Slashdot Mirror


Sticky Tape Defeats Sony DRM Copy Protection

cybrpnk2 writes "As reported by InformationWeek, Sony BMG Music's controversial copy-protection scheme can be defeated with a small piece of tape. According to thinktank Gartner analysts Martin Reynolds and Mike McGuire, Sony's XCP technology is stymied by sticking a fingernail-size piece of opaque tape on the outer edge of the CD. 'After more than five years of trying, the recording industry has not yet demonstrated a workable DRM scheme for music CDs. Gartner believes that it will never achieve this goal as long as CDs must be playable by stand-alone CD players.'"

67 of 464 comments (clear)

  1. Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does using tape in such a fashion violate the terms of the DMCA? If so, could the tape manufacturers be held responsible for making a product that potentially aides in piracy?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by curteck · · Score: 5, Funny

      As long as you don't hold down the shift key while you're doing it, I think you're ok.

    2. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, applying the tape doesn't violate the DMCA.

      Telling us that we can use tape to defeat the DRM violates the DMCA. Gartner should be hearing the arrival of the black helicopters within the hour.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by omeomi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sadly enough, that's actually true, isn't it? Even this /. story violates the DMCA...

    4. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by omeomi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently the USCO has some older, less silent, black helicopters...

    5. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by Aralor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, Dora the Explorer had it right all along! She's always using sticky tape for something! (I know this because my two-year old daughter insists on watching it everyday.) So, could Backpack be implicated in this, too, since he's the one carrying the sticky tape for Dora in the first place?

    6. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the tape in question was originally invente4d by the military during World War II and called duck tape as water 'rolled off' of it like a ducks back. It was later rechristened as duct tape after the war when it proved valuable for duct repairs as well, so both names are right.

      --
      I am Spartacus
    7. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by ciellarg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nahh, tape is obviously analog..

    8. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by circusboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      regrettably a recent study has shown that the one thing that 'duct' tape is really not good for, is repairing ducts... (heating ducts anyway, the glue melts)

      It's apparently good for warts though

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    9. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by Diamon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it was invented by Johnson & Johnson (http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/duct tape.htm). The military doesn't invent anything, they contract the private sector to develop things for them.

  2. Damn yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This would be a good place to say something insightful, but the headline has me dumbfounded.

  3. And they always said by Zegnar · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they always said that home taping would kill the music industry...

  4. In other news... by GweeDo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sony/BMG sued 3M Corporation today for their new technology called "tape" to circumvent their copy protection and encryption schemes. They will be tried under the DMCA, news at at 11!

    1. Re:In other news... by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now *that* is a sticky situation...

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  5. It's sticky tape now, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's what you can do to defeat it without risking your optical drive: Hold shift when inserting the disc or, even better, disable CD autostart. But that wouldn't make such a nice headline, would it?

    1. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by BenFranske · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think once upon a time there was a similar revelation that running a black marker around the edge would do the same thing. Really you're just interfering with the drive reading the data portion of the disc so it appears just as an audio disc. The parent is correct, the shift key or turning off autorun works just as well. They don't make headlines though.

    2. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by Enzo+the+Baker · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no no. Running a green marker around the edge of your CD is for making it sound better.

      --
      I may twist orthodoxy to partly justify a tyrant. But I can easily make up a German philosophy to justify him entirely.
    3. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I know a guy who insists that degaussing his CDs (i.e., with a magnetic tape eraser) makes them sound better. I $#!^ you not!! I tried to be reasonable and explain how many ways that is wrong, but he insisted that I just have a tin ear. Well, I guess I better go turn in my Master's degree in electrical engineering, because it's no match to his Golden Ear.

      As if that wasn't absurd enough, he later told me how he breaks in his AC power cords by running a current through them before using them on his stereo, because otherwise the sound is too, well, I don't even remember what adjective he used. Yellow? Impudent? Octagonal? Whatever. He said that a new electrical outlet takes even longer to break in. OMFGBBQ! I'm ashamed to say that at that point I completely lost the ability to debate rationally with him and try to educate him, and told him what an idiot he is. Well, at least he doesn't bother to ask me any electronics-related questions any more.

      Sometimes I find myself thinking that I should invent some electrical snake oil to liberate audiophools from their excess money, but I just don't want to sink that low.

    4. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Funny

      What a moron! He uses CDs! Real audiophiles know that records have a much warmer sound than CDs. CDs are so digital sounding! Real audiophiles stick to analog recording with real tubes. I bet this guy doesn't even have the 1000lbs granite slab to mount is equipment on so he doesn't get vibrations from passing trucks and stuff! What a poser.
      And yes there are people like that and no for the love of all that is holy I am not one of them! It is a joke, true but a joke.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by qengho · · Score: 4, Informative

      Monster Cable? Feh. Their power cords are only 100 bucks.

      This is the ticket: the US$1500 power cable.

      Whoops, old review. The new improved model of that cord goes for US$2200.

    6. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by alienw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, you can't measure any fidelity-related parameter in audio systems with an oscilloscope (or any other cheap, readily-available instrument). Distortion, for instance. Anyone can easily hear 1% THD, on any system. You'll see visible distortion on the scope only when it's at about 10% (when you get visible clipping). In fact, most digital scopes use 8-bit ADCs -- try listening to music on an ancient 8-bit soundblaster.

      A very precise spectrum analyzer designed for low frequencies would be much more useful, but you likely won't find one even in a well-equipped lab; a really good one might be _very_ expensive ($50k to millions of dollars).

      Quality is very difficult to measure, simply because the ear is a hell of a lot more sophisticated and sensitive to nonlinearities than any man-made instrument. I think listening to a system is much more useful than trying to measure it with cheap, primitive instruments (like THD meters or oscilloscopes). You can have two systems that measure the same THD but sound drastically different, simply because THD is a simplistic measurement.

      I hate audiophile snake oil ($500 power cables, $20k "interconnects", and magic boxes) as much as you do, but don't assume you can measure everything. Nobody knows how to quantify, for instance, the taste of something. There same applies to audio.

    7. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting
      How that would translate into better sound is an issue left to those who suffer from the mental disorder known as "Audiophilia".
      I am an audiophile. I don't have Monster cables, and I haven't degaussed my CDs. Yes, thin, shitty speaker wire loses bass, if it's run more than 3-4 feet. I've verified this myself. But considering the sad quality of the speakers with most current stereos, well..... they've got no bass to begin with, so it really doesn't matter.

      I've got my bookshelf stereo hooked up to a pair of 3-way Audio Research speakers, with some decent 16, possibly 18 guage wire, and it shakes the floor quite nicely. The speakers probably cost about 4-5 times what the whole stereo, including speakers, originally cost, but that's where the big difference is.
      I've hooked a pair of Bose speakers to a cheap-as-hell(TM) RCA bookshelf stereo, and it sounds great. Put a pair of cheap speakers on a $1000 Pioneer or Kenwood receiver, and it'll sound like hell. 99% of the sound quality is in the speakers, provided you've got an amp with enough power to drive them. And I'm meaning 5-10 watts, not 250.

      My component stereo is an old circa 1985ish 20W/channel Hitachi, with another pair of Audio Research Speakers. Again, good speakers, decent speaker wire about 16 guage, and it blows away the sound of anything else in the neighbourhood.

      There are nutcases who'll say you need to spend over $1000 on every component, and at least $100 on speaker wire, but there are people who spend $1500 on a pair of GeForce 7800 GTX cards as soon as they come out, too. Yes, it's sweet, but what's the point? It's hardware junkie orgasm-inducing, that's all.

      Spend the money where it counts. In home theater, that's the speakers.
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  6. Freedom cannot be defeated! by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Indeed, these scenarios show just how artificial restrictions on knowledge and information are. It is impossible to try to make such an inherently abundant resource scarce, in order to derive profit.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Freedom cannot be defeated! by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      " ". . .it will never achieve this goal as long as CDs must be playable by stand-alone CD players.'" "

      Well, obviously all they need to do is put a stop to this sort of nonsense.

      KFG

  7. When office supplies are outlawed by gelfling · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only outlaws will have office supplies.

    1. Re:When office supplies are outlawed by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can have my red stapler, when you pry it from my soft, geeky fingers.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  8. Restricted Technology by scovetta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Illegal technology, outlawed by DMCA:
      * Sticky Tape
      * Magic Markers
      * Shift Keys

    When will these companies learn? 3M, Sharpie, and Dell-- stop trying to get me to break the law!!!

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  9. Easier way by nsayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last time I had to defeat the usual sort of multi-session CD DRM I just used a whiteboard pen. It's helpful because if you go to far in (and start losing the last track), you can just rub little bits off until you get it just right.

    1. Re:Easier way by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

      ....if you go to far in, you can just rub little bits until you get it just right."

      How do you know my girlfriend?

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Easier way by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess, yeah. I don't know. Sometimes I get the feeling that she's cheating on me.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  10. Low tech hacks by Chr0nik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gotta love it. Almost as cool as the captain crunch whistle.... well, not quite.

    --


    ... what did you expect, something profound?
  11. I predict by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That it will be impossible as long as CDs are playable!
    What is next will Sony try and outlaw mics and wires?
    Dear Sony. I will not steal your music. In fact I will not listen to or buy your music anymore. I am sure that eventualy artists will move to a label that treats it's customers with a bit more respect.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:I predict by amigabill · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I am sure that eventualy artists will move to a label that treats it's customers with a bit more respect.

      Sony will likely call your bluff here, as they know there is no such thing today as a label that treats its customers with any respect.

  12. Any Linux-proof DRM... by tchuladdiass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has there been any Audio CD drm put out that doesn't rely on the auto-run feature of Windows? I remember reading something about one method that would put defects in the disc that would be filtered out by an audio CD player, but I haven't seen any reports if that would affect cd-paranoia.
    In other words, since I do all my music work using Linux, do I need to worry about any of the protection methods currently out there?
    I'd like to see a list of all the drm methods that are "in the wild" along with their prevalence and effectiveness agains various OS's & tools.

    1. Re:Any Linux-proof DRM... by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > the drive made funny noises faintly reminding to 1541
      > (that's the C64 floppy drive for you youngsters) read errors.

      It may have been the very same thing.

      The 1541 would recover from read errors by telling the stepping motor to position the head WAY past the outer track. Of course, this would cause it to bang it repeated against the cam stop. This would insure that the head was properly aligned for track zero (and probably why those damned drives went out of alignment so often!). Then, it would count forward the right number of tracks, and try to read the data again.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Any Linux-proof DRM... by iamnotaclown · · Score: 4, Informative
      Has there been any Audio CD drm put out that doesn't rely on the auto-run feature of Windows? I remember reading something about one method that would put defects in the disc that would be filtered out by an audio CD player, but I haven't seen any reports if that would affect cd-paranoia.

      Yes, there is. There are a few different versions of this, but the general idea is to intentionally put bad data in the tracks (or the TOC) that would be error-corrected out by an audio CD player, but cause a CD-ROM to fail while attempting to read it. Some modern CD-ROM drives still have trouble with this type of copy control. Since the error correction layers have been subverted, the tiniest scratch will usually render the CD unplayable.

      More info here: http://www.cdrfaq.org/faq02.html#S2-4-3

  13. pics by towsonu2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i'd like to see some picture-demonstration for the less language-savvy.

  14. Not a smart solution by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gee, all I need to do to avoid the backdoor* software is to stick a piece of tape to the CD and risk the tape coming off and damaging my CDROM drive?

    BTW, when explaining the Sony CD fiasco to non-techie folk, using the term "installs a backdoor" seems to be very effective.

    1. Re:Not a smart solution by saskboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right that the tape is a bad idea. If someone does try it though, at least put a balancing slice on the opposite side of the disc. You don't know strange and loud until a CD EXPLODES in your CDROM drive. I've seen the remaining disc after an explosion, and sand almost has bigger pieces than some of what's left.

      Also in describing the Sony Rootkit problem it's good to mention that the disks are "infected with DRM". The person won't know what DRM is, but it helps to associate it with a bad word like "infection". And in the case of the Sony CDs, it's not overhyping the facts either, so your conscience can remain clear.

      Bottom line is, "these discs are designed to infect a computer with DRM, which breaks Windows, and lets Sony and viruses take over your computer."

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  15. If Piracy is the problem, is DRM the solution?? by archiereed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In 2003 some of the HP Labs researchers looked at the related issues and published a paper titled: "If Piracy is the Problem, Is DRM the Answer?" http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2003/HPL-2003-11 0.pdf

    You might find the white paper interesting if you've not read it before. This caused quite a stir when it was released, both inside and outside HP, and is still quite relevent in light of the Sony issue. This provides an counterpoint even inside HP where we try to maintain some form of management across all the issues.

    The conclusion reads:

    "We pointed out that unauthorized use and unauthorized acquisition are two aspects of piracy. A key concept is how licenses are bound to content. We saw that various kinds of DRM technology address these issues in very different ways, but that all of them have some kind of flaw that make it highly unlikely that they will be able to solve the problem of piracy. The real problem with piracy is that it takes only a small fraction of users who are capable of dissociating licenses from content to make managed content available to a significant fraction of users in unmanaged form.

    We explored the concept of draconian DRM in which devices that handle managed content do not handle unmanaged content at all. Draconian DRM could potentially be effective at eliminating piracy if it were ubiquitously adopted, but introduces a new problem of how to handle public content.

    Our conclusion is that currently proposed technical measures will not be able to completely stop the illegitimate distribution of pirated content. We believe that content producers must take steps to compete with the piracy as an alternative."

  16. PRM: Penis Rights Management by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    SONY should develop Penis Rights Management (PRM) systems for male geeks. Applying such a system to one's cock would prevent unauthorized use. Of course, since it is designed by SONY it will most likely work in the complete opposite way: women will be enticed to play with a cock using such technology! All of the geeks and nerds out there who can't get any pussy would benefit from such a device. They might even get laid!

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:PRM: Penis Rights Management by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Applying such a system to one's cock would prevent unauthorized use."

      Kind of like a wedding ring.

      "Of course, since it is designed by SONY it will most likely work in the complete opposite way: women will be enticed to play with a cock using such technology!"

      Kind of like a wedding ring.

  17. Best way to break Sony's DRM by Anti-Trend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I still maintain that the best way to defeat Sony's DRM is by simply not buying their music. All the fuss and legal backlash is nothing if we are two-faced in our dealings with them, and indeed all big industry. If we're chiding them on the one side for their vicious tactics and financially supporting them on the other, they hear the message loud and clear: we're pushovers. I think that's the answer they were prodding for when they first decided to include XCP on their CDs in the first place.

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
  18. You can't spell analyst without... by griffjon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Gartner 2001: (18 July 2001 'Research Management Update: Content Management - Timetable for Digital Rights Management' IGG-07182001-02 written by Michael Calvert; Analytical source: A. Weintraub, from http://www.dcita.gov.au/drm/1981.html:

    Gartner predicts that 2003 will be a critical year for DRM when mainstream content providers begin to understand and identify the value propositions DRM systems can provide. Around this time full production systems will be launched and there will be some settling in technology and standards. This will take some of the 'chaos' and risk out of choosing a particular technology for each functionality area. More importantly, there is likely to be a higher availability of well-integrated and flexible systems from outsourcing services or Application Service Providers (ASP). This could dramatically lower the capital and technical investment required from content owners to implement and utilise a range of DRM, ecommerce, marketing and content techniques. In Gartner's view, it won't be until 2004, or more likely 2005, that revenue models start to mature and mainstream adoption of DRM becomes commonplace.

    By 2006, Gartner sees the DRM market consolidating and a standard rights description language emerging. They identify the factors that will affect the success of the market as:

            * the acceptance by consumers of the regulation of e-content
            * the capability of the industry to establish a 'standard rights' language
            * the cost balance between developing a secure DRM solution and the potential revenue to be gained from DRM secured e-content management


    Not to mention September 2005 (http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_sear ch&id=485976):
    "Organizations increasingly need to create, store, retrieve and manage rich media files. Those that successfully cultivate a digital asset management environment can cut their associated operational costs in half."

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  19. Obligatory Simpsons Paraphrase by hahiss · · Score: 3, Funny


    The DRM, they do nothing!

    --
    "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
  20. HISTORY REPEATED!!! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh, this is too funny.

    Many years ago in the Apple ][ era... Lotus 1-2-3 was a great spreadsheet. They invested a huge pile of money to make certain that you could not run their program without possessing the original disk. And try as we may, we couldn't figure out how they did it... there was one sector that was funky, but it didn't make any sense.

    Then, by chance, my neighbor had a nice RANA drive - and it had a 'write protect' button on the face, that you could manually toggle. We stuck a (non-working) copy into the drive to begin the arduous task of single-stepping through the code, and accidentally hit that button while doing so. The result?

    Lotus fired right up!

    They spent way too much money using a laser to create a specific media defect in a specific place; upon startup, the program would attempt to write to that location. If it failed, it knew it was the original. If it succeeded... then there was no defect there, and it was a copy.

    All that time and god-knows-how-much-money they invested in this scheme... only to be defeated by a .01 cent piece of 'write-protect' tape. And now, Sony repeats it with the same level of hubris... that's too funny.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    1. Re:HISTORY REPEATED!!! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh, save that bad-boy if ya can... you might be able to get your money back :)

      The one we had, there was a little "blip" of a burn-mark on the one side. We had no clue how it was made, until someone published something about in... Byte? Or Nibble that month. On ours, anyway, that side contained the defect; the other side was still writable.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  21. I GOT A DIFFERENT APPROACH by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

    WHICH IS STICKING THE TAPE TO MY SHIft key oh darn it got loose again....

  22. FRAUD !!! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In addition to everything else Sony is being sued over I wish they'd add Fraud to the list.

    People buy CDs to get the best 44.1Kbs uncompressed audio usually available for purchase. Yet the DRM'd versions are highly compressed audio files (hence things like the illegally included LAME decoder in the XCP package) where true quality is sacraficed in order to achieve compression levels allowing it to be sandwiched onto a standard CD.

    Some very fine audio chips and speakers are available for computers these days, and certainly some people use their computers as their primary audio system. Yet were on the packaging, or EULA (an astonishing concept for a music CD in and of itself), does it tell you that you'll receive inferior quality playback when played on your computer. How many people believe that the DRM'd discs are actually playing back the .WAV files, instead of WMA or other crap files? It's fraud to not inform consumers that even after they agree to the DRM that they'll receive degraded audio as a result -- and Sony should have to pay for that as well!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  23. And in more news... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 4, Funny

    RIAA was forced to sue itself today, as some smartass found a way to use a "sticky" mailing label that was included with one of their subpeonas, to circumvent the Sony Digital Rights Restriction kit.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  24. Re:Floppy Disks by kinzillah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you could reformat aol disks instead of buying disks.

    --
    Douglas P. Price
  25. Sony thought so by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sony, I believe, did threaten to sue the guy who revealed the shift key bypass a year or several ago. I suspect the current adverse publicity may have something to do with them not following up with threats against the sticky tape terrorist.

  26. in other news.. by tomcres · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sony VAIOs will now ship without shift keys...

    1. Re:in other news.. by Zerathdune · · Score: 3, Funny
      That would be hilarious. talk about a strain on tech support:

      customer: how do I type captial letters?
      tech support: push the caps lock key when you want to start typing in capital letters, and push it again to stop.
      customer: why doesn't my computer just have a shift key?
      tech support: it's a nessicary measure to prevent piracy.
      customer: huh?

      of course, this would be just another failed DRM scheme, since all you would need to do was hook up an external keyboard. I'd be more willing to do that than trust my dexterity to not block out music when applying tape/marker

      --
      No single raindrop believes that it is responsible for the storm.
    2. Re:in other news.. by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you know the Sony rootkit is not PRE-INSTALLED on your Vaio when you receive it? How do you know that the Sony rootkit is not embedded in hardware on every Sony USB stick, every Sony memory card, every Sony digital camera...?

  27. Re:Tape? by grimJester · · Score: 4, Funny

    5adly, in some countries we no longer have the option of using shift keys. 1've managed to come up with some workarounds, though. 7hankfully most sentences can be worked around to start with a letter easily replaced by a number. 3asy 0nce you get the h4ng 0f it. 0f c0urse, 17'5 4 b17 0f 4 h455l3 to le4rn, bu7 y0u g37 u53d t0 17.

  28. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You got it backward: Lotus would not run *unless* it failed to write that spot.

    Copy on ordinary floppy --> write works --> 1-2-3 won't run
    Original disk --> write fails --> 1-2-3 runs
    write-protect disk --> write fails --> .... 1-2-3 runs

  29. Sony is a "serial DRM offender". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ed Foster provides more information that allows us to make a "behavioral profile of Sony":

    Sony has other DRM software. Here are quotes:

    MediaMax also "phones home" every time you play a protected CD with a code identifying what music you're listening to.

    ... before users can even say yes or no to accepting the Sony EULA, MediaMax has already installed a dozen files on their hard drive and started running the copy protection code. The files remain even if the user rejects the EULA, and the Sony CDs provide no option for uninstalling the files at a later date.

    ... an e-commerce revenue generation "feature of dynamic on-line and off-line banner ads. Generate revenue or added value through the placement of 3rd party dynamic, interactive ads that can be changed at any time by the content owner."

    Ed Foster says Sony management has a "scum" profile. Quote: OK, so let's see what we've got here. A company that seems bent on sneaking files onto unsuspecting users' computers, pretending they've gotten permission to do so from a vaguely-worded EULA, transmitting a constant stream of usage information back to their servers, and using that information for who-knows-what revenue generating opportunities. Does this sound like a familiar profile to you? Of course, it's the profile of all the spyware/adware scum that have come very close to destroying the Internet just to make a few bucks peddling their trash.

    Issues that remain concerning Sony's rootkit software and other DRM software:

    As is shown by Ed Foster's analysis linked above, attacking customer computers seems to be the kind of thing that is part of the Sony corporate culture. There has been no apology, and Sony management makes statements giving the impression they intend to continue infecting customer computers.

    A music retail store spokesman said that Sony's rootkit attack has become public just before Christmas. Customers can easily choose some other gift now that they are scared about computer attacks. Sony's attack has hurt the entire music industry, not just Sony. Also, the damage will continue after Christmas.

    Few people are technically knowledgeable. The Sony rootkit CDs will be causing problems for many, many years, as they are traded or borrowed or sold to thrift stores.

    The number of computers already corrupted by the Sony rootkit is probably far larger than the 500,000 quoted in articles about the Sony attack. That number is just the number of Domain Name Servers that show evidence that a computer has tried to contact the Sony phone home address. The average server would almost certainly service more than one corrupted computer.

    Following Microsoft's lead years ago, some businesses treat all their customers as crooks so that they can stop a few.

  30. Skip the CD condom! by BYTEBuG · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heck, I've been using a green marker around the edge of my CDs since the '80s. Softens those strident "1" bits (makes 'em less assertive) and rounds out the "0" bits (so they're rounder, like "o"). Sounds better, and no DRM either!

  31. If you can play it, you can copy it by glarbex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really fail to understand what anyone hopes to achieve by any form of copy protection...

    As far as I can tell, the only form of copy protection that can hope to work against any low-level data extraction tool is one that involves partially invalid data or unreadable regions. And even then, you can do a straight 1:1 copy, and whenever it starts having read errors, put a 0 or something in those bytes and skip them. That is easily achieved using a utility like dd. In many cases, you can also read the disc in a virtual PC (e.g. VMware), and save the audio output to a disk file - and then delete the virtual PC in case of malware installed by the CD.

    Unless the disc is in a proprietary format which can only be read by a specific player, which has no standard output connections, you can copy anything that you can play, simply by plugging the output of whatever you use to play it into the line-in on your PC. If they somehow prevent that, you can still record anything using a microphone, as long as you can somehow get sound waves out of it.

    Also, is it really right to try and stop all copying? I absolutely cannot stand any kind of data being held within a single physical object, especially such a fragile one as a CD. I keep most of my CDs backed up onto two locations, but I steadfastly refuse to play the music on more than one location at a time, or share it with a friend. There can't be very many people in the world who would want to rip the musicians off, and not posess the necessary technical skills to bypass copy protection. The slightest hint of copy protection on a CD in my posession prompts me to try and create a "pure" copy, just because I can't stand my data being defiled by such things.

    Certainly, it is stupid to incorporate Windows trojans into the CDs. People trust the music companies; at least, they did. Things like this must really lower people's trust - especially since they try to disuade people from piracy by saying that pirate copies may contain trojans. I will certainly be very reluctant to insert a CD into a Windows computer without the shift key held down in the future.

  32. Re:Unnessecary by ppz003 · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those with XP (and something similar works for 2k)

    Disabling AutoPlay

    I find it best to disable CD or DVD autoplay in XP using either local group policy or, for an enterprise, an Active Directory group policy.

    The local group policy editor method:

                    * Click Start
                    * Click Run
                    * Enter GPEDIT.MSC
                            Group Policy mmc will popup. On left panel:
                    * Double-click Computer Configuration to open submenu
                    * Double-click Administrative Templates to open submenu
                    * Double-click System to open submenu
                    * Double-click Turn autoplay off option which will be near the bottom of the list in the right panel.

    The default is the Not configured . Set it to Enabled.

    This will still allow Windows to regonize when new media is inserted and any icons will appear/update or whatever. You can still right click and choose autoplay, but no CDs or DVDs will autoplay upon insertion. You can also change the setting to do the same with all inserted drives to stop autoplay for usb drives and the like.

  33. They didn't always; sometimes they got it right. by abb3w · · Score: 5, Informative
    An article predicting the current problem (as a minor aside!) was published in Rolling Stone magazine back in 1972; the RIAA has had more than thirty years warning about this.

    Since huge quantities of information can be computer-digitalized and transmitted, music researchers could, for example, swap records over the Net with "essentially perfect fidelity." So much for record stores (in present form). From SPACEWAR: Fanatic Life and Symbolic Death Among the Computer Bums.
    "A failure to plan on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part."

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  34. Sandpaper trick by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sell him some "special" 00 grit sandpaper and tell him to scrub the labels off of his cds with it. Tell him that it'll make the cd lighter and the sound "clearer".

    Make sure you get a good headstart before he destroys his cd collection.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  35. Copy Protection Drilldown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Audio CD Protections, in brief:

    - Zeroth Generation (the Click Generation):

    * Weak Sectors in ATIP: TTR Technologies MusicGuard (never deployed)

    Flat out doesn't work at all, you probably wouldn't even notice they'd done anything. Any Lite-On, BenQ or Plextor wouldn't even skip a beat. Only CD-ROM tested which even gave a damn was a Sony (heh), the drive in the PlayStation 1 to be precise. Didn't get a contract, so TTR partnered with Macrovision, and tried harder. Much harder. Much too hard, in fact.

    * Weak Sectors causing C2 Errors in Audio: TTR Technology/Macrovision SAFEAUDIO (limited deployment), Settec Alpha-Audio D-Type (data type, never deployed)

    Extremely rare, no longer used; the market overwhelmingly rejected it, which is to say, it broke a music exec's speakers. High channel return rate because of obscenely low compatibility, duplicators returning whole batches as bad pressings because they couldn't perform any useful QA on discs deliberately damaged to this extent. Useless. (TTR apparently liquidated.)

    Archiving: Alternate CDFS.VXD tools for Win9x may work, as they interpolate in exactly where SAFEAUDIO puts corruption. Other than that, deliberate damage = not perfectly playable, or rippable. Effectively an analogue medium with huge deliberate noise spikes. Use a mint disc, do the best you can, and high-order-interpolate over the scratches (Adobe Audition or something), just like archiving vinyl.

    - First Generation (The Anti-CD Generation):

    Archiving all first-generation formats merely needs a Good Drive and Good Software with Good Settings. Can be divided into roughly three groups:

    * High Jitter Spike: Cactus Data Shield (classic): CDS-100/CDS-200, First4Internet XCP-Aurora XCP "Red"

    (0'09", insert bad CIRC sector, 1200 weak sector/desync, 2 *blank* sectors with no sync, then start again with normal data.) Intent: Cause a "hiccup" during a burstmode rip which would be absorbed by a CD player's (tiny) buffer. Reality: Any quality drive firmware, buffer, or jitter correction, means you won't even skip a beat. Might slow down a little, but that's all. Now only marketed for internal releases/promos.

    * Malformed TOC/Evil Session with no player: Early Sony key2audio (1.0), Settec Alpha-Audio S-Type (session type), First4Internet XCP-Aurora XCP1

    Bread and butter, it's simple; include a normal or malformed TOC, and sprinkle liberally with a seriously malformed second session, relying on CD-ROMs being multisession and CD players being single session only.

    * Malformed TOC/Evil Session with autorun player: Sony key2audio, SunnComm MediaClòQ

    Differs from the above only in the second session being malformed, but having a valid data track containing a DRMv2 WMA player (or downloader). Players have evil EULAs, and may interfere with ripping while the player is running (although the first version of the key2audio player that appeared actually shifts the session enough to allow flawless ripping while the player is running...!) but as far as known, they don't leave behind malicious software.

    - Second Generation (The Autorun Generation):

    Rate of returns was still high, so Macrovision tried a weaker system with a much higher false negative, but a much lower false positive. Actually caught on; almost no returns. They could actually put the CD logo on these if they wanted.

    * Valid CD-Extra with autorun player: Macrovision CDS-300, Macrovision TotalPlay CD, Alpha-Audio M-Type (main type)

    Player (MS-DRMv2, as usual) interferes with ripping (while it's running) but doesn't seem to leave any malicious software behind. If the autorun isn't run (disable it, or hold SHIFT while inserting CD and be careful in Explorer) or supported, it's a normal CD-Extra. First session is valid Red Book.

    - Third Generat

  36. DVD stands for by typical · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was also thinking some one should explain to them what the V stand for in DVD.

    Well, originally the "V" stood for "Video". That presumably made some marketing guy from some DVD Consortium company that made non-video devices unhappy, so it was renamed to "Versitile". After many more dollars spent debating this crucial issue, nobody could agree, so officially the "V" stands for nothing.

    You probably think I'm joking; I assure you, I'm not, sad as it is.

    I once had a boss that kept marketing people off of his back by generating busywork to occupy their time. Every time they had a meeting in which they wanted to influence anything technical, he'd bring up the fact that something lacked a name and emphasized how crucial it was to the product's success that the name be appealing. They'd vanish for a month. It was amazing to see this guy in action.

    Of course, we had to put up with silly names as a result, but we didn't have to deal with technically broken things, so it was worthwhile.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  37. EA's Chuck Yeager gamesim story and related rant.. by iamcf13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the 1980's when computer game piracy was at its peak(?) I heard firsthand that copies of this game would deliberately reformat the disk they were on upon detection!

    As with the case of Lotus 1-2-3, a write-protect tab solved that 'problem' and a copy of this once-popular gamesim worked as normal.

    After enough consumer backlash, game copy protection became more subtle or was somehow integrated into the gameplay of the games themselves somehow.

    To this day, the best example of this I know of were the 'launch codes' from another EA hit game STARFLIGHT (I).

    It's a shame Electronic Arts has devolved into a tool of major sports franchises and not as the cutting edge computer game company they used to be
    with such releases like STARFLIGHT, its sequel, and the 2 'CONSTRUCTION SET' gamesims they put out for pinball and music composition....

    Another major copy protect annoyance are the 'gotta-have-the-CD-in-the-drive-at-all-times' kinds of protection -- very lame and potentially destructive to your valuable investment in the CD game itself and CD-ROM drive it is spinning needlessly in....

    The simple solution to all forms of media/IP piracy are low, competitive prices but that would conflict with the corporate duty to make as much profit as (legally?) possible. Because of this, we now live in a world filled with DRM, DMCA violations, and IP copyrights that will likely outlive everybody alive who reads this post.... :(

    The corporate stance of the media industry as a whole is essentially this: Your purchases have worn out and you want them again on 'replacement media' for a small replacement charge? Fsck that! Buy another damn copy at full retail price! (If it's still in print if you're lucky.)

    This happened to me years ago when my cassette tape copy of John William's E. T. The Extra-Terrestrial soundtrack wore out from playing it constantly (and enjoying it). Fortunately(?), I was able to rebuy it again on CD. In a perfect world, the term 'out of print' would be unheard of and licensed media bought could be replaced for just 'materials, shipping, and handling'. But the industry model of artificial scarcity brings with it corporate greed and eventual subsequent consumer dissatisfaction. Notice how the advice nowadays is to wait for 'ultimate edition' DVD releases of favorite movies instead of buying the bare-bones release now and the 'ultimate edition' later if/when it comes out? Perhaps the 'shining' example of this 'atrocity' is the 'two DVD release' of KILL BILL as 'two separate volumes' instead of as one, complete 'set'.

    Touching on DRM for a bit, look at the hypocrisy of USA government/big business persecuting 'DVD Jon' and that guy from Russia that cracked DVD Content Scrambling System and Adobe's protected PDF format respectively. Why is it, due to DMCA, legal to import strong cryptograpy into the USA to protect the secrecy of your own affairs but to reverse-engineer domestically created encryption schemes that 'protect media' for personal uses only is a felony offence worthy of serious fines and jail time? Has society come to the point that human life is so cheap that we can throw them away (in prison for 'minor', non-violent offences) and just make more in 9 months or less so long as the 'precious cash' keeps flowing between big business and big government here in the USA?

    'Twould be nice if the USA copyright system went back to the original 14-year max format established by the Founding Fathers. If that were the case, these and other 'Slashdot Favorite Films' for example would be public domain by now....


    2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

    Close Encounters Of The Third Kind (1977)

    Alien (1979)

    Blade Runner (1982)

    E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial (1982)

    Aliens (1986)

    Superman (1978)

    Star Wars (1977)

    The Empire Strikes Back (1980)

    Return Of The Jedi (1983)

    The first six STAR TREK movies (1979,1