Slashdot Mirror


Online Scammers Go Spear-Phishing

Ant wrote to mention an examination at C|NET looking into the increasingly more effective techniques employed by phishers. From the article: "More recently, however, a hybrid form of phishing, dubbed "spear-phishing," has emerged and raised alarms among the digital world's watchdogs. Spear-phishing is a distilled and potentially more potent version of phishing. That's because those behind the schemes bait their hooks for specific victims instead of casting a broad, ill-defined net across cyberspace hoping to catch throngs of unknown victims."

43 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. This is weird. by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
    According to records of the Israeli investigation, Wieseltier told authorities that she received a Trojan-infested e-mail message bearing the address of gur_r@zahav.net.il, which she believed came from a friend.

    But her friend's e-mail was actually gur-r@zahav.net.il. As Israeli investigators traced the origin of the bogus account they discovered that the person who had opened it lived in London and had charged the cost of the account to his American Express card.

    Are we to believe that these super-phishers don't know how to spoof a From: header?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  2. Its the viruses you don't know about... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...which you should worry about. Viruses which create havoc and draw attention to themselves should be less of a concern.

    If software has been created for a specific attack, then standard virus scanners will never pick up its signature.

  3. bullshit article by eobanb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I particularly love this part:

    Jackont took his computer to the Israeli police last fall and was told to reformat it. But his problems persisted. So the police examined his computer more closely and discovered that a malicious program known as a Trojan horse lay hidden deep inside and had hijacked the machine from a remote location.

    So he reformatted his drive but the virus was still there? What?

    I'm sorry, but does it really take much effort to get the facts right? EVERYONE seems to get it wrong: CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, CNET. Somehow, the writers chosen to pump out articles like this either don't really understand technology or just pick subjects of which they don't really know anything.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:bullshit article by Renraku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its entirely possible to reformat and still have a virus. What about MBR viruses and memory-resident ones?

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:bullshit article by Sir+Runcible+Spoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is more than one way to format a disk. If you do it with FDISK and don't provide the /MBR option it does not recreate the master boot record. If your virus is hiding there it will survive.

    3. Re:bullshit article by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 5, Interesting
      EVERYONE seems to get it wrong: CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, CNET. Somehow, the writers chosen to pump out articles like this either don't really understand technology or just pick subjects of which they don't really know anything.
      And unfortunately, it's not all that unusual. After reading the article, I'm not so sure that "phishing" played a part at all, and I'm disappointed that C|Net is playing the media-hype-buzzword game beyond what could reasonably be expected. I figure that [MS]NBC, CNN, and the other networks will get this sort of thing wrong, but C|Net is fairly reputable when it comes to tech reporting.

      FTA,
      Last spring, staff, faculty and students at the University of Kentucky opened e-mail messages purporting to be from the university's credit union and requesting confidential information to access their accounts (something no financial institution in the country ever seeks via e-mail).
      That isn't "spear phishing," and sure as hell doesn't warrant the coining of a new term. It might be considered normal "phishing," if only the author had a clue. Just because a "phish" is targeted at a particular group doesn't make it any more special than the everyday eBay "phish" spammed at random to ten million email addresses. This whole "spear phishing" thing is a contrived buzzword like "spim" (or "Cyber Monday"). Spam over IM is still spam, it doesn't need a new term. Phishing for particular targets is still phishing - I even hate that term, really - and doesn't need a new cyberbuzzword.

      Free clue-by-four: the term "phishing" gained popularity on AOL some 6 or 8 years ago, and described the practice of attempting to solicit passwords from unsuspecting users. No matter how simplistic or elaborate the scheme, and regardless of whether normal users or employees were targeted in a blanket or with a direct ploy, it was always "phishing" (or ><> 'ing). Back then, the media hadn't yet caught on to the idea. Now that they've caught up, they want to call anything and everything "phishing."

      From TFA,
      About two weeks ago, a more traditional phishing scam infected about 30,000 individual computers worldwide, according to CipherTrust, a computer security firm.
      Are you kidding me? How does a "phishing scam" "infect" computers? "Phishing" is asking for information; it's impossible for a "phish" to infect anything.

      I've really lost some respect for C|Net on this one.
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    4. Re:bullshit article by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, more likely, the person who did "reformat" it just reinstalled the OS without actually formatting anything. Most of people who work in tech support don't know the difference.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:bullshit article by oolon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No i does NOT! It infact installs it where the "boot" line in your lilo.conf tells it too. Yes alot of distro default to this behavior but they don't HAVE to. For example from my lilo.conf

      boot=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2

      Why don't I install it on my MBR? because when you install windows it wipes the MBR, creates a boot block on its partition and changes the active partion. So if I don't use the MBR all I have to do to get lilo back is to change my active partition back to partition 2, which is much less hassle then having to boot a rescue disk etc.

      James

    6. Re:bullshit article by Stiletto · · Score: 4, Insightful


      How about we just drop all the silly cyber-words and start calling it what it is: Fraud.

    7. Re:bullshit article by Woldry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, let's get even less specific and just call it "crime." Or wait! How about maybe just "bad"? While we're at it, let's stop all this silly talk of Fords and Saturns and SUVs and just call 'em all "cars". And we can definitely do without all of the ridiculous kitchen words like "fry" and "roast" and "microwave" and "steam" and "simmer" and just call it what it is: Cooking.

      "All the silly cyber-words" are useful means of distinguishing nuances of meaning -- identifying specific methods of fraud, for instance. "Phishing" refers to a specific method of fraud, and as such adds precision and power to the language. The coining of the new term -- "spear phishing" -- makes it clear that this is a special type of the more general method of phishing, and even provides a pretty clear image to identify the particular type. Identifying this particular subtype also is the first step toward arming people against it -- which may require slightly different methods of self-defense than arming people against more general phishing, or mail fraud, or flimflam scams at the bank, or car-in-distress fraud, or white collar crime, or "blind" panhandlers who can see perfectly well, or any of the other myriad varieties of fraud that exist out there. Lumping them all together with a single word is sometimes useful, but "just dropping" all the language that draws useful distinctions between them is what is "silly".

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    8. Re:bullshit article by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about we just drop all the silly cyber-words and start calling it what it is: Fraud.
      i prefer the term "Unsmurfy"
    9. Re:bullshit article by samureiser · · Score: 2

      In the writer's defense, it only states that the Israeli police told him to reformat his drive and then problems persisted. It never explicitly stated that he actually did format his hard drive. As a tech support monkey, I've had many users simply listen to my advice/instructions and then ignore it.

      Of course, the writer was probably not technically knowledgable to pick up on this little omission or its significance.

    10. Re:bullshit article by StopSayingYouSir · · Score: 3, Funny
      Nah, let's get even less specific and just call it "crime." Or wait! How about maybe just "bad"? While we're at it, let's stop all this silly talk of Fords and Saturns and SUVs and just call 'em all "cars". And we can definitely do without all of the ridiculous kitchen words like "fry" and "roast" and "microwave" and "steam" and "simmer" and just call it what it is: Cooking.
      I just call everything "Marklar," to avoid confusion.
  4. Format the disk by jurt1235 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jackont took his computer to the Israeli police last fall and was told to reformat it. But his problems persisted.

    So either he did not format it, or after formatting it, he did not properly protect it and got infected again.

    Poor (usually Microsoft Windows) users who also have to be administrators. The key problem is just that current OSes are not for people without CS knowledge to use. They need appliances which are protected, on which they can not install more software and which are protected by a mixed contract of anti-virus anti-spyware and system update vendors.
    As long as users have to administrate their system, whatever system, these kind of problems will continu to exist.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  5. Not news by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People run an operating system known to be vulnerable to Trojan Horse infections. They haven't had the source code independently audited and verified. They believe the headers in e-mail messages. And then they get infected by a Trojan horse.

    The only surprise is it's taken this long for it to get noticed.

    As long as people have had weaknesses, there have been other people out there seeking to exploit those weaknesses. That's just human nature; and if you fail to account for it, you might just as well have failed to account for gravity. The moment you put someone in front of a computer, they panic and lose all semblance of common sense. That also is human nature.

    I believe Microsoft are complicit in all this, because it was Microsoft's deliberate design decision that the users of those computers did not have to give consent for a process to run as root. But whoever picked Microsoft must share some of the blame, since they basically decided that the integrity of their computer systems was less important than a pretty user interface.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Not news by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hate to burst your bubble here, but it's incredibly EASY to create a trojan horse in Linux. All you have to do is convince the user to run the program, and if they do that, no matter what the OS, the program the user runs has all the same privlidges as the user. Meaning if I want to covertly send all the user's files to an offsite location, I can because the user has read access to all those files. Sure I can't delete the whole hard drive, but seriously, what is the point in doing that? Even if you do delete the whole drive, outside of the home directories, who cares? Seriously, the kernel files are easily replaceable, the home directory files much less so....In conclusion, that was a pointless, completely wrong post by an open source fanboy, ie something that is incredibly common here...

      *Note:I did not say that open source OSs do not have any security advantages, they usually do. However, the parent decided to mention trojan horses which are the easiest of all malware to write and probably the hardest to protect against.

    2. Re:Not news by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're forgetting the rather obvious.

      If somebody is bothered enough to be running GNU/Linux or a BSD variant, they probably are already smarter than to go running unknown programs without at least checking what they do. Of course, there are plenty of Windows users who know that already. But they aren't the ones you hear about.

      Windows has made it possible for computer users to be ignorant and proud of it, and ignorant people have created all manner of problems for them and the rest of us. A computer is not a single-purpose appliance like a washing machine or a hoover. It is a highly general-purpose device; and that very generality of purpose is a double-edged sword which cuts both ways.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:Not news by Technician · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All you have to do is convince the user to run the program, and if they do that, no matter what the OS, the program the user runs has all the same privlidges as the user.

      This is a little harder to do. In windows all you have to do is convince the user to look at these pictures of my naked wife wife.gif.pif (the .pif does not show)

      In linux you have to convince the user to save the attachment, change it's attributes to include execute and explain why the file must be executed instead of viewed.

      Convincing the user is much harder in Linux. Microsoft has blurred the line between executing a program and viewing a file. Linux still makes it harder to trick a user into running a program.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Not news by forkazoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Certainly, it is quite easy to nuke a home directory, but that doesn't mean there aren't any benefits. The first that occurs to me is that a normal user can't install a service that runs at boot automatically. They also don't have permission to do things like open certain ports.

      So, on Windows, as long as the average user is running your code, you can very easily have an FTP server running at boot which the user can't kill. It can run silently for a very long time, making available keylogs or whatever else.

      On Linux/BSD/OS-X, the danger is slightly reduced. Sure, you can monitor a single user's access, and you can open up a port > 1024. You can certainly nuke the home directory, which would be horribly bad news for a lot of users. But, it is always possible to log in as another user and kill whatever it is. When you are running as another user, you will be fairly confident that you can at least see any problems that might present themselves. With windows, any app can make itself invisible to normal means of inspection (See Sony rootkit!).

      There are some *nix fanboys who overstate the protections, certainly. But, "not much real extra security" is a hell of a lot better than "what in god's name were those chimp brained fucktards thinking?"

  6. Is this really phishing? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like good old-fashioned social engineering to me, probably kicking off with some even more old-fashioned dumpster-diving to get the names and addresses of the target's friends and acquaintances.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  7. the path! Re:This is weird. by leuk_he · · Score: 5, Interesting

    als form the article:

    Some computer security specialists suggest at least one basic approach that might allow e-mail recipients to learn right away that a communique appearing to come from a company like Amazon.com actually originated somewhere in the Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Russia or any of the other places that law enforcement officials say are hot spots for phishing scams. "It strikes me that this is just a failure of most e-mail systems to reveal the history of an e-mail," said Whitfield Diffie, a pioneer in computer cryptography who is the chief security officer of Sun Microsystems. "You could post a warning flag indicating that the 'from' address doesn't seem consistent with the path history."

    I have yet too see an applcation that does (only) this. And "8 out of 10 collegues here (in the IT) don't have a clue what a "path" in a e-mail is.

    Anyway the gist of the article was in the start that some phisher used a fake-emial address where the from was NOT faked, but contained a small alteration that does not show at first. Since no anti-spam/anti-phissher can protect against that ou leave the people who run the most up to date anti-spam will beleive the mail is trusted. Even the journalist has problems to explain that a technical solution is not the final solution.

    by the way: you americans do not have to worry so much since you seem to care so much for privacy.

    1. Re:the path! Re:This is weird. by Red+Alastor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the interest of science, I tried to forge the from field into mails I sent myself to my Gmail address. The first one was sent using Gmail smtp server and they changed it back to my real one.

      The second one was sent from my ISPs smtp server and pretended to be from admin@gmail.com, I got a bright red :

      "Warning: This message may not be from whom it claims to be. Beware of following any links in it or of providing the sender with any personal information."

      The third pretended to from Bill Gates himself (billg@microsoft.com) and didn't raise any flag.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:the path! Re:This is weird. by Technician · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have yet too see an applcation that does (only) this. And "8 out of 10 collegues here (in the IT) don't have a clue what a "path" in a e-mail is.

      And if I was phishing, there are ways to get completely valid headers. For example, I live in the US. From here it is a simple task to send you a valid e-mail from the Cayman Islands. I have an account in the Cayman Islands. Using the Webmail interface, I can send an e-mail from there. If I scam someone in England for example and got the password for one of their e-mail accounts, I could scam someone in England by using the ISP Webmail interface and send a perfectly valid e-mail from the US that originated in England. By signing up for an account in England, using a bogus credit card, I could use VOIP and dial into the ISP in England from England (local number) and send a scam that way. Think outside the box. A local call doesn't have to be local anymore.

      Some Nigerian scammers are using Canadian, Australian, and UK VOIP phones so they don't look like Nigerian scammers until you are hooked and find out where to send the Western Union money. I'm in England and not a Nigerian scammer.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:the path! Re:This is weird. by Prog_Burner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most webmail will give the actual originating IP, not just the server IP, so it can be localized. So your e-mail, although sent from a server in the Cayman Islands, should still show an originator in the US. Even taking into account that you may have used a proxy in the Cayman Islands, it's less likely that it would be for the same company that provides the webmail. This is the path of the e-mail that we're talking about, it can still be deemed suspicious by software, especially if there's some sort of history (we are talking about e-mail that appears to be from someone you know and have a relationship with.) Most users wouldn't know what any of this means though, they'll still open an e-mail from unknown sources after how many years of being informed of the danger, so it seems to be more of a matter of education than one of protection.

  8. C Food by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the beginning, life in the C was perilous. Once in the 'net, our shells were vulnerable. They tried to bait us with spam & worms, and while most found those tasteless, some were hooked.

    Explicitly casting further with new lures, the phishers trolled, hoping for more bytes on the (on)line. The emails of the species were particularly at risk, as their outlook was not so good to begin with.

    Some sought harbour in the eBay, hoping their bet paid off. Last I heard, the feedback was good.

    Maybe our only hope is growing legs and migrating to the LAN.

    --

    Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    1. Re:C Food by MollyB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does that make us all Bourne-again Crustaceans?

  9. The problem isn't Windows by wk633 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Phishing isn't a technology problem. If your computer has a virus, the bad guys can get your critical data without tricking it out of you. Phishing will always exist due to human nature.

    Case in point: http://www.schneier.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/474/

    in which a bank manager was convinced to leave 5 million under the door to a bathroom stall in a bar in Paris.

    1. Re:The problem isn't Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The link about the bank fraud doesn't work. Here's the correct link:

      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-1814 531,00.html

  10. FROM GOVERNMENT SOFTWARE FOUNDATION OF NIGERIA by n0dalus · · Score: 4, Funny

    DO NOT WORRY, my GOOD FRIEND.

    PHISHING claims many LIVES, but YOU TOO can be SAFE when you use our SECURE SOFTWARE to protect your family from PHISHING. BUT alas, my COMPANY lacks FUNDS to share this SECURE SOFTWARE with GOOD PEOPLE like you. THIS TRAGIC moment for our company can only be FIXED by your kind SERVICES. PLEASE transfer ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS to me at the GOVERNMENT SOFTWARE FOUNDATION OF NIGERIA so we can all SHARE this SECURE SOFTWARE.

    ATTACHED is a special TRIAL of this very SECURE SOFTWARE, just for YOU. DO NOT HESITATE to protect yourself from the deadly THREAT of PHISHING.

    1. Re:FROM GOVERNMENT SOFTWARE FOUNDATION OF NIGERIA by Maradine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait a minute, you're using definite articles, prepositions, and proper plurality! You're not from Nigeria!

      Scam! Scam!!

      --

      trustedworlds.net - gaming, security, and the gunk that lives in between

  11. That does it. by sticks_us · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm calling the "Metaphor and Analogy" police, if there is such a thing.

    Why is it that EVERYTHING involving computers and the internets ends up becoming some cutesy-cutesy thing?

    What's next?

    Employee 1: "You hear about Bob?"

    Employee 2: "Yeah, I hear he got spear-phished this weekend. I guess they gutted and scaled him, and supposedly they're going to pan-phry him."

    Employee 1: "Well, it beats being served in a tuna salad!"

    Employee 2: "What the hell, exactly, are we talking about?"

    --
    "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth
  12. Drama queen by bumptehjambox · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sorry for the 'spoiler,' but what a grand finale at the end of the article.

    People don't like it when I say this, but it's like being raped. It's like my underwear was spread all over the streets. It was a severe breach of privacy.

    I'd like to be the cop that treats this like they do when they try to tell young girl rape victims its their fault...
    Well, look at ya! is that all you put on as a browser?!
    Yea, this is just what I usually put on, Internet Explorer.
    Well there ya go... You're going out on the internet putting on nothing but a skimpy browser, making all sorts of purchases, without any sort of protection? No wonder you're gettin yourself raped!

  13. Better habits.... by Chaffar · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Wieseltier told authorities that she received a Trojan-infested e-mail message bearing the address of gur_r@zahav.net.il, which she believed came from a friend.[...]But her friend's e-mail was actually gur-r@zahav.net

    See why whitelisting your contacts is important ? The problem is that people want to use they computer the way they use their washing machine. They think that just because they have "auto-update on" for Windows and Norton, then they're safe. Unfortunately, they're not. If they use emails irresponsibly, they will get spammed/phished/worse. There is no miracle cure, but good internet "security" habits can help a lot. No amount of software can replace good habits and experience.

    However, I feel that this is a battle that is already lost. How can I convince strangers to pick up good habits if I can't even convince my sister and father? All they care about is having a functional computer to send their emails and type their .docs whenever they need to do so. Any downtime is unacceptable, yet they refuse to acknowledge the fact that any downtime is usually their fault. PCs have become the 'automobiles' of the 21st century:" I don't care how it works, as long as it gets me to where I want to be."

    Bah, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I have too much free time, others don't have the luxury to care about these things. Still I'm the one who ends up fixing the PC/ taking the car to the mechanic....

  14. Spear-phishing by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Spear-phishing = social engineering via e-mail

    Instead of telephoning some company and making believe ur their service provider to try and get the root password for some machine, one sends an email disguised as a legit email from a company with which a target company's employee has a commercial relation. Said email contains as payload an agent program which can be used to gather information/control the machine.

    This is more powerfull than old style social engineering, both because you directly get an agent running on a machine inside the target company's network and because the list of potential targets is bigger than just "the person's that have passwords to the company's servers"

  15. What utter crap by MikeyToo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    CNET takes a year-old story about a bitter divorce and revenge, adds some buzzwords, information about very common, almost "old school", spamming and phishing techniques and we're all supposed to run around yelling "The sky is falling!!". Someone must be way behind on their copy output and have the FUD generators turned up to 11.

    I'm sorry for those of you IT types who have managers or "super users" who learned everything they know about computers from reading PC Ragazine or CNET. I'm sure you'll be getting worried calls and emails today. Just what you need on a Monday.

    --
    "Well Ranger Brad, I'm a scientist. I don't believe in anything." - Dr. Roger Fleming
  16. More marketing words by OO7david · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have half a mind to start a company that targets people whose computer freezes from all of the spy/ad/malware by claiming to offer something that will remove it. They, being tired of frozen screens, will give me the info I need.

    I'll call it ice phishing.

  17. Spam Fritter by BarryNorton · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got spam-frittered the other day - they used the old 'spam, spam, spam, egg, chips and spam' attack, luckily I was phishing on the back of a trojan horse on my pharm - still, I was pretty phreaked. You know what I mean?

  18. Phishing or not? by swm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My health insureance company called.
    First thing they want is my birthday.
    I hesitate, and they say they have to confirm who I am before they can talk to me.
    (Federal privacy regs, HIPAA, and all that).

    I refuse, because I don't know if they are who they say they are.
    They immediately understand, and give me a tool-free number that I can call into.
    After I hang up, I realize that their number doesn't help me, becuase *they* gave it to me.

    It isn't the number on my health insurance card.
    I can't find it on their web page.
    I google for it and get no hits.
    So I still don't know who they are.
    So I don't call the number.

    Phishing? Probably not.
    It probably was my health insurance company.
    But it's been a couple of weeks now, and they haven't called back.
    In the past, when they've wanted to talk to me,
    they've called every few days until they got hold of me.

    So I don't really know...

    1. Re:Phishing or not? by Lord+Grey · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one.

      A couple of months ago I received a message on my home phone from American Express concerning "suspicious activity on my card." The message said really only that, and that I should call some toll-free number that wasn't printed on my card. There was no identifying information at all in the message, and to make matters stranger they were calling about a business card (they called me at home, not at work).

      So I called the number. I get a person almost immediately and there is quite a bit of background noise on the line. They ask for my card number. When I didn't tell them and started asking questions (trying to determine if the person really did work for AmEx), the guy got insistent and asked for my social security number. I refused to answer and asked more questions, but never got a good answer.

      I eventually hung up on the guy and then looked up AmEx's fraud prevention number in Google and called THAT. It turned out that someone really did hijack the card number from some vendor's database and there were 4-5 bogus purchases. We got the problem cleared up relatively quickly.

      The problem, however, is that the AmEx representative did not come across in a professional manner and his conversation with me served only to make me more suspicious. With all the phishing going on, I'm extremely leery of simply providing personal information upon request.

      --
      // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    2. Re:Phishing or not? by Technician · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A couple of months ago I received a message on my home phone from American Express concerning "suspicious activity on my card."

      So did I. I knew it was a phishing call. I was polite and refused to give my paticulars and asked about the activity. I asked if I gave the last 4 digits if they could verify the address. They said no they needed the full number, exp date, name as it is on the card and the verification number. I then told them I do not have an American Express card. I then called American Express and gave them the phishing information.

      If a bank is having their customer base phished, and you don't have an account, let the bank know anyway instead of ignoring it. You may protect your neighbors.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  19. Dupe? by MirrororriM · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hate to beat a dead horse, but here is an older Slashdot story about "spear phishing" here ...

    --
    Content Management System: A pretentious way of saying "text editor."
  20. Wow Mods, pay attention at all? by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Informative
    A) Not only does your link not work
    B) The man only left 358,000 Euros, not 5 million.

    The man, described by detectives as the greatest conman they had encountered, convinced one bank manager to leave him 358,000 in the lavatories of a Parisian bar.
    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  21. "Spear" phishing? by Entropy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spear Phishing? Because it "targets specific people" ?

    Okay:

    Jelly phishing - targeting politicians.

    Salmon phishing - targeting gays.

    Flounder phishing - targeting christians.

    Tuna phishing - targeting pianists.

    Shark phishing - targeting lawyers.

    I am sure we could come up with others :)

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.