Slashdot Mirror


A Mind Map of Linux Distributions

Howard writes "All about Linux has posted a Mind Map of GNU/Linux distributions. This map of GNU/Linux hopes to throw light on the current GNU/Linux distributions and their relationships with each other. Though the map doesn't show the historically significant but now redundant distros like SLS, Yggdrasil and the erstwhile Red Hat, it shows many of the more prominent GNU/Linux distributions."

23 of 67 comments (clear)

  1. Nice diagram! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great diagram - it does a pretty nice job of showing distro lineage - it is very hard to show linux distributions in a hierarchical chart like this as the relationships between distributions is not necessarily hierarchical.

    For instance, the multi-lingual section does not show the parent distributions (with the exception of Vine linux) red flag (IIRC) was based on a version of red hat (as was mandriva).

    Still, that's just being picky - its a useful diagram, that shows many of the important relationships between distros.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Nice diagram! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OT. i wish there was a similar graph for processor families. All I hear is prescot this, opteron that, athlon another, but no idea how they relate.

    2. Re:Nice diagram! by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:Nice diagram! by jasontn · · Score: 5, Informative
    4. Re:Nice diagram! by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 4, Informative
      the multi-lingual section does not show the parent distribution

      Look again. See the legend in the upper right assigning colored dots to the major distros? See the colored dots on the cells for the multi-lingual distributions and the security related, and small distros?

      (this also answers another posters erroneous gripe about having groups unrelated to their parentage)

  2. Linspire and Debian by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Somebody else said that Linspire is derived from Debian, but the diagram does not show this.

    Who is right about this? I can't really see the linspire people rolling their own, somehow.

    1. Re:Linspire and Debian by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don;t be silly, of course Linspire isn't derived from Debian, its derived from Windows.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Linspire and Debian by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Informative
      This is from 2004, when it was still called "Lindows", but I don't think they have re-written everything from scratch since then!

      I've followed both the company and its flagship product, LindowsOS, since its introduction over two years ago. Lindows is based on the Debian version of Linux.

    3. Re:Linspire and Debian by Ajehals · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note the ever so small browny orange dot next to linspire, denoting its a debian deriv (I think guessing by the key...) This is similar to the dots on the multi lingual distros, so I guess it does show the same thing (i.e. Linspire as a Debian derived distro...)

      Not a great diagram as far as inclusion and hereditry (pedigree?) are concerned (but its not supposed to be for that so who cares) but certainly a useful one for new users.

    4. Re:Linspire and Debian by asac · · Score: 2, Informative

      At least they call themselves downstream:

      > I'm sure you're right, but we are downstream from you and our
      > libraries are older.
      from debian bug 277572
  3. It's not a mind map, but by m4c+north · · Score: 2, Interesting
    a map for your mind. It helps you see the historical/genealogical relationships between distros, but doesn't map the minds of the users/developers of those distros.

    I was expecting something more along the lines of the philosophical leanings of the mapped distros, like which are more community-based and which are more corporate; which are incredibly zealous and which are more diplomatic. You could pick up to three different spectra and map them before you ran out of easy-to-visualize dimensions.

    For example, I'd like to see:

    • Cathedral [-----] Bazaar (leadership style)
    • Boss [-----] Best Friend (openness to questions or new ideas)
    • Jihadist [------] Zen Monk (open source philosophy)

    --
    Who's your user, program?
  4. Small corrections needed by OlivierB · · Score: 2, Informative

    Linspire is Debian based.
    And ClarkConnect (not represented here)should be under RedHat Entreprise Linux.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
  5. Those who ignore history are doomed to .... by Yonder+Way · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ....irrelevance?

    Unfortunately by leaving out the historical lineage, it doesn't really show how Fedora, SuSE, and Mandriva are all descended from Red Hat Linux. Others are grouped together by things like size or security rather than lineage. It's not very logical or consistent in its current layout. And by ignoring lineage, it has sacraficed its relevance.

    1. Re:Those who ignore history are doomed to .... by wed128 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct. Suse was originally a German localized version of Slackware.

    2. Re:Those who ignore history are doomed to .... by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, SuSE was one of the founders of the RPM spec. Caldera was also involved. Caldera doesn't really matter anymore since the whole SCO fiasco, and the only other Caldera derived distro was Lycoris.

      And TurboLinux was not designed from the ground up, it was based off of Red Hat. Mandrake and Conectiva (which became Mandriva) are RH derived. Gentoo is conceptually related to LFS. Vector is designed to be a Small Linux, and Slax is derived from Slackware. Linspire and Xandros are siblings being both derived from CorelOS, itself a Debian derivative. I am pretty sure Julex and Puppy are Slackware derived.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  6. SELinux isn't even a distribution by Netsnipe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's really a series of kernel patches that implement mandatory access control.

    --
    -- "I can't tell the future, I just work there." -- The Doctor
  7. Yggdrasil was great. by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting


    One of the first easy-to-use and easy-to-demo Linux distro's around, I got a whole data center moved to 486/Pentium hardware on the strength of the "rootfs on CD" bootsys that Yggdrasil was shipping, before RedHat was anything more than an SLS-wannabe, and I have to say that I really can't fathom why it wasn't considered significant enough to include on this map ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Yggdrasil was great. by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As you say, it "was" great. The picture of the mindmap itself contains some text, which explains why it isn't there:

      "This mind map does not go into the historical perspective of Linux but tries to showcase the relationships between current linux distributions".

      Although there might be critizism to this mind map, I still find it pretty useful, because I really lost track of what which distributions are based on.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  8. Mind Mapping Software by jallen02 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That Mind Map appears to have been made with FreeMind. An excellent, open source, mind mapping solution. I advise folks to try it out.

    FreeMind

    Jeremy

  9. Re:Useful by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...ended up installing Suse, which was ok, but not suitable to my needs.

    And how would this map be useful in deciding which are? It only tells you which Linux distros exist, and how they relate. Apart from a few notes on special-purpose/language versions, it tells you nothing about the functionality and philosophy of a distribution.

  10. Missing distro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why doesn't it show that everything comes from SCO and GNU/Linux is a result of the merger between SCO and XFree86?

    *duck*

  11. Re:News to me... by stu42j · · Score: 2, Informative
  12. Mindmapping Software by i_am_the_r00t · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have recently finished a 3 month analysis of mindmap software. Everything from Visio, to Freemind.

    My conclusion is that the best mindmap software on the market is not software but a large piece of paper and colored pens. The mind-mapping experience does not translate easily to mouse-clicks and keystrokes.

    That said, the SECOND best is Mindmanager 6 Pro. It is pricey but worth it.

    Freemind is nice and hopefully will mature into a better product