Slashdot Mirror


Apple Recycling Old Macs for Free

charleste writes "CNN is reporting that Apple is going to recycle Macs for free. I wonder if this means they will actually recycle them in Cupertino, or sent overseas to be dumped as many 'recycled' computers do, or if they will actually mine them. And does this make the MacQuarium obsolete?"

42 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. I will do one better! by crazyjeremy · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, I will now recycle ANY piece of computer equipment for free. Simply get the device to me (in working order) and I will disassemble, dismember, shoot, melt, sell or attack it with a cowbell.

    1. Re:I will do one better! by joe+155 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am also now offering a similar service, where I will just use the mac, hell, I'd even pay for the shipping... It seems like giving them away to people would be a far better way of getting rid of old, but still usable, computers... onyl recycle when they no longer work

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:I will do one better! by Darkon · · Score: 4, Informative

      It seems like giving them away to people would be a far better way of getting rid of old, but still usable, computers

      Not necessarily. Often these old machines are highly inefficient in terms of the computing power they provide vs the electricity they consume. Sure, having one of these at home would be cool - in fact I did used to use the next model down as my home server - but these days I just don't want to either pay the power bill or try to justify the waste of resources. Sometimes it really is better just to let this old kit go to silicon heaven.

    3. Re:I will do one better! by renoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know sure, the old computer is less efficient than a new one, but once you take into account the energy used to *make* the new computer, I doubt that you saved energy, more likely you wasted energy.

    4. Re:I will do one better! by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Informative
      Maybe they don't want a repeat of the old Mac Clone - where people cold take the custom bios chips out of a defunct mac and use it to legally run a clone made by Franklin Computer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_clones

      a large amount of this system software was included in the Macintosh's ROM chips. Hence any competitor who attempted to create a Macintosh clone would have to either illegally duplicate all the copyrighted code in the ROMs -- in which case Apple could legally quash the manufacturer -- or reverse-engineer the ROMs, which would have been an enormous and costly process without certainty of success.

      The strategy of suppressing clone development was successful; from 1986 to 1991, several manufacturers created Macintosh clones, obtaining their ROMs by actually purchasing one of Apple's Macintosh computers and removing from it the required parts, then installing those parts in the clone's case.

      ...

      Before true clones were available, the Atari ST could be converted into a Mac by adding the third-party Spectre GCR emulator (which required that the user purchase a set of Mac ROMs). The Amiga could also be converted into a Mac with similar emulators. Since Apple Computer never manufactured a 68060 based Mac, the fastest way to run native 68000 MacOS applications on real hardware was to run it on an Atari or Amiga.

      So your dead mac is worth money. Pull the roms, send the rest back.

    5. Re:I will do one better! by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I still have an E450 running at home, 4x 480mhz cpus and 4gig ram... It's far cheaper than a modern system capable of handling the same kind of load. It may not be the best system for brute force processing, but it's very stable and will handle a high load easily.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:I will do one better! by Mistlefoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think this has to do with Mac Clones. I think this is just one way that Apple can continue to be progressive in their marketing.

      Maybe I have a skewed view of the typical Mac user - but I consider them more progressive, open to new technologies and, well - maybe even more likely to be a vegetarian or drive an economical but classy car then a PC user.

      You must remember that Microsoft won't be able to compete on this level - they don't make the hardware and likely won't recycle it for free. The average computer users sees Apple or Microsoft as the two choices. Maybe something like this will appeal to some undecided buyers.

    7. Re:I will do one better! by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So your dead mac is worth money. Pull the roms, send the rest back.

      10 years ago that was true. Now it's cheaper to buy a used G3 or G4 Mac entire than screw around with clones or emulation (if any of these are still sold at all) of an obsolete OS.

    8. Re:I will do one better! by TClevenger · · Score: 2, Informative
      I use a Kill-A-Watt meter. It displays volts, amps and watts in realtime, and has a kilowatt counter built-in.

      I used it to replace a server in my house (old server: HP Vectra VLi8 PIII-650, 46 watts idle, new server: Toshiba Tecra 8100 PIII-650 laptop, 15 watts idle), and find some surprising waste, such as a set of Boston Acoustics speakers that drew a continuous 40 watts, even when "turned off", and my HP Laserjet 2100, which draws 13-16 watts in powersave mode. (The speakers are now on a power strip, and the printer gets switched off when I'm done with it.)

  2. Not about being green by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't about being green, it is about removing older macs from the 2nd hand market. The exact same reason that HP offers a similar program.

    1. Re:Not about being green by anonicon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't about being green, it is about removing older macs from the 2nd hand market. The exact same reason that HP offers a similar program.

      OK. As long as it achieves the same effect, whether by some altruistic concern for the environment or through sheer greed, it's all good. Besides, it helps the individual Mac resllers who will be able to maintain a greater profit margin on used equipment due to less product glut on the open market.

      Chuck

    2. Re:Not about being green by moo083 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not exactly. They don't just take Macs. They take any old computer. Theoretically, if you still wanted to use your old computer, you could give them the computer that was the old one before you got the new one. At some point, you'll want to get rid of the old one. It seems really wierd right now, but at some point, its likely that I will want to recycle this Macbook Pro in front of me. Precisely, it will likely be in six years, which is three years after I buy my next computer.

    3. Re:Not about being green by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's Saturday, you don't have to sip the anti-koolaid today.

      What you wrote might be true if the program was restricted to recycling old Macs. This program covers any computer; the only requirement is that you purchase a new Mac to participate. More details. More info.

      HP, AFAIK, charges a small fee to recycle your computer.

      If you're going to slag on companies, at least get your info straight. Then you'll have some factual basis for your cynicism.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  3. recycling... by SolusSD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what all is involved in recycling a computer? I know there is quite a bit of lead on the circuit boards that needs to be handled properly, but what exactly do they do with it?

    1. Re:recycling... by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about Apple's program, but in general electronics "recycling" involves shipping them to some impoverished country where people making practically nothing remove chips from boards by burning them over a coal fire to melt the lead/tin solder.
      As you can imagine, these people are not exactly working in healthy conditions. In fact, the report I was listening to recently said that the operations were polluting the area so badly that this little village by a river had to start importing bottled water because the river was now poisonous. It's also likely that the ground will be unable to support crops for hundreds of years (until the toxins ALL wash into the river and downstream to poison some other places).
      All in all, you're probably better dumping the stuff in a landfill here. At least in the US, landfills are contained areas that are monitored and controlled. Send them to a "recycler" and they'll get released into the environment in the worst possible ways.

    2. Re:recycling... by parvin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps you were listening to one of NPR's excellent reports on the environmental costs of electronics "recycling". You can read or listen here

    3. Re:recycling... by boingo82 · · Score: 2, Informative
      All in all, you're probably better dumping the stuff in a landfill here.

      Apple tried that already when in 1989 they dumped about 2700 Apple Lisas in a Utah landfill, because the tax writeoff was better that way than if they donated them to charity.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
  4. This came from Steve by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'll bet this is a directive from SJ. He's a pretty green dude.

    I remember a quote from him once, pretty excellent example of Steve Jobs' mentality actually. It was both very poetic and utterly ridiculous. This was from back in the early Apple days before he was fired by Scully. He said (paraphrasing), 'I want a computer factory that takes raw beach sand in one end and outputs fully assembled Macs from just that raw material.' What a crazy, wonderful idea.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:This came from Steve by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Funny
      'I want a computer factory that takes raw beach sand in one end and outputs fully assembled Macs from just that raw material.'

      Great, so there goes another ecologically important wildlife habitat and economically important tourism attraction! :)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  5. Old Computers are a Gold Mine by coffeecan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Literally. There is more gold per-ton in old computer parts than gold ore, and its cheaper to extract. so it makes sense given the recent rise of precious metals for apple to salvage as much of these resources as possible. This Free program is probably going to turn a profit.

    1. Re:Old Computers are a Gold Mine by shashi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Very true. There are also a lot of metals besides gold that are worth more (though in smaller amounts, like platinum). I've been part of a business before where we chunked up old Macs and PCs, packed all the circuit boards up in huge wooden crates, and sent them off to a recovery mill... a couple months later, a few tons of scrap is turned into a check for $20,000. It's not bad money but it takes a lot of manual labor to separate it out (i.e. separating circuits from CRT's and plastic) or the mill will charge you to do the separation and sorting.

      Also, newer computers have much lower amounts of these materials, making them almost worthless. The sweet spot are the 68020's and 486's (the heavy processors are where you get the most precious metals per oz.).

  6. Obsolete? by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, no... cost more...

    When there are less items available on the market, the value increases if there's still a demand for it. (if there's no demand, then the value's effectively 0)

    The conspiracy theorist would assume that Apple's trying to corner the market on MacQuariums, and they need more spare parts, so they're tricking people into giving them the parts under the assumption of 'recycling' (which it is). They might even have a company that's willing to buy lots of thousands of these for the very purpose. (pbfixit comes to mind)

    They might also find that it's more cost effective to strip and refurb some machines than to have new parts manufactured for those with extended warranties. (this assumes that the product is on the market long enough for people to recycle out of warranty machines while other people still have them under warranties)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  7. ever so timely and accurate by DynamoJoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    A little research is a wonderful thing
    . Ahh, /. All the news that's fit to print several days ago.

    --
    bah.
  8. A rebate would grease them skids! by phorest · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, why not a rebate of say 100.00 to make a user switch from win-ux and just fill a warehouse with the junk.


    When it's full they can have a new ad campaign with bulldozers loading barges with all the junk and crow about how many people switched. They could probably write it all off as marketing costs and sell more hardware to boot!. Apple wins!

    --
    God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  9. Reuse rather than recycle by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the machines are still working, then reusing them is going to be better than ripping them apart for the gold.

  10. Staying in the US by bizard · · Score: 4, Informative

    At the announcement, Jobs specifically said that the recycling would all be done in the U.S. and not just shipped off to China.

    1. Re:Staying in the US by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

      So much for sending the dead computers back to the place where they were born.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  11. Apple recycling old COMPUTERS for free by BearRanger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not just Macs. Steve Jobs' quote at the shareholders meeting was something like: "We like switchers too."

  12. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition vs. Apple by reporter · · Score: 4, Informative
    DAldredge (2353) incorrectly stated, "This isn't about being green, ..." On the contrary, the CNN report mentioned in the lead article starting this thread of discussion talks explicitly about recycling.

    How has Apple handled recycling?

    According to the "The 2005 Computer Report Card" by the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, "Apple, Dell, Gateway, and HP are the companies that use recyclers that have signed the Electronic Recyclers Pledge of Stewardship. To learn more about the Recycler Pledge go to: http://www.svtc.org///cleancc/recycle/recycler_ple dge.htm".

    In that report, note that Apple received the second highest score in the category of "DISPOSAL CHAIN". That category indicates the degree to which a company will audit the entire disposal chain (including work sub-contracted to suspicious companies in China, Taiwan Province, and Korea) to ensure that recycling of old computer equipment is done in accordance with the most ethical, most responsible practices.

    Note that Apple management actually signed the Electronics Recycler's Pledge of True Stewardship, committing to the gold standard of ethical, responsible recycling.

    Finally, the recent decision by Apple management to take back old equipment for free is probably due to the tireless efforts of the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) and other groups in the Computer TAKE-BACK Campaign (CTBC). When Steve Jobs gave the keynote speech at the 2005 graduation ceremony at Stanford University, CTBC flew a banner over the ceremony. The banner exclaimed, "STEVE - DON'T BE A MINI PLAYER - RECYCLE ALL E-WASTE".

  13. Re:why not... by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    donate them to poor urban schools, or third world countries?

    Urban schools have plenty of technology, thanks to programs like E-rate. What they don't have is people to set it up, whether it's old junk like this or brand new machines. Take a walk around a typical city school some time; it's enlightening.

    (I live in Buffalo, not an exceptionally wealthy city by any means.)

    --saint

  14. Not just Macs... by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple will recycle ANY computer you decide to unload on them when you purchase a new computer. Even your old 486 Win 3.1 box. That way, switchers get in on the recycling action too.

    Here's a snippet from the Shareholder meeting stating so.

    --
    Zing!
  15. Re:In other news by c_forq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A few points:
    1)This isn't only Apple computers, they will recycle computers made by anyone.
    2)I'm sure if the computer has value people will sell it. I put an old 486 up on EBay before (working Pentium system). No one even bid a dollar on it, something like that has no value on the market I could find, if this program was around then I would have recycled it, but it ended up going into the trash.

    --
    Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  16. Taking over the world by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    - Steve Jobs wants to take over the world
    - Apple all of a sudden recycles computers for free
    - Steve Jobs owns Apple

    This can mean only one thing: Steve Jobs has a new trapper keeper.

  17. Some Context by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In California, and many other places, it's now illegal to just throw old electronics in the trash. So Apple is actually supplying a valuable service.

  18. Re:Overseas and dumped is my bet... by shawb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this is done properly (Which is much more likely if the actual recycling is done in the U.S. as Apple claims) this is a lot better than just dumping your old gear in the trash. A fair amount of the heavy metals can be expected to be stripped out for reuse, those parts which are not economically recyclable will be divided into two parts: general waste which is disposed of at any old landfill, and toxic materials which are disposed of at designated facilities that monitor groundwater perfusion, etc. But if the old parts are shipped off to a third world nation, chances are the end result will be less environmentally friendly than just dumping the old gear in the trash for the garbage man to deal with.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  19. Indeed... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Computer Take-Back Campaign was canvassing this neighborhood for signatures and all just about a week or so ago.

    They've been really aggressive about getting letters, etc. to Jobs and BOD members about doing take-backs on the computers (They already do them on iPods for free...) and to handle the returns in a responsible manner.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  20. Links from the horse's mouth by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Informative

    Neither Slashdot nor CNN posted Apple's official computer recycling webpage, so here it is. For the U.S. (excluding the Cupertino area) they are partnered with a company called Metech to do the recycling. In Cupertino, Apple has had their own recycling facility for quite some time now that has freely accepted used Macs, PCs and some home electronics.

  21. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to refurb older computers, clean them up, give them away to kids (rural poor kids in my community). They were all decent, worked well enough for school reports, surfing the web, email, etc. They all had legit licensed copies of the OS too, stuff I paid for, 95 and 98 primarily, then I would install like zone alarm and similar on them, get them all set up (no linux I found-and I tried a BUNCH- would run on pitiful amounts of RAM in GUI, so I used older windows) Not a one of them ever really bothered to learn computing, or programming or anything intelligent, ALL of them used the machines primarily for videogames. Closest they came to making them practical was to slap stickers on the outside of them...it's was nuts and a big waste of my time and money.

    I don't do that anymore, not worth it, I'm relatively poor, not going to pay to subsidise that so called industry. It's stupidity, this generation's waste of time and effort. Might as well watch pro wrestling or NASCAR or something for all the good it does.

    As to the schools, hell ya, if I had school age kids now they WOULD be home schooled, I have seen up close the results of the social engineering and alleged educational system as it is run today. It has gone downhill BAD since they created the federal department of education. There are a few fed agencies that should just be totally shut down as complete failed experiments, that one is near the top of the list, IMO.

  22. Uhh, the free program starts in JUNE. by Warlock7 · · Score: 2, Informative
    But why bother to RTFA?

    The old program costs you eight bucks, while the new one is free. The old program was still very reasonable.
    Starting in June, Apple will offer a free computer take-back program for U.S. customers who buy a new Mac through the Apple Store or an Apple retail store. Check back soon for more details.
  23. It's just you. by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a mandatory recycling fee for monitors in California. Screens between 15" and 35" have an $8 fee (CRT and LCD). This only started last year, so it's misleading to say that just because you were charged a state-imposed tax on a newly purchased system, that it wasn't "free" to recycle your POS Pentium-III system. Heck, everyone has to charge the tax, but you don't see Fry's begging to take back your old systems*.

    From the .gov site: http://www.erecycle.org/fee.htm
    Or clearer details: http://www.mpccorp.com/about/california_fee.html

    * Actually, they might. I didn't check.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  24. sent overseas? by weg · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wonder if this means they will actually recycle them in Cupertino, or sent overseas to be dumped

    Do a little research before you submit a story next time.. especially if the story is several days old. From Apples homepage:

    Hazardous materials

    No hazardous waste from Apple's U.S. recycling program is shipped outside North America. All recovered materials are processed domestically, with the exception of some commodity materials that can be recycled for future use. Apple's recycling policies prohibit the use of recovered plastics as fuel in smelting.

    --
    Georg
  25. Not a clone, but very close to a "G5 in Black" by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now one might explain why IBM suddenly is selling these systems with very similar specs to these. Yes, the 185 is a bit neutered (memory, undocumented AIX only 3d graphics, PCI-X versus PCI-E), but they'd make for a nice system to use recycled 970's.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.