Slashdot Mirror


Exposing Children to Technology?

LabelThis asks: "While I'm not a huge fan of immersing children in technology, there is a certain point at which you must expose them to the tools that will help them be successful in the world. Looking back, I distinctly remember my parents making every effort to provide a computer for me and my sibling, early on (they bought an Atari 400 for us when I was 5). Either by accident or on purpose, that single decision (and the continued follow up of purchasing newer computers as needed) shaped my future and the future of my siblings. I now have a daughter, and my wife and I have a number of years to before we worry about equipping her with technology (right now spending time with her and helping her be a happy well adjusted toddler are our primary concerns). In the spirit of my parents choice, what type of tools should parents be equipping their children with, today?"

58 of 466 comments (clear)

  1. Make sure they know how do it either way by Zantetsuken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    with or without tech, that away they wont be screwed if they dont have their favorite tech, but make sure they are plenty exposed to tech so they arent screwed in the job market later in life...

    1. Re:Make sure they know how do it either way by thx1138_az · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a "technologist" I work for da man. Now that you have made da money, teach 'em to be da man.

      Personally my children are going to be better than me. My father was a barber, I'm a computer tech. It's a step forward but we still are in the "service industry" working for someone else. Technology is a business tool and I'm just a tool that operates the tool. I want my kids to both master those tools and be the master of those tools. MBA all the way, get them some seed money and then let them become the cio, ceo or c-insert_letter_here-o of their company. Providing I can keep 'em off da drugs.

    2. Re:Make sure they know how do it either way by Slithe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How old are your children? Are you sure they want to be MBAs? If they are less than 15 years of age, they most likely have no idea about what they want to do. I am not saying that becoming an MBA is a bad thing, but make sure it is their passion. Having to fulfill their parents' dreams instead of their own is what puts a lot of kids on 'da drugs' in the first place.

      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    3. Re:Make sure they know how do it either way by jawtheshark · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It is not your choice...

      • My great-grand-father (following dad's line) had a bike-repair shop.
      • My grand-father was an accountant.
      • My dad is an economist, but reverted quite early to IT. (in the seventies to be exact... Self-taught of course, he can't really program)
      • I am a computer scientist.
      As you can see, there is clearly a up-going line. According to your idea, I should encourage my kids to become MBA's. You know what? My dad wanted *me* to become an MBA, because it was *his* vision of "his-career-but-better". My vision of "his-career-but-better" was not in the management part but in the IT part. These constructs are not "lines", they are networks.

      Worse: you don't take into account the capacities of the kids. My brother is a bus driver and my sister finished highschool, but that's it. Oddly enough, both seem to be happier than me in what they do.

      What you want is the "best-for-them-financially", because you know that an MBA usually earns better than whatever you do now. That is not the road to happiness. Go figure.... Sometimes, I wish I was the busdriver in the family.... or heck, had a bike repair shop. Utimately, in the line of the family, my great-grand-father had the best situation: a cool "tech job" (for those times) and he was his own boss. I don't think an MBA can match that...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:Make sure they know how do it either way by firl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well I started out when I was 8 on a 8086, it was not too helpful for prononciations of words like, genre. Although I did learn how to compile my kernel and install different operating systems when I was 10. To me the computer was this mega game, that when I would program using the win32 api I could do whatever I wanted the computer to do. This was also before the internet, and AIM. I would connect to BBS's and play rpg's there. If the kids just wanna sit there and play mindless games, I am not sure how long, but depending on the motivation and the desire, it could be a great thing to know at age 5. My Mother teaches 5 year olds in school and teaches them about the computer, how to type, has them playing typing games, and has them type letters, and draw out plans. It really depends on your kids on how much they want to do it. I ended up spending 10 hours a day on my dos / linux computer dialing up into BBS's. It ate into my school time, but I now program making more money than I would if I did go for an english degree and became a teacher.

    5. Re:Make sure they know how do it either way by JWW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally my children are going to be better than me. My father was a barber, I'm a computer tech. It's a step forward but we still are in the "service industry" working for someone else. Technology is a business tool and I'm just a tool that operates the tool. I want my kids to both master those tools and be the master of those tools. MBA all the way, get them some seed money and then let them become the cio, ceo or c-insert_letter_here-o of their company. Providing I can keep 'em off da drugs.

      And people actually have to wonder why interest in science, engineering, and math is dropping like a rock.

      The @%#$%$ MBA's don't actually create anything, most are worthless, and the core value of being the 'man' will wear off for them when they find their entire company being replaced by a foreign competitors, who instead of doing just the outsorced technical work for their companies, take over doing all the work of their companies.

    6. Re:Make sure they know how do it either way by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, learning how to figure things out with pencil and paper is the basis of being a programmer or engineer.

      How do you do that until you have learned to read or write?

      My five year old taught himself how to read fluently at the age of 4 by playing computer games. Oddly enough not even computer games designed to be educational. I-Spy spooky mansion has a series of picture riddles with written clues. I worked with him the first time through, after that he wanted to play the game on his own. He is now teaching himself how to write by creating rebus puzzles.

      I have a big problem with the anti-technology in education crowd. It is mostly prejudice. Sure constant 1 on 1 attention from a trained pre-school teacher might be more effective, but that is not going to happen for the vast majority of children. Even if it did a computer has certain advantages over a teacher, the biggest problem in getting a child to read is getting them to want to read. When a person asks them to read they give a puzzled look 'why don't you just read this'. With the computer they can see an immediate incentive.

      Education is unfortunately an area where it is very hard to apply a scientific approach. Any attempt at innovation will be attacked by the traditionalists. Most of the 'research' produced is worthless, produced to further an agenda rather than to illuminate.

      A good example of this is the recent rubbish produced in the UK to back the teaching reading using structural phonics. The report was requested by a minister of education who has an axe to grind. The experiment described involves a sample that is too small to be meaningful and appears to be intentionally flawed as both groups were taught using phonics.

      There is an infallible method of detecting junk research. Whenever the results are released to the press and endorsed by a politician involved in the commission of the study before the text of the document is available for third party examination then the study is junk.

      Phonetics is the basis of virtually all forms of human writing. Even apparently non-phonetic systems such as Han began as phonetic systems. It should not be suprising then that the majority of children respond best to teaching methods that take account of phonetic structure. But that does not mean that a phonetic system developed by one particular clique is better than other systems to the extent that teachers should be prohibited from using any other technique with any child.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  2. jigga bomb by sheaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    in my opinion, definately not the internet. it's not long before they/their friends start getting into AIM and things like that. before you know it, when they're still really small, they'll probably end up loading the computer with spyware and they might even have a myspace or something...teach em how to use a computer, but don't give em the internet until they're older and seem somewhat more responsible.

    1. Re:jigga bomb by carlislematthew · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And besides, who on earth would set up a computer for a child with administrative privileges?

      Ummm, perhaps the 99% of parents who have no idea what "administrative privileges" actually means. Just a thought...

    2. Re:jigga bomb by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting
      it's not long before they/their friends start getting into AIM and things like that.

      When did your parents start letting you use the telephone? "Instant Messaging" didn't begin with AOL. It began with Bell along about 1876.

      Our family preserves Grandmother's postcard correspondence as a seven year old girl in 1904. They are delightful and revealing. Consider it her entry into a larger world.

  3. hrn. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    My parents gave me plastic bags when I was very young. I expecially liked the full-body dry cleaning ones. For my 4th birthday they game me an old refrigerator with a locking door. I loved it.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  4. Computer != Technology by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you mean "computers" say so. "Technology" is not a synonym for "computers". Hint: cooking is technology.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Computer != Technology by kw87 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree that computer != technology but I don't know that I would call cooking technology. To quote from Douglas Adams, "Another problem with the net is that it's still 'technology', and 'technology', as the computer scientist Bran Ferren memorably defined it, is 'stuff that doesn't work yet.' We no longer think of chairs as technology, we just think of them as chairs."

    2. Re:Computer != Technology by whitehatlurker · · Score: 2, Funny

      what type of tools should parents be equipping their children with?
      "Technology" is not a synonym for "computers".
      Dang! I was going to say "weapons", but now I can't. Thanks for spoiling it, eh? ;-)

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    3. Re:Computer != Technology by MrCam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is why some people hate geeks and why many geeks can't seem to socialize well. Since you can pick appart this question about the pure definition of technology you obviously know what he is talking about, often the context is more important than the words. You know what he is trying to convay.

      I may not be communicating this properly, but I think the saying I get from sisters when I do the same thing would sum it up best and make my point:

      You know what I was talking about smart ass!

  5. Tech toys for tots by Announcer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As the child gets older, and shows an aptitude for Technology, I would suggest some simple electronics project kits that are suitable for their age, and appeal to their interests.

    There are a number of kit manufactures, such as Ramsey Electronics and Velleman which make kits of all types and skill levels. Some of my fondest memories are of having my Dad help me build something. As I got older, I spent my allowance on kits.

    Today, I work in a radio station as a Broadcast Engineer. Computers and IT are important, naturally, but if a child shows interest in what's "under the hood", they will have an advantage over their peers who only see the computer as a "box" that runs programs.

    --
    Willie...
    1. Re:Tech toys for tots by gatzke · · Score: 4, Insightful


      My dad bought me a few of these as a kid but it never sunk in. I could follow the instructions and put something together, but I was frustrated that I never really understood what the complex circiuits were doing.

      Maybe I needed some more fundamentals, maybe I should have asked dad for some more help, maybe I didn't have the math for op-amps or whatever when I was 10. It did not come naturally and the environment was not right to help me really get it.

      Maybe the educational materials that go along with those kits are better now. The radio shack stuff from 25 years ago didn't help me much...

    2. Re:Tech toys for tots by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea these kits sucked as they didn't expect you to use any problem solving skills. Lucikly I was curious enough to take the existing plans and attempt to slowly modify them to figure out what each and every part did. I still never quite figured out the chip that was provided, though I had no understanding of gate logic at my time, thats probably something that would have helped! :)

    3. Re:Tech toys for tots by logpoacher · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yup, I had exactly this problem - I was desperate to know about electronics, and although the kits made me familiar with soldering and components, I just couldn't figure out where to start understanding them. I could interpret the diagrams, but I couldn't infer the Purpose. I had a number of books, but they were either archaic (all about valves) or too low-level (semiconductor theory).

      And when I was a student, someone recommended Horowitz and Hill "The Art of Electronics" - and it was like a light going on! Fantastic book - I read it cover to cover, and ensured that I understood every single example. And I went back and had a look at my "150 Electronics Projects" project guide that had so puzzled me when I was 13, and it was totally clear what the problem was....

      The circuit diagrams! They were CRAP! They gave no indication of signal flow, or purpose - they were just a pile of symbols with lines between them. I took a couple of the ones that I was more familiar with, and redrew them properly, and it was instantly clear what the functional modules were: "this is a diff amp, this is a high-pass filter, ..." etc.

      Each project was also accompanied with an "explanation", which was the analog electronics equivalent of the

      x++; // add 1 to x
      style of commenting. It told you what each component did, without giving any kind of modular breakdown. Crazy.

      Of course, if it was now, I'd know that there had to be something better. The problem is that when you're a kid, you just accept that things are awkward - you tend to give up rather than say "let's find a better way!" Kits like that can be used as the basis of an educational experience, but there has to be someone watching who can say "hang on, this bit's not clear, let's do it like this instead!"

  6. Programming. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I first witnessed computer programming when I was 6 - A half brother coded a drawing program for me while I watched. 2 years later, I started taking my old 321 Contacts (GREAT magazine) and programming the Qbasic programs and games, and then modifying them.

    It just went up from there. If you can find a good magazine or something for kids that introduces them to programming, DO IT!

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    1. Re:Programming. by Boronx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoah, imagine what a whole brother could do.

    2. Re:Programming. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not saying force them, but make sure they are exposed to it (knowing it exists, knowing it can be fun and interesting - not making them do it). I myself am actually not a programmer - I do web development (PHP/MySQL/HTML/CSS), but I'm actually employed as a graphic artist. I myself didn't really get into music until I was exposed to something I really liked - Classical, and Industrial.

      Programming isn't just for programmers - it aids in critical thinking. I took Computer Math (Pascal programming) in Highschool with 5 other people - only one of them actually went on into the computer field, other than myself. We took the skills we learned into the future, helping us with math, logic, and flow/process conceptualization.

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  7. Back to the basics... by jpsowin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what type of tools should parents be equipping their children with, today?

    Pencils, pens, paper. Printed books--good, old, classic books. They'll learn computers and all that--you can hardly do anything these days without using one. What they need are the basic skills they won't get through computers, and that is accomplished through reading good ol' books and writing.

    1. Re:Back to the basics... by Shag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. Along with, of course, all the other tools, including computers.

      Speaking as a parent of a first-grader, one of the big challenges is that kids make developmental steps in different areas, and they rarely do so in a synchronized way. So one month, a kid might be making a lot of headway in math-related areas, the next, in language, and the next, in social skills.

      And of course, you don't want them to get too far ahead in any one area, since a kid who's terribly advanced in math, but behind in social skills, will have a rough time in school.

      So... yes, my kid has a cheapish computer (Mac mini). And she knows how to do things like email grandma, play games, surf the web, feed it optical discs, etc. She also has (and reads, like there's no tomorrow) a lot of books. And supplies for writing and being artistic and making noise and doing the sort of messy "chemistry" kids like, and so on. And between my wife's social-science studies and my own work in natural sciences, her questions get answered.

      Which leads her to say things like, "but daddy, I already know what a supernova is!"

      Anyway, it's all a matter of balance. Give them the latest technology, yes - but only if you're willing to put just as much into the other aspects of life and learning.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    2. Re:Back to the basics... by MrAndrews · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. I have two girls, both young, and they are both interested in computers. Our rule is that you can't use a computer to do things that crayons and paper do just as well: you read words on books, you write stories on paper, and you draw pictures in one of the hundreds paper pads stacked in the closet. Both kids have learned how to open iTunes and find the "Kids" playlist when they want to get their Raffi fix, and they use iSight for video chats to their grandparents, but otherwise they're entirely non-computer monkeys. I know that when they need to use computers, they'll already have the basic concepts mastered through osmosis. You don't want to raise technophobes, but you can't let them limit their existence to the online world so young... there's too much can't be reached with a mouse.

    3. Re:Back to the basics... by MrAndrews · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong, I do all my work straight into the computer now too. I definitely agree that (especially when older) they're going to be expected to type 150 wpm and jump through hoops that I can't even imagine... but in the early years, before they need to write out their book reports double-spaced in Times New Roman... I think there's a really vital connection to be found in writing words out with a pencil on a paper, fitting the letters on the lines, dealing with erasers, with smudges, with all the trickiness that computers help eliminate. There's a value in having to overcome obstacles like that. They're tiny little obstacles, but I'm pretty sure they help shape personalities.

      One thing that happened just recently: my older daughter wanted to translate a word from English to Japanese. She got her dictionary and was struggling a bit with where to find the English word, and I thought to myself: I have a widget that translates automatically, and I could get her the answer in a second. Better yet, she could use the widget and translate things on her own, and think of how much faster things would be for her. And then I stopped and realized that if I give her that tool, no matter how fantastic it may be, she'll never fully grasp how to use a dictionary, how alphabetical order works, about any of the tiny little skills that teaches you.

      Some day she WILL use that widget (or something far cooler and more automatic), but for now she has to struggle with the paper like I used to, because I'm afraid there's something lost in having everything be so easy.

  8. Tech for kids by Spacejock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A PC, networked but no internet, virtual CD (no scratched disks around here), lots of world-building games (Age of Empires, Sims, etc). An LCD screen instead of CRT. Print-to-PDF instead of direct to printer, so we can cancel 99 full colour pages of Pikachu and just print one.

    My kids spend time on their computers, but they spend a lot more time playing in the garden. They make their own dolls furniture (wood, nails, paint), miniature food (clay & paint), etc etc. The eldest taught herself to ride the unicycle. What I'm getting at is that they're not mindless blobs slaved to their PCs 24/7 - yes, they sometimes get heavily involved in a game and will play it in their spare time over 2 or 3 days, but then they'll avoid the computer for a week and do something else.

    The youngest is now 8 years old and produces her own digital art and newsletters, the eldest (11 yo) types up stories and homework. Both use an mp3 player on their computers, and because the music available to them is all my own favourites (mostly 70's and 80's), it's very interesting to see their tastes via their playlists. They're not exposed to modern rubbish on the radio, so I'm probably warping their minds and putting them forever out of touch with their friends.

  9. Synthesizers by BoomTechnology · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get the kid a real hardcore synth -- the kind that uses envelopes, oscillators, and filters etc with MIDI ports to boot. Got one in middle school and it taught me more about my major (EE) than you could possibly imagine...

    --
    Now then, Dmitri, you know how we've always talked about the possibility of something going wrong with the Bomb...
  10. The Best Tools Come From Within by bennyp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Tools for success in a modern technological world
    1. Critical Thinking The ability to think clearly, even amidst constant persuation is essential for mental and emotional equilibrium. A person must be able to distinguish honest messages from those with alterior motives. A person must also be able to take media with a grain of salt.

      One good way to teach critical thinking is to practise it with your child. Ask them questions about how media, especially advertising, makes them feel. Point out to them the tactics that media purveyors use to produce emotional responce.
    2. Awareness Make sure they know the difference between healthy and unhealthy fantasy. Make sure they have a clear and balanced view of reality by exposing them, little by little to the facts of inequality and injustice, but don't overwhelm them with the negative. History is also very important.

      As your child matures, involve them in your political, economic, and spiritual life. Take them to a political protest and explain why. Engage them in charity and volunteering, perhaps at a local food bank. They will learn humility and also see what it is like to be less prosperous.
    3. Self-Expression Teach your child to express themselves through a variety of means. Allow them to explore media on their own, but be there to guide them when they become frustrated or confused.

      It is important for a child to know how to properly express themselves. One great way to teach is to practise it yourself. Take your time when choosing words and sentences, and always be honest.
    4. Morality Pass on your own sense of morality to your child. Practice morality in front of your child in how you act towards others.

      Morals help us to act rightly, even when no one is watching. The internet provides a great deal of annonymity, and a strong moral sense serves as compass and shield.

    ...a few suggestions from someone who doesn't have it all right, but gets closer every day...

    --
    could it be?
  11. Be Your Child's Best Educational Toy by Quirk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Spending time with your children learning new things and sharing with them the fun of learning is the best a parent can do. Handing their education off to their teachers won't have the visceral impact of them knowing their parents love to learn.

    As far as tech goes they'll be inundated from their earliest days although I'd work with them in bits :) and words to ensure they have a conceptual grasp of the how it is that computers work. Too often in education an assumption is made that everyone gets the basics then students are shunted up the ladder where often they can't grasp concepts because the basics learned by rote weren't fundamentaly understood.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  12. The single biggest gift by lheal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is you. Your time, your attention, and your approval. You appear to know all of that, but sometimes we get caught up in being good little consumers and buying "tools" when we should be focusing on the tool wielder.

    With kids aged 18, 15, and 14 I have some experience in this. I can view with 20/20 hindsight the mistakes I made and the triumphs, such as they were. Without exception my failures have involved taking my eyes off of them for just a little while.

    Play with them. Make them earn everything but love (and what you're required by law to give them). Don't be afraid to punish bad behavior. Don't reward tantrums, whining, or other manipulation, but do reward reasoned persistence.

    Reward honesty, so much that if the has a "cherry tree" moment, give praise and forget the misdeed. Punish dishonesty in every form.

    Punishment should fit the misdeed, and should be designed to benefit the family in the long run. Reserve corporal punishment for "you ain't the boss of me!". It will come. Whack 'em. They'll get over it.

    If you give them a computer, make it known that you can lock them out of it at your slightest whim.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:The single biggest gift by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So that is your way to show them that you are their single biggest gift? Sounds more like a helpless course of action of one who doesnt know better.

      I couldn't have said it better myself -- before I had kids, that is. Sometimes, no matter how well you strategize, plan ahead, and train them, they'll rebel and demand a showdown. If you fail to use physical force at those times, you will lose their respect and have a brat to deal with. They'll think you don't care, either about them or what they do. It's weird, but I've seen it over and over again, in my own kids and others.

      On the other hand, if you use physical force for mere punishment, it will lose its effectiveness and cause resentment, bitterness, and require escalation.

      I think the key is consistency. If they know what to expect from you, they'll adjust to most anything.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
  13. The earlier the better. by SSID · · Score: 2, Informative

    I myslef am married with a 2.5 year old daughter. I must proudly say that she uses a laptop very well for her age. Just this past weekend my wife set up her laptop with the kid websites like Dora the explorer and a few others. My daughter navigated her fun and games sites like a champ. Yeppers, going to be another geek in the family. My wife is the one that keeps her grounded in everything else. Like social stuff and that sort of thing. I guess we teach our child what each knows best. I would have to answer your question with the obvious. When ever you think you want to buy/build your child's first computer. It's up to the parents and not anyone else.

  14. Technology should be interesting, modular and fun by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Interesting: If it won't hold a kid's interest, then it'll be forgotten when the next toy comes along. The best way for a device to do this is to be re-usable in many ways. One specific game won't last for very long, no matter how good it is.


    Modular: This builds off the interest. The more modular a device is, the more ways it can be assembled and the more games the kid can make up as they go along. Later on, modular becomes good for developing experiments, trying to see what works, what doesn't, and what produces the Magic Blue Smoke.


    Fun: Intellectual interest is great, but it'll need to hold a high level of emotional interest, too - kids aren't known for having vast reservoirs of intellectual interest. Too few adults do, either, but that's beside the point. Besides, they can always become Talk Radio hosts.


    Some examples of what is good:


    • Lego Mindstorms or any other controllable electronic Lego systems
    • Mecchano / Erector Sets
    • K'Nex - you'd want to drive the motors via the computer


    Some examples of what would work for SOME kids, especially if older:


    • Great Egg Race Eggmobile
    • S-Deck or other solderless electronics kit, using the computer to supply an input or output
    • Computer-steerable telescope, where telescope eyepiece is rigged to a webcam with output to the computer. Put books giving an introduction to programming and an introduction to image processing next to the computer.


    Stuff that is useless:


    • Any single-function electronic toy
    • Any single-function computer project or kit
    • Anything where practical experimentation would be too hard (home-made sugar-based rockets might be a great occasional bit of fun, but I can think of no practical way they can do more than entertain until they're large enough to require special licenses - and even then, research would be extremely limited, for safety reasons)
    • Anything a furious or distracted kid could turn into an expensive repair project (transistors, capacitors, LEDs - these are dirt cheap, and it takes a fair amount to break lego or mecchano pieces)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  15. Don't just be a consumer. by chris_eineke · · Score: 4, Interesting
    what type of tools should parents be equipping their children with, today?

    Disclaimer: I am not a parent. Hell, I'm still half a kid myself (23).

    One of the most important things you can teach your kids is not to be just a consumer but a producer, too. Teach them that using a computer doesn't just mean to download software and watch flash animations, but that a computer - any computer - is a tool for self-expression.

    A computer is one of the most important tools of today. While it is a tool for the advertising department of company XYZ, it is also a tool express your thoughts (and dare I say it) dreams.

    The ultimative producer experience is, in my humble opinion, writing a good program. (Don Knuth is with me on that one.) Programming in the right language* is a delighful thing.

    That is what you should teach your kids.

    * LISP is a good candidate since it is extremely simple and powerful. These two things go hand in hand.
    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    1. Re:Don't just be a consumer. by Urusai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bleah, people put too much emphasis on creation. Most real stuff is just rote and mindless. You should have your kids out picking cotton or removing weeds and rocks from the field. Not everyone can be a self-absorbed artiste with a portfolio of original drivel. Odds are your kids, despite whatever advantages you pretend to give them, will end up losers, just like everyone else you know, including yourself. Sure, you can attempt to build a fantasy world for them were what they do matters. You can also pull gold nuggets out of your butt and fly to Venus on a candy cane fire truck. Ok where's mah meds?

    2. Re:Don't just be a consumer. by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Disclaimer: I *am* a parent (two boys (7 & 5), two girls (3 and 2).

      any computer - is a tool for self-expression.
      A computer is one of the most important tools of today.

      For a 7 year old boy, "self-expression" means jumping up and down on the couch yelling, "I am the Butt-Master! I will fart on you!" at the top of his lungs, and then laughing so hard with his 5 year old brother that he goes short of breath, staggers into the dresser and cracks his head so hard that he not only cuts his forehead, but knocks the lamp over so it smashes on the floor, which makes him sit down in crying, hysterical pain while his little brother is scrambling out of the room on hands and knees, because he can hardly stand himself from the effect of deep belly laughs being suddenly wrenched into the need to get the hell out the vicinity before Dad comes upstairs from his workshop to find out what that crash was before the 2 year old starts to play with the broken glass... and the 3 year old is trying to get Dad's attention so she can tell on her borthers while Dad is cleaning up said broken glass, holding back said 2 year old, bandaging said cut on 7 year old's forehead, and calling for said 5 year old so he find out if he's bleeding, too.

      All this with a couch and a $30 lamp. Imagine what they'd be able to do with a $1500 computer.

      So, I would say the whole "self-expression" thing is really overrated. These days, I really like the "knock it off and behave yourself" model.
      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  16. To follow on that thought by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

    A computer is a tool, teach your kids that.
    The internet... is a distraction that young children don't need.

    Or if you do decide to stick them on the internet, be there while they use it. Make it an experience that involves you, the parent. Don't let the internet turn into the TV babysitter that some parents use.

    And for God's sake, don't let them log on as Administrator.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:To follow on that thought by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Informative
      Maybe i've been using Linux too long, but I've found that my computer is largely useless as a tool without an internet connection.

      It's not Linux. It's you.

      A (short) list of things that a computer is good for without an internet connection.
      1. Calculator
      2. Budget tracking
      3. Media player
      4. word processor
      5. Learning Computer Programming
      6. playing computer games
      7. quiz-tester
      8. Study aide
      9. alarm clock

      All things that a kid could use, all avaluable (with proper setup) without the internet at all.
    2. Re:To follow on that thought by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

      The internet... is a distraction that young children don't need.

      Not really. To be honest, I don't know how one could really raise children without Wikipedia.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:To follow on that thought by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or if you do decide to stick them on the internet, be there while they use it.

      That's great, for about 3 hours a week. No person in their right mind could stand to stare at the screen while a kid browses pointless Blues Clues websites for any serious length of time. The thought alone is driving me crazy.

      Also, if my parents had stood over my shoulder while I used my long line of computers since 4th grade, I would NOT be a programmer today. In fact, I doubt I'd know much about it at all because I'd be worrying what they thought about what I was doing, rather than just doing it. "What's that?" "It's a Hello World program." "Why'd you write it?" "It's a good first program on a language." -silence- "WHAT!?" "Just watching."

      No, that doesn't work at all. -Now- I can work with someone watching what I'm doing, because I'm confident in it. But back when I was first learning, it was just too nerve-wracking.

      People (not just children) need room to grow. Smothering them will effectively kill them.

      If you want computers and the internet to remaining a barely-useable tool for you child, restrict them from it heavily and that is how it'll be.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:To follow on that thought by apellius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Three hours a week (or less) is about right! My son does have access to the internet. The computer is supervised at all times (in the living room). If he is doing somethat that he feels he needs to hide, he probably shouldn't be doing it. In online games, I create parallel accounts to my son and play along side him. His friends think that he has a really cool dad! And I see everything that is happening and can provide instant commentary. I do not try to prevent my son from entering the "real world" -- but I DO try to teach him how to deal with it.

    5. Re:To follow on that thought by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If everything still worked properly, I'd give my kids some older tech to play on. You know, computers that boot instantly and have a programming language built in. Because today's computers *can* do so much, they insist on doing quite a lot of it all the time for no good reason. That's too much distraction for focusing on the task at hand I'd say."

      EXCELLENT point.

      When I was in elementary/middle school, my family had a 386 at home. However, the only thing that anyone had showed me to do on it was play games, use Lotus (one of my older brothers is an engineer, and I watched) and look up things on the Encyclopedia Britannica CD. I learned a few basic things about the command line too, but for the most part the computer was used as a tool to teach me non-tech things or for entertainment. We weren't online and wouldn't be until much, much later.

      What actually got me started on programming and truly about the inner workings of computers wasn't a PC at all, but a programmable calculator with a form of BASIC built in (I ran into C a few months later when the technology teacher realized I was interested in programming). I spent a large portion of sixth-grade sitting in the back of the class writing simple programs, mostly games and simple unit conversion stuff, gradually learning the basics of procedural programming.

      If you want a kid to get interested in technology, don't present the computer as a crystal ball that magically lets them get what they want. Present it as someting that will do what they want IF they're willing to figure out what commands to give it.

  17. Re:Slide Rule by FireballX301 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or, give them a pencil and paper and tell them to work it out by hand.

  18. An SGI Tezro by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I recommend getting her an SGI Tezro workstation, while SGI's still around. She'll be awed by the stylish enclosure and rocksolid IRIX operating system running on an XFS foundation. As her pre-school colleagues grapple with color precision and flawed volumetrics, she will be smooth sailing by the smooth CFD visualizations on her scientific-grade machine. As SGI folds during her later years, she'll appreciate your foresight in giving her a piece of computing history. Don't be late; start her off on a real computer.

  19. Re:Stop babying them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think you'd be right to point out that things like computers should be granted as privileges for good behavior over a long period of time. I'd suggest balancing things slightly differently though. The occasional random "just because I love you" gift as well as the semi-regular "you'll do it because it needs doing." It's not a good idea to overindulge, but you don't want to ignore and boss around too much either.

    Personally, I'm in favor of keeping things on pencil and paper more or less until teachers start asking to have papers typed. (Maybe late middle school?)

    Some of my friends in college didn't see a computer until mid/late high school and they still have a hard time with the difference between a file and folder, or understanding that you should navigate by reading the menu if you aren't familiar with the interface. That's a big setback these days. Give them a chance to play and work with a computer before high school for sure.

    If you really want to help them though, and avoid the nagging "buy me stuff" attitude, dump the TV, or anything else that has commercials (monitor Internet as that takes off). The complaints about violence on TV causing problems might well be unfounded, but you can find any number of advertising agents who explicitly say that their goal is to make your kid nag you to death, and they don't get paid the big bucks for nothing.

  20. Good thing I'm here to sort it out for you: by Hosiah · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We seem to get some of these "kids and computers" questions every few months. We just had this one and there was this one.

    Now, stop and think about the logic of this. First, you're asking a bunch of geeks for parenting advice. Only a few of us have kids. Next, you're asking the kind of question which doesn't provoke the kind of thought that would lend a helpful answer; doubtless you'll toddle off and go do whatever you felt like doing anyway, as you should do anyway. Finally, you're asking what you can do for someone so that by 16+ years from now, they'll be prepared.

    Now, if you were 18 today, what kind of insight would you have gained from your explorations of technology in 1990? Let's see, here: Cell phones would be lost on you. You'd probably have learned to type on an IBM Selectric. You'd have discovered Windows 3.0 running on a 386 PC or a Mac box. With the Windows box, you'd get as far as DOS and the QBasic language and hit the wall after that, and with the Mac you'd be drawing nifty black-and-white bitmaps and learning Hypercard. If you got to tour a workplace of the time on a school field trip, you'd get to learn about how computers are huge blue cabinets in special cold rooms with Halon dumps and running things like VMS. You'd get real handy at copying songs from the radio onto tape cassettes, or at least scoring on CDs if you were pink. Ipod's would never have entered your sphere...

    You see where it's going, now? There's almost nothing you can show your kids today that won't be landfill fodder by the time they're getting a job. As a last ditch effort to say I recommended something, I'd say give them Linux to play with, so at least they'd get to see a system that's geared to enable learning from the guts outward. As opposed to proprietary systems which are designed to keep you in the dark and hence dependent on "The Man" like a junkie scoring their fix, endlessly chasing the delusion that you can pay somebody else to do your learning for you. But by now, I suppose you're just sneering in contempt at the audacity to suggest such a thing, even though my kids have had no problem doing everything they want to do on a Linux box, and I'm OK with that, and I'll be OK with your kids working for my kids, too!

    At least some good has come of this exchange, this time. I've set the point in concrete once and for all so I can copy and save this reply in a file, the quicker to post the *NEXT* time we get this question.

  21. Immersing children by typical · · Score: 2, Funny

    While I'm not a huge fan of immersing children in technology...

    I am. Dump 'em in a vat of PDAs and see what burbles up.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  22. Re:Stop babying them by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    When my generation was growing up, our parents did whatever the hell they felt like doing and the kids came along for the ride. Nowadays parents spend all weekend with their kids.

    Wrong. Every generation has both types. Your rosy view of the past is only detrimental to this discussion.

    It's because our parents didn't spend 98% of the salary on buying shit for us kids.

    Yeah, your opinion is OBVIOUSLY 100% accurate and nobody did anything else. Oh wait. Take your crotchety bullshit elsewhere, thanks.

  23. Re:1st Programming for 13-year-old? by falkryn · · Score: 2, Informative

    since he's 13, I'd think he'd be old enough for something more complex than logo for instance. so, since he likes games, a good language would be one he could write some in (i.e. no COBOL for him), but as a bonus might turn into a marketable/useful skill later on in the non-gaming world if he keeps an interest. There's a number of C++ for beginning games books out there, but I might actually lean more toward learning something with quicker results, say perl combined with SDL_perl (recently mentioned here on /.) or python + pygame.

  24. A parent's role is to prepare their kids. by Runesabre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a parent of two boys (8yr and 13yr respectively). My philosophy raising my kids has never been to hide things from them as a means to "protect them". I don't really buy into movie or video game ratings. Hiding things from your kids rather than teaching them to experiment, learn and think for themselves based on their personal experiences is doing them a disservice. It's the parenting equivalent of "security through obscurity" and in the long run is not security / parenting at all. Certainly, parents must not expose their kids to things they simply aren't ready to handle. I'm not handing the keys to my car to my 8yr old any time soon.

    Parenting is about involvement; about giving your kids a safe space to learn, both from their successes as well as their mistakes. Hiding things from your kids is not involvement. Discussing topics with your kids is parenting. Allowing your kids the freedom to experience life and make their own choices and live with the consequences as a learning experience for future situations is what parenting is about. Simply safeguarding your kids from everything that might be potentially damaging is only setting the kids up for a future shock that will have far more dire outcomes than what they could have learned at home making small mistakes with the safety net of their parents.

    My kids have been playing and using the computer since each were 5yrs old. My oldest learned his alphabet playing Quake because I refused to show him where the letters were on the keyboard nor would write down any of the commands but would simply spell them out and require him to figure it out. It was great motivation for him and a great learning experience. Yeah, the end result... shooting other people... wasn't exactly what I would have liked to see him doing with his time but I worked with him not against him.

    Both of my sons have learned the value of being able to read and write while playing games such as DAoC, UO, WoW, Halo, Unreal despite not being that thrilled with such subjects in school. Both, I believe have learned the value and importance of communication. Spelling is not just that boring thing your teachers make you do at school. It's how you communicate with your fellow players online. Without the computer and the ability to play and interact online, I doubt either would have as much appreciation for reading and writing.

    So, IMO, expose your kids to technology as soon as you can while your kids still listen to you and have the umbrella of the home to provide them a place to experiment with life. Stay involved with your kids, make them think on their own. I think the worst thing you could do is protect them by hiding things from them and pretend such things don't exist.

    --
    Runesabre
    Enspira Online
  25. Re:Stop babying them by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nowadays parents spend all weekend with their kids.

    Part of me thinks this is a troll, but the fact that it has been modded up so high forces me to reply...

    So the above quotation is seen as a bad thing by the poster who either a) has no kids, or b) has no kids. As a parent, you try to do what is best for you children. I'm not saying that parents don't make mistakes, and that the word "spoiled" is not in the dictionary, but given the society that we live in where oftentimes both parents work in order to try and give their children the best opportunities possible, the weekend comment is totally out of line, and so is the whole rant-of-a-post that, again, I can't believe has been modded up so high.

    --
    Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  26. Tangible technology by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Technology encompasses everything we do to modify our environment/experience. This includes the clothes they're wearing, the house they live in and everything else. If you want to get kids to start thinking then introduce them to technology that they can readily understand,see working and experiment with. Computers hide too much of their inner workings and are pretty hopeless for teaching anything useful to young kids. Being able to boot a game and click a mouse is hardly tech-savviness.

    Cooking is a good introduction to experimentation and elementary chemistry etc. Lego for spatial & basic construction skills. Get a steam engine or a Stirling engine, some magnets,... Fix a bike, brew some ginger beer... Fly a kite, knit some socks... Just whatever you do, do something **real**, not virtual computer simulation crap.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  27. Re:Stop babying them by Carl+T · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Personally, I'm in favor of keeping things on pencil and paper more or less until teachers start asking to have papers typed. (Maybe late middle school?)

    That reminds me of how at some point (7th grade or later?) the teachers started asking us to hand in such things typed because at the _next_ level of school they'd require it. And of course at the next level they didn't really require it for the most part, but reminded us that at the _next_ level they would. And the next thing I know I'm writing (and correcting) hand-written reports for graduate courses.

    One thing I really can't see in mankind's future is the obsolescence of paper. Or pencils.

    --

    This signature is not in the public domain.
  28. recurring post by cjsteele · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the silliest recurring post I see on slashdot and here's why: what's the demographic of the average slashdot reader? late-teens to late twenties, male, geeky (but perhaps not in keeping with the dorky sterotype of our predicessors)? So, as a parent, you're going to ask THIS group of guys when you should do something that has potentially long-lasting impact on your child... riiiight. Speaking as the father of three, I won't do it. My kids are too special and too important to risk horsing up on account of taking the advice of a bunch of guys who know as much about children as they do about grammar.

    No offense, but the /. crew is the LAST group of people on earth I would turn to for advice on parenting.

    -C

    --
    "This above all, to thine own self be true" :x!
  29. It's just another toy to our kids. by JoeD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have two kids. When our oldest was 2-ish, we set up an old non-networked machine with a Sesame Street game. At first, she'd pull us over to the computer when she wanted to play. We'd put the CD in and start the game up for her.

    Then we started to notice that she was playing the game, but neither of us had started it up. She'd figured out that she could click on the desktop icon and hit enter to start it up.

    We got a couple more games. She learned how to swap CDs, and which CD went with which game.

    When she was 3 and half, I gave her an old Logitech ClickSmart digital camera. It's great for kids. I configured the software to automatically download and delete the pictures from the camera, and showed her how to plug the cable in, and how to launch the photo album software. For two weeks, every time I turned around, it was "Surprise Daddy!" CLICK! FLASH! I had spots in my eyes constantly.

    She's now 4 and a half. She's been upgraded to a 700 Mhz Athlon. She goes to the Noggin website to play games, and has half a dozen or so games she likes to play. There's a link to Noggin on her desktop, and she knows which CD goes with which games, and can start them herself.

    The computer is just another toy to her. She still draws with her crayons and plays games and does all the usual kid stuff. But she will never be able to remember not knowing how to use a mouse. She's also getting good at framing stuff in the camera.

    Her old machine was inherited by her 2 year old little sister. We found a game that lets kids just pound on the keys. She seems to like it.

  30. Re:And I forgot the most important one by sgtrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And if you do get divorced, don't remarry until the kids move out. Stepfamilies suck.


    That is such wrong advice that I don't even know where to start. Look, kids need solid parental role models in their lives. My ex lives almost 2,000 miles away, so she only sees the kids on long school breaks. Not that she was all that available as a mom before the divorce. Not really her fault, though. Her own childhood is the stuff that nightmares are made of. I just wish I'd known about her upbringing before I proposed. Maybe we wouldn't have gotten married, maybe we would. I do know that I would have preferred knowing what the core problems were before I spent 18 years trying to figure it all out. But I digress.

    Before we were divorced, my kids had been struggling in school. My youngest was nearly two years behind in reading, and my son was struggling to keep up with his class. At least he passed everything. If my ex and I watched everything he did, that is. (sigh)

    After the divorce I was very worried about my younger child's reading issues, and devoted almost all of my spare time to getting her up to snuff. I was successful to the point that she's now reading about 18 months ahead of her grade, but my son suffered. It got so bad that last year he failed 3 classes in 9th grade and I had to withdraw him from a 4th to prevent another F on his transcript. I know that a lot of that had to do with how I was coping with being a single parent while working full time.

    The last quarter of his 9th grade year, I met and fell in love with a wonderful woman. We were married the following August. She has been nothing but a strong, postive stepmom for my kids. In many ways she is a far better mom than their birth mom has ever been. She has also helped make me a better dad as well. My son's GPA is nearly a full point higher than it was last year. He's passed every class so far, and is slowly learning how to stay on top of stuff (something that I could never seem to get through to him on my own).

    My wife's kids were also struggling. Her ex is a nice guy, but seems to be completely incapable of maintaining any boundaries for his kids. It made it virtually impossible for her to teach her kidsself discipline. The good side is that he lives close by, and sees them every other weekend and every Wednesday. He is also more than willing to run his kids around.

    Still, my wife tells me that having me around and silently backing her up when she needed to discipline them was a real eye opener for her children. We've had some rocky incidents, but clearly her kids are happier and feel safer now than they did in the past. Their grades are up as well (although they didn't have as far to go as mine did).

    Moral of the story for me is: MAKE SURE that whoever you consider marrying is both willing and capable of doing their part to make your marriage and family life a success. That is the secret to any successful marriage, regardless of whether or not kids are involved, and regardless of whether it's your first, second, or twenty second marriage.

    Now, back on topic:

    My kids have had access to their own accounts on my Linux boxes since they were four or five. They started out with things like Tux Paint and have moved on to playing games, using OpenOffice, gaim for the teens, etc. My stepkids had Windows XP growing up. The teen still prefers that. The younger one is more willing to experiment with Linux to get stuff done. We have two Linux PCs and a WinXP box at the moment.

    The grades of all 4 have shown improvement since we got married. I attribute it more to a much happier home life for all than any technology availability. But I don't think that you can say that they've been hurt by the easy availability of tech, either.

    The truth is that our kids are growing up in a far different world than we did. The rate of change itself continues to accelerate. It really doesn't matter how you teach your kids. WHAT you teach them is far more important; impart a strong sense of values, teach them self discipline, and teach them the skills necessary to continually learn new subjects as they come up.
  31. The Psychopathology Of Everyday Schooling by Savantissimo · · Score: 2, Informative
    On the contrary, mandatory schooling has squandered potential, abused and imprisoned free minds and taught citizens to hate academics. See John Taylor Gatto's The Underground History of American Education.

    I could regale you with mountains of statistics to illustrate the damage schools cause. I could bring before your attention a line of case studies to illustrate the mutilation of specific individuals--even those who have been apparently privileged as its "gifted and talented."[3] What would that prove? You've heard those stories, read these figures [-] until you went numb from the assault on common sense. School can't be that bad, you say. You survived, didn't you? Or did you? Review what you learned there. Has it made a crucial difference for good in your life? Don't answer. I know it hasn't. You surrendered twelve years of your life because you had no choice. You paid your dues, I paid mine. But who collected those dues? ...

    All alleged reforms have left schooling exactly in the shape they found it, except bigger, richer, politically stronger. And morally and intellectually worse by the standards of the common American village of yesteryear which still lives in our hearts. Many people of conscience only defend institutional schooling because they can't imagine what would happen without any schools, especially what might happen to the poor. This compassionate and articulate contingent has consistently been fronted by the real engineers of schooling, skillfully used as shock troops to support the cumulative destruction of American working-class and peasant culture, a destruction largely effected through schooling. ...

    School wreaks havoc on human foundations in at least eight substantive ways so deeply buried few notice them, and fewer still can imagine any other way for children to grow up:

    1) The first lesson schools teach is forgetfulness; forcing children to forget how they taught themselves important things like walking and talking. This is done so pleasantly and painlessly that the one area of schooling most of us would agree has few problems is elementary school--even though it is there that the massive damage to language-making occurs. Jerry Farber captured the truth over thirty years ago in his lapidary metaphor "Student as Nigger" and developed it in the beautiful essay of the same name. If we forced children to learn to walk with the same methods we use to force them to read, a few would learn to walk well in spite of us, most would walk indifferently, without pleasure, and a portion of the remainder would not become ambulatory at all. The push to extend "day care" further and further into currently unschooled time importantly assists the formal twelve-year sequence, ensuring utmost tractability among first graders.

    2) The second lesson schools teach is bewilderment and confusion. Virtually nothing selected by schools as basic is basic, all curriculum is subordinate to standards imposed by behavioral psychology, and to a lesser extent Freudian precepts compounded into a hash with "third force" psychology (centering on the writings of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow). None of these systems accurately describes human reality, but their lodgement in university/business seven-step mythologies makes them dangerously invulnerable to common-sense criticism.

    None of the allegedly scientific school sequences is empirically defensible. All lack evidence of being much more than superstition cleverly hybridized with a body of borrowed fact. Pestalozzi's basic "simple to complex" formulation, for instance, is a prescription for disaster in the classroom since no two minds have the same "simple" starting point, and in the more advanced schedules, children are frequently more knowledgeable than their overseers--witness the wretched record of public school computer instruction when compared to self-discovery programs undertaken informally. Similarly, endless sequences

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry