Slashdot Mirror
First Impressions Count in Website Design
Andy King writes "Web designers have as little as 50 milliseconds to capture the interest of potential customers, according a new report by researchers at Carleton University. Through the halo effect, first impressions can influence subsequent judgments of website credibility and buying decisions."
I could tell in less than 50 milliseconds as well....
Official GOD FAQ.
my first impressions tell me this is not just a DUPE but a TRIPE!
... But on slashdot you get to have a second and even a third chance to get it right!
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
Stop it.
bad repeat, bad!
look at what you've done, now go outside. Get.
) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
...you have a whole 50 seconds for them to take the page in as it loads.
This article has been around so many times I have now thought of something to post against it.
http://michaelsmith.id.au
I don't complain about dupes, but this is ridiculous. I have to wonder if this is a sick joke. A third time? I don't even pay and I feel like demanding my money back...
I'm expecting CmdrTaco to post a dupe of one of his "letters to slashdot" soon.
Read reviews of shopping cart software
Man i've been reading Slashdot for 4 years now, and I still can't tell its shit.
:)
Just 50ms to make an impression is very short, so Slashdot just does the logical thing; they're giving it 150ms!
Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
Seriously, do you think this is some Andy Kaufman prank where many members of the public are the victim and the only people who find the joke funny are the moderators? It's just getting silly now.
http://www.frenchgeek.com/
This had to be on purpose. They're taking the piss with us. No one is that incompetent. They're having a joke at our expense, so just let it ride
Hah. Do what I do, resubmit every dupe you see. Eventually I'll get an article posted that way...
...it only takes Slashdot editors 50 milliseconds to forget each story they post.
"Nothing to see here..."
One of the interesting points made in What the bleep do we know is that human retinas are bombarded with millions of data bits each millisecond, and somehow the brain reduces this to a few tens of thousands of bits in the process of forming a conscious image, which happens pretty quickly. So these questions arise:
So in terms of web sites, it seems that even though I might not know how to define it, I can recognize quality before I see it. Yeah, that fits my experience: I'll google for something, open up a dozen of the most promising links in new tabs, then run through most of them at full click speed because I can instantly tell that they aren't the ones I'm looking for.
Viva tabbed browsing!
For all we know, this "on-topic" comment is a dupe, too.
7 &cid=14489311
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=17416
tehanu said:
You know this idea that people make judgements in the first 50ms before you can really gain a conscious impression of it (though probably something flashes in your subconcious) remind me of one of the entries in the "Dangerous Ideas" article in Edge (slashdot had it as a story a short while ago) in which Nobel Prize winning biochemist Eric R. Kandel argues that much of what we call "free will" is processed unconsciously without awareness:
willeh "said":
You know this idea that people make judgements in the first 50ms before you can really gain a conscious impression of it (though probably something flashes in your subconcious) remind me of one of the entries in the "Dangerous Ideas" article in Edge Magazine in which Nobel Prize winning biochemist Eric R. Kandel argues that much of what we call "free will" is processed unconsciously without awareness:
To be fair, he/she added, "Interesting read for sure." Insert usual karma whore comments, etc. here.
I wonder if we all submit this link as a story (several times each?), will /. editors finally get a point?
And people pay for subscriptions to these triple postings........very very sad.
It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
I moderate therefore I rule!
--
If you make a webpage, remember that people will judge them quickly.
CowboyNeal: Hey, so it's really cold out there today, huh?
CmdrTaco: So how much do we owe you for the pizza?
Pizza Delivery Guy: FOR THE THIRD TIME, YES IT'S COLD OUT THERE, AND YOU OWE ME $15.95!!!
Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.
You think "websiteoptimization.com" might be a commercial site?
This isn't a dupe/trupe. The former article was a synopsis. This one actually gives the real research. I was looking for the original research on the earlier article but I didn't want to pay the publishers for it. This article gives the methods, the pages viewed, the results. That's far better than the first two /. postings!
---- I'm out of your mind!
Can anyone tell me how long my web page has to capture the interest of a visitor? I've been searching everywhere for this data but cannot seem to track it down.
Wouldn't the original article link normally be posted in a Slashback?
--The Programming goddess from Gorflaz