Slashdot Mirror


GDC - Ron Moore Keynote

Ronald Moore may have done a lot for the Trek series of shows, but recently he's been making new fans with his work on the Battlestar Galactica title. He was invited to speak at GDC to relate ways in which intelligent folks can adapt an existing franchise. He focused on not only adapting and improving the original, but maintaining the core goodness of the inspiring work. Read on for notes from his talk. Update: 03/22 22:11 GMT by Z : Fixed Adama/Psylon spellings. I need a nerd-friendly spellchecker. I got here late, but not before the montage of Battlestar footage had ended. Ron More comes on from stage left. He's here to talk about the process of developing and adapting the original show into the popular sequel series.

What are the fundamentals of Battlestar Galactica? Cylon attack on the colonies. Original show is very dark. A show of survival, not the normal s/f pablum. Footage from the original show compared to the new show, with the attack on the homeworld. Side-by-side comparison of the old footage with the new footage of the genocidal attack. Realistically, you don't want to have 'fun' with the attack. It's not that it can't be entertaining, but there has to be a fundamental realism. With the new show, a lot of the attack was off-screen, to make it about the character's reaction rather than just special effects. Somewhat topical, as the pitch for the new show came soon after the September 11th attacks. "You know what it is to wake up one day and find that the world has changed forever." Out in the fog, terrible things are happening, an important element of the show.

The characters are the core of the show: 'The Family Adama'. Everything rotates around the Family of Adama. Footage of the family, side by side, in the old and new. In the old show 'not credible' to have his whole family on the ship. To make the show rooted in our reality, he avoided the hierarchical military state by having Apollo come aboard later in the show. You lose Athena, who had no real purpose. The role of Athena is taken by Starbuck. Instead of Zach dying in the pilot, he's part of the backstory. Welds together how Starbuck, Adama, and Apollo interact.

Footage of new and old Adama. He's key both as the father of the family, but he's also the father-figure for audience and survivors. A man of principle and true beliefs. He's a believer in democracy, and ethics, honorable person. Mixed with the realities of a ship at war, crossing some ethical lines. He's not perfect, 'a human man for a human story.'

Problem with the original story was that there was nothing to balance Adama as an authority figure. Balanced, of course, with the Madam President. Compared with the old show's aging president (weak, non-threatening). President is important in three ways: Balance of military and civil authority, Mother figure of the show (though there is little sexual tension), she is a reminder of the apocalypse. She grounds the series in the context of the tragedy that began the show.

The government: the Quorum of Twelve. The original was a bunch of straw men with stupid ideas ("Let's trust the Cylons!") This time around, a group with more of a backbone. A show about democracy, what it means to be in a society during a time of war. There still has to be a civilian government despite the time of war. Not only that you survive, but the way you survive. The decision to make Starbuck into a woman... lots of 'comment'. Comparison of old starbuck and new Starbuck. Starbuck is a 'load-bearing member' in the architecture of the show. Making her a woman was almost random. Original Starbuck was a cliche (hot-shot pilot, womanizer, gambler), only really worked because of the actor. His attitude made the character okay. The new show: Don't let things be 'okay'. Don't have fun. Everything has consequences. 'This is a screwed up person.' She's been really damaged, and is only functioning in the military environment because it's all she knows.

Colonel Ty, another part of the Family Adama. Provides contemporary for Adama, a confidante for the head of the family. He's a drinker because he wanted the character to be fundamentally different than Commander Riker. Riker's job was to say 'me too'. He wanted an XO with more truth to him, because he's the guy everyone hates. 'The captain's whipping boy'. Make him a screwed up guy so that one of the folks close to Adama can be a poor choice to listen to.

Boomer, very little thought. An extension of family and a second family unit. The part where Boomer was a Pylon suggested by co-producer. "That is fucking brilliant!" Designed to be a very human element, Cylon change made without changing any of her dialogue.

Cylons! Old and new. Comparison between old and new bad guys. The limitations of TV actually help, in ways. Real stuff out of the question. CGI was originally thought to be out of the question. 'What if they look like us?' That idea opened up a lot of the stuff that's the basis of the show. If this was a videogame, they would have spent all their time making 'really cool Cylons'. The limitations of TV actually helped the show a lot by making them do somethiing they might not otherwise have ever done.

Not just 'an attack from the black', but a betrayal. Baltar. Why did he do this? Interesting that he gave up his own race. A lot of problems from within rather than without. He sells out the entire race ... for a woman. He's not even paying attention, but sells out the race just the same. He's kept in the show, with the crew, to make that betrayal last and last. Mmmm torture. Otherwise you end up with a guy chewing the scene and twirling his mustache.

Vipers basically unchanged. Why change something that works? The use of the handheld camera in space grounds a non-real moment in reality. Comparing it with shots of the Enterprise. Audiences are smart, even if they're non-technical. Tying the hands of the animators to make sure that there was always 'a cameraman' for every shot. New locations were guided by the philosophy: People actually live there. Make the controls workable. "Why did all those people in Star Trek have pictures of space on their walls?" They want things that comfort them.

The myth of Kobal and the 13th tribe: the underlying story of the show. Stayed very far away from Egypt/Greece, going for a more pagan/greco-roman element. 'What kind of universe do they live in?' They lost the Star Wars/Star Trek 'populated universe' idea. He was tired of having lots of alien races. Philosophically, he wanted a drama more than s/f. No aliens, no time travel, no evil twins. "You're forcing the show to be internally driven." The story is about the character's lives, not something from outside. The Search for Earth is the underlying driver of the show: Going to the 13th colony. A refuge from the Cylons. The challenge was to make it 'real'. "Why are you only now mentioning Earth?" is the reaction from the audience. Adama is lying, reaffirms what the audience is thinking while making the situation believable. "It's not enough to survive."

Ultimately, he didn't want to destroy the show to save it. Don't wipe the slate clean, take what was important to the show and translate that to a new audience. Telling the same story in different way. They're unique, very special shows. They're different, but they're both very much Battlestar Galactica.

Overall a nice talk by a very talented speaker. Not really sure why this was here ... the organizers may have wanted more Q&A to bring out aspects for game design, but they ran over time.

180 comments

  1. *claws eyes out* by SigILL · · Score: 1, Informative

    Aargh! The horror!

    s/Psylon/Cylon/; s/Odama/Adama/ please :)

    --
    Error: password can't contain reverse spelling of ancient Chinese emperor
    1. Re:*claws eyes out* by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't forget "Kobal" to "Kobol"... plus he can't spell Moore's name right. :P

      --

      "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    2. Re:*claws eyes out* by shepmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's even worse that you elegantly state. It really seems as if Zonk banged this out as fast as possible to post. Perhaps being at the GDC is leaving him little time to do the story, but a once-through for spelling and grammar couldn't take that much time, could it? I don't expect a lot from Slashdot editors, but when they write the article itself ., you'd think they would care a little more.

      Not to mention, the careless disregard of the names makes you wonder why Zonk wrote it. Most Slashdotters who watch the show would know how to spell these names. Does Zonk watch BSG, or was he just there to 'get the scoop'?

      Enough ranting for now...

      Oh: s/Ty/Tigh/

      http://www.tv.com/battlestar-galactica-2003/show/2 3557/cast.html

    3. Re:*claws eyes out* by david.given · · Score: 3, Funny
      Psylon

      I think he was channeling Psychlo...

    4. Re:*claws eyes out* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Slashdot editors don't even edit things when they are sitting in their cozy offices with plenty of time on their hands, why do you think they would do it when they're rushing something out to the front page after showing up late for a keynote speech because they were still recovering from the bender they went on the night before? All speculation, of course.

      And yes, Zonk is at the GDC to get the scoop and provide content for Slashdot. Who knows what games he personally cares about there?

      It's likely Zonk simply transcribed his notes from the speech, put a little filler in, hit "Post," and then went off to enjoy the rest of the conference.

      I don't want to be too hard on the Slashdot editors, but it seems to me that once you start getting paid to do a job, you ought to put some effort into doing it right.

    5. Re:*claws eyes out* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, he called Boomer a Pylon.

    6. Re:*claws eyes out* by tpgp · · Score: 2

      Of the first 20 comments, 16 are about spelling.

      I can understand why the rest are modded redundant - but why the first? Its obviously important to many people.

      --
      My pics.
    7. Re:*claws eyes out* by temojen · · Score: 1

      You mean this isn't about a SNL Coneheads sketch?

    8. Re:*claws eyes out* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, or playing too much MOO2.

      I knew there was a reason I never trusted those creative bastards.

    9. Re:*claws eyes out* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zonk's post is actually a demonstration of the efficiency of Microsoft Office versus Open Office.

      This post, on the other hand, is actually a demonstration of a rather clever troll. (Sorry Zonk, had to.)

    10. Re:*claws eyes out* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my friend, my friend, let this AC fill you in. The reason is, if you haven't noticed, that Slashdot is filled with little motherfucking bitches ... or is it motherfucking little bitches?

      eh.

    11. Re:*claws eyes out* by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Most Slashdotters who watch the show would know how to spell these names.

      I would disagree to some degree here. Most who watch the show only hear the names, and English spelling is such that there are multiple ways in which to spell various sounds. Typos like Psilon/Psylon/Cylon/Sylon, Ty/Tigh/Tie/Tye, Odama/Adama/Odamah seem acceptable if one has only heard the names spoken on the show.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  2. Psylon or Cylon? by maxarturo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I honestly didn't read the entire thing. Or watch the show very often. But how is that spelled?

  3. Oh, and s/Ty/Tigh/; s/Kobal/Kobol/ (n/t) by SigILL · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG, it's full of tighpo's.

    --
    Error: password can't contain reverse spelling of ancient Chinese emperor
  4. Spelling and why... by Elfboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Odama is spelled Adama (as has been pointed out) and it has been suggested that the name was chosen as a combination of 'Adam A' as in the root/head/etc...

    --
    * We dance where angels fear to tread *
  5. Re:Editor! Please Edit! by sabi · · Score: 1

    s/Ty/Tigh/ also.

  6. Freespace 2 Mod Underway by wickedj · · Score: 3, Informative

    Official Site http://www.game-warden.com/bsg/ Teaser trailer http://www.game-warden.com/bsg/Video/BSG_Mod_Tease r.avi It looks cool but it also looks a long way off.

    1. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by psykopotat · · Score: 1

      yeah i've been thinking what the latest space combat sim is. is it still freespace 2?? i would have thought that since x-wing, tie fighter and freespace1-2 would have built a strong enough community to allow a new game to be developed. those games were awesome.

    2. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were, but they were also complex. A lot of people are lazy about their gaming.

      What we need is a space sim with realistic physics. None of this "I rotate my ship and my velocity changes with me" bulldrek.

    3. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by jafac · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you can do this with the Freespace engine.

      But what's called "decoupled flight" in aerospace terminiology (vehicle is "pointed" in a direction other than the direction of travel), is actually very difficult to manage and control for an unskilled operator, it takes a very well-developed sense of 3 dimensional thought. I remember a freeware game that attempted this a few years back, but they still cheated (you could put the game into a non-realistic mode, that compensated for the effects with "reaction control thrusters" - which amounted to - the ability to accellerate in directions other than that which your main engine was pointed, yet at accellerations that would have required a main engine).

      It's my opinion that we're still waiting for a brilliant software developer to invent the right User Interface to make this not such a difficult task.

      But I understand the frustration. Every space-dogfighter shares it. "This motherfucker's on my tail, I'm in space, why the fuck can't I just turn around and blast him?"

      . . . some day. . . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by Axem · · Score: 1

      Well, there's no true decoupled flight (we call it Newtonian motion) in FreeSpace, but since the source was opened up, they've added gliding. Which means your fighter can keep moving in the same direction, but you can turn your fighter and face the guy on your tail. There's also keys that let you thrust up, down, left, right and backwards. And by modifying the data files enough, you can get something that mimics real space flight, but its not perfect. There's still a few WW2 dogfighting things left, like a ship's max speed.

      --
      We all live in a #FFFF00 submarine...
    5. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by Atomic+Fro · · Score: 1

      There was such a game, called Terminus. It was released around 2000 for Linux, Windows, and Mac OS all on the same disc. It promised a lot of what Eve:Online is doing, and infact the two games are very similar. Its just that this game has Newtonian physics, which people found out rather quickly isn't all that fun.

      --

      ==================
      Hippie Logger Jock
      ==================
    6. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by Evangelion · · Score: 2, Interesting


      The guy who makes X-Plane has a space sim up that does what you're talking about. It's a simulation, and a very difficult one. There are scenarios in there where you have to, say, chase a comet.

      It's not really fun.

    7. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by jafac · · Score: 1

      Well, there's no true decoupled flight (we call it Newtonian motion) in FreeSpace, but since the source was opened up, they've added gliding. Which means your fighter can keep moving in the same direction, but you can turn your fighter and face the guy on your tail. There's also keys that let you thrust up, down, left, right and backwards.

      The Macintosh version doesn't have this. At least not the one I downloaded about 3 months back. The controls for the up down left right back thrusters are listed in the configuration page, but they don't actually function. Maybe it's just as simple as a keybinding problem. Never really pursued it. IF there's a mod I can download for the Mac version, I'd certainly like to try it.

      Anyway, secretly, when BSG came out, and I first watched it, I was hoping that it would be popular so someone would write a video-game version. But like I said before, they're going to need a really innovative UI to make decoupled flight (Newtonian motion) accessible for the average player.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Freespace 2 Mod Underway by Axem · · Score: 1

      Well the thing is that only the Shivan fighters were meant to have that kind of directional thrust, so the Terran and Vasudan fighters don't have them by default. I don't know if there's a mod that lets you do that, but it's pretty easy to mod that functionality in. Really, its just changing a few values. If you'd like to continue this through email, I can help you get that working.

      --
      We all live in a #FFFF00 submarine...
  7. Video? by getnate · · Score: 2

    Is there a video of the keynote?

    1. Re:Video? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Who mod this as off topic? If there's a video, it should appear on Sci-Fi or GDC, or maybe as a (free) download on iTunes.

  8. I was going to complain by John+Harrison · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I thought that the editors didn't bother to read this given all the errors, but it turns out that and editor wrote it, right?

    1. Re:I was going to complain by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 1

      I thought that the editors didn't bother to read this given all the errors, but it turns out that and editor wrote it, right?

      Thank you for my morning dose of irony.

  9. Zonk is a Cylon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    'Nuff said.

    1. Re:Zonk is a Cylon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it.
      Cylons have built-in spell checkers, standard issue no less.

    2. Re:Zonk is a Cylon. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, the Cylons have better spelling.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  10. Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 4, Informative

    It shows through out the entire series, yes he pissed some of the hard core fans off but in the end, this is a quality show and thats all the matters, it doesn't try to destroy the old show, its taken the best parts and moved it on with the times. It still features the old vipers and old cylons as well which i thought was a nice touch, just without the lasers. Ron Moore i salute you!

    1. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes he pissed some of the hard core fans off but in the end

      Paging all grammar nazi's - worst case of split infinitive to ever hit slashot! Please 'pylon.'

    2. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think he means that he ejected them from his urethra in much the same way that Galactica launches Vipers.

    3. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by vandon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      yes he pissed some of the hard core fans off but in the end, ... it doesn't try to destroy the old show, its taken the best parts and moved it on with the times.

      If you've paid attention, the BSG on SciFi isn't a remake of the original, it's a continuation.

      Starbuck - You're sick. You're not a person, you're a machine that's enjoying its own pain.
      Leoben - All this has happened before, and all of it will happen again.
      Starbuck - Don't quote scripture. You don't have the right to use those words.
      Leoben - You kneel before idols and ask for guidance and you can't see that your destiny's already been written. Each of us plays a role, each time a different role. The last time, I was the interrogator and you were the prisoner. The players change, the story remains the same. And this time...this time, you're wrong.

      It seems to be an endless cycle of time where:
      Humanity advances and creates AI.
      AI rebels against Humanity.
      Humanity is forced to run.
    4. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Basically, Moore just did what he had to do. The fans of the old show wanted a sequel to the old show, but they would have been the only ones who watched it.

      It's an OK show, but not a great work of imagination. Basically, Moore just took everything that was done wrong on Star Trek when he worked for them and did the opposite. The result works fine, but it's not the most memorable piece of SF I've ever seen.

      I am very curious what will happen when they get to Earth. I'm guessing that the Cylons got there first, a long time ago ....

    5. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Which SF shows have bettered BSG? Don't quote movies either.

    6. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      I'd say Babylon 5 is better.

    7. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Good call but for drama's sake, I still think BSG is to go. What ruins B5 for me was fudging season 5 into season 4. Then when season 5 was given the green light, it was well boring.

    8. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Star Trek TOS was a little better in the first two seasons. Farscape was a lot better before they ran out of ideas. Even Stargate often does better with basic storytelling, though the acting isn't nearly as good as on BSG, and you have to blink at the sillier aspects of the premise.

      But please notice that I didn't say "show" when I stated that BSG isn't great SF. TV and movies occupy only the tiniest niche in a serious SF fan's imagination. Most of what attracts me to SF just doesn't translate onto the screen. Some details are just too difficult technically (zero gravity, aliens that don't look like humans in latex masks); some changes have to be made to meet the expectations of a scientifically illiterate audience (spaceships make a woosh in a vacuum; physics doesn't account for the work of Newton, never mind Einstein). Most of all, serious SF requires some time and patience on the part of the audience — more than you'll get in an hour or two of screen time.

      But why am I trying to explain? I say "SF" and you think "show". Obviously we have nothing to talk about!

    9. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't catch on straight away, that we were talking about SF in other forms of media, (I thought you was comparing shows and shows only) when you do get off your high horse or pull whatever stick is in your arse, out, maybe we could further this line of thought.

    10. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      It's not at all obvious that they mean that it's a sequel. In fact, that makes very little sense to me. It probably has more to do with the weird religious kick the Cylons are on. The fact that Cylons are monotheist zealots in this version still hasn't been fully explained — and it's the biggest departure from the 70s version, where the Cylons had been created by an extinct race of lizards.

    11. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Aww, did the evil poster hurt your feelings?

    12. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I don't know what it is but it looks like all the network admins are in tonight!

    13. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by jdray · · Score: 1

      I think they did it because religious wars are something we (given the history of the Western world) can understand. I think it's amusing that the bad guys are the ones with the monotheistic religion and the good guys are the pagans; something that probably creates a certain amount of consternation among Judeo-Christian or Islamic religiously-minded fans of the show.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    14. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      OK, you're going to have to explain that one.

    15. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Except are the Cylons really the bad guys? Yeah, they're genocidal, cruel, manipulative, etc. But there are all these morally ambiguous moments. Which might be leading up to something interesting — or it just might be Moore playing silly games with us.

      I also wonder where the religious thing is heading. Maybe Moore has something clever planned around it. Or maybe it's just his way of recycling the premise of the original series, that human mythology is just a distorted version of some ancient space opera. Of course the implication of that is that the patriarchs of the Old Testament were Cylons...

    16. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      Drama, sure. But for a truly great SciFi series, Babylon 5 is the way to go.

    17. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Yeah but what about the last season? It sucked!

    18. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      It can't be a continuation. If this happened before then wouldn't the cylons be like the original cylons? But we are not even talking ideology here either. In the original series, the cylons were actually lizards who forced themselves to become robots or the cylons that are seen during the course of the original series. They are not lizards in this show nor did the humans create the cylons in the original show like they have done here.

    19. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by JulesLt · · Score: 1

      I think the 'moral ambiguity' is one of the most interesting parts of the show.

      I don't think it's particularly subtle that the Cylcons think themselves to be more pure and moral than the humans (and therefore justified in their actions). I mean it probably all comes out of the budgetary decision to have them look human, but of course it's an interesting idea to change it from just a territorial war.

      The one thing that I think was a big mistake was making the inside of the Cylon mothership the typical 'organic alien' living ship look - all gloomy and dark. Why would either type of Cylon live in an environment like that? There might have been more power in making the inside of their ships more like your typical 'light race' - your Vulcans, or the ones in Bab 5 whose name I forget - but your usual thing with crystal buildings and temples, and little young Cylons running around.

      --
      'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
    20. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by JulesLt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Much as I like B5, I would agree that BSG has the edge. A lot of the enjoyment in B5 was spotting where things came from, and a lot of it was really fantasy literature rather than SF (Tolkein and Moorcock seemed to be the two major influences). It obviously set the scene by moving SF from the 'episode' paradigm to wider story arcs and character centered drama (and also by bringing politics in, rather than the presumed liberalism of early Star Trek shows).

      The moment that sold BSG for me was the episode in the first series when due to sabotage they lost water, and they're discussing the logistics of the situation. Up to then there was still potential it was going to be one of those 'find a new alien race each episode' shows.

      --
      'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
    21. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I had mixed feelings about the mini series but settled down wholeheartedly after the first episode was shown. When near the end they destroyed the olympic carrier and you had the characters reaction to it all. Was it full of cylons or not, there was this big and drastic moral dilemma to it, they had to do something immediately. The characters were more than one dimensional and I've been a fan through and through ever since.


      If B5 was in book form and wasn't subject to the will of the network like season 5 was in the end, I'm sure it would have been brilliant, this is coming from someone who really hated B5 right from the start, but as usual my dad gets me hooked unknowingly on these shows and I end up watching and enjoying them. B5 was unique and moved sci fi forward with the long story arcs.

    22. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 1
      You're right, that change obviously came from budget constraints. As did many others, starting with the decision to have mostly humanoid Cylons. And probably those mothership sets you hate so much: by the time they'd built all the other sets, they probably didn't have much money to spend on a set that they weren't going to use much.

      Then again, there's this whole compulsive organic thing going on with the Cylons. For example, they build their Raiders out of organic parts, even though a simple machine would have done just as well. Only the original centurions are still mechanical, and they don't play a big role.

    23. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I shall just say "I strongly disagree, sir."

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by JulesLt · · Score: 1

      You do have to wonder what the centurions think of the new guys they created.

      --
      'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
    25. Re:Ron Moore put a lot of thought into this show. by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I don't think the centurions are supposed to have created anything — they're pure warriors. You might recall the conversation where Baltar first discovers that his lover is a Cylon. He asks why she doesn't look like a toaster, and she refers to "old models" that "have their uses". My inference is that there were once mechanical cylons that specialized in intellectual chores, but these have been replaced by the biological cylons. Centurions haven't been upgraded because they're fine for what they are: cannon fodder.

      But Moore and his writers don't really say anything about this kind of issue, and I suspect they don't really care about that kind of detail. Which is one reason I consider the show to be a decent adventure story, but not great SF — there's no geeky fascination with How Things Came to Be.

  11. Editing? by Have+Blue · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There are at least 3 major terms from the show that are misspelled here, two of them character names. Aren't editors supposed to, you know, edit these articles? If you so much as type "battlestar galactica" into Google you could find the correct spellings for all of these in under ten seconds.

    1. Re:Editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gergle? Wots dat?

    2. Re:Editing? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      You must be new here...

      *Sorry could not resist*

    3. Re:Editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see that DShitredge is still the biggest fucking lame-ass on slashdot.

  12. Spelling corrections by saforrest · · Score: 3, Informative

    Erg, all the spelling errors were driving me insane...

    =====
    Ronald Moore may have done a lot for the Trek series of shows, but recently he's been making new fans with his work on the Battlestar Galactica title. He was invited to speak at GDC to relate ways in which intelligent folks can adapt an existing franchise. He focused on not only adapting and improving the original, but maintaining the core goodness of the inspiring work. Read on for notes from his talk.

    I got here late, but not before the montage of Battlestar footage had ended. Ron More comes on from stage left. He's here to talk about the process of developing and adapting the original show into the popular sequel series.

    What are the fundamentals of Battlestar Galactica? Cylon attack on the colonies. Original show is very dark. A show of survival, not the normal s/f pablum. Footage from the original show compared to the new show, with the attack on the homeworld. Side-by-side comparison of the old footage with the new footage of the genocidal attack. Realistically, you don't want to have 'fun' with the attack. It's not that it can't be entertaining, but there has to be a fundamental realism. With the new show, a lot of the attack was off-screen, to make it about the character's reaction rather than just special effects. Somewhat topical, as the pitch for the new show came soon after the September 11th attacks. "You know what it is to wake up one day and find that the world has changed forever." Out in the fog, terrible things are happening, an important element of the show.

    The characters are the core of the show: 'The Family Adama'. Everything rotates around the Family of Adama. Footage of the family, side by side, in the old and new. In the old show 'not credible' to have his whole family on the ship. To make the show rooted in our reality, he avoided the hierarchical military state by having Apollo come aboard later in the show. You lose Athena, who had no real purpose. The role of Athena is taken by Starbuck. Instead of Zak dying in the pilot, he's part of the backstory. Welds together how Starbuck, Adama, and Apollo interact.

    Footage of new and old Adama. He's key both as the father of the family, but he's also the father-figure for audience and survivors. A man of principle and true beliefs. He's a believer in democracy, and ethics, honorable person. Mixed with the realities of a ship at war, crossing some ethical lines. He's not perfect, 'a human man for a human story.'

    Problem with the original story was that there was nothing to balance Adama as an authority figure. Balanced, of course, with the Madam President. Compared with the old show's aging president (weak, non-threatening). President is important in three ways: Balance of military and civil authority, Mother figure of the show (though there is little sexual tension), she is a reminder of the apocalypse. She grounds the series in the context of the tragedy that began the show.

    The government: the Quorum of Twelve. The original was a bunch of straw men with stupid ideas ("Let's trust the Cylons!") This time around, a group with more of a backbone. A show about democracy, what it means to be in a society during a time of war. There still has to be a civilian government despite the time of war. Not only that you survive, but the way you survive. The decision to make Starbuck into a woman... lots of 'comment'. Comparison of old starbuck and new Starbuck. Starbuck is a 'load-bearing member' in the architecture of the show. Making her a woman was almost random. Original Starbuck was a cliche (hot-shot pilot, womanizer, gambler), only really worked because of the actor. His attitude made the character okay. The new show: Don't let things be 'okay'. Don't have fun. Everything has consequences. 'This is a screwed up person.' She's been really damaged, and is only functioning in the military environment because it's all she knows.

    Colonel Tigh, another part of the Family Adama. Provides contemporary for Adama, a confidante for the head of the fa

    1. Re:Spelling corrections by Yunzil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ron More comes on from stage left.

      You misspelled "Moore". :)

    2. Re:Spelling corrections by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      What I thought when I read this article..

      Yap Yap Yap.. Oh that GDC, let me check the website.. WOW
      Tomorrow Will Wright will be discussing Spore.. Yap Yap Yap..

      Who else thought this same thing??

    3. Re:Spelling corrections by CasaVacas · · Score: 1

      Tish just in.. Batllestar Gactica Game Coming! Thanx for tha "trasnaltion" so to speak. I salute you! /Casa

  13. BSG Rules by moochfish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, aside from the already noted mispellings and lack of grammer, I must say your summary only reaffirms what I tell my friends when I try to convert them to BSG-ism. The characters are all flawed. The universe emphasizes realism over sensationalism. Most of the plot twists are not due to, as I like to describe it, "bullshit last-minute oh-my-god that's-impossible" moments.

    I can't think of very many other shows that have all of these elements together. And I love how the stories are unpredictable because the writers are willing to put the main characters through pain and suffering without a "happy ending" at the end of each episode. Without spoiling anything, I can the last 3 episodes of the second season totally proves this point.

    So long as they keep the show driven by the characters and not by special effects or plots written from the big surprise ending first, it will only gain more mindshare.

    1. Re:BSG Rules by Chimera512 · · Score: 1

      "most of the plot twists are not due to, as I like to describe it, "bullshit last-minute oh-my-god that's-impossible" moments." the cylon fetus blood curing cancer was a stretch for me...but i still love the show to death.

    2. Re:BSG Rules by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was a bit of a stretch. I thought it was kinda cheap how they dodged that long-anticipated bullet.

    3. Re:BSG Rules by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Despite the corrections he still missed that Col. 'Ty' is spelled Tigh.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:BSG Rules by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Not "grammer", "grammar". Sorry, couldn't resist.

    5. Re:BSG Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The characters are all flawed. The universe emphasizes realism over sensationalism.Most of the plot twists are not due to, as I like to describe it, "bullshit last-minute oh-my-god that's-impossible" moments.

      I can't think of very many other shows that have all of these elements together."

      Try any drama series. BSG is a good character driven drama show, with a basically irrelevant side order of spaceships.

      I don't see why it gets so much nerd attention, compared to e.g. The Sopranos. People are suckers for futuristic eye candy. I wish they were more into mind candy... mmmm, original, challenging ideaaaaaaas [drool]

    6. Re:BSG Rules by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That's why I like The Shield. It's not about crime and punishment, but the people -- realistic people with believable motives and roles which directly affect the plots. It's the exact opposite of CSI really, which, while a good show in its own right, is focused almost exclusively on the details with very little character development. Of course they both have some amount of BS, whether its zooming in on crappy video or the chief believing a patently obvious lie. Overall though, they present plausible scenarios, and it's hard to think of any examples of any show, even documentary, which doesn't take liberties with the truth.

      As for Zonks summary sometimes unreadable. Like bad notes. But better(?) "Can't understand!" Ideas but skill communication... Heard before. Somewhere. Kirk!

    7. Re:BSG Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much rape in the Sheild. Every two weeks someone new gets raped.

    8. Re:BSG Rules by ga5ket · · Score: 1

      Come on, spoiler warning where appropriate please! Some of us haven't got that far yet

  14. Re:Completely worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It made perfect sense to me. You should open your eyes and read.

  15. Re:For the uninitiated by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Funny

    You fail karma whoring.

  16. Pylons by raygundan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like the "psylons" got fixed, but there's still at least one "Pylon" in there.

    Now THAT would make good TV!

    *gasp*

    "Boomer is a PYLON!!!!!"

    (cut to closeup of small orange cone)

    1. Re:Pylons by soundofthemoon · · Score: 1

      But where are the Sleestaks? Don't they usually hang out around pylons?

    2. Re:Pylons by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, why did his spell checker accept "psylons" in the first place?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    3. Re:Pylons by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It probably didn't. He just ignored it since most spell checkers don't have an exhaustive list of proper names and words. In Zonkspeak:

      Cylon. Psylon. Both red. Which is right? Cannot tell. Pylon. That works.

  17. [Good] [[to|know]] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    [Thanks] [for|the] [[interesting](post)]

    1. Re:[Good] [[to|know]] by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Its mediawiki markup, not random punctuation. Not that makes it any better. If you are going to just raw copy, at least do it from the rendered version, not the source. I'd rather not have to parse this stuff in my head unless I feel the need to edit.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
  18. Boomer by maciej · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Boomer is a Cylon, not a Pylon =)

    1. Re:Boomer by joeyspqr · · Score: 1
      you got a Pylon for Boomer the Cylon?

      waaaaay too much information !!

      --
      +1 fashionably cynical
  19. Take notes, THEN write by KanSer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dude, take the notes and then write the goddamn story. We don't want you to just post your briskly jotted down thoughts and abysmal sentence fragments.

    Like, did you even go to journalism school? Do you get paid for this shit? Can you give us more than this half-assed effort next time?

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    1. Re:Take notes, THEN write by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He at least fixed the spelling and amended the story saying he needed a geek-friendly spellchecker. My first thought was, "A Slashdot editor has a SPELL CHECKER!?"

      Seriously, though, editors. Use your Slashdot salary, buy a OS X machine, and use Safari to compose your "articles." It has a built-in red-underlining spellchecker which is very nice. (Side note: Why the hell doesn't any other browser have a spellchecker? People type more now in browser windows than in word processors!)

    2. Re:Take notes, THEN write by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Firefox has spellchecker plugins — and runs on you-know-what.

    3. Re:Take notes, THEN write by Surt · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but I just have to know: does your sig work?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Take notes, THEN write by fm6 · · Score: 1

      A spell checker won't tell you that Ron Moore's last name is spelled with two O's.

    5. Re:Take notes, THEN write by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Never mind the bad writing. The dude lost me when he said "preserved the goodness of the original show". Aside from the dubious quality of the original, there's the fact that Moore has pretty much redone the whole concept from scratch. Yes, a lot of details have been carried over, but that's more for copyright purposes than preservation of anything. Key details, like exactly why the Cylons want to destroy humanity (robots on a religious crusade?!) is completely different. All the stuff that's the same is stuff that doesn't matter, like the fact that Starbuck still smokes cigars and they still call liquor "ambrosia".

      Anyway, this is Zonk, they guy who basically accepts every story submitted to him when he's in charge on weekends. He really needs to reconsider his career options.

    6. Re:Take notes, THEN write by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the guy who *is* writing up his notes into a story will submit his story and have it rejected because it is a duplicate of this one.

      Oh, haha, what am I talking about? This is Slashdot after all.

      Rich

    7. Re:Take notes, THEN write by seann · · Score: 1

      It's from NeXT. It's a part of the apple operating system.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    8. Re:Take notes, THEN write by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Spelling aside, I thought he did a good job of conveying the main points succinctly and clearly. I'm not sure what additional verbiage would have achieved, aside from grammatical elegance.

    9. Re:Take notes, THEN write by ZippyKitty · · Score: 1

      Firefox has spellchecker plugins -- and runs on you-know-what.

      Linux?

      :^)

      ZK
      --
      Time flies like an arrow Fruit flies like a banana
    10. Re:Take notes, THEN write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      konqueror also has a spellchecker

    11. Re:Take notes, THEN write by jafac · · Score: 1

      . . . yeah. Unfortunately, Safari is just about the ONLY application that uses it. What was that framework again? Cocoa?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:Take notes, THEN write by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 2, Funny
      Firefox has spellchecker plugins -- and runs on you-know-what.

      Diesel?
      Dead Babies?
      I give up.

      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    13. Re:Take notes, THEN write by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      I thought not being able to spell, "cylon," was automatic grounds for losing all of your geek points to begin with, right?

  20. "Homicide: Life on the Streets" style direction by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not joking here for a change. The show takes itself seriously, unlike most Glen Larson franchises, and it does nothing to try to be a cute family show.

    Proven actors, unproven actors, deliberate reflections of our own society and its issues, and really good action sequences.

    This is what Enterprise should have been in some respects, a show without tethers to expectations.

    Oh, and Katee Sackhoff smuggling hollowtips.

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    1. Re:"Homicide: Life on the Streets" style direction by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      The show takes itself seriously, unlike most Glen Larson franchises

      Oh come on, you didn't think Buck Rogers was serious? One look at Gil Gerard's chest hair should have told you "Hey, this show is ALL ABOUT seriousness!"

      And you can't tell me you weren't touched by the poignant love affair in Knight Rider between a man with gay hair and a car with a gay voice.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  21. New Galactica's philosophy in a nutshell . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To steal a line from a review Bruce Sterling wrote about Haldane's The World, The Flesh, and the Devil, the new BSG is . . .

    "Totally lacking in comfortable bullshit."

    Last week, when Sci-Fi started running Doctor Who, I actually felt a sense of relief at not having a new episode of BSG to watch at Ten. Not because I don't like the show, but because it is so damn wrenching. There's no feel-good sci-fi bogostity there. People die and suffer and doubt.

    1. Re:New Galactica's philosophy in a nutshell . . . by KrisW · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see the people behind the show try their hand at a few "light" episodes, to somewhat relieve all the drama. There was the one episode where Colonel Tigh's wife shows up, which was definitely not as heavy as the rest of the season, and I thought it worked pretty well.

      I'm a huge fan of the show - something I really doubted would happen when I first heard about the miniseries - but a slight break from the generally bleak atmosphere every now and then would be much appreciated.

      --


      "Think you can take me? Go ahead on. It's your move." --Joe Don Baker in Final Justice
    2. Re:New Galactica's philosophy in a nutshell . . . by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

      People die and suffer and doubt. You mean just like in real life?

    3. Re:New Galactica's philosophy in a nutshell . . . by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You've basically summed up why I don't like the show. I watch TV to be entertained, not to look into some twisted mirror populated by so-so actors.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:New Galactica's philosophy in a nutshell . . . by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Well to each his own but I think BSG serves a purpose more than to simply entertain but to enlighten, its taking it to the next step after Star Trek with its philosophical messages and ideas for betterment.

    5. Re:New Galactica's philosophy in a nutshell . . . by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I guess there's that, too. Enlightenment is basically the SciFi bailiwick, I suppose.

      What'll happen is the show will run it's course, then I'll watch it in it's entirety over a feverish weekend (plus whatever time is required), and only then will I change my mind and proclaim it wonderful entertainment for the new millenium.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    6. Re:New Galactica's philosophy in a nutshell . . . by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      There's no feel-good sci-fi bogostity there. People die and suffer and doubt.

      Which is why I hate, for example, Stargate SG1 & Atlantis. They're the antithesis of BSG. It's not that the acting is bad, per se, but it's hard to present a believable character when everyone's doing and saying things you'd never expect someone to do/say in real life. They don't even really have a plausible motivation for what they're doing. And to top it off, any sense of risk is negated by the fact that you know everyone's going to be fine at the end of the day. I guess some people find that comforting. I find it boring. Great for kids, sure, but that's about it.

  22. Pile on by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Funny

    The part where Boomer was a Pylon suggested by co-producer.

    I'd sure like to pylon Boomer too!

    1. Re:Pile on by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      Haha, join the crowded club ...

  23. Re:For the uninitiated by DavidHOzAu · · Score: 0

    It could be, however [[assume good faith]] and [[don't bite newcomers]]. ;-)

  24. Why? by CmdrAdama · · Score: 1

    This article was largely pointless. I'm really not sure why this was here either. We all know the story of the rag-tag fleet, and a large article summarizing it really isn't needed. And Zonk should be tossed out an airlock for his atrocious spelling. He is Colonel Tigh. He is not related to any Adamas. And the planet is named Kobol.

    1. Re:Why? by jdray · · Score: 1
      He is not related to any Adamas.

      Blood relations aren't the only way to be part of a family.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  25. Greatest ... Show ... Ever??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Greatest show on televsion right now. Hands down. I would encourage everyone to watch it, as it's going to be in hiatus from new episodes until October.

    Might be one of the greatest television shows I've ever seen. Can't remember the last time I found myself actually EXCITED to see something on TV, ANTICIPATING it coming on each Friday/Monday.

  26. Re:For the uninitiated by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Redundant post, whoever is not watching BSG most likely is not among the /. crowd :)

  27. Re:For the uninitiated by DavidHOzAu · · Score: 0

    Flaimbait, it is not airing in Australia!

  28. re: typos by dargon · · Score: 0

    I just love how he typo'd Cylon in his note that the spellings of Adama/Psylon had now been fixed. LOL!!!

  29. Re:For the uninitiated by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

    You do know how to run BitTorrent, don't you?
    A. Don't take every word literary.

    B. I recently got a complaint when I posted sthng related to BSG that my post is a spoiler. Why would that other retarded aussie would complain if BSG was not airing down under? Most likely the show is airing there in a public or subsciber channel and you have not taken notice.

    Who was the retarded mod who gave his pathetic post +1?

  30. Re:For the uninitiated by vandon · · Score: 1

    Troll, any true /.'er would know where to download it.

  31. You Can't. by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    ways in which intelligent folks can adapt an existing franchise

    Answer: You can't. It's copyrighted, patented, and trademarked, and will remain so until you are worm food. Only medialopolies have the money and connections needed to get rights, and they do their square best to avoid hiring intelligent folks (BSG was a regrettable accident - they had planned to hire the drooling neanderthals that did Enterprise), so piss off before you get yourself sued. :)

    1. Re:You Can't. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You can't. It's copyrighted, patented, and trademarked,

      That pretty much goes with the term "franchise". Like McDonalds, if you want to sell Big Macs, you have to sign a contract with the McDonald's Corporation.

      But it's not like there is any patent on space opera in general; there's a huge body of work from the 30s pulp magazines up to the present you could licence for almost nothing; or just write somethng original, there's a thought.

    2. Re:You Can't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bob, what's a Medialopoly?

      You're right, in a sense. A great many people over a very long time tried very hard for Battlestar Galactica to be given another chance, long after it was originally axed. This is unprecendented. Star Trek did get another run, years after finishing the race, but it was not "the fans" that made this happen.

      If you're actually interested, there was only one obstacle in the way of getting another BSG off the ground and it wasn't any medialopology.

      His name was Glen A. Larson.

      I think you might be missing the point, Bob. I don't think the lesson here is how to get your pet Automan remake project off the ground. I think it's more along the lines of "once you have actually been given the job of remaking Automan for the 21st century, how to you go about making sure it doesn't suck the second time around..."

  32. Pylon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boomer is a pylon? I thought he said Starbuck was the load-bearing member.

  33. Be polite. by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We don't want you to just post your briskly jotted down thoughts and abysmal sentence fragments.

    Unless by "we" you mean "me and my multiple personalities", you're being a bit bold to speak for the entire games.slashdot.org audience. Indeed, Zonk's posting these things as he's dashing from talk to talk. He's trying to post timely content because of an endless stream of complaints that Slashdot is constantly getting scooped by other sites. Many Slashdot readers are very vocally saying that they prefer the "jotted down thoughts and abysmal sentence fragments" of say, digg, and want Slashdot to be more timely. They may be wrong, but it's hardly Zonk making this decision totally divorced from what his readers want.

    "Like, did you even go to journalism school?"

    Did any of the Slashdot editors and writers go to journalism school? If you're looking for some sort of credential that the writers are good enough to bother spending your time reading, you're at the wrong web site. Come of to think of it, I doubt you'll find any site or magazine that focuses on covering the game industry (as games.slashdot.org does) that is entirely or even mostly j-school graduates.

    Your might also consider how you phrase your feedback. "Do you get paid for this shit? Can you give us more than this half-assed effort next time?" is not a good way to provide feedback. It makes the recipient more likely to brush you off as a troll. I suggest something like, "This was rushed and low quality. It harms Slashdot's reputation as a polished news organization when drafts are posted as final articles. I'd really prefer more polished articles, even if it means waiting longer to get them." Obviously that's just a hypothetical example, as no one who has read Slashdot for more than a day or two would confuse it with a "polished news organization."

    1. Re:Be polite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with him. I wanted to read a good article about it, not some half-arsed notes scribbled down and then typed up.

      So, when he says "we" he really does mean "we."

    2. Re:Be polite. by Threni · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > He's trying to post timely content because of an endless stream of complaints
      > that Slashdot is constantly getting scooped by other sites

      I've never read any such complaints. It's not important to me if other sites get hold of news before Slashdot - I can wait. It's not like I rely on Slashdot for my living, or as my only source of news. I can wait for scribbled notes to be written up into complete sentences and then edited so that only useful, relevant information is presented. Slashdot isn't a blog, and apparantly wishes to make at least some money from its stories and therefore has more to lose from low quality stories than a blog. This sort of breathless nerd trauma does nobody any good.

    3. Re:Be polite. by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      > I've never read any such complaints.
      You're kidding right? The "old news" complaint is even more prevalent than the "news for nerds?" ones (and just as invalid, as far as I'm concerned), it might also outdo the "dupe" ones (which, at least, have some merit). Trolling, yes, but you can only have missed them if you read "above 3" (or something) and only after the mods have had time to sort the wheat from the chaff (Hint: the mods are even less of a journalist than the editors, they're people like you and me)

    4. Re:Be polite. by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I read at -1, because every opinion may be worth it. Moderator opinions
      > shouldn't censor for others, post them instead!

      I read at 1, because there's enough informed opinion out there to not have to rely on the Slashdot fuckwits. Over time, not everyone with something valid to say will be moderated below 1. (I also mod funny and AC stuff way down. I've never understood why ACs are allowed to post at all. If you can't be bothered to get an account then you shouldn't be posting here. The `what if they want to remain secret` argument is also invalid, as no-one is forcing you to identify yourself in any way).

  34. ZONK IS A PYLON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This, uh, "article" should confirm that Zonk is, indeed, a pylon.

    But look on the bright side, dude - when Taco cans your ass, you've got a career in road construction or bridge support ready to go.

  35. Half of the fun of the show for me by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    is figuring out where they filmed the outdoor scenes.

    Some I recognize from my ex-Army days (Canadian), and living in and around Vancouver in the 80s.

    Oh, ok, and Boomer and the other Cylons.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Half of the fun of the show for me by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " is figuring out where they filmed the outdoor scenes."

      Probably outside.
      I'm just sayin'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. Re:For the uninitiated by DavidHOzAu · · Score: 0

    You do know how to run BitTorrent, don't you?
    Yes, I know how to run BitTorrent, and I know what you guys were referring to, but the first I heard about it was when I read the article this morning. (Read the title!) However considering how long it would take to download GB of information and then upload it again, I'm not going to bother getting it. I've got better things to do than burn my download limit.

    Most likely the show is airing there in a public or subsciber channel and you have not taken notice.
    Actually I have PayTV (Austar Digital), and it is not airing on any public or subscriber channels at all. That's why I made my post because I knew not everyone would know about recent developments.

  37. First off by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Starbuck is a 'load-bearing member' in the architecture of the show. "

    So StarBuck was the Pylon, not Boomer? ;)

    That said, I hope Boomer being a Cylon wasn't a critical plot twist.

    MMmmm Starbucks..I'm going to get me a coffee....then a whale.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:First off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, I hope Boomer being a Cylon wasn't a critical plot twist.
      Only one of the most critical plot twists in the opening few episodes of the show...

  38. Zonk uplifting his own status by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    " I need a nerd-friendly spellchecker."

    pfft, I have my doubts Zonk is a nerd. Geek, yes, but not a nerd.

    I could be wrong, I wonder what he did before /.?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Zonk uplifting his own status by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Didn't he used to polished chrome toasters? :P

  39. Grammar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's grammar.

  40. MOD PARENT UP by Spaceman40 · · Score: 1

    Zonk's time-restrained, and he's fixing the problems when he can. I'm glad to have relatively timely GDC coverage, personally - if the spelling/grammar problems bother the GP so much, perhaps he should find another site?

    --
    I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
  41. Come on! by Darth+Maul · · Score: 3

    "News for Nerds" and you can't spell Tigh, Cylon, or Moore?

    For some reason Slashdot just doesn't seem like the place for me anymore. I'm a total geek and want editors of stories that actually know how to spell, especially in a story about the best sci-fi on tv.

    --
    --- witty signature
    1. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you've set your locale to "canada", you'll get the canadian dictionary in your spellchecker... common enough mistake. I'm just champing at the bit until April 16th for the sixth season of Trailer Park Boys!

  42. Still ticked off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that many of the things Ron Moore has done in the new BSG are good. The talk just reinforces my view that I disagree that some of the original things he changed were bad and needed to be changed for the new series. The whole Starbuck is woman thing was randomly done, which was just what a lot of us suspected. I still find it strange that this whole big universe of the new BSG is devoid of any aliens. It makes it harder to explain why there aren't more planets of colonists that have broken away from the main colonies.

    There was a strong underlying theme of freedom and its importance in the original series that would surface in many of the best episodes. There was that 3 episode arc with the planet Terra that was really good and dealt with the importance of freedom, and that arc is totally cut off the new BSG because of these other decisions.

    Sorry to rehash, but this talk confirmed for me what is good and bad in the new BSG.

  43. Next Season Premise Tedious by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BSG is currently my favorite show. It has even overtaken B5 as my all-time fav SF show. But I gotta say, I really hope the writers pull this next season out, because turning the whole series into a Mila 18 reprise is tedious. It would be great to see some retribution, and then exultation. Blood-and-guts as the soul of human endeavor is an apt lesson in these times.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  44. Lack of alien life by Cy+Sperling · · Score: 1

    I appreciate that the show has had no Trek-style alien races running around. They have given themselves are terrific opportunity to introduce, at some point, an encounter with some other life form and have it actually mean something.

    As these characters have been searching for Earth and encountering countless barren uninhabited worlds, finding some form of life, intelligent or otherwise, can have an actual impact on viewers who have become accustomed to the established rules of the show.

    If you have a setting where anything can happen- nothing then becomes amazing or unexpected. But, by establishing rules and limits, you give yourself the chance to break them to great effect.

    1. Re:Lack of alien life by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 1
      As these characters have been searching for Earth and encountering countless barren uninhabited worlds, finding some form of life, intelligent or otherwise,
      You mean like trees?
  45. Proof that Starbuck is a Cylon by Timbotronic · · Score: 1

    Just go to Vancouver sometime, there are Starbucks everywhere!

    *ducks*

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    1. Re:Proof that Starbuck is a Cylon by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention cute blonds as well.

  46. BSG Ruled. Is that a ramp? a shark? by guidryp · · Score: 1

    Well It was my favourite show last year, but this year it is taking on shark jumping proportions.

    From "Deus ex machina" cures for cancer, to the totally surreal (not in a good way) final thirty minutes of the finale where every character seems so untrue to themselves, that any suspension of disbelief is shattered.

    I felt like I was watching one of those "evil opposite universe" story lines from other sci fi. Or a self indulgent wierdness for the sake of wierdness episode like the twin peaks finale. At least in Peaks that wierdness was self consistent.

    Of course diehards will paint this as being "brave", but to me it is one step removed from backwards talking dwarfs.

    The brilliance of BSG was it's strong, even harsh realism in the face of the fantastic. The finale was self inconsistent and surreal. It left me cold.

  47. Ron Moore's main mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ron Moore said he didn't want a show where you hit the reset button at the end of each episode. Fine he has succeeded in that, but he has committed the opposite mistake.
    In BSG you have a show where you hit the "change" button at the start of each episode.

    I really shouldn't have to pay close attention to the "Previously On" section of the show to figure out plot points. He puts cut scenes in the previously on. And I am being charitable that he cut the scenes, not that he is going back a playing revisionist.

    It is not a show with long term continuity. He can maintain continuity for about 3 episodes but after that, anything that gets in the way of his latest cool idea is jettisoned. Ron Moore is doing well at creating 3-5 episode arcs but he really needs to sit down and plot out where he is going for at least a season. And I mean write it on paper, preferably in outline form. I think he sits down and says "In Season 3 we'll look at the Cylons" and that is it. 1 sentence of pre-planning for the season. He then makes the rest up as he goes along. If some shiny idea catches his attention mid-way through the season, he'll just change direction. He needs to figure out what he wants from the season and plan it out. Not "it'd be cool to do this for a while".

    Now I still think BSG is well shot, well written (per episode) and well acted (some members excluded), but this show isn't the second coming. There are too many internal flaws to warrant this show being studied like the Dead Sea Scrolls. Especially after the last 20 minutes of the season finally. It goes on my list of entertaining, good shows, but it isn't great.

    (There really isn't a great show out there at the moment, although I am enjoying Carnivale & Deadwood on DVD.)

  48. Re:BSG Ruled. Is that a ramp? a shark? by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    I felt like I was watching one of those "evil opposite universe" story lines from other sci fi. Or a self indulgent wierdness for the sake of wierdness episode like the twin peaks finale. At least in Peaks that wierdness was self consistent.

    It could get worse. It could all be a dream of Adama's, his sleeping on the decision to let the election stand. Yeah, I know, Six shoots down that theory. I did like how she was responsible for their discovery. Although I would expect a search of any reasonable large "hiding spot".

  49. "Sentence fragment" is also a sentence fragment. by crimson_alligator · · Score: 1

    Zonk, I'd like you to meet Complete Sentence. Complete Sentence, this is Zonk.

  50. Berserkers by Illbay · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did Fred Saberhagen ever get an ounce of credit for the essential germ of that show?

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  51. Problems with the new BG by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    I have many problems with the new BG series. The show is too close to the Western Earth military, clothing styles, culture, etc. The original built a whole culture based on a connection to ancient human civilization such as Egyptians and Toltecs. Also the Galactica was a very old ship, on the order of 500 years and had been updated over the years. It was multigenerational ship. The new one is only about 50 years old and was to be mothballed at the start of the series. Visually the Galactica looks like a younger ship than the Pegasus from the outside and more like the Galactica from the original series.

    One of the things I like about many sci-fi shows such as the original Galatica, Star Trek, Farscape and many others is that they create alien cultures. The new BG series had a ready made culture and they didn't use hardly any of it. Another annoying thing is that the show seems to be a tobacco commercial at times. Granted that Starbuck did on the original series too. It's insane to thing that anyone would be smoking on a space craft or a doctor smoking while with a patient.

    There are things I do like about the show such as the humanoid Cylons, the more accurate physics, the interpersonal conflicts and the new Vipers. Although that last episode was too much of a jump for the show. Over all I have more of a negative view of the new show but it's like a traffic accident, you just have to look at it.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    1. Re:Problems with the new BG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm glad they chucked the ancient Egyptian backstory overboard. It reeked of 1970s LSD induced "age of aquarius" bullshit. Hell, the pilots flew around in King Tut masks for crying out loud. I wish they chucked the Earth myth too. The fact that the mythical utopian planet is our planet is a groaner. Again, the new age mormonism was palpable; but hey, you take what you can get.

      You just seem to be nitpicking the the Pegasus vs Galatica visuals, and the Galatica age. The idea of a 500 year old ship is just too far fetched. Metal simply fatigues after awhile, and I imagine fatigues even faster in space given cosmic rays, rapid heating and cooling on every orbit, and micrometeors. If you want a reason why the Pegasus looks older than Galatica, how about the fact that Pegasus spent the year after the attack seeking out cylons to fight, while the Galatica by and large has been trying to avoid fights?

      One thing I always hated about sci-fi shows and books was the aliens and the alien worlds. They all suffer from the same annoying flaws. First, they all breath Earth's atmosphere. Which I guess isn't surpising since every planet is every planet is Earth, but with only one environment. Hoth? Arctic. Tatooine? Desert. Endor's Moon? Forest. Dagobah? Swamp. Mustaafor? Volcanos. Third, every alien race is human. Not just humanoid, but human through and through. Sure they might give them different ears, or skin color, or contacts. Now with CG they make more insect like aliens, but they all are bipedal, bilateral symmetric, with four appendages that terminate in hands or feet. Furthermore the aliens are almost always take the form of animal-man. Squidman! Frogman! Birdman! Bearman! Fishman! Dogman! Worst of all every alien culture is a stereotype. All klingons are aggressive and warlike. All romulans are conniving. All ferengi's are hyper-capitalistic. The only species with any depth in scifi are humans, but even then humans are inevitablly described as intelligent, resourceful, peaceful, and curious explorers. It's an idealised human. Alien cultures are never well developed. Humans always dominate the universe (apparently humans breed like roaches), and every planet has a single world government. Aliens are at worst McGuffins or at best foils for the human characters.

      Just in case you were wishing they were going to make a sequel to the original BSG, they already did that. It was called "Galatica 1980" and it sucked.

      I do agree that the last episode jumped too far in time. I don't like that. The Dee-Lee thing should have developed more. For that matter, the Dee-Billy thing should have degenerated slower too. And what happeneed with Lee and Starbuck? All of a sudden they hate each other, but they never explain why. Yeah, her new bo' has something to do with it, but it never actually was explored. I don't understand how they're going to get back in the ships and escape. The dynamics have changed so rapidly and dramatically. It's hard for me to imagine the Galatica crew just showing back up for work one day. It's all very strange. Hopefully they didn't jump the shark with that last episode. Oh for a shower scene!

    2. Re:Problems with the new BG by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      Your life will get better once you realize that each and every "alien" ever displayed or described is always a reflection on humanity. If someone even could think up a "realistic" alien, you would be lucky to realize it as a lifeform. Even if this were possible and you could also understand the realitically un-translated language you would just grow bored of the show because it's a complete fiction with nothing you can relate to.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
  52. best show in years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love this show, I cannot get enough of it. I gave up on a TV a long time ago and caught the pilot by accident. I feared it would cheesy and campy, thankfully it isnt. Its incredible! The writing is top knotch and internally driven with topics that are real-world relevant.

    and GOD DAMN!! the women are HOT! Even the mousy flight deck mechanic, Callie.
    sheck it out mang.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicki_Clyne

  53. Re:BSG Ruled. Is that a ramp? a shark? by mcb · · Score: 1

    At first I thought it was Baltar's dream - I found it strange how the flash forward occurs when Baltar puts his head down on his desk, then it starts by him raising his head. Almost everything in the dream was something Baltar feared would go wrong during his presidency... he doesn't have a lot of self confidence.

    Of course the producers have said it wasn't a dream, so shrug.

  54. Pylon by kria · · Score: 1

    Yes, the Psylons have been replaced, but a Pylon snuck through. I'm picturing tying a rope to Sharon. (As a female, that does not put my mind in the gutter, thank you very much. It puts my mind at the boat dock.)

  55. Glad there are no aliens by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Esp ones that suddenly pop up on the large plasma screen tv wearing fake ears and start speaking English.

    I guess technically the wild life on New Caprica are aliens.

    If they do encounter intelligent life I hope it is on the order of "what the hell is that?" instead of "gee your forehead is wierd want to come over for a drink and have sex... as you do seem to have a giant and gorgeous rack."

    Not that I have a problem with chicks with huge tits wearing rubber ears... but I usually pay for that in Vegas.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  56. Extreme Makeover: Galactica Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adama wandering around the bridge with a megaphone. Check.

    Starbuck wearing her trademark pink outfits. Check.

    Richard Hatch as the head-shaven English carpenter added in the second season. Check.

    Might just work!

  57. Independence war and IW2 "Edge of chaos" by Down_in_the_Park · · Score: 1

    But what's called "decoupled flight" in aerospace terminiology (vehicle is "pointed" in a direction other than the direction of travel), is actually very difficult to manage and control for an unskilled operator, it takes a very well-developed sense of 3 dimensional thought.

    It has been realised for around 5 to 6 years now in the above mentioned games, but they never became popular. Guess it was to difficult to play, although a lot of fun

    --
    "People who are willing to sacrifice essential freedoms for security deserve neither freedom nor security."

    B F
    1. Re:Independence war and IW2 "Edge of chaos" by orac2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man, I loved the IW physics engines, especially those missions in both games that relied on some deft decoupled maneuvering, such as when you would put a cargo container on a collision course with a station, or wanted to drift silently by an object with all thrusters off but needed to turn to inspect it.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    2. Re:Independence war and IW2 "Edge of chaos" by Down_in_the_Park · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, and dogfights were you approached your opponent with full speed, launch some rockets and then while passing twist 180 and shoot in his back. Or a mision where you had to manoever into a relay transmitter and dock to it. And all the film scences... just some of the best games I ever experienced.

      --
      "People who are willing to sacrifice essential freedoms for security deserve neither freedom nor security."

      B F
    3. Re:Independence war and IW2 "Edge of chaos" by orac2 · · Score: 1

      Loved the dogfights, and the storylines were good too. My only nit was that the scripting engine was brittle: e.g. you'd dock a station to talk to someone, then if Marauders happened to randomly attack, you were screwed. If you undocked, the script wouldn't resume the rest of the dialogue necessary to unlock the next mission stage when you redocked after destroying the Marauders, and if you didn't undock you stood a good chance of getting killed as a sitting duck. Still, I see there's a total conversion available for IW2 now, Torn Stars, -- must give it a go!

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    4. Re:Independence war and IW2 "Edge of chaos" by Down_in_the_Park · · Score: 1

      Played IW-1 entirely, but didn't got that much into EoC (scripts...), but with this new conversion I might give it a try.

      thanks for the hint :-)

      --
      "People who are willing to sacrifice essential freedoms for security deserve neither freedom nor security."

      B F
  58. I wish it was a dream. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I wish it was a dream, that is the only way I can reconcile the startling inconsistency after his head hit the desk.

    With Baltar in mad dictator Caligula mode (complete with drug addiction and his own harem) running them into the ground, and Adama doing nothing about it. This is the man that put Roslyn in Jail for less. Now his only passtime is moustache growing.

    Starbuck playing house in the shanty town, complete with hair extensions.

    That last half hour was completely sureal and that is not a good thing for a series that has hard edged realism as its core.

    It is easy to reconcile events of a flash forward, it is no so easy to reconcile the big change in most of the characters behavior. Inconsistent is how it appears to me. I bet that will never be addressed, they just needed to get to the next plot element in the most expedient manner and they broke character consistency to do it. A big miss-step. My respect for the creative team has dropped a large amount.

    I was certain a box set was in my future, but now that is much less likely. I will judge it on it's complete merit when the series is done, but overall this finale lowered my view of the whole series from a 10 to an 8.

  59. Boy did YOU miss the point by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    The new series is meant to resemble us because it's COMMENTING on us. They ARE us and are facing the same issues we are facing with 9-11, the "War on Terror" the Western world vs. Muslim world, etc. Like all good science fiction, BSG really isn't about the future, or aliens, or other worlds at all.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Boy did YOU miss the point by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

      So, I'd be better off watching the news? Well... I get tired of hearing about the whole 911, War on Terror, War in Iraq (= just another Crusade to take the holy lands and they're resources), etc. Sometimes I like sci-fi escapism. Sci-Fi isn't always about commenting on the human condition, sometimes it's about a platform for presenting new ideas, and sometimes it's just meant to entertain. It would have been possible for the new BG to be a comment on the current world situation and still maintain the defined elements that made the original BG unique. Remakes are usually a pale reflection of the original. Bad remakes seems to be the current fashion.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  60. Re:Boy did ***YOU*** miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak for yourself! Guess what? the WORLD does not BEGIN and END with AMERICA! Like was previously stated, at least the original series TRIED for a culture that started with the Egyptian/Mayan/Toltec and went in a different direction to any on Earth - not unlike another SCiFi show that recently went down the toilet - Stargate.

    For all the points the producers scored in the mini-series and first season, they completely dropped the ball come season two, and reverted back to LAME Star Trek story-telling. Those of you who keep espousing "oh there's no bullshit plot twist that ruins everything" obviously haven't seen the season finale - WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH!

    Anyhow, to get back to my original point, one of the things that PISSES ME OFF the most about this show is that it is SO BLOODY AMERICAN IT'S NOT FUNNY!

    It's one thing to try to be a reflection of modern society and to make statements about the world (once again we are reminded of Star Trek here) but THE WORLD IS NOT AMERICA!

    SOME OF US have no problems with Muslims. Some of us ARE MUSLIMS! SOME OF US are not at war with an abstract concept, like "drugs" or "terror" - what a stupid concept - who came up with that? And who actually swallows it and actually believes "oh I've got issues I'm facing like this Terror guy WE'RE ALL at war with"... WTF????

    You can have your nods and tributes to real-world events and people but please DO NOT insult my intelligence by limiting these to some in-joke about your own culture and then pretend it is somehow relevent to the rest of us!

  61. Re:For the uninitiated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Season 2 has not yet aired in Australia.

    I don't know anyone to whom this makes a lick of difference to, one way or another.

    Back off on the Aussie-bashing or we'll stop fighting your wars for you motherfuckers!

  62. Re:Boy did ***YOU*** miss the point by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Well it *IS* an American show, after all. What society do you EXPECT it to focus on? That's like looking at a BBC sitcom and saying "That show is just too damned *BRITISH*!" or looking at a Bollywood movie and saying "Well, it would be okay if it weren't so typically Indian."

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.