Slashdot Mirror


Bounty For Booting XP on the Intel iMac

An anonymous reader writes "The race is on. You can try to get the bounty for booting Windows XP on iMac. At this moment there is $2773 waiting for the winner. However several people have brickified their iMacs when playing with EFI." I imagine those tech support calls are hysterical ;)

72 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. Charity Suggestion: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    From TFA:
    If it is determined impossible to boot Windows on the Mac by March 23, 2006, all donations will be donated to a charitable cause (please send suggestions to charity@pintmaster.com).
    Here's a suggestion for a charity...how about a charity for all the poor saps who've hosed their iMacs trying this stunt? ^_^
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  2. I'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who would want to boot Windows XP normally?

    1. Re:I'm sorry by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know sounded fun so I tried it .
      But a little boot on the iMac's stand ,then proceeded to use it to kick a Windows XP CD around the room.
      Unfortunately due to a technicality , I can't claim the prize money.
      I assume though I am the first person to boot windows with an iMac

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:I'm sorry by Jamil+Karim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just what we needed... Fidel Castro giving the boot, instead of getting it...

  3. Brickified? by SpooForBrains · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not to be too picky, but the correct word, I believe, is "bricked". Although whether there's an actual dictionary definiton of the word in this context I do not know.

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:Brickified? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a cromulent Neologism

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Brickified? by minginqunt · · Score: 5, Funny


      Enbrickened.

      Fracked.

      Made to exhibit a Brickish form.

      Relegated to brickhood.

      Elevated to the Platonic ideal of "Brick".

      Invited to join the elite group of formerly functioning Von Neumann machines now inculcated in the eternal, static realm of Brick. (FFVNMNIRSRB: pron. Fuff-van-man-IRS-Rub)

      DEAD BRICKED.

      Seriously, kids. Do try this at home. It is big, it is clever. And it will give us a laugh. Let's see you try and do that with your $3000 Alienware rig.

      Muhahahahaha.

    3. Re:Brickified? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to be too picky, but the correct word, I believe, is "bricked". Although whether there's an actual dictionary definiton of the word in this context I do not know.

      This is a new low for a grammar nazi... trying to correct a word that isn't even a word. Brilliant.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re:Brickified? by ettlz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, doesn't the verb "to brick [it]" mean to crap oneself in en_GB?

    5. Re:Brickified? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 5, Funny

      That Mac isn't dead... its pining for the fjords..

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    6. Re:Brickified? by vjzuylen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then wouldn't it be "to embricken"?

      --

      Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
    7. Re:Brickified? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Funny
      This is a new low for a grammar nazi... trying to correct a word that isn't even a word. Brilliant.
      No, but if it wasn't for these stupid grammar-challenged /. morons, it would be a real word, and people would know how to use it, dammit!!!
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    8. Re:Brickified? by mjpaci · · Score: 5, Funny

      embricken

      It could be one of those detached (or whatever it's called) German verbs...

      Wann hast du deine iMac emgebricken?

      Die iMac verbindung bricken em.

    9. Re:Brickified? by pornking · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm...

      "to brick" already has the meaning of using bricks to block something off. for example, bricking up a window.

      If were to "brick up a building", you would not be turning it into brick or building it out of brick. You would either be enclosing it in brick, or walling off all entrances and windows.

      I think "to brickify" is clearer in this case since the suffix indicates a literal or figural transformation.

      --
      pornking
    10. Re:Brickified? by Gargish+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Us germans love to mess with the original English words, so I'd conjugate this verb like zwicken:

      to brick -> bricken
      he bricked his iMac -> er brickte seinen iMac
      I have bricked my iMac -> ich habe meinen iMac gebrickt
      the iMac is bricked -> der iMac ist gebrickt

      Yes, I love it and I'll use it, as others apparently already do:

      http://www.google.de/search?q=gebrickt

  4. the opposit by servo335 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would prefer to see booting osx86 on a non intel mac then ruining a perfectly good mac with xp.

    1. Re:the opposit by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That'll probably have to wait until Apple is selling an Intel-compatible version of OS X. At the moment they sell machines with one loaded, but they only come with recovery disks, not full installers. (And the recovery disks are probably locked to that particular model, which limits your options when you hack.)

      The next version of OS X will have it on the DVDs, and that is when the real hacking will commence...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    2. Re:the opposit by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The "restore" DVD contained a normal Mac OS X 10.4 installer

      It has recently been established that the "normal" Mac OS X 10.4 DVD which comes with the new iMac will not work on other Macs.

      I believe that's what the grandparent post wast bitching about.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  5. Bricks are useful too by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 3, Funny

    [...]However several people have brickified their iMacs when playing with EFI.

    Aha, but don't worry, just ask these nice people to add bricks to their existing set of architectures ;-)

  6. Re:BartPE by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, it shouldn't. You apparently either have no idea what BartPE is, or ou completely failed to even read the article summary.

    BartPE is simply a custom version of XP that can boot from removable media. The EFI rom on the MacTel machines seems to forbid booting an El Torito volume.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  7. Don't they have this backwards? by SlickCow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I want is to boot MacOS on my PC. How about a bounty for that?

    1. Re:Don't they have this backwards? by $ASANY · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Absolutely. Booting windows on a mac is sort of like booting OS/2 Warp on a mac. An interesting exercize, but of doubtful usefulness.

      Hey honey, guess what? Our Mac is now vulnerable to the Kama Sutra worm! Aintcha proud of me?

  8. I suggest the Free Software Foundation by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

    in a twist of irony. Or the EFF.

    1. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by HuguesT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Shouldn't it be illegal for a computer vendor to force you to only use a
      > particular OS on your computer?

      Apple isn't forcing anybody to run OS/X. I'm quite sure people buying Macs do it of their own volition. Furthermore I'm pretty sure Linux will be booting on these machines quite soon, this should answer this worry.

      On the other hand there is no requirement on hardware manufacturers that their machines must be made to boot Windows, just because they have an x86-compatible chip inside.

    2. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by SteveAyre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More like the choice of using unleaded petrol or diesel in your car, or a particular tire size.

      You can use the other if you like, just don't expect it to work as well anymore if at all.

      The fault is with Windows AFAIK not supporting the hardware anyway, which is hardly surprising when it was written several years before Apple announced that they'd be moving to Intel.

    3. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Running Windows" isn't "prohibited" by the "BIOS".
      1) There's no fucking BIOS.
      2) That's the problem.
      3) Windows prohibits itself from booting on EFI (by not supporting it)

      Fucktard.

    4. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When did they remove BIOS? Macs have never used BIOS. People haven't bought a computer that Apple have come round and pulled a chip out of. They designed a computer that doesn't use BIOS... just like all the other computers they've been designing. In what sense can they be said to have removed something that was never there in the first place?

    5. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by gh0st1nth3mach1n3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a big difference between removing things and not bothering to put them in in the first place.

      Apple isn't doing anything to prevent anyone from running Windows on their systems, but they're not spending money to help anyone either. Why should they? Spending money to add legacy functions that aren't necessary for anything but Windows just doesn't make sense for them.

      They switched to Intel, not WinTel.

    6. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did Apple say the current version of Windows? No, they didnt.

    7. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by PastAustin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Isn't that like a car manufacturer forcing you to only use a certain brand of fuel, or a certain brand of tyres?



      Was it ever illegal before to not be able to run Windows on a Mac?
      Nope. Because it wasn't because they were trying to make sure that you couldn't, it was because the os was incompatible with the hardware. Not illegal, incompatible.
      --
      Firefox 2.0 - Spell Rightly.
    8. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by linuxfanatic1024 · · Score: 5, Informative

      On the other hand there is no requirement on hardware manufacturers that their machines must be made to boot Windows, just because they have an x86-compatible chip inside.

      EXACTLY!!! Most people don't get the idea that two computers can be completely different even if they have the CPU in common. Some examples:

      - Z80: Game Boy, Game Gear, TI graphing calcs, and CP/M machines all have the same processor but totally different architectures.

      - Motorola 680x0: Classic Macs, Amigas, and 68k-based TI graphing calcs are all different

      - PowerPC: Power Macintoshes and PREP machines are incompatible.

      Perhaps the x86 Macs are PC-compatible, but nothing says they HAVE to be. Just look at history.

      --
      Microsoft-free since March 28, 2004
    9. Re:I suggest the Free Software Foundation by yerfatma · · Score: 2, Funny

      The rest of the world called. I tried to forward them to you, but this damn rotary phone, y'know?

  9. Maybe... by thepotoo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's to prove you can. Just like the people who hack IE to run on Linux in WINE, there's a lot of geek credit (and 15 minutes of fame) to be gained by doing this. If I had a mac, I'd try for it.

    Short answer: Because you can.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  10. No EFI backwards compatibility module on iMacs by Randall311 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Therefore getiing XP to boot natively won't happen. There is still a chance at booting Windows Vista though, as it supports EFI. The only thing to overcome is the ACPI requirement that Vista has. The intel chip and mobo inside the iMacs stupport ACPI, but of course it has been removed from Apple's version of EFI. Find a way to get ACPI support onto the Mactel's EFI, and you should be able to have a dual boot config with Windows Vista.

    1. Re:No EFI backwards compatibility module on iMacs by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only part of XP that needs the BIOS is the bootloader.

      So, only one of two things need to happen: Either someone rewrites NTLDR for EFI systems, or someone needs to create a fake BIOS enviornment. The LinuxBios people had a way of faking a real BIOS to boot XP, so going EFI -> Linux -> Windows might be possible also.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  11. UNBRICK your Intel iMac by Knytefall · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Dave Schroeder, posted to http://nak.journalspace.com/?cmd=displaycomments&d cid=407&entryid=407

    By following these steps, the iMacs that had difficulty with certain EFI modules appear to have been restored to a functioning state:

    1. Disconnect the internal hard disk
    2. Disconnect the iMac from AC power
    3. Plug in AC while holding the power button
    4. Power up the iMac and zap NVRAM (cmd-opt-P-R)
    The hard disk can be reformatted and the operating system restored.

    1. Re:UNBRICK your Intel iMac by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, you don't.

      Sorry the instructions weren't more specific.

      After you plug in the iMac while holding the power button (at this time that appears to be the equivalent of the old PMU/motherboard reset) and zap the NVRAM (probably not required after the reset, but I included it because that was in the series of steps I performed), you can reconnect the hard disk. You can then boot from the DVD installation media, reformat the drive, and restore the OS.

      You don't disconnect or reconnect the hard disk while the machine is running.

  12. For the last time... by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I could have a dual core machine with a really nice graphics card, and the machine was also cool, quiet, and attractive for $1300, and I could boot any OS I wanted on it (OS X, Linux, XP), I think I don't qualify as perverse. The iMac is a compact and powerful machine, and there's nothing available like it at the moment. Furthermore, give me the choice between carrying around two laptops or one (especially for developers or on-site technicians), can you possibly guess which one would be less expensive?

    So, please, just drop this joke. It's been told a million times. If you don't have anything useful to say, just save your breath.

  13. Why? Seriously by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've always heard that I would "need" Windows for something or other. In my business it seemed prudent to own/install a copy of Software Windows and so a bought a succession of versions starting in the early 90s.

    In more than 10 years of having a copy of Windows, I've needed it all of 3 times (using content on 2 MS-only CD-ROMs and some MS-Access work). Now I don't even need the emulator -- I bought a Pentium-III laptop at a garage sale for $10. It's sat unused now for 3 years.

    I can understand the "because its there challenge," and I suppose some people really need to play PC-only games (I don't), but otherwise putting Windows on a Mac seems like a waste of good hardware.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  14. Xen and Vanderpool by affinity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does the "Core Duo" processor include the Vaderpool virtualization extensions.
    And if Xen is able to use Vanderpool to transparently support WindowsXP/2003 then, would using Xen be the best way to go, with out having to deal with the Boot issue.

    --
    no sig yet
  15. How to report a brickified iMac to Apple by pvera · · Score: 4, Informative

    1.Walk it into any Apple store or Apple authorized repair shop.
    2. Tell them your mac stopped working.
    3. When they ask you for the symptoms, tell them it showed a spining ball in many colors, like a rainbow. Then it beeped. Then it told you to reboot in many languages.
    4. When you rebooted it, it refused to power up.
    5. The proper answer to any probing questions is "uh, I don't know."

    Under any circumstances are you to give the impression that you know more about macs than the guy taking your repair order. If the contents of the drive are an issue, take the drive out, connect it to another machine and delete the partitions. Check out the "user installable parts" document for your mac, it will tell you the exact procedure for pulling a drive without voiding the warranty. For the first generation iMac G5 it even tells you the color of the 3 screws that you need to remove, I bet that has not changed with the Intel version.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:How to report a brickified iMac to Apple by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong. There is no warranty-safe user access to the iMac HDs. You can't get past the iSight cable or something. All it allows is memory under warranty, which is actually less than my iBook allows (memory+AirPort)

    2. Re:How to report a brickified iMac to Apple by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, lets advocate fraud. Good one.

    3. Re:How to report a brickified iMac to Apple by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Or alternatively, you could call them and tell them what actually happened. That way they can diagnose the fault, and fix it. In the event that the person you talk to is someone who reads Slashdot and is therefore convinced that someone experimenting with different commands on their computer is actually doing something illegal, immoral, or just "against the Man(tm)" and that Apple is perfectly within their rights to not honour a warranty under such circumstances, you ask to speak to their supervisor.

      There is no reason why typing commands at a prompt should completely brickify a computer. Result in data loss? Yeah. Mean you have to reinstall the OS? That's fine. But render a computer utterly incapable of being restored to a usable state by the user? Absolutely not. We're not talking about plugging the AC cable into the Firewire slot here, or dropping it from the top of the Empire State Building, we're just talking about experimenting with the subsystem that boots the computer in order to try to, legitimately, boot another operating system.

      This isn't a slam against Apple here. I suspect these machines do, indeed, have a by-pass somewhere in them to restore the firmware (there's already a supposed fix circulating which may actually be the solution), and there are plenty of companies that also make it relatively easy to brick their systems (would it be too fucking much to add a $5 ROM to your $800 laptops that contains a "good" version of the firmware in case there's a problem with the flash?); far from it: I have great difficulty believing Apple would refuse to honour a warranty over such an issue, and I suspect, ultimately, they'll have a KB article up soon enough ensuring users can fix the issue themselves. In the event they do not, I'd be surprised if they're not seeing this as a design flaw, rather than a user issue.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  16. OH NO, The slashdotters cometh. by colin_n · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just got a message from a friend of mine saying I have been /.ed . Now my life is complete

    --

    --------- I have no signature
  17. Tech support brickfied call by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    However several people have brickified their iMacs when playing with EFI. I imagine those tech support calls...

    UserX: Hi, is this Apple tech support?

    Tech Support Operator 213453098: Yes, how can I help you?

    UserX: Well, I was trying to win a contest by booting Windows XP on my iMac and then totally brickified it.

    Tech Support Operator 213453098: Oh that's too bad, can you please start from the beginning?

    UserX: Okay, I had XP copied to a disc, I put it in the iMac and fiddled with the EFI a bit to boot XP and all of a sudden I had a screen with a bunch of letters and numbers on it. I tried to hardboot it and get back OSX, but it failed...so I brickified it.

    Tech Support Operator 213453098: So you corrupted your iMac to the point will it will not boot at all?

    UserX: No, I got so mad I just threw a brick at it - now it's just a pile of sparking wires and smoking plastic.

    Tech Support Operator 213453098:
    Please hold, let me transfer you to our anger management department. You estimated wait time is... thirty-five .... minutes. Have a great day, sir.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Tech support brickfied call by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, did you blow a shot at the "oblig." Airplane reference there!

      "Well, let's see... First the earth cooled. AND THEN THE DINOSAURS CAME. But they got too big and fat, so they all died and they turned into oil. And then the Arabs came and they bought Mercedes Benzes. And Prince Charles started wearing all of Lady Di's clothes. I couldn't believe it... "

      I don't want to live in a world where that's considered too obscure.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  18. Re:Why? Seriously by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right, because no one else has other software needs than yours.

  19. Re:Don't they have this backwards? Here you go by mobby_6kl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Installing and booting OSX on PCs.
    I expect to receive my rightfully earned $2500 by midnight.

  20. Re:Why? Seriously by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Turn your argument around. Nobody really "needs" a Mac in the first place. We could get everything we need to get done on a standard Windows PC, but instead we buy Macintoshes because we *want* to, not because we need to.

    Surely you will admit that there are some very popular Windows packages that have not been ported to the Mac. As well about a million inhouse and vertical software packages designed for Windows. A lot of people in the Mac community see this as something that would be legitimately useful to them, and not just "because it's there". They're doing this because they think it would add value to their Mac system.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  21. Wine? by millahtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that macs use an intel chipset and the backend is BSD based, can't one just use wine to run their MS apps? Just like in freebsd/linux/unix? When I get my MacBook that is one of the first things I will be taking for a spin.

  22. Bill Gates for one! by cyberbian · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure that ole Bill and Steve would like to see it boot normally, AT LEAST ONCE since its been coded.

    --
    if I claimed I was emperor just because some watery tart lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!
  23. Re:Small bills please... by mh101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They mean installing and booting it natively, so you can dual-boot OSX or Windows, not simply running it in an emulated or virtualized environment.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  24. No it wouldn't by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) domU instances don't get access to the graphics hardware. If you want hardware video acceleration, virtualization is currently not an option. There's a chance that you can do it in a case where your system has multiple video cards, but so far there is no solution for concurrent access to the same video card.

    2) dom0 instances (generally considered the "host") OS actually run under Xen too. Apparently (according to the Xen mailing lists) dom0 OSes actually need more modifications than domUs. Thus, it may not be possible to use OSX as a dom0.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  25. Bounty & booty by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 2, Funny

    I actually first thought the topic was "Get booty for bounting XP..." Now there's a challenge for nerds!

  26. "I imagine those tech support calls are hysterical by Caspian · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...you insensitive clod!

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  27. Re:BartPE by larkost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Change "forbid booting" to "not have support for". Apple has not done any work to support booting, that means they don't include things that they don't need, but might be needed for Windows. they are not hindering you from booting Windows, just not helping you either.

  28. Linux on Macintelintosh by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Probably this bounty for Windows XP on the Intel Mac is prompted in a reaction to Linux on the Intel Mac. Can't have the press paying attention to that, now can we?

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  29. Pirates want in on this by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Funny

    A bounty for booty ye say?

    ARRRRRRRRRRR!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  30. Games. by Alcimedes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe they want to play games on occasion, but want the OSX experience the rest of the time. I know a LOT of people in that boat.

    1. Re:Games. by Alcimedes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, let me load up WoW.....

      Oh, that doesn't run on an Xbox or playstation. How about I bust out my old copy of Master or Orion.... Hmm, nope not that either. Ok, I'll play some CSS. Crap, no again.

      Sorry, I could do that all day but the majority of games I want to play don't exist on consoles, and either don't run, or run like ass under OSX.

      Dual booting would be a god send to me. Instead of buying the low level laptop (work needs) I'd be a lot more likely to spring for the top of the line laptop so I can game on it as well. I'm not going to buy a laptop exclusively for gaming, or a desktop for that matter. However, I'd be more than happy to drop an extra $200 - $500 on a machine that will do my work AND play games well.

  31. No, because... by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

    - there is no legal way to do it (there is also currently no way to buy a standalone copy of Mac OS X for Intel, even if you choose to ignore the license agreement)

    - the Mac OS X license agreement specifically states that Mac OS X can only be installed on a single Apple-branded computer

    However,

    - the Windows license agreement allows for this

    - it is legal to purchase a license for Windows and use it on any machine desired, including an Intel-based iMac

    Microsoft is a software company. Apple is a hardware company.

  32. Excellent by joeytsai · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a very good idea. Clearly, there are not enough machines that run Windows XP right now; any effort to increase its use is certainly for the best.

    --
    http://www.talknerdy.org
  33. Re:Plug in AC while holding the power button??? by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Um, I'm one of the people who originally was left with an Intel-based iMac that would no longer boot. Both the blog's owner (Nakfull Propaganda) and one of the other posters in the comments also had the exact same issue when attempting to load EFI modules that presumably were unsupported by, or otherwise disagreed with, Apple's EFI implementation.

    The steps I posted apparently reset something related to the NVRAM or firmware in the machine, and allow the machine to be revived (albeit after formatting the hard disk). Considering my contact information is everywhere, and I posted all of my contact details in every blog post I made, it's ridiculously easy for people to contact me and/or see who I am and what I do.

  34. There are many reasons. by pavon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you do webdesign, you need to check your pages in Explorer.
    If you do application software, and your users are on windows.
    If you do embedded software, and the dev kits are windows only.
    If you do electrical design, you will probably need to run OrCAD.
    If you do drafting, you will probably need to run AutoCAD.
    If you teach and your school requires a specific application for grades.

    Since MS Office was ported to the Mac, most business people will probably be able to get by without using windows. For graphics work, all the professional tools are also on the Mac, so they can get by just fine as well. There are also many good audio tools as well, although most professionals use a mix of Mac and Windows software (plus that one that boots up without a seprate OS).

    However for many people, they really don't have that option. Even if there are replacements apps on the Mac that are as good or better than the windows based industry standards, compatibility with others pretty much forces you to have a copy around.

  35. Re:Plug in AC while holding the power button??? by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please directly me to any place I've ever been against booting Windows. Second, I don't "host a site on how to do it". Nakfull Propaganda is not my blog. winxponmac.com is not my site. If you're referring to appleintelfaq.com, that is not a site about "how to run Windows on a Mac". It's a FAQ addressing the Apple/Intel transition. Once Windows is able to be installed directly on an Intel-based Mac, there definitely will be a FAQ entry about it, since that is indeed, well, a "Frequently Asked Question".

    In fact, all of my posts here (and on the blog) on the topic are specifically FOR booting Windows on Intel-based Apple hardware, or using Windows in a virtual machine:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173774&cid=144 55455
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174115&cid=144 83527
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174203&cid=144 91243

    At the end of this post, I even enumerate the reasons why people might want to run Windows directly, as opposed to in a VM:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174845&cid=145 43786

    I've also been trying to install Windows directly on Intel-based Macs since the first day we were able to begin testing. Anyone can see the log of the various tries here:

    http://nak.journalspace.com/?cmd=displaycomments&d cid=407&entryid=407 (Note: that is NOT my blog)

    And finally, even though some of the EFI testing rendered the iMac unbootable (after someone else already had the same issue), I then posted my steps for recovering both in the story here and in the above blog entry's comments.

    Nice try, though!

  36. Re:But not as useful... by carlislematthew · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's not just the Intel chip that's the issue. Things like graphics card access and hard drive access *are* emulated, or at least abstracted and go through additional APIs. SLOW.

    I've run VMWare many times on x86 hardware and it runs VERY SLOWLY when you need to access the hard drive, usually because the "hard drive" is actually a fragmented file sitting on the host OS hard drive, which is the only convenient way of setting it up.

  37. Article: Will Macs boot Windows? by DECS · · Score: 4, Informative

    EFI isn't the only problem for the new Macs to run Windows. I wrote an article that looks at a range of problems: http://www.roughlydrafted.com/Jan06.IntelMacsWin1. html

  38. Cars aren't computers. by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    If cars were enough like computers to make that kind of analogy meaningful, you'd be able to buy a car at Walmart for about fifty bucks, it'd go Mach 3 at ground level and be capable of reaching any point in sublunar space on a cupful of gas. And every few days it would just stop working for no reason, sometimes to the accompaniment of gouts of livid flames from the engine compartment, and occasionally fall apart and need to be rebuilt from scratch... and people would consider that normal.

    But since they're not, you get zero points and have to leave the island.

  39. Du Arschloch! Proper (sortof) German translation by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2

    Wann hast du deine iMac emgebricken

    My German is a bit rusty, I am not a native speaker, but I think that should be:

    Du Arschloch ! Hast du meinen iMac Verziegelt?

    If this post has offended your sentiments please accept my (complete lack of an) apology.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  40. Re:booting linux by In+Fraudem+Legis · · Score: 2

    Amen.

    --
    Per Aspera Ad Astra.
  41. Tech Support Call by mkiwi · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is a really great story. Here is my example Apple tech support call:

    Apple: Hello, Apple Tech Support this is iMac, how can I help you?
    Nerd: My new iMac Core Duo won't boot up.
    Apple: Ok, could I get your name and telephone number?
    Nerd: ...Ok (gives name and telephone number)
    Apple: Hmmm....
    Nerd: What?
    Apple: Have you called about problems with this computer before?
    Nerd: Yes. It's been very buggy.
    Apple: I'm showing 10 other tech support calls and 10 replacement iMac's sent to you.
    Nerd: Yeah, like I said they are really buggy machines.
    Apple: You know what? Do I look stupid? DO YOU THINK WE WEREN'T TOLD THIS WOULD HAPPEN?
    Nerd: Well I just....
    Apple: (interrupts) Stop messing with the EFI!!!
    Nerd: But I WANT to boot Windows!! How else am I supposed to do it?
    Apple: I think we need to start seeing other people.
    Nerd: What... WHY?
    Apple: I need some space, and I feel like you can never be honest with me.
    Nerd: I'm honest with you most of the time....
    Apple: It's over guy, get a new girlfrield. Maybe you can go back to Dell, I hear she's available.
    Nerd: But iMac you are so sexxxy!! You're breaking my heart!
    Apple: No, you are literally breaking mine. My motherboard > you. (click)
    (Nerd goes into corner, cries, and calls Dell.)
    Dell: Hello you have reached Dell Tech Support.
    Nerd: My iMac just dumped me, I need a friend....