VENUS Satellite, The Next Eye in the Sky

Erica Campbell writes "According to IsraCast, Israel and France are working together on a new micro-satellite called VENUS, which is supposed to be far more advanced then present satellites. VENUS, which will be launched in 2008, will carry a unique Super Spectral Space Camera, and will have an advanced plasma-thruster engine for propulsion. From the article: 'The Israeli-French project will allow farmers to better treat their crops, fisherman to locate large quantities of fish in mid-sea and will also vastly increase the ability of the scientific community to study and monitor the flora and fauna in many areas around the globe.'"

Comments

One Fine Day In Provence

[ackthpt]

Sez a French Farmer: "Mon dieu! I feel like I am being watched by a goddess on a mountain top!"

Sez a Fisherman: "Mais oui! It is like I can feel her crystal eyes burning into the back of my head!"

oo-er

[telchine]

plasma-thruster engine

Am I the only person that giggled when reading that

Re:oo-er

[Anonymous Coward]

May be it's a variation on the Oscillation Overthruster?

Re:oo-er

[Anonymous Coward]

It's that thing that's powered by the flux capacitor. :-D

Re:oo-er

[indyweb]

plasma-thruster engine--funny name but an excellent leap forward in propulsion technologies. Shame they couldn't come up with a "Cow-dung" powered engine that could make the farmers feel more at home.

Re:oo-er

[whitehatlurker]

Possibly ;-) However, I almost spit coffee when I saw the caption "VENUS in the sky with ions" in the article.

Re:oo-er

[Anonymous Coward]

That was a title of a section, not a caption, you god damned idiot.

Overfishing?

[cgifool]

Umm. Exactly how does this help with the global problem of overfishing?

Re:Overfishing?

[ackthpt]

Umm. Exactly how does this help with the global problem of overfishing?

All fry will be implanted with tiny RFID tags and receivers. When they are too close to a fishing vessel Venus will transmit a signal which will make them swim away.

Re:Overfishing?

[Iphtashu Fitz]

Exactly how does this help with the global problem of overfishing?

Simple. No more fish means no more fishermen. Problem Solved.

(Actually I had the exact same thought as you when I read that part of it)

Re:Overfishing?

[shotfeel]

Easy. They assume that the fishermen, like you, don't know that "large school of fish" is Hebrew slang for "hurricane".

Problem solved.

Re:Overfishing?

[Anonymous Coward]

sounds like we need a nice pandemic to thin out the consumer population. save teh fisheses!!!1!

Re:Overfishing?

[Anonymous Coward]

Because if you're planning to overfish, it's more efficient to overfish where the fish are, as opposed to fishing where there aren't any more fish left due to overfishing.

Re:Overfishing?

[anothergene]

Where exactly did it say it was going to HELP with over fishing?

Re:Overfishing?

[Anonymous Coward]

It's only a problem if you view it as a problem. Personally, I think it is an amazing technological feat that we have been able to wipe out macroscopic marine life. We've successfully invaded an entirely different habitat. I mean, imagine if fish had been able somehow to wipe out bison. I think you would have to recognize that as a pretty impressive accomplishment. Well, that's what we've done, and it is awesome if you think about it. So maybe the War on Drugs is stalled and the War on Terror is bogged down. But the War on Fish is going, ahem, swimmingly...
I celebrate by eating fresh, wild-caught fish as often as possible; you all should too if you don't want to look back in regret in 10 years from now when there's nothing left but farmed McSalmon...

Re:Overfishing?

[Anonymous Coward]

Exactly how does this help with the global problem of overfishing?

In the past, overfishing required considerable effort.

Now it will be much easier.

For known satellites maybe

[Grant29]

which is supposed to be far more advanced then present satellites

Maybe more advanced than presently known satellites. I'm sure the government's don't release all the data...
--
Find the lowest price at PriceAge. Comparison Shopping with online coupons.

It's only for helping the farmers right?

[Noryungi]

Let's see, this thing has:

1. Advanced, high-res optical cameras.
2. Plasma thruster to change orbits.
3. Small size, for smaller radar image, and/or better survivability.

And all of this for crop surveillance? Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

I think our good friends at the NRO are going to get some competition from... ahem... "friends and allies" or something like this. Even if I am just being paranoid, the military potential is there, and don't forget that SPOT (European space imaging project, led by France) has been denounced often by the USA as a "dual-use" project...

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[renoX]

> 3. Small size, for smaller radar image, and/or better survivability.

Of course, the small size wouldn't never be because it comes from a reduction of the weight so also a reduction of the price to put the satellite in orbit?

And probably all space technologies are "dual use".

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[Vellmont]

I think our good friends at the NRO are going to get some competition from... ahem... "friends and allies"

You should stop being so paranoid. Where in the article does it say that it has a high resolving power? It's my understanding that you need large mirrors to get a good angular resolution. Large mirrors don't fit so well in a micro-satellite. This this is designed to have extremely good color vision, not the high angular resolution you want for a spy satellite. It'd be interesting to know the angular resolution of this thing, but my guess is that it's going to be fairly large.

Also, the Ion engine is designed to keep the thing in orbit, not change the orbit. Ion engines provide small amounts of thrust over long periods of time. Just the kind of thing you'd want to maintain an orbit, but it wouldn't be very good at changing the orbit quickly. Maybe if you had several months to wait for an orbit change. The spy satellite users usually don't have the luxury of waiting that long for changing orbits.

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[Vellmont]

I missed it in the article. The resolution is 5.3 meters, which is about 17.4 feet. You could probbably tell something was a house, but not much better than that. This thing would make a very poor spy satellite.

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[IAmTheDave]

etter treat their crops, fisherman to locate large quantities of fish in mid-sea

... for governments to more quickly locate possible civic unrest before it happens, for Israel to better monitor the activities of the Gaza strip, for France to better be able to figure out where car burning is concentrated...

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[jafiwam]

With an interferometric setup of several of those, you do not need a large mirror.

You just need to hook them up correctly.

More info here

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[Seanasy]

Advanced, high-res optical cameras.

The spatial resolution, as stated in the article, is 5.3m. Think about how big something would have to be in order for an image to show anything meaningful about it if each pixel represents 5 m^2.

Plasma thruster to change orbits.

Exactly why do you think this is spooky?

Small size, for smaller radar image, and/or better survivability.

Or, maybe, a small size means less weight and lower cost to orbit. But, don't let that hamper your paranoia.

Even if I am just being paranoid, the military potential is there...

Where? Look at this 5m SPOT image and tell me what the military applications are when you've got 2m commercially available imagery and probably much, much better on the satellite that wasn't announced in a press release.

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[anothergene]

You don't think that since they are making this technology publicly known, it's not at least 5 years old and the stuff the that military is actually using is reading what I am typing right now?

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[Anonymous Coward]

You can get much better resolution by using interferometry. Either other sats or the same sat at slightly different positional offsets will do just fine. Sure, you won't be able to get high quality images in realtime, but for looking at enemy installations it's just fine.

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[Abcd1234]

First off, modern interferometers work in at most the infrared because, as the frequency gets higher, it gets harder and harder to line up the wave fronts. Secondly, even if you did create a visible light interferometer, doing such alignment in *space* would be virtually impossible, especially if you don't have some sort of rigid structure aligning the satellites. So, in short, the very idea is flat out ridiculous.

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[iamlucky13]

Agricultural use of satellite imagery is nothing new. Space Imaging is a company that already markets infrared and other imagery to farmers. It can help ensure balanced irrigation and application of pesticides or fertilizers or predict crop yield. I believe several land grant universities are currently doing research on how to effectively utilize satellite imagery for agriculture purposes.

I think someone already mentioned that this has lower resolution than SPOT, and many satellites have thrusters.

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[Anonymous Coward]

ork in at most the infrared because, as the frequency gets higher, it gets harder and harder to line up the wave fronts. Secondly, even if you did create a visible light interferometer, doing such alignment in *space* would be virtually impossible,

No, it would just be hard, but nowhere near impossible, and not cheap.

The reason you wouldn't make an interferometer for looking down at earth is that it isn't much good for resolved (i.e. not point) sources of light. There are ways to deal with that, too, but they aren't a lot of good for looking at arbitrary places on the planet.

Re:It's only for helping the farmers right?

[davidsyes]

Talk about going on a "fishing expedition"...

Hmmm, imagine if this thing were used for fish farther out to sea... which fishing client do you alert first?

Client A has word the fish are circling in their exclusive economic zone.

Client B is told the fish are coming to their side of the EEZ, or maybe heading out to international waters.

Party C (not a client) jumps them both and snatches the bulk of the school of fish/tuna (or, pod of whales/calves if that's what they turn out to be...)

Who's open to law suit.

Imagine if this is used to track whales, and to head off the whaling fleets "studying the whales"... What if Green Peace has or gets into this act and REALLY starts disrupting whalers. Is interfering with "whaling studies" an assault on the "national sovereignty perimeter" around those fishing boats? What if a destroyer conveniently shows up to aid the whaler, then sets up an "enforceable" (with guns) perimeter....

Things could get dicey, and someone'll be saying, "Sorry, Charlie..."

Lame Excuse

[XMilkProject]

Helps fisherman and farmers? That's a pretty lame excuse I'd say.

Why don't they just come out and say "Lets us take a pictures of such a high resolution that we'll be able to capture screen shots of you pirating movies"

hehe.

Re:Lame Excuse

[PornMaster]

Does anyone else find it strange that France and Israel are collaborating on this? It seems an unlikely marriage. Just about the only thing that the two countries seem to have in common which they don't have with other "Western" nations in the vicinity is rioting Muslims.

Re:Lame Excuse

[Anonymous Coward]

Question :
Is it a Misspelling ?
Does it help fishermen?
Or does it help Phishers !!

Re:Lame Excuse

[Anonymous Coward]

Well, you should read a bit about how the Israeli people got the bomb (the nuke type). Then, you wouldn't be so suprised about them collaborating in this kind of matters.

Re:Lame Excuse

[HermanAB]

Well, spy sats are good enough to see the expression on your face, so be careful where you do your pr0n surfing...

wokka

[kisrael]

If other nations get jealous of the camera and jets of this sattelite, will they have a bad case of Venus-envy?

large schools of fish?

[buddhahat]

yes, the ocean's ecology desperately needs a means to spot large schools of fish in mid-ocean...

Re:large schools of fish?

[ackthpt]

yes, the ocean's ecology desperately needs a means to spot large schools of fish in mid-ocean...

And avoid sharks with lasers!

Are there any large quantities of fish left?

[under_score]

This seems like a really expensive way to address over-fishing!

Re:Are there any large quantities of fish left?

[pbaehr]

There are plenty of fish in the sea.

Super spectral my ass.

[Anonymous Coward]

The normal term for a 10-band sensor would be multispectral. Hyperspectral imaging systems, on the order of 220 distinct bands (e.g. AVIRIS), have been around for quite some time now, though most of these tend to be airborn and not satellite based.

NASA woes and Data policy

[Lord Satri]

This is good news especially when in light to the alarmist view of future NASA satellite projects.

For the SPOT program, the French are trying harder than the US to recover their fees. What I mean is SPOT data is not cheap when compared to NASA data (Landsat, ALI, Hyperion, etc). Yes, I know, this is different types of data, but the US has been in the past more prone to sell data at a lower price than the French. My uneducated guess is that Israel too will want to sell the data in order to cover their costs. This is just different goals: make the data available cheap and hope the advantages of massive use of data will justify the investment. That's the problem with Canada's Radarsat-1 and Radarsat-2 (not yet launched, but commercial). While Canada's Radarsat-C (launch timeframe: 2012-2014) data will be available at a minimal fee for the canadian government agencies. That said, I just hope this VENUS satellite will have a data policy which will allow widespread use of the data it collects.

Re:NASA woes and Data policy

[d-Orb]

The problem with NASA is that NASA is science focused. ESA, on the other hand, is still thinking what they are good for. So, NASA decides that anyone should use their data for science and applications. When the technology is mature, it's up to NOAA, the USGS or whoever, to, take the technology and make commercially viable.

No ESA or NASA here, but a commercial company in the like of SPOT. These are for-profit companies, where you get to pay good money for your images. You get several tries and so on. But this is not the market we are looking at, this is so 1990 :).

Consider just the agriculture bit. France is an EU country, where things are moving from production scale, to agroenvironmental rules, water and air quality, erosion monitoring, Nitrogen limits... Israel, on the other hand, has one of the most advanced precision agricultures in the world (if not the most). We are moving from simple uses of Remote Sensing as a qualitative tool, useful for the administrations the world over, to keep tabs on things, to an end-user centric view of the world, Ideally, farmer John has a plot of land with crop A. He wants a target yield of 8 Tons/Ha. Fine. He wants to minimise fertiliser and/or irrigation (in other words, "optimise" his labouring). He gets a map in digital format for the areas which need more irrigation, more fertilisation, and so on. This map goes directly to his tractor (or probably, a tractor subcontracted for this task) in digital format, and we close the loop throwing GALILEO in. In fact, people are doing just that using SPOT images. Presently, our understanding of optica data is far more advanced than what most people think: you can invert canopy reflectance models and estimate (with a high level of accuracy) useful biophysical parameters which are then coupled into agrometeo models, and which allow a number of these things to take place. To improve this, a sensor configuration like that of VENUS (5ish meter resolution, loads of useful bands in the VIS and NIR/MIR...) are useful. You need the 5m resolution to get a swath big enough so that things start becoming economical (say, some 80km?). You no longer sell images, but products tailored to the end user. And people are doing this for 10/Ha already.

Radarsat2 is different can of fish. To start with, it is a SAR. SARs have a number of military applications, and as I understand it, it is these which are going to provide a major part of the income. Other sources are going to be civil engineering-like (land subsidence applications, natural hazards), and some of the cash will come from marine and coastal applications. End-user applications are not even half as developed for SAR as they are for optical, and until TerraSAR-X comes along in 2008ish, we won't see major shifts in this. And yes, I am a big SAR fan, and wholly looking forward to TerraSAR-X, TerraSAR-L (if it ever comes) and TandemX.

To make the difference between these VENUS people and similar American consortia, let's just say that Europe is getting ahead in the end-user part of the applications, with derived products (companies like RapidEye AG will launch a constellation of satellites in the next couple of years, and do not plan to sell imagery, but products). American commercial companies have focused more on very high resolution imagery (QuickBird et al.), small swaths. The European model is, if anything, a tribute to NASA's vision that people want "products" and not images (just Google for MODIS list of data products, and see LAI, fAPAR and other biophysical variables, derived from the images on a global scale).

Re:NASA woes and Data policy

[GroovBird]

Please mod parent up, because I don't know what he's talking about, but it sounds like he does.

Great. MORE ways to kill the seas

[jthill]

fisherman to locate large quantities of fish in mid-sea

As if we weren't doing a bang-up job of it already.

Obligatory austin powers reference

[morganix]

Dr. Evil: Our early attempts at a tractor beam went through several preparations. Preparations A through G were a complete failure. But now, ladies and gentlemen, we finally have a working tractor beam, which we shall call... Preparation H.

[Scott snickers]

Dr. Evil:

What?

Scott Evil: Why don't you just call it operation ass-cream, you ass.

Dr. Evil: I'm sorry, did you say you want some ice cream?

Scott Evil: Yes, I'd love some chocolate ass-cream.

Dr. Evil: Perhaps later.

Number 2: Dr. Evil, I love your plan.

Dr. Evil: You do?

Frau Farbissina: YAH. IT'S A REALLY GOOD PLAN!

Dr. Evil: Yes Frau, on the whole Preparation H feels good.

[Scott resumes snickering]

Dr. Evil: What is it now?

Scott Evil: No, I totally agree with you. Preparation H does feel good... on the hole.

Re:Obligatory austin powers reference

[Anonymous Coward]

Would that be H for HAMAS?

Re:Obligatory austin powers reference

[Anonymous Coward]

Obligatory shut it!

Poor Naming

[dreemernj]

Of all the things they could have named a dot in the sky after, they had to go and name it after an existing dot in the sky.

Re:Poor Naming

[xzanthar]

There are far more dots in the sky, than there are words to name them.

Re:Poor Naming

[Anonymous Coward]

Yes, they should have called it "The Son" since it is the offspring of the French Space Agency.
Or maybe "The Moon" named after the sound that cows make
Or maybe they should have called it "Mars" named after the chocolate bar.
Or even "Jupiter" after the infamous DEC computer project that was cancelled.

Re:Poor Naming

[Scarletdown]

Of all the things they could have named a dot in the sky after, they had to go and name it after an existing dot in the sky.

So instead of having 2 Venuses in the solar system, does this mean we will need to rename the second rock from the Sun?

If so, how about Aphrodite, Ishtar, Ashtoreth, or Inanna? (Those last two have a nice ring to them.)

This is just funny, it had me laughing.

[elucido]

I think we all know what this satelite will be used for. I don't know why they talk about it like we are school children. Are we supposed to believe that this satelite is going to be used to help farmers? LOL

I just wish they could have come up with something better than that.
Sure I can believe this satelite will be used to help people, but even a generic answer such as "This satelite will be used to help people view and track organic structures from space" makes a bit more sense than tracking fish?

I don't know the point of the annoucement. But whoever worked on the PR on this announcement should investigate a career in comedy.

Re:This is just funny, it had me laughing.

[fighthairloss]

Ok I'll bite.

Yes, it's funny to think "oh suuure... it's for farmers and fishermen".

It's a whole different thing to let go of the humor and objectively state "we all know what it's really for".

I don't know what it's for. I don't know satellites and satellite designs, so I would ask questions such as:

- what kind of equipment do different types of spy satellites carry?
- what kind of orbits do they use to maximize the results of their missions?
- how heavy are they due to the kinds of equipment they have to carry?
- do these satellites in question fit the profile of anything we've described above?

Ok, if you have evidence or some observations about the nature of satellites and how you think this might be more than it's being touted as, let's see it so we can all make a better decision.

Otherwise, no, we don't "all know what this satellite will be used for..."

Then/Than!

[Resident Netizen]

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/than.html

Jeez, kids, this ain't no third grade book report! /grammar nazi mode = off

In that respect, I wish them bad luck

[Anonymous Coward]

There are nations with zero sense of responsibility for sustaining the fish stock. The fact that they are members of the EU, and the EU stands up for them, is a black mark on the EU. How about the ability to pinpoint Spanish fishing trawlers so Greenpeace can more effectively harass them.

Exactly, the excuse sounds like a joke.

[elucido]

It seriously sounds like something you'd see in a comedy routine. It almost sounds like sarcasm or something. When I read it I was thinking "are these guys serious?"

We all know what the satelite is for. Just seeing that Isreal and France is involved automatically tells you exactly what this satelite is for.

The real question..

[Anonymous Coward]

will it get me laid?

Fish Location may lead to Fish Extinction

[digitaldc]

'The Israeli-French project will allow farmers to better treat their crops, fisherman to locate large quantities of fish in mid-sea...'

There is already a threat of illegal fishing on the high seas, I only see this as being detrimental to the ocean environment.
This article states, 'Over half of the global fish stocks are already fully exploited, and 25 percent are overexploited, depleted or recovering from depletion.'
A better use would be to locate and protect certain species from depletion.

But the real question is, does anyone care? Or will they only care when it is too late to do anything about it?

Re:Fish Location may lead to Fish Extinction

[JesseMcDonald]

But the real question is, does anyone care? Or will they only care when it is too late to do anything about it?

The situation you describe is known as "tragedy of the commons", and it occurs whenever private ownership of a scarce resource is prohibited while private use is not. Since the fishing companies share a common resource devoid of any recognized property rights, they have no financial incentive to conserve or improve the resources that they exploit. It makes sense, if you think about it; would you invest your hard-earned savings in trying to improve something that can be taken away from you at any time, which you can't sell to someone else, and which will benefit your competitors just as much as it benefits you? Not when you're forced to justify your investments to a board of directory, certainly. The rational thing would be to take advantage of the opportunity while it lasts. Individuals might protest the exploitation, but in general the ones protesting aren't the ones most affected by the loss. On the other hand, if property rights (exclusive fishing rights, in this case) were generally recognized, the fishing companies would have an incentive to try to conserve the value of their exclusive fishing areas, because doing so would give them an advantage over the competition as well as increase the resale value of their property.

Re:Fish Location may lead to Fish Extinction

[Abcd1234]

Since the fishing companies share a common resource devoid of any recognized property rights, they have no financial incentive to conserve or improve the resources that they exploit.

Yeah! 'cuz this never happens with privately-owned natural resources! Heck, just look at the forest industry. They've done a great job of preserving the resources that they exploit! At least, they did in the magical fairy land known as "idealized capitalism".

Unfortunately, in the real world, companies are just as likely to do whatever it takes to increase short-term profit, even if they end up shooting themselves in the foot in the long-run.

Re:Fish Location may lead to Fish Extinction

[JesseMcDonald]

Care to provide a source for that comment about the forest industry? Everything I've run across indicates that privately owned forest lands are doing at least as well as their government-owned counterparts.[1]

Fortunately, "in the real world," companies tend to invest a portion of their short-term profit in renewing their capital to ensure their long-term survival. In the process they are far more likely to fulfill the goals of conservation than any government edict.

[1] One hastily-located source out of many: How Private Ownership Saved the Southern Forest

The hunt is on!

[agent0range_]

..fisherman to locate large quantities of fish in mid-sea...

Soon there will be no place for our piscine enemies to hide! We will hunt them to the ends of the earth! Fuck the planet!

Poor guys just can't catch a break... Soon the only food source left will be people.

Re:The hunt is on!

[captainPenguin13]

Mmmmmm, this soylent green is tasty.

So if I decide to go fishing out on the open seas I can just call these guys up and say "Hey, what's that sattelite you guys have up there say about fishing conditions? Where are they biting?"

This is probably the worst cover story I've ever heard for a spy sattelite.

fauna

[Anonymous Coward]

...quantities of fish in mid-sea and will also vastly increase the ability of the scientific community to study and monitor the flora and fauna in many areas around the globe.'"

especially of the homo sapiens sapiens variety.

Mod Parent Up

[Anonymous Coward]

It doesn't. And that's the point. Even with current technology, the fish supply is being depleted. Go out now, and make even the mackarel extinct. Woo hoo! Really smart there, Europe.

Unemployed entomologists rioting in France!

[Nymphalidae]

This satellite is so advanced that it can see into corn stalks to determine whether a particular farmer has a problem with European corn borer. It can count the number of aphids on a soybean leaf to determine whether you have reached economimc threshold and need to spray. Yes, this satellite will be a boon to farmers and increase yields all over the world.

Re:Unemployed entomologists rioting in France!

[Anonymous Coward]

It can count the number of aphids on a soybean leaf to determine whether you have reached economimc threshold and need to spray.

Not really - check the resolution specifications "5.3m across all of its 12 bands - it was specifically fine-tuned for its purpose of analyzing agriculture and water quality." That is 5.3 meters - not really good enough to count insects.

The above comment is assuming they wouldn't lie about the resolution of the camera. --- they wouldn't lie - would they?

Pot Hunter

[Anonymous Coward]

It's a pot-hunter (poppy, cocoa too ... gotta keep tabs on whom to 'tax' for their imports).

5.3m res, so their only keeping tabs on the bigger folks ... though I'm plenty of GIS providers could provide ridiculous resolutions for the US.

Small sat, lower cost, manuverability, nice cameras and other imaging gear ... PLUS something in subtext about supporting 'anti-terror this or that (tm)'. It all equals GoodShit (tm).

Hi-Tech

[DanTheLewis]

"... will carry a unique Super Spectral Space Camera, and will have an advanced plasma-thruster engine for propulsion."

Super Spectral Space Camera? That's nothing. The US is putting up a really unique Super Dog Duper Spectral Space Camera on its next Awesomely Rad Surveillance Satellite.

I guess they went with plasma thrusters because they couldn't get the Hyperexploding Fusion Containment Rockets done in time.

Re:Hi-Tech

[Linker3000]

Meh! Call me back when it has a frickin' laser.

Re:Hi-Tech

[Anonymous Coward]

So does this mean I have to start wearing clothes when i'm sitting at my computer next to a window?

Re:Hi-Tech

[fanblade]

I, for one, welcome our new Super Spectral Space Camera wielding, advanced plasma-thruster engine driving Israeli-French overlords.

Re:Apartheid

[packetmill]

You are right. How can anyone possibly not believe that Israel will not use a unique opportunity like this to help it pick targets for assasinations..etc. It would be interesting, however, to find out if the French can see whatever the Israelis are peeking at, or how many imaging devices/cameras are on that thing.

Then != than

[Ludedude]

Morons.

Re:Then != than

[HermanAB]

Actually, in Elizabethan English, 'then' is used exclusively and means the same as 'than' - there is no 'than'. Go and read some plays by William the Shaky Spear Man.

Technically, Elizabethan English is Modern English, so the use of 'then' instead of 'than' is not as wrong as you believe, just old fashioned... :)

Poor farmers...

[luder]

Actually, this will make life harder for the average farmer. Now they can't even have any intimate moment with their sheeps without feeling somebody's watching...

It's just like night vision in Iraq.

Having a tinfoil hat party, everybody's invited!

[hey!]

missed it in the article. The resolution is 5.3 meters, which is about 17.4 feet. You could probbably tell something was a house, but not much better than that. This thing would make a very poor spy satellite.

Well, let's say the vague listing of this thread in the direction of paranoia is correct. They wouldn't tell us how good the resolution of their cameras were, would they? That would be information for their special customers only.

Maybe by counting fish?

[Vellmont]

The article is pretty light on details, but maybe it has some way of determining how many fish of a certain species are in an area of the sea? One of the biggest problems in over-fishing has got to be just determining the health of fish population in different parts of the ocean. If governments and scientists could get definitive information that something is over-fished, then it's much easier to get international bans on fishing in that part of the ocean.

I don't know if that's what this thing can do. It'd be nice if there were more information about how this satellite works.

Re:Having a tinfoil hat party, everybody's invited

[Vellmont]

If it's a spy satellite, why would they make a press release about the thing in the first place? I don't recall any announcements by the NSA or NRO about the latest Keyhole satellite launches.

Secret Feature

[bartisasbartdoes]

I hear it's going to have a Batphone for astronauts too.

Re:Apartheid

[cybpunks3]

Go ahead and let them, as far as I care.

Re:Having a tinfoil hat party, everybody's invited

[hey!]

If it's a spy satellite, why would they make a press release about the thing in the first place? I don't recall any announcements by the NSA or NRO about the latest Keyhole satellite launches.

If you can't come up with an answer to this one, you'll probably want to adjust your meds downward before the party, otherwise you might be feeling a little left out.

Obviously, the reason they'd want to do the press release is because they don't want the NSA or NRO to know what they are capable of. They can't hide the fact their steering their little satellite all over the place from Cheyenne Mountain; so they want the US spooks to laugh it off, scoffing it's contemptible resolution.

By the way, did I mention it's BYOB. In fact, I'm assuming everybody will bring their own everything, including tin foil.

Hyperspectral Imaging

[Anonymous Coward]

I used to work for a company that did a lot of work in Hyper spectral imaging. Designed a few prototypes myself. The government used to tell us that we were building sensors for tracking fish and other oceanic anomalies, which they can. More importantly they use this kind of technology to look for deep subs. They can also use the spectral cross bands to determine what kind of growth they are looking at. Specifically the DEA looking for large marijuana crops and things of that nature. They may be being built under some normal pretense but they sell the sensor time to government agencies looking for the bad guys, or in some cases the good guys. JD

Hmm...

[Seanasy]

Well the english on that site is really poor and I never trust Israeli tech sites to be accurate.

According to this press release, it's a multispectral sensor in VNIR with only 12 bands. I don't know where they get "super-spectral," I've never heard that term before. The IsraCast article has an AVIRIS image with it. AVIRIS is a hyperspectral (hundreds of bands) sensor but it's not on any satellite. It flies on planes. The only impressive thing about this seems to be the spatial resolution.

And to all of you paranoid androids, yes, there are legitimate and very useful applications of multi-spectral remote sensing for agriculture and environmental monitoring. Also, a 5.3m spatial resolution is not going to impress any spies. You couldn't even make a out a house reliably with the resolution.

The problem with SPOT is ...

[Anonymous Coward]

that only large corporations and terrorists can afford it.

...but then they'd be pirates too...

[Anonymous Coward]

Wouldn't they be breaking some law if they snapped a picture containing an unauthorized image of whatever you were pirating...?

We better as the (RI|MP)AA for legal clarity on this issue since they seem to be the authority now-a-days.

Fishes with WMD

[roman_mir]

So, are we declaring a global war on the Fishes in the oceans? It looks like it. It must the the fish oil... but let's just say that the Fishes know where Saddam put his WMDs.

--
Disclaimer: never for a second did I believe that Saddam had any WMDs. This should have become clear to everyone once the war started and he never used any. If I was Saddam and had WMDs, by god, I would strike those infidels with all the nukes and all the other great stuff in an eye blink.

Re:Having a tinfoil hat party, everybody's invited

[M1FCJ]

To be able to maintain secrecy, you should not keep it completely secret. Intentionally leaking a little bit of correct information with lots of incorrect data is commonly known as misinformation. Outright lying about everything is not useful because at least easily verifiable sections of the information package will be proven to be false pretty much instantly. For example let say you are going to launch a spy sat. Instead of hiding the whole launch and everything, you put out a little bit of nice information in a press release, which contains some correct information (small size, small launch vehicle) with false information (5.7m resolution size). This is both to hide the capability of your technology and the actual purpose of the device.
Misinformation is still widely used by intelligensia and politic spin doctors.

Re:Having a tinfoil hat party, everybody's invited

[hey!]

Give the man a lampshade.

It might be called Venus, but...

[Kittie Rose]

Can it ride clams naked? Now THAT would be an achievement.

Eye in the sky

[jamesjw]

Regarding the Austin Powers reference above, and the title in the article.. one cant forget the Alan Parsons Project "Laser" joke.. and Eye in the sky was a song and album name for Alan Parsons Project..

Umm..

Okay so I was stretching for humor there..

--Jim.

Strip mine fishing

[Nonillion]

"fisherman to locate large quantities of fish in mid-sea"

Do we really want fisherman to have these tools to essentially strip mine the ocean of even more fish? Give me a break!

Re:Strip mine fishing

[barefootgenius]

It is interesting logic isn't it.
"People! We need a satellite to find the fish. The oceans are not being overfished"

Venus==Valis??

[BlindIdiotGod]

Maybe this is the God-like entity PKD encountered and he just got a couple of the letters wrong (or fudged them on purpose).

Won't last long...

[Monoliath]

Too bad the dreaded 2012 solar storms will to fry it to bits, four years after it's launch.

Heh.

Hopefully this will humiliate NASA to catch up

[couch_warrior]

Having worked with NASA in the near past on a satellite project, I was amazed at the positively ANTIQUE technology they throw into space. Their engineers are mostly in their 50's and 60's and they got their EE degrees before PCs were invented. They build satellites using hundreds of millions of dollars worth of custom-designed discrete component logic, when the same functions could be performed hundreds of times faster and more reliably with integrated circuits for a small fraction of the cost. They still build earth-sensing satellites with individual photodiodes and reciprocating mirrors instead of CCD arrays. The failure of a single transistor took out a whole spectral band (one of twelve) on one recent bird. When Golden tried to get them to do things "cheaper, faster, and better" they sabotaged his programs by cutting out testing and QA, blew up a few probes, and then started saying "That's what happens when you try to save money!" They pay a team of half a dozen scientists to sit around and periodically analyze the response curve of the photodiodes to look for drift in intensity, when the entire function could be done more accurately by a simple feedback and control loop.
The whole place should be cleaned out and re-staffed from scratch.

Gullible enough to eat this farmer nonsense?

[Anonymous Coward]

Last time France and Israel cooperated we got the dirty 1956 Suez invasion and the Dimona reactor, which the zionists used to make 220 to 400 nuclear bombs so they can terrorize the entire middle east and hold USA at gunpoint so that Uncle Sam dares not to oppose their occupation of arab lands and purging of palestinian refugees by the millions. The whole world is mum about the jewish bomb out of fear of the Mossad, they do not want to end like JFK who was gunned down to stop his opposition to Dimona and the zionist A-bomb.

Do not think for a minute that this french-jew satellite will be about farmers, it is espionage and targeted assasinations tasked. Jews are the masters of yankee as Sharon has clearly said, Bush the leesser is just a puppet.