Slashdot Mirror


The Chinese Socialist MMOG

GP writes "How different is China? In the online game version of the idealized Socialist state, you gain experience points by 'doing good deeds' and 'thwarting spys'. You can even meet Chairman Mao!" From a great writeup by Scott Jennings on the game: "And now we have the online MMO version, 'Learn From Lei Feng Online', which allows you to... mend socks. Again - not making any of this up. To quote from the original Xinhua story 'For beginners, sewing and mending socks is the only way to increase experience and to upgrade,' said Jiao Jian, a six-grade pupil in Yuexiu District, quoted by the newspaper. He then continues. 'Every time you are promoted to a higher level, your clothes will become more average,' he said. I'm pretty sure this isn't a translation screw up. The longer you grind, the more you look like everyone else. I guess new users wear designer pastels or something."

200 comments

  1. wow by genrader · · Score: 0

    that's completely and utterly messed up.

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas paying money to be a online wage-slave is good fun.

    2. Re:wow by neoform · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, cause countries like the United States never make propaganda games, right? Man, china's such a fucked up country! How dare they do this?!

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:wow by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Oh boy, after a hard day's work making basketball shoes for a nickle an hour, you can go back to your tiny apartment and mend socks online.

      A virtual sweatshop.

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    4. Re:wow by Aragorn379 · · Score: 1

      America's Army is more of a recruiting tool then propaganda. I consider it more like an ad.

    5. Re:wow by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Killing virtual stuff is fun. Mending virtual socks doesn't even merit a put down.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    6. Re:wow by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      Since when is an advertisement not propaganda?

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    7. Re:wow by neoform · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you should probably look up what propaganda means..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    8. Re:wow by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

      But since everything in the shops (plus rent etc) costs about the same is here IN RELATION to that nickle, you can have quite a good standard of living. Or if you get bored with working, you could go back to your hut in the countryside and tend pigs for zero an hour.

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    9. Re:wow by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Since when is an advertisement not propaganda?
      --

      I'll be the karma whore.

      Propaganda is a promotion of a cause or a particular idea - often times presented with a one-sided or distorted bias.
      Advertising is a promotion of a product or service - often times presented with a one-sided or distorted bias

      Put it another way, advertising may compel me to become fat or poor while propaganda may lead me to the gallows or the gas chamber.

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    10. Re:wow by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No they aren't and factory workers in China or anywhere else in poor countries do not have a good standard of living. Stop believing economists' lies, sweatshops are not good for anyone except corporations; why do you think they're illegal in the developed world?

    11. Re:wow by Imsdal · · Score: 1
      Your sweatshop is another man's way to a better life.

      The worst factories are obviously horrible and should not be allowed anywhere, much as child abuse should not be allowed anywhere ever. That said, a regular chinese factory offers better opportunities *for those choosing to work there* (not for you and me, obviously) than what is otherwise available.

      The option really is tending pigs for zero an hour. That may or may not make the person happier, but it definitely makes him poorer.

    12. Re:wow by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      But they're not advertising a service or product, they're recruiting people for their cause. Following these ads could end with returning in a casket.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    13. Re:wow by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      In which case encouraging military enrollment can be classed as propaganda, it's not a product.

      However you define propaganda, the principles are the same in this case.

    14. Re:wow by Monkeyboy4 · · Score: 1

      YOur understanding of choice is mistaken given much of what is presented about the sweatshops. These are places where you go, get a loan from the company to rent an apartment from the company and buy food at the company store. Then you work for a nickel a day and use that to pay your rent (1/5) - by your food - (1/5) pay principle (.5/5) and interest (2.5/5) on your debt

      Many people chose to work at these factories and are stuck there for thier lives. Not a very pleasant choice

    15. Re:wow by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Oh yes Chinese factory workers choose to work there, because there are so many other alternatives like begging, starvation, prostitution or crime. Please. If sweatshop factories are so wonderful why did workers in the developed world fight so hard to get rid of them.
      It's only a better life relatively speaking, and once China becomes too expensive for the multinationals those people are going to be just as fucked as they were before - it's not like they could buy a house or save some money on the wages they get.
      Developing economies should not be competing on the cost of labour, that is only a short-term win situation for corporate cost-cutters, they should be competing on quality. Although Germany and Japan have fucked up their world position in recent years they had 20 to 30 years of success even though their products weren't particularly cheap in comparison to those from other countries, they were just better.
      This race to the bottom is in the long-term going to benefit no-one: workers in the developed countries see their incomes and lifestyles reduced, workers in the developing countries have a choice between working long hours in dangerous conditions for a pittance or starvation, and most multinationals lose the income from a well-paid workforce buying their products. The likes of Walmart will win big from this situation, but I can't see many other corporations that depend on people having disposable income doing well.

    16. Re:wow by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      He's just using the standard economists' practice of trying to make people feel ashamed about being justifiably upset about their livelihoods being taken from them; a practice that is primarily designed to make rich people and organisations richer and has zero to do with altruism.

    17. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not trolling, please don't ever vote, because you're an idiot.

      Sweatshop workers work absurd numbers of hours a week, often in unsafe conditions, and are generally paid just enough to ensure they won't die of starvation before their next shift.

  2. yes, but.... by scenestar · · Score: 0, Troll

    Does it run on linux?

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Rinux

  3. what about their TOS? by Klowner · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if you get an immediate ban for using 1337 Falun Gong macros.

  4. Hmm by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much do you get for killing infant girls?

    //and before you ask, yes. When this type of thing is so pervasive in your country, it is very necessary to repeatedly point it out

    1. Re:Hmm by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Hopefully not as many points as you get for holding up a line of tanks, by standing in front of them.

    2. Re:Hmm by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      That sounds like something that would get you Wanted -- where other players can kill you for a day of age free of lawsys penalty.

    3. Re:Hmm by idonthack · · Score: 1

      That only happens when TV cameras are around. If they aren't there you just get run over and shot, no matter how many people are standing in the way.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    4. Re:Hmm by pomo+monster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno. How much do you get for stuffing your aging parents in "retirement communities" where they can be conveniently forgotten?

      (Before you ask--yes, Chinese people really do consider us barbaric for our cultural idiosyncracies. And killing infant girls really isn't pervasive in modern China, even in rural areas, regardless of whatever uninformed drivel Microsoft-NBC is spewing today. Gain some perspective, please.)

    5. Re:Hmm by linzeal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bullshit, I have a cousin who married a Chinese woman and her family demonstrated killing an infant girl while he was there for only 2 weeks. To say it does not go on is to ignore the fact that places like Shanghai are now approaching 60% male population because of the practice. Places like India are not far behind.

    6. Re:Hmm by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      infant girls really isn't pervasive in modern China

      Assuming the occurence is only 1 in 10,000, that's only 60,000. Nothing to get worked up over. Not like it's pervasive or anything.

    7. Re:Hmm by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      What the hell? That's just so outright wrong, I don't even know where to begin. Just so no one gets misled by your specious assertions, I'm going to link a starting point for your education. To summarize, the sex ratio isn't due to infanticide; it's a combination of (a) selective abortion, and (b) parents choosing to have another child after having a daughter, because they want a son. Don't even try to pretend like neither of these happen here in the West (though not as extensively, I'll grant you).

    8. Re:Hmm by TheOrange · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Haha. You retard. You are so fucked up you equate putting your parents into an old folks home with killing a baby. Not only that, you have the balls to call it perspective. Let me ask you, is belonging to a different culture justification for denying people rights we consider fundamental? I mean how far can we take this perspective thing? Kill people for speaking out against the government? Hang women for having sex out of wedlock? Kill and eat one and other? I mean, please, oh wise and cultured one, let me know when it stops being "cultural" and starts to be a fucking problem...

    9. Re:Hmm by SteroidG · · Score: 1

      And just where did you get that 1 in 10,000 figure?

    10. Re:Hmm by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      having a second child after a daugher does not increase the boy:girl ratio. at worst, it decreases it, as a couple who has had one daugher has provided a statistical sample of one that they are more likely to have girls, which while extremely lacking in predicitivity, does pass 1%.

    11. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do socialists always respond in the same way. Everyone else is obviously not educated enough. They always have books we should read. We just aren't thinking correctly. Give it a break. If you have an argument or relevant facts then state them so they can be debated. Half of your posts in this article have been for 'reeducation'. Good grief.

    12. Re:Hmm by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      You're right. My mistake.

    13. Re:Hmm by pomo+monster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh please. I'm as capitalist as they come. If you think Frommer's travel guides and the Economist are mouthpieces for the Chinese Communist Party, I'm afraid you're beyond "reeducation."

    14. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The difference between US [tinyurl.com] and China [tinyurl.com].

      Looks like you win if you live in China and are actually looking for pictures of the place.

    15. Re:Hmm by Valar · · Score: 1

      First of all, you aren't going to sound credible if you just make up numbers and then present them as evidence.

      Let's assume /. user Bob Cat blah blah blah ONLY eats fifteen kittens a day. That's still 5,475 kittens a year! Not a problem at all!

    16. Re:Hmm by Valar · · Score: 1

      There's actually little evidence that the one child policy or communism made this problem any worse in China. It had been going on for a long time, as a result of it being a predominantly agricultural society.

      Secondly, direct infanticide is fairly rare (a lot rarer than the American press would have you believe). Now, gender-select abortion, that's a huge issue.

    17. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the sex ratio isn't due to infanticide; it's a combination of (a) selective abortion"

      Wait.. I thought you said it was NOT due to infanticide...

    18. Re:Hmm by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      If that's your problem, then there's really no reason to go after the Chinese.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    19. Re:Hmm by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Selective abortion of female fetuses is as equally henious as infantacide to at least half of the world. Killing because of sex should be called something else, pardon me if my latin does not allow to come with something off the cuff.

    20. Re:Hmm by Trogre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't know. Is it any more than in countries that kill baby boys and girls if the mum finds them inconvenient?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    21. Re:Hmm by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Just in case you don't know, selective abortion = infanticide.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    22. Re:Hmm by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      I agree. Selective abortion is illegal, and in fact China's government is trying to change cultural attitudes towards women so as to reduce its incidence. You don't even have to read Lonely Planet to learn more; see here, for example.

    23. Re:Hmm by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Regardless of what you may have read in an article, selective infantcide is still very pervasive.

      I know two girls who are only around today because the doctor misread the ultrasound and thought they were a boy. Let me tell you, this doesn't lead to good relations with your parents later in life.

      And sure, it's illegal. Whatever. What the doctor does is smile if it's a boy, frown if it's a girl. Then without anything obvious at all being said, the parents spontaneously decide to abort or not.

      Regardless of if you are for or against abortion, selective abortion is a heinous crime against humanity. The Chinese can easily think us uncivilized because we don't know Chinese manners (which are actually pretty hard to learn), but we can think they uncivilized because of practices like these and others. It drives some of my Chinese (living in China native Chinese) friends crazy when I say that China has a barbaric civilization. =)

    24. Re:Hmm by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, abortion = foeticide because foetus != infant.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    25. Re:Hmm by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let me ask you, is belonging to a different culture justification for denying people rights we consider fundamental?

      Yes because it means the person in question is not part of the "we" and will have different ideas of what rights are fundamental.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    26. Re:Hmm by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to my knowledge. Some societies kill children with certain defects (Sparta was notorious for that, as was medieval Christianity) but inconvenience was never a sufficient reason to kill a child. Of course you probably can't tell the difference between a sperm and a child.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    27. Re:Hmm by Echnin · · Score: 1
      I don't know anything about the biology involved (and am not very good at statistics), but if almost every family that has a daughter attempts to have a second child (I don't know if this is the case), and no family that has gotten a son has a second child, does that really increase the amount of females?

      For those not familiar with the law: if you get a son, you aren't allowed more children; if you get a daughter, you are allowed a "second chance". Thus, any family with a boy does not have a girl, while every family with a girl might have a boy. It should be mentioned that rich people don't have to worry much about the law, because they can just pay the fine.

      --
      Lalala
    28. Re:Hmm by Echnin · · Score: 1

      But then, a family with a girl is likely to have two girls, while a family with a boy will only have one boy. So I guess you (GP) are right.

      --
      Lalala
    29. Re:Hmm by Echnin · · Score: 1

      In this particular case I agree with you, since selective abortion is despicable regardless of the reason, but dismissing a foreign culture as generally "barbaric" without even trying to understand context is a medieval way of thinking. I want to make clear that I disagree strongly with cultural relativism, but comdemning something before trying to understand it breeds hatred and causes wars, and no country in the world can be classified as entirely "barbaric" or, for that matter, perfect. It goes all ways. I have a Chinese friend who says he hates Japanese. I have a Japanese friend who says he hates Chinese. What's the use? It's so pointless! It's alright to criticise aspects of another culture - such as infanticide or selective abortion - but there is nothing worse than blanket condemnation.

      --
      Lalala
    30. Re:Hmm by lastninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are you refering to? I have searched Google.cn and I can not find a reference to this "holding up a line of tanks" that you speak of.

      --
      John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
    31. Re:Hmm by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      Okay. Drop barbaric. How about they're a deeply sexist culture with widespread disregard for human life?

    32. Re:Hmm by TheOrange · · Score: 2, Interesting



      Are you telling me you lack the basic ability to make moral judgements? In other words you could sit by and let someone kill a child because it was culturally exceptable for them? Rationalize it away because of your twisted moral relativism? Beat women and hang teenagers for sexual activity? I want to call you stupid but I am not sure that is appropriate. If you really believe that is right, you aren't only dumb, you are evil.

    33. Re:Hmm by Monokeros · · Score: 1

      I don't think the poster was trying to assert equality between forcibly imprisoning our ancestors in retirement homes and killing babies.

      I think (s)he was merely pointing out that All groups of people do certain horrible things. Some worse than others.

      And I say that's true. While not always happy about it, people can find a justification and generally accept some pretty harsh shit.

      Indeed in a century or two your culture, whatever it is, will be reviled for violating some rights that they will consider "fundamental". Chances are it'll be for something that even you accept. It will be called an "atrocity". They might be right.

      The spirit of the post as I read it was this: "Killing babies is bad, but stop being all high-and-mighty. Judge not lest ye be judged"

      --
      The Statue of Liberty is America's lawn jockey.
    34. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And killing infant girls really isn't pervasive in modern China, even in rural areas, regardless of whatever uninformed drivel Microsoft-NBC is spewing today. Gain some perspective, please.)

      The fact is male children strongly outnumber female children large areas of China and neighboring Korea. This isn't happening out of some freak of nature but because the female children are dying at some point after conception.

      If one in five to one in three female children being killed because they're female isn't "pervasive" I don't know what is.

      People in rural areas would be less likely to do that because the one-child policy isn't enforced as much out there as in the cities anyhow.

    35. Re:Hmm by heli0 · · Score: 1

      "And killing infant girls really isn't pervasive in modern China, even in rural areas, regardless of whatever uninformed drivel Microsoft-NBC is spewing today."

      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?story Id=3499024
      http://www.bowdoin.edu/news/archives/sociology/000 040.shtml

      "China's demographics don't add up, according to a new study. The country's 2000 census indicates 120 boys are born for every 100 girls, the highest ratio ever recorded in human history (in average populations, the sex ratio is 105 to 100)."

      Can you locate a study suggesting a biological cause for this anomaly? Are you suggesting this is just a coincidence?

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    36. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "120 boys are born for every 100 girls," Therefore, selection happens PRIOR to birth. Infanticide ? abortion, and if it's going to be one or the other (which it is, realistically) the latter is preferable, is it not?

    37. Re:Hmm by skajake · · Score: 1

      Wait, so just because the infant is in a protective womb means it isnt an infant? Come again? Sounds like you are grasping at straws to justify abortion.

      --

      ~ Maintainer of the Skajake Projects

    38. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because drowning your child in a burlap sack, is far less merciful then giving someone continuing medical care and observation that you are too busy being gainfully employed to provide yourself.

    39. Re:Hmm by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Just because the infant is 80 years old and wrinkly doesn't mean he's not an infant? Come again? Why should we try them under adult law?

      In other words: There is a clear definition of foetus and a clear definition of infant. If you were to cut the foetus's umbilical cord he'd die, an infant survives that, for example. If you think abortion means killing a child a day before it is born you're misinformed, abortion is only allowed while the organism is still in early stages of development, while it's still a body part.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    40. Re:Hmm by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I'm sitting back and not interfering with the US Government executing its own citizens because of a jury decision despite that being a violation of fundamental human rights. I'm sitting back and not interfering with the NATO running a war of aggression despite having a citizen's duty to prevent a war of aggression at all costs. Who says I'm right and they are wrong with their understanding of morality? Is it moral to kill a mass murderer? Is it moral to kill a heretic?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  5. Oblig by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet China, MMOG play you!

    1. Re:Oblig by BobPaul · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That comment was about as obligatory as getting drunk and beating your wife.

      "But Judge! I couldn't help myself!"

    2. Re:Oblig by masterzora · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    3. Re:Oblig by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      russians != chinese
      2006 != 1998
      nuff said?

    4. Re:Oblig by masterzora · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree with you entirelt that it was a retarded use, I'm just saying that /. seems to think that any loose connection makes it oblig. That and the irony of telling *you* that you must be new here.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
  6. wee! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's the Razon Ramon Hard Gay MMORPG!

    Can you repeatedly go "SEI!" if anyone tries to flame you too!? :D

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:wee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! lameness filter defeating text goes here

  7. Revolutionary idea! by bromodrosis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where do I wait in line for a copy?

    1. Re:Revolutionary idea! by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      No need to, in Soviet China, games play you!

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  8. New Tagging System by dcapel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It gave me the option of tagging the topic. I entered 'scary'. :/

    --
    DYWYPI?
    1. Re:New Tagging System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I put in Orwellian.

  9. Excellent advice by the_other_one · · Score: 5, Funny

    in real life, Mao believed that deflowering virgins would help him live longer

    All I need now is a steady stream of corsage bearing virgins.

    Just one question: What do I do with the flowers?

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    1. Re:Excellent advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grind them up and mix them into a large vat of hot snake urine.

    2. Re:Excellent advice by Ekhymosis · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, it comes from an ancient Taoist belief. Not too sure exactly what, but the elderly men were deemed to be suffering from a lack of balance (Ying and Yang) so it was believed that the virgin woman would provide some counter to the ailments the elderly men were suffering. This is why back in the old days old men were always shagging young girls and hoarding virgins.

      Gettin' some ying for their yang! (There goes my karma...)

      --
      Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
    3. Re:Excellent advice by Ekhymosis · · Score: 0
      --
      Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
    4. Re:Excellent advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, I'd probably give that a positive one, if nothing else to pull you out of negative karma (looks like that last offtopic mod left you posting at 0)

      AC in case I get mod points any time soon

    5. Re:Excellent advice by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> Mao believed that deflowering virgins would help him live longer

      He lived to be 84!

    6. Re:Excellent advice by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

      if slashdot was around back then, he'd still be kicking :)

    7. Re:Excellent advice by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      yeah, Mao was HAWT!

    8. Re:Excellent advice by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      Nobody needs an ancient Taoist belief to shag young women and hoard virgins.

    9. Re:Excellent advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not too sure exactly what, but the elderly men were deemed to be suffering from a lack of balance (Ying and Yang) so it was believed that

      Ah! So THAT's what "bringing back the balance (to the force)" means...

  10. Behold! by zephc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have level 25 Narcing ability! I can tell the authorities in mere seconds if I see someone reading banned materials or thinking subversive thoughts!

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:Behold! by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      The Block Monitor class also has +5 to the "not being first against the wall" skill.

  11. Not "Bad" So Much As "Boring" by cmholm · · Score: 1
    Steady there, TeX. While it might be reasonable to assume that the parent post was a slam against the POV the game is trying to sell, it's also plausable that s/he thinks the concept won't prove compelling to the vast majority of gamers in the PRC, or anywhere else for that matter.

    What's odd is that the game is a throwback to something the CPC really quit trying to sell to anyone but party cadres. However, there's never homogeneity of opinion in any organization, including the Party.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  12. Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by technoextreme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To monitor what people are doing on their computers.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by pomo+monster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Insightful? Hardly. Believe it or not, China isn't some kind of Orwellian nightmare where everything you say or write is monitored by truncheon-dragging thugs, or by brains cloistered in the Ministry of Thoughtcrime, for that matter. Nowadays, you could parade around downtown Shanghai yelling "Down with the Party!" and people would care about as much as people in New York care about the drunk guy on the subway prophesizing the return of Jesus. Don't get me wrong--China's certainly no paradise for dissenting voices, but then, neither was America in the '60s and '70s. Frankly, I think you have a better chance of being spied on by the government today in America than you would in China.

      That's not to excuse the ongoing horrors perpetrated by the Chinese government. But I'd really like to know where this popular conception comes from, of China as equivalent to North Korea or Zimbabwe.

    2. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by heinousjay · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Anything in the way of proof for these assertations? I suspect it's just your hatred of all things American, but I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by steelfood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite frankly, both the US and China are not particularly good places to live for one who values civil rights. Just say certain keywords loud enough in the US (I need not say which ones) and I'm certain the men in black suits will start paying attention.

      However, the US isn't quite as experienced in these matters as China. My communications might get monitored for mentioning said keywords, but that doesn't mean the FBI or NSA is going to show up at my door and disappear me right away. It's just beginning to get bad in the US, but until the federal government does away with things like due process, it's nowhere near as bad as it is in China. Having rights slowly being taken away is not the same as having no rights to begin with.

      The only advantage China has over the US (and what makes what you say true) is that China is enormous. Can't monitor everybody, so they go for the outspoken ones only.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by pomo+monster · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got friends from Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong whom I met in college. Having grown up in Ohio, living and talking with people with different perspectives really enlightened me as to what life is actually like for Chinese citizens today. I also happen to read a lot, and pay attention to a diverse set of media. I find The Economist particularly illuminating--read the articles in that section, and you can come away with a pretty good sense of what it's like to live in China.

      BTW, what makes you think I hate America? I do know enough about China to know that I'd prefer to live here in New York, where the culture is much more tolerant. And thanks for "foe"-ing me for daring to challenge your preconceptions of China. How open-minded of you.

    5. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having them taken away slowly may not be the same but either way you end up with no rights

    6. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      Quite frankly, both the US and China are not particularly good places to live for one who values civil rights. Just say certain keywords loud enough in the US (I need not say which ones) and I'm certain the men in black suits will start paying attention.
      I can't really tell what you are trying to imply. Can you please give a few examples?
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    7. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by readin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please do me a favor. Go to your favorite bookstore in Shanghai (where you can supposedly parade around downtown yelling "Down with the Party") and pick up a copy of any book by former President Lee Deng-hui of Taiwan. If you can't find such a book, try going to another book store in Shanghai. If you fail to find any of Lee's books in Shanghai, start working the bookstores in another Chinese city. Please continue this exercise for as long as it takes to find one of Lee's books in China.
      Or, as an alternative for disappearing for just as long, walk down a street in Shanghai yelling "Taiwan is a free and independent country!"
      I suggest these as better ways to spend your time than making absurd comparisons between the United States and China. Notice, that in trying to make you go away for a long time, I didn't suggest that you walk down a street in New York yelling "America invaded Iraq!" or ask you to go to a book store in New York and look for something by Karl Marx.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    8. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Americans are brainwashed by misleading and biased media and can't make their own judgement. That's how the system works here in the U.S.

    9. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      I believe a certain phrase that contains the personal pronoun "I", a synonym for the word "harm", and also the word "President" would get you a visit from the Secret Service. Of course, that wouldn't be Free Speech as you'd be making a threat against someone. (Hell, back in the 19th Century, if you said you were going to kill someone, you meant it and your target could shoot you in the back and claim self-defense.)

    10. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      I believe a certain phrase that contains the personal pronoun "I", a synonym for the word "harm", and also the word "President" would get you a visit from the Secret Service. Of course, that wouldn't be Free Speech as you'd be making a threat against someone. (Hell, back in the 19th Century, if you said you were going to kill someone, you meant it and your target could shoot you in the back and claim self-defense.)
      I know. It was just a joke. I actually knew someone who claimed that they were visited CIA for threatening the president. Didn't know if it was the truth or not but she never ended up going to the Washington DC field trip.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    11. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also execute over 10,000 people a year (and possibly many times that number), often without trial. (Google "strike hard campaigns.")

      They lock political dissidents away in mental institutions.

      They continue to deify Mao, whose backward reign would read like a comedy if not for the tens of millions of dead Chinese he left in his wake.

      I don't have a problem with the Chinese people. But the Chinese government is one n of the most embarrassingly backwards, oppressive and evil institutions in the world.

      But hey, at least they're not Iran.

    12. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by EvilNecro · · Score: 1

      True story...

      Long ago, in the days of modem based BBS systems (a Citadel syetem, if you remember those). We used to do song parodies and what not. Anyway, a friend of mine re-did "Cop Killer" as "Clinton Killer". The sysop did indeed receive a visit. Though we later learned that one of the more fanatical system users (one of those "fur sticker" people) had placed an anonymous phone call about the whole thing.

    13. Re:Easy way to install rootkits onto computers by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I marked you as a foe quite some time ago, due to the fact that I disagree with your opinions quite frequently. Don't worry, it's just to draw attention to your posts. I don't use it to descore you or anything - and I read at -1 in any case.

      I didn't really evidence any preconceptions of China in my post. I've been working with, and friends with, a number of Chinese citizens and former Chinese citizens for many years. I live and work in Washington DC, one of the most international cities on the planet. There's no rational way to describe me as a bigot.

      This particular sentence is what prompted my response: Frankly, I think you have a better chance of being spied on by the government today in America than you would in China. I was simply interested in what you had to say regarding this, and the rest of your post. I come off flamishly because frankly, this is Slashdot, and I don't care what anyone here thinks of me. I'm much nicer in person.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  13. Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    It happens all the time in communist China and it is a major part of their culture.

    Here are some facts for other mods to read:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5953508

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by kongjie · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The original post referred to "killing infant girls."

      Infanticide does not happen "all the time" in China. Your MSN reference noted two phenomena: sex determination via selective abortion and infanticide. One is much more pervasive in China and I can assure you it's not infanticide, which was more common before the advent of Communism in China.

      Speaking of Communism, you're also way off base blaming "Communism" for this phenomenon. China has a one-child policy which most experts feel is a necessary thing. It's because of their population size, not ideology. The preference for sons has its origins in China's agrarian/Confucian roots. It's an unfortunate thing that when you combine the "good" one-child policy with the "bad" preference for sons, you end up with trouble on a large scale.

      In fact, if it hadn't been for China's best-known "Communist" leader, i.e., Mao Zedong, the population problem might not be so extreme, but unfortunately Mao held that China's greatest exploitable resource was manpower and thus more babies was more power, so he ignored calls for population control and urged baby-making instead. So in a sense the situation is opposite of how you portray it.

    2. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by pomo+monster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rather than use policy and statistics refute your egregiously false (and borderline racist) conception of Chinese culture, I'll just point you to some resources so that you can begin to correct your ignorance, if you so desire.

    3. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the gender representation in China isn't really that alarming. According to the CIA World Factbook, males represent 53.0% of the 0-14 age group (lower for the 15-65 age group), compared to 51.1% in the US, and the UK for the same 0-14 age range.

      If you want to see something really disturbing, look at the 15-65 age group for mid-east countries such as Kuwait and Qatar: 63.8% and 69.5% respectively.. ~2:1.

    4. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by Rei · · Score: 1

      The sex-selective abortion and, less commonly, infanticide, are much more common in the countryside. If you had followed Chinese news, the governent has been trying to stop this. They've taken rather extreme measures, in fact, such as outlawing doctors from telling the parents what the sex of their child is going to be. They've also done some less extreme (and rather cheesy, but well meaning) efforts to promote the value of women in society (usually targetted at men in a "imagine how bad a world without women would be!" style)

      --
      Democratic Party needs food badly.
    5. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing, you see, is that Kuwait and Qatar don't have a population of a billion people.

      There are like 840,000 Quatari and 2.2 million Kuwaiti, that's respective male excedents of 155,400 and 256,000. China's 53% vs 51% for a population of 1,300,000,000 translates into a male excess of 26,000,000...

      You could replace the whole Kuwaiti population by women 10 times and you still wouldn't have enough wives for these guys...

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    6. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it's widely held that sexual satisfaction and violent tendencies are inversely proportional. China's problem gets lost in the averages, but Kuwait & Qatar's problem is a pervasive social ill that influences the entire culture.

    7. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 0

      I dont quite get the idea behind the one child policy. Two people die - one is born. Are they crazy enough to set their goals to REDUCE the population of the country?

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    8. Re:Hey mods!!! That's not off topic by popeguilty · · Score: 1

      Considering the population of China, it's rather irrational for them to increase in population. ...just like it is for the rest of us, but China's got it really bad.

  14. GBLT Friendly? by Zibara · · Score: 1

    Remember the whole GBLT-friendly controversey in World of Warcraft? I can only imagine what the situation must be like in this "game." I wonder what the GMs are like...

    1. Re:GBLT Friendly? by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      They can 'take you out of the game' in more ways than one ;)

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  15. You look more and more like everyone else.. by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 4, Funny
    'Every time you are promoted to a higher level, your clothes will become more average,' he said. I'm pretty sure this isn't a translation screw up. The longer you grind, the more you look like everyone else.

    And this is different from WoW in what way?

    1. Re:You look more and more like everyone else.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen bro... I'm sick and tired of seeing every single raider decked out in the same gear...

    2. Re:You look more and more like everyone else.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sick and tired of seeing every single raider decked out in the same gear...

      I'm sick and tired of WoW fuckheads thinking they're doing something new and interesting. Nothing but a bunch of shitbags and homos.

    3. Re:You look more and more like everyone else.. by Tedium+Unleased · · Score: 1

      Good point - I played WoW for a few months... I had some nice (looking) sets of equipment around 15-35th level.. after that I sorta didn't like how my character looked anymore or how any other characters around my level looked even when I got to 60th.

    4. Re:You look more and more like everyone else.. by Malakusen · · Score: 1

      On the brighter side, it makes it a lot easier to figure out what your opponents in the BGs have equipped. Oh look! The whole opposing raid has their tier 2 lvl 60 gear! We die now!

      --
      Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  16. Defining irony... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...would be if all PC gamers in China were REQUIRED to play a few hours of this game a day.

    Muha muahahahhhaahaaa

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Defining irony... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      That would take them out of their goldfarming business that not-so-coincidentally is on unlimited time (versus the limits on their domestic servers). Not as if they don't have people keeping them busy in the quest to keep them from doing their "Heavenly Mandated" duty to farm (valuables).

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  17. A good fit by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amazing how well the ideological absurdity of utopian communism finds its expression in the mechanics of a multi-player online game. Or maybe it's not that amazing. Surely you World of Warcraft players, engaged in the "grind" of leveling, have heard an Orwellian Animal Farm voice calling "Work is Fun. Fun is Work. Fun is Unfun." Co-operation and submission to the group is explicitly rewarded through "Guilds" and similar organizations.

    Of course, not only is the gameplay of multi-player online games ideologically communist, but the mechanics of game economies are explicitly communist. They are planned economies. Gold farming and black markets are exactly the same phenomenon. The Chinese Socialist online game will be interesting to watch for observers due to this inevitablity. How will they deal with external and internal black markets? Will it be possible to distinguish countermeasures gameplay from reality as ingame countermeasures are taken?

    1. Re:A good fit by jandersen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good heavens, man, is this really the best you can manage? Talk about displaying your ignorance. But perhaps this is the way Americans think? A quick comparison:

      Communism:

      - in America the manifestation of anything evil, repressive or stupidly unrealistic is labelled 'communism'. Satan is a Communist, no doubt. Nobody knows why.

      - in the rest of the world 'Communism' is a political viewpoint, something about sharing etc etc.

      Capitalism:

      - in America the manifestation of anything good, true and beautiful. God is definitely a capitalist. Again, nobody really knows why this is the case, but if you ask wuaetions or express dissent, then you are a Communist!!

      - in the rest of the world 'Capitalism' is another political viewpoint, something about money, but who really cares?

      Democracy:

      - in America, a synonym for 'capitalism', 'freedom' and doing what your priest/pastor/church leader tells you.

      - in the rest of the world this is simply a method for choosing who should lead the country.

      To an American an expression such as 'communist democracy' is an oxymoron, something that makes no sense. To the rest of the world this is not inherently contradictory, and indeed there are examples of countries that approach this - Denmark, Sweden and Norway have at times not been far from that.

      The very strange and indeed scary thing is that America - or at least their president - think they have to go out in the world and teach everybody else how to think. But how can one even comtemplate such a thing when Americans are mentally so far from the rest of us?

    2. Re:A good fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, actually, you can't have a communist democracy, because communism requires a totalitarian government. You simply can't allow the slaves, sorry, the workers, to choose other forms of government, because they'll choose the freedom provided by personal economic power (money) if you do. That's why every communist leader has been a dictator.

      I'm no fan of America, but I'd rather be run by a George W. than Stalin, Mao, or Castro, who (IMO) are as bad as Hitler and Mussolini.

    3. Re:A good fit by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Well, actually, you can't have a communist democracy, because communism requires a totalitarian government. You simply can't allow the slaves, sorry, the workers, to choose other forms of government, because they'll choose the freedom provided by personal economic power (money) if you do. That's why every communist leader has been a dictator."

      No. Trying to enforce _your_ own point of view, regardless of what people want, is what's incompatible with democracy. It's not even just about communism. The USA McCarthy era trying to enforce capitalism and weed out any communist thinking wasn't a particularly democratic process or a case of "land of the free".

      Freedom and democracy mean that the people are able to choose whatever they choose, including communism, capitalism, something in between, or something very stupid. (E.g., ancient Athens democratically chose to wage war on Sparta, even though the power of Athens was naval and Sparta was landlocked on a mountain. And most land battles had been won for Athens by the Spartan elites. Let's just say Athens never recovered from that mistake.) But that's what democracy means: letting the people choose for themselves.

      And there's this fundamentally post-McCarthy American point of view that, given freedom and a right to choose, anyone would choose a cult of the psychopaths. (In the medical sense, not in the axe murderer sense.) That anyone would choose a dog-eat-dog world, where it's only right to be chewed up and spit out by those more powerful than you. And that there are no other shades of grey.

      In practice, in Europe for example most countries have democratically chosen something in between. Something where enough economic freedom is left to keep the economy going, but there are plenty of safety nets for those who aren't CEOs. Some countries, as was pointed out, veered pretty far to the left.

      But even if I was to accept your points, the GP point still stands: there's something particularly stupid in claiming basically "everything I don't like is communistic." In this case someone argues that "working" in WoW to gain an advantage over other players is somehow communistic, because he doesn't like that. Excuse me? Last I've heard having to work to gain an advantage was the very fundament of capitalism.

      That's really the whole problem. For some people "communism", "capitalism" and so on have lost any trace of their real meaning and are some generic synonim for "evil" and "good". Everything they like, including getting a free meal, is "capitalistic" and "democratic". Everything they dislike, e.g., having to work to get a reward, is inherently "communist" and "totalitarian". They've become just buzzwords triggering some Pavlov's Dog kind of prescribed response, without any thinking involved.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    4. Re:A good fit by Dobeln · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "in the rest of the world 'Communism' is a political viewpoint, something about sharing etc etc."

      No, to semi-educated Slashdotters 'Communism' is 'something about sharing'. Communism (I.e. Marxist communism, the only version that survived the 19:th century) is the teaching of the radical remaking of society and mankind itself through first civil war and revolution, then the supreme rule of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat'. This is also how Communists have (attempted) to go about (with some variation) creating the Communist ideal state.

      What has been implemented in some* Nordic countries, notably my own country (Sweden) is rather Reformism, which is founded on the rejection of Communism and the implementation of gradual reform of society (as the name implies). This also means that Sweden has always had a relatively vital private sector with many large multinational corporations. (Volvo, SAAB, ASEA, SKF, IKEA, H&M, etc.) Still, a larger share of savings and income transfers are routed through the state than in the rest of Europe (on the order of 10 percent of GDP or so).

    5. Re:A good fit by danpsmith · · Score: 1
      Satan is a Communist, no doubt. Nobody knows why.

      I'd always assumed that Satan was a capitalist. Either way I know I feel his presence when I walk into walmart... Maybe he just likes the cheap lighter fluid.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    6. Re:A good fit by Detritus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Communism is a mountain of corpses. By their acts you shall know them, and not by their words.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:A good fit by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1, Troll

      - in America the manifestation of anything evil, repressive or stupidly unrealistic is labelled 'communism'. Satan is a Communist, no doubt. Nobody knows why.

      Er, Stalin had Satan beat cold. Check the body count when you total up Soviet, Chinese, Cambodian, et al. murders of their own citizens.

      Communism is also institutionalized theft. Any country you can't leave without getting shot in the back is evil.

      To an American an expression such as 'communist democracy' is an oxymoron, something that makes no sense. To the rest of the world this is not inherently contradictory, and indeed there are examples of countries that approach this - Denmark, Sweden and Norway have at times not been far from that.

      Communism != Socialism. BTW, take another look at the so-called socialist paradise of Scandinavia.. Their standards of life are stagnant or falling, what's the unemployment rate again? White power movements? You're SOAKING in it! Oh, and thanks to unchecked Muslim immigration, you're going to have some serious race riots very shortly, and your precious "social liberty" will burn. While in America immigrants go thru the wringer but at least at the end they're Americans, ready to put the next batch of immigrants thru the same wringer. The enemy will laugh as you drown in your own correctness.

      America's defeat of Communism was at least as important as the Union victory in the Civil War IMHO. A Manichean struggle which we won thanks to the stalwart strength of the great troika (Reagan, Thatcher and JP2).

      The very strange and indeed scary thing is that America - or at least their president - think they have to go out in the world and teach everybody else how to think. But how can one even comtemplate such a thing when Americans are mentally so far from the rest of us?

      Thinking so far from "the rest of you" is what makes America great. Even at our worst, our unemployment rate is better than any in Europe. Where did the PC come from? Where did Unix come from? Where did the Internet come from? America is the land of disruption, of creative destruction, and Old Europe is the senile old (and getting older) grandpa.

      BTW, read your history, Reagan was called a cowboy and a warmonger, and he beat the Russians. Keep calling Bush a cowboy and a warmonger, and he'll beat the terrorists! How many times must Europinkos be wrong before they admit it? Have they no shame??

    8. Re:A good fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you are correct on this with a lot of people. It is rather convienant that a person such as yourself can wrap up a vastly diverse population in such a neat and tidey littel package of stereotype. Even more amazing that a person who bases all of their judgments on stereotypes manges to call otheres ignorant. American is not george bush. George Bush is a moron who didnt even come to power through democracy, he was apointed by some florida judges who happened to have been on his campaign staff. Just because we are bossed around by crooked rich politicians and america is an aristocratic plutocracy, doesnt mean we are all clue less.

    9. Re:A good fit by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, like Walmart, he is a mix of the worst aspects of both....

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    10. Re:A good fit by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Freedom and democracy mean that the people are able to choose whatever they choose, including communism, capitalism, something in between, or something very stupid.

      I recently learned that Benito Mussolini's granddaughter Alessandra Mussolini (who is also a fascist) has a seat in the European Parliament.

      In a free society you can't prevent people from being assholes; even elected to democratic institutions.

      --

      What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
    11. Re:A good fit by TimboJones · · Score: 1

      Well... at least the trains run on time...

    12. Re:A good fit by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      having to work to get a reward, is inherently "communist" and "totalitarian"

      Actually, working to get rewards is very capitalist. Volunteering for overtime to get more money, working harder to get a promotion, etc. We teach those principles to our children even, doing chores to earn an allowance.

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    13. Re:A good fit by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
      Trying to enforce _your_ own point of view, regardless of what people want, is what's incompatible with democracy.
      And yet we go to war all the time. "Fuck you, Iraq. You will be a democracy, so sayeth the Lord Almighty." I'll let you guess who I am paraphrasing here.
    14. Re:A good fit by chefren · · Score: 1
      America's defeat of Communism was at least as important as the Union victory in the Civil War IMHO. A Manichean struggle which we won thanks to the stalwart strength of the great troika (Reagan, Thatcher and JP2).



      I prefer to think:

      1. Communism isn't "defeated".
      2. The Soviet Union "defeated" itself in the end.

  18. Payback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I will be spending all my time farming socks. I can hear them now, damm these American sock farmers.

    1. Re:Payback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I for one welcome our new sock-farming overlords.

  19. LFM raid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LFM raid on Forbidden City meet in Tiananmen

  20. Do we get to protest standing infront of tanks? by ninji · · Score: 1

    We get to meet mao, do we get to protest at tiananmen square?

    1. Re:Do we get to protest standing infront of tanks? by eamonman · · Score: 1

      It would most definitely win the "first easter egg to incarcerate the entire dev team" award.

      --
      0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    2. Re:Do we get to protest standing infront of tanks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't protest about anything in the game. The thought police - sorry, Game Masters - have the authority to delete more than just your character. Now be a good slave. Communism is great.

  21. Balanced Economy? by billysk8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another enticing feature in the socialist game is that the level 1 sock menders make the same gold/minute as the level 99 epic monster slayers!

  22. OT by Spaceman40 · · Score: 1

    I know - it's comments like those that make me wish there was a "-1, idiot" moderation...

    --
    I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
  23. Seriously, I want to try this! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This may sound messed up, but in an age of Yet Another "Madden" Football Game and Zombie Fragger 9 (or whatever), we finally have a game that piqued my interest. I'm not being ironic for once. I doubt there will be an English translation and even if there were, there wouldn't be US servers... but if there were, I really would consider trying it! I mean, it would be free for the people, right?

    Doesn't anyone see how this could be fun? Yeah, mending socks doesn't sound like a thrill, but what do you do for XPs when you're weak in a commercial fantasy game? Endlessly stab chickens? How is that more fun? No, I think mending socks in a sweatshop that more of a feel of honest labor.

    I think my talent would be in being a newspaper reporter for the government. I'd try my best to sound like this North Korean paper. Really, it would be a blast! And I bet there would be all sorts of neat quests, like stopping burglars, helping fishermen, getting a village to quit smoking... the sort of stuff that would be really refreshing after months of "deliver this scroll to Naldemor and you shall receive this +2 sword and lots of XP!" Yes, it would take a lot of creativity to make this game fun, but I guess I am one of these people who still appreciates creativity.

    1. Re:Seriously, I want to try this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please look up the definition of Ironic, thanks. (I think you mean sarcastic)

  24. translation mess up? by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 5, Informative
    I read a news on tihs report in Chinese.

    From this article "Every time you are promoted to a higher level, your clothes will become more average."

    "More average" is not it is supposed to mean. That word should mean "simple".

    Also, the title should read the Chinese Revolutionary MMO.This has to do with the person Lei Feng itself and the background at that time. "He was characterized by propaganda as a selfless and modest figure after his death and consequently was an idol to many." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lei_Feng

    He is protrayed as a selfless person, including his accidential death at 22. A quote from him: "Life is limited, but the service to the country is boundless. I want to use my limited life to boundless serve the country."

    It was the time whe loyality to the party that matter's most. In was in the 1950 and 60's in the history, see:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Revolution

  25. Try out in the rural areas by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    In rural areas, infancide is brutally rampant. Since theres no accountability/no effective police force/everyone knows each other and therefore won't speak out again it, its insanely easy for a baby girl to "fall down a well" or "die in its sleep" and have NO ONE question it.

    Hell, even if it happened in the U.S. some people wouldn't question it. "The pillows accidently smothered it in its sleep. We should be sueing the pillow company instead for this tragedy!"

  26. Score one for propaganda by aendeuryu · · Score: 4, Funny

    I really hate it when governments try to sneak propaganda into computer games. This indoctrination of youth is really creepy. You're never going to see me advocating or playing a game like this. Those Chinese are just so... so... sinister.

    [/goes back to playing America's Army]

  27. What about the end boss? by Langfat · · Score: 1

    I can just picture a giant Dalai Lama breathing fire and throwing his nobel peace prize at you...

  28. Wake up Mods, -1 Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Criticising a country because they can't afford regular abortions is a little hypocritical. If you are so concerned send em some ultrasound or whatever to determine sex and build some safe clinics.

  29. Enough with the teasing.... by gristlebud · · Score: 1

    Where's the torrent?

    --
    OK...
    I can do this. I am, after all,
    a superhero!
  30. Parent is right by Oldsmobile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most slashdotters don't know a damn thing about China. It is like listening to a bunch of humanities students talking about computers.

    "Man, I just re-formatted my processor because I got a virus or a bug or something in my window."

    "Yeah I know, you should use that linux-program I heard it really zaps those bugs!"

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    1. Re:Parent is right by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      I know comp.sci grad students that know little about home PCs as well. Anthropologists may in general be luddites, but understanding the workings of a PC/OS is something you go to a technical school for.

  31. LGBT or GLBT, not GBLT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucking ignoramus. What's GBLT? Is that a sandwich?

  32. Talk about missing the point by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amazing how the same lame sophistry dating all the way back to the first MUDs, and maybe even before, still gets spewed as if they were some deep revelation about humanity.

    In fact, probably even before. I can imagine some "but I really want to start directly at the top of Pong's high score table" whiner sitting on the side and spewing rationalizations about how actually playing the game is "work", and how those poor Pong players got scammed into working in their free time and paying for it. (And make no mistake, playing arcade games used to cost a _lot_ more than 13$ a month.) Fast forward a bit in time and you find the same kind of people whining about how deluded people are to invest any kind of time or effort into their entertainment and, god forbid, to cooperate with other players.

    That's all that levels, xp, epic equipment, or PvP ranks are: a way to keep the score, not all that different from Pong's or PacMan's high score table, or from a RL football team's rank in the leagues and championships. And some people "grind" for that score (in fact, for some trying to beat the high score _is_ the challenge and the fun), some people just play the game for what it is and let the score just happen on its own, and... some busibodies stay on the sideline and try to sound deeply philosophical in their lament about how sad it is that people put up with "having" to spend hours on their entertainment, or "having" to interact with other people or whole groups. (E.g., the group around the arcade machine.)

    And yes, some form of coop play always existed even in those arcade machines. Ever since the first game got a fire button to mash, in addition to the directional joystick/trackball/whatever, I recall people "grouping" and having specialized "group roles" at the arcades. E.g., one would guide the character/ship/whatever around and dodge enemy fire, and one was mashing the fire button and dropping the AOE "bomb" at the right moment for maximum effect. I.e., using the modern MMO terms very loosely, one was the "tank" keeping the team from taking damage and one was the "damage dealer", even if noone used those words at the time. I.e., even when the game didn't actually offer the in-game mechanics for that, some found their own makeshift ways to cooperate and interact with other humans, regardless of how many others sit around and whine about how everyone else should be a loner.

    Get this: it's not a matter of "work" or "grind" to some end. That's the actual game. It's ok if I "have" to spend some hours doing quests in WoW, because exactly that was the whole point and purpose in the first place: to waste some hours in a game. Gaining some level or armour piece at the end is just a virtual pat on the back, but the real purpose was to waste those hours in the first place. That's what entertainment is all about: filling your time with something better than staring at the walls.

    It may surprise you, but it's not just MMOs. Actually _most_ of the RL passtimes need some time or effort, and most are someone else's "work". Do you enjoy tweaking your car? That's a mechanic's "work". Do you enjoy going dancing? A professional dancer would call that "work". Taking digital photos in the park with your cool new camera? Yep, pro photographers would call that "work". Play tennis or basketball with your friends? That's a pro athlete's "work". _Watch_ sports? Sports journalists do that for a living. Watch a movie and maybe discuss them with your pals? Yep, that's a movie reviewer's "work". Etc.

    You'll notice that they also all involve some time spent on that hobby. E.g., a movie buff may spend hours a day "grinding" through movies on their DVD player. E.g., someone with a digital camera may "grind" for hours taking photos of squirrels in the park. Etc. Some of those, *gasp* may even involve "grouping" with people. E.g., going dancing with a couple of friends instead of doing it solo. Some of those *gasp* may involve joining some kind of a "guild". E.g., joining some photo community or whatever kind of associati

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Talk about missing the point by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are two types of motivations for playing MMORPGS:
      a) Playing the game for the fun. Enjoying walking around, iteracting with other players, discovering new places, facing new challenges and beating them and maybe getting a cool outfit for your avatar in the process - playing because it feels good.
      b) Being the best, having the fattest loot and letting everybody else know about it. Being able to publicly proclaiming one's 1337ness, rubbing it in everybody else's face and going around calling all else noobs - in other words, an ego trip.

      The big conflict between this two factions is born out of the following factors:
      1. Casual players - those that cannot (for example because of work) or will not (because gaming is not the most important thing on their lifes) dedicate a significant part of their time to gaming - will NEVER be able to outcompete type b) players. They simply don't have the time for it
      2. Type b) players - those that do it for the ego-trip - tend to be less mature (typically younger) than the type a) ones. This is because most people reach a point of their lifes after which they don't need to prove themselfs to others (in a game, of all things) in order to feel good about themselfs. For such persons, being successful and aknowledged as such by others still feels good but is not NEEDED - they don't have the drive to waste countless hours doing something repetitive to go from 7th to 6th in some ladder or other inside a game (in real life they might have that drive because it will give tangible rewards, not so in a game)
      3. Most MMORPGs reward players persistence in doing something (for example, going again and again to farm an instance) with items or increased avatar ablities (levels) that allow them to be more effective than other players. This increase effectiveness is not only applicable in PvE (player versus environment) encounters but in many MMORPGs (certainly for WoW) in PvP (player versus player) encounters. Type b) players will, independently of their SKILL and purelly because they play more hours, pretty much always have the best equipment/highest level and thus be more likelly to defeat type a) players of equal or superior skill in PvP encounters. In most MMORPGs (WoW is a good example here), a slight difference of avatar levels translates into an enormous game-mechanics-generated benefict to the player with the highest level avatar
      4. In some MMORPGs players play for different factions and are allowed to attack each other in most places in the world (again WoW in PvP servers is like this). It is a very common event that some player with higher levels and/or beter equipment will enter an area filled with lower-level players of the other faction and activelly go after and kill any players they found from the other faction, even though, game wise they get no rewards for it. Another common sight is higher level players killing any lower level player from the other faction that simply crosses their path. See my coment above on maturity for possible explanations.


      To summon it, less mature players with the drive to spend enormous ammounts of time doing repetitive tasks in order to increase their 1337ness and (due to few or no responsabilities ) plenty of free time on their hands (type b) are, purelly due to game mechanics that reward repetitive behaviour, placed in a position in which they can easilly spoil the enjoyment of those players that play purelly for the fun of playing (type a). Some of these type b players take advantage of such built-in game mechanicas and will actually go out of their way to pester all other players.

      Hence the conflict.

      Personally i would love to see some type of player segregation (into different servers) on the basis of maturity. I doubt that this will ever happen within a single game - most likelly the segregation will naturally occur as game publishers put out more games aimed at the casual player crowd.
    2. Re:Talk about missing the point by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      you're just a noob :P joking. . . I'm an A, too.

      seriously though, you've struck the pitch into the stratosphere with that! (well, atleast in modern games such as WoW)

      Take for example, a friend of mine told me he was rolling a new character and I should do the same, so I did. 3 weeks later he's level 60 and I'm level 11 and taking some serious flak over it too. . . I'm such a noob and all that funk.

      I've lost my point now, but I suppose the question to ponder is which one of us is getting the best value out of the game? Is it him for being uberleet with the phat lewt, is it me for the sheer number of dumb chuck norris jokes I hear (and sometimes giggle at) in the noob areas?

      *insert witty comment in here*

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    3. Re:Talk about missing the point by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Casual players - those that cannot (for example because of work) or will not (because gaming is not the most important thing on their lifes) dedicate a significant part of their time to gaming - will NEVER be able to outcompete type b) players. They simply don't have the time for it

      I play pool now and again. It is unfair that I can't compete with people who play it for several hours every day? Should the pockets be made 12" across to level the playing field?

      This is because most people reach a point of their lifes after which they don't need to prove themselfs to others (in a game, of all things) in order to feel good about themselfs. For such persons, being successful and aknowledged as such by others still feels good but is not NEEDED - they don't have the drive to waste countless hours doing something repetitive to go from 7th to 6th in some ladder or other inside a game

      Some people like to compete and succeed. Perhaps you weren't aware, but competition is a natural human instict, and is very healthy. I don't understand at all people who don't like competition. It reflects the real world, as we don't like in a communist dystopia where no-one can be any better or more successful than anyone else.

      In most MMORPGs (WoW is a good example here), a slight difference of avatar levels translates into an enormous game-mechanics-generated benefict to the player with the highest level avatar

      That's more an issue of game balance than a difference in abilities between characters. Why should someone putting time into a game not be able to improve their character? Part of the whole enjoyment of such games is the gradual increase in power, strength, skills, weapons etc. If you stayed exactly the same no matter what happened, there wouldn't be much achievement.

      It is a very common event that some player with higher levels and/or beter equipment will enter an area filled with lower-level players of the other faction and activelly go after and kill any players they found from the other faction, even though, game wise they get no rewards for it.

      Killing enemies is part of the game. If you're an enemy of someone, why should they spare you? Because it hurts your feelings? Many games are set up in some sort of 'war' scenario. I'm sure that if in WWII a Russian tank found a lone German soldier, the tank wouldn't spare him just because the German was less capable. You know, some of us actually /enjoy/ the excitement of playing a game where other people can kill you, even when you don't want it? There isn't much adrenaline in playing a game where you can be 100% safe all the time.

      Another common sight is higher level players killing any lower level player from the other faction that simply crosses their path. See my coment above on maturity for possible explanations.

      Maturity? Get down off your high horse, I used to play a MMORPG where killing other players was pretty much the whole point, and it was populated largely by people in their late 20s/30s, most people were pretty mature. But don't let facts get in the way of making yourself feel superior to people who beat you at computer games.

    4. Re:Talk about missing the point by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      I play pool now and again. It is unfair that I can't compete with people who play it for several hours every day? Should the pockets be made 12" across to level the playing field?

      The difference is that in pool (and every meatspace game I can think of), an experienced player's advantage comes from his, um, experience. Pool doesn't innately reward you for playing a lot--it's your ability to learn from your past successes and mistakes that makes you a better player. The rules are the same for both players--the laws of physics don't become more forgiving for someone who's played more.

      You can't deny that WoW is very raid-centric, and that you'll do far better with a modicum of skill and a tier 2 epic set than you will with amazing reflexes, strategic brilliance and a Shadowcraft set.

      Honestly, this philosophy probably appeals to more people than the truly level playing field of most games. In most games of skill, a small minority of players wins almost all the time. (In baseball, for example, you'll see many of the same names at the top of the home run list year after year.) Some people are just more skilled than others, and there's really not that much that anyone can do about it. (I could practice golf for twelve hours every day for the next ten years, and I still probably couldn't compete with Tiger Woods.) But no one likes to lose, and unhappy people don't keep their subscriptions active. And so WoW has become a candy-coated world in which skill isn't really a factor, everything comes easily with the right amount of effort, and anyone can be successful if they spend enough time playing.

      There's nothing wrong with that. Judging by the sales numbers, a lot of people like that kind of thing. But it is a radical departure from almost everything that came before it, and I think people tend to ignore that. The bottom line, of course, is that if you don't like it, you should quit whining and play something else.

      Pre-endgame WoW is a deep, amazing game. But once you get into raiding, it degenerates into a boring, repetitive timesink. There's nothing new left to see, and nothing left to do but try to get the most purple items, and then act like a jackass to everyone who has fewer than you. It's not like you have anything better to do while you're waiting for those two hour queues to pop.

      This inequality completely ruins PvP, since everyone who's put in the hundreds of hours clearing Blackwing Lair is at a huge mechanical advantage. If that's your thing, then by all means, have fun. I just don't see the appeal in competing on such an uneven playing field.

  33. But it's missing something by moochfish · · Score: 1

    Wait, mend socks?? But then how do I gold farm? How can I sell my clothes once I get it to look like everybody else's?

  34. Why does it matter anyway? by Moraelin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Exactly why _do_ you feel a need to advertise your sexuality in a fantasy RPG? Other than a way to be an attention whore, that is.

    Exactly what difference does it make anyway? Do gay players get different costumes? Different quests? Do you get to give Onyxia a stern talking to and redecorate her room if you're gay, instead of killing her like us macho heterosexuals? Or what?

    I keep hearing about how a GLBT-friendly guild was needed, presumably as opposed to all those who've been unfriendly. So please enlighten me... Exactly which guilds explicitly asked you about your sexuality when you joined? The ones I've been in asked me about the classes I play, whether I have teamspeak installed, maybe the country I'm from, several asked my age (apparently making sure I'm not 13 years old), but not one asked about my sex life yet.

    I've been in guilds and groups in several games and more than one server even in WoW, and the question never ever popped up at all. I haven't yet seen any guild ask me "but first, are you straight? we don't allow gays in our guild." I haven't yet seen any group advertise as "LF1M straight heterosexual for UBRS". I have seen groups advertise "LFM, but no more rogues, we have enough", but never ever seen one advertise as "LFM, but no gays and lesbians."

    Basically from where I stand, and from what I've seen in-game, the issue doesn't even exist unless _you_ choose to shove it down people's throats and advertise your sexuality in a non-sexual game.

    So _why_ do you need to advertise your sexuality in a non-sexual game? It's just a game, and kids play it too. It's not a matchmaking service for either gays or straights, nor a forum for sexuality-related discussions.

    So basically you don't see the rest of us advertising "straight heterosexual guild looking for members" on the chat channels, how about returning the favour? How about realizing that we're all there to play the fucking game, and not to get a dose of sexuality debates, persecution complex whining or attention-whore drama on the public channels?

    I don't give a damn about your sexuality, and make no mistake, Blizzard doesn't give a damn either. All they did have against is _polluting_ the public channels with some topics that just don't belong there.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Why does it matter anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'll bite.

      The point is to provide a safe refuge for people who are sick of hearing "gay" or "fag" being tossed around as an insult. As a human being, I hear things like that and think "Are they ignorant or just being thoughtless?" As someone who's bisexual, it makes me queasy to think that the people I game with might spit on me in real life.

      Consider what it's like to be a member of an openly despised minority and to have the slang word for that group be used as an insult. Nigger, kike, spic. If you're caucasion and say that won't happen to you, think of what it would be like to go to Japan and hear an old lady calling you "devil" behind your back.

    2. Re:Why does it matter anyway? by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      They probably won't spit on you in real life. They'd probably be too scared. See John Gabriel's Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory.

    3. Re:Why does it matter anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they'd be too uncomfortable to meet my eyes. I think that's even worse.

  35. OTOH by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly, the Chinese will go pee pee in your coke when they want to play a joke. I guess a few of the stereotypes are based in reality.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  36. So... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    When do they add the new Cultural Revolution expansion pack?

  37. You might be surprised by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Nope. The whole revolution and "dictatorship of the proletariat" was Lenin's addition, and the reason why his "bolshevik" faction split from the "menshevik" faction that advocated gradual reforms, i.e., from the actual Marxists. Marx's vision was more of a long term utopia in which eventually the production levels become high enough to comfortably support everyone (and indeed in the 20th century they did), and basically there's no more reason to be a slave to those controlling the capital.

    Marx's communism, since you explicitly mention that, was indeed all about sharing, as the GP mentioned. It was simply about having plenty to share. In his utopian vision there was no need to replace one set of slave owners with another set of slave owners, Soviet-style, because his utopian vision was all about a time when there's simply no more need for slaves or slave-owners. (By "slaves" and "slave-owners" I pejoratively mean the 19'th century workers and factory owners, not slaves on a cotton plantation.)

    Transforming that into a "screw this, we'll just shoot everyone who stands in our way" theory is Lenin's work, and partially because Russia just wasn't economically at the point envisioned by Marx. There was no over-abbundance to share, but an impoverished country ravaged by war, with too little industry to be anywhere _near_ Marx's vision.

    At any rate, if your country went the social reforms way, yes, you're not anything like Lenin's Soviet-style communism, but you may be closer to Marx's ideas than you think.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:You might be surprised by Dobeln · · Score: 1

      Saying that Marx advocated gradual reform indicates that you really don't understand Marx worth a damn. Revolution is the very point of Marxism - as he makes clear in "The Communist Manifesto". He puts it this way:

      " Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organize itself as a class; if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class."

      So, we will indeed have blissful classlessness, but first we need a good revolution, not some wishy-washy reformism. That Communism is a revolutionary creed has really never been much of a secret - until it came crashing down that is. Then it suddenly became "all about sharing". Heh.

  38. Here in the USA, our government would NEVER by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    produce a propaganda videogame to indoctrinate impressionable kids with jingoistic bullshit, right?

    http://www.americasarmy.com/

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  39. You mean Bartle's player types, perchance? by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Basically what you describe there is insightful in its own right, but it's basically a sub-set of what Bartle described for MUD players. His division went something like this:

    - socializers: basically the people who are there to chat, make friends, organize a guild, organize a player town/community/whatever, and generally be social about it

    - achievers: people who want to have the highest score, a level 60 character, the biggest player house or the full epic suit for their class, etc.

    - explorers: people who like discovering stuff. It can be finding a new quest, a new piece of the story, a new area, seeing a new instance, or finding out some cool new trick using the tools the game gives them. E.g., that you can get some cool effect by using two spells as a combination. (A lot of people who "just like to play the game" actually fall in this category: they like constantly being given new stuff to do or new pieces of the story. Then again, some don't fall in this category.)

    - killers: these are the people whose fun is to annoy, harrass, humiliate, and whose greatest achievement is if they can get someone to leave the game completely, effectively perma-killing them from the game. A.k.a., "griefers". (Note that unlike what the term "killer" might imply, this isn't equivalent to "pvp players". Not all pvp players are killers, and not all killers are into pvp. Indeed a lot find more effective ways to harrass their victims.)

    Basically while your distinction does have merit, and indeed is made by Bartle himself too, you seem to be sorta lumping the achievers and killers in one large category, and the socializers and explorers in the other. The distinction does exist in Bartle's paper too, as one of the divisions of his set: people who "play with" something/someone, versus people who "act upon" something or someone.

    But it's only half the story. Dividing it again, gives some important distinctions too. For example while both might grind to level 60, an "achiever" may do it just for achievement sake, while a "killer" might do it to better gank or humiliate others.

    And yes, you're right in another aspect: it's one of the major reason for social frictions among players. Many of those falling mostly in one category can't possibly understand what those in another category find fun in that. Maybe they're immature? Or whatever.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  40. Diversity of information is good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Diversity of information is good.
    I don't have a problem with a socialist game, as long as its just a game. All the talk we give on censorship, the least we can do is be accepting of their version of free speech even if its not something we'd find popular.

    We can have socialist games, or communist games, ultimately it's not real. As long as we can sell our ultra capitalist games to China, I think they have the right to sell their socialist games to us.

  41. A perspective from Inside China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There's very serious counter-examples, but a lot of what the Chinese government does sounds a lot bigger in the foreign press than in the national press. This is just another case of the Communist government doing something nobody actually cares about. Communist propoganda is a total joke, ever since the Cultural Revolution everybody things it's all bullshit and will specifically do things because the state propoganda department says not to. The government realizes this, and to be honest modern China has a lot less state propoganda than, say, the US.

    In this specific case, it is incredibly unlikely this game will be more popular than WoW or the Korean MMORPGS that are so popular here. But who fucking knows, maybe the game is actually a lot of fun?

  42. common mistake by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

    What word means in the dictionary
    is different then what word means
    In Reality(which is propoganda)
    Political or economic goals that propoganda presents both end up CHEATING
    the viewer to promote their goal.

    Legitimate advertisement is presented as unbiased ,complete data on a subject matter,highlighting some compelling aspects of a product,concept,or feature.
    I consider pop-up ads and spam a form of propoganda.

    1. Re:common mistake by Monkeyboy4 · · Score: 1

      Legitimate advertising?

      Like what? Beer commercials that are about doing manly-silly stunts? Or (other) beer comercials that say that "It's time to grow up and start drinking our beer?"

      YOu are defining advertising as legitimate if it discusses the aspects of the product. Advertisers really haven't cared about that since the 1980's. Advertising now is about creating a realationship with ht eproduct/service. Ideally, advertising makes the customer feel like the product is part of thier personal identity (for example "I'm a ford guy")

      Connecting to your personal identity is not about "unbiased ,complete data on a subject matter,highlighting some compelling aspects of a product,concept,or feature." That's what consumer reports are for

      Advertising is about emotion.

    2. Re:common mistake by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Not TV ads(watching TV ads is like voluntaruly eating mental excrement) ,Legitimate advertising is what you can see in newspaper,like
      "Selling used PC pentium 3 700mhz,harddrive 20GB CDrom drive x24 128MB ram"

  43. Westwood Would've Done Better by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
    Westwood (Requisat In Pacem) would have done so much better creating a Commie MMORPG.

    Hot Chicks, Rock Music, Evil Masterminds, Superweapons, Giant Squids...

    Sigh, Real Communists are so boring....

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  44. Year of the Dog by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

    Just a reminder that because of the Chinese calendar, today is the equivalent of April 1.

    --

    God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
  45. LFM tanks, locks for 40-Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    raid on Mao's Citadel

    phat l00tz!

  46. Additionally by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    In China, the Party has been working to reduce the rate of female infanticide. They allow people to drop off female infants at state hospitals, orphanages, and elsewhere, without penalty, and the girls are then raised by the state. The downside of this is that to me it's somewhat creepy to have people raised entirely by a Communist State. But I guess it's better then death. Also, the only penalty for exceeding the one-child limit is a monetary fine. Many wealthier families (yes, they have those in China) simply suck up the fines and have as many kids as they want. This is a roundabout Party way to ensure that any family with more then one kid is able to afford it, so they don't have people on welfare with 15 kids pumping kids out for a bigger check. Instead of financial bonuses for extra kids, it's more like a tax on having kids. I learned all this when I asked someone in Military Intelligence who specializes in China what she thought of the one-child policy.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  47. Re: Hmm, informative by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    I'm an explorer, didn't know that. Little bit of killer, but I don't go out of my way to gank. Usually.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  48. A little perspective on "barbaric"... by jthill · · Score: 1
    CAESAR (recovering his self-possession). Pardon him. Theodotus: he is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature.
    --
    As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
  49. Mod parent flamebait by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

    The Chinese party does *not* kill infant girls. They kill *fetuses*. Fetus != human, got it? There's nothing wrong with killing a fetus, as long as it hasn't come out of the womb. Now if they do "partial-birth abortions" (infanticide), that's something to worry about. By the way, 95% of these abortions are at the behest of the father or mother. I guess CNN missed that when they did their little yellow journalism. (pun intended)

    (behest = request, don't ask why English has so many similar words that mean the same thing)

    --
    Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    1. Re:Mod parent flamebait by japhmi · · Score: 1

      Fetus != human
      So, there's some sort of change in the DNA when someone is born that makes them human?

      Legally, in the US, fetus != person, but biologically fetus = human. We've just legally determined some humans aren't persons.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    2. Re:Mod parent flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, there's some sort of change in the DNA when someone is born that makes them human?
      So we should consider individual cells to be human beings? Clearly they have human DNA.

      Please, use your head.
    3. Re:Mod parent flamebait by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      When the barber went to throw out my hair clippings I had to call the police. THOSE WERE MY BABIES.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:Mod parent flamebait by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      Since this is probably too deep now for even my nemeses (see list) to mod me down for off topic, that reminds me of a way somebody could get away with killing an infant. (Not advocating this of course.) Basically, carry it into an abortion clinic and kill it in front of everyone. They'll be unable to summon police for the following reason:

      "911"
      "There's a man here killing a baby!"
      "What is your location?"
      "Uh um, forgot the address, it's the Planned Parenthood on ..."
      "You mean the abortion clinic"
      "Well, yeah, but they also..."
      "Oh, I get it. A man's killing a baby in an abortion clinic. We haven't heard that one 600,000 times already. Very funny. Now stop tying up the lines."

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
  50. Minor point - it's Yin not Ying by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

    Yin and Yang. Ying is something else.

  51. That's just silly by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Informative

    if a right can vary by culture, then it's not fundamental. By definition a fundamental right is one that applies across cultural boundries. You can argue that there are no fundamental rights if you like, but you can't argue that they vary from one country to the next. That's a non-sequitor.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  52. A Question of Fun by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    America's Army is a game meant to advertise joining up for the army by being fun and entertaining. The goal is to make people want to sign up for the governments message because it's fun.

    There's no way in hell that this rumored game could be fun. There's no way that people would voluntarily sign up for this. This is likely to be forced on people or to become just another ritual to go through to prove one's loyalty to the government.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  53. Mao was a criminal by tabby · · Score: 1

    The fact that the indoctrination of their people continues to this day with the myth of Mao as a great man of the people etc scares the crap out of me to be honest.

    I'm in the midst of reading 'Mao The Unknown Story' by Jung Chang, and its a hell of an eye-opener.

    How widely regarded is he as a great man in China by the general populace?

    --
    I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
  54. right on, pomo monster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know that female infanticide doesn't happen in China, especially not in any significant numbers.

    China? Female infanticide? What a racist thing to say! That post was almost as ignorant and egregiously false as denying the Holocaust. You tell him, pomo, set that China hating fool straight!

  55. Hoax? by Kuukai · · Score: 1

    Is this actually real? All articles reference the Xinhua one, which seems like kind of a dead end for something supposedly on the internet. Can anyone actually back this up, with like the Chinese site or something? (Just wondering, our irresponsible western media has been known to get pwned)

    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
  56. the lack of ballance means... by Matarick · · Score: 1

    that they are about to expire. Why deny the unaidable?
    If I were a female virgin, I would rather risk death by killing the old coot than be raped by sick disgusting wrinkled ass.

    1. Re:the lack of ballance means... by Ekhymosis · · Score: 1
      True, however you must remember this is from ancient times in China where women were to be obidient (gee, the more things change the more they stay the same, eh?).

      I would assume they (or rather their families) receive some sort of payment, though. Usually only the rich old geezers would be interested in this in order to retain their status/power/etc.

      Sadly, this practice is still ongoing, which is why pedophilia is quite common in asian countries. Take Japan for instance: a teacher gets busted shagging a schoolgirl but only gets busted for "upbringing and wholesome education" laws instead of pedophilia.

      --
      Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
  57. Holocaust Denial 101 by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    None of your supposed resources refute my claim: female infanticide (including abortion) happens en masse in Communist China.

    That is Communist China, is it not? Or are you arguing that it is happening in alternative-universe China? Sidereal China? Capitalist and Democratic China? Huh? Help me out here. If it isn't happening in Communist China then where is it happening?

    Here's a reading comprehension aid for you: I said it was happening in China, not because of Communism. I do stand by the fact that the Communists' One Child Policy is at fault for this despicable tradition reinfesting China. Call that racist. Call that whatever. But it is 100% irrefutable FACT .

    Now please, tell us all again, in the name of abject intellectual dishonesty, that female infanticide does not occur in Communist China. What part of what I said was racist or wrong? The part where Chinese girls are being killed (at some time during their pre and post natal development) with prejudice? Or that it was happening in Communist China?

    I'm totally sick of your lies, and I have karma to spare.

    Female infanticide is a major problem in Communist China

    Female infanticide was brought back by the one child policy

    and the men in Communist China are going to pay. Dearly.

    That is not racism.
    That is not ignorance.

    That is a fact that millions of Chinese men are going to face with a level of reality so vivid and frightening that their lamentations will be heard loud and clear for generations to come, in all corners of the world.

    Please, carry on with your Holocaust Denial, and bring on those Holocaust denial moderators. The families who have wrought this horror upon womankind in China will still pay for their crimes against women, even if this post goes to -1.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  58. WTS Socks Of The Dragon!!!1 -30 Foot Smell Enchant!! 300g!! PST

  59. Some people must feel funny now :-) by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

    Since it seems to be a 1st of april hoax, all the lively discusions are for nought :-)
    Oups ;-)

    (although I'm sure that the PR CP has some PC games for the PC (in latin languages its even more "alliterative" CP becoming PC)

    Sorry to end my mail here I have to mend some socks before my batery closes down due to electricity shortage :-)