Slashdot Mirror


Marfa Lights Explained

billsoxs writes "The Marfa lights are ghostly lights that have been observed for years around Marfa TX (near Big Bend). They have been the subject of curiosity , a source of tourism and scientifically studied a number of times. Now a group of physics students from the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) have use small lasers and traffic sensors to show that these lights are most likely headlights from cars on a distant highway. The publication is in the Society of Physics Students website. The PDF of the article is here. (Unfortunately the related video is no longer available on the web but more stuff is here.)"

183 comments

  1. Weird... by MSFanBoi2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't know there were major highways with automobiles running around on them back when the lights first were seen...

    1. Re:Weird... by randyzoch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good detective work. This story dates back to the 1880's. Try using Google sometime.
      http://www.qsl.net/w5www/marfa.html
      http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/article s/MM/lxm1.html

    2. Re:Weird... by Tinn-Can · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Robert Ellison came to Marfa in 1883 and off-loaded his cattle in Alpine. He then drove the herd west and on the second night out, while camped just outside Paisano Pass, he saw strange lights in the distance. At first, it was feared that they were Apache signal fires. Mr. Ellison searched the countryside by horseback. He finally realized that the lights were not man-made. Other early settlers assured him that they too had seen the lights and had never been able to identify them." from the first thing google came up.. yeah no cars in west texas in 1883 I guess thats why they go to UTD...

    3. Re:Weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have seen them, and they are not headlights from cars. That is pretty obvious. You are most likely to see them in times of high humidity, and very late at night. There is only the one highway with an observation spot, and not very many cars (this is an extremely rural area). At one time a Japanese film crew chased them with helicopters and jeeps, and they never got close to catching them, although they were able to film them. Disclaimer, I did not read the article, but if you had ever seen them, you would know better.

    4. Re:Weird... by Jimbookis · · Score: 3, Informative

      I haven't RTFA of course, but there are similar lights here in Australia called the Min-Min lights somewhere out the back of NSW. Hot flat plains during the day, cold flat plains at night - perhaps a bit like Marfa in Texas. Anyway, some professor here demonstrated that the Min-Min Lights were car headlights being refracted from a long distance away. Even before cars I am sure someone's campfire at night could have been a sufficient source of light. I have to say, refracted light is terribly pedestrian and no-where near as interested as ghosts and UFOs be a source of the light - not that I think either exist. Except for Tommyknockers.

    5. Re:Weird... by Jimbookis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, well, here is an article about the Min-Min lights explained. Min-Min Lights Explained

    6. Re:Weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The headlights are obviously a DeLorean's.

    7. Re:Weird... by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Funny

      so now we've gone full circle from UFOs to Time Travel, rather than freeing us from our tin-foil hats we'll need to double their thickness

    8. Re:Weird... by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was unaware that major highways existed in 1883, as well. Those cars must have had to haul ass to get between the towns before the Indians could scalp them. . .

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    9. Re:Weird... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm almost certain that there was an explanation by a/an astronomy prof/s at UT Austin about how Marfa sat in the bottom of a basin, which set up some sort of thermal inversion which caused air of greater density to set on top of air of a lower density which in turn acted as acted as a lens to refract the light from bright stars, and or planets near the horizon into the basin giving rise to the Marfa lights.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    10. Re:Weird... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      I'd like someone to research the light with a high quality optical range finder used in conjunction with a compass and GPS to locate the position of the lights. A small telescope with a spectrograph would also be interesting. Get the spectrum on these puppies.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    11. Re:Weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light is electromagnetic energy as are radio waves.
        Light can be diffracted , bent just as radio waves can .
      Due to atmospheric conditions , the result is the same as for radio waves , they can travel a much longer distance than normal without losing their strength , the result with light is that it would be seen at a much greater distance and in places that they mignt not normally be seen.

      It may be just that simple.

    12. Re:Weird... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I have not seen the lights, but if you had read the article, you would know better.

    13. Re:Weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      url:http://www.hotwebcam.org

    14. Re:Weird... by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      I have seen them, and they are not headlights from cars. That is pretty obvious.

      Right. And I've seen so-called heat lightning, and it is not just lightning that is occurring a long distance away. That is pretty obvious.

      Disclaimer, I did not read the article,

      Ahhh. It all makes sense now. And you still got modded up how?

    15. Re:Weird... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I have seen them, and they are not headlights from cars. That is pretty obvious. You are most likely to see them in times of high humidity, and very late at night.

      When cars headlights are on high, and the atmosphere is ripe to reflect them. Brilliant deduction, Sherlock!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  2. This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For a while now, and I'm rather glad it's been explained.

    Now if they'd move on to the Blue Light Cemetery, I'd be more interested.

    http://www.cemeteries-of-tx.com/Etx/Harris/cemeter y/bluelight.htm

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For those of you who don't want to Google, let me explain. (Those of you who know Houston and its legends, you can skip this.)

      In Houston, there's a reservoir out on the west side. Back during the 1800s, this was a floodplain, and the settlers lived there. They had a cemetery in what is now Bear Creek Park, and over the years, the cemetery became lost to the trees and such. Nowadays, teenagers use it for god-knows-what, despite the park rangers and Harris County sheriff's office sending deputies over the whole park area.

      Legend says that there are blue lights there at night. It's commonly explained away as light glinting off the tombstones, but I've been there, and I can't say that the tombstones are what's giving off the light, seeing as how it was well away from the tombstones when I saw it.

      --

      Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    2. Re:This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by gmby · · Score: 1

      More likely it's the Hemstead Shroom Fields!

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    3. Re:This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by R-2-RO · · Score: 2, Funny

      Suckers! Blue Light Cemetery was K-Mart's failed attempt at selling cheap headstones. :)

      --
      Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
    4. Re:This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by Swaffs · · Score: 1

      So is it legend or did you see it?

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    5. Re:This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      the cemetery became lost to the trees and such. Nowadays, teenagers use it for god-knows-what

      Drinking beer.
      There, one mystery solved ;- )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by sillyman71 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm betting this strange luminecent phenomenon is more likely due to "blue smoke".

    7. Re:This has been an urban legend here in Texas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Halloween 1978, about 20 or so of our senior class from a high school in Houston drove out to bear creek to see the Blue Light cemetary. I think it was a week night, so we all had to sneak out. There's another cemetary near the BL that's next to fm 1960 where we all parked. We walked down the road & down the dirt path where the place is located and found the place. We were all hoping to see something, since the place has a reputation, and it -was- All Hallow's Eve. No luck. It was a sad, semi-forgotten little over-grown place with half of the stones turned over. There was a large cleared area where a bonfire had been built, that had what looked like a pentagram scratched into the dirt near it, which spooked us. We waited for about an hour or so until after midnight, no blue light. There wasn't a moon out, so I'll bet that had something to do with it. The symbol in the dirt upset some of the girls to the point that the other reason we went out there crashed and burned as well.

  3. Finally! by tannhaus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's sad that we can cook our meals with microwaves, but don't know answers to questions like this. I thought science was supposed to answer the how and why. If so, they really should devote time to explaining local phenomena like this. Leaving unanswered questions for things so visible and widely known makes science look like a bunch of blowhards. THIS is why intelligent design is even considered in schools...

    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sadly, it seems like most people are completely uninterested in scientific explainations for anything :(

      The Science Channel, Discovery and SciFi are RIFE with UFO and Psychic garbage. Why? Because that's what people want. They want to believe that not everything can be explained and actually get rather hostle at times when they are!

      As it is, we are pretty low in supply of "scientists" and time to devote to relatively unimportant things like studying swamp light. :( Maybe if science were more of a topic in school and we had more scientists and well if people in general were so damn superstitious! (That's why ID is really now being taught in schools)

    2. Re:Finally! by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      Why was GP modded as flamebait? Doesn't seem like it to me.

      It's true that science and technology answer some types of questions and provide us with certain tools and luxuries, but other more mundane stuff seems to go without explanation, like these lights.

      And, on a cursory examination of the sites listed, I couldn't find any photos or video (other than this http://utdallas.edu/~roddy/Marfa_Lights/car1.WMV which is just a highway in the dark.)

    3. Re:Finally! by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      Sure, but I think that people appreciate (or at least understand) that REAL science is what makes their everyday lives better. They're watching the Science chanel, Discovery, etc, on a television that was produced by real science... and you mentioned the SciFi channel... well that's the Science FICTION channel, and that should tell you something.

      And if they DON'T undesrstand how important science is, well, these 'bogus' scientists are simply increasing human appreciation of science, and there's nothing wrong with that. Sure, I'd rather people watch documentaries on string theory or even simple newtonian mechanics, but people don't find that interesting. Whatever gets people interested in science, I suppose, can't be ALL bad.

      Furthurmore, I doubt these scientists are going to be doing research at CERN (for example) as an alternative to what they're doing now.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    4. Re:Finally! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Remember when the science channel had the slips with William B Davis(sp?) The Cigarette Smoking Man calling BS on things like UFO's, physic surgery, etc. Now it seems like they are advocating that stuff. I've seen about 20 minutes total of Ghost Hunters and it makes my stomach turn to think that a show like that is on a science channel.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a pretty weak stomach.

    6. Re:Finally! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      They're b-rated filler crap. Like "Storm Warning" on discovery channel [in Canada] or "Reno 911" on Comedy Central in the US [or anything with Lou Dobbs on CNN]. Most of what the discovery channel shows in Canada is totally retarded like "Extreme Machines" where they show the same five machines over and over and of course the occasional "super natural" show.

      They use crap like that to fill up the day because the real shows you'd find interesting cost money. And they're not in the business of doing actual work.

      Oh and I swear to god if I hear or see another "cocks" er. sorry "cox" commercial I'll hurt someone. It's just a dumb name and hearing "cocks" 20 times an hour is annoying [I was recently in hotels a lot with nothing more to do then watch TV and read...]

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    7. Re:Finally! by Zhiroc · · Score: 1

      Ghost Hunters is on the SciFi channel.

    8. Re:Finally! by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Science only answers the "how".

      Religion has to answer the "why".

      If one subscribes to the premise that religions are superstition, then there is no "why" at all.

      In fact, to even begin to ask why, you have to suppose that there was some purpose for it in the first place, which automatically implies the existence of an intelligence or reasoning entity that designed the purpose.

    9. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If one subscribes to the premise that religions are superstition, then there is no "why" at all."

      Exactly. There is no 'why', if by 'why' you mean purpose. There is only cause and effect.

    10. Re:Finally! by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      As MikeHock@cox.net, I too, hate cox.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    11. Re:Finally! by tannhaus · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Science can answer how something happens. The why is often an effect in a cause and effect relationship. Why did it happen? It happened because of this. How did it happen? It happened like this.

      You don't need to attribute everything to God in order to get a why.

    12. Re:Finally! by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Sadly, it seems like most people are completely uninterested in scientific explainations for anything
      Take for example the sighting of a cigar shaped green light over London in the late 1800's. Some insensitive clod put the light through a spectrograph and made detailed observations, thus finding out more about the northern lights and putting off the UFO craze for over half a century when people who jumped to rapid conclusions were listened to instead.
      As it is, we are pretty low in supply of "scientists" and time to devote to relatively unimportant things like studying swamp light
      Why not - if it's cool, interesting and weans people off the magnetic blankets and other superstition? A study of belly button fluff (ignoble last year I believe) got people involved with a radio science talkback program.

      ID is just a symptom of general ignorance and superstition which is becoming common. On Friday a geophysics student about to start an honors year helping out in her holidays was telling me that CRT computer screens give you the same amount of radiation as a medical X-ray after a week of exposure - of some sort of radiation like X-rays only different and just as damaging - told to her by a doctor apparantly. My explanation of how a CRT works and how an X-ray tube works only got as far as mentioning amounts of energy involved, intensity and target materials before I could tell she thought I was lying to her because I have an agenda to not replace CRTs with LCDs due to cost. Even many of those in science studies have fallen victim to snake oil sociopaths and see technical folk as Moorlocks who will eat their babies to keep technology going.

      Back to pseudo-science on TV - one thing that pissed me off intensely was the "roads that go into the sea" crap about Easter Island on one TV program made decades after they were shown to be boat ramps by scuba divers.

    13. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the most sensible comments I've ever read. Funny thing is that I could imagine somebody from each side having an issue (Science *can* explain *why* or religion can explain *how*).

    14. Re:Finally! by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      What a douche.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    15. Re:Finally! by Nyago · · Score: 1

      ...you have to suppose that there was some purpose for it in the first place, which automatically implies the existence of an intelligence or reasoning entity that designed the purpose.

      I dislike this argument as it's equivalent to the "no creator" scenario with an added layer of complexity. Why, then, does the creator exist? By your argument something had to have created it. And so on, ad infinitum.

      One could argue "well, maybe it's beyond human understanding/logic", which is basically non-falsifiable; but then one has to ask how far one needs to go. How many creator-levels are there?

      You could say there is one god created everything. Why not say that some god created that god? They're both equivalently non-falsifiable. It's just that the more you add, the more complex the situation becomes.

      By the same token, you could say the universe just exists of its own accord, and THAT is beyond human understanding or logic. Again, non-falsifiable; just simpler.

      So the question then boils down to: "how simple do you want your universe to be?".

      --
      Reality is fluffy!
    16. Re:Finally! by renoX · · Score: 1

      Nope, it is "when do you admit that you don't know?".

      Why does the universe exist? Agnostic answer: I don't know.

      Why does the universe exist? Religious answer: God created it.
      Which trigger: Why does God exist? Religious answer: equivalent to 'I don't know'.

      Atheist are just Agnostic which recognize the stupidity of the Religious point (adding an entity which doesn't solve the problem), so they acknowledge that they don't know why the universe exist but they consider that God is a stupid idea.

    17. Re:Finally! by m50d · · Score: 1

      The how is the why. You don't ask for a religious reason for why an apple falls to the floor.

      --
      I am trolling
    18. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and ignore the fact that "why not existance" is an equally meaningful/meaningless question.

  4. BREAKING NEWS! by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lights in distance probably headlights from far off cars! Populace of Marfa stunned! Physicists skeptical! Sensastionalists de-sensastionalized!

    I've never heard of these "Marfa Lights," but I can't help making fun of them out of context...

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:BREAKING NEWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't do a very good job...

    2. Re:BREAKING NEWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Actually, below are some pictures of Marfa lights and if anyone still thinks these are car lights then he has his own problems :)

      http://www.whattofix.com/blog/archives/2005/07/giv e_up_trying.php
      http://www.rense.com/general45/excel.htm
      http://taskboy.com/lectures/UFOlogy/02_Pre-1946/sl ide_03.html

      Also am I the only one who read the pdf? I didn't see anything about any lasers. All they did was pure statistics; # of lights appeared at given time vs # of cars that drove on the 67th highway. This could be pure coninsidence.

    3. Re:BREAKING NEWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two pictures of the "mystery lights" at the taskboy.com link are in fact cars on the highway with their headlights on during the day. Look at the positioning of the lights. They are right on the near horizontal line between the light and dark terrain that goes across the entire picture.

    4. Re:BREAKING NEWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lights in distance probably headlights from far off cars! Populace of Marfa stunned!

      "It was like, er, a Vee, um, a Vee Dubya"

    5. Re:BREAKING NEWS! by labnet · · Score: 1

      Marfa Lights have been known in the Australian Outback for a long time as minmin lights.
      See this link http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s818193 .htm
      Or google it http://www.google.com.au/search?q=minmin%20lights

      --
      46137
    6. Re:BREAKING NEWS! by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I've seen them firsthand. Not much else to do in Marfa ;)

  5. Video Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Video Link by vistic · · Score: 1

      Those are UFOs !!!

    2. Re:Video Link by tor528 · · Score: 0

      That made me laugh, although it would be nice to see an actual video of these Marfa lights.

      --
      If I think something is funny, I will probably mod it +1 Insightful. "It's funny because it's true."
    3. Re:Video Link by flood6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Moderated "interesting"... Every time a moderator mods a post before clicking a link, the Flying Spaghetti Monster kills a kitten...

    4. Re:Video Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.. those ARE the marfa lights.

      They concluded the lights are generated by traffic on the highway.

    5. Re:Video Link by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I named my kitten Pirate to avoid such problems.

      I actually named five kittens Pirate, so they should be safe from Eris too...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    6. Re:Video Link by euphgeek · · Score: 1

      No, they concluded that the lights they saw were generated by traffic on the highway. And they still didn't explain how they could have been seen back in 1883.

    7. Re:Video Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any links or references to actual documentation of these suposed obersations in 1883?

      People have a tendency to make shit up. Including the suggestion that these lights were seen in 1883.

      Given how the lights they saw match what others describe, this can only be the definitive answer.

    8. Re:Video Link by hazman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now if they could just figure out what all of those eerie sounds are.

    9. Re:Video Link by Froug · · Score: 1

      Fire and lanterns existed in 1883. And of course as others have pointed out, people can lie.

    10. Re:Video Link by euphgeek · · Score: 1

      Even if they were fires, lanterns or made up stories back then, the fact remains that the students only observed car lights on those nights. They didn't prove that everyone who ever observed lights at that location saw headlights. There is much that science doesn't know. Why assume that just because there is a possible way to explain phenomena using current scientific knowledge that it is the only possible explanation?

    11. Re:Video Link by qeveren · · Score: 1

      There's no documented evidence that anyone saw them back in 1883, either.

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    12. Re:Video Link by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the good old inductive fallacy. David Hume thou art avenged!

      Neither can we prove that things will fall (even terrestially) every time, that the sun will rise tomorrow, that H + O2 will be water, or ANYTHING in science. We can only observe it x times, and be relatively certain in our observations. Science never grants certanty, only pretty damn sure-ness. If these kids managed to reduce to principle, proven by a coherent web of theory, then they are more certain than the sum of their observations, but still not completely.

      Not even Einsteinian physics are certain, afterall.

      If we must run with the skeptic vibe, I would like to challenge you to disproving Descartes radical doubt? Can you PROVE, beyond a doubt, that anything exists besides the cogito (I think therefore I am)?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    13. Re:Video Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course as others have pointed out, people can lie.

      No they can't you filthy liar!!

    14. Re:Video Link by euphgeek · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to get into a flame war with you. That's what Usenet is for. All I was saying was that having an open mind in a scientific investigation is not necessarily a bad thing.

    15. Re:Video Link by fbjon · · Score: 1

      You're right, but statistically speaking, it's nearly always a bad idea to trust your open mind (fraught with bugs, internal inconsistencies, irrational behaviour, and a willingness to believe anything that fits pre-conceived notions), rather than hard evidence and sound, peer-reviewed theories.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    16. Re:Video Link by euphgeek · · Score: 1

      The way you worded that, it sounds like you're saying it's a bad idea to trust your mind if it's open to the possibility that it could be wrong. I think that's the best time to trust your mind, since you would be open to new experiences and information, as well as to accept scientific evidence.

    17. Re:Video Link by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Hm, no that's not quite what I meant. More like: it's a bad idea to have an open mind, and then suddenly begin trusting it while landing on some arbitrary hypothesis. It's good to have an open mind, but you need to keep it open using reason as your crowbar, not let it degenerate into gobbledygook.

      It's sometimes rather difficult, admittedly.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    18. Re:Video Link by euphgeek · · Score: 1

      In other words, it's bad to close an open mind. :-)

  6. Interesting, but ruining a source of revenue... by redwoodtree · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, it's like an episode of Scooby-Doo basically, everyone knows the lights are cars but the local area has used it as sort of fun way of attracting tourists and they even have a festival around the event. See http://www.qsl.net/w5www/marfa.html . So, it's kind of sad that these students went to this amount of trouble to explain away the lights.

    I think it's interesting that the local legend has it that the lights have been there before cars and that you hear a tuning fork sound in one ear. Obviously these little details have been added to add the little bit of doubt to keep the charade going and to draw some more money into town.

    It's a fun thing... let it go, as I'm sure the people down there will not be accepting of even a scientific study like this.

    1. Re:Interesting, but ruining a source of revenue... by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Funny

      but but, it is a superstition. A dangerous cult. We live in the age of science. We must only believe in science and logic.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:Interesting, but ruining a source of revenue... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      So, it's kind of sad that these students went to this amount of trouble to explain away the lights.

      You mean you think it's kind of sad that rational people find a reasonable natural explaination that doesn't rely on supernatural or paranormal? I think it's kind of sad that people rely on supernatural explainations to explain anything they understand when it rarely (or never) supernatural.

      Obviously these little details have been added to add the little bit of doubt to keep the charade going and to draw some more money into town.

      Given that there are people that doubt the NASA moon landings, I wouldn't be surprised that people brush aside these explainations.

    3. Re:Interesting, but ruining a source of revenue... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      to explain anything they understand

      Sorry, it should say:

      to explain anything they don't understand

    4. Re:Interesting, but ruining a source of revenue... by gijoel · · Score: 3, Funny
      So, it's like an episode of Scooby-Doo basically, everyone knows the lights are cars but the local area has used it as sort of fun way of attracting tourists and they even have a festival around the event.


      "And we would have gotten away with it, if it weren't for those pesky kids!!!" says Mayor of Marfa.
    5. Re:Interesting, but ruining a source of revenue... by gagypsy02 · · Score: 1

      I agree, it would have been better to leave it to the imagination. The same sort of thing happened where I'm from http://historicalakewales.com/spookhill/ They investigated it and said it was just an optical illusion.Spook Hill drew alot of extra tourists to places like Bok Tower, Cypress Gardens etc. who had Enough trouble competeing with Disney World. What a Buzz Kill!!

  7. Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...or am I the only one who originally misread it as "Mafia lights"?

    1. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, Hoffa's flashlight strikes again! Mua ha ha

    2. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nopes, same here. "Mafia Lights" totally freaked me out which is why I actually read this piece and then read up on "Marfa" lights.

    3. Re:Is it just me? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      No, you're not. I misread it as "Mafia lights" at first too.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  8. Urban legend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similar legend here...

    Never witnessed it myself, but interesting how they share several similar characteristics in their stories...

    http://www.prairieghosts.com/devprom.html

    1. Re: Urban legend... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Similar legend here...

      And at Bailey's Prairie, Texas.

      And probably 10,000 other places around the world.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Urban legend... by TromboonDotPy · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Brazoria County. Re the wikipedia article, I'd heard that the second wife refused to put whiskey in the coffin because she was a water-drinker...

  9. Did anyone else... by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

    Read this as "Mafia Lights Explained"?

    "Oh shit," I thought, "now that it's been explained to me, they'll come after me next!"

    I'm sure we won't be hearing from the OP anymore.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:Did anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill yourself before you breed, retard.

  10. Science! by mboverload · · Score: 1

    Just more proof of the reasoning and rationality that science provides.

    Don't understand something? Lets say ghosts did it! Or aliens!

    The world is far too complex to assume such magical explanations. All you need is some clever dudes, equipment, and the will to find something out.

    1. Re:Science! by EtherealStrife · · Score: 4, Informative
      Don't understand something? Lets say ghosts did it! Or aliens!

      All you need is some clever dudes, equipment, and the will to find something out.


      Not that clever, if they're attributing this to automotive traffic. There were only a handful of automobiles (all of them "experimental") on the North American continent when the first documented reports emerged (1880s). In effect, they're doing exactly what you blame others for doing: they don't understand what has been causing the lights over the last 120 years, so they pull a scientific possibility out of the hat and give it a go. According to the article, they've been able to create light appearances observable at the same locations as the Marfa lights have been observed by having a vehicle on the highway flashing its lights on and off. This presents the possibility that many of the so called sightings were of cars traveling on the highway. Unfortunately for them, the highway has only been around since 1930... *cue xfiles theme* (not to mention the Marfa lights are often described as being highly distorted, and not always as clear as those observed by the students).

      The students did a great job of presenting a possible explanation, but it should be noted that they have not proven / solved anything. Even in their writeup it's mentioned that they were unable to find any historical accounts to compare their findings with. At which point Robert Ellison (first documented sighter) rolled over in his grave and coughed.

    2. Re:Science! by BrynM · · Score: 1
      There were only a handful of automobiles (all of them "experimental") on the North American continent when the first documented reports emerged (1880s)
      Not taking sides here, but how long has the highway the "lights" are "coming from" been there? Carriages had lantern light for centuries. With metal focus elements since the early 1800s I think. "Vehicle light" might be a better term then. Merely a theory.
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    3. Re:Science! by Dark_Lord_Prime · · Score: 1

      Read a little farther down the post next time:

      "Unfortunately for them, the highway has only been around since 1930... *cue xfiles theme*"

      ;)

    4. Re:Science! by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      The highway may have only been there since the 1930s, but at least the railway and probably primitive roads have crossed Paisano for some time.

      While I'm glad to see a scientific investigation into this, this study seems to at best be a partial explanation. As others have noted, the lights have been around for a long time. This study seems to neglect that, since cars would not have been nearly common enough in the 1880s to be a likely cause, and while it could be a reflectorized light on a wagon or carriage, it just seems unlikely.

      Oh well, headed down that way this spring. Even though I'm sure there's a perfectly rational explanation for it all, I still want to see the phenomenon for myself.

    5. Re:Science! by Kelson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately for them, the highway has only been around since 1930...

      As someone else pointed out, the early sightings aren't very well documented -- the first substantiated reports of the early sightings were made years after the fact and date from well after the highway was built. Even Ellison, it turns out, never actually wrote about the event in his memoirs (1937) -- he told his family about it, and they later told the story to historian Cecilia Thompson or to her source.

      The earliest report that researcher could verify was a 1957 magazine article. That doesn't mean the earlier sightings didn't happen, just that they couldn't be verified.

    6. Re:Science! by EtherealStrife · · Score: 1

      Actually, he was just the first (not the only) from the 1880's (many of the early settlers reported sightings in the mid to late part of the decade). Unfortunately, as you said, all Marfa sightings from that time period are second hand.

    7. Re:Science! by EtherealStrife · · Score: 1

      Their objective was to test a hypothesis (not necessarily to solve or definitively answer anything), and after reading their report I believe they succeeded.

    8. Re:Science! by charlesesl · · Score: 0

      I found it scarey not in that we can not explain these lights but we are starting to science as a religion to get answers. I believe findings such as these should stand up to more scruetny before being published.

    9. Re:Science! by camg188 · · Score: 1

      I'd believe in god before I believe in UFO's, crop circles, bigfoot, et. al.

    10. Re:Science! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      As others have noted, the lights have been around for a long time. This study seems to neglect that, since cars would not have been nearly common enough in the 1880s to be a likely cause, and while it could be a reflectorized light on a wagon or carriage, it just seems unlikely.

      Think, man. The source of the light doesn't have to be a vehicle light. Just because it's a car today doesn't mean it had to be a car in 1880, or even that it had to be a freakin' wagon. It could have just as easily been a campfire. Atmospherically refracted light can appear to move around even when the light source is stationary.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  11. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    These lights are most likely headlights from cars on a distant highway

    Thats what they want you to think

  12. Mafia Lights Explained by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Boss: Yo Ruff ilb, I'll explain de lights, but you hafta keep'em secret. Othuhwise we gunna send yer ass back here tuh Vinny. Right, Vinny?

    Vinny: *sharpens chainsaw* Ey, fuggeddaboudit.

    Boss: You 'erd 'im, kid. Keep da family secrets secret, capeesh?

    ;)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  13. This was explained DECADES ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the '70s I read an old (even then) Popular Science magazine article about these lights, and the car headlight explanation!

    1. Re:This was explained DECADES ago! by tazan · · Score: 1

      I remember that article, it was different lights though. It was the spooklight in southwest missouri. Iirc they put colored lenses on the cars headlights to see if the light changed color and it did.

  14. Let's see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh.

  15. Obligatory by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new automobile headlight overlords.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, exactly, did you feel obliged to post that piece of shit? It's not funny. Hasn't been for a long time.

  16. Your Tax Dollars At Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and my tuition money (I'm a UTD student) at work too. I'm glad that they are about to jack it up even more so that a bunch of physics students can go camping on my dime to explain something that is rather obvious to the causal observer and already explained.

    I guess part of the path of a university to become "important" is to do a bunch of these useless/pointless projects just for the sake of getting our name out there.

    1. Re:Your Tax Dollars At Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should RTFA, "UT Dallas chapter of the Society of Physics Students".

      And it's trolls like you that make UTD look bad.

    2. Re:Your Tax Dollars At Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should read their research proposal to get before crying "Troll!" because someone dared to question the groupthink around here:

      http://utdallas.edu/~roddy/Marfa_Lights/marfa_ligh ts.htm.

      Who's the one making UTD look bad now?

    3. Re:Your Tax Dollars At Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who funded the proposal? "Schlumberger Tech"

      http://www.utdallas.edu/orgs/sps/?CFID=659901&CFTO KEN=76141456

  17. It took how much work to show this is the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What I saw at Marfa, which everyone there explained to be the Marfa lights, where easily recognized as lights from traffic. I know the arguement is that there where lights before the highway was there, however, that doesen't mean the lights they see now are the same as what was seen then. I took long exposure shots of the current lights and they followed an easily tracable path, which conincides with the highway. The distortion/shimmer is easily explained with the point of view, distance and heat rising off the earth at night. Not much else to say, imo. I certainly won't rule out that there are other more interesting lights, but I was utterly unimpressed with what I've seen. I do like Marfa though, and it's still fun. Any excuse to be out in the pitch black desert at night is good enough for me.

  18. Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this similar to the Bingham Light phenomenon here in South Carolina?

  19. I just think it's funny... by emptycorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    "and scientifically studied a number of times. Now a group of physics students from the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) have use small lasers and traffic sensors to show that these lights are most likely headlights from cars on a distant highway."

    When leading scientists can't figure it out, leave it up to students.

  20. Do you really need lasers? by yuriyg · · Score: 1

    Lasers are good and all, but why haven't somebody just walked/drove in the direction of the lights?!

    1. Re:Do you really need lasers? by Slayk · · Score: 1

      Because it's 20 miles through hilly/rough/hot/dry west texan desert? I grew up about 150 miles away from there, and I wouldn't want to trek over that. You first. :)

      That, and it made a good tourist trap. Why kill off something that brings in some tourist dollars to what otherwise is a fairly poor portion of Texas?

    2. Re:Do you really need lasers? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny
      why haven't somebody just walked/drove in the direction of the lights?!
      They did....
      And were never heard from again.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Do you really need lasers? by Pulsar · · Score: 5, Informative
      People have, actually, people have 'walked towards the lights' in one form or another ever since they were first reported in the 1800's. From one of the links in the original post:

      The unexpected lights alarmed the cowboys, who thought the Apaches were on the move, and they quickly doused their own campfires. But they determined to investigate the area in the daylight. After spending an uncomfortable night huddled under blankets for warmth on the cold desert floor, dawn found them on horseback, combing the area for any signs of an Indian encampment. They found none.

      All day, the men searched along the base of the Chinati Mountains and the mesa between their camp and where the lights had been. They found no evidence that Indians had been anywhere in the area. No tracks, no doused campfires, no nothing. But the next night and the next after that, they again saw the strange lights.


      As well as...

      An unscientific method was tried in the 1980's by Dallas journalist, Kirby Warnock. Warnock's family had settled in the Trans-Pecos region just north of Big Bend country more than one hundred years ago, and he first saw the lights in 1963, when he was eleven-years-old and his brother was eight. He and his brother decided that the reason no one ever got close to the lights was because they used motor vehicles, such as airplanes, jeeps, and cars. The two men thought that if they headed out on foot across the desert, they just might be able to sneak up on the lights.

      One summer, they assembled their gear and a camera, and at dusk, started walking. They tried for four hours to get close to the lights, but it was like walking up to a mirage. The more they walked, the further the lights moved away. Warnock reported that he thought the lights were "trying to frustrate and thwart us. It was like they knew what we were doing and were teasing us by staying just a little ahead of us." It is a fact that distances are deceiving in the desert. The Warnocks could not tell if they were looking at a light as big as a tire or one as big as a cantaloupe. They just could not get close enough to get a good idea of how big the lights actually were.


      The lights seem to either evade or confuse anyone who attempts to walk/drive/fly closer to them, and sometimes they simply vanish if someone seems to get 'too close'. There's even been occasional reports of the lights 'chasing' a car or plane traveling through the region, but no one has ever reported getting close to any of the lights successfully.
    4. Re:Do you really need lasers? by Viper168 · · Score: 1

      That is what mirages do. You move, so do they. You get too close, they vanish. It's likely no more supernatural than ordinary water mirages.

      Atmospheric conditions play a big part, air will do funny things with light under the right conditions. For example the Min Min Lights.

      What the students did was verify that cars can indeed cause "mysterious" lights, and probably do at least part of the time.

    5. Re:Do you really need lasers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first historical record of them recalls that in 1883 a young cowhand, Robert Reed Ellison, saw a flickering light while he was driving cattle through Paisano Pass and wondered if it was the campfire of Apache Indians. He was told by other settlers that they often saw the lights, but when they investigated they found no ashes or other evidence of a campsite. Joe and Sally Humphreys, also early settlers, reported their first sighting of the lights in 1885. Cowboys herding cattle on the prairies noticed the lights and in the summer of 1919 rode over the mountains looking for the source, but found nothing. World War I observers feared that the lights were intended to guide an invasion. During World War II pilots training at the nearby Midland Army Air Field outside Marfa looked for the source of the elusive lights from the air, again with no success.

      Someone should have told the WWI observers that the lights were only cars on the highway that will be built there in 20 years.

  21. Re:Weird... -- MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP

  22. Not Very Comprehensive; Duplicate Study by Pulsar · · Score: 5, Informative
    I wouldn't be surprised if the 'official viewing area' the UTD students used in the study, supposedly constructed to keep tourists from wandering all over private property in search of a better view (but most likely constructed for the revenue), was designed so that the majority of the 'Marfa Lights' visibile from the viewing area are car headlights, as discussed in the UTD study. It ensures visible 'Marfa Lights' every night, and will keep the hype and the legend alive, in turn keeping some level of tourist dollars flowing into Marfa.

    However, their study does not resolve or even address one problem with this conclusion - the lights have been visible long before cars were common, or even available, in the area. Furthermore, the students documented the lights were car headlights from US Highway 67 - however, Highway 67's west end was in Dallas when the highway was originally built; Highway 67 did not extend into west Texas and the Marfa area until 1930.

    The best part is, this study has been done before, in March 1975, by another Society of Physics Students, who reached a slightly different, but similar conclusion:

    Don Witt, then a physics professor at Sul Ross University in Alpine, coordinated a monumental effort to locate the lights' source. Using the Sul Ross Society of Physics Students, the Big Bend Outdoor Club comprised of community members, and local pilots, short-wave radio amateurs, and a few outside professionals, Witt's group was positively unable to form any sort of solid conclusion. They did say, however, that sometimes the lights that people claimed were "Marfa Lights," were really artificial lights from area ranches or automobile headlights merely passing behind unseen obstructions along distant Highway 67, which winds through the Chinati Mountains between Marfa and Presidio.

    So some of the lights are car headlights - this was already known and accepted, I'm pretty sure. I'm disappointed with their 'grant from the Schlumberger corp.' mentioned in the PDF and the equipment they had access to at UTD, these students couldn't do a more in-depth study or come up with a more comprehensive conclusion. Sounds like a group of students at UTD wanted a 4 day all-expenses paid road-trip to one of the more beautiful parts of Texas, down near Big Bend National Park.

    Then again, as a UT-Arlington (UTA) alumnus, I may be a little biased against our cross-Metroplex rivals.
    1. Re:Not Very Comprehensive; Duplicate Study by mwilliamson · · Score: 1
      How about driving a car with headlights flashing a recognizable pattern down the area highways...wouldn't this be definitive proof if it seen as a flashing Marfa light?

      Also, here in Corpus Christi, TX we have a somewhat weird optical effect effecting the visability of an offshore platform being built on land across the Corpus Christi bay. There is a significant image magnification effect while driving on a road that faces the platform (~12 miles across the bay). Besides looking like it is bigger, you can actually see much more detail while on that road. After approaching the water, it suddenly looks a lot smaller (and you cannot see the same level of detail as when viewed back over land).

    2. Re:Not Very Comprehensive; Duplicate Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      However, their study does not resolve or even address one problem with this conclusion - the lights have been visible long before cars were common, or even available, in the area.

      The lights have allegedly been visible. I think you'll find it quite difficult to find any reliable documentary evidence that anyone claimed to have seen the lights at any time before cars became common in the area. Basically it appears that there are no claims of sightings before the 1950s that were actually recorded at the time; all references to sightings before the 1950s were, in fact, written down after the 1950s, and the "evidence" on which they're based is either local Indians saying "oh, yes, we totally do have a legend about those lights, and it's really ancient, of course we didn't just make it up", or local old folk saying "oh, yes, I totally did see those lights in 1890, of course I'm not just telling you what you want to hear in the hopes that you'll buy me another drink, no sir".

      Count me totally unconvinced.

    3. Re:Not Very Comprehensive; Duplicate Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Some" of them are? Are you sure you're not just reaching for some method of keeping the delusion alive?

    4. Re:Not Very Comprehensive; Duplicate Study by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      However, their study does not resolve or even address one problem with this conclusion - the lights have been visible long before cars were common, or even available, in the area.

      Just because they move like headlights now doesn't mean they always have. Early sightings have the lights looking like campfires which, upon investigation, could not be found. Therefore it seems likely that these sightings actually were campfires that were in reality a long way off on the other side of the mountains.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:Not Very Comprehensive; Duplicate Study by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      How about driving a car with headlights flashing a recognizable pattern down the area highways...wouldn't this be definitive proof if it seen as a flashing Marfa light?

      Maybe the cops wouldn't like that on a moving vehicle, but if you parked and did it, and talked to your observers at the same time to coordinate...

      Or maybe you could just save yourself the trouble by RTFA.

  23. Those damn SUVs... by Chaffar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    According to the article:
    All of the mystery lights observed by this group on the nights of 11 and 13 May 2005 can be reliably attributed to automobile headlights travelling along US 67 between Marfa and Presidio, TX.
    According to the Lee Paul though, The first recorded Texan history occurred in 1883.

    Yep, in 1883 it was all the craze to install those Bi-Xenon headlights on your SUV...

    1. Re:Those damn SUVs... by Pulsar · · Score: 1

      Yup, an SUV with Bi-Xenon headlights that can split into two, soar into the air, and later merge back together, as well...from one of the links in the article:

      They appear and disappear, veering and cavorting suddenly in odd directions. One moment there might be one, and just as suddenly, it might split into two or three or more, dividing and merging at whim. They hover in mid-air and sometimes flicker like balls of fire. They might shoot straight up into the sky, or race madly to the left and right.

    2. Re:Those damn SUVs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In... pretty much any year, it's all the craze to make shit up. Also known as lies and revisionist history.

    3. Re:Those damn SUVs... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      that can split into two, soar into the air, and later merge back together
      Air moves, and thus the image getting distorted by atmospheric conditions can also move. Mirages are interesting and are not limited to a shimmering false water effect. False suns in the antarctic are especially cool.
    4. Re:Those damn SUVs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah its definitely not car lights. I grew up 26 miles from there (Alpine, Tx) and have seen them hundreds of times and I can say for a matter of fact that its not highway lights.

  24. Predates Cars by texbot · · Score: 1

    Marfa is a small town near what used to be an army fort established to keep Indians out of Texas. The lights were unexplained even back then. Sometimes the army would chase after the lights thinking that they were enemy campfires, but they never seemed to catch them. ...maybe just a legend. But, having been there, if it were caused by headlights I imagine it would follow the same path every time -- whereas in actuality they move about seemingly random in the sky.

    1. Re:Predates Cars by VENONA · · Score: 1

      The Army! Yeah, that's it! It was secret Army mind-ray experiments.

      Predating autos? Well, even if that's proven, the phenomenon is still seen in an area that's known to be a good spot for viewing refractive affects. The same can be said of the Missouri Spook Light. Auto lights proven to be the cause of some of it, at a minimum, yet apparently seen before the auto.

      It would seem to me that the more reasonable explanation is locales that are simply good locations to see interesting refaction affects, whatever the light source.

      "...I imagine it would follow the same path every time..." The atmosphere isn't that uniform. Cells of a particular refractive index are constantly being disturbed by breezes, perhaps adiabatic effects, etc. I would be surprised if the changes *weren't* random.

      That would imply that atmospheric conditions between the source and observer had wandered into the correct state required to cause a light at position A to be seen at position B, and then this inherently unstable system had somehow stabilized.

      Finding refractive affects that take place on time scales from fractions of seconds to several seconds isn't difficult. Stars twinkling, even at the zenith, heat ripples over nearly any relatively warm surface (and the Big Bend country is desert), etc.

      Add in periodic obscuration of auto headlights by terrain features, atmospherics closer to the source having a larger displacing affect than nearby atmospherics.

      Also add in the probability of a sense of mystery being propagated by residents of a small town that certainly isn't noted for anything else and writers trying to sell copy by doing the same, which predisposes observers to believe something truly mysterious is happening.

      Americans can be so credulous.

      A January 2000 nationwide poll by Yankelovich Partners revealed that 1% of American adults believe they've encountered beings from other planets. And a Gallup Poll in May showed that 33% of Americans believe that extraterrestrial beings have visited Earth-and another 27% aren't sure they haven't.
      http://www.centerchange.org/passport/shadowsintoli ght.html

      Sixty-seven percent say they believe that the entire story of Christmasthe Virgin Birth, the angelic proclamation to the shepherds, the Star of Bethlehem and the Wise Men from the Eastis historically accurate.
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6650997/site/newsweek/

      I'm off to order my Q-ray ionized bracelet.
      http://www.qray.com/Default.aspx

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
  25. Highway 67 / Population Density by Pulsar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Highway 67 was commissioned in 1927 as US Highway 67, and ended in Dallas. It didn't reach West Texas, including Marfa, until 1930. Source: Wikipedia.

    As someone who lives in the Dallas/Ft. Worth Metroplex and whose company is in an office literally right in front of what I believe is the original terminus of Highway 67, you should know that the path it takes through Dallas and through most of Texas is a pretty odd one; it's a route only a (relatively) modern traffic engineer could come up with, and the path it takes through the mountains near Marfa are most likely not related to any common paths taken by carriages before the highway was built.

    Also, the population density out in that part of Texas, especially before cars were common in the region, was incredibly low. I doubt there would've been enough carriage traffic on any given night to generate the type and number of phenomenon normally attributed to the Marfa lights. Considering the current population of Marfa is 2,424 people, I'm almost certain there wouldn't have been enough traffic of any sort before Highway 67 was built to generate all of the phenomenon reported during that time.

  26. I know these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My ex-roommate was one of the physics students who went on the trip. They went in the summer of 2004, and it was basicaly an excuse to get funding so they could go on a road trip/camping. From what I hear they also brought along plenty of booze and weren't exactly in a 'scientific' mindset most of the trip. They had fun though, and got a free trip out of it, so more power to them.

  27. We've always known this in West Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is idiotic. I grew up in West Texas and we've ALWAYS known the Marfa Lights were headlights. What an utter waste of time.

  28. Highly illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Ramp Creates Power As Cars Pass" is Hardware but

    "Headlights Create Marfa Lights As Cars Pass" is Science?

    Wake me up when Marfa Lights create you!

  29. Marfa Lights = Lame by lenwood · · Score: 1

    About five years ago I took a detour from a trip to Big Bend to see the Marfa Lights. Soooo lame. It looks exactly like cars driving down a distant highway. I can't imagine why anyone would want to spend more than 5 minutes there, much less try to explain them.

    --
    -Chris (aka Lenwood)
  30. Optical illusions by jd · · Score: 4, Informative
    The lights back then probably were not cars - unless they were Delorians... However, other posters have mentioned that there are other requirements - high humidity being one. My guess is that the distant highway in question would also need to have relatively low humidity. Furthermore, I would guess that if you were to draw a diagram, showing the observer, the apparent position of the lights, the boundary between the two air masses, and the cars, you'd find that the light is being bent by the amount you would expect from the difference in refractive index.


    Now, how does this relate to the lights in the 1800s? Oh, quite easily. I suspect the lights were quite probably fires, but considerably further away and in a completely different place than the observers had expected - which is why they never found anything.


    As for people chasing the lights and never reaching them (according to another poster), this is exactly what you expect from an optical illusion from refracted light. Most people have seen this with rainbows, which are also caused by refraction through water droplets. It's the same mechanism, so you get the same "moving" effect. Duh.


    In fact, once people had observed they could not "approach" the lights, the physics of it should have been obvious. There aren't many types of illusion which work that way. You can approach a mirage, for example, but it vanishes when you get "too close". If you shine a bright light onto fog, you will get reflected light from it. Etc.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Optical illusions by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1, Troll

      In fact, once people had observed they could not "approach" the lights, the physics of it should have been obvious.

      Dude, these were 19th century Texans for crying out loud! You expect them to understand basic physics?

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    2. Re:Optical illusions by zakkie · · Score: 1

      That's De Loreans, just FYI.

      Thanks

  31. Google Maps in the article by CrowdedBear · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice the Google Maps screencap in the PDF? Used to good effect I must say.

  32. Marfa, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - What are we Doing tonight Brain?
    - The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Get psyched over distant carlights!
    - NARF!

  33. Things like this... by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    ...makes me glad we don't have contact with any extraterrestrial species, yet. Imagine explaining this one: "Have you been sending saucers to spy on our desert? No, wait, never mind, we just figured out it was the light from our own ground vehicles." Prove your sentience after that conversation!

  34. Re:It took how much work to show this is the sourc by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > What I saw at Marfa, which everyone there explained to be the Marfa lights, where easily recognized as lights from traffic. I know the arguement is that there where lights before the highway was there, however, that doesen't mean the lights they see now are the same as what was seen then.

    Probably no one would have made any fuss over the auto lights if not for the pre-existing legend.

    Factor out the modern phenomenon and you're left with one of thousands of unsubstantiable claims of ghost lights around the world. Maybe some of them actually had some basis in fact, but at this date it's nigh impossible to tell which ones, let alone to investigate the source of light seen 100 years ago.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  35. Headlights? by Belseth · · Score: 1

    The explaination is headlights from UFOs? What a let down. Surprised it turned out to be something so mundane. Now how do we get the little green buggers to use their low beams?

  36. Re:How much energy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10kW is meaningless if you don't know which thread you're posting in.

  37. A bit more detective work reveals... by hullabalucination · · Score: 2, Informative

    As I suspected, a bit more detective work reveals that early sightings were first reported well after the event and that folks digging for serious contemporary documentation can find none:

    http://www.astronomycafe.net/weird/lights/marfa15. htm

    Turns out that Mr. Ellison never did mention the supposed 1883 sightings in his memoirs (written in 1937 when the man was in his 70's), according to local historian Cecilia Thompson.

  38. We have a similar cemetary near me. by hullabalucination · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have a local legend about a "ghost lights cemetary" just south of Springtown, Texas. I've taken a look and it is indeed caused by small particles in the tombstone material that is more reflective than the rest of the stone. It reflects the pale glow on the horizon of the nearby town's lights at night. Quite eerie the first time you see it and locals insist that supernatural things happen there but the phenomenon is easily explanable. Tombstones further away give the most interesting effect as the light seems to eminate away from any observable objects, as if floating in mid-air.

    1. Re:We have a similar cemetary near me. by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      And I thought I was the only Slashdot geek in the Springtown area (I am actually closer to Poolville). The Slashdot phenomenon invades rural America!

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  39. Did you really read? by My+Name+Is+Neo · · Score: 1

    Also am I the only one who read the pdf? I didn't see anything about any lasers. All they did was pure statistics; # of lights appeared at given time vs # of cars that drove on the 67th highway. This could be pure coninsidence.

    It says in the PDF:

    Members of the chase team observing the mystery lights viewing area with binoculars could not identify car headlights, but did observe a 1 mW laser that was being shone towards their location.

    Although it doesn't say if the laser behaved like the other lights; my assumption was that it was just used to establish direct line-of-sight

    --
    Snarf This.
  40. Dry line anyone? by Stupor+Man · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Actually, no idea what causes the light. Since reports date automobiles and electricity to the region..... Have any of these students given thought to the Marfa Dry line? It's a pretty well known fact in the weather world. Doesn't explain the lights, but I find it odd that people often say things like "humidity", "moisture", etc. when explaining these lights and never does one of them mention of the Marfa Dry line. Hmmm. Could it be there is a link? LOL

  41. Google maps shows an old roadbed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For those who grumble that there was no highway south back in the day, there is ample evidence of at least one other roadbed running the same stretch southward crossing back and forth over Highway 67 in a less direct path. The roadbed seen in the satellite imagery is not on the current map as a road, but it's clear that's what it was.

  42. Physicists, Women, and Guns? by uberpeon · · Score: 1
    Did this strike anyone else as a really odd combo of people working on this?

    The Society of Physics Students at the University of Texas at Dallas, in conjunction with the school clubs Women in Physics (WIP) and the Gun Club


    Physics Students, Women in Engineering, and the Gun Club? Man, I'd love to see the after party on that one....
  43. Horse carriages had lights. by lfnoise · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't know there were major highways with automobiles running around on them back when the lights first were seen...

    It can be explained by road lights even back in the 1880s. Horse drawn carriages carried lanterns when driving at night.

    "The entire coach was dark red with lanterns near the front to help while driving in the dark."

    Old timey looking lighting fixtures selling today still go by the name "carriage lantern" or "coach lantern". Google for it.

  44. Let's consider this carefully, shall we? by hullabalucination · · Score: 2, Informative
    OK:

    1. Photo at www.whattofix.com. No photographer credit on the photo, no history, no nothing. So we can't check its pedigree. I do photo manips, and I can whip you up, say, 200 of these to your specs, in a couple of hours. What colors would you like your lights? Would you like lens flare effects or even fog/haze effects? You name it, I and any of about 300 million other folks could have faked this photo for you. No photographer credit or documentation is always a great tipoff to a hoax.

    2. Photo at www.rense.com. So, this was taken on Highway 67 "east of Marfa?" Highway 67 runs north/south through Marfa, not east/west. I'm already smelling hoax here, as the photographer can't even be bothered to do a map check and get his basic geographical facts down for his story. Oh, this is interesting...look at the pattern of lights in the photo. Looks like...erm...well, let's just say that there's an Air Force base in the region which loves to send B1-Bs on extremely low-level missions through the vast scrublands of west Texas/New Mexico where, if you happen to get it all wrong and auger in, you're unlikely to take out hundreds of civilians with you. I'll bet this photo wasn't even taken in Presidio County.

    3. Photos at taskboy.com. Sure looks like car headlights or even sun reflecting off chrome at a great distance to me. If you live in Texas like I do and do a lot of driving around in the middle of nowhere, you've seen this a million times. I'm amazed that people can manage to misinterpret stuff like this. This fellow repeats the Robert Ellison myth, meaning that he didn't want to spend the 30 seconds of Googling to find out that the story is completely undocumented. You wanna see more lights like this? Drive north on State Road 4 out of Palo Pinto, Texas. Same deal as you get about 4 miles south of the "mountain" at the eastward bend of 4 near Grayson, on any clear evening. Its a wonderfully eerie effect, but its about as supernatural as kitty litter.

    1. Re:Let's consider this carefully, shall we? by atam · · Score: 1

      Your second point about Highway 67 is incorrect. A quick look at Google Map will show you that once Highway 67 reaches Marfa from the south, it turns 90 degree and merges with Highway 90 to run east/west.

  45. Headlights have been brought up before by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    ftfa..

    "Others have scoffed at the idea that the lights are anything more than headlights, and claim proof using high-powered binoculars. This latter group is at a loss, however, to explain why there are often more Lights than there are cars, or why the lights merge, divide and disappear."

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Headlights have been brought up before by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

      why the lights merge, divide and disappear.

      It's a highway now, but we know it wasn't a highway in 1883. However, what most likely laid along the path of what is now the highway? A trail or a road. And what traveled along roads? Wagons. At night, these wagons would surely have lights attached to them, which, if viewed from the side, would appear to "merge, divide and disappear" as the wagons moved by at different speeds. That's just a guess, but worth looking into. Someone more interested should do that for me :).

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
    2. Re:Headlights have been brought up before by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Refraction, diffraction etc. through different densities of air caused by heating during the day and cooling during the night without a reasonable breeze to move the air around.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    3. Re:Headlights have been brought up before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen photos of crazy atmospheric effects taken on a ballon flight at various altitudes. At one altitude the mountains had their tops lopped off, at another altitude scenery from under the horizon was seen. So cool. It was mentioned that it was a very calm morning.

      I can't beleive there are so many morons on slashdot. LOLz, no highway before 1930, what stupid investigators.

  46. Another view - with photos this time. by danboarder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Photos and one blogger's experience of the Marfa Lights.
    http://westtexasnights.blogspot.com/2005/03/marfa- lights.html

  47. Its down to your nation's history by CdBee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not going to comment on the religious nature of many early immigrants to the Americas - many outstanding centres of science have been based in places which to a European (me) appear to be very religiously orientated

    My point is that the spreading of population across America's vast spaces took place at a time when European nations had been fully farmed and occupied for over a thousand years.
    as a result you've always had small rural populations, which are classic sources of mythology and folklore, and this has led to a cultural appreciation of unscientific beliefs which has survived the astonishing prowess of American science due to its deeply-ingrained nature

    I suppose in some ways it makes your people more open to innovative (read, outlandish) scientific theories, which has led both to some of the silly beliefs present in present-day US, and some of the more amazing genuine discoveries.
    We Europeans see Americans as slightly naive, but it would be kinder to describe your culture as more willing to investigate what many of us would just ignore.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Its down to your nation's history by eyeruh · · Score: 1

      >We Europeans see Americans as slightly naive, but it would be kinder to describe your culture as more >willing to investigate what many of us would just ignore.

      Kinder, but less accurate. :-)

  48. Re:It took how much work to show this is the sourc by parcanman · · Score: 1

    The whole pre-existing legend might have just been created to enduce local commerce by telling anyone from out of town that the lights have been there for over 150 years. People who wouldn't usually drive a few hundred miles to visit the Marfa General store or the old mobil fillin' station, now have a reason to go there.

    Look at the loch ness, one day some scientist will discover that the monster is actually just an old sunken boat that appears whenever the water level gets low enough, after that people will say "well, scotland's just a place where men wear miniskirts" without even mentioning the lake.

    That's what happens when someone who loves to show off their brain points out a blatently obvious fact which was only covered up by people trying to preserve their local folklore.

    --
    Why lie when you can just make up stuff and claim it to be true?
  49. Australia's Min Min lights - also hot air involved by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
    These sound like Australia's Min Min lights seen in a fairly dry region which were explained a couple of years ago. Early sightings are thought to have been kerosene lamps - and then in the early days of the automobile people still drove in that area before there were roads. Layers of still desert air in flat country can do odder things than the usual false water mirage.

    Really weird optical effects happen in cold air areas too - like the false suns seen in Antarctica at times.

    Next one - crop circles. Drunken Australian tourists with sticks and rope in at least a few of the early cases.

  50. marfa lights by dsisson · · Score: 1

    they have been around longer than car with head lignts!

    1. Re:marfa lights by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      they have been around longer than car with head lignts!

      But they haven't been around longer than illumination in general. Nobody said it had to be car headlights in 1880.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  51. A very good (scientific) web site about them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a good site about them. He did spectral analysis to prove they are not headlights, the spectral results used to be within this web site somewhere but it appears he went on to write a book showing his results. This guy used to be my boss, I trust what he has to say. They are not headlights.

    http://www.nightorbs.net/index.html

  52. Mafia lights? by Mathness · · Score: 1

    Mafia lights?

    For some odd reason I don't want to know.

    It is probably some poor sap who is getting a new pair of cement shoes.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  53. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Teens are using their cell phones as flashlights...

    Mystery solved. Move along...

  54. Silly by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    These have been definitively explained about six times, each time exactly the same way. And then everyone apparently forgets what the explanation was last time, and/or a bunch of people say 'nooo, it COULDN'T be headlights, because that's not a cool enough explanation!' and we go back into the same roll-around again. My science writing prof in college, lo these many years ago, was part of the first or second team to go and sniff it out with an actual PhD in optics and all sorts of funky equipment, and he wrote up an article for Science News and a big brassy Popular Science article on it. (If I could remember his name I'd include it here, but it's, ah, been a while.)

    I wish people would just give it up. They're not mysterious any more.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  55. Car lights? by SheeEttin · · Score: 0

    Well, since everyone here seems to doubt that they are car lights, why not just get everyone to go a different way during a lull in traffic (so as to incenvenience as few people as possible). If the lights still appear, then they're not car lights.

    And anyway, if they were head or taillights, wouldn't they only be white or red?

  56. Hmmm. by jd · · Score: 1

    Well, it is certainly true that a book I have from 1750 describes thunder as the explosions of evaporated gunpowder, so a lack of understanding is certainly possible. On the other hand, we're in the early 21st century now, so I would have expected somebody to have figured this all out in the intervening hundred to hundred and fifty years.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  57. Depends. by jd · · Score: 1

    If one of them went back in time and changed things, the spelling might be different.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  58. Foolish earthlings! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    If we were going to anally probe members of your species, do you think we would start with the trailer trash?!?!? -The Aliens

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  59. You didn't see nuthin', understand? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Say it back to me "Mafia lights do not exist. They're just a myth created by the FBI to harass honest Italian businessmen." Can you remember that, smart guy?

    -Jimmy Two-Times

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  60. Old news by MrOrn · · Score: 1

    A useful explanation of the phenomenon here. Note that it doesn't have to be a light source.

  61. TFA sez by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    First:

    "The Marfa mystery lights are a
    phenomenon that occurs after dusk
    outside the town of Marfa,"

    then

    "Traffic volume decreases after dusk just as the
    number of observed mystery lights"

    If they don't occur until after dusk, and then decrease, that means the Marfa lights appear in negative numbers. No wonder nobody knows what they are. There are less than none of them to study.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  62. UT Dallas by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    ...is doing some interesting things. They are a former junior college, and they are heavily recruiting valedictorians via nice scholarships, and doing things to attract other smart kids (nationally ranked chess club, etc). If I was trying to make my new university stronger, I'd be doing exactly what they're doing.

    They have this thing called the McDermott (sp?) Scholars. My friend from high school is one. They are, among other things, required to study abroad as part of the program. They also get something like a full ride at the university.