Slashdot Mirror


Pen-Based PDA Market on Death Bed

An anonymous reader writes "The traditional pen-based PDA market is destined to evaporate within the next four years, according to HP, and it will be focusing its handheld efforts on converged smart phone devices, such as its latest BlackBerry rivals unveiled this week -- the iPAQ rw6800 and the iPAQ hw6900." From the article: "This won't come as a surprise to many, as HP hasn't given its traditional pen-based product line a refresh since the launch of the iPAQ hx4700 towards the middle of 2004. It released the iPAQ rx1950 in September of last year, but this was very much an entry-level product and made few waves among the high-end, tech-savvy consumers that dominate the PDA segment."

38 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. Tablet PCs by PlayCleverFully · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pen Based PDA's will be replaced by better tablet pcs.

    I am not sure why they have not caught on a lot more, they offer tons on functionality, and decent uptimes.

    Take handwritten notes and have them stored in digital format stored immediately?

    Why not?

    --
    Windows? I haven't used that since 1999. Fix the Slashdot Problems
    1. Re:Tablet PCs by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll believe it when I see a Tablet PC
      - small enough to stick in a pants pocket
      - that doesn't need charging every 4 hours

    2. Re:Tablet PCs by badasscat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pen Based PDA's will be replaced by better tablet pcs.

      I am not sure why they have not caught on a lot more,


      Because people don't want them. In fact, the same dynamic is at work in replacing the pen-based PDA with keyboard-based models. You may not understand it (hey, even unpopular ideas have at least a few fans), but I think the market has proven time and time again that people want keyboard-based input.

      Those who argue in favor of pen-based input always talk about how "intuitive" it is, but I think that's a misnomer. Is it more intuitive to jot something down that even you yourself can barely read and that is poorly recognized by the PC than it is to simply type something that everybody can understand? Is it any faster? (The answer to that is clearly no; you can test that yourself.)

      Pen-based PDA's are on the way out and so are tablet PC's, except for those certain market segments (medical professionals, construction, etc.) that can benefit from them. But they are not suitable as general purpose machines; not as suitable as PC's with keyboards, anyway.

    3. Re:Tablet PCs by Techguy666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pen Based PDA's will be replaced by better tablet pcs.

      I am not sure why they have not caught on a lot more, they offer tons on functionality, and decent uptimes.

      Take handwritten notes and have them stored in digital format stored immediately?

      ===

      Well, my employer (a K-12 school) pushed me to introduce the iPaq handhelds two years ago. After a lot of poor trial results (dead batteries, cracked screens, difficulty of interface, inferior software to the Palm, etc...) I let the project die like a dinosaur in a tar pit. Administration wasn't particularly happy about that - since we had a partnership with Compaq/HP. It's nice to have the last laugh - yet again.

      Now, the school wants to introduce TabletPCs. ...And I find myself dragging my feet again. TabletPCs have two aspects that make them really useful - they have an additional input method over the laptop, and in pen mode, they take up a much smaller volume compared to a laptop. Tablets also, however, have significant downsides - for the same cost of a tablet, you can get a much better laptop, the single swivelling hinge or detachable keyboard create another point of weakness on the tablet that doesn't really exist on laptops; finally, there are no "killer apps" that take full advantage of the new input method. You can write things in OneNote and store them but then your TabletPC becomes a glorified organizer. When people think "TabletPC", everyone immediately thinks (as you have), "Gee, I can store handwritten notes!" Great. Another tool to organize data rather than synthesize new data. The amount a typical student spends on paper and pens in the entire course of her academic career is significantly less than the cost of a tabletPC that needs refreshing every four years. That's why tablets haven't caught on.

      Having said that, I still believe that a pen-based laptop has a place in schools in a few years. There just needs to be more applications that allow tablets to process or create data more effectively, rather than the traditional organization of data; the other possibility is if the cost of tablets come down to match the cost of more fully-featured laptops.

    4. Re:Tablet PCs by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Nokia 770 fits your first criteria. However the battery life is only 3 hours.

      I've seen it at CompUSA, and it is very sleek! It is horizontally oriented and sits comfortably into my hand.

      The only problem is that it lacks apps. I think partly because it was designed as a web browsing device, and partly because Nokia thought it would fail, there were no apps built for it. However, since it runs the somewhat open-source Maemo platform, there is a lot of opportunity for community development.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Tablet PCs by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can agree that pen-based PDA-only devices might not last much longer, but pen-based phones seem entirely logical to me. The problem isn't the pen-based aspect of the PDA, it's that the PDA doesn't do anything else.

      I bought a Palm a few years ago and used it actively for probably a couple of months. Then I just stopped. It just wasn't convenient to carry my cell phone and my PDA. The problem wasn't the pen, the problem was the extra device.

      As I had to recently decide what kind of phone I was going to get, I decided to spring for the Treo and see if it would help me out. Ever since then, I can't imagine how I got along without it. It has a pen which I sometimes use, sometimes don't. Just depends on what I'm doing. But there are definitely many times that the pen is a lot easier to use than a keyboard.

    6. Re:Tablet PCs by hotspotbloc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm getting atleast three hours of heavy use (100mW 802.11g and the screen full blast) on my 770. Four plus without network usage and a dim screen. It also seems to take less than hour to get an almost full charge. Beautiful hardware and decent, but somewhat immature software. Time will fix that and the lack of apps. Many of the deb-arm packages work if you've rooted your 770.

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    7. Re:Tablet PCs by Beowabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just got one, and I've gotten much more than three hours out of the battery. I spent four hours on the bus with one (no Bluetooth or WiFi running, but with the backlight up pretty high) and the on-screen battery indicator showed about 50% charge when I was done (although I'm not sure that's linear).

      I'd say 3 hours is about what I'd expect with WiFi on, and maybe playing music. For reading an ebook or browsing off-line, I get a lot more.

      There are lots of third-party apps available (cf http://maemo.org/maemowiki/ApplicationCatalog). However, it's a bit weak on standard PIM stuff like addressbooks and calendars. The choice I know about is , whose PIM apps have been ported to the N770. To my mind, it is a bit odd that Nokia shipped the thing without a full-featured addressbook and calendar pre-installed; they seem to really want to distinguish this product from traditional PDAs. (To my mind, the gorgeous if small 800x480 landscape-orientation screen does that quite well enough. :-)

    8. Re:Tablet PCs by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it more intuitive to jot something down that even you yourself can barely read and that is poorly recognized by the PC than it is to simply type something that everybody can understand? Is it any faster? (The answer to that is clearly no; you can test that yourself.)

      Having switched a year ago from a Grafitti-based Palm to a keyboard-based one (the Treo 650), I firmly believe the keyboard is worse. I suspect raw character entry speed is about the same for me, but now I have to switch back and forth between the keyboard and the stylus all the goddamn time. It's awkward in a way that pure pen-based work never was.

      I think the reason people buy the keyboard more is that it's more obvious how to work it. I doubt it's faster to get proficient at the keyboard, but any fool can see where the buttons are.

  2. Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fine, get out of the market. Just please, someone stay in. I'd be lost without my PDA, and I don't want a 'smartphone'. I want something I can reference while holding the phone...

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
    1. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Handsfree Bluetooth Headsets will be your best friend then. That or get an Axim :)

    2. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, this stinks. I have the 4700 pocketpc and like it, in fact I'm posting on it now. We're not allowed cellphones in the workplace so a standalone pda is a necessity for me.

      With sony out and palm going downhill, where will I get my next PDA?

    3. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by elmegil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, because we're all slasdotters who don't mind looking like big startrek geeks. And just because some business people don't mind either, they still look like idiot in my book. Until someone comes out with a bluetooth headset that doesn't look like I've strapped a clothespin on my ear, it ain't happnin.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by digitalgiblet · · Score: 4, Informative
      I agree, but evidently NON-geeks seem to be adopting the bluetooth "clothespins". I stopped for gas this morning (in a suburb of Atlanta) and of the 5 or 6 people getting gas I was the ONLY one NOT wearing one (and I'm pretty sure I was the biggest geek onhand). The funniest part is that people who wear them DON'T take them off. They were all walking around inside the building getting coffe, etc. while wearing their large, obtrusive ear-pieces. Only Lt. Uhura had a more obtrusive ear-piece!

      I've long held the opinion that if you gave one of these things to one of the homeless guys who stand on the street and talk to unseen people, they would cease to look crazy, but rather "productive". Go figure.

    5. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you've missed the aesthetic aspect entirely. It's a clothespin with a beacon. I think it makes you MUCH more attractive than a plain ol clothespin without a beacon.

      I was amazed how bright that sucker is in my Plantronics 640 when it strobed as I walked through a dark hallway.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
  3. In other news... by Rydia · · Score: 4, Funny

    Harley-Davidson has a release fortelling the impending doom of automobiles in favor of motorcycles.

  4. You know... by mangus_angus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    not all of us WANT all in one devices. I like my phone, MP3 player, and PDA being separate devices. If one breaks I'm not screwed three times over.

  5. Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by DrRobert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and I can't stand it. I could enter data incredibly fast with one hand with pen on the palm, with the treo I have to fumble using those stupid small keyboards, which takes two hands and is very, very , very slow compared to just writing something with the pen. I have just about given up on entering any data into the thing because it is so difficult. I want a palm phone with no keyboard. I guess I'll be going back to my regular old palm and separate phone though.

  6. I hope not by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love my Palm with satnav software. For me, this is the best compromise yet for satnav: it's linked to my address book, easily updated with new maps/POI etc, and usable everywhere. Much better than traditional in-car satnav. Running this on a phone would suck, too, thanks to the tiny screen of a phone.

  7. Pricing matters by orangeguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most people NEVER needed a PDA anyway - a calendar and addressbook in a mobile is enough for most people.

    Plus many modern PDAs cost almost as much as a small / low budget laptop. Why bother buying an expensive gizmo if you can the real thing for a bit more? Also subsidized smart phones from network operators will always be cheaper as 'unconnected' PDAs.

    So in the future we will only have even smarter phones and mini notebooks. PDAs will be gone - they were an evolutionary step to the new offsprings.

  8. Going the way of the pager by engagebot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PDAs are slowly going the way of the pager.

    As soon as you have devices that do everything a PDA does, but better and still cheap, the PDA as it is now will disappear. The problem is a lot of these devices now try to do everything, but don't do anything well (and they're expensive). Once that begins to change, it will be no surprise.

    That's what i thought the origami was going to be. Why not have a blackberry-type device which is super easy to use, works perfectly with Exchange, and has all the cool pen-based pda functionality. As long as they could pull it off without being cumbersome, i think it would work. Thats why some devices succeed and some fail: crappy ones are too cumbersome to actually use.

    --
    Han shot first.
  9. Re:Dieing? by wild_berry · · Score: 2, Funny

    Netcraft have only confirmed that it's dying. The Spelling Nazis also endorsed the pronouncement.

  10. Expensive toys by DrWho520 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the high-end, tech-savvy consumers

    Do you mean the early adopters who are willing to spend way to much on a piece of kit so they can flaunt their technical superiority? I wear a watch, I carry a planner and I have a pen. My watch is self winding (yes, it is even an analog watch), I recharge my planner once a year (calendar refils) and a pen is always at hand. I guess that just leaves the effort of finding the correct date and writing something down. Oh, and manually checking the schedule.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  11. Death of PDA by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The PDA (personal digital assistant) is simply changing shape. It's called the cellphone. We need our cellphones. Take a look at Japanese cellphones. They are used as e-wallets, garage door openers, gym membership verifiers, 3 way video conference communicators, and so on. With the advent of e-ink and flexible display technology, we can expect larger screens with higher resolution and lower power consumption that roll out. Take a look at the images at e-ink.com. The PDA is not dead. The personal digital assistant is simply changing shape to accommodate the needs of people the world round.

  12. Re:Origami will probably replace PDAs by BewireNomali · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In theory a PDA should have been a threat to the IPOD as well. IT's clear the IPOD's selling point isn't functionality per se.

    My ppc plays videos and music (via a 1 gig sd card). I also have bluetooth (used mostly for DUN) - Wifi. I can do basical word processing and spreadsheet functions - surf the web, read ebooks, play games, skype, instant message... just a wide range of things at a cost on par with and in some instances below the cost of an IPOD.

    Origami is going to need cool factor and the right price point to be effective because feature filled handhelds are already here - and no one wants them.

    --
    un burrito me trampeó.
  13. Depends on how you look at what constitutes a PDA by Gunfighter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The one class of PDAs I know to be on the rise is... analog!

    I just splurged and dropped ~$20 on a new PDA. This PDA I purchased is great! The batteries never run out, it is almost totally immune to shock from being dropped, I can transfer data easily between home and office, and the format is universal so I never have to worry about incompatibilities, and it is so fast and easy to use that even my parents can understand it. I went ahead and purchased an add-on module for it so I could have the advanced calendaring to track my gigs and rehearsals. Luckily, I already had a docking station for it with extra storage capacity as well as a variety of other add-ons, so it fit right into my daily routine.

    I consider it one of the best investments I've made in years. Spending $20 to successfully replace a $300 device may not sound realistic, but I've never been more organized than I am now. All I had to do that I got rid of my old PDA systems (Palm OS based devices) and find something that fit better with my new filing system.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  14. Bullshit by jasonditz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like how the mobile phone was going to replace the handheld video game system in a few years. Or how desktops were going to be replaced by laptops, or how laptops were going to be replaced by tablet PCs.

    Some people just don't want a PDA with a monthly subscription fee attached.

  15. My only want? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want a Cell Phone. One that isn't the size of a damn PDA, but has text input via a stylus and touchscreen.... Large Phones deter me..... But it's useful being able to "pencil in" appointments, assignments, and stuff like that on a PDA.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  16. They haven't caught on because the interface sucks by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're crap to use. I mean, they're *useless* for any serious amount of data input, have you ever tried writing a letter on one? and a PDA or smart phone is more useful for displaying data because *it fits in a pocket*...

    You want a serious computer, today, it *must* have a keyboard, otherwise it's a data display device.

    For those who don't want to carry a PDA, camera, a laptop and a phone, Nokia have the Communicator devices, everything in one.

    Big:
    http://www.europe.nokia.com/nokia/0,,54106,00.html

    Small:
    http://www.europe.nokia.com/nokia/0,6771,77854,00. html

    --
    Deleted
  17. I don't think so. by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least if PDAs are losing to tablets, I haven't seen evidence of this.

    It is more true that PDAs are losing to converged devices, but I think that's only half the story. What I think really is happening is that PDAs are being bracketed by laptops on one end and converged/feature rich phones on the other. Everybody who might use a PDA is almost certainly carrying a laptop and a phone that if it isn't "converged", it is practically so in all but name.

    Personally, I don't think either fits the true PDA niche, which is about form factor. A true PDA is larger than any reasonable phone would be, but fits in your shirt pocket without stretching it or making it sag. To some degree the PDA manufacturers have brought this on themselves, blurring their market niche by making the PDAs more desktop like in their power; WinCE bears a lot of the blame for this. It's the classic tendency to want to blur your market position to get more sales. You pick up a few sales on the edges, at the cost of losing clarity as to why the customer should buy your product in the first place.

    My sense is that the 200-600 PDA market is in fact doomed, because the marginal value of the PDA once you are carrying a laptop and featureful phone is small. However it doesn't mean there is zero value in the PDA. It follows that PDA prices have to drop. If I were to imagine the successful PDA device of 2010, it'd cost about $100 in todays terms, and by design would complement your phone and laptop, having easy to use wireless connectivity to them. Connectivity exists today, but it is extremely awkward. Microsoft's bluetooth is positively dreadful from a user's perspective. The question is whether PDA prices will reach that point before the buyers have completely abandoned the form factor.

    There are two additional survival scenarios to consider. The first would be specialized devices, such as a GPS/PDA or perhaps some follow on to the video iPod. These are cases where usage makes a phone form factor less attractive. The second possibility is that a truly superior PDA may appear and revitalize the market, although this is a long shot. What I think we've learned by watching the music player market is that design and connectivity matter. Sure lots of people bought MP3 players before the iPod, but the iPod actually drove the expansion of the market, rather than cannibalizing it. It's not impossible to imagine a video iPod/PDA becoming a must-have item.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:I don't think so. by powerlord · · Score: 2, Interesting
      or perhaps some follow on to the video iPod.


      I remember the rumors recently that the current "iPod Video" is not what Apple really had in mind for the iPod video and that the next generation would have a screen the size of the device, and move the controls to a touch sensitive screen.

      If this is true (and I think it likely), then it would also be a perfect opportunity for Apple to upgrade the PDA functions already in the iPod by including better text entry (a soft keyboard, and/or a stylus of some sort?). These small changes could easily turn the iPod into a converged device that would kill 90% of the market for traditional PDAs.

      I think most people prefer the idea of keeping their PDA and telephone seperate, mostly due to battery life concerns. On the other hand, since you already connect an iPod regularly to a computer to load up new music, recharge it, etc., it is already being treated as it would need to be to handle most PDA functions. Irronically an iPod/PDA wouldn't have a replacable battery (assuming the follow the previous designs), while a Cell phone would, but one advantage of an iPod/PDA over most PDAs is the large non-volatile storage capacity. With most PDAs, when you run out of power, you data is lost. With an iPod/PDA, running out of power means you ran out of power :) Find an outlet/usb port/firewire port, and your device can be recharged and you can again access your data without having to reload it from a PC. Heck, I've even seen emergency chargers for sale in airports that use the dock connector and a one-time battery to deliver 10 hours of extra life to an iPod (or so they claimed), or the Belkin attachment that runs it using batteries.

      Granted, one of the things people like about PDAs is the "add-on" software they put on it, but, after owning various PDAs (mostly Palm), for the past 10 years, I find that the only programs I really use are the Memo, Addressbook, Clock, Calculator, and one "custom app" (eBook Reader). Quite bluntly, I would be surprised if apple didn't offer support for all of those things. In fact, if they had everything BUT the eBook reader, I would still dump my aging PDA (a Sony Clie that I love), in favor of a new iPod. I can read the eBooks on my laptop if I really want.

      If Apple is smart they could use the iPod popularity to re-enter the PDA market (everyone remember the Newton? :) ), and use that to further entice people to start using their OS X platform.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  18. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by Kithraya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm right there with you. I've got a high-end Palm and an mid-range Axim. I've tried unsuccessfully to use both to get myself organized. My cell phone holds all the contact information I need on a daily basis. Since entering anything in an electronic calendar that requires handwring recognition (or numerous taps on a virtual keyboard) is slow, the only entries in my calendar were recurring things I remembered anyway (weekly team meetings, martial arts class schedule, etc). The important stuff to jot down (oil change on Thursday, doctor on Tuesday) never got written down, so I was always forgetting. I tried to use it as an electronic shopping list, and failed. In the end, my Axim became a way to play games in boring meetings.

    Then I moved to some $0.25 mini spiral-bound notebooks from Staples with a bullet-type space pen. It's tiny and light-weight, so it's always with me. Lists get written down immediately. When I'm done shopping, that page is torn out and thrown away. An upcoming schedule page at the front keeps me organized, as does a simple to-do list. When pages fill up or are no longer needed, they're torn out and tossed. When the notebook is empty, I spent another $0.25 to replace it. It's going to take me a long time to reach the level of electronic PDA cost with this system, and I've never been more organized.

  19. I love my PDA by Lanhdanan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Been using a PDA for years. Read books, play games, keeps photos, my emails, phone numbers, personal notes, date reminders ... It is a part of my life really. Use it everyday. One thing it doesnt need it a damn phone. Im already around too many phones (most times i dont even bother answering my phone @ home. more bother than what it is worth.)

    I will be upgrading when im inclined (to a model around $500-$600 CAD), and i guess with HP going out, that is one less model i need to be concerned with researching when i do decide to purchase. I highly recommend a PDA to anyone who enjoys any of what i mentioned above, cept for the phone thing, if you *must* have a phone, then you will have to sacrifice some things in the name of communication.

  20. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by gamigad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amazing, I've just been through the same kind of epiphany. I've got my iBook and Treo with me constantly, but a couple of weeks ago found myself floundering with my todo's and whatnot. While syncing is no problem, I really didn't feel I had a Birds Eye View. Since I'm a project manager basically hired out to customers, I have an extremely heterogenous workload. Like many, I went the GTD -> 43Folders (link in parent post) -> Hipster PDA (3x5 index cards).

    I liked the templates I found referenced at 43Folders, especially those at DIYPlanner http://www.diyplanner.com/. BUT, I've whittled it down to a week template, and a blank template that covers everything else.

    The result? Pure goodness! An empty inbox, a few contexts, preemptive rather than reactive management. And all in two weeks. For the first time in a long time I'm facing a weekend without catchup work.

    I love my Treo, but it has been completely displaced by pen and paper + Mail.app + iCal.

    Simplicity rules.

  21. Keyboards MIGHT be a problem by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The interesting question is this: what is the difference between what people want and what people need.

    Answer this wrong, and you fail to get the customer on the all important upgrade treadmill.

    Keyboards are a trade off. What you give up is the ratio of PDA size to screen. A PDA that is smaller is better. A PDA with a bigger screen is better. It therefore follows that the ideal PDA is all screen, and a keyboard PDA will never be ideal.

    On the other hand, a keyboarded PDA has the following advantage: it's easy to learn. A few minutes in the store, and you're as good as you're ever going to be on the thing. And therein lies the problem: is that good enough? Having used both keyboard-less and keyboarded PDAs, I'd say that for the answer is no. I'm not saying that's true for everyone, but it is certainly true for many. I'd be interested to know if many people who got used to Graffitti in the Palm days actually prefer the keyboard after a few months. I'm sure some do, but most people I know who were palm enthusiasts don't.

    I think the problem is this: people don't go into a store to buy a keyboarded PDA. They go in to buy a PDA, then choose keyboarded ones over keyboardless ones because they are beginner friendly. However, this doesn't mean that they're necessarily happier after eighteen months than if they'd gone without a keyboard. If the keyboard is a limiting factor in their PDA experience, those people will probably go converged, accepting an even more limited keyboard because they don't perceive the PDA functions as having much value. They might forgo PDA functions altogether.

    What I'm trying to say is just because a feature is popular it doesn't automatically follow that it's good for the market.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  22. Which product is "on it's death bed?" by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I sort of agree with what the article's saying; that the stand-alone PDA's days are numbered. (pun intended).

    But when devices converge, and you get one thing that is a cell phone, and a camera, and an MP3 player, and a GPS/mapping/directions device, and it manages and hotsyncs your email and address book and lets you edit them, then how can you really say which category of device "won" and which ones "died?" Is it based on the existence of a pen for input that truly defines the PDA? Is it based on whether you end up buying the device at an office supply store or a cell-phone store? Is it based on which predecessor device the new device looks the most like?

    I don't think PDA functionality is going away, it's either being subsumed or else subsuming the functions of other devices. I think that when functionality is integrated, arguing over which previously separate set of functionality "won" and which "died" is just pointless semantic quibbling.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  23. about damn time by option8 · · Score: 2

    about damn time. my newton is starting to show its age. now the industry can move on to something *new* and finally come up with a replacement for it.

  24. Long live Palm Pilots! by wwphx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Agreed. Three days ago I got fed up with the failing handwriting recognition of my old Palm Vx, Wednesday I bought a brand-new T|X (I was going to buy it with this year's tax refund but I was pushed beyond the point of endurance).

    I want something that I can put in my pant's pocket. With long battery life. With a good display. That doesn't crash.

    I don't want something with a cell phone, it will violate the size issue and also gives me a single point of failure depriving me of two devices if one fails or the unit is lost. I don't want an MP3 player in it, the fidelity will suck and it will suck more memory that I don't want to give over to it. I don't want Bluetooth, I don't want WiFi (it can't get onto my home network because of my security restrictions). I definitely don't want a digital camera as I'd like to do some DoD consulting at some point.

    And I don't want something from HP/Compaq: two B companies that merged to form a bigger B company (except their servers, I like Compaq servers).

    Sorry, I've been using Palm Pilots for over a decade and will not give it up until they pry my cold dead fingers from around it.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.