Slashdot Mirror


Science Meets Style In This Cathode Tube Watch

scope-n-SHOUT writes "The Nixie Watch displays the time on nixie tubes, a cold-cathode tube filled with neon, a little mercury and argon at a small fraction of atmospheric pressure. Nixies were used in many early electronic desktop calculators, including the first: the vacuum tube-based Sumlock-Comptometer Anita Mk VII in 1961. This two-digit wristwatch is designed for everyday use, being water-resistant and rugged, not to mention looking really retro-future cool. The watch requires no button pushing to operate - it shows the hours, minutes and seconds in sequence at the flick of the wrist. For the hardcore code tweaker, a programming adapter allows the GPL'd PIC firmware running the watch to be hacked up at will. The Nixie Watch is being sold in very limited edition, with each piece individually numbered and engraved."

190 comments

  1. Why a watch? by avalys · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems like a watch is the wrong form factor for this thing. The idea is really cool, and I think I might actually buy one if it was made as a desk clock, but I wouldn't want that enormous hockey-puck-sized-thing strapped to my wrist all day.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Why a watch? by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 5, Informative
      It seems like a watch is the wrong form factor for this thing. The idea is really cool, and I think I might actually buy one if it was made as a desk clock, but I wouldn't want that enormous hockey-puck-sized-thing strapped to my wrist all day.

      Something like one of these or these?

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    2. Re:Why a watch? by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Oh you mean like
      http://www.hack.net/nixie/

      Keep it quiet, or the link will get front page'd .. again.. :-\

    3. Re:Why a watch? by deetsay · · Score: 1

      Ah, OK... I thought the numbers appearing inside the tube were pretty sci-fi, but looking at the big picture on that page, it seems there's actually 10 little tubes inside there, bent to the shape of numbers, and I guess it just picks one to light up. Apparently they hadn't come up with the idea of using just 7 segments yet. :-)

      Can you bend cold cathode tubes (that people use to light up the insides of their computers) over a candle..?

      --
      "The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand", or so I have read.
    4. Re:Why a watch? by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Not sure, sounds like a neat idea though.
      The first thing that jumps into my head though, would be that you'd cook the fine balance of gas, but it is a sealed system..

    5. Re:Why a watch? by deetsay · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. Xenon schmenon!

      --
      "The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand", or so I have read.
    6. Re:Why a watch? by dancallaghan · · Score: 1

      It seems like a watch is the wrong form factor for this thing. The idea is really cool, and I think I might actually buy one if it was made as a desk clock, but I wouldn't want that enormous hockey-puck-sized-thing strapped to my wrist all day.

      Although currently sold out, it seems the same guy has made some much cooler desk clocks in the past.

    7. Re:Why a watch? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      A candle is not hot enough to soften most glass. If you do heat it enough, there is a near vacuum in the tube so it will collapse unless you were working under similar low pressure.

      No joy...

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    8. Re:Why a watch? by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A 7-segment display needs a 7-segment decoder to drive the appropriate segments for each digit. That's a fair bit of extra circuitry and expense when your logic circuits are built from discrete components.

      Some older equipment used displays that were like miniature slide projectors. Each digit had a small rear projection screen. Behind that screen was an assembly of miniature light bulbs and optical slides. When one of the light bulbs was turned on, its light passed through an optical slide that had an image of the desired digit. It produced a very readable display, better than Nixies or 7-segments. This display was designed and manufactured by Industrial Electronic Engineers, Inc. starting back in the late 1950s, and amazingly enough is still alive and in the display business.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    9. Re:Why a watch? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Yeeeeah ... I have a longcase clock which is only marginally smaller (about 2m tall - nice oak case) and probably nearly as accurate (if I could just adjust the fucking pendulum a bit more precisely - it's a bastard of an adjustment and you need to wait a couple of days to see if you got it right this time) which is about 250 years old. It's my grandfather's grandfather's grandfather clock. AND it rings the hour. My children hate it. I'll leave it to whichever one reproduces himself first.

      Sure, you can't wear it on your wrist, but I never much cared for wristwatches anyway.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    10. Re:Why a watch? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Bugger. s/smaller/larger/g

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    11. Re:Why a watch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for nerdy watches, any one of these is far more useful, arguably more nerdy, and the Nooka Zot watch actually looks really nice
      http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/7d2b/
      http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/7b67/
      http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/725d/
      http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/7243/

    12. Re:Why a watch? by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nixie tubes are based on the same technology as the neon lamps you find on mains extension leads and some appliances {from the pre-LED era, or ones that don't have any low-voltage electronics inside them} and in power-finder screwdrivers. These simple lamps are just a glass tube with two electrodes, connected to the mains through a ballast resistor {or in the case of a power-finder, the capacitor formed between the whole surface of your body [not, as per common misconception, just the soles of your feet] and the earth; AC can flow through a capacitor because it is being continuously charged and discharged}. The tube is filled with a mixture of gases, mainly neon and argon, which become conductive and emit light when a sufficiently high voltage is applied. The glow occurs in the space between the cathode {negative terminal} and the anode {positive terminal}, but always nearest to the cathode. Note that the mains is AC, so each electrode glows on each alternate half-cycle; but since there are 50 cycles every second, your eyes cannot detect this.

      In a Nixie tube, the cathode wires are shaped into numbers {or letters, or symbols} and each one is brought out to a separate terminal pin. The anode is a fine wire mesh grille in front of the cathodes. This is connected, through a ballast resistor {to limit the current} to a positive supply of several tens of volts DC {dependent upon the size of the tube}. When one of the cathodes is connected to ground, the gas ionises and a visible glow is given off around the cathode. The smaller the resistor, the bigger the current, and the further the glowing region extends {and the shorter the overall lifetime of the tube, since some material is transferred }; the general aim is to get a strong enough glow around the active wire so the whole digit is visible. Note that if a switched-mode power supply is being used to generate the high voltage, it will most probably already have a high enough output impedance so as not to need a ballast resistor.

      The cathodes can be driven by ordinary, open-collector NPN transistors but they must be selected carefully: the collector-base junction must have a sufficiently high breakdown voltage to withstand the display drive voltage. Otherwise the C-B junction will behave like a Zener diode, essentially dropping a constant voltage irrespective of how much current is flowing through it; and once a digit has been lit, it won't extinguish until the anode supply is interrupted. It won't actually fail catastrophically due to the ballast resistance limiting the current; but it probably is not what you want anyway. If the anode supply is switched-mode, and the output capacitor is small enough that this afterglow can discharge it completely, you might just be able to get away with using under-rated transistors to switch the cathodes; but this is not ideal since the anode supply will always be dying {not just in the afterglow while the transistor is staying on} and the display will flicker.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    13. Re:Why a watch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure if your a /. regular your left wrist should be strong enough. :)

    14. Re:Why a watch? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      I have a cousin of those displays on my vintage 1960's Tektronix test gear. On some plugins, the sweep speed is displayed on what looks like a LCD screen but it's a projection screen. It only has a 1 2 5 sequence of digits, but a 2 or a 5 can appear on the same spot. It's quite lovely.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    15. Re:Why a watch? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Something like one of... these?

      Thanks for that link. There are so many examples there that now I'm officially bored with the idea.

      Does anyone bother to make anything other than clocks out of these things?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    16. Re:Why a watch? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      No, it's extremely easy to set the timekeeping on a longcase clock. The pendulum has a 2" period; the mechanism is basically a self-resetting counter which records the number of times the pendulum has reached one or the other end of its travel. The only thing which affects the timekeeping is the period of the pendulum; and the only thing which affects the period of the pendulum is the distance from the pivot to the centre of gravity. Since T = 2 * pi * sqrt (l / g), it follows that for a two-second period you need a length of g / (pi ** 2), which I get as being 0.994 metres using the constants in KCalc.

      Adding or subtracting half a millimetre will give an error of about 20 seconds a day, so you will indeed need some time to verify its correct operation.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    17. Re:Why a watch? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      They don't necessarily have a 2" period. Some of them had 1/25' periods, or other divisions of a minute (it's to do with the ease of setting out the required number of teeth on the various cogs in the drive train).

      It's _really_ a pain to have to stop the pendulum, adjust the screw on the bottom of the bob, restart and (maybe) reset it, then wait for about 2 days to see if it's any more accurate. (This may seem like meaningless pedantry when you consider there's about a minute either way slop in the minute hand ...)

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    18. Re:Why a watch? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Announcing -- the iPod Nixie! Thank you, Steve Jobs!! Now I can watch neon numerals while rollerskat.... ARRRGGHH (truck brakes squealing) ... (silence)....(blink..flash..flash...)

    19. Re:Why a watch? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      It's fairly standard practice in the electronics industry to test timing circuits which use the mains frequency as a reference, by injecting a higher frequency signal into the timing input so as to shorten timeouts.

      What you really need, then, is a very small, very heavy object that you could place directly below the clock. This would increase the local value of g; thus, speeding up the pendulum and allowing you to measure several thousand periods of oscillation in a shorter time.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    20. Re:Why a watch? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I'm not really interested (directly) in the period of the pendulum (and anyway, where would I get a small black hole and how would I prevent it from absorbing the clock?). The way to adjust any pendulum clock is, unfortunately, by trial-and-error.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  2. So its basically the complement of Slashdot by ghoul · · Score: 4, Funny

    where Science meets a total lack of style ;)

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:So its basically the complement of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the file name of the image on the main page (the one with the guy looking at the watch).

    2. Re:So its basically the complement of Slashdot by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Is it a ones complement or a twos complement?

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    3. Re:So its basically the complement of Slashdot by ghoul · · Score: 1

      1s complement DOnt u know for geeks1 is company 2 a crowd

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  3. What time is it? by Bonker · · Score: 4, Funny

    *flick* *flick* *flick*

    Dammit... too far.

    *flick* *flick* *flick*

    11... No, I'm sorry, that's the minutes.

    *flick* *flick* *flick*

    Something 11.

    *flick*

    And 15 seconds.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  4. Old school hip by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Its simply amazing how what can be considered today as antique technology that would be sitting in some electronics museum to a "hip" new product. As Old Skewl goes, this is pretty geeky!

  5. Not by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "...really retro-future cool" -- NOT

    Maybe 4 smaller nixie tubes, but this first hours then minutes then seconds display on two digits looks more like a bad high school science project than a must have geek item.

    1. Re:Not by realbadjuju · · Score: 1

      This guy made one with 4 digits, and he's the fist thing to come up when you google "nixie watch". Oh, wait, it's the same guy. Don't know why he when from 4 to 2 digits.

    2. Re:Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh. You're right, it is the same guy (Forbes). WTF, that four-digit model was definitely cooler.

    3. Re:Not by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Because the new one's only half as cool.

  6. Thank you, Johnny Olsen. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    This fabulous Nixie Watch could be yours if... the price is right.

    1. Re:Thank you, Johnny Olsen. by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At 395 bucks I think I can say for sure, the price is not even close to right.

      --
      Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    2. Re:Thank you, Johnny Olsen. by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Oh come on--if they paid me $395, I'd probably be willing to wear one. Though I'm not sure why they'd want me to.
       
      ...Wait, you're saying they want ME to pay THEM?

      Oh.

      Nevermind. :)

    3. Re:Thank you, Johnny Olsen. by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Remember that the winner guesses closest to the item's retail price without going over. With this watch it should be difficult to guess too high.

  7. A real conversation with my wife by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me: Hey, honey - take a look at this watch.

    My Lovely Wife (MLW): Oh - uh, what is that?

    Me: Cathode ray tube watch.

    MLW: Oh. How much is it?

    Me: About $400.

    MLW: $400 for that?

    Me: Yeah. And you know what?

    MLW: What?

    Me: That is the exactly opposite of what kind of a watch I want you to buy me for Giftmas someday.

    MLW: Got it.

    1. Re:A real conversation with my wife by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exact opposite? So you're waiting for the anode version?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:A real conversation with my wife by Quadraginta · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought he was waiting for the version that uses a positron-emitting cathode.

    3. Re:A real conversation with my wife by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      I'd like an anti-matter watch. I mean - at least then I wouldn't ever have to worry about telling time once I turned it on, right?

    4. Re:A real conversation with my wife by nacturation · · Score: 1

      That's not just funny, that's ART!

      While I'm at it, I love how they claim it's a limited edition and every watch has its own engraved serial. My Seiko has its own serial number engraved in the metal and, last time I checked, they didn't claim to be producing it in infinite quantities.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:A real conversation with my wife by tomw576 · · Score: 1

      Ahhhhhh.... so she wants a really cheap one

    6. Re:A real conversation with my wife by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      No, he probaly wants a nice analogue watch, with real hands and gears and a spring.

      Oh, and roman numerals on the face.

      Possibly a pocket watch. With a really cool chain.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  8. Not the only one by wkitchen · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's been done before. And with more digits.

    1. Re:Not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was just gonna say I liked the older one better for having more digits (and the Krusty The Clown brand battery label). But you will notice there's a link to this watch's site on that page. :)

  9. Too bad these weren't around in 1984... by Tsar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Terry Gilliam would have loved to have had these in Brazil !

  10. Cost vs. Reward by mister_llah · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cathode Tube Watch: $395
    Tiger Print Suit: $2530
    Authentic Aviator Goggles: $125

    Realizing that you have the fashion sense of Helen Keller: Priceless

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Cost vs. Reward by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      What, because she couldn't hear how loud the shirt was?

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    2. Re:Cost vs. Reward by BigWhiteGuy_27 · · Score: 0

      Thanks for making me spew Mountain Dew on my monitor!

    3. Re:Cost vs. Reward by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      Thanks for making me spew Mountain Dew on my monitor!

      Bet one of them old retro cathode tube monitors would be easier to clean.

  11. It's so cheap too! by DocOmega · · Score: 0
    "The nixie watch is in stock and costs $395 plus shipping."

    Wow! /me pulls out plastic.

    Really, this is just sad. It's ugly too: look.

    --
    Meh
    1. Re:It's so cheap too! by MadCow42 · · Score: 1, Funny

      >> costs $395 plus shipping

      Yeah, $395 is a steal, but the "plus shipping" is where they get you. Have you seen the size of that thing? Wow... it'll cost you a mint to ship that.

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  12. Slashdotted already? by FlyByPC · · Score: 3, Funny

    What, are they running the webserver on Nixie tubes, too?

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      No, but their internet connection is with with a "0&1" nixie tube shining into a fiber cable, then transcribed by a kindly elderly gentleman and mailed to their ISP.

  13. Re:sTUPID aMERican Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    what the fuck is a TUPIDMERD or a saicanream???!?!?!?!?!

  14. Science Meets Style??? by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

    More like impracticality meets extravagance.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  15. OR... by ducati999 · · Score: 1

    You could cram a lot of PDA into that beast instead.

  16. So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just wondering. Did you get any decent amount of money for that huge ad? I sure hope you did since this probably sent more traffic their way then anything else has in the past.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just wondering. Did you get any decent amount of money for that huge ad?

      OMG!!!! SLASHDOT is linking to an item FOR SALE!!!!
      LIES CORRUPTION END OF THE WORLD!!!!

      ... or maybe it's just a link to a small company with a cool product. Stop acting so self-righteous and get over yourself.
      Are you really suggesting that slashdot shouldn't link to any product or service that is offered for sale?

    2. Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just wondering. Did you get any decent amount of money for that huge ad? I sure hope you did since this probably sent more traffic their way then anything else has in the past.

      I don't understand how this got modded +5 "Insightful." I mean, were all the XBOX 360 articles somehow enlightening to geeks, but this one is all of a sudden an "advertisement" because some dude will (gasp!) make money off of the product?

      I just checked the front page (3:35 am EST) and found that 4 of the 10 articles are about either for-profit companies or the products they sell. Until geeks stop liking to buy stuff, maybe you should save this kind of comment for Mother Jones magazine or something.

      I don't mean to crack on you so hard but, damn, the product is nerdy ("news for nerds"). I might buy into your logic if the article was about scrub brushes or something.

      TW

    3. Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's more suggesting that Slashdot editors are accepting bribes to link to products. It's a very easy thing to do, due to the very defense that you quote. There have been a slew of questionable articles lately, and it doesn't take a genius to theorize that Slashdot has become corrupt. The risk versus payoff is just too rewarding to pass up. If I were a Slashdot editor, you can believe that I'd put my ass up for sale.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by tgd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Did you get stuck in cryogenic suspension for the last five years?

      Its been a LONG time that the logo should read Slashdot: Ads for Nerds, Repost that Don't Matter.

    5. Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by SComps · · Score: 1
      If I were a Slashdot editor, you can believe that I'd put my ass up for sale.
      Is it hairy or no? I've not been very happy with my ass recently and have been considering a replacement. With all the cheap Korean models on the market today it's hard to make a good decision.
    6. Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      by tgd (2822)
      Did you get stuck in cryogenic suspension for the last five years?

      Its been a LONG time that the logo should read Slashdot: Ads for Nerds, Repost that Don't Matter.


      ...Says the guy with the ridiculously low ID who still for some reason comes here despite stating that the site is irrelevant, ad-filled, and doesn't matter.

    7. Re:So when did /. become such an ad pusher? by scope-n-SHOUT · · Score: 1

      Wow, you sure have a negative opinion of people's intentions. I wrote this article because I saw something that I thought was really neat. I wanted to share it with the slashdot community because I thought they would appreciate it, just like I did. I must admit, altruism wasn't my sole motivation, as I also enjoyed the idea that I might possibly get some acclaim from my peers. A little fame, yes, but fortune, a resounding NO. I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO TIES TO THE DUDE WHO MAKES THESE WATCHES! I saw this watch featured on 2 other webmagazines, then checked it out, loved the way it looked and figured it would be something slashdot readers would want to get. The guy who makes these watches is just some dude making these himself, you should check out his website where he documents everything. He even gives out open source code for the watch. He seems like your regular tech nerd, making these watches because he loves cathodes, not capitalism. I'm sure he is getting alot of traffic, so what? Slashdot is a news organization providing information. Would you rather have Slashdot feature this watch, then not tell you where to get it, just so they look like their not "putting up ads". I don't have the time to surf the net looking for interesting articles, thats why I read Slashdot, because they do it for me. People would be so annoyed if they had to search for products themselves that were featured. Slashdot doesn't put up stories for money. Give me a break. And Slashdot certainly wasn't scammed into doing a fake story by me, once again, I have no affiliation with this watch.

  17. Skip it, thanks... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    The "sold out" desk and wall clocks are MUCH cooler.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Skip it, thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I discovered the scope clock on my own some time ago. Now -that- thing is cool. It draws the numbers using vectors, not scanning and looks awesome. He's been sold out for quite some time but now that he's slashdotted, he oughta put the thing back on the market.

    2. Re:Skip it, thanks... by doubtless · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      but same can't be said about the "sell out" slashdot editor, sick.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
  18. This actually is a pretty cool watch... by John+Miles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... if only for its homebrew-deco appeal. According to the .PDF copy of the user manual on the site, the software that runs it is GPL'ed and fully user-compilable/modifiable. The complete schematic is provided with a nifty discussion of the underlying circuit theory.

    Aesthetically, yeah, it's hard to argue that it's not a piece of junk. The first thing you notice -- because your eye expects to see two more Nixie tubes -- is the huge battery next to the two that are present. That should have been a stack of heavy-duty lithium coin cells mounted out of sight. If they'd gone that route, then the housing could have accommodated three tubes... which 85% of the time is all you need, right?

    It doesn't deserve the bashing it's getting on a "News for Nerds" site, at any rate. Everybody reading Slashdot has scarier stuff than this in their (psychic?) basements.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    1. Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1
      If they'd gone that route, then the housing could have accommodated three tubes... which 85% of the time is all you need, right?


      If this were giving time in hex, three tubes is all you'd need 100% of the time (assuming a twelve-hour clock).
      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    2. Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... by shawb · · Score: 1

      Then all you'd really nead is one hex and one octal.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1
      Nixie tubes don't do hex. They do exactly the digits 0 through 9, and nothing else.

      It's implemented by having 10 separate "filaments", one per digit, stacked over each other. Because different digits are at different distances to your eye, a whole line of nixie tubes looks a bit odd since some numbers are farther away than others.

      On the other hand, that's also why the digits look so nice. No nasty 8-segment displays here.

    4. Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

      Ah, interesting. Mods, mod Clueless Moron Insightful.

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    5. Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, Informative, that is.

    6. Re:This actually is a pretty cool watch... by interlingua.ro · · Score: 1

      I like this one much better http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2005/Hughes-K ettner-Tube-Clock.html Plus it's about the same price

  19. WOW.... that watch is UGLY. by atarione · · Score: 1

    that is one fucking painfully ugly watch.... I have yet to see on of these "nerd" watches I would actaully wear... as others said... this thing with hours/min..etc as a wall clock could be kewl... but as a watch it is only a good idea ...... if you find yourself constantly having to fight off the ladies with a stick and you are looking for sure fire sex repellant.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:WOW.... that watch is UGLY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, it does not work. :( I still have to use white socks as a backup system.

  20. Back in the day... by boomgopher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was in the military some years back, we were still using some test equipment with these tubes as displays. The subtle beauty of them is when the digits would cycle through a sequence, you'd notice the position/depth change as it changed to a new digit. Coupled with the fadeout of the deactivated digit, it was a fascinating to watch.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    1. Re:Back in the day... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      The last thing I remember seeing these in was a frequency counter. Nothing else really needed a numeric display, and the equipment that the frequency counter was being used on predated the nixi tubes anyway. (1950-1965 era military equipment.)

      I don't think there was a maintenance tech in his right mind that would have suggested taking one of those frequency counters to the field.

      Whether there were that many maintenance techs that were in their right mind to begin with is an entirely different question, which I won't even suggest persuing.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    2. Re:Back in the day... by cocotoni · · Score: 4, Funny

      You Sir are the last person I would like to have watching the countdown for an important defense missile:

      10... 9... 8... 7... 6... ooh, shiny... 4... and look at the depth change...

      Only kidding :)

    3. Re:Back in the day... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I have a Texas Instruments claculator I inherited from my late father with the same kind of display. I also have a vague recollection that the HP25s (god, the prince of claculators - a boon to mankind - reverse polish is the. best. notation. ever.) had this too. I may be wrong here.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    4. Re:Back in the day... by Dielectric · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean reverse polish / the best notation ever / is?

    5. Re:Back in the day... by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I (briefly) held a night job as high volume xerox machine operator back in the 60s (or was that the 70s? Damn memory has been funky ever since) ...the machines used counters like these, and I used to er...smoke stuff... turn out the lights and watch the pretty numbers. ooh. cool. What you didn't want 60,000 copies of this?

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  21. What I would like to see by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

    is a watch like this one, but instead of using nixie tubes, it would use those green-blue displays also used in some old calculators. Does it exist ?

  22. Watch a Cathode Tube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um.. ok. I've seen plenty of cathodes on tubes -- even touched one or two in my lifetime (never intentionally), but why in Hell would anyone want to sit around and WATCH one?

  23. I think I'd prefer a watch like this by Lobais · · Score: 1

    Uhm, I think I'd prefer a watch like this: http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/6a17/

  24. Meh, if it was trully geek by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

    it would tell time in hex :P

  25. Better site, and cool photo: by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Better site, and cool photo: by Cyclotron_Boy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hate to self-promote, but here's my website with the nixie tube clock I was selling (before I ran out of parts). The most informative webpage for nixie tube related stuff is actually the Yahoo NeoNixie group, at Yahoo Groups. David Forbes, who designed the watch, is a regular contributor to the list, and is a great guy- very knowledgeable. I have learned a lot from the list, and I highly suggest joining the group to anyone even remotely interested in the technology.

  26. time to get a new arm model by Pollardito · · Score: 1

    1. slap retro-futuristic watch on skinny, hairy model 2. ?? 3. profit

  27. Re:Retro-future cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh so close to a haiku, better luck next time.

  28. geek application by acslat3r · · Score: 1

    Just imagine if this was hacked to display text two letters at a time. With rhythmic motions of the wrist it could output pornographic text. This would me a stellar stocking stuffer.

    1. Re:geek application by cocotoni · · Score: 1

      Nixies have a limited set of symbols they display - they are not your average 7 segment display. Normaly they would have only digits 0-9, as you see each digit is a separate fillament in the tube. So they are not used for displayin text.

  29. Slashdot meets... by mattwarden · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... cheap advertising. All that was missing was a "step right up" intro.

  30. Real LED watches... by Joce640k · · Score: 1
    --
    No sig today...
  31. Two digits! by ydra2 · · Score: 1

    Woo Hoo!! I can tell what hour of the day it is now without looking at the sun. This is really cool ancient technology, especially since I can't find a reasonably priced watch that can tell me what time it is. I'm tired of watches that give me weather reports and time zone data and underwater depth readings and everything but the time of day. This is the one for me. Not very granular, but at least a step in the right direction.

    1. Re:Two digits! by terciops · · Score: 1

      Yes but it doesn't show the 22g wires running up his arm to the battery pack on his back. It is guaranteed for life - if it fails it electrocutes you ...

  32. Bannanatree3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, yeah. You have got a lot of sit-down-and-think time in front of you if there were actually two other "Bananatree" users before you and you STILL chose to become number three. I'm not even including the stream-of-huh? statement you made.

    Originality just isn't your strong suit, is it?

  33. Re:UG-LY by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1, Funny
    how the hell did this story get accepted? That is by far the UGLIEST thing I've ever seen.
    It was probably accepted as a test to separate the nerds from the non-nerds. This is the "News for Nerds" site, after all.

    Everyone complaining about it being ugly is clearly not a nerd, since a nerd doesn't care whether a watch is ugly.

  34. Geeky? No. Pricey? Yes by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    For $29.99, I rather get this time keeper.
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/6e72/

    Just look at those gorgeous layout and colors... It's just too bad, it's not on sales any more...

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  35. Or how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having them in Fallout? I think they'd make ane excellent adition to the post-nuclear-war-gizmo-mania-galore!

  36. Science Meets Style by marcushnk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Science Meets Style... and Style walks away with a bloody nose.

    Seriously people.. this does not look cool, neat, retro, funky or any thing other than an ugly lump on the end of an appendage.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re: Science Meets Style by javaxman · · Score: 1
      and Style walks away with a bloody nose.

      At least I'm not alone in thinking so; I don't care how geeky you are, this does not approximate "style", unless your style is "ugly". At the very least, for $400, I expect brushed metal, if not something better. That plastic look just has to go.

      Geeky, yes, but it's not stylish at all, not even to a bunch of geeks on Slashdot. Sorry, but it's true.

  37. Re:Retro-future cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh so close to a haiku. Better luck next time. Winter smells like snow.

  38. Options? by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Does it come with an optional B-battery carrying case?

  39. Not for me by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    Apart from the bulk, battery life is "a few months" - reminiscent of the first digital watches which used LEDs, so the display had to be turned on to read the time. Still, an unsubtle but doubtless effective bit of late product p1mpage in time for Christmas ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  40. Much cooler version by wrmrxxx · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's been a very impressive Nixie wristwatch at http://www.amug.org/~jthomas/watch.html for quite a while now - he made it in 2001. The fact that it doesn't even use a microcontroller makes it that much cooler. Less flexible because you can't re-program it, but far more in keeping with the theme of the project.

  41. Science meets style? by Flying+pig · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Obsolete engineering meets design disaster area.

    Seriously, years ago I actually encountered a Geiger counter (don't ask) which used transistors to drive Nixie tubes. In those days there were no high voltage transistors, so it worked around the idea that the Nixies turned off at a certain voltage, therefore the VEBO of the transistors did not need to exceed the difference between the high voltage rail and the Nixie cutoff voltage.

    Did you notice the words "Geiger counter" there? Yes. Of course, if the radiation reached a level sufficient to ionise the gas in the tubes, they stayed conducting. So turning a small gamma source on the tubes themselves blew all the output transistors.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  42. $395 too! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I wanted to buy a watch that guaranteed I would never get laid, I certainly wouldn't have to spend that much on it.

  43. Obligatory... by siwelwerd · · Score: 1

    "1,2,5!" "No, 3 sir!" "3!!"

  44. No, its different. by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Informative

    We have really old (and back then expensive) frequency counters here that use the same display technology.

    Its basically a glow discharge tube like you can find them as gadgets sometimes (like a hearth, or a number or so glowing). The glow is around the kathode, which can be formed however you want.

    So this tubes have 10 different kathodes in one tube, sorted by visibility (to but the "big" shapes back as to not hinder the view to other ones). All in all, you can see that they are in different planes (about 5-8mm or so, which makes neat effects for a frequency counter (as the digit seems to jump rapidly, seemingly randomly back and forth in 3d-space)).

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:No, its different. by lobro1 · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. a trip down memory lane. In another life I was the proud operator of a Varian-MAT 311A double focussing mass spectrometer which used nixie tubes to display the current mass to charge ratio in real time. Since my instrument was used to continously scan gas chomatography effluent, I can attest to the "3D" effect of the various cathodes rapidly lighting over and over and over and over and...hypnotic. The color of the gas around the cathodes was a very electric pinkish tinged with purple..mesmerizing. The don't make displays like this anymore.VERY pretty..

      --
      money doesn't talk... it swears - Bob Dylan
  45. Somebody say 80's hairstyles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arnold, who never had a cool hairstyle in his life, just killed the guy who was sporting this fro in the early 80s....

    1. Re:Somebody say 80's hairstyles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think the fro guy killed himself when he CHOSE to kill people. Arnold was nowhere close to the fro guy at that time, and had no control over someone else's FREE WILL. Why do people think actions have no consequences?

  46. Re:Retro-future cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fucking formatting.
    'twas set to HTML.
    I forgot the

    's.

  47. The Wind o' the Hawk by kahei · · Score: 1


    Wow, it's the outfit Bob Calvert dreamed of but could never afford!

    This Bob Calvert reference was brought to you by a stubborn desire to refer to the things that nobody else bothers to refer to. I would type more but I'd hate to give away too many clues to the sonic conspiracy.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  48. It's not that simple... by nickds · · Score: 5, Informative

    Making a nixie watch is enormously complicated - the power issues are complex - the tubes need 180VDC at a few mA to strike, but the batteries must last for 6 months or so. Each watch is hand made and uses lots of SMD components - the tubes are indeed not the smallest available as they are not made any more, so you can only use "common tubes" - the earlier 4-tube watch mentioned used JAN7009/4998 tubes which are extremely rare (the builder found a one-off small batch at a hamfest), and can't be used for commercial construction. It's not ideal, using these tubes, but it does work. Other common small tubes, like the Russian IN-17s have other problems (they are too deep). I actually have one of these watches (a prototype), and it attracts nothing but admiration, even from my wife & daughter. You do need big wrists, though (I'm 6' 4" tall and 103kg)... David only did this as a bit of fun - he deserves credit for producing something that's fun, with little profit (if any) for an awful lot of hard work. Nicko

    1. Re:It's not that simple... by 6350' · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. The watch he made, and the larger version someone else made, are gorgous - as well, they cracked open the whole lovely world of nixie clocks in general that I never knew about. I just spent the last hour wandering from site to site, and gallerly to gallery, looking at these gorgoues things. Wow!

  49. ...it would tell time in hex

    According to the .PDF copy of the user manual on the site, the software that runs it is GPL'ed and fully user-compilable/modifiable.

    Go for it!

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:DIY by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Nixie tubes had/have ten filaments for the digits 0-9. Seven segment displays were invented later.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  50. some more... by sheimers · · Score: 1
    1. Re:some more... by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, that Digitale Nixieröhrenuhr von Friedhelm Bruegmann (your last link) although hellish to translate is damned impressive - building the entire timepiece as an valve driven analog computer - and pretty too (if you like that sort of retro thing).

      A shame he's only built one :(

    2. Re:some more... by JazzHarper · · Score: 1
      ...the entire timepiece as an valve driven analog computer


      It's not analog, it's entirely digital.

      You're right, though, it's a beautiful piece of work.

  51. The only problem... by squoozer · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... after 3 weeks of wearing this watch your hand goes black and drops off.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:The only problem... by Cheapy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This watch causes rampant masturbation?

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    2. Re:The only problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. You didn't think that a woman would have sex with you, if you put that on your arm, did you?

  52. ...power is a problem... by nickds · · Score: 3, Informative

    He looked at lithium cells, but the supplier would not let him have samples, and the MOQ was in the order of 10,000 units (or $$, I can't remember), so the "common camera battery" route was taken... Again, it's a compromise. The reason the tilt-detector (a solid-state Analogue Devices unit) is used is that the HT converter is only activated whn the watch is at 45 degrees or so the the Earth. As you tilt the watch, you can just hear the HT boost converter starting (a very slight whstling) if you put your ear to the watch... Assuming the HT supply is 90% efficient (typical for this sort of unit), to get 180VDC at 3mA, you need about 200mA at 3V from the battery - Obviously you can't let that run continuously as any battery would be flat in a few hours, hence the tilt-detectors. Everything is a compromise... but it really does work... Nicko

  53. Re:Geeky? No. Pricey? Yes by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
    Oooh! Shiny!!!

    How about a watch that displays the time digitally in colors matching the resister color code?

    12:17 == brown red brown blue

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  54. Watch design still stuck in the 1970s by elronxenu · · Score: 1
    Unfortunately this watch design is no smarter than the norm.

    I was disappointed when I read:

    The timekeeping rate is adjustable to permit regulation to within a few seconds a week.

    I can't understand why in the year 2005 every digital watch does not include a tiny radio receiver to pick up the WWV or GPS radio time signals. Then every watch will be accurate to within a second or two, all the time (as long as the wearer goes outside every so often if it's a GPS watch), and there's no need to set it - unless you're telling it the local timezone offset from UTC.

    1. Re:Watch design still stuck in the 1970s by fikx · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd hate for all watches to do that. For me my watch is a personal refernce. If I couldn't rely on it to stay a static refernce I wouldn't wear one. Sure, it's nice if you can buy watches that do that, but I would never buy one myself. For one reason I would rather be able to look at my watch and know that when it sais 2:00 that an hour ago it said 1:00 instead of being automatically adjusted from under me. For another reason, I don't trust the automatic settign working correctlyanyway. I bought one of those clock radios and it's wrong twice a year due to living in a state that doesn't do that DST time stuff. and THAT clock stays in one place...a watch travels from time zone to time zone with me.

      --
      AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  55. Stop the Slashads! by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I am sick and tired of these blantant ads appearing on Slashdot! Remember a few weeks ago, we had the "high tech gifts for geek dads" article? Which turned out to be a CDROM with parenting tips?

    The editors need to start acting like editors and edit! If an ad-post occassionally makes through, then alright, I understand, but ones like this one are obvious. It reads like an ad and the only link to the watch is the one to the manufacturer.

    I've heard other people say it and I'm starting to agree: a moderation system for stories that make it to the front page might not be a bad idea. If the editors won't do their job, then let us do it for them.

  56. Nice Hack, but wouldnt ... by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    Want to try and wear this through the airport. I could see the security flipping out right now..

    1. Re:Nice Hack, but wouldnt ... by nickds · · Score: 1

      ...when one of the original prototypes was shipped to the UK, the customs folks here destroyed one of the tubes and the watch glass... Not even a "Sorry" from them...

  57. Just perfect, learn from this guy. by davygrvy · · Score: 1
    As Old Skewl goes, this is pretty geeky!

    And perfect, too. This is the perfect product model. Don't laugh. Here's my complex hardware thing (that has value) and you get free source code for it.. have fun if you want :)

    A perfect business model in my book.

    --
    -=[ place .sig here ]=-
  58. Real Hairy Arms.. by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

    Did you see the video?
    If that's not an evidence for bigfoot then I don't know what is.

  59. back to the future? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    If you run at 88 miles an hour while wearing it, do you go back in time? Or does it require doing something else at 88 miles an hour... ha ha

    --
    stuff |
  60. Probably won't go thru airport security by skeptictank · · Score: 1

    But some of the desktop clocks are fantastic.

    1. Re:Probably won't go thru airport security by cab15625 · · Score: 1

      Big Burley Guard (BBG): What's that sir?
      Nixie Fan (NF): It's a nixie watch! Cool, huh?
      BBG: It didn't look like a watch in the scanner. May I take a closer look?
      NF: Sure ... Careful. It's hand crafted.
      BBG: Did you assemble this "watch" yourself sir?
      NF: No, it came that way.
      BBG: What are all these wires? What's that little cylinder?
      NF: Well, it's a ...
      BBG: What makes it glow?
      NF: Oh! Well it's really cool. You see there are filaments and they charge up a mixture of argon and mercury ...
      BBG (into head-set): Chief ... yeah, sir, we got some nut trying to smuggle a mercury bomb onto the plane ...

    2. Re:Probably won't go thru airport security by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      I've worn it through an airport several times. No problem. It seemsto be ignored by the TSA goons. But the checkout lady is always curious about it. [disclaimer: I am the creator of this gadget.]

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
  61. Is that a clock on your wrist? by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or are you on house arrest?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  62. On the down side by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I'll bet that baby eats batteries for breakfast. Just imagine buying one for the paltry price of $395 and the spending another $1,200 on batteries because everyone who spots it while you walk by wants to see it in action.

    Why do I get the feeling the developer is in cohoots with Union Carbide?

  63. more nixie clocks from my watchmaker by wayne · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine has made quite a few nixie clocks, including one that sync's its time to WWVB. They are cool to watch.

    --
    SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
  64. and you thought woz's watch was the must have item by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    woz's watch costs about six times as much as this cathode watch.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  65. No, not cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's been a very impressive Nixie wristwatch at http://www.amug.org/~jthomas/watch.html for quite a while now - he made it in 2001

    Actually, if you read the article (or actually the website), you'll see that the maker of the current watch was "inspired" by the watch you link to above. Now the above watch is chez cool, but the maker of the new watch wanted to basically shrink the original watch down to something that one could, somewhat, practically wear on your wrist. Other than the # of digits compromise, I think he did a very good job. To say that one is "cooler" than the other, I think is a mistake, as they both had different goals in mind, and both reached some very impressive goals.

  66. See it in action! by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

    I tried to "see it in action" and I totally just saw snow (just like I expect from a CRT), and then it threw my browser outa wack! Stupid watch!

    Well whatever. Who cares. This reminds me of those stupid phones Japanese people like to carry around--an old school phone handset hooked up to their cell phone.

    Yeah, lets go old school. Next I'm gonna put a steam engine in my car...

    1. Re:See it in action! by c0WG0d · · Score: 1

      Yeah, lets go old school. Next I'm gonna put a steam engine in my car...

      Hahaha, it is so funny that you mention that! Today on slashdot: Steam Hybrid Car

      --
      cowgod Esc:wq
  67. I can't resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Douglas Adams had it right... From HGttG:

    "Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun.
    Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea."

  68. Hell, that ain't nothing... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    If you want the ULTIMATE in clunky, difficult to wear watches, you need one of these:

    http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/atomic-bill/

    One hell of a lot more accurate than that nixie tube toy! :)

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  69. Re:sTUPID aMERican Dream by physman_wiu · · Score: 1

    Is it slash dot, or just some of it's readers?
    You, sir, are stupidier than I.

    --
    Physics is imagination in a straight jacket. ~John Moffat
  70. Vacuum tube cathode tube display calculator? by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see a similar idea put towards a desktop calculator that used vacuum tubes instead of transistors and cathode tubes instead of LEDs. Yes it would be big, hot, and slow... but it would definitely be a geek conversation piece.

  71. Tokyoflash by SonnyJimATC · · Score: 1

    Phrrrp, whatever. You want to get one of these, like me: http://www.tokyoflash.com/viewwatch53W2LED-watches .html And yes, I can actually read it whilst xxxx'd

  72. I have one by HWguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have one of these. It may not be for everyone but I bought it because:

    - It uses nixie tubes. I think they are the nicest of all digital display technologies. I like the fully formed numbers and I like the 3-dimensional movement as the digits change.
    - It was designed and manufactured by one person. I think that is quite an accomplishment and makes for a much more personal and unique timepiece.
    - The designer released the firmware under the GPL. This is the only watch in the world that I know of that can be reprogrammed by its owner. The designer put a lot of neat features into the firmware and given the uC is a PIC this is no small feat. I'm surprised more ./ers don't really appreciate this.
    - It is a fairly complex design including a 180 volt power supply and an accellerometer to trigger the display. There are several PCBs assembed together in 3D in this watch which I like.
    - It is large and not for everyday use. However the size and quality of the case make it stand out. I wear watches to be noticed and this one certainly is. I added a gel sheet to the watch which accents the display and obscures the battery making for a better display.

    I've looked at most of the mass-produced "geek" watches and retro LED watches (ok so I did buy a Zeon) but most of them look and feel cheap. And there is nothing special about their design or function.

    This watch is like an expensive two-seat sports car and can be appreciated as such. You take it out on the weekends for a fun. You don't take it to work everyday.

    1. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wear watches to be noticed and this one certainly is.

      Insecure much?

  73. Neat idea, but... by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

    Neat idea, but it's really quite ugly, and much too big. The "cool for geeks" factor is high, but the design of the actual watch looks like a prototype, not something ready for sale.

    Keep trying, guys. Once you find something that's interesting and looks good, you'll tap into a huge market of gals buying gifts for their geeky guys, as well as the smaller market of geeky women who will want one of their own.

  74. These tubes used to be on Pinball machines by supertsaar · · Score: 1

    Seeing these tubes brought back the memories of playing pinball in my local snackbar again. Another post here mentions the really cool effect you get when te numbers change rapidly, as the filaments are placed at different depths you get this nice depth change effect....

    --
    The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    1. Re:These tubes used to be on Pinball machines by Whoop-John · · Score: 1

      Nixie tubes were only used on a few French pinball machines made by Rally Play in the mid-1960s. The flat planar displays used from 1987 onwards in US machines were also neon gas plasma displays, but they were 7 flat segments. No US pinball machine ever used nixie tubes, to my knowledge.

      John

    2. Re:These tubes used to be on Pinball machines by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Hey that's interesting. I seem to recall many many pinball machines had these. Btw, I'm from the netherlands, so who knows, maybe I was playing french pinball machines from the sixties (my memories of these tubes are from the seventies....)

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  75. Huh...I was banking on a wrist sundial. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    You know, so it could be worn to dress-up parties and what-not and not be anachronistic.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Huh...I was banking on a wrist sundial. by Sabotage · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Huh...I was banking on a wrist sundial. by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      That is so cool. What a pity it's not currently available.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  76. All good fun until you go through airport security by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine trying to explain to any TSA employee why the thing on your wrist looks like a bomb timer from a bad movie?

  77. Alphanumeric Nixies by Happy+Lemming · · Score: 1

    I bought some segmented alphanumeric Nixie tubes from a surplus dealer, just after the last ice age. Drove them with TTL and 180 volts. Very visible, but they just didn't seem retro then.

  78. Something I will always regret... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    At the first software development job I ever had, about 12 years ago, I was given a "piece of junk" electronic calculator by the IT guy (small mom & pop shop). I was a "kid" then (19 or 20 years old), and I didn't have the same appreciation for old electronics that I do now. Back then, a piece of electronic junk, for me, was another thing to tear apart, and salvage any usable junk from it.

    I don't remember the make or model of this calculator - it may have been a Texas Instruments, not sure. I do remember that it had the regular layout of keys, and a switch or two to set a decimal position or something like that, and it plugged into the wall - but all in all, a very basic calculator, with the exception of this: it had a memory feature. Plugging it in, nothing on it worked, it just displayed all 9's - on a bunch of glowing nixie tubes.

    Now, I didn't know what a nixie tube was at that time, but I knew that the display was old, and that it was a tube display. I was thinking it was similar to a neon display (which of course it is), so I thought that piece was neat and all. But - it didn't work! It was a non-working calculator. But that memory feature bugged me, because I could tell it was old, and there was date on it (from sometime in the very early 1970's - prior to the 4004). I knew it didn't have a bit of RAM in it - so, how did it store things. In my zeal to understand (and my ignorance of youth), I decided I would take it apart, keep what was good and throw the rest away.

    That calculator is long gone - I ended up saving nothing of it (cringe), but what I found was very cool, and I only appreciated it later as my knowledge of computer and electronics history grew as I learned more with age. First off - the entire logic of the calculator was done in transistors - not a chip in sight. This was something I was impressed to see when I first saw it, but it didn't really strike me at the time as something I should save. Transistors didn't interest me that much - I could buy them cheaply anywhere. There was also the driver system for the (what I would later learn) were the nixie tubes. I kept the tubes for a little while after that, but they too eventually were thrown out, as well (I couldn't see any use for them at the time). They were all lined up and supported in a fitted metal chassis with rubber shock mounts, and the wires were individually soldered to the drivers and logic system - no sockets there! Then, there was the metal box, with four wires coming out of it.

    This piece intrigued me - what was this thing? Could this be the memory? With only four wires, how could that be? The box itself was alluminum, and was sealed airtight - no screws or such to easily open it, just a metal box with four wires. So, I did what any stupid kid would do when confronted with such a device - I took a hammer and screwdriver to it (nowadays, if that was something I wanted to get into, and I didn't care about it like I would now, I would use a vice and a hacksaw, maybe a dremel too, but I didn't have those at the time in my apartment). I punched a hole in the side, expecting to hear a vacuum released, but I heard nothing. Using other tools, I got it ripped open, and what I found inside was curious: Where two of the wires entered was some kind of device hard mounted to the alluminum case, with a (steel?) wire coming from the center, which itself was suspended and coiled inside the box, with the other end connected to a similar device for the other two wires. What was this, and how could it be memory. I ended up throwing it away, along with most of the rest of the calculator - eventually, it all became trash.

    Have I told you how much I now kick myself for this? It was only much later that I realized what that alluminum box was, and that maybe that calculator could be fixed, and was probably worth something to a collector. The box was this: a very compact implementation of an old form of electronic computer memory, the serial delay line. Original delay lines on computers that had them in the 1940's used acoustic tr

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  79. lacking fashion sense by binarybum · · Score: 1

    well, it certainly would appear that someone isn't very really retro-future cool

      I, for one, am working on a 35-mm film base camera watch. Don't be left behind in the dust man, - get with the retro-future cool movement you square.

    --
    ôó
  80. Its a fantastic watch by Whoop-John · · Score: 1

    I have one of these Cathode Corner watches. What you all have to appreciate is the incredible feat of technical engineering that this watch represents.

    The tubes are over 30 years old. I am glad David chose to use a tube which has a reasonable supply, as the UK customs broke one of my tubes apart looking for bombs, or Bin Laden. I was able to get a replacement fitted.

    The case is anodised aircraft-grade lightweight alumin(i)um machined to a high specification. It is not heavy and you don't notice it when you are wearing it. Yes maybe it is a little large by watch standards, but what fun. Genuine jaw-dropping high-voltage neon on your wrist. It also has a precision neoprene gasket to keep moisture out and a precision fitted glass crystal. The strap is a beautiful quality leather item which complements the watch.

    The electronics represent as good a compromise as is possible, given the various requirements of long battery life, reliable high voltage firing of the tubes and good timekeeping. It's not so easy technically to do this stuff. The two axis accelerometer is a nice touch. You set it to your preferred viewing angle and when you want to see the time, it shows. The miniaturisation and small component size inside has to be seen to be believed. There's even a programming socket and open source code, should you want to hack your own features into the watch.

    It's a truly great watch and a remarkable achievement. I am happy and proud to own one. Its been going for about 9 months now without a hitch.

    Get your wallets out and don't be so mean. This thing is a true work of art.

    John

  81. Agreed by goon · · Score: 1
    `... David only did this as a bit of fun - he deserves credit for producing something that's fun, with little profit (if any) for an awful lot of hard work ...`

    I hang my head in shame when I read some of the posts here. Isn't the journey of hacking together some technology from design to completion what /. is (was) about?

    ; Bits in SetDig tell which digit's being set
    ;
    NotSet equ 0 ; not in set mode
    H24Set equ 1 ; setting hours
    HrsSet equ 2 ; setting hours

    Did anyone comment on the firmware? or even look at it & wonder how the watch works at code level? To me the biggest leap D made was a) making the firmware hackable & b) taking the trouble of getting a 3D designer to redisgn the cosmetics & rebuild the guts to fit into the case. Masterpiece.

    I've added the url to Make blog where they really do get off on making things from scratch. Instead of worring about trivial things like fashion trends & consumer item aesthetics :P
    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  82. Good prop by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Good prop for a Lensman movie. I think E.E. Doc. Smith would be pleased.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  83. Maker of the day by goon · · Score: 1

    Looks like D's already on Make. Read about the geeky lad here & check out those pics.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  84. Simplicity and function by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1
    You know what watch I've had for ages (compared to anything else electronic I've ever owned)? My plain old Casio five-function "Alarm Chrono". It's been ticking away since January or so of 1991, with two battery changes (early 1998 and mid-2002) and one O-ring replacement (later in 2002, because when I replaced the battery I noticed the rubber O-ring was basically gone -- it's supposed to be replaced every 2 years...) It's basically this watch in a slightly different casing.

    It just works. It's been scratched, dropped, banged against walls and metal objects, and through one major car accident. It survived three summers of vibration and sweating when I mowed lawns as a teenager for spending money, which killed the Timex that preceded it in a single season. It's been through the shower, rain, pools, etc. God alone knows how many times. Other than the battery, O-ring, and the band which is a cheap metal expandable I bought to replace the crappy plastic band the watch came with, it's still completely intact compared to when I bought it.

    Some of the LED segments have gotten dim in fluorescent light, but they're still readable. It still keeps time with the manual-specified accuracy of 30 seconds per month, as far as I can tell. Certainly I only set it a couple of times a year and I don't remember it ever being more than a minute or so off. If it should ever break or, I dunno, they quit making batteries to fit it or something, I guess I'd buy another watch. Probably just the current version of this one, though.

    It's simple, it's unobtrusive, it's accurate, and it's reliable. To me, for a watch, that is the definition of style.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  85. Re:Retro-future cool by parasonic · · Score: 2, Informative

    LED watches are actually more energy efficient than Nixie tubes. A Nixie tube *IS* a CRT. So my watch battery lasts months even.