Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Spending $120M To Look Smaller

Ant writes "Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that Microsoft Corp. will spend $120 million a year on an advertising campaign to fight its image as "a huge American company." That sound you heard while reading the article is my head exploding.

158 comments

  1. Microsoft - small? by SimonInOz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously it's time for the obligatory Belinda joke ...

    Wedding night ....

    "Oh, so that's why they call it Microsoft".

    Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
    1. Re:Microsoft - small? by ncurtain · · Score: 0

      With such a small codicil I wonder if there is a relationship with the penis extension spam. No, that's even beneath my threshold in bad taste.

      Good luck to them I say. All they have to do is open up their code. They have mre than enough to live on.

    2. Re:Microsoft - small? by makeyourself · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Melinda , as in Melinda Gates?

    3. Re:Microsoft - small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill, Melinda. Like TomKat :)

    4. Re:Microsoft - small? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Is Belinda the woman who came before Melinda, or is Belinda your wife's name?

      As an aside, I like the "occupation: relative" part in her bio. :)

    5. Re:Microsoft - small? by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      My wife's name is Jenny.
      I've never had sex with anyone called Belinda.

      At least I don't think so .... some of those years in the 70's are a bit fuzzy.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
  2. Small? by chris_mahan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I can go to my IT manager and say: We can't rely on Microsoft being here long-term, they're such a small company...

    Oh wait, it's just for OUTSIDE the US.

    What do they think? That the foreigners are easy to fool?

    In any case, anything Microsoft does to burn its cash uselessly has got to be good, somehow.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

    1. Re:Small? by inter+alias · · Score: 0

      It's not just foreigners that are easy to fool, people are easy to fool (foreigners are people too).

      Marketing works. Sure, they may not convince everybody, but enough people will believe their hype that it will have a positive effect for them.

    2. Re:Small? by rbarreira · · Score: 0

      They didn't even say that they'll try to look small. If only people knew how to read!

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:Small? by ScriptedReplay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh wait, it's just for OUTSIDE the US.

      What do they think? That the foreigners are easy to fool?


      Judging from TFA, the title was misleading. They want to change the "huge American company" image, but with a "huge global company" - hence those whose perception has to be ... umm ... improved are outside the US. It's hard to see how showing off international programs would peg MS as a smaller company.

    4. Re:Small? by rjshields · · Score: 1
      Oh wait, it's just for OUTSIDE the US.
      Did you RTFA?
      The ads have started to air in some U.S. regions and will appear in all target markets in coming weeks
      Do Americans not like their own huge corporations or what?
      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    5. Re:Small? by CDPatten · · Score: 1

      "In any case, anything Microsoft does to burn its cash uselessly has got to be good, somehow."

      It is still $150mill in advertising. I think you are a fool to say that advertising is just uselessly burning cash. You might not like the theme of the commercials, but it does make sense. The US isn't popular in many places in the World, and right now MS is seen as a big US company. Helping them helps the US.

      "What do they think? That the foreigners are easy to fool?"

      Anyone in the advertising industry knows how easily people's impressions are changed by ad campaigns. Hell, any critical thinker understands that. So either you are the fool or just trying to create a point when you have none.

      So they advertise Windows in a way that makes the company look smaller.... they are still advertising Windows. A big company develops a (savvy) marketing strategy for their target audience, that's news?

      If people like you ever stopped for just one minute to try and understand why MS does some of the things they do you might see why they aren't as moronic as you pretend and why they have the most successfully software company in the history of world (unlike yourself).

      It's pretty easy to criticize someone's success, but it's much harder to actually achieve it. I'd say your sales and marketing guys are fairly competent when you have upwards of 90% of a market share, wouldn't you? If they analyze a situation and make a recommendation I would probably listen, you wouldn't? Certainly I wouldn't be implying they don't know what they are doing or saying they are just wasting money, but hey, I'm not some zealot bashing MS every chance I get.... so whatever.

      All hail Matt Szulik!

      Oh incase you didn't know that is Redhat's CEO, what's their market share again?

  3. Oh brother by PagosaSam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't they just spend $48 Billion and make it true!

    --
    :q! Oh crap, not again...
    1. Re:Oh brother by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only they had let the DOJ break them up they wouldn't have his problem.....

  4. Been there, done that by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't sound much different from what Wal-Mart has been trying to do in recent years. And Microsoft actually looks small compared to them.

  5. In other news, by jb.hl.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    US announces to world that it wishes to be seen a small Eastern Bloc country from now on, and will so give the impression of financial hardship and military weakness from now on.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:In other news, by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      In Soviet United States, small makes... Oh, I'm just all too confused now.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    2. Re:In other news, by powerspike · · Score: 1

      that's inbetween invasions right ?

    3. Re:In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appearance of financial hardship and military weakness... That's it! I *knew* the Iraq war had a purpose!

    4. Re:In other news, by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not? We're already approaching the civil rights record of Eastern Bloc countries.

    5. Re:In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please, just because terrorists have no rights here doesnt mean the rest of us are losing them.

    6. Re:In other news, by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The phrase "except terrorists" appears nowhere in the United States Constitution.

    7. Re:In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it does, but it's scribbled over it in crayon and in the bottom corner it says "by George, age 59"

    8. Re:In other news, by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      please, just because terrorists have no rights here doesnt mean the rest of us are losing them.

      Alleged terrorists. I don't think any of the people in that gulag in Cuba have been so much as charged with an offence, let alone gone before a trial with judge and jury and public presentation of evidence.

      So: to lose all your rights, all it takes is for you to be accused of terrorism. Some of us think that a country where accusation is considered equivalent to proof is, well... a tyranny. YMMV.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    9. Re:In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try being black or below the poverty line like so many people are in your ass-backward country and see what rights you have then. Oh, and is being brainwashed by corporate media BS conducive with freedom?

    10. Re:In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was funny... I don't care who you are.

  6. Slashdot 2007 by glamslam · · Score: 4, Funny

    damn slashdot... What is "Microsoft"... Please provide some background in the article summary!

    1. Re:Slashdot 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that. Best laugh I've had all day.

  7. This is only possible in the US. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only an American company would spend this much to not look American.

    1. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uuhhhmm...that's because non-American companies don't need to spend anything to look non-American..... :)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Only an American company would spend this much to not look American.

      DUH! If it were a British company, they wouldn't need to spend money to not look American.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by rjshields · · Score: 1

      Uhhh - he meant that only an American company would spend this much to not look like they're from the country they are from.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    4. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an American would miss that ;)

    5. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, moron, the humor escaped you.

    6. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      And even with the :) at the end. I figured that would make it obvious, but I guess not.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    7. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss it, I'm not an American, and it was supposed to be a joke.
      (Canadian, and I figure from your ;) that you knew the joke part.)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    8. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by ILKO_deresolution · · Score: 0

      I know some canadians, here in the US (minneapolis)
      And I played hockey with some. They're mommy's boys!
      They wouldn't know how to take care of themselfs if
      they had to! Can't wait until the shit goes down then we
        see who comes running for help!

      --
      I tip toe like rats on vouge runnways.
    9. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by ILKO_deresolution · · Score: 0

      You prolly giggle like the other...as we call them " gay canadians " don't you.

      --
      I tip toe like rats on vouge runnways.
    10. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look, up in the sky!
      it's a bird!
      it's a plane!
      it's the joke flying over your head!

    11. Re:This is only possible in the US. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and what a fucking *hilarious* joke it was ;) It's so unfunny I thought no-one could ever find it funny, but oh, this is *American* "humor" :-/

  8. Incredible by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a company with more employees than most cities have citizens, and they're trying to make people believe they're small. I wonder whose brilliant idea that was, and how long they'll remain employed at their current post...

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:Incredible by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a company with more employees than most cities have citizens,

      Ummm... no. Microsoft has something like 50,000 employees. That won't even fill many major sports arenas and concert venues. Unless you live in Wyoming, it really doesn't compare to the population of a "real" city.

    2. Re:Incredible by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Yes, 50,000 'employees'.... emphasis on 'employees'. This does NOT take into consideration the vast army of temps that they keep employed on rotating 6 month contracts so they don't have to bring them on full time (which easily doubles the number of ACTUAL employees), the overseas contractors and agencies that they outsource work to such as customer service, nor the multitude of 'leech companies' that suckle at their dark mothers teet.

      Up here in the greater Seattle area, several cities have gone from being podunk little two-horse towns to yuppieville, USA overnight. Tyhe population explosion in Seattle since the 90's has not stopped and while housing prices across the US are now dropping. Ours are still skyrocketing out of control.

      So, to corrrect the original poster, it's actually the population of SEVERAL small cities!

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Incredible by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has something like 50,000 employees. That won't even fill many major sports arenas and concert venues. Unless you live in Wyoming, it really doesn't compare to the population of a "real" city.

      50,000 people would actually fill several large concert venues. They tend to seat 10 - 20 thousand.

    4. Re:Incredible by Elminst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the US Census list of the top 100 largest cities; #100 is Arlington CDP, VA, with a population of 170,936. http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation /twps0027.html

      According to a September BusinessWeek Article, MS has ~60000 employees.
      This company is 1/3 the size of the 100th largest city in the country.
      Microsoft also has more people than 70% of the counties in the US. The average county population is ~90000, microsoft is 2/3 of that.

      According to Forbes, MS is the 47th largest company in the WORLD.

      They're frickin BIG. No amount of money they spend is going to change that. In fact, the more they spend, the more it PROVES how big they are.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    5. Re:Incredible by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      "They're frickin BIG. No amount of money they spend is going to change that."

      Nope, as pointed by some poster above, mere $46bln can change that easily ;)

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    6. Re:Incredible by Hosiah · · Score: 1

      Nice try.

    7. Re:Incredible by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft has something like 50,000 employees. That won't even fill many major sports arenas and concert venues.

      However, probably for the sake of convenience, Microsoft does hold company meetings in major sports arenas from time to time.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    8. Re:Incredible by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 1

      I live in a city with slightly less then 30k people in it, and I'm in Washington state. Yes kids, this is the same home state of MS. The population is about 29,686 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walla_Walla%2C_Washin gton )

      As Einstein once said, Reality is Relative. As another great writer once said, We are all the third person.

      --
      - d
    9. Re:Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been to Norway, have you.

    10. Re:Incredible by Elminst · · Score: 1

      Except that MS brings in roughly 1 billion dollars in revenue every quarter... according to this Inquirer article a couple years ago; http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13350

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    11. Re:Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot.

      > Ummm... no. Microsoft has something like 50,000 employees. That won't even fill many major sports arenas and concert venues. Unless you live in Wyoming, it really doesn't compare to the population of a "real" city.

      Real city, eh? Ok, I've lived in several states in my life (none of them Wyoming), and not a single one has had more than 3 cities with a population over 50k (your arbitrary number). Now, we can split hairs here, but I live in a 'town' which has 'city' in its name, and the population is somewhere around 18k. To be fair, during a typical 'work-day' it approaches somewhere around 30-40k). However, this hardly dismisses the OP:

      >> This is a company with more employees than most cities have citizens,

      Again, I say, Idiot.

    12. Re:Incredible by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Real city, eh? Ok, I've lived in several states in my life (none of them Wyoming), and not a single one has had more than 3 cities with a population over 50k (your arbitrary number).

      One in three Americans live in one of the 600 cities of more than 50,000 people.

      Three in four Americans live in a metropolitan area of more than 50,000 people.

      I'll grant there are broad empty spaces in America where no-one lives. There are counties in Wyoming with fewer people than the capacity crowd at your neighborhood McDonalds. That doesn't mean every McDonalds has more people than a county.

  9. That much? by abscissa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pardon me, but anyone or anything who spends $120-million a year on something does not come accross as a "mom and pop" operation.

    1. Re:That much? by sdnoob · · Score: 2, Funny

      they should use some small-town hick television station or ad agency instead of some slick big city operation... no better way to "look" like a mom-and-pop joint than to have their ads look like one did the ad.

      if you've never watched small-town television you won't know what i mean.. but small town commercials on tv are just awful. a six-year-old with a handicam can run circles around some of those schmucks.

      maybe they should change their name to "unca' bill's software shack"

  10. So... by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was that really loud splashing sound made by all of America's PR firms wetting themselves at once?

  11. It is small(ish) by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is smaller than Dell, about half the size of HP or IBM, and about a tenth of the size of WalMart.

    Steve Jobs only purpose on earth is to draw attention from Bill Gate's own stupendous reality distortion field.

    1. Re:It is small(ish) by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Wait... Wait a minute...

      You say that Microsoft is smaller than Dell...

      But in the news recently it came out that Apple is bigger than Dell...

      So then that makes Apple bigger than Microsoft.

      STOP THE PRESSES!!! We've got a live one!!!

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:It is small(ish) by DeveloperGuy2000 · · Score: 1

      Ummmmmm, actually, ever company listed is a lot smaller than wal-mart in terms of market cap.

    3. Re:It is small(ish) by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure what data you are referring to, but Microsoft's market cap is significantly larger than Wal-Mart's.

      The market cap (taken from http://finance.yahoo.com/ of listed companies as of January 23, 2005:
          Microsoft: 280.49B
          Wal-Mart: 188.40B
          Apple: 65.46B
          Dell: 71.12B

    4. Re:It is small(ish) by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 1

      Oops, that should be 2006... not 2005.

    5. Re:It is small(ish) by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      s/market cap/revenue

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  12. After Vista by Dynotrick · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hopfully they will live up to their ads

  13. No! Don't you see? by Bazzalisk · · Score: 4, Funny
    They aren't trying to appear small, they're just trying not to appear American.

    Microsoft, that large Canadian company :)

    --
    James P. Barrett
    1. Re:No! Don't you see? by neillewis · · Score: 1

      Microsoft
      'I'm lovin' it'

    2. Re:No! Don't you see? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, we don't want them.

    3. Re:No! Don't you see? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Hey - if history had turned out slightly different, then Seattle would have been in Canada, back around 1842 or so.

    4. Re:No! Don't you see? by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

      I thought we were over that 'Blame Canada' stuff since the South Park movie left theatres.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    5. Re:No! Don't you see? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      That's an euphemism? As opposed to "I love it" - the present perfect form implies an activity in progress, "I'm making love to Microsoft".
      Or simply:
      I fuck it.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    6. Re:No! Don't you see? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      The UK didn't have the land forces in BNA at the time, IIRC. The US would have been hurting on the oceans against the Royal Navy, but it would probably have ended up the other way around, with BC as part of the US and being able to drive to Alaska without leaving the country.

    7. Re:No! Don't you see? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently you haven't seen any of McDonald's hip-hop related commercials.

    8. Re:No! Don't you see? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      I meant if we had caved on negoiations.

    9. Re:No! Don't you see? by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      Or, as is often heard in IT departments worldwide:

      Fucking Microsoft!

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    10. Re:No! Don't you see? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      But I did. I fuck McDonald's all the way!

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    11. Re:No! Don't you see? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon my ignorance, but where is this Canada that is not in America?

    12. Re:No! Don't you see? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's why they bought mike row soft (iirc .ca)

    13. Re:No! Don't you see? by armb · · Score: 1

      Reading the article, that's actually exactly it, but "global, including local to you", not "Canadian". Reading the article's headline and comparing it with the article, you have to admire the high standards of journalism on Slashdot in comparison....

      --
      rant
    14. Re:No! Don't you see? by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Canada? Which State is that then, and where is it in the US?

  14. Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by syukton · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's not like they've got 110,000 employees or anything...

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by un.sined · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, if you include all of their contract employees (yes, the permatemps that they don't have anymore) they've got more like 90,000 employees.

      Not that I've ever worked there or anything...

    2. Re:Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by syukton · · Score: 1

      I permatemp for MS and I checked the headcount before posting. The number is accurate.

      They also have 10,000 open positions (fulltime, contract & intern)

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    3. Re:Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I call BS

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    4. Re:Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by syukton · · Score: 1

      lol, why? Why would I have any reason to lie? There's an internal utility used to track headcount and build organization charts, the number is available to anyone in the company, whether intern, contractor, or full-time employee.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    5. Re:Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by Skreems · · Score: 1

      because 1) you haven't named that utility correctly yet, and 2) the last time I looked I swear the count was right around 65k. I have no idea why you would make it up, and I may just be misremembering the count I saw... but hey, this is slashdot -- so I just threw it out there :-)

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    6. Re:Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by syukton · · Score: 1

      1) you haven't named that utility correctly yet

      I haven't named it at all, actually. It's called Headtrax.

      2) the last time I looked I swear the count was right around 65k

      The count for employees only is 66,647. The count for Vendors is 37,475. The count for "other" (temps, interns, etc) is 7,556. This brings the total to more than 110,000. (actually, more than 111,000)

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    7. Re:Microsoft? A huge company?! whadda ya mean?! by Skreems · · Score: 1

      ah, touche. I didn't realize the vendors were so many, and not counted in the FTE list. Still not the 1:1 FTE:Vendor ratio other people in this thread are claiming, but closer...

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
  15. MSN by immorak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft is always at the end of every computer joke or bad comment. They need to do something.

    1. Re:MSN by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      all they need to seem smaller is start pretending they are a very large school of herring then the penguins will come ...

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:MSN by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      True. However, flaunting their stupendous cash reserves by spending $120 million a year in a vain attempt to "look smaller" isn't going to do anything but give people ammunition.

      Aside from Wal-Mart, the MPAA/RIAA (and IBM, but only really to techies), Microsoft is practically synonymous with big business. News stories about them spending huge multiples of what the average person earns in a lifetime, every year, to try to give the opposite impression... well, it isn't really going to work...

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    3. Re:MSN by DuctTape · · Score: 1
      They need to do something.

      Yeah, like change.

      DT

      --
      Is this thing on? Hello?
    4. Re:MSN by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is always at the end of every computer joke

      Please note that the M of MSN is at the beginning. This shows that sometimes Microsoft is at the beginning of a joke.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  16. Who's idea was this? by BertieBaggio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So MS got the Temp to dream up another PR campaign to burn up some money for them? I mean, I don't see who they are going to convince with this, nor what they have to gain by doing it. Personally I either want my computing needs served either by guys like me doing it for the sheer fun and love of it, or by some large corp that needs customers (y'know, for profits...). And even at that, I'd take the like-minded community any day.

    Still, I guess a little disinformation^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H marketing never hurt anyone. Oh, 'cept those guys that tattooed company logos on their foreheads...

    --
    If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
  17. They'll succeed... by kponto · · Score: 1

    ...and end up looking about $120 million smaller.

    --
    This too, will end.
  18. Let me get this right. . . by Geneus · · Score: 1

    They are spending over a $100 million to make themselves look smaller. Would that be like putting a tent over an elephant to make it look smaller? I mean really using a large amount of money to appear to be smaller. . .

    1. Re:Let me get this right. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's marketing logic, don't try to understand how they do it, they just do. Just open your eyes, this kind of misinformation is everywhere.

  19. Article Text by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny
    REDMOND, WA (Hydraulic Press) - Steve Ballmer, who possess the world's largest ego, will spend $120 million a year on an ad campaign to fight his image as "a huge blowhard".

    The campaign, using subway posters, blogs, and airplane banners, will portray Ballmer engaging in everday, blue collar activities like drinking with his buddies, bowling, playing softball, and doing the laundry. Pleasantville actor William H. Macy has been hired to portray Steve Ballmer's best friend.

    "A lot of people see me as some kind of rage-filled bully. And I'm not like that," Ballmer said while emphatically pounding his desk.

    "I took the job because Steve said he would 'fucking kill' me if I didn't. I knew he meant business when he threw a chair at me," said Macy in an interview.

    In one ad, Ballmer bowls a strike, then turns around and high-fives Macy. He then proceeds to scream and and dance himself into a sweaty frenzy with blood vessels popping out of his reddened forehead, finally calming down enough to hoarsely shout, "I love bowling! Yeah!"

    Reactions to the ads have been mixed. Many have commented that Macy seems in danger of being crushed by Ballmer, and that Ballmer's jokes come off as threatening and unfunny. The ads have been showing in select US markets, and are expected to go national in time for Windows Vista, the next version of Microsoft Windows, to ship.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure genius.

    2. Re:Article Text by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1

      REDMOND, WA (Hydraulic Press) - Steve Ballmer, who possess the world's largest ego CUPERTINO, CA - Steve Jobs, who challenges that assertion, ...

      --
      James P. Barrett
    3. Re:Article Text by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      REDMOND, WA (Hydraulic Press) - Steve Ballmer, who possess the world's largest ego

      CUPERTINO, CA - Steve Jobs, who challenges that assertion, ...

      NEW YORK - Today Lorne Micheals issued a press release ...

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  20. Well, you know ... by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if you have "educational and development projects in 32 countries", doesn't that pretty much prove you're big?

    D

  21. Microsoft Spending $120M To Look Less American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The article title is misleading in focusing on the word "huge" instead of "American."

    From the original news story:


      The campaign, using television, print and the Internet, highlights Microsoft's education and economic development projects in 32 countries, including France and Taiwan, according to group advertising manager Mike Lucero.

      "We are often perceived as a huge American company," Lucero said Friday in an interview.

      "We wanted to be very specific about what we are doing in each country in education, innovation, economic opportunity and security," he said.

  22. Non Sequitur by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1, Redundant
    From The Fine Article:
    "That was a global campaign in the traditional sense, with half a dozen ads pretty much the same in different countries," Lucero said. "We had to get very local."


    Showing the same thing in different countries is "getting local"? Eh?

    *head explodes*
    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    1. Re:Non Sequitur by fleaboy · · Score: 1

      Getting very local really means....buying the appropriate local officials to help block competition.

      --
      Life is a gift. And my Karma couldn't possibly be 'Positive'
  23. what a rip off by rizawbone · · Score: 1
    i just bought some pills to make me appear 'massive and girthy' for only 129.95

    suckers

  24. Kirstie Alley by No2Gates · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't that what Kirstie Alley is spending to look smaller too???

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  25. Suddenly by Elixon · · Score: 1

    Probably they hired a good PR experts that find out (after spending few hundrets K bugs) that people tend te be scared by extra large companies.

    Who wants to buy a candy from Beelzebub?

    --
    Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
  26. I just don't undersand the issue by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Corp. will spend $120 million a year on an advertising campaign to fight its image as "a huge American company."

    Because they aren't just an American company. They are a huge company in every country they are in. :)

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
  27. Oblig. Dilbert Reference by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Bad News: There's no way we can compete with smaller and nimbler companies.
    The Good News: At the rate we're going, we're going to smaller than any of them!

  28. Google will help them by Elixon · · Score: 1

    They try to look as extra large and stable company for investors - huge investment harbour that cannot be shaked...

    On the other hand they want to looks like a symphatic small, flexible and progressive company that has an unlimited possibilities for growth... :-) Sweet friend's garage company from my neighborhood...

    I hope they spent their millions on the AdSense advertisement... I think that Google is able to serve "We Are Big" ads to investors and "We Are Small and Sweet" to potential Windows users... :-)

    --
    Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
  29. Either that or you guys can't read... by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that Microsoft Corp. will spend $120 million a year on an advertising campaign to fight its image as "a huge American company." That sound you heard while reading the article is my head exploding.

    Either that or you guys just can't read. Clearly what the article says is just that Microsoft will advertise in other countries with the objective of seeming more like an international company...
    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Either that or you guys can't read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100% with this one.... they dont want ot be an 'American' company... tbh alot of cunt-ries hate americans to begin with for their own reasons... so to try to become a bit more versitle as in ethnicity and culture they need to evolve away from the 'american ' way of thinking and broaden their horizons to suit more 'other' ethnicities and cultures which will only help their 'selling targets'... if you owned a business...wouldnt it be about money? if not then y not work for joe...rather then open ur own. i despise alot of microsofts practices... but in the biz world... they have done everything they can to uphold thier status and keep target. Use linux... but ill bet 90% of the replies on this site are windows users... go figure. PROPS to Microsoft... tho i still wont buy a fuckn thing off em...pmfsl

  30. Incorrect Title, RTFA please by Sean0michael · · Score: 5, Informative
    The article isn't about Microsoft trying to look smaller. It is about microsoft looking less American-centered. Since 1/3 of its business comes from outside the US, it only makes sense to start looking like Microsoft cares about each country that it sells in. It wants people to believe it cares about issues facing each country and region, not just American consumers far far away.

    Kudos to those who have posted similar replies. Hopefully people will read these enough to get the message. Or perhaps this just proves that most of the /. community would rather read what they want than what is on the page.

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
    1. Re:Incorrect Title, RTFA please by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      To be fair, TFA only says what the summary says - that they're going to fight their image as a huge american company.

      I mean the ads are are airing in the US right now. Are MS really going to try and appear less american to a US audience? Makss about as much sense as trying to portray themselves as smaller, I suppose...

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    2. Re:Incorrect Title, RTFA please by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1/3 of its business comes from outside the US

      Just one third? That's the EU, Japan, Canada... What's going on? Do American businesses upgrade more frequently? Do European servers all run that commie OS from Finland?

      If the Rest of the World only adds up to half of what Microsoft makes from Americans, then surely their monopoly in most places isn't worth a hill of beans. That's not what I'm seeing.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Incorrect Title, RTFA please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... that Bush/DOJ let-off so as not to punish a successful U.S. company really looks good now, doesn't it?

    4. Re:Incorrect Title, RTFA please by syukton · · Score: 1

      As somebody who works for Microsoft (permatemp), I can say that it is NOT American-centered, at least in terms of their workforce. I work at the main campus in Redmond, and I would say that 30% of the workforce here is imported from somewhere, with most coming from Russia or India, but still a fair number from Pakistan, Turkey, China and Korea.

      All they'd have to do to appear less American-centered is take a camera and walk down a hallway showing the names on peoples' office doors. Of course, a few commercials showing their products in different languages couldn't hurt--or better yet, a commercial showing somebody sitting at their desk at Microsoft running Arabic/Chinese/Korean/etc Windows and Arabic/Chinese/Korean/etc MS Office.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    5. Re:Incorrect Title, RTFA please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't the blue screen in the same language regardless?

  31. First change... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The first thing they could change would be to offer free tech support to their customers. They could 'act' like a small company. Of course the article said 'look' like a small company, not act, so never mind.

  32. Another thing by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now Steve Ballmer just needs to get his temper under control

    --
    Register the editry.
    1. Re:Another thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now Steve Ballmer just needs to get his temper under control

      or use smaller, not US-made chairs. Ikea should work.

  33. Re:STFU for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Per employee, they churn out quite a bit - the teams for each product are really small (often orders of magnitude smaller than corresponding teams or companies elsewhere).

    That's not hard to achieve when you buy or copy most of your basic technology from outside sources, then omit staffing for adequate QA and security reviews in product development, then leverage your familiar dominant cash cows to force success new markets with mediocre products.

  34. Suuuuuuuure. by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    Suuuuuuuure. For all I know, YOU are one of the new "small microsoft" agents-for-hire.

    =D

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  35. It's a replacement campaign by NorbrookC · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess everyone missed the news a month ago:

    Redmond WA (AP) Microsoft announced that it would drop its current overseas advertising slogan "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated." after a successful trademark infringement suit filed by The Borg, who claimed that Microsoft's use of their trademarked phrase was ruining their brand, and subjecting them to ridicule by interstellar civilizations.

    1. Re:It's a replacement campaign by rts008 · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right!

      The Borg are smart enough to avoid assimilating M$, they don't want the Collective to crash and end up as salvage for Ferengi profits.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  36. hypocrisy by semiotec · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What a load of horse manure. How can they not be seen as the huge American company when they do things like asking US Government and DoJ to intervene on their behalf in EU investigations? http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1887714,00.as p

  37. Honey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...does this operating system make my ass look big?

  38. I will save MS a lot of money by balloot · · Score: 1

    MS can look like a small American company FOR FREE. Just cut 50,000 jobs. I just saved them hundreds of millions with this advice! /to what address do I send my bill?

  39. yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And mostly no in any practical sense. MS as a company who hands a direct paycheck to someone, yep, your figures are correct. MS as a company who have co opted any number of governmental agencies and private business to use their crapware and MS certified bugware technicians is a much larger number, which is much closer to being a practical figure when you look at the macro-economic aspects of it.. They keep MS going, they are the ones "recommending" this perpetual cash cow beta busywork stuff, and they get a check. There's very little money in stuff that works, but there's a HELLA LOT of money in keeping perpetual betaware out there that needs constant "fixing" and expensive "upgrades" and that keeps people only using MS inc stuff.

        Technically, you are correct in the raw numbers,but for most practical purposes all those others should also be counted as MS employees, because it is money out of someones pocket, out of the economy, that goes to keep MS in power and dominant, that keeps their stock prices up, either one step or at most two steps away. As far as I am concerned, anyone who paid for their cert and operates under it is an employee if they charge money for that work. Not in todays legal sense but they sure should be considered that if the laws reflected reality better. They are a sort of stealth mercenary force. Now add in such vendors as Dell who also contribute to keeping MS in the cash. They aren't "just some customer", all they offer for desktops is MS stuff, as such, and the DOJ should deal with this, they are operating as a defacto division of MS inc. They are collaborators in maintaining a status quo of a monopoly operating system. Microsoft isn't "just" a software company now, it's a racket, a computing cartel, made up of numerous other companies and individuals all collaborating to stifle competition on a global scale. The bad news is, they appear to have won their status quo existence inside the US, despite all the evidence of serious wrong doing. The good news is, overseas many nations are now fed up with this situation, because it's beyond obvious, and realise the only way out is to just show them the door. It is both an economic and national security issue for those people.

  40. I can see the commercials now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    [Pastoral-sounding music fades up in the background, as the picture opens on a small farm tractor plowing a field]

    Welcome to our little world. Translucent window borders. Virtual desktops. Sophisticated security settings. All created by hand. By people, for people.

    Windows Vista. Made by folksy folks.

  41. Give Me The $120 Million by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    And I'll make it a true statement that Microsoft is no longer a "huge" American company.

    They'll be a LOT smaller when I get through with them.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:Give Me The $120 Million by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Sadly, $120mill isn't a lot against a company like MS. The most efficient thing you could do with it would be to take out contracts on various execs, and I'm not sure that you should lower yourself to that level. Yet.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Give Me The $120 Million by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Actually I was "lowered" to that level years ago - using the $120 million for legit things would be a atep up for me.

      And I could do a lot with $120 million - that's just the seed capital for some R&D. Once I had the products I wanted, it would be easy to find investors to put up enough to bury Microsoft - especially since I'd use software patents to make sure Microsoft couldn't reverse engineer the product - "hoist them with their own petard", as it were. After MS (and a couple other outfits like Oracle) dropped, I'd open source the whole thing.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    3. Re:Give Me The $120 Million by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      "Actually I was "lowered" to that level years ago"

      So you're an admitted murderer? Interesting.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    4. Re:Give Me The $120 Million by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Haven't killed anybody - yet...

      Not for lack of wanting to, though.

      I got better things to do.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  42. Next ad campaign: Hardship for Bill Gates. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Funny

    The next ad campaign will try to get you to believe that Bill Gates is poor. There will be an address to which you can send donations. I, for one, will not be donating, however.

    1. Re:Next ad campaign: Hardship for Bill Gates. by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I, for one, will not be donating, however

      Why not? The poor lad could use new glasses or a new haircut for sure.

      --
      Krazy Kat

    2. Re:Next ad campaign: Hardship for Bill Gates. by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      He could also make use of a healthy infusion of honesty and integrity and a liberal application of leeches to bleed off some of that greed and ego. To me it makes more sense if you substitute ugly for huge but perhaps they already have done that ;-).

      OH well back to reality, yet another campaign to tell the world how good and fair and honest and trustworthy the executives at microsoft are (well at least the major shareholding executives).

      Microsoft could likely save a huge amount of money by sending those executives off to a hypnotherapist and just convince them that everybody likes them and that they are well respected and trusted individuals because it is pretty sadly obvious that the poor buggers don't believe their own advertising any more ;-(.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  43. Overheard in Redmond... by the+darn · · Score: 1

    "Honey, does this monopoly make me look fat?"

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.
  44. Smoke and noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    More smoke and noise to hide yet another patent infringement case against MS. MS is alleged to have infringed on Softvault's DRM patents for security components to enable or disable systems using a remote server. Included in this infringement Windows Server 2003, Windows XP, Microsoft Office XP, Access 2002, Excel 2002, Vision 2002, Visual Studio Net, Office 2000 SR-1, Project 2000 SR-1, Powerpoint, and many other products including Word.

    Not that MS is going to give a shit about Softvault, except to stomp them. But the bad press from the suit is something it appears to want to avoid.

    Face it. MS is a movement, not a technology company.

    1. Re:Smoke and noise by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > MS is a movement, not a technology company.

      What, a bowel movement? No, they aren't a technology company, they are just a software company. A "movement," to me, implies some kind of grass-roots organization, which is plainly not true WRT MS. So I'm not sure what you are trying to say.

  45. tactics.. by ekran · · Score: 1

    I think there are several ways this can be achived by microsoft really, without spending all that money on commercials that everyone loathes anyway. I think that what I would do if I were in change would be to buy up a tiny company, give them the windows source code, then have the tiny company release a windows compatible OS, that way everyone who loathes microsoft would buy their OS from that company. And since it's a tiny company, they wouldn't have to worry that much about doing everythings right, just like microsoft. The tiny man who loathes microsoft would be satisfied and companies would still be able to pump money into the huge corporation, microsoft.

    Another way would be just to change the name to nanosoft, since nano is smaller than micro.

    Yet another way is just to change the name to something completely different. Then wait 2 weeks for the general public to forget about it all. And then continue releasing bad software.

  46. Actions speak louder than words: here's a start by sane? · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Stop assuming that the default is US English(sic) and USA for every damn thing. Its not "International English" its "English", and it should come before any regional dialect.

    Just try being a bit smarter and make sure you only ever ask once what country people are in - and take note from there. In short, start assuming the US is just one other country, and there is certainly nothing special about it. Save yourself the marketing budget for something useful.

  47. Doing the right thing by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    Microsoft can see that Google's image of a "goo" company helps it put out features and products that, if came out of Microsoft would be instantly cried against and banned.

    If you've ever been in Microsoft's HQ you'll see it's a company like any else, with one exception: people really believe that their work will change the world, for the better or worse.

    This inspires, but it's also a lot of stress. Some support from the "public" is never a bad thing, neither for the employees or the business, so this initiative is all for the better.

    1. Re:Doing the right thing by gselfridge · · Score: 1

      The monopolist and the monopolistic damage has been done. Take an exotic vehicle, fast and sexy and tone its reputation down as so not to attract attention to itself...It is too late. Another point that crosses my mind is, why pay to look smaller? Why pay all this money to make a monopolistic entity look like it is not monopolistic in any one way and at the same time paying money to make it look like that they have not accumulated money...What about the lawsuits and embarassments that were endured in the past? Does not that aid in what they have become? If it looks like an ant and walks like an ant, it is an ant because it is too late to be something else it most certainly is not.

    2. Re:Doing the right thing by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      If you've ever been in Microsoft's HQ you'll see it's a company like any else, with one exception: people really believe that their work will change the world, for the better or worse.

      To paraphrase H.L. Mencken, the New Deal, like the Salvation Army, set off to save mankind from it's inherent, incurable swinishness. Like the Salvation Army, it wound up running flophouses.

      Drawing the parallel is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  48. Not huge, but American by Geeselegs · · Score: 1

    I feel that the title of this article is misleading, after reading it, I felt Microsoft rather than wanting to appear smaller (Impossible and ridiculous), but they infact want to be known more as a multinational company.

    1. Re:Not huge, but American by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Presumably there's less hostility to multinationals now, in much of the world, than to the USA.

  49. Same Size Giants, one Fake. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Doesn't sound much different from what Wal-Mart has been trying to do in recent years. And Microsoft actually looks small compared to them.

    Both companies have market capitalizations of about $250 billion. Walmart, Microsoft. The microsoft article also shows that IBM has a market capitalization of about $60 billion. Realize, however, that market capitalization is only a measure of estimated company earning power not actual worth. People have insane expectations for Microsoft's continued earning power in a competitive market that contains zero cost competitors, so their small propaganda might work out soon.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  50. The Borg have Sorry Lawyers. by twitter · · Score: 1
    drop its current overseas advertising slogan "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated." after a successful trademark infringement suit filed by The Borg

    It will be replaced by, "You are our passion, Let us help you reach your potential," which means the same thing but the Borg forgot to trademark it.

    An impressed human Borg lawyer said, "Microsoft lawyers have taken trade mark, copyright and patent law to the next level. We can't wait to add them to the collective. In trademark they claim entire concepts and individual preexisting words. In patents, they claim whole ideas instead of implementations which vastly simplifies everything. Their copyrights are forever though they discard they make subtle changes to their code which breaks old versions every two years or so."

    The same lawyer, in the form of an IMP, continued, "We are also very impressed by their small is beautiful work and will seriously consider deception as an alternative to honestly portraying ourselves to potential clients."

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  51. One billion dollars. by twitter · · Score: 0
    $120 million is peanuts to a company with a capitalization of $250 billion and is deceptive in it's own way. They spent more than a billion promoting XP, a billion on MSN, etc. While not mom and pop, a much smaller company might spend that kind of money. Very few companies have the ability to spend billions in advertising. At the same time, few companies have reputations so poor that they need to spend that much either.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:One billion dollars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      few companies have reputations so poor that they need to spend that much either

      What a stupid comment. AT&T is spending a billion on advertising campaign. Can you please go ahead and make the same rationalization about them?

  52. In Europe they're sort of... by knarf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...a huge Irish company... No, of course Microsoft is not an Irish company, but they *do* use Ireland as a base for most European operations. There are Microsoft branch offices in other European countries, but they all source their products from the Irish branch. The reason for this is that Ireland uses a 12.5% tax rate, half (or less) of what the rest of Europe charges. And Ireland is in the EU... And most trade within the EU is tax-free...

    More on this? Sure, look here (Irish unit lets Microsoft cut taxes in U.S., Europe) or here (Microsoft Corp.'s Round Island One unit is Ireland's most profitable company). Or do like I did to get $insert_favourite_search_engine to produce these results: search on 'Microsoft ireland eu tax'...

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
  53. No, that would be Janet jackson by psgalbraith · · Score: 1
  54. It's /. ... by eosp · · Score: 1

    Microshaft spending $120M to look smaller.

    Why would Microshaft want to look smaller? /ducks

  55. Huge Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are often perceived as a huge American company.

    What? Microsoft isn't a huge American company?

    We wanted to be very specific about what we are doing in each country in education, innovation, economic opportunity and security.

    What??? Microsoft is doing something about education? They're innovating? I didn't know they innovated! Security? I didn't know that Microsoft was doing anything about security!

    I did know that Microsoft wants to create a lot of economic opportunity for themselves, though.