Slashdot Mirror


Sticky Tape Defeats Sony DRM Copy Protection

cybrpnk2 writes "As reported by InformationWeek, Sony BMG Music's controversial copy-protection scheme can be defeated with a small piece of tape. According to thinktank Gartner analysts Martin Reynolds and Mike McGuire, Sony's XCP technology is stymied by sticking a fingernail-size piece of opaque tape on the outer edge of the CD. 'After more than five years of trying, the recording industry has not yet demonstrated a workable DRM scheme for music CDs. Gartner believes that it will never achieve this goal as long as CDs must be playable by stand-alone CD players.'"

117 of 464 comments (clear)

  1. Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does using tape in such a fashion violate the terms of the DMCA? If so, could the tape manufacturers be held responsible for making a product that potentially aides in piracy?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by curteck · · Score: 5, Funny

      As long as you don't hold down the shift key while you're doing it, I think you're ok.

    2. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, applying the tape doesn't violate the DMCA.

      Telling us that we can use tape to defeat the DRM violates the DMCA. Gartner should be hearing the arrival of the black helicopters within the hour.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by omeomi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sadly enough, that's actually true, isn't it? Even this /. story violates the DMCA...

    4. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by spacefight · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the point about the black helicopters was, that they're able to move without making any noise at all...

    5. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by omeomi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently the USCO has some older, less silent, black helicopters...

    6. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by Aralor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, Dora the Explorer had it right all along! She's always using sticky tape for something! (I know this because my two-year old daughter insists on watching it everyday.) So, could Backpack be implicated in this, too, since he's the one carrying the sticky tape for Dora in the first place?

    7. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 2, Informative

      3M makes DUCT tape not DUCK tape. DUCK tape is made by http://www.duckproducts.com/ in response to so many people mispronouncing the name of a product. The tape was to close gaps in DUCTS not DUCKS.

    8. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the tape in question was originally invente4d by the military during World War II and called duck tape as water 'rolled off' of it like a ducks back. It was later rechristened as duct tape after the war when it proved valuable for duct repairs as well, so both names are right.

      --
      I am Spartacus
    9. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by ciellarg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nahh, tape is obviously analog..

    10. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by circusboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      regrettably a recent study has shown that the one thing that 'duct' tape is really not good for, is repairing ducts... (heating ducts anyway, the glue melts)

      It's apparently good for warts though

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    11. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by Diamon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it was invented by Johnson & Johnson (http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/duct tape.htm). The military doesn't invent anything, they contract the private sector to develop things for them.

    12. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by nathanh · · Score: 2, Informative
      3M makes DUCT tape not DUCK tape. DUCK tape is made by http://www.duckproducts.com/ in response to so many people mispronouncing the name of a product. The tape was to close gaps in DUCTS not DUCKS.

      The tape was created to seal ammunition containers watertight. It was originally called Duck Tape.

      It was originally developed during World War II in 1942 under the name "Duck Tape" as a waterproof sealing tape for ammunition casings. Permacel, then a division of Johnson & Johnson, used a rubber-based adhesive to help the tape resist water and a fabric backing to facilitate ripping. Because of these properties, it was also used to quickly repair military equipment, including jeeps, guns, and aircraft. Wikipedia

      You really should have checked Wikipedia before making such an empathic statement.

    13. Re:Does this violate the terms of the DMCA? by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does work on cold ducts and you get a product called Real Duct Tape, that works on hot air ducts.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  2. Damn yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This would be a good place to say something insightful, but the headline has me dumbfounded.

  3. And they always said by Zegnar · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they always said that home taping would kill the music industry...

  4. You're right! by Junky191 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm off to short 1000 shares of 3M.

  5. In other news... by GweeDo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sony/BMG sued 3M Corporation today for their new technology called "tape" to circumvent their copy protection and encryption schemes. They will be tried under the DMCA, news at at 11!

    1. Re:In other news... by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sony/BMG sued 3M Corporation today for their new technology called "tape" to circumvent their copy protection and encryption schemes. They will be tried under the DMCA, news at at 11!

      In other news, Sony/BMG sues Microsoft for allowing the "autorun" feature to be turned off. When the autorun feature is turned off, Sony's DRM doesn't install properly and this can be used to circumvent it, the music giant said in a statement.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:In other news... by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now *that* is a sticky situation...

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  6. Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we talk about Apple or Google instead 'cause I'm feeling depressed.

  7. foot by towsonu2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

    where is the foot icon above the sony icon?

  8. It's sticky tape now, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's what you can do to defeat it without risking your optical drive: Hold shift when inserting the disc or, even better, disable CD autostart. But that wouldn't make such a nice headline, would it?

    1. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by BenFranske · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think once upon a time there was a similar revelation that running a black marker around the edge would do the same thing. Really you're just interfering with the drive reading the data portion of the disc so it appears just as an audio disc. The parent is correct, the shift key or turning off autorun works just as well. They don't make headlines though.

    2. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by Enzo+the+Baker · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no no. Running a green marker around the edge of your CD is for making it sound better.

      --
      I may twist orthodoxy to partly justify a tyrant. But I can easily make up a German philosophy to justify him entirely.
    3. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I know a guy who insists that degaussing his CDs (i.e., with a magnetic tape eraser) makes them sound better. I $#!^ you not!! I tried to be reasonable and explain how many ways that is wrong, but he insisted that I just have a tin ear. Well, I guess I better go turn in my Master's degree in electrical engineering, because it's no match to his Golden Ear.

      As if that wasn't absurd enough, he later told me how he breaks in his AC power cords by running a current through them before using them on his stereo, because otherwise the sound is too, well, I don't even remember what adjective he used. Yellow? Impudent? Octagonal? Whatever. He said that a new electrical outlet takes even longer to break in. OMFGBBQ! I'm ashamed to say that at that point I completely lost the ability to debate rationally with him and try to educate him, and told him what an idiot he is. Well, at least he doesn't bother to ask me any electronics-related questions any more.

      Sometimes I find myself thinking that I should invent some electrical snake oil to liberate audiophools from their excess money, but I just don't want to sink that low.

    4. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Funny

      What a moron! He uses CDs! Real audiophiles know that records have a much warmer sound than CDs. CDs are so digital sounding! Real audiophiles stick to analog recording with real tubes. I bet this guy doesn't even have the 1000lbs granite slab to mount is equipment on so he doesn't get vibrations from passing trucks and stuff! What a poser.
      And yes there are people like that and no for the love of all that is holy I am not one of them! It is a joke, true but a joke.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Except that the data is encoded as physical pits in the metallic layer (which is usually aluminum, if I'm not mistaken), and it's read by shining a laser on the disk and observing how the pits modulate the intensity of the reflected light.

      To the best of my knowledge, a tape degausser will not have any physical effect upon a thin layer of aluminum unless the eddy currents that it induces are large enough to heat up the aluminum significantly (think "CD in a microwave oven"). Aluminum is not magnetizable, and even if it was, the method used to read CDs is not sensitive to magnetization of the media.

      Even if the tape degausser did affect the disc by heating up the aluminum enough to melt it, the only thing that it could do would be to induce data errors. Minor data errors would be corrected by the error-correcting code and thus have no effect on the recovered audio. Errors that are too severe to be corrected by ECC would most likely create pops, skips, dropouts, etc., none of which would sound "good" even to somebody with Golden Ears.

      The whole CD-degaussing thing is pure hogwash.

    6. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by qengho · · Score: 4, Informative

      Monster Cable? Feh. Their power cords are only 100 bucks.

      This is the ticket: the US$1500 power cable.

      Whoops, old review. The new improved model of that cord goes for US$2200.

    7. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by alienw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, you can't measure any fidelity-related parameter in audio systems with an oscilloscope (or any other cheap, readily-available instrument). Distortion, for instance. Anyone can easily hear 1% THD, on any system. You'll see visible distortion on the scope only when it's at about 10% (when you get visible clipping). In fact, most digital scopes use 8-bit ADCs -- try listening to music on an ancient 8-bit soundblaster.

      A very precise spectrum analyzer designed for low frequencies would be much more useful, but you likely won't find one even in a well-equipped lab; a really good one might be _very_ expensive ($50k to millions of dollars).

      Quality is very difficult to measure, simply because the ear is a hell of a lot more sophisticated and sensitive to nonlinearities than any man-made instrument. I think listening to a system is much more useful than trying to measure it with cheap, primitive instruments (like THD meters or oscilloscopes). You can have two systems that measure the same THD but sound drastically different, simply because THD is a simplistic measurement.

      I hate audiophile snake oil ($500 power cables, $20k "interconnects", and magic boxes) as much as you do, but don't assume you can measure everything. Nobody knows how to quantify, for instance, the taste of something. There same applies to audio.

    8. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by justasecond · · Score: 2, Informative

      You guys are pikers. Haven't you heard about the $30,000 dollar speaker cables?

      Thats $ US, by the way.

    9. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by ockegheim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, I feel like I did the time I found out some grown up people enjoy playing with other people's poo.

      I guess one's son wouldn't be allowed to install broadband over power lines.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    10. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by nathanh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, you can't measure any fidelity-related parameter in audio systems with an oscilloscope (or any other cheap, readily-available instrument)

      I'll reservedly agree with that statement.

      Quality is very difficult to measure, simply because the ear is a hell of a lot more sophisticated and sensitive to nonlinearities than any man-made instrument.

      But that is absolute nonsense. Give me a break. You try to distance yourself from the "audiophile snake oil" yet here you are repeating one of the audiophile myths; that they can hear things that can't be measured.

      Anyone can easily hear 1% THD, on any system. You'll see visible distortion on the scope only when it's at about 10% (when you get visible clipping). In fact, most digital scopes use 8-bit ADCs -- try listening to music on an ancient 8-bit soundblaster.

      The problem here is that you're using a strawman experiment. Nobody seriously attempts to measure THD by looking at the signal on an 8-bit scope and squinting until they see clipping. You measure THD with a tone generator and a 24-bit ADC which can easily measure THD down to -122dB. I could personally build such a system for a few hundred dollars or you could buy one of the dozens of professional systems on the market.

      Test equipment is 100s of times better than your ears. The random noise and non-linearities in an ear are just incredible; fluid moving across the hair cells due to movement of the head, the sound of blood flowing near the ear, pressure buildup in your sinus, damaged hair cells due to exposure to high frequency or loud volumes, tinnitus (ringing) which is normally automatically masked by your brain, etc. The human ability to hear is incredibly imperfect. Anybody who thinks that electronic equipment's ability to reproduce audio hasn't already surpassed our ability to hear that audio has more in common with audiophiles than they might like to admit.

    11. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Funny


      from the website: The Clairvoyant 4D has no equal at its price point.

      A-yup.

      --
      sig?
    12. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting
      How that would translate into better sound is an issue left to those who suffer from the mental disorder known as "Audiophilia".
      I am an audiophile. I don't have Monster cables, and I haven't degaussed my CDs. Yes, thin, shitty speaker wire loses bass, if it's run more than 3-4 feet. I've verified this myself. But considering the sad quality of the speakers with most current stereos, well..... they've got no bass to begin with, so it really doesn't matter.

      I've got my bookshelf stereo hooked up to a pair of 3-way Audio Research speakers, with some decent 16, possibly 18 guage wire, and it shakes the floor quite nicely. The speakers probably cost about 4-5 times what the whole stereo, including speakers, originally cost, but that's where the big difference is.
      I've hooked a pair of Bose speakers to a cheap-as-hell(TM) RCA bookshelf stereo, and it sounds great. Put a pair of cheap speakers on a $1000 Pioneer or Kenwood receiver, and it'll sound like hell. 99% of the sound quality is in the speakers, provided you've got an amp with enough power to drive them. And I'm meaning 5-10 watts, not 250.

      My component stereo is an old circa 1985ish 20W/channel Hitachi, with another pair of Audio Research Speakers. Again, good speakers, decent speaker wire about 16 guage, and it blows away the sound of anything else in the neighbourhood.

      There are nutcases who'll say you need to spend over $1000 on every component, and at least $100 on speaker wire, but there are people who spend $1500 on a pair of GeForce 7800 GTX cards as soon as they come out, too. Yes, it's sweet, but what's the point? It's hardware junkie orgasm-inducing, that's all.

      Spend the money where it counts. In home theater, that's the speakers.
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    13. Re:It's sticky tape now, huh? by nathanh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, you measure THD with a tone generator, a filter, and a voltmeter. Do you even have a EE background?

      Yes, I do. I graduated with honours from a leading Australian university several years ago. As part of my studies I not only built this equipment but also did the mathematical derivations to prove the validity of the equipment. I also build audio equipment as a hobby and I really dislike egotistical pissants who use the "Do you even have a blah blah background" pompous statement in an attempt to discredit another person.

      Also, which ADC chip are you talking about?

      Chip? Who said anything about a chip? What the hell are you talking about?

      Second, THD is a primitive measurement.

      You were the one who raised THD as a strawman argument against electronic test equipment. You made the claim that audio engineers measure THD by squinting at 8-bit scopes looking for visible clipping.

      You are arguing that it is impossible to tell a recording from the original sound, which is obviously not the case.

      No, I'm not. Yet another obvious attempt by yourself to divert the attention from your original gaffe. I'm arguing against this claim you made.

      simply because the ear is a hell of a lot more sophisticated and sensitive to nonlinearities than any man-made instrument.

      Because that statement of yours is pure and utter crap. The human ear has well known boundaries that are easily surpassed by decent test equipment.

  9. Freedom cannot be defeated! by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Indeed, these scenarios show just how artificial restrictions on knowledge and information are. It is impossible to try to make such an inherently abundant resource scarce, in order to derive profit.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Freedom cannot be defeated! by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      " ". . .it will never achieve this goal as long as CDs must be playable by stand-alone CD players.'" "

      Well, obviously all they need to do is put a stop to this sort of nonsense.

      KFG

    2. Re:Freedom cannot be defeated! by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It does and doesn't compare to something like a web site. For example, you have a site like CNN which is delivering the same information in a different format that you can otherwise get on TV. Now that information changes so much that they can get you to keep coming back for more every day. And they can also give you the information for free with included advertising. You could if you wanted to capture the video streams from the web site, or just simply record it with your TIVO or VCR.

      Music on the other hand does not change quite so often. That video file or text file that you got from CNN will be something that you don't care about in a couple of days probably. Music on the other hand could still match your tastes 20 years from now.

      The other thing, music is not really an abundant resource. I do not personally know anyone who has ever written their own song. But everyone I know has typed up info and posted or transmitted it on the internet at some point. Secondly, the quality of music varies greatly given the artist recreating it.

      Record companies do need to change their expectations for profit in the new world of online media. Anyone with a web site can now transmit their own music to anyone in the world. Indie music is rising in this new environment, and big record companies are confused as to what to do about it.

      It's simple competition, the big guys just don't like the new way of playing the game. Sink or swim record labels, lawsuits will not save you.

    3. Re:Freedom cannot be defeated! by happymedium · · Score: 2, Informative

      all they need to do is put a stop to this sort of nonsense.

      But for HD-DVD/Blu-ray and SACD, all players will support DRM. It won't be nonsense then.

      (At least until DVD Jon gets his hands on their so-called "encryption"... ^_^ )

  10. When office supplies are outlawed by gelfling · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only outlaws will have office supplies.

    1. Re:When office supplies are outlawed by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can have my red stapler, when you pry it from my soft, geeky fingers.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  11. Restricted Technology by scovetta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Illegal technology, outlawed by DMCA:
      * Sticky Tape
      * Magic Markers
      * Shift Keys

    When will these companies learn? 3M, Sharpie, and Dell-- stop trying to get me to break the law!!!

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    1. Re:Restricted Technology by InvalidError · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot:
        * Non-Windows (or OSX) OSes
        * Non-x86 (or PPC for OSX) CPUs
        * User accounts that do not have software and driver install privileges
        * Disabling autorun (gpedit.msc -> Admin Templates -> Turn Off Autoplay = Enabled for all)

  12. Easier way by nsayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last time I had to defeat the usual sort of multi-session CD DRM I just used a whiteboard pen. It's helpful because if you go to far in (and start losing the last track), you can just rub little bits off until you get it just right.

    1. Re:Easier way by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

      ....if you go to far in, you can just rub little bits until you get it just right."

      How do you know my girlfriend?

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Easier way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      dude, everybody knows your girlfriend.

    3. Re:Easier way by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess, yeah. I don't know. Sometimes I get the feeling that she's cheating on me.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:Easier way by bohemian72 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I know what you mean.

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
  13. THIS GUY IS GOING DOWN by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right with the Shift-Key guy. HACKERS!

  14. And in related news by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...shares of 3M rose by 15 points

    From Information Week: According to Gartner analysts Martin Reynolds and Mike McGuire, Sony's XCP technology is stymied by sticking a fingernail-size piece of opaque tape on the outer edge of the CD.

    Ok, if I'm a Sony exec, do I feel very stupid right now?

    From Gartner: After more than five years of trying, the recording industry has not yet demonstrated a workable DRM scheme for music CDs. Gartner believes that it will never achieve this goal as long as CDs must be playable by stand-alone CD players.

    And being the music industry, they will not give up. Like lemmings to the sea. Really, there's nothing they can do. If someone can create software to copy-protect a CD, some enterprising soul can create software to defeat it.

    They'll keep it up, because they will be in a blind panic at the idea of their profits drying up, even though they could spend time and effort creating some kind of shared, P2P music publication system whereby they could make money and people could get the music they wanted. But that's just one man's opinion.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  15. Low tech hacks by Chr0nik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gotta love it. Almost as cool as the captain crunch whistle.... well, not quite.

    --


    ... what did you expect, something profound?
  16. LOL @ MUSIC INDUSTRY!!!!!!!! ROFL by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Funny

    seriously

    these guys are better than that insane chick on 'trading spouses'

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  17. I predict by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That it will be impossible as long as CDs are playable!
    What is next will Sony try and outlaw mics and wires?
    Dear Sony. I will not steal your music. In fact I will not listen to or buy your music anymore. I am sure that eventualy artists will move to a label that treats it's customers with a bit more respect.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:I predict by amigabill · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I am sure that eventualy artists will move to a label that treats it's customers with a bit more respect.

      Sony will likely call your bluff here, as they know there is no such thing today as a label that treats its customers with any respect.

  18. Hooray for Old Technology! by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is, however, probably in violation of DMCA.

    "Alright, buster, how did you get around it?" "Look, Sarge! Tape! He's got a roll of tape!"
    "You rebel scum!"
    I bet I can overcome their DRM by not wanting anything from that list of albums, too.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  19. Any Linux-proof DRM... by tchuladdiass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has there been any Audio CD drm put out that doesn't rely on the auto-run feature of Windows? I remember reading something about one method that would put defects in the disc that would be filtered out by an audio CD player, but I haven't seen any reports if that would affect cd-paranoia.
    In other words, since I do all my music work using Linux, do I need to worry about any of the protection methods currently out there?
    I'd like to see a list of all the drm methods that are "in the wild" along with their prevalence and effectiveness agains various OS's & tools.

    1. Re:Any Linux-proof DRM... by paranode · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The glaring problem that the record companies don't seem to grasp is that if a CD player can read it, then you can get the audio from it. There is no way around this really. Pirates have a lot of resources too, so even if these companies manage to stop casual ripping the groups will still put the music out there. The best the music companies can hope for in future formats is that pirates will have to resort to analog copying (which with good equipment is still high quality) but I don't think it will even come to that.

    2. Re:Any Linux-proof DRM... by Pope · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, there was that one that killed slot-loading iMacs... :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Any Linux-proof DRM... by Angstroem · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't remember whether it was the first Anastacia album or Shakira's "Laundry Service". When my g/f bought them, I just *had* to rip them just due to the "copy protected" sticker, although I was not quite keen on having that stuff on my HTPC.

      First attempt: Pioneer Slot-in DVD drive. That one just didn't like the disk: I wasn't even able to read the CD, as the drive made funny noises faintly reminding to 1541 (that's the C64 floppy drive for you youngsters) read errors.

      Second attempt: Plextor. No problems with accessing the disk, but when ripping it I got some bogus track 0 with strange data in it.

      Never had that again with any of the "copy controlled" CDs.

    4. Re:Any Linux-proof DRM... by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > the drive made funny noises faintly reminding to 1541
      > (that's the C64 floppy drive for you youngsters) read errors.

      It may have been the very same thing.

      The 1541 would recover from read errors by telling the stepping motor to position the head WAY past the outer track. Of course, this would cause it to bang it repeated against the cam stop. This would insure that the head was properly aligned for track zero (and probably why those damned drives went out of alignment so often!). Then, it would count forward the right number of tracks, and try to read the data again.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    5. Re:Any Linux-proof DRM... by iamnotaclown · · Score: 4, Informative
      Has there been any Audio CD drm put out that doesn't rely on the auto-run feature of Windows? I remember reading something about one method that would put defects in the disc that would be filtered out by an audio CD player, but I haven't seen any reports if that would affect cd-paranoia.

      Yes, there is. There are a few different versions of this, but the general idea is to intentionally put bad data in the tracks (or the TOC) that would be error-corrected out by an audio CD player, but cause a CD-ROM to fail while attempting to read it. Some modern CD-ROM drives still have trouble with this type of copy control. Since the error correction layers have been subverted, the tiniest scratch will usually render the CD unplayable.

      More info here: http://www.cdrfaq.org/faq02.html#S2-4-3

  20. pics by towsonu2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i'd like to see some picture-demonstration for the less language-savvy.

  21. Not a smart solution by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gee, all I need to do to avoid the backdoor* software is to stick a piece of tape to the CD and risk the tape coming off and damaging my CDROM drive?

    BTW, when explaining the Sony CD fiasco to non-techie folk, using the term "installs a backdoor" seems to be very effective.

    1. Re:Not a smart solution by saskboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right that the tape is a bad idea. If someone does try it though, at least put a balancing slice on the opposite side of the disc. You don't know strange and loud until a CD EXPLODES in your CDROM drive. I've seen the remaining disc after an explosion, and sand almost has bigger pieces than some of what's left.

      Also in describing the Sony Rootkit problem it's good to mention that the disks are "infected with DRM". The person won't know what DRM is, but it helps to associate it with a bad word like "infection". And in the case of the Sony CDs, it's not overhyping the facts either, so your conscience can remain clear.

      Bottom line is, "these discs are designed to infect a computer with DRM, which breaks Windows, and lets Sony and viruses take over your computer."

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  22. If Piracy is the problem, is DRM the solution?? by archiereed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In 2003 some of the HP Labs researchers looked at the related issues and published a paper titled: "If Piracy is the Problem, Is DRM the Answer?" http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2003/HPL-2003-11 0.pdf

    You might find the white paper interesting if you've not read it before. This caused quite a stir when it was released, both inside and outside HP, and is still quite relevent in light of the Sony issue. This provides an counterpoint even inside HP where we try to maintain some form of management across all the issues.

    The conclusion reads:

    "We pointed out that unauthorized use and unauthorized acquisition are two aspects of piracy. A key concept is how licenses are bound to content. We saw that various kinds of DRM technology address these issues in very different ways, but that all of them have some kind of flaw that make it highly unlikely that they will be able to solve the problem of piracy. The real problem with piracy is that it takes only a small fraction of users who are capable of dissociating licenses from content to make managed content available to a significant fraction of users in unmanaged form.

    We explored the concept of draconian DRM in which devices that handle managed content do not handle unmanaged content at all. Draconian DRM could potentially be effective at eliminating piracy if it were ubiquitously adopted, but introduces a new problem of how to handle public content.

    Our conclusion is that currently proposed technical measures will not be able to completely stop the illegitimate distribution of pirated content. We believe that content producers must take steps to compete with the piracy as an alternative."

    1. Re:If Piracy is the problem, is DRM the solution?? by plover · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, it's long been known as the BORE problem: Break Once, Run Everywhere. It's as old as copy-protection itself.

      DRM in any form drives a certain percentage of consumers away from the product. Assuming demand is a constant, the more onerous the burden the fewer legitimate customers will put up with the restrictions, driving otherwise legitimate consumers to piracy just to obtain ease-of-use. It's common sense, and has been known since the Apple ][ days.

      Cryptography ultimately cannot help the DRM makers, either. The decoding equipment must be by nature installed in a hostile environment (the end-users equipment.) And there is nothing that can be distributed that can't be reverse engineered. It may take specialized scientific lab equipment, but once it's broken, it's forever broken. It's BORE writ large.

      In today's adversarial DRM / anti-DRM world, any DRM immediately inspires a certain segment of the population to defeat it. Some of them do so for profit: illicit reselling of satellite TV decoder cards, for example. Others do so for convenience: many choose to download media files for playing on their iPods instead of going through the hassle of ripping their own CDs or DVDs. The problem is that if you drive a legitimate paying consumer away even once and they discover the "free" world of media sharing, they're not likely to come back and spend money for another piece of legitimate media.

      --
      John
  23. PRM: Penis Rights Management by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    SONY should develop Penis Rights Management (PRM) systems for male geeks. Applying such a system to one's cock would prevent unauthorized use. Of course, since it is designed by SONY it will most likely work in the complete opposite way: women will be enticed to play with a cock using such technology! All of the geeks and nerds out there who can't get any pussy would benefit from such a device. They might even get laid!

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:PRM: Penis Rights Management by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Applying such a system to one's cock would prevent unauthorized use."

      Kind of like a wedding ring.

      "Of course, since it is designed by SONY it will most likely work in the complete opposite way: women will be enticed to play with a cock using such technology!"

      Kind of like a wedding ring.

    2. Re:PRM: Penis Rights Management by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      You wear you wedding ring on your cock?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  24. Best way to break Sony's DRM by Anti-Trend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I still maintain that the best way to defeat Sony's DRM is by simply not buying their music. All the fuss and legal backlash is nothing if we are two-faced in our dealings with them, and indeed all big industry. If we're chiding them on the one side for their vicious tactics and financially supporting them on the other, they hear the message loud and clear: we're pushovers. I think that's the answer they were prodding for when they first decided to include XCP on their CDs in the first place.

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
  25. You can't spell analyst without... by griffjon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Gartner 2001: (18 July 2001 'Research Management Update: Content Management - Timetable for Digital Rights Management' IGG-07182001-02 written by Michael Calvert; Analytical source: A. Weintraub, from http://www.dcita.gov.au/drm/1981.html:

    Gartner predicts that 2003 will be a critical year for DRM when mainstream content providers begin to understand and identify the value propositions DRM systems can provide. Around this time full production systems will be launched and there will be some settling in technology and standards. This will take some of the 'chaos' and risk out of choosing a particular technology for each functionality area. More importantly, there is likely to be a higher availability of well-integrated and flexible systems from outsourcing services or Application Service Providers (ASP). This could dramatically lower the capital and technical investment required from content owners to implement and utilise a range of DRM, ecommerce, marketing and content techniques. In Gartner's view, it won't be until 2004, or more likely 2005, that revenue models start to mature and mainstream adoption of DRM becomes commonplace.

    By 2006, Gartner sees the DRM market consolidating and a standard rights description language emerging. They identify the factors that will affect the success of the market as:

            * the acceptance by consumers of the regulation of e-content
            * the capability of the industry to establish a 'standard rights' language
            * the cost balance between developing a secure DRM solution and the potential revenue to be gained from DRM secured e-content management


    Not to mention September 2005 (http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_sear ch&id=485976):
    "Organizations increasingly need to create, store, retrieve and manage rich media files. Those that successfully cultivate a digital asset management environment can cut their associated operational costs in half."

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  26. Tweak UI = never hold shift again by courtarro · · Score: 2, Informative
    Since it seems the "shift" key trick is in the news again, I'd like to point out the permanent "shift key" that already works on the computers of countless geeks. :

    1. Download TweakUI for XP (or the older version)
    2. Run TweakUI
    3. In the XP version*, look through the tree list on the left and go to My Computer, AutoPlay, Types.
    4. On the right, uncheck "Enable Autoplay for CD and DVD drives"
    5. Click OK and reboot (just for kicks)

    Sure, it's karma whoring, but I get tired of the "shift key" advice when so many of us have moved on. Never worry about evil code on a CD again! If you're particularly paranoid, feel free to deselect the other checkbox as well.

    * if you're using the older version, you'll have to do some searching. I have no reference for it.

  27. Unnessecary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't need to download TweakUI to do that.

    Go to My Computer, right click on the CD-ROM drive, go to the AutoPlay tab and set your preferences accordingly.

    1. Re:Unnessecary by ppz003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those with XP (and something similar works for 2k)

      Disabling AutoPlay

      I find it best to disable CD or DVD autoplay in XP using either local group policy or, for an enterprise, an Active Directory group policy.

      The local group policy editor method:

                      * Click Start
                      * Click Run
                      * Enter GPEDIT.MSC
                              Group Policy mmc will popup. On left panel:
                      * Double-click Computer Configuration to open submenu
                      * Double-click Administrative Templates to open submenu
                      * Double-click System to open submenu
                      * Double-click Turn autoplay off option which will be near the bottom of the list in the right panel.

      The default is the Not configured . Set it to Enabled.

      This will still allow Windows to regonize when new media is inserted and any icons will appear/update or whatever. You can still right click and choose autoplay, but no CDs or DVDs will autoplay upon insertion. You can also change the setting to do the same with all inserted drives to stop autoplay for usb drives and the like.

    2. Re:Unnessecary by dbhankins · · Score: 2, Informative

      GPEDIT.MSC is not available on up-to-date Windows XP Home installations - my home computer which is at SP2 and fully patched has no GPEDIT.MSC, while my work computer which is at SP1 does have it.

  28. Better to short SNE by baomike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    or buy puts.

    1. Re:Better to short SNE by starakurva · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why you gotta use insults, schmuck?

      --
      All you need is lurv.
  29. Obligatory Simpsons Paraphrase by hahiss · · Score: 3, Funny


    The DRM, they do nothing!

    --
    "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
  30. HISTORY REPEATED!!! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh, this is too funny.

    Many years ago in the Apple ][ era... Lotus 1-2-3 was a great spreadsheet. They invested a huge pile of money to make certain that you could not run their program without possessing the original disk. And try as we may, we couldn't figure out how they did it... there was one sector that was funky, but it didn't make any sense.

    Then, by chance, my neighbor had a nice RANA drive - and it had a 'write protect' button on the face, that you could manually toggle. We stuck a (non-working) copy into the drive to begin the arduous task of single-stepping through the code, and accidentally hit that button while doing so. The result?

    Lotus fired right up!

    They spent way too much money using a laser to create a specific media defect in a specific place; upon startup, the program would attempt to write to that location. If it failed, it knew it was the original. If it succeeded... then there was no defect there, and it was a copy.

    All that time and god-knows-how-much-money they invested in this scheme... only to be defeated by a .01 cent piece of 'write-protect' tape. And now, Sony repeats it with the same level of hubris... that's too funny.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    1. Re:HISTORY REPEATED!!! by David+Off · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A laser? The versions of 123 I owned had a pinhole through the media - used to trash floppy heads.

    2. Re:HISTORY REPEATED!!! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh, save that bad-boy if ya can... you might be able to get your money back :)

      The one we had, there was a little "blip" of a burn-mark on the one side. We had no clue how it was made, until someone published something about in... Byte? Or Nibble that month. On ours, anyway, that side contained the defect; the other side was still writable.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  31. 3M sez to Sony.. by Mobster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Owned!!!

    --
    ---- You have been programmed by the Illuminati to not see the word ""!
  32. UserFriendly on Sony DRM by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Funny

    UserFriendly has a dig at Sony (as well as Microsoft) in today's strip

  33. I GOT A DIFFERENT APPROACH by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

    WHICH IS STICKING THE TAPE TO MY SHIft key oh darn it got loose again....

  34. FRAUD !!! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In addition to everything else Sony is being sued over I wish they'd add Fraud to the list.

    People buy CDs to get the best 44.1Kbs uncompressed audio usually available for purchase. Yet the DRM'd versions are highly compressed audio files (hence things like the illegally included LAME decoder in the XCP package) where true quality is sacraficed in order to achieve compression levels allowing it to be sandwiched onto a standard CD.

    Some very fine audio chips and speakers are available for computers these days, and certainly some people use their computers as their primary audio system. Yet were on the packaging, or EULA (an astonishing concept for a music CD in and of itself), does it tell you that you'll receive inferior quality playback when played on your computer. How many people believe that the DRM'd discs are actually playing back the .WAV files, instead of WMA or other crap files? It's fraud to not inform consumers that even after they agree to the DRM that they'll receive degraded audio as a result -- and Sony should have to pay for that as well!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  35. And in more news... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 4, Funny

    RIAA was forced to sue itself today, as some smartass found a way to use a "sticky" mailing label that was included with one of their subpeonas, to circumvent the Sony Digital Rights Restriction kit.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  36. DRM will NEVER work. by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gartner believes that it will never achieve this goal as long as CDs must be playable by stand-alone CD players.

    As long as it must be playable in a standalone CD Player? As long as media must be visible or audible, DRM will never work. It might for a while, but people are always going to figure a way around it. I've argued this over and over. The software industry which, let's face it, has been at this copy protection thing a lot longer than the music industry and has quite a bit more specialization in it, still hasn't come up with a solution that works for software. What makes the music industry think it will succeed where this industry has repeatedly failed?

    The software industry has managed to survive, despite rampant piracy. M$ has become enormous, despite the rampant piracy of Windows and every app they produce. The music industry just has to bite the bullet, accept that piracy is going to happen, but for God's sake, stop treating all your customers like criminals. All that will achieve is alienation and it will eventually lead to their demise when someone comes along and offers a competing product without treating the customers like criminals.

  37. Re:Floppy Disks by kinzillah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you could reformat aol disks instead of buying disks.

    --
    Douglas P. Price
  38. Re:Floppy Disks by umeboshi · · Score: 2, Informative

    We used to use notch cutters to circumvent a single sided disk, making it double sided. We also used to always buy ss/dd disks for that purpose, because they were cheaper and just as good as the ds/dd disks that were around. The disk manufacturer had no idea which side of the ss/dd disk would be used (and claim compatibility with various drives), so they dd both sides anyways.

  39. Re:Floppy Disks by Randall_Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also, an audio cassette can be copied over by putting tape over the notches on top.

  40. Go one step further... by uqbar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time you skip on buying a CD because of DRM, write a letter to the artist explaining why. Yes this is work, and in some cases these letters go nowhere (or are just read by label staff). But many groups have their own people reading their fanmail, and in some cases the trend will be noticed by the bands. They will not be happy, and they can add pressure from other angles.

  41. Missed the boat, but there is still a future... by RingDev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    for DRMs. The big issue is that the DRM must be transparent enough to not effect the consumers, but strong enough that it discourages (not prevents) infringement. The best possible solution is at the hardware level. But at this point, with millions of CDs in circulation, you can't alter the hardware and break compatibility with existing disks. The key for the DRM industry is the next medium. CD will always be a weekness though. A high quality unsecured media. In order for DRMs to succed the RIAA/MPAA needs 3 things. A universal secure hardware based DRM (that in itself is a pipe dream), a new medium that offers something better then the current options (ie: Digital downloads and HD/Blue DVDs), and a marketing department that can convince main stream America to move up to the latest greatest.

    The universal hardware DRM is a key. Because if a person doesn't HAVE to break your DRM to move their music from the PC to iPod to home sterio to car sterio to work, they wont. But you need a system that can be run in all of those places, and you need it to be cheap.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  42. Sony thought so by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sony, I believe, did threaten to sue the guy who revealed the shift key bypass a year or several ago. I suspect the current adverse publicity may have something to do with them not following up with threats against the sticky tape terrorist.

  43. in other news.. by tomcres · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sony VAIOs will now ship without shift keys...

    1. Re:in other news.. by Zerathdune · · Score: 3, Funny
      That would be hilarious. talk about a strain on tech support:

      customer: how do I type captial letters?
      tech support: push the caps lock key when you want to start typing in capital letters, and push it again to stop.
      customer: why doesn't my computer just have a shift key?
      tech support: it's a nessicary measure to prevent piracy.
      customer: huh?

      of course, this would be just another failed DRM scheme, since all you would need to do was hook up an external keyboard. I'd be more willing to do that than trust my dexterity to not block out music when applying tape/marker

      --
      No single raindrop believes that it is responsible for the storm.
    2. Re:in other news.. by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you know the Sony rootkit is not PRE-INSTALLED on your Vaio when you receive it? How do you know that the Sony rootkit is not embedded in hardware on every Sony USB stick, every Sony memory card, every Sony digital camera...?

  44. Re:Tape? by grimJester · · Score: 4, Funny

    5adly, in some countries we no longer have the option of using shift keys. 1've managed to come up with some workarounds, though. 7hankfully most sentences can be worked around to start with a letter easily replaced by a number. 3asy 0nce you get the h4ng 0f it. 0f c0urse, 17'5 4 b17 0f 4 h455l3 to le4rn, bu7 y0u g37 u53d t0 17.

  45. Thanks Slashdot by fury88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks guys, I submitted this same article yesterday and it was rejected!

  46. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You got it backward: Lotus would not run *unless* it failed to write that spot.

    Copy on ordinary floppy --> write works --> 1-2-3 won't run
    Original disk --> write fails --> 1-2-3 runs
    write-protect disk --> write fails --> .... 1-2-3 runs

  47. just don't buy CDs.. by tomcres · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't even buy CD's anymore. It's not worth the trouble of wondering what it's going to do to my Windows machine, having to run downstairs to rip it on my Slackware box, or wondering if it's going to play in my DVD player or car stereo. Since I've managed to get to the point where I have enough accessories for my iPod that I can play that anywhere, even in the car, I just buy all my music from iTMS. I've had to buy a couple of things from MSN Music that I couldn't find on iTMS, but I just burn that to CD-R and rip it Apple Lossless and get the same effect. It's not perfect, but it's good enough for me.

  48. Sony is a "serial DRM offender". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ed Foster provides more information that allows us to make a "behavioral profile of Sony":

    Sony has other DRM software. Here are quotes:

    MediaMax also "phones home" every time you play a protected CD with a code identifying what music you're listening to.

    ... before users can even say yes or no to accepting the Sony EULA, MediaMax has already installed a dozen files on their hard drive and started running the copy protection code. The files remain even if the user rejects the EULA, and the Sony CDs provide no option for uninstalling the files at a later date.

    ... an e-commerce revenue generation "feature of dynamic on-line and off-line banner ads. Generate revenue or added value through the placement of 3rd party dynamic, interactive ads that can be changed at any time by the content owner."

    Ed Foster says Sony management has a "scum" profile. Quote: OK, so let's see what we've got here. A company that seems bent on sneaking files onto unsuspecting users' computers, pretending they've gotten permission to do so from a vaguely-worded EULA, transmitting a constant stream of usage information back to their servers, and using that information for who-knows-what revenue generating opportunities. Does this sound like a familiar profile to you? Of course, it's the profile of all the spyware/adware scum that have come very close to destroying the Internet just to make a few bucks peddling their trash.

    Issues that remain concerning Sony's rootkit software and other DRM software:

    As is shown by Ed Foster's analysis linked above, attacking customer computers seems to be the kind of thing that is part of the Sony corporate culture. There has been no apology, and Sony management makes statements giving the impression they intend to continue infecting customer computers.

    A music retail store spokesman said that Sony's rootkit attack has become public just before Christmas. Customers can easily choose some other gift now that they are scared about computer attacks. Sony's attack has hurt the entire music industry, not just Sony. Also, the damage will continue after Christmas.

    Few people are technically knowledgeable. The Sony rootkit CDs will be causing problems for many, many years, as they are traded or borrowed or sold to thrift stores.

    The number of computers already corrupted by the Sony rootkit is probably far larger than the 500,000 quoted in articles about the Sony attack. That number is just the number of Domain Name Servers that show evidence that a computer has tried to contact the Sony phone home address. The average server would almost certainly service more than one corrupted computer.

    Following Microsoft's lead years ago, some businesses treat all their customers as crooks so that they can stop a few.

    1. Re:Sony is a "serial DRM offender". by wintermute740 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "A music retail store spokesman said that Sony's rootkit attack has become public just before Christmas. Customers can easily choose some other gift now that they are scared about computer attacks. Sony's attack has hurt the entire music industry, not just Sony. Also, the damage will continue after Christmas. "

      Has anyone from the RIAA weighed in on this fiasco? Not that I'm buying anything from them ever again, but it would be interesting if they did the right thing and came out publicly against Sony. I know it's not gonna happen, but it would still be interesting nonetheless :)

  49. Was never about preventing piracy by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DRM schemes such as XCP aren't about preventing piracy anyway, which is why it's okay that it's so easily defeated. Instead, today's DRM schemes are about indoctrinating the public, getting them so used to putting up with DRM that we won't complain loudly enough when the ultimate home invasion occurs - that is, when we all switch to digital TV, and their DRM finally puts a nail in the coffin of VCRs, DVRs, and that pesky Betamax decision.

  50. Darn by johnty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we have to change from a marker to sticky tape... soon they'll probably make us get white-out as well to circumvent the next generation of copy protection...

    I think sony has a secret alliance with office supply manufacturers - the losses in copyright material will be offset by increased furniture sales... :P

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
  51. Re:And in related news - by vern4of7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the gartner report, the authors suggested two very disturbing ideas, no stand alone players and DRM installed, in all hardware pc. Failing this, or additionally, it is suggested that the RIAA go the legislative route to solving this problem. Given the that it is pretty clear, that they can not prevent technology from moving forward, I am sure that they redouble their efforts on a DMCAII.

    It has been mentioned here before but the purpose of the government is not to save dying business models but to incourage innovation and jobs. The history of the 20th century is littered with businesses that have gone by the way side, telegraph, gas lighting, teletype machines are just a few. I am not one to argue that information is free but a new model is being forced upon the music/movie industry and hiring lawyers/lobbiest is not going to make the problem go away.

    ---
    four industries that hate their customers: the airlines, the telephone companies, the music and movie.

  52. Skip the CD condom! by BYTEBuG · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heck, I've been using a green marker around the edge of my CDs since the '80s. Softens those strident "1" bits (makes 'em less assertive) and rounds out the "0" bits (so they're rounder, like "o"). Sounds better, and no DRM either!

  53. If you can play it, you can copy it by glarbex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really fail to understand what anyone hopes to achieve by any form of copy protection...

    As far as I can tell, the only form of copy protection that can hope to work against any low-level data extraction tool is one that involves partially invalid data or unreadable regions. And even then, you can do a straight 1:1 copy, and whenever it starts having read errors, put a 0 or something in those bytes and skip them. That is easily achieved using a utility like dd. In many cases, you can also read the disc in a virtual PC (e.g. VMware), and save the audio output to a disk file - and then delete the virtual PC in case of malware installed by the CD.

    Unless the disc is in a proprietary format which can only be read by a specific player, which has no standard output connections, you can copy anything that you can play, simply by plugging the output of whatever you use to play it into the line-in on your PC. If they somehow prevent that, you can still record anything using a microphone, as long as you can somehow get sound waves out of it.

    Also, is it really right to try and stop all copying? I absolutely cannot stand any kind of data being held within a single physical object, especially such a fragile one as a CD. I keep most of my CDs backed up onto two locations, but I steadfastly refuse to play the music on more than one location at a time, or share it with a friend. There can't be very many people in the world who would want to rip the musicians off, and not posess the necessary technical skills to bypass copy protection. The slightest hint of copy protection on a CD in my posession prompts me to try and create a "pure" copy, just because I can't stand my data being defiled by such things.

    Certainly, it is stupid to incorporate Windows trojans into the CDs. People trust the music companies; at least, they did. Things like this must really lower people's trust - especially since they try to disuade people from piracy by saying that pirate copies may contain trojans. I will certainly be very reluctant to insert a CD into a Windows computer without the shift key held down in the future.

  54. Even better method by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try a Sharpie!

  55. They didn't always; sometimes they got it right. by abb3w · · Score: 5, Informative
    An article predicting the current problem (as a minor aside!) was published in Rolling Stone magazine back in 1972; the RIAA has had more than thirty years warning about this.

    Since huge quantities of information can be computer-digitalized and transmitted, music researchers could, for example, swap records over the Net with "essentially perfect fidelity." So much for record stores (in present form). From SPACEWAR: Fanatic Life and Symbolic Death Among the Computer Bums.
    "A failure to plan on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part."

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  56. Sandpaper trick by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sell him some "special" 00 grit sandpaper and tell him to scrub the labels off of his cds with it. Tell him that it'll make the cd lighter and the sound "clearer".

    Make sure you get a good headstart before he destroys his cd collection.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  57. Copy Protection Drilldown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Audio CD Protections, in brief:

    - Zeroth Generation (the Click Generation):

    * Weak Sectors in ATIP: TTR Technologies MusicGuard (never deployed)

    Flat out doesn't work at all, you probably wouldn't even notice they'd done anything. Any Lite-On, BenQ or Plextor wouldn't even skip a beat. Only CD-ROM tested which even gave a damn was a Sony (heh), the drive in the PlayStation 1 to be precise. Didn't get a contract, so TTR partnered with Macrovision, and tried harder. Much harder. Much too hard, in fact.

    * Weak Sectors causing C2 Errors in Audio: TTR Technology/Macrovision SAFEAUDIO (limited deployment), Settec Alpha-Audio D-Type (data type, never deployed)

    Extremely rare, no longer used; the market overwhelmingly rejected it, which is to say, it broke a music exec's speakers. High channel return rate because of obscenely low compatibility, duplicators returning whole batches as bad pressings because they couldn't perform any useful QA on discs deliberately damaged to this extent. Useless. (TTR apparently liquidated.)

    Archiving: Alternate CDFS.VXD tools for Win9x may work, as they interpolate in exactly where SAFEAUDIO puts corruption. Other than that, deliberate damage = not perfectly playable, or rippable. Effectively an analogue medium with huge deliberate noise spikes. Use a mint disc, do the best you can, and high-order-interpolate over the scratches (Adobe Audition or something), just like archiving vinyl.

    - First Generation (The Anti-CD Generation):

    Archiving all first-generation formats merely needs a Good Drive and Good Software with Good Settings. Can be divided into roughly three groups:

    * High Jitter Spike: Cactus Data Shield (classic): CDS-100/CDS-200, First4Internet XCP-Aurora XCP "Red"

    (0'09", insert bad CIRC sector, 1200 weak sector/desync, 2 *blank* sectors with no sync, then start again with normal data.) Intent: Cause a "hiccup" during a burstmode rip which would be absorbed by a CD player's (tiny) buffer. Reality: Any quality drive firmware, buffer, or jitter correction, means you won't even skip a beat. Might slow down a little, but that's all. Now only marketed for internal releases/promos.

    * Malformed TOC/Evil Session with no player: Early Sony key2audio (1.0), Settec Alpha-Audio S-Type (session type), First4Internet XCP-Aurora XCP1

    Bread and butter, it's simple; include a normal or malformed TOC, and sprinkle liberally with a seriously malformed second session, relying on CD-ROMs being multisession and CD players being single session only.

    * Malformed TOC/Evil Session with autorun player: Sony key2audio, SunnComm MediaClòQ

    Differs from the above only in the second session being malformed, but having a valid data track containing a DRMv2 WMA player (or downloader). Players have evil EULAs, and may interfere with ripping while the player is running (although the first version of the key2audio player that appeared actually shifts the session enough to allow flawless ripping while the player is running...!) but as far as known, they don't leave behind malicious software.

    - Second Generation (The Autorun Generation):

    Rate of returns was still high, so Macrovision tried a weaker system with a much higher false negative, but a much lower false positive. Actually caught on; almost no returns. They could actually put the CD logo on these if they wanted.

    * Valid CD-Extra with autorun player: Macrovision CDS-300, Macrovision TotalPlay CD, Alpha-Audio M-Type (main type)

    Player (MS-DRMv2, as usual) interferes with ripping (while it's running) but doesn't seem to leave any malicious software behind. If the autorun isn't run (disable it, or hold SHIFT while inserting CD and be careful in Explorer) or supported, it's a normal CD-Extra. First session is valid Red Book.

    - Third Generat

  58. The secret's out by bhmit1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    'After more than five years of trying, the recording industry has not yet demonstrated a workable DRM scheme for music CDs. Gartner believes that it will never achieve this goal as long as CDs must be playable by stand-alone CD players.'

    Damn, you weren't supposed to tell them that. This was just starting to get funny.

  59. DVD stands for by typical · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was also thinking some one should explain to them what the V stand for in DVD.

    Well, originally the "V" stood for "Video". That presumably made some marketing guy from some DVD Consortium company that made non-video devices unhappy, so it was renamed to "Versitile". After many more dollars spent debating this crucial issue, nobody could agree, so officially the "V" stands for nothing.

    You probably think I'm joking; I assure you, I'm not, sad as it is.

    I once had a boss that kept marketing people off of his back by generating busywork to occupy their time. Every time they had a meeting in which they wanted to influence anything technical, he'd bring up the fact that something lacked a name and emphasized how crucial it was to the product's success that the name be appealing. They'd vanish for a month. It was amazing to see this guy in action.

    Of course, we had to put up with silly names as a result, but we didn't have to deal with technically broken things, so it was worthwhile.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  60. Why on Earth?! by ki85squared · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why on Earth would anyone spend over $100 on one short cable is beyond me.
    I've worked with stage sound for a while now, and I can tell you that we use no cables like these. Most of them are years old and still "primitive", but they still provide professional sound.
    These "special" cables sound like a rip-off to me.

  61. EA's Chuck Yeager gamesim story and related rant.. by iamcf13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the 1980's when computer game piracy was at its peak(?) I heard firsthand that copies of this game would deliberately reformat the disk they were on upon detection!

    As with the case of Lotus 1-2-3, a write-protect tab solved that 'problem' and a copy of this once-popular gamesim worked as normal.

    After enough consumer backlash, game copy protection became more subtle or was somehow integrated into the gameplay of the games themselves somehow.

    To this day, the best example of this I know of were the 'launch codes' from another EA hit game STARFLIGHT (I).

    It's a shame Electronic Arts has devolved into a tool of major sports franchises and not as the cutting edge computer game company they used to be
    with such releases like STARFLIGHT, its sequel, and the 2 'CONSTRUCTION SET' gamesims they put out for pinball and music composition....

    Another major copy protect annoyance are the 'gotta-have-the-CD-in-the-drive-at-all-times' kinds of protection -- very lame and potentially destructive to your valuable investment in the CD game itself and CD-ROM drive it is spinning needlessly in....

    The simple solution to all forms of media/IP piracy are low, competitive prices but that would conflict with the corporate duty to make as much profit as (legally?) possible. Because of this, we now live in a world filled with DRM, DMCA violations, and IP copyrights that will likely outlive everybody alive who reads this post.... :(

    The corporate stance of the media industry as a whole is essentially this: Your purchases have worn out and you want them again on 'replacement media' for a small replacement charge? Fsck that! Buy another damn copy at full retail price! (If it's still in print if you're lucky.)

    This happened to me years ago when my cassette tape copy of John William's E. T. The Extra-Terrestrial soundtrack wore out from playing it constantly (and enjoying it). Fortunately(?), I was able to rebuy it again on CD. In a perfect world, the term 'out of print' would be unheard of and licensed media bought could be replaced for just 'materials, shipping, and handling'. But the industry model of artificial scarcity brings with it corporate greed and eventual subsequent consumer dissatisfaction. Notice how the advice nowadays is to wait for 'ultimate edition' DVD releases of favorite movies instead of buying the bare-bones release now and the 'ultimate edition' later if/when it comes out? Perhaps the 'shining' example of this 'atrocity' is the 'two DVD release' of KILL BILL as 'two separate volumes' instead of as one, complete 'set'.

    Touching on DRM for a bit, look at the hypocrisy of USA government/big business persecuting 'DVD Jon' and that guy from Russia that cracked DVD Content Scrambling System and Adobe's protected PDF format respectively. Why is it, due to DMCA, legal to import strong cryptograpy into the USA to protect the secrecy of your own affairs but to reverse-engineer domestically created encryption schemes that 'protect media' for personal uses only is a felony offence worthy of serious fines and jail time? Has society come to the point that human life is so cheap that we can throw them away (in prison for 'minor', non-violent offences) and just make more in 9 months or less so long as the 'precious cash' keeps flowing between big business and big government here in the USA?

    'Twould be nice if the USA copyright system went back to the original 14-year max format established by the Founding Fathers. If that were the case, these and other 'Slashdot Favorite Films' for example would be public domain by now....


    2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

    Close Encounters Of The Third Kind (1977)

    Alien (1979)

    Blade Runner (1982)

    E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial (1982)

    Aliens (1986)

    Superman (1978)

    Star Wars (1977)

    The Empire Strikes Back (1980)

    Return Of The Jedi (1983)

    The first six STAR TREK movies (1979,1