Slashdot Mirror


NBC To Live Stream Olympics Event

An anonymous reader writes "According to Broadcasting Cable, NBC is going to stream the gold medal Men's hockey game live on the NBC Olympics web site. This is in preparation for (hopefully) many more live feeds throughout the year. The video stream will have DRM and IP protection to attempt to limit access to residents of the US, like the other event video on the site. With the stream served by Akamai's CDN, it will be interesting to see if it can sustain the load. The game starts around 8:00am EST on Sunday, Feb 26 if you are interested in checking it out."

186 comments

  1. Medal Not Metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not hard people. You can't rely on spell check for all your editing.

    1. Re:Medal Not Metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says they even use spell check at all??

    2. Re:Medal Not Metal by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      It's the Winter Olympics. The fun is watching them getting their tongues stuck to their metals.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  2. Gold Metal!? by paulproteus · · Score: 0, Troll

    I didn't know they had that event in the Winter olympics!

    --
    |/usr/games/fortune
    1. Re:Gold Metal!? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Gold Metal? That's probably how the kids these days refer to the NWOBHM.

    2. Re:Gold Metal!? by 680x0 · · Score: 1

      Wow... Does it make me old if I know what that stands for? And what's more, that I've been to an Iron Maiden concert within the last few years?

  3. metal by benasselstine · · Score: 0, Troll

    medal this is as bad as when i saw "died coke" on a menu.

    --
    My other car is a slashdot UID.
    1. Re:metal by distributed · · Score: 1

      Mebbe Zonk is a metal fan... btw Why isn't anyone fixing it ?

      --
      [all generalizations are untrue except this one]
    2. Re:metal by ryanov · · Score: 1

      In Japan, they have Soy Source on their menus! :)

  4. This sounds familiar... by Toba82 · · Score: 1

    Didn't the previous story go over this? Something about Akamai being unable to handle too much load?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/25/211521 8

    Yeah, I know that Cringley didn't actually mention Akamai.

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
    1. Re:This sounds familiar... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Funny that Zonk Greenlighted both stories :op

      It's okay Zonk, /. is fickle. We'll thank you tomorrow.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:This sounds familiar... by distributed · · Score: 1

      This should be one of the fewer (or maybe the only) instance of a live video feed site beeing slashdotted by appointment.
      Sad that Zonk wanted to give them a fair notice... well.. Bring lets 'em down !! hee haaa haaaw !!

      --
      [all generalizations are untrue except this one]
    3. Re:This sounds familiar... by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      I bet they can handle the load. The game's on at 8 AM EST on a Sunday - that means 7 AM in the Midwest, 6 AM in the Moutain Time Zone and 5 AM on the West coast... And it's hockey... I dunno, there may be some die-hard fans that get up at 5 AM to watch a hockey game live over a grainy Internet connection, but I'd be willing to bet the numbers will be small. I mean, who but the most die-hard of hockey fans is going to get up at 8 AM or earlier on a Sunday to watch a game live on a computer screen when they can wait until a decent hour and watch it on their HDTV?

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    4. Re:This sounds familiar... by Toba82 · · Score: 1

      I personally think that the submitter of the previous story actually pulled that number out of his nether regions. I'm sure Akamai is quite capable of handling pretty much anything you throw at it.

      --
      I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
    5. Re:This sounds familiar... by KitFox · · Score: 1
      As of right now, the stream is "Working" and not overloaded. Connected and playing at 341kbps. Looking for the stream on the NBC site? Seems that their secret is to hide it as deeply as possible so not too many people watch. Hop over to http://www.nbcolympics.com/streaming/index.html?ib _oll=Headline to get a link to the video.

      Of course, the playlist comes from Doubleclick.net, and yes, the stream itself is coming from Akamai, in my case, a906.v193758.c19375.g.vm.akamaistream.net.

      As a note, this post is time-sensitive, as obviously the live stream won't be around once the game is over.

      --

      @Whee

    6. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The url is on the front page of ESPN.

    7. Re:This sounds familiar... by KitFox · · Score: 1
      As of right now, the stream is "Working" and not overloaded.

      Ahhh, I am proud of /.'ers. Within a few minutes of posting my message, the stream has promptly begun to have issues intermittantly. However we obviously aren't working hard enough here, as it's still working most of the time. Can /. bring Akamai to its knees? Can we drag the speed down, make people buffer all the time, or only see 1 fram every 6 seconds? Do /.'ers in the US actually GET UP at this time of morning... or is it "stay awake until this time of morning..."?

      All these questions and more, to be answered as time goes on. Now streaming: "These important messages"... yay. Commercials.

      --

      @Whee

    8. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you expect a perfect stream all the time, it's the Inet. Dude, your having 0 effect on the feed but keep trying.

  5. Give up already NBC by elister · · Score: 1

    You failed at the olympics coverage! Offering a carrot in the form of an internet stream just shows how much you suck at covering these events.

    1. Re:Give up already NBC by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1

      Events at the Olympics? Oh, that sports stuff? I thought that was just there to break up the commercials!

    2. Re:Give up already NBC by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "Events at the Olympics? Oh, that sports stuff? I thought that was just there to break up the commercials!"

      I suffered so much mental anguish during the US TV coverage of the last Olympics that I vowed never to watch it again.

      To see so many live events interrupted by human interest vignettes featuring US athletes doing day to day stuff in hometown America was horrific beyond belief.

      At one point I was watching a pole vaulting event only to suddenly find myself watching the life story of one of the US team members. By the time it had finished the event was concluded and then exactly the same thing happened during the next event.

      I was able to catch quite a bit of the actual sporting events this year because we are lucky enough to get CBC here in Seattle, but whenever I see Bob Costas sat in front of a big fire with an athlete I break out into a sweat.

    3. Re:Give up already NBC by iwsnet · · Score: 0

      8 am on a Sunday morning. Wow, that's early!!

    4. Re:Give up already NBC by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1

      It's really interesting how many of the threads, here, reveal a real consensus that the Olympics coverage in the USA is just plain terrible. Do the networks get the message?

    5. Re:Give up already NBC by Basehart · · Score: 1

      I think the real problem is that they're not designed for me, you and other folks who think the coverage sucks, therefore the networks don't really give a damn what "we" think.

      It's like the local 6'oclock news shows. They're designed to scare women and make them buy stuff. That's it. There's no news on those shows at all, just the usual suburban predators and breast cancer.

    6. Re:Give up already NBC by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      You should have watched the high-def feed, then. The 2004 NBC coverage on HDTV was the best I've ever seen: they'd pick three events each day, and cover each for four hours, then repeat the broadcasts twelve hours later. No bias towards coverage of American athletes, and no "human interest" crap.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  6. What about linux? by blaksaga · · Score: 1

    So can I assume that with DRM protection I won't be able to view it on linux?

    1. Re:What about linux? by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's a valid assumption. It should be obvious to everyone by now that DRM is more about platform lock-in than really keeping pirates at bay.

      This is what really scares me about DRM, tiered internet, and pretty much every other tech-related control scheme we've been reading about lately. In the end, it's about making sure you have a "trusted" software/hardware platform. So much for Linux tech hobbyists like myself. You want to write your own PVR? Illegal. Convert video content that you bought to another format? No way. "But, please take a look at our Approved Device (TM). Just buy that and don't worry about having control; it's just confusing."

      --
      --- witty signature
    2. Re:What about linux? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      They could use a serious, multiplatform media solution like Real (Helix) Server and broadcast happily with DRM. At least it has clients for all platforms.

      You may not like DRM but compatibility is not the issue here. Mplayer etc. are third party hacks. Windows Media for Mac never worked right (in full function, plugin etc), so the format "hates" anyone not using windows.

      If they used Real format, they could even stream/make money from Cell Phones and PDAs, their loss... I hope the sponsor money from Intel and Microsoft will cover the costs.

      (btw you gotta have Intel processor for Full Screen, others can't do it!)

    3. Re:What about linux? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      OK, what about my BeBox and Amiga? (note: I don't actually have either one, just posing a theoretical question)

    4. Re:What about linux? by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know you are joking but in fact BeOS has Realplayer G2, I am not sure they coded the newer codecs for "auto update" though...

    5. Re:What about linux? by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

      Of course, they should all be assimilated as quickly and painlessly as possible. There is a running joke amongs my friends. I started off as a Windows admin and quickly got side tracked by Linux. Since we refer to Microsoft as the Borg Collective and have since the late 80's when the episode first aired. When Seven of Nine was introduced, it quickly became a nickname since I, too, had escaped the collective. Another friend of mine is a Microsoft Certified Trainer, and her nickname is Borg Queen, since she's licensed to assimilate.

      Geez, if people wanted to think for themselves....let's see what would happen.

      1) Cars would burn ethanol and we'd tell those oil sheiks to go bork a camel for $60 a barrel
      2) The school policy wouldn't be "no child left behind" - it would "fail them if they can't do the work"
      3) There would be no more fat people because they'd realize that they're killing themselves by being overwieght
      4) Some religious nutball who cut off her kid's arms "to give her to God" wouldn't be getting off with a hung jury. She'd be getting a needle.
      5) Most of our elected leaders wouldn't be allowed in the country much less in office
      6) Priests who molest children would punished with a biblical punishement - preferably something ugly like stoning - instead of being moved to a new dicocese.

      The fact is that they're all sheep and as long as it works when the plug it, they don't give a damn about the rest of it. They never do until it's far too late.

      2 cents,

      Queen B

      --
      HDGary secures my bank :/
  7. Live (except on West Coast) by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    It should be noted that the gold medal game will also be broadcast by the main NBC network live at 8am ET to affiliates in the Eastern and Central time zones. The game will be seen at 8am local time in the Mountain and Pacific time zones.

    99% of the TVs in America has access to an NBC affiliate, and this web stream is designed not to be viewable outside the USA, so it's kinda questionable just who this stream is aimed at. West coasters who can't wait out a three hour tape delay and want to see the game at 5am PT? People who have an office job who are working at 8am ET on a Sunday morning?

    1. Re:Live (except on West Coast) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it's so early in the morning, they're probably testing out streaming on a light load, and I'm sure that they're just as interested as you are to find out what kind of people where will watch it.

    2. Re:Live (except on West Coast) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to be aimed at me... a Swede on the west coast who does have to be at work at 8am. I am sure there are a whole bunch of us - oh, maybe three or four. Add a couple more for the Finns on the west coast who also have to be at work at 8am on a Sunday. Thanks NBC! :)

    3. Re:Live (except on West Coast) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just going to be a test of the slashdot comment. Please ignore and excuse me.

    4. Re:Live (except on West Coast) by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't watch the olympics because I don't have cable and can't watch the coverage live. It feels like bullshit having NBC package up stories and events, complete with the backgrounds of the athletes, when they already know full-well who actually won. They expect me to watch their stories set to swooning music, and then see that athlete lose, even though that happened 5 to 12 hours ago. The worst as I remember it was in Sydney and Nagano when the coverage was tape delayed on the west coast about 18 hours. Which is truly screwed up because 8pm Pacific time is 1 or 2pm in Australia or Japan. NBC could've given live events prime-time coverage on the West, and East coasts, but waited a day to package them. Besides, then maybe some of the viewers would realize how stupid it is to watch day old events.

    5. Re:Live (except on West Coast) by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
      99% of the TVs in America has access to an NBC affiliate, and this web stream is designed not to be viewable outside the USA, so it's kinda questionable just who this stream is aimed at. West coasters who can't wait out a three hour tape delay and want to see the game at 5am PT? People who have an office job who are working at 8am ET on a Sunday morning?

      NBC is hoping to double their ratings by reaching the other eight people interested in watching...

    6. Re:Live (except on West Coast) by jseale · · Score: 1

      More than likely. A lot of folks on the West Coast get shut out of this stuff 'cause of time zone differences and video streaming is a big help when it comes to that. It won't however be much of a help for folks who want to watch the event in HDTV though.

  8. Online radios are still broadcasting! by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    Two years ago the online radio stations I normally listen to (Dutch Radio 1 and Australian ABC Radio National / News Radio) went off-line during the Olympics because the news reports on it contained news and snippets of the Olypmic games and weren't allowed to be broadcasted outside the country itself and thus were turned off.

    This year, Olympic games again and I'm still listening to the three stations mentioned earlier. Is this a change of policy of the Olympic council or doesn't it matter too much for the winter olYmpics? Anybody with any insight in this?

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  9. Who's watching the olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody!
    I rather watch a college party hurling contest than an olympic curling contest. Image a rich white boy sliding rocks across the ice while more rich white boys sweep imaginary snow out of it's path. My remote has been programed to automatically skip NBC for the past week.

    1. Re:Who's watching the olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine an anonymous asshole knowing the difference between ITS and IT'S. That should be an Olympic event all by itself. And they're not sweeping imaginary snow, they're melting the ice to let the rock slide better.

    2. Re:Who's watching the olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, thanks for your insightful comment. Those of us that enjoy the sports represented in the Winter Games really give a damn that you don't.

    3. Re:Who's watching the olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know about you, but I sorta like watching those girl skaters. I think it's hard coded DNA or something...

    4. Re:Who's watching the olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those of us who have been watching the behavior of the IOC and various governments lately don't give a fuck that you enjoy the sports.

      FUCK THE OLYMPICS!!!

    5. Re:Who's watching the olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's, I just thought that fuckin polished creek stone, with a god damned handle on it, had some majiK powers of possession. I thought luge was a contest where you spit lugies as far as you could, however I found out it's some moron strapped to some rails going then using gravity to slide down a steep slope. It would be more fun to watch if they just jumped out of a helicopter without a parachute.

    6. Re:Who's watching the olympics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all those rich curlers...
      Including that one UK curler that they did an expose' on.
      She won a gold medal at the last Olympic games, and still needs public assistance to help pay the bills.

    7. Re:Who's watching the olympics? by loki1978 · · Score: 0

      Curlers are all rich?
      Curlers are all white?
      I just assume you dont know a shit about curling if you think they sweep imaginary snow
      People around the globe watch and enjoy the Winter Games. And nobody is the least interested about your interest in it or not
      Like nobody would be interested in my nonexistant interest in football.

      --
      According to prophecy
  10. Been there, done that with Auntie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BBC have been doing this for UK residents for the duration of the Olympics - not just Ice Hockey (which I have been following closely - go Niittymäki!), but a host of other sports that involve sliding too.

    It's a Real Video stream, and it works pretty well; I've only had a few occasions where congestion has killed it. The only other problem is that quite often the compression they're using removes the puck from the image. Quite amusing :)

  11. NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by Clockwurk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And its no surprise since they have exclusive broadcast rights in the US. Rather than show most of the events, they hand pick a small few where the US is supposed to win and then cover them. Maybe I'm in the minority, but I'd much rather watch the biathlon or curling or x-country skiing than sit through another "spirit of the games" hype session (this olympian has battled through cancer, loss of family, broken leg, blah blah blah). Every olympian works hard and overcomes personal obstacles on their way to the games, its nothing special.

    Snowboarding and freestyle skiing shouldn't be olympic sports; save that shit for the x-games. When I'm watching the Olympic games, I should never hear a commentator say "he got sick air on that phat run".

    The only thing that has made these games less than absolute shit is the fact that I get CBC (hoser tv), and they actually cover the games, not the hype (Bode Miller needs to change his name to Sir Chokesalot)

    1. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      NBC proper didn't cover curling at all, but on cable USA covered live in early mornings just about as many early round matches as possible, while CNBC had a daily 5pm ET three-hour block that was dedicated entirely to curling... showing most of the Team USA matches and selected other matches.

      Bottom line: Every event in the Olympics got TV coverage, you just needed to know which one of NBC's cable networks to look on.

    2. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by btempleton · · Score: 1

      Well, the Olympics are of course in theory not for the viewers, but the TV coverage is.

      One of the problems is that races against the clock, best time at the end wins, are not the best TV. Not nearly the drama of races where people are competing at the same tme. Snowboardcross (and to some extent parallel slalom snowboarding) have the race element that makes for good TV. And hockey, curling also can make good TV because you are seeing the real competition directly. Curling is rare in Olympic sports because it is a game with a moderate amount of strategy as well as having good control of individual shots. The thing that turns people off curling is that it can be slow at times. Like baseball, sometime the slowness is tense and delicious, other times it's boring.

      Having MythTV on the other hand makes curling great. You can play at 2x and still hear the commentary, or smooth 3x to watch the less important parts of the ends really fast. Makes a good game for TV.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    3. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowboarding shouldn't be in the olympics but curling should ?

      Are you gay ?


      No, he's a Newfie.

    4. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by neoform · · Score: 1

      Snowboarding and freestyle skiing shouldn't be olympic sports; save that shit for the x-games. When I'm watching the Olympic games, I should never hear a commentator say "he got sick air on that phat run". Let me guess, bobsledding and skeleton is a real sport? Freestyle skiing is very difficult and strenuous. It's in the olympics for a reason.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    5. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their coverage is terrible. During the opening ceremonies they talked about each coutry's politics, how stupid is that? Aren't the Olympics supposed to be about PEACE? Asside from this it's a sporting event...

      How about during the NFL player introductions the commentators start talking about quaterback so and so being a repbublican or democrat and that he supports abortion or something. This would completely distract that whole game, it would be stupid and unprofessional.

      During the Athens 2004 Olympics opening ceremonies, NBC talked politics too. I downloaded the BBC's Athens 2004 opening ceremonies and they talked sports. They discussed the athletes and which events they would participate in and their potential at gold.

      Anyway....

      Curling is where it's at. You see that rock move!!?! IT'S CURLING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    6. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by typical · · Score: 1

      Are you gay ?

      Are you telling us that his opinion would be less valid if he was?

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    7. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by glazed · · Score: 1

      I've been watching a very large number of the curling matches, they're especially interesting in that the athletes are mic'ed so for english speaking teams I can actually hear what the lead, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and skip are saying. I can only hear mumbles and yells when a skier is getting psyched to launch out of the gate.

      The cost of this: it's on cable...the USA, MSNBC or CNBC networks, and it's daytime programming. But set your PVR/TIVO/VCR and you *can* watch a LOT of the events. It's the big money draw events that are on the over the air broadcasts in primetime.

    8. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Snowboarding and freestyle skiing shouldn't be olympic sports; save that shit for the x-games.
      I agree that "artistic" sports seem to be a bit of an oxymoron. But how can you single out those two and not mention ice dancing? That'd be first to go if I were choosing. Besides, the snowboard cross has (IMO) been one of the most interesting sports at the Games.
    9. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by yanagasawa · · Score: 1

      Just got back to the US from a week in France. French coverage was so much better. Hours at a time of just sports and they didn't just show the sports where the French were contenders. Obviously for interviews they tended to talk to French atheletes, but that is natural since other atheletes wouldn't be understood by the target audience.

      I'm not sure how or why US coverage became so bad, but it really is awful. I had half expected the French coverage to be just as bad, but it really was fun watching sports instead of the docudrama that NBC shows.

    10. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It would.

    11. Re:NBC's olympic coverage sucks ass by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      When I'm watching the Olympic games, I should never hear a commentator say "he got sick air on that phat run".

      I think one of the Australian commentators was taking the piss when he remarked that they were changing the (winter) olympic motto to "higher, faster, longer, sicker"

  12. whoop-dee-do by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    and with the absolutely brilliant performance of the american hockey team this year; they might actually get a half-dozen hits on their stream. ebersol himself could host the stream on his home broadband connection and still have the pipe left to seed the latest survivor episode.

  13. Is this revolutionary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL has already proven with Live 8 that a large stream event is possible. The press release from AOL says 175,000 concurent streams at more then 60Gb/s. The AOL backbone is comprised of OC-192's (atdn.net) and all of this content was served in house with out use of Akamai to the ENTIRE world. This is hardly reveolutionary.

  14. Do you believe in Miracles? by kaufmanmoore · · Score: 1

    NBC does. I've got Sweden 3-1.

    1. Re:Do you believe in Miracles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo Hoo it will most likely be interspursed with tons of footage from the miracle on ice...Typically we and the Canucks went and decided to play square box pp defence. And a close centre ice trap..NHL style ...end result the Fins and Swedes kicked the shit out of us on offensive ...Canada losing to the Swiss was the icing on the cake! Who was the brilliant coach that did the Canadian game plans, no doubt a product of the 70s Philly rough house scene! Might have even been rigged...We and the Canadians lost out, not because of the skill of the players but the lack of real coaching and stupid big ice tactics. Ruffhousing and double teaming around the boards just does not work on big ice. Brilliant *&^($#^%(

    2. Re:Do you believe in Miracles? by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      you like hockey dont you? Isnt that the game were the guys play on ice with sticks and stuff?

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  15. NBC ya by transami · · Score: 1

    Good grief. When's the last time anyone saw a past olympic event that was more than a 3 second blip on a prepackaged news blip. And they're worried about DRM here? Let's be clear. They are going to show the event for a day. Some people will watch it, most won't and almost everyone will NEVER SEE IT AGAIN. Wow, there's a lot of repeat business in that brilliant model!

    They don't have a clue about today's internet culture. You think they would have caught on last time, but obviously they are still clueless.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
    1. Re:NBC ya by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      I saw about 10 hockey games live, about as many curling matches, some cross country and biathalon in the morning, and some other live events on the weekend.

      Maybe they are preparing for 2008 and 2010. Streaming video seems almost ready for real use after years and years of promises it was on the cusp. Since most of the events are of niche interest and they need the primetime nuggets to manufacture ad revenue, streaming video might be the answer to real olympic coverage in a couple years.

    2. Re:NBC ya by Basehart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Maybe they are preparing for 2008 and 2010. Streaming video seems almost ready for real use after years and years of promises it was on the cusp...."

      After watching Speed TV slowly turn into NASCAR TV I'm hoping motor sports promoters soon realize the only way they can get through to audiences in the USA is online.

      Dakar, WRC and numerous other local, national and international motor sports events have been dropped from Speed TV's scheduling in favor of reality TV style chop shop and street drag racing shows, while the omnipresent NASCAR programming from our friends at NASCAR Corp fills in the gaps that aren't already taken by infomercials for exercise machines and bottle openers.

      Whoever gets it together to offer motor sports events online gets my $$$'s.

    3. Re:NBC ya by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      You know, with as many channels as we have, there is no excuse for the lack of sports coverage that we have. I understand that the IOC sold NBC the exclusive rights to the olympics seemingly forever, so in my opinion, it's almost a lost cause in the US. However, the fact that we cannot get reasonable international sports coverage is beyond my comprehension. We shouldn't just get soccer. We should be able to get everything from table tennis to Aussie rules football.

      How much would the rights to niche sports cost in the US? I can't imagine it would be more expensive than, say, all those dumb "original" shows on ESPN.

    4. Re:NBC ya by Basehart · · Score: 1

      I don't know about TV, but I'd have thought getting the rights to re-broadcast international events on the web in the USA would be dirt cheap.

      All you'd need to do then is tap into the feed, set up a slick media management system and get some ad space.

    5. Re:NBC ya by grishnav · · Score: 1

      http://revs.tv/ isn't bad.

  16. US Only? by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda pissed that only US residents get to watch the feed, leaving my fellow Canadians out...

    But then again, Canada's out of the running - so I don't give a shit about the Olympics anymore. :P

    --
    Whoo, signature!
    DesireCampbell.com
    1. Re:US Only? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Don't feel bad. As an American living in Canada I remember NBC's coverage and know first hand how much better olympic coverage is here than in the states. Someone a few posts above was moaning about how NBC has all this hype and half-hour specials detailing some atheltes life and blah blah blah ad nauseum instead of showing the sports. And it made me glad that I'm here to enjoy this year's olympics. We aren't missing anything.

    2. Re:US Only? by blueadept1 · · Score: 1

      As an American living in Canada

      OPEN TRANSMISSION
      You are not an American anymore. You are a Canadian. Assimilate.
      END TRANSMISSION

    3. Re:US Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go tell the French Canadiadiananans this... You'll get punched in the face, but not preceding the kick to the nether regions!

    4. Re:US Only? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Errr, why not just tune in to CBC on the ol' fashioned TV? Personally I would rather have the Canadian than American coverage.

  17. For those of you just joining us by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    For the benefit of people who come accross this article in a search, you might want to notice that the /. article posted immediately before this one estimates that Akamai can only handle 150,000 streams at a time.

    Put these two articles together: and you come to the conclusion that Internet streaming just isn't ready for prime time. TV will always be more easily moved over broadcast technology, not something that has the overhead of IP.

    1. Re:For those of you just joining us by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      estimates that Akamai can only handle 150,000 streams at a time

      Google has been trying to support the Tour of California by streaming video coverage of the race. They apparently had 60,000 people trying to watch on the first day (according to the on-line text commentary), many of whom (including me) spent a lot of time looking at a window that said "buffering...". It sounded like they added capacity the next days, but I still mostly got "buffering", and occasional video for a few seconds at a time, followed by it freezing, and maybe playing again.

      I did finally get to watch about 20 minutes of the streaming (up to the finish) on Friday.

      They were using akamai for at least some of the streaming, and it sounds like they actually contracted with someone to provide the whole video feed service (rather than use some in house beta capability)

    2. Re:For those of you just joining us by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      But the replies to the story pretty much prove that 15k is WAY too low of a guess.

      It works out to 15 streams per server (or somewhere around there).

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:For those of you just joining us by heptapod · · Score: 1

      estimates that Akamai can only handle 150,000 streams at a time

      They'll have bandwidth to spare considering how the Olympics are tanking in the ratings this year!

    4. Re:For those of you just joining us by drasfr · · Score: 1

      Well... sure... I agree with current infrastructure... But... If we could live in a dream world... There is still the experimental (for life??) multicast network... It was created to solve these problems. But it's been experimental for....... If companies were to push for it. It could work and solve all the problems.

      Thoughts on this or am I wrong?

    5. Re:For those of you just joining us by Meski · · Score: 1
      <mental image of 1000's of users streaming over the limited pipe between USA and Oz>
      PLEASE use DRM to limit this to the USA.[1]
      </rant>
      and a sneer at the lameness filter, cos I actually wanted this in all caps, to indicate yelling.
      [1] Assuming thousands of hockey fans exist here :)
    6. Re:For those of you just joining us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious to know how the 150,000 maximum concurrency estimate was acquired. The estimate omits any reference to stream bitrate; are those 150,000 streams running at an average of 150kbps, 300kbps, 800kbps? Any Akamai customer with portal access can see evidence that Akamai surpassed this number last night. According to my EdgeControl Management account, the Akamai Network peaked at 11:55 pm PST yesterday with 173,060 concurrent streams. I work for a streaming media service provider that frequently delivers traffic through the Akamai CDN, and I have never heard of a 150,000 stream limit.

  18. Dang. by cosmotron · · Score: 1

    DRM means that I won't be able to watch it in Linux, right? I hate DRM.

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  19. Jack, meet ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack, meet ass. His name is "elister" and he just dicouvered Slashdot!

  20. Gold Metal? by MSBob · · Score: 1

    Given that those things aren't made of actual gold anymore, perhaps this is more of a Freudian slip than a typo?

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    1. Re:Gold Metal? by jxyama · · Score: 1

      They aren't "made" of gold, but they certainly contain gold... "Gold medals" in Olympics are actually silver medals that are gold plated. (Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_medal)

    2. Re:Gold Metal? by cmacb · · Score: 1

      "They aren't "made" of gold, but they certainly contain gold... "Gold medals" in Olympics are actually silver medals that are gold plated."

      Well, there went any inspiration I had to start an excercise program.

      *whew*

  21. it will be interesting to see if it can sustain... by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    well now that it's been posted to slashdot it will be even more interesting..hmm..

  22. Canadian Men's Hockey Team by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
    Canada's out of the running

    They weren't really in the running, were they? It's a good thing we have women who can play hockey, eh?

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  23. BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Da BBC Has ALREADY been up IN DIS bitCHHHH

    1. Re:BBC by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excuse me. This is an American-centric forum. Please don't bring up irrelevant facts that others have been doing this for some time now.

    2. Re:BBC by jamesots · · Score: 1

      No, the BBC don't do this. There's no DRM on their olympic streams - I've been watching it for the last two weeks on my linux box without any problems. With a choice of up to four different streams, so I can choose which events to watch as well.

      --
      Ho hum for the life of a bear
    3. Re:BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBC use Geo-IP if they need to restrict a stream and can cope with large numbers in Real and Windows Media. DRM is something that has been trialed but Geo-IP is seen as a better way forward. Premier League Football (for example) is Geo-IP restricted.

    4. Re:BBC by phavens · · Score: 1

      I say mod this one up as an example of what a real broadcasting company would/should do in broadcasting the olympics.

      The NBC broadcast of the Olympics(TM) continues to be the worse showing of the Olympics(TM) I've EVER dealt with. I actually loved the 24/7 showing of the olympics that it used to be. With perhaps prime time reshowing of popular events on broadcast it worked out fine for most involved. You could still catch the sports that interested you VCR delayed (this was pre-PVR) if necessary, but still there.

      Not that NBC will give a damn... they wasted a lot of money on this and I hope they lost enough that another network gets the rights.

      --
      Patrick Havens (Mr. 573333 to you.) Graphic Artist / Coder / Father / Journeler
  24. How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by Palal · · Score: 1

    1. STOP MIXING EVENTS! I want to watch downhill skiing and I don't care about hockey! (I do but that's besides the point). I want to be able to watch a single competition and I want to know when it will start and when it will end. I don't want to have them mix everything together! I have to tape all of this and then watch all this stuff! 2. They have NBC, CNBC, MSNBC and USA. Three out of the four can be used to broadcast olympic events 24/7. So you set appart time slots on each channel for each sport and advertise it as such. The less popular sports should be shown on cable and the more popular sports should be shown on broadcast channels (or vice-versa if the cable companies pay them). 3. USA is not the only country there! Since they have so much underutilized timeslots, why not show other countries? I, for example, want to watch other countries' competitors and I'd be willing to tape this at 3 AM if I had to. 4. If they don't have enough slots for less popular competitors/sports, why not tape them and put them online with DRM/IP restrictions? I'd be glad to watch them that way too. 5. Hopefully I won't need stupid NBC next time around since I am planning on going to the 2010 Winter Olympics since it's coming to my coast (Vancouver) only a few hours' flight. BTW. Who is covering the Olympics for Canada and how are they doing?

    --
    -Palal
    1. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by yetiman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The CBC is covering it as always...and doing a damn fine job as always.

    2. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. First off, the cable stations don't mix events nearly as much as the broadcast network. USA, MSNBC, and CNBC had huge blocks dedicated to uninterrupted curling matches, hockey matches, and full coverage of biathlon and cross-country events. Secondly, for prime time, not mixing would be a disaster. NBC would immediately lose everyone not interested in the one sport they were covering.

      2. What you describe is pretty much what was done. The less popular stuff, plus events that really needed to be shown uninterrupted, like hockey or curling, were shown on cable. There really isn't enough going on in the Winter Olympics to merit 24/7, but they had a godawful amount of coverage anyway. Certainly more than I could watch.

      3. They did show other countries, especially on the cable networks. There was a ton of hockey coverage, not just the US and Canadian teams. Curling wasn't just limited to the US, either.

      I have to wonder how much of the coverage all the bitchers and complainers actually watched. With the help of the three cable networks, EVERY Olympic sport got air time. Of course the NBC broadcast coverage was limited to the most popular events, but who gives a shit? That's what VCRs and DVRs are for -- to tape the stuff on cable and watch it instead.

    3. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by Kankraka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed they are! I've been watching it on HD at work, wow that's amazing :D. CBC just does sports right!

    4. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by magicchex · · Score: 1

      CBC, as always, and if you're lucky enough to live in Michigan like I do, you get CBC in your basic cable package. I actually never watch US coverage of the Olympics anymore, because I got sick of half the events being time-delayed.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    5. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by FunFactor100 · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding me? They repeat the same stuff over and over again and Brian Williams is a joke.

    6. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by Tripster · · Score: 1

      Actually .. CTV has the rights to 2010 and 2012, so they are producing it for the world this time.

      They will of course be upgrading to HD equipment for the whole thing I'm sure but expect coverage to go down a bit compared to CBC quality and quantity.

      They will air it over CTV, TSN and will likely partner with other domestic broadcasters or possibly petition to allow CTV Newsnet to air content, etc.

    7. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by Tripster · · Score: 1
    8. Re:How to improve NBC Olympic coverage by jseale · · Score: 1

      Let us hope and pray that NBC doesn't try another PPV experiment like they did with the summer games a few years ago. I don't really care who I'm getting my content from, but having to pay for it really sucked eggs. GEEZ! :o

  25. DRM!? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    I guess I'd better get crackin'...get it? C'mon LAUGH! All I need is a proxy up in the states...right? That's how my friends get DirecTV. They just bill it to an American address and bring the box down here. It might not be legal, but everybody gets paid, anything else is irrelevent.

    --
    What?
  26. DRM, IP protection????? by presarioD · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Enable proxy
    2. mplayer -dumpfile Olympics.wmv -dumpstream -playlist "http://NBC.sucks/Olympics-DRMed-don't touch-Americans only.wmv"
    --
    Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
  27. Mac-compatible? by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1
    What I want to know is what format this video stream will be in. For the other Olympic videos on NBC's site, you MUST have a PC with Windows Media Player to be able to watch them. I know that there is an OSX version of WMP, but it apperently can't play the videos on NBC's site.

    I think that is ridiculous. They should at least have an alternate format for the rest of us.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    1. Re:Mac-compatible? by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      Please just conform and buy a Windows PC. Stop trying to be different. You want to consume all this media like a good citizen, right? You need a platform we trust.

      --
      --- witty signature
    2. Re:Mac-compatible? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Ahem, bad news...

      "Video Support
      NBCOlympics.com video can be viewed in Windows Media Player 6 or higher on a PC.

      Playlist Support
      The playlist auto advance functionality is supported in Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher for Windows. It is not supported on a Mac."

      Good news is, I suspect even if Akamai network can handle that crap named "windows media server", also as windows media backwards format does not have "fallback support" like Real or Quicktime does, a nightmare for clients is on the way.

      Funny is, I suspect Akamai will be using Helix Server on their huge network, aka real server to stream windows media. :) Yes it can stream windows media.

      Here is the thing they will probably use:
      http://www.realnetworks.com/products/media_deliver y.html

  28. NBC this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, there's a lot of repeat business in that brilliant model!

    Precisely.
    I've never heard anyone say "Hey, want to come over and watch last year's world series?"
    Are they worried about someone making their own highlights tape? All that the DRM will do is make it hard for someone like me to watch. I refuse to use the newest Real or Windows Media players. Maybe I want to watch hockey, but I don't want to upgrade my media players to watch NBC's Wonderful World Of DRM. If it is so damn important to me to watch, I'll program my damn VCR to record it. Other slashdotters may feel free to Tivo it.

  29. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're just jealous.

  30. Should have started day one. by Mike_ya · · Score: 1

    /side rant
    The silver medal game was on TV today at 2pm eastern.
    Could they not schedule the gold medal game either later today or later tomorrow? Not liking the 8am start. /side rant

    The streaming is something they should have been doing for the entire Olympic Games, instead of this one hockey game. It would have been nice to catch some of the games from the comfort of my desk at work.

    Do they really think that many people in the US are going to be interested in Finland vs Sweden? The only ones that are would be watching it on TV anyway. The game is on at 8am on Sunday morning. I don't see a lot of demand for the internet stream. Be different if it was a weekday.

    Having said that I do think the Olympic committee should require, at least here in the US that any media company, like NBC that carries the Olympics provide live internet streams of all the events. That would make catching the Olympics particularly during the week a lot easier.

    1. Re:Should have started day one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the hockey final start is at 2pm Torino time. The closing ceremonies is on at 8pm Torino time.

      I'm guessing men's hockey is like the men's marathon-- traditionally it's the last sport played...

      They probably want to make sure to give the hockey players time to show up at the closing ceremonies. Either that or account for any possible multiple overtime game...imagine two groups of hockey players showing up in uniform and pads at the cermonies... %->

      At least the 8am eastern start time is live on the east coast.

  31. BBC by mr_tommy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't the BBC do this.... daily? And not just for the Olympics?!

  32. No more crashed stars, a good game at last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the NHL stars out of the competition finally we will see a decent game of hockey, the stupidity the NHL have sumerged into the last years have hit the players hard, to the point they forgot hockey is a fast game not chess.

    Good for NBC

    1. Re:No more crashed stars, a good game at last by atam · · Score: 1

      The Swedes and Finns are loaded with NHL players also.

  33. US vs Canada by Eightyford · · Score: 1

    Too bad we don't get to see a US vs Canada match. Those are always exciting. Ah well, the Fins definately deserve to win this one. They don't have four lines of superstars like Canada, but they play amazingly well as a team.

    1. Re:US vs Canada by Kankraka · · Score: 1

      :P I really hope you're using the term "super stars" lightly, seeing as they played much less than super.

  34. Canadian Lesbians kick ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I know is off topic but canadian women kicked mens asses on this olimpics.

    Beer drinking, ass scratching, hockey watching and couch potatoes canadian men suck ass.

    Go Canadian Leasbian!!!!...So Sexy....

  35. anyone else? by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The video stream will have DRM and IP protection to attempt to limit access to residents of the US

    Raise your hand if you're:

    • Tired of the location Olympic games being picked based on a bribe-fest (with your tax dollars as the ante money)
    • Tired of your tax dollars going towards facilities that most often are never used again
    • Tired of being shown only the most 'marketable' events or not seeing them at all, because only one news source is granted "rights"
    • Tired of the drama
    • Tired of people who happen to be good at a particular sport getting acts of congress to instantly give them citizenship while hard-working, tax-paying greencarders have to wait years and pass exams
    • Tired of the olympic committee getting special legislation to protect its interests and giving it the ability to shut down businesses simply because they contain the word "olympic" in their title
    • Tired of the drug scandals and an IOC obviously looking the other way, like virtually every other major sports sanctioning body
    • Tired of "for the sport" or "for the joy of competition" having turned into "for the money", right down to the recent decision by the IOC to allow athletes to be paid endorsements and more

    The list goes on...and don't get me started about the sex-fests that go on in the olympic "village"; ever wonder why the media isn't allowed in? It's for "privacy" all right...

    Used to be that when the olympics came on in the winter, we'd fire up the TV, make popcorn, and watch. We stopped watching right around the same time they started doing 10 minute long fluff pieces about athletes, instead of just showing us the damn competitions.

    1. Re:anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran out of hands on the fourth item.

      Now back to my home galaxy to retrieve a warp drive for those skeptics at the patent office...

    2. Re:anyone else? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I'm just tired of all the whining about the Olympics!

      Frankly, I don't think NBC has done near as many "athlete profile" pieces as they've done in the past, and have done a better job at showing more events in a given evening. If you really want your curling fix, try USA, MSNBC, or CNBC. And the IOC has probably done a good a job as any sports organization of taking a hard line on doping and drug use by athletes.

      I'll be up bright and early tomorrow morning for the Sweden/Finland hockey final, which should be a dandy. I'll go with the Swedes, 3-2...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:anyone else? by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 1

      The list goes on...and don't get me started about the sex-fests that go on in the olympic "village"; ever wonder why the media isn't allowed in? It's for "privacy" all right...

      Well, sure. All athletes who do a lot of aerobic activity are more likely to have higher sexual energy. Swimmers and rowers are among the top. Plus, they are practicing (and therefore unavailable for a date/relationship) up 16 hours of the day, why can't they have their fun?

      --
      When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    4. Re:anyone else? by freeweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tired of your tax dollars going towards facilities that most often are never used again

      Can't argue with the rest of your rant, but rest assured that Olympics facilities very often are used again - at least in places that care.

      Calgary's '88 winter Olys left us with some amazing facilities, which have directly lead to Canada doing better each time since. We're looking at a record haul, much of which can be attributed to having a world-class speed skating oval here. Canadian athletes used to have to go overseas to train for a lot of winter events.

      Last time I visited Lake Placid, the facilities there were in continual use, as a touist destination and training facility.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and don't get me started about the sex-fests that go on in the olympic "village"; ever wonder why the media isn't allowed in? It's for "privacy" all right...

      Sounds like someone is jealous...what's wrong with sex? Fucking moralist crusaders...

    6. Re:anyone else? by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      The list goes on...and don't get me started about the sex-fests that go on in the olympic "village" [scotsman.com]; ever wonder why the media isn't allowed in? It's for "privacy" all right

      Why do you care if they're having sex? Rumor has it that famous good-looking athletic people do that quite often.

    7. Re:anyone else? by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      Do I need all of them to raise my hand?

      * Tired of the location Olympic games being picked based on a bribe-fest (with your tax dollars as the ante money)

      Pretty much, but then I don't like the political aspects of the old olympic choosing. I don't really know a realistic great way to do it. I wish people could just pick a place for it's beauty and ability to host the games. I'll raise my hand on this one, even though I offer no solution.

      * Tired of your tax dollars going towards facilities that most often are never used again

      Yup, not a big fan of govt stepping in on this one. I'm a small govt type of person. Private industry can provide for it quite well.

      * Tired of being shown only the most 'marketable' events or not seeing them at all, because only one news source is granted "rights"

      Very much. It always seems I'm interested in the smaller sports. Though, for some reason, curling always seems to get *a lot* of air time during the winter olympics. I don't mind that - if you like curling great, I just don't really know why it's singled out of the "lesser" sports (with respect to itnerested viewers). Eh.

      * Tired of the drama

      Eh, I've never payed it much mind. Most of it is manufactured by a media needing ratings anyway.

      * Tired of people who happen to be good at a particular sport getting acts of congress to instantly give them citizenship while hard-working, tax-paying greencarders have to wait years and pass exams

      Somewhat. I guess I care less about this one than most of the ones you list. IMO they bring in enough money for it to be worth it. They typically work longer hours and much more physical than most of the "hard-working" and, because of thier endorsements, pay a much higher tax rate and amount. If hard-working tax-paying is your litmus test these guys are grand and should be flitted right through. I rather suspect you mean that thier impact on society is pretty much worthless compared to, say, a brick layer. Though that is a matter of argument.

      * Tired of the olympic committee getting special legislation to protect its interests and giving it the ability to shut down businesses simply because they contain the word "olympic" in their title

      Oh yea, not a big fan of govt controls. Much more of an Adam Smith type of person here. Artifical controls should only be used in extreme cases or for short periods of time (such as the original patent and copyright laws - not what we have today).

      * Tired of the drug scandals and an IOC obviously looking the other way, like virtually every other major sports sanctioning body

      Eh, another one to hard for me to get worked up about. If you are a big sports fan I can see it, I'm not. I just watch it once every four years and only care about the "oooh neat move" factor. I'm not particularly aware of any incidents of this, but then again not caring I wouldn't know.

      * Tired of "for the sport" or "for the joy of competition" having turned into "for the money", right down to the recent decision by the IOC to allow athletes to be paid endorsements and more

      This is the only one I really disagree with. It's been many many years (if ever) that it was truly "for the sport" or "joy of competition". For many countries there were no such thing as profesional so thier equivilent were the olympic teams. Even then, most of the western teams were not really "for the sport" - they were semi-professional looking to get that big contract. If you ever really thought that the majority would do it no matter what you were naive. Had it ever been this great alturistic thing t

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    8. Re:anyone else? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Canadian athletes used to have to go overseas to train for a lot of winter events.

      You've got to be kidding...

      This is Canada we're talking about here, right... not some African country? Canada, right up at the artic circle, where most of the country is below freezing for 9 months out of the year?

      I'm at a complete loss as to why Canada didn't have any appropriate venues before 88. Hosing down the floor of any old wherehouse will give you an ice rink for free. Canada, where hockey reigns supreme, couldn't find a single ice rink, appropriate for speed-skaters to practice on, in the entire country?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The list goes on...and don't get me started about the sex-fests that go on in the olympic "village"; ever wonder why the media isn't allowed in? It's for "privacy" all right...

      Sounds like someone is a little jealous. Maybe you should get out more often.

    10. Re:anyone else? by prichardson · · Score: 1

      The list goes on...and don't get me started about the sex-fests that go on in the olympic "village"; ever wonder why the media isn't allowed in? It's for "privacy" all right...

      And exactly what is wrong with this? If a bunch of young adults get together and fuck each other there's nothing wrong with that. No one's being forced to do anything; no one gets hurt. Athletes deserve privacy, too.

      There's another place where young adults are packed in together, where a list of every person in available, where they give you free internet access. It's called college, and lots of sex happens there, too. The people who don't want to have sex, don't have sex. The people who do want to have sex generally do. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

      I agreed with almost everything on your list until this point. I almost think that the Olympics should be held nude again, then maybe NBC could make a profit. Oh wait, except the FCC says that's illegal.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    11. Re:anyone else? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      the sex-fests that go on in the olympic "village"

      It takes a village to raise a child.

      Or at least to conceive one.

    12. Re:anyone else? by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      Canada, where hockey reigns supreme, couldn't find a single ice rink, appropriate for speed-skaters to practice on, in the entire country?

      Hockey rinks are of vastly different dimensions than a (long-track, at least) speed skating oval. An NHL rink is 200 feet long and 85 feet wide, giving a perimeter of 570 feet or 173m (ignoring rounded corners, so the true length is shorter). Long-track speed skating tracks are 400m. For this reason it is rare to find indoor speed skating ovals; I believe Calgary was the first Olympics where the speed skating was held indoors (I'm not sure about 1984, but the oval in Lake Placid (1980) is outside in front of the high school). Short track could be held on a hockey rink, but then short-track has only been an Olympic medal sport since 1992 (its Olympic debut was as a demonstration sport in Calgary).

    13. Re:anyone else? by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      I'll go with the Swedes, 3-2...

      Damn... Maybe you should go buy a lotto ticket.

    14. Re:anyone else? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I agree. Quite simply, I think it's time for the Olympics to take another 2,000 year hiatus. It's all far too commercialized, and all about money now. The original spirit of the games has been lost.

    15. Re:anyone else? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding. The design of a speed skating oval and the quality of the ice is an absolute science. The design of Calgary's speedskating oval was a massive engineering accomplishment, and a huge revolution. It was the fastest ice in the world. Until Salt Lake's facility was built, almost all of the world records had been set in Calgary. Salt Lake copied and improved upon the design, even employing the same engineers to design it I believe. I unfortunately have no knowledge about the oval in Torino.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  36. Free streaming by deltagreen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dutch television has free streaming at http://www.nos.nl/gfx/winterspelen2006/live/index. html. Not hard to figure out the schedule below either, even if you don't speak dutch.

    1. Re:Free streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you happen to have a proxy that lets you view the stream? They block US people:)

    2. Re:Free streaming by ramunas · · Score: 2, Funny

      you bastard! I was watching that. How am I supposed to watch it now that the slashdot crowd stampedes the site?

      --
      ./R My blog
  37. Just a question by caereth · · Score: 1

    What's stopping people from watching this on the TV? Wouldn't that be more convenient and higher quality than some web stream? Myself I hope Sweden wins as I am a Swede, but Finlands team has seemed awfully good this year, so it will be a tough match. I guess there are some people without access to TV but having access to a computer. But those are likely at work and shouldn't be watching the game anyway ;)

  38. Streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cycling.tv has been streaming cycling races live from Europe for the past year or so. They streamed the Het Volk this morning, and I think they are streaming Kuurne-Brussels-Kuurne on Sunday. Yeah not as exciting, or as fast-paced, as hockey; but seeing as I'm stuck in Canada where cycling gets almost zero coverage on TV, it's better than nothing. And they don't bore the viewer to death with endless stories about 'Lance', unlike OLN.

  39. Rootkit perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I watch this puppy will I later discover an NBC rootkit on my computer? They do mention something about updating the DRM on my machine.

  40. rather they streamed it HD on a subchannel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been watching the Olympics using the pcHDTV card, old GeForce2 FX5200( DVI ) to HDTV via HDMI-DVI cable picking up the local NBC station off the antenna. Awesome. So sending a live feed on a subchannel would be my wish.

  41. NBC Sucks. by Cadre · · Score: 1
    I think that is ridiculous. They should at least have an alternate format for the rest of us.

    I know. This just pisses me off. About a week before the games started Flip4Mac was working. I played a couple clips and it worked. Then the day the games actually start they break it and we haven't had coverage since. And NBC goes to great lengths to not list any ways to contact them to complain about this either. Fuck NBC.

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
  42. This is why I want Disney/ABC coverage. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    And the reason is simple: Disney could use ESPN, ESPN2, likely ABC Family Channel and possibly ESPN Classic channel to cover Olympic events live around the clock without interfering with normal ABC programming, so that ABC doesn't lose the profitable daytime soap opera programs. This will allow ABC to show a nightly compilation highlights program during prime time that is three hours long.

    1. Re:This is why I want Disney/ABC coverage. by sam1am · · Score: 1

      I'd love it too. But you see, the Olympics want broadcast, over-the-air exposure. Nevermind that ESPN and ESPN2 are both available in roughly 90 million households in the US.

      But I could definately ESPN Classic, perhaps even ESPNU (lots of college athletes in the games). Perhaps the biggest improvement for olympic coverage would be using ESPN Deportes (not that I speak spanish, but I think it would be a great move).

      Don't forget regular highlights/updates on ESPN News

      Not to mention, you'd get three HD channels available for use, too - ABCHD, ESPNHD, ESPN2HD.

      Not likely anytime soon (well, obviously, with the NBC contract...)

      Also Interesting to consider how much NBC paid for the Torino games (613 million) vs NFL deals.. 1.1 Billion/year for ESPN's MNF. NBC, 600 million a year. Fox: 712.5 million a year. CBS: 622.5 million a year.

    2. Re:This is why I want Disney/ABC coverage. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      But you see, the Olympics want broadcast, over-the-air exposure.

      I think that's true in the past, but with most of the USA having access to cable TV and/or small-dish satellite TV, the IOC will probably allow far more live programming on cable stations than in the past. With my suggested scenario, it would actually be quite good, especially since Disney will have access to ESPN's extensive studio and production facilities at Bristol, CT, probably the best facility of its type in the world.

  43. Investment? by thebiss · · Score: 1

    Certainly if Akamai succeeds, it will set a precident that NBC will tap again, and that other broadcasters may join.

    For those that have cashed out of Google, perhaps now's the time to invest in Akamai, if you haven't already http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Sym bol=AKAM&event=peek.

    --
    Beware: I believe all are created equal, and have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
  44. Sustain the load?? by WoTG · · Score: 1

    It's Finland vs. Sweden. I can't imagine too many people will watch this one. Let me put it this way, I'd bet that the Victoria's Secret stream will have had more viewers.

    If only it was Canada vs. USA...

    1. Re:Sustain the load?? by deetsay · · Score: 1
      If only it was Canada vs. USA...
      :-) Well, in Finland and Sweden's defense, we ruled.
      --
      "The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand", or so I have read.
    2. Re:Sustain the load?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, in Finland and Sweden's defense, we ruled"

      Actually, Sweden then Rusia ruled, then Finland got it's independence. Finland's gonna whup their Swedish ass.

    3. Re:Sustain the load?? by sweborg · · Score: 1

      > If only it was Canada vs. USA...

      Maybe you should learn to play better hockey. Good luck in the next Olympics. /Swede

  45. Destined to Fail by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    Who watches Olympic hockey?

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  46. Gold 'metal' game? by KFury · · Score: 1

    I wish I could win a gold metal. Nowadays they only give out gold plastic.

  47. Someone set us up the games!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your metal are belong to US!

  48. Simulcast in HD by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

    Alot of grief being given to NBC about their broadcast, but I'd point out that I was really impressed by the High Definition Simulcast this year. They seem to have solved some technical issues that their HD broadcasts had been plauged with in the past. There used to be some excess compression in their video feed, probably cuased by bandwidth limitations somewhere, but the Olympics broadcast looked spectacular.

    Of course NBC is still broadcasting in 1080i instead of 720p. The interlaced broadcast certainly doesn't lend itself to the high-motion video in the olympics, but even so, the detail was impressive and watching the games was substantially more enjoyable than it would have been over 480i.

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  49. For the Swedes and Finns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:For the Swedes and Finns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks but we can watch it on TV here.

  50. MobiTV by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    I think this is one of the channels that I get on MobiTV for my Palm Pilot. Of course, the stream is all proprietary, I'm sure, and can't be saved anyhow through the provided app.

    BTW... TV channels on Palm hand-helds over Wi-Fi. I can't say it is useful, but it is cool.

  51. You sure it's going to be really live? by AdamReyher · · Score: 1

    No delays? I mean ... what if there's a puck malfunction or something?

    --
    The Computations of AdamR
    http://www.adamreyher.com
    1. Re:You sure it's going to be really live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The encoders will introduce a delay. Last time I watched a live stream up next to a broadcast there was 20-30 sec lag.

  52. Just once by typical · · Score: 1

    Just once, just *once*, just for the *sheer novelty*, I'd like to see an actual streaming video website that's nice and usable in Firefox in Linux.

    Inexplicably, websites with streaming video also seem to be the ones that are badly-tested IE-specific "applications" with masses of Javascript and everything else you can think of, instead of just websites with a "video" link. They're making money off ads here. What possible benefit can it be to them to make it miserable for everyone else?

    The only think I can think of is that the people who get hired to do streaming video must be the same crowd that is convinced that websites need to be "media-rich" and either be a single big Flash applet or pop up four windows running various clever scripts that they didn't bother to test anywhere but IE and playing sounds.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Just once by BabyDriver · · Score: 1

      The BBC's video streams work perfectly in Linux (I'm using SeaMonkey so FF won't be a problem) the site never gives me problems and the streams are in Real format with Windows Media as an alternative (the wmv streams are not always available)

      During the Olympics they've had three streams running from about 9am to midnight every day (you can also watch them on satellite/cable/digital) in addition to the broadcast TV. I'm watching the mens 50km cross-country at 225KB/s as I type this :)

  53. As a Finn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to say that I think it's hard for people outside Finland to fully comprehend how huge this game is. Olympic hockey in Finland is like baseball, basketball, american football and hockey in the USA, all rolled into one, having the finals of all of those rolled into a single event, played only once every four years, and against your arch rival. Picture it happening against the Soviet Union back during the cold war. And not just that, but Sweden has a history of beating Finland in close games. Not just once has Sweden come back from being behind by 2 goals in the last 60 seconds. Pretty much every single person in the country will be glued in front of the TV screen 3 hours from now when the game begins and they will remain glued to the screen until the final second. It's like the Boston Red Sox vs. the New York Yankees. It's almost like a curse. The outcome of the game will either result in the biggest victory celebrations in the history of the country, or in streams of tears.

    I understand very well that most people in the USA don't even know the entire game is being played. Much less do they care about it at all. But for those that might watch it, I just wanted to let you know what's at stake in Finland and what the feelings will be like...

  54. Well said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the Olympics, and our family loves to gather together and watch them. But NBC's coverage this year is the worst I have ever seen...

    "Omigod, this race is neck-and-neck, not only does it look like a record may be broken here, but the Italians may win this race for the first time ever, here they come, down to the wire...

    Ladies and Gentlemen, we'll be back to that race in an hour or two, maybe, if we feel like it, right after these commercials and then after we leave you completely hanging while we switch our coverage over to the first of many bobsled trials..." Etc etc bla bla bla...

    What the hell is up with all of the "teasers" and showing of just snippets, and cutting away from events just as they are getting good? I have never seen that kind of thing before in the Olympics, ever. In the past, the TV station would allow suspense to build by showing you the whole freaking show, one event at a time. If you sat down to watch women's skating, you GOT women's skating, not a few seconds of skating, and then we'll switch over here to some bob sledding, and then we'll switch over THERE to some curling, and then we'll focus in on Bob Costas's wrinkles for a while, and oh yeh, now let's have some commercials...

    You should hear my kids complain about this coverage this year. They are assuming some little kid with less attention span than THEY have has taken control of the NBC studios, Kidzilla-like, and is messing with the cameras and the equipment.

    NBC, YOU SUCK!!! After a beautiful opening ceremony, showcasing the wonderful job the Italians did in presenting these games, your TV coverage has failed miserably! You ruined the whole Olympics for all who were unlucky enough to be stuck with watching your station!

    I guess when you get in bed with Microsoft, you start sucking as bad as they do.

  55. Pfff. The Dutch NOS has 6 live feeds from Turin! by Arrawa · · Score: 1

    Why is the NBC stream an item on Slashdot? The Dutch public broadcaster NOS has six live feeds from Turin to choose from! And has been streaming continuously for free from day one!

    Feeds are restricted on ip-address and are viewable only in the Netherlands and some other European countries.

    http://www.nos.nl/gfx/winterspelen2006/live/index. html

  56. Re:Pfff. The Dutch NOS has 6 live feeds from Turin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These streams are also from akamai, by the way. But (as long as you have the codecs) they also run fine on Linux machines. I've been watching (and at work only listening, of course ;) ) it for the passed 2 weeks. Hurrah!

  57. Re:Mac-compatible? How about *Windows*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't work on my *Thinkpad* T41 (Pentium M 1.6, and one of NBC's *sponsors*). *None* of their DRM'ed clips work - they peg the cpu at 100% & playback is jumpy. Non-DRM clips work fine, both in Windows & with a Mac running Flip4Mac. And on the Thinkpad *no* videos of any kind (their pop-up) work with IE6 (!). Maybe it's a setting with IE6 but they do "work" (DRM excepted) with Firefox & Opera. The DRM clips jump both browsers to 100% CPU and the clips skip/jump. And I've found *no* "contact us/help/tech-support" available, especially on NBC's site.

  58. Re:Pfff. The Dutch NOS has 6 live feeds from Turin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ard (http://sport.ard.de/spe/turin/news200602/10/video _livestream.jhtml) in germany has a similar service, but they only have one channel. But there is no DRM protection at all.
    It also works in other countries.

  59. Re:Pfff. The Dutch NOS has 6 live feeds from Turin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like NBC they're also using Akamai and GEOCoding.

    pnm://a1873.v21874d.c21874.e.vr.akamaistream.net/o ndemand/7/1873/21874/v0001/ebustreaming.download.a kamai.com/21760/broadcaster/21874/_!/euro
    vision_territory_error_message.jpg/da_b6dycra7bzaA bjbddNbjalbRbMd9cycU-beaCVF-b4-vnH-q6s8/v01
    pnm://a1873.v21874d.c21874.e.vr.akamaistream.net/o ndemand/7/1873/21874/v0001/ebustreaming.download.a kamai.com/21760/broadcaster/21874/_!/euro
    vision_territory_error_message.jpg/da_b6dycra7bzaA bjbddNbjalbRbMd9cycU-beaCVF-b4-vnH-q6s8/v01

  60. Re:Pfff. The Dutch NOS has 6 live feeds from Turin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course when that fails, find a EU proxy. :)

    pnm://a76.l2187362076.c21873.e.lr.akamaistream.net /live/D/76/21873/v0001/reflector:62076/da_bOavdpbd cvb0avaXbsaXcgdtdncKa1bI-beaC6z-b4-nkE-o7m9/v01
    pnm://a77.l2187362077.c21873.e.lr.akamaistream.net /live/D/77/21873/v0001/reflector:62077/da_dncFbaaY cFbwdldLcobUcZcMcqaCc_cZ-beaC6z-b4-qmE-j6j9/v01

  61. Load? by TadZimas · · Score: 0

    It's hockey. And it's only available for streaming in the U.S. And they're worried about load? I think NBC needs to reavaluate the value of their content.

    1. Re:Load? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said they were worried about load?

  62. hmm... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'll admit I don't like the special legislation stuff.

    But the rest I think you're just wrong on or else I don't agree.

    The olympic committee is not turning the other way on drugs. I have to say, they're having trouble catching people, but ask the director in any sport, they know there are "designer steroids" out there now and they haven't figured out how to catch them yet. There also is tons of red blood cell packing (likely via EPO), but how are you going to catch those people? Having red blood cells in your blood is normal, they're not a foreign substance. They do refuse to let people compete if they have too many red blood cells in their blood, stating the "health risks" of doing so.

    The bribe-fest was almost exclusively not with tax dollars. If you are referring to Salt Lake City (or Nogano), the bribes came from individuals/companies with an interest. Using tax money for bribes would be traceable, which isn't going to work.

    I do find it ridiculous how much money is spent on arenas and such that are never used again. Most of the money comes from local sources though and I don't live in Utah. Note that after the ridiculous bath Montreal took, most cities have tried to reuse facilities. Atlanta was moderately successful, although creating a fake river/rapids for the kayaking was ridiculous.

    The "most marketable events" argument was very strong in the past. But now, with 4 channels showing the Olympics, nearly every event is shown (esp. since winter has so few events). You see, the biathalon has been show on the primary channel (NBC) in hidef! No one in the US gives a rip about that event, and it's not only getting shown, but in the primary coverage. I got to see every US curling match. The non-US curling matches in the round-robin were for the most part not shown. This is not at all unusual since these matches all go on simultaneously. Simultaneous events have always presented a problem for TV coverage, this isn't new.

    For the citizenship, I presume you are talking about that skater. I don't watch skating, so I don't know much about it. However, if I spent my time getting angry about our government playing favorites, I'd be one pissed off guy. It's simply not worth it. (Note that Rupert Murdoch didn't have to wait to get citizenship either, and he isn't known for his skating.) I wonder how much of that stuff takes place for the World Cup? Quite a bit I would guess.

    I don't care about the sex-fests. I don't spend my time moaning about other people getting some, nor looking down on them for it. If you get a bunch of fit, young adults together, there is going to be sex. Count on it.

    There is a ton of backstory stuff nowadays in the NBC coverage (almost none in the non-primetime coverage on MSNBC or CNBC), all I can say is get a TiVo. The coverage is already delayed 12 hours, just delay watching it for another 2 hours and blast right through the backstories. This isn't new either, if you saw the coverage of Curt Gowdy's death, they had plenty of footage of him in Innsbruck, Austria in 1964 doing fluff pieces and interviews.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  63. short track... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Short track takes place on an international-sized hockey rink (30x60m). An NHL rink (like most in Canada and the US) is much narrower and simply wouldn't work.

    Calgary currently has the only bobsled run in Canada. Before it, Canadians had to train at Lake Placid (which is still closer to most Canadians than Calgary is). I wouldn't be surprised to hear that Calgary has the only ski jumps in Canada too.

    So, yes, before the Calgary Olympic facilities many Canadians had to leave the country to practice for the Olympics.

    I think when you talk about ridiculous facilities, the Summer Olympics has to take the cake. In Georgia, they built an artificial river rapids for the kayaking events. London isn't known for their mountains either (where rapids naturally occur) so I'm guessing that won't be the only such facility for long.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:short track... by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      Calgary currently has the only bobsled run in Canada. Before it, Canadians had to train at Lake Placid

      And if I recall correctly Lake Placid has one of only two bobsled runs in the US, the other being near Salt Lake City of course. So they're clearly not exactly a hot commidity.

      In Georgia, they built an artificial river rapids for the kayaking events.

      Actually the '96 events were on a natural river (the Ocoee) that was artificially "enhanced", so it wasn't completely artificial. Northern Georgia and eastern Tennessee (the events were actually held in southeastern Tennessee) are quite rugged, so it would have been ridiculous for them to build a completely artificial course, unless they wanted the events within a few miles of Atlanta. London, on the other hand, does appear to be building a completely artificial venue.

  64. How can it be live by jhines · · Score: 1

    The rest of the media is reporting the Swedes won.

  65. Re:As a Swede... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really feel for you.

    But hey, I think I cant talk for all of sweden when I say that there is no team wed rather see win the silver. ;)

  66. iTVP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Polish interactive TV (aka iTVP) - division of public TV streamed all the olympic games on the 5 (five;) channels in parallel. iTVP page: http://www.itvp.pl/

    Technology: of course.. windows encoders and their DRM.

  67. Stupid question? by allanw · · Score: 1

    This may be a stupid question, but I don't see any explanation in the summary/story or any comments here.

    Why's the rest of the world not allowed to watch this? Isn't the Olympics an international event?

    1. Re:Stupid question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IOC sells the rights to the olympics in each country. As part of the contract you CANNOT broadcast outside of your country. Inet streaming scares the shit out of the IOC.

      If I can watch the BBC stream in the US then I'm not watching NBC.
      If I don't watch NBC they can't sell ads.
      If NBC can't sell ads then IOC can't sell the rights.
      If the IOC can't sell the rights then it goes broke, or so they say.