:Robust == Robust flavor? This is incorrect by ZiakII · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whoever wrote "So decaffeinated brands usually use a bean that has a more robust flavor," to explain why they use robusta (the cheapest swill, much cheaper than Arabica), probably also says:

    "HIV virus"

    and my alltime favorite:

    "PIN number"

    Actually, it is due to the propensity for acronyms (more often, backronyms) to trip up idiots like this guy that I am officially against acronyms.


    Your on a computer nerd website and you forget "NIC Card" .... just thinking about someone saying that makes me want to hurt someone.

  43. Thank you, no really, thank you. by beisbol · · Score: 2, Funny

    thank you for giving me a way to justify my insane caffeine addiction. now all i need is that article telling me how cigarettes lower my cholesterol and reduce my chance of heart disease.

    1. Re:Thank you, no really, thank you. by wpiman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here you go.

      Smoke away- but please crawl into a field when you die-- don't drive up the cost of health care for those who need it for non-preventable, legitamite purposes.

      Smoking

      May help prevent Alzheimer's and makes you slimmer. So smoke away- but when you die of lung cancer, please crawl out into a field somewhere and die a not so peaceful, quick death there. We'd rather that than have you chew up medical resources dying a long and slow death in hosptital. This drives up the cost for the rest of us who might need it for non-preventable things.

      Talk to physicians and they'll tell you there are few things you can put in your mouth that are worse for you than a cigarette. But it's not all doom and gloom. Smokers are at least doing their bit to slow down the runaway obesity epidemic that is sweeping through the western world. "In many studies, you often find smokers are slimmer. We've certainly seen it in our studies," says Jodi Flaws at the University of Maryland school of medicine. "Some people think it's due to certain chemicals in cigarettes somehow making them burn more calories, but others believe it suppresses appetite. It may well be both."

      Drastically upping your chances of cancer and heart disease might not be the best way to avoid obesity, but it's certainly easier than running round the block.

      Scientists have also found evidence that smoking might, in some circumstances, help prevent the onset of various dementias. Many dementias go hand-in-hand with a loss of chemical receptors in the brain that just happen to be stimulated by nicotine. Smoking seems to bolster these receptors, and smokers have more of them. The theory is that smokers may then have more to lose before they start losing their minds. "It does seem that nicotine has a preventative effect, but the problem is that the other stuff in the cigarette tends to rot everything else," says Roger Bullock, a specialist in dementia and director of the Kingshill Research Centre in Swindon. So if your time is nearly up anyway, and you have somehow managed to steer a course past the Scylla and Charybdis of heart attacks and tumours, smoking might just help you retain your marbles.

    2. Re:Thank you, no really, thank you. by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Parent is totally off topic... and I'll continue it... I've always wondered whether the stats showing increased risk of heart disease for smokers may be corrupted by the fact that many smokers also live overly sedentary lifestyles, ie: they don't go jogging in the morning, don't play b-ball after work or raquetball or any of the other things non-smokers do to distract themselves while smokers sit back and enjoy a cup of coffee and a newspaper. Similarly do smokers also 'breathe shallow' as a result of smoking... ie: taking deep breaths really isn't common for a smoker, also due to sedentary lifestyle plus the fact that smoking typically involves a shallower inhale in general... so the lungs aren't regularly fully inflated...

      These may be moot points as they go hand in hand with the smoking habit... but is it accounted for? Could a person live an otherwise very healthy lifestyle, exercising, yoga, eating well... and still smoke.. and enjoy a life without emphesema and heart disease and lung cancer?

      I smoke a pack a day but when I go for checkups the nurses think I'm an athlete and have never told me that I have symptoms of anything detrimental. When I tell them I smoke they don't believe it. I eat very well, excercise regularly and in general keep my body in good shape. I also take Taurine, a fish based enzyme that helps to avoid arterial hardening by improving elasticity of blood vessels (vitamin C does the same in large doses). I wouldn't say I do more preventative healthcare than a non-smoker however... just a few things differently.

      I mention heart-disease and emphesema because they are a much larger percentage of smoking related illlnesses than lung cancer which I believe is nearly as prevalent in non-smokers as in smokers, though when smokers get it it's all, 'must be from smoking' (my grandfather had lung cancer, smoked from age 14 to 40s but was also in the Navy, stationed on the first nuclear subs... hmmm.. was it smoking that did him in or exposure to radiation).

      To sum up, is it really smoking that increases disease or is it the lifestyle that many smokers live???? moreso than non-smokers.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  44. Re:di-hydrogen monoxide by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Informative

    If NHS information leaflets are anything to go by, a similar problem is quite common in ecstacy users. They believe they are becoming dehydrated and panic (after reading the other NHS leaflet about becoming dehydrated when taking ecstacy), and drink a great deal of water for the rest of the night without taking in any sodium. The overhydration leads to swelling of the brain and coma. Of course, this is a government drugs health warning we're talking about, and I believe that the ecstacy itself has a role to play (rather than just the water).

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  45. Re:di-hydrogen monoxide by ray-auch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not an urban legend - drinking large amounts of water can indeed be fatal.

    Hyponatremia is probably the effect you were thinking of - but excess water can cause other serious problems also.

    Links here and here

  46. Re:di-hydrogen monoxide by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not an urban legend. A teenager was hospitalized close to death not too long ago where I live after drinking 25 liters while winning a water drinking contest.

    I think the technical term would be "electrolyte imbalance" (although that might also be applied to the opposite where you eat too much salts and not enough water).

    Your nerves (and probably a lot of other stuff) need ions to work (but I think it's mainly the axons and not so much the synapses) and drinking too much makes you piss those necessary ions away.

  47. GOOD for fatties, BAD for thin people by jjo · · Score: 3, Informative
    You didn't read closely enough.

    In measuring HDL cholesterol, researchers looked specifically at HDL2, a type of HDL in which high levels are particularly associated with lower risk of heart disease

    IN overweight people, decaf drinking was associated with increase of good cholesterol, so they might benefit from decaf. Thin and normal-weight people saw a decrease in good cholesterol, so they might want to avoid decaf.

    This is, of course, much more complex than "Drink decaf and die". So it's probably hopeless to try to get the real message across.
  48. Of course it's bad by IAmATuringMachine! · · Score: 2, Funny

    As I've said in my debugging code for years, 0xDECAFBAD

    --
    "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes."
    -E. W. Dijkstra
  49. Re:Blame Evolution: It's In Our Genes by RocketRainbow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since coffee is indiginous to Ethiopia where humans appear to have evolved*, I'm glad that it's such a natural food stuff and totally good for me.

    The researchers have clearly made a mistake. Pass the goofballs.

    *Humans from Kansas are known not to have evolved.

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  50. Re:di-hydrogen monoxide by mbius · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine in school damaged her brain drinking water to try and pass a drug test. No joke.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  51. Re:I've always known... by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The health risks of trans fats do not prove that "processed" food is bad, unless you narrowly define "processed" to mean "partially hydrogenated".

    Actually a huge percentage of processed foods contain transfats (or at least they did), so there was a tremendous correlation. However that was just a sample of a wider trend, which is that when people screw with food, it usually has negative consequences.

  52. Re:I've always known... by RocketRainbow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem with most processed food isn't that it's actively bad - it just isn't good.

    My idea of a lolly is halva or marzipan. At any shop, you can see that lolly means sugar, jelly and a bit of flavouring. Nice start, but there's nothing healthy in that little snack.

    Now suppose you have a sandwich for your next meal. Mine's on good brown bread, yours is on supermarket white. Yours has had the fibre and vitamins removed. Also, I'm having hommus and vegies, while you're having plastic cheese and sausage. You've got a bit of vitamins, but I've got more. Mine also tastes better, but you've forgotten about that. Also, yours likely has trans fats in it. Quite common now that they don't bother raising the bread anymore, but sort of whip it and cut it into rectangles.

    I enjoy juice. It's made out of fruits. Soft drinks look soft of like juice to a toddler who sees them and gets excited, but they're just flavoured sweet water with colouring in.

    Convenience packaged foods might be mostly "safe" but if that's how you usually eat, you're looking at malnutrition, which is definitely bad.

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  53. Damn hippies by Urusai · · Score: 3, Funny

    I prefer to make my sandwiches with extra butter and a thick slice of lard, and dip my salami in the warm blood of baby seals. While cutting down a virgin redwood.

  54. Re:Steamed water by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, you are correct. But you might want to switch to decaf anyway, you seem a little uptight...

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  55. Re:German Beer? by Sarisar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually there are TWO budweiser drinks, one American one... some other country that I can't remember (although this is probably the right one so it would be Czech). I'm guessing this is why Bud did the whole 'genuine bud' thing to make the difference quite obvious.

    I wouldn't drink the non American one - it's not great. Although to be honest I'm not too fussed about 'the king of beers' either - I'd rather have one of these.

  56. Re:A question. by mellon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because if they put poison in your food, you die. If they make your food well, it gives you pleasure. And if you treat them like drones, you're encouraging them to give you drone food. Don't try to tell me it doesn't matter - even at a place like McDonalds it's possible to get comparitively good or bad service.

    Furthermore, how do you want to be treated? With respect, or like a drone? If with respect, then you're just like everybody else. Why would you treat someone else differently than you yourself would like to be treated?

    It's not so much that in treating someone else with respect, you ensure that they treat you with respect. That's not the case, as I'm sure you've experienced. But if you refuse to put negative energy into the world, that's less negative energy in the world, and ultimately that means less negative energy coming back at you, even if it doesn't work in the moment. And when you put positive energy into the world, then that's more positive energy in the world that can come back to you later. I know it sounds a bit lovey-dovey, but on a practical level it does seem to work.

  57. Turkish Coffee vs. Americanos by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    20 years ago I was travelling around the Middle East. Any time the bus would stop, within 2 minutes the driver would be hanging out with people drinking a little cup of half-mud local-style coffee. Any time any of the _passengers_ wanted coffee, anywhere, we'd get handed powdered-Nescafe, because they know that's what Americans drink (and in fact, for most of the people in the group**, that was true.) Arrrgh. I want coffee strong enough the spoon doesn't fall over when you stir it, but just weak enough that the spoon doesn't actually dissolve. After a couple of tries I was able to convince some places to give me coffee the way the locals drink it - much better... And then there was the place out in the wadi where Moses or Lawrence of Arabia had done something (I forget which; somewhere in southern Jordan anyway), where I had coffee with the local historical-monument-guards, which was much more civilized in spite of being in a tent in the middle of nowhere.

    Jordan's version of Turkish coffee is a bit different from the Greek or Turkish stuff, just as most of the common Middle Eastern cuisine varies a bit from place to place, but it's pretty similar. But you're wrong about "Americano" being a joke - to us, it's not "the stupid way stupid Americans like their coffee watered down from the way normal people drink it", it's "coffee made the strength Americans like it at home, with enough water in it that you can drink a whole cup of hot liquid, instead of drinking an octuple-espresso which is what you'd get if you asked the Italians/French to make you 250ml of coffee." Yeah, ok, it's watered down, but it's no more diluted than drinking a latte - it's just diluted with water instead of milk.

    **Yes, I was with tourists; my wife knew the guy leading the group, who'd been travelling to the Middle East on various business for about 60 years, and we wanted to go there with him while he was still in reasonable health, so there was us, a 40-year-old guy, and a bunch of old people who prefered powdered nescafe. Got to see all kinds of cool places in Jordan and Egypt as well as the usual modern tourist traps and the usual 4th-century pilgramage tourist traps.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  58. Re:Decaffeination solvents removing flavor by sdpuppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    A very common solvent used for decaffeination is CO2 which leaves absolutely no traces of the solvent in the product, since it turns to gas at normal pressures. (compressed to a pressure such that it has liquid properties - for more info, google Super Critical Fluid Extraction)