Slashdot Mirror


Google Base Retail Rumours Confirmed

kaufmanmoore writes "According to an MSNBC report, the head of Google's European arm has said that Google wants to use Google Base for brick and mortar stores to submit lists of goods and prices in order to create an online presence." From the article: "Google would index and package the information into a consumer-friendly search engine, giving its users a virtual supermarket across a number of retail brands. Mr Arora said: 'Google Base is going to have a huge impact on retailers," adding that the move reflected internal research, which found many leading European retailers did not feel they were competitive enough online.'

87 comments

  1. Froogle anyone? by myspys · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But.. isn't this exactly what Froogle is?

    1. Re:Froogle anyone? by wenzi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it is very similar to Froogle. But I am sure someone in Google has noticed that fact also.

      What I think is interesting is how Google payments works with Google base and not Froogle.

      I think when retailers go for Google base, there will be a pre-built e-commerce rig waiting to go.

      Froogle will be for the rest of us punters.

      --
      -- I doubt, therefore I might be.
    2. Re:Froogle anyone? by sirambrose · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is sort of like froogle without the screen scraping. Because the content provider enters the information about the item, there is all kinds of neat attributes that can be used to narrow the search. For example a honda civic can be classified by price, make, year, color, model, engine, mileage, door count, and body style. You can actually search for a used 2000-2002 civic sedan with 50-75k miles that costs less than $12,000 and is less than 100 miles from your house. It appears that cars.com has put all their car classifieds into the system which means that any car advertised in the washington post is in the system. If the car dealerships started to add their inventories it would be really cool. I'm not sure if it will take off because it of the desire of businesses to keep their prices from being compared.

    3. Re:Froogle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Base will actually host the content for them. Froogle will index an existing e-commerce site. Base will be used by brick and mortar shops without a website.

    4. Re:Froogle anyone? by fbjon · · Score: 1
      And it's also for brick-and-mortar shops, in case everyone.. I mean someone, forgot to RTFA. That would mean you can search for prices that don't exist anywhere else on the net. As it says in the summary, "in order to create an online presence.", or in TFA: "Some retailers are yet to set up their own internet operations, even though consumer purchases online have soared."

      This is a new thing, not just another pricecompare.com.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:Froogle anyone? by sirambrose · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Bricks and mortar shops like car dealers and stuff that want to advertise their inventory and prices. The poster I replied to wanted to know how Base differs from Froogle and implied that he wanted to know why this feature wasn't being added to froogle instead. The big difference is that instead of comparing prices from web merchants, it allows people to find items offered for sale based on detailed criteria including the physical location of the vendor. Is that clear enough for you?

    6. Re:Froogle anyone? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      Froogle might have started off screen scraping, but normally you (the merchant) set up an account for your store and then upload a csv text file with the product name, description, image link, product link, etc.

      base is similar (merchant uploads file), but uses a modified rss/atom feed. It's a lot more flexible as far as specifying attributes (ie, color, size, weight, etc).

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    7. Re:Froogle anyone? by head_dunce · · Score: 1

      Froogle just links to your current web pages/shopping cart application -- this sounds like they'll be your shopping cart application. Big difference.

  2. For Sale: by slashbob22 · · Score: 1

    Google Base
    Slightly used; usage will increase quickly over time.
    Will provide a wealth of information on your competitors and other individuals.
    Image:

    |insert snapshot of googlebase information here|

    Asking Price: $G,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo,gle

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  3. Let's get this out of the way now by eldoo77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    All your base are belong to Google... Really!

    1. Re:Let's get this out of the way now by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > All your base are belong to Google... Really!

      Well, it's a database-driven app, so it's gonna be something like this:
      SELECT * FROM BASE;.

      Either that, or we go the retail website route:
      # chown -R google /htdocs/products/*/base

    2. Re:Let's get this out of the way now by kennygraham · · Score: 0
      SELECT * FROM BASE;.
      Delete From *
      Where ship_class = "Zig"

      It's interesting that the lameness filter had a problem with the caps, but didn't even notice that my comment itself was lame regardless. ;)

  4. Well.. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After attending SDWest yesterday and listening to Jeff Barr from Amazon Web Services, I expect Google has to be doing something. I don't mean to evangelize Amazon, but to shed some light on what they have been doing, which was brought to light on the 14th, regarding this online storage. They have web services, which you can program and wot and build your own online businesses with, which for a small brick and mortar, could be quite a bonus (Amazon have worked with small booksellers and wot for years, now anyone can.)

    Check it out, at least, at aws.typepad.com

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOT?

  5. Google VS EU? by DarkNemesis618 · · Score: 1

    Could this be the first step before the EU puts sanctions on Google along with Microsoft? Maybe not soon, maybe not to the same extent, but the EU seems to be hellbent on preventing monopolies.

    --
    What's the matter, James? No glib remark? No pithy comeback?
    1. Re:Google VS EU? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      No, the EU seems to be hellbent on preventing monopolies from engaging in anti-competitive practices.

      What has Google done to stifle competition? What is preventing other organisations from offering the exact same service?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    2. Re:Google VS EU? by onetwentyone · · Score: 1

      Well if we follow the logic used to say Apple had a monopoly digital music, you don't really need to stifle competition - you just need to be the most successful. Google isn't suing other web companies claiming stolen ideas or whatnot but since they are company most freely associated with the internet they must have monopoly on name recognition.

      If you reduce your circles enough, you can find monopolies everywhere.

    3. Re:Google VS EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a monopoly on my penis, I just rent it's limited liscense out to my girlfriend...

      Ok I lied, she rents out the vagina liscense to me...

    4. Re:Google VS EU? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      Well if we follow the logic used to say Apple had a monopoly digital music

      Why would we do that? The only antitrust lawsuit pending for Apple is the one in California as far as I know, and California is definitely not a member state of the EU. Virgin tried to sue Apple for anticompetitive behaviour in France, but the court ruled against Virgin.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  6. Google Base? by user24 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who (for a second) thought that google were actually beginning construction of their other base

    1. Re:Google Base? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I thought of it too =)

  7. Google Base joke... by revery · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seems like there should be a joke that I could make about Google Base... and how everything will belong to them...

    Google: All the retail is ours.... No that's not right...

    Something really obvious...

    Google: We own you... No...

    Oh well. Maybe someone can set me up the joke...

    No? OK....

    1. Re:Google Base joke... by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Face it my friend, in Internet terms we're older than the hills, and the youngsters here are rolling their eyes every time we give a phlegmy chuckle at one of those catch phrases from the good old days. Still, I for one welcome our new Google Base overlords, so long as they have Natalie Portman as their spokesmodel, naked and petrified.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Google Base joke... by SLot · · Score: 1

      Still, I for one welcome our new Google Base overlords, so long as they have Natalie Portman as their spokesmodel, naked and petrified.

      Just as long as she brings hot grits.

    3. Re:Google Base joke... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Just as long as she brings hot grits.

      Because our teeth won't handle much more.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Google Base joke... by tacokill · · Score: 1

      you forgot the hot grits

    5. Re:Google Base joke... by fbjon · · Score: 3, Informative
      Slashdot isn't really slashdot without some base-jokes, overlords, and Natalie Portman sprinkled around.

      And don't forget the trolls, GNAA, and spelling errors compliatn with ISO Flaming Standards.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    6. Re:Google Base joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of you just joining us you can read up on all slashdot-related jokes in this Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_subculture

  8. Froogle (+) anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I get the feeling that this is going to be Froogle+. A step beyound what they're presently doing. The more important question which the story raises is how well this new Google initive compares against what's already out there?

  9. Still leaves a lot to be desired. by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So they will index deals submitted by stores.

    Who is going to collect the funds?

    Who is going to deal with the fraud?

    Who is going to be responsible for the accuracy of the information presented?

    Will google police stores that advertise one price but sell at another (or just bury more profit in S&H?)

    Sounds like a high tech flea market. Without any guarantees this could devolve quickly into a disaster. Is Google prepared to vouch for the information, if not how will they convince people to use a service they won't stand behind?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Still leaves a lot to be desired. by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      I agree and also if I find a retailer that seems to have some sort of Google endorsement, I have a "no shananagan" expectation. I'm not saying that Google has to warrent every product sold through these stores, but they can't simply act as a middle man and use their name to woo customers but not offer anything in return to the customers. I'm a little concerned Google is getting itself into something with a lot of competition. Not to say there weren't search engines before and after Google, but searching is something they can do inhouse and focus on. This idea sounds like they might be putting the customer service and complaints on to some fly-by-night company and their image may suffer if bad stores simply use this to make a quick buck.

      Although, I'm just speculating of course and we'll see where this goes.

    2. Re:Still leaves a lot to be desired. by truckaxle · · Score: 1

      I suspect they will use some sort of community voting to establish confidence in vendors - just like ebay.

    3. Re:Still leaves a lot to be desired. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you use Google now, even though they don't vouch for the accuracy or accountability of the results?

      Seems to me that they wouldn't have to solve every freaking problem of commerce to still make this a very useful service for both consumer and vendor.

    4. Re:Still leaves a lot to be desired. by 222 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is Google prepared to vouch for the information, if not how will they convince people to use a service they won't stand behind?

      Ever actually tried to get Ebay to resolve a fraud issue? It was easier (and cheaper!) just to forget the whole thing.

    5. Re:Still leaves a lot to be desired. by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

      They'll include a bigass disclaimer to the effect of "Use at your own risk, no warranties/liabilities represented bla bla". That's how.

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
  10. Tick Tock, Tick Tock. by aphoenix · · Score: 4, Funny

    And the Google Countdown to Evil continues... Don't get me wrong, I love Google, but they really need to make sure that they're using their powers for Awesome.

    1. Re:Tick Tock, Tick Tock. by Brent_Litzer · · Score: 1
      Agreed - every time you I see the accumlation of power, coruption and collusion of some form is soon to follow. Also, Google was not that innocent to begin with.

      It pains me that one day I may hate Google more than Microsoft.

      --
      - Just because you can't, doesn't mean you shouldn't
    2. Re:Tick Tock, Tick Tock. by onetwentyone · · Score: 4, Funny

      By the time that happens, Google will already know you hate them and will start serving you little, unobtrusive text ads reminding you of how insignificant you are to them. ;)

    3. Re:Tick Tock, Tick Tock. by moochfish · · Score: 1

      The countdown:

      Unusually evil...
      Technically evil...
      Kind of evil...
      Somewhat evil...
      A tiny bit evil...
      Slightly evil...
      Lesser evil...
      Pretty much evil...
      Just short of evil...
      Almost evil...
      Evil!!!

      [I almost put "Microsoft!!!" but I refrained]

  11. Froogle notwithstanding... by Illbay · · Score: 1
    ...I have wanted something like this for a long time. Even now, as internet commerce is firmly established in the mainstream, you have to work very hard to aggregate all the information you need when you are SHOPPING (as opposed to BUYING) online.

    After all this time I still have to spend a lot of time just looking for the best prices for things like replacement computer parts to feed my hobby.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  12. Google Information by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI, Google Base is still under development. Most likely the service will give retailers access to hundreds of millions of Google users. You can visit it at base.google.com.

    1. Re:Google Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything by Google is permanently in development.

  13. I'm wondering the same thing by blueZ3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I'm searching for something online, I'm usually looking for a single item or a set of related items. This usually makes Froogle a good starting point; I search for arcade pushbuttons, and I get links to stores that sell them along with other arcade console items. Poking around a few sites usually leads to one with good prices on the things I want, and I make a purchase.

    Really, I don't see the benefit of aggregating content across stores. How often does someone go looking for a doorknob, a picture frame, and a KVM all at once? Online shopping is fundamentally different than shopping at a physical store, but it's not that different: I want to find a competent supplier of each thing, not a one-stop-shop where I have to wonder about the quality of service and related issues. And if they're just showing me info from three different places in a single search, but I am actually making three orders, what's the advantage?

    Color me unimpressed

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:I'm wondering the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>And if they're just showing me info from three different places in a single search, but I am actually making three orders, what's the advantage?

      Less clicking?

      It's the Google version of Amazon 1-Click purchasing.

    2. Re:I'm wondering the same thing by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How often does someone go looking for a doorknob, a picture frame, and a KVM all at once?

      Have you not noticed the recent Wal*Mart ad campaign? "I went in for chips and salsa, and walked out with this great deck furniture." Or "I went in for hemorhoids cream, and walked out with a new car." That kind of thing.

      The point is, when someone's in the mood to browse and spend, the more products you can put in front of them, the more they'll buy. "Stack 'em high and watch 'em buy" is a retail maxim. Why do you think Fry's Electronics (for those unfortunate enough to have one near them) load up their check out lanes with all kinds of random junk? This is just more of the same, present as many products as possible, and people will inevitably buy them. It's just how our culture is.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:I'm wondering the same thing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Fry's Electronics (for those unfortunate enough to have one near them) load up their check out lanes with all kinds of random junk?

      I just have to say, Fry's fucking rules if you know what you're doing. It's a little bit like going to a sketchy part of town you're not familiar with - you just need to go with someone who knows their way around to avoid getting jacked. If you are aware that you have to always check packages to make sure they have the right product in them, you can do pretty well. Of course, you have to know what you want, but then, most of us do, right? Ostensibly anyway...

      Regardless, all stores use these tactics, or typically, they go under. I work in a Casino and it's really entertaining to look at the floor plan that shows the locations of the slot machine banks and so on. The layout is definitely arranged to maximize floor time. And naturally, like most retail stores (but moreso) it's nigh-impossible to find a clock, and we make it difficult to see what the weather is like outside, to eliminate the feeling of the passage of time.

      Anyway, Fry's absolutely rules. You just have to shop like a man and not a woman - you have to know what you want and know where it is, go in and get it, and get the fuck out. Then again, you could add a more feminine aspect to your shopping as well - you could follow the ad circular. It can be pretty hard to get your hands on it, though, because they're too stupid to put a PDF on their website. You pretty much have to get a sunday paper.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I'm wondering the same thing by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1
      "I went in for hemorhoids cream, and walked out with a new car."
      You mean, "I went in for a new car, and walked out needing hemorrhoid cream"
    5. Re:I'm wondering the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go here: http://www.techbargains.com/index.cfm

      Type "Fry's" into the search box on the left.

      See a list of all the local papers that have Fry's ads in high-res online glory 7-days a week.

      Includes the following: SF Bay Area, Orange County, LA, Renton, Houston, Dallas, and Chicago

    6. Re:I'm wondering the same thing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Unfortunately, the SJ Mercury News ad has to be viewed in IE, because they fucked it all up as pertains to Gecko. Luckily, I have the IE Tab extension loaded, so I can be so lazy as to not even have to open another browser...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. I can personally confirm this... by Zelph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was invited to use Google Base using the Google Payment Corp. Google has a payment service that people can pay me with, and it is better than PayPal.

    1. Re:I can personally confirm this... by mc+bean · · Score: 0

      Paying with livestock is better than Paypal, they're such a piece of shit.

      --
      Coranon Silaria, Ozoo Mahoke
  15. All your Retail Base belong to us by doyoudig · · Score: 0, Redundant

    someone had to say it..........

    1. Re:All your Retail Base belong to us by Firewalker_Midnights · · Score: 1
      --
      I Lost My Virginity While Waiting for BSD to Compile.
  16. Apple licensed one-click by blueZ3 · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Google will? :o)

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  17. Google by colin8651 · · Score: 0

    Oh February 4th in the year 2015 The Google super somputer became self aware and launched a nuclear attack on Europe.

  18. I Hope It's the Right Items by Trojan35 · · Score: 1

    Where I'd like to see this most are for things that aren't easily shipped. TV's, Appliances, etc. The problem is will google be able to pester the businesses enough to keep their inventories updated. I'd be pissed if I drove out somewhere only to find that they're OOS. And no, calling first defeats the purpose of this product IMO.

    There *is* a reason that these stores don't have a good online presence. It's probably not a web programmer's fault, but more of the stores not being able to integrate the needs of an online store into their B&M's daily processes.

    1. Re:I Hope It's the Right Items by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Actually a lot of stores don't have a strong online presence because they don't want one. They know they are not price competitive and use old world media marketing to get people into their stores, where they can't compare price and their customers basically pay up to 50% more than a competitive online price.

      I often prefer to pick up now rather than wait for delivery, so I call the store and give them the online price from a relatively reliable online store, if the bricks and mortar store BS about the unreliability of the online store, I call someone else until I get a store that just negotiates close to the online price and buy it and pick it up now (well at least with in the next 20 minutes or so).

      A fancy replacement for the telephone yellow pages, with inventory? Given that the current Australian online yellow pages are now POS (they only list book entries online if the advertiser pays extra, of course for the end user the majority of entries are missing forcing you to use the book, DUH, greed and stupidity).

      It is still counter to what the bricks and mortars store want, people in the store regardless of whether they have the product or not in the hopes of selling the customer something they want to sell (at the price the seller wants), rather than the customer buying what they want to buy (at the price the buyer wants to pay).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  19. Now if they add a RFID "service"... by csoto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    then you have the ultimate in Mom-and-Pop competitive advantage to big corporate box retailers. I'd love to be able to find just the right product at a shop down the street than have to go to Best Buy or Amazon.com. Increasing the ability to find their inventories will help immensely.

    This is where the moronic book publishers get things wrong - by Google helping consumers actually FIND the crap they sell, they DRIVE business TOWARDS your stupid company. Oh, and ISPs get it wrong too. The only reason we pay monthly fees to get IP service is because companies like Google provide compelling reasons to do so. Otherwise, I'd take up windsurfing or something...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:Now if they add a RFID "service"... by big+dumb+dog · · Score: 1
      Interesting thoughts...

      I can see how, on the surface, this looks like an advantage for the Mom & Pop shops, but the reality of it is that it hurts them.

      Because the large retailers have more purchasing leverage and lower marginal costs than a Mom & Pop retailer, the large chain is able to offer the product at a lower cost.

      When purchasing online the two major points of consideration for any consumer are:

      1. Price. Comparing price is very easy online
      2. Speed, reliability, and cost of shipping

      It's sad to say that, but places like Wal-Mart are able to sell for less, process faster, and ship for less because they sell in volume.

      Mom & Pop shops need to focus on service, quality, or other factors that justify the higher prices.

      --
      "Seven years of college down the drain. Might as well join the f-ing Peace Corps." - John 'Bluto' Blutarsky
    2. Re:Now if they add a RFID "service"... by csoto · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I often prefer criteria #2 to #1, particularly when #1 isn't that big of a difference. But there's also a #3, which is "service." I much prefer to give my money to the guys down at the local hardware store, because they actually help me find what I need. Not so for Home Depot. They suck.

      --
      There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  20. Brick and Mortar? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People will probably consider this trolling, but I can't stand that expression brick and mortar.

    Why can't it just be called a physical store? What if my store is made of wood and sheetrock? Who comes up with these obnoxious, self-important business terms?

    And with that, I have to go pull the trigger on something...

    1. Re:Brick and Mortar? by mc+bean · · Score: 1

      Click and mortar

      Ready to kill yourself yet?

      --
      Coranon Silaria, Ozoo Mahoke
    2. Re:Brick and Mortar? by kruczkowski · · Score: 3, Informative

      The name comes from Banks. During US expantion in the 1800's, Banks held a lot of cash and were the only buildings in town to be built with "bricks and mortar".

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    3. Re:Brick and Mortar? by jeko · · Score: 1
      The post above is correct. Banks did come up with the term, and their lobbyists had it put into law that banks had to be brick, not wood. Since most of the large, established banks of the time already were brick, this meant their competitors couldn't just rent land and throw up a cheap, wooden building, but had to be willing to cough up the significant extra expense for bricks and masons.


      It's the traditional Economics 101 example of businesses protecting themselves by raising barriers to entry into the market.

      --
      He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  21. What does WOT mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does "wot" mean?
    Seriously. is it an acronym? new slang? what is it?

    1. Re:What does WOT mean? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wot approximates to 'whatever' or 'whatnot' it's old.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:What does WOT mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it British or something? Im in the US and we dont
      use that terminology over here.

    3. Re:What does WOT mean? by CYDVicious · · Score: 1

      It means "wide open throttle" to the auto/motorcycle junkies(me atleast), I must be the only one on /.

      --
      //Nothing to see here, please move along.
    4. Re:What does WOT mean? by Potor · · Score: 1
      according to my Dictionary of Archaic Words (London: John Russel Smith: 1850), wot means "eat":
      Wot na dryng wald she nane
      Swa mykel soru ad she tane
      Just thought you'd like to know.
    5. Re:What does WOT mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waste Of Time

  22. You just don't get it by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who comes up with these obnoxious, self-important business terms?

    Google is unleashing a long tail, soup-to-nuts integrated solution that satisfies pent-up demand and synergizes efficiencies. It's a slam-dunk no-brainer!

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  23. ObReference by Khelder · · Score: 1

    All your base are... oh, nevermind.

  24. GoogleBase Copyright Infringement Notice by dbdweeb · · Score: 1

    "GoogleBase?" Just wait a minute, I invented that and I've got the sketches on a napkin to prove it. You owe me big time and until you pay up I'm going to have a judge slap on a restraining order.

    Sincerely yours,

    Al Gore-Rhythm

  25. Retail Execs to Google: Yeah, I'll get right on it by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Nikesh Arora, head of Google's European arm, said in an interview with the FT that Google wanted companies in retail - and possibly sectors such as real estate - to submit details of their goods and prices. Google would index and package the information into a consumer-friendly search engine, giving its users a virtual supermarket across a number of retail brands."

    Typical Retail Executive: "Yes, thank you, Google, for offering me an easy way to redefine the retail brand I've been building for years as just another price player. Would you like me to send over demographics of my key customers and how we reach them via advertising too? Yes? OK, I'll get right on that. (click)"

  26. Google Base? by Daedala · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else really hope they meant Google Moon Base? I was so going to apply.

    --
    What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
  27. Google needs to buy FedEx or UPS next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one likes paying for shipping.
    With the increasing popularity of onlines sales, Google
    would become an instant hero by providing free shipping services.

    I can dream can't I?

  28. This just in... by dbucowboy · · Score: 1

    I can see it now... "Google suceedes from the US to form its own country... Matt Cutts is elected President of the UN."

    --
    This just in! 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the population.
  29. This is great! by British · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait to shop with Google Base at PriceRitePhoto!

  30. Fry's? Unfortunate? by beeblebrox · · Score: 1

    Fry's Electronics (for those unfortunate enough to have one near them)

    Dude, unfortunate? Over the years they've let me borrow all sorts for goodies to try out and then return after I figured out they didn't work for me/I didn't need them/I didn't like the color, or whatever.

    I like Fry's.

  31. Gotta second the "Fry's rules"... by rsborg · · Score: 1
    It can be pretty hard to get your hands on it, though, because they're too stupid to put a PDF on their website. You pretty much have to get a sunday paper.

    Being a SF Bay longtime resident, I gotta second this... man, I love to read their sunday paper adverts.. it's so dumb of them that they don't just publish this via pdf or something (probably to avoid other stores from "gaming" with their prices).

    They're also quite dumb in that up until 1999 or somthing they didn't even have a website... ironically, the only hits you'd get on altavista/yahoo/google would be "anti-Fry's" or "Fry's sucks" websites :-)

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  32. Let's zoom ahead about 15 years by serutan · · Score: 1

    Google will be teh suxorz. We will be fondly remembering the good old Windows/Linux golden age, when you had apps and data on your own machine instead of hotnetting on your rights-managed, government monitored Googlepod cranial implant.