Slashdot Mirror


HTPC 4-Way Enclosure Roundup

Anony writes "Anandtech's Joshua Buss takes a look at four horizontal HTPC enclosures. He writes, "With the amazing rate at which full-fledged computers are dropping in price, it's really no wonder why they're starting to take over more and more roles that used to be accomplished by simpler machines. For everything from car stereo systems to hold massive music collections to kitchen machines for helping retrieve and store recipes, these "specialized" computer uses seem to only be expanding in number...Luckily, there have been many improvements made in this category since the inception of the HTPC, and as such, we were able to round up four very nice looking enclosures to compare in this article. Every unit is advertised as being able to handle a full ATX motherboard, and since the demands for a powerful HTPC are relatively high, we'll be giving these cases' cooling systems a vigorous workout with a brand new 3 gigahertz Pentium 4-based ATX test bed."

102 comments

  1. HT == Home Theater by benhocking · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's unfortunate that one hast to actually RTFA to figure that out.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:HT == Home Theater by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Or you could have used the Firefox Dictionary extention. Select a word and a small window pops up with the results, and if that doesn't supply good enough results, then no worries because there are 14 more dictionary sources to seek answers with.

    2. Re:HT == Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is HTPC really that obscure a term?

    3. Re:HT == Home Theater by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 0

      RTFA?

  2. What happened? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did this article just pop on the frontpage under the novell article? Or did I just miss it??

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  3. building SkyNet by glengineer · · Score: 1

    "they're starting to take over more and more roles that used to be accomplished by simpler machines" - and Ahnold is about to lose his job as Ca Gov.... seems that the Terminator prophecy is just ten years later than the movies predicted.

    --
    Evil Overlord Rule #86. I will make sure that my doomsday device is up to code and properly grounded.
  4. Supply. by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

    Once you got the crucibles banged out, which the industry did many years ago (including full atx boards with all the frills), stamping down boards is cheap. And a lot of them don't get bought, ever. Wouldn't it be more expensive to build custom dumbed-down motherboards for these smaller but unique applications?

    1. Re:Supply. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Smaller boards seem to be in less demand, so those that need them sometimes end up paying more. Most boards throw every feature on that they can, even if few used any one particular feature, simply because adding features can be pretty cheap when done in rediculously high volume. It's tough to know who will want any particular feature, thankfully, providing a lot of them drives the costs down. This is why it doesn't make sense for people to complain that they don't need a particular set of features on a board, because it probably only costs $0.05 US to put it there.

  5. If you missed it, then so did I by glengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had the same thought until I read your post. Thanks for clearing up my insanity. /. is getting weirder and weirder every day.

    --
    Evil Overlord Rule #86. I will make sure that my doomsday device is up to code and properly grounded.
  6. 4-way HTPC? by joib · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously I *need* a quad cpu machine to handle my recipes database.

    1. Re:4-way HTPC? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Obviously I *need* a quad cpu machine to handle my recipes database.

      Do people use their home theater PCs to handle recipes? I suppose it's possible, though a second-hand laptop would seem a better choice.

      Initially, I thought it was a 4-cpu system review as well, assuming it would be for recipes is new for me.

    2. Re:4-way HTPC? by joib · · Score: 1

      Apparently you failed to note the sarcasm. ;-)

      As for the recipes thing, it was from the blurb. I haven't actually RTFA (now that's a surprise here on /.).

    3. Re:4-way HTPC? by porneL · · Score: 1

      How do you want to cook things on low-power CPU?

    4. Re:4-way HTPC? by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, would 4 Mac Minis count as a quad?

      :P

  7. Time for a CaseMod thread! by glengineer · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that it would be a simple thing to casemod a system into an old stereo receiver case. At least then it'd look like it belongs there, my JVC receiver sitting on top of my old JVC receiver.

    --
    Evil Overlord Rule #86. I will make sure that my doomsday device is up to code and properly grounded.
    1. Re:Time for a CaseMod thread! by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      Not as simple as buying a case already made.

    2. Re:Time for a CaseMod thread! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried that, it's much more difficult than you think. Heat and airflow are the main problems. Standard audio gear just doesn't have to deal with that much heat.

  8. MythTV by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While we're on the topic of HTPC enclosures, does anyone know of a company that sells pre-built MythTV boxes? Or would anyone like to volunteer? I'm in the market for one but I really don't want to spend a lot of time getting the hardware to work right.

    1. Re:MythTV by w.p.richardson · · Score: 4, Informative
      I would be willing to build one for you, if the price is right.

      Alternatively, you could get the "reference" knoppmyth hardware. I am by no means an expert in configuring Linux systems and I have had a working mythtv box for almost 1 year. I built the system from soup to nuts (order parts, assemble hardware, install, test, deploy) in 1 week vacation around the holidays last year. If you have two bits of knowledge, it would take even less time.

      There are a couple of companies that sell these pre-built, but they are expensive, to the point of being in the price range of a Windows Media Center box with similar specs. The obvious advantage of mythtv is no DRM, etc., but you would need to know how to troubleshoot if something went wrong. Without setting it up, that would be potentially bewildering...

      --

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    2. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:MythTV by Jules+Bean · · Score: 1

      I suspect companies are put off by possible legal consequences. A typical MythTV install contains a load of software which is patented (various codecs) and some software which is even illegal in certain jurisdictions (deCSS). Whilst an individual putting together a system themselves is probably pretty safe from patent lawyers, a company making money out of it would not be...

      --
      -- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a perl script.
    4. Re:MythTV by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

      Could you email me please to discuss? kevin dot a dot conaway at gmail dot com

    5. Re:MythTV by kebes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interestingly, I asked the exact same question some time ago. If you look at the replies to that post of mine, you'll see some others who said they might be willing to negotiate building a MythTV box for someone else (you can check into those if you want).

      If you're interested, what I ended up doing was building it myself. It really was a fun and manageable project. I added this wikibook to describe the process (which also mentions some alternatives to building your own MythTV).

      Even without much linux knowledge, building a MythTV is do-able... in fact I used it to get-to-know linux.

    6. Re:MythTV by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

      Could you please email me? I'd like to talk with you. kevin dot a dot conaway at gmail dot com

    7. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://mythic.tv/product_info.php?products_id=44

      preconfigured and ready to go......

    8. Re:MythTV by Zurk · · Score: 1

      i built mine a while ago using a via epia m10K board. works ok and i also use a remote with it. cost me $1500 total with everything in a slimline VCR style package. fairly easy to do, but YMMV. its better you build it yourself since you can tweak it and stuff. i use debian myself with a 2.4 kernel image and use XFS with a compressed ext2fs boot image on bootable dvdrom (to prevent my tweaks from destroying anything vital until i decide to update the dvd).

    9. Re:MythTV by harryk · · Score: 1

      Sure,

      I'd build you one, parts plus a little bit for christmas, how soon would you want it? Silver or black, full height, or half height (half is more what you see today's components at, but I believe (mostly) that full height are a little cheaper to come by.

      Single turner, dual tuner, satellite, HDTV, etc... give me some details and I'll give you a qoute. I've built a few in the past for friends. Lets talk...

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    10. Re:MythTV by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      I'd have to say that I agree with others here. Pretty much anyone who built a MythTV box once can build one for you... but why? If it broke, who would you call to fix it? I know I for one wouldn't want to be on-call for people with problems with Myth unless I was making a good living at it.

      Try Knoppmyth, or go to The Fedora Myth(TV)ology site for the excellent Fedora guide which I followed myself and built a very good and stable Mythbox. So far going on 7 months and two major revisions of MythTV (0.16 to the current 0.18.1) without a hitch... and even better my wife and kids can use it without problems. Hell, only occasionally does a problem surface.

      However, the problems ARE the problem. When problems do occur, it would be better if you'd had the experience building the box... that way you know where your problems might lie. Similarly, some Linux experience might be advantageous. It's really not hard building a good Myth box... but I also stuck pretty closely with standard, recognized hardware (PVR-250, Geforce2MX, Athlon 800) that would do the trick rather than try some of the more "out there" configurations. Of course, I also had a nice ATX case for hi-fi component matching (an old Gateway Destination PC) that matched my Harmon Kardon sound system perfectly.

      YMMV... but my advice is to check out that guide. If you want to build a good Myth box... follow it to the letter and you'll be good to go.

  9. Joshua Buss by AtomicSnarl · · Score: 1

    I forget... did he invent the Buss Bar, or the System Buss? Google no help here.

    --
    Pacifist paratroopers yell, "Ghandi!" when they jump.
  10. Mini / Pico ITX much nicer by mustafap · · Score: 1

    For many of the jobs they suggest - Kitchen machine, music hub, lower end specialist stuff - I personally would much rather go with Mini ITX.

    eg Via
    http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/spearhead/min i-itx/

    with a nice compact case
    http://www.mini-itx.com/store/
    http://www.bigbruin.com/html/morex_3688.htm

    I guess really what Im saying is I would perfer a Mac Mini :o)

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:Mini / Pico ITX much nicer by Corporal+Dan · · Score: 1

      I would say that there are two sizes below the cases they describe...microATX cases which are about 4" tall, and the miniITX cases you describe. Either of these seems preferable to the enormous cases in this article.

    2. Re:Mini / Pico ITX much nicer by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you want flexibility to go beyond those simple tasks, small cases are too crippled by the inability to add PCI cards. It might be OK if you're sure you'll never need new capabilities down the road, but my HTPC/fileserver is a 7-year old computer which never would have lasted so long without the flexibility to add:

      1) a linux-compatible sound card with optical outputs for my stereo.
      2) a pci to pcmcia adapter for a wireless card
      3) a second video card (one outputs to the TV, the second to the kids' monitor and keyboard)
      4) a second NIC (it's the router and provides QoS for VOIP)
      5) a TV tuner card
      6) second hard drive (you want lots of HDD space and a separate spindle for backup in a fileserver/HTPC)
      7) an old-fashioned serial port for the infrared receiver (remote control)
      8) Another obvious addition would be a high-performance graphics card for gaming on the TV, but I don't do that.

      I realize you can get a small PC with some or many of these things now, but my point is a lot of those needs were originally unforeseen and you never know what will happen next. Of course there are external USB devices, but IMHO that's much uglier than one somewhat larger box.

      As for larger boxes being ugly monsters, well it's personal taste but I note that many of the higher-end receivers are in taller boxes that look a lot like the cases in this review.

    3. Re:Mini / Pico ITX much nicer by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I guess really what Im saying is I would perfer a Mac Mini :o)

      The Mini is a nice box, but it's not an HTPC box, despite what Slashdot users want to think.

      Things you might want in an HTPC that the Mini doesn't have:
      • Lots of disk space. TV, ripped DVDs, and music all take up space. Notebook drives aren't going to cut it, and your only option for adding drives to the Mini is to buy external FireWire drives/enclosures - another added expense.
      • Multichannel / Digital audio. I'm sure that there is some USB gadget that you can buy, but, again, we're talking more gizmos sticking off the back of the Mini and more added expense. Lots of PC motherboards have optical/multichannel audio, ora decent PCI sound card (e.g. Audigy 2) runs around $40.
      • Component video. If you have a TV that will accept a DVI input, you're lucky. Most TVs won't accept DVI, and they only accept the encrypted DRM variant of HDMI. That leaves component output - which is available on many different video cards, often for less than $60.
      • A TV tuner. Sure, there are USB and FireWire solutions, but it's another thing sticking off the back. And more money - PCI tuners with MPEG-2 encoding run less than $70


      • So, yeah, if you get a Mini and add:
        - FireWire disk
        - USB Optical Audio adaptor
        - USB TV tuner
        - USB IR reciever
        - A USB 2.0 hub (only 2 ports on the Mini)

        Then you may have an HTPC. All you need to do now is piece together an integrated solution to browse your media on the TV.
    4. Re:Mini / Pico ITX much nicer by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      While not a HTPC, check out these add-ons for the mac mini: http://wiredblogs.tripod.com/cultofmac/index.blog? entry_id=1280301/. They add sound and a hard drive. Not a HTPC for a working geek, but it would be pretty spiffy in the dorm room. Those are the nicest looking add-ons I've ever seen for any computer system.

  11. RT == Read The by Quest171 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's unfortunate that one hast to actually BAFN to figure that out.

    1. Re:RT == Read The by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It's unfortunate that one hast to actually BAFN to figure that out.

      Bloomsburg Area Free-Net? Bonnechere Algonquin First Nation?

      (Be A Fine Nerd?)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:RT == Read The by Quest171 · · Score: 1

      (Yes.)

  12. Hyper Threading? by Life700MB · · Score: 1


    Nobody else reads HT and thinks of Hyper Threading?

    --
    Superb hosting 2400MB Storage, 120GB bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Hyper Threading? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Or Hyper Transport, or Home Theater, or... anyone else read "4-way" and think kinky pr0n?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:Hyper Threading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody else reads HT and thinks of Hyper Threading?

      To avoid confusion, Hyper Threading should be abbreviated to HTH.

      HTH.

  13. Why a 3GHz Pentium? by mark2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't a low power Pentium M be more sensible - otherwise the fans will drown out my TV and the cost of the power would bankrupt me.

    Why do we always assume we need a high end generalist device for a specific usage that could be satisfied with a lower power and cheaper alternative?

    1. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by 42Penguins · · Score: 0

      "Why do we always assume we need a high end generalist device for a specific usage that could be satisfied with a lower power and cheaper alternative?"

      You must be new here...That's just the way we do things.
      But seriously, bring back the dual pII webservers!

    2. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      You must have a really quiet TV and burn $20 bills for electricity. A midrance P4 system will run at about 70-100 watts idle, my high end system runs 170 watts idle, 220 watts full tilt. As for fans, just get a well designed case and quality fans, and you won't hear them.

    3. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The P-M may consume little power but they're pretty expensive. The motherboard selection is also much smaller than for the P-4. The best bang for the buck at the moment is probably a low end (3000+) 90nm Athlon 64 on a socket 939 board with a GeForce 6100 chipset. They're cheaper and consume far less power than the P-4. One or two years down the line you can just swap out the CPU for an Athlon X2 4800+ when they become affordable.

    4. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Spooon69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A fast CPU is required if you want optimal image quality with resizing/noise-reduction/sharpening filters (e.g. piping your video through ffdshow for instance). Unless you own a DVD player that costs a few/several grand, an htpc is a good solution that costs much less and does much more.

      And no, you can't enable "Hardware Acceleration" (to reduce cpu usage) in your video card for mpeg2 video (e.g. DVDs) and still pipe your video through a software post-processor, it's either one or the other. So a fast cpu is required.

      Here is a good beginner's guide to what I'm talking about:
      http://htpcnews.com/main.php?id=ffdshowdvd_1

      DVDs honestly look a lot better and going back to "regular" dvd video is a big let down that's very noticable.

    5. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time you resize and process the 480p image from a dvd up to 1080i or 720p with ffdshow, dscalar, etc it will eat up alot of that 3ghz CPU. My HTPC is a AMD 3200+ (A64) 1GB Ram, Nvidia 6600 graphics car 4x250GB hdd, 16x DVD+-RW and Haupauge(sp?) 150MCE tuner. It isn't that loud, and will be quieter when I get it into a HTPC case (in a normal tower right now)

      As for power, when not in use, it goes into s3 power save as does my main box.

    6. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      The point is that your Athlon 64 uses whole whopping gobs less power than a P4.

      My entire Athlon 64 system can run at full load (playing Counterstrike or something) on less power than a P4 idles on.

    7. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there done that. However my recommandations are going out for an ATI X200
      based MB. HDTV hardware acceleration is a plus there, and specifically I had conflicts
      with my frame grabber card on the aforementioned Geforce 6100, too. Not sure whether
      the motherboard maker Gigabyte or the Nvidia glue logic is to blame. With the MSI
      board I am having now ( comes even with DVI out ) so far everything plays well. Noise
      is almost not audible when system is idling, and even with load the CPU cooler spins
      with low RPM

      Dan.

    8. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by phusg · · Score: 1

      Nice post, I've been meaning to look into this. The guide you link to is a little outdated though by the looks of it. At first glance it would seem easier to do this using VLC, where there is an option to increase the quality of the ffmpeg filter from the default 0 to 6, although having just tried this I don't notice any increase in CPU usage and the picture is of the same quality. What am I doing wrong?

    9. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by keytoe · · Score: 1

      Preach it, brother.

      I'm always amazed when I see an article about building a MythTV system and discover they recommend using high performance processors and video cards. The only reason in the world you'd need muscle in the processor is if you're using cheap tuner cards that don't have the encoding chips on them.

      But if you're buying a faster processor and the various other bits it takes to make it go, the cost difference pays for the better tuner card. All you get is more noise since your processor needs a gargantuan fan, your case needs an extra fan, your power supply needs a bigger fan, your video card needs its own fan and you motherboard needs its own fan. And it cost you more to build than it would have if you'd just picked up a decent tuner card for an extra $50 and stuck with the 2Ghz Celeron.

      It seems that the people who do this fall into one of several camps:

      • Plan on playing heavy duty games or something on their PVR
      • Fall victim to the marketing machine and just don't know better
      • Are 'compensating' in the same way as a 50 year old with a new Porsche

      Personally, I built my setup with a low end bare-bones system from Asus, plopped a 2Ghz Celeron in it, slapped in a pair of cheap Hauppauge MCE150 tuner cards and an SATA drive. The thing never goes over 40% CPU utilization, barely makes a sound and sits right next to my tuner looking wonderful. I didn't go for HD, otherwise you're going to be better off with better tuner cards.

      Total cost: about $400 or the equivalent of a TiVo + two years of service. Total setup time: most of a weekend - and most of that was getting the IRA-3 remote receiver working with lircd. Hell, I spent more time researching the hardware before purchase than I did building the thing! Except for the remote, that is - and I got what I deserved...

    10. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Spooon69 · · Score: 1

      I've never used VLC + ffmpeg so I don't really know exact what the ffmpeg filter settings do, I would think it's some sort of post-processing like deringing and such.

      As for the low cpu util, the cpu horsepower is needed most when resizing using the lanczos algorithm, especially when upscaling a dvd image to 1080i. Because of the size of the image, you have to blur/sharpen before resizing, but people still hit ~70-80% cpu util that way, with high end cpus.

      So if VLC allows it, try resizing your dvd video to 1440x1080 using lanczos, cpu usage should shoot up.

      Oh btw, resizing in software has better quality than hardware scaling, hence fastcpu+software.

    11. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by enderwig · · Score: 1

      For analog signals and xvid/DiVX/MPEG2 playback, a P3 is more than sufficient, as you already know. Have you tried decoding those bright new shiny H/X264 video files using mplayer, vlc, etc? My P3-based 1.3GHz Celery just sits there at 100%. All I get is sound and a nice black screen or a frozen frame. Maybe your 2GHz Celery has enough juice to plow through an H/X264 video. Maybe it's a problem with the linux codecs. I still watch most of my video on this machine running MythTV and a Hauppage PVR250, but xvid is not exactly perfectly smooth on it (mplayer -vo xv).

      For HD, hardware encoding does not exist for the consumer market. If they do, then ponying up for such "better tuner card" is going to cost much much much more moolah. Hardware decoding requires some very recent GPU like 6800-series from Nvidia and, I think, the R10000-series from ATI. I don't think either company's linux drivers will do hardware decoding, yet. So, for now, HD playback probably needs a nice beefy CPU.

      Now if only Hybrid64 or Merged64 or ConjoinedTwin64 support was better. Pure64 support in Debian is pretty painful (yes, I've got chroot ia32 working, still painful). I haven't tried installing a pure ia32 system onto my Athlon64 system, yet.

    12. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Your P4 idling at 170W is going to add about $12 plus change to your power bill each month if you leave it on all the time at 10 cents/KWH. While that wouldn't kill me, it's still going to add up to about $150 per year.

    13. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Hast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The frontend needs to be powerful if you want to decode HDTV. 1080p requires a really good CPU/GPU combo to playback without framedrops.

      The reason you would want a backend with CPU power instead of hardware encoders is because software encoders are typically higher quality. It's hard to do multi-pass encoding and similar if you are recording real-time.

      Naturally these don't apply to everyone, but there are reasons for getting a high powered HTPC.

    14. Re:Why a 3GHz Pentium? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Which is less than the average cable bill, or 4 tanks of gas.  Which do you want more?  Remember, this IS slashdot.

      P.S.  I live in a dorm, which means free electricty.  Feel free to stop by with an extension cord. 

  14. JHTPC Cases by Silwenae · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm surprised the reviewer stuck to some of the major case makers in the review (Antec, Lian Li).

    HTPC's, IMHO, are still very much a niche product, and the specialty case makers like a Silverstone or Ahanix would seem more appropriate.

    The review focused on some of the bigger cases out there - when you realize how big the assortment is to choose from, from mini-ITX to slimline to full size, there are quite a number of choices out there.

    1. Re:JHTPC Cases by platos_beard · · Score: 1

      And both Silverstone and Ahanix feature (at least some) cases with built-in VFD's -- damn near essential for HTPCs

      --
      What's a sig?
    2. Re:JHTPC Cases by kmartshopper · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the all-important question of why the hell would anyone want a beast as big as these cases (see TFA) for an HTPC? Half of them lay claim to fitting an entire ATX board like it was some sort of accomplishment. Personally, I'd certainly rather have something slimmer.

    3. Re:JHTPC Cases by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      I'm suprised that these are actually seriously targeted as HTPCs. When I think of home theatre I think of movies and TV. What I saw in the article were 4 big cases with no soundproofing and lots of fans. Apparently we all need more HD and fan noise in our home theatres. These manufacturers have completely missed the point IMO, they need to make cases which look nice, are unobtrusive, and make -no- noise...

  15. 4 Way SMP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read that and immediately think of a "4-Way" SMP Capable mini-box?

    My dreams were shattered when I realized it was a 4-way review :(. Something about having a cluster of 16*4 Proc boxes made me happy.

  16. Anandtech by mwheeler01 · · Score: 1

    Anandtech.com is on slashdot enough, you'd think they'd have some better servers by now.

    --
    Pretty widgets? What pretty widgets?
  17. Hint for building a music box from crappy parts... by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

    I bought a box at a garage sale for 10 bucks to put FreeBSD and musicpd on for playing my ogg collection. The only problem was there was annoying 60hz hum on the output of the crappy soundblaster 16 card that I was using. I tried a number of things, including building my own shielded interconnects and trying to shield the powersupply.

    Then I thought: this may be a ground loop. So I disconnected the powersupply ground (at the plug) and the hum went away, leaving a very clean sound.

    Dangerous? Yes. Effective? Yes. YMMV. Great way to spend 10 dollars, but don't blame me if you burn your house down. (Yeah, I'm still trying to scrape up another 100 bucks for a new HD to hold more music.)

    --
    The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
  18. Not works of art, are they? by Jules+Bean · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe I have pretty high standards, but I want a PVR/HTPC to fit in with my HiFi equipment and TV. I thought these four were rather ugly, to be honest.

    I quite like the Accent HT-400 http://www.arisetec.com/products/HT-400.htm, or some of the silverstone cases http://www.silverstonetek.com/product-case.htm, or perhaps (although personally there's something about this last that doesn't feel quite right) the http://www.ahanix.com/dvine5.html.

    --
    -- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a perl script.
    1. Re:Not works of art, are they? by mickey+knox · · Score: 1

      I agree. Most of the HTPC cases that I've seen haven't been works of art. However, that's because they are so generalist. The closest that I've seen to having a nice looking HTPC is the Bose Lifestyle systems. While these aren't strictly HTPCs... they techincally are... (just like an XBox360 is technically a PC). The drawback, of course, is that these suckers start at such a ridiculously high price (oh, and they aren't MythTV type boxes... but music playback type of boxes). Another good whole house audio solution is Sonos, but again... it costs a small fortune.

      The big thing that bothers me about most HTPC cases? Their stupid brand name being on the front of them. Silverstone's seem to be the least obtrusive... but come-on. If I'm building one of these suckers... I want it to say my name or no name.

      --
      Andrew 'Mickey Knox' Gearhart
    2. Re:Not works of art, are they? by Camarones · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I used the Ahanix D5 as the basis for my HTPC. Full ATX board, extremely clean and high quality design/build. People think its a large DVD player until I tell them otherwise.

      What doesn't feel right about the D5? Its shorter than most full-size HTPC cases that allow an ATX motherboard, at the expense of using a proprietary compact PSU. Its all aluminum and comes in silver or black (I chose black). All of my standard components fit without modification.

    3. Re:Not works of art, are they? by akepa · · Score: 1

      Well, there's no accounting for taste. I like the Overture, and already own a case from Thermaltake (the Tsunami Dream) for my PC that is somewhat similar in styling. I think the Accent case you linked to is butt-ugly, though I like the Ahanix D.Vine and some of the Silverstones.

  19. Re:Hint for building a music box from crappy parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ever thought about using ferrite? worked for me.

  20. Re:Hint for building a music box from crappy parts by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    Soundblaster 16s are crap, there is your problem. You can dig newer cards out of the trash, ones that won't burn your house down, and don't have ground loop issues.

  21. Re:Hint for building a music box from crappy parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know they sell ground loop isolators right? Sure it would cost more than you paid for the box ($16), but it's cheaper than burning your house down:

    http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?produc tId=2062214&cp

  22. Re:Hint for building a music box from crappy parts by joib · · Score: 1

    I had a ground loop problem once too.

    I solved it by putting the 'puter and the stereo in the same wall outlet. AFAIK that isn't a 100 % foolproof solution, but it worked for me.

  23. HTPC chips by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    There's a myriad of HTPC cases, but very few chips and motherboards.

    I am very disappointed with the availability of "alternative" platforms. Very few places sell the VIA C3 chips. The VIA C7 only exists in press releases. Some companies sell the chips but not the motherboards! Most of the motherboards have on board video that doesn't include DVI/HDMI which makes them no good for home theater anyway. The Transmeta Crusoe is a good option, in theory, but I've never found any place that sells them.

    I've been looking for a CPU+mobo combo for a few weeks and I am getting very frustrated. My 54 watt AMD Athlon 1Ghz overheats no matter what case I have, since it sits in an entertainment center. If somebody made a DVD player with Mozilla, MPEG-4 support, and a hard drive I wouldn't even need a PC.

    1. Re:HTPC chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not a Mac Mini? Otherwise an Athlon 64 system can be made to run very cool and quietly. The Asus A8N CSM has good onboard graphics with DVI-out. The main problem that I found in the x86 world is that small, good looking cases are very overpriced, which is why I went with the Mac. OTOH it's much easier to get good inexpensive tuners (like the Hauppauge PVR or ATI Theater 550). On the Mac you seem to be stuck with the pricey El-Gato stuff.

  24. 6600 GT? by thebdj · · Score: 1

    My complaint is with the temperature benchmarking. Why on earth use a 6600 GT? I mean we are talking about an HTPC case, and maybe I am alone in thinking this, but if I am making a PC for home theater use, I want a card with some power, but I also want a card with TV tuning.

    This test should've used an AIW either the AIW 2006 edition (overpriced AIW 9600), the X600-AIW or the newer X1800XL AIW (for the truly crazy people). For an HTPC where power is not the ultimate requirement the AIW 2006 edition should suffice for true testing.

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    1. Re:6600 GT? by crow · · Score: 1

      For HDTV with Linux, the only option is nVidia, and even there, you have to accept the proprietary drivers. So for MythTV, the AIW is nearly useless.

      On the other hand, you don't need anything faster than a 5200. In most cases, even a Geforce 4 440MX is good enough. The only reason for something more powerful is for gaming.

    2. Re:6600 GT? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      According to firingsquad.com's review of the 1800XL AIW, you're better off getting a separate video card and the TV Wonder Elite, since its scaler is better than the AIW's. Or you might want to get an HDTV tuner; I don't think any of the All In Wonders have that.

      Personally, I'd probably want a separate HTPC and 3-D gaming computer, but it depends on your setting, and whether you might need to use both at the same time.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:6600 GT? by Camarones · · Score: 1

      You don't need a 6600GT, but its not because its lacking a TV tuner. A lot of people that build an HTPC for Tivo-like functionality (and are demanding a full ATX board in the first place) intend to use standalone hardware-encoding cards like the Hauppauge PVR150 card. The 6600GT is a fine card for gaming, possibly overkill for HTPC duty unless you're outputting to a HDTV and using it to decode DVDs.

      I had a Geforce 4 Ti4200 in my HTPC until the fan on it died recently (for the 3rd time). I picked up a GF5200 to replace it, and haven't notice a great deal of improvement in DVD playback (I get an occasional jitter).

    4. Re:6600 GT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using a 6600, because it takes real horsepower to do HDTV well. A 5200 is fine for standard definition. I use nVidia because I'm running Linux, so ATI is out of the running.

      Combining the tuner with the graphics card makes sense only if you are limited to a single slot. Even then, you'd be better with something that works well, such as a Hauppauge PVR-350. A combo card is only as good as its weakest link. Separate graphics cards benefit from better driver support and lower prices, because they are high volume commodity items. Separate tuners may be specialty items, but less so than a combo card. Plus it is easy to add additional tuners. Even if you only watch two shows each week, they always seem to be on at the same time. Two identical tuners is much easier to deal with than one tuner and one AIW.

      If you think that integration is the way to go, then the right way is to integrate the graphics with the motherboard, not with the tuner. The nVidia 6100 and 6150 look quite promising. Add in as many tuner cards as you need. A pair of Hauppauge PVR-500s gives you four tuners, which should enough for almost everyone.

      Do yourself a favor and stay away from the AIW. The HTPC forums are full of complaints about them.

    5. Re:6600 GT? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      *sigh* an AIW? really? *sigh*

      I think a gigabyte passive/heat pipe non-GT 6600 would have been a better choice.

      If we're heat/stress testing this puppy add one of those ATI theater pro 550's tuner cards.

      I dunno there's some good info/insight about the cases they used, but somehow i'm left dissapointed with the "shoot out" *shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    6. Re:6600 GT? by damsa · · Score: 1

      I also had a Geforce 4200 fan die on me and decided to get a fanless Zalman cooler rather than a new fan or a new card. Also for some benchmarks the 4200 will out perform the 5200. For an HTPC i'd rather have quiet than fast, but that's just me.

  25. I've got one of these by philj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hoojum Cubit 5 - in chrome.

    Very sexy :-)

  26. mCubed HFX ? by dago · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunately, they missed a unique case : the mCubed HFX. Altough it is a little pricey, it features heatpipes between the CPU/GPU and the case that will dissipate the heat (with fins). There's also an optional "emergency fan", as well as other gadget (VFD display, remote control, ...).

    Add a fanless powersupply, internal or brick, and you've got a nice silent HTPC.

    dirkvader.de has a review with a Pentium M, this site with an Athlon64 3500.

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  27. Re:Hint for building a music box from crappy parts by timeOday · · Score: 1
    Here's a better solution for hooking up to your stereo: a Linux-compatible (so maybe FreeBSD too?) sound card with SPDIF optical outputs to your receiver, for less than $30 shipped.

    Be careful to get the "AW850 Deluxe" and not the confusingly similar "AW850 D" - they're different! It wasn't easy to find a cheap, OSS-supported digital sound card that can handle various sample rates, but this one works.

  28. Finally...oh no wait. by fwitness · · Score: 1

    When I read the title I thought that this article would feature some nifty non-pc like designs. Wrong. They're just SFF PCs, some with a hide-away drive bay, except for possibly the last one which has some artistic curves.

        I've built two mythboxes now. The first is of the Shuttle G2 variety, which works nicely, but still looks very PC. The one I built for the girlfriend is a much prettier ASUS Pundit which is very aesthically pleasing. It's not "booksize" as advertised (unless you read books twice the thickness and length of a hardcover), but it's the smallest full-featured case I've found. Too bad the card reader isn't Linux supported and doesn't have all the card types available.

        What we really need is an article on very tiny (mini-itx preferably) motherboards and cases. I need something without fans, because most fans are distracting. The two I have are minimal, but if you strain it can definetly be heard. The Via chipset looks promising, and the almost fanless 1Ghz Epia Nehemiah motherboard might fit the bill, but I'm not sure how well supported the architecture is supported in Linux.

        In researching my post here, I stumbled across Shuttle's latest M1000 offering. That looks pretty sweet, but I haven't done my due dilligence on Linux compatibility yet.

        So, if someone could review the prettiest, smallest, fanless (and throw in cheapest too) HTPC case/motherboard combos, it would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Till then, I'll browse http://www.mini-itx.com/ from time to time.

    --
    -- I have fans? Wow.
    1. Re:Finally...oh no wait. by MrEkted · · Score: 1

      I saw Synertron at LinuxWorld Boston - http://www.synertrontech.com/products/embedded_com puting/twister/ec-twister.html Great case, but they're not set up as direct to consumer.

      They have variations that do TV in/out and SPDIF.

      From the site:
      Twister case is a FANLESS solution for our motherboard. The material of the case is mainly ALUMINUM. The purpose of the Twister case is to cool off the processor without using the FAN because there is always the possibility of the failure of the FAN which will damage the processor and the system. Using VIA C3 processor, Twister can handle up to 1 GHz CPU The Biggest difference between Neo and Twister case is that Twister case is bigger, so it has space to add a PCI slot.

      --
      Tell the moon dogs, tell the March hare
    2. Re:Finally...oh no wait. by fwitness · · Score: 1

      Great link my friend. With the exception of the lack of optical drive, that looks perfect. The problem is, how much are they going to charge for one of those? If it's reasonable, I would definetly bump up my research of the Via C3s and make that my next project.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
    3. Re:Finally...oh no wait. by MrEkted · · Score: 1

      When I talked to them, they were really vague about price. It will greatly depend on quantity. For a single unit, they quoted between $400 and $700US depending on model.

      --
      Tell the moon dogs, tell the March hare
  29. Re:Hint for building a music box from crappy parts by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

    Yikes, a lot of replies. I like yours best though :) I've never tried ferrite, I might have to try picking up a large core and see what happens. As for the ground loop isolator, I've heard a little of these but I'll probably need to spend a little more than 16 bucks to get one with a good transformer (or to build one myself), as lower end ones end up rolling off some frequencies and distorting some as per here While a nice card might solve the problem, I did try several others (my roommate collects older/useful PC components) and they all had the same problem. Also, I did try and plug the computer into the same outlet as the amp, to no avail.

    While an optical connection would be fun, I like to build my own audio equipment (well, amplifiers at this point) but I'm not quite to the point of building in optical inputs :-D However, thanks for the link, it is nice to know of some good hardware that supports linux (and I'm sure FreeBSD) in case I can ever afford to build a NEW computer. Got any more?

    --
    The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
  30. My HTPC woes by andrelix · · Score: 1

    I hear a lot about HTPC and built a few systems for myself at home. In general I like both Myth and Windows and would love to make this a real DVR but I have one problem. It is not the case, the mobo, or the CPU (I love the Pentium M in my box, almost completely quiet). The BIG problem I have is with the video card/tuners that are out there. I can not seem to get a good signal out of anything that I have tried. I am not sure if it is the tuner or the output (vid card). What I really want is something with progressive scan out. I have heard of some of the new cards that say HD ready but I am not sure what that means. I also have a replayTV and it smokes anything I have built to date. The picture quality, though not as good as direct from the source, is superior to anything that I have been able to get out of my HTPC. Is there any hope for this or am I completely blind or ignorant to what is available???

    1. Re:My HTPC woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hi,
      you may want to try out the MSI RSI482-4 ILD motherboard. It has almost everything integrated including the HDTV out. It's a video component out which outputs 480p/720p/1080i to feed into your HDTV. If you like to go digital ( with all the newer TV sets out now ) you also can hook it up using the DVI out.I've put together such a system and couldn't be happier. Using mATX as opposed to some VIA ITX based solution imho is a much better idea anyway btw. since you caneasily modify or upgrade such a system.

      Dan

    2. Re:My HTPC woes by andrelix · · Score: 1

      Thanks Dan, can you tell me where you got the board from? I found this on MSI's web site, is it the same (RS482M4-ILD)? Here is a link:
      http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?mode l=RS482M4-ILD&class=mb
      Do you record SD TV? If so, how does it look on playback, relative to the source? Thanks Again, Alex

  31. What a complete waste of bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is a clueless joke.

    It's hard to imagine, this clown has *any* clue about the HTPC community or market.

    Go to www.pcalchemy.com or www.htpcnews.com if you want to see *real* HTPC cases.

    Then someone can write a review about real products the HTPC community is actually using instead of the stupid-ass cases in the article posted today.

    Good greif.

    For the record, I've used a Silverstone SST-LC03-B case for years. But don't put anything more powerful than a Celeron in one because they suffer from poor airflow.

    Curretly I backed away from the whole HTPC case concept and went to an Antec P180 because the case is beautifully engineered for awesome airflow and silent operation. It doesn't look like audio gear, but then I hide all the gear, because nobody really wants to look at a pile of electronic boxes in their living room anyway.

  32. Re:Hint for building a music box from crappy parts by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    Get a piece of 12-16 gauge wire. Crimp a ring terminal onto each end. One end goes to a screw somewhere on the stereo's case, one end goes to a screw somewhere on your PC's case (to which your motherboard and therefore sound card is, or should be, grounded). Now ground is ground on both devices, and your risk of dying due to a problem in the PC power supply is decreased (presuming the stereo uses a 3-prong plug or you fix the plug on the PC).

  33. IR receivers? by eyegone · · Score: 1


    As usual, almost no mention of how you're supposed to control the damn thing once it's built. Hanging an external IR receiver off the side seems contrary to the aesthetic considerations that would lead one to shell out for one of these cases in the first place, so I assume that some or all of them have built-in IR receivers. (IIRC, the article did mention a remote control that came with one of the cases.) It would be nice if they would actually discuss the subject, however.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:IR receivers? by drdread · · Score: 1

      Buy an ATi All-In-Wonder card; they come with an RF remote control. The remote uses a small receiver that attaches via USB. The receiver is easily hidden from sight, since it does not need to have an optical line-of-sight to the remote. The remote itself allows you fabulous control over all the ATi applications, and even has a mouse/cursor button that lets you drive the PC easily. Fairly decent tool, all things considered.

    2. Re:IR receivers? by fwitness · · Score: 1

      I actually prefer something seperate, preferrably USB for ease of use. The reason is you can actually hide the *entire* HTPC, and just have the simple IR reciever out. My first mythbox, an Shuttle, is somewhat attractive, but easily fits behind a door in shelf-system. Cut out some extra ventilation holes and you have the best looking HTPC ever, one that you never see.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
  34. alternative to a HTPC by wilson316 · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a Pinnacle Showcenter 1000g after spending forever on trying to slap together a HTPC using old pc parts. The showcenter is a really nice unit for what it cost me ($64) It does everything I wanted ..mp3's,divx,xvid..etc.. The only bad point is that I can not record tv shows on it. All it does is stream moves and videos via wireless off my HD into my entertainment system. If someone wants something easy to setup the showcenter might be your best bet if you can get them for under $100.

  35. What the hell is that? by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    That thing does not fit in with any audio-visual equipment I've ever seen anywhere. Looks like a cross between a generator and a 50's radio.

  36. My opinion of the Antec case by drdread · · Score: 1

    I have had an HTPC in my stereo cabinet for ~3 years now. About 6 months ago I switched motherboard/cpu/etc and put it all in the exact Antec case the review describes. For the most part, the case is perfect. It only has two small problems: (1) the front of the case is silver, and it's basically impossible to find silver DVD drives so you end up with a sore-thumb black or beige drive in your shiny silver case, and (2) the Antec case is so open to air flow that noise from inside the case is poorly muffled. My CPU fan is quiet, but the !@&^# northbridge fan is really loud, and the case does nothing to help that. I solved problem (1) by buying a DVD writer that came with replaceable front plates; I took the beige set and spray-painted it silver with garden-variety paint from Home Depot before attaching it to the drive. The match with the case color is surprisingly good. I would have preferred a black front to the case, however...

  37. BAFN by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    BAFN == Be A Fucking Nerd