Slashdot Mirror


The Truth About Suprnova Shutdown

Romeo E. Cabrera writes "You might remember it was exactly a year ago when Suprnova, once the most popular BitTorrent search engine went dark. Today, Suprnova's admin Sloncek, reveals the truth and details, about the events occurred then."

59 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. RIP by crummynz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I spent far too much time on that site :(

    Safe to say that the torrent community has gone downhill since, I'd say.

    --
    ~ Crummy
    1. Re:RIP by muffen · · Score: 5, Informative

      TBP, safe to say the torrent community is still strong just like it was in the suprnova days, might just be you who decided not to be part of it anymore.

      TvTorrents,www.tvtorrents.com would be another one, there are plenty of torrent site, thepiratebay, without a doubt, being the largest in the world.

      If you wanna have a laugh, take a look at TBP Legal Threats, and then decide how big the chances are that tpb will go down (lawchange in sweden, where TPB is hosted, takes approx. 2 years, and they haven't even started trying to change it yet).

  2. So, to sum it up by fmwap · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, summarizing the article:

    Nothing happened
    Case dropped
    Suprnova still gone

    1. Re:So, to sum it up by ericdano · · Score: 4, Interesting

      However, if you live and host in the same country as him, you might be able to do it again and still nothing will happen. Sounds good to me.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:So, to sum it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      But now many invite-only trackers (running PeerGuardian on the server as well) are causing problems for the MPAA and RIAA to find bittorrent downloaders.

    3. Re:So, to sum it up by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So, summarizing the article:

      Nothing happened
      Case dropped
      Suprnova still gone
      You have an interesting definition of "nothing happened." To me, it sounded more like:

      Police raid ISP
      Police confiscate servers
      Police visit Suprnova operator at home
      Police seize two computers and various media from Suprnova operator
      Suprnova spends a few months in limbo
      Suprnova stresses out over mail from prosecutor
      Case dropped
      Suprnova still gone

      I'd be interested in a translation of the letter that he posted on the site. Specifically, I'm interested in knowing why exactly the prosecutors decided not to pursue the case.
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    4. Re:So, to sum it up by NitsujTPU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I concur with other posters on this one.

      Police raiding your home, seizing your property, and dragging you through legal proceedings, when you've done nothing wrong sounds pretty bad to me.

    5. Re:So, to sum it up by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Without knowing the details of Slovenian copyright law, I'd guess that it was dropped because he didn't actually do anything wrong. No copyrighted data went through the suprnova servers, and copyright infringement is not a criminal offense in most countries, so it's likely that contributing to it is not illegal at all, either (it typically only is for criminal activities).

      In other words, it's the same reason why ThePirateBay still operates - only that the latter is hosted in Sweden, where it's probably (I assume!) less easy for the music/movie industry to get the police to investigate things when there is no evidence of an actual crime being committed.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    6. Re:So, to sum it up by ZoneGray · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More likely the prosecutor looked at the case, and figured he shouldn't put much effort into prosecuting a countryman for the benefit of American movie studios.

    7. Re:So, to sum it up by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 5, Informative

      FYI in the US, there is secondary liability for civil copyright infringement. In a criminal copyright infringement case, it might be possible for the government to prosecute an indirect infringer under an aiding and abetting theory, but I'm not aware of any examples.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    8. Re:So, to sum it up by InsaneCreator · · Score: 4, Informative

      The scanned letter is just a list of conficated equipment (streznik = server, osebni racunalnik = personal computer) which is to be returned, because the charges against him were dropped.

    9. Re:So, to sum it up by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Know anyone who owns an island or a small country and is willing to donate the domain name? What would MPAA or RIAA do? They can't invade a country.

      In the case of supernova they probably bribed the police into doing all this scaring tactics. As far as I know the police in Eastern Europe is not really interested in piracy and computer fraud, they got other things to worry about and besides, some countries don't even have good laws concerning computers and internet BUT for a large enough bribe the police in those countries will arrest and scare anyone regardless of the crime.

    10. Re:So, to sum it up by BerislavLopac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with countries like Slovenia (and my native Croatia) is that nothing of that would ever happen if there wasn't a major news piece about the service. If someone just came to the police and say "you know, there is such and such server in Slovenia" they would shrug them off; but as the media picked up the hype, someone saw it ad said "wow, we must do something about it" (even though that person probably had no idea what "it" was all about).

    11. Re:So, to sum it up by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting


          There are plenty of influences beyond police and the military. The RIAA or MPAA could impose economic sanctions on sales in that country, until the local organizations did something about that.

          For example, if I was the ??AA them, I could impose an extra USD $5 surcharge on every piece of media sold to vendors in that country, due to their lack of cooperation, making it clear of why they increased the cost. The local vendors would either need to tack that onto the price of the media, or eat it. If they increase their prices, sales will go down. If they eat it, profit goes down. So in the end, they can (and would) put start pressuring the local government to do something about the crimes.

          The next reply suggests invasion or mercenaries. That's not their MO, and it wouldn't be necessary.

          The recording industry is huge, no matter where you are. They do have an influence. They showed a bit of force with the initial arrest. They'll show more force next time to get their way.

          They still don't understand, bringing the costs down would solve a lot of their problems. If I can get an album (record, tape, cd, or whatever) for $5, why bother pirating it? But, looking at a $20 price tag, that may encourage me to pirate. At $5 each, I'd consider actually going to the store and buying music. If I could buy 5 CD's for $25, that's reasonable. 5 CD's for $100 isn't justifiable to me, even though I do have the money to do it.

          For the record, I don't pirate. I have a small collection of store bought DVD's. I listen to broadcast or streaming radio. I watch most movies on DirecTV. We actually find it's more comfortable to watch movies in my home theater, than it is to watch in a traditional movie theater. I'm satisfied. Why bother download songs and burn them to CD? I'd say iPod, but I don't even own one. I'm not the coolest geek on the block, as far as that goes.

          I don't use BitTorrent, but I do use other P2P programs to get the occasional piece of software to try out. For example, I wanted to try 'Poser'. I installed it, played with it for abotu 20 minutes, grew bored of it, and uninstalled it. I also downloaded several video editing programs, for editing home movies. I picked one that I liked, and bought the current version from the store.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    12. Re:So, to sum it up by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because Corporations are always getting Merc and Terrorists to stop things they don't like. For example the MercCo raid on Shanghi Windows XP pirates in '02 that resulted in...

      Actually they don't, and the United States Government really doesn't do much militarily to protect corporate interests these days, not like the Fruit company fun in the 20th century. Yea, War for Oil, War for Kosovo's Tin, the geopolitical ramifications of the US and/or NATO going to war are much larger than Corporate Interests these days.

      However, if a Nation-State has a relationship with the United States, there will be treaties and frameworks usually that'll help shut this stuff down. Plus, your ISPs could just block thier domain names.

      That all said, if you are really intent on pirating other people's property, and it's not about "Sharing", come on, it's about gettng crap for free, look at Indian Reservations in the United States. The legal issues between a Reservation, County, State and the Federal Governments are a goddamned mess. Plus, theres a whole lot of corruption so with some cash, you might get a Rez to go for this model.*

      * - I'm Indian and from a Reservation and have known a fair share of Tribal Council and Chairpeople over the years that I can say they are corrupt for the most part without being a Troll or a Flamer.

    13. Re:So, to sum it up by RevBingo · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd need a very well armed small country, only one appears to be a possibility...

      The Vatican?

    14. Re:So, to sum it up by golgotha007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      now anyone who owns an island or a small country and is willing to donate the domain name? What would MPAA or RIAA do? They can't invade a country.

      Everytime we have this discussion, I always say the same thing, and here it is again:

      I run a small/medium ISP in Russia. We host tons and tons of copyrighted material. When various bittorrent sites started going down in fear, I spoke with many of the owners on transferring their domain and business to our servers. I was willing to host their content for free! Most of the reason is because I'm not Russian and I don't want to miss the new western movies or latest western television shows (I depend on these sites!).

      The problem is: most of these sites are run by teenagers that are unable to see logic through the thick veil of ego and attitude. They think they know everything. I can't deal with people like that. It totally reminds me of the cracking groups back in the heydey of the Amiga. I refused to deal with it then, I refuse to deal with it now.

      I have since moved on, and found other membership sites where I can get the latest television shows, etc. I don't miss those old attitude sites one single bit. Good riddance.

    15. Re:So, to sum it up by Dolda2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know about the US, but here in Sweden, there is a law from the BBS era that holds sites free from any responsibility of linking to copyrighted material, as long as they don't host the material themselves. That is what keeps ThePirateBay afloat (since that's basically the way Bittorrent works).

    16. Re:So, to sum it up by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I'm sure they're chomping at the bit to host my porn.

    17. Re:So, to sum it up by muffen · · Score: 4, Informative
      Know anyone who owns an island or a small country and is willing to donate the domain name? What would MPAA or RIAA do? They can't invade a country.

      In the case of supernova they probably bribed the police into doing all this scaring tactics. As far as I know the police in Eastern Europe is not really interested in piracy and computer fraud, they got other things to worry about and besides, some countries don't even have good laws concerning computers and internet BUT for a large enough bribe the police in those countries will arrest and scare anyone regardless of the crime.
      Well, it's not really working that well for them in all countries, take a look here: Legal Threats against ThePirateBay

      EU, efficient as it is, normally takes 5 years to answer a question on how a law is to be interpreted, plus the EU cannot in itself enforce any laws but rely on the member states to do so. In the case of ThePirateBay, Sweden sees itself as having followed the EU directive. If they haven't, well, ask the EU as to how the law is to be interpreted and wait 5 years, at the very least, for an answer :)
      Then ofcourse you need to wait approx. 2 years more for Sweden to make a lawchange and then about another year for the law to be enforced, so I'd say time is on your side!

      Ofcourse, DMCA or any other US specific laws do not apply in Sweden so TPB, or any other bittorrent tracker you wish to open, is completly safe and cannot be shutdown or forced to remove material in any way shape or form (as decided by the Swedish Supreme Court in 1996, linking to copyrighted material is not against the law). Hence, you do not need an island or a small (well, not that Sweden is that big but still) country in the middle of nowhere. Simply host the site in Sweden and you're set!
    18. Re:So, to sum it up by kevin.fowler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Free-range torrent hosting and great gingerbread cookies. That's reason enough to move.

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
  3. Unprovable intent? by mister_llah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Incredibly lucky for the guy, really... but do you think it was because prosecutor couldn't figure out how to get the guy?

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Unprovable intent? by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt it. If they wanted him bad enough, I'm sure they could get something.

    2. Re:Unprovable intent? by Stripsurge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Naw, its because prosecutors get their movies just like everyone else.

  4. 15 minutes of fame by intelliot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why normal people are catapulted into a spotlight they didn't ask for will always be a question of concern. If you want to be famous, you can be. But think about it. If you want to be famous, you're not thinking straight. As small site owners are plummeled with traffic and legal issues, how can we help them survive? This reminds me of the blogosphere, which recently experienced growing pains with the servers and datacenters struggling to cope with demand.

    1. Re:15 minutes of fame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Blogosphere?!

      Blogosphere: The "blogosphere" is the new buzz word that has replaced "information super highway." It's what idiots like to call a collection of "blogs," otherwise known as a tragedy.

      http:///http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c. cgi?u=banish>
  5. Slyck Disagrees with Sloncek by remove+office · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sloncek's story is disputed by Slyck here.

    slyck of course being the most prominent file sharing news source on the web.

    1. Re:Slyck Disagrees with Sloncek by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      They're not disputing it. Try reading it again. They list three questions/inconsistencies that they felt were unanswered:
      1. Why would he continue supported eXeem if he was under copyright enforcement actions?
      2. Why would he continue working with ANY P2P development?
      3. Although the Suprnova.org servers were raided in November, the site continued to function until December.

      They go on to say:
      A year later, answers for the curious are finally available. ... Considering the magnitude of the situation Sloncek faced, he did what was best for him. No on else from the BitTorrent community was going to help him, and he knew that. Whether he is telling the truth is irrelevant.

      That's not disputing him. That's saying, "we had questions before, but he answered them sufficiently, and it doesn't really matter even if he weren't telling the truth."

      Yay.
      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  6. welp by theheff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good to know that nothing really happenned to the guy. Sometimes us leechers forget that behind every torrent/p2p website, there's still good people working behind the scenes who made it all possible... sadly, they are usually the ones who get all the blame.

  7. Well... by Sinryc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll be honest. I would have done the same thing as him. I mean really, Everything turned out okay for him in the end anyway. He didn't serve any jail time, and he got all of his stuff back. Hell, hes probabbly glad about the site bein' kaputs. All these people that will say that he should have fought, etc... Well, they need to understand this guy has a real life as well, and not just one that encompases a website that gives torrent files to materials in wich you didn't pay for.

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
  8. Text of the Letter by frostman · · Score: 3, Funny
    Na podlagi dolocila 224. clena ZKP ter dolocila 6. alincje 136. clena Drzavnotozilskega reda izdajam naslednji.


    s k l e p :


    V kazenski zadevi, zoper...


    Oh hell, anybody here speak Slovenian?
    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

    1. Re:Text of the Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I appologise for my poor English (legal), here is translation. And yes, document is genuine.

      With part 224, ZKP and 6/136 of State pros. order we:
      In criminal case against Andrej Preston, (adress omitted), in suspected criminal case of giving help with crime of unauthorized usage of authored (copyrighted) works at. 1/159 with connection 22 in 27 of KZ, are all objects in CD (corpus delicti) entry no ****:
      ***list of equipment****
      to returned to owner, that is Andrej Preston, because criminial case against him was dropped.

      LEGAL:
      Named (Andrej Preston) can take above mentioned objects at District State prosecutor office in Ljubljana in 30 days from receiving this letter. After 30 days, all objects will be destroyed.

    2. Re:Text of the Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Oh hell, anybody here speak Slovenian?

      Sure. Here is a helpful translation into icelandic:

      "KJa wfoami coliaboa cklembi 224. Anerpicja 13 ZKP 6 opwef nabrioa. 136 Kpentitia. Kpmarij manstani onikapp."

      HTH.

    3. Re:Text of the Letter by lewp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Roughly translated, it says, "I, for one, welcome our new BitTorrent overlords."

      --
      Game... blouses.
  9. EU law and Slovenia by frostman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slovenia is a member of the EU, so whatever EU law says about these P2P issues is probably relevant as well.

    Any of our Euro-dotters care to comment?

    I have a feeling this is not a fully-harmonized area, EU-law-wise, since the good folks at the Pirate Bay continue to entertain us with their responses to legal threats.

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

    1. Re:EU law and Slovenia by lynzh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The people at pirate bay arent scriptkiddies either, see this url: http://static.thepiratebay.org/

    2. Re:EU law and Slovenia by gladmac · · Score: 3, Informative

      That'll be due to the laws of Sweden. They're very explicit about that you're allowed to communicate how to commit crimes, which is what the torrent tracker does. So for now they're safe. The law is nice for P2P, but doesn't really make sense so we expect that it'll change eventually.

    3. Re:EU law and Slovenia by dago · · Score: 5, Informative

      The EU doesn't really make laws, but directives, which focus on objectives, forcing member states to implement them, generally with laws. The member states usually have some freedom in the implementation.

      For example, for the EU Copyrirght Directive (EUCD), there're the list of all possible "faire use" exceptions, and this is even linked with anti-circumvention articles. At the end, the states are free to take an agressive, DMCA-like legislation, where it is illegal to "break" DRM to make a private copy, while other could choose to allow circumvention of DRM and creation of MP3 for private use (see article 5.2.b and 6.4).

      So, it depends, and in this case, you should ask a slovenian ;)

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  10. Re:Next time, try... by Atario · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then don't use the ones that are.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  11. Re:Is Suprnova... up again by outsider007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's up again, now it's newnova.org - maybe I shouldn't be sharing this but what the hell.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  12. Translation by Ghandalfar · · Score: 5, Informative

    (slovenian speaker here)

    The legal document basicly says:

    Legal case against Andrej P. (his address blacked out), charged with criminal act of helping copyright infrigment by 1. article of 159. of some law with following objects written into log:
    - server with serial number ..
    - server with serial number ..
    - server with serial number ..
    - server with serial number ..
    - personal computer ..
    - personal computer ..


    are returned to the owner because legal charges against A. P. are dropped.

    And them some more legal talk where he can get his stuff in 30 days.

    That is about as much as I can handle at this early hour.

  13. Re:One of the most idiotic stories on /. to date by shreevatsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Huh? The article was written by "Suprnova's admin Sloncek". He is the one who came close to being prosecuted, his computers were confiscated, etc. He is the only one who can give an account of the story, and if he choses to say blah blah and blah blah, there is nothing anyone else can do to fill in those details.
    Your remarks would make sense if an original news item was dumbed down for the "general public".
    If the guy who got the letter from the prosecutor does not wish to quote verbatim from it, or he thinks it is not relevant, why question it? It's probably not relevant anyway, just some law numbers and dates.
    He does provide the original letter (in Slovenian), so read it yourself for the gory details. Or, scroll down for helpful translations below.

  14. SuprNova may be gone but... by Capeman · · Score: 5, Informative

    NewNova is online, it offers the same content that SuprNova once had.

  15. mininova.org by know1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    am i the only person here who goes to mininova.org instead? seems like the same library of media, justabout

    1. Re:mininova.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      am i the only person here who goes to mininova.org instead? seems like the same library of media, justabout

      SHHH! ... Uhoh, do you hear it?! The quiet roar of turbine engines, the whirr of rotorblades... the Black Army Helicopters are coming! Quick, you must sell everything you have and give all your life savings to the RIAA and MPAA in the hopes that you can bribe them and their their vast armies to fend off the imminent attack!

      This episode of "Scare The Living Pants Off Of Internet Users" paid for by the MPAA and RIAA

  16. Welcome to the club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "On November 2004, I received a call from my ISP saying that all of my servers had been raided by the police. I received nothing from the police before or after the raid, nobody told me what was going on."

    On my end, Adobe lawyers contacted my ISP and sent a short, but curt letter: "Shut him down, or we will." I balked and so did my ISP after some heated conversation. I ran a VERY popular macintosh serial # site and yeah, serial numbers are sort of a grey area as far as I was concerned (and so thought my ISP thought, as well).

    Whoops.

    Yeah, it was stupid on my part but I enjoyed the money that rolled in from my sponsors. In the long-term I got burned, much like this fellow will. I had to claim bankruptcy, due to my mounting legal bills. I'm basically screwed for the next 7 years. Hooray. Some people can walk that thin grey line between legal and illegal but I found a way to trip over it. Oh well.

  17. From the article... by trawg · · Score: 3, Funny
    This has been a huge pressure on me and I think it left some permanent marks on me. I hope none of you will ever have to go through something like this.
    I hope I can remember not to facilitate piracy on a massive scale so something like this doesn't happen to me!
    1. Re:From the article... by kelnos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, if you were to facilitate raping, pillaging, murder, and plunder on the high seas, probably a lot worse would happen to you.

      Though I suspect you're really talking about copyright infringement.

      (Chuckle: it's amusing, really.)

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    2. Re:From the article... by darkmeridian · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This has been a huge pressure on me and I think it left some permanent marks on me. I hope none of you will ever have to go through something like this.


      I hope I can remember not to facilitate piracy on a massive scale so something like this doesn't happen to me!

      And RIAA's job here is done.
      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  18. Re:And where's all the donated legal aid money? by montyzooooma · · Score: 5, Informative

    Needless to say but you seem to be confusing Suprnova with Lokitorrent. Loki pretty much took the money and ran after selling his registered users out. Suprnova never required registration to use the trackers, Lokitorrent did, so when Loki handed over his user logs the RIAA (I think it was) got there hands on the email addresses of anyone who'd used the sites. That's a LOT of hotmail addresses...

  19. no, no, and no,.. by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful

    vcrs (famous betamax decision) helped people carry out an illegal act.. but it was legal.
    just providing the means does NOT equate into illegal actions.

    napster got in trouble because they kept the master file list on their own servers- and then couldn't filter out content the riaa & others wanted blocked.

    Laws concerning morality never fit in with the 'average' views of the citizenry--

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  20. sites come and go by beast6228 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Suprnova may have been popular at the time, but like all websites, they come and go. There is always someone else to take their place. Remember isonews.com when it was taken down by the FBI years ago? Hey guess what? Their back up and running with a new website theisonews.com

    Now we have sites like thepiratebay.org which is probably one of the best torrent sites on the internet. Heck, they even tout the lawyers and post the threating legal letters on their website for everyone to read http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
    Quite hilarious if you ask me.
    Of course you have other torrent sites as well, like torrentspy.com which is another popular site.

    sites come and go, they come and go....

    --
    ~Later~
  21. "wait and see" ? by Presence2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How the hell does an admin go a week, let alone "November to December" without having a single clue as to why police would raid his servers? Why his site was shut down? Fear or apathy?

    His statement strikes me as someone who was simply hoping the problem would go away (as quoted) from the onset. More pressure on both the police and a legal defense from the onset could have both quelled the investigation as groundless and gotten the site back up.

    It's an unfortunate truth that law enforcement often only succeeds in setting legal precedent in computer investigations only because people aren't more diligent in defending themselves.

    1. Re:"wait and see" ? by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you an American? Then get a clue. According to the Patriot Act that our "representatives" *PTOOEY!* signed into law, all they have to do is say "Homeland Security", and you can be held INDEFINITELY, with NO CHARGES FILED, and NO PUBLIC RECORD, NO REPRESENTATION BY AN ATTORNEY, AND YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE WAIVED!

      And that's in a country with a history of being one of the most free and liberal in the world. What do you think normally happens in Slovenia?

      How did the land of the free come to resemble Soviet Russia?

      --
      When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
  22. Most telling piece of the article by hta · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is written above is just a short story of everything that went on during last year. I also do not want to give out too much information, since it wouldn't be wise.

    In the US, this would probably have said "after taking advice from my lawyer, I have decided not to say anything more".

    I wish him luck.
  23. A proverb by carcosa30 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Crime is the art of knowing when to quit.

    -Me

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  24. Misinterpretation by ndogg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looking at just the title, I was wondering about how one would go about stopping the explosion of a star, then I read the blurb.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  25. Re:A proverb-Do NOT Step on... by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Jolly Green Giant's Toe!

    You may be right. JGG may have harmed you. JGG may have taken your property or deprived you of assets or income wrongly. But the JGG is so large that one little nudge can spell the end of your life, & (in the U.S.) he can get a legal judgement that goes even beyond bankruptcy. The JGG can get a judgement that locks you out of your field of expertise (unless you want to leave your native country, and even then today that may not help).

    Trust me that when they accuse you, it is a curse, and when they claim (rightfully or not) that you have caused $60 million (or pick the number they invent) of damages, and are willing to spend millions to shut you down (because they only claim something might not be right, and can say without penalty later, "well, I guess he didn't do anything wrong, but we didn't know that until we did discovery and got a jury verdict", and the JGG has no fear of being sued for malitious prosecution), you generally have no choice (though you might just be stupid enough to fight). What a horrible sentence (in so many ways).

    It happened, and stupidly I figured I did not have anything to worry about, since I did not cause them harm. The JGG just assumed I would eventually cause harm & they said "So hammer the SOB".

    In the end the JGG made a FATAL mistake, and David caused JGG to go back to his hole, but ONLY because the JGG organized a really horrible RICO crime operation, which I found out about when gathering evidence to defend my self (from where I will not tell), which would have landed the multi-national JGG in world headlines had they gone a single step further. /.rs might think "Great, a win for the small guy." It was on several levels, including that JGG went away, and I had no more restrictions. But do you have any concept what happens with multiple teams of rapacious lawyers over 5 years who work for you & me, who figure you are going to lose and go bankrupt anyway, so "Let's just bleed the chicken now, before he dies, so we can pay our overhead". I paid for more criminals to defend me than the JGG did to attack me. In the end, a single lone attorney, talked to the other side one time about the RICO issue, and in two days, the JGG was only a bad memory.

    It worked out to about $1 million in defense fees, out of pocket, the JGG was not harmed and I won?

    "You don't tug on Superman's cape and you don't mess around with JGG", to coin a variation which I suppose could infringe someone's copyright, except we are allowed to do short quotes for literary review.

    Some take longer than other to learn...some lie...some view themselves as immortal...but the time and money are what will take you down, if you insist on stomping on toes.

  26. On the contrary! by Phil+Urich · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Safe to say that the torrent community has gone downhill since, I'd say.

    On the contrary! Torrent sites have split up and decentralized, that is true. But that, in many ways, is a good thing, and the content has in many ways improved in quality; back in the days of Suprnova I still would search for most things via DC++ or IRC because the general level of quality and content was better, even if Suprnova had the quantity. But nowadays, even if they're harder to get into, the torrent sites have precisely for that reason grown more vibrant and connected within themselves. Instead of faceless posts of questionable content, we have tightly knit communities!

    Really, look me straight in the eye and argue that places like Demonoid and Dimeadozen aren't stellar examples of what the torrent community can be (each in their own ways; Dimeadozen perhaps the most notable, considering that it works expressly to share media from live music, and in doing so ensures a rather high quality of content, something that just wouldn't happen with stuff of similar subject matter back on Suprnova).

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!