Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft to Acquire ProClarity
Gosalia writes "In order to increase its presence in the business intelligence market, Microsoft announced its plan to acquire business analytics software developer ProClarity. 'This acquisition advances our (business intelligence) strategy and our ability to deliver performance management applications to customers,' Jeff Raikes, Microsoft business division president, said in a statement."
I've thought for some time that Ajax couldn't/doesn't provide all the answers for how to collaborate on various office documents and workflows. While I think there's a place for stuff like Writely, I really believe that 10 years from now most businesses will still be using MS Office or something like it. So, this acquisition will provide those companies with a realistic way to collaborate aon stuff and increase their per-worker productivity.
There are a whole bunch of benefits from this, including making it more possible for people to telecommute, etc. But to me the best part of this news is that it demonstrates that Microsoft is plowing ahead, in the face of all the FUD and vaporware that's being shot out all over the place about Ajax and web-based technologies. Maybe someday the web will get there, but not soon. Not soon.
Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
At least the Borg are honest:
'This acquisition advances our (business intelligence) strategy and our ability to deliver performance management applications to customers,' Jeff Raikes, Microsoft business division president, said in a statement.
Translates to: 'And.. Oh yeah, I'm going to be filthy rich!'
"...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
have some software that some manager will want to buy because of its colorful view graphs that supposedly helps them make business decisions quicker and easier.
In reality, most management types don't understand analytics at all, and when one of their math-geeks does, they are often overlooked as geek-speak.
My feeling is that this is a swipe at Siebel/Oracle/SAP/whoever so Microsoft can add a feather to their cap and say that they are relevant in the enterprise space because they have a one-size-fits-all BI solution.
I could be wrong, but I'm not.
Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
seriously though, i'd be interested in seeing how they take an incredibly complex app domain (in general) and try to fit it into a typical microsoft interface template, where things like selectively averaging columns in Excel is non-trivial...
An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
Microsoft has been experiencing a lot of disorganization recently. With the qualification of some machines as un-Vista capable, it's delay of Vista until January 2007, popular technology experts' Opinions that "America isn't ready for Microsoft's Vista", and all kinds of project delays (Media Center, XBox, etc.) they are in need of some clear visual indication as to the direction they must take. After all, a picture is worth a thousand words.
I find this statement from an InformationWeek article to clear up what ProClarity exactly does: "ProClarity makes analysis and visualization software." Much of this software is in very popular demand now; a friend of mine just started a job at a company called SSS, which makes visualization software for modeling all kinds of information and displaying it in a manner that is very informative and interactive. Google released something similar, Google Analytics, for websites, and it has been a huge success (heck, Slashdot uses it).
Overall, I think this is a very smart move on Microsoft's part. Software for organizing information can be very useful. It's also nice to see some Microsoft articles on Slashdot for a change (even though I'm not a big fan of Microsoft), rather than the usual Googlomination.
Usually a buyout like this would send people the message to immediately raise their expectations about the future performance of the business products. ProClarity has worked with Microsoft as a partner up until now to help them optimize SQL Server. Now we have to wonder how integral the ProClarity division will become and how likely they'll be the new target of internal blame when the intelligence just doesn't stack up. ProClarity claims that their business intelligence software and solutions are used for decision support, data mining, balanced scorecards, and reporting from multiple data sources. It would be interesting to know just what scoring devices they'll be using for Microsoft's up and coming products. Gold Star: It didn't crash until I opened a second copy Silver: It was backwards compatable almost 30% of files from the previous version. Bronze Star: Autosave worked great right after autodelete worked great! Participants Award: Good thing they were only beta-testers...
Sometimes you just have to wonder if Microsoft actually invents anything on their own these days. Their own flagship products, Windows, Office, and Visual Studio have been in maintenance now for how long?
This is my sig.
'This acquisition advances our (buyout) strategy, and allows us to innovate quickly by bypassing the brainstorming and invention phases.'
"Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
They already have a monopoly on Crapolarity.
Come on fellow nerds, you know you were digging that pink.
**insert favorite profound quotation here**
Microsoft's recent spate of acquiring large-scale business software vendors seems vaguely familiar....
Oh yeah, that it what Larry Ellison is doing too. Except he started sooner.
sPh
"have some software that some manager will want to buy because of its colorful view graphs that supposedly helps them make business decisions quicker and easier.
In reality, most management types don't understand analytics at all, and when one of their math-geeks does, they are often overlooked as geek-speak."
Translation: I am geek. Hear me roar! Now aren't you all glad the meek...er, geek will inherit the earth?
This acquisition is ridiculous. Proclarity was a beatch partner of MSFT for the duration, doing whatever MSFT wanted, and operating as an extension of MSFT already. So what does MSFT gain by having them in the package? Really it's about too much hype about analytics in MS-Office, and not enough stuffing. So MSFT, typical of MSFT, goes shopping at the last minute to beef things up.
They did the same thing right before the SQL 2005 launch in order to beef up their ability to have end-users create reports - but it was a total flop because MSFT is awful at integrating this stuff.
The reality is that they need to show lots of pretty stuff in the launch of MS-Office or else nobody will upgrade to it (again) and life will be poopy for the reporting people there.
The only happy people are the perclerity people, who always wanted to have a Borg injection!
The biggest problem MS faces is the fact that they don't have any solution to support the SQL Server 2005 Analysis Services. Oh sorry I forgot, the half cooked BSM or internally called Maestro, what a joke. MS has been lementing on this issue for years and was going back and forth between ProClarity and Panorama. Now Panorama is officially screwed... MS has had tons of problem implementing Panorama... So it's no surprise that they went with ProClarity... But they still have at least 3 different initiative that I know of that provide similar functionality at different scales...
I always wonder what the turnover is from these aquisitions. My experience with them is that the people who made the product strong usually leave at the time or not long after its aquired. Is Microsoft aquiring people here, or a codebase?
"Old man yells at systemd"
I was thinking that too, as in WTF? Is this like the PHB deal of the "purple pill"? Ask your doctor if the purple pill is right FOR YOU!" So this one is "Ask your boss if acme performance management systems is right FOR YOU!"
If Microsoft were to aquire some ordinary home-grade clarity, that would be enough for me.
Blank until
Offtopic, but ProClarity is one of the dumbest company names I've ever heard of. It sounds like an acne treatment.
Religion for nerds. Stuff that really matters
Twice in this thread, including the OP, posters have written "it's" when they meant to write "its". "It's" is a contraction for "it is". "Its" is a possessive.
Here's the dictionary article that outlines how to use the two.
(goons with pocket protectors move in, rough up 'acquisition prospect').
Bill Gates leaves, sniggering "checks? I didn't get rich writing checks!"
hmp.... I wonder why they don't show this one anymore....
I work for a BI consulting firm and this is, I think, a good move for Microsoft. I think Proclarity's product will eventually merge with SQL Server 2005 and probably will be distributed as a bundle just as the reporting or analysis (OLAP) components of SQL Server. This will probably provide better front end tools to Microsoft's offering right now which is very limited.
This really is a threat to other BI vendors like Cognos or Business Objects, and probably to the other front ends to SQL Server Analysis Services. Not that the resulting suite when integrated (if ever) will be a full BI suite, but because of the fact that it would, very probably, be purchased bundles with SQL Server Licences.
This is actually a fairly smart move by Microsoft as much as it is an admission that they don't understand the space or the customer base. Not that they care - now that they have a more or less complete front-end and lovely middle tier, their technology is end to end now. ProClarity has smart people who understand MDX better than just about anybody in the industry. MDX is the multidimensional equivalent of SQL and it handles things like cross-tabs (to be non-technical about it) very nicely. In fact when I last checked a couple years ago (I'm certified, thank you) they were the only people in the industry who had built a competent MDX code generator. Their developers have scoped out a complete API for the product and I have little doubt that the whole thing will fit very nicely into the .NETframework. This means that .NET geeks will have no obstacles to building integrated analyic products into anything with an MSSQL back-end. This is something a small tech company with all the smarts cannot market by itself, but that Microsoft can definitely market.
The ProClarity suite of products has many more features than the average MSSQL customer uses and will enable people with lightweight ( 3 years) experience in the BI space to build relatively competant applications. So as an entre into your generic IT shop, they've got a headstart. But it also is plenty extensible. I wouldn't be surprised if a bulked up ProClarity group within MSFT didn't start building analytics into Great Plains under the Microsoft Dynamics label.
It shouldn't take long for MS to integrate ProClarity into its product offering. All the hard stuff is already built.
This is a slap in the face of Panorama Software, the Israeli company that helped usher in 'Plato' some of the original technology behind MSAS - MS' multidimensional server now embedded with MSSQL. It's also something of a slap to the interal people behind Microsoft Reporting Services, which although not very good for high-end apps is a good me-too against Business Objects, Cognos and Hyperion on the low end. It's reasonable to say, generically, that anybody who wants to run static format reports is a low-end analytical application anyway. Nobody expects much more who buys MSSQL anyway.
What's most interesting to me is whether or not ProClarity will continue to support MDX for Hyperion Essbase, the industry standard server for MDX on Linux & Unix boxes. Its got Yukon beat for scalability and does fabulous things on 64bit hardware. But as usual, the difficulty is getting people who understand high end BI to build with the pure technologies when so much of analytics is marketed in packages aimed at BPM and CRM etc. The last time I checked the ProClarity folks were very impressed with Essbase' Java API and how smoothly they were able to build. IE it worked the first time and did what it was supposed to do. The new MDX book out covers the differences between Essbase and MSAS, let's see how closely to the standards MSFT will remain.
Microsoft really had to do this since Hyperion has already released their System 9 integrated platform 6 months ago. Oracle just recently made their announcement within the past week, and I suspect that MSFT is announcing their strategy to make this another tentacle in their .NET multiverse. This puts a great deal of pressure on Microstrategy, Business Objects and Cognos who are selling middle tiers and front-ends but don't own their own database technologies, but you never know, SAP might try something and Informatica is something of a wild card in this. IBM? Well they have the technology but who knows if they really care?
All in all this is a good way to seed future Yukon buyers with stuff that Microstrategy used to get away with. Since all the Yukon buyers are going to wait anyway, piling on some of the ProClarity stuff won't hurt MS.
fault-tolerant
Someone wake me if MS makes a play for SAS. I don't think they will though (lack of fit).
Hay Dude. Um. . Like Why r yew sew cot up with the weigh people spell they're words. Its the english langwidge thats sew am big you ous, not my spelling!
In order to increase it's presence in the business intelligence market, Microsoft announced it's plan to acquire business analytics software developer ProClarity. "It's" is a contraction of "it is." "Its" is a possessive singular pronoun.
There's no place like ~.
From the Slashdot Summary (OMG! Emphasis mine!):
Man oh man, gotta love that business-speak!
All of a sudden the April 1 "OMG!" theme is sounding a whole lot more intelligent.
ProClarity ran out of printer paper earlier today as hundreds of employees hurdled their bearclaws and lattes with newly printed copies of their resumes. Uproarious laughter and golf stories were heard in the offices equipped with doors as pink slips were signed, along with bonus checks and option sell orders. Meanwhile the phones were clogged with exit interview schedules and preliminary arguments with collection agencies.
In other news, the last intact family north of Arizona filed for divorce early today after winning a game show prize for most layoff notices before the Super Bowl. Here's Bob with the weather.
Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
The submitter mentions it twice in two sentences, and I still don't know what it means. Seems to be an expensive Google adword though...
Seriously though, this is all buzzword bingo for the Pointy-Haird Boss, right?
Jesus, that's a hell of a bingo prize.
Suggesting that the changes to the Office suit is just "maintenance" seems a bit disingenious. Much like cars today are much better than cars from 30 years ago, Office and Visual Studio have improved tremendously. (For Windows the results are less impressive, especially considering the resources they have spent.)
Actually, for BI solutions different scales almost certainly requires different products. This is also true for accounting, where SAP is not an option for a company with 30 employees, but that company's accounting system of choice isn't an option for a Fortune 100 company either.
That said, MS has a pretty bad track record here, so I'm not too convinced they will deliver well in any of their initiatives...
No kidding, that's the answer I got when I informed one of our higher-up managers that there's a flaw in his statistics (I got a degree in the art of jumbling those numbers, so yes, I do know what I'm talking about).
That doesn't matter. "It looks pretty" is all that matters. To most beancounters, statistics is just the means to the end of promoting their pet idea, not something useful for decision finding. Or even something to base a decision on.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
"business intelligence"... is that the new euphemism for "corporate espionage"?
quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
There are other "application stack" vendors that need a BI solution too. IBM has lots of BI parts, but not really a BI solution. SAP has a data warehouse that is almost enterprise ready, but its BI functions are weak. Oracle has chosen to run with Siebel analytics for a while. Microsoft has made their choice. Second tier software vendors, like HP/BEA, Sun/Seebeyond, Tibco, and WebMethods still need better BI. The BI vendors choices those in need include Business Objects, Cognos, Microstrategy, and maybe SAS Institute. MS bought cheap. It will be good for their mid-market customers, but it won't add anything to MS's high-end reputation. Will we see the rest of the BI dominos fall?
Care to explain your inflammatory comments about BSM? It may not be perfect but it surely flexible enough to do many cool things. Seems like Home Depot and many others liked it enough to buy it and use it...