Slashdot Mirror


The Truth About Suprnova Shutdown

Romeo E. Cabrera writes "You might remember it was exactly a year ago when Suprnova, once the most popular BitTorrent search engine went dark. Today, Suprnova's admin Sloncek, reveals the truth and details, about the events occurred then."

41 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. So, to sum it up by fmwap · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, summarizing the article:

    Nothing happened
    Case dropped
    Suprnova still gone

    1. Re:So, to sum it up by ericdano · · Score: 4, Interesting

      However, if you live and host in the same country as him, you might be able to do it again and still nothing will happen. Sounds good to me.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:So, to sum it up by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So, summarizing the article:

      Nothing happened
      Case dropped
      Suprnova still gone
      You have an interesting definition of "nothing happened." To me, it sounded more like:

      Police raid ISP
      Police confiscate servers
      Police visit Suprnova operator at home
      Police seize two computers and various media from Suprnova operator
      Suprnova spends a few months in limbo
      Suprnova stresses out over mail from prosecutor
      Case dropped
      Suprnova still gone

      I'd be interested in a translation of the letter that he posted on the site. Specifically, I'm interested in knowing why exactly the prosecutors decided not to pursue the case.
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    3. Re:So, to sum it up by NitsujTPU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I concur with other posters on this one.

      Police raiding your home, seizing your property, and dragging you through legal proceedings, when you've done nothing wrong sounds pretty bad to me.

    4. Re:So, to sum it up by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Without knowing the details of Slovenian copyright law, I'd guess that it was dropped because he didn't actually do anything wrong. No copyrighted data went through the suprnova servers, and copyright infringement is not a criminal offense in most countries, so it's likely that contributing to it is not illegal at all, either (it typically only is for criminal activities).

      In other words, it's the same reason why ThePirateBay still operates - only that the latter is hosted in Sweden, where it's probably (I assume!) less easy for the music/movie industry to get the police to investigate things when there is no evidence of an actual crime being committed.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    5. Re:So, to sum it up by ZoneGray · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More likely the prosecutor looked at the case, and figured he shouldn't put much effort into prosecuting a countryman for the benefit of American movie studios.

    6. Re:So, to sum it up by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 5, Informative

      FYI in the US, there is secondary liability for civil copyright infringement. In a criminal copyright infringement case, it might be possible for the government to prosecute an indirect infringer under an aiding and abetting theory, but I'm not aware of any examples.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    7. Re:So, to sum it up by InsaneCreator · · Score: 4, Informative

      The scanned letter is just a list of conficated equipment (streznik = server, osebni racunalnik = personal computer) which is to be returned, because the charges against him were dropped.

    8. Re:So, to sum it up by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Know anyone who owns an island or a small country and is willing to donate the domain name? What would MPAA or RIAA do? They can't invade a country.

      In the case of supernova they probably bribed the police into doing all this scaring tactics. As far as I know the police in Eastern Europe is not really interested in piracy and computer fraud, they got other things to worry about and besides, some countries don't even have good laws concerning computers and internet BUT for a large enough bribe the police in those countries will arrest and scare anyone regardless of the crime.

    9. Re:So, to sum it up by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because Corporations are always getting Merc and Terrorists to stop things they don't like. For example the MercCo raid on Shanghi Windows XP pirates in '02 that resulted in...

      Actually they don't, and the United States Government really doesn't do much militarily to protect corporate interests these days, not like the Fruit company fun in the 20th century. Yea, War for Oil, War for Kosovo's Tin, the geopolitical ramifications of the US and/or NATO going to war are much larger than Corporate Interests these days.

      However, if a Nation-State has a relationship with the United States, there will be treaties and frameworks usually that'll help shut this stuff down. Plus, your ISPs could just block thier domain names.

      That all said, if you are really intent on pirating other people's property, and it's not about "Sharing", come on, it's about gettng crap for free, look at Indian Reservations in the United States. The legal issues between a Reservation, County, State and the Federal Governments are a goddamned mess. Plus, theres a whole lot of corruption so with some cash, you might get a Rez to go for this model.*

      * - I'm Indian and from a Reservation and have known a fair share of Tribal Council and Chairpeople over the years that I can say they are corrupt for the most part without being a Troll or a Flamer.

    10. Re:So, to sum it up by RevBingo · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd need a very well armed small country, only one appears to be a possibility...

      The Vatican?

    11. Re:So, to sum it up by Dolda2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know about the US, but here in Sweden, there is a law from the BBS era that holds sites free from any responsibility of linking to copyrighted material, as long as they don't host the material themselves. That is what keeps ThePirateBay afloat (since that's basically the way Bittorrent works).

    12. Re:So, to sum it up by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I'm sure they're chomping at the bit to host my porn.

    13. Re:So, to sum it up by muffen · · Score: 4, Informative
      Know anyone who owns an island or a small country and is willing to donate the domain name? What would MPAA or RIAA do? They can't invade a country.

      In the case of supernova they probably bribed the police into doing all this scaring tactics. As far as I know the police in Eastern Europe is not really interested in piracy and computer fraud, they got other things to worry about and besides, some countries don't even have good laws concerning computers and internet BUT for a large enough bribe the police in those countries will arrest and scare anyone regardless of the crime.
      Well, it's not really working that well for them in all countries, take a look here: Legal Threats against ThePirateBay

      EU, efficient as it is, normally takes 5 years to answer a question on how a law is to be interpreted, plus the EU cannot in itself enforce any laws but rely on the member states to do so. In the case of ThePirateBay, Sweden sees itself as having followed the EU directive. If they haven't, well, ask the EU as to how the law is to be interpreted and wait 5 years, at the very least, for an answer :)
      Then ofcourse you need to wait approx. 2 years more for Sweden to make a lawchange and then about another year for the law to be enforced, so I'd say time is on your side!

      Ofcourse, DMCA or any other US specific laws do not apply in Sweden so TPB, or any other bittorrent tracker you wish to open, is completly safe and cannot be shutdown or forced to remove material in any way shape or form (as decided by the Swedish Supreme Court in 1996, linking to copyrighted material is not against the law). Hence, you do not need an island or a small (well, not that Sweden is that big but still) country in the middle of nowhere. Simply host the site in Sweden and you're set!
  2. Unprovable intent? by mister_llah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Incredibly lucky for the guy, really... but do you think it was because prosecutor couldn't figure out how to get the guy?

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Unprovable intent? by Stripsurge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Naw, its because prosecutors get their movies just like everyone else.

  3. 15 minutes of fame by intelliot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why normal people are catapulted into a spotlight they didn't ask for will always be a question of concern. If you want to be famous, you can be. But think about it. If you want to be famous, you're not thinking straight. As small site owners are plummeled with traffic and legal issues, how can we help them survive? This reminds me of the blogosphere, which recently experienced growing pains with the servers and datacenters struggling to cope with demand.

    1. Re:15 minutes of fame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Blogosphere?!

      Blogosphere: The "blogosphere" is the new buzz word that has replaced "information super highway." It's what idiots like to call a collection of "blogs," otherwise known as a tragedy.

      http:///http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c. cgi?u=banish>
  4. Slyck Disagrees with Sloncek by remove+office · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sloncek's story is disputed by Slyck here.

    slyck of course being the most prominent file sharing news source on the web.

    1. Re:Slyck Disagrees with Sloncek by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      They're not disputing it. Try reading it again. They list three questions/inconsistencies that they felt were unanswered:
      1. Why would he continue supported eXeem if he was under copyright enforcement actions?
      2. Why would he continue working with ANY P2P development?
      3. Although the Suprnova.org servers were raided in November, the site continued to function until December.

      They go on to say:
      A year later, answers for the curious are finally available. ... Considering the magnitude of the situation Sloncek faced, he did what was best for him. No on else from the BitTorrent community was going to help him, and he knew that. Whether he is telling the truth is irrelevant.

      That's not disputing him. That's saying, "we had questions before, but he answered them sufficiently, and it doesn't really matter even if he weren't telling the truth."

      Yay.
      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  5. welp by theheff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good to know that nothing really happenned to the guy. Sometimes us leechers forget that behind every torrent/p2p website, there's still good people working behind the scenes who made it all possible... sadly, they are usually the ones who get all the blame.

  6. Well... by Sinryc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll be honest. I would have done the same thing as him. I mean really, Everything turned out okay for him in the end anyway. He didn't serve any jail time, and he got all of his stuff back. Hell, hes probabbly glad about the site bein' kaputs. All these people that will say that he should have fought, etc... Well, they need to understand this guy has a real life as well, and not just one that encompases a website that gives torrent files to materials in wich you didn't pay for.

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
  7. Re:Is Suprnova... up again by outsider007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's up again, now it's newnova.org - maybe I shouldn't be sharing this but what the hell.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  8. Re:EU law and Slovenia by lynzh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The people at pirate bay arent scriptkiddies either, see this url: http://static.thepiratebay.org/

  9. Translation by Ghandalfar · · Score: 5, Informative

    (slovenian speaker here)

    The legal document basicly says:

    Legal case against Andrej P. (his address blacked out), charged with criminal act of helping copyright infrigment by 1. article of 159. of some law with following objects written into log:
    - server with serial number ..
    - server with serial number ..
    - server with serial number ..
    - server with serial number ..
    - personal computer ..
    - personal computer ..


    are returned to the owner because legal charges against A. P. are dropped.

    And them some more legal talk where he can get his stuff in 30 days.

    That is about as much as I can handle at this early hour.

  10. Re:Text of the Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I appologise for my poor English (legal), here is translation. And yes, document is genuine.

    With part 224, ZKP and 6/136 of State pros. order we:
    In criminal case against Andrej Preston, (adress omitted), in suspected criminal case of giving help with crime of unauthorized usage of authored (copyrighted) works at. 1/159 with connection 22 in 27 of KZ, are all objects in CD (corpus delicti) entry no ****:
    ***list of equipment****
    to returned to owner, that is Andrej Preston, because criminial case against him was dropped.

    LEGAL:
    Named (Andrej Preston) can take above mentioned objects at District State prosecutor office in Ljubljana in 30 days from receiving this letter. After 30 days, all objects will be destroyed.

  11. Re:One of the most idiotic stories on /. to date by shreevatsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Huh? The article was written by "Suprnova's admin Sloncek". He is the one who came close to being prosecuted, his computers were confiscated, etc. He is the only one who can give an account of the story, and if he choses to say blah blah and blah blah, there is nothing anyone else can do to fill in those details.
    Your remarks would make sense if an original news item was dumbed down for the "general public".
    If the guy who got the letter from the prosecutor does not wish to quote verbatim from it, or he thinks it is not relevant, why question it? It's probably not relevant anyway, just some law numbers and dates.
    He does provide the original letter (in Slovenian), so read it yourself for the gory details. Or, scroll down for helpful translations below.

  12. SuprNova may be gone but... by Capeman · · Score: 5, Informative

    NewNova is online, it offers the same content that SuprNova once had.

  13. Re:Text of the Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Oh hell, anybody here speak Slovenian?

    Sure. Here is a helpful translation into icelandic:

    "KJa wfoami coliaboa cklembi 224. Anerpicja 13 ZKP 6 opwef nabrioa. 136 Kpentitia. Kpmarij manstani onikapp."

    HTH.

  14. Re:Text of the Letter by lewp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Roughly translated, it says, "I, for one, welcome our new BitTorrent overlords."

    --
    Game... blouses.
  15. Welcome to the club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "On November 2004, I received a call from my ISP saying that all of my servers had been raided by the police. I received nothing from the police before or after the raid, nobody told me what was going on."

    On my end, Adobe lawyers contacted my ISP and sent a short, but curt letter: "Shut him down, or we will." I balked and so did my ISP after some heated conversation. I ran a VERY popular macintosh serial # site and yeah, serial numbers are sort of a grey area as far as I was concerned (and so thought my ISP thought, as well).

    Whoops.

    Yeah, it was stupid on my part but I enjoyed the money that rolled in from my sponsors. In the long-term I got burned, much like this fellow will. I had to claim bankruptcy, due to my mounting legal bills. I'm basically screwed for the next 7 years. Hooray. Some people can walk that thin grey line between legal and illegal but I found a way to trip over it. Oh well.

  16. Re:From the article... by kelnos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, if you were to facilitate raping, pillaging, murder, and plunder on the high seas, probably a lot worse would happen to you.

    Though I suspect you're really talking about copyright infringement.

    (Chuckle: it's amusing, really.)

    --
    Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  17. Re:mininova.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    am i the only person here who goes to mininova.org instead? seems like the same library of media, justabout

    SHHH! ... Uhoh, do you hear it?! The quiet roar of turbine engines, the whirr of rotorblades... the Black Army Helicopters are coming! Quick, you must sell everything you have and give all your life savings to the RIAA and MPAA in the hopes that you can bribe them and their their vast armies to fend off the imminent attack!

    This episode of "Scare The Living Pants Off Of Internet Users" paid for by the MPAA and RIAA

  18. Re:EU law and Slovenia by dago · · Score: 5, Informative

    The EU doesn't really make laws, but directives, which focus on objectives, forcing member states to implement them, generally with laws. The member states usually have some freedom in the implementation.

    For example, for the EU Copyrirght Directive (EUCD), there're the list of all possible "faire use" exceptions, and this is even linked with anti-circumvention articles. At the end, the states are free to take an agressive, DMCA-like legislation, where it is illegal to "break" DRM to make a private copy, while other could choose to allow circumvention of DRM and creation of MP3 for private use (see article 5.2.b and 6.4).

    So, it depends, and in this case, you should ask a slovenian ;)

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  19. Re:And where's all the donated legal aid money? by montyzooooma · · Score: 5, Informative

    Needless to say but you seem to be confusing Suprnova with Lokitorrent. Loki pretty much took the money and ran after selling his registered users out. Suprnova never required registration to use the trackers, Lokitorrent did, so when Loki handed over his user logs the RIAA (I think it was) got there hands on the email addresses of anyone who'd used the sites. That's a LOT of hotmail addresses...

  20. no, no, and no,.. by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful

    vcrs (famous betamax decision) helped people carry out an illegal act.. but it was legal.
    just providing the means does NOT equate into illegal actions.

    napster got in trouble because they kept the master file list on their own servers- and then couldn't filter out content the riaa & others wanted blocked.

    Laws concerning morality never fit in with the 'average' views of the citizenry--

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  21. sites come and go by beast6228 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Suprnova may have been popular at the time, but like all websites, they come and go. There is always someone else to take their place. Remember isonews.com when it was taken down by the FBI years ago? Hey guess what? Their back up and running with a new website theisonews.com

    Now we have sites like thepiratebay.org which is probably one of the best torrent sites on the internet. Heck, they even tout the lawyers and post the threating legal letters on their website for everyone to read http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
    Quite hilarious if you ask me.
    Of course you have other torrent sites as well, like torrentspy.com which is another popular site.

    sites come and go, they come and go....

    --
    ~Later~
  22. "wait and see" ? by Presence2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How the hell does an admin go a week, let alone "November to December" without having a single clue as to why police would raid his servers? Why his site was shut down? Fear or apathy?

    His statement strikes me as someone who was simply hoping the problem would go away (as quoted) from the onset. More pressure on both the police and a legal defense from the onset could have both quelled the investigation as groundless and gotten the site back up.

    It's an unfortunate truth that law enforcement often only succeeds in setting legal precedent in computer investigations only because people aren't more diligent in defending themselves.

    1. Re:"wait and see" ? by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you an American? Then get a clue. According to the Patriot Act that our "representatives" *PTOOEY!* signed into law, all they have to do is say "Homeland Security", and you can be held INDEFINITELY, with NO CHARGES FILED, and NO PUBLIC RECORD, NO REPRESENTATION BY AN ATTORNEY, AND YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE WAIVED!

      And that's in a country with a history of being one of the most free and liberal in the world. What do you think normally happens in Slovenia?

      How did the land of the free come to resemble Soviet Russia?

      --
      When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
  23. A proverb by carcosa30 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Crime is the art of knowing when to quit.

    -Me

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  24. Re:RIP by muffen · · Score: 5, Informative

    TBP, safe to say the torrent community is still strong just like it was in the suprnova days, might just be you who decided not to be part of it anymore.

    TvTorrents,www.tvtorrents.com would be another one, there are plenty of torrent site, thepiratebay, without a doubt, being the largest in the world.

    If you wanna have a laugh, take a look at TBP Legal Threats, and then decide how big the chances are that tpb will go down (lawchange in sweden, where TPB is hosted, takes approx. 2 years, and they haven't even started trying to change it yet).