Slashdot Mirror


Indian Companies Embracing Linux Faster Than Ever

cpatil writes "CNBC-TV 18 India has just announced that India's largest Insurance company, LIC(Life Insurance Corporation of India) sealed a deal with Red Hat to use its desktop and server software. LIC has roughly 160 Million customers, making it a non-trivial deal. Leslie D'Monte over at rediff also has a closer look at Linux deployment in India."

169 comments

  1. What about Windows? by MarkByers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are probably embracing Windows faster than ever too.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:What about Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple, on the other hand, is right out.

    2. Re:What about Windows? by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's probably true. I'm sure general computer use is growing so fast that they're embracing software left and right. The real question is how much market share each respective OS has.

    3. Re:What about Windows? by thePig · · Score: 1

      But this is a golden oppurtunity for Linux, I beleieve.
      Since in India, automation is just coming up for most systems, linux has an
      advantage (ok, rather less disadvantage) compared to that of developed countries,
      wherein the systems were all under development even before very stable Linux
      systems were a reality.

      Now we can see how well Linux can match up with its greatest rival.

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    4. Re:What about Windows? by Lost+my+religion · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am sure that you are right in a way - with computers becoming more accessible, Windows usage will also go up. However, I believe that Linux has the faster growth rate - just because it is free (as in beer).

      To pull a statistic out of thin air, more than 95% desktops in the home user market use pirated versions of Windows. With the average incomes, it is simply not possible to buy software that is priced in USD. Windows costs more than what an average engineer makes in a month. The more educated folks are trying to move away from piracy, and Linux offers them a good option. Also, it being free (as in speech) gives people a reason to contribute to it.

      I am glad that major corporations are moving to Linux - it just means better software for everyone as the benefits trickle down.

    5. Re:What about Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article, the operative word was migrate. The company discussed already had a network and switched from an unspecified OS to RedHat. So, what about Windows?

    6. Re:What about Windows? by distilledprodigy · · Score: 1

      99% of people hate people who pull statistics out of thin air to create an argument.

    7. Re:What about Windows? by Billhead · · Score: 1

      Do you have anything to back that number up?

    8. Re:What about Windows? by Zebidiah · · Score: 2, Funny

      I actually like this joke 0.6745% of the time

    9. Re:What about Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians are a bit conservative, and don't support open homosexuality. So you really shouldn't be surprised that Apple isn't making any headway.

    10. Re:What about Windows? by arvindn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not true. Speaking from first hand experience in both countries, linux usage in India is much higher than in America both in the home and office. There have been a number of genuine large-scale Windows-to-linux switches, as opposed to just talking about it or migrating a dozen servers in a corner somewhere. The average bank clerk (my mom included :-) is actually using linux terminals on a day-to-day basis.

    11. Re:What about Windows? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      They are probably embracing Windows faster than ever too.

      Not if they are paying for it... The problem is Microsoft more or less took care of the casual 'easy' piracy with the Software Activation / hardware fingerprinting they started with WinXP and later OS. Yes, there are cracks out there, but for the most part Microsoft is finally making it darn inconvenient to use a bootleg copy of their kit.

      I spent a few months in India last year and probably will spend another couple this year. Anything produced domestically was dirt cheap, but imports were more or less the same as what I was seeing in the US. Difference was the wages paid to the developers was shockingly low (as was the cost of living). I was thinking I could get an ipod for cheap - but they were more than what I could get it for in the States! Licensing costs for most US or European software, and this includes Windows, would be a sizable portion of expenditures for a dev shop if they are legit. I'm not saying they would pay for RHEL or SLES either, but with Linux you don't have the activation issues.

      Now if they offered a copy of Windows that was priced to match what most software folks would pay in rupees, I would be the first to try to buy an import version. (Already see this in games) English is the national language after all...

    12. Re:What about Windows? by Disavian · · Score: 1

      I agree that windows costs more than an engineer makes in a month. If you want to legitimately buy Windows XP, MS Office, and MS Visual Studio Architect (say, you want to be a programmer for windows), it'll set you back more than I think is worth it.

      So their choices are to starve and buy those, pirate them, or use linux. The latter two just need an okay internet connection and a bittorrent client.

      I don't doubt that there's a lot of piracy in developing countries. That's probably one reason why MS is making Vista Basic. Sell it to China, and at least you'll be making a buck off of them before they run off and pirate Vista Ultimate (now with MS Kitchen Sink!).

    13. Re:What about Windows? by woobieman29 · · Score: 1, Informative
      95% eh? WRONG.

      Sure there are a large number of pirated copies, but it's nowhere near 95%. Most likely the largest portion of Windows users are running whatever came installed on their Dell/Gateway/HP machine.

      That's the problem with pulling statistics "out of thin air" - you run the risk of making a really silly statement.

      --
      \/\/oobie
    14. Re:What about Windows? by bain_online · · Score: 4, Informative

      Windows users are running whatever came installed on their Dell/Gateway/HP machine.
      You don't really get India mentality. Nobody (consumers atleast) buys dell/hp/gateway except for laptops. Most of the machines delivered at homes are hand assembled by local supplier who buys motherboards and other stuff in bulk. They have zero knowledge and just install pirated copies of windows to "test" the machine and deliver.
      We at PLUG :- Pune Linux User Group (Pune is a mid size city in central india.) have very less resistance in installing linux on the PC's we find at our grasp as long as whatever software the person wanted the pc for is provided on linux. Games are the most problamatic feature of a standard windows pc however and we so far have no solution for it. Transgaming/wine are all ok but unfortunately they don't garuntee all the games on a "1500 games mania" dvd bought for under 500Rs (20USD) will run.

      --
      BAIN http://www.devslashzero.com
    15. Re:What about Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the "thin air" he stated he pulled it out of? This suggests he wasn't being literal.

    16. Re:What about Windows? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen elsewhere (not India though), in "non western countries", I expect small companies to work more or less the same way using assembled machines. (actually in Europe a lot of small companies use assembled machines as well).

      They should be able to run Linux without trouble, however the availability of accounting software remains a problem.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    17. Re:What about Windows? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with pulling statistics "out of thin air" - it's just that 35-40% of the people who do fail to pull reasonable sounding numbers.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    18. Re:What about Windows? by aalu.paneer · · Score: 1

      I do not have stats, but by personal experience I know the number of pirated Windows is very high. Only places where I have seen licensed windows is where it is pre-packed in branded computers. these computers are usually in SOHO and large companies. at home only if they took a loan to buy a computer is the computer branded. of all the people i know, only one has a branded computer at home and rest (~25) have pirated windows.

      --
      where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
    19. Re:What about Windows? by aalu.paneer · · Score: 1

      abhijit, pune maybe midsized but in linux adoption is leading among all cities. i travel around and give lots of tech talks. i have never seen more aggressive and knowledgeable linux advocates anywhere else.

      --
      where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
    20. Re:What about Windows? by distilledprodigy · · Score: 1

      You must hang around people who make their own computers. That's likely because you point out the savings, and at the same time point out the possibility of pirated windows. Most people don't know where to get leaked versions of Windows. You may think it's easy to find, but when you don't know shit about computers it's not. Most people rely on Dell and other such companies to prebundle everything they need, the MAJORITY of consumers do not want to be arsed to build their own computer or download a pirated version of windows and burn it to cd(s).

  2. Using is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    contributing is something else, are these (m|b)illion dollar companies using Linux writing/contributing any code ?

    1. Re:Using is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Existence of the market will incite the software companies to contribute. You don't really expect an insurance company to work on the operating system, do you?

  3. Re:Non-trivial? by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    It's called evolution and its something that non-dead languages should do to survive (it's a good thing).
    Regards,
    Steve

  4. KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an Indian, I am quite surprised that they went with an offering from Red Hat. Red Hat has long been known to support GNOME as their main desktop. However, KDE is the leader when it comes to supporting the popular Indic languages like Urdu, Tamil, Hindi, and Bengali.

    I myself use the Tamil support of KDE, and have long found it superior to that of GNOME (even for recent releases). More of the core KDE applications have translations available, and most of are a higher quality than those of GNOME. That is not to say that GNOME is unable to support those languages; that is clearly not the case! The fact remains, however, that KDE is the better option at this time when it comes to displaying Indic scripts, and offering Indic translations.

    1. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      If you wanted to make more than an anti RH flame you might have suggested a distro which better suits your requirements.

      The irony here is if you are accusing that poster of flaming, you are sounding like an RH fanboy here.

      BTW you can install KDE on redhat. Most of the redhat users I know use KDE.

      You mean Redhat-KDE which sucks in feel unless you want to compile and install KDE separately and not from the installation medium. How many redhat users do you know use KDE? 3? 5? 10? 20? 100? Stop trying to sound so self-important

      I am surprised that you bothered to try gnome at all. Why do all this research when KDE works so well?

      Curiosity? I used to be a big-time KDE user and i switched to Gnome because i didn't like Redhat KDEs feel. I now use KDE on my SuSE laptop and Gnome on my RHEL4 desktop. To each his/her own. Nothing surprising here.

    2. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by kimvette · · Score: 1
      I am surprised that you bothered to try gnome at all. Why do all this research when KDE works so well?


      My distribution of choice is SuSE, because the time from booting from the install disc to having a full functional environment with everything we need is the quickest. The primary environment we use is KDE, but we keep Gnome installed alongside and any time anyone logs in they can choose whatever desktop they wish (disk space is cheap!).

      However, every few months I reevaluate distributions and environments. The fact that KDE seems to be better today doesn't mean that the next Gnome release won't be superior for our needs. And, as more releases of Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora, and others come out, if they somehow leapfrog ahead in an area which is important, doesn't it make sense to not wear fanboy blinders?

      That statement reminds me of how (some) Apple users always think that Apple can do no wrong, and no matter how good or how bad a particular Apple product is, it's better than anything else simply because it carries the Apple brand. (I'm not attacking Apple here, I just know people who love anything Apple comes out with regardless of quality, just because it's Apple, and freely admit it). Now Apple has some damn fine products, but they've also had some duds over the years) but because Apple has worked so well for someone up to now, does that mutually exclude the possibility that someone, somewhere, someday might offer a better product?

      Examine the problem, examine possible solutions, and then arrive at your decision. In six months, if you encounter a similar problem, the best choice may not be the same one you settled on for that problem today. Perhaps with today's solution you had to make some compromises or put a little more work in terms of spending many hours to tweak some code, but six months from now there may be two additional options, one of which might be plug&play?

      In six months KDE might suck, and our Indian friend here might be inclined to go with a Gnome-heavy distribution. Right now KDE seems to be a better option for him. What of it? Just as you have your opinion that Gnome is the best thing since sliced bread, he finds KDE to be superior. Personally, I'm inclined to agree with his choice, but for different reasons; the over-simplification of Gnome.
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by MarkByers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      KDE is the leader when it comes to supporting the popular Indic languages like Urdu, Tamil, Hindi, and Bengali.

      If you could link to some statistics it might be interesting to see.

      According to Gnome's website.

      Gnome v2.14

      Hindi: 94.10% complete.
      Tamil: 66.64% complete.
      Benglai: 80.33% complete.

      According to the KDE's website:

      Kde stable:

      Hindi: 57.06% complete.
      Tamil: 66.13% complete.
      Bengali: 23.93% complete.

      --
      I'll probably be modded down for this...
    4. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for one of the five largest companies in the world. Most of our technical users have RHEL with KDE as a desktop. This is only a small (~2000) group of employees though.

    5. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conclusion: KDE people work, and let their websites slip. Gnome people update their websites, but don't do the work.

    6. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is mostly irrelevant: the money in the service contracts going to India is for English support, not "dialect of the three people in my grandmother's village". By using good-quality English interfaces rather than wasting the hundreds of megabytes of disk on every possible language in the world common to KDE distributions, they save system resources and ease document creation.

      If you think I'm kidding, think about how much time is wasted generating multiple sets of incomplete and often poorly edited documentation in multiple languages.

    7. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by archen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure how you neccesarily arrive at that conclusion. Although I agree that the statistcs don't really seem to mean much. If you dig deeper into the "packages" translated, kde has WAAAY more applications to translate then what are considered part of gnome base and gnome desktop.

      Why is Gnome being translated into Old English anyway?

    8. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      KDE is very well supported under RedHat. Go bark up a different tree.

    9. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      KDE is very well supported under RedHat.
      Yes, but it is supported by RedHat? When you are paying for an OS and getting the support that doesn't mean they will support any software that you install. Since they don't ship with KDE I doubt that their support staff would officially support KDE that was compiled and installed by the customer.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    10. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      Every RedHat distribution I've ever installed has shipped with KDE.

    11. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Kingsly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since the GP claims to use "Tamil" he probably has basic (highly unlikely) knowledge of Hindi and no knowledge of Bengali.

    12. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Since the GP claims to use "Tamil" he probably has basic (highly unlikely) knowledge of Hindi and no knowledge of Bengali.

      Since the grandparent's post was in well formed English, I find your comment perplexing. Mayhaps he was researching Indian language support for non-English users?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    13. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      Well, half a KDE anyway!

      What Redhat do to KDE gives KDE a bad name.

      For corporate stuff then Suse is a better place to see KDE if I wanted to show someone what it could do and for desktop use PCLinux.

    14. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by SorryTomato · · Score: 1

      As an Indian, I am quite surprised that they went with an offering from Red Hat. Red Hat has long been known to support GNOME as their main desktop. However, KDE is the leader when it comes to supporting the popular Indic languages like Urdu, Tamil, Hindi, and Bengali.
      Thats because using 'Indic' languages is irrelevant to a major subcontinent wide corporation like LIC. All corporate work will be done in english.

    15. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      SUSE, versions 9.x or less. Novell is no longer focusing on KDE. Its still supported, but all the interesting things are happening with Gnome.

    16. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      What do you base that on? From what I've seen, most Indians in the business world know their native language, and learn Hindi and English in addition to that as a minimum. However, while they may be able to speak several Indian languages, they may not be able to read/write the scripts of those languages.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    17. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by hashinclude · · Score: 1

      Which ass are you speaking out of? Unlike "North American Continent" where everyone uses english (and ok -- some amount of Spanish) the Indian Subcontinent has about 17 different "official" languages, + many hundreds local languages and dialects, and at LEAST 5 different scripts (I think the number is more like 10).

      So if you want to do business with that large a demographic, you bet your ass it has to support all those languages.

      (as an Example -- which $MegaCorp in Southern states (California ... Texas) does _NOT_ provide Spanish as an option for users)

      --
      US is now divided as the "Red" and "blue" states. Red States = communist countries. Coincidence? I think not
    18. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not, if you have free time to spare. What makes you think that somebody who can translate to Old English is the same person that can translate to Hindi or whatever other language you find more important?

    19. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      Bummer!

      In that case I'd use PCLinuxOS for the corporate stuff too.

    20. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Unlike "North American Continent" where everyone uses english


      Like in Mexico for example (or to a lesser extent quite a bit of the south western US where you won't go far if you don't speak Spanish).
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    21. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by PaneerParantha · · Score: 1
      Which ass are you speaking out of? Unlike "North American Continent" where everyone uses english (and ok -- some amount of Spanish) the Indian Subcontinent has about 17 different "official" languages, + many hundreds local languages and dialects, and at LEAST 5 different scripts (I think the number is more like 10).

      I don't understand your criticism. OP talked of corporate work, not public-dealing-interfaces. Does LIC do its corporate work in regional languages? Or is regional language work only limited to a particular region's offices. And then to communicate with officers of another region, they would use English?

      That seems unlikely, not to mention wastage of time and effort to, for example, translate the contents of a file into English so it could be communicated across regions.

      I have worked in Delhi and Maharashtra. In Delhi, govt. forms used to be in English and Hindi. In Maharashtra, they were in Marathi and English. So I can understand if forms given to public are in the regional language, but why would corporate work be in a regional language, unless it is in all regional languages at the same time so employees in different regions could understand or in English!

    22. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Why is Gnome being translated into Old English anyway?

      Why does someone try to put Linux on a toaster? Because they feel like it. Sometimes it needn't be more complicated than that.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    23. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by richlv · · Score: 1

      kde is sort of nicely supported. information coming out of novell is quite different. official position is "we ship both, but concentrate on gnome in our commercial products".

      i've heard that gnome is being pushed hard by ximian zealots, though ;)
      if i see kde being obsoleted by suse, i'll leave it in a moment.

      --
      Rich
    24. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      To where? What commercial/enterprise distro is pushing KDE, with it being the more equal desktop?

    25. Re:KDE offers better Tamil, Hindi and Urdu support by richlv · · Score: 1

      doesn't mandrake/mandriva ?
      besides, i don't not explicitly want commercial distro - actually i am running slackware on most of my boxes, i am just planning migration to suse on my workstation ;)

      --
      Rich
  5. Re:More indians taking american jobs by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Screw that, if another country is more efficient handling our crap jobs ( and let's face it, the programing jobs that are getting exported are the crap jobs ), then by all means let's let them.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  6. I think its about time... by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think its about time that, even though this piece was slightly biased, mainstream media began looking seriously at the behemouth that *nix has become. Its always been in data centers, and Linux is fitting in well there. The only reason that mainstream view of desktop software is so biased is simply because these people grew up knowing only Windows or Mac, and so that is, to them, how computers are supposed to be, and perform. When someone else comes along with something new, it is always compared to the existing system to see if it measures up.

    Now, I'm not saying that Linux is a perfect replacement for XP or OS X, but I remember the arguments about using F3 vs. F1 for the help key, and if you have ever seen Windows 3.0 or earlier, you'd know that there were plenty of people, myself included, that said meh, I'll keep using DR DOS thank you very much. The fact that Linux is the new kid on the block is all the more reason for MS and others to fear it. It *IS* changing everything.

    It is about to the point that if a card or MB won't be supported by Linux, I can leave it setting on the shelf, and so can a lot of other people. The fact that there are examples of this, and WHOLE countries (apparently) leaving Windows for Linux means that the revolution is happening, slowly, but it is happening.

    This story is not so exciting for those of us who have been waiting for it, expecting it, and are now ready to hear the daily updates in application development that surpases MS's capability to keep up. F/OSS is a better way to do thing, and I think (hope) that CLAMAV and others will show the Bill schills and others exactly what can be done to stop spam, virii, and malware. You know, something along the lines of "here, download the software.. its free.. and only 14.99/year for updates. Then someone fix the F/OSS mail clients to utilize global white and black lists etc. and some of the other ideas for stopping spam for only moderate yearly costs... say... hmmm 14.99/year maybe?

    Look at what Vonage and Skype are doing to the telecomms business arena. That is pretty much the same sort of apple cart upsetting that's happening with *nix right now. I'd love to see a *nix distro that is first to be ready (out of the box) to be used to download television, movies, etc. ... you know, like a "Ubuntu media edition for Dell computers" ... or something like that.

    I'd just really like to see totally heated up competition in all media markets. iPod! your days are numbered. CD player? your days are numbered. Solid state memory is able to hold as much, in smaller spaces, and is more flexible. I'm just waiting for someone to create the hardware that will supercede CD's and DVD's altogether... leapfrog this whole BR-HD-DVD argument.

    Anyway, the point is that this news, isn't really news to some of us, and it should not be shocking to anyone. Bring on more news like this is what I say... we can all use good news anyday.

    1. Re:I think its about time... by Shelled · · Score: 1
      "Now, I'm not saying that Linux is a perfect replacement for XP or OS X..."

      You almost make that sound like a negative.

    2. Re:I think its about time... by init100 · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for someone to create the hardware that will supercede CD's and DVD's altogether... leapfrog this whole BR-HD-DVD argument.

      You might be interested in this:

      Holographic Versatile Disc
    3. Re:I think its about time... by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      > When someone else comes along with something new,

      New? Linux is about 15 years old.

      > it is always compared to the existing system to
      > see if it measures up.

      So... if Linux has been unable to measure up sufficiently to take significant desktop share over the past fifteen years, what exactly makes you think it's going to suddenly become important?

      > Solid state memory is able to hold as much, in
      > smaller spaces, and is more flexible.

      And a *damn* sight more expensive. I used solid state disk drives when they cost tens of thousands of dollars for a few hundred megabytes. They were great, but honestly - just not worth the money.

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
    4. Re:I think its about time... by Hosiah · · Score: 0, Troll
      Rare though I login to Slashdot these days, I made an exception just to say: "Damn, you're smart! What the heck are you doing on Slashdot?"

      Now begins the standard disclaimer meant for the general public: "Buy a fish, name it life, so you'll have one!" and I might add to the standard disclaimer, "For GODS SAKE, find SOMETHING else to do with your time!"

    5. Re:I think its about time... by naelurec · · Score: 1

      New? Linux is about 15 years old.

      True.. but I don't think anyone will argue that there was even remotely a notion of "desktop linux" 15 years ago. This is relatively recent (last 4-5 years?)

      So... if Linux has been unable to measure up sufficiently to take significant desktop share over the past fifteen years, what exactly makes you think it's going to suddenly become important?

      It takes time. There is a saying "It takes 20 years to make an overnight success." So umm.. Linux still has 5 years to go.. hehe.. :) Needless to say, month after month, I hear more and more news of people understanding what FOSS/open standards/etc is all about. It seems like Linux is the only desktop os that has ever gained marketshare against Microsoft's monopoly. When your talking about hundreds of millions of installations, it takes time. :-)

    6. Re:I think its about time... by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      > This is relatively recent (last 4-5 years?)

      I recall discussing it with company management at CSC in 1994. So not only was it on the table, it was being taken seriously.

      Trouble is, it was a bad idea then, and it's still a bad idea. There's a massive difference between hiring an administrative staff that knows Windows and one that knows Linux. If you're hiring a dozen people, it makes about a quarter million dollar difference annually, and you're also hiring from a much smaller pool of available applicants. When you consider that using Linux instead of Windows is only saving you about $5,000 a year in licensing fees... well, that's just plain stupid.

      > There is a saying "It takes 20 years to make
      > an overnight success."

      That saying is about people. Software generally becomes obsolete in twenty years. Some people claim this shows how great Linux is, but strangely enough, the people who didn't like Linux ten years ago *still* don't like it... for pretty much the same reasons. So I don't really see Linux making any headway.

      > It seems like Linux is the only desktop os
      > that has ever gained marketshare against
      > Microsoft's monopoly.

      This appearance is generated through unverifiable means. When someone buys a PC with Windows installed, installs Linux as a dual-boot option, and then never uses the Linux boot... which I have seen done many times... is that desktop market share?

      I'll bet they count it. I'll also bet the surveys on Linux market share are largely conducted among a self-selected group that is likely to use Linux anyway. But let's pretend they're a standard distribution anyway, okay? It will make Linux look good.

      Lying is lying, and wrong is wrong. Your intentions may be good, but we all know what's paved with those.

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
    7. Re:I think its about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trouble is, it was a bad idea then, and it's still a bad idea. There's a massive difference between hiring an administrative staff that knows Windows and one that knows Linux. If you're hiring a dozen people, it makes about a quarter million dollar difference annually, and you're also hiring from a much smaller pool of available applicants. When you consider that using Linux instead of Windows is only saving you about $5,000 a year in licensing fees... well, that's just plain stupid.

      Is someone knowing linux actually 1736.11$ a month more expensive than someone knowing windows? (please tell me where you live, I want to become rich...) Or are you counting that you are going to hassle your windows developers to admin also? And in this cost analysis, are you counting the cost of downtime, if we're talking about servers, or the overhead of malware if we're talking workstations with any time spent at all online?

      That saying is about people. Software generally becomes obsolete in twenty years. Some people claim this shows how great Linux is, but strangely enough, the people who didn't like Linux ten years ago *still* don't like it... for pretty much the same reasons. So I don't really see Linux making any headway.

      You're looking at this wrong. The people who didn't like linux, will probably never like linux. Windows is more than ok for their needs and they don't want to spend time learning something new. That's ok. Linux is expanding to people who didn't know linux and actually prefer it. And alot of them aren't tech geeks.

      This appearance is generated through unverifiable means. When someone buys a PC with Windows installed, installs Linux as a dual-boot option, and then never uses the Linux boot... which I have seen done many times... is that desktop market share?

      It goes both ways you know. I am 'officialy' a windows user, but I use linux 99.9% of the time on this pc. So hardware sales is a good metric for businesses and all, but it's far from solid.

      I'll bet they count it. I'll also bet the surveys on Linux market share are largely conducted among a self-selected group that is likely to use Linux anyway. But let's pretend they're a standard distribution anyway, okay? It will make Linux look good.

      I hope all microsoft employees share the same arrogance! Look at the king's new robe!

      Lying is lying, and wrong is wrong. Your intentions may be good, but we all know what's paved with those.

      -It's shiny I tell you!
      -Dude, he's not wearing anything.
      -You're lying. Everybody is cheering about it!

    8. Re:I think its about time... by DrYak · · Score: 1
      So... if Linux has been unable to measure up sufficiently to take significant desktop share over the past fifteen years, what exactly makes you think it's going to suddenly become important?


      I think new markets is what is really different.
      Until now, linux uptake has been slowed down because most people in the west are using Windows for their Desktops, are used to it and so won't consider switching to something else.
      Now you have new markets opening in Asia, filled with people who aren't specially dependant/accustomed to one solution, who are interested in cheap solutions (Linux has a good point here... Note that Windows "pirated" edition too...) and who would like to have support for their languages (Linux is very fast in being translated to other language. Microsoft is catastrophic on this point).

      In other words : It's only recently that you have a lot of people who could *really* freely choose what OS to use.
      --
      "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    9. Re:I think its about time... by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      > It's only recently that you have a lot of people
      > who could *really* freely choose what OS to use.

      I don't see your scenario as representing freedom. If they are interested in cheap solutions, there is an economic factor which restricts their choice. One might even go so far as to say these people are being forced to choose Linux, whether they want it or not.

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
    10. Re:I think its about time... by richlv · · Score: 1

      I recall discussing it with company management at CSC in 1994. So not only was it on the table, it was being taken seriously.

      i recall talking about this at 2000. the person (supposedly working in it...) had never heard of it and for the first weeks wrote it LENUX. he is relaying on linux servers every day now (no workstation - yet).
      i recall telling about linux/oss a friend of mine, who had not heard about it a year ago. he is evaluating it as his primary os for the new workstation he is going to buy.
      it is new.

      Trouble is, it was a bad idea then, and it's still a bad idea. There's a massive difference between hiring an administrative staff that knows Windows and one that knows Linux. If you're hiring a dozen people, it makes about a quarter million dollar difference annually, and you're also hiring from a much smaller pool of available applicants. When you consider that using Linux instead of Windows is only saving you about $5,000 a year in licensing fees... well, that's just plain stupid.

      hmm. assuming that software age is ~ 3 years and equiping average workstation with windows, msoffice, antivirus and whatnot would be somewhere around 300ls = $600, this would turn out into 25 workstations (not counting any servers at all here...)
      using it for 5 years would be 41 workstations, still no servers.
      depending on qualification, you can get an average it support person here for ~ $600-~1200 a month (which probably heavily differs from your location). getting a wannabee windows expert might be slightly cheaper than wannabee linux expert, but once you start looking at people who know what they are doing, the wages quickly level out (i believe this should be the same everywhere :) ).

      now, if you really need a dozen of people to keep (let's be generous) 50 workstations running... depending on the needs, that should be half-time for a single person at most...

      and that's not counting the fact that you have provided some baseless amount. are companies with thousands of employees getting all their windows software for $5000, no matter what and in which amounts ? how does ms survive then ?

      That saying is about people. Software generally becomes obsolete in twenty years.

      this _is_ about people. this is about thinking. this is about changing something people are used to. and this is about availability of your information - to you.
      this isn't one software vendor against other, this is completely different concept.

      Some people claim this shows how great Linux is, but strangely enough, the people who didn't like Linux ten years ago *still* don't like it... for pretty much the same reasons.

      steve ballmer ? ;)
      antivirus companies ? overpriced commercial software producers ?
      yeah, their reasons probably are the same :>

      > It seems like Linux is the only desktop os that has ever gained marketshare against
      > Microsoft's monopoly.

      This appearance is generated through unverifiable means. When someone buys a PC with Windows installed, installs Linux as a dual-boot option, and then never uses the Linux boot... which I have seen done many times... is that desktop market share?


      ugh. WHO is counting that ? i'd say that cases when a computer is sold with mswindows licence and later linux is installed over it are a lot more common than such a miscounting. this seems to be an extremly false argument.

      I'll bet they count it. I'll also bet the surveys on Linux market share are largely conducted among a self-selected group that is likely to use Linux anyway. But let's pretend they're a standard distribution anyway, okay? It will make Linux look good.

      of course They do. They have a way to track EVERY linux install ! fear Them !
      wtf ? surveys of linux marketshare usually are done either by comparing revenue gained by it (which favours windows a LOT) or by enquiring businesses (and here also quite often clueless people respond to qu

      --
      Rich
  7. blah blah and yeah by atari2600 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The state-owned LIC (Life Insurance Corporation) is a big customer and a major player in India and has a major share of the market (with a few smaller players). In the last few years though, private companies have been eating into the share of LICs market.
    From here

    "Though the total volume of LIC's business increased in the last fiscal year (2004-2005) compared to the previous one, its market share came down from 87.04 to 78.07%. The 14 private insurers increased their market share from about 13% to about 22% in a year's time. The figures for the first two months of the fiscal year 2005-06 also speak of the growing share of the private insurers. The share of LIC for this period has further come down to 75 percent, while the private players have grabbed over 24 percent."

    So yeah this is a big deal (where the hell did you come up with "non-trivial"? - use of non-trivial because this is Indian stuff?) and this is offtopic, but rediff.com is a sucky site. Try control-clicking any of their links on their home-page (and say hello to popup central which beat Firefox).

    1. Re:blah blah and yeah by giorgosts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in Greece we have the tax authorities database (www.taxisnet.gr) running Oracle on RHEL, and that makes us another 8 mill. customers. So I guess proffesionals know about their business and install what's best for them. What about the consumer though. Can he make the switch?

    2. Re:blah blah and yeah by robertjw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where professionals go consumers will eventually follow. That's why everyone runs Microsoft platforms in their homes, even though when I was growing up Apple donated millions of machines to schools. The business industry wouldn't accept Apple in the workplaces, everyone wanted the same thing at home that they were used to at work, so Windows became dominant. If professionals move to Linux, eventually consumers will as well.

    3. Re:blah blah and yeah by gnud · · Score: 1

      Yes, the only reason my father isn't on linux, is because of software he uses at work (adobe pagemaker (not so much photoshop), ms office).

  8. It's both non-trivial and important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They describe two different things. The use of 'non-trivial' is obviously in reference to the massive size of this deal. Nearly 20% of 1 billion people will be affected by this. We're talking about 20 cities with the population of New York, to put it in terms you may better understand.

    The word 'important' would not suffice when describing the size of the deal. A deal between even just two participants (say Micro Soft and IBM) can end up being very 'important'.

    So yes, this deal is 'important', but it is also well described as 'non-trivial', due to the extensive impact this will have on the people of India, and the open source community. This is an instance of very accurate and concise usage, contrary to your beliefs.

  9. Re:More indians taking american jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it's all about efficiency. I wouldn't characterize a job as "crap" or "notcrap". Germans create a lot of the world's best MRI machines, Japanese people create high quality ink and photocopying machines. Indians happen to create application software efficiently. These are not "crap" jobs, these are jobs that can be done elsewhere more efficiently. Do we see Indians creating skyscrapers, or becoming the world's best lawyers? No, that is something that Americans have the highest efficiency.

    relax, don't get emotional, try to figure out what your value add is and work towards those jobs.

  10. Pseudo-tech by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Based on the price, vendors classify servers as small (anywhere from Rs 40000 up to Rs 500,000), medium (from Rs 500,000 to Rs 1 crore) and large (over Rs 1 crore). They are identified as Intel (or X86 processor-based), Unix (or non-X86 processor-based) and Blade servers. Linux and Solaris are flavours of Unix. Windows and Intel form the loosely-termed "Wintel" brand.

    Since when did running Unix decide your processor type for you? Last I checked, BSD ran on X86 without much issue. Last I checked, Linux wasn't a flavour of Unix.

    This is what happens when English majors get hired on to do tech writing. It becomes tech guessing.

    1. Re:Pseudo-tech by Theatetus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Since when did running Unix decide your processor type for you? Last I checked, BSD ran on X86 without much issue. Last I checked, Linux wasn't a flavour of Unix.

      The point is, vendors classify servers based on their chip type. The assumption seems to be that a CISC system will run some flavor of WINNT while a RISC system will run some flavor of UNIX (largely because there isn't any other choice for most of them). I could see calling a RISC system UNIX based on the fact that a large percentage of Intel systems are not running UNIX, while virtually every RISC system is.

      And, yes, Linux is not a flavour of UNIX, just like the toy I had my dog fetch this afternoon was really a "flying disc" rather than a "frisbee (tm)", since it wasn't made by Whammo (tm).

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    2. Re:Pseudo-tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, yes, Linux is not a flavour of UNIX, just like the toy I had my dog fetch this afternoon was really a "flying disc" rather than a "frisbee (tm)", since it wasn't made by Whammo (tm).

      Exactly, I'm glad you understand that LINUX IS NOT A FLAVOR OF UNIX.

    3. Re:Pseudo-tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL I have to agree!

  11. Re:Non-trivial? by ctid · · Score: 1

    I think that "non-trivial" is fine if the context is that somebody might otherwise call the news "trivial". It addresses the perception that some random Indian company adopting Linux doesn't mean that much in the grand scheme of things. To say that this conversion to Linux is "important" would miss some connotations of this area of debate. I feel that "important" would imply that everyone would agree that it is important; the implication here is that the author is trying to convince people that this is important.

    All IMHO of course.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  12. Re:More indians taking american jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw that, if another country is more efficient handling our crap jobs ... then by all means let's let them.

    You can only employ that logic for so long until employment figures begin to drop. When you're at 30% unemployment you'll want those jobs back, only by then you'll have lost your competetive edge.

  13. Re:Non-trivial? by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    Read this as to why this is a big deal and non-trivial is a dumb term to use.

  14. Insourcing is becoming big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I could care less about outsourcing. H1/L1's are a total scam, and horribly exploited, but I digress.

    I'm starting to see a lot more of projects coming back to Silicon Valley from India. In fact, I just turned one down. The manager in charge sent off the embedded Linux project to India, they screwed it up (after 3 months, they STILL couldn't get a "hello world" program to work). Then he expected me to come in at the last minute and save his sorry ass.

    Sorry, I can pick and choose what projects I want. I'll take the easier ones, where I'm assured of making a knowledgeable manager happy.

    But anyway, the vast majority of projects and people over there are clueless. The truly good people tend to make it to the U.S. on at least a green card status. IMHO, this is more a result of the boom there than anything else; and is similar to what happened in the U.S. during the dot-com boom (when any idiot could call themselves a webmaster, and many did).

  15. Which has better Urdu support -- vi or Emacs? by BerntB · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK, you think KDE is better than Gnome?

    But what is better for Hindi and Urdu -- Vi or Emacs?

    Sigh... but I guess a bit of flame war is a good change of pace in this dull story about Linux deployment in a traditional Windows markets.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  16. Many thanks to the KDE developers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have found Ubuntu to work best. I initially tried GNOME because that was the default desktop. It worked well, but my coworkers suggested I install and try KDE for a better experience. They were right. I did find the Tamil translations of KDE to be of a higher quality, and more widespread.

    One problem I recall involved Galeon. It has decent support for Tamil, but for some of the configuration dialogs there was a mix of English and Tamil translations, and sometimes the Tamil translation would be missing outright! Now, I am thankful that I also understand English quite well, so I was able to switch over and finish the configuration that way.

    Other core GNOME applications (like the Users & Groups utility, for instance) do not even have Tamil translations. It is unsuitable for purely Tamil-speaking users to deal with such translations!

    I have not had any similar problems with KDE. The translations are always complete, and I think they are very well done. My many thanks to all who have provided such excellent work!

  17. Simputer vs tivo by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    I say this is all seriousness, is it really better to have lots of indian companies make flops like the simputer or to have a few american companies make things like Tivo. I dont mean that they are mutually exclusive, but is quantity better than quality? when did that happen?

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:Simputer vs tivo by jma05 · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, what does this have to do with the article?

    2. Re:Simputer vs tivo by alphakappa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a pointless argument. Many of the american 'hits' are actually designed and created in India. For example, Portalplayer which powers the iPod, or the Slingbox... many of these small american companies are simply headquartered in the silicon valley for business purposes, while their entire design and development teams are in Bangalore/Hyderabad. As long as the major customers are in the US, that's how things will be. It's pointless to try to distinguish them as Indian or American companies. They are both.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    3. Re:Simputer vs tivo by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      did you just claim that the ipod was designed and created in india? care to back that up? Apple makes a big deal with its designed in california stickers on every product. Lets see you prove the ipod was actually thought up in india.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:Simputer vs tivo by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      Read carefully my friend, I mentioned Portalplayer, not the iPod itself. The Portalplayer chip was largely created in Hyderabad.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    5. Re:Simputer vs tivo by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      "The company has 280 employees, more than half of them in India, and it has opened an office in Taiwan"

      Thats all the article says. You do know, there is a big difference between making something somewhere and designing it. To be fair i couldn't read the WSJ article because the yahoo login didnt work.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    6. Re:Simputer vs tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say this is all seriousness, is it really better to have lots of $country companies make $dumb_generalization like the $os_product or to have a few american companies make things like Windows?. I dont mean that they are mutually exclusive, but is quantity better than quality? when did that happen?

  18. Re:More indians taking american jobs by mspohr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    India is much more efficient at programming (and many other tech jobs)... perhaps one reason is that they use Linux and don't have to deal with Windoze.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  19. Number of customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Citing the number of customers makes no sense. An insurance company doesn't equip each of its customers with a computer (and OS). What's much more relevant to Red Hat is the number of employees of the company that will be using their product. This number is probably in the tens of thousands, not hundreds of millions, assuming every employee gets a Linux desktop. (If it's just server machines, then the number of instances of the OS might be in the hundreds.)

    No doubt the poster was motivated to wave a large number around, despite the lack of common sense.

    1. Re:Number of customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Citing the number of customers makes no sense. An insurance company doesn't equip each of its customers with a computer (and OS). What's much more relevant to Red Hat is the number of employees of the company that will be using their product. This number is probably in the tens of thousands, not hundreds of millions, assuming every employee gets a Linux desktop. (If it's just server machines, then the number of instances of the OS might be in the hundreds.)" The number of customers is relevant in terms of the size of the company that adopted the Linux solution.

    2. Re:Number of customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and the size of the company (in employees) could have been cited directly, rather than by implication. But I suppose it wouldn't have been an impressive large number by the submitter's standards.

      Number of employees tells you something about efficiency. If Company A can serve 100M customers with 10,000 employees, and Company B provides the same service to the same number of customers, but needs 20,000 employees, then Company B is being rather inefficient. Here, the number of customers is irrelevant to the size of the company.

      When talking about the IT infrastructure of a company, the efficiency it provides (in terms of revenue or customers per employee) is a much more interesting figure of merit than just the absolute number of customers.

    3. Re:Number of customers? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      While the number of customers LIC has is not directly relevant to the number of Linux computers LIC will use, it serves to make one valid point: there will be some large, complex applications that need to be handled and Linux is up to the task. Having dealt with some applications for a company with around 12 million customers, I can well imagine that LIC has some truly demanding computing problems.

  20. Re:Non-trivial? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 1

    > It's called evolution and its something that non-dead
    > languages should do to survive (it's a good thing).

    I'll remember to use that excuse too next time a slashdotter complains when someone in the media refers to breaking into a computer system and stealing data as "hacking".

  21. Critical mass by teslatug · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Linux has gotten to the point where Microsoft's FUD can no longer hurt it. There are enough companies that have adopted Linux now that nothing that Microsoft says can cause clueful companies to ignore a Linux solution. Sure Microsoft will make or keep some sales due to FUD, but that no longer hurts Linux but perhaps the companies themselves.

    The next battle may be with patents, but with IBM so involved with Linux, I seriously doubt Microsoft would go head to head with Linux for fear of stepping on IBM's toes. I actually wish there would be a big patent battle. If there was it would probably fizzle out with the result being some cross-patenting agreement, but there is a miniscule chance that companies and the government would realize the mess of patents if we had an apocalyptic patents battle.

    1. Re:Critical mass by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Linux' biggest problem isn't Microsoft, it's itself.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Critical mass by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Please explain.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:Critical mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Linux has gotten to the point where Microsoft's FUD can no longer hurt it."
      If it was a big western bank (f.x. CitiBank) or some other big multinational company, it would have ment that.

    4. Re:Critical mass by caluml · · Score: 1

      It's official! Teslatug has pronounced that, as of 2006-04-08 23:51, Linux has won!
      Hallejulah!

  22. the pirate cd makers association call strike. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    god. i hope the trend doesnt continue, the winduze pirate cd makes association is talking of going on hunger strike if this continues.

    *its a joke*

  23. The idiot who posted that... by Naruki · · Score: 0

    Oh, sorry, it was you. So when you posted that, you failed to explain even the tiniest hint about why "non-trivial" is a bad word. Just asserting that it's bad does not equal proving it.

    Based on your logic (that non-trivial is stupid simply because important is a similar word), explain why we have "trivial" and "unimportant" and which of those two you declare to be obviously retarded.

    While you're at it, go ahead and explain the pruning of these terms, too:
    bootless, bush-league, diddly, dinky, dispensable, disposable, entry level, exiguous, expendable, extraneous, foolish, frivolous, immaterial, inappreciable, inconsequent, inconsequential, inconsiderable, ineffective, ineffectual, inessential, insignificant, insufficient, irrelative, irrelevant, lesser, lightweight, little, low-ranking, meager, meaningless, measly, Mickey Mouse, minim, minimal, minor, minor-league, minuscule, minute, needless, negligible, niggling, nonessential, nonserious, not germane, nothing, nugatory, otiose, paltry, peripheral, petty, picayune, piddling, pointless, profitless, puny, purportless, secondary, senseless, shallow, silly, slight, small, small potatoes, small-fry, small-time, superficial, superfluous, trifling, two bit, unnecessary, unneeded, unproductive, unprofitable, unprofound, unsubstantial, useless, vain, valueless, and worthless.

  24. A long way to go by DesiVideoGamer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I did some research/interviews in India and I can assure you that Linux has a long way to go until it can get wide adoption for Desktop Computers (lets ignore servers for now).

    - Almost everybody in India has a pirated version of Windows XP (which came with their computer, so its pretty much "free" for them)
    - Very few people I interviewed actually do Windows Update (probably because of the whole XP-Key validation)
    - Unless he/she is a software engineer, they would have never heard of Linux
    - When asked about spyware, they didn't seem to care. Most Indians didn't seem to care about the performance factor. They also didn't seem to care about identity theft as much either (the culture is such that most people pay just about everything in cash since most vendors charge a "service charge" for using credit cards or even a check)
    - Bill Gates is more of a hero in India than a devil (his charitable contributions are well known)
    - Tying in Gujarati in Linux (KDE) takes time and pratice to learn (I assume the same with other Indian languages)
    - Some "cablenet" ISPs in India require you to run Windows software in order to connect to the Internet. There is no support for Linux at this time.

    Those are just a few problems that I can think of on top of my head. There are plenty more issues in Linux Desktop adoption in India.

    1. Re:A long way to go by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 2, Funny
      Indian Companies Embracing Linux Faster Than Ever


      With all the time you spent banging out that post - perhaps it would have been better spent actually reading the article.. then you might have realized that this has nothing to do with home use...

      --
      I'm not fat, just big boned...
    2. Re:A long way to go by downwardspiral · · Score: 1

      u did get everything right.

    3. Re:A long way to go by DesiVideoGamer · · Score: 1

      Sorry for not being clear. These interviews were in a corporate environment. Desktop usage is very important in corporate company since it suddenly becomes a requirement for employees to learn such an OS. However, the companies that I interviewed were not nearly as big as the ones mentioned in the article (they were all less then 100 employees) and so there may be some differences between what I said and large companies like Rediff.

    4. Re:A long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Almost everybody in India has a pirated version of windows XP (which came with their computer, so its pretty much "free" for them)
      yeah its somewhere arount 99% here and microsoft did gave windowsxp for peanuts(some Rs 1500 $40USD or so i'm not sure) here, but it too did not work. the thing is many people dont know that you need to buy windows to use it. Everyone buys assembled systems and the systems will get pirated windows installed by default. when i say that linux is free to some people..., the answer I get was.... "Windows is also free. right?"
      - Unless he/she is a software engineer, they would have never heard of Linux
      Thats not completely true and not completely false. I have had many people(non soft engg) asking me what all the fuss abt linux is. To say you frankly, they dont know what windows actually is and what it does. They simply use/buy computer coz their kid will learn it or they need to do some office work, which they dont actually know what they are doing. They simple remember their work like this... press f8 enter name, press enter, then f10....

    5. Re:A long way to go by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      You seem to be a regular sort of a guy, but I'm sorry, I have to take issue with all of your points:
      Almost everybody in India has a pirated version of Windows XP (which came with their computer, so its pretty much "free" for them)

      And this is different from other places how? Even in (decadent, IPR-friendly-and-all-that-shit) West, your Windows copy is part of your computer costs, so essentially it's "free" in the sense that you don't have a seperate bill.

      Very few people I interviewed actually do Windows Update (probably because of the whole XP-Key validation)
      Right. So how's that stopping Linux adoption?
      When asked about spyware, they didn't seem to care. Most Indians didn't seem to care about the performance factor.
      Again, how's that different from the West?
      They also didn't seem to care about identity theft as much either
      Linux in India, bud. How does ID theft tie in with Linux? Or are you saying folks actually install Linux because they want to protect themselves from ID theft?
      (the culture is such that most people pay just about everything in cash since most vendors charge a "service charge" for using credit cards or even a check)
      There's a service charge everywhere in the world, just that, most of the bigger shops absorb this fee because of legal agreements with MasterCard/Visa. Just as it is, I'm sure, in most of urban India.
      Tpying in Gujarati in Linux (KDE) takes time and pratice to learn (I assume the same with other Indian languages)
      Then again, Gujarati in Linux uses exactly the same Inscript layout as MS Windows does, so I'm not sure how that's stopping Linux adoption.

      Personally, I've never really understood this argument about finding it tough to type Indic languages. Let's face facts, with their conjunct consonants and constructed glyphs, Indic scripts are significantly more complex than the 26-letter English alphabet, so yes, you'd expect to spend sometime getting familiar with the keyboard layout. That's part of the deal isn't it, you don't spend that bit of an effort, you don't get Indic glyphs on the screen. It's as simple as that.

      Some "cablenet" ISPs in India require you to run Windows software in order to connect to the Internet. There is no support for Linux at this time.
      My alma mater here required us to install some Windows-only authentication software to connect to the LAN. The local LUG came up with a Linux-workaround in exactly one day.

      My overall point? You seemed to have set out trying to elaborate on the broader thesis that Linux adoption in India is struggling for some India-specific reasons. With the exception of this one point about not having enough brand-awareness, I don't see how the other points should necessarily be detrimental to greater Linux adoption in India.

    6. Re:A long way to go by DesiVideoGamer · · Score: 1

      You have a few good points. Just want to make a few things clear (my links may require subscription):
      Many Linux advocates use security , internationalization and "free-ness" as a major selling point.
      For security, many users in the US care about spyware and etc. sending off their private data. Meanwhile I didn't see as much concern for private data in India (I assume the whole identity theft factor will take a major role which is why I mentioned that). That killed off the security selling point. This is also why I also mentioned about Windows Updates since it can make a computer far more vulnerable to spyware and etc. However, US and India seem to share the lack of concern in performance factor.
      For Internationalization, there has been a notion that Linux has great international support. However, when I had users try KDE's Gujarati, I didn't see any kind of quick adoption to the language. In general, users tend to need to see quick results before being convinced a product is worth adopting. So KDE's Gujarati could be "the best" out of every other interface out there, but it is not good enough to convince them that "Linux has great Gujarati support" (thus killing that selling point).
      As for Linux being free, the Indian small businesses (the ones I interviewed with) had a pirated version of XP as opposed to US where many small businesses have a legal version that came with their computers. This can come in to play when these companies deals with larger companies (or governments) that may require their assets to all be legal (you can see an example of this in Thailand). The small businesses I talked to didn't seem to have a concern about it. Therefore, the "free" as in beer selling point was killed off.
      So I tried those three major selling factors of linux on a few small businesses in India and they all didn't work out well at all. So yes, a lot of what I said is not India specific but those where the problems I saw upfront for businesses migrating to Linux.

    7. Re:A long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cablenet company in the US required that I use Windows, too. So, whenever I needed support, I booted windows, otherwise I use OS/2 or linux. It was a real PIA, too. When the cable service would go down, the helpdesk technician would have you delete and reinstall the drivers in windows before they'd admit that the problem was on their end and they'd have to send a technician. They had a script that they went through, and you had to go through it step by step. After that first time, I simulated the process with the tech.

    8. Re:A long way to go by dodobh · · Score: 1

      - Bill Gates is more of a hero in India than a devil (his charitable contributions are well known)

      This isn't an issue of charity. A rich man has more honour in a country with a lot of poor people.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  25. And nobody cared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially the Vietnamese.

  26. Stateless Linux by Chemicalscum · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Since this is a major integrated desktop and server deployment. It is an interesting question to ask is RH using its stateless Linux technology. It seems to me that the adoption of the approach is one factor that can drive a Windows to Linux desktop migration as is happening with LIC. The Fedora Project defines stateless Linux as:

    The Stateless Linux project is an OS-wide initiative to ensure that Fedora computers can be set up as replaceable appliances, with no important local state.

    For example, a system administrator can set up a network of hundreds of desktop client machines as clones of a master system, and be sure that all of them are kept synchronised whenever he or she updates the master system. We provide several technologies for doing this.

    This is an obvious improvement over the situation now when a legion of MCSE services the networked MS Windows fat (in fact boated or obese) clients. By adopting this technology a large corporation can avoid the even greater bloat that will be enforced by the Vista upgrade.

    It seems to me that there are three major approaches to the forthcoming corporate migrations to the Linux desktop by those corporations forward looking enough to want to avoid the cost and dislocations of the upcoming upgrades to Vista and who at the same time want to make cost savings and improve IT efficiency.

    1. There is the Novell approach which is to replace the Windows fat client by a better more cost effective Linux fat client, i.e. SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop.

    2. There is the IBM approach which uses a Java Rich Client Platform (the Eclipse RCP) that is OS agnostic and which allows a smooth transition from Windows to Linux. This involves the Websphere based Workplace technology, the OOo based IBM productivity editors and new Hannover Notes client which runs natively on Linux.

    3. Finally there is the RH stateless Linux approach outlined above.

    1. Re:Stateless Linux by richlv · · Score: 1

      stateless linux isn't tied to migration in any way - it is more of a way to manage large amount of computers.

      i wanted to paste some info from the pdf on their website, but it seems to use some shitty protection against copying. screw them, that's not an opensouce project.

      --
      Rich
  27. Re:More indians taking american jobs by BeanThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice to decide that *someone else's job* is crappy and they *they* shouldn't mind losing it ... so long as it's not your job, right?

    (I agree with you on the efficiency point though.)

  28. Holy bias and son and spirit by suv4x4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So if I come home from work hungry like hell and embrace the whole fridge, does it make me embracing vegetarian diet faster than ever since I also ate tomatoes (beside the pork and chicken)?

    As you can see, I'm kinda hungry.. but that's not the point.

    1. Re:Holy bias and son and spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I envy you !, but such a thing is not meant to last.......

      The paint is chipped in places, so if i try anything like that
      i am sure to get a shock !!

  29. Re:More indians taking american jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds more like one of those "Jobs that Americans won't do" arguments, that dosn't really exist. Every year the news has a another short disparaging report about how we are graduating less and less science, math, technology and engineering majors. And the reason always is that there aren't any jobs. Anerican companies need to realize that they get what they pay for, and once employment of american technology workers picks up technology education will too. We are at a very dangerous crossroads right now, one of the richest countries with a slipping education average. Other countries instead of trying to make what they can for themselves (just like americans did around the industrial revolution), are taking our slice of the pie. Stealing instead of making their own.

  30. Re:Non-trivial? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    No, evolution is a mail client from Novell, which provides a semblance of support for Microsoft Exchange-based Linux clients.

    Or did you mean something else?

  31. Wow: RTFA and tell me Linux isn't going places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "LIC will deploy Red Hat Enterprise Linux across its 2,048 branches, 100 divisional offices, seven zonal offices, head office, subsidiary offices and overseas locations. The Linux deployment will provide LIC with a uniform, finely tuned operating system environment, along with security and integrity for its core application software. The implementation will also include utilisation of enterprise-layered solutions through Linux Servers for management, provisioning and monitoring of Red Hat Network."

  32. Fanboyism by amightywind · · Score: 1

    As an Indian...I myself use the Tamil support of KDE, and have long found it superior to that of GNOME

    Interesting the Gnome/KDE Flamewar has spread to India. Fanboyism is a fundemental human trait I guess. If you took 2 Linux machines to New Guinea and gave them to the natives you'd find them waring over Gnome and KDE within an hour. I personally think KDE sucks.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Fanboyism by DextroShadow · · Score: 0

      True. And then a third person would chime in and say fluxbox, and then a fourth would chime in with xfce. Before you know it, there are jihad's and tribal wars going on.

      --
      My karma makes buddha cry.
    2. Re:Fanboyism by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      I personally think KDE sucks.


      Oh yeah ? You... you... you vi user !
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:Fanboyism by amightywind · · Score: 1

      How dare you! vi is a shameful editor. GNU/Emacs uber alles!

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
  33. LIC - India used Unix earlier by betasam · · Score: 4, Informative

    LIC India was one of the largest users of Unix (SUN Solaris) systems prior to this announcement. They had trained Unix sysadmins and tape backup systems in 1998. Long before such an official announcement was made many of the client machines connecting to the servers were being switched to Linux even at regional offices. This time Redhat is migrating the servers too to Linux. So that in a sense is the corporate world beginning to embrace Linux.

    Adding to this, Reliance Infocomm Ltd., one of the largest CDMA service providers does provide a rather clumsy, yet workable tool for dialing-up internet using their phones. They try to address a small but existent Linux Desktop market. There are OEM PCs that ship with TurboLinux desktops in India from many manufacturers.

    However, the largets ATM chains, SBI - State Bank of India (now on a week long strike) and several other institutions continue to use flavors of legacy old systems including Microsoft Win32 platforms. Home users are most uncomfortable switching to Linux despite the arrival of Ubuntu/Kubuntu and other easily configurable alternatives. There is still much to be done. The transition is slow but definitely happening in the market, and that's the good news.

    As for outsourcing blah, that's irrelevant to the article. Service firms adopt platforms that can put them in business with their clientele. That's business sense and they keep doing it.

    --
    No Greater Friend, No Greater Enemy! (Lucius Cornelius Sulla)
  34. So its replacing SCO ;) by dvNull · · Score: 1
  35. By that logic... by Naruki · · Score: 0

    you have to cite BOTH numbers in order to make a guess at efficiency. But it still lacks surety, as there are other factors involved as well, such as how much they pay.

  36. Re:More indians taking american jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously haven't seen any indian source code...

  37. and of course rediff uses LInux by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    And of course rediff (the news service posting this article) uses Linux. Their free webmail system, Rediffmail.com, alone uses well over sixty Linux servers and has hundreds of terabytes spinning.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  38. Re:More indians taking american jobs by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

    India is much more efficient at programming (and many other tech jobs)... perhaps one reason is that they use Linux and don't have to deal with Windoze.

    The reason people were all hot and bothered to farm out the development costs to India is the manpower cost much less. In the New Delhi area, a seasoned Java developer would make about $20 a day. If I can write up a spec in the US or UK and have someone implement it for pennies on the dollar (or sterling), that may we worth the bother of outsourcing it.

    The irony is as the development shops demand a larger chunk of the pie, people outsourcing start to look elsewhere as the implementation stops being such a good deal. Even in India, some of the cities in the Southern portion of the country are the new 'Seattle'. So now we see the new 'cheap' shops springing up in other locations. Problem is, China and some of the Eastern European countries are pitching cheap labor as well.

    It is not that India is smarter, more efficient, or better at 'grunt work' coding - they just have a much lower cost of living. When they ship the same code in the same time as someone who's cost of living is several orders of magnitude higher it figures the cost to the requestor should be less while the folks that make it should have better margins. I would not sell you my weekend for $200, but others in the world would jump on that.

  39. Your statistics are misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem with your statistics is that they're measuring very different things. Recall that GNOME and KDE are structured quite differently. KDE is a far tighter distribution system than GNOME.

    Those statistics are for the very core of GNOME: GTK+, GLib, GDK, the GNOME desktop and taskbar, Metacity, and applications like gnome-terminal. It does not take into account GAIM, for instance, which is a separate project.

    The stats for KDE, on the other hand, not only include the comparable base libraries and applications to that of GNOME, but also much software that for GNOME is completely separate. The data for KDE includes that for the Kopete instant messenging system, while the GNOME data does not include that for the equivalent in GAIM. The KDE data includes Konqueror, while the GNOME data does not include Galeon, Epiphany, Firefox, etc.

    The amount translated for GNOME should be far more, just because the portion of software being measured is far less than that being measured by the KDE data. The numbers for GNOME start to decrease significantly once you start making the packages equal (by bringing in GAIM, Galeon, Nautilus, etc.)

  40. Re:I am standing beside myself with joy! by the_mushroom_king · · Score: 0

    Thank you, come again!

  41. Re:More indians taking american jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India is much more efficient at programming (and many other tech jobs)... perhaps one reason is that they use Linux and don't have to deal with Windoze.

    It's pretty simple. India is in Asia. Computer programming requires intelligence. And Asians are the most intelligent.

  42. Why I loathe Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was the sort of moment thing you'd expect to read in Penthouse Forum. "I never believed this could happen to me, but I was at a club and I ran into Paris Hilton...." Normally, I wouldn't even be in a club; my Saturdays are invariably spent grabbing a slice of pizza in between WoW ninja looting sessions. Tonight, however, I'd finally gotten tired of my friends from work saying things like "we never see you" and "people are scared that you're studying chemistry and writing a manifesto." So, after letting my guild know that I wouldn't make the raid tonight, I'd let them drag me out to some dance place. Since I'm not nearly coordinated enough to dance, I spent most of the evening sitting around drinking. Three wine coolers finally took their toll, and I staggered off to the bathroom.

    Feeling much relieved, I walked out the bathroom door, wondering if I could convince one of my coworkers to drive me back to my apartment. If we hurried, I might be able to make the raid after all. Absorbed in pleasant thoughts of ganking some n00bs, I walked right into someone's path. The impact sent me sprawling. Unsteadily, I rose to my feet, already mumbling an apology. I turned, and the words stuck in my throat; I knew that face! Those pouting lips and vacant blue eyes were a prominent feature in my JPEG collection. She was saying something, but my mind couldn't focus on the words. Before I could stop myself, I blurted out, "Oh my God, you're Paris Hilton!"

    Things were kind of a blur after that. We ended up at my apartment, my arm around her waist as I fumbled with the lock. Inside, she set her purse down by the door and looked around. I cringed a bit, seeing my apartment as if through a stranger's eyes. There was a pyramid stack of empty mountain dew cans by my desk, a half-painted army of space marine miniatures covering the couch, and empty pizza boxes serving as a mute testimonial to my ineptitude at cooking. She didn't seem to notice; instead, she saw the cables leading from my desk to the plasma TV and said "wow, is that hooked up to the computer?" Her hands slid up and down the front of my X-box 360 t-shirt as she moaned "I love geeks... they're so hot." I couldn't believe my luck; a six-year-long dry spell was about to come to an end!

    I found myself bragging about my setup, rattling off the system specs as she pressed herself against me. She seemed a bit surprised that I hadn't put it together myself, and was strangely silent as I told her about the great financing Dell had given me. The puzzled look turned into a frown when I mentioned the Pentium 4 processor; I found myself becoming defensive, explaining that it was a really innovative architecture while AMD was just a Pentium III retread. It was when I got to the OS that all hell broke loose. She stepped away, a look of total disbelief on her face, and shrieked "XP Media Center? You fucking nerd wannabe!" Grabbing her purse, she stormed out the door. In a rage, I followed her into the hallway, screaming "I downloaded your video!" at her retreating back. "At least Rick Solomon could set up Ubuntu," she snarled over her shoulder as she slammed the building door.

    Alone in my apartment, I slumped over my keyboard, weeping bitter tears. Deleting her pictures brought me no consolation; someone had to suffer for the humiliation I had endured. Opening my trusty IE window, I headed off to MSN search to find the people who had brought this shame upon me. I clicked on a likely-looking link, Slashdot.org. Immediately, I knew I was in the right place; they proudly proclaimed themselves as an open-source advocacy site and one of the article headlines made the absurd claim that Windows systems had a higher TCO. They had obviously been ignoring the "Get The Facts" campaign. The comment threads were a target-rich environment: Linux zealots, Apple snobs, Clippy haters, and Firefox fanboys, all waiting to feel my wrath. My lips drew back in a primal snarl as I began crafting my first A.C. post.

    From Hell's heart, Tux, I stab at thee!

  43. Indian Companies don't advocate FLOSS by x86processor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Companies in India use FLOSS a lot. From my contacts, and experience with FLOSS in India in the past 1 1/2 years, this is the list that I have prepared:

      http://shakthimaan.com/misc/database.html

    David Axmark, the co-founder of the mysql project was here in India, recently, and recently gave a talk at IIT-M (http://www.chennailug.org/). He said that Indian companies are major consumers of free/open source software, but, don't produce/contribute back to the community.

    Recently, there was the Debain Defconf meeting in Hyderabad, and about 1000 "developers" from India had participated, only 2 of them were Debian contributors.

    Companies seldom market about FLOSS in India, where the "majority" of the masses read their news from newspapers, get updated from radio broadcasts and television broadcasts.

  44. Educated != Anti-corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The more educated folks are trying to move away from piracy, and Linux offers them a good option. Also, it being free (as in speech) gives people a reason to contribute to it.

    Educated != Anti-corporate.

    Microsoft has some anti-competitive methods in place but this doesn't mean its software is inferior (overall). Mac systems are still years behind Windows in terms of overall compatibility (the recent change to Intel chips are a flat-out admission of defeat). Sure, it has some nice software, but you don't pull million/billion dollar deals if your boss has to ask the IT department why the company's Macs can't open a Microsoft Office file.

    Linux hasn't even arrived at the starting gate. Third party developer support is virtually non-existant, second party developer support is COMPLETELY non-existant and first-party support is a flat-out joke. The few companies that do support Linux get bashed by the Linux community no matter what they do (Doom 3 and Quake 4 were both bashed because they weren't on par with Windows graphics, wth?) Hardware drivers are hit-or-miss, assuming Nvidia or ATI actually release them, theres nothing similar to Plug-and-Play, you MUST know a certain level of programming in order to self-maintain your system, etc etc etc...

    1. Re:Educated != Anti-corporate by lintux · · Score: 1

      Sure, it has some nice software, but you don't pull million/billion dollar deals if your boss has to ask the IT department why the company's Macs can't open a Microsoft Office file.

      What are you talking about? Microsoft made their own Mac version of office, so surely it should be able to open those files. Shouldn't give more problems than exchanging documents between different Win32 Office versions.

      The few companies that do support Linux get bashed by the Linux community no matter what they do (Doom 3 and Quake 4 were both bashed because they weren't on par with Windows graphics, wth?)

      Computer games.. Can you maybe take something that actually matters as an example?

      theres nothing similar to Plug-and-Play, you MUST know a certain level of programming in order to self-maintain your system, etc etc etc...

      You didn't touch a Linux box during the last five years, did you? :-)

    2. Re:Educated != Anti-corporate by l33t+gambler · · Score: 0


      theres nothing similar to Plug-and-Play, you MUST know a certain level of programming in order to self-maintain your system, etc etc etc...

      You didn't touch a Linux box during the last five years, did you? :-)

      Tell me how to

      1. change the refresh rate
      2. change the resolution
      3. change the bit-depth

      of the monitor in these Linux variations

      1. Fedora Core 5
      2. Linspire
      3. Suse

      A re-install of the OS isnt as user-friendly anymore since most Linux variations put Home and System on the same partition.

      --
      Teasing the nobles, and rightfully so!
  45. china as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an awesome product! It is a 146$ Linux computer (Thinix OS) from China
      that does all the basic things most people need, like browsing (firefox),
    emailing (thunderbird), instant messaging (gaim), skype, word processing (Red
    Office), audio/video playback (mplayer), e-learning, all through a very user-
    friendly very basic interface and is software upgradable. It has got 40GB, a
    400mhz/800mhz Godson 2C processor (the chinese dragon chip cpu), 256mb ram, 4 usb2 ports, VGA-output, ps2
    input, tv-output and weigths something like 400 grams. Their slogan is "Say
    no to Wintel".

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-920346214 8706105599&q=municator

  46. LIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    offtopic -1

    LIC offers insurance services in India, as government owned company. It has monopoly since ages, since private companies were not allowed to provide services in India.

    One of the most important fact is LIC services are ineficient, very expensive and theft oriented. People in India are afraid of claiming anything, because no claims are settled by LIC.

    LIC has loads of money to share.

  47. Re:Non-trivial? by ctid · · Score: 1
    Read this as to why this is a big deal and non-trivial is a dumb term to use.

    I don't understand your link:
    1. I agree that it is a big deal and I don't need convincing.
    2. All the link tells me is why you think that non-trivial is a "dumb term to use".
    3. As far as I can tell, the reason you that think the term is wrong, ie the perception, real or otherwise, that this story might be dismissed by readers as not significant because it's about one company in a country that many don't know much about, is exactly the same reason that I think it is right.

    I think the word "non-trivial" draws attention to the story and invites even a sceptical reader to take closer look.
    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  48. Oops. by hullabalucination · · Score: 1
    It's pretty simple. India is in Asia. Computer programming requires intelligence. And Asians are the most intelligent.

    Except that, unfortunately for them, folks on the Indian subcontinent ("South Asians") are classified as Caucasian along with us laggardly Europeans; not the East Asian racial group referred to on the graph as "Asian" (later on in the article they clarify this by explicitly discussing East Asians versus other racial categories). Oh, well--we can't all be lucky enough to be born Mongolian!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race

    * * * * * *

    I hate everybody equally and fairly without regard to race, religion or national origin.

  49. In related news by slack_prad · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.rediff.com/money/2006/apr/08spec.htm

    The UTI bank is glad they have linux running.

    "Today, we are really happy with Linux that has delivered 99.99 per cent uptime so far," says Pritesh Thaker, AVP, IT, UTI Bank.

    --
    Sent from my desktop computer
  50. Re:Non-trivial? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the world of Management, Public Relations, Sales etc... the world where you are not a customer... you are a consumer... a world where growth is a must... so the products are manufactured to last only as long as the warranty period...
    Rolls Royce and Mercedes will not be considered a success if they were started today... they would be considered a disaster... that is the world we have created, do we really want it to be this way ?
    --
    I will be flamebaited for this but it is the truth !

  51. Wrong! by eldacan · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you cared to click the link you could have seen that for each language, you have both developer-libs and desktop percentages. For example:
    Hindi: dev 99.84%, desktop 93.39%
    Tamil: dev 73.38%, desktop 65.81%

    Now clicking on 'desktop' for Tamil you have the details for each app. Indeed, GAIM is not in there because it's not an official GNOME app, but you do have Epiphany and Nautilus (the GNOME equivalents to Konqueror), or Ekiga (previously Gnome-Meeting), or Totem (movie player), ...

    Of course the KDE stats don't take into account *all* apps written for KDE either...

  52. Indians DO help take our MONEY away! by gd23ka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When push comes to shove, like everybody else I worry about my wallet. This time it's not only about my wallet but also yours and everybody else's here, so think this through and try to keep your kneejerk reflex to a minimum: There are a zillion business opportunities where people could earn a minimum of $80 and more an hour if companies did not have the option of outsourcing to India etc or pulling in cheap, foreign workforces. The reason they have those H1B-visa's is of course to keep prices for IT from skyrocketing. I sell IT services, and I suppose you do too. Anything that keeps prices down is not welcome and if that means Ranjid from some village in India is helping to keep prices down then he's not welcome either. Nothing personal, Ranjid.

    1. Re:Indians DO help take our MONEY away! by Adra+Ka+Badra · · Score: 0

      Nothin personal to you too.

      Ranjid.

    2. Re:Indians DO help take our MONEY away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When push comes to shove, like everybody else I worry about my wallet. This time it's not only about my wallet but also yours and everybody else's here, so think this through and try to keep your kneejerk reflex to a minimum... I buy IT services, and I suppose you do too. Anything that keeps prices down is welcome and if that means Ranjid from some village in India is helping to keep prices down then he's welcome too.
      Howdy, Ranjid.

    3. Re:Indians DO help take our MONEY away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha HA HA Ha HA Ha Ha HAR HAR HAR Mahadev~~~~

      Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

      Ranjid and his 12 kids

    4. Re:Indians DO help take our MONEY away! by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      Remember what I told you about your knee? ... you need to work on getting that under control. I really hate to be
      picking on you, dear Ranjid, but prices haven't come exactly down now have they? While we're at it, most ordinary
      people don't buy IT services. They buy a computer preinstalled with Windows XP. It's companies who buy IT services.

      It's the company that bakes the toast for my breakfast cable, the company that manufactured my toaster, the companies
      that manufactured the thousand parts of my car and the company who welded them into a car, the companies who go out and
      drill for crude oil and those companies that turn that into gasoline to run my car... none of these companies would
      ever CONSIDER (nor would they be wise) to pass a single red cent of their savings in IT manpower on to you and me,
      the consumers.

      So Ranjid, do me a favor and stay home because even though with H1-B you might be earning what is a fortune to spend
      in India over here I have little use for you as you are costing me money. Unlike you, I don't have a third world country
      to return to where a mere thousand dollars are worth ten to a hundred thousand.

    5. Re:Indians DO help take our MONEY away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't have any clue about capitalism do ya? If I'm the owner of a company why would I pay you 120$/hr to do nothing but pouring down your saliva into slashdot, all the while I can get Mr.Ranjid for 10$/hr in India to get the work done in half the time?
      Obviously nothing personal to you dear

    6. Re:Indians DO help take our MONEY away! by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      About time you got personal with me, not that I wasn't expecting it though. Let me rephrase your question to how
      polite and reasonable people would pose it.

      Why is it someone should pay me $120/h when they can get a H1-B worker for $10/hr from India who also gets the
      work done in half the time?

      Simple really.

      1. It should not be possible in the first place. There should be no such thing as an H1-B program. If you sell to a market you should also have to acquire services and goods from that market. People who employ people from India at a tenth of cost should have to sell in India at a tenth of the price.

      2. More often than not that someone from India sold to you as an outstanding and fully certified Oracle specialist
      will find out about his role when he is already at an altitude of 10,000 ft and heading west at 600 MPH. A thoughtful
      H1-B recruiting agent will pass the surprised individual reading material such as "Oracle for Dummies" to while away
      the boredom of flight.

      Oh and btw... $120/hr which I'm sure you consider an outrageous hourly rate.. is probably by all means fairly reasonable.
      It just depends on what kind of consulting is done.

      Regards

  53. Question of chairs, I think by chawly · · Score: 1

    They can afford to do this - the Indians actually export chairs. No single person could bring about a shortage of chairs in India - even by throwing them day and night.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  54. Re:More indians taking american jobs by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Indians happen to create application software efficiently.

    Cheaply, yes. Efficiently, no.
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  55. Desktop? GNOME, KDE, Java Swing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What desktop will they use?
    GNOME
    KDE
    Java Swing
    something else

  56. Any idea where the figure came from? by sharpestmarble · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know where the submitter got the 160m customer figure? It should also show how many employees they have. Since LIC isn't an IT firm, the employees use the IT product, not their customers.

    --
    AC's modded -6. I don't see you, I don't mod you, anything you say is lost. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
  57. YOU NAZI!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU SUCK!!!!!! Tell you what you are, you're nothing but a fucking racist NAZI PIGGGGGG!!!!!!!! I am SO SICK of PEOPLE LIKE YOU for who every excuse is good enough to WAIL WAH! WAH! WAH! They're taking our american jobs away! WAH! WAH! WAH! The jews! it's the jews who are all behind this!! WAIL WAIL WAH WAH FUCK YOU ASSHOLE! You will just have to live with it you piece of shit. Fuck you, NAZI TRASH!

    1. Re:YOU NAZI!!!!! by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      Oh well, did you run out of arguments? Try some of mine, plenty more on my side than yours.
      This isn't about kicking people out of the country or blaming the jews or calling people names,
      it's about getting paid again instead of getting plundered.

      Does anyone see the connection between me not being thrilled about how the value work is undercut
      and therefore a "nazi trash asshole pig", because I just don't get it.

  58. Re:I think its about time... -- But: by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 1

    Good points. What's worrying me lately is that, while Linux is doing a fine job catching up to (and in many cases surpassing) the established OSes, the law hasn't really caught up to Linux.

    For example, Ubuntu is pretty much how I'd want it by with the default installation, but it can't play certain proprietary media formats and some other things by default -- the wiki explains this. I know some of this is related to gray-area software that's free as in beer, but not as in speech, but there's a significant part of the computer world that's really restricted by patents and copyright issues. I also expect that, in the interest of diplomacy, more countries are going to start prioritizing intellectual property claims over FOSS. Is it politically shrewd to let Linux get tangled up in ridiculous legal issues? Obviously it's better for the public to have a free, flexible, secure OS available, but -- that hasn't necessarily stopped politicians in the past.

    Now, if the media picked up that idea and ran with it, you'd think that would satisfy every reporter's innermost desire to do the world a favor and help the little guy. Clear some FUD off the table, get people interested in what our new trans-Pacific overlords are up to. Events like this are happening all the time, so mass media has every reason to spread the word.

  59. Indian Linux Distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elx - http://www.elxlinux.com/ - Indian Linux Distro

  60. Then, no freedom at all. by DrYak · · Score: 1
    I don't see your scenario as representing freedom. If they are interested in cheap solutions, there is an economic factor which restricts their choice.


    Then, according to your definition, freedom never exists. There's always some reason (be it evil marketing strategy, economic pressures, patriotism & xenophobia against foreign producers, ecological specs of the considered device, childproof safety of a toy, or even presonnal taste in design and color) that restricts the choice to the specific item you finally pick up...

    The freedom about which I'm speaking is that the choice isn't restricted by the strategy of a *sinlge company* who got a strong desktop share by doing lock-in marketing. Most of the time, a westerner company choose to keep microsoft and avoid switching to something else, because they're damn used to windows and affraid to switch to something new and to have to retrain their staff. New companies in emergent countries are *not* tied by such addiction to microsoft's products, both windows and linux are equally new to them and both need the same effort for deploying and learning.

    Linux uptake in western companies is slow because these companies are locked-in. Linux uptake isn't that slow in new markets, because those companies aren't locked-in. This is a proof that the "lock-in" marketing of microsoft is the only reason why companies keep using their shit, and that Linux is a mature and valid solution for companies, whatever folks at microsoft say with their "Get the Facts" FUD.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Then, no freedom at all. by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      > Then, according to your definition, freedom never exists.

      COMPLETE freedom never exists, no. There is always some degree of freedom available, but when only one choice meets your needs, there's no practical freedom at all.

      > The freedom about which I'm speaking is that the choice
      > isn't restricted by the strategy of a *sinlge company*
      > who got a strong desktop share by doing lock-in marketing.

      It's not the strategy of a single company. It's the strategy of a great many companies, most of which do not provide an operating system alternative, while those who do are not providing the features and compatibility desired by the consumer marketplace. I used BSD as my main desktop O/S for years, and only kept DOS around as a compatibility measure. For a time, there were three varieties of DOS - PC-DOS, MS-DOS, and DR-DOS. I personally preferred PC-DOS. I used OS/2 for a while, I was part of the BeOS developer community, and I've got an old Mac sitting on my desk right now.

      I don't select Microsoft because it's the only choice I have. I have a lot of choices. Unfortunately, only Microsoft is producing a choice which offers a level of stability, performance, and reliability I consider acceptable. I don't blame Microsoft for producing the only O/S that isn't a piece of unadulterated crap, I blame the competition for not producing anything better.

      > This is a proof that the "lock-in" marketing of
      > microsoft is the only reason why companies keep
      > using their shit, and that Linux is a mature and
      > valid solution for companies

      No it isn't. It's an unsupported assertion from someone with an obvious bias against Microsoft.

      The difference between American O/S markets and third world O/S markets is the difference in cost between humans and computers. In many of these third world countries, an employee makes less than a hundred dollars per year. The computer costs several times that. The cost of a $5 Linux CD is a month's salary for one of these employees.

      If you compare a $150 copy of Windows (not that Microsoft charges that much in developing markets... but I'm sure you consider that predatory pricing), that's more than a year's salary for an employee. Windows is only worth that kind of money if an employee can do twice as much work on Windows as he can on Linux, and generally speaking, that's not the case.

      However, if the Microsoft alternative saves your employees fifteen minutes a day, that amounts to roughly 62 hours annually. So if you pay your employees more than $2.50 an hour, Microsoft is the clear and obvious choice.

      Since the third world is paying its employees a dollar and change each week, they scoff at these tiny little gains, but here in the U.S. we have a federal law requiring that we pay anyone and everyone more than twice this wage. So if Windows saves you seven minutes a day, it's worth it. And since most computer professionals make twenty dollars an hour or more, if it saves you TWO minutes a day, it's worth it. If you operate a serious technical company where the average wage is closer to $40 an hour, recovering less than one minute a day pays for the software.

      So the clear and obvious choice here is to use Windows, regardless of Microsoft's "get the facts" campaign. The situation in the third world is closer to the mainframe era, where people were routinely expected to invest weeks in optimisation and redesign to save a few clock cycles on the massively expensive single computer down in the lab.

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
    2. Re:Then, no freedom at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the deal:

      You can be more, or at least as productive on linux workstations as you are on windows. Aside some applications that simply do not exist on linux, or they do not exist on the scale a professional would want them to. I personally find windows wastes my time more than it saves me. I work alot more efficiently with the help of small features in linux like shading windows. Also linux doesn't get in my way as much as windows does.

      You're building your whole argument around the fallacy that with windows everyone is somehow more productive. If it is specifically _you_ who is, I can accept that. But _you_ are not the general case.