Slashdot Mirror


Best Method for Automated CD Ripping?

OzPeter asks: "I have a need to rip about 200-300 CDs in the near future, and I am not looking forward to being a slave to the computer every 4 minutes in order to change the CD in the drive. I have been looking around for automated ripping systems but in general have not been impressed by what I found. This question was asked, 4 years ago, and the best advice to come out of it seemed to be to hire a local teenager to be that slave. Have things improved, or does the advice given in that article still stand? What is currently the best way of automatically ripping a significant number of CDs?"

133 comments

  1. Software or hardware? by usurper · · Score: 1

    I was expecting the software to be around the automation of ripping/encoding a CD, but this text here:

    "I have a need to rip about 200-300 CDs in the near future, and I am not looking forward to being a slave to the computer every 4 minutes in order to change the CD in the drive."

    makes me think you're looking for something hardware based? No 300 CD drives out there, sorry.

    1. Re:Software or hardware? by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are some hardware options that aren't totally insane pricewise:

      MF Baxter
      http://www.mfdigital.com/baxter.html

      StarMatix PowerFile
      http://search.ebay.com/powerfile

    2. Re:Software or hardware? by scragz · · Score: 2, Informative

      That Baxter, while exactly what is being asked for, is ~$800 and only works with their proprietary ripping software. The Powerfile route looks a little better, but preliminary research has me a little bit worried about its scriptability.

    3. Re:Software or hardware? by anshubansal2000 · · Score: 1

      Hi, I was also havin the same idea 2 years ago but couldn't implement. It will be the combination of software and hardware. Anshu

    4. Re:Software or hardware? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Some suggestions:

      • Use a machine with several CD-ROM drives. Script the system to do one drive at a time. I'm picturing three drives, placed at /dev/hdb, /dev/hdc and /dev/hdd (assuming Linux). Don't try to use all three at once.
      • Similar to above, using SCSI drives instead.... eliminates the need to avoid using all at once.
      • Similar to above, using firewire external drives instead... easier to set up.
      • Use several computers (obviously not mutually exclusive to the other options)
      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    5. Re:Software or hardware? by smbarbour · · Score: 1

      SCSI is probably your best bet for multiple drive configurations. They even make external towers for arrays of optical drives (which I've used before with a net-attached SCSI server).

    6. Re:Software or hardware? by jad4 · · Score: 1
      That Baxter, while exactly what is being asked for, is ~$800 and only works with their proprietary ripping software.

      That software is a custom version of Riptastic!.

  2. Well by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    What is currently the best way of automatically ripping a significant number of CDs?"

    There isn't one. If you were mearly duplicating, there's plenty of robotic/automated (albiet expensive) solutions, but since you're wanting to rip, you can either hire that teenager, or send it off to these people.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Well by paeanblack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there's plenty of robotic/automated (albiet expensive) solutions

      Keep in mind the hidden cost of not investing in automated ripping hardware: you need to invest in a more robust storage system or pay the ripping fee again when drives fail.

      However, if you spend a few hundred dollars on a 200 disc changer, like a Starmatix Powerfile, you don't really need to bother with a RAID. This factor needs to be considered when pricing the whole deal.

    2. Re:Well by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Informative

      Trying reading the 278 comments when this was last discussed in December 2005:
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/16/011224 9

      Really, that was a good discussion, and this is basically a dupe of that.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Well by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      but since you're wanting to rip, you can either hire that teenager, or send it off to these people.

      Or you could just do it a few CDs at a time. I've been ripping my CD collection onto my laptop over the last few months - you don't need to do it over a weekend, you know, and it's no great trouble to occasionally pop a CD in and rip it ...

    4. Re:Well by scragz · · Score: 1

      That discussion was about ripping services, and really wasn't that great a discussion IMO.

      I looked into those services and couldn't find anything cheaper than ~$1/disc. For the 1500 or so discs my friends and I have, that is way too expensive to be worthwhile. The submitter has the right idea with loading up a 200+ jukebox/changer a couple of times and I'm researching that now.

    5. Re:Well by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Where are you located?
      I have an 8 drive ripping RAIC setup and if you are close enough to drop them by, my system averages less than 1 minute per CD. Granted that's still a full day of ripping, but ... I'm sure we could work something out. General geography is enough to get started, I should be able to tell if you are within a few hours driving with that (no need to say city or zip or anything.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  3. Impossible by ShaneThePain · · Score: 1

    I dont think Its possible. Unless there is a cd changer out there that can handle hundreds of CDs, your S-O-O-L.

    --
    Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
  4. Isn't that too quick? by luder · · Score: 1

    4 minutes? Either you're not looking for lossless ripping or my computer is getting really really old... It takes me much more that that to rip a complete CD with EAC.

    1. Re:Isn't that too quick? by chill · · Score: 1

      It takes me 6 minutes to rip/encode a typical CD using FLAC on a 1.7 GHz Sempron64+, 52x CD-R running Slackware and using Konqueror to drag-n-drop the files.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  5. buy a cd duplicator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many different companies that make them. One that comes to mind is primera -

    http://www.primera.com/products_duplicators.html

    1. Re:buy a cd duplicator by W.+A.+Dragunov · · Score: 1

      some other companies that make duplicators are Rimage and Amtren(Discmaker Elite Series). Amtren was once working on an automated ripping solution but it went nowhere.

      http://www.amtren.com/
      http://www.discmakers.com/

      --
      Tries hard. Fails to achieve the low standards he sets himself. Works well with a broom
  6. AllOfMP3 by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Download it off AllOfMP3.com.

    Probably end up being cheaper then a teenager.

    Seriously though, for such a specialized situation, there isn't going to exist any reasonably priced automated solution.

    1. Re:AllOfMP3 by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      Unless your tastes are mundane, AllOfMP3.com is not going to have more than 50-60% of those 300 cds...

    2. Re:AllOfMP3 by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      ok then, he is down to having to rip 150 CD's, not bad and there are other russian mp3 sites among them all he should be able to get his need-to-rip list down to 10-20

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  7. Don't overcomplicate things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Utilize more than one CD drive (borrow them from friends and family?). With 3-4 CDs going at once you're looking at 3-4 dozen disks per hour. You can finish your collection in one evening.

  8. Better Than a Teenager by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only thing better than a teenager, is to get two computers and hire two teenagers.

    Honestly, why go for an expensive, complicated solution when a simple solution is already at hand.

    5 minutes per CD gives about 12 CSs per hour.

    That's 25 hours to rip 300 CDs.

    $5 per hour comes in at $125. Buy a pizza for lunch over 3 days brings it to just under $200.

    If you borrow a laptop or two, there is no reason one guy can't swap out CDs in 3 computers; it's be done in a day. Offer a local teen $150 + pizza for a day's work, and they'll jump at the chance.

    So, unless you can come up with something less than $200, you are just shooting yourself in the foot.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    1. Re:Better Than a Teenager by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      Depending on the content of your collection and the content of your character, you could probably find a teenager that would rip those CDs in exchange for access to the music instead of cash.

      Just presenting options.... :whistles

    2. Re:Better Than a Teenager by LLuthor · · Score: 1

      Use multiple drives ripping at once. There are at least two drives in any decent machine, and probably two or three machines at least in any self-respecting geek's place.

      /heh, please type the word in this image: coaster

      --
      LL
    3. Re:Better Than a Teenager by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      Of course, depending on what type of music it is, the teenager probably already has all of those CD's, not on CD of course :)

    4. Re:Better Than a Teenager by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

      Offer a local teen $150 + pizza for a day's work, and they'll jump at the chance.

      Or you could offer a local graduate student just the pizza, and save yourself $150.

    5. Re:Better Than a Teenager by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or just gladly promise pizza on Tuesday for a ripping job today.

    6. Re:Better Than a Teenager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And remember, with Two Times Tuesday, you're not really paying anything more than normal, just buying yourself a pizza and giving the free one away.

    7. Re:Better Than a Teenager by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      The only thing better than a teenager, is to get two computers and hire two teenagers.

      Or get a video camera and two teenagers. Sell the movies on the internet, and you can afford one of those professional ripping services.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:Better Than a Teenager by Otis2222222 · · Score: 1

      A related comment to that: During the time it took to post this article to slashdot and wait for a sufficient number of responses to your post, you could have been well on your way to getting half or more of your CD collection ripped by yourself. I have about 250 CDs in my collection that I ripped using Winamp while I was web browsing. I was at my computer already, I would just go through 20-30 of them while I was there and after a couple of days I got them all ripped.

  9. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the best advice to come out of it seemed to be to hire a local teenager to be that slave.

    That advice is old. Rent a few cartoons, buy some non-sticky candy and get hold of a well-behaved 9-year old. Much cheaper :-P

  10. Outsource It by xCepheus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you looked at hiring a cd ripping service like MusicShifter? A lot of these places will rip you collection for cheap because they have massive digital libraries of pre-ripped music. Once they receive your cds instead of actually having to rip all 300 of them there is a good chance that 250 or so are already stored in their library resulting in a relatively cheap and fast service ($.79 per cd from Music Shifter).

    (I'm in know way affiliated with any cd ripping services - I've just heard good things about them.)

    1. Re:Outsource It by cfulmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      If that's true, then MusicShifter is infringing copyright -- this is exactly what mp3.com got spanked for a few years ago (with mp3.com, you didn't send in your CD, you just put it in your PC to prove that you had it).

    2. Re:Outsource It by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they hard hardware that would take the CDs off of a spindle, rip them, and put them on another spindle without any human interaction. That would make it legal and a lot cheaper then manually ripping them.

    3. Re:Outsource It by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      I have been happy with Kinkos for this sized runs.

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    4. Re:Outsource It by merreborn · · Score: 1

      If that's true, then MusicShifter is infringing copyright -- this is exactly what mp3.com got spanked for a few years ago (with mp3.com, you didn't send in your CD, you just put it in your PC to prove that you had it).

      When they can actually have the physical CD in their hands, that's slightly stronger evidence that you actually own the CD than your home PC beaming a few bits over the net claiming that the disc is in your drive.

    5. Re:Outsource It by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So, your solution is about getting something ripped by someone else of some other CD just because you got the same one

      If you push that logic further, you'll realize that it's exactly the same thing as downloading your 300 CD's off P2P : there's a very good chance that 300 or so are already shared in the network resulting in a relatively free and fast service.

      So don't use some cd ripping service, get em from P2P networks. What's the difference between the two? They both give you the rips of the CD's you have except it was ripped before by someone else with the same CD's as you have, so there's no difference really, besides the price and the convenience.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    6. Re:Outsource It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P2P music quality is often too bad for my needs

    7. Re:Outsource It by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      What can your needs possibly be then??

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    8. Re:Outsource It by dangitman · · Score: 1
      That still does not give them the right to copy the music from their database and give it to other people. It might be a slightly different version of the CD (released in a different country, has bonus tracks, etc.) - or the customer's CD may be scratched - meaning you are really giving them something other than a rip of that CD, but rather illegally distributing their copies.

      Do you actually have any evidence that they keep a library of ripped files and the original CDs? That seems very stupid, and very expensive. How are they supposed to have a copy of every possible customer's CD, and how would they make money if they had to pay for a copy of the original CDs? Doesn't make any sense. Sounds like a rumour, or an illegal operation.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:Outsource It by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Once they receive your cds instead of actually having to rip all 300 of them there is a good chance that 250 or so are already stored in their library resulting in a relatively cheap and fast service ($.79 per cd from Music Shifter).

      What are the odds that they'll "Cache" all of the CDs that they don't have pre-ripped?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Outsource It by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      If that's true, then MusicShifter is infringing copyright

      They're infringing copyright, period. It makes absolutely no difference what method they're using to copy the CDs. It doesn't matter if they're using a really fast burner, or a CDDB rip, or are using an advanced tachyon positronic laser to duplicate all music you've ever listened to from a strand of your hair.

      The AHRA made duplication of music for personal use on home recording equipment legal. They're not doing anything of the sort.

    11. Re:Outsource It by KingVance · · Score: 1

      They probably just keep the rips they dont have and build up a database over time.

      And if people want to nitpick over a slightly different version of 'thriller' by Michael Jackson, then they can burn in hell and deserve to get ripped off.

      Plus if the customers CD is scratched, they still own the music, so they deserve a backup and a way to get to it. Getting a backup from an alternate source is not illegal AFAIK. Especially when you send in the physical CD and say "hey punk...i own this"

    12. Re:Outsource It by dangitman · · Score: 1
      They probably just keep the rips they dont have and build up a database over time.

      Which would be illegal.

      And if people want to nitpick over a slightly different version of 'thriller' by Michael Jackson, then they can burn in hell and deserve to get ripped off.

      Again, the RIAA would complain, because giving away a different version of the song would also be illegal.

      Plus if the customers CD is scratched, they still own the music, so they deserve a backup and a way to get to it. Getting a backup from an alternate source is not illegal AFAIK.

      I think the courts decided otherwise in the case of some (can't remember the name) online "backup" service.

      Once again, I ask if anyone has evidence if these ripping services actually do maintain a database, or if it is just baseless speculation. The claim that it makes operations more efficient also doesn't hold a lot of water. Looking for the correct matches in the database, and managing that database is still going to require some work. Easier just to load the customer's discs into a robotic loader - and avoids legal liability, too.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  11. One of the Best CD Replicators Out There by Kagura · · Score: 1

    My boss asked me one day what options were available for automatic CD replication, which ran through completing however many CD copies as requested, with as little human intervention as possible. After we got direction from higher, we were able to have this CD replication system installed, albeit slightly modified. It works so well, that it's definitely one of the coolest purchases we've made.

    1. Re:One of the Best CD Replicators Out There by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckin' idiot.

    2. Re:One of the Best CD Replicators Out There by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, yea, for starters, that's a duplicator, not a replicator; also he wants to RIP, not COPY. RTFT (Title) and LTFWYTA (Learn the F What You're Talking About). That is all.

  12. Use a service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a ripping service like the ones here:

    http://reviews.designtechnica.com/guide44.html

  13. Grip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use Grip with two cdroms. It will take a while, but it's worth it. Just start with the music you listen to most and work your way through with your collection. That is what I ended up doing for my collection when I switched from Vorbis to MP3 (~800 cds).

  14. Pay someone by MarkRose · · Score: 1

    There are many companies that do exactly this: you ship them the CD's and they'll rip them for you. If your time is worth money, they're certainly worth Googling. The good ones include album covers, etc. I imagine they simply keep a ripped (wav) copy of each CD that passes through their hands to speed up the process for future customers.

    --
    Be relentless!
  15. robots by user24 · · Score: 1

    I heard about a guy who made a lego/mechano robot to automatically change cds from one pile to another every X minutes, via the CD drive. If you're programming is OK I imagine it'd be a fun way of doing it. Sorry, I don't have schematics.

    1. Re:robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:robots by mrzaph0d · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  16. What's the rush? by anomaly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was able to do this over a period of a couple of weeks with a similar number of CDs. This was not rocket science. I simply kept a stack of media to be ripped near the Mac, then configured iTunes to auto lookup, rip to mp3, then eject CDs when done. If i walked by the laptop and there was a CD sticking out, I'd replace with another and keep going with whatever I was doing.

    Didn't take *that* long, I spent no cahs, and I was not a slave to the PC, either.

    YMMV.

    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    1. Re:What's the rush? by stevenvi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I must second this statement. I, too, decided to put my CD collection (~500 CDs) on my computer in a lossless format (flac), with little difficulty.

      Your four minute estimate is incorrect if you want to make sure you're actually copying the right data. Using (in Linux) grip and cdparanoia, it was pretty easy. I just queued up a new disc each time one popped out, whenever I was in my dorm room.

      Took me a few months to finish it, and for some reason I had two albums that refused to rip in Linux. (Not DRMed ones, old ones -- Foo Fighters, "The Colour and the Shape," and Meat Puppets, "Too High to Die.") Didn't cost me a dime, and because I used cdparanoia it ripped at maybe 2x, so I only had to swap discs every half hour. I didn't consider myself a slave. Nice change of pace from hammering refresh on Slashdot. ; )

    2. Re:What's the rush? by tooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's exactly what i was going to respond with. I'm in the middle of doing this right now, done about 200-250 cds so far. Slap a CD in, rips automatically, ejects. I have a stack of about 10 "to do" cds on the left and 10 done cds on the right. When the "to do" gets to zero, i put the done stack into a box and grab another 20 or so from the cd stands. I read web sites and emails while this is happening and i never rush to change a cd. like you i often wander off and when walking past i swap out the old one and put the new one in.

      A few tips:

      Stop your wife/gf/so from putting the "done" stack back into the main "to do" pile. This is very temping for them, as the see a cd they want to listen to, but dont tell you they took it and then you find it days later in the car or other odd places, think you missed it (or have 2 copies) and re-rip it. itunes has a duplicate song finder, but it's not very intellingent and calls the same song on different albumns duplicates when they are not (eg songs appearing on "best ofs") ... i'd like a duplicate albumn function.

      I was origionally going to use abcde to rip the cds under linux with a slot loading drive, auto ejecting done cds and non-music cds. this never worked out though as i would forget about it and only get a few cds done an hour. the advantage of using your main pc (mines a mac too) is that you sitting there anyway so the effort is less.

      anyway, break it done into smaller lots, if you have 300 cds, and assuming you can do 20 a day you'll have it done in 2 weeks. And you could do 2 pcs at once if youre in a hurry, or you can listen to the music you've ripped to make it a bit more enjoyable.

  17. iTunes + automated CD burning machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never used one of those automated CD burning machines before, so I don't know how it controls the robotic arm, or if it's activated by a disc being spit out of the burner... BUT if you load up iTunes instead of the burning software and set it to rip and eject a disc on insertion, it seems pretty easy to me.

  18. Re:Use bananas.. by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

    If there's a few people around, put the system somewhere central so whoever's closest can swap to the next cd.

    If you want to make a game of it, put a jar of quarters/tokens/dollars near the system and tell people to take one for every cd they swap.

    Use iTunes with the auto-CDDB-lookup, auto-rip, auto-eject for the rest. Remember to set your file naming and other options first.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  19. ripping vs encoding by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    There's a difference between ripping and encoding. For a task like the poster is describing, you'd want to rip all of the discs to wav first, then encode unattended later. Depending on the drive and condition of the discs, this could take less than 4 mins each (haven't timed it in awhile).

    400 gig drives (to store the uncompressed wavs) are relatively inexpensive these days.

    1. Re:ripping vs encoding by notanatheist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FWIW, Audiograbber does just as well as EAC IMHO. YMMV. As for unattended ripping, are you seeking accurate tags or not? Are you willing to sift through everything later if something didn't work right? As for myself, I'm in the midst of re-ripping my entire CD collection (only about 200 right now) to MP3 with LAME via Audiograbber with "V 0 --vbrnew" for near lossless quality. (all you purists can just STFU, I'm aware of compression and how it affects things. I can also tell you I'm only human and my speakers didn't cost more than my car). Why re-rip? Greater compatibility across devices. Everything is presently VBR OGG which I've been very happy with but can't easily throw 5 albums on a disc for my car or load up one of those black or white fruit things with songs. So, sit down, shut up, properly tag and encode in one pass. Do what I do, rip while you work. Pick up where you left off. If you're in a hurry send somebody else your collection and let them do it for you.

    2. Re:ripping vs encoding by Shabbs · · Score: 1

      If I had a dime for every person that has used "ripping" when they meant "rip and encode", I'd have a lot of dimes. Apps like iTunes that do it all in one make people forget you first have to extract the digital audio (WAV or AIFF) and then compress it down to a lossy format (or a different lossless). If they rip everything to WAV first and then encode later, how are they going to populate their ID3 tags? WAV does not store ID3 tags.

      I use EAC/LAME in Secure Mode and it takes ~10 mins to rip and encode an audio track. The ripping takes the most time, the encoding with LAME 3.97b2 is pretty fast.

      To the OP: Do it right, do it once, use EAC/LAME and get the best quality MP3s you can. You don't want to have to re-rip all these tracks when you realize you've made the wrong choice in formats (do NOT use WMA, please for the love of god and be careful about choosing AAC - limited support). You can get fancy and do a one rip, double encode to MP3 and FLAC using EAC/LAME with MAREO and then you have lossless for archiving and lossy for your portalbe audio system.

      Cheers.

      --
      Mark
    3. Re:ripping vs encoding by tomjen · · Score: 1

      Well, you could store your files as ArtistName-Album-Tracknumber-Title.wav
      And then just have your script slice the filenames and set the id3 based on this.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    4. Re:ripping vs encoding by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1
      If they rip everything to WAV first and then encode later, how are they going to populate their ID3 tags? WAV does not store ID3 tags.

      I use the filenames to carry the information that I will later use MP3Collector to make into ID3 tags.

      Here's an example
      • Ice Cube-[AmeriKKKa's Most Wanted]-07-Turn Off The Radio.wav


      All of the information that I use (artist, album, track index, song title) are all contained in the name of the file. It's easy to extract automatically.

      I encode my music as 256kbps MP3s. Personally, I prefer Blade for encoding. Not lossless, but more than good enough for my purposes.

      LK
      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:ripping vs encoding by gnud · · Score: 1

      Well, us purists may be ripping to a lossless format for other reasons than quality. For example, to avoid having to re-rip 200 cds, as you are currently doing :) If I needed my entire collection in mp3 for some reason, I could do it with a bash script overnight.

    6. Re:ripping vs encoding by Shabbs · · Score: 1

      True. I use ID3-TagIT to do similar activities when the tags don't come out right. But a lot of people like to store more ID3 tag info than the basics such as Genre, Year, Comments, Total # of tracks, etc... you end up with really long file names.

      --
      Mark
  20. Try one of these by Tacvek · · Score: 1

    For the hardware side you could make one of these:
    http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/tech/changer.html
    or one of these:
    http://www.redfrontdoor.org/cd-changer.html

    Software would be some bash scripting, and a few short programs.

    On the other hand, it will probably take more time to make one of these than it would take to do the cd changing by hand.

    --
    Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  21. Slim Devices (of squeezebox fame) also offers by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1
    ripping.

    Check their offering out which comes to just under $400 for 300 CDs.

  22. cheapest way by cheaphomemadeacid · · Score: 0

    buy a dvd burner?

  23. Sony VAIO by bleaknik · · Score: 1

    Sony Makes an interesting VAIO now--it's called Sony® VAIO® VGX-XL1 Digital Living System(TM)VGX-XL1.

    I don't have $2000 floating around, so I can't exactly test it out for ya, but there are mixed reviews out on the net...

    It's an interesting system, actually. In theory, it's a capable media center pc with a 200 disc CD/DVD changer. The specs aren't too bad, although for a PVR, 200 GB seems low. And at that price... seems a whee expensive, but VAIOs usually are...

    Anyway, this is probably your best bet, if you're looking to spend a bit of money.

    --
    Deja Vu
    n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    1. Re:Sony VAIO by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      not to troll, but you expect a Sony computer to rip CD's for you?

      I realy don't know but I would suspect they will start making firmware that will stop ripping...

      (yes I'm paranoid. I also dont like VAIO comps for a few other reasons...)

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
    2. Re:Sony VAIO by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      Sony's business divisions are relatively segregated. Not that I agree with the whole rootkit fiasco.

      I have been, historically, been satisified with the quality of the two VAIOs that I have bought. They have been well built, durable, and reliable.

      I did not make any claims regarding the quality of the XL1--or it's ability to do the job well. As stated, reviews seem to be mixed; some praising it as the greatest invention *evar*, and some scoffing at it's poorly designed software.

      What I do know is that the XL1 is the first personal computer that I have found with a 200 disc media changer.

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  24. Automated CD ripper from Sony... by nacs · · Score: 1

    I was at Fry's yesterday and saw a Sony media center system that allows you to load up 200 discs in it's CD changer and have them all ripped to your PC automatically.

    I googled it and apparently it's the "Sony XL 1" media center, runs Windows Media Center (and is pretty expensive). I guess if you were in the market for a high end media center system then this would be a good route.

    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
    1. Re:Automated CD ripper from Sony... by nacs · · Score: 1

      Here's a link to the Sony system at Amazon.

      It's $1800 for the whole thing (you can't get the CD changer/ripper separately it seems).

      --
      "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
    2. Re:Automated CD ripper from Sony... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      can it rip to an open format or is it limited to protected wma's?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  25. The geeky way... by nacs · · Score: 1

    I just remembered this home-made CD changer that could be used to rip your CDs automatically.

    Of course it's an ugly hack and uber-geeky but hey, this is /. ;-)

    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
  26. Trade them for an iPod? by value_added · · Score: 1

    Dunno if this is legit, but there's these guys who will do it for you and send everything back on a shiny-new loaded iPod.

    1. Re:Trade them for an iPod? by A+Commentor · · Score: 1

      That's not legal.

      To summerize what they claim to be doing: You give them the CDs to digitize, they do that, put it on an IPOD that they will give you and also burn you a DVD "back-up" of the songs. You sell them the CDs and then get your new IPOD and DVD "back-up" copy of the CDs...

      At the point you sell the CDs, you no longer have the right to keep the songs on the IPOD or to keep the DVD "back-up". You may as well just try to download the MP3 of the CDs you have, I would think that you have a better chance in court arguing that you just downloaded songs that you already own on CD, than selling your CDs and keeping a copy... all the RIAA has to do is sue that company to locate all of their customers...

      --

      Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    2. Re:Trade them for an iPod? by value_added · · Score: 1

      That's not legal.

      Most of it seems structured in such a way to avoid any problems, so if by "not legal" you're referring to the act of keeping the digitised copies on your shiny new iPod, yeah, possibly.

      Then again, is "posession" really a crime? And is it worth pursuing? Seems to me the RIAA et al. are more interested prosecuting indviduals for distribution.

    3. Re:Trade them for an iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's not legal.

      Who cares? Most or all of us are criminals already.

    4. Re:Trade them for an iPod? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      At the point you sell the CDs, you no longer have the right to keep the songs on the IPOD or to keep the DVD "back-up".

      Why not? Ripping a CD, selling the CD, and keeping the rip is 100% legal. Copyright isn't a license.

      However, any company that "professionally" rips CDs for a fee is violating copyright. Consumers have the right to copy music for personal use. There is no way in hell that any company can copy CDs for a fee.

    5. Re:Trade them for an iPod? by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      And this is why it's bad to take legal advice from Slashdot.

      Where on earth do you get the idea that you can rip-and-sell? In the U.S, that's clearly a violation of S. 106(1) of the Copyright Act. You can claim fair use in space-shifting, but when you sell the original, you've gone well beyond that.

      The best I can come up with is S 1008 of the Audio Home Recording Act, but (1) your computer isn't a "Digital Audio Recording Device" and (2) when you sell the CD, that's commercial.

    6. Re:Trade them for an iPod? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      You can claim fair use in space-shifting,

      You can claim it, but probably lose. Ripping a CD is probably not fair use, no matter who owns the CD, who rips the CD (with the exception of a library), or what happens to the CD after it's ripped.

      your computer isn't a "Digital Audio Recording Device" and

      Hmm... this is an interesting argument. If this is true, then any ripping CDs is a violation of copyright. Period. Because there's no way any sane person can claim that creating a digital music collection is fair use.

      you sell the CD, that's commercial.

      That has nothing to do with the ripping itself. You're allowed to rip, and you're allowed to sell the CD. It may be commercial if you rip the CD for the purpose of selling it after, but that doesn't give you any obligation to destroy legally ripped copies after you sell a CD.

    7. Re:Trade them for an iPod? by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      I would point you to R.I.A.A. v. Diamond Multimedia, 180 F.3d 1072, noting that space-shifting is fine and that a computer isn't a Digital Audio Recording Device.

      You are allowed to rip the CD (AHRA & Fair Use) and you're allowed to sell the CD (First sale doctrine). Once you've sold the CD, though, you no longer have an original work. So, any copying that you do of it -- including the copying from your disk drive into the memory of the computer -- is an infringement. You can't claim that this copying is fair use, because fair use relies on your having an original to begin with.

  27. The old fashioned way by TequilaJunction · · Score: 1

    Unless you've already got all your cd's in a stack, the most time consuming part of the process is removing them from the jewel case. There's no cost-effective way to automate that without spending more time than you would just doing it. If you're doing 10k discs or more, then it's time to buy or build a robot.

  28. How Many of These CD Ripping Services... by dch24 · · Score: 1
    ...have a warranty to cover your CD if it is damaged?

    Or is it "Even if CDs do become damaged, replacements are readily available at affordable prices.".

    I mean, the RIAA might sue them for not damaging your CD's! I see a way to make a lot of money here. ;-)

  29. Challenge to /. - it's time for some hacking. by mmell · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Look carefully at (virtually any) CD/DVD drive designed for mounting in a half-height 5 1/4" bay.

    Now, open ANY cd-jukebox (I've got a 60-slot model; I couldn't afford the 250-slot model). Mechanically, it shouldn't be too difficult to fit the CD/DVD drive mechanism in place of the existing CD; it's a fairly simple mechanism (although hacking the cupholder will certainly be required,.

    Fix up the data cabling to support the drive (piece of cake) and hack the front panel controls to allow for inputs from some form of computer interface (serial perhaps - gotta do something with it) (that looks like the hard part, BTW, but I also know that there are /.'ers out there who will read this and say "no, that's easy!").

    I thought about building something like this for profit once, but I'll never raise the VC for it. Can Slashdot produce a hack (with free-as-in-beer instructions) to accomplish this? Or has it been done already?

    1. Re:Challenge to /. - it's time for some hacking. by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you're trying to say but it seems like it's leading to something interesting.
      Want to give it another shot?

  30. abcde by mrfantasy · · Score: 3, Informative

    abcde works well. It's very configurable, rips to any audio format you'd want (I use FLAC) and can eject the CD when done. And it's written in bash.

    My blog talks about how I used it. It can run as a daemon so I had it down to insert CD, and change it 15-20 minutes later when it ejected again (cdparanoia and flac took longer than 52x would make you think).

    --

    -- Of course I'm paranoid. I'm a sysadmin.

    1. Re:abcde by c0l0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is designed to be run with any POSIX-compatible shell. That doesn't make it any better or worse, though - it's a VERY nice tool for ripping CDDA. I dumped my collection of about 150 CDs to hdd in just under 2 days (when I was one of those teenagers you might want to hire to do it for you ;)). The only drawback with all this ripping-by-yourself-stuff is, that if you want to have your music tagged properly and consistently, you're about to re-{read,format,write} ALL of the freedb-provided info with $EDITOR. Sucks, really.
      Still the way I'd go for to tackle the problem.

      --
      :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g

      YTARY!
  31. Just do it at work by pla · · Score: 1

    the best advice to come out of it seemed to be to hire a local teenager to be that slave

    Assuming you have a desk-job and a machine not locked down tighter than a cat's ass...

    Take a dozen CDs per day to work. Set your preferred ripping software to automatically look your CDs up, rip, and eject. Pop one in, start your program, minimize it, and just replace discs whenever the tray pops open. Then just dump them all to a keychain drive (DON'T use it as the intermediate path, copy them at the end of the day - Some rippers and some encoders write and flush sample-by-sample, meaning you can burn through your 100k write lifetime after just two or three dozen ripped discs) at the end of the day.

    Anyway... If it takes a total of 30 seconds per disc of human-interactive time, you need a new ripping program (and I say that as someone who manually checks that FreeDB/CDDB gave me results to my liking).

    I would suggest separating out any classical, multi-artist compilations, books-on-CD, and some live material (where one song can span multiple tracks, and vice-versa) to do on your own time... They can take a few minutes of research to get the names right. But for standard one-artist-per-disc with one-song-per-track material (ie, the vast majority of modern music), you shouldn't have to do anything more than role-play a CD changing robot.

    And hey, what more could you ask for than getting paid for that whopping five minutes per day it takes to rip a dozen CDs?

    1. Re:Just do it at work by spinfire · · Score: 1

      Well, I rip to flac so that would fill up a flashdrive pretty fast. But, if you use a portable music player with a hard disk you can use most of these as a USB hard drive (very convenient for making convenient sneakernet transfers when I am already at the colo!). Alternatively, if you have a DVD burner you can use that.

  32. Wimp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just ripped - according to my database statistics - 2116 albums when I combined my wife's (she was a dj) and my collection. She had probably twice the number of CDs that I had and I spent those four minutes reviewing artists and albums I didn't know in her collection using AllMusic. I learned a lot - both about my wife and the music she likes. I'd approach it as an opportunity to figure out if you should catch-up on any artists you previously liked or maybe find some similar ones that you never heard of.

    Speaking of cool, old music - have you heard of Wolfgang's Vault? Try Playing Vault Radio. It is kind of neat.

  33. Best Method for Automated CD Ripping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Build an android to do it for you.

  34. lots of boxes! by flatt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd say buy maybe 5-10 ideally indentical Pentium 3-ish computers, perhaps from ebay (look for local to avoid shipping fees) or from college surplus auctions (a geek gold mine). Get one setup to automate the process as much as possible and clone hd's.

    Have at it. This can be done for much, much cheaper than you might think. I managed to get 12 PCs of this type for $50 at a surplus auction and I could have had about 10 more at around $2 a piece. You could be up and running in an afternoon ripping many cd's at once. Go down the line every 10 minutes or so while you hang out/read a book/watch tv and you'll be done in no time. Plus, when you're done you'll have all sorts of goodies to play with for other projects.

    Just be nice to your circuit breaker.

    1. Re:lots of boxes! by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      I have an operation like this. Six machines machine ripping, plus a server that collects all the files and burns the mp3 archive disks (and loads the iPod). Every now and them someone needs 500 CDs ripped and loaded in time for a birthday. (The next step is fitting them with turntables and audio processing software for converting LP collections.)

    2. Re:lots of boxes! by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      http://wooga.drbacchus.com/wordpress/?p=1148 tak a looky for LP conversion..

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  35. How do they handle unique albums by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Say I have 1,000 garage-band one-off CDs from the late '80s and early '90s I want ripped.

    They won't have any of these in their inventory, and it's unlikely anyone else will ever ask for them again.

    Will they just eat the loss/lack-of-profit or will they turn down the business?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  36. WTF? by aquabat · · Score: 1
    Could you please clarify what you mean by "automatically" ripping, as opposed to "manually" ripping a CD?

    I ask merely for information.

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  37. Moot by owlman17 · · Score: 1

    While saying this might make me off-topic or flamebait, I suppose http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060215-6190 .html would make it (ripping our own cds) moot and academic.

  38. dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're posting on slashdot...obviously you're a slave to the computer every 4 minutes at least...

    move along folks, nothing to see here

  39. Try a disc library by serent · · Score: 1

    You could use a CD or DVD ROM library such as the R200ROM from http://www.powerfile.com/. A disc library used in conjunction with software which operates it allows discs to be automatically loaded and accessed. This kind of solution is expensive though, so is best used when you will have to do this frequently. Using several PCs or a local teenager may well be faster and cheaper overall.

  40. Multiple drives on one computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do this as a business on the local level. I currently have 2 PowerMac G4 ($200 or less on ebay) with a total of 32 52x CDRom drives in 4 different 8 Bay firewire enclosures. I load all drives up and close the trays. iTunes automatically rips them all and ejects them when done. I check in every couple of hours to reload trays and repeat. My 8 bay enclosure ran about $280 each with shipping and around $150 per ten pack for brandnew 52x LG CD-Rom drives. It could be done cheaper buy building your own enclosure (convert an old server case or SCSI CD tower using firewire or USB bridge boards) and used cd drives, or even a stack of individual USB external burners-$30 $40 bucks each. I dont know if iTunes on a PC will rip multiple mounted discs like a Mac will so YMMV. Also there is software like RIP Monkey for the Mac $1000 that will control the Powerfile networked or locally connected 200 disc cd changers and interface with iTunes.

  41. Being a multitasking slave isn't so bad by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    I am not looking forward to being a slave to the computer every 4 minutes in order to change the CD in the drive.
    Being a slave isn't so bad, if you're just going to be sitting at the computer anyway. Play a game, read Slashdot, get addicted to MUDs, get a job, stare at porn, etc -- whatever it is that you do with your computer. Every few minutes, change the CD. It's no big deal, as long as your CDs aren't too obscure (i.e. not in freedb, so you have to actually spend your time typing in track names). The trick is to not think of it as time wasted on reading CDs, but rather, time wasted on all of life's other shit -- your CDs are getting read asychronously. ;-)
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Being a multitasking slave isn't so bad by Strolls · · Score: 1
      Being a slave isn't so bad, if you're just going to be sitting at the computer anyway.., stare at porn, etc -- whatever it is that you do with your computer. Every few minutes, change the CD. It's no big deal, as long as your CDs aren't too obscure

      It's no big deal, as long as you don't mind your CDs getting all sticky.
  42. Hard part is not ripping in bulk by jbridges · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Anyone can hookup a bunch of CD-ROM drives to a PC and rip multiple CDs at once.

    The hard part is getting perfect rips with correct tags so you NEVER have to rip those CDs again.

    Perfect means EAC (Exact Audio Copy), with Secure, no C2, no buffering, and using TEST/COPY. Using FLAC (or other lossless) format. Who wants to ever do this much work again? Rip to lossless and never rip again.

    You can run multiple copies of EAC at once, it works with external USB drives. I've seen people rip 12 CDs at the same time. Fill up the drives, start them all up, and walk away.

    Yes, TEST/COPY takes twice as long, but with a stack of drives running, who cares, the important part is catching errors, and TEST/COPY will catch errors you would miss otherwise!

    The truely time consuming part is tagging and problematic CDs (ones with scratches, or bad pressings). Ever type in tags on a complex CD? Takes time. Then there are those precious CDs that won't rip without errors no matter how many times you swap drives, or grind it down with a DiskDoctor.

  43. Re:Use bananas.. by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    I agree that this is really the best solution. I ripped my entire collection over the span of about 2 weeks. Pop in a CD, fire it up, walk away. I'd be willing to bet that the original poster spends a lot of time sitting near a computer. Just load up another one and keep it rolling when it ejects.

  44. Build one by kinema · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check this out. The guy built exactly what you are looking for. Here is another one.

  45. Seriously. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's funny because I've done exactly that. I'll be at work and need a obscure bunch of tracks for a mix CD for someone in the office. Shit... my CDs are at home, of course. But sure enough, AllofMP3 has it. Do I pay a dollar to save the hassel of lugging around and flipping through a CD album? You bet I do, especially when I get to pick the encoding technique.
    The day is saved! Huzzah!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  46. Do you have a day job? by sootman · · Score: 1

    I ripped my whole collection (~300 discs) over the course of a week at work with a second computer in my cube. Wasn't that big of a deal, I just turned around whenever I felt like it. Even if you only get to them every 10 minutes, that's 6 an hour or about 50 in an eight-hour day. Unless you need them so soon that you feel compelled to run back and forth between an array of machines to knock it out in a couple hours, just do it at your leisure. The task will melt away before you know it.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  47. Oh really! by BlackErtai · · Score: 1

    You've obviously never met any nine year olds. Spend alittle while in an irc channel, then imagine trying to get that to sit in front of a computer for 24 hours swapping CDs. Yeah...I thought so.

    --
    -|BlackErtai|-
  48. Was a wimp! (was Better than a teenager) by StonyCreekBare · · Score: 1

    200-300 CDs is a big job requiring farming out to a teenager? Sheesh.

    I just ripped ~300 CDs to my computer. I offer the following observations.

    (1) Use multiple computers. I set up 4 computers, and cycled myself between them as fast as I could load/unload CDs. I ripped everything to a network share on my server, and it went extremely smoothly.

    (2) Use DVD drives if you can. My 2 computers with DVD drives ripped 4-5X as fast as the 2 with CD drives only, and I found some CDs that the CD drives couldn't read, the DVDs could.

    (3) You can use multiple drives on one computer. I plugged a couple of USB drives into a fast Sony laptop and was able to run multiple instances of my ripping program, each talking to a different drive. The work goes a little slower per drive, but the computer is never idle, and the total job goes much faster. Plus, if a disk is hard to read and the ripping process slows down, only one drive is affected, ripping proceeds at full speed on the other drives.

    (4) Set up the computers all in one room. I didn't do this and I got a heck of a workout running back and forth. If I do it again, I will do this differently.

    I didn't time myself (I didn't know it was a race) but I think my whole session was around 3 hours, give-or-take. A little more time after the job to tweak/tune MP3 tags will be needed as CDDB didn't have all my music. I put movies on the tube and watched a couple of favorite movies out of the corner of my eye as I shuffled disks, and was done before I knew it.

    Stony

  49. Forget that! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    First:

    1) Buy as many external USB2.0 5.25" enclosures that you possibly afford. They run anywhere from $20-$40. The main thing you're getting out of this is POWER ADAPTERS.

    2) Buy an equal number of IDE CDROM drives. If you paid more than $20 for any of them, you paid too much.

    I wouldn't spend more than $50 with tax and shipping for each pair of CD-ROM + enclosure. You can do it for $40 if you buy refurbed/OEM/surplus stuff.

    If you managed to get more than 12 drives, then also buy a cheap, bus-powered 4-way USB 2.0 hub for every 4 drives. This should be $15 or less a piece, shipped. Make sure it comes with a short A-B cable. (some of the cheap one's don't)

    Add up the total number of USB-2.0 connections you have to make with the host computer. If you have 14 drives, that's 3 + 2 = 5 (3 from the USB hubs that hold 4 each, and 2 left over). You'll need that many connections on your host computer.

    Purchase an appropriate number of USB-2.0 expansion cards with at least 3 ports each. You may have some onboard, but you shouldn't plug all your drives into it because the southbridge becomes a bottleneck when you have a lot of USB endpoints behind it.
    Try to put one hub on the onboard USB-2.0, and then 1 per expansion card. Once you put a hub on each expansion card, loop around at put another hub on the onboard USB, then visit all the expansion cards again. Finally, do the same procedure with the non-hub attached CDROMs.

    This should balance your connections among the USB controllers in your system in such a way to minimize PCI and USB bus contention.

    So let's say I bought 24 external CDROMs.
    I would buy 6 USB2 4-way hubs, and 2 PCI USB-2.0 controllers (in addition to the one in my motherboard)

    I would plug all 24 drives into the hubs, and then 2 hubs into each PCI card, and the remaining 2 into my onboard USB2.

    Stack up all the external CDROMs into a couple of nice rows, and turn on your system.

    Boom! You should detect 24 CDROM drives. You should be able to rip in parallel.

    Note: You may have trouble ripping from a lot of CDROM drives simultaneously. If so, break your work into chunks that operate a few drives at a time, and go full tilt ripping and encoding. When one set is done, move onto the next set of drives. At least you don't have to run around changing CDs every 5 minutes.

    Try different combinations of numbers of drives until you find your max throughput.

    Note: Windows might not like having 20+ individual drives plugged in. At least, the shell might not give drive letters to all of them. You'll have to get creative with the volume manager and accessing them in other ways. In linux/BSD, it's a matter of starting a lot of ripping processes in parallel, appropriately niced.

    Note: You might need a lot of powerstrips. Try the "Squid". It's $15 a pop but you'll use it for more than just this.

    Example costs (all with 3 day shipping):

    * 24 Samsung CDROM drives from CSO: $ 200
    * 24 external 5.25" enclosures from NewEgg $ 700
    * 6 USB2.0 hubs from NewEgg $ 90
    * 2 USB2.0 controller cards from NewEgg $ 25
    * 5 "Squids" from any etailer: $ 75

    Total cost for 24 CDs AT ONCE: ~$1100

    Now that's not bad at all. A lot less power draw and more managable than 8 PCs on your dining room table.
    Plus you can probably get away with returning those CD-ROM enclosures. Better yet, you could probably net a profit reselling the assembled external CD-ROMs on ebay. :-D

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Forget that! by damiam · · Score: 1

      That sounds like fun, but even assuming your computer can handle ripping and encoding 24 CDs at once, your plan is almost certainly more work than just spending a day with a normal 2-drive computer and a helluva lot more expensive than hiring a teenager.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Forget that! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

      After I posted this, I found even cheaper ways to hook up CD-ROMs... there's these IDEUSB converter dongles which are basically the guts of the enclosures. You can get 'em for half the price.

      You don't have to spend more than a few hundred dollars. Set them up in some kinda lego tower with all the cables snakin out of it. :-D
      The cool part about this is being able to just insert CDs and have the software automatically rip and index it. The system would eject the drive when it can accept another.

      Besides, I already have thousands of CDs. I'm not paying to have some kid manhandle them and rip them for his own personal use. :-/

      --
      THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  50. iTunes or some other automated program by 55555+Manbabies! · · Score: 1

    As long as you have something that ejects the disc automatically and starts ripping automatically when you insert, you can get high and play a computer game while you rip.

  51. What I did to rip my collection by treczoks · · Score: 1

    Years ago, I ripped my collection of ~250 audio CDs. I used cdparanoia as software, and a little script I wrote, which made a directory on the server based on the ID of the CD (so the directories are unique), and asked me for a title. Everything as automated as possible. After ripping, the CD would automatically eject.

    Then, I gathered each and every PC in my home that still run, booted it into linux (even the windoze boxes have a minimum of linux on them just in case win f***ks up again), installed the script, and kept changing CDs for about half a day on a whole bank of machines.

    Hunting for a teen that I could trust with my collection would have taken longer, I guess ;-)

  52. Spend any time in front of the computer? by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

    My dad just bought a new computer and ripped his CD collection (300?).

    No teenagers.

    While he was surfing his favorite websites, he put in discs. If he walked past the computer room on his way to the garage, he'd put in another disc.

    It took about a week.
    Simple.
    Fast.
    Problem solved.

  53. Cost vs teenagers... by mrfaulty · · Score: 1

    Teenagers need a highly disposable income, so in the end, a compromise between yourself and machine is the best option!

    I recommended looking for a cheap 2nd hand CD/CDR tower they've been around for years - 7 x SCSI CD readers (maybe even CD-R/RW drives depending on what you find)... in a tower you plug into your PC with a SCSI interface.. grab some CD ripping software that works from a shell/command line (eg cdrdao/lame).. script it up and rip 7 CD's at once... may not do the whole 300 in one go but you do 7 at once, and it's relatively fast and cheap for one of these boxes nowadays as it's obsolete technology.

    At the end of the day after your CD's are on your new ipod you can use it as a doorstop or put it on ebay for someone else to rip another 300 CD's. If I didn't describe this piece of equipment properly search for 'cd tower scsi' on ebay to get an idea. I don't know if there may be newer versions of this contraption based on sata, and it all depends on your budget.

    Check your local classifieds, I picked mine up for $50 if there are no decent online deals. Heck mine is being used here as a doorstop...

  54. Grip is fine, but watch out for CDDB! by rklrkl · · Score: 1

    I use Grip myself too to rip my CD collection (done about 800 so far), but the big problems with this are:

    1. Some CDs I have aren't in CDDB, so you have to stop the rip, type the track names, artist and album name in manually and restart the rip again, deleting any "NoArtist/NoTitle" files created by the "empty rip".

    2. Some CDs (particularly CD singles) are recognised as entirely different CDs - I suspect this is where the CD ID isn't in CDDB, so it falls back to using track lengths to match a CD. This especially painful when you end up with a Japanese CD single that creates 8-bit filenames...

    3. A sadly common problem is where the CD is in CDDB, but the CD title and track titles are misspelled or missing, involving a lot of file renaming later on if you don't spot it before Grip gets to the track(s) involved.

    Hence, even "automated" solutions involving big jukeboxes or robot arms will need manual intervention. As other responses have said, pay one or two people to do it (having 2 or 3 PCs available would help speed things up w.r.t. waiting the 5 mins for the rip to finish).

  55. Robotics. by OgGreeb · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been researching this for the last several weeks because I'm thinking about offering CD ripping as an additional service. I've found that the makers of the DVD/CD robotic duplicators are just now getting the hint that these devices can be re-tasked to rip disks and make them some more sales, so they are coming out with solutions.

    For low-volume ripping, there is a device called the Baxter that goes for about $800 from various resellers. It will hold 25 disks at a time in its hopper and comes with the excellent Riptastic software bundled. Go in with a friend to get one of these and it makes the cost cheaper. Sell it on eBay afterwards and make most of your money back.

    The biggest problem with small-capacity units is that they run out of disks too soon -- you can't load enough to let them run overnight.

    The larger capacity (250 to 600 disks at a time) robotic units come with PCs built into them (they were designed for duplicating and the software is only beginning to catch up with them). They run from $3300 up to $5500 depending on capacity and number of CD drives used. Even with the higher cost, it can make sense if you get together a bunch of buddies to chip in. Say you charge your friends $0.50/disk simply to cover the cost of the machine (you're not doing it as a business). Pooling the money of 6-8 friends and then selling it on eBay afterwards might cover the cost.

    The vendors I spoke to said that they get questions about these boxes every day. The biggest problem is making the Riptastic software (or other similar software) work with multiple simultaneously ripping drives. So we should see some announcements on this in the next several months.

    Any of the robotic devices used for ripping also have the advantage of being duplicators of course. They also help make excellent DVD backup devices, since you can start the backup and walk away, letting the robot flop the disks for you.

    Disclaimer: I don't represent any of these vendors -- I'm just doing the research necessary to purchase some to offer a ripping service. You could of course ask me to rip them for you... 8-).

    --
    -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
  56. Good time for doing other stuff too by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Or you could just do it a few CDs at a time. I've been ripping my CD collection onto my laptop over the last few months - you don't need to do it over a weekend, you know, and it's no great trouble to occasionally pop a CD in and rip it ...
    No need to be a slave to your computer. It's maybe a 30-second process each time the CD needs to be changed out. When I have a bunch to process (usually after a birthday or one of my clearance-rack sprees), I just grab a good book or movie and settle down with it. Pop a CD in, click Start, read, remove CD, and loop. I also find it forces me to get some reading done that I might otherwise replace with computer games.

    It's not exactly fire and forget, but it has always worked well for me.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Good time for doing other stuff too by racermd · · Score: 1

      Even better - Read /. while ripping!

      Seriously, I just hit my normal list of geek news sites whenever I have a batch process running that needs occasional attention. Most of the time, it's a CD/DVD backup, a hard disk copy, or some audio processing. During whatever process I run, I fire up the browser and hit /. and a few other sites to get up to speed on what the world has going on.

      The basic point is that the CD ripping isn't a task that requires a constant monitor, nor is it one that needs to be Ronco simple ('Set-it-and-forget-it!'). If either of the two extremes aren't feasible, accept that fact and start multitasking.

      Of course, that's assuming that the need to rip 300+ CDs isn't absolutely immediate, as in, 'I need it done today'. If that's the case, I have nothing for you.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
  57. Automated Solutions by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I know we have a robot-arm CD duplicator here at work that clocked in at about $200 that holds about 40 discs at a time. Admittedly, you'd have to get into the drivers to figure out how to tell it to just load the CD, run the ripping, then move it to the next stack...

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  58. Baxter CD robot by negpol2 · · Score: 1

    http://www.mfdigital.com/baxter.html/ The Baxter CD robot sold by MFdigital can do what you need, 25 disks at a time. Its a cd/dvd copyier, audio disk ripper, and backup / restore. It costs about $800. I use one at work. its nice in that it can backup 115 gig to cheap dvds in about 10 hours.

  59. What to do flac rips with? by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Sounds like flac is the best lossless archive standard, then (or simultaneously) to mp3 for compact portability. iTunes won't rip to flac, nor will cdparanoia from what I can see? What will, and will get the tags as well as iTunes et al? Do any support flac/mp3 creation in one pass? I need a Mac or Windows app, although others may care about Linux solutions.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    1. Re:What to do flac rips with? by pashdown · · Score: 1

      Cdparanoia is a ripper, not an encoder. All it does is take the digital stream off the CD. You need another program to use cdparanoia in conjunction with an encoder. I know you said Mac or Windows, but since you mentioned simultaneous flac/mp3 creation, I had to put in another plug for abcde. I use it for simultaneous flac/mp3 creation, flac to archive, mp3 for my iPod and portability. I've done over 1500+ of my own CDs with this setup. Its well worth a Linux install. However it appears that abcde works with OSX now, I can't vouch for that setup.

  60. Re:Or you could just talk to us by niknakwak · · Score: 1

    I hate being blatantly commercial, but this is what we do ....automated CD conversion systems. www.ripfactory.com . Happy to take any questions not remotely commercial!

  61. or goto isohunt.com and download them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If u payed for the rights to play them. U should just be able to download from the net cuz. ..ur letting them get caught

  62. RIFF tags by tepples · · Score: 1

    WAV does not store ID3 tags.

    RIFF files such as .wav files and .avi files certainly can store the information of ID3 tags and more. If your ripper or encoder doesn't support RIFF tags in .wav files, bug the developer.