Slashdot Mirror


Canada Moves to Keep Skilled Workers

ashitaka writes "Just in time for all those who have vowed to leave the United States in response to government policies and mainstream cultural malaise, the Canadian government is announcing a C$700 million initiative to help skilled workers stay in Canada and become citizens. If you had the choice, would you really uproot to a new country especially one where the lifestyle isn't that much different than your own?"

125 of 1,067 comments (clear)

  1. Lifestyle by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you had the choice, would you really uproot to a new country especially one where the lifestyle isn't that much different than your own?

    It seems to me that a lifestyle that includes warm weather would be reason enough.

    1. Re:Lifestyle by ryanjensen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some parts of Ontario are on the same latitude as northern California ... in fact they have several wineries in that area.

    2. Re:Lifestyle by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      one where the lifestyle isn't that much different than your own?

      Except for that part where we peel our faces off and reveal ourselves to our god. Wait, forget I said that. Everything is fine.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Lifestyle by mpsmps · · Score: 4, Funny

      So is Chicago. What's your point?

    4. Re:Lifestyle by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, that's not saying very much. If you look at a map, the northern most part of California is about 42.0 degrees north. The southern most part of Ontario is about 41.9 degrees north. It would be more fair to say some parts of Ontario are the same latitude as Oregon.

    5. Re:Lifestyle by billy+reuben · · Score: 2, Informative

      That statement is misleading. It would be more accurate to say that the southernmost parts of Ontario bear the same latitude as *Oregon*. I will grant you that the southernmost borders of Ontario share the same latitude as the extreme northern end of California, but so do Chicago and Cleveland -- which, incidentally, appear to be very close to the areas of Ontario you're talking about.

    6. Re:Lifestyle by killjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want warmer weather both Australia and New Zealand have skilled immigrant classifications. I haven't looked into it but Belize is also a warm english speaking country where you might be able to relocate to. IN the pacific there is also saipan, guam (yuck) and fiji. There are also many countries where english is widely spoken even if it's not the primary language. The nice thing about canada is that it's easy to visit the US if you miss your friends and family.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    7. Re:Lifestyle by rossdee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Latitude isn't the only thing determining climate. California and Oregon both have the Pacific ocean nearby to moderate the temperature during the winter.

  2. The only catch by i8puppies · · Score: 2, Funny

    is that you have to dress like a mountie.

    1. Re:The only catch by Flounder · · Score: 4, Funny
      About the only thing you can't do is marry the horse, yet.

      So, just live across the border in Washington State and commute every morning on your wife.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  3. The lifestyle IS different! by MLopat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having done alot of travel to the US, both for business and pleasure, let me assure you Canada's lifestyle is far different. We live in a much more secure, comfortable and friendly environment than most places in the United States. We have very little crime (Toronto, our largest city, has about 70 murders a year), we have the best health care system in the world, we have tonnes of green land, and are well respected by most of the World.

    1. Re:The lifestyle IS different! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

      we have tonnes of green land

      Every time I've been to Canada the land has been white.

    2. Re:The lifestyle IS different! by DanteLysin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The US is a large country. The "lifestyle of the US" does differ from region to region. To travel to "most places in the US" and get a good appreciation of each would take years. I'm sure Canada is similar.

      I moved from 1 state to another and life is very different for me. Turns out I like where I live now, I don't ever want to move back. And if I travel to different parts of my state, life is quite different.

    3. Re:The lifestyle IS different! by davecb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Our values are quite different: Canada and the U.S. used to have similar ones, back in the years just after the Second Wold War. We worked together, helped each other out, and had just finished smashing the Third Reich and everything it stood for.

      These days, Canadians aren't too interested in wars, but they still tend to cooperate and help each other out. The army mostly does peacekeeping these days.

      Americans, alas, have distinctly moved towards regarding the world as a dog-eat-dog one, with wars and militias as standard features.

      I, for one, think this is a bad thing, and harmful to my American cousins.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    4. Re:The lifestyle IS different! by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate to tell you this, but you read the map wrong and didn't go far enough north. You only made it to Utah. :)

    5. Re:The lifestyle IS different! by cpangelich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Americans, alas, have distinctly moved towards regarding the world as a dog-eat-dog one, with wars and militias as standard features.

      Don't make the mistake of judging all Americans by our 'elected' leader who barely won either of his two elections. A large number of Americans would've preferred otherwise.

      --
      Charles Angelich
  4. ho by mr_tommy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Psst... I think the similarity is part of the atraction....

  5. Re:Rather to Alabama by mordors9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are you a Hurrican chaser?

  6. Oh, Canada! by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given that I travel up to B.C. about twice a year, and that I'm going to be looking for employment up north after I graduate (two years down the road), I say 'Hell, yes!'

    No worries about healthcare, low crime, fantastic local beers, hockey in the winter, Tim Hortons...er, what am I not supposed to like, again?

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    1. Re:Oh, Canada! by CarlinWithers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Consider Alberta as a place to look for work. Our two major cities (Edmonton and Calgary) are the fastest growing in Canada. There's lots of IT employment available if you have the skills, heck there's lots of most kinds of employment. We currently have a shortage of skilled workers, and a jobless rate of less than 5%. It's not quite as beautiful or warm as BC, but it's still nice. I'm a Calgarian myself. When I compare the quality of life in Calgary to most other places, the results are enough to motivate me to tough out the weather. Course, sometimes I've got to take holidays to somewhere warm.

    2. Re:Oh, Canada! by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I prefer california, actually. Better beers, crime's a bit of a problem but getting better, My employer has a great healthcare plan, and if they didn't, it's only $30/month for heath care to cover true emergencies, oh, and I'm 1/2 mile from a major hockey venue, and a mile from an amateur venue. What's there to love about having to wait 5 minutes for your car to warm up in the winter, or generally higher taxes?

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:Oh, Canada! by paranode · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey I have all of that in the rural United States only we are not deluded that a several-month waiting list to see a doctor is the 'best healthcare'.

    4. Re:Oh, Canada! by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, I keep hearing about this, but none of my Canadian friends have ever mentioned it; I mean, I'm not saying it doesn't ever happen, but I don't think it's the big problem that a bunch of Americans make it out to be. Hell, last time my friend Sarah got sick with a nasty cold (!), the local hospital offered to send out an AMBULANCE to pick her up.

      On the flip side, if you're a student in the US, you can shell out $100 a month for CRAP healthcare -- as in, if the Student Heath Center is open and you don't go there first, you can pay your own bills, and unless it's an emergency (life-threatening), you had better not even think of going to see a doctor, because the student insurance won't cover it. Oh, and it won't cover anything out-of-network, so I owe my dentist $150 because the student insurance I forked out about won't cover cleanings with my regular dentist.

      At least I have healthcare; half of the people I go to school with don't, because $100 a month is more than they can afford.

      Now that I'm working 'full time' again, things are better (back to real healthcare), but having experienced 'cheap healthcare' for a year, I'd rather see us Americans with a better system.

      I hate to say it, but I think the Japanese have something going with the way they run things -- even without being on the 'National Insurance', I was able to go to a Japanese clinic and have my cough diagnosed as a really nasty case of pneumonia -- and was out the door after a total of an hour, with a small bag filled with about five different kinds of medication, and all for about $200 (IIRC). I shudder to think of what two sets of chest X-rays and about two weeks of meds would have cost in the U.S. without insurance.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    5. Re:Oh, Canada! by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've had a real job before; left it to go back and finish up my degrees. Given what the government charges me in taxes, and what they spend on pork-barrel programs for defense contractors, I think they can afford to spend some money to give the lower-class citizens some basic healthcare, and let us higher-ups pay for better care if we want to.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  7. Empty promise by uncleO · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those unaware of Canadian politics, the government faces a non-confidence vote Monday or Tuesday. It is expected to fall and call a December election.

    For campaign reasons, the government has announced a flurry of new spending over the last week, most of which is expected to never materialise, whether the governing party wins again or not.

    1. Re:Empty promise by tomstdenis · · Score: 2

      Very true, mod parent up. This is right up there with the cancellation of the gun registry and GST...

      Of course where is the gun registry office? [hint: How do you keep unemployable easterners happy...]

      That said, I'd rather live in Canada than the USA. Mostly because it's so cold the terrorists are few and far between. Who the fuck would bomb an office in -20C weather? :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  8. Re:Yes. by mordors9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the US is such a hell hole, why does it have to go to such lengths to keep people out?

  9. Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by Stone316 · · Score: 5, Informative
    and I don't mean catching a cold or pulling a muscle in your back and having to take a trip to the family doctor. I mean 'sick' and require the attention of specialists.... You can get your dog in for an MRI same day but you'll be waiting months for yours. I believe the average wait for a specialist is about 3 months now... I know I had to wait 6 months (at least, can't remember) to see a specialist last year.

    Well respected? Maybe but I keep sensing that other countries find us about as annoying as a nat flying around your head.

    Saying that, I love this country and would never move.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by wizwormathome · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You can get your dog in for an MRI same day but you'll be waiting months for yours.

      For those who are curious, the above is not an exaggeration, as shown by this film.

      As partially summarized by a Canadian blogger, "When you have finished watching this film several images will remain with you for some time to come. A woman who spent two years waiting for knee surgery and innocently asks the American filmmakers whether the waiting lists are as long there as they are here. The moment when she begins to grasp that a health care waiting list is a concept alien to most sick Americans, though sadly not health care compelled bankruptcy, is something that cannot be explained. More stories follow of addiction to pain killers brought on by wait times, of the suffering families go through, of men and women calmly contemplating death for ailments which medical science long ago conquered, but which government control has placed out of reach."

      --
      An explanation of my choices for friends
    2. Re:Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by Valar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It takes time to see specialists here in America too. Three months would be rare, but it happens. A lot of it just has to do with the supply and demand for people with specialized medical knowledge. Canada is a little bit worse off because lower wages for doctors->lower # of people willing to be doctors.

    3. Re:Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by ThaFooz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up. There is a reason weathly Europeans and Canadians often have private doctors (despite the "free" healthcare system) - and flying to Boston is not unheard of for exceptionaly dangerous procedures. While we can argue the merits of applying Capatilism to the health care system - skilled US workers (which would include everyone reading this site in the US) have the best health care. Period.

    4. Re:Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by chaotic_synergy · · Score: 2

      I'm a canadian citizen and a resident of Vancouver BC. I only had to wait a few days for my MRI ...

      It took SIX WEEKS(!!!!) for a standard test to come back with bad news (cells suspicious for cancer). After that things went much much faster ...

      - appointment with a gynocologist 3 days later
      - test results confirming cancer 8 days later
      - appointment with a gyno-oncologist 2 days later
      - MRI 5 days later
      - major abdominal surgery 6 days later.

      In summary, I had my surgery for cancer 1 month and a day after my initial test came back as "cells suspicious for cancer".

      The canadian system needs improvement, but I certainly wouldn't trade it for the american one. I did a LOT of research on cancer when I got sick, and couldn't find anything to recomend theirs over ours.

    5. Re:Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by starm_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, its not illegal to cross the border to the south and get your health care there. You have both options in Canada, wait and get it for free or pay for a US specialist.

    6. Re:Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by wizwormathome · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is my understanding that private healthcare, with the exception of dentistry, is essentially illegal in Canada. So no, she can't get private medical treatment and jump ahead of a line. On the other hand, important folks, like politicians and celebrities either get treatment elsewhere or are bumped ahead, so that there's no reason for the "loud voices" to complain publically.

      The fact that some Americans, like myself, do not have healthcare coverage is too broad a statement to act as a condemnation. There are multiple reasons why some people do not have coverage and not all are automatically immoral. Personally, without coverage, I'm not tied to any particular doctor or healthplan. If I don't like the service I'm getting, I walk along with my money.

      --
      An explanation of my choices for friends
    7. Re:Healthcare is great if you don't get sick by plopez · · Score: 2, Informative

      though sadly not health care compelled bankruptcy

      No longer true. In the US it has been replaced by health care compelled indentured servitude. The bankruptcy laws have been tightened up so that now it is almost impossible for an individual to write off debts. Despite the fact that approx. 70% of bankruptcy in the US was due to health care bills. In addition, you are forced into counsummer credit counseling, often for profit organizations. Sometimes these counseling services are fraudulent driving the vicitm further into debt.

      You don't know how good you have it up north...

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  10. Nice by smartin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Canadian living and working in the States, I wish the Canadian government would have done more to keep skilled citizens rather than attracting skilled immigrants. Unfortunately it is really just too easy to max out in the Canadian market place and the only option is to move south.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:Nice by PygmySurfer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That was my thoughts exactly upon reading the article. Why is it I had to come work in the US, rather than finding a job in my own country? I make more than twice as much in US dollars than I was making in Canadian dollars. Where's the incentive to stay?

  11. Quick question.... by Neuracnu+Coyote · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If American citizens are frustrated and annoyed with their government's behavior, can someone please explain how expatriating will do anything but make the problem worse?

    If they have any interest in achieving their goal, shouldn't they be sending a loud message to the rest of the world, inviting like-minded individuals to come live there instead? Or perhaps convince their neighbors to read a newspaper?

    Oh, wait. That would involve effort. Never mind - I forgot who I was talking about.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Quick question.... by miyako · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've long been considering moving out of the US for Canada or someplace in Europe. My thinking on the issue has generally been that a group of people has the right to generally run themselves the way they want. If I don't like it then, instead of trying to change things more to my liking (and to the chagrin of many others), I may be better served by moving to a location that is more inline with my own views.
      In my case, I would like to move to an area that is much more socially liberal than the US, and has more social services. Personally, I don't mind paying more in taxes if the government is going to use those taxes to help the people of the country.
      Basically, you say, "if you don't like X, why not try to change it, and invite other people to come and help", whereas I say "If most people in the area like X, but I don't, would I not be better served by going to a place where people share my ideas instead inviting fruther fragmentation into the area I am at, and trying to strong arm my own views onto others?"

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    2. Re:Quick question.... by killjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's more about not staying where you are not wanted. Bush sr said that atheists are not real americans and should be allowed to vote for example. The exact quote was " I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."

      This is the president of the USA telling atheist citizens that they don't belong in the country. Other members of this administration have made similar remarks about atheists, collage professors, environmentalists, femminists, homosexuals and other people they hate.

      Why stay in a country that you are not wanted in? Why not move to a place where people don't hate you?

      --
      evil is as evil does
  12. It's a cop-out by sam_handelman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As an American I am in a better position to fix the problems than anyone. If I move to Canada (and even if I become a Canadian subject, or whatever) I have given up on influencing the course of events because I don't want to deal with some sort of guilt over my failure to do so recently?

    We don't know how much worse things might have been, either. We say, and it's true, that the domestic opposition didn't prevent the administration from invading Iraq. Well, that was a failure. There is literally no way of knowing what else they might have done if given free reign - Miers on the SCOTUS is only the start of it.

    In case you haven't been paying attention - the two last US elections have been very close, and their outcomes (especially in 2000) have had a tremendous impact on the rest of human history. In spite of those election results, public opinion here in the US still plays a big role in determining what the administration can and cannot get away with. If you're really concerned with human civilization, and not with melodrama, you move to a purple state, not to Canada.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:It's a cop-out by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MOD UP.

      For once someone gets it. If we ever meet in person I'll buy you a beer [or whatever ya drink].

      As a Canadian [and fellow North Americaner] all I have to say is it's good to see someone gets it. Too many foreigners flee their country for safety reasons then just pursue the culture that bred it here [often with the problems just following behind them].

      Moving China to Toronto, Vancouver and a few other cities won't fix the problems they have in China.

      That said, if you guys don't open up the poles to a "third" option you're doomed for another four years of "Iraq SMASH! Iran PHEAR!". Demo == Repub.

      Oh and to CNN ... your system of government is NOT a democracy it's a republic and it's not bi-partisan no matter how much you say that word. Open up your fucking eyes and report the world the way it ACTUALLY is not the way you'd like it to be. For a 24 hour news station you'd have more to report [e.g. less repetition] if you actually investigated [and presented] the other parties. You know, your, "job" ...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:It's a cop-out by PaulBu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In case you haven't been paying attention - the two last US elections have been very close, and their outcomes (especially in 2000) have had a tremendous impact on the rest of human history

      Hmm, some people say that current US administration is arrogant in their attempt to change "human history", but it is really funny to see the same attitude from their opponents!

      Is it possible to have somewhat "balanced" (if not "fair") discussion here?

      Paul B.

    3. Re:It's a cop-out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      "In case you haven't been paying attention - the two last US elections have been very close, and their outcomes (especially in 2000) have had a tremendous impact on the rest of human history.

      You sound like a decent enough person but for god's sake put down the koolaid. Even the most cursory examination of recent history provides a dozen examples of coutries which have suffered far greater catastrophe and they too will leave as much impact as the fall of Pitcairn's society. The WTC towers didn't mean spit on a global scale, and your attacks on two Islamic nations will ultimately mean more to your history than the world's.

    4. Re:It's a cop-out by aaronrp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a Canadian [and fellow North Americaner] all I have to say is it's good to see someone gets it. Too many foreigners flee their country for safety reasons then just pursue the culture that bred it here[...]

      Yes. It's good to find a Canadian who agrees that if the so-called Loyalists had stayed at home and tried to make their state better instead of fleeing to Canada, everybody would be better off.

      Of course, it's not too late. As the grandparent stated, more can be done from within the US than from outside. Surely twenty new US senators, and a corresponding shift in the House of Representatives, from north what is now the Canada-US border would make a tremendous difference. You seem to be one of those rare Canadians who recognizes this.

    5. Re:It's a cop-out by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The current negative savings rates in the US, propped up by incredible debt levels made worse by low interest rates and the housing bubble (allowing people who can't really afford it to have millions in cheap debt), could possibly spell the beginning of an economic holocaust the likes of which the US has never seen.

      Large scale societal dynamics are the things which shape history, not so much the politics of the day. Politics in a vacuum looks very impressive, but you look closer, and you'll often find that it is a mirror which reflects what's actually happening in the world.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    6. Re:It's a cop-out by GooseKirk · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right, it is a cop-out... and I do feel bad that I'm not there, fighting the good fight, trying to make things better.

      On the other hand, I feel better about myself, just not being there. I feel better that I never have to see Fox News ever again. I feel better knowing that even as Dubya spirals the country into the ground and half the people cheer as they go down, I don't have to ride along with them. Hell, I don't even have to pay attention.

      Sorry for the cop-out... but I know I'm much happier. Life's too short to tilt at windmills forever.

  13. Funny this should pop up on slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just as I am researching what it takes to immigrate to Canada, job opportunities, quality of life, housing prices, etc.

    I come from Europe and, no offense to our American friends, find Canada a much more appealing choice than the USA - exactly because I perceive Canada and Canadian mentality to be much closer to a European mindset.

    I admit this may just be a whim, but coming from a country where everybody under 40 years of age is suffering from financial rape from the older generation, Canada sure does look appealing.

    1. Re:Funny this should pop up on slashdot... by Neoprofin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, many Americans hate France too.

  14. Canada's more like the US than ever by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nowadays a guy can go a whole day in Toronto without ever seeing a single igloo.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  15. Prepostorous! by nxtr · · Score: 5, Funny

    >>Canada Moves to Keep Skilled Workers

    No one can move an entire country, not even Superman!

  16. Re:Yes. by v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The upper class seem to do well with the people currently in control in the govt. The lower class does fairly well with the hand-outs. This leaves the middle class to support all three. Immigration is mainly by people in the lower class, where they stand to benefit by moving to the USA. Meanwhile, the middle class that are already IN the usa find their situation going downhill. So you see people that want in, and people that want out.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  17. Look at who this applies to... by KJE · · Score: 2, Informative
    From TFA:
    "Ottawa will spend $700 million over the coming years in a two-pronged initiative to make it easier for skilled immigrants to stay in the country while at the same tackling a big backlog of people waiting to get into Canada."

    Also:
    "Immigration Minister Joe Volpe will join the flurry of pre-election promises with his announcement today."

    The minority government in Canada is about to fall, this is just one of the many, many promises the Liberal Party is making before they lose a no confidence vote next week, think of all these spending promises as the beginning of their campaign and react accordingly.

  18. First we take Manhattan, then we take.... Toronto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've already uprooted and left the US for another country.
    Japan in this case.
    I just couldn't get past America re-electing the failed
    ideologues in the White House. Pity the people have seen the err of
    their ways all too late. (ref: Bush's declining approval rating)

    Barring stumbling into marriage over here, I can't see myself
    staying forever though. A place like Canada is *extremely* attractive
    to me on a number of levels - it's similarity to America being just one.

    Having spent a bit of time in Toronto and Vancouver, they're both places
    I can easily see myself living in. They're not New York or Tokyo, mind
    you... but they do seem to be everything America believes itself to be -
    with Jesus wonderfully absent.

    The only problem I can see being an issue is that I don't particularly
    care for hockey... Is that a deal-breaker on naturalization?

  19. Re:So what are geek wages like? by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it depends on what part of the industry you're looking at. The games industry, for example, is very big here in Vancouver -- my boyfriend works for EA, and I'm going to be doing a co-op job (that's an internship, for you American types) in January at a small startup game company. To my knowledge, a lot of American companies, particularly those of the video game persuasion, are actually outsourcing to Canada because thanks to public healthcare and other perks, we're cheaper to employ.

    Also, it probably doesn't mean much, but all of my friends who are recent computer science grads managed to find jobs very soon after graduation. I don't know how their wages were, but I haven't heard any complaints.

  20. What seperates Canada from the US by Jorkapp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can see this initiative as targeting the citizenry of the United States. It makes perfect sense to target them, and here's why:

    US citizens already speak english, work with dollars and cents, drive cars on the right, etc. At the core, they're basically the same (less some cultural differences) as Canadians. Less government money spent on teaching them english or how to drive.

    Right now the Canadian dollar is at $0.85USD. The minimum wage in Ontario is at $7.45CDN/hour for an adult (slightly less for people who serve food/beverages and are subject to gratuities), which is more than $6.25USD/hour. Bear in mind too, that minimum wage is typically only paid to entry level jobs, and most other jobs pay more. I've heard horror stories of US Wal-Mart workers making maybe $5/hour - come up here and get a pay raise!

    Come on up boys, We've got plenty of room!

    --
    Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    1. Re:What seperates Canada from the US by JacobO · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can see this initiative as targeting the citizenry of the United States.

      I do not agree. Firstly, the Canadian govt spends sweet fa on teaching immigrants anything. In fact it typically insists that they spend their own money getting "qualified" for something they can already do back in their home country. This might make it quicker for an American working in Canada under current NAFTA rules to just get residency, but Americans who move here seldom have any trouble becoming residents (other than the usual problems, such as the horrendous bureaucracy and $$ involved - I have been through it myself.)

      Regarding the wage numbers you give, you forgot to consider the generally higher taxation here in Canada.

      That said, depending on where you live in Canada, you can have a very good standard of living. There are definitely opportunities here and I too welcome more immigrants. Even those weird ones that drive on the left-hand side of the road and those who use weird currency like the yuan.

      On a related note, someone please teach Canadians to drive.

  21. Warm weather by phorm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pick a season then. In the summer it's about 25-30c (77-86f), in the winter I've been as low as -40c/f, but generally we're in the -10 to -20 (14 to -4) range or milder. Right now it's about 4c (39.2f)

  22. Re:How about giving up the Socialism, eh? by JohnWiney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Better economy?? The Toronto Stock Exchange index is up 20% so far this year - the Dow Jones is down. The past few years have had similar results - and that is without taking into account the changes in the currencies. The Canadian federal government has posted a surplus each of the past seven years. The US government, uh, has not. Canadian unemployment levels are nearing record low levels....

  23. The Real Question by CyberLife · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's your feeling about people immigrating TO the United States? If one applies your position equally to all countries of the world, nobody should ever leave their native land. Are you advocating that? This country is largely populated by immigrants and those descended from immigrants. I don't know the details of your family background, but chances are they were immigrants at some point. Should they have stayed in their home country? Should you have instead been born and grown up there instead of here?

  24. Policy Changes by JohnWiney · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please note that these changes are directed at people already in Canada - foreign students, for example. Canada already has the highest levels of immigration in the world from outside the country (at least on a per-capita basis).

  25. You can be a thief, too! by dada21 · · Score: 2

    The Canadian government wants to rob the citizens of $700,000,000 and give it to programmers. Why not just arm yourself, go to your neighbor's house in the U.S., and take their money?

    It is the same thing. Don't believe the hype, read deeper.

    1. Re:You can be a thief, too! by justins · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, ten times $700 million, 7 billion, is roughly what we spend in Iraq in roughly a month and a half. Sad but true.

      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  26. Canada vs. USA by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The question of living in Canada vs USA depends a lot on your skill set (job qualifications), home language, tolerance of bad weather, politics, and intoxicational preference.

        Let's say you have a good job skill set and can get a job more or less either north or south of the 49th parallel. If you speak French as a native language, you'll most likely feel more comfortable in Quebec. If you speak Spanish as a home language, Miami, Los Angeles, or New York would be more confortable. This issue is neutral for native English or other language speakers, eh?

        If you don't really like the cold, but don't mind dark gloomy rainy days (say you're a goth programmer or gamer), Vancouver BC would definitely beat the rest of Canada, New England, California, or Florida (too much sunshine).

        Fascists, either Christian or racial, will definitely feel more at home in the USA. It's your kind of place.

        Cannibus lovers, ('Stoners' to everyone else) will be more comfortable in British Columbia than anywhere in the USA, except possibly Maui. Not even the Humboldt Thunderbolt beats the BC bud. And you're less likely to have a Hummerload of psycho Iraqi vets kicking in your door and sticking machine guns or tasers in your kid's faces at 3am if you smoke in British Columbia instead of the USA. That's important to some people, less to others.

        In general, everything that you buy in a store is cheaper in the USA. Canada has insane sales taxes on top of high prices. This is the big issue for most people deciding USA vs. Canada. Big income taxes too. However the money collected in taxes mostly gets back to the Canadian people in some form, whereas in the US taxes paid go mostly to giant corporations with fat government contracts.

        However if you're gonna get sick, try to get sick in Canada instead. With the new bankruptcy laws in the USA, along with a corrupt and insanely expensive health care system there, you'll be in debt forever if you need medical care in the USA. Like if you get shot. The US has more guns than people, Canada doesn't.

    1. Re:Canada vs. USA by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, in Canada the money gets back to the people via the government, and in the US it gets back to the people via Wal-Mart... what's the difference?
      I would like to point you towards the Forbes 500 richest list. I think you will see several Waltons with billion dollar fortunes. So, the money DOES NOT go back to the people. If you add up all the cost of all the extra insurance and pension funds that you need here in the US, I think you'll find that the difference is marginal if any at all. Lower taxes and cheaper prices does not necessarily mean cheaper totally. Think of it as Total Cost of Ownership like we do in IT and you'll see that you probably pay more in USA than in Canada.
      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    2. Re:Canada vs. USA by udowish · · Score: 3, Informative

      "In general, everything that you buy in a store is cheaper in the USA. Canada has insane sales taxes on top of high prices. This is the big issue for most people deciding USA vs. Canada. Big income taxes too. However the money collected in taxes mostly gets back to the Canadian people in some form, whereas in the US taxes paid go mostly to giant corporations with fat government contracts." BS, the only thing lavishly higher is booze and smokes in my experience almost everything else is CHEAPER in Canada and I have travelled all over the US. That goes for food, insurance, housing etc etc.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    3. Re:Canada vs. USA by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also if you are gay or a muslim you are much more likely to be accepted in Canada then the US.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:Canada vs. USA by Mouse42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is so true and so sad.

      I am dating an Arab - not even a muslim! - and I'm getting so much flack from my family. They are insistant that he is going to _become_ muslim. They even told me he was going to manipulate me into becoming a suicide bomber myself!

      The insane degree of idiocy to believe such things astounds me.

      I'm reading through these comments because the idea of moving to Canada is actually appealing simply for the social freedom.....

    5. Re:Canada vs. USA by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They've (the wealthy, like the Waltons ) been spending their no-tax windfall by buying other companies, and buying back their own company's stock to privatize their corporations. What they aren't doing with the money is spending it on new jobs, which is what the putative purpose of the cuts are for; no less authority than the American Enterprise Institute states that, to their surprise, the newly released wealth is not returning to the economy at large, but is "going into the matresses".

      When the economy tanks in the next year or so, all that hoarded wealth will be released to purchase stock and real estate at greatly deflated prices. They'll make a bundle on our economic disaster, eventually, when the US climbs out of its debt hole (by raising taxes and cutting public spending) and the value of the holdings they will purchase at fire-sale prices go back up.

      Supply side economics, as Reagan's budget director David Stockman admitted, is a con to lower taxes on the wealthy at the expense of everyone else. He should know, as he was Reagan's salesman to congress.

      Supply side cuts have failed. Jobs are gone, poverty is up, aid to the poor is going, we're trillions in the hole in debt to China, the wealthy are insanely wealthy and poised to become mega-wealthy after the crash caused by the tax cuts and borrowing. Bush believes in his supply side cuts. But, as we've seen, his beliefs are gut-based, not fact-based, and his gut is unbelieveably incorrect about reality. He simply didn't believe in his own college education, and certainly had his own ideas about economics, his Harvard professor says. Faith-based economics, welfare is communism, government is evil, all that.

      Economic booms are based on the price of oil, not tax cuts. Reagan cut taxes and increased spending, sending us into a spiral that mirrors today's death swirl, but he was saved by one thing: OPEC's pricing discipline collapsed in the early Eighties. So much wealth, which had been hemorraging to the middle eastern princes since 1973, suddenly flooded into the American economy. We sang with power and money and grew, even as the debt ballooned. Reagan was a lucky bugger: his supply side con would have ruined him had OPEC not collapsed.

      Bush the senior had to raise taxes to stop the disaster that supply side created. He paid for it by losing a chance at a second term.

      Bush the junior came into office believing, as all the other conservatives did, in the Reagan Miracle. He was wrong: the miracle was the OPEC collapse that saved the old fool from the folly of believing the pack of thieves that sold him on the supply-side con.

      So, Bush slammed straight into OPEC and the oil companies ascendant, believing that tax cuts were the solution to all, that government was the problem, and that debt would eventually force the death of the New Deal programs the wealthy hated so. It's five years later, and the International Monetary Fund is telling us we can crash hard or crash soft -- but we will crash, when the Chinese and all the others lending us money cut us off. They will dictates terms to US. And Bush will probably react by screaming at his aides and locking himself away from the public, which is pretty much his reponse to every challenge.

      After the crash, the very people who keep selling the supply side con will be flush with offshore cash. They will swoop in and buy cheap, while taxes for the lesser mortals go up 20% to try to stop the bleeding. And oh yep -- they will be the ones who'll be lending us money to shore up the tax base, so they'll make a trillion bucks in interest alone in the next couple of decades -- paid for by tax payers.

      Yup, the money is in the mattress - for now.

    6. Re:Canada vs. USA by Vicissidude · · Score: 2, Funny

      The poor, poor Waltons. They have no money to speak of since it's all tied up in stock. And everyone's out to get them because they provide plenty of well-paying jobs to the community while all but giving away high quality goods. They provide great benefits for their employees while taking absolutely nothing from the government. We should all bow before the great Waltons and the sacrifices they make for all of us.

    7. Re:Canada vs. USA by Belseth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, we got a Republican in the woodpile. In the good ole days they called that trickle down economics or as we at the bottom liked to call it piss down economics. The rich don't benevolently sprinkle their money down like fairy dust they horde it. The average person can't aford to save the bulk of their income so if you want to improve the economy let the average person have more and stop giving all the advantages to the rich. The big tax give back was a joke because the average person saw little of it and most of that went to pay bills. The tax cuts were a scam because they came snaeking back in the form of stealth taxes. All those cuts in deductions you're starting to see are part of that. No we won't raise your taxes but we'll take away your deductions thus raising your taxes without officially raising them. Services are being cut and fees are going up in an effort to balance the books. There's no free lunch and if the rich want to feast the rest of us have to pay for it. Thinking that we are better off with the corporations getting the tax money than the people only makes sense if you are a major corporation. If you claim it creates jobs apparently you aren't paying attention. There's been a blood bath of job cuts for many years now. Most of it so they can send the jobs overseas. Yes the money creates jobs, in China.

    8. Re:Canada vs. USA by saitoh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll add a fundimental difference of defining objectives/principles in a sociological sense to consider:

      US: "Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness"
      Canada: "Peace, order, and good government"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace,_order_and_good _government

      --
      We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    9. Re:Canada vs. USA by farrellj · · Score: 2, Informative

      I spent 2 and a half years in North Carolina, having been recruited from Canada. I had accepted because finding a tech job is very, very hard there...and still is.

      Although I found housing to be cheaper, and many consumer goods...food was the same price, which meant everything was 20-30% more expensive. The tax rate was chaper, but there were more types of taxes. for example, I had to paid a tax to the city for the car, which I had never done in Canada, and the cost of health care insurance was huge. Drugs were very expensive, even with the co-pay. The antihistamine I use, Zirtec in the US, cost me a $30 (USD) co-pay. In Canada, Reactin, (same medication, different name) is half that in CDN dollars...which means I am paying about $13 USD for it.

      Another example...Coca-Cola, which in Canada you can buy in slabs of 24 cans, usually for $7.99 CDN were absent in NC, and the 12 packs were $4.99 USD. As well, after I moved back, I am finding that computer equipment, with the exception of complete systems, are cheaper.

      But things are not all rosy in Canada, either. We have one big problem here...the Human Resources people.

      Since the meltdown of Nortel, there has been a glut of highly qualified techies. Between Notrel's layoffs, and the trickle-down effect, some estimate over 20,000 techies were released into the Canadian tech job market. Because of of this, the HR people have been able to get very specific in what they are looking for, and used to be able to find it. But now, most people have either left the tech field, or Canada, and still the HR people are very specific in what they are looking for, and are not willing to look at equivelent qualifications. For example, if you know AIX, Linux of many flavours, SCO, Solaris and Tru-64, chances are you could pick up HP-UX in a couple of weeks of on the job experience.

      I spent an hour chatting with a former Federal Government HR person, and she said that the burnout rate in the HR field is very high, on the order of 2 to 3 years, so even if an HR person learns that someone who knows MS Word 2000 could probably do OK with Word 2003, they don't forward the resume to the manager who needs the talent to run his business.

      That is why there is a tech shortage, not a lack of techies!

      ttyl
                Farrell McGovern

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  27. Skilled Workers credentials fallout by tv+war · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The attracting of skilled workers to Canada is a bit of a scam. It turns out the only credentials which "count" in practice are ones mainly of Canadian and/or American sources. Sometimes credentials of British, Australian or Western European sources may get by. Otherwise you're shit out of luck. Many folks with credentials from other places, are relegated to working at McDonalds or other minimum wage type jobs. Some are willing to tough it out by going back to school to get Canadian approved credentials.

    Main reason why immigration to Canada isn't very popular for "skilled workers" is because it's harder to find work in comparison to the United States. If you don't have Canadian and/or American experience and credentials, most employers will just delete your resume.

    I highly discourage any skilled workers from immigrating to Canada, unless you're willing to work blue collar jobs and/or are willing to go back to school to get Canadian approved credentials.

    Attracting "skilled" foreign workers and then relegating them to blue collar or minimum wage jobs is largely a waste of resources and time.

  28. Could be nice by Graham1982 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was born in Michigan, and travelled to Canada a few times for brief roadtrips while I was a child. Keep in mind that Canada is not Antarctica, it is not a frozen wasteland the whole year round. You cannot just drive there and say, "okay, where is my citizenship?" though. You have to file with the Canadian Government first, wait a while, and also pay something like $3,000 USD I believe. One thing is for sure, the Canadians have an awesome healthcare system. Yes, it is also true that they don't have nearly as much crime either.

    So why am I not yet living there myself? I am just too lazy to leave for now. Also, I wonder if enough Americans moved there, would we eventually mess the place up and make it an extention of our own country? Ohwell, to fully grasp the reality of this subject, I think you would need the experiance of being a resident both in the United States and in Canada. Even then, keep in mind that not all of the United States is alike, certainly different places in Canada must have some sort of social/economical distinctions from other places. Okay, I think this post is long enough now, I will stop here.

  29. Re:Yes. by EvilMagnus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you looked at Canada's criteria for admitting skilled professionals? It's remarkably egalitarian and open - much better than the US. You basically fill out a checklist based on things like degrees held, languages spoken ... the higher you score, the easier/faster it is to get in. Canada has a form of 'open' visa, where if you qualify (say, if you have a degree and know a bit of French) you can enter Canada to look for work without actually having a job offer.

    Compare that to the US and the H1-B system, where if you're outside the US you must have an offer letter and apply for the visa from outside the country (3-6 month wait for the visa to be granted, if you're lucky) and your degree has to be directly related to the job you've got the offer for.

    So yeah, the basic criteria to be able to go to Canada and look for a job 'on spec' are; hold an Advanced Degree, speak either English or French fluently, and have a passing familiarity with the other.

    --
    -EvilMagnus
  30. Canada Sucks. by nblender · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a Canadian. You Merkans would hate it here. This place sucks. Don't come here. We regularly eat children and stab puppies for sport. It's cold and everyone has a dog-sled. This is a horrible purgatory. I beg of you, please don't come here.

    1. Re:Canada Sucks. by petabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a Canadian. You Merkans would hate it here. This place sucks. Don't come here. We regularly eat children and stab puppies for sport. It's cold and everyone has a dog-sled. This is a horrible purgatory. I beg of you, please don't come here.

      And not a single "eh" in there at all. Like we'd believe you're a Canadian! ;)

  31. Shaddup! Sick of the MRI story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The MRI thing is a myth. I work at University Health Network. At the Princess Margaret Hospital, the MRI staff works in two 10-hour shifts. The delay is for people who do not want to go in before 9am or after 6pm. My mother had to have one and she was booked for 8pm appointment merely four days later! Yes, convenience is great, but sometimes is not an option.

    But then again, outside Toronto it may be a different story.

  32. Re:To become a real Canadian... by PygmySurfer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't kick the baby...

  33. Re:You may still have to wait in the U.S. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And in case anyone wants to cry about how fast food people deserve health coverage too - don't worry. They get it. My mom works in fast food and has health coverage. My brother works at Radio Shack and has health coverage. Fuck, my girlfriend is a stripper and even SHE has health coverage.

    So where are all these full-time employed adults without any health coverage that I keep hearing about? I mean, everyone makes it sound like there are more people driving Escalades than have health coverage, so . . . I want to know. And of those who aren't full-time employed adults with employee health coverage - how many aren't getting health coverage from the state?

  34. Income tax misnomer by Chemical+Serenity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Turns out, income taxes for median incomes (roughly CAD$52k in the US per household, roughly CAD$56k in Canada per household) are more or less equivalent dependant on province vs. state. You'd be better off anywhere in Canada than, say, Texas. If you make 60k or less, you'll probably pay less tax in Canada. If you make 60k or more, you'll pay more. Particularly if you're a landowner... Canada doesn't give big tax breaks for land ownership, which is unfortunate... but you can get a significant portion of dividend income tax free, so if you're getting started in the investor class, you've got some advantages.

    GST does make things more expensive, but cost of living varies so widely based on region both in Canada and the US that it's essentially useless to make comparisons.

    --
    "People will pay big bucks for the luxury of ignorance."
    1. Re:Income tax misnomer by renehollan · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'll have to followup later, but, having been born in Canada, and lived in Texas, I can assure you that it is much cheaper in Texas, tax-wise. Property is dirt cheap, though property taxes and insurance can be high (the property taxes generally pay for great schools, at least they did in Allen). There is not state income tax.

      At just about any income level, a family with a single income, filing jointly, and owning their home will be much better off just about anywhere in the U.S. compared to Canada: there is no deduction for morgtage interest for non-investment property in Canada, and couples with a single income can't file jointly (and the spousal credit is mediocre, about CA$7-8k at the *lowest* marginal tax rate taken off your gross tax burden).

      I once figured out that for marrieds, taxes in the U.S., in a no-income tax state, are generally lower once income goes above $US15k.

      It's the main reason we left Canada for the U.S. -- we could not afford to live in Canada anymore with the high taxes, and mediocre health care (free, perhaps, but non-existent for the most part).

      --
      You could've hired me.
    2. Re:Income tax misnomer by cass1010 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This dude is drunk. I moved from Calgary to Dallas 5 years ago and pay way less in taxes now than I did in Canada.

    3. Re:Income tax misnomer by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "there is no deduction for morgtage interest for non-investment property in Canada"

      The Republican necons in our Congress are trying to remove the mortgage interest deduction as we speak. Now how does the US look if that's gone?

    4. Re:Income tax misnomer by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I once figured out that for marrieds, taxes in the U.S., in a no-income tax state, are generally lower once income goes above $US15k.

      You did, of course, not being a disingenious shill, include the $200-600 (depending on employment type/other factors) a month health insurance per-person in the household in the US equation, right? Right?

    5. Re:Income tax misnomer by Jetson · · Score: 3, Informative
      there is no deduction for morgtage interest for non-investment property in Canada

      There's also no taxes owing for capital gains when you sell that non-investment property. My house in Vancouver, BC has gone up in value by more than $125,000 in the last 3 years. Given a choice between a 17% deduction on the interest portion of my mortgage versus $125,000 in tax-free cash I think I'll take the latter....

    6. Re:Income tax misnomer by Ragingguppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny you should say that health care is non-existent in Canada. Because Canadians pay less per capita for health care then the people in the US. Americans pay 14% of GDP and don't cover everyone. Just the rich and those with corporate health plans can afford it. While in Canada we pay 12% GDP and everyone is covered on our health plan. Regardless of who you are and what you do for a living.

      Non-Existent is an exageration. Thats what the ultra right wing fasists will have you believe so that they can consider installing a two tierd health care system.

      As for affording to live in Canada. I don't believe its the taxes that are difficult to live with. Its the lack of work. Lets face it there are more opportunities in the US. Canadian companies are pansies and won't take a chance on someone if they have no experience. Have you looked at what the requirements are in Canada for working in the computer science field. I can safeley say that most job postings are unrealistic when it comes to the job requirements. But thats what Free trade got us companies moving down to the US because they don't want to pay into a public health care system even though they pay less.

      Free trade is the problem not the high taxes. Since free trade came in Corporate Canada has been completely gutted. Even the Hudsons Bay Company is subject to an American take over bid. A 300 Year old company. Its been around longer then when IBM was selling Cheese Slicers. Yet its subject to a takeover bid. Thats just not right.

      I remember when Free trade first came in to Canada. I personally witnessed a 20 year old company go out of business within a few months of an American big box store come in to the market in Vancouver. That big box store was Home Depot. They drove out a smaller company that served the Greater Vancouver area well for more then 20 years. And the list doesn't stop there. Eatons was purchased by Sears, Woodwards went out of business all together, and McMillan Blodel was bought up by Wearhouser. McMillan Blodel was the biggest logging company in Canada and one of the biggest in the world. That gives you an Idea of the negative impact free trade has had on Canada. The taxes are manageable. They'd be manageable if it wasn't for outside presures. Personally I hope our prime minister follows up on his threats and dumps the North American Free Trade Agreement. That would be the best thing that has ever happened to Canada.

    7. Re:Income tax misnomer by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It is sort of like having 200-600 tax free dollars which must be used to purchase health care, but in this case the employer buys it for you instead of giving you the cash

      Except this is unlikely to be the case in the situation the parent described. The employers are doing their darnest to get out of paying these "benefits" and change work designations to "part-time" or "temporary" or "contract" work to avoid paying them on ever expanding basis. Most people employed in the only area of job expansion in the US - the burger flipping. Wal-Mart and other "service" industries do not have any such benefits. Even many well to do places, such as Microsoft do that. It is a very common scenario amongst IT workers, who are treated as "consultants". Add to this the fact that if forced to, the employers will opt for cheapest insurance with the lowest coverage and highest deductible possible. To compare this situation to Canada and claim that taxation in the US is "lesser" is ridiculous, even if one does not take into account the miriad of other programs offered by the Canadian and Provincial Governments. It is comparing apples to oranges. The US "take home" pay is "greater" simply because the people who take it home are expected to pay much more dearly for these, largely unaffordable to them, services. The fact that there is 40 million of completely medically uninsured US citizens speaks for itself far louder then any self-centered, greedy shill on Slashdot can. What bothers me about the parent is that I fully expect him to crawl back here as soon as he gets into any medical trouble over there. For the likes of him, all of his profits are "private" and exclusively of his own making and all of the losses and help to him are, naturally, an obligation of the Canadian society. I know that kind of a cockroach all to well.

      In other words both systems are third-party pay, but in Canada its the government through higher taxes and in the US it is mostly the employers.

      That is untrue. Some industries, mostly old-style and going away manufacturing ones, used to provide generous benefits. Such benefits are today restricted mostly to the CEO class. In this "comparison" the Canadian system is the only one which is "third-party" as in the US the coverage is abysmal and it could be more accurately described "third-party for CEOs and the wealthy, everyone-for-himself-party former middle class and no-party for the poor" system.

      The economist Milton Friedman wrote an excellent paper on how to fix the healthcare system in America and he considers many other systems alongside our own including the Canadian and European systems.

      That man is a total loon. In his scenario, the coverage for the many Americans would be restricted to the "catastrophic" insurance only, which in the long term is much more expensive as the low income (most populous group and increasing) would avoid using high-deductible medical services until their situation got so desperate as to qualify for "catastrophic" coverage. Such a system promotes use of the "catastrophic", emergency services by discouraging the pre-emptive, lower cost ones. It would result in continuation mad profit taking and little change amongst the insurance leeches who would benefit enormously from the fact that they no longer have to worry about the most expensive and money loosing procedures, for which the taxpayer would pay instead. In other words, it is socialism for the insurance companies. All the profits remain private and in place for regular medical service coverage and the greatest potential losses are socialized. I would expect such as system to prove far more expensive as a whole then the current one (but far more profitable for the insurance companies), even though it would provide at least the catastrophic insurance to all citizens. A typical plan by the kind of a "thinker" Freedman is. An economist my ass.

    8. Re:Income tax misnomer by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Informative

      You get a tax free sale once per 2 years of your personal residence in the U.S. My house has doubled in 5 years, could double again, and double again and I still wouldn't owe any taxes when I sold it.

      The mortgage deduction really doesn't kick in unless your mortgage is about $100k (so say a $120k house with 24k down)and up because of the "standard" deduction.

      The mortgage deduction is really a subsidy for rich people who are buying million dollar houses and getting 2 grand a month off their taxes. The "fair tax" people are trying to lower that to the average house price in a given market- so about $200k Texas and $450k Calif and New York.

      As far as unlimited nationalized health care, I think it is unsustainable. However, I would strongly support a national health care that was about 1,000 times the minimum wage (about $5k). This would cover about 95% of what could go wrong to most people (since auto wrecks are covered by auto insurance and so on for other ways you get injured). It would -not- cover cancer, rare diseases, etc. I think catastropic health care should be covered like it is now. It sounds heartless but we just can't afford to heal everyone- I look at Oregon as a model. And I say that as a cancer survivor who had some heavy bills.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:Income tax misnomer by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except this is unlikely to be the case in the situation the parent described.

      Nope. 80% of Americans get their health insurance paid for by their employers. It is in fact very likely.

      Most people employed in the only area of job expansion in the US - the burger flipping.

      Nope. Here are the fastest growing ocupations in the US over the past 10 years:

      Health aides 138%
      Human service workers 136%
      Personal and home care aids 130%
      Computer engineers and scientists 112%
      Systems analysts 110%
      Physical and corrective therapy assistants and aides 93%
      Physical therapists 88%
      Paralegals 86%
      Teachers, special education 74%
      Medical assistants 71%

      In general the top categories are in health care. It seems to me that a nation with the terrible health care problems you claim would not be adding health care workers at that rate.

      Wal-Mart and other "service" industries do not have any such benefits

      Wal-Mart does in fact offer health covereage to it's workers. The problem here is that their pay rate is so low that about half of them decline coverage.

      Such benefits are today restricted mostly to the CEO class.

      Utter nonsense. My insurance coverage, which I pay $25 a month for includes 100% hospital coverage, free prescriptions and $5 a visit copay to the doctor. Two years ago I needed an MRI for an ankle injury and was able to get an appointment in 3 days. Out of pocket cost was $0. I am definitely NOT a CEO class person.

      An economist my ass.

      A Nobel Prize winning economicist, actually.

      It seems to me that you are living in some sort of weird fantasy world not connected in any way to what the reality is.

    10. Re:Income tax misnomer by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nope. 80% of Americans get their health insurance paid for by their employers. It is in fact very likely.

      Source?

      Health aides 138% Human service workers 136% Personal and home care aids 130% Computer engineers and scientists 112% Systems analysts 110% Physical and corrective therapy assistants and aides 93% Physical therapists 88% Paralegals 86% Teachers, special education 74% Medical assistants 71%

      Most of these are service, part-time, contract or self-employed (i.e. "consultants") "workers". Explain to me again how is it that the employer pays their insurance?

      Wal-Mart does in fact offer health covereage to it's workers. The problem here is that their pay rate is so low that about half of them decline coverage.

      Oh yes! That makes all the difference! Phew! The end result is so completely different! Why, if Wal-Mart did not provide any coverage, that would be, like, they would have no coverage. As opposed to having no coverage. I am so glad that we have this clarified.

      My insurance coverage, which I pay $25 a month for includes 100% hospital coverage, free prescriptions and $5 a visit copay to the doctor. Two years ago I needed an MRI for an ankle injury and was able to get an appointment in 3 days. Out of pocket cost was $0. I am definitely NOT a CEO class person.

      Let me put you in touch with these people then (read all the comments from your fellow Americans). Enlighten them as to your wonderful insurance company. It seems they sure need it.

      A Nobel Prize winning economicist, actually.

      It seems to me that you are living in some sort of weird fantasy world not connected in any way to what the reality is.

      That's the way to prove your grasp on reality! Nobel Prise winning economcists [sic!] are always guaranteed to be experts in everything. Like national medical care. Even if economics itself is considered "science" only by other economists (sort of like psychiatry). And the top Nobel Prize winning economists never get together to apply their "theories" to practice by forming world's most famous and largest hedge funds, which never, I mean never would fail completely and spectacularly to the tune of many billions of dollars, having the said geniuses scatter all over with their tails between their legs. It could never happen! They also never have agendas, oh no! Even if their theories have obvious, easily noticeable holes you could drive trucks through. But what counts for "reality" is only the things which agree with your ideology. Reality my ass.

    11. Re:Income tax misnomer by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Indeed.

      Not so. The parent is spinning, which I pointed out in my reply.

      Many Canadians I've met can not understand how the U.S. can function at all without universal healthcare. But, function it does.

      That depends on your definition of "function".

      But, when one looks deeper, one sees that the percentage of the population in the worst case scenario is (a) actually quite small and (b) there is opportunity to move out of poverty.

      What is (a) the number then and (b) I have the "opportunity" to become the King of Monaco, if only I were to hang around in the right places to meet the princess and get hitched, no? It could happen, really! The odds are even similar as for some of those people "moving out of poverty". What the fuck does "opportunity" to "move out of poverty" mean? What counts is that they, at present, not in your hypotetical, coulda-woulda-shoulda America, have no coverage. Or is this too complicated?

      In contrast, Canada's "social safety net" is, for many, an illusion. Rather like a lottery: everybody knows of someone who won, but the chances of doing so are quite slim.

      I have first-hand experience. Many who post on Slashdot do too. You are just a lying, greedy dork with an agenda, that's all.

      We have, went through boom and bust, having to return to Canada for a while (always staying in legal status), and are now back.

      That fuck says it all about you. Do not come back here you fucking leech! You've abandoned this country, you are opposed to what it stands for, you pay your taxes to another and obviously have greater allegiance to another so stay the fuck out!. You whine about how wonderful it is to make profits on the backs of some poor idiots in the States and then, when some shit hits the fan, to crawl back here to take advantage of the social safety net which the rest of us are building for ourselves. The same one you are dissing whenever it is inconvenient for your pocket book at other times. What a fucking cockroach!

      Heck, my son is an American citizen, and the rest of us hope to be soon, as well.

      Good riddance. And stay out.

      There is poverty everywhere. I happen to like that I can donate substantial funds a month to the local food bank (generally more around the holidays) rather than have some fat-ass politoco tax that money from me "for the poor on welfare (after expenses of course -- mmmm, leather chair, mmm".

      Sure and they get to eat whenever the bank happens to have some food, i.e. whenever you and other economic-rape artists feel pangs of conscience. Every second July or so.

    12. Re:Income tax misnomer by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      n my case, the cost of our health coverage is more like $1200 a month, but my employer covers all of it,

      There are not many people like you there statistically. You are an elite exception. Also a huge, $1200 a month, tax on an employer is supposedly somehow better then personal taxation how again?

      and it's for far better care than I can get in Canada -

      And that would be how precisely? Blow jobs by nurses? 1400 square feet bed-rooms with French maids? What?

      much of what it covers is not covered by provincial health care programs.

      Ouija boards or Chinese Astrological Brick To The Head Therapy I presume?

      Even then, it's still cheaper

      $1200 a month is cheaper? Does it cover whatever that thing is you are smoking right now too?

    13. Re:Income tax misnomer by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now shut up, before the U.S. decides to block export of cheap meds your way.

      The reason that they are cheap here is because otherwise the 20 year patent protections which Canadian government granted to them under the condition of price controls would be removed. Followed by Canada's generic drug makers becoming the suppliers of drugs to 90% of USA. But you knew that, didn't you?

      Funny. Doctors weren't scare in Canada until there was universal health care coverage and their fees were fixed by the government. We know not of this "scarce resources" problem, at least when applied to doctors, in the U.S. If you'd stop taxing your "scarce resources" away, perhaps they'd not be so scarce.

      Let me explain to you how this works: some doctors (and many other professionals) are supremely greedy sons of bitches. Luckily for them, there is one place on Earth that is insane enough to allow them to control access to medical care for all of its citizens. In that place, called the USA, they can make fortunes completely out of proportion with their services to society. The result of such a thing is that many US citizens have no medical care, most only partial and the doctors get supremely rich. Not to mention other middle-men such as the insurance companies. That is chiefly because medical care is not an element of a free market and not even of capitalism per se. Patients do not qualify as Adam Smith's "educated consumers" as in many cases they arrive in the hospital unconscious and thus unable to "shop" for medical services. Not to mention the lack of knowledge required to even do such "shopping". So, consequently, by being direct neighbours to complete insanity, it is only natural that some unscrupulous medical professionals would leave to hope to get rich quick in such an environment. Luckily, most are sane and understand their role in society. And they dont leave. Many older doctors are actually coming back, having tasted the way things work in the US. That is the long answer to your "scarcity" of doctors. The short answer is: you are an idiot. Do not let reality interfere with your engaging in the oldest pursuit of man: trying to morally justify your own selfish greed.

      It's funny how scarcity is a self-fulfilling prophesy of socialist societies.

      Only temporarily, when they are neighbours to insane houses of cards built on pure greed. If they can make it to the next "depression" there is smooth sailing afterwards, at least for a few decades, until the memories wane and the greedmongers overtake the discourse again amidst the affluence. Rinse, repeat.

    14. Re:Income tax misnomer by Chemical+Serenity · · Score: 2, Informative
      I wonder, then, why more doctors are coming back to Canada than going south.

      Or perhaps you havn't been paying attention?

      A quote:

      Dr. Andrew Johnson, an infectious diseases specialist, said he left Canada six years ago to pursue his career in the U.S.

      "At the time it was really just the opportunity to perform research," he told CTV News.

      Now with two children of his own, Johnson has returned to live in Calgary.

      "Canada is a great place to raise children and has a good education system," he said. "We don't have quite the same problems like violence and hand guns."
      Which brings us full circle to the point of the article. Obviously, Canada has attractions that money can't buy. A general sense of safety, for instance, as exemplified by the people coming home. Thus it's wise (election posturing or no) to give additional incentives to people worthy of being here. Combine that with higher median per-houshold income, not having to worry about declaring bankruptcy if you happen to get sick (oh yes, did you know that half of the bankruptcies in the US are medically related, and that 75% of those bankrupts HAD INSURANCE? Some great coverage, there!), a socially liberal atmosphere and not being in a country that has a leader threatening to veto anti-torture legislation.... well, Canada's lookin' pretty good these days.

      Not that it'd matter much to you "Hate Canada First" types.

      --
      "People will pay big bucks for the luxury of ignorance."
  35. Re:Well it's the UK, but same logic... by ThaFooz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well i'm not in the US, i'm in the UK...That said, we haven't exactly done a grand job of keeping anyone out anyway...

    More precisley, you haven't exactly figured out who to keep in. I guess the Americans and Australians weren't the rejects that you suspected they were ;)

  36. Re:How about giving up the Socialism, eh? by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about giving up the Socialism, eh?
    People leave Canada for a country with a better economy, and the government's solution is to spend more tax money! Brilliant move, eh?

    I presume you're talking about the US - one of the most socialist countries on the planet (or have you opted out of the endless socialist pork projects, massive socialist war machine, and corporate welfare? Is that a checkbox on your income tax return?). Of course it isn't to benefit the poor, so Americans lift their chins up and talk about their great "capitalism" versus the evil "socialism" (of the REST OF THE 1ST WORLD), strangely imagining some moral high road.

    Absolutely amazing that any American, with the enormous pork and tax-grabbing bloat of its government, can bleat the word socialist in any manner other than humor or self-deprecation.

    What's even more remarkable is the fact that the all-in tax load in the US is, in many cases, similar to or greater than a comparable person in Canada. Don't tell Americans this, though - it might upset their imaginary world.

  37. American style socialism by tv+war · · Score: 4, Interesting

    America is just as socialist as Canada or any European country.

    Only difference is that most of the American style "socialism" is more towards the military and defense sector (ie. Halliburton, Bechtel, etc ...). In Canada and most European countries, the socialism is more towards things like a health care system, welfare state, etc ...

    America has all kinds of socialistic institutions like:

    The Federal Reserve Bank,
    Fannie Mae,
    Freddie Mac,
    Social Security,
    The US Postal Service,
    Pension Benefit Guarnaty Corporation,
    Medicare,
    Medicaid,
    Amtrak,
    etc ...

  38. Re:Goodbye Canada by Darktan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Annoying? It's not really the Quebecois that are annoying, it's the ones who use the threat of separation as a stick to bully the rest of Canada. Oh no! you didn't concede to our every whim! We're leaving! It's like dealing with a three year old.

    That said, most of the Quebecois that make it out west are really cool. They're almost as much fun to hang around as the Newfies.

  39. Re:You may still have to wait in the U.S. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

    Should we include starving artists in that as well? If you're a depressed starving artist living in a loft and you spend your days drinking coffee and splattering paint on a canvas (or eating your body's impression out of a bread-mattress) that nobody will want to buy, you are OWED health care. Hell, society should owe you a fucking CAR! And a nice one, too!

  40. Re:Well it's the UK, but same logic... by hug_the_penguin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Let's not get xeonphobic about this ;)

    We're doing fine at keeping skilled doctors etc. in, working the NHS etc., the problem is the non-workers. I was waiting at a bus stand a few months back and i started talking to this guy there. He told me he was a South African and that he was only here to get his family transported over so his son could have an operation free on the NHS. I don't exactly call that a good reason to be over here, given that the goverment are already EXTREMELY generous to immigrants, what with giving them a house and car for free, more than pensioners or disabled people get.

    --
    ~HTP~ Hug that tux ;)
  41. Ya don't say! by bitspotter · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I left Arizona for Vancouver BC in Jan 2003. I've been telecommuting with the little web services outfit (still in AZ) ever since. I married a local last June, and she's sponsoring me for Perm Residency soon.

    It was a great relief. My first coherent thought after 9/11 was "This is how tyrants are made". I seem to have been right.

    I have absolutely no regrets. Answer your question?

  42. Re:How about giving up the Socialism, eh? by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And your "record low level" is 6.6%. During our "recession," we hit a high of 6.3

    Only because people dropped off unemployment completely and thus disappeared from the statistics. Had we been counting actual bodies and not just checks we'd still be in the hole right now.

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
  43. Re:As an american currently living in canada... by CrankyBuffalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Also as an American currently living in Canada, I must disagree. Canadian healthcare is FAR superior.

    Canadian healthcare does the job -- everyone has a basic level of care. For specialized services that are not life threatening, you wait. In the US, if you are fortunate enough to have good insurance, you can fight your way through the system and get care...once. After that, you're hosed unless you manage to keep insurance through your work, because you'll never get insurance personally again.

    My wife waited 3 months for a gynecological procedure in Bellingham, WA before we moved. She's been waiting for 5 months or more here in Vancouver for a possible knee procedure.

    Emergency medicine is exactly the same here except that you don't get a multithousand dollar bill at the end of the experience.

    Our last complete year in the US, we paid over $14,000 US for medical insurance. In BC, we pay about $1300 CDN. The $5K CDN or so in extra taxes we paid saved us a bunch of money.

    And BTW, only 2% or so of Canadians ever avail themselves of US healthcare, despite claims that Canadians flock to the US to get care they can't get on time in Canada. Just ain't so.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Re:How about giving up the Socialism, eh? by larry_larry · · Score: 3, Informative

    Canada is not a socialist country and it has a pretty damn good economy. Here is a graph of the Toronto Stock Exchange vs. the S&P500. By your metric, if Canada is Socialist then almost every western country other than the US must be too. Checkout The Economist's factsheet for Canada. Also, Canada has the second largest oil reserves in the world.

  46. The wait vs. the cost by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It is true that nationalized healthcare systems, such as the NHS of Britain, and the Canadian system, are slow. That could be fixed by adding more doctors. It's a solvable problem. In the US, insurance costs are through the roof (you could probably rival Bill Gates on wealth just by not getting sick), medicare is rife with fraud by hospitals and not all insurance is even accepted at all hospitals, so you can get turfed out even in life-or-death situations.


    (Actually, in America, you might get turfed out in critical situations anyway. Many hospitals don't have an emergency room, as they cost more than they make and US hospitals are there for profit not care. Those ER rooms that do exist are hopelessly overcrowded, overworked and are considered by the CDC to be extremely high risk areas in the event of an outbreak of a contageous disease. If bird flu ever goes critical, it will likely do so in a US emergency room.)


    The American situation, unlike the British and Canadian counterparts, is not fixable. Because hospitals in the US are profit ventures, not health-care centers, they have no interest in doing anything that will cost more than it will earn. Proper emergency care is expensive and earns little, as most accident and crime victims are uninsured and/or flat broke. They have no interest in lowering prices, because the bulk of "paying" customers have health insurance and so never see the real price tag and therefore have no reason to care what it is.


    Insurance companies in the US are also money-grubbers and they know how to rake the money in. By charging the companies a "reduced rate" for bulk purchases, they can absolutely guarantee that customers never see the real cost to their paychecks. The victim - errr, employee - only sees a given deduction for their deduction. What they don't see is what the company is really paying and therefore what the company is really calculating payscales on. In the end, you pay the full cost but you only see a fraction of it on the pay stub.


    By these accounting tricks and other fraud, the US employees are bilked billions of dollars and somehow consider themselves better off because they don't have the wait. Trust me, if you threw billions of dollars out the window in England, you'd get prompt healthcare too. Well, just as soon as anyone realized that was real money and not something from a Monopoly game.


    (For that matter, there's always BUPA, if you insist on the insurance thing in more civilized lands.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:The wait vs. the cost by PPGMD · · Score: 2, Insightful
      With exceptions of specialist hospitals, such as ones that only treat children, any hospital worth it's salt has an ER, at least in this state. If Canada or the UK threw the amount of money needed to take the wait times down to reasonable levels (no person should have to deal with the pain for more then a week), they would see such a sharp incline in spending that it would make the government accounts choke.

      Medicare fraud sucks, but it's something to deal with, but it's there for those that need the care, whether old, or simply those that can't pay. Also most states have health plans for the low income, in particular children.

      Would I rather be in a system where fraud can happen, but is punished when found, or be on my couch, in pain waiting for a doctor? Personally when you are in pain, the only thing that matters is removing it. Something is wrong when your citizens have to fly to other countries to get needed surgeries.

    2. Re:The wait vs. the cost by PixelScuba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you also speak for the ~46 million of us that can't afford Health Insurance here in the States? We're not lazy, we work very hard, but Health Insurance here is TOO costly to afford. I can't count the number of times I've suffered with an illness or injury simply because I can't afford to go to the hospital... and I KNOW I'm not alone.

    3. Re:The wait vs. the cost by pavera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know how many hospitals you've been to in the US, but I've never been to one that actually called itself a "Hospital" that didn't have an ER (I've lived in 5 cities in 4 states...)... Now sometimes you'll see a "medical center" that doesn't have an er.. but anyway...

      The US is fixing the "No one sees the price tag" problem, its called HSA's. Hundreds of companies are moving to them, I own a small business its how my employees get coverage, we save tons of money on premiums, and we save tons of money on care because we all see the full price of everything, and we can shop around. HSA's are introducing value shopping to the health care market (by value I mean cost+quality=value not just cost) So if you find 2 doctors, one who will do procedure x for 300, and he's rated a B, and another doctor who charges $5000 for the same procedure, but he's rated slightly higher (maybe B+) you go for the $300 doctor...

      Anyway, this is something I've learned in the last year using an HSA, doctors in the US really do overcharge (but some don't), and the reason they do is because the insurance is picking up the tab. For just a regular checkup type visit (30 minutes in the chair, vitals, weight, eyes, ears, mouth, basic physical type stuff) I was quoted earlier this year anywhere from $1000 to $45. I ended up paying $85, the doctor was professional, and good, I didn't have to wait, and I saved $450 from what our old family doctor was charging (to our previous insurance, so we never knew how much he charged).

      Anyway, the "hidden charge" problem can be fixed and is being fixed, and guess what its being fixed by creating an OPEN MARKET! I know you lefties will hate that. The Health care market is not an open market right now, its run by basically an oligopoly (the doctors) and a gov't sanctioned monopoly (insurance cos) The insurance cos are in effect a monopoly because they have an OK from congress to share information, and colude on prices. Ever wonder why there aren't any "budget" health insurance companies? It's because the Insurance industry has pushed through enough laws to make it illegal to be a health insurance provider unless you play their game and set prices where they already are.

      The US system can be fixed and much more readily and cheaply than the UK, or Canadian problems. IE if everyone in the US moved to HSA's there would be an immediate drop in prices across the industry everyone would save money. In national health care systems the only solution available is to spend more money on extra doctor's specialists, equipment, etc. Previously in this post it mentioned that Canadians pay $60/mo for their "free" health care... Well if they got the level of service that is available in the US, I bet it would cost closer to $300/mo... oh wait... that looks alot like the $250/mo I used to pay (regular insurance I had before HMO, I own the business, I know all the costs). If people are waiting 3+ months for a specialist that I can make an appointment to see next week, well.. that is 12 times more capacity (1 week vs 12) so I'm probably being generous with only making the cost 5 times more (60 * 5 = 300).

      My point is I think you're wrong, the health care situation in the US can be fixed, and the way to fix it is to open the market, not socialize it. National health care leads to lower levels of service, or to provide the same level of service, you have to spend just as much as people are in the US.

  47. financial rape by jbellis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    wait, you recognise the problem, but you still want to move to "almost as socialist as europe" Canada?

  48. Re:Yes. by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sadly, you're still and ignorant sod.

    The problem is that the baby boom is over, and it's going to be quite a while until the echo boomers are ready to take over those positions. In the meantime, everyone wants to be a doctor or a lawyer or some other job they see glamourized on TV, so nobody wants to be a tradesman anymore -- the median age of tradespeople is aggregating towards 55 now, which means that there is a vacuum. Lots of jobless people with IT skills, but nobody who can turn a wrench.

    This is great news for people with a bit of vision, because they can get into trades and make a bundle right now.

    That said, this problem has everything to do with shifting demographics and nothing to do with socialism. The US has the exact same problem. Nobody wants to do any real work any more.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  49. Canada isn't all that it's cracked up to be by StandardCell · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a Canadian who has worked for years both in Canada and the United States, and having taken the plunge 18 months ago to come back to Canada to work, I can say that it has been an unpleasant experience.

    Healthcare up here is abysmal. Trying to find a family doctor is nearly impossible, and there are long wait times for elective procedures and medical imaging. One of our family friends died of a heart attack after waiting nearly a year for bypass surgery. I'm paying more for health care up here than I ever did in the US due to my premiums.

    Education is a joke up here too. Ontario, for example, passes ALL children unless they basically hand in nothing or choose to do nothing throughout the year. My neighbor's son got straight "R" grades ("F" is no longer politically correct), yet somehow passed to Grade 5 last year. That'll keep happening until he graduates high school, even though this kid still can't read a basic "See Jane Run" type book.

    Daily life is ok, but there are some things you have to be aware of. Although the overall murder rate is lower in Canada, per-capita rates of rape and property crime are all higher than in the United States. I feel less safe here than I did in the San Francisco Bay area and much less safe than in the Lehigh Valley of Pennsylvania. Try rolling through Toronto and see what it's like these days. Forget about the unbelievably bitter cold, excessive snow if you live in Eastern Canada, and generally longer winters. Weather counts for a lot.

    Then there's the financial aspect of it. Sure, people don't get bankrupted here, but if you're not chronically or seriously ill you are better off in the US. I've paid more for health care here since my employer doesn't cover my premiums (yes, we pay premiums, $60/month/person). Auto insurance is 50% more expensive than what I paid for in California, plus I can't remove tickets from my record with traffic school. House prices are insane; I can't buy a fully-detached house with two car garage for under $400k, and I can't deduct my mortgage interest or property taxes from my federal taxes. I get paid less in equivalent dollars than any job in the US, and all of my Canadian friends who have worked both places want to go back south unless they have significant family obligations north of the 49th. I pay more in taxes, especially at the till (15% sales tax on a car is insane!). The government's overly-liberal immigration policies make unemployment consistently 2% higher at a minimum than in the United States so I'm always looking over my shoulder thinking when my time might be next.

    Finally, there's the government. Lots of /.ers think that Canada is some magical place of freedom. It's not. Freedom of speech is curtailed as we have laws against "hate speech" that the US would consider violations of the First Amendment. Freedom of the press is a joke, since several times reporters were spied on, wiretapped or just simply had their personal files confiscated without a warrant by corrupt police who feel that due process is an inconvenience. Our Senate isn't elected nor provides regional representation, but is an expensive rubber stamp with no real power. Heck, we didn't even have our full independence from the United Kingdom until April 19, 1982! We have sexist and racist government departments that purposely exclude white males from positions supposedly in the name of diversity. There are 36,000 deportation orders on illegal immigrants that can't be executed because the government doesn't know where they are. They let the families of Somali warlords and Sikh terrorists stay in this country. And, in general, the majority of people here have been lulled into utter stupidity by the clever social engineering of Pierre Trudeau's liberal party over the last 35 years that has their party about to be voted back into power that has stolen billions of dollars from taxpayers (Adscam, HRDC et al). Not to mention that Canada is the only major industrialized nation in the world to

  50. Re:No! You are mis-informed by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The aboriginal people are self governed, and they are not by any means underfunded. Their problems are entirely self-inflicted, and the productive natives should be up in arms over the disgusting behaviour of their bretheren.

    Billions are already spent on providing what SHOULD be excellent living conditions for a virtual handful of people. Instead, their corrupt self-government combines with the pitiful behaviour of people on reserves, leaving taxpayers with the cheque -- The Prime Minister just allocated 5 billion dollars to prevent suicides in native communities, which have pitifully reached epidemic levels.

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. Until the native populations in canada grow up and start actually taking some responsibility for their actions(And some of them are atrocities -- My mother lived in the North, in a small mining community past Thompson Manitoba, and she has told me stories of natives feeding their kids drano to send them to the hospital because they don't want to get a babysitter while they went out drinking for the night) and their own self-government, they have absolutely no business blaming anyone but themselves for their situation. Rational natives should be extremely vocal in critisizing the unfortunate majority which is enforcing stereotypes and in so doing causing even natives who want to be productive in society untold grief.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  51. I was born in Canada... by Barbarian · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..when do I get my entitlement?

  52. Some numbers to compare Canada and USA by EMB+Numbers · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let me say that I enjoy the Canadian way of life myself, but let's look at some numbers:

    Source: http://www.worldfactsandfigures.com/gdp_country_de sc.php [worldfactsandfigures.com]
    GDP per capita Canada: $29,700
    GDP per capita USA: $37,800

    Source: http://www.readersdigest.ca/mag/1999/06/think_01.h tml [readersdigest.ca]
    National average total taxation Canada: 48.2 %
    National average total taxation USA: 41.4 %

    Source: http://www.statcan.ca/english/Subjects/Labour/LFS/ lfs-en.htm [statcan.ca]
    National unemployment rate Canada: 6.6%
    National unemployment rate USA: 4.9%

    Source: http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/040728/d040728 a.htm [statcan.ca] & http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm [disastercenter.com]
    Total Violent crime per 100,000 people Canada: 963
    Total violent crime per 100,000 people in USA: 466

    By all of these measures you are better off in the USA.

    [This may be a duplicate of a previous Anonymous Coward posting that I did not intend.]

  53. Vancouver vs. The Frozen North by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Last time I seriously thought about moving to Canada I drew a decent number in the draft lottery and stopped worrying about it, but it would have been a much easier decision if I'd seen Vancouver instead of just The Frozen North, which (as an East-Coaster) were the parts of Canada I'd seen. Montreal's nice in the summer, as is Toronto, and Sudbury's ugly year-round just like the US industrial cities on the other side of the lakes, but they're all Too Cold in the winter, and they start winter too early. (I went to college in upstate New York - it's pretty much the same thing. Winter's beautiful there, but too much hassle.)

    Vancouver's great, and it's on my list of cities I'd move to if I really wanted to get out of San Francisco Bay Area or out of the US. Weather's like Seattle, culture's interesting, coffee's good, and you can get out of town easily. And as far as "would I move to a different country with similar culture", I moved from New Jersey to San Francisco; moving to Vancouver wouldn't be as big a change. Moving to Toronto would be, because it'd be moving back to a culture with winter.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  54. Re:Well it's the UK, but same logic... by leathered · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, immigration of Australians is essential if the beer is to be kept flowing in the London's bars.

    As for Americans, we need them here because...

    I'll get back to you on that one.

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
  55. Re:Well it's the UK, but same logic... by ThaFooz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah yes, I forgot the slashdot rules. A Brit with a gentle poke at Americans is all in good fun, but an American doing it is xeonphobic ;)

    In all seriousness though, I agree with you that the American and British laws and/or their enforcement tend to be favorable to immigrants and are prone to abuse. It doesn't particularly bother me though, I'd certainly rather that then the inverse elitist anti-immigrant mentality (anyone heard of the hoops one has to jump through to earn Swiss or Japanese citizenship?). I'm not sure if say that because of the old American give-us-your-wretched mentality, or because the population density of the US still allows it, or because the US economy benifits from it (IMHO anyways, I'm sure someone would argue it).

    This is kind of an aside, but I've kind of always wondered this about the English. You're example an abuse of NHS was that of a South African man... but do you feel any obligation towards South Africa? I mean, the British rape of India & Sub-Saharan Africa only ended ~60 years ago, and has yet to recover. Not that the US (or any other nation) doesn't have skeletons in its closet, of course - but do you think such relativley recent disadvantages should factor into said immigration laws, college admissions, job applications, tax breaks, et cetra? The US has decided "yes" (hotly debated though), and I was wondering the take on it over in the UK.

  56. Canada is still a great option by toby · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Trying to find a family doctor is nearly impossible,

    Maybe in your district. This month in Toronto I found one in about 20 minutes using the Physicians directory. (Despite the dribble of objections from the middle class who have captured the notion that privatisation solves everything, some level of public health service is necessary in a socially just state. That's one big point in Canada's favour...)

    (What does "excessive snow" actually mean? How is snow "excessive"? It's snow, for goodness' sake. If you have such a problem with it, sure, you probably want to live somewhere else, at least for those couple of months (Dec/Jan/Feb in Toronto). Frankly, I find the Toronto Summer much harder to cope with than the Winter...)

    I can't buy a fully-detached house with two car garage for under $400k,

    Have you priced that in any other first world country lately? Then try pricing one in Europe. Canada's real estate prices are quite reasonable compared to comparable New World cities of my acquaintance.

    As for education, I cannot comment on the elementary levels, since I'm personally done with that phase. I'm sorry if it's not working out with your kids. However, should I choose tertiary, I know that the cities I'm familiar with - Toronto, Montreal - boast many world class institutions. So presumably you weren't talking about university level "education".

    On the subject of city life: The infrastructure Just Works(TM); there is clean and efficient public transport (Montreal's Metro can hold its own with any city's); the streets of Toronto are (still) much safer than US cities; Canadians are incredibly, touchingly polite and civil; they read books; they are informed and interested in things outside their own borders; etc.

    several times reporters were spied on, wiretapped or just simply had their personal files confiscated without a warrant by corrupt police who feel that due process is an inconvenience.

    I can't think of a "democracy" where that hasn't happened from time to time. Ditto for the corruption/kickback/etc things that I'm sorry to say are not uniquely Canadian. Put that one down to human nature: "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance," n'est-ce pas? We can still hope that something less than armed revolution is necessary to keep a Canadian government (relatively) honest...

    There are 36,000 deportation orders on illegal immigrants that can't be executed because the government doesn't know where they are.

    I don't think this situation is unique to Canada by any means. It is effectively impossible to locate every alien who doesn't want to be found and deported, especially given Canada's geography. Sure, with a few hundred million thrown at the problem, you could find maybe 70% of them (volunteering your tax dollars?) That last few percent just won't ever be found... could just be they really want to live here! (Duh.)

    If you think you're going to...satisfy your ideological cravings by coming up to Canada, you are gravely mistaken

    Au contraire. I moved here largely for ideological reasons. Canada did not support the Iraq occupation nor the Vietnam adventure, unlike my previous country of residence. I believe in voting with one's passport and Canada's values as a nation do not make me sick to my heart. The arrogance is at least partly justified; and a healthy and judicious distaste for today's America puts Canadians who feel that way in very good company worldwide.

    Canada is able to lay claim to more than its fair share of progressive thinkers. Heck, I hear it's one of only 4 countries in the world that countenances gay marriage, and won't give you a life sentence for a couple of grams of dope. Which reminds me. We're METRIC! If that's not enough to make you want to live here, then nothing will...

    --
    you had me at #!
  57. Germany is cool too, no pun intended! by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I moved from Arizona to Hamburg, Germany just over a year ago. The best move I've ever made. I make a little more money than the US national average for a Unix Admin but the cost of living here is much lower than Phoenix or my other recent home San Diego, CA.

    The health care system here is also socialized but with an option for private health care (either exclusive or in addition to) your basic health care.

    Naturally there is the language problem. You can live here if you don't speak German but it would be very very difficult. For me, that's not a problem though.

    The immigration laws are extremely strict for most nationalities but not nearly as bad for Americans. They do kindof use a Catch22 system though. You can't get residence permission without employment and a registered address here. You can't rent an apartment or get a job without residence permission though. There are loopholes but it's tough.

    Of course, if anyone in your family tree, has or had, even the slightest percentage of German blood you can get citizenship pretty easily.

    If you're married to a German, you don't have to change your citizenship to live here. Of course you can if you want to but it's not required which is my case.

    Crime is extremely low everywhere and the weather is similar to the Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York region.

    The IT market is somewhat thin, similar to the US, but there are plenty of jobs out there.

  58. Re:How about giving up the Socialism, eh? by Nolkyan · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Also, Canada has the second largest oil reserves in the world." Yes, sir, Mister President, I do believe Canada is intending to use weapons of mass destruction against us.

  59. Re:Yes. by drsquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's not very egalitarian, it's still biased towards rich educated people who speak French. The EU has a superior system where anyone can move from any member state to another and live and work there, with no visa and no work permit required.

    As an unskilled worker, neither America's nor Canada's system are any use to me, I can't go there.

  60. Re:Bullsh*t by Shajenko42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You see, if you work for a living, you have access to great healthcare.
    Not if you work at Wal-Mart.