Slashdot Mirror


The Man Behind Online Porn's 'Steve Lightspeed'

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "'In the online pornography business, just about everybody has heard of Steve Lightspeed,' who runs a network of sites, reports the Wall Street Journal Online. 'But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it.' In WSJ.com's profile of Jones, tension between his job and the rest of his life is evident: 'He said he and his wife mostly socialize with others inside the porn business, in part because it avoids the awkwardness of explaining his line of work. "Most of our friends tend to be in the industry," he said. Relationships with family members can also be tricky. Mr. Jones's mother works for Lightspeed Media, handling customer service duties, but he said some relatives don't know about his work and likely wouldn't approve.'"

59 of 246 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdot by Metabolife · · Score: 3, Funny

    'But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it.' I hear slashdot is a great place for a porn king to be noticed.

    1. Re:Slashdot by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Combined with Google, yes.
      "But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it".

      Some relatives don't know about his work and likely wouldn't approve.

      Except shortly everyone Googling for his name will know who he is and what industry he works in. Nice responsible journalism. Why not ruin someone's life so you can write an interesting article.
      "A few years ago, Mr. Jones relocated his family after some neighbors learned of his profession, and forbade their children from playing with his. "It was kind of heartbreaking," Mr. Jones said. He added: "My kids have no clue what we do."

      The media stooped lower than usual this time. The least they could have done was shown some slight respect for the guy and his kids, and obscured the names.
    2. Re:Slashdot by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wouldn't know, I only read the Wall Steet Journal for the articles...

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:Slashdot by TheLongshot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As the article says, his real name is all over the internet anyways, so this doesn't change anything.

      There is no mention of his wife's or his kids' names anywhere in the article, and having a last name of "Jones" is innocuous enough.

    4. Re:Slashdot by re-Verse · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno.. last name Jones. Isn't that about as close to John Doe as you can get? In fact, Jones often means "the person next door", keeping up with the Jonses, etc. I'm guessing its not his real last name.

      I guess in this case, "keeping up with the jonses" would have a whole new meaning eh?

    5. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "A few years ago, Mr. Jones relocated his family after some neighbors learned of his profession, and forbade their children from playing with his. "It was kind of heartbreaking," Mr. Jones said. He added: "My kids have no clue what we do."

      I can't belive how hypocritical people can be. What do you want to bet that the same dad that didn't let his children play with Mr. Jone's kids could be found surfing his sites after the kids were in bed?

      I am one of those "neocon" republicans that everyone here hates (hence the annymous post), and I feel I maintain high moral standards. I would have no problem living next door to Mr. Jones, letting my kids play with his, inviting them over to BBQ ect. Any Christian that would segregate themselves and their family from their neighbors should study the life of Christ a bit more.

    6. Re:Slashdot by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2

      "A few years ago, Mr. Jones relocated his family after some neighbors learned of his profession, and forbade their children from playing with his. "

      Yep, he should have gave his neighbors the free month pass like they wanted - this could have all been avoided.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:Slashdot by Caiwyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At first I had the same reaction, until I realized that the man would have had to agree to an interview with the Wall Street Journal. If he's really interested in keeping his privacy, why is he fielding questions about his work?

    8. Re:Slashdot by AoT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except shortly everyone Googling for his name will know who he is and what industry he works in. Nice responsible journalism. Why not ruin someone's life so you can write an interesting article.

      Boo-fucking-hoo!

      He's a pornographer. If he has a problem with his friends and family knowing that, maybe he should work in that field. This is as absurd as some guy driving race cars being terribly secretive about his job because all his family rides bikes.

    9. Re:Slashdot by AoT · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe he should work in that field.

      Or shouldn't work in that field even.

    10. Re:Slashdot by dsgitl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am one of those "neocon" republicans that everyone here hates... Any Christian that would segregate themselves and their family from their neighbors should study the life of Christ a bit more

      Are you SURE you're one of those Republicans? I didn't think treating people like equals was allowed. Maybe you've got the wrong Christ or something. The Republican Christ seems to love segregating people, ideas, and countries. Not to mention the whole warring/conquering nation thing.

  2. pr0n... the $14 billion business by xtal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..nobody seems to know anything about

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by StarvingSE · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see it now... pr0n.google.com

      beta of course

      --
      I got nothin'
    2. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by British · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the article's header it mentioned Lightspeed's mom working in the same place. Seymour Butts' mother also works for the same pr0n company Seymour is in charge of. Heck, a reality show was made about it(Family Business)

  3. Wall Street Journal by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool. The Wall Street Journal is submitting their own articles to Slashdot now. Nothing like a little free advertising.

    1. Re:Wall Street Journal by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 2, Funny

      The little guy needs to get noticed somehow. Once the Washington Post starts getting their stories on here, that's when to get worried though.

  4. P0rn News by run4ever79 · · Score: 4, Funny

    now there's some news for nerds.

    --
    Linux : Hotrod :: Windows : Yugo
  5. Obligatory Futurama-quote by October_30th · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Lightspeed fits today's active life style, whether you're on the job or having fun. Lightspeed Briefs - style and comfort for the discriminating crotch."

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  6. I can just imagine... by pedalman · · Score: 2, Funny
    What it is like for the kids when asked to tell the class what Daddy does for a living:

    "Uhh, he brings much joy to Slashdotters around the world."

    --
    Friends don't let friends line-dance.
  7. This is news? by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am unsure as to why this is news. Subject X works in the Y industry, an industry not looked upon with great respect by a majority of the public. Because of this X does not want his family to know he works in the Y industry and generally associates with people from the Y industry so as to avoid embarassment due to his profession.

    1. Re:This is news? by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yah, I don't want my family to know I work with computers either. In order to avoid the embarrasment, I tell them I'm a piano player at a brothel.

  8. Click here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know you want google to always remember you searched for Tawnee Stone. How old is she now, like, 25?

    1. Re:Click here by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You know, I love how, following your link, Google tells me
      Results 1-20 of about 299 for tawnee stone (0.15 seconds)
      Then, I see this little blue link at the top. "Moderate Safe Search is on". So I switch it off. Ergo:
      Results 1-20 of about 32,500 for tawnee stone (0.06 seconds)
      Maybe I should try that trick with my own name once in a while...
  9. Slashdot can keep a secret! by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it."

    Have no worries, your secrets are safe with us.

  10. Well, I have to say ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but he said some relatives don't know about his work ...

    They do now.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  11. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not at all clear why this is a story for Slashdot.

    Having an successful Internet business doesn't make an interesting in and of itself.

    Is this supposed to make those of us not in the porn business feel grateful that we don't have his problems?

    1. Re:Why? by freeweed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having an successful Internet business doesn't make an interesting in and of itself.

      No, but having a successful Internet business in an industry that is used by millions of people daily, perfectly legal, and yet the guy still has to hide what he does IS interesting.

      Hence, "YRO".

      I think it's a very interesting comment on our society (at least, American society). Even with no government censorship, the societal sanctions we impose on others have a great deal of influence. Parents won't let their kids play with his kids? What do they think Mr. Lightspeed does - porn films displayed 7x24 in his home? I guess they also figure someone who works for a gun manufacturer uses his kids as target practice...

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  12. Lightspeed by CheeseTroll · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...the name "lightspeed" came from an alias Mr. Jones adopted in computer chat rooms in the early 1990s.

    Excellent! I'm all set to follow in his footsteps!

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    1. Re:Lightspeed by thesnarky1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, "lightspeed" is the name his wife gave him... and also the reason she forced him into the porn business in order to meet real men.

  13. hahaha by YourM0m · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mr. Jones's mother works for Lightspeed Media, handling customer service duties..." I'm sorry but that just makes me LOL!

    --
    Steve -- http://tail-f.net/
  14. Naive parents. by Funkcikle · · Score: 5, Funny
    "My kids have no clue what we do."

    Yeah right. And Steve Ballmer's children have never touched an iPod or used Google.

    They'll have an idea something is not quite right. Moving house because the neighbours won't let you play with their kids? Not at all suspicious.

    Keep up the good work though, Superdad! Shame you can't get that bumper sticker "Your AP kid gets DP'd by my kids".

  15. This being slashdot... by thepotoo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...this is something that a lot of us are interested in.

    I have no problem with WSJ submitting one or two articles that we might like now and again, but if it happens more than a couple of times, I'll start getting really worried.
    Bottom line: The occasional submission; OK, regular submissions; they're using us.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    1. Re:This being slashdot... by kevin_conaway · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Carl Bialik" from the WSJ has had dozens of stories accepted. Who cares? His summaries are usually concise and accurate and the linked articles are informative as well.

      I have no problem with him or the WSJ submitting articles to Slashdot

    2. Re:This being slashdot... by conJunk · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Carl Bialik" from the WSJ has had dozens of stories accepted. Who cares? His summaries are usually concise and accurate and the linked articles are informative as well. I have no problem with him or the WSJ submitting articles to Slashdot

      amen. especially since they are honestly attribute. not beatlesbeatles shennanigans here, he says who he is upfront, it's all on the up and up, and the articles are usually of interest.

  16. I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning by erbmjw · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the tail end of the article
    As his children get closer to adulthood, he said, he'll explain what their parents do. "I wouldn't mind if my kids get involved in this business," he said. Then he added: "Behind the scenes."
  17. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by IflyRC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great, exploit other people's family members, just not his. Personally, if I was working in something that I was ashamed to tell my family members about I think I'd rather be digging ditches.

  18. Re:WTF? by utlemming · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why? I wouldn't want his job or any job like it. The guy has a job that carries social stigmas. FTA, he said that he had to move his family when peopel found out about his job, and he generally only associates with people that are in the business. Sure he may get to look at porn, but when he has practically isolated himself and his family from the real world is it really worth it? In fact his daughters have no clue what their Dad does. Why on earth would you want to work in an industry that carries such a cost? Sure he may be financially secure, but sometimes the costs of wealth are too much.

    The other thing that really made me wonder is that Mr. Jones shields his daughters from his business. It makes me wonder why he shields them? What exactly does that mean?

    --
    The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  19. Here's a photo of the dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steve Lightspeed - He seems to enjoy his job.

  20. What's wring with porn, really? by Kunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see anything morally wrong with it, as long as it is done by consenting adults. It's entertainment.

  21. I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by cliveholloway · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when they become teenagers.

    Joe Ordinary: "I found my dad's secret porn stash - four copies of Hustler!".

    Lightspeed Jr: "*cough*, well..."

    I have a feeling they'll be very popular at High School :)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    1. Re:I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by cliveholloway · · Score: 2

      Girls can like porn too. Sexist!

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    2. Re:I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Laugh out loud)

      And in this case, they would really be popular in their high school.

      Daughter: "Check out the rack on this one!"
      Horny Boy: Eyes bulging "Uhh... what?!"

  22. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Informative

    As his children get closer to adulthood, he said, he'll explain what their parents do. "I wouldn't mind if my kids get involved in this business," he said. Then he added: "Behind the scenes."

    These statements are in no way contradictory or hypocritical. Steve is behind the scenes, and is recommending the same to his children.

    There may be more to Steve Lightspeed than I know, but I've seen some of his work and it was primarily very young and young looking girls doing naked dances and/or heavy petting with another similar girl. Jordan Capri was/is his star model, and she is extremely cute. AFAIK, there is no guy/girl stuff or hardcore, just cuties being cute.

    In my eye, its not even porn. But there is no clear definition of porn at this time.

  23. Family values by mariox19 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Mr. Jones said he has been particularly worried about shielding his children. The Joneses installed software to block illicit content on both of their kids' PCs, and Mr. Jones has password-protected his and his wife's computers.

    And it's as simple as that, even if you yourself are in the porn business. If only more parents would take the time to do this, we wouldn't suffer the spectacle of holier-than-thou types demanding that the government step in and place the entire Internet under a giant, child-proof cap.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  24. Re:WTF? by skintigh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't want his job for even more basic reasons than that:
    He works 12 hour days
    7 days a week
    travels often
    and isn't even rich.

    I also hear about young lawyers and doctors making well over 6 figures but I'm not jealous of them, either, because when you divide their salary by the 100 hours a week they work I'm making a lot more than them AND I have time to enjoy it.

    But back to the other guy, it would be nice to be surrounded by nude models all the time...

  25. Re:If this is the guy from Lightspeed University.. by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

    which it'd be hard to assume it isn't, then sir, I owe you a drink.

    You don't owe him anything. If anything, he owes you a few boxes of tissues.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  26. internet policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if you work for Lightspeed Media Corp, do you get in trouble if porn is NOT found on your PC?

  27. Re:WTF? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But back to the other guy, it would be nice to be surrounded by nude models all the time...

    Yeah, you'd think so but really, after a while they all blend together and the enjoyment ceases.

    I'm saying this not as someone who works in the industry but rather from every story I've ever read written about people in the industry (the adult industry as a whole, not just online). To a one they all say the same thing: it's just a job.

    Sure, looking at cute/hot girls seems like it would be great. They come in and you get look them up and down without fear of them calling the cops on you. But you're not looking at them and imagining all the lascivious things you could do with them (well, maybe a little) but rather, do they have the look? How do they react in front of the camera? Can they follow directions? Anything about their body that might turn people off (big feet, hairy butt, etc).

    When I was getting my photography degree we were required to do sketches of nude models. Both male and female. I can assure you that when the model is on the stand you're not thinking, "Whoa! She's hot. Wonder if I can take her out to dinner or something else, hint, hint, wink, wink". Rather, you're thinking, "Holy shit, how am I supposed to draw her elbow in that position?", "Dammit! Why can't I get that shadow around her hip right?", "It would be nice if I didn't have to see her fingers in profile" Repeat for every session you drew a nude model.

    For the record, in case you were wondering about getting a programming job for an adult website, check my journal for a lengthy article about what the reality is like. You may have to go back a bit to find it. It's called, 'Getting a tech job in the adult industry'. It was never accepted which is why it's in my journal. After all, why would the editors accept a story about programming and porn.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  28. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

    In my eye, its not even porn. But there is no clear definition of porn at this time.

    Yeah, if you don't start with a horse, a midget, a tub of lard and a big blue tarp it hardly qualifies.

  29. Then there's San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then there's San Francisco. I stop in at a bondage shop to see a friend who works there and find the manager, a striking blonde who's been in several pornos and is unashamed about it, working the cash register. She usually has her clerks doing that, and I ask her where everyone is. "Oh, they're at dildo training".

  30. Uh, no? by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Informative
    google for "steve jones"

    Guess his secret is safe enough, even if that is his real name. I bet they DID obfuscate it, anyway.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  31. What goes into a name... by Cumikaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always wonder what some names really mean. For example, before I read the article I assumed "lightspeed" was an indicator of ... well ... something else.

    I wish the article would say a little more about how he got started and also how he got his wife and mom?!? (wtf?) involved. That just seems odd. I wonder how many porn company owners have either their wife or mother working for them?

    "...he and his wife mostly socialize with others inside the porn business.." And that's a bad thing? Damn, I wish I had those problems!

    For those bitching that this isn't news: maybe you're right, but put the word "porn" in the title and it'll get posted on slashdot!

  32. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Illbay · · Score: 2, Insightful
    These statements are in no way contradictory or hypocritical.

    You gotta be kiddin' me.

    "Kids, I just want you to know that we would be very proud for you to be in the family business. We're very proud of our business. Uh, NOT the product, mind you, just the business.

    "You'll go into the 'production' end over my dead body."

    Your take on this is like saying it's "not hypocritical" for a narco-trafficker to punish his kids for taking drugs.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  33. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >But there is no clear definition of porn at this time.

    I can't claim I made this up but I read a great definition hereabouts, that I think is absolutely accurate: "if you lose interest in it once you've come, it's porn."

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  34. Re:Time to earn the "Troll" mod again... by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


    It seems to me that for someone to be concerned about shielding his children, etc

    Do you drink? Do you want children to drink? I guess you're concerned about alcohol then. Do you think someone that works for Anheuser-Bush shouldn't shield their kids from alchohol because they work for an industry that sells it?

    There's such a thing as age appropriateness. I fail to see how there's anything inconsistant here.

    and that people who find out won't let their kds play with his because they don't like his business, and this bothers him

    He's protecting his kids from the intolerant people of the world. Wouldn't it bother anyone if neighbors went so far as to punish your kids because they didn't approve of you? That seems like more of a problem with the neighbors. They don't have to like him, or what he does, but banning their kids from associating with his kids is just bigotry.

    --
    AccountKiller
  35. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    then a lot of men are married to porn stars

  36. So what? by oliderid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He has a nice business, a dozen of employees get a living thanks to it. Models are paid. Customers get what they were looking for. He doesn't promote anykind of violence. There is strictly nothing to be ashamed about. He should be proud of his achievment.

    This is quite strange the fascination/repulsion the society has for this "traditionnal" business. It exists for centuries (first were drawings, then black and white pictures, magazines and now web sites) and so many people are still so unconfortable with it.

    I don't want to sound like a hippy :-) but...Sincerily what is the worst? Producing a movie glorifying the war; singing how great the drug dealer life can be or making a video clip about a beautiful nude girl?

    I prefer the last one.

    Olivier

  37. this article hold no news value by Device666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I as a nerd am not so interested in the pornbusiness. I can understand the link between the internet and the porn business. But what I don't understand is why this should be stuff that matters and how this is new for nerds. In fact I don't get the news value of this post at all. Being a nerd doesn't mean we wank all day so that these kind of superficial topics would be of any interest.

  38. Tech ignorant parents can do that till age 8 or so by bADlOGIN · · Score: 2, Informative

    If this guy knew what he was doing, he'd have his cable modem/DSL connected to a proxy server that only routes http (e.g. Squid) in a locked closet and tell the kid they can surf whatever they want, but he'll know all about it. That child protection software will do no good once the kid figures out how to download and burn a copy of any live Linux distro...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.