Slashdot Mirror


BlueSecurity Database Compromised?

EElyn writes "Numerous users of Blue Security's anti-spam system now report of a new form of aggressive spam. An unknown group of spammers claim to have derived a way to extract the member email addresses of Blue Security group's anti-spam system, called Blue Frog. Blue Frog, a small tool which once installed on the user's computer, enables Blue Security to systematically flood a known spammer's website with opt-out messages; much to the headache of the spammer. Tens of thousands of users have already signed up, so can it really be true that spammers now possess this database? Or is this yet another frail attempt by spammers to intimidate the user?" Another reader sent the text of the letter; read more to see.

Stray1 writes ""You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity...." An email from unknown detractors has taken the Bluesecurity anti spam lists and decided to take matters into their own hands. I recieved this Email from an anonymous, and garbled host, which went on to say in not so fantastic english that I, as a Blusecurity member, would recieve this and many more (about 20 -30) spam messages a day until I left the blue security community. Blue Security, (www.bluesecurity.com)a website and community designed to lessen your Spam Email, is down for the moment. Is this what we have come to? Spam,(erm 'high volume email') companys holding your address hostage until you comply? "...We mightve had your email addresses before in our lists, but now, we are targetting YOU, because YOU are a bluesecurity user". I have to say, up until this point, my spam was down by about 70% to 80%."

73 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blue Security to systematically flood a known spammer's website with opt-out messages; much to the headache of the spammer.

    And by flood I taeke it you mean spam

    When will the world learn, violence begets violence and spam begets spam. Lets find a real solution to the problem rahter then a vigalante justice.

    1. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blah blah blah.

      'Vigilante' would imply something illegal is going on. This is market forces at work - more effective, generally, than government intervention.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:Eye for an Eye? by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When will the world learn, violence begets violence and spam begets spam. Lets find a real solution to the problem rahter then a vigalante justice.

      Actually, I've found that things some people think are unfortunate or bad beget shallow, empty platitudes.

      Sometimes, violence simply ends violence, because there is no other way. Sometimes, fighting fire with fire is the best way. Sometimes showing someone what it's like to suffer the consequences of their own actions actually changes their behavior.

      I'm all for as many technical approaches as possible, but finding "a real solution to the problem" that doesn't involve some degree of making this painful/costly for the spammers simply isn't going to work. Even if, through filtering, you can get 99% of the stuff blocked, all they have to do is increase the volume that much more to make that remaining 1% still pay off. Remember, they're not paying for their own overhead most of the time.

      Your "real solution" comment, in the context of "violence only begets violence" is completely tone deaf. You're applying Israeli-Palestinian-conflict-type babble to a completely different situation. The spammers are not oppressed, or the victims of some historical violent wrong... they're a parasitic, bandwidth sucking plague. Any means by which we can stop them is called for. Surely you don't think that you're going to just turn the other Bayesian Filter Cheek, or write a Korea-bound, thought-provoking appeal to integrity and expect the onslaught to stop? Tempting as it is, no one is suggesting actual violence - just a substantial response in kind, only when provoked. It's called self defense, and it's an appropriate measure because it only happens when an illegal spammer causes it to happen.

      How fortunate for you that you've never had anything violent threaten you, requiring you to offer up a physical deterrent to stop it. If you had, you might rethink your metaphors.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Eye for an Eye? by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When will the world learn, violence begets violence and spam begets spam. Lets find a real solution to the problem rahter then a vigalante justice.

      Naaah, let's just spam the bastards 'till they're blue. If I got a blackmail message like that, I'd change my e-mail (I know it'as not easy but it isn't THAT hard too) and setup a friggin server cluster to spam the spammers.

      It's the war against spam people, if you're not with us... you're funding spam activities, there we go.

    4. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vigilantism is the act of taking the law into your own hands. It carries an implication of illegal, or more specifically, 'by any means necessary'.

      This is 'a community action to produce a market incentive', which is wholly different from 'vigilantism', at least in a literal sense.

      Sure, sure, it looks like we're locked in this huge digital superhero battle between the evil spammers and the innocent citizenry, but face it: We're making an attempt to prevent high-volume e-mail to our e-mail addresses from being profitable, and that is all. We are consciously generating market pressure to achieve a goal, and we are doing it in an unorthodox, but morally and legally clean way.

      A segment of the population has said, 'High-volume e-mail is annoying enough to be a breach of the peace, as far as I'm concerned. I want none of it, and I will make an effort to prevent my mailbox from recieving them, by filter and by incentive."

      Your use of the term 'vigilante tactics' is an obvious attempt to cast a dim light on the activities of the Blue Security community. It brings a baseless accusation to mind - and this being slashdot, I'm inclined to make it - but I think I'll leave the obvious to the outside observer.

      Frelling trolls.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    5. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it seems - strictly from your story - that desperation (addict needing a fix and happening to have a gun) and greed (competing dealer wants your territory) begets violence, which appears to beget self protection (have you ever shot someone out of anything but self-defense?).

      I was both addict and dealer back in my late teens. I got out of there damned quick when I saw how dangerous it was (got clipped in the ear during a soured deal - damned lucky I got out alive).

      You say you continued to work in an extremely dangerous field for ten years AFTER the world suggested to you that it might be a bad occupation for you, yet you still put that statement out as if it's supposed to validate your little nugget of cliched wisdom.

      Seriously, nobody likes violence, but like anything it's a tool, and its use is only as evil as its weilder (shoot a lunatic who has a knife to your wife's throat: good or evil?)

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    6. Re:Eye for an Eye? by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was shot in the leg when I was 17 and dealing heroin.

      I didn't stop dealing heroin until I was 27.

      I did start carring a gun.


      The fact that you were too stupid to get out does not mean that violence is never a way to stop other violence.

    7. Re:Eye for an Eye? by AdamD1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Several of the emails I received feature this line in the body text:

      YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and expect to get away with it.

      So... but it's okay to forge headers, right? And use a botnet to flood my inbox with this crap, right? A botnet which was built by writing a virus that would turn an unsuspecting user's computer into a zombie so you could pump out more of this crap like a frikkin' coward from some bunker in the midwest. That part is totally a-okay right?

      News flash for pathetic spammers like these ones: The whole point was: we didn't want to hear from you idiot spammers in the first place. Period. We attempted unsubscribing and you didn't unsubscribe us. In fact most of you spammed us even harder. You didn't take our collective "no" for an answer. Now that we had a new outlet for our "no" to be sent to you, as an apparent last resort, you're calling what we're doing "illegal?!?!"

      Spammers are retarded.

      ad

      --
      Because I can! [Brainrub.com]
    8. Re:Eye for an Eye? by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I was shot in the leg when I was 17 and ... The only way violence ever stops future violence is if one party is killed."

      Exactly. so what your example demonstrates is that ineffective violence begets more violence. Had that guy been a better shot, it would have stopped.

      Translated to this context, if the BlueSecurity effect is potent enough, it could have a subsantial effect. If it's not, it'll just spark more back-and-forth.

    9. Re:Eye for an Eye? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

      > When will the world learn, violence begets violence

      What a load of hippie crap. Next thing you will probably move on to even more idiotic bumpersticker philosophy like "violence never solved anything."

      Learn the difference between initiating force and resisting it. One is perfectly moral and one isn't. Resisting violence often reduces future violence instead of 'begating violence.' Since you lack clue I'll state the obvious, the violent only attack those who they believe to be weaker. (unless they are truly insane, then all bets are off)

      Spammers are attacking our systems hourly with impunity. We build our defenses higher and higher yet they continue to attack. Because they know we will sit there and take it as they learn to penetrate each new defense. Failing to resist their violence is only begating more violence.

      They don't believe we can hurt them in return so they prey upon us with impunity. These parasites cost the world millions for every thousand dollars they scam off some idiot who falls for their 'herbal viagra' scams. Governments can't stop these people. ISPs won't do it, preferring to sign 'pink contracts' instead. Hosting companies won't turn away the money. That leaves US to evolve some sort of collective defense. Ultimately self defense is our own responsibility anyway. The police just pick up the body parts and attempt to arrest the killer, if you don't want to get killed in the first place that is your responsibility. Same with spam.

      Personally I think the solution is something like the Usenet Death Penalty. A collective decision to simply disconnect users, networks, ISPs and even whole nation states who refuse to curb their network abuse. A distributed list loaded into the routers of who is currently failing to police their system and simply refuse all traffic for a few weeks as a punishment. The Internet is a peer to peer network, but there is no inferent 'Right' to connect to any system and no duty to allow connection from anyone.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    10. Re:Eye for an Eye? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a load of hippie crap.

      I believe that some 2000 years ago they nailed someone to a cross who had pretty similar ideas.. Seems he has a huge following outside the hippie scene also. Ok, I have to say that he looked a bit like a hippie.

      Learn the difference between initiating force and resisting it. One is perfectly moral and one isn't. Resisting violence often reduces future violence instead of 'begating violence.' Since you lack clue I'll state the obvious, the violent only attack those who they believe to be weaker. (unless they are truly insane, then all bets are off)

      Well considered and restrained violence can in specific cases work as a defense, and can even be the only defense, yes. That in no way means that violence is the only way to respond to violence or will solve it most of the times.

      The problem is that you are wrong about whom get attacked by 'the violent'. They attack those whome are easiest to intimidate, regardless of actual strength. (which is one reason why terrorism is such an effective offensive strategy against the USA btw)

    11. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems to me that if you used one of several free Bayesian Spam filters out there in addition to BlueSecurity, this could be easily foiled and all such e-mails could be targeted on their misspellings alone.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:Eye for an Eye? by tbannist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I disagree... Killing spammers will end the spam problem! Violence can be the solution, if applied correctly. Support the death penalty for spammers... It's the only way they'll ever learn.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    13. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite right, marxie. In fact, GMail has already quashed the whole debacle. The next step is for the Blue guys to locate the asshat and see if a formal complaint is in order - or better: a class action suit. Harassment is not a way to save your business.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    14. Re:Eye for an Eye? by idesofmarch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I believe that some 2000 years ago they nailed someone to a cross who had pretty similar ideas.. Seems he has a huge following outside the hippie scene also. Ok, I have to say that he looked a bit like a hippie.

      Are you actually trying to use the bible as a foundation for your argument?

      The problem is that you are wrong about whom get attacked by 'the violent'. They attack those whome are easiest to intimidate, regardless of actual strength. (which is one reason why terrorism is such an effective offensive strategy against the USA btw)

      First of all, terrorism is often performed by parties who, due to anonymity, are immune (or are difficult) to counterattack. Second, the USA is actually fairly hard to intimidate. Say what you want about the many bubbas of this country, but they are the first to say "let's go kick their ass." Third, and most relevant, while you can debate whether the strong get attacked too, you seem to blissfully ignore the fact that the poster is absolutely correct on the specific point addressed - spammers have nothing to fear in terms of an actual counterattack. To draw an analogy from RTS games, the defending mail servers are just "turtling," building up stronger and stronger defenses in the hope the attackers will decide that spamming is not worth the effort. Maybe the strategy will work, maybe it will not, but we all know the flaw with turtling - you can never kill the opponent, only survive.

    15. Re:Eye for an Eye? by TFGeditor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Harassment is not a way to save your business."

      It is much more than harassment, it is a federal crime called extortion.

      I hope Blue Security makes such a complaint to the FBI. These assclown spammers are compounding crime with more crime.

      They really *should* be locked up in a labor camp for the crime known in the former Soviet Union as "parasitism."

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    16. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Spudley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The opt-out request instructs the spammer to download and *encrypted* list of member email addresses from Blue Security, which the spammer then uses to "wash" his spam list and rid it of member addresses. The spammer never sees any legitimate email addresses.

      So what's stopping the spammer from washing his list, and then comparing the resulting list with his pre-wash backup? Seems like it would still give him a list of addresses to target, even if the encryption was watertight. Doesn't even need any hacking; just a diff program.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  2. I'd call the bluff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they're able to do so, what will stop them from *not* spamming you in the future anyway? Their ethics, integrity or your stupidity?

  3. Screw the spammers. by Vengeance · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What the hell does 20 or 30 messages mean? Nothing at all to me. I reject anywhere from 20 to 40 THOUSAND emails daily, on a domain with precisely two email users: My wife and me. The vast majority of the crap I get is easily rejected because it's sent to bogus (as in, they never ever existed) email addresses. SpamAssassin catches much of the rest.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  4. What must be done by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We really need to take the internet back from these guys. Reply to every spam e-mail by going to their web site, and filling out bogus info. Give them bad information overload. Same thing goes for junk mail and telemarketers. When somebody sends you a credit card offer, send it back to them, writing "Take me off your list". Make sure they have to waste so much time throwing out bad mail that it isn't worth their time. When telemarketers call, ask them to hold on a minute. Then set down the phone and don't pick it up again for 10 minutes. That will dig into their costs.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:What must be done by clevershark · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seems like a good approach actually. Perhaps some script could be developed that would do nothing but look at a web form, fill in appropriate bogus info, and just hit the site repeatedly with bogus orders. I'll bet any CC provider would soon get tired of having to constantly do verification on bogus CC numbers and would end up closing the spammer's account.

      Sure, it's a nasty form of attack, but then that's no less than spammers deserve.

      --

      My sig is too lon

    2. Re:What must be done by haplo21112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better Yet, tape the Business reply envelope to a Brick (wrapped in shipping paper), the Post Office has to deliver it, and it will cost the receiving company a fortune in shipping costs.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    3. Re:What must be done by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Perhaps some script could be developed that would do nothing but look at a web form, fill in appropriate bogus info, and just hit the site repeatedly with bogus orders"

      Actually, there's a very nice client written in C++ that does a damn good job. No CC data or anything, but 'please remove me' forms. If you're confused, read the article again; it's mentioned.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    4. Re:What must be done by clevershark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only thing that most of these "please remove me" BS forms do is confirm that the email address is a valid one, and can be resold to more spammers. If anything filling those out actually causes more harm than good.

      If you're confused, read the article again; it's mentioned.

      Thanks Tips, but all four links in the article seem to be unreachable.

      --

      My sig is too lon

    5. Re:What must be done by mpaulsen · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_356.html

      'According to rule 917.243(b) in the Domestic Mail Manual, when a business reply card is "improperly used as a label"--e.g., when it's affixed to a brick--the item so labeled may be treated as "waste." That means the post office can heave it into the trash without further ado.'

    6. Re:What must be done by Drathus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Better Yet, tape the Business reply envelope to a Brick (wrapped in shipping paper), the Post Office has to deliver it, and it will cost the receiving company a fortune in shipping costs.


      No, they don't. And no, they won't.

      To quote:

      'According to rule 717.243(b) in the Domestic Mail Manual, when a business reply card is "improperly used as a label" -- e.g., when it's affixed to a brick - the item so labeled may be treated as "waste."'

    7. Re:What must be done by toastyman · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be awesome, but unfortunately it doesn't work.

    8. Re:What must be done by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Problem is, that to waste their time, you have to waste your time. I sometimes do respond to junk (paper) mail by sending random junk in the envelope. Sometimes I actually write a letter demanding they remove me from their lists. No matter what I do, it doesn't end. Capital One still sends me junk mail despite multiple letters between us -- me demanding them to stop, them reassuring me they will honor my request. Junk mail is even worse because it is more anonymous -- it is easy to forge headers and mask where a mail truly came from. Yes, there are ways to track it down, but it isn't always easy. Filling out information on a web site in the email doesn't do much, since odds are it doesn't go to the same person. Even then, it takes time to screw with the spammers, electronic or paper, and I don't want to waste my time.

      Sometimes I do get bored and do screw with them. Such as using my brand new photo printer to print stuff and put it in those return envelopes. After visiting certain not-work-safe sites for photos.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    9. Re:What must be done by pla · · Score: 3, Funny
      That would be awesome, but unfortunately it doesn't work.


      The brick idea, no. But the SD article made a nice suggestion - A rectangular chunk of nice thick sheet metal would fit well inside the return envelope, yet weigh far more than one ounce.


      Also, one point on the SD article:
      of the 161,000 people who wrote to the DMA last year, 116,000 wanted more junk mail. They were sent a booklet entitled "How To Get More Interesting Mail" (as God is my witness, I am not making this up), which tells you various key catalogs that you can send for to guarantee you'll be deluged with stuff.
      I can tell you exactly why people ask for more junk mail...

      They own wood stoves.
    10. Re:What must be done by tidokoro · · Score: 2, Funny

      When solicitors call me at work, I don't make them wait 10 minutes, but I do put them on hold for a minute or so. I figure that's enough to throw off their curve.

      We also have in our small company a fictitious employee whose sole job is to have telemarketers routed to his voicemail box.

      It's gotten a little tricky once or twice when vendors have showed up at our office actually looking to meet him!

      --
      tidokoro
      what turns a man's karma neutral? lust for gold? power? or just a heart born full of neutrality?
    11. Re:What must be done by macdaddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to be a big anti-spammer, back when I had time on my hands. I generated a list of proper-pronouns that was somewhere just over 500k long (I forget the exact #s now). I wrote a number of scripts that used wget and curl (depending on the form) to stuff addresses generated from the pronoun list and about a dozen spam-hole domains I registered into those Remove Me forms. Within hours I was getting tens of thousands of pieces of spam. Within days my Cox cable connection was saturated. I offloaded it onto a co-lo box for another couple of months before I finally changed the MXs to 127.0.0.1 and shut the system down. I had automated scripts for auto-forwarding a copy of the spam to the FTC and to post the messages to NANAS (news.admin.net-abuse.sightings). I also archived the incoming spam and used it to seed my Bayesian filters and DCC system for the ISP I worked for. I can't begin to tell you how effective that was. It was a helluva rig. I wish I still had time to dick around with that kind of stuff.

    12. Re:What must be done by Pollardito · · Score: 3, Informative
      When somebody sends you a credit card offer, send it back to them, writing "Take me off your list".
      you can get off the prescreened credit mailing lists altogether, just use one of the methods suggested on the FTC website
    13. Re:What must be done by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It just depends on how good your bayes filter is. I agree though that it was much more effective back in the day. Now things like the SURBL are essential. Spammers have to make money some how. To make money they have to get you to buy one of the contract company's products. To get you to buy one of their products/services they have to get you to their website. That's where you nail them. No matter how well they obfuscate the URL you can always figure out what site they're trying to spamertise. Then you just use that as your qualifier for identifying spam. The SURBL is nice.

    14. Re:What must be done by Alan+Jay+Weiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are absolutely right. The problem is highly asymmetrical : the spammer needs spambots and webservers worth a few thousand $, and can flood the Internet with crap. If every recipient is to spend a few minutes to do a mDOS (manual denial of service), it sums up to tens of millions of lost minutes, or millions of $ in lost productivity.
      We need an automated descentralized P2P network to attack the spammers and the spam-friendly ISPs.


      It takes me less than 5 minutes to forward the 5000-7000 emails in my catchall account each day. I use Thunderbird with the Blue Frog plugin, and forward about 400 messages at a time - I could do it all in a minute if I could attach all the messages at once but that ends up to be too large a message...
      Doing it manually would take *far* longer - I've enough time sinks as it is!

      According to my Blue Security statistics, my Blue Frog has sent 11,152 "opt-out" requests in the past 7 days. (which also points out that every spam doesn't generate an opt-out) Blue Security's idea is to be enough of a thorn that it's easier to not send to the Blue Frog list than to fight it. (one of the spammer tools has recently added a "clean emails of Blue Security registered names" button - making it trivially easy to remove the registered names. This implies that Blue Security is having an effect.

      Right now there are 471,000 names in the list - surely not all are really active, and not all are sending opt-out messages, but it seems spammers are sitting up and noticing now. According to Blue Security's blog, in the past month several spammers have negotiated with them and agreed to clean their lists. If I remember right they generate something like 8% or so of spam volume. Not a *lot* but I'd expect more in the coming months. Spammers are in it to make money - once they get over the initial irritation, it'll just be easier to clean their lists than to try to fight back. Which also makes sense - the list is people who won't buy from them in the first place, so in the end it's a waste of time to send spam to them.

      In my opinion (everyone's got em! :) this is the best shot I've seen at drastically reducing spam. Laws aren't as helpful as they could be - especially against spam from other countries. And it takes a long time to catch and convict a single spammer. Do you *really* want your tax dollars used that way? (we don't even need to get into how gosh-darn *wonderful* CAN-SPAM is...) Filters help, but that's not stopping the spam, it's just preventing you from seeing it. Killing spammers might have an effect but seems a bit severe. (although there are days... :) Baysian filters help - but a business can't lose a mail to false positives, so they need to check the spam anyway. Challenge-response is ugly and annoying. And I sure don't want to go down the pay-for-email road! RBLs are too dangerous - throwing out the good with the bad. (one listed the entire Comcast.net domain, for example) Greylisting isn't a bad idea, but it does use extra computing power, and delays some email. Seems to me that being a thorn in the side of a spammer has a decent chance of working. They're not stupid, not even necessarily lazy. They're just taking advantage of the way things work. (excepting those who use trojans etc to take over other's machines - they're evil!) Once they reach the point where it's easier to accept and comply, and recognize they're not losing any revenue (because those emails won't become customers anyway) they'll clean their lists - and spam will go down. It won't disappear, but hopefully be significantly reduced.

      - Al Weiner -

  5. Unrestricted Warfare by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pretty soon the spammers will be conducting unrestricted submarine attacks on civilian shipping in the North Atlantic.

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    1. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Funny

      attacks on civilian shipping

      Shortly thereafter, the global average temperature will fall a few degrees?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by Zebadias · · Score: 2, Funny
      How can you compleatly miss this FSM reference!!

      Yarrrh!! Arrrrrh!

  6. So, is the database compromised? by Dynamoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A big question here is.. is the database compromised? From the poking around I've done, it does seem that the only people who have received this message are BlueFrog users.. those who don't use it, don't seem to have it. It could simply be that the spammers have used tracking information embedded in the spammy URLs to find out who is using BlueFrog.

    BlueFrog has been criticised for it's so-called "vigilante" approach.. it's not alone in this approach, but perhaps this does go to show a potential downside: spammers are evil - pissed off spammers will simply direct the evil at the people who pissed them off.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful
      BlueFrog has been criticised for it's so-called "vigilante" approach.. it's not alone in this approach, but perhaps this does go to show a potential downside: spammers are evil - pissed off spammers will simply direct the evil at the people who pissed them off.

      So what do we do -- surrender, because some spammer compromises this one system? Blue Frog has its own problems, but their idea is sound, if a bit "above the law." Let Blue Frog users forward the emails to them and let the company go after the spammers (aren't they violating CAN-SPAM or the law against harrassing emails?).

      Look, Wyatt Earp was a lawman looking to see justice done and occassionally he had to step outside the law. Call it vigilantism if you like, but the fact is, these spammers have been operating under the assumption that they are untouchable, and can do this all day long with no repercussions. It's time for users around the globe to go on the offensive, give them a taste fo their own medicine. Shut down their ISPs if they won't stop the spam. Jam up their systems. Let them know we're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore. The court system can rule against them, but so many of them are overseas that I seriously doubt they can be touched. So hit 'em where it hurts, right in the servers.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:So, is the database compromised? by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am a victim of the blackmail letter as well. It's easy to figure out how the spammers got my email address, they already had it. They simply backed up their address book, cleaned their list with Blue Security's tool, then "diffed" the database to figure out who was BlueSecurity member.

      Another note, BlueSecurity is not Slashdotted. It is unavailable because of a DDoS attack started sometime earlier this week. The attack started submitting invalid PHP requests, making the site slow to a crawl and at times be completely unavailable.

      I write about it on my blog. More on the attack here. The threating letter I received is also on my Slashdot journal.

  7. Monty Python by caffeinatedOnline · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, if I got this right, the spammers that are getting spammed are now spamming the spammers? Sounds like a flying circus to me!

    --
    The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel...
  8. How about posting the web site addresses involved? by clevershark · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure that we're all interested in what these people have to sell... also that would probably cause a massive slashdotting.

    --

    My sig is too lon

  9. Email I Received by duerra · · Score: 4, Informative

    Below is an email that I received, which pretty much confirms that they have been hacked.

    ----

    You are being emailed because you are a user of BlueSecurity's well-known software "BlueFrog." http://www.bluesecurity.com/

    Today, the BlueSecurity database became known to the worst spammers worldwide. Within 48 hours, the database will be published on the Internet, and your email address will be open to them all. After this, you will see the spam sent to your mailbox increase 10 - 20 fold.

    BlueSecurity was illegally attacking email marketers, and doing so with your help. Many websites have been targeted and hit, including non-spam sites. BlueSecurity's software has been fully analyzed, and contains an abundance of malicious code. This includes: ability to send mass mail to users; the ability to attack websites with Distributed Denial of Service attack (DDoS); the ability to open hidden doors on any machine on which it is running; and a hidden auto-update code function, which can install anything on your computer and open it up to anyone.

    BlueSecurity lists a USA address as their place of business, whereas their main office is in Tel Aviv. BlueSecurity is run by a few Russian-born Jews, who have previously been spamming themselves. When all is said and done, they will be able to run, hide and change their identities, leaving you to take the fall. YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and expect to get away with it. This email ensures that you are well aware of the situation. Soon, you will be found guilty of computer crimes such as DDOS attacking of websites, conspiracy, and sending mass unsolicited bulk email messages for everything from viagra to porn, as long as you continue to run BlueFrog.

    They do not take money for downloading their software, they do not take money for removing emails from their lists, and they have no visible revenue stream. What they DO have is 500,000 computers sitting there awaiting their next command. What are they doing now?

    1. Using your computer to send spam ?
    2. Using your computer to attack competitor websites?
    3. Phishing through your files for your identity and banking information?

    If you think you can merely change your email address and be safe while still running BlueFrog, you are in for a big surprise. This is just the beginning...

    1. Re:Email I Received by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do they even realize the sheer irony in accusing others of sending mass emails?

    2. Re:Email I Received by discHead · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sure you're right. I have an entire domain registered with Blue Security, but it looks like the spammer has only been hitting some well-worn addresses I have seen other spammers using. I'm sure whoever it is "cleaned" his list, looked at what addresses got filtered out, and singled out those addresses for "special" treatment.

    3. Re:Email I Received by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Below is an email that I received, which pretty much confirms that they have been hacked.

      No, it absolutely does not confirm that they've been hacked. See my previous comment about how it's likely that the spammer simply confirmed BlueSecurity registration for addresses he already has, but is unable to get new addresses out of the BlueSecurity database.

      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=184656&cid= 15245875

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    4. Re:Email I Received by d_54321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here's the email I got:
      ------
      Dear Sap,
      You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity (http://www.bluesecurity.com).

      The blue frog is poisonous and causing us all a very excrutiating and slow death. Please make it stop. Or else...
        Or else what you ask? Oh, don't worry-- we'll think of something. Something bad. Very, very bad.

      If you do not cave in to our harmless threats, a great wrath of biblical proportions shall be visited upon your house the likes of which you could never conceive in your most awful nightmares. Seriously. God, the law, and logic are all on our side. Think about it...

      Sincerely,
      Yet another punk ass bitch who couldn't cut it in the real marketplace.

      PS, click here for v1agra.

  10. Don't Back Down by colonslashslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As Shadowknot said earlier, you may as well stay subscribed. If they have your email address and are spamming it, do you really think they are going to delete it from their lists if you unsubscribe from BlueSecurity? I doubt that. You're in the 'fight' now, no point backing down in my opinion.

    All the best with it.

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
  11. The REST of the story ... by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Gmail spam filter is filtering nearly every one of these spams, only a couple out of 60+ yesturday got into my inbox. .... and every one of that bastard's spams advertising a website went right to bluesecurity to hurt his business. He's just shooting himself in the foot.

    Contrary to what the author wrote, there's closer to 475,000 members, not just a few 10's of thousands, enough that several major spammers have already agreed to not spam members due to the huge financial hits they were taking with the bluefrog choking off their websites.

    What a joke, what dumbass would really believe that the spammers will not spam you if you leave blue security? Who here will admit to believing the criminals? ... I think that about covers the points that were lost when slashdot decided to post this boring version of the story, instead of what I submitted yesturday afternoon :)

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  12. What I received by Carny+Trash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's what I was sent:

    "Hey,
    You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity (http://www.bluesecurity.com).

    You signed up because you were expecting to recieve a lesser amount of spam, unfortunately, due to the tactics used by BlueSecurity, you will end up recieving this message, or other nonsensical spams 20-40 times more than you would normally.

    How do you make it stop?

    Simple, in 48 hours, and every 48 hours thereafter, we will run our current list of BlueSecurity subscribers through BlueSecurity's database, if you arent there.. you wont get this again.

    We have devised a method to retrieve your address from their database, so by signing up and remaining a BlueSecurity user not only are you opening yourself up for this, you are also potentially verifying your email address through them to even more spammers, and will end up getting up even more spam as an end-result.

    By signing up for bluesecurity, you are doing the exact opposite of what you want, so delete your account, and you will stop recieving this.

    Why are we doing this?

    Its simple, we dont want to, but BlueSecurity is forcing us. We would much rather not waste our resources and send you these useless mails, but do not believe for one second that we will stop this tirade of emails if you choose to stay with BlueSecurity.

    Just remember one thing when you read this, we didnt do this to you, BlueSecurity did.

    If BlueSecurity decides to play fair, we will do the same.

    We are quite sure you will think this will not continue, that we will not continue wasting our resources doing this, feel free to wait out the first 48, or the second, and see whether these stop, you will be quite suprised.

    If you have another email under the protection of bluesecurity, and have not recieved this there, do not worry, you will soon enough.

    We mightve had your email addresses before in our lists, but now, we are targetting YOU, because YOU are a bluesecurity user.

    You might also notice, that the BlueSecurity site(http://www.bluesecurity.com) is down..

    Just remove yourself from BlueSecurity, and make it easier on you.

    Sal Webber"

  13. Re:So... by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://members.bluesecurity.com is still up; I don't know what they did to www., but it seems to be down.

    Meanwhile, stay on, ride it out. Use your spam filter to catch the spams; heuristics will still capture the spams they're sending if they're reported. This guy is desperate - likely going bankrupt - and some of us in the Blue Community would like to see him and his sort become paupers for their asshattery.

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  14. Blue security must be working by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If BlueSecurity wasn't hurting Spammers they would ignore it. If they are fighting back it must mean that BlueSecurity is actually doing damage to them.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  15. Bluefrog does WHAT? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not sure that only Bluefrog users getting the message proves anything. The spammers can get the list from Bluefrog themselves by agreeing to not spam its users.

    WHAAAAAT?

    Bluefrog HELPS SPAMMERS LISTWASH?

    Holy fuck. They should say to spammers, 'No, we won't tell you who our users are. Just stop spamming everyone for whom you don't have a confirmed opt-in, and you won't have any more trouble from us.'

    If they're helping spammers listwash, then they're firmly on the Dark Side. Fuck 'em.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  16. Probably not compromised by jhernand · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll bet this spammer already has your e-mail address from some other source. He checks it against the Bluesecurity DB, and if it's a positive match, he sends you the Bluesecurity-targeted spam. Since there is no web site associated with these messages (because he's not selling anything), he does not suffer any consequences for these particular messages.

  17. Go ahead, grab the snake... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

    If spammers begin writing to us, they'll only increase the form spam they receive.

    PLUS! The blue security e-mail database contains a bogus honeypot address per each valid e-mail address.

    If this rumour is true, it will be a fatal mistake for the spammers. Because the blue community are ALREADY fighting back. Not only with form complaints on the spammers' websites, but with FORMAL complaints to the FCC, geocities, Microsoft,the MPAA and the FDA about illegal offers.

    I joined Blue Security because I already receive 100 spam mails PER DAY. Do you think it'll make a difference whether I receive 100 or 500 e-mails a-day? (99.9% of it is sent to my junk-mail, where it's fed back automatically to Blue Frog)

    I feel no mercy for spammers. That's right, you're messing with the wrong guys. The release of this list will only make us MORE POWERFUL.

    Do you feel lucky? PUNKS?

    P.S. Interesting - the captcha for this post was "predate". I like it. B-)

  18. Blue Security coming back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From http://www.bluesecurity.com/Announcements/spam.asp

    As many spammers choose to comply with the Registry (see our recent blog posts here, here and here), other spammers may resort to other means in an attempt to avoid compliance.

    A major spammer had started spamming our members with discouraging messages in an attempt to demoralize our community. This spammer is using mailing lists he already owns that may contain addresses of some community members.

    We have also received complaints from users about spam allegedly sent from Blue Security promoting our anti-spam solution and our web site. This is yet another tactic used by some spammers in an attempt to slander us by sending unsolicited email forged to appear as if it was sent from Blue Security. Blue Security is an anti-spam company determined to fight spam and as such never has and never will send unsolicited email.

    Our answer to those criminals should be one - we will not be discouraged; We will continue to exercise our right to opt-out of spam.

    If you are not a member of our community, now is the time to actively fight spam and make spammers leave you alone. For more information click here.

    If you are already a member of our community, make spammers hear you load and clear - report your spam, let Blue Frog fight spammers on your behalf.

    We regret any inconvenience caused by this incident.

    Best Regards,

    Blue Security.

  19. BlueSecurity wasn't hacked: Spammer FUD by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was sent out on an anti-spam list this morning:

    http://www.bluesecurity.com/Announcements/spam.asp

    "A major spammer had started spamming our members with discouraging
    messages in an attempt to demoralize our community. This spammer is
    using mailing lists he already owns that may contain addresses of
    some community members.

    "We have also received complaints from users about spam allegedly
    sent from Blue Security promoting our anti-spam solution and our web
    site. This is yet another tactic used by some spammers in an attempt
    to slander us by sending unsolicited email forged to appear as if it
    was sent from Blue Security. Blue Security is an anti-spam company
    determined to fight spam and as such never has and never will send
    unsolicited email.

    "Our answer to those criminals should be one - we will not be
    discouraged; We will continue to exercise our right to opt-out of
    spam.

  20. Its more than that by Lanoitarus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...blue security takes another step, besides re-spamming the spammers sites. They also directly contact every advertiser featured in spam, asking them to stop paying these spammers because they sent emails to X number of users who arent interested. It may not be very effective, who knows. But its a great idea. If companies stopped paying for spam, it would sure dry up pretty fast, and the companies care allot more about the customers than the spammers. Im sure at least *some* companies genuinely dont even realize that the publicity firms they hired are using spam.

  21. They don't have the database! by drosoph · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I am seeing, I am now receiving 1,000s of these stupid "Because you are using the BlueSecurity Software ...." emails .... but they are all being directed to Mike, Jan, Cindy, Lucy, Bobby, and Greg@mydomain.com .... They are NOT directed to MY email address. These addresses that they are using were ONCE entered by an ignorant relative of my onto one of those online greeting card sites, (even mispelled) and those are the addresses that are being spammed. Since I ALSO registered my DOMAIN with BlueSecurity, I would ponder to guess that the spammers are using the domain list, matching it up to ANY email they have in their spam database with that domain and spamming the heck out of it. They HAVE NOT, I repeat, HAVE NOT hit ANY of my REGISTERED email addresses with BlueSecurity. They are only hitting random crap email addresses on my domain. They're shooting in the dark, they're angry, and they're running scared ... and I hope that you all keep up the good work!

  22. First they ignore you... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    then they laugh at you...

    then they fight you...

    then you win :D

    One thing is safe to know: At least the spammers are now PAYING ATTENTION to us. A year ago they didn't even know we exist. Then they tried to give bad publicity to Blue Security in anti-spam websites (they said bluefrog was a botnet).

    Later, SendSafe included an option to use bluefrog's list to NOT send spam to those addresses.

    Finally, they're targeting us directly. You know what that means B-)

    Also, I doubt the database's been compromised. I'm sure they only diffed the original and the filtered e-mail list. This means that only a small percentage of e-mail targets has been truly released.

    1. Re:First they ignore you... by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just got this funny one:
      <tt>
      Dies ist eine automatisch erstellte Benachrichtigung +APw-ber den Zustellstatus.
      +ANw-bermittlung an folgende Empf+AOQ-nger fehlgeschlagen.
                  dunham@cardse.com

      Final-Recipient: rfc822;dunham@cardse.com
      Action: failed
      Status: 5.1.1

      ---------- Forwarded message ----------
      From: "BlueFrog member" <bryan@fordi.org>
      To: <dunham@cardse.com>
      Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 20:28:24 +0300
      Subject: {Spam?} FW:Join the top-level Israel internet security company

      The trackback URL for this blog entry is:
      http://community.bluesecurity.com/

      Bringing spammers to Their Knees:
      Bluesecurity.com hopes you'll join thousands of others in an army capable of crippling spammers' Web sites.

      A few thousand spammers have ruined our internet. They've clogged our mailboxes with filth. Already, 90% of email traffic is made up of spam. Let us no longer blind ourselves to the irrefutable facts: current measures have failed to stop spammers. The experience of the past several years has proven that passive measures are just not the answer.

      Retribution is the only real answer to spam. We must punish spammers ourselves to prevent them from taking over cyberspace. We must reclaim our territory. We need direct action to eliminate spammers for good.

      The magnitude of the task which lies before us is great. We are fighting for the future of the Internet. What we need to do now is get as many users as possible into our community. We already have a botnet with
      hundreds of thousands of computers working together to induce commercial loss on spammers and their ISPs. We have launched numerous Denial-of-Service Attacks on Chinese spam networks with great success, and plan many more!

      We have excellent financiers who allow us continued success with our botnet growth and Denial-of-Service Attacks. We thank the government agencies involved for their continued cooperation. We thank our leader, Eran Reshef, for continued strategies of DoS attack operations. Also, US-based Rembrandt Ventures & Skybox Security for their extensive funding & continued support. And a very special thanks to Douglas Schrier who has helped our botnet come to life.

      If you haven't signed up with the registry and installed a blue frog yet, please sign up now.
      If your friends have not yet joined us, we will convince them to do so.

      Let's stop filtering spam and start eliminating spammers.

      Together, we will reclaim the Internet, One ddos at a time.

      Please Contact Us for any questions on signup via the following info:

      2077 Gateway Place, Suite 550
      San Jose, California 95110 USA
      Phone: 866-6SKYBOX
      Phone: 408 441 8060
      Fax: 408 441 8068

      Israel HQ:
      60 Medinat Hayehudim St.
      P.O.Box 4109
      Herzliya Pituach 46140 Israel
      Phone: +972-9-9545922

      Current and potential investor relations:
      Rembrandt Venture Partners
      2200 Sand Hill Road, Suite 160
      Menlo Park, CA 94025

      T: 650.326.7070
      F: 650.326.3780

      -----
      Fight back spam! Join our Botnet today.
      Download our .EXE here: http://www.bluesecurity.com/blue-frog/
      </tt>
      Is it just me, or is this REALLY weak?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  23. Simple solution? by smbarbour · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not just sign spam@uce.gov up? That way the US government will have a nice log of who is sending these emails. Plus, if the spammer shares the list, there will be additional spammers who will happily be reporting themselves for violating the CAN-SPAM act.

  24. Anyone even bother to research this? by Audigy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The site hasn't been hacked.

    Hasn't anyone gone to bluesecurity.com to actually see what THEY have to say about this "security breach"?

    I have two other email address that WERE NOT signed up with BlueFrog also getting this spam.

    BlueSecurity's official statement is this: ...which I would be pasting here if I could get to the goddamned site. Thanks a lot, slashdot. I'll be back to post the full text once I can get in the bloody site.

    In short, the spammers are PISSED and they'll do anything to get people to unsubscribe from BlueFrog, including sending spams with lies. Don't fall for it. Keep fighting spam.

    --
    [an error occured while processing this directive]
  25. Re:So, is the database compromised? No. by MrNougat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comments on BlueSecurity forums last night demonstrate that users with multiple protected addresses are getting these attack spams to some, but not all, of the protected addresses.

    What's lkely happening: Spammer has a mailing list. Spammer uses BlueSecurity's "cleanlist" tool to clean registered addresses from his mailing list. Compare original list to cleaned list - email addresses that are in the first but not the second are BlueSecurity registered.

    By this logic, email addresses that the spammer does not already have are not made available to the spammer in any way via BlueSecurity's own list. Delivery patterns of the attack spams support this observation.

    I'll also note that Gmail's own spam filters are already capturing all of these attack spams; I only got two in my mailbox this morning, about 50 more were filtered.

    This is the first time I'm aware of that a spam prevention service has worked so well that it's got a spammer pissed off enough to lash out. BlueSecurity++

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  26. DoS and Explanation by cheshire_cqx · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to this article BlueSecurity is the target of a DoS attack.

    Also, here's their explanation of the spammer's countermeasure:


    This sounds scary, but it's not as bad as it sounds. Blue Security's email address registry remains secure contrary to what this spammer would have you believe. The way subscribers' emails were obtained was by checking the spammer's own list of emails against the Do Not Intrude registry. Normally spammers will get the emails of those who subscribe returned to them and will then remove those emails from their spamming lists. This one, however, has taken another approach. Instead of taking those hits off of his spam lists, he is sending them these intimidating emails.

    Makes sense to me, and explains why only BlueSecurity users are getting the emails.

  27. Re:Sent abuse report by Slashcrap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I noticed a calpoly.edu address in the header, so I sent a copy of the message to abuse@calpoly.edu.

    Well if it's in the header then that must be where it came from. Congratulations on your superlative detective work.

    I'm sure that the abuse admin at calpoly.edu will also soon be writing to you to let you know how much he appreciates your skills.

  28. A fundamental change of spam economy by ericald · · Score: 2, Informative

    What many spammers already understand, including the criminal who is now threathening Blue Security's users and trying to DDoS their website, is that this is a new era in the fight against spam - and for the first time, spammers know they are losing the fight.

    This is not just another passive mesure tryig to keep spam away; Blue Security's solution undermines the economy spammers rely on, the economy that motivates them to send billions of unsolicited messages. They know they will have to adapt to this new reality - some will comply now (Blue Security claims top spammers already comply) and others will try to put up a fight before understanding they have no other choice but to stop spamming the users that are willing to stand up for their rights and do something to fight spam.

    I call all Internet users with any sense of responsibility for the future of the Internet to join the ranks of the Blue Community and make sure that spammers realize that common sense and justice will prevail.

    Blue Frog can be downloaded from Blue Security's site or from major download sites such as download.com.

    Do the right thing - join the fight now!

    -- A proud member of the Blue Community

    http://www.bluesecurity.com/register
    http://download.bluesecurity.com/BlueFrog
    http://www.download.com/Blue-Frog/3000-2092_4-1052 7188.html (download.com)

  29. Neville Chamberlain, is that you? by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whenever anyone says "violence never solves anything" I always remember the part in Starship Troopers where the History and Moral Philosophy teacher says "Perhaps you could tell that to the Carthagians..."

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  30. Spammers exposed their resources? by VikingThunder · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like the spammers might have forgotten who they were messing with. They were essentially flooding a number of users of which a high percentage actually report their spam. Could it be that the sudden drop of their FUD spam e-mails to 0 over the last 6 hours be due to this mass reporting? In particular, to SpamCop.

  31. Nice FUD but... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blue frog is open source...

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  32. Re:vigilante rant by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And the government's job concerning illegal immigrants? I don't believe they should have one. Same for spammers. I prefer to allow market forces to do the work for me.

    Anyway, that sort of behavior will almost always get you marked offtopic. Just cos it relates in some vague, hazy way does not make it relevant.

    I may be ignorant, but I'd like to see how illegal immigrants are more of a threat to a 'blue-collar' (unskilled labor) job than legal immigrants. Further, I'd like to know why there's such a glut of 'grey-collar' (skilled labor) jobs, yet the 'displaced american workers' don't seem to be getting some training and flocking to them.

    Yeah. I'm actually for job market liquidity in the interest of free trade. The initial costs are worker displacement, but the benefits are improved conditions for both countries. Resistance to the process only exacerbates the costs. Got to a damned trade school, get some training, fill in the huge grey gap, make a good hunk more money, and finally, stop your bitching.

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  33. New attack email text by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just got the following NDR email (which GMail flagged as spam, but I read anyway). Looks like the pissy spammer is using email addresses from his list in the From field, and generating false spam for BlueSecurity.

    I have deleted contact information at the end, for the sanity of those involved.

    Begin

    Subject: FW:Automaticly send 1000s of DDOS complaints for each spam you recieve

    The trackback URL for this blog entry is:
    http://community.bluesecurity.com/

    Bringing spammers to Their Knees:
    Bluesecurity.com hopes you'll join thousands of others in an army capable
    of crippling spammers' Web sites.

    A few thousand spammers have ruined our internet. They've clogged our
    mailboxes with filth. Already, 90% of email traffic is made up of
    spam. Let us no longer blind ourselves to the irrefutable facts:
    current measures have failed to stop spammers. The experience of the
    past several years has proven that passive measures are just not the
    answer.

    Retribution is the only real answer to spam. We must punish spammers
    ourselves to prevent them from taking over cyberspace. We must reclaim
    our territory. We need direct action to eliminate spammers for good.

    The magnitude of the task which lies before us is great. We are fighting
    for the future of the Internet. What we need to do now is get as many
    users as possible into our community. We already have a botnet with
    hundreds of thousands of computers working together to induce commercial
    loss on spammers and their ISPs. We have launched numerous
    Denial-of-Service Attacks on Chinese spam networks with great success,
    and plan many more!

    We have excellent financiers who allow us continued success with our botnet
    growth and Denial-of-Service Attacks. We thank the government agencies
    involved
    for their continued cooperation. We thank our leader, Eran Reshef,
    for continued strategies of DoS attack operations. Also, US-based Rembrandt

    Ventures & Skybox Security for their extensive funding & continued support.
    And a
    very special thanks to Douglas Schrier who has helped our botnet come to
    life.

    If you haven't signed up with the registry and installed a blue frog yet,
    please sign up now.
    If your friends have not yet joined us, we will convince them to do so.

    Let's stop filtering spam and start eliminating spammers.
    Together, we will reclaim the Internet, One ddos at a time.

    Please Contact Us for any questions on signup via the following info:

    address and phone deleted

    Israel HQ: address and phone deleted

    Current and potential investor relations:
    Rembrandt Venture Partners address and phone deleted

    Fight back spam! Join our Botnet today.
    Download our .EXE here: http:/// www.bluesecurity.com/ blue-frog/

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  34. Spam attack plan by RedToad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (killthem)
    FoGGeR lol yeh sure am a fed and you a blueguy :)
    anyway fuck you and your company we're fighting you and i recived around 100 pvt msgs
    telling me that they're with me. No need to remove them we'll just show them who we're. Thanks

    (killthem)
    LCS yes it's been down :) our good friend and master of hes job did that. heh it's just a beginin.

    (ebulker)
    yes down but members.bluesecurity.com still up need to down www, members, community ! ...
    need to fuck all aliases afaik this domain used in bluefrog ?

    (killthem)
    xxzindoxx and bluefrog feeel me babys :)
    you can both of ya blow me and belusecurity company as well. the game started i am the winner
    hehe and yes Hello to all the feds they're most welcome to get over and visit me hehe.
    bleu i got over 400 pm's last days and feel the power of this people very soon.
    we walk slow but the heat gonna TO BIG FOR YOU.
    all the sponsors contact me if you having problems with this fuckers i'll give you everything
    you need help people servers money and all.
    LETS FUCK BELUSECURITY.COM bleusecurity.com are down already lol

    (crazy)
    You BlueFrog faggots, you think this is the only community that has your whole database?
    You honestly think a community of people you are trying to take down are going to
    REMOVE you from their lists? Look, killthem is not an anti, I know him personally,
    so let that whole bullshit idea go to rest. Second, by running that database as froms
    or mailing them on a dedicated box will not result in any "fed" coming to your door,
    more so you'll just be pissing off another bullshit internet-lamer who can't understand
    how to filter a simple spam message, so they join some bullshit community called
    "BlueFrog" and think they can run this shit. BF, newsflash: do you realize how many
    resources this community as a whole controls? Do you honestly think you stand a chance?
    Your domain is down, it's a matter of time before more nets are mounted to bring down your
    members area and it'll be held down continuously until BF userbase has gotten to the
      point they can't perform their equally illegal DDOS attacks. Guys, download the DB,
    spam it, compile your lists with it and trade it around. Use them as froms, mail your
    anti DB with them, do whatever you want.
    Let this database leak to the point all these stupid ass fucks have to get new e-mail addresses.
    Adios bluefreaks

    (killthem)
    did you ever try to protect your websites and all ? you're fucking down baby
    Date 5/2/2006

    (crazy)
    Pinging 194.90.8.20 [194.90.8.20]:
    Ping #1: * [No response]
    Ping #2: * [No response]
    Ping #3: * [No response]
    Ping #4: * [No response]
    Done pinging 194.90.8.20

    Boy oh boy
    Date 5/2/2006

    (dollar)
    "baby why dont you hit me with your best shot!!" da daa da daa "I said baby why dont you hit me with your best shot"
    Thats what these bluefrog idiots have been singing the whole time. They simply asked for it.

    "Slap an anti a day to keep spamhaus away"
    Great Affiliate Programs
    Custom Bulk Applications
    BP Mailing/Hosting/Direct Servers
    Contact Me
    Date 5/2/2006