Slashdot Mirror


In2TV Goes Public

An anonymous reader writes "It looks like AOL has finally released In2TV, allowing us to watch some of our favorite shows on the internet. It looks fairly promising." In2TV has managed to bag four major advertisers right from the start but if you want to watch on anything but a WindowsXP machine you may be out of luck.

99 comments

  1. Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Informative


    In2TV is also out of bounds to other alternative browser users inside XP.
    Unless you use Internet explorer 6.0 and Media Player 10 you can't watch the big streams.

    This obviously rules out Firefox users, so no Babylon 5 for me :(

    You can't even use it on XP 64.

    Damn good though, and so far the only thing that has tempted me to install WMP 10...
    Hell, I might even use IE for it as well.

    tip for Windows users who have removed their IE icon, open "My Computer" and directly enter the URL into the address bar - it converts from Explorer to Internet explorer automagically...

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by bherman · · Score: 3, Informative
      This obviously rules out Firefox users, so no Babylon 5 for me :(

      When you go to the site with firefox (after you choose a show). It prompts you to install the Mozilla Firefox ActiveX plugin you might be saved.
      --
      Error: Sig not found.
    2. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      All I got was a big error message telling me I needed XP (not 64bit), Internet Explorer 6.0 and Media Player 10.0

      I hadn't seen anything about that until having a really close look, but if you go here:

      http://television.aol.com/in2tv/heroes_horror_tv?d efaultLevel=0&defaultItem=0

      And click on the "HI-Q Video" link in the spotlite, it brings up the error page.

      Its only after this (in Internet explorer) that it asks about an ActiveX control.
      I believe however the FLASH console hosts the expected ActiveX and thats what is telling you its needed.
      (Standard missing plugins are the green jigsaw pieces usually...)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by bherman · · Score: 1
      I went here
      http://television.aol.com/in2tv/heroes_horror_tv in ff and it shows part of the screen that will have the player and controls. In there it says:
      We're sorry, this feature requires the Mozilla ActiveX Plugin. Click here to install.

      --
      Error: Sig not found.
    4. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Informative

      Is it my imagination, or are most media outlets run by retarded corporate types who hire nothing but retarded programmers? Man, but AOL becomes more pathetic all the time. It's not like multiplatform means don't exist to do this.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by Coltman · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say that there is a way to install the Mozilla ActiveX to see it. But I may be wrong. All they would show me is the commercial, then I just sit here waiting for the show to start. (15 minutes now)

      If its faster in IE I would never know, but it sortof worked for me.

      --
      - my $.02? - you can't have it...it's all I have!!
    6. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Informative

      Follow up...

      I sold out.
      I installed WMP 10.0
      I used Internet Explorer 6.0.

      I still can't play this fucking thing (during the licensing for the stream it says "We apologize, this content must be played in the AOL Video Player. Please goto aol.com/video."

      Teething trouble, or over complexified DRM?

      It looks like a good time to hit the p2p.
      I wanna see B5 now damnit, how far off streaming torrents are we?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 4, Informative
      From http://television.aol.com/in2tv/requirements :

      Core System Requirements
      • Operating System: Windows® XP, 32 bit or 64 bit
      • Media Player: Windows® Media Player version 10.0 get it HERE!
      • Web Browser: Internet Explorer 6.0+, Netscape® 7.2 and 8.0+, Firefox® 1.0.7+
      • An Internet connection
      • Macromedia® Flash Player 8. Get it HERE!
      • In2TV video is only licensed for viewing in the United States.

    8. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by loconet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Add IE7 to the list. Even thought it doesn't complain about my version of IE, the movies wont play, I get script errors, etc. This service is turning out to be extremly flaky.

      --
      [alk]
    9. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Sure the tech exists. But support for multiple platform costs, and user base is tiny. Why should they jump through hoops for such a small return?

    10. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The complicated Windows-only DRM'ed scheme surely costs more than just producing a stock mpeg, avi, or christ even a flash file. And the latter is inherently cross-platform.

    11. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by temojen · · Score: 1
      I wanna see B5 now damnit, how far off streaming torrents are we?

      Not quite streaming, but...

      If you use a client that can set priorities on individual files of a multi-file torrent, you can set the first episode enabled and the rest disabled, then the second when the first is done, and so on. Just don't try do download raw DVD rips of the entire 7 series' of Ranma. Your ISP will not like you.

    12. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Same here--I started in Firefox, which requires the ActiveX control, and then download and launch of the Hi-Q player. The Hi-Q player launches IE (which I have supposedly disabled on this machine) to bring up a "catalogue" of videos to choose from. When I pick the same video in IE that I had already picked in Firefox, I get the commercial in IE again, and then a Hi-Q player window that times out on "acquiring license." Looks like plenty of bugs left.

    13. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      I wanna see B5 now damnit, how far off streaming torrents are we?

      Probably quite a long ways, as BitTorrent doesn't require that parts of the file are sent in-order.

      As the protocol stands now, to try to improve the overall download situation for everyone in the swarm, BitTorrent attempts to download the rarest file chunks (usually 256KB long) first. This probably isn't the first chunk in the file. Just as the next rarest chunk you download probably isn't the second chunk in the file, etc.

      In-order BitTorrent would quickly break down. If you're the 10th peer in a swarm, and have all of the chunks but the last 256KB, but can't connect the the seed (as it's serving 8 of the 9 peers before you), you're hosed: you now either have to wait for the peers ahead of you to get the chunk and send it to you, or for them to complete and free up the seeder so you can connect to it.

      And this doesn't have to happen at the end of a transfer (if BitTorrent sent chunks in order). It could happen 10% of the way through if you're connection speed is faster than that of those who are getting packets directly from the seeder (and/or each other). If the seed is saturated by 28.8K modem users, and you're on broadband, you're not going to get anything beyond what those modem peers have downloaded (and it's going to be brutally slow downloading from modem peers, but that's not the point. They could be on any connection slower than yours such that you get starved for chunks).

      Transferring the packets out of order, and transfering the rarest ones first means you're more likely to get what you need. But this defeats streaming, which requires the data to generally be received in order (or if out of order, in small enough chunks and fast enough (and close enough to the chunks you need) that TCP can automatically re-order them with no noticable effect on viewing).

      Yaz.

    14. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same problem until I went here http://hiqvideo.aol.com/ and installed the HiQ plugin.

    15. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      First of all, the cost of paying a few royalties to use DRM software is nothing to the cost of developing, deploying, and supporting an extra platform. I mean, jeez, have you ever worked in a real software operation? Programmers, QA people, support geeks — none of them work for free.

      Second of all, can you imagine getting any content without DRM? Yeah, it's a royal pain for the user, but the content owners won't go near a system that doesn't have it. That's actually another reason for supporting Windows only.

      If you just want to give content away and not control its redistribution, sure there's plenty of platform-independent client software. You got a business model that works with that?

    16. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      tip for Windows users who have removed their IE icon, open "My Computer" and directly enter the URL into the address bar - it converts from Explorer to Internet explorer automagically...
      And thereby hangs the problem with Windows ....
    17. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by rollie_tyler · · Score: 1

      Where does one go to install the plugin on that page? It just shows me my list of downloaded shows, and links to other music videos and such.

    18. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by rollie_tyler · · Score: 1

      Oh, and when I "click here for help," I get a Web page whose source is this:

      <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
      <HTML><HEAD>
      <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"></HEAD>
      <BODY></BODY></HTML>

      But it's HTML 4.0 compliant! At least that's something! Way to go AOL, embracing the standards of 6 years ago!

    19. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      There should be no concept of having to 'support' specific platforms. When Amoco produces gasoline, do they have to 'support' each brand of car specifically? When broadcasters produce programs, do they have to 'support' each brand of television set? No. The having to 'develop, deploy, and support platform specific software' *IS* the high cost of DRM, and could be entirely avoided by simply using a standard documented media format, that didnt require special software. And the sad thing is that the DRM on the expensive platform specific software will be broken anyway, making all that investment tossing money down the drain.

      And yes, current technology will be making the business model of 'pay per view' obsolete, and no I cant think of any viable new 'business models' that allow the robber-baron record and movie labels to suck their customers dry.

    20. Re:Not just Linux and Mac with problems... by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      It's the error received after one installs the Mozilla plug-in and then uses the Hi-Q VIDEO link (and IE doesn't auto open for you) that send you to this ugly url.

      http://kontikiapp.stream.aol.com/zodiac/servlet/zo diac/template/pub%2Cinstall%2CGetIt.vm/moid/8cba9b d2-9d32-efcc-f56d-ebd94262dafa/m/d7a28aad-1f36-e5c f-8b0e-76a7412d3034/s/kdx/kget/urn:kid:aol_hqv:aol _hiq:moid:8cba9bd2-9d32-efcc-f56d-ebd94262dafa here

      The actual message he sees (in case you don't) is http://cdn.digitalcity.com/_media/hiqvideo/error.g if that does indeed mention that 64-bit is not included in support.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  2. Brisco County Jr! by prockcore · · Score: 1

    Damn.. I've got boot into XP just so I can watch Brisco County Jr. I've been wanting that on DVD forever.. this will have to tide me over until they release it.

    1. Re:Brisco County Jr! by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Brisco County would have been the perfect foil to Deadwood. They should bring it back just for the contrast.

    2. Re:Brisco County Jr! by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  3. Help! by Guano_Jim · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somebody please get Steve Jobs on the horn and tell him to get the Sopranos on iTunes.

    Please.

    1. Re:Help! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given that AOL Time Warner owns The Sopranos, I'd have to say fuggeddaboudit.

  4. Pointless by scragz · · Score: 4, Funny

    AOL and Warner Bros. have launched In2TV, the first broadband television network, . . .

    I thought BotTorrent was the first broadband television network?

    1. Re:Pointless by mordors9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ssshhhh, that one is a secret that no one knows about.

    2. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the first one I watched was iCrave TV, it was ahead of it's time and squashed by a consiracy of cable companies and the RIAA.

      An article about iCrave TV

  5. Upgrade? by temojen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It tells me to "Upgrade" to WinXP ... sounds like a downgrade to me.

    1. Re:Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know you are in denial... but one of these days you're gonna have to rid yourself of Windows 95. There are bigger and better things - like WindowsME.

  6. reasons for missing mac/linux support? by just-a-stone · · Score: 1

    after having read tfa and the source it provides for the information about "windows xp only", i don't really feel informed about any reason.
    it needs media player 10. but why? because of DRM? copying / recording restrictions? soecial features, codecs? just missing interest in supporting different platforms?

    i got to run drm'ed streams using cxoffice plugin in firefox/linux, any chances for me?

    1. Re:reasons for missing mac/linux support? by temojen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's because of the DRM. If you go to in2tv.aol.com and try to watch a show they explicitly tell you that, before you see the link to the .avi (will verify with wget when I get home).

    2. Re:reasons for missing mac/linux support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they actually advertise MS products with it. There was a link, something like "Learn more about Windows XP", that pointed to microsoft.com. Fucking annoying..

    3. Re:reasons for missing mac/linux support? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Should say "Learn why AOL, the most fucked up provider in the universe, goes with Microsoft's browser and media player, glorified crap that lazy, no-good corporate programmers go with when they're not giving blow jobs to Ted Turner's red-light descendants."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Watch favorite shows on the internet? by poptones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who has the bandwidth to watch crappy, jerky streams?

    Until they fill that worldwide "analog hole" there's no way this stuff is really going to compete. Even if the US succumbs to pervasive DRM, are they going to stop marketing shows internationally? It seems most of the torrents come from abroad anyway. I once downloaded a "West Wing" episode before it had even appeared on TV in my east coast market.

    Thanks to the indie film makers there's already better stuff freely available on the internet than on most of those 500 TV channels, anyway.

    1. Re:Watch favorite shows on the internet? by Baseball_Fan · · Score: 1
      Who has the bandwidth to watch crappy, jerky streams?

      It does not have to be that way. Most people have DSL or Cable Modems, and they can get a good resolution video without the stream stopping to rebuffer.

      Maybe some shows are slightly less res than television because the provider wants to make money twice. They want to sell it on the internet, and then again on DVD. They have been doing this for a long time. How many DVD's have been re-released multiple times with "special edition" then "directors cut" then "2 disc fan set".

      If the producers can sell the same product to the consumer 10 times, they will. We, the consumers must stop buying content over and over again. Would you pay five times for the same book? Then why pay five times for a film?

      The best possible scenereo for end users is one large MPEG file in high res. MPEG can play on any machine, it does not buffer, it plays fast and well. Most people with DSL and Cable Modems can handle a 1.5 gig file no problem, and that should be good resolution for an hour long show.

      Until they fill that worldwide "analog hole" there's no way this stuff is really going to compete.

      This is going to sound so politically uncorrect. Who cars about the world? They care about the USA, Canada, UK, France, Germany and other advanced nations. If we all must wait for the world to catch up to speed, then we'll never get it. Does anyone care if the people of Zimbabwe can't watch streaming video?

      Thanks to the indie film makers there's already better stuff freely available on the internet than on most of those 500 TV channels, anyway.

      Care to give a few examples? What are the shows like? Are they in english, could they make it on prime time tv in the USA? Or is it more like the cable access channel?

    2. Re:Watch favorite shows on the internet? by poptones · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people have DSL or Cable Modems, and they can get a good resolution video without the stream stopping to rebuffer.

      Umm.. not exactly. A majority have access to broadband, but a third of the US still doesn't. And even among those who have broadband access, in most places reasonable broadband speeds are still so expensive most households don't have it. If you're on cable it's a boon, but a good portion of that tiny majority has access only via dsl. While BASIC dsl prices are not too bad (30 bucks around here) it's only 128kbs on oversold channels - streaming performance on such a connection is not exactly worthwhile. This is readily proven by surveys and statistical analysis that reveal less than 25% of all those internet users, broadband or no, actually use streaming services on a regular basis. And an equal percentage of that remainder say they rarely use it or have no plans at all to use it. My own experience with dsl was like this - my 80 buck a month 1.5mbit connection was peachy keen when I was one of the first in my neighborhood to bite that bullet, but within six months pacbell had so oversold their lines I couldn't even stream a 100kbps video without stuttering and interruptions - sometimes, they wouldn't even connect at all.

      Maybe some shows are slightly less res than television because the provider wants to make money twice.

      I really don't have a problem with this. In fact, that's kind of the point I was making: if I really want to watch Bsg an I don't have scifi channel I can just download it via torrents. The quality of this download, even the lower rez 180MB versions, is still going to be better than any "stream" I have ever seen. And if I really, really want to enjoy it in DVD rez then they still get the sale because it costs me nearly as much in time and bandwidth as it costs just to go to amazon and buy the damn things.

      Would you pay five times for the same book?

      I've bought the same book many times. I buy the book to have it when I want it, then end up giving it to a friend because I want them to have that ability as well. Then I end up buying it again. So? A paperback costs about an hour's pay even if you're on minimum wage.

      I've also bought at least three copies of Sgt. Pepper's in my life. Two copies of the "red" album compilation, and probably two or three copies of pretty much every Alice Copper album (or cd0 printed before 1985.

      There's also a lot of good stuff I don't have on cd because it still isn't offered. But that's a bit beside the point.

      Then why pay five times for a film?

      When I was a kid I saw Star Wars at least five times. By best friend saw it six times in a single month! We paid every single time because you could only see it at the theater.

      It's easy to forget, when stuff is "free," how it used to be. I'm not defending the machine that cranks out an endless stream of bad action movies, but many of the points raised are really nothing new - what's new is our increasing ability to not have to pay every single time we want to see a popular hollywood movie (and more impoirtantly, to see it whenever the hell we want instead of waiting for it to "come around" again), and not have to replace records that have been damaged by dust or heat or cheap k-mart turntables that grind away the vinyl a little more each time we listen to a recording.

      The best possible scenereo for end users is one large MPEG file in high res. MPEG can play on any machine, it does not buffer, it plays fast and well. Most people with DSL and Cable Modems can handle a 1.5 gig file no problem, and that should be good resolution for an hour long show.

      Absolutely. I even do this on dialup with "small" files (Until they fill that worldwide "analog hole" there's no way this stuff is really going to compete.

      This is going to sound so politically uncorrect. Who cars about the world? They care about the USA, Canada, UK, France, German

    3. Re:Watch favorite shows on the internet? by Baseball_Fan · · Score: 1
      While BASIC dsl prices are not too bad (30 bucks around here) it's only 128kbs on oversold channels - streaming performance on such a connection is not exactly worthwhile.

      You might want to check out Yahoo SBC DSL (if they have it in your area). It is only $12.99 a month for 12 months. For $4 bucks more, they sell a 3meg DSL. It's a much better deal than cable which ripped me a new one with a $100 bill for basic and internet. I got rid of them, and started buying DVD sets, and I came out ahead.

      Did you not get the example I gave about West Wing? Where do you think that came from? Someone in the UK, or Switzerland, or one of those euro countries where everyone has a fat pipe into their homes had already recorded the show via their local satellite broadcaster, ripped it to avi, and posted it to usenet before the show had even finished airing in the US!

      I thought all the C-Dish broadcasts were getting DRM'ed to high hell.

      for example, there's a great show called "welcome to the scene" that has 18 episodes now in the can. The entire show is simply one long screencap - one of the main characters chats with other characters, surfs the internet, and emails.

      How do you find shows like this? I wonder how these guys make any money??? They film a show, and then give it away on the web. I've watched the first three episodes, and it's pretty good.

      Do you have any other reccomendations? Or better yet, an index of web based shows?

      Oh, about the show. Why would these guys want to go through the trouble of offering a hollywood movie to the internet. Why do they care if someone in asia is selling it on the street. I don't get the reasons why being first is so important. And what is wrong with the main character. His gf is naked, and is busy talking to his irc buddies.

      LOL, that show was a good find!

    4. Re:Watch favorite shows on the internet? by poptones · · Score: 1

      How do you find shows like this? I wonder how these guys make any money??? They film a show, and then give it away on the web. I've watched the first three episodes, and it's pretty good.

      I don't have an index of stuff... I just lookk around and find things. Maybe I need to start posting that stuff on a blog somewhere and then others can subscribe to the torrents via my css feed. Hmmmm... do I smell opportunity? Maybe if I was more ambitious - right now I got too much other stuff on my plate.

      Anyway, I'm glad you liked the show. See how it works? I tell you about it in a post on slashdot, you've found the show and now a gazillion others might as well because there are so many people reading here and they see it's not just me raving about it, someone else things it's pretty good, too.

      THAT is why they "give it away." I don't care if you're a wannabe rock star or just some joe wiht a digital camera who wants to make a living taking wedding photos, no one is going to give you work without seeing what kind of work you can do. This particular show is fantastically better in many respects than ANY Hollywood movie ever made about "the internet" and pirates and bootleggers and all that stuff... is it not? It's "better" because, for people like you and me who actually understand this shit, it's believable. So maybe these folks don't get a big deal hollywood contract to make "the scene:the movie" - but maybe they DO get writing contracts, or a technical consulting deals, or even the chance to sell the storyline to someone else who wants to make "the scene:the movie."

      This is how art works, and you can already find more art on the internet than in all those satellite channels combined. TV is not art - it's where art goes to die.

      Welcome to the scene...

    5. Re:Watch favorite shows on the internet? by Baseball_Fan · · Score: 1
      I don't have an index of stuff... I just lookk around and find things. Maybe I need to start posting that stuff on a blog somewhere and then others can subscribe to the torrents via my css feed. Hmmmm... do I smell opportunity? Maybe if I was more ambitious - right now I got too much other stuff on my plate.

      I'd be in line to subscribe. And you could make money with adsense or whatever google has going.

      The cool thing about the show is I didn't need bit torrent to download. I got rid of that software a long time ago, after the 100th download that stalled at 92% or 93%. I like odd stuff, and there are never that many people sharing the stuff I like.

      particular show is fantastically better in many respects than ANY Hollywood movie ever made about "the internet" and pirates and bootleggers and all that stuff... is it not?

      It is good. And it probably has to be one of the cheapest to film. What does he have, one camera? LOL. It is ingenious. I just watched the 4th episode, and finally there was a second actress in front of the camera, just long enough to give a quick titty shot.

      So maybe these folks don't get a big deal hollywood contract to make "the scene:the movie" - but maybe they DO get writing contracts, or a technical consulting deals, or even the chance to sell the storyline to someone else who wants to make "the scene:the movie."

      That's sick, that it has to be filtered by the powers that be, that outsiders can't make their own flicks and distribute them. Maybe that will change with the internet.

      If there is more stuff like this on the web, I must be blind because I've never found it before. I guess I have a bunch of websites in "my favorites", and finding new ones isn't all that easy. Dang google is flooded with all sorts of links to links to links of somethinge. Too many websites with no real content, it gets discouraging to search.

  8. How much does it cost? by Baseball_Fan · · Score: 1
    I couldn't find the price to view shows. Are they giving it away for free, just forcing advertising?

    I really don't want to instal Media Player 10. I had it on a system, and I just didn't like it compared to Media Player 6. I wonder what good the DRM in 10 is if people can record the video when it plays?

    1. Re:How much does it cost? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And worse yet- my laptop last night upgraded itself (thanks again XPSP2 automatic upgrade) to WMP 10- and now it won't play any of my non-DRMd Beyond TV files across the network.

      I went ahead and installed TCMP and it works just fine.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:How much does it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you know you can turn that off right? or even set it to notify but not download or install when there are new updates?

    3. Re:How much does it cost? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It's a new laptop, and I hadn't done that yet. At any rate, TCMP is a MUCH better media player for my purposes- especially since it has a user setable skip ahead/skip back for missing those nasty comercials.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:How much does it cost? by loraksus · · Score: 1

      vlc is also quite a good player. Control left/right is a coarse way of going through a video, shift left / right is a little more fine tuned.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  9. Excerpt of the listings by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sounds like a bunch of dusty re-runs from decades past. From TFA:

    The shows are organized into six genre-themed channels (with two more to launch this summer), including:

    - LOL TV: Laugh Out Loud with everyone's favorite comedies from Welcome Back, Kotter, which made a household name out of John Travolta to the slapstick antics of Cousin Balkai and Larry in Perfect Strangers as well as the Emmy-winning Chico and the Man, Hangin' With Mr. Cooper and Head of the Class.

    - Dramarama TV: Fans will enjoy the unaired "lost" pilot of juicy soap Falcon Crest and all the drama of five-time Emmy nominated Sisters, plus there's Scarecrow and Mrs. King, Spenser: For Hire and the family favorite Eight Is Enough.

    - Toon Topia TV: Kids and adults alike will flock to animated fare such as Beetlejuice, Steven Spielberg Presents Pinky and the Brain and Freakazoid, The New Adventures of Batman, and Histeria!

    - Heroes and Horrors TV: Sci-Fi and Horror come together in heroic proportions with Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman, Babylon 5, Wonder Woman, V and Freddy's Nightmares.

    - What a Rush TV: Rev up for plenty of action-adventure when East meets West in Kung Fu, plus La Femme Nikita, The Adventures of Brisco County, Jr., Dark Justice and The Fugitive.

    - Vintage TV: Fans find all-time favorites such as Growing Pains with heartthrob Kirk Cameron, F-Troop, The F.B.I., Maverick and Alice.

    1. Re:Excerpt of the listings by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Unbelievable. I was reading your post - when I geto to "Scarecrow and Mrs. King" I had to bring the article up to see if you were joking or not.

      F-Troop? Eight is Enough? Chico and the Man? Where do I sign up????

    2. Re:Excerpt of the listings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they do have Brisco County Jr! I have been waiting for real non-bootleg dvds of that forever! I only wish it would work!! Friggin unfunctional DRM is killing me. It wants me to reinstall Windows Media Player :(

  10. Good for European viewers? by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 1

    Here in Ireland/Britian we get shows like Scrubs, Lost, etc. months after you do. This service could become immensely popular with people in Ireland(when we get real broadband in about 20 years time) & Britian and any other English speaking language. This could cause a large negative impact to broadcasting companies like Sky because their shows will already be months outdated. I'd like to see how this pans out. I have no objection to installing Windows Media Player 10 if it stays the hell away from everything else when it's not running, and all this works over the college firewall(another massive user base).

    --
    EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!
    1. Re:Good for European viewers? by FuzzyDave · · Score: 1

      You think you've got it bad. Months? We're just now getting the new Dr. Who series starting here in the US. The SciFi channel has picked them up finally. Counting down til friday...

    2. Re:Good for European viewers? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Well if this initial run is any indication, you'll have to wait YEARS to get any of this stuff. I can't believe they feel the need to DRM "Wonder Women" episodes.

  11. Firefox is fine by slagell · · Score: 1

    I am watching B5 with Firefox now. Just install a plugin and an Active X control (gives me shivers) from AOL.

    1. Re:Firefox is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I don't think so.
      NSTAAFL I guess. I got as far as (You need to click here to install
      a new version of spyware/adware, er I mean media player.)

      What is the business plan anyway? Won't people who jump through all the
      hoops just report them somewhere else for free? Without the commercials?

    2. Re:Firefox is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just install a plugin and an Active X control (gives me shivers) from AOL.

      The plugin wasn't written by AOL. It's a 3rd party extension that allows Firefox to run ActiveX controls you already have on your system.

    3. Re:Firefox is fine by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      You are very brave my friend. Power to you.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  12. Ack by GmAz · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I consider AOL to be as evil, if not a little more than Microsoft.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  13. Damn Office Workers by Basehart · · Score: 1

    "but if you want to watch on anything but a WindowsXP machine you may be out of luck."

    Why is it that only people who are at work can get to watch TV on their computers?

  14. Resolution/Quality? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

    Any info on what resolution / quality they support. I couldnt find anything on their site. The stream speeds seem to top out at 700 kilobits.

  15. Seems to work as advertised by rufo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just fired up episodes of Pinky and the Brain and Babylon 5 and they both seemed to go fine (besides me having to switch to my Windows box and fire up IE - if you want to use Firefox on Windows (no Mac/Linux) you have to install an ActiveX plugin, which scares the living bejeezus out of me). It looks like you're watching a 30-second ad before the video; I didn't watch long enough to find out if they're inserting advertising in the middle of shows as well. The quality is actually quite good; at least VHS quality, and you can click a button to make it full screen. Some shows are advertised as having a higher quality version available, but you have to install their client that downloads in the background; it appears to use Kontiki, which I'm reluctant to install (I already have enough upstream being used between Vonage and Bittorrent without another content delivery system gumming up the works). Lastly, they seem to have a limited selection of episodes up - I'm not sure if they're planning on making all epsiodes available on demand or if they're going to rotate through episodes and only have a limited selection available.

    Overall it's not going to win any awards for design - but it works, and for free I suppose I can't complain too much.

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  16. Waste-of-time dept by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    When they offer a video *SERVICE* without forced bundling of software (eg when the video is delivered in a standard, documented format over standard, documented network protocols, in such a manner that *ANYONE* can develop software to read and play it), that might be newsworthy. This isnt.

  17. small image on high res display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried it, but the video image is too small. Does anyone know how to increase the image size? My laptop has a 15.4 inch 1920x1200 resolution display, btw. The video window is like a 1x1.5" box on my screen! arghhh

    1. Re:small image on high res display by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Umm, hit the full screen button? It actually looks quite good at 1280 by 960.

  18. WinXP by wiredlogic · · Score: 2, Funny

    if you want to watch on anything but a WindowsXP machine

    Damn. I was just about to fire up AOL on my Apple ][.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  19. Requires WMP10 though by bogie · · Score: 1

    At least they left pref("security.classID.allowByDefault", false); in the activex Extension that FF users will have to use.

    Security issues aside I guess its nice that they made the effort so that Firefox users can use it.

    Too bad it won't work without the UI nightmare that is WMP10. Someone post a WMP9 workaround...

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  20. TV over IP really requires Multicast or "Peercast" by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    They have not thought it through if think they can have unicast connections to half the US or World, when the final episode of the "I married a random person" reality show is on.

    I guess that's where the DRM comes in. Nobody will want it, so no problem.

  21. AOL shoots self in foot by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If AOL wants to alienate a crap load of its potential customers, then they can go right ahead. They either fix this "problem" (probably intentional) or suffer losses. People aren't going to switch operating systems just to watch some T.V. online.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  22. only ads - don't bother installing anything by swatthatfly · · Score: 1

    I tried to view some of the content (Kung Fu) and all I got was the ads before the movie. Nothing plays after that. If you try another episode, you just get another ad served. Lame really!

    --
    keyboard not found! press any key to continue...
  23. The United States one is more glaring to me by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    What's up with that? WIPO?

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  24. Re:only ads - don't bother installing anything by electrichamster · · Score: 1

    Me too, hence the reason I'm knee deep in ethereal right now...

    Damnit, I want Pinky & The Brain!

  25. Looks like Firefox/Mac might be supported someday by electrichamster · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've just been digging through the code and came across this in the variable declaration section of the player Javascript. (I snipped all the uninteresting lines in the middle)
    GECKO_AX_PLUGIN_REQUIRED_US = "We're sorry, this feature requires the Mozilla ActiveX Plugin. <a href=\"javascript:installAxControl();\">Click here</a> to install."
    GECKO_AX_PLUGIN_REQUIRED_NOLINK_US = "We're sorry, this feature requires the Mozilla ActiveX Plugin."
    GECKO_AX_PLUGIN_INSTALLED_US = "Firefox Windows Media ActiveX Control install succeeded. Please restart your browser to continue."
    GECKO_AX_PLUGIN_FAILED_US = "Firefox Windows Media ActiveX Control install failed."
    FEATURE_NOT_AVAILABLE_MAC_MSG_US = "We're sorry, this feature is not yet available for Macintosh."
    FEATURE_NOT_AVAILABLE_MAC_IE_MSG_US = "We're sorry, this feature requires Safari or Netscape 7.2 and up."
    UPGRADE_AOL_MSG_US = "Please upgrade AOL to experience this feature. <a target=_top href=\"http://www.aol.com/aol_downloads.adp\">Clic k here to upgrade.</a>"
    WM_UPGRADE_MSG_US = "You're almost there... <a href=\"http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmed ia/download/AllDownloads.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">Click here to upgrade</a> your Windows Media Player to experience this great content."
    WEB_BROWSER_UPGRADE_MSG_US = "Please use Netscape 7.2+, IE 5.5+, or Firefox 1.0.4+ to experience this feature."
    NETSCAPE_UNSUPPORTED_MSG_US = "Please upgrade to Netscape 7.2+, or use IE 5.5+, Firefox 1.0.4+ to experience this feature. <a target=_top href=\"http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/do wnload.jsp\">Click here to upgrade Netscape.</a>"
    FIREFOX_UNSUPPORTED_MSG_US = "We're sorry, this feature requires <strong>Firefox 1.0.4+</strong>. <br><br>Please download the latest version of Firefox at <a href=\"http://www.getfirefox.com\">www.getfirefox. com</a> or use <strong>IE 5.5+</strong> or <strong>Netscape 7.2+</strong>."
    FIREFOX_BETA_UNSUPPORTED_MSG_US = "We're sorry, the player has encountered problems initializing. Please restart your computer and try again, if you continue to get this message try a previous version of Firefox located <a href=\"http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/fire fox/releases/\" target=\"_top\">here</a>."

    It's probably just old recycled code, we can but hope....God I love "Pinky & The Brain"...
  26. Anger. by Perseid · · Score: 1

    Okay. I tried to install their little ActiveX plugin for Firefox and it failed to work. I didn't feel so bad, though, because it barely works in IE as it is. But then I went back to browsing and discovered Firefox kept crashing. After 20 minutes of digging, I found the little POS files it put in there. I deleted them. All is good now.

    And these companies wonder why things are pirated. When this thing dies a fiery death, they'll sit and scratch their heads and wonder why.

    Anger.

  27. "Upgrade"?! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    So, I went to the link with my Mac running 10.3.9 and Safari 1.3.2 just for laughs, knowing it wouldn't work. Sure enough, it redirects me to a page telling me that I need Windows XP and WMP 10 to "experience all that this great new service has to offer."

    To be expected.

    But then I notice the title of the window, "AOL Television: In2TV: Upgrade." And in bold letters on, the page says "How to Upgrade" followed by a link to Microsoft's page on Windows XP.

    So, I need to "upgrade" my Mac to a Windows machine to view this content? Guess who wrote this page?

  28. Screen size too small by grahamandgraham · · Score: 1

    The image quality isn't much to write home about. Graham http://www.grahamandgrahamphotography.com/

  29. an increasingly proprietary internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the beginning, the 'net was fairly system agnostic. You could send an email from a PDP-10 running Unix to some TOPS-20 machine. And it was good.

    Increasingly, it is becoming proprietary. You must have *this* OS, and *this* video player.

    I fear the day when to even connect, you will need to be running Windows with some blessed DRM-safe code. "Sorry, you are not running a Secure OS. You cannot connect."

    The sad thing is, few understand.

    Even fewer care.

  30. AOL stores the high quality files locally! by Controlio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How thoughtful.

    If you look into the service, you can stream the videos for free with nothing but an ActiveX plugin and Macromedia Flash. However, if you want "HighQ" video (what they claim is "DVD Quality"), you have to install a piece of software.

    It's basically a BitTorrent ripoff. It's a peer-to-peer upload-as-you-download service. But since the files are stored locally and not streamed, I started poking around. Lo and behold, I found the hiding place for the WMV files!

    Download a file with the service, then navigate to:

    c:\Documents and Settings\~user\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\*random hash*\filename.wmv

    Note: You may have to do this at the command prompt, as any attemps I made to get into the "Content.IE5" folder through the GUI were futile. But take a look around, and you'll find all of the WMV files the program uses. Copy them to another directory, and there you have your DRM'd file. The first one I tried was named "PerfectStrangers_Barcode_151772C_1500.wmv~". It plays fine in the standalone WMP10, but not in BSPlayer or MPC. GSpot also doesn't recognize the file.

    So there's the source file. Gentlemen, start your cracking!

  31. XP 64 problems, and "automagically" by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1


    You can't even use it on XP 64.

    Well, I pretty much assumed that. My sister has a 64-bit machine, but we've just decided to run XP Pro on it; once we get around to getting a new hard drive in it that actually has decent size (long story why we didn't in the first place) and install an OS to take advantage of that juicy 64-bittedness, it's certainly not going to dual-boot into XP 64, it's definitely going to be some distro of Linux. I mean, does anything work on XP 64? Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if people managed to find out some workaround for tricking In2TV to work on *nix before XP 64 ever gets support.

    tip for Windows users who have removed their IE icon, open "My Computer" and directly enter the URL into the address bar - it converts from Explorer to Internet explorer automagically...

    I'd almost think it's insulting the intelligence of /. readers to even mention that ;) but I suppose there's probably people out there that don't realize how linked explorer and iexplore are underneath their facade-of-difference exteriors. I'm more interested in your word "automagically" . . . I'm unsure whether that's a spelling mistake or an intentional bit of wordplay, but that's brilliant! Brilliant, I say! Shortly people will be looking at me oddly as I begin working "automagically" into everyday conversation! :)

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  32. Small Update by Controlio · · Score: 1

    I don't know exactly why, but 20 minutes later the file no longer works in WMP10 alone. I can guarantee that I had the file copied to the desktop, opened it, and had it playing perfectly. Now, I don't know if the software did some poisoning, or if I had some perfect combination of things open at the right time, but it now no longer plays in WMP10 alone.

    Odd.

    1. Re:Small Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the world of DRM. That's Windows Media DRM for you. The "licensor" can specify a frame of time in which the DRM'd file is playable. Or there are a limited number of times you can play it. Or AOL's WMP DRM license server noticed something odd and revoked your license. Or...

      This is why one should always boycott DRM.

    2. Re:Small Update by CMBologna · · Score: 1

      For me its:
      c:\Documents and Settings\username\Documenti\My Deliveries\kdx\tmpcache\
      What disturbes me is that even though I had requirements (except location, I'm in Italy but content got downloaded) it doesnt plays the video (head of the class, I was a kid and I loved that geeky show).
      It opens it with the AOL Video player and tells me:
      We appologize, this content must be played in the AOL Video Player. Please go to www.aol.com/video

      How crappy is that?

    3. Re:Small Update by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      You mean when you open it up in WMP, you can't acquire a license? You could probably get around the location lock by using a US proxy for WMP.

    4. Re:Small Update by rollie_tyler · · Score: 1

      I get this error when I try to play the "Hi-Q" content properly, ie by opening up the Hi-Q app and clicking "Play." Anyone have any input?

  33. Freakin' Freddy's Nightmares! by tommut · · Score: 1

    I thought the list of available shows was pretty dull until I saw that they got fuckin' Freddy's Nightmares! I was a huge Nightmare on Elm St fan and I would take all the Fredddy I could get. The first episode was really good in that it actually showed the backstory of how he came to be. Granted Freddy himself only appeared in a handful of episodes and the ones without him were pretty horrible, I'm still going to watch a couple of these for memory's sake.

    And they got V too! Another Freddy/Robert England connection.

  34. Animaniacs and Tiny Toons by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    The IN2TV wikipedia article mentions those those, but I don't see them mentioned anywhere on the actual site. Anyone know if they're going to add these? I believe Pinky & the Brain, a show they already have, was part of Animaniacs.

  35. AOL hasn't always used totally closed video format by linefeed0 · · Score: 1

    During the Live 8 concerts last summer I had zero trouble viewing the live streams with linux (just had to click through their flash-dependent selector, use the DOM inspector to find the actual windoze media bit, and feed that to mplayer, which is a handy sequence in general). The on-demand clips were a bit trickier until I found out that they were in a format called Nullsoft Streaming Video, using the On2 VP5 codec, which xine supported at that time and probably more players since then. It also took a while to work around the broken bits of javascript in the player window, but all of the content played fine on Linux. Has anyone looked at this to see if it's similar?

  36. useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Idea, but all i get is their adds then a blank screen. ...and this is why I went out of my way to get media player 10? Give me a break.

    Nothing to see here unless you are lucky. I'd think AOL could have done better, but I guess I'm deluded again.

  37. Re:AOL hasn't always used totally closed video for by jZnat · · Score: 1

    Well, their streaming server is running Red Hat, so, uh, yeah...

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  38. Re:AOL hasn't always used totally closed video for by jZnat · · Score: 1

    In fact, they're using Tomcat/4.1, so their streaming is being done via servlets or something. If anyone knows where the actual direct URL's to the videos (not the URN thing), I think it'd be a good thing to post it.

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  39. Re:AOL hasn't always used totally closed video for by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    I think the videos might all be DRM'd. Although, I'm not sure, since I didn't get a popup asking me if it was OK to acquire a license. The 1.5 mbps downloads are certainly DRM'd though. All the ones I'm downloading appear to expire June 1.

  40. .NSV = AOL proprietary format (kinda) by TwoScoopsOfPig · · Score: 1

    In case anyone cares, Nullsoft is the creator of WinAmp (recently bought out by AOL) and .NSV is theier standard streaming format for video (.PLS is their standard for music). cents+=2;

    --
    #include <disclaimer.h>
    #include <beer.h>
  41. Broadcast vs Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with these sorts of ventures is that they are run by big media. Consider some alternatives:

    1. iCraveTV style: do what the cable companies did: simply rebroadcast TV signals in a different format, ie. over the internet. Benefit: where the cable companies offered better reception, iCraveTV's USP was deterritorializing TV: local TV goes global. TV for ex-pats. A fine idea for it's time; legal in Canada; killed by litigation by US networks and cable co's and NFL/NBA.

    2. Democracy style: video podcasting. Benefits: standard file formats and protocols; anyone can publish videos; movies are downloaded automatically by subscription and can be saved; Bittorrent distribution; no streaming; no commercials; soon there will be millions of niche channels.

    In contrast, how does big media approach it?
    Hmmn. Internet. Niche publishing. Peer to peer based communication. Email. IM. Sounds a lot like radio in the 1930s! Imagine if we could broadcast radio with pictures with this thing!

    Big media's approach: a few big corporations broadcasting the same old crap to passive viewers; proprietary technology; technology used not for what it can do to empower people, but for what it can do to prevent people from escaping a purely passive reception, ie. skipping commercials and saving clips. And no one - and I mean NO ONE - gets to publish but big media, and I don't care *how* cheap it is!

    It's basically like the phone has been invented, and the phone company is insisting that it be used to solely for broadcasting weather reports. The biggest obstacle to the future is those with accomplishments in the past - and their lawyers. Dismal thinking, implementation, and content. Yet another dinosaur.

  42. Re:AOL hasn't always used totally closed video for by linefeed0 · · Score: 1

    Well, I just did. It's similar right up to a nice bit of javascript code buried in one of the files referenced by called isDRMAsset which looks for a magic letter next to the bitrate in the mms URL, and that letter is there. And my mplayer doesn't like connecting to the mms url that results. So this is apparently MS DRM. Sigh. (The letter is either S or G depending on the bitrate, if anyone cares.)

  43. If they used Realmedia or Quicktime by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    If they used realmedia, they could offer it to every modern OS including Macintosh and Linux and still have "evil DRM" they need.

    They could offer same content to mobile platforms too.

    Or same goes for Quicktime which they DEVELOP the content on.

    I guess another "code/invent nothing, just spread spyware lie and bribe content providers" wmedia lame dominance strategy from MSFT.

  44. Don't waste time by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Instead of giving time to this obvious "we can't make a good player so lets offer AOL free servers so they use our format only" lame game, try this:

    http://www.getdemocracy.com/

    At least they offer some stuff AOL/TW can't dare to air. Oh, not porn :)

  45. United States Only by Enkerli · · Score: 1

    This might be well-known but what's quite frustrating is that it's not clearly stated. The tv shows may only acquire a license through a U.S.-based Internet connection so, if you're outside the U.S. and don't have a proxy or VPN, you can't play that content. (Some previews work, though.) Using a VPN is a bit cumbersome and much slower for streaming media. The "Hi-Q" local files require a license/connection every time they're played.

    --
    Alexandre http://enkerli.wordpress.com/
    1. Re:United States Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone comment where can I set these things (in internet connection, WMP10 preferences?) and where can I get a list of proxies that work?

    2. Re:United States Only by CMBologna · · Score: 1

      I belive the proxy can be set under internet explorer (correct me if I'm wrong) however I haven't been able to find a proxy that could fool the service in beliving it's in the USA.
      Can someone give us a clue?