Slashdot Mirror


Stone Age Dentists

morleron writes "Scientists have found evidence in Pakistan that the Stone Age had dentists. They used flint drills to remove cavities and attempt other tooth repair. No evidence as to whether or not the patients were conscious during the procedures."

219 comments

  1. Obligatory: by dteichman2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news, ancient people from Bedrock had cars, which they powered with their feet. Scientists have located stone cylinders next to sticks, which can only have one possible meaning. No evidence as to whether or not this is really the case. NOTE: This is a joke. Plain and simple. The article is actually pretty cool.

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    1. Re:Obligatory: by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      NOTE: This is a joke. Plain and simple.

      Bah! You almost got me there.

    2. Re:Obligatory: by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

      The fear was that someone would see it as an insult to science, and mod me down as flamebait.

      --


      Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    3. Re:Obligatory: by Tenali+Rama · · Score: 1

      In related news... Police are investigating a complaint from a witch doctor in North West Pakistan about his lost tools... Scientists are treating this as proof of what they always suspected, parts of Pakistan is still in the Stone Age.

  2. anesthesia? by fcheslack · · Score: 0

    I dont think I want to know what kind of anesthesia they would have used then...

    1. Re:anesthesia? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Informative
      I dont think I want to know what kind of anesthesia they would have used then...

      Probably not as bad as you'd think. Hemp, opium, datura, henbane, mandrake and hemlock were all known to be used as prehistoric anaesthetics. Dwale, an anaesthetic used in old England, was a reasonably sophisticated mixture of bile, lettuce, vinegar, bryony root, hemlock, opium, and henbane.

      "When it is needed, let him that shall be cut sit against a good fire and make him drink thereof until he fall asleep and then you may safely cut him, and when you have done your cure and will have him awake, take vinegar and salt and wash well his temples and his cheekbones and he shall awake immediately."
      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:anesthesia? by temojen · · Score: 1

      Opium, or ethanol, perhaps?

    3. Re:anesthesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "... Hemp, opium..."

      Dude, that so totally makes sense. It was the Stone Age, so they were, like, stoned...

    4. Re:anesthesia? by Hellasboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Codeine, a powerful pain reliever is a constituent of Opium. Opium has been known to be used by Neanderthals roughly 40,000 years ago and it's effects were well known in Ancient Greece, Egypt and Mesopotamia. Considering that this is Pakistan, I would imagine that they had supplies of Opium nearby.

      They weren't exactly grunting fools 8,000-10,000 years ago.

      --

      "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    5. Re:anesthesia? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      They weren't exactly grunting fools 8,000-10,000 years ago.

      No Republicans then?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:anesthesia? by dartarrow · · Score: 1

      "They weren't exactly grunting fools 8,000-10,000 years ago."

      perhaps not, but we are now. And now

      --
      I love humanity, it is people I hate
    7. Re:anesthesia? by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1, Funny

      They weren't exactly grunting fools 8,000-10,000 years ago.

      So the human race has de-evolved then?

      -Grey

    8. Re:anesthesia? by Tiro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the same time period in which agriculture/civilization first developed, which also led to a decline in diet [too much starch] and a lower quality of life [state oppression].

    9. Re:anesthesia? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      They weren't exactly grunting fools 8,000-10,000 years ago.

      Are you suggesting that they were smarter than most of us?

      Whoa.

    10. Re:anesthesia? by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      hemlock

      Dearie dearie me, I'd read that olde booke of herbales again if I was you, anyone munching on sprig of hemlock will indeed feel nothing while you operate on them. Or ever again. We have to strip field of the stuff here to stop it killing the cows.

    11. Re:anesthesia? by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In most cases, the dosage makes the poison. See drugs (legal and illegal). Re hemlock, look here, for example.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    12. Re:anesthesia? by banaanimies · · Score: 0

      Clinton did it too.

    13. Re:anesthesia? by Theatetus · · Score: 1

      *shrug* there's this assumption that people before the Enlightenment were stupid, but 'tain't so. Galen performed brain surgery. So did ancient Egyptians. People are very very good at figuring out the medicinal properties of herbs, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if there were some moderately effective anaesthesia they used.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    14. Re:anesthesia? by MindKata · · Score: 0

      Well as it was the stone age, they could just hit the patients over the head with a rock.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    15. Re:anesthesia? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Read Plato's Phaedo (Hackforth's translation is pretty good, and the translator's name oddly appropriate for the Slashdot crowd), which recounts the death of Socrates and where the executioner discusses his art in a disconcertingly cheerful fashion. Hemlock had to be downed once in a large quantity for it to kill, taking smaller doses would just cause numbness throughout the body.

    16. Re:anesthesia? by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I want to know two things:

      First, did they save a lot of money on their car insurance by switching to GEICO?

      Secondly, did they really favor roast duck with a mango salsa?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    17. Re:anesthesia? by kfg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Considering that this is Pakistan, I would imagine that they had supplies of Opium nearby

      Nope, sorry, but the opium poppy is an introduced species in Pakistan. Alexander gets the credit for the introduction, circa 327 BC, from "Ancient Greece, Egypt and Mesopotamia".

      It's a plant native to the Mediterranian basin.

      The first record of opium being used medicinally in India (remember that Pakistan did not exist until the last half of the 20th century) occurs circa 1200 AD and recreational use of sufficient quantity to be notable did not begin until circa 1600, "coincident" with:

      Massive cultivation of opium in India did not begin until the Portuguese, followed by the Dutch and English, began exporting it from India to China. It was the Dutch who taught the Chinese to smoke it, circa 1700.

      Opium in Asia is one of the earliest byproducts of Eurpean "colonization" of the Orient. It was entirely unknown there before the Iron Age.

      KFG

    18. Re:anesthesia? by cintyram · · Score: 1

      considering that susrutha http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susrutha was from a couple millennia ago atleast.. i wouldnt be surprised if they were well advanced a few millennia before his time as well. Among the best of the world's universities were in that region [ Taxsila] for thousands of years.

    19. Re:anesthesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they drilled the holes tro put little "toothings" (derived for "earings") made of diamonds

    20. Re:anesthesia? by thc69 · · Score: 1

      You joke, but I do recall a few years back when it was discovered that prehistoric man did brain surgery using stone tools. They found the tools and skulls with healed repairs. A quick googling returns http://www.brain-surgery.com/history.html -- maybe somebody can cite better sites.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    21. Re:anesthesia? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      They were no smarter or dumber than us, in fact "they" are "us".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:anesthesia? by Doc+Ri · · Score: 1

      But he never inhaled.

      --
      617B3B7F7E7C7D7F00EOF
    23. Re:anesthesia? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Codeine, a powerful pain reliever is a constituent of Opium

      Codeine is actually a rather weak pain reliever. It's also a rather minor component of opium. The main active alkaloid is morphine. Codeine is just
      methyl-morphine, and is demethylated in the body to morphine and has identical
      pharmacology.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    24. Re:anesthesia? by MindKata · · Score: 0

      Yeah I've heard of this. Its called Trepanning ... I need that like a hole in the head! ;) ... which I think is the origin of that saying. :)

      (I'm surprised that site link about the history of brain surgery didn't mention its name).

      Here's a fun site, some great looking tools on here ...
      http://www.braceface.com/medical/Pages/Trepanning. htm

      ... just don't look at that site before you're about to eat! ;)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    25. Re:anesthesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I'm much less than 8000 years old.

  3. Consciousness by lovedew · · Score: 5, Funny

    No evidence as to whether or not the patients were conscious during the procedures

    During the "Stone" Age, I think it's obvious that even the patients were conscious, they weren't be soon after the procedures started.

    I'm more interested in knowing if the patients were still alive after the procedures.

    --
    Got Game/Music/Movie? In NZ? Swap Them Here
    1. Re:Consciousness by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Of course patients lived!

        I mean, in order to have the title, D.D.S or M. Caveman D.D.S, he has to pass dental school. So a patient had to survive in order for M. Caveman to get his Phd, or so called plakard.

        I for sure wish I had insturance against Malpractice, because after I left M. Caveman DS clinic, my whole mouth was bleeding, and part of my lip is missing.

        Plus I think he's from France...

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    2. Re:Consciousness by Bonker · · Score: 1

      Being that dental pain is among the worst imagineable, I imagine that many people were willing to risk their lives in order to end the pain.

      I work with a former EMT. He's told me that the worst kinds of pain for most patients are:

      Waking up on the table during anasthesia mishaps.
      Kidney Stones.
      Childbirth.
      Dental infection.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    3. Re:Consciousness by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it's safe to say that they all died at some point after the procedures.

    4. Re:Consciousness by drachenstern · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article states that the teeth showed use-wear from chewing, indicating that the tooth excavations were indeed performed in mouth and the patients did live for an appropriately long length of time in that they continued to have use of their mouth.

      Kinda like the romans and ?mayans/incas/aztecs(one of the three, don't feel like doing the google)? performing brain surgery and the patients living. This was proved by bone growth around the openings.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    5. Re:Consciousness by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      might i remark on your wonderous leap of logic, that they died at some point?

      in other news: Somebody mod this post up, For I have NO Mod Points!

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    6. Re:Consciousness by Ugly+American · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm more interested in knowing if the patients were still alive after the procedures.

      Successful brain surgery dates back to at least 3,000 BCE, so it wouldn't surprise me.

      I'd like to know what (if anything) they were using for fillings.

      --
      For sale: one sig space, gently used. Inquire for details.
    7. Re:Consciousness by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could RTFA, which describes how scientists can tell that patients lived longer than the treatments' duration.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Consciousness by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was undergoing an outpatient operation on the scrotal area in 1999. I was given local, they waited till we all thought it was numb, then they opened me up...

      They used an electrical cauterizer to keep the bleeding down...it sounded like the lightning gun in Q3A and felt like what you can imagine electricity against the scrotal area feels like.

      I said, "Doctor, I can feel that." He zapped me and said, "you felt that?"

      I never was able to play Q3A again because of that lightning gun sound.

      A Spinal Tap is pretty bad, migraines since my stroke are bad, but the cauterizer was worse.

    9. Re:Consciousness by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative
    10. Re:Consciousness by beoswulf · · Score: 1

      Funny, for years my HMO has only covered stone tool procedures and asphalt fillings. And anesthesia? Sure, if I don't mind waiting 9,000 years for the first available appointment with the plan's first anesthesiologist to come on duty.

    11. Re:Consciousness by acq3 · · Score: 1

      I did not!

    12. Re:Consciousness by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

      I would instead say that they were not counscious at all!
      Even if they were stone age people, none would consciously go to a dentist using flint drills!

      --
      Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
      For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    13. Re:Consciousness by jamesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've obviously never suffered from dental pain have you? (Or you've forgotten how much it hurts. Memory of pain is like that)

      You'll find that most 'normal' (non-prescription and low-end prescription) drugs don't do a lot for you, and anything that might relieve the pain starts to seem like a good idea, even if it involves someone tinkering inside your mouth with a rock :)

    14. Re:Consciousness by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were grafts and there is much more to discover about stone age medicine...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    15. Re:Consciousness by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      I had something along those lines and they used iodine to sterilize the area. I woke up after anesthesia, looked down, and screamed.

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
    16. Re:Consciousness by Knuckles · · Score: 3, Informative

      I imagine that many people were willing to risk their lives

      Exactly my thought. In fact whenever I see dental equipment from hundreds of years ago in a museum (or the odd dentist who likes to showcase it in his waiting room), I believe to be able to infer the amount of dental pain the patients suffered from the instruments they allowed to be used to help them.

      Drilling a hole into a tooth with a foot pedal-powered drill, then pouring molten lead into the cavity must have been better than the toothache. Aaargh!

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    17. Re:Consciousness by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that trephination (opening the skull to let the demons out) predates the Romans by at least 2000 years, possibly a lot more.

    18. Re:Consciousness by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1
      Your tale reminds me of the bith of our 4th child. My wife had a spinal epidural block, and the surgeon started to cut (all 5 of our kids were ceasarians). Now due to the repeated cutting of the one spot, Jo can feel anything where the external incision is. Once the surgeon got inside she said "I can feel that!". The block hadn't worked at all!

      She was given the option for a general anesthetic, but she decided she wanted to see the boy as soon as he was out. She lay there, starapped to the table, with surgeons cutting and mucking about inside here and she felt the whole bloody thing! She lay there, tears streaming from here eyes, and said "Trussed up like this I guess this is what Jesus went through".

      As soon as Cooper was born she didnt care about the pain.

      Now I don't know if that can be compared to electric shocks in the scrotum, but both cases show that people can stand a lot more pain than the ignorant masses would think.

    19. Re:Consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now don't you think, after all those ceasarians, it's time to use a condom!?

    20. Re:Consciousness by Bonker · · Score: 1

      She was given the option for a general anesthetic, but she decided she wanted to see the boy as soon as he was out. She lay there, starapped to the table, with surgeons cutting and mucking about inside here and she felt the whole bloody thing! She lay there, tears streaming from here eyes, and said "Trussed up like this I guess this is what Jesus went through".

      JESUS H. CHRIST.

      "Ma'am, it looks like the epidural we've given you isn't working properly. We want to give you a general anaesthetic."

      "No, because I want to see my baby right away."

      I couldn't do that. Those mother-bear hormones must be the strongest chemicals known to man.

      They have counseling for people who've waken up on the table during operations. It takes years for some people to deal with the trauma. This lady volunteered for it.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    21. Re:Consciousness by kfg · · Score: 1

      I think it's obvious that even the patients were conscious, they weren't be soon after the procedures started.

      You might think that, but it's really not true. I always refuse anathetics for simple procedures, not because I'm some sort of tough guy, but because I'm the worlds biggest wuss.

      It really doesn't hurt as much as you think, about 80% of pain only hurts because you think it hurts, and before the introduction of topical anasthetics before the novacaine injection the needle hurt more than the drilling.

      And the pain of the drilling stops when the drilling stops. The damned novacaine goes on, and on, and on. . .

      KFG

    22. Re:Consciousness by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      Although an ancient race may well have believed that trepanation helped patients by "releasing demons", modern studies, as well as practice has shown that the process can relieve cranial swelling in cases of sever concussion. Not sure if you were aware of that, but your post seemed to me to imply that you deemed the procedure akin to garlands of garlic and crucifixes.

    23. Re:Consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow I never really thought of that, but you're right... That numbness lasts forever and can do more harm than good (did I just bite my tongue? Would be nice if I felt it).

      I never really thought to ask them not to do it... it's just kinda one of those things. You sit down and they inject you with it like there was no other option.

      I think next time I'll tell them to skip it and see what happens. Hope I don't wuss out myself, because I really agree, that stuff takes forever to wear off.

    24. Re:Consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck are you talking about

    25. Re:Consciousness by JaJ_D · · Score: 1

      Are you 100% sure....

      Most of the IT managers I have worked with _had_ to be from the stone age - otherwise they would have been (a long time ago) selectivily remvoed from the gene pool

      :-]

      Jaj

    26. Re: Consciousness by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1
      You've never had your teeth treated without anasthesia, haven't you? I had. It was a standard practice in free dental care in Soviet Union. My family did not care to send me to a good dentist (you'd have to pay for that).

      I had all cavities drilled and filled without anasthesia. When root filling was required, the dentist would drill just enough to reach the pulp (she knew the pulp was reached when the patient emitted a moan), then put arsenic paste and a temporary seal. It will hurt moderately badly over a couple days, after which the nerve is killed. Then you visit the dentist again and have the root filled (no anasthesia, either). The only treatment when they did apply anasthetics was pulling a tooth.

      Too bad it drove me away from dentists. I was afraid of them like hell. I have bad teeth now.

      I never lost consciousness during a treatment. Sometimes I fainted. The dentist would put a cotton moistened with sal ammoniac under my nose for a second (that's a nastly smelling substance that returns you to your senses quickly), and then resume drilling.

      Telling from other patients I saw around the room, fainting during treatment was uncommon.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    27. Re:Consciousness by kalirion · · Score: 1

      There should be a "Too Informative" mod.

      ughhhhh....

  4. not dentist by Clazirus · · Score: 0

    i'm sure that they are not called as 'dentists'.

    --
    If dreams are like movies then memories are films about ghost..
    1. Re:not dentist by Tezkah · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'm sure that they are not called as 'dentists'.

      what are you, an anti-dentite?

    2. Re:not dentist by jpardey · · Score: 1

      I would have just asked "What?" myself.

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
  5. Re:Rucas gets Fristage Postage? by dteichman2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ooops... looks like I beat you, Mr. Troll

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
  6. THE MORE YOU KNOW! by Tezkah · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dont think I want to know what kind of anesthesia they would have used then...

    they didn't use novocaine, they used NovoClub

    NovoClub: Only one swing and the pain goes away!

    1. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

      You need to check your facts. I was quite useful in small doses, and it was fatal in large doses. We must assume that it was "LidoClub."

      --


      Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    2. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by Tezkah · · Score: 1

      You need to check your facts. I was quite useful in small doses, and it was fatal in large doses. We must assume that it was "LidoClub."

      this man is clearly under the influence of modern drugs! with NovaClub, you dont get any of these "side effects" such as posting incoherently on slashdot, just a minor headache!

      Please note, NovaClub may cause constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, drowsiness, increased sweating, loss of appetite, nausea. Do not increase dose on your own; do not stop abruptly unless advised to do so by your doctor; do not drive or operate heavy machinery until you know how your body reacts to this drug.

    3. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

      I didn't post incoherently. It's two jokes in one, if you read carefully.

      --


      Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    4. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by plankrwf · · Score: 4, Funny

      No wonder this (NovoClub) treatment isn't used anymore; it was and probably still is patented ;-0

      Roel

    5. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ;-0

      Is that some emoticon I don't know about? (notices that ")" is shift-0)

    6. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1
      NovoClub: Only one swing and the pain goes away!

      ...or not!

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    7. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right! You don't want to be hearing from the NovaClub lawyers....

    8. Re:THE MORE YOU KNOW! by Rashdot · · Score: 1

      NovoClub: Only one swing and the pain goes away!

      No, the pain just moves to another spot.
      You don't want to keep it moving though...

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
  7. Speaking from experience... by winmine · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If they weren't out cold when the 'procedure' started, they would be by the time it was finished.

  8. They'd have a choice... by crossmr · · Score: 1

    One of us would have to be unconscious during that procedure. If it wasn't me, the dentist would have been long dead before he got eaten by a wooly mammoth.

    I'm thinking their dentistry ran along the lines of:
    It hurts, rip it out with whatever method you can.

    They still recommended you see them twice a year though...

    1. Re:They'd have a choice... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Ripping out is a destructive, but effective method. Even Tom Hanks could do his dentistry in Cast Away.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:They'd have a choice... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      definitely effective as long as the socket didn't get infected, but I'm not sure I'd call it dentistry. If your tooth hurts and you don't want to pay a dentist and I grab a pair of pliers and yank it out, no one will mistake me for a dentist.

    3. Re:They'd have a choice... by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      It hurts, rip it out with whatever method you can.


      I saw an old John Wayne movie where he entered a dentist's office to avoid getting shot by a bad guy, and told the dentist to pretend to pull a tooth. So we got a look at what that involved in the Wild West. Lots of hollering, and the dentist grabbing the "tooth" with his "pliers".
      The bad guy looked in the window, saw what was going on, and went off in another direction, forgetting about Wayne for some reason.
      Anyone remember the name of that John Wayne movie?

  9. This is what happens when... by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you have your spouse do dental work on you.

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
  10. Old Drilling? by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

    samzenpus from the old-drilling dept.

    Try the old Slashdot story department maybe?

    It's alright, us Slashdot readers understand. After having your teeth drilled without Novacaine it's understandable that you're suffering from memory loss or blocking out the trauma as previously reported.

    I wanna make a bow drill now.

    1. Re:Old Drilling? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I don't know. My father hates the numbing feeling of novacaine so much, he has endured fillings, crowns, and even several root canals without any pain killer.

      Now, I don't know how he does this, but I joke with him that he must have worked as a spy for the CIA. He says it's a matter of letting go and making your mind wander to something else - but I'm not about to test this.

      But anyway, he shows no memoryloss/blocking due to trauma. I imagine ancient peoples in general having a higher pain threshhold due to more exposure.

    2. Re:Old Drilling? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Assuming you see your dentist regularly, your cavities should be spotted before they get anywhere near a nerve. I suspect that dentists give pain killers just in case the hole is deeper than it lokos, or in case they slip, and that in most cases wouldn't be required.

    3. Re:Old Drilling? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Your dad is right on the pain.

          Pain is an electrical impulse being sent from a nerve to the brain, signaling the brain that pain exists. The brain then comprehends the pain, and responds appropriately.

          If you are mentally strong enough to ignore those sensations, there is no pain.

          Most people have a problem with doing this. Instead of being able to ignore the pain, they focus on it. People who can ignore the pain are usually the ones who can ignore a dripping faucet or a nagging wife. People who can't ignore the sounds are the ones that tweak out about them. Being able to hear sounds is based on the same concepts. Your ear translates the sound waves into electrical impulses, which the brain comprehends.

          Kids are the best for this, as far as ignoring sounds go. Try telling a kid to clean something up, or do their homework, and you'll see. :)

          I play a game with some people. I've let girls pinch me with their fingernails until they break the skin. I'll hold a conversation with them while they're doing it. It's entertaining, and of course the macho "oohh, that doesn't hurt." Sure, the sensation is there, I just ignore it. Anyone can.

          I've had dental work done with no ansthetic, multiple piercings, and had nasty cuts. Sometimes you just have to deal with it, it doesn't do any good to cry about it. There's a 6" scar on my leg, from a wound that I treated myself. You'd think cleaning it with alcohol should have hurt. Other people in the room flinched. I just refused to feel it.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Old Drilling? by hankwang · · Score: 1
      After having your teeth drilled without Novacaine it's understandable that you're suffering from memory loss or blocking out the trauma as previously reported

      Come on, I have plenty of fillings and almost all of them have been done without anesthesia. Only when they extracted the wisdom teeth and when they had to work for 60 minutes to place a crown, I asked for anesthesia. Actually, with the wisdom teeth I didn't have an option and with the crown I'm still not sure that it was necessary. On the other hand, I tried eating a bacon sandwich while the anesthesia was still working (two hours afterwards) and I started chewing my tongue which I didn't notice before I could taste the blood on the left side of the tongue.

      Yes, it hurts when there is only a millimeter of hard tissue between the drill and the nerves. But the bone itself does not contain any nerves and most of the drilling is just a lot of annoying noise. The time it actually hurts is less than a minute. I normally try to solve calculus problems in my head to distract myself from the pain.

      Nothing beats being able to talk, smile, drink and eat directly after the dentist takes his tools out of your mouth, rather than have a numb and tingling feeling for 3-4 hours.

    5. Re:Old Drilling? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      There's can also be decay on the front of the teeth, not deep, but sometimes the dentist cuts away the gum line to put in the filling. This was the case with me with my bottom front teeth (plus these teeth are thin, not much room to miss a nerve coming in from the side instead of the top).

    6. Re:Old Drilling? by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      I was exagerating to explain the editor's apparent lapse of Dupe protection. I too have had a drilling or two even without Novacaine to numb the tooth, and survived just fine. I prefer with numbing though, I just make sure not to chew much for a couple hours.

    7. Re:Old Drilling? by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      not to mention the anastetic is more for thermal transferances.... IE. you grind on something and it WILL get hot. and heat/cold == pain on teeth.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  11. It's always easy by sunwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...to underestimate ancient people, maybe even necessary in order to gain a better appreciation of human nature, but it's heartening to know that we only underestimate ourselves. Now to master nano-age dentistry...

    1. Re:It's always easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now to master nano-age dentistry...

      Where, through the art of nanotechnology, dentists are able to amplify pain by 200%!

  12. Practical Applications? by Yst · · Score: 0, Troll

    From a more practical, present day standpoint, one might be inclined to ask how England might apply this theory of "dental care" to its current populace, in order to reap beneficial rewards.

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (comes and goes)
  13. Would that also mean they had fillings? by kanweg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any dentists here?

    If the tooth bone (pulp or whatever the stuff below the enamel is) is exposed, wouldn't it start to rot in no time?

    If yes and the further decay is limited (4 teeth showed decay associated with the hole), would that suggestion that they filled the hole with clay, resin, or some other material capable of hardening?

    Bert

    1. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by teethdood · · Score: 5, Informative

      IAAD (I AM A Dentist) Coronal tooth structure (the part that is above the gum) is composed of Enamel, Dentin, then Pulp. Enamel is very hard, not easily susceptible to decay. Dentin is softer, more sensitive, contains tubules that lead directly into the pulp. Bacteria can either secrete acids to break down dentin (most likely) or crawl their way into the pulp (less likely), causing pain, pulpitis, then necrosis. From the looks of the images, the ancient dentists drilled past the enamel into dentin. There is no mention of any attempt to fill these teeth (amalgam wasn't exactly perfected until the late 1800s, resin composites not until circa 1950s). It is not trivial to come up with a long-lasting filling material. Malleable gold comes to mind. Gold had been extensively used in dentistry dated back to I'd say 3000BC, not nearly old enough for these dentists. Most likely the recurrent decay found in those teeth resulted from plaque and bacteria making those un-filled drilled holes their home.

    2. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by (negative+video) · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm a dentist. It is a misconception that teeth "decay". The calcium-rich material is actually stripped away by dental mites, who use it to build nests behind the tonsils.

      Regarding the present discovery, it is thought that the tonsils were removed at the time of the dental work, disrupting the life cycle of the mites. Unfortunately the soft tissues were not preserved and the only evidence is indirect. Measurements of the skull ridges where the tonsils attach tend to support this theory, although it is difficult to know whether they represent tonsillectomy-induced changes or simply a natural variation in an isolated population.

      --
      Call now for our Become a Scientist in 21 Days program. If you act now we'll throw in 5 pounds of authority, absolutely free!!!

    3. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Well in that sense, it is also a misconception that dead bodies "decay".

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by teethdood · · Score: 1
      Why don't we all get tonsillectomies...no longer any need for dentists due to nonexistent tooth "decay". Any applicants for tonsillectomist school?

      Tooth decay

    5. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      Uh... dental mites? Nests behind the tonsils?? What crack-smokery is this??

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    6. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Hey, the man says he's a dentist. Who are we to doubt him.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    7. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      I doubt everybody. Even myself.

    8. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 0

      You sure about that?

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
    9. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by kanweg · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply.

      "no mention of any attempt to fill these teeth (amalgam wasn't exactly perfected until the late 1800s, resin composites not until circa 1950s)"

      Well, I had natural resins in mind (those from bark or something). They're known to be antibacterial, so that would help too. And they may not leave a trace for archeologists. That leaves the problem of course of overcoming the tremendous forces on the filling (not just in the direction of the tooth, which would be easy to survice, but also a pulling force exerted by food during chewing).

      Any idea how fast such a drilled tooth would start to rot?

      Bert
      Who considers the bacteria cave dwellers

    10. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

      would that suggestion that they filled the hole with clay, resin, or some other material capable of hardening?

      Teeth filled with Amber - the ultimate in Stone Age 'bling.'

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    11. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      Self-aware intellects who weren't beaten with a stupid-stick this morning? (speaking for myself anyway). If it's a joke, I don't get it... but dental mites don't exist.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    12. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Hmm, now that you mentinon it -- I'm beginning to have my doubts. Maybe I don't doubt myself...er...wait...

    13. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yes. You may be a self-aware intellect, but obviously not a humor-aware one.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    14. Re:Would that also mean they had fillings? by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Clearly you didn't read his .sig. Read it. All will make sense then.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  14. This week on 'The Flintstones'.... by Channard · · Score: 4, Funny

    'I tell you, Barney, I don't need to see no dentist! I can do this myself...' 'But Fred...' 'Look, I've tied one end of this rope to my tooth, the other end to a boulder. Then I just push it over this cliff and... yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!' 'Fred? Hey, where'd you go, Fred?' *voice from bottom of cliff* 'Call the dentist, Barn.'

    1. Re:This week on 'The Flintstones'.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dentist, shmentist - The Great Kazoo just used his magical powers to fix their cavities, dumb-dumb.

  15. Captain Caveman - the Dentist by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Funny

    Toothpain? No problem...Captain Caveman fix you good

    Captain Caveman apply anesthetics so you dont feel pain (SLAM!)

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  16. progress by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    and this is how dentistry is still done there!

  17. Why? by garyr_h · · Score: 2

    Why has there been such a precedent lately to post old news?

    --
    http://chickencamels.poemofquotes.com/
  18. Coincident? by layer3switch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "The form of dental treatment seen at Mehrgarh continued for about 1,500 years, before the practice was stopped in the area."

    Coincidently short before the practice was stopped in the area, a scripture found nearby describing about a birth of an entity called, "HMO".

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  19. it's not *that* bad by Quadraginta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Eh, let us not wildly exaggerate the pain involved. My father had all his fillings as a child without anaesthesia. It isn't unheard of for people to refuse it today.

    What I find more curious about this report is that the ancient men were observant enough to realize that if you stopped the decay by drilling it out, you needn't lose the tooth later. As late as the 18th century or so, I believe the standard treatment for a decaying tooth was: (1) wait until it really starts to hurt, and then (2) pull it out. Drilling the decay out (while preserving the tooth) is a lot more sophisticated.

    1. Re:it's not *that* bad by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I prefer no anaesthesia as well if it's only a filling. Sure, it's painful, but you can get through it. Besides, the very thought of that needle...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:it's not *that* bad by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I know there's a high nerd-factor, but it's the little details like this that keep making me think there's something to the idea of advanced civilizations predating the birth of civilization as we understand it today.

      Hindi mystics traditionally have a word for 1/36,000,000th of a second, although none of them know why. Indian atomism describes 3 types of indivisible particles that can combine to form all the elements we know (a theory that suspiciously resembles current ideas of subatomic particles). Now "cavemen" understood that drilling cavities and filling the holes would prevent long-term pain and health problems, a fact which the species forgot and didn't rediscover for thousands of years.

      Yeah, in reality it's very unlikely, but I like the fact that so many things can be fit together into an elaborate theory of prior civilization.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    3. Re:it's not *that* bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a sadistic dentist when I was a kid. He wouldn't do the ansthetic right, and had more fun moving the needle around, so when I was about 13, I told him, "Screw the needle, just do it."

          Another dentist much later in life told me, he probably did a lot of unnecessary work. He just liked hurting kids.

          I'd sue him, but he died 10 years before the other dentist told me the truth.

          My new dentist was very cool about it. He'd give me lots of nitrous, because every time I heard the drill, it brough back memories of the sadistic doctor. I could feel the nerves being drilled into, just from the sound of the drill.

          Thanks to a 15 year gap in dental work, a wisdom tooth was pretty badly rotten. The new dentist pulled it out while I was all groggy on nitrous, and I didn't feel a thing.

    4. Re:it's not *that* bad by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      As late as the 18th century or so

      After the Middle Ages, LOTS of stuff had to be rediscovered (often badly, often not at all) that was well-known before the christian churches destroyed or locked up "pagan" knowledge and killed the people in the know.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    5. Re:it's not *that* bad by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in reality it's very unlikely

      I'm also intrigued by the idea, and am not even sure why it's supposed to be so unlikely. Homo Sapiens existed for probably at least 200,000 years with the same physiological capacities as today. I don't really see why a development at least to the level of ancient Egypt should have occurred only once during the last 10,000 of the available years.
      There is some evidence (not so good link for Sudanese pyramid-building cultures predating Egypt, whose architectural remains were discovered not long ago, and are in pretty bad shape. A culture a few thousand years older could easily have vanished completely.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    6. Re:it's not *that* bad by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, you're about 1000 years off!

      A hell of a lot of Western knowledge was lost due to the burning of the Great Library of Alexandria, which happened early in the 1st millenium. Amongst other things lost were originals of Aristotle and Euclid, and Heron's plans for his steam car.

      It's thought by some that we still haven't brought geometry to the state it was in before the Dark Ages.

      We do have to keep in mind though that non-western civilisations kept most of their knowledge until the colonial powers trivialised and marginalised it. A great example is the Ancient Chinese proof of "Pythagoras' Theorem", which is simpler and clearer than Euclid's, to the extent that I use it when teaching, and have never had a student fail to understand it.

    7. Re:it's not *that* bad by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      I agree it's unlikely, but I don't think it's as very unlikely as you said. Even in the 2500 years for which we have decent records, civilization has seemed at times to advance and recede. It's been suggested by perfectly sober historians, for example, that the life of a Roman citizen of New Carthage (modern Cartagena) in 100 AD was much closer to modern life, in terms of public hygiene, literacy and education, and the sophistication of urban life, than was the life of a English subject in 16th century London.

      If we can experience these kinds of fluctuations over a mere 2500 years, why not much larger fluctuations over periods of, say, 200,000 years? Fluctuations in which civilization advances to a modern equivalent (or further) and then collapses? How would we know? Artifacts? We have explored archaelogically very little of the Earth's surface, and mostly only where we already have reasons to suspect interesting stuff is buried. Further, consider that almost the entire temperate zone of the Earth has been ground down by glaciers several times in the last 250,000 years. We could never expect to find ruined cities, a la Planet of the Apes. Is it likely we could have missed noticing the 200,000-year-old artifacts of a global civilization? No. But is it impossible? Perhaps not.

      We can open the door a smidge further -- we know there was, at one time, at least one other hominid species that we drove extinct, Homo neanderthalis. Why not others? Maybe 50 million years ago there was an intelligent, tool-using hominid much like ourselves, who rose to form a mighty civilization and then destroyed himself, or merely degenerated and went extinct. After 50 million years very little in the way of artifacts would've survived. Heck, of all the brontosaurs that ever roamed the planet -- surely a number in the billions -- we've only found the preserved skeletons of a dozen or so.

    8. Re:it's not *that* bad by Theatetus · · Score: 1
      It's thought by some that we still haven't brought geometry to the state it was in before the Dark Ages.

      Only by those who don't read Hebrew, Arabic, and Farsi (which, sadly, includes almost every scholar of Hellenic math and sciences). I remember once in a Hellenic conics class I was taking the prof. said "unfortunately, book III of whatever has been lost", which surprised me because we had just been studying the Arabic version of book III of whatever that week in my medieval Arabic class.

      Incidentally, I agree about the Chinese proof of Pythagorus: it's much clearer than Euclid's I.47 (if it's the one I'm thinking of with the inscribed circle). Still, for clarity and elegance in a proof it's almost impossible to beat Euclid's VII.3 for the GCD (well... once it's edited to make the recursion explicit rather than assumed) or (my personal favorite) Euclid's IX.20 for the infinitude of primes.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    9. Re:it's not *that* bad by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Agreed insofar as the burning of the library was also a great loss, but mainly of what is now considered "classical" stuff, e.g., greek.

      Disagreed insofar as that does not mean I'm "off". I was merely talking about something else, namely the extermination of the knowledge of the celtic, germanic, etc. cultures. This did still happen even though it was not the only event in which knowledge was lost, as you rightly pointed out.

      E.g., most of the knowledge about the healing and other properties of local European plants was lost during the Middle Ages.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    10. Re:it's not *that* bad by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1

      I consider Hebrew, Farsi, Arabic etc to be "Eastern" (the "Middle East" thing I guess) but yes, I agree that there was a lot of stuff saved in Baghdad and Damascus.

    11. Re:it's not *that* bad by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      At some point in advancement a society begins to produce artifacts that WILL last 50 million years, or at least leave traces. If every human on the planet died today, I think a civilization 50 million years from now could tell we were here. In particular, Radioisotopes in nuclear waste with 100k year half lives would still exist in detectable quantities after that long. Also, our moon landers would still be sitting up there, barring moon-destroying interplanetary meteor activity.

    12. Re:it's not *that* bad by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Hindi mystics traditionally have a word for 1/36,000,000th of a second, although none of them know why. Indian atomism describes 3 types of indivisible particles that can combine to form all the elements we know (a theory that suspiciously resembles current ideas of subatomic particles).

      Have you read Fritjof Capra's The Tao of Physics ? It's an entertaining look at how closely some Eastern religious beliefs follow modern notions of physics and cosmology. In the end, however, you have to assume that it's all a matter of either coincidence, or discoveries due to observation and reason without any especial benefits of civilization.

    13. Re:it's not *that* bad by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      The new dentist pulled it out while I was all groggy on nitrous, and I didn't feel a thing.
       
      You didn't feel it at all?
       
      When I was getting a wisdom tooth removed,he anaesthetic suddenly stopped working in the middle of the job. They gave me that nitrous stuff and after that they finished the job with no problem. I could feel everything. But I didn't care at all.
       
      Weirdest sensation that I have ever had.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    14. Re:it's not *that* bad by dajak · · Score: 1

      Eh, let us not wildly exaggerate the pain involved. My father had all his fillings as a child without anaesthesia. It isn't unheard of for people to refuse it today.

      I never had a filling done with an anaesthetic. There is really hardly any pain involved if you don't need a root canal treatment first, and I don't think these stone age dentists did those. Root canals are doable without anaesthesia too: I tried it twice.

    15. Re:it's not *that* bad by dajak · · Score: 1

      After the Middle Ages, LOTS of stuff had to be rediscovered (often badly, often not at all) that was well-known before the christian churches destroyed or locked up "pagan" knowledge and killed the people in the know.

      I rarely defend Christianity, but I do think it deserves a more balanced view than this one. The Catholic Church, its monasteries and universities, and the "Holy Roman Empire" at least kept alive the memory (and some of the works) of the great civilization that fell apart. Without it it would have been almost completely forgotten. Unfortunately it did not keep the spirit of free scientific inquiry and exchange of ideas alive. Throughout the middle ages people believed they lived in a world which was naturally degenerating. Only in the early 14th century arrogant artists in Italy started to consider themselves the equals of this old civilization and invented the notion of Dark Ages in between. The ironic thing is that we do not consider Petrarch's Italy equal to Rome, but we did retain his notion of Dark Ages.

      I think the reality is that the exchange of ideas necessary for building up a significant body of knowledge only works in an empire of the size of China or Rome, and these are more the exception than the rule. In the dark ages there were simply too litle books and too small an audience for books to keep knowledge alive. "We" may know more than they did, but "we" are still just a few of the 6 billion people on earth, and if we lose our libraries, universities, and means of communication for some reason even we might lose it in a few generations. In the classical world this small elite of educated people probably consisted of not more than tens of thousands, maybe a hundred thousand people.

    16. Re:it's not *that* bad by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1
      We have explored archaelogically very little of the Earth's surface, and mostly only where we already have reasons to suspect interesting stuff is buried. Further, consider that almost the entire temperate zone of the Earth has been ground down by glaciers several times in the last 250,000 years.
      Hell, end of the last ice age vast amounts of the Earth changed, much of what was coastline became pretty far out into the ocean. In fact, we've only recently really started seriously thinking about looking out there for signs of civilization, mainly after stumbling accross some ancient villages and so forth long covered in ocean. And they've found signs of larger city-like ruins as well in places. Who knows what's out there, and how far civilization really goes.
    17. Re:it's not *that* bad by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Ah, perhaps you mean like this.

    18. Re:it's not *that* bad by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Well, you're right, so that's why I said the odds are against finding an ancient civilization near ours. But I don't think it's anywhere near impossible.

      I'm not sure much of what we've built would survive 50 million years. That's an awful long time. Continents move, climate changes, mountain ranges are uplifted and eroded down, rivers change course, seas are formed and dry up again. Your typical 50 million year old strata is 50 to 100 feet down, I believe. So those artifacts would be whatever survives being compressed into 100 feet of sedimentary rock. Not a lot.

      Stuff on the Moon would last, of course. But how easy would it be to find? The Moon's a big place. Maybe we'll only come across another Tranquility Base in 150 years or so, when all the Moon's nooks and crannies get explored. Not likely, no. But it's possible.

    19. Re:it's not *that* bad by mpe · · Score: 1

      I think the reality is that the exchange of ideas necessary for building up a significant body of knowledge only works in an empire of the size of China or Rome, and these are more the exception than the rule.

      You missed off the "Arab Empire" which is probably more relevent to Europe than China.

    20. Re:it's not *that* bad by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Arab science mostly living off of the Byzantines whom they had conquered--once they exhausted those ideas, they began a long slow decline.

    21. Re:it's not *that* bad by Recneps · · Score: 1

      I have only ever had two cavitys, neither of which i was given any thing for when they drilled my teeth. This was not by choice, my dentist never offered any thing. Even with out the anaesthesia all i felt was some pressure and a tickling sencation.

  20. Ha! by benbranch · · Score: 1

    Well it sounds like dental technology hasn't changed. My dentist is a bastard from hell, a flint drill would be better than that little whining lightning rod. And I'll bet the ancient Pakistani's let you get properly smashed on fermented goats milk before they took the drill to you. None of this "Injection in the mouth" bullshit.

  21. Suprisingly effective by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The team that carried out the work say close examination of the teeth shows the tool was "surprisingly effective" at removing rotting dental tissue.

    Surprisingly effective compared to what? The Tom Hanks method of dentistry?

    -Grey

  22. Malcolm Gladwell on Tooth Decay and US Health Care by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  23. Drills to remove cavities? by Orlando · · Score: 1

    They used flint drills to remove cavities

    Em, a cavity is a hole, so can someone tell me how you remove a hole with a drill?

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-
    1. Re:Drills to remove cavities? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "Em, a cavity is a hole, so can someone tell me how you remove a hole with a drill?"

      Like duhh, just run the drill backwards!

    2. Re:Drills to remove cavities? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Mayor Quimby: Mmm, I guess we're not gonna find anything.
      Otto: Well how we gonna get outta here?
      Homer: We'll dig our way out!
      Wiggum: No, no, dig up, stupid!

    3. Re:Drills to remove cavities? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      No, no, you remove the decayed crap from around the hole, which then naturally falls out. If you're quick you can spit it out, because if you swallow that hole you're going to be in a world of hurt...

    4. Re:Drills to remove cavities? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      You, Sir, are qualified to be in management.

  24. procedure motiviation? by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    i read in another article, and in thinking about it would probably also be my conclusion, that the motivation was likely not to remove abscessed parts of the tooth, but to provide a means by which evil spirits or whatever could escape.

  25. Did some looking up on our fragile teeth by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative

    As I had a spate of dental problems the last year and because I was wondering why we evolves such apparently wretchedly fragile teeth (sharks have it nice, three rows of ever-emerging teeth keep popping up and the old ones pop out), and read up on dentistry in general to take better care of my teeth.

    There are a lot of people out there who keep repeating that cavities were not a problem in most people until refined sugar hit the scene around the 1700s and that the industrial revolution made it cheap for the masses.

    This is true to a point but I guess this article shows it's stupid to think that no one had cavities before refined sugar.

    Drspiller.com being a good site to look up some info. Meat won't give cavities. Natural starchy foods (vegetables like potatoes) and fruit have many natural fibers that wash their own sugars off your teeth before they have time to settle, and the acids in them negligent because of dilution. With a drink of water afterwards should prevent any problems.

    So it's true, processed and refined foods, especially with sugar, high fructose corn syrup, corn syrup, etcetera, are the biggest causes of cavities.

    However, dried fruits are sticky and should be treated as refined sugar or processed foods (these all can cause cavities) and may be the biggest cavity causer of the old world (along with perhaps alcohols, like mead, etcetera).

    1. Re:Did some looking up on our fragile teeth by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if these people were farmers by this stage (it's around the time when grain farming started), but if they were, they would have had problems with grit in their not quite pure flour, which wore away the teeth of the Egyptians, for example. Once the top had worn through, the rest could be sensitive to decay maybe.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    2. Re:Did some looking up on our fragile teeth by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
      I was wondering why we evolves such apparently wretchedly fragile teeth

      It probably also has something to do with the fact that throughout most of human evolution, the average life span is *far* shorter than that of today. People just needed to survive to child bearing age and raise the child to self-suficiency, to be evolutionarily successful. That can be done by your teens. Even our fragile teeth, with poor hygiene, would likely last that long no problem. No that we're living well past our 30's, 40's, and into our 70's or so, we're far exceeding the "design specifications" of our teeth (and many other parts of our bodies).

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    3. Re:Did some looking up on our fragile teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. The story that I heard was that it was milled flour that started the cavity problem. or rather, finely ground minerals from the grinding stones that ended up mixed in that wore down enamel enough to let the sugary stuff do its job...

    4. Re:Did some looking up on our fragile teeth by DanMc · · Score: 1
      As I had a spate of dental problems the last year and because I was wondering why we evolves such apparently wretchedly fragile teeth (sharks have it nice, three rows of ever-emerging teeth keep popping up and the old ones pop out), and read up on dentistry in general to take better care of my teeth.

      I wondered the same thing. Animals have very few problems with their teeth, especially crooked, impacted, etc... You will never run across an animal with teeth as crooked as a human who has never had access to dental care. I came to the conclusion that human teeth are an evolutionary failing. Basically, I believe brain size increased, which caused jaws to shrink, crowding of teeth, and problems in childbirth. However, congnitive powers and the use of hands and tools instead of teeth, overwhelmingly made up for the problems. It was better to have crappy teeth and a big brain and tools. Especially when you consider that evolution would not have been affected greatly by older humans who had already procreated. It's the same reason heart disease isn't being affected by evolution. By the time it kills you, you've already had kids. I think this also happens with teeth. In prehistoric times, if your teeth had problems at 25, it was too late to affect your reproductive success.

    5. Re:Did some looking up on our fragile teeth by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      > No that we're living well past our 30's, 40's, and into our 70's or so,
      > we're far exceeding the "design specifications" of our teeth (and many
      > other parts of our bodies).

      I don't think we exceed use-by specs - rather we don't maintain them properly. My uncle is 80, has just 1 tooth missing, with no cavities in the others.

  26. Where There Is No Dentist by front · · Score: 4, Informative

    Stone age dentistry happens even today... a little more updated, but not too much, for most of the billions on this planet.

    "Where There Is No Dentist"

    cheers

    front

  27. Lack of progress by CarpetShark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know; I don't see a lot of advanced technology in today's dentistry. They have instruments with finer precision, sure, and they have fillings that last longer, but essentially, they're just plugging holes for the most part, which has always been possible with a bit of tree resin. Essentially, dentistry is a major contrast to other medical professions, because it has made little progress towards prevention or CURES for decay, besides physical stuff like toothpaste and floss.

    Lately, there was a slashdot story about changing the electrical properties of teeth so that plaque can't attach. In sci-fi, there are ideas like hermetically sealing teeth. I really think dentistry should be working much harder towards things like that.

    1. Re:Lack of progress by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      [quote]In sci-fi, there are ideas like hermetically sealing teeth. I really think dentistry should be working much harder towards things like that.[/quote]

      What? And kill off all the profitable fillings, root canals, and all the rest?

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    2. Re:Lack of progress by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Health Industry (i have to repeat it again) work for profits.
      Only person who works to cure you,is yourself.
      As for dentistry to prevent plaque you need to cure the source,Bacteria.
      I.e. chewing garlic,onions,less sugar-containing food,washing mouth after each meal.

    3. Re:Lack of progress by chivo243 · · Score: 1

      Can I get an AMEN! here. There has be be better dentistry on the horizon. I thought I heard of a treatment for kids that seals the teeth? I used to fix my retainer all the time, and wondered why they couldn't seal the tooth with something akin to crazy glue??

      p.s. I have logged enough time in a dentist chair to know that I want that shot.

      --
      Sig Hansen?
    4. Re:Lack of progress by tigersaw · · Score: 1

      Ahem,

      1. Fluoridation of Water

      2. One of many other innovations in development.

      3. Do you really think dentists are making anywhere near the kind of money our friends at Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, and Novartis reap on lifelong medications for heart disease, cancer, and ED?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, all our base are belong to you!
    5. Re:Lack of progress by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> 1. Fluoridation of Water [cdc.gov]
      >> ...
      >> In Soviet Russia, all our base are belong to you!

      In Soviet Russia, your precious bodily fluids corrupt the water supply.

    6. Re:Lack of progress by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      If you want to be cynical, consider that if dentistry advances to the point where you go in for a one-time futuristic tooth-sealing procedure once you have all your permanent adult teeth, and then never need dental treatment for the rest of your life (barring accidents like getting a tooth knocked out), there won't be very much business left for dentists -- and I doubt dentists would want that to happen.

      Sure, dentists might end up like buggy-whip manufacturers, outrun by technology -- except that dentists are professionals (in the sense of having to carry malpractice insurance), and like most professionals, have a powerful guild behind them (in this case, the ADA, which pretty much dictates American dental practices). If the ADA decides it wants to squash some new procedure in this country, it probably will. And affluent Americans will end up going to Europe in order to get their teeth sealed anyway.

      (Warning: Future predictions are not guaranteed. Actual mileage may vary.)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    7. Re:Lack of progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually they have found a microbe that colonizes the mouth and kills the bacteria that causes plaque and decay. Once you've gotten colonized, you don't get another cavity, ever. (Drinking large quantities of alchohol at frat parties not included.)

      Problem, they don't think making a few hundred at a one time dentist appointment is good enough. They are trying to genetically modify the microbe to need something special it can't get unless you buy the daily/weekly microbial maintenance mouthwase. (At an inflated price of course)

      I have no problem with genetic engineering to improve things, but making a 'pay me forever or it dies' gene is just plain evil. Kinda seems like blackmail.

      Also, I don't think this would wipe out dentistry. Just about everything non-cavity related should still be viable.

    8. Re:Lack of progress by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So basically we need to wait for the Europeans (or Japanese, or Indians, or someone else) to develop a great new preventive treatment because it'll never see the light of day here.

      Hey Europeans! Hurry up!! I don't want to suffer through another root canal!

    9. Re:Lack of progress by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Where did you read this? Do you have a source?

      Surely someone else can take the microbe as it is now and manufacture and sell it. If not here in the Corporate States of America, then somewhere else like Cuba.

    10. Re:Lack of progress by bziman · · Score: 1
      In sci-fi, there are ideas like hermetically sealing teeth.

      Um... this isn't sci-fi... I had all of my molars sealed when I was a kid. Dental Sealant has been around since the 1970s.

      --brian

    11. Re:Lack of progress by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Presence of Fluoridation "Coincidental" with Repression and Racial Tyranny

              When you consider that the part of the brain most affected by the fluoride ion is the Hippocampus, and that the Hippocampus is heavily involved in decision-making, motivation and ability to "challenge" threats (or for that matter tyranny), thus inducing compliance with "authority", it is no surprise that in the United States, all military bases and Indian Reservations are heavily fluoridated, and in another fluoridated country, Australia, all aboriginal water supplies are heavily fluoridated, it becomes quite apparent that fluoridation is "coincidentally" used in programs of racial suppression.

      more info

    12. Re:Lack of progress by tigersaw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that makes sense. No way our country's problems are attributable to governmental and media corruption, the effects of global warming, or our imperialistic foreign policy founded on racism. Must be the fluoride brainwashing us. I, for one, welcome our halogen overlords.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, all our base are belong to you!
    13. Re:Lack of progress by milletre · · Score: 1
      If you want to be cynical, consider that if dentistry advances to the point where you go in for a one-time futuristic tooth-sealing procedure once you have all your permanent adult teeth, and then never need dental treatment for the rest of your life (barring accidents like getting a tooth knocked out), there won't be very much business left for dentists -- and I doubt dentists would want that to happen.


      I'll feed at least one anti-dental troll on this thread, even though it's awfully late. Dentists by and large do operate for profit, but people always find inventive ways to screw up their teeth, decay or no. Traumatic fractures, erosion, attrition through grinding, orthodontic issues, color issues, periodontal issues ... the list goes on. Most of this thread has been devoted to, basically, people whining about a disease that's already preventable (dental caries), but we do a lot more than drill and fill.

      -a non-profit dentist
    14. Re:Lack of progress by Recneps · · Score: 1

      I thought I heard of a treatment for kids that seals the teeth? I had this procedure when i was younger, they paint your molars with some sort of glue or cement. it is suspossed to protect the teeth. It apparently lasts many years, when my Mom asked when the next time I would have to get this done they responded "you don't have to worry about that". i geuss i dont have to worry about ti wearing off. To this day I have not had a cavity after I got this done, geuss it works.

  28. ought to help though by r00t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Prior, you have a normal cavity. It might have a small opening in the top of a molar. The small opening could lead down to something much bigger. The inside is impossible to clean.

    Afterward, you have a great big hole. You'd at least have some hope of keeping it kind of clean so that things don't get much worse.

    1. Re:ought to help though by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Afterward, you have a great big hole. You'd at least have some hope of keeping it kind of clean so that things don't get much worse.

      They had to be sticking something in there, even if they had to frequently replace it. Otherwise every time they ate it'd get filled with food, which unless they removed every speck would soon decay and cause all sorts of grief.

    2. Re:ought to help though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are correct.
      Exposed dentin won't rot if it is kept clean.

      I broke a tooth when I was 15.
      It was a clean break and the exposed dentin area was flat.

      My dentist said that a clean break like that would be fine.

      I was 40 before I had a veneer put on it.
      No rot at all in 25 years.

    3. Re:ought to help though by kanweg · · Score: 1

      Thanks for, eh, filling out the missing bit.

      OK, so the verdict is that either they had dental hygiene or fillings (or both).

      Bert
      Who wonders how the hell an informative post like yours gets modded "0"

    4. Re:ought to help though by r00t · · Score: 1

      It didn't get modded at all. Anons and bad users start at 0. New users (little posting history) and so-so users start at 1. Nice users start at 2.

  29. Before bad diet and state oppression by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For more on your point, see:
        "The Original Affluent Society" by Marshall Sahlins
        http://www.eco-action.org/dt/affluent.html
        "Hunter-gatherers consume less energy per capita per year than any other group of human beings. Yet when you come to examine it the original affluent society was none other than the hunter's - in which all the people's material wants were easily satisfied. To accept that hunters are affluent is therefore to recognise that the present human condition of man slaving to bridge the gap between his unlimited wants and his insufficient means is a tragedy of modern times."
    and:
        "CLAWS: Creating Livable Alternatives to Wage Slavery"
        http://www.whywork.org/
        "If you start asking yourself "why work?" you may see a connection between wage slavery, misunderstandings of leisure, lifestyles based on consumption, corporate welfare, education that often amounts to little more than conditioning, and the global social, environmental, and economic crises we are now facing. We hope that the materials we feature here will encourage critical thinking about such things. This site is primarily about ideas and encouragement, so our focus is more philosophical than practical. However, ideas and action go hand-in-hand, so we're currently expanding the "practicality" sections."
    and:
        "THE ABOLITION OF WORK" by Bob Black
        http://deoxy.org/endwork.htm
        "Liberals say we should end employment discrimination. I say we should end employment. Conservatives support right-to-work laws. Following Karl Marx's wayward son-in-law Paul Lafargue I support the right to be lazy. Leftists favor full employment. Like the surrealists--except that I'm not kidding--I favor full unemployment. Trotskyists agitate for permanent revolution. I agitate for permanent revelry. But if all the ideologues (as they do) advocate work--and not only because they plan to make other people do theirs--they are strangely reluctant to say so. They will carry on endlessly about wages, hours, working conditions, exploitation, productivity, profitability. They'll gladly talk about anything but work itself. These experts who offer to do our thinking for us rarely share their conclusions about work, for all its saliency in the lives of all of us. Among themselves they quibble over the details. Unions and management agree that we ought to sell the time of our lives in exchange for survival, although they haggle over the price. Marxists think we should be bossed by bureaucrats. Libertarians think we should be bossed by businessmen. Feminists don't care which form bossing takes so long as the bosses are women. Clearly these ideology-mongers have serious differences over how to divvy up the spoils of power. Just as clearly, none of them have any objection to power as such and all of them want to keep us working."
    or:
          _The End of Work_
        http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0874778247/002-64 49219-7760050?v=glance&n=283155
      "Global unemployment is now at its highest levels since the Great Depression. Rifkin (Biosphere Politics, LJ 5/15/91) argues that the Information Age is the third great Industrial Revolution. A consequence of these technological advances is the rapid decline in employment and purchasing power that could lead to a worldwide economic collapse. Rifkin foresees two possible outcomes: a near workerless world in which people are free, for the first time in history, to pursue a utopian life of leisure; or a world in which unemployment leads to an even further polarization of the economic classes and a decline in living conditions for millions of people."

    James P. Hogan has several sci-fi novels envisioning an alternative positive future (e.g. _Voyage from Yesteryear_)

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:Before bad diet and state oppression by Damek · · Score: 1

      Hmm, sounds neat, but on the other hand, I kinda like my iPod, you know?

    2. Re:Before bad diet and state oppression by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      It is the challenge of modern times to have the benefits of the stone age lifestyle without the limitations and bad parts. Home 3D printing seems like a step in the right direction:
          http://www.zcorp.com/products/printersdetail.asp?I D=2
      When something like that could print stuff that works like an iPod (and not just pretty mockups) then even more of the rationale for work will disappear.

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  30. Regressive culture? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    If humans in then stone-age were aware of how to handle toothdecay in such detail. (not just knocking out the affected teeth, but drilling) how come in the mideavil ages humans seemed to have reached a deep low? (I thought the French used anise to cover the smell of their rotting teeth and themselves)

    The more scientists discover about humans in the stone-age, the more they appear to be very peaceful and more develloped as priorly portraited.

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:Regressive culture? by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1
      If humans in then stone-age were aware of how to handle toothdecay in such detail. (not just knocking out the affected teeth, but drilling) how come in the mideavil ages humans seemed to have reached a deep low? (I thought the French used anise to cover the smell of their rotting teeth and themselves)

      It was not until later in history that this trend developped ; during the middle ages, people were cleaner than you'd have thought. They took bath, knew how to make soap and used it. In fact, bathing was part of the knighting procedure, for instance.

      The trend toward unhygienic practices settled after the XVth century, and I don't know if it was "regressive" but it was tied to a shift in the Catholic Church's attitude in the troubled times of religious wars ; the Church enforced a very harsh view on the body, claiming that it was by essence evil. So as it was already lost to God, people were not expected to care about it. If they did, they would have been suspect of the sin of lust.

      Of course, all of this is very sketchy.

    2. Re:Regressive culture? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It makes sense now: stone age people were actually in many ways better off than people later on, because they hadn't developed religion yet. Everything went downhill when that happened.

  31. stone age anaesthetic... by mliikset · · Score: 1

    ...I think it's the large round rock with no sharp edges, on the tray behind the flint drills and chisels.

      I tend to think they only removed teeth, what kind of amalgam could they have used?

      Braces would be out of the question, although other deliberate deformation probably wasn't unheard of at the time. OTOH, like some se asian and african tribes (and probably others) used to do, they may have just sharpened their teeth to a point.

  32. No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0
    "Scientists have found evidence in Pakistan that the Stone Age had dentists. They used flint drills to remove cavities and attempt other tooth repair. No evidence as to whether or not the patients were conscious during the procedures."


    Quotes one local politician in Maaaaassassachussettes, "I'm angry about this. Were there no politicians back then to regulate them? To give them permission?!?!? Heck, I'll bet there wasn't even a politician there to force that dentist to only charge three melons for the procedure rather than four."
    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  33. My Dentist is a Caveman by Mesinjah · · Score: 0

    Why it was just the other day my dentist sat me down on his slab of rock and gave me a local anesthetic with a club to my head. I have been flint-drilled several times in my life. And though this sounds nasty it isn't half as bad as my proctologist.

  34. Fascinating. by douglaid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My father was a dentist. The foot-operated drill he used during W.W.II was later given to a friend to polish gemstones. By modern standards, it would be considered "stone age." I thought that you were meaning such things.

    Books from Roman times show that complicated operations were routine, but the scale of dentistry has its own particular challenges. Making a thick drill from flint may be easy, but to make a fine dental drill that won't break before the tooth could be a real challenge.

  35. if your proctologist is flint drilling you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you have got some seriously freaky shit going on

  36. Sad to say... by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the past 9000 years, the only real advancement in dentistry appears to be the addition of fillings to the procedure. Otherwise, going to the dentist is still pretty much like having a neolithic barbarian bang on your teeth with rocks.

    1. Re:Sad to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh be serious.
      root canal, artificial crowns etc not to mention cosmetic procedures like braces and teeth straightening

      You might as well say surgery is still just about cutting people open and pulling bits out.

    2. Re:Sad to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly, otherwise we just try to sew the bits back together....

  37. Stop giving out good advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I own and operate a dental laboratory and make my living off tooth decay and proudly support all the sugar conatining caffine charged drinks all geeks consume. I go nuts handing out 20 to 30 pounds of candy every holloween. There must remain in ALL schools soda machines keeped fully stocked. Hell let the 1st graders drink coke in the classroom if they want... I Support Tooth Decay...damit. So do most dentists I know, they just wont say it in public! So stop giving out healthy tooth habits ;-)

    Frag on /.'ers

    )-(ellbilly

    1. Re:Stop giving out good advice by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Sugar? But why didn't God improve our body design to handle junk food? Don't tell me he sits around waiting for natural selection to do it. That would take too long.

  38. Re:Malcolm Gladwell on Tooth Decay and US Health C by Josh+teh+Jenius · · Score: 1

    As someone a) currently w/o dental insurance and b) with a cavity starting (I can feel that bugger) I appreciate the link.

    Anyone got any pliers? :wince:

    --
    Math is math. Regular expression is regular expression. The tools are there. The future is now.
  39. Hasnt changed much by mnmn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can go to the Qandahari Bazaar of Quetta today, and you'll see dentists lined up on the footpath fixing peoples teeth. There are cars and rickshaws blaring away a few feet away from them. Dentists themselves are stocky muscular dudes in the same traditional dress, shoes taken off sitting on the cloth mat and sometimes with a made-in-china loupe holding boiled metal tools that they sharpen using knife sharpeners or simply ceramic bricks.

    They obtain their tools from the organic waste of hospitals of Karachi which are sold on trolleys in the bazaars there. You see thousands of scalpels and the likes lined up under the sun sold for Rs 5 (10c) or less even to the grand public. Get up real close and in the crevices of the handle you'll notice dried up blood.

    But the dentists DO boil their tools sometimes before your eyes on gas cookers, on the footpath. You'll occasionally hear a moan where a tooth is getting right out... real men dont need anasthetic.

    With my full dental insurance here in Toronto, I still am put on long holds, have to fill out way more paperwork, and in the end, its still an italian surgeon who remarkably resembles the Qandahari Bazaar surgeons complete with hairy forearms, who pulls the teeth. Even the tools look the same. So stop pretending we've advanced that much!

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  40. Conciousness is lost soon after the procedure... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 1

    ...as scientificaly demonstrated by Tom Hanks in Cast Away with an ice-skate blade and a rock!

    That scene still gives me the heebie jeebies just remembering it!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  41. Re:THE LESS YOU KNOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I was quite useful in small doses, and it was fatal in large doses."

    Seems incoherent to me too, with mismatched pronouns, and possibly the and should be replaced with but. Though I admit I don't get either joke.

  42. Re:THE LESS YOU KNOW! by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    "I was quite useful in small doses, and it was fatal in large doses."

    The possible meanings are dependent upon how old the author is. Is the author thousands of years old?

  43. Where the heck is by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    Oog, the Open Source Caveman -- he could give us a first-hand account of the procedure.

    1. Re:Where the heck is by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Recently deciphered cave painting:

      Today Only! Special Two for one Special:

      You're already in pain, and it's going to get worse before it gets better. So why not get Trepanned while your tooth is extracted?

      "My molars were killing me," said one satisfied customer,"and I'd always wanted to have a hole drilled in my skull, so I said to myself, 'You're going to pass out from unbearable pain anyway, so why not?' Now I get respect like never before. I tell my hunting buddies that I lost my teeth in a fight with a cave bear. And confidentially, the hole in my head is a big success with the ladies, if you get my drift. Thank you Flint Dentistry!"

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  44. Look how far we've come by robson · · Score: 1

    In the Stone Age, at the dawn of human civilization, primitive dentists were forced to use physical drills to grind away tooth decay. This barbaric practice was undoubtedly painful for the patient, who may have had nothing but a local anaesthetic to help them through the procedure.

    (Implied wink)

    But seriously, screw the flying cars, screw the house-cleaning robots... where's my pain-free dentistry? Shouldn't we have something better than drills and shots by now?

    (And yes, I'm terrified of dentists and way overdue for a visit.)

    1. Re:Look how far we've come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "where's my pain-free dentistry? Shouldn't we have something better than drills and shots by now?"

      It's called sedation dentistry, and has been available in Canada, and I suspect many other countries for quite some time. You take a pill, and wake up when all the gory work has been completed.

      Then again, you are having work done on a part of the body that's less than 6 inches from you're brain. Maybe it should be normal to feel some extreme discomfort. Playing devil's advocate, it is called "pain management" not "pain removal"

  45. Ever eat a pine tree? by retrosurf · · Score: 1

    I have evidence that partially hardened pine resin,
    compressed and packed with nearby teeth, could provide a
    durable (but probably not permanent) filling for the hole.

    As a child, my brother had to have a piece of this resin
    removed by a dentist, after our feeble caveman attempts
    to remove it failed. We had been trying something our
    grandmother had told us, that you could create a stiff
    chewing gum out of a lump of hardenened pinyon resin
    plucked from the tree. You can!

    It turns out that some technique is involved, and my
    brother failed that test, and had an impacted chunk of
    compressed resin stuck in his teeth.

    1. Re:Ever eat a pine tree? by kanweg · · Score: 1

      So, it still does stick in a moist environment. Thanks for sharing the observation.

      No answer on how fast dentine rots, but the hypothesis is still plausible.

      Bert

  46. Would yanking the tooth out cause pain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, then, you're a dentist.

  47. There's another perspective. by jd · · Score: 1

    The flint drills could carve holes just as good as a modern dental instrument in less than a minute. That's an awful lot faster than modern procedures. Although technology (x-rays, etc) have undoubtably improved in some respects, it seems evident that other aspects of modern dentistry are essentially unchanged from this primitive form, or perhaps even less sophisticated in some cases.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  48. I'd disagree, only in that by jd · · Score: 1
    ..the dental instruments and drillings discovered rival any modern technique - and almost certainly superior to any dentistry in the Middle Ages through to at least the advent of self-powered drills. (A saw-powered drill would be smoother, faster and more predictable than any foot-powered drill. Flint, although not great, was also likely superior to low-grade metals. The lack of conductivity may also have helped somewhat.)


    There is one part that intrigues me more than all of this put together, though. Flint is not a strong material. It can be made into an edge very easily by striking it at the right angle and knapping it into shape. But those edges will only be any good for cutting. I have seen NOTHING in any of the articles which explains how you would knapp a flint into a rotatable cutting edge, needed for a drill. Flint breaks into a pair of concave/convex shapes, you can't make any kind of corkscrew shape or uniformly rounded point. You could make an edge that looked like the top of a Phillip's screwdriver, but that's about it, and my guess it would be too fragile to cut through something as hard as a tooth.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  49. Neanderthals? by rkmath · · Score: 1

    For a second I read Netherlands insstead of Neanderthals - and thought "Wow, they had
    pot 40,000 years ago too?"

    1. Re:Neanderthals? by dajak · · Score: 1

      The results of some googling: Prehistoric man used drug plants long before they invented agriculture, and the first crops grown may have been drugs. Apparently the Neanderthals used Ephedra as a stimulant, and Opium was grown as a crop as early as 4000 BC. The use of Cannabis dates back to 4500 BC in China. Nightshade, Piper betle, and Mandrake are also mentioned.

      I don't think the stone age dentist would have had a problem alleviating the pain.

  50. heh by popeguilty · · Score: 1

    The sad part is, NovaClub never actually went into production; its patent is owned by NeoLith industries, a well-known patent troll.

  51. When will modern dentists stop using flint? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's my question.

    In my lifetime, dentists have changed the way you're supposed to brush your teeth three times now.

    This isn't rocket science, folks. Try to find a way to get plague off someone's teeth without using C-4, please.

    I suspect dentistry simply isn't trying to solve the problem of tooth decay - there's too much money in not solving it. By now, we should have a simple chemical that spread on the teeth should remove bacteria and plaque almost instantly and prevent further growth. It's ridiculous.

    I guess I'll have to wait for further development of nanotech - I just hope I have any teeth left by then (OTOH, I'll probably be able to rebuild them with nanotech, anyway.)

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:When will modern dentists stop using flint? by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Actually, there is a device out there (and will probably remain that way), that is essentially a retainer (custom shaped for your mouth) with some electronics in it to run a current (at a specific frequency? dunno) that you are supposed to wear at night and it is supposed to inhibit the growth of plaque while you sleep. I first saw this device on "Beyond 2000" back in the late 1980's - it was invented in Australia, IIRC. Then - nothing. Until sometime last year if I remember right, there was another trial of this device (or something similar) going on...

      With that said, maybe you need to choose another dentist if you hate the hygenist's use of picks. While picks will always be necessary, there is other technology on the market for cleanings. My dentist prides himself on using the latest tech once he is familiar with it and has investigated it thoroughly. He isn't on my insurance plan (actually, he isn't on any), so I have to do the 80/20 route and get reimbursed later, but I like his office and work so much I won't go anywhere else.

      For cleanings, he has the standard rotating polisher and picks, etc - but when the machines aren't out being cleaned and adjusted, my hygenist uses a different system. Basically, the cleaning instrument looks like a fat pick attached to an air/water line combo. With this combination, it vibrates (at the press of a footpedal) the pick at ultrasonic frequencies, which break up the plaque. The water flushes the plaque away, and the regular vacuum line picks up the excess water as it collects. I am not sure on how this device works, but it is either vibrating the pick using air in a venturi or something blowing over a reed (ultrasonic picolo?) - or it is using an ultrasonic version of "water hammering", like when your pipes groan and vibrate due to water and air bubbles/pressure etc (however that works). I suspect the latter, as it would have more power, but the former method is equally possible.

      Now, once that is done, if needed my hygenist uses a pick to remove any stubborn areas. I would bet on some people this isn't needed, but I am unfortunate, it seems. Even so, since the pick is barely used, my gums don't feel like they are on fire afterward, so all is good. After that, the polishing is done not by the rotating dental drill tool as usual, but with a system that uses a pressurized water/flavored baking-soda mix sprayed out at high speed in "puffs", also controlled by a foot pedal. It is basically a miniature sandblaster for the teeth. It works great, it is fast, and a lot easier for the hygenist to use. However, if they have to go to the backup methods, they have all of that available, to be sure.

      The last thing my dentist was talking about was the use of a laser drill. They already use laser light at my dentist, mainly to cure ceramic caps, fillings and other cosmetic stuff. He had gone to conferences and stuff where the tech was discussed and demonstrated, so maybe in the future that will be something he will use...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    2. Re:When will modern dentists stop using flint? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, ultrasonic picks have been used for several years. I think they were even used in the Federal joints where I was. However, the worst and most incompetent (from the point of view of pain) cleaning I ever had was in the Federal joint using an ultrasonic pick.

      I can see the difficulty of using lasers in an environment with a lot of soft tissue, but since it's used on eyes, I can't imagine they can't figure out a way to do it. Of course, in the eye case, you're immobilized and they still have a significant percentage probability of screwing it up. On the other hand, the eye is a much more sensitive and important tissue than the teeth and gums.

      What I'm complaining about is the need for picks at all. There should be a chemical way to remove plague and bacteria or to prevent it from forming at all. As long as dentists rely on physical methods, it will be inefficient and expensive. And I think that's the way they like it.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  52. Toothbrush and Toothpaste with Fluoride? by teethdood · · Score: 1
    They're called toothbrush, toothpaste with fluoride. Two minutes of brushing twice a day compared to 1440 minutes in a day...it's but an instant. Stop being lazy and blame other people for providing you a service.

    We need the C-4 to get plaque (calculus) off your teeth because it IS that bad. How many times do you hear people/ads/TV/etc telling you to brush and floss in a day? In one ear, out the other, apparently

  53. No, just naives ... Re:Neanderthals? by emilper · · Score: 1

    He would have had lots of problems using flint.

    Flint flakes ... because of this it has a good cutting edge that leaves a clean cut that heals easily, but for drilling it's totaly inapropriate. In UK it was used in surgery until the XXth century (there were a couple of workshops that made flint blades for scalpels), but if you attempt to drill (not to cut) something with a flint point you'll see that the edge will be distroyed fast.

    My gues is this:
      1. Archaeologist needes funds.
      2. Archaeologist looks around and sees lots of pointy objects.
      3. Archaeologist looks at his work table and sees tooth with hole in it.
      4. Archaeologist sees the light.
      5. Press sees the light.
      6. Pakistani authorities see the light, too, since it's nice to have something to show to those arogant Westerners.
      7. Archaeologist gets the funds.
      8. /. crowd sees many colored lights and keeps talking about them (it's sunday, the real engineers are resting, and the real archaeologists did not recover after the saturday ... party).
      9. Dentists have a good time and promise themselves to read /. more often, since it's fun to know that people think that the drilling does the job, not the filling applied on a clean tooth.

    Remember the stone dildo BBC wrote about some time ago ? Imagine how much attention would have been received by an article with the title "A tool for resharpening flint blades was discovered in almost perfect condition" ... then you'll see why the article was about the "stone dildo".

    1. Re:No, just naives ... Re:Neanderthals? by dajak · · Score: 1

      The one medical treatment they certainly would have known about is anesthetics.

      The evidence is about 11 teeth that show signs of drilling (the concentric grooves in the holes) while the owner of the teeth was still alive. The case for a flint-based dental drill is less obvious, and the remains of any natural resin used to fill the hole would have disappeared.

      The idea isn't that ridiculous in itself. The ancient Egyptians had dentists. The oldest complete set of false teeth and bridgework found is Etruscan and dates from 700BC. Drilling and filling teeth is a technique of unknown age and origin. The main technology added in the 19th century is fillings that are durable and harden at room temperature. It is possible to test whether it is possible to drill holes in teeth using some manually driven stone drill.

      I agree about the dildo, and archeologists also have an irritating tendency to ascribe anything they can't categorize to some religious purpose, but I think popular history tends to understate the technological skills of ancient peoples that didn't leave written history, instead of exaggerating them. This seems to be caused by an infatuation with modern 'inventors' and the anachonistic belief that inventions immediately spread all over the world and are never lost, in combination with the scientific skepticism we expect of the archeologists.

      Take the example of the capacitator. Is the invention Iraqi? Greek? German? Dutch? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. We know of Von Kleist, Van Musschenbroek, Franklin and Volta because of written history, not because we found 'batteries'. In the Iraqi case we did find something that appears to be a battery, but then we skeptically conclude that they probably didn't use it as a battery.

    2. Re:No, just naives ... Re:Neanderthals? by emilper · · Score: 1

      I agree about the anesthetics ...

      There are two issues here: one is "were the ancients capable of ingenious use of simple materials?", and I would say that they were: some Roman roads and some Greek or Roman waterworks are used even now, without much repair, high grade steel is not neccesary for dental work and copper will do etc. The other issue is: "are we missinterpreting the significance of their technological skills?": even if the people of Babilon used, well, voltaic cells to gold plate their jewels, they did not discover electricity ... they just discovered a method for gold plating cheaper metals.

      I still can't believe that stone tools could be used for drilling in live teeth ... if there is a stone that could be polished into a thin enough point, I don't know about it ... flint is the only solution I know (some mesolithic and neolithic flint tools were very sofisticated), but flint would not work for drilling. ...

    3. Re:No, just naives ... Re:Neanderthals? by dajak · · Score: 1

      even if the people of Babilon used, well, voltaic cells to gold plate their jewels, they did not discover electricity ... they just discovered a method for gold plating cheaper metals.

      We have no Babylonian explanation of the phenomenon, because we have no Babylonian writing on the subject. Therefore we can't tell what they thought they discovered. The only thing we know is that they were not able to put it to more generic uses, suggesting a lack of understanding of the more general principles, but that is just as true for famous 17th century scientists playing around with toy Leyden jars and stuff like that. The 17th century celebrities are only relevant because we know there is a continuity from them to the present. We have no way of knowing how many false starts were made in the past on the subject of electricity.

      I still can't believe that stone tools could be used for drilling in live teeth ... if there is a stone that could be polished into a thin enough point, I don't know about it ... flint is the only solution I know (some mesolithic and neolithic flint tools were very sofisticated), but flint would not work for drilling. ...

      The pictures of the teeth suggest drilling, although the only relevant quote sheds no light whatsoever on how well flint works in a drill: "Analysis of the teeth shows prehistoric dentists had a go at curing toothache with drills made from flint heads. The team that carried out the work say close examination of the teeth shows the tool was surprisingly effective at removing rotting dental tissue." If flint is not convincing, then what is the explanation for the holes in the teeth? Horn? Teeth?

    4. Re:No, just naives ... Re:Neanderthals? by emilper · · Score: 1

      >> If flint is not convincing, then what is the explanation for the holes in the teeth? Horn? Teeth?

      cavities ... depending on the acidity of the soil, the "rotting dental tissue" could have rotten away ...

  54. Is it safe? by nytes · · Score: 1

    There is also evidence that the dentist repeatedly asked "Is it safe?" during the procedure.

    He would then continue, regardless of how the patient answered.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  55. out with the bad, in with the good by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

    This drilling, as well as trepanning and some forms of massage, could also be explained as a method of releasing or removing the "evil wind" from the body part. Your tooth feels like it's about to explode with pain? Let's drill a hole in it to release that pesky demon!

  56. What are the chances? by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

    Once again you talk out of your ass, and others corrected you.

    Is it so hard fo you to at least ATTEMPT to be accurate? Or is that not part of how you troll?

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...