Slashdot Mirror


eBay Scraps Transaction Fees in China

PlayCleverFully writes "The US online auction service eBay scrapped all sellers' transaction fees in China, in an effort to compete with local competitors offering free services, including Yahoo-invested Alibaba.com. The online auctioneer announced the changes on its China auction website, saying transaction fees would be waived, but small fees would continue to be charged for listing products on the site's webspace and for "feature" products. eBay's China unit, Eachnet, would also require all sellers to provide authorized online payment mechanisms to improve its credit environment, including PayPal and other escrow services, the announcement said. The move means that sellers won't get paid until the buyers receive and are satisfied with the products, it said."

133 comments

  1. At the editorial comment by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Capitalism works - for the Chinese.

    Meanwhile in the USA - 98% of patents...what?

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:At the editorial comment by operagost · · Score: 1

      Definitely. This single example of price competition in China indicates that the entire capatilist economy in the USA is broken and inferior. We should conveniently ignore the facts on this seditious web site, for example.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:At the editorial comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that without patents, many of the things patented would have never been developed and no one would have ever been able to benefit from them. Companies are not going to develop new technologies if in the end they will ultimately be giving them away for free.

    3. Re:At the editorial comment by kahrytan · · Score: 1
      Capitalism works in the United States regardless of patents. There is nothing stopping you from starting a online auctions website.

      eBay will scrap all sellers' transaction fees from today, amid market pressure from local competitors offering free service...


      eBay would be forced to lower it's fees in the US if there was a enough competition.

        Capitalism works in the USA!
      --
      \
  2. Moving time! by DaHat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screw all of this talk about moving to Canada or Europe... sounds like China is now the place to live... except for that whole... oppression of unfavorable speech and blocking of websites.

    1. Re:Moving time! by CyricZ · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      .. oppression of unfavorable speech and blocking of websites.

      With the recent US DoJ request for search terms from a number of the major search engines, Americans might find themselves in a very similar situation with regards to censorship. Except they'll be without the vibrant, rapidly-expanding economy that China current has. Growth is the key to a strong economy. A strong economy without significant growth is not a very healthy economy.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:Moving time! by DaHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Head on over to http://blogs.msdn.com/msnsearch/archive/2006/01/20 /515606.aspx to see some info from the horse on what kind of information was requested and given, at least as far as Microsoft search is concrned... it's not as bad as many have claimed.

    3. Re:Moving time! by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You realize that this could be the first of numerous future requests, right? And there's nothing stopping the future requests from being far more probing.

      With the first request they:
      CAN see how frequently some query terms occurred.
      CANNOT look up an IP and see what they queried
      CANNOT look for users who queried for both TERM A and TERM B.


      With the second request they:
      CAN see how frequently some query terms occurred.
      CAN look up an IP and see what they queried
      CANNOT look for users who queried for both TERM A and TERM B.


      And with the third request they:
      CAN see how frequently some query terms occurred.
      CAN look up an IP and see what they queried
      CAN look for users who queried for both TERM A and TERM B.


      At that point censorship and persecution is far too close.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:Moving time! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Good idea! Lets all live in fear of subpoenas because they CAN be abused!

      Better idea... deal with them on a case by case basis and froth when the really bad ones come out... not when there is the potential for a really bad one to be issued.

    5. Re:Moving time! by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Remember, the "really bad ones" are all relative. That is why this sort of data is collected slowly. It starts out relatively benign. Then the next time around it's just slightly more probing, but not so much as to get people riled up. That process repeats for a while. Soon enough, BAM. There goes your once free nation.

      Anyone with even the smallest background in world history will know how that that sort of situation has happened time and time again. And the outcome is always the same: tyranny. To think anything but is foolishness.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    6. Re:Moving time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

          States should be allowed to have secrets and so should individuals-- even if sometimes in both cases abuse happens. Unfortunately those obsessed with "the war on terror" don't seem to understand this. Furthermore they neglect to remember that we didn't need these crazy laws when faced with a fully nuclear armed Warsaw pact.

          Ever right lost seems fairly innocent, what seems to be missed is why stop at searches and spying online? Why not have physical searches of your home? Why not place camera's in your toilets? It's a slippery slope indeed.

            I'd rather risk my life with the occasional bomb going off by some terrorist group (with very limited power) or some criminal getting away with things than have all my rights trampled by an oppressive all powerful state thanks.

            "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." Benjamin Franklin

    7. Re:Moving time! by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Growth is the key to a strong economy. A strong economy without significant growth is not a very healthy economy.

      Do you really believe that insane nonsense? Infinite growth in a closed system (ie THE EARTH) is IMPOSSIBLE. It's this kind of thinking that has doomed our economy to an unending cycle of booms and crashes.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    8. Re:Moving time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cycle of boom and bust was a self-fulfilling prophecy. Economists have wisened up and no longer preach the ~10yr boom-bust economic cycle so it no longer occurs.

    9. Re:Moving time! by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      And the fog and cloud formations that you later realize are pollution, and the immense gap between rich and poor, and the arbitrary nature of the government...

    10. Re:Moving time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd rather risk my life with the occasional bomb going off by some terrorist group (with very limited power) or some criminal getting away with things than have all my rights trampled by an oppressive all powerful state thanks.

      Not to mention that they haven't provided any proof that the lies, spying, and war mongering has actually made anyone safer. Assuming that the Osama bin Ladin's boys actually did 9/11 (which the government has not made any attempt to prove, while covering up and burying all the physical evidence of the crime) then I don't think we've even hit the first measure of whether all this "war on terror" bullshit is doing any good. September 11th came 8 years after the first WTC bombing, it's been less than 5 years since 9/11.

      And again, they've provided no proof that anything on that day happened the way they claim. The huge amount of lies bush and company tell should have us all working from the assumption that what they claim is absolutely not what happened.

    11. Re:Moving time! by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Informative
      Growth is the key to a strong economy. A strong economy without significant growth is not a very healthy economy.


      I don't know about that, eternal (big) growth is unsustainable if the population of the country levels off or if all the 3rd world countries (cheap labor/new markets) evolve into 1st world countries over time.

      I think growth is needed for a strong economy with a lot of debt (US: Government has 8 trillion dollars debt, individuals even more) and you can see this hit Japan even more, as it's population amount is leveling off (some Europeans countries also have low birth rate) and it's loaded with debt.

      You are also seeing this in the housing market in the US. The prices are insane right now, and everybody who is buying is betting that growth/prices will increase even further in the near-term future, making the current prices a bit cheaper with inflation/future payoff. That's betting on future growth, but is it there?

      But what about an economy with little (government) debt? Does it need much growth?
    12. Re:Moving time! by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      Being allowed to move millions of people to build a dam or host an Olympics without the consent of the governed does wonders for the GDP!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Moving time! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Does any one remember this: (http://www.boingboing.net/2004/10/28/homeland_sec urity_sa.html)
      DHS has it's fingers in economic/business areas due to the idea of "the economy is tied to National Security".

      How could "the war on terror" have ANYTHING to do with Rubik's cube knockoffs?
      It isn't sneaking up on us, it's bulldozing it's way over us now!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    14. Re:Moving time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could "the war on terror" have ANYTHING to do with Rubik's cube knockoffs?

      Modelling the current state of a Rubik's cube can be performed using "Group Theory", which
      is also used in the design of encryption algorithms.

      Therefore, exporting a Rubik's Cube without the proper export permissions is a threat to
      national security.

    15. Re:Moving time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not to mention that they haven't provided any proof that the lies, spying, and war mongering has actually made anyone safe"

            In fact not only is not better I would argue all the paranoia and negativity it creates actually makes things far worse. Paranoia is a breeding ground for terrorism. (refer to Tim, Waco, IRA, Palestinians) The tighter the authorities squeeze the more enemies they will make. Eventually when critical mass is reached and enough people are fed up with their freedoms being taken away (for "security" and "righteousness")-- it leads to full scale bloody revolutions

            I'm a pacifist so I would never advocate this but it seems to be how history works unfortunately. Let's hope the powers that be come to their senses before it comes to this. Everyone would lose.

    16. Re:Moving time! by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in China, the government has the right to move people for national causes.

      in America, the government has (unconstitutionally) given the right to businesses to move people if the business will use the land for more profit and taxes.

      which is scarier?

    17. Re:Moving time! by operagost · · Score: 1
      By the way, thanks for adding me to your foes list. I'm sure it's due to my reputation as a dangerous religious dissident.

      For what it's worth, I'm apalled by the abuses of eminent domain. But the people who are encouraging these abuses aren't in my camp. They are people like Justices Stevens, Breyer, Ginsburg and Souter, and Mayor John Street.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. The 21st century will belong to China. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Indeed, countries like China and India will be where the 21st century will take place.

    But in the big picture, it is just the typical East-West reversal. Remember, in centuries past China and India were the major world civilizations. The Europe of today is much like the China of the 1200s. And the China of tomorrow will be much like the Europe of today.

    The East was on top for a while, and then various events lead to the West becoming more prosperous. But we see the tide turning one again, this time in favour of the East. In three or four centuries it will no doubt switch back towards the West's favour, and soon enough there'll be yet another switch.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1, Funny

      "and soon enough there'll be yet another switch."

      The scientific basis and accuracy of your predictions are amazing.

      If you turn out to be right, can I call you NostCyricZamus? ;)

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by BuR4N · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " In three or four centuries it will no doubt switch back towards the West's favour.."

      It will go much faster, as living standard grows in China much of what are now a benifit for the country will vanish. People will demand more spare time, higher salarys, the country will have to deal with enviromental issues and political issues. Just to name a few.

      They are cutting allot of corners today that gives them an temporary advantage over the west.

      --
      http://www.intellipool.se/ - Intellipool Network Monitor
    3. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.

      You know, dude, that is by far the lamest sig I've ever seen.

    4. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      Civilization carried on in the Islamic world, as well, although Genghis Khan certainly threw a wrench in the works in the 1200s.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    5. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by lxs · · Score: 1

      Actually, the economic center of gravity of the world had been steadily moving west.

      It started in China, moved to India, then to Sumeria, Greece, Rome, Western Europe, US East Coast, US West Coast.

      These days it is crossing the Pacific and is moving towards Japan (it may be already there) and back to China.

      (This is not my idea, but I forgot who first discovered it)

    6. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      Or even better you can call him: A beautiful mind. His analysis was so insightful... I bet none of us ever saw things from this persperctive. It takes a beautiful mind to reach that levels of historical awareness. Thank you /. for bringing this knowledge to the masses at score 5!

    7. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, countries like China and India will be where the 21st century will take place. ...
      And the China of tomorrow will be much like the Europe of today.


      Have you BEEN to China? The country has more than its fair share of current and oncoming economic problems. 50% of its workforce is agricultural, yet the environment is degrading so rapidly that 20% of the arable land in China disappeared in the last 50 years, and continues to decline significantly. Its biggest growth sector is industry, with an unsustainable 23% growth rate, but they experience such a huge and growing economic disparity between the coastal and inner areas that the inner areas will soon become an economic burden. You can't point to China's population of 1.5 billion and say that it will propel it forward as a massive workforce, because only a small portion of that population is in the industrialized coastal region. 10% of China's population isn't even literate according to the official numbers, and in the inner areas that number is likely much higher than the official count, with a large number of children never reported to the government and thus never allowed to go to school.

      In India, 40% of the population is illiterate, and over half of all women are illiterate. India is clearly not even close to poised to take over Europe's position.

    8. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because he's a queer faggot state-the-obvious piece of shit.

    9. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      Absolutely wrong. The first important civilizations appeared in Mesopotamia (that includes Sumeria) this happened long before (-1000 BC) Asian tribes formed into thriving societies. The ancient Chinese civilization appeared in an advanced form around 500-300 BC. By that time great societies had already formed and vanished in the Mediterranean (Minoan civilization around 1000 BC) and lets not forget Egypt which was a prevelant civilization for at least the whole 1000 years BC. And I have no doubt in my mind that the Greek civilization of 300 BC (Golden Age in Athens) reached much higher levels of technological and philosophical advances than the early advanced Chinese societies did. China had indeed an important role at around the same time the Roman Empire and Byzantium ruled Europe. But noone can really say that they were much more advanced. They were exotic yes, having all these little inventions (e.g gun powder) but much more advanced, I doubt it. Perhaps China was more advanced than the western european Kingdoms during Europe's dark ages, but keep in mind that not all of Europe or Minor Asia was deep in the darkness. Byzantium (ex eastern roman empire) and the Arabs had many advances in sciences and arts and their economies were thriving. Personally I don't see an east to west pattern. Sometimes you are up sometimes you are down. That is how history works. It is true however that the rate with which changes take place is much faster nowadays. I don't expect that it would take 300 years for western states to become dominant powers. I think that shifts in power now happen once every 20-50 years (or even less), not the 300 the grand-parent suggests.

    10. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got to disagree, this is not you're typical pendulum swinging anymore. In centuries past, nations were isolated. We live in a global economy now with rapid communication, if the pendulum is swinging, its not swinging much, but rather getting comfy in its final place.

      I don't think India and China are going to be where the 21st century happens. Really their only benefit is they have a large population with which to pull work from. With the rapid replacement of manual labor with automated means (something I strongly support and push), sometime around 2030 or so you'll see most manual labor and even a good chunk of work once considered to require intellect replaced with machines. At that point India's and China's greatest strength (their population) will be their biggest burden because it will no longer be the nation with the largest work pool, but rather the nation with the most efficient machines. At this point, it seems that a number of nations could take that title, none being China or India.

      China's government, while getting better, I doubt will change enough to support the kind of economy that would ensue from the continued succes that they've had for the past decade or so. India is in a similar situation, but not quite as bad. I do find it ironic however that some of the outsourcing firms in India are no longer using Indian programmers but rather outsourcing their work to Chinese programmers to save more money. It implies a trend of future economic stagnation, there are similar situations in other job sectors of India also. There are a few trends like this that seem to lead to only a short term period of prosperity (most likely not lasting more than 2 decades, maybe 3). Google around a bit and you'll see reports and forecasts predicting similar situations.
      Regards,
      Steve

    11. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in 1949 more than 80% chinese people are not literate.
      in 2002 the number is reduced to 8.72%.

    12. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and in A.D. 2101, war was beginning.

    13. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by caudron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, countries like China and India will be where the 21st century will take place.

      Sure it will.

      Seriously though. While that link is a bit tongue-in-cheek, the reality is that while it seems logical on the surface to assume that China and India will take the technological lead, reality is likeely to prove counter-intuitive.

      It may be non-PC to point this out, but China and India are incredibly backwards countries by Western standards. You think America has problems because some vocal minority wants to rant about evolution? Remind yourself that America spend more money on research than any other country on the planet...bar none...and by a VERY wide margin. Much of that research money gos into military research, which again might suggest to you that we will lose the edge elsewhere, but you should not underestimate the usefulness of military research to the civilian world (the Internet being the most common example) and you should not underestimate the power of a nation whose biggest advances come from the military sector in terms of world power.

      It's cool lately to compare America to decaying Rome, but the fact is that the world is a different place than it was during the Roman Empire and our lead is enrenched in a way the Romans could not conceive.

      The problem for other countries is essentialy that while they are making advances, we are too and we are starting from a position that all but ensures victory. It is possible but unlikely that anyone could not only overtake us. We aren't a sitting target, regardless of what you may have heard in the media (that sells more papers with prophecies of doom that visions of a bright future).

      Sorry, but the best we can all hope for is that America grows into a leader that respects other nations fully and seeks to lift them up rather than knock them down.

      The world is not fair. We are in the lead and right or wrong, China and India will have to do A LOT more than they are currently if they hope to compete. As I said, not impossible, just highly improbable.

      --
      -Tom
    14. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by rolfwind · · Score: 1
      At that point India's and China's greatest strength (their population) will be their biggest burden because it will no longer be the nation with the largest work pool, but rather the nation with the most efficient machines. At this point, it seems that a number of nations could take that title, none being China or India.


      I think 2030 is a bit optimistic for a fully automated workforce but I can forsee it being at the middle of a transition period.

      But in any case, won't there still be a workforce? Even if most of the work is intellectual and not physical? China is pulling ahead there too - graduating more than 800,000 Bachelor engineers a year. I think the US in the 150K-200K range.....
    15. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by zontroll · · Score: 1

      you're wrong that it will switch back for one very important: depopulation. Europe already has negative population growth and the US isn't far behind.

      Contrary to popular belief, the world isn't overpopulated in any way and the explosive growth in population in India and China, combined with their new economic strength, means they will hold the reins until other high populated areas (such as South America, Africa, or the Middle East) develop economically.

      The lack of population in Europe and North America will relegate Western Civilization to the third world for the foreseeable future (starting about 50-75 years from now.)

      A reference from a source I wouldn't normally refer:
      The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization
      by Patrick J. Buchanan

    16. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ibn Khaldun had a theory, although he used city dwellers and nomads based on his personal experience. The perspective may have been too limiting in terms of the relative "virility" of city dwellers and nomads, but I think the basic premise is not bad and can be generalized:: Those who have lots of wealth, spend more time spending the wealth than creating new wealth. Relatively speaking the poorer people are more productive, becaue they are capable of living with less. In essence we're spoiled brats living off the wealth accumulated by our forebears. Their success is the direct cause of our failure. The eternal dilemma of life.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    17. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but 500-300 BC (commonly called the Warring States) was definitely not the start of advanced Chinese civilization. It is in fact a period of disconnect from the previous dynasties, where after the collapse of the last empire, various local kings engaged in centuries old wars to annex each other and take over the broken empire. In your own words, where "great societies had already formed and vanished". This is one of the golden era for Chinese scholars and thinkers due to their high degree of intellectual freedoms and opportunies in the various states.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynasties_of_ancient_ china

    18. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. The Romans probably thought the same thing.

    19. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Contrary to popular belief, the world isn't overpopulated in any way and the explosive growth in population in India and China, combined with their new economic strength, means they will hold the reins until other high populated areas (such as South America, Africa, or the Middle East) develop economically.

      And yes, and contary to popular belief, the world is flat. So, people who go too far will fall off the edge.

      Just go to India or China and you will see what overpopulation really is.

    20. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Actually, the economic center of gravity of the world had been steadily moving west.
      So we can save our economy just by slowing down the earth's rotation a bit? Actually it would be kind of nice to have a 25 hour day, so long as I get to keep the hour!
    21. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      While I can see where you are coming from the point should be made that there is a whole world that is being more and more innovative, and such a place in time like the information age sets up new challenges to what (and who) is the domiant force.

      I am an Australian and I see innovation (the product of any form of R&D regardless of location or input costs) taking place. The 'net makes it easier for developments to procreate throughout the globe in many areas, for example business pratices, innovation culture, etc; which don't attribute them to a geographic reigion.

      Some things granted you can wrap up in IP and licencing but there is a whole world of people out there who can ehance and extend the fundamentals of any idea. Lucky for us (inc. you) it goes both ways.

    22. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by johansalk · · Score: 1

      A very important factor in the fall of the Islamic civilisation, other than the mongols, was the plague. The mongols carried the plague and it travelled farther than they did. It didn't seem to affect the mongols themselves. It hit both the Islamic world and Europe, though Europeans soon developed a relative immunity against it, but the Arabs didn't seem to and it continued to hit them hard and decimate them until the 19th century. I'm wondering if this is a case of Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs and Steel theory. Jared Diamond speculated that Europeans had immunological advantage over the New World inhabitants due to the fact that they lived near their cattle and were well-exposed to pathogens. The Arabs at the time were perhaps a more urbane culture and, most notably, were obsessive washers due to the requirement of their religion, washing 5 times a day for prayers and even required to wash again if they fart and their fart made a noise or smell, and this was at a time when even European kings and queens never bathed. Who knows, sanitation and cleanliness standards seem high now amongst Westerners eventhough most men still don't wash after they use toilets, so much so that modern allergies are blamed on inadequate exposure to pathogens, so perhaps western civilisation will be threatened by a global pandemic that kills off most of its people and some rural civilisation of a more resistant people in China and India will emerge.

    23. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by caudron · · Score: 1

      The 'net makes it easier for developments to procreate throughout the globe in many areas, for example business pratices, innovation culture, etc; which don't attribute them to a geographic reigion.

      I agree. That's one of the reasons why I'm not willing to say others can't catch up, just that they will have a great deal harder time than is normally suggested. Indeed, even with the globalization effect of the Internet, I'm not sure anyone could catch up at this point.

      Set aside all the media hype about fundamentalists running the country and just look at the numbers: The heaps of money we in the U.S. spend on research. The amount is truly staggering. According to UNESCO's 2005 Report on Science and Technology Statistics, China spends about 1.23% of it's GDP on R&D. In the US, we spend 2.67% of ours on R&D and we have a a much higher GDP. Put in apples-to-apples comparison: China spends $72,014,408 in adjusted (ie standardized) currency on R&D. A lot? To be sure, but in the U.S. we spend $275,095,956. If we rounded down to the nearest 100 million dollars the rounded amount we drop would be more than China spends in total. That's not including U.S. and Chinese Defense budget spending, granted, but the amount of money the U.S. throws at military R&D is legendary and those numbers would only server to widen the gap. And it's a sort of snowball effect, too. We make these advances in-house (so to speak) and those advances bring us both profit and more advances more quickly. It's very hard to compete with that. China (a country I have a great affection for!) can't just throw bodies at that problem to see it solved. They simply cannot muster the technological resources to stand toe-to-toe with us in that way, and by the time they get to where we are now, we will have advanced significantly.

      Please don't take this as some sort of Pro-USA chest pounding. I am one fo the few people in my field here who sees outsourcing as a good thing (for the world if not for me) and, again, China has a special place in my heart, but unless and until the nature of our situation as a species changes drastically it's unlikley that countries like China or India will ever catch up.

      --
      -Tom
    24. Re:The 21st century will belong to China. by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      Hey Tom,

      I looked for an email on your home page but couldnt get the links to work.

      Thanks for replying. I see your point and persepective. I'm just one of those who is backing (believing) in a change in our species.

      But the lead is easier to follow than create. Markets are prone to external factors, meaning they are beyond the control of any leader. Their are no permanent leaders.

      I dont see you as "Pro-USA chest pounding".

      Cheers

      P

  4. All the time our customers ask us, How do we make by Spazntwich · · Score: 2, Funny

    money doing this? The answer is simple: volume.

  5. That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    because eBay just raised fees for US sellers again.

    1. Re:That's great by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, like it or not, the Chinese market dwarfs the American market. Remember, that holds true even today, without the full Chinese market being completely realized and integrated. Once the Chinese market really gets going, coupled with that of India and other Asian nations, traditional markets will look quite irrelevant.

      Even with significant wealth, a 300 million body US market is still quite insignificant when compared to the 2 billion person Indian and Chinese markets.

      EBay is quite lucky to be able to tap into such fantastic financial resources so early on. If they can maintain a foothold in those markets, they will become extremely prosperous.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bigger online market?

      United States -- Internet Users: 159 Million (2002)
      According to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/field s/2153.html

      China -- Internet Users: 94 Million (2004)
      According to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/field s/2153.html

      And I don't see why this would dramatically change in the next 5 years.

    3. Re:That's great by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      First all, your data is several years old. So to suggest it is relevant today is incorrect. Second of all, it is from the CIA. After the whole Iraq debacle, many people are suspect of any data from such groups, be it intelligence about the weaponry of other nations, or even data in their Fact Book.

      What you're not taking into account is the current state of the US economy. While it may not look bad at this point, there is much speculation that it will tank in the near future. The billions upon billons spent on the various wars the US is now involved in are really starting to strain the economy. The mass media isn't really covering this, but then again, it's not in their benefit to do so. Economists and those in the financial field know that things just aren't right, however.

      Even if the Chinese market doesn't grow significantly (which is very unlikely), a decline in the American economy could easily lead to the Chinese market becoming relatively larger than the American market.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:That's great by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      My guess though is that more people won't mean more power in the long term. I'd suspect that as the world grows, the real measure of strength will be something of a exploitable natural resources per person measure. I don't know what china's sitting on but it better be big.

      --
      I do security
    5. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA factbook is a pile of propoganda crap. Read the comments on any country not right-wing mental capitalist, it makes out the vaguely socialist countries like those of Europe are backward when they are more advanced than USA. It also stupidly states the USA is the worlds biggest economy but also admits the EU is bigger.

    6. Re:That's great by c_forq · · Score: 2, Informative

      First all, your data is several years old.

      I would like to note that it clearly states 2004, which at maximum 2 years old (and it would have to be from the first 22 days of the year to even be that old).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    7. Re:That's great by c_forq · · Score: 1

      it makes out the vaguely socialist countries like those of Europe are backward when they are more advanced than USA

      What is your definition of advanced? In what regards are those countries more advanced then the US?

      It also stupidly states the USA is the worlds biggest economy but also admits the EU is bigger.

      The EU isn't a country.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    8. Re:That's great by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Umm.... the American market is at the bottom of its decline right now. I think you need to get your facts straight, or at least stop letting your bias against America blind you (you are blatantly biased in all of your posts, I guess some people just can't accept being inferior and need to keep repeating false information to convince themselves otherwise) The American economy is expected to strengthen significantly over the next 15 years, currently it is considered to be at its low point.
      Regards,
      Steve

    9. Re:That's great by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      The EU isn't a country./blockquote
      The EU has a Constitution.

      Maybe it'd help if you thought of them as the "United States of Europe"

      Just like there are the United States of America and the United States of Mexico
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    10. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More advanced:
      higher literacy rate
      better education
      better healthcare
      greater broadband adoptation
      lower CO2 emissions
      vastly lower rate of violent crime
      etc
      etc

      and it's best to think of the EU as one country as the economies are so tightly integrated.

    11. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better healthcare
      I've never heard anywhere having better healthcare then the US. More available, yes. More affordable, yes. But better? I've also heard massive complaints of trying to get into specialists in almost every socialist country.

    12. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to add higher life expectancies in Europe. According to the WHO (world health organisation) USA is 37th rank in healthcare, France No 1.

    13. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU doesn't have a constitution. Remember the French and, I think, the Dutch rejected the proposed constitution?

    14. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They rejected a new constitution, the old constitution still stands.

    15. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Australia - fees too high.
      EBAY does not enforce even the worst postage ripoffs.
      256mb memory card - 1 cent, postage $30, most originating from China or HK. Many others have subscribe to pay checkout, which means ebay makes money on the first sale, and thereafter repeat deals done direct.

      Ebay is about peaked, and after the initial honeymoon, hoardes of browned off sellers and sniped buyers will move. Google just needs to introduce and alternative, and an agent/convertor to import the ads. Nothing lasts forever.

    16. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm.

      Yeah because that damn $11 trillion dollar American market is sooooo dwarfed by the Chinese and Indian .....

      You forgot the important words "potential", "future" and "possible".

  6. It's all about a bigger marketplace by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yahoo Auctions beat Ebay to the Japanese market by only 5 months, and it has dominated there.

    1. Re:It's all about a bigger marketplace by guardiangod · · Score: 1

      Taiwan and Hong Kong have a similar situation where whenever people talk about online auction, they mean Yahoo Auction. China, on the other hand, is quite uncertain as the Chinese find the idea of "pay first, then wait for shipment" is quite....ridiculous.

      My advise: Never do business in China unless 1. you have someone you trust that lives in China 2. You are extremely good at approaching the limits of laws without being illegal.
      Law doesn't mean much in China....

  7. the article is misleading.. by 512k · · Score: 2, Informative

    it's not a %9 increase based of the auction ending price in the US, it's a %9 increase of their current percentage. %2.75 to %3 in this case. Ebay has 3 levels of pricing, %5.something percent for the first $24, %3 for the next 25-999 of value, and around %2 for anything over $1000. The people who make a living bulk importing brand new things from China and re-selling them on ebay are NOT going to be happy about this.

    And you can always set your searches to be US only.

    --
    ------ Work is so much easier when you don't
    1. Re:the article is misleading.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually the % sign should come after the number...

    2. Re:the article is misleading.. by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Pssst, don't disturb him!

      He was actually trying to construct a query for MySQL 6.0.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    3. Re:the article is misleading.. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      It depends on your region. It's customary in several European nations to put the percentage sign first. The benefit is that you immediately know what follows is a percentage, much as is the case with the American tradition of putting the dollar sign before a dollar value.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:the article is misleading.. by binkzz · · Score: 1

      The people who make a living bulk importing brand new things from China and re-selling them on ebay are NOT going to be happy about this.

      Actually, almost all of the Chinese listings are in Chinese, and very few of the sellers will be able to speak useful English to any degree. It's almost impossible for any 'average' ebayer to buy products from Chinese sellers, so I don't think those bulk importers have to worry yet.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
  8. The Value of eBay by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    in an effort to compete with local competitors

    Apparently the extra value eBay brings to the table in China has been priced above its actual worth. Nice to see them essentially admit this in not so many words.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  9. Re:All the time our customers ask us, How do we ma by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    That sounded like a spammer.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  10. Re:All the time our customers ask us, How do we ma by Spazntwich · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's actually a quote from SNL, you straight-up clod.

  11. Ebay just raised their fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ebay just raised their "mid-tranche" fees to 8% (oh yea, they prefaced that by lowering their insertion fees for "low-tranche" items by $.05) ... IMHO the fees ebay charges have gotten way too high! I sold a $92 item and after paying for the ebay and paypal fees came away with a little less than $80

    12/92 = 13%!

    I think they're just shooting themselves in the foot because I'm not using ebay half as much as I used to and I'm sure I'm not the only one they've turned off.

    1. Re:Ebay just raised their fees by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "oh yea, they prefaced that by lowering their insertion fees for "low-tranche" items by $.05"

      That "lower tier" is $0.99 or less. I decided to sell some of my duplicate Animal Crossing-e cards and, doing the math and including PayPal fees, there are very, very few things in this world you could sell on eBay for $0.99 and come out in the black.

      As far as I'm concerned, lowering the percentage for that tier is an empty gesture when you are all but required to accept PayPal to make a sale and they charge a flat $0.30 plus percentage.

    2. Re:Ebay just raised their fees by saskboy · · Score: 1

      eBay's no different from a casino now. They have analyzed every possible profit making angle, and any which way you try to sell, they'll come out ahead more than 50% of the time.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Ebay just raised their fees by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      You're not, no. I used to do a reasonable amount of business on eBay, but nowadays, I don't anymore - it's just not worth it. Considering that there's no guarantee that things will actually sell and that you have to pay a significant fee even when they don't, I've pretty much stopped doing business on there. Not that it will matter much to them, of course, but as soon as there's a worthwhile competitor (Yahoo does not count; they're probably even worse then eBay in terms of corporate ethics, if that's even possible), I'll switch over to that and never look back.

      Where's Google Auctions when you need it...

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  12. Re:All the time our customers ask us, How do we ma by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Indeed. And as is often shown, spamming is a very lucrative business. If you can base your business around a large volume sales, even at a few pence per sale, you'll often be very well off.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  13. Where is the online auction competition in NA? by qualico · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what eBay is saying is now that we own the North American market, we'll keep raising the fees.

    Does anyone know of any other good online auctions?
    Maybe its time we start to take our money to the competition so we can get a break like the Chinese.

    1. Re:Where is the online auction competition in NA? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Does anyone know of any other good online auctions?


      Pretty much they all suck, with Yahoo sucking the least. The problem is really a chicken and egg problem. To attract buyers you need a lot of items available. But to attract sellers you need a lot of buyers. With both those groups settled on ebay to do auctions it's very hard for another auctioneer to get a foothold, even with cheap or free listing fees. I've looked at yahoo auctions before in the hopes I'd get a better deal because of the smaller amount of buyers, but I can almost never find what I'm looking for on yahoo auctions. Because of this I essentially forget that Yahoo even does auctions.

      The real competitors to ebay is still people selling things locally and privately. Craigslist is probbably the biggest competitor to ebay because you can get things the same day, there's no fees to anyone, and there's no shipping as it's all designed for a local city.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Where is the online auction competition in NA? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I second Graigslist! Fuck e-bay and paypal. With all of their fees combined, it strips away too much of my potential profit to make it worth while. In fact, E-bay only good recycling if you must get rid of something.

      With Graigslist, there are no fees. I meet people (and freaks), and it's cash up front baby!!!

      Only complaints I have is the webpage. It's poorly designed and need a major overhaul.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Where is the online auction competition in NA? by putko · · Score: 1

      The page is OK -- it loads super-fucking-fast, works with lynx.

      It is ugly. I think that this website, which has similar pages, looks a lot better (never mind the content -- it is neocon):

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/browse

      Craigslist will kill E-bay, eventually.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    4. Re:Where is the online auction competition in NA? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Hey. Genius. This is the Internet.

      MAKE YOUR OWN AUCTION SITE AND COMPETE.

      End of moral.

    5. Re:Where is the online auction competition in NA? by qualico · · Score: 1

      If they keep raising prices for sellers, no doubt eBay will make it worth my while.

      The biggest hurdle is getting enough participants.
      And to do that you need more than Genius now that eBay has captured most of the market.

      They know this and therefore will continue to slowly increase the thumb screws.

    6. Re:Where is the online auction competition in NA? by brufleth · · Score: 1

      Err...eBay owns part (25%) of craigslist.

      http://www.craigslist.org/about/press/ebay.stake.h tml

  14. The eBay longterm strategy for $$$ in China.... by jmcmunn · · Score: 1

    1. Give away the service
    2. ????
    3. Take over market share
    4. Raise prices again
    5. Profit!

    So they just need to figure out how to steal the market share and they are good to go.

    1. Re:The eBay longterm strategy for $$$ in China.... by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. Give away the service
      2. ????
      3. Take over market share
      4. Raise prices again
      5. Profit!

      So they just need to figure out how to steal the market share and they are good to go.


      Step 2 is "Wait while the market works."

      Indeed, at this point all they would have to do is outlast their competition. The market itself will likely lead to consumers going with the lowest-cost option. So there are no unknown steps in this plan.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:The eBay longterm strategy for $$$ in China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off Cyric.

    3. Re:The eBay longterm strategy for $$$ in China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fully agree. The top poster was trying to use that lame joke again.

  15. Re:All the time our customers ask us, How do we ma by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh excuse me miss "I'm so smart I wanna go to the island."

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  16. Fortunately for EBay by ztucker · · Score: 4, Funny

    In an unrelated move, the Ebay subsidiary PayPal tripled its "seller protection fees" for as yet undisclosed reasons

    1. Re:Fortunately for EBay by Heembo · · Score: 1

      he Ebay subsidiary PayPal tripled its "seller protection fees" for as yet undisclosed reasons

      The Mafia uses the same techniques, it's called "extortion" and you goto jail for a long time if you do this.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    2. Re:Fortunately for EBay by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      PayPal is not a banking service, credit card company, etc.

      You have no protection for your money beyond what PayPal offers you.

      Comparing PayPal to the mafia is stupid and ignorant.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Fortunately for EBay by Heembo · · Score: 1

      I was joking you twit! But still, the phrase "tripled its protection fees" is very mafia-esque.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  17. So Big a Market, Not so big a Market Base (yet) by silent_wumpus · · Score: 1

    1.x Billion Chinese = 1 Big (potential) Market But the bottom line is just how many can/will buy/sell using their system. Its like the last comment about how the seller doesnt get paid till the buyer is happy. Reminds me of NAFTA and Mexico. Vast potential market, but didnt quite work out that way. Dont get me wrong, theres alot more net centric user potential in China, but like India even with the massive amount of people, you still have to grow your client base and that may take more time then even a altered Ebay business plan change can get it on.

    1. Re:So Big a Market, Not so big a Market Base (yet) by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The Chinese "we have big big potential market, make you lots big bucks" line has been suckering American business in for some time now. It's only a big market if they'll let you into it, and even if you do manage to successfully "partner" with a Chinese firm, odds are that it will end up not being your business anymore. Japan has been remarkably successful at keeping foreign corporations out of their markets, and China is doing much the same thing (although in a different way.) Until U.S. corporations wake up and realize that China simply does not do business the same way we do they'll keep getting their fingers burnt. I'm not saying that we can't do business with China, but it had better be with a fuller understanding of their culture, motivations and ethics.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  18. ebay is too damned expensive by urine · · Score: 1, Interesting

    With all additional service fees they hit sellers with, it often adds up to 7% of the sale price. Because of this sellers can't make money or are forced to tack on outrageous shipping and handling fees. I haven't bought or sold an item through ebay in ages. Because it's just not worth it. And the reason for that is not lack of items to buy, but ebay itself pricing its sellers out of the market.

    --
    I like coffee
    I like tea
    I like it when the girls pee on me!
  19. Ebay's Failure by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My time in China showed me that Ebay is failing, not because of competetive pricing, or a poor cost model but because their major competetor is home grown and plays to the Chinese cultural prefrences. Ebay has been hesitant to branch their code base to make Ebay-China more Chinese friendly -- and therefore no cost cutting measure is going to save Ebay in China. Just look at how wonderful Ebay did in Japan. http://news.com.com/2100-1017-845099.html It's the cuture stupids , it's the culture!

    --
    - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
  20. Capitalism works well at first by YearOfTheDragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Capitalism works - for the Chinese.

    Capitalism must be cared for. You must care that there is enought competition. You must divide monopolies. Capitalism need a lot of work.

    It's a system that works, but as any other system, when some people gets too much power the system is corrupted and stops to work.

    In China capitalism is making the government to share its power, so it's working great. In U.S.A. the government is concentrating power in itself and in the big companyes, so capitalism works no more.

    It isn't only a matter of what system you chose, but of whom is using it and how.

    --
    -= If you fight Dragons long enough, you will become a Dragon =-
  21. Chinese Ebay scams... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sheer volume of China/Chinese Ebay scams are already giving Ebay a big, black eye. Personally, I'm afraid to deal with anyone at the first hint of a Chinese connection (even imperfect spelling or grammar is enough that I'll pass on a bid). This isn't racist or nationalistic ... just pragmatic. I think it is rather sad, since I'm sure the majority just want to buy and sell (like everyone else). Ebay should do a lot more to police the scamming, since some are pretty obvious to all but the most naive (that said, they usually seem to find a victim). Even a modest fee to create an account, and display of the IP addresses/regions logging into an account would make a *big* difference.

  22. On noes! by lopie · · Score: 1

    Oh no, the pricing model of the 1990's is back. eBay has forgotten it is a publicly traded company and shareholders want money. If Yahoo (or whoever) wants to do it for free, that's their problem.

  23. PayPal is NOT an escrow service by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    Just to set the record straight, and in case anyone was confused by this statement:

    ncluding PayPal and other escrow services

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  24. Just my 0.02c by squoozer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm pretty new to the whole eBay thing (about a month) but I have to say as a new comer I am stunned by the complexity and cost of it. The fees are nothing short of scandalous and the number of things that you have got to get your head round before being able to sell well.... The whole auction thing is dead in most markets as it is dominated by businesses setting start prices which are what they want for an item (erm, I'm guilty of that too but that's not the point). To top it all the site is slow and generally confusing. I'm surprised no one has taken the market away from eBay.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Just my 0.02c by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      The love of my life (domestic ebay guru) has started only to bid on "Buy It Now" items. Its too big and fast in some categories to bid effectivly. I have seen items go for little more (or less) than then manufacturer sells them for. Perhaps there is a good market for mini site holding mini auctions of targetted products.

    2. Re:Just my 0.02c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. From the standpoint of a (yeah, go ahead and laugh, get it out of your system) toy collector who was with eBay from practically the beginning, it's absolutely ridiculous. The whole nationwide yardsale aspect of the operation is gone, replaced with legions of scalper storefronts.

      What was absolutely the biggest draw to eBay was it's ability to bring together people selling more obscure items and those looking to buy them. Looking for a 45rpm record that's been out of print 25 years or a boxed "Pepsi" edition Optimus Prime? eBay was your savior.

      Now it's full of the asshats who buy up all the local stores' monthly shipments of Hot Wheels and think they deserve $20+ each (plus $15 "handling" fees of course). eBay keeps piling on the fees and all it does is increase the them:us ratio (I very rarely even browse the auctions anymore). What I wouldn't give for a real competitor right now...

  25. Culture, or Time To Market? by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even the article suggests that Ebay lost to Yahoo! because they were late getting to market in Japan. Metcalf's law really applies in ebay style auctioneering. In the absense of software interoperable with ALL auction sites, the largest site will have huge advantages over competitors identical in operations. If bidders have to use the website to find auctions and bid, then they'll gravitate to one or two sites, the ones with the largest selection. The primary function of this is the number of people visiting, so early gains over competitors aren't just important, they're vital. It would appear that marketplaces are one area that gravitate towards a natural monopoly.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  26. Slashdotters missing the point again!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has'nt anybody snapped to the point that Ebay is handing Chinese vendors competitive advantages not available to non Chinese. From now on, Chinese buyers/sellers will operate for free, and NON-Chinese sellers/buyers will have to pay commissions. That is gross unfairness to all non Chinese. If Ebay wants to be a Chinese First organization, then let it be honest and ssy so publically by registering as a Chinese company and not an American one.

    1. Re:Slashdotters missing the point again!! by thx1138_az · · Score: 0

      Missing the point? Ebay is an American company (read corporation hence evil) operating in China. It is breaking ground and essentially dumping into China gaining a vast market share. It has a lot at stake... one billion potential customers and it has to establish itself as the de facto website for auctions. As an American you get your bit by buying stock in Ebay... my recommendation is: "Buy it Now"

  27. Re:belong to China. "Today we conquer....." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Today we conquer.
    Though if some day we are defeated,
    well, war has its fortunes
    good and bad." Klingon Commander Kor
    TOS "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7

  28. Two things come to mind: by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "WTO" and "anti-dumping laws."

  29. You don't realize how fast China is growing. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    What you're not considering is the massive growth that China has experienced in even just the past year. That means that data that is a year or two old isn't very useful today.

    Again, look at the difference between the numbers the original poster gave. We're talking about 60 million or so people. While that's a fair chunk of the American population, it is less than 10% of the population of China.

    While Internet access has likely reached a plateau in the US (those who can afford or want access have such access), while the growth in China is just beginning! So while they may hold an absolute lead over the US a year or two ago, two or three years from now they will likely be a far larger market. As such, the age of the data is quite relevant. Two years can make a massive difference.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:You don't realize how fast China is growing. by c_forq · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying your point isn't valid, I was just criticizing your word choice. Several usually is used as greater then three (around three being "a few") and less then 12 (a dozen). In this case it was less then a few, it was most likely less then a couple.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    2. Re:You don't realize how fast China is growing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "First all, your data is several years old."

      I would like to note that it clearly states 2004, which at maximum 2 years old (and it would have to be from the first 22 days of the year to even be that old).

      Oh dear, CyricZ, having trouble admitting you were wrong, even after criticizing so many people for this?

      You're a troll and a hypocrite. If only your Christmas break had been longer and you'd just given up here...

  30. Bootleg Central by mrshowtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ebay has a serious, serious, problem with China and it's "goods" provided/exported. I love how they raise the rates for legitimate US sellers, but ignore the fact that now the Chinese Bootleggers list for FREE, totally screwing anyone selling dvds on ebay. Do a search for the Sopranos on ebay and you'll see what I mean. Ebay is bootleg city and has really done nothing to stem the tide of Chinese bootleggers on ebay. I have seen a LOT of Chinese bootleggers that sell only bootleg dvds that have THOUSANDS of positive feedbacks and are ebay Powersellers and are relatively untouchable. Hopefully ebay will start to take China more seriously and suspend the bootleggers, especially now that they are not making any money for ebay and are effectively tying up the ebay system. Of course, this won't happen, especially with ebay now asking sellers to waive any and all rights and protections if they want to sell on the new ebay express site coming soon.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:Bootleg Central by mochan_s · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? That's outrageous.

      On an unrelated note, I needed to purcahse a few DVDs. **click click** ebay.com

    2. Re:Bootleg Central by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate buying bootleg items, if you go to Shanghai, most *government* shops sell bootleg DVDs. Now this indicates that whether or not it is illegal it is accepted by the Government *and* the greater community over there. eBay is an international service, they should NOT dictate to one nation another nations values (whether positive or negative). You need to be more tollerant.

    3. Re:Bootleg Central by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's easy for you to say when you, or your government ain't paying for anything (the intellectual rights, the ebay fees, the residuals paid to those who worked on the movie/show or the cost to create the material in the first place.) We are not talking about competition, we are talking about unfair competition. Let's see how "tolerant" you would be if the roles were reversed.

      --
      "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    4. Re:Bootleg Central by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

      Um, I don't think I'd mind if roles were reversed (note: neither am I chinese or blood related). If Australia suddenly got into China's position of ignoring US Copyrights I'd be more than happy. But then perhaps US will send over their troops.

    5. Re:Bootleg Central by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1
      This is totally offtopic, but regarding your sig:

      "I didn't accept 'wasn't optomistic it could be done' for and answer"

      I read it several times, and still can't quite parse it. What do you mean?

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    6. Re:Bootleg Central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how they raise the rates for legitimate US sellers, but ignore the fact that now the Chinese Bootleggers list for FREE, totally screwing anyone selling dvds on ebay. Do a search for the Sopranos on ebay and you'll see what I mean.

      I think you're missing the point. They're not scrapping fees for Chinese selling on ebay.com - that would be stupid (I for one would just claim to be based in China). They're scrapping fees for ebay.com.cn, which apart from being owned by the same company is a completely unrelated service.

  31. In the interest of a global economy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when will they scrap the transaction fees in the US?

    I mean, fair is fair; they are moving programming jobs to the far east for cheaper wages, why can't competition to eliminate transaction fees move back to the US?

  32. You are basing this off of NO EBAY FEES? by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Indeed, countries like China and India will be where the 21st century will take place.

    You are basing this idea off of the fact that Ebay is not charing transaction fees? Come on man, you are a known troll but you have to try harder than that...

    I don't see China/India becoming a power in my lifetime. Or my childrens. Or their childrens. They have people. They don't have much more than that. PhD's per capita? No. Resources? Not really... middle east and Russia, and neither of them are getting anywhere quick. It takes more than people to make a country a success; and as another poster already mentioned as these countries become successful the lower and middle classes will demand the comforts that Americans and Europeans currently afford... their governments cannot provide these... without a careful balance they cannot succeed.

  33. The WTO May Hear of This... by lorelorn · · Score: 1
    Foreign company enters market, dumps product at below market cost to make sure that local competitors can't get a foothold.

    I know I've heard this one somewhere before...

  34. Let's all of U.S. get Addreses in China by mrs+clear+plastic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What would happen if someone in China opens up a private mailbox service (similar to Mail
    Boxes Etc or Postal Annex) and take advantage of the China Ebay and their policy of
    weived fees.

    If ebay sees that you hava a China address, would they give you the China rates?

    If you are a seller, you don't have to worry about having your China address in your
    transactions. It's only the buyer who has to have a good shipping address.

    Perhaps we here in the U.S. would need to have two ebay accounts. One that we use
    to sell (with a China address) and the other we use to buy (with a good U.S. shipping
    address.

    --
    Cleara
  35. Re:All the time our customers ask us, How do we ma by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    That was a quote from "The Island", you straight-up clod moderators. :)

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  36. JIM CROW LAWS by tacocat · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it a few years ago that Microsoft said it was ok to steal their software as long as you were Chinese?

    And now eBay says you don't have to pay fees if you are Chinese?

    American history used to have Jim Crow laws of segregation. Sonds like some kind of new segregation is forming on the internet.

    If someone can afford to give away their product for free, then those of use who are forced to pay the subsidy should really consider boycotting the companies until their price models are brought into a balanced structure.

    1. Re:JIM CROW LAWS by YellowRaft · · Score: 1

      The reason eBay China scraps the listing and final evaluation fee is because eBay China is at the loser end of the scale. There are other bigger online auction sites in China that attracting much higher traffic, have bigger user communities, better service and best of all FREE. Like the native 'taobao dot com' (means treasury hunting), a subsidiary of Alibaba - Yahoo's Chinese partner. Which I think it is very unfair to other eBay user in the world. I am guessing the only non technical issue to stop a Chinese eBayer to sell outside China is the online payment + Chinese government restrictions on Chinese currency exchange.