Slashdot Mirror


Evolution of the Netflix Envelope

An anonymous reader wrote to mention an article over on CNN Money. They go into some detail on what seven years of tinkering has done for the simple red Netflix envelope. From the article: "Years of experimentation went into creating the perfect DVD envelope. In 1999, Netflix started out with a heavy cardboard mailer. With only 100,000 subscribers, costs weren't a concern yet. Then the company experimented with plastic envelopes, which proved not to be recyclable, and padding, which added too much to postage costs. Both top-loading and side-loading envelopes made an appearance."

238 comments

  1. Careful! by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They re use those things and don't forget what most people rent! I wouldn't seal them with a lick.

    1. Re:Careful! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      They re use those things and don't forget what most people rent! I wouldn't seal them with a lick.

      See? they thought of that alreaday. Netflix envelopes now have self-adhesive peel-off sticky bits. Nothing to lick 'cept your partner =_)

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    2. Re:Careful! by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know you're just being funny, but Netflix doesn't carry those kinds of movies.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    3. Re:Careful! by Namronorman · · Score: 1

      "Nothing to lick 'cept your partner =_)"

      Remember, this is Slashdot.

      --
      $fortune
      Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    4. Re:Careful! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      kinda wish they did though...
      Might be embarassing when they give you new reccomendations ;)

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Careful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.staticusers.net/adult-dvd-rental-intern et/ -- netflix like service for those kind of features... enjoy.

    6. Re:Careful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they do. They are not advertised as XXX, but are UR/etc. You just have to search for them really *hard*.

      Try searching for the movie *Womb Raider*........

    7. Re:Careful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Remember, this is Slashdot.

      I dont understand why would anybody on /. would have problem with 'to'!

    8. Re:Careful! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Yes they do. You just don't know where to look, who to call, and the secret password.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    9. Re:Careful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the Poison Ivy series isn't exactly for kids.

  2. Damn! I was SO interested in the history of the.. by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Netflix envelope! Too bad everything past the first slide is a 404. Now whatever shall I do?

  3. Perfection is in the pennies by Saeul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Imagine shipping 1 billion DVDs for one cent cheaper.

    1. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A saving of 1 cent after a billion shipments? Pffft....

      What they really need to do is save 1 cent per each shipment for a total saving for $100 million. Now, that is what real MBAs do.

    2. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Imagine selling a billion songs at 99c instead of an even buck. It works both ways.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by drivekiller · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Imagine making 1 billion slashdot posts at -1. Oh that was me before I got an account.

    4. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Keep making brilliant insights like this and you could be well on your way to the second billion.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by karnal · · Score: 1

      I could have helped you get back to 0 as a default, but I figured I'd reply, threatening to do it to you next time :)

      --
      Karnal
    6. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine selling a billion songs at $1.01 instead of a buck!

    7. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the common idea being you'd sell 0.8 billion songs at a buck or a billion at 99 cents* - a buck just seems like a lot more money, y'know.

      *figure pulled out of my arse, but you get the point

    8. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by vishbar · · Score: 1

      That probably wouldn't matter that much.

      If they were one cent cheaper each, on the other hand, then they could save 10 million dollars!

      --
      Ride the skies
    9. Re:Perfection is in the pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine selling a billion songs at $1.02 instead of a $1.01!

  4. Bar Code on Envelopes by selfabuse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Netflix somehow always knows when I've sent a movie back before it actually gets there. I always assumed the barcode was somehow related to that.

    1. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Doubt it, they're not psychic and I doubt the USPS scans it in for them (hey they might never know), the barcodes are more likely for when they do get it in, it's alot easier then having to type in numbers or names for returns and checkouts.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by radish · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the USPS do offer a service where they scan return envelopes at your local Post Office. It's used by a number of companies including Netflix to speed up return times.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Then it must be on a case by case basis because my girlfriends dad is on a firstname basis with the netflix delivery guys in Madison, WI and they just pick up all of their envelopes in a big bin to go back to the processing facility. If you look at the time stamp on your account that they received it back you can can see when it was scanned, if it isn't from 6pm-4am the USPS probably didn't do it.

    4. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by buddahfool · · Score: 1

      Me too. It seems that there is a "staging center" local to me. The return address said "nearest nexflix location" but the closest is like two days away. Yet they know within a day, so I assume they get aggregated nearby, scanned and shipped back in mass.

    5. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by zeroduck · · Score: 1

      I'm from Sun Prairie (about 15 minutes east of Madison), and when I'd return movies, it'd almost always say it was returned the day I put it in the mail, or the next. They were pretty damn fast at getting things out to me.

    6. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Close ... here's what the USPS actually does, and how that fits in with what the previous posters report.

      There are two possible barcodes on the mailer that are of interest to the USPS.

      The first, and most common, is the barcode immediately below the address area. This barcode is a routing code derived from the address, and is used only by USPS.

      The second, and optional (you pay USPS for it) barcode will appear immediately above the address area. This barcode is used to do 'package tracking' of a crude sort. It contains a code identifying the USPS customer (netflix, for example), as well as some arbitrary data supplied by netflix - probably including a customer id and 'movie id' of some sort. This barcode is scanned when the envelope arrives at the USPS, and the scanned data is transmitted to the USPS customer who printed the labels. The customer then knows that 'the check is in the mail'. The most common users of this are credit card companies and utilities (gas, electric, cable).

      Beyond the barcodes, there is another USPS mechanism at work, which your 'netflix delivery guys' allude to. That is, for a fee, the USPS will 'aggregate' mail for a customer in a largely internal way. For example, the USPS allows you to set up 'virtual' addresses almost anywhere. Any number of 'virtual' addresses can be linked to one or more 'real' addresses. So, in the netflix case, they might have one regional processing center, and several dozen 'return addresses' for the surrounding area. The USPS then internally aggregates the mail at each 'virtual' address, and delivers it to the linked 'real' address. This can both significantly reduce the amount of time that it takes USPS to process a piece of mail, but also reduces the number of actual processing centers that Netflix has to operate in order to maintain the desired level of service.

      And no, I don't and never have worked for Netflix .. but I do know their business area well.

    7. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by MisterOblivious · · Score: 3, Informative

      I imagine they use the USPS Confirm service as does Gamefly, who won an award for developing the system along with the USPS

    8. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      That makes sense- if they can ship your envelope 1 day away to their own sub office, then bundle them all into a van and have them in their offices the next morning, then they cut out the cost of the profit that the postal service would make on the same journey.

      I suspect that companies like netflix may be one of the first to really start using RFID tags on their goods. There are fewer provacy concerns (unless your postman starts reading their tags) and since the dvds are reused in a loop, the tags are reused.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    9. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by swelke · · Score: 1

      It contains a code identifying the USPS customer (netflix, for example), as well as some arbitrary data supplied by netflix - probably including a customer id and 'movie id' of some sort.

      The bar codes you refer to are affixed to the internal envelope around the DVD itself. Since these bar code labels always seem to be about as old as the envelope they're attached to, my guess is that they remain in place until they or the envelope wear out. For that to be the case, the data they contain is probably the netflix code and a unique ID for the specific copy of the DVD ie "Netflix, copy #218 of Dawn of the Dead" would be a reasonable english translation.

      You're right about the shipping address translation too. I have two netflix envelopes in front of me; one shows shipping to "nearest netflix facility, PO box whatever, St. Louis MO", and the other shows it in Greensboro NC. I'm pretty sure, however, that they'll actually go to Fargo ND, which is by far the closest netflix shipping place to me (only about 45 miles).

      --
      Have you ever wondered How to Take Over
    10. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except gamefly is not nearly worth it unless you live on the West Coast. The turnover time is way too long.

    11. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

      I have the three-movie-at-a-time plan, which is the most popular one, and I make no effort to keep track of which envelope which movie came in. So I don't see how an envelope bar code could help.

      Hmmm, I just noticed that there's a little window on the envelope and a bar code on the sleeve of the movie... but it would only show if I put the movie in backwards from what I usually do. Is that the trick? Am I supposed to put the movie in so the barcode shows? Then I'll get quicker service?

      Gee, I don't remember them telling me to do that, but it makes sense. I'll have to try it and see if it makes a difference.

    12. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that your account has been throttled for heavy usage. The more you rent the farther netflix makes the return facility and thereby increases your turn around time.

    13. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      That makes me want to find out if the actual shipping center is in Sun Prarie, because that would explain why they just have a P.O. in Madison and you're getting one day turnaround.

    14. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'd look into that, because everyone I've ever received is from the city I live in, even though a great-uncle post leads me to beleive the actual facility is in the next town over.

    15. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by WaltFrench · · Score: 1

      I've always presumed that the "Nearest Netflix Facility" address means that the USPS routes it to... the nearest Netflix facility.

      I often finish movies on the outbound leg of a biz trip. When I drop my DVD into the mail in downtown Minneapolis, methinks it goes to the Netflix sorting center that is supposedly an adjunct to the USPS facility @ MSP airport (despite receiving it in CA from the San Jose Netflix).

      That would allow Netflix to have a hot movie spending as much time as possible in paying customers' hands.

      --
      "Inquiring Minds Want to Know!"
    16. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by fm6 · · Score: 1

      How do you know the movie hasn't gotten there? I have a movie in transit as we speak (put it in the mail yesterday) and it's still listed as "At Home".

    17. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Why would netflix care? Their customers don't pay by the movie. Quite the opposite. The faster they ship a movie out to a given number of customers, the more it costs them for shipping and handling.

      The fact that the envolope SAYS "nearest" doesn't actually mean it gets sent to the nearest. Those envolopes have a preprinted barcode at the bottom which determines where it gets mailed to. Whatever text is printed on the envelope is irrelevant..the USPS sorting machines won't even bother trying to read the text if the barcode is present.

      I can back this up with my past experience. My local netflix center gets my DVD's overnight in about 90% of the cases, and occasionally it takes 2 days. Never more. On the other time, EVERY time I get a DVD shipped from a different center, it takes 3 days for netflix to receive it after I mail it back. That's enough to convince me.

    18. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by prator · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the envelope next time you receive one. The barcode is visible through that window. I've always considered it part of their shipping out procedure, but it can't hurt to make it line up when you send it back.

      -prator

    19. Re:Bar Code on Envelopes by swelke · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that your account has been throttled for heavy usage. The more you rent the farther netflix makes the return facility and thereby increases your turn around time.

      Can't be. My turnaround time is ~3 business days.

      --
      Have you ever wondered How to Take Over
  5. perfect paper envelope by flogic42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a long-time netflix user I think the paper envelope they have now is damn near perfect. It's dirt cheap, but keeps the DVD safe. It's recycleable too. It takes 5 seconds to put the DVD in securely and be ready to mail it.

    --
    Check out my women's designer clothing store.
  6. Neat to see. by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been with Netflix for over two years now so I've seen a few of those.

    That said, I've always wondered why Netflix didn't use more square envelopes. Some of the earlier designs looked that way. I wonder if it has to do with sorting or some such.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Neat to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they were square you could get them all straightened out, but they could be in 8 possible orientations (consider a mailbag full of these). If they're rectangular, then when you get them straigtened out they can only be in 4 possible orientations.

    2. Re:Neat to see. by cfulmer · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is an easy one: square envelopes cost more.

    3. Re:Neat to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://postcalc.usps.gov/mailpiecedimensions.asp

      Could be postal rates. I don't know what they weigh, but square envelopes cost more to mail in most cases.

    4. Re:Neat to see. by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 4, Informative

      The post office charges more for square envelopes.

      From http://postcalc.usps.gov/mailpiecedimensions.asp

      First-Class Letter Nonmachinable Surcharge:

      First-Class envelopes weighing 1 ounce or less require an additional $0.13 nonmachinable surcharge if any one of the following apply:

              * It is a square letter
              * It contains very rigid items such as wood or metal
              * It has clasps, string, buttons, or similar closure devices
              * It has an address parallel to the shorter dimension of the letter
              * It contains items such as pens that cause the surface to be uneven
              * The length divided by height is less than 1.3 or more than 2.5 (calculate this below)

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    5. Re:Neat to see. by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Surely it already falls under that 13c surcharge for containing a "very rigid item".

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    6. Re:Neat to see. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      That depends... I've gotten some very flimsy ones in the past.
      Anything that comes from more than a couple counties away tends to have a 50/50 chance of being broken.
      Once I got the remains of an envalope, and one shard of dvd in one of those plastic USPS "We're sorry" bags. I returned the whole mess to netflix in a 8x12 manilla envalope with a netflix mailer taped to it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    7. Re:Neat to see. by bshensky · · Score: 1

      Ask youself "where's the barcode", and it becomes easy to see why the USPS might charge a premium for a square envelope.

      Use of a rectangular envelope, landscape oriented, reduces the effort to locate the stamp, barcode and all by 50%.

      --
      Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
    8. Re:Neat to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not be too quick to judge the PO for this; square envelopes don't work in their automatic sorting machines. They charge more because square and otherwise irregular envelopes require special handling.

    9. Re:Neat to see. by MBCook · · Score: 1
      It contains very rigid items such as wood or metal

      Sounds like a CD to me. As long as they are subject to the fee, why not save the 1/2 cent on paper?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    10. Re:Neat to see. by ahpx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      DVD's are not rigid. They flew, perhaps you should try it out. Then try to bend wood, or some metal.
      Think before you comment next time.

    11. Re:Neat to see. by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      They flew?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Neat to see. by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      They flex, presumably.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    13. Re:Neat to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think that the real answer is to prevent breakage. If you look at the Netflix patent for the envelope design (No. 6,996,484), it says that the reason that the package has the spacer on the side to prevent breakage of the DVDs by automatic postage cancellation machines. From the patent:
      The packaging used to convey the DVD from Netflix to the customer passes through high-speed automatic sorting equipment at postal facilities. Further, the packaging used to convey the DVD from the customer to Netflix passes through high-speed automatic cancellation equipment at postal facilities, during which a postal cancellation mark is applied to the packaging. Because DVDs are manufactured from relatively brittle plastic material, and because the cancellation marks are applied with considerable force, a percentage of DVDs passing through the postal system in this manner are subject to damage, breakage or mutilation.

      Based on the foregoing, there is a clear need for a way to package a fragile or breakable item for transport in the postal system from one party to another party in a manner that protects the item from damage, breakage or mutilation...

      [The] pocket... is aligned away from the impact region. As a result, any mechanical impact applied by the postal processing equipment... does not impact directly over the item... Further, by providing a relatively stiff laminated leading edge [it] is less likely to jam in Postal Service mail processing equipment when the envelope is sent from sender to recipient.
      ...And I think there's your answer!
    14. Re:Neat to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be right. A friend of mine started noticing a delay in his netflix arrivals. The reason, he was folding the envelope into a square. Doing so, covered some of the barcode that either USPostal or Netflix was using in there systems. Once realized, he stopped folding the envelopes, and doing so reverted his wait time to what it once was.

    15. Re:Neat to see. by arodland · · Score: 1

      Yes. Because you can't bend metal at all! Or a thin layer of wood. I mean, man, wood, that stuff just shatters if you try to bend it. Anyway, it's a good thing that there's no metal at all in DVDs. Because metal, you just can't bend that shit.

    16. Re:Neat to see. by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      They flew?
      Are you suggesting DVDs are migratory?
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  7. Does the barcode need to be in the window? by JPriest · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I notice when I get the envelopes the bar code on the inside sleve is rarely visable in the envelope window. The instructions didn't seem to say anything about it, so Idon't really bother making sure it is there.

    Would I save them any time by ensuring it is visible? Can anyone from Netflix corp answer this?

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:Does the barcode need to be in the window? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      It makes sense to me that the barcode on the label on the DVD sleeve should line-up with the slot in the envelope part of the DVD. Would be interesting to learn why they do this, and what advantage -- if any -- there would be to shipping them back barcode-visible. I try to mail the DVD back like this. I haven't noticed any difference in the shipping frequency.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    2. Re:Does the barcode need to be in the window? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Placing the barcode so it's visible has made a difference in shipping / receiving times for us - we had a slowdown in deliveries until my wife discovered I was stuffing the DVD in the envelope with disregard for the position of the DVD. But YMMV, of course.

    3. Re:Does the barcode need to be in the window? by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      I don't think it makes any difference. I always send them back with the barcode visible but the way you have to insert it is so unnatural that I doubt you are suppose to worry about it.

      To insert it with the barcode visible you have to put the disc in with the label facing away from you which is probably not the way you normally hold it since you need the label facing you to read the movie title. And if you insert from the left not only is the label facing away but you have to put the disc in upside down where it can fall out of the sleeve.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    4. Re:Does the barcode need to be in the window? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > barcode so it's visible has made a difference in shipping / receiving times

      I have the same theory. I played around with different PO drop box's on my route to work (different Postal districts) and discovered on a basis of less than 6 returns that orientation seams more important. I think it was 2 out of 6 got back the next day when oriented incorrectly. more like 3 out of 4 if correctly oriented.
      If this were truly the case, since they re-use the cotton sleve, why they dont print the barcode in all 4 orientations, or at least encourage people to orient. randomly it would only be 1 in 8 dvd's to get the window correctly set. if they printed 4 on one side it would be 50/50 if it were both sides you could get 100%

      since they allow you to return multiple dvd's in a single envelope, the importance of the barcode may not be so great to them.

    5. Re:Does the barcode need to be in the window? by the+idoru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From my experience, it makes no difference. I used to line up the bar code when sending a disk back, but stopped bothering months ago. I've seen no change in the turn around time.

      I think that NetFlix uses that barcode only when printing the address on the envelope. The disk gets stuffed (by hand) into an envelope with no address on it, bar code lined up with the window. Then the envelope is run down the conveyor and the bar code is scanned through the window. Their computer determines who should get that particular disk and prints that address on the envelope.

      The returned envelopes are unstuffed by hand and then the barcode is scanned to see who had that disk and credit them with the return.

      I saw an article online a few months back that briefly described NetFlix's turn around process. They do all the envelope stuffing and unstuffing by hand.

    6. Re:Does the barcode need to be in the window? by nadaou · · Score: 1

      better yet use a splitting mirror like the one at the supermarket checkout to scan all four/eight/sixteen orientations at once.
      Save on looks and printing costs. If the scanner wobbled as well you could get away with a simple mirror.

      alt just spin the mirror. This is old and well developed retail tech. I'm sure they've figured this out already.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    7. Re:Does the barcode need to be in the window? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Why would they want to help you get your DVD's back faster? The longer you keep them out, the fewer discs they have to ship to you (and, hence, the more money they make).

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  8. Re:Damn! I was SO interested in the history of the by urbanRealist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Um, p2p?

    --
    I've seen a lot of things, but I've never been a witness.
  9. evolution and intelligent design by AhtirTano · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm at a loss. The envolopes were clearly intelligently designed. But they appear to have evolved to match the current pressures of cost and safety applied by their environment.

    Only a pointless flame war can guide me through this conundrum. That's why I'm turning to you, O Wise Slashdotters.

  10. This is how it works... by Jerf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For those of you who think that there hasn't been much technological progress since, say, 1980 (except perhaps computers which are special*), this is how it happens. Take this sort of incremental improvement by one company in one very small facet of our lives, and multiply it across any number of thousands of products, carefully trimmed and optimized and made more efficient. You only notice the things that the process isn't very good at; UI, for instance.

    (*: And computers only seem special for two reasons: One, most fields don't get to experience exponential growth for decades at a time, and two, you know more about them. There's a lot going on under the hood of any number of other products, too. Familiarity breeds contempt; so does ignorance.)

    1. Re:This is how it works... by ralla_coco · · Score: 1
      How about that Froid (Sigmund) study that increased the sales of this all-ingredients-cake-powder by removing the egg part and required the person to cook it to add a fresh egg.

      Apparently by doing so it removed the sense of guilt from the American house wife of the 50s and it's sales soared

    2. Re:This is how it works... by hazem · · Score: 1

      It also made the cakes less of a "pile of chemicals"... I mean, what's more natural than an egg. So, like you said, take out the powdered egg, and now you're cooking a wholesome and and natural cake again!

    3. Re:This is how it works... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      And for those of you "glass is half empty" kind of people like myself:

      Every year the government and big corps find ways to make things a little harder for you. Its not a conspiracy, just every entity on the planet trying to amass power and money at your expense.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:This is how it works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck? Freud was dead long before the '50s. Also, the grammar in this post is so bad it is nearly comedic.

    5. Re:This is how it works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man- it must suck to be a liberal. How do you even manage to get up everyday being so damn pessemistic?

    6. Re:This is how it works... by hazem · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Freud was dead, but in the '50s, his theories were all the rage in the US.

      From: http://changingminds.org/analysis/betty_crockers_e gg.htm

      Betty Crocker's Egg

      Analysis > Betty Crocker's Egg

      The story

      In the early 50s Freud's psychotherapeutic approaches were sweeping America, even to the point where the CIA was trying to use it for mass-control of the population. Although these alarming mind-control experiments had limited success at best, there were some notable successes, particularly in promotion.

      A place where it proved successful was in the unassuming kitchens of middle-class families. Betty Crocker Foods had produced an instant cake-mix. All you needed to do was to add water to the supplied powder. By today's standards, the result was probably quite unpalatable, but then, it was something of a miracle.

      The problem was that the miracle mixture did not sell. Undaunted, Betty turned to the new science of psychoanalysis to help solve the problem.

      The conclusion of the psychoanalysts that she employed was that the although the average American housewife very much appreciated the convenience of the cake mix, she felt guilty at deceiving her husband and other guests into thinking she had worked hard for them when, in fact, she had done very little work.

      Their answer: add an egg.

      An egg also has the connotation of life and birth, making the creation of the cake more meaningful -- the housewife thus 'gives birth' for her husband.

      Changing the recipe to add an egg to the mixture (which was suitably modified to make space for one egg's worth of protein and cholesterol) offered the guilty housewife a way out. By doing more than adding water, by adding a real ingredient, she could assuage her guilt.

      The result: sales soared.

      Freud 1, Housewives 0
      Comment

      Was it all so Freudian? Were the housewives feeling guilty? Maybe -- but there are other explanations. For example:

              * Eggs are known for their nutritional value. Adding nutrition would seem to result in a better cake.
              * It may assuage guilt to add an egg, but the Freudian 'birth' stuff could be theoretical nonsense.
              * Doing work adds investment to the process, thus creating a sense of ownership.

      The bottom line, however, is that it worked. In today's pre-packaged economy, there may be opportunity for purveyors of instant, one-shot goods to add a little activity into the process that actually increases sales.
      See also

    7. Re:This is how it works... by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      How about that Froid (Sigmund) study that increased the sales of this all-ingredients-cake-powder by removing the egg part and required the person to cook it to add a fresh egg.

      Close; that'll be his nephew Edward Bernays, father of Public Relations:

      Bernays revitalized slumping sales of Betty Crocker cake mix by using focus groups which revealed that the traditional just-add-water recipe was so simple that it made housewives feel guilty and inadequate. By simply adding an egg to the recipe, the marketers of the cake mix believed they could convince women that Betty Crocker had made cake-baking a tangible way to express their femininity to their husbands.
      - from this article.
  11. My Postman by Ankou · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love the innovation but personally my postman always seemed to find that ONE weakness in em. I was at an apartment complex with those little metal boxes. I swear the postman would fold them every time and I'd still get a envelope of broken pieces. Happened more times than I'd like to recall.

    1. Re:My Postman by st1d · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, such an innocent assumption. Perhaps your mailman's second job was at the local movie rental shop? :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    2. Re:My Postman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worled for the post office, I most often worked on the rejects belt for the machine most likely to eat your mail. Since the netflix onvelopes were so unusual, they enede up in the rejects pile more often than not. Even among the several thousand netflix envelopes that went through me, I never felt a broken dvd. I was quite amazed by the durability and the robustness of those packages.

  12. Crappy cheap envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Constant breakage... they need to spend a fraction of a cent more for a thin cardboard insert... they spend more on reshipping and dvd loss..

    Not the smartest folks..

    1. Re:Crappy cheap envelope by Ankou · · Score: 1

      They tried something similar with the transition from 6 - 7:
      "2001
      Foam padding is dropped because the benefits don't justify the cost. The company gives top-loading another try."

  13. I hate the paper ones... by dteichman2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a pain when you get your movie and you have to be careful to avoid damanging the return envelope while you open it.

    Plus, I can't send it back with a different movie because we only get one at a time.

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    1. Re:I hate the paper ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But with one at a time there's no way to get the second dvd without sending the first one back...

    2. Re:I hate the paper ones... by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

      Plus, I can't send it back with a different movie because we only get one at a time.

      Kinda tough to send two back in the same envelope if I only have one movie out at a time.

      --


      Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    3. Re:I hate the paper ones... by prator · · Score: 1

      Do you have some sort of gorilla man hands or something? I notice that I only rip them when I don't take an extra second or two to make sure I don't rip them.

      -prator

  14. Synopsis by kratei · · Score: 0
    Basically:

    1) The Mailers started white then turned red (Embarrassment about obscene profits?)

    2) They switched between side and top openings.

    3) They fixed barcode issues.

    4) They perfected their "secret sauce"

    5) Now this may be irrelevant soon if video-on-demand takes off.

    So how does the brief history of the Netflix envelope make the front page anyhow?

    How does this make the news at CNN?

    Why don't we have a brief history of slashdot interfaces instead? Now that would make for some fun debate.

    1. Re:Synopsis by Descalzo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Perhaps this doesn't make for hot debate, but for some inexplicable reason I found this one of the neatest things I've read on Slashdot for about a week.

      I guess it's just the idea that incremental progress is quite fascinating when you look at it all at once.

      That said, I also think it would be cool to see something on the evolution of slashdot interfaces,

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    2. Re:Synopsis by Ringthane · · Score: 1

      kratei wrote:

      "1) The Mailers started white then turned red (Embarrassment about obscene profits?)"

            And they were quite sturdy, some type of thin cardboard. I actually thought they were a better, more protective mailer, but not as cost-effective for Netflix, probably.

            After the white mailers were discontinued, I was getting yellow paper Netflix envelopes, a transitional format before the current red envelopes started being used...

      --
      Friends help you move... Real friends help you move bodies...
    3. Re:Synopsis by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Prior to April 1: Primarily slashdot green
      April 1: Ponies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111
      April 2 and beyond: Classics die hard.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Synopsis by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "5) Now this may be irrelevant soon if video-on-demand takes off."

      I'm having a difficult time imagining that video on demand will 'take off' and wipe out Netflix. I suppose it's possible, but we'd need a service that's available everywhere, has a humungoidginormous library, and is roughly the same price as Netflix. Maybe I'm narrow minded, but I don't connect this level of VoD service with the word 'soon'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Synopsis by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Why don't we have a brief history of slashdot interfaces instead? Now that would make for some fun debate.

      Crap nonstandard HTML that didin't validate to crap nonstandard HTML that now they block the W3C validator from accessing the site directly.

      End discussion

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    6. Re:Synopsis by znu · · Score: 1

      Exactly. We have VoD service here (Time Warner Cable in New York City). It costs $4 to get a movie for 24 hours, and there are only maybe a hundred choices at any given time. They seem to skew toward bad movies. Worse still, the quality is terrible. The signal is hugely over-compressed, and widescreen movies are letterboxed, not any kind of native widescreen, so by the time you're done, you've got maybe 200-something pixels of vertical resolution. So, it's like VHS, with the addition of MPEG-2 compression artifacts.

      No thanks.

      With Netflix, even with throttling and broken discs and all the rest of that nonsense, I still manage to get movies for less than $1.50 each. The selection is huge, and I'm getting a real DVD, with decent quality and all the extras that come on the disc.

      I expect the gap to widen even more in the next couple of years; Netflix has a system that will scale to HD content much better than what the cable companies can provide. They don't need to dig up streets, or replace millions of set-top boxes, or build huge data centers. They just need to start sticking HD-DVD and BluRay discs in envelopes, which doesn't cost any more than sticking regular DVDs in envelopes.

      I'm sure everyone on Slashdot has heard the ancient adage "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway". Well, never underestimate the bandwidth of millions of red envelopes full of optical discs. Seriously.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    7. Re:Synopsis by Jules+Mercuri · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget OMG! PONIES!

    8. Re:Synopsis by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      and all the extras that come on the disc.

      In my experience there were almost never any extras on Netflix DVDs (and this has tended to be true also at video stores). If the video store rents you a disc with extras, you may keep it longer. Since few stores reward early return, there is profit in the consumer returning DVDs early. Netflix, on the other hand, saves by buying cheaper DVDs instead of Special Editions, etc. This was one of two reasons I stopped Netflix. The other was their non-delivery on the "unlimited rentals" promise.

      --
      I come here for the love
    9. Re:Synopsis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their non-delivery on the "unlimited rentals" promise

      Oh, so you're the guy who filed that silly class action lawsuit. What color is you lawyer's new boat?

    10. Re:Synopsis by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

      Good sir, I just now read your reply in the "natural/unnatural monopoly" discussion back on March 9th. I just want to say I appreciate your input and do wish that I had seen it sooner, before that discussion was archived.

      Unfortunately, there are no inter-user messages, I hope this doesn't interrupt the present discussion.

      Peace, may your aim never waver,

      Bob-

      --
      The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  15. Please insert DVD like *this*... by AdamTrace · · Score: 1

    I noticed they removed the instructions telling people the orientation that the DVD should be returned.

    Probably made their lives a lot easier, but I actually didn't notice those instructions until, oh, 6 months into my membership.

    Sorry 'bout that. :)

    1. Re:Please insert DVD like *this*... by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

      We were just talking about this tonight (so I'm tickled to see this article).

      I saw the orientation instructions on the first three DVD's I got, then never again. But I still faithfully put them facing away from the barcode window. I figure they got a new sorting machine.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  16. Similar, but different, ... by LionKimbro · · Score: 1
  17. Mod This Comment Dumbass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to admit that I am a member of Netflix but I don't recognize the new envelope. Two years ago I moved away from Richmond, VA, where I had originally signed up for netflix. Since the move the last three DVDs I got have been sitting in a box that I have yet to unpack. I've been paying for two years and have not gotten a movie in that same time period. My only consolation to this is that I am sure I hold the record for paying for Netflix service without using it for the longest period of time.

    The movies are
    Y Tu Mama Tambien
    Mission Impossible 2
    crap, I can't remember what the third one is.

    1. Re:Mod This Comment Dumbass! by dl107227 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would that be +1 or a -1 dumbass mod?

  18. Worked for me... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    but the detail they provided is practically useless... like everything else on this bloody planet.

  19. Not Perfect Yet by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that there are a few flaws yet - for example I have torn off the adhesive strip more than once along the wrong set of perforations. I am not sure why the outer flap has to be the full length of the envelope. Sometimes the little adhesive tab tears the envelope when I open the thing.

    1. Re:Not Perfect Yet by karnal · · Score: 1

      I usually stuff my 3 DVDs all in the same return envelope. They all JUST fit within, allowing maybe one crease on the sticky strip that folds over...

      That way, I get three chances to not mess up one envelope.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Not Perfect Yet by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I have a similar strategy - I built up a stock of spare envelopes by sending back two at a time until I had half a dozen spares.

    3. Re:Not perfect yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parenting is not Netflix's job, it is yours.

    4. Re:Not perfect yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm you dont have to report it as lost.. just mail it back with another one.

  20. Lies from the article by Talinth · · Score: 0, Troll

    From the article. The result of more than five years of experimentation, this mailer transports approximately 1.4 million DVDs a day to Netflix's 4.2 million subscribers. This isn't even theoretically possible. This would require them to ship 3 DVDs per person per day. You can tell how they came up with the number. But assuming the post office would deliver the same day it was shipped, and that you watched it and returned it that day, this would require every netflix subscriber to Watch 3 movies a day. I'm skeptical.

    --
    71.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    1. Re:Lies from the article by rminsk · · Score: 1
      To quote you "From the article. The result of more than five years of experimentation, this mailer transports approximately 1.4 million DVDs a day to Netflix's 4.2 million subscribers.This isn't even theoretically possible. This would require them to ship 3 DVDs per person per day."

      No. This would mean they would ship one DVD every 3 days to each customer.

    2. Re:Lies from the article by Fhqwhgadss · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll go out on a limb and guess that word problems are not your forte.

      --
      How does a 7-person democracy cut a pie? Into 4 pieces.
    3. Re:Lies from the article by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      (1.4 million DVDs)/(1 day) * (4.2 million people) = 0.33 DVDs per person per day or 1 DVD per three people per day, not 3 DVDs per person per day.

      --
      Pelé!
    4. Re:Lies from the article by hazem · · Score: 2, Informative

      My guess is that they are saying that at on any given day, 1.4 million DVDs are "in-transit".

      If you ship 10 DVDs on one day, and it takes 3 days to get to the destination, you would still have 10 DVDs in-transit per day.

      It sounds funny, knowing what's "in-transit" is an important inventory metric.

      Plus, they might be counting the return trips as well.

      It's impossible to know, however, without having the underlying data.

    5. Re:Lies from the article by neurojab · · Score: 1

      From the article. The result of more than five years of experimentation, this mailer transports approximately 1.4 million DVDs a day to Netflix's 4.2 million subscribers. This isn't even theoretically possible. This would require them to ship 3 DVDs per person per day.

      By my math, 1.4 million dvds a week to 4.2 million subscribers = .33 dvds per subscriber, per day, or about 10 dvds a month... which really doesn't seem that unreasonable.

    6. Re:Lies from the article by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      No, if you read it carefully it means that each subscriber receives 1.4 million DVDs each day. I can assure you that they've never sent me over a million at once though so these numbers might be a little off. In any case, 4,200,000 * 1,200,000 = 5,040,000,000,000 DVDs a day, so as you can see your math is flawed.

    7. Re:Lies from the article by robertlankford · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure it means that each customer gets 1.4 million disks every day!

  21. big deal by willutah · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I use a Netflix competitor and they send the DVD in everyday white envelopes.
    The movie is sent to me in a 6 inch x 9 inch envelope that contains:
    • The DVD in a DVD sized paper sleeve (the paper sleeve has a barcode on it)
    • A 5.5x8 inch return envelope with a first class stamp, addressed back to them

      This article makes it sound like you have to be an engineer to send a letter.
    1. Re:big deal by thatoneguy_jm · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This article makes it sound like you have to be an engineer to send a letter.

      You may not have to be an engineer to send a letter, but to design an envelope that protects the DVD being sent while minimizing cost and customer frustration is quite a bit more complicated than simply sending a letter.

      By continually evaluating and optimizing their envelopes, Netflix has been able to both save quite a bit of money (as someone above pointed out, saving 1 cent on every envelope adds up quick when you're sending out millions of envelopes a year) and design a sturdy envelope that is remarkably simple and easy to use. Good design should never be laughed at.

    2. Re:big deal by willutah · · Score: 1

      How does there current paper envelope protect the disc any better than the system I described?

    3. Re:big deal by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      Agree. Clearly many of these changes are marketing-related -- if you don't change car styles and dress styles annually people complain. Change them often and people notice you more.

      By the standard of this article, AOL should be shown great respect for their wonderful mailers, currently in irregularly shaped tin foil at Staples.

      --
      I come here for the love
    4. Re:big deal by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      You ignored the other half of his comment about minimizing cost. The system you described involved using 2 envelopes per DVD (1 sending & 1 returning). The netflix envelopes only use 1.5 envelopes per mailing (it's the same envelope both ways, with the original shipping address on an extra paper sheet attached over top of the return address...essentially an extra half of an envelope). According to this articles claim of 1.4 million per day, thats about 500 million DVD's shipped per year. That saves them the cost equivelent of about 250 million envelopes per year. I'd bet in a single year that would more than cover the cost of the time spent engineering it.

  22. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's $10 million. Pffft.

    1. Re:Wrong by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      Obviously, not if you have an MBA.

  23. Savings per share? by tepples · · Score: 1

    That's $10 million. Pffft.

    But how much is that per share?

  24. Synopsis-Yawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "5) Now this may be irrelevant soon if video-on-demand takes off."

    Only for those who have cable or broadband, and the price is competitive with Netflix.

    "How does this make the news at CNN?"

    Most people don't know what goes into packaging.

    "Why don't we have a brief history of slashdot interfaces instead? Now that would make for some fun debate."

    Very brief.

  25. Re:Damn! I was SO interested in the history of the by hazem · · Score: 1

    I had to "temporarily allow" 3 different "sites" on scriptblocker to see the whole show...

  26. Wrong units, its 3 days per movie by Derivin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry, but your calculations are a little off. It says 1.4Mil per day for 4.2Mil subscribers.
    You are correct in that it works out to "3", but your units are wrong.
    It is 1 movie per subscriber every 3 days which is in keeping with my personal use.

    12.6Mil per day would be 3 movies per subscriber.

  27. Re:Damn! I was SO interested in the history of the by robogun · · Score: 1

    Can you get their vids to work in Mozilla?

  28. Question by NVP_Radical_Dreamer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've noticed that the return address on the newer netflix envelopes now reads "Nearest Netflix Shipping Facility" and then has a PO box located in my very small rural town. It makes you wonder if they dont scan the barcodes in different locations and then once that nearby local has marked it as received your next disc is sent. There has to be something to the way they get movies to me so quickly when I live so far from a major city.

    --
    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

    - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Question by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The "very small rural town" on mine is Worcester.

      "Worcester is a city in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the United States of America. A July 1, 2002, estimate put the population at 174,962."

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Question by bobwoodard · · Score: 1

      Mine says the same (Nearest...), but the return address on the envelope was located in CA, rather than FL (where I am) for some reason (where it was shipped _from_?).

      Needless to say, I trashed that envelope and doubled up on one of the return envelopes that was addressed to Tampa, FL. Sending back to CA would put a serious dent in my TAT.

    3. Re:Question by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I always double up.
      Im my logic a single slightly heavy envalope is cheaper than two just over half as light ones.
      Also, it mitigates breakage by reinforcing the parcel better (that or I'll loose two at once).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  29. Still room for improvement by frantzdb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's a fascinating look at innovation. But they still annoy me in several ways in that it's too easy to damage the return mailer while opening it. First, the perforations on the thin flap are too sturdy. Second, the circular sticker is a pain; unless I am careful I wind up ripping the thin layer with my address on it. If the circular sticker were thinner or perforated or had notches in it to act as stress risers then it would easily rip the way it should. Lastly there is, the flap with the adhesive strip on it to seal it. The line of perforations is often stronger than the fold on the other side of the adhesive strip. Several times I have had to tape a Netflix mailer closed because I accidently ripped off the adhesive strip. Simply cutting notches in the ends of the perforation would get it started ripping.

    The fact that there is an "OPEN ALONG EDGE" notice says to me they aren't done innovating. I should be able to open it naïvely the first and get at my disk without worrying about damaging the return envelope.

  30. Except we're not sending letters by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We're sending DVDs.
    In case you weren't aware, DVDs have several properties unlike letters:
    1) Rigid
    2) Reflective
    3) Smooth

    If your package alters any of those three properties then your DVD has become a coaster.

    Additionally your package has other constraints outside of mailing DVDs:
    1) Easy to use
    2) Cheap
    3) Useful

    Cheap means making them lighter and more durable. Useful means making them more productive in the warehouse and as advertising. Easy to use means more users.

    1. Re:Except we're not sending letters by willutah · · Score: 1

      But Netflix took 5 years to come to the conclusion that it is most cost effective to send a DVD in a paper envelope. Here is the picture of the current envelope: http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/biz2/netflix/pict ure.13.exclude.html

      How is that more protective than the basic method that I described?

    2. Re:Except we're not sending letters by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Well, I forgot to add cost. Does the plain white envelope do it cheaper?

    3. Re:Except we're not sending letters by willutah · · Score: 1

      If you factor in the five years of corporate R&D it took to evolve the design to a fancy version of a regular envelope, I'd venture that a plain white envelope is cheaper.

    4. Re:Except we're not sending letters by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't venture that. They grew from 10,000 customers to 4.2 million customers; today they mail about 1.4 million DVDs a day, and if the ration of 1:3 held then they shipped 3,333 DVDs a day in the beginning.

      At today's cost if the difference between the red envelope and a white envelope is $0.002, then NetFlix will be saving throughout the course of the year $1.022 million. If every envelope change cost them $10,000 in effort , and they changed envelopes 10 times then they will have spent $100,000 and saved $900,000 in this year alone.

    5. Re:Except we're not sending letters by willutah · · Score: 1

      Ok. Makes sense. I doubt it only cost them $10,000 to make the changes between envelopes, but your point still stands.

  31. mail it like it's 1999 by donutz · · Score: 1

    In 1999, Netflix started out with a heavy cardboard mailer. With only 100,000 subscribers, costs weren't a concern yet.

    I dunno, you'd think a business with a small number of customers would be cost-conscious. But then 100,000 isn't all that small I suppose.

    1. Re:mail it like it's 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their model was different back then. They didn't have "subscriptions" really. You just would go online, pick a movie to rent, and pay for it. Several days later it would show up. Rentals were something around $3 to $4 each, but you could buy a "10 pack" in advance at a reduced rate. In other words, the customers were paying a lot more for the service.

      I was a customer in the cardboard mailer days, but stopped using them when they introduced their "Marquee Program" which was based on a monthly fee. This eventually became the current subscription based service, which is now much cheaper & faster.

    2. Re:mail it like it's 1999 by Donut2099 · · Score: 1

      I imagine at this point in the game they are burning investment capital and maximizing profits is taking a back seat to gaining customers.

    3. Re:mail it like it's 1999 by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Bingo. Every buisness textbook in college starts out with, or at least contains "it takes 10 times more money to gain a customer than it does to retain them". It's pretty easy to sell the idea of "$4 movie rental - $1.50 packaging - $.32 postage - $.50 handling - 1.00 administrative costs = fantastic profit margin for a new buisness" to a venture capitalist. Most don't expect a profit within the first six months, usually 18 months. Customers first, trim the fat later.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  32. Re:Damn! I was SO interested in the history of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It requires scripting, dumbass...

  33. I hope Ubuntu sees this by bzipitidoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried Ubuntu's ShipIt service for a few free CDs. They came, but the cardboard holders had scratched the surface enough that the disks were no longer reliable. Of course I found this out 3/4 of the way thru an install in front of a bunch of people I was trying to impress with Linux.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:I hope Ubuntu sees this by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      If you get an error while installing (or booting the live CD), the problem may be bad/incompatible hardware. And Ubuntu seems to be too picky about that! Try other distros; my dad's PC won't run Ubuntu at all, but Kurumin and BeatrIX work just fine!

    2. Re:I hope Ubuntu sees this by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Interesting, didn't know Ubuntu was picky that way. But, I had no problem installing Ubuntu from an ISO image I downloaded and burned at the extra slow speed of 4x (in case I ran into an old CDROM drive), on those same computers that would choke on the official Ubuntu CDs at the step "installing the rest of the packages". I did think CDs could take scratches better than that, and that cardboard wouldn't scratch them. These all had thousands of small scratches in a wide area across the diameter of the CD where the edge of the cardboard pouch had rubbed during shipment.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  34. Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by mlantz7 · · Score: 3, Informative
    While it is interesting to see how the envelope has changed over the years, I find it more interesting to see some new competitors in the marketplace who are really innovating...

    Imagine being able to go online and request any movie you want, and be watching it within the hour. (OK, other than using BitTorrent!). You just go down to the local Redbox kiosk and pick it up within the hour.

    This is on the way, and you can't beat the current prices ($1/day) for new releases. And, there is a website with Redbox codes where you can get A LOT of free rentals, too.

    So, if you are in one of 10 major metros you can get this today.

    So, forget the red envelope, and get ready for the Redbox.

    1. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Astroturf? No way!

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Only available in 10 metro areas [though somewhat widely available in those areas]?
      * You have to go to the store to rent and return?
      * You choose from what's in the box? Are you limited to the 143 "Current Titles" shown on their website? My current online rental queue has 125 titles, and perhaps 5 of them are shown on the Redbox site.
      I'll stick with the envelope [mine are actually blue and yellow.] I'm all for alternatives and consumer choice, but I don't see RedBox having that much to offer, at least for me.

    3. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that pretty much like going to a local video rental store? Which are pretty much all over rather than in 10 cities? And, depending on how long you keep them, it might be cheaper to go to a Blockbuster or whatever. Plus, it looks more like you request the movie on the machine. It doesn't say anything about choosing titles over the net, nor does it really seem necessary.

    4. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by vision864 · · Score: 1

      Dood cut him some slack he probably just invested 5000+ in that Tv infomercial, :P

    5. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just go down to the local Redbox kiosk and pick it up within the hour.

      So you're asking me to leave my parents' basement?

    6. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by rich_r · · Score: 1

      Can't be, not with tha comment history ;)

    7. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by mlantz7 · · Score: 1
      It is somewhat like going to the local video store, except it is a lot cheaper.

      One thing I failed to mention is that Redbox is owned by McDonald's. They have just been testing to those 10 markets, but they have recently got some great partnerships with some grocery chains, and one day just about every McDonald's restaurant will have one. How is that for convenience.

      What is cool, too, is that you can return your rental to ANY Redbox in the country, so great for travelling. Pick it up in DC and return it in Vegas, etc...

      Anyway, I have been using it for the past year in my town, and I love it! (Plus, I have probably only paid for 3 rentals in the past 5 months or so because of the free codes.)

    8. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's easier to get them mailed to you.

      And I say again: "ASTROTURF"

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    9. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by mlantz7 · · Score: 1

      Well sure it is "easier". But what happens if you want to watch the movie today? That is why I like it. I personally think it is good to have a membership like NetFlix for getting classic movies, and using the Redbox for the new releases.

      And, BTW, I have no clue what "astroturf" means. So, sorry I can't comment on that.

      Anyway, just thought I would share. I use it and love it.

    10. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      "In American politics and advertising, the term astroturfing pejoratively describes formal public relations projects which deliberately seek to engineer the impression of spontaneous public reactions to a politician or political grouping, product, service, event, etc. by many diverse and distributed individuals acting of their own volition, when in fact the efforts are centrally coordinated."

      I've seen the late night infomertials saying "OMG INVEST IN REDBOX" but I never actually fell for them.

      How's that invesement going for you, buddy?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    11. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by mlantz7 · · Score: 1
      I don't think it could be the same thing you have seen on TV. Redbox is owned by McDonald's and CoinStar. I don't think anyone can actually "invest" in it, as it is a private company.

      Here is a release from McDonald's that talks about CoinStar's investment last year.

      I do, however own the website http://www.insideredbox.com/, which I created to be a place for people to discuss Redbox and get free dvd rental codes. It is a lot like the popular "Hacking Netflix" site.

      Anyway, I really don't care one way or the other what anyone thinks about the Redbox, I was just posting to give some information related to the article.

    12. Re:Redbox beats red envelope hands down.... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      So, you just admitted that you are astroturfing.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  35. Top-loading is abandoned in favor of side-loading. by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    I fail to see the impact of this on an essentially square envelope

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  36. Sorting Machines Eat Them by Xerotope · · Score: 2, Informative

    If they don't properly affix the sticker that seals the flap, the USPS sorting machines can mangle them pretty good.

    In fact, just today I received only the address flap in the mail. It must've been ripped off from the envelope (who knows what happened to the dvd), and those persistant bastards at the post office delivered just a red flap.

    I've also received a disk that had the flap partially torn off. It took two days longer than normal, and the USPS had placed it in a "Sorry we damaged your mail" envelope.

    So not quite the perfect solution, but still pretty good.

    1. Re:Sorting Machines Eat Them by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if they deliver only the flap, the mail counts as "delivered" while if they don't deliver anything to you the mail is considered "lost" and USPS has to return the shipping costs back to Netflix.

  37. Re:Damn! I was SO interested in the history of the by hazem · · Score: 1

    I didn't try - but if it was flash, I've totally ripped flash out of mozilla. I pretty much expect that I won't see video.

  38. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a long-time netflix user I think the paper envelope they have now is damn near perfect. It's dirt cheap, but keeps the DVD safe. It's recycleable too. It takes 5 seconds to put the DVD in securely and be ready to mail it.

    I don't think their so perfect. I work for the post office and have to handle the damn things. I'm not the guy that stuffs your mailbox, I run the sorting machines. (about 95% of your letters are sorted by machine). Problem is, the DVDs jam the machine because they don't flex (enough). They need to be run on a special machine used to sort magazines. I regularly see their ripped envelopes and occasionally broken DVDs from the letter sorters, where they are mixed in with normal letters and difficult to see and remove. The envelope is too flimsy, and the adhesive sticker to "seal" it is a bit of a problem. It sometimes sticks to the adjacent mailpiece. You are seeing the result of "engineering" something to just barely meet requirements, to save a penny or two.

    The Blockbuster mailer is great from my point of view. Envelope is sturdy, and fits and protects it's contents well. The NetFlix mailer has the floppy empty "tail" because it is rectangular rather than square. Difficult to handle to load into the machines. This deficiency requires more time to handle the NetFlix, so it costs more to process. But that's OK, 'cause you're paying for it by subsidizing it with your first class postage on other mail. You do realize you subsidize the discounted postage bulk mail pays with your full rate first class postage, right?

  39. Evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I dunno. Sounds more like intelligent design to me.

    1. Re:Evolution? by pintomp3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      FSM works at netflix? i guess it takes a lot of noodly appendages to juggle all those dvds.

    2. Re:Evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This very comment justifies reading the whole thread. Funny.

    3. Re:Evolution? by uniqueUser · · Score: 1

      Just a nother example of Martorana's Law

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  40. ooh, a bijection.... by rhesuspieces00 · · Score: 1

    i think contempt breeds familiarity, and ignorance.

  41. Re:Don't we have... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Don't you have better things to do than comment on if people have better things to do than read why Netflix envelopes aren't square?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  42. I'll tell you what the big deal is... by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The big deal is that Netflix tweaked their mailers to eliminate the following:
    • The need for a secondary envelope
    • the large amounts of waste generated from their mailers (since you're using a separate envelope for returns, I'm going to assume you junk the original)
    • As many pennies as can be saved as possible without risking further damage to the disk.

    Now, if this 1.4 million mailers daily idea is to be believed, even $0.0001 saved in printing/scanning/postage comes out to saving over $51,000 annually per hundreth of a cent per mailer. If Netflix decides to spend the extra cent to add padding or a second envelope, that's a loss of over five million dollars to them each year.

    In short, your FlixClone can get away with 'better' packaging because it's not having to deal with these ridiculously marginal values. Once and if their subscribers grow to as much as Netflix's current base, they'll either notice how much it's costing them or else cripple themselves financially.

    1. Re:I'll tell you what the big deal is... by willutah · · Score: 1

      The "FlixClone" I use is a small company (maybe only a few people as far as I can tell). The librarian responds in less than a half hour to my e-mails, and will even buys DVDs not in the library a few days after I request them. I can have four DVDs out at a time for $15 a month.

      If people were smart, they wouldn't all flock to NetFlix. A smaller operation can offer better service and doesn't need to worry about shaving pennies off of the cost of envelopes.

      And you are right that I "junk the original envelope" -- right into the paper recycle bin with all the other envelopes I get on a daily basis.

  43. Hmm..... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, if we make a change to the accounting software to redirect a fraction of that penny left over from rounding operation to a different account we could bring down the evil of Netflicks! Who's with me?

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Hmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute... this sounds familiar.

    2. Re:Hmm..... by JM+Apocalypse · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm in! But I sometimes misplace my decimal point.s

      --

      - - - - - - -
      Orppf urp mf y.ppcxn. yflcbi otcnnov C am yflcbi yr n.apb Ekrpatv (Dvorak -> Qwerty)
    3. Re:Hmm..... by pete-classic · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If we get caught, we're not going to white-collar resort prison. No, no, no. We're going to federal POUND ME IN THE ASS prison.

      -Peter

    4. Re:Hmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, wasn't that in superman or something?

  44. Re:Damn! I was SO interested in the history of the by Tatsh · · Score: 1

    So true. I fucking hate sites like that. Whatever happen to plain old HTML?

  45. This is how it works...Charity starts at "/.". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Every year the government and big corps find ways to make things a little harder for you. Its not a conspiracy, just every entity on the planet trying to amass power and money at your expense."

    Uh, huh. So you're giving away money and power...at your expense then?

  46. Next Step: Extinction of the Netflix Envelope by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

    The next step in the evolution is the extinction of the Netflix Envelope ...

    Once Video-On-Demand (VoD) becomes more common and affordable, services that snail mail DVDs will seem quaint...

    Ron

    1. Re:Next Step: Extinction of the Netflix Envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno. One of my CS profs used to say "never underestimate the bandwidth of a stationwagon full of disks going at 65 miles per hour."

      Take "stationwagon" and replace by "postal truck" or better yet "postal airplane."

    2. Re:Next Step: Extinction of the Netflix Envelope by Gunzour · · Score: 1

      Remember the name of the company is "Netflix". When VOD becomes common and affordable, Netflix will be a VOD provider.

    3. Re:Next Step: Extinction of the Netflix Envelope by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Until the number of people who have a mailbox have high speed internet access, there will be a market for snail-mail DVD rental.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:Next Step: Extinction of the Netflix Envelope by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      A large proportion of the US population lives in the hinterlands where they are unlikely to get any broadband access anytime soon, rental stores are hard to get to, cable is unavailable, and terrestrial broadcasts are poor.

      This leaves satellite and the mail as the only viable delivery mechanisms for entertainment. Satellite VOD is unlikely to happen anytime soon which leaves us with just the mail.

      This is the genius of the Netflix service. They tap into a market that is underserved by other media distribution systems. They are also in the best position to seamlessly handle the transition to HD content over the next few years.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  47. What Pure Bullshit by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
    They make it seem like this was an advanced and complex problem.

    Every ounce of weight in the mailer added to postage costs

    Weight (within reason) shouldn't be an issue. You can send letters up to 1 ounce, for base USPS postage. Since a DVD only weighs half that, and they only send one at a time, they could have very heavy envelopes before it would cost them any extra money. I think it would be a good idea for them to send 2 at a time (and in an envelope 2/3rds as large) which would make this more of an issue, but that's another story.

    but if the mailer was too flimsy, DVDs broke in the mail.

    DVDs will occasionally break in the mail, no matter what. An envelope would have to be incredibly strong to even slightly reduce the incidents of damage. So, it's the DVD's own strength and flexibility that keeps them from breaking, which has NOTHING to do with the mailer. The envelope is just scratch-protection...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:What Pure Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't forget that netflix also has to pay for each envelope that it sends, so reducing the weight of the envelope (which means a reduction in materials) will produce a significant savings, even if the cost to ship the DVD remains the same.

    2. Re:What Pure Bullshit by zlogic · · Score: 1

      I've ordered lots of free CDs, and none of them ever broke - even Sun's thin cardboard packages. You should have seen these - imagine a piece of thin cardboard (like in paperback books), twice the width of a CD and the same height as a CD, folded in two, the CD put inside it, and wrapped in wrapping film so that the CD doesn't fall out on the sides.
      And these CDs arrived in excellent condition; perhaps that's because the disc is fixed in the package and can't move and scratch itself.

  48. One step ahead by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Once Video-On-Demand (VoD) becomes more common and affordable, services that snail mail DVDs will seem quaint...

    Netflix agrees which is why they are partnering with TiVO to do VOD.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:One step ahead by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Except for DRM, that is. How in the world am I going to play a downloaded video without a Microsoft brand player?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  49. Hum.. by TheGreatHegemon · · Score: 1

    Must be a slow news day...

  50. direct link to gallery by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    the summary already says it all. here's the direct link to the gallery: http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/biz2/netflix/fram eset.exclude.html

    1. Re:direct link to gallery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary already includes that direct link. It says it ALL.

  51. Engineering oddities by nolife · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The referenced article is very interesting and I often wonder about the process that goes into such things or what seems to be a lack of process. One thing that has me wondering is the rack managment of some servers. You have companies like HP that in the past has made some great contributions to technology with a wide variety of electronics, test equipment, and computing with both hardware and software. All that being said, HP has some of the strangest contraptions for server wire management. A few years ago, they had this setup with these retractable cables that could probably sever your fingers if they let loose (like those retractable keychains) connected to what looked like a small cargo net with about 6 sets of velco straps, the contraption even had numbers so you knew where to attach what as you were fighting with the velco glob. You put your wires in that thing if you could. They eventually moved over to the swinging metal rack and after several years of revisions, they finally have something reasonable. For a company that was one of the most respected engineering companies in the world, you'd think they could make better progress with wire management and rack slider setups then what they have offered up to this point.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  52. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by mclipsco · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I vote we change poster's name from Anonymous Coward to Federal Whistleblower.

    --
    Take off every 'SIG'!!
  53. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by BeoFebenna · · Score: 5, Funny

    YES! Yes, we realize that. We do. We really do. It's okay. We all totally realize it. And we're grateful. Did we say we're grateful? We are. Okay. Now. Just put down the rifle...

  54. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do realize you subsidize the discounted postage bulk mail pays with your full rate first class postage, right?

    Funny, I was always told the exact opposite. Namely, that the discounts given to presorted bulk mail were actually less than the labor saved by the Post Office as a result of the presorting, thus most "junk mail" and stuff shipped at the bulk rate is more profitable, on a piece-by-piece basis, than individual First Class letters. So that really it's all those catalogs and crap that are subsidizing the Post Office's ability to deliver your letter to Grandma for 39 cents.

    If what you're saying is true, and it's the other way around, then what I've basically been told my entire life about the Post Office is wrong.

    I just ran some quick Google searches and I'm not the only person under this impression:
    "Most people are unaware that bulk mailing is highly profitable for the U.S. Postal Service and it subsidizes first class mail." http://www.lawmall.com/abuse/abe-mail.html
    "Bulk mail thereby subsidizes low cost stamps for letter, magazine, and book mailing." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_mail#Legislati on
    &c., etc.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  55. And that is why 'House Wife' isn't a real job. by Belial6 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm glad that we are past the 80s bit where we were constantly being bombarded with the 'Housewife is a career' garbage. No doubt that pre 1950s being a house wife was a full time job, but in this day and age with no wax floors, vacume cleaners, boxed cakes, pre-sliced bread, dish washers, washing machines, dryers, and all the other modern convinences we have, being a housewife is about an 8 hour a week job.

    Even with all of these modern convienences, I still know a few 'housewifes' that as soon as dad comes home from work, they drop the kids in his lap, and take 'me time' because plunking their kids down in front of the TV is SOOOOOO much work.

    1. Re:And that is why 'House Wife' isn't a real job. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      Most pre-made food you find at a supermarket is crap. I mean, it tastes and smells poorly. Cooking is still a good skill to have, if you want to save money and actually eat something paleatable.

      Most work in a modern home is cleaning and next to that is cooking. Vacuum cleaners are a good replacement for brooms, but you still need to clean up furniture and glasses yourself, for e.g. Dish washers are not perfect either.

    2. Re:And that is why 'House Wife' isn't a real job. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I live as a slob with someone else and spend well over 8 hours a week cleaning a smallish house.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  56. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 4, Informative
    But that's OK, 'cause you're paying for it by subsidizing it with your first class postage on other mail. You do realize you subsidize the discounted postage bulk mail pays with your full rate first class postage, right?
    That's silly... It's actually the other way around... Bulk mail is subsidizing first class mail, not the other way around bub. The bulk mailers get a lower rate because they come pre-sorted, and generally with bar codes on them or other machine readable notations to facilitate the delivery. They cover the costs of driving past everyone's door. The larger the number of pieces of mail, the more letters the delivery costs are amortized over. If bulk mailers stopped sending mail, there'd be a huge spike in the price of stamps. For those of us keeping score, that means they are good for us, not bad. Thanks, for playing...

    Kirby

  57. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    That explains why so many of my DVDs are broken.

    If you ask me the current design is excellent. The real achilles heal in the whole operation is on the fold/seal. That thing tears off about 1/3rd of the time and I have to just tape the dumb thing shut. They used to be made much heartier, and I would never have a torn envelope. Maybe they could just reinforce that one fold somehow.

  58. poor economy by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That sounds right, but I think bulk mail is still bad for us. I would rather spend a dollar apiece on the 2 or 3 letters I send out each year than spend time almost every day wading through junk mail.

    1. Re:poor economy by alienw · · Score: 1

      Apart from all the wasted paper and resources, I don't see much of a problem. Take the junk mail, deposit into recycle bin/shredder. I almost never even open it.

  59. foam solves the wrong problem by r00t · · Score: 1

    Foam protects from crushing, which is not a problem. DVDs need protection from bending.

    If cost were not a concern, sheets of carbon fiber or steel would work great. Perhaps use an aluminum rectangle with a circle cut out of the middle.

    Since cost is a concern, a better idea would be a multi-disk discount. A pair of disks is less likely to get bent. Sure, you lose both on rare occasions, but shipping pairs might still be a win.

  60. Redundant conditions by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    • It is a square letter
    • ...
    • The length divided by height is less than 1.3 or more than 2.5 (calculate this below)
    Considering that, for a square, length/height = 1 < 1.3, why did they put the first condition in? It's already included into the more general last condition.
    1. Re:Redundant conditions by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Because they're not logic nerds?

    2. Re:Redundant conditions by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Square is easy for anyone to understand.

      < 1.3 is to avoid people using something 4.5 x 4.51 and claiming "it isn't square"

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  61. Re:evolution and intelligent design -- moderation by zacronos · · Score: 1

    > Only a pointless flame war can guide me through this conundrum.

    Oh for crying out loud -- why is parent moderated as "flamebait"?

    The post is clearly tongue-in-cheek, and intended to be funny. "Flamebait refers to comments whose sole purpose is to insult and enrage." (emphasis added) At worst, parent is offtopic.

    Now, of course, this comment is clearly offtopic. :-)

  62. Not perfect yet by hey! · · Score: 1

    Until they find a way to keep my kids from grabbing them out of the mail and losing 'em.

    You're supposed to be able to send the DVD back in the same envelope as another one, but you have to report the DVD as "lost".

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  63. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    The rule in the food business was to mark up your biggest volume item the most -- for us (University concessions) that was coffee. That would suggest the USPS marks up bulk mail (or business mail) the most.

    --
    I come here for the love
  64. Re:evolution and intelligent design -- moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was moderated flamebait because the parent (now grandparent) used the term 'flame war' in the post. It actually is more of a troll than flamebait.

  65. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by belloc · · Score: 1

    You are seeing the result of "engineering" something to just barely meet requirements, to save a penny or two.

    $0.01 (or $0.02) x about a bajillion mailings = about $10 or $20 majillion in savings for Netflix.

    See, they have lots of customers, with many mailings per customer, so a tiny per-envelope savings means a lot to them.

    --
    I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
  66. Perfection? Bah! by fm6 · · Score: 1
    I object to using the word "perfection" in this context. The current envelope is more cost-effective, but it's a lot less effective in protecting the DVD than some older designs. From Netflix's point of view, it's cheaper to accept that some DVDs will be damaged in transit — especially since they don't bother replacing titles more than a year or two old when the last copy is damaged or lost. But from the customer's point of view, it's damned frustrating to sit down to relax and watch a DVD, only to find that it's split or cracked.

    I accept this, because I hate video stores, and because paying only $1.40 (my average cost per DVD) allows me to see a lot more DVDs than I could afford otherwise. But it's hardly "perfect".

    1. Re:Perfection? Bah! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I joined Netflix right after it started (back before that damned subscription plan, "throttling," queues with "long wait" on almost everything, etc.). I loved the cardboard mailers. When they went to the flimsy paper mailers, I started getting mailers that had been ripped, even to the point of the disc falling out.

      Netflix started out as a great service. But they kept getting worse with every change they made. It finally reached the point where I left them in 2001.

      Back when they started, they had every incentive to get you any disc as fast as possible. Since the subscription model, they have every incentive to work AGAINST you, ensuring that you receive as *few* discs as possible.

      No thanks.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Perfection? Bah! by fm6 · · Score: 1
      The problem with the pre-subscription Netflix was that they were losing money hand over fist. They were just an online video store, and not enough people thought that was an improvement over the B&M kind.

      Netflix can be a pain, but if you stop and think about it, there's no way a business like this could possibly work except the way they're doing it. If they used better envelopes, they'd have to charge more. If they didn't throttle heavy users, they'd have to charge more. (Though they never should have pretended they weren't doing it.) And if, like me, you rent about 11 movies a month for $15 a month, yo're getting a pretty good deal. Though maybe I wouldn't think that way if I got as many damaged discs as some people seem to get.

  67. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by Firehawke · · Score: 1

    How about Gamefly mailers? I've yet to see one of those get to me with damage, but I'm curious from the perspective of someone from the inside.

  68. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Gamefly mailers? I've yet to see one of those get to me with damage, but I'm curious from the perspective of someone from the inside.

    Haven't noticed any, so can't comment. The NetFlix go thru my location in the thousands every day.

  69. Netflix inventory by doctorjay · · Score: 1

    I wonder how big the netflix inventory is, not only do they have to have every movie out there, but they have to have multiple copies of it too.. thats a lot of DVD. Imagine financeing that? Did they buy them wholesale?

  70. Your doing something wrong then. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    The moderator was right. I was off topic, but if you are spending more than 8 ours a week cleaning a smallish house, and it is not emaculate, you are doing something seriously wrong.

    I understand how that can happen. When I met my wife, she would spend all day doing 3 loads of laundry. She would spend so much time organizing the laundry that she would never get it washed. Once I conviced her to just go ahead and put the clothes in the washer, a full days work turned into 15 minutes. If you miss a white sock because you didn't spend hours sorting, you can just throw it in next time.

    The fact that she created work where none was necessary did not make a few loads of laundry a 'real job'. If you are spending as much time as you say, and you live as a slob, you are definitly creating work where it is not necessary.

  71. As a member of the internet elite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I refuse to support the RIAA or the MPAA.
    As such it is my RIGHT and my DUTY to pirate and SELL as many movies as possible.
    Proceeds go to LINUX, a Free Open Source Opetating System that is worthy of your atttentoon!

  72. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by pete-classic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You can see elsewhere in the comments to this story that the floppy bit is there to PREVENT A POSTAL SERVICE SURCHARGE!

    Blame your boss.

    -Peter

  73. You're not perfect yet! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    So you return three movies at once? That means either you wait until you've watched all three movies before you return any of them — in which case you're cheating yourself, because Netflix could be replacing the first movie while you're watching the other two. Or else you watch all three movies in one sitting and return them all in the next mail — in which case you need to get a life!

    1. Re:You're not perfect yet! by karnal · · Score: 1

      Or I could be ripping all 3 and letting them sit on my file server.

      And, by the way, telling me to "get a life" is about as productive as me watching paint dry. Which I do admit to doing, occasionally.

      --
      Karnal
  74. Up to Netflix by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Now that problem is up to Netflix & TiVO, TiVO's are not Microsoft creations so there is no reason to think they would go with Windows Media.

    That said, probably there will be some DRM - it will be interesting to see what form that takes.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  75. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by jwiegley · · Score: 1

    Good for us??? Please... do not try to speak for me...

    I would GLADLY pay $1.00 for every first class letter I had to send if the USPS would just stop delivering all that bulk mail crap to me.

    I never read it. The first thing I do is go through the mail in one pass...

    1. Junk mail? yep... goes directly to the trash, don't care what it is, don't care who it's for.
    2. Is it for my roommate? Yep, put it in his inbox.
    3. Is it for me? Yep, process it

    Notice that both my roommate and I have an equal agreement... If it doesn't look like a bank statement or other official source that we deal with regularly then it gets thrown away. Period.

    It's just a total waste to send this crap to me and personally I think it should be illegal. I think it destroys the environment. I think it unnecessarily overburdens the USPS carriers. I know it annoys it me. I believe it invades my privacy by harassing me directly. I think most of the crap is merely scams that don't offer any decent value to the recipient and usually is for products that are misrepresented. In short it's the worst kind of advertising.

    It simply is NOT "good for us."

    --
    I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
  76. No Adult DVDs on Netflix by GeoSanDiego · · Score: 1

    NetFlix doesn't do porn. I created a website using the domain name NotNetFlix.com to capitalize on this fact. NetFlix did not appreciate this and $2,500 in attorney fees later I finally relented and had to turn the domain over to them. I sure miss that name as my new one generates only half the traffic: RentXReview.com.

  77. Not even close to perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can tell you the Netflix envelopes are far from perfect - they often jam in the Post Office sorting machines, tearing open, breaking the DVD inside, and causing several following peices of mail to get chewed up. The barcodes on them when they are going back to Netflix are also misprinted, causing them to be sorted to the wrong destination, and often to multiple different (wrong) destinations. The Blockbuster ones aren't that great either, but they at least have the right barcodes.

    I can tell you this - if you ever mail a CD or a DVD, I would strongly recommend mailing it in a strong plastic hardcase (save one an AOL CD came in) if you want it to get where its going in one peice. Dont try to mail it as a letter in an envelope - it is a parcel. And be sure to tape the box shut securely with packing tape - you dont need it popping open somewhere, and the case going to the desitnation with nothing inside, and the disc ending up loose (and scratched) in the dead-letter dept. I've seen ones that people have mailed in a cheap thin plastic case, with just a small peice of scotch tape - most of them do just that.

  78. Re: home mail sorting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My roommate and I do a very similar thing with our mail.

    The key is to look at all mail from the top right first, where the stamp/imprint is. If it says 'PRSRT STD', 'STANDARD', or 'STD' that means it was mailed at Standard instead of Frist Class rates. Standard rate is the new term for bulk mail. In this house, all Standard rated mail gets torn in half and put into the paper recycling bin. If it is from a credit card company, it hits the shreader first.

    The reason for this is that Standard rate can pretty much be only used to send you advertising. No bills, payments, or invoices are allowed to be sent via Standard rate. See the flow chart at http://pe.usps.com/text/standardeligibility/ .

    In addition use junkbuster's webpage to generate an opt out letter for all DMA member companies: http://www.junkbusters.com/declare.html .

    Don't catch a STD from your mail! Throw it out!

    d

  79. Re:perfect paper envelope... NOT by Jokerz17 · · Score: 1

    Just be careful... I had one the other day that would have normally gone in "straight to trash" pile, but I was bored so I opened. There was a $666 check in side (seriously). I wasn't expecting it, so I would never have know it was gone.