Slashdot Mirror


An Underground Radio to Save Lives

Roland Piquepaille writes "The Duluth News Tribune wrote last week about a communication device which could be a lifesaver for miners. This invention is the brainchild of David Reagor, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). His prototype radio works at depths of 500 feet and is based on very low frequency electromagnetic radiation and digital signal processors. A commercial version is in the works and could be used not only by workers trapped in a mine, but also by firefighters and other emergency workers to communicate with people in collapsed buildings or subways."

82 comments

  1. Sound familiar by CCFreak2K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like something I saw in Dante's Peak. No pun intended.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    1. Re:Sound familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would not this device require a lot of power to send the signal though?
      I think that is the case, anyway. So it may not last long in a cave colapse.

    2. Re:Sound familiar by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Sounds like something I saw in Dante's Peak.

      We've been using underground radio in Australian mines for decades. Leaky feeder systems are common in most mechanised mines, and personal emergency devices (PED) are available that use ULF signals to transmit text messages through the ground. If this guy has found a way to encode voice as well it's an improvement, but not groundbreaking (pun intended).

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  2. Re:Roland spams Digg too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He linked the news article, not his blog, what's the big deal?

  3. VLF has been used for submarines for decades by ishmalius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Very low frequency (VLF) has an extremely low data rate, yet it has a great ability to penetrate earth and water. The Navy has been using it for a long time to communicate with submarines.

    1. Re:VLF has been used for submarines for decades by Stellian · · Score: 1

      It seems pretty extreme to me to receive a 1 million $ grant to build what is basically a long wave radio coupled with a CELP encoder (these can compress voice down to 1200 bps).
      I'm sure there are lots of practical difficulties though.

    2. Re:VLF has been used for submarines for decades by skogs · · Score: 4, Informative

      It seems you do not understand VLF/ELF ideas. The entire point is that it is a super low frequency. Low frequency doesn't cycle very often, and makes it hard to press data...so it would be rather difficult to compress audio and then send it.

      The navy's ELF is just that...ELF...it sends text only. This is no email system, this is exactly what needs to be sent, and thats it...and some messages take several minutes to send. Sending voice data would take an extremely long time...and transmitting for that long wears down batteries. Your LMR(land mobile radio) be it motorola, etc, MIGHT last an entire day or 8/12 hr workday...but it only gets keyed for about 20 minutes of that timeperiod, if that.

      I think, even if it was VLF instead of ELF, they would be far better served to make a keypad, and force people to type short messages to transmit. That way it might actually last for 3 or 4 days if there were an emergency. Otherwise it simply wouldn't have the power to maintain sporadic communications for that kind of timeframe.

      --
      Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
    3. Re:VLF has been used for submarines for decades by Slugster · · Score: 1

      Yes--the international VLF emergency code is three long five-second blasts of brown note noise, which indicates "send toilet paper immediately"
      (them's "bog rolls", for you non-American speakers)
      ~

    4. Re:VLF has been used for submarines for decades by lampajoo · · Score: 1

      Speech compression algorithms by using linear prediction and other tricks can reduce the bandwidth required for transmitting speech by a factor of 8 with no perceptible quality loss. You can reduce the bandwidth required even more by taking a quality hit. Also, the latency in a voice conversation can be quite high(500ms or more) before anyone will notice that there is a delay. I expect that a miner that was trapped would not care that much if while he was talking to the rescuers that the sound quality was poor and it took a few seconds for the response to come.

      If you used the bandwidth from all of ELF and SLF...not sure if that's feasible or not, you would be short by a factor of 10 (if 300hz-3hz=297 and hz=> 297bps and the speech requires 2400 bps) which could be used for a "store and forward" radio...like underground voicemail.

  4. Troglographs are not new by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Informative

    Troglographs are not new.

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
    1. Re:Troglographs are not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it hits the news, it is a fair bet that it has been done before (often many times).

      The media sucks when it comes to science and technology.

  5. wait a second. by mattpointblank · · Score: 3, Funny

    "A communication device which could be a lifesaver for miners"? We already have Myspace.

    Wait, miners? Oops.

  6. Fact of the matter is... by nitrocloud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In recent mine collapses, two things were needed in the mining tunnels, oxygen, and communication. Without oxygen, humans die. Without communication, humans are lost in a large mine shaft with relatively no way to signal those above of where ventilation shafts can drilled to vent toxic gases and supply oxygen. The truth is, communication is vital, and the lack thereof has been proven deadly, with this radio, perhaps mining accidents don't become mining tragedies in the future.

    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
    1. Re:Fact of the matter is... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      If you don't make it to a refuge station, you're dead anyway.

      Mine refuge stations are fed with high-pressure air lines. If those lines get damaged, you probably won't survive long enough for anyone to sink down new lines.

      I can't imagine this kind of communication helping much. People don't wander mines aimlessly. After a cave-in, they're either at the job site, the refuge station, or somewhere in between. If they're on the surface, then their tag wouldn't be on the tag-board.

      Maybe at best, a device in a refuge station to signal that yes, there are some survivors. But if you're rescuing and you don't get a signal, what do you assume?

  7. In other news by protich · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apple is already working on a nano ipod for miners which comes with a radio,video, music. Code named "underground". You can also connect to iTunes!!

    1. Re:In other news by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Odly enough, I heard that among the essential supplies sent through to the trapped Australian miners (along with food water and air) were Ipods. I guess they could listen to that BeeGees song (New York mining Disaster)

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah....I don't belive it....Apple actually building a device with "extras"? They can't change their business model of selling $300+ single function devices.... /steps off the "displeased iPod owner" soapbox

  8. Not deep enough. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

    South Dakota's Homestake gold mine is 8,000 feet deep. 16 times deeper than this thing can reach. What's needed are acoustical communicators that can ping through the rock with a coded signal telling the miner's location. But given the safety record of mine operators, they won't update the codes as new side-tunnels are dug, won't keep the batteries charged, won't keep the receivers in working order, and won't train the safety personnel.

    1. Re:Not deep enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, then you just put 16 signal repeaters in as well. Problem solved.

    2. Re:Not deep enough. by onebuttonmouse · · Score: 1

      It says right there in the summary that the thing is just a prototype, surely it's possible to communicate over greater distances using a more powerful transmitter.

      --
      MacBook Pro. Worst name since the Bicycle
    3. Re:Not deep enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surely it's possible to communicate over greater distances using a more powerful transmitter.

      Only a little more distance for a whole lot more power. Ground-penetrating radar has been used for decades and is very very limited. This is just a GPR with a voice signal.

    4. Re:Not deep enough. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      On other other hand all it has to do is to reach a level with a repeater and power. A disaster that wipes out everything in a 2000 fout radius in all directions would not be a resonable design case.

      As regards your allegations about mine safety practices, you are (pardon the phrase) dead right.(*)

      (*)Useta live in West Virgina. Study the history of coal companies before you call anyone in high-tech "evil".

    5. Re:Not deep enough. by Reverberant · · Score: 1
      What's needed are acoustical communicators that can ping through the rock with a coded signal telling the miner's location.

      I'm not sure that acoustics is the answer here, especially if you're talking about an 8000-ft depth. Acoustical waves travel well through rock, but exciting the rock in the first place takes a lot of force. As a comparison, ground-borne vibration propagation test equipment (used for train vibration assessments) typically put out peak forces in the 6,000 to 10,000 lbs range, and the signal is barely detectable using averaging methods at 200 ft.

      You could try signal processing tricks (MLS for example, self-link to a PDF paper I wrote), but then you're trading in the peak force for massive computing power at long distances- I'm guessing several hours of number crunching for a top-of-the-line PC for several thousands of feet of depth, maybe less for multiprocessing workstations if you can vectorize the calculations.

      I suspect that an EM solution would be much easier to develop.

    6. Re:Not deep enough. by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      (*)Useta live in West Virgina. Study the history of coal companies before you call anyone in high-tech "evil".

      agreed. i'm in wv now.

    7. Re:Not deep enough. by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1

      Don't trapped miners already beat on the walls to signal their position? I distinctly recall reading that the Sago miners did just that.

      --
      Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    8. Re:Not deep enough. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      South Dakota's Homestake gold mine is 8,000 feet deep. 16 times deeper than this thing can reach.

      In other words..."Holy crap. This thing is not useful in every possible situation imaginable. Therefore, it is totally useless. Let's try something else that may or may not work."

      Jebus, dude..calm down. Here's a new use for an old technology. Let's see what it can do before we blow it off completely.

    9. Re:Not deep enough. by lukej · · Score: 1

      Having been to the 8,000ft level of Homestake, I'll confess, it is spooky! Radios would be nice.

      However, deeeeeep mines (gold in Homestake's case) are probably vastly out numbered by 'shallow' coal mines in the Eastern US.

      As a side note, /.'ers should help lobby to turn the now defunct Homestake into one heck of a laboratory...

      http://neutrino.lbl.gov/Homestake/LOI/
      http://www.state.sd.us/homestake/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homestake_Mine_(South _Dakota)

  9. Tesla by edwardpickman · · Score: 0

    Sounds similar to what Tesla was doing. His power transmition system was sold to Hearst as a means of communication but Hearst scrapped it when he found Tesla intended to use it to provide free electricity. Most people think Tesla was transmiting power through the air but it was actually using the ground as a conductor.

  10. another company has something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there's a start-up in North Carolina that has a hospital-asset location tracking system which also works in mines, and looks far more promising than this low-frequency system ... unfortunately, the start-up is still in 'stealth mode" and there's nothing useful on their website

  11. It might not be radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be very hard to make a portable VLF transmitter because the antenna would be miniscule compared with a wavelength. For example, at 100 kHz, a 150 foot antenna is tiny. On the other hand, a range of 500 feet is much less than one wavelength at any very low frequency. In other words, the receiver would still be well within the near field. The inductive field would still be big enough to be useful. The advantage is that you could get something like broadband (ie. audio) performance without having to build an impossible antenna.

  12. Nothing new here by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Informative
    As usual, there is nothing new under the sun. Cave radios have been under active development for some time. Check out these resources

    Cave Radio & Electronics Group
    Google "Cave Radios"

    Granted this guy's sounds a little more advanced with DSP and stuff, but still not a new concept.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:Nothing new here by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "As usual, there is nothing new under the sun."

      Yes but this is for use in mines where there is no sunlight. Big difference.

  13. How about a standing wave? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    Would it be possible to just setup a standing wave between the surface and some underground node? To chat, all you have to do is modulate the wave. Right?

    Low power (cheap) underground radios talk to the underground node.

    Or am I missing something obvious... /Radios & antennas are not my forte

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:How about a standing wave? by josecanuc · · Score: 1
      Or am I missing something obvious...


      Radio waves don't travel too well through rock/soil. The very long wavelength (hence low frequency) of this proposed product would theoretically be less absorbed/reflected by the rock and soil, but I can't imagine it being any significant amount more effective than existing VHF/UHF radio systems.

      In my opinion, the most effective and also the cheapest way to communicate with miners is with copper. I mean, if you can get people down there, you can certainly get a cable down there, too. Right? The telephone system has proven the effectiveness of "landline" communications.
    2. Re:How about a standing wave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the thing your missing is the transmission medium. For low frequency plane waves, the skin-depth that is the depth at which the signal strength is 1/e or about 37% of its original strength is approximately defined as

      d = 504*sqrt(rho/f)

      where rho is the electrical resistivity of the medium and f is the frequency of propagation.

      For example, lets consider air to be nearly infinitely resistivity. This means the skin depth at which plane waves decay is nearly infinite: you can transmit through the atmosphere and it goes a long way.

      The electrical resistivity of the Earth varies greatly, but a typical value for the resistivity may be 100 ohm-m for many Earth materials.

      For example, the skin depth for a plane wave at 100 Hz would be about 504 meters in this example. So, in order to get longer depth of penetration the frequency must be decreased.

      So, you will generate waves and then modulate a signal using this carrier. The frequency of the carrier is low, so the rate at which you can transmit information is low.

  14. partially a matter of economics by fermion · · Score: 4, Informative
    The talk lately has been that plenty of technology exists to help in rescue efforts and insure the trapper persons survive until rescue happens. The probelm seems to be funding for production, the market for these devices is very small, following existing safety regulation, and training. THE VLF frequency radio is nothing new, and this just seems like a way promote the technology and encourage the federal authorities to mandate the device, and probably use tax monies to partially fund the deployment. I don't know why we would want to do this insted of enforcing the current regulation, perhaps raise fines on violation, and, if we want to be realy radical, actually expect the fines to be paid. In fact USA Today, which I am lothe to quote, seems to think that the current rash of accidents are a result of lack of enforcement over the past several years, and not the direct result of the lack of any safety equipment. I know that I would much rather be at the dinner table with my family than trapped in a mine, even if I did have the ability to say goodbye with my last dying breath, and with the full knowledge that the mine company will get the digging equipment in as soon as humanly possible, and would pay the $5000 fine for the accident, if it survived the appeal.

    Which is not to say that accidents never happen, but when a mine has been cited at nearly every safety inspection, and has not paid fines, one wonders whether more safety gizmos are really going to do any good.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:partially a matter of economics by Bishop · · Score: 1

      In North America there is a cycle in mining safety. As a result of accidents authorities impose various safety regulations. After several years of safe mining the companies point to their safety records and convince authorities that certain regulations are no longer needed. After the regulations are relaxed (or no stop being enforced) serious accidents happen.

  15. Is this what they used in "The Core"?? by SeaDour · · Score: 1

    I was always annoyed by the fact that, though the movie tried to be vaguely scientifically accurate, their ability to communicate with the people traveling thousands of miles beneath the earth's surface seemed magical at best. Maybe it was something like this!

    1. Re:Is this what they used in "The Core"?? by thePig · · Score: 1

      The CORE ?? Are you sure?
      Check out http://www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/core.html

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
  16. that's great by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    now try convincing profit-oriented mining companies to buy it. they're scum.

    1. Re:that's great by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Your pc wouldnt be here if it wasnt for metals from mines.

      And the electronic companies charging 900% market arent scum? Where as gold miners HAVE TO SELL their
      gold at spot price, not 900%. The sell price is fixed, your margins are determined by your
      mining efficiency and labour and stupid local govt whores+taxes.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:that's great by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      i'm referring to underground COAL mines, not metals.

  17. Hmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a joke, you dumb-asses. The Navy used simular technology to kill off whales.

  18. Not deep enough by ajdlinux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in Australia there are two miners trapped around 935 metres (3116 ft) below the ground. They managed to contact them using existing radios. Fact is, most mines are deeper than 500ft.

    1. Re:Not deep enough by ajdlinux · · Score: 1

      Sorry, meant 3067 ft.

  19. Developped in caving activities up to 1Km deep by zijus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hi there.

    You better check that out : systeme Nicola. I don't put a hand on publishing date, but some folks in Europe are developing such a system for a while. They are aiming at caving rescue activities. In specific conditions they got the communication through 1000 m of rock. Interesting. Funny as well to get a feeling on how polluted can be our environment in the low frequencies realm.

    Bye. Z.

    1. Re:Developped in caving activities up to 1Km deep by scdeimos · · Score: 1
      This sounds impressive until you read the specs, which include:
      Antenna : Large virtual loop constituted by the two electrodes connected to earth spaced by 40-80m
      Miners trapped underground will often be lucky to have any more than 2-5m to move around and lie down to rest in.
    2. Re:Developped in caving activities up to 1Km deep by zijus · · Score: 1

      Good point. Also, AFAIU the system described in the article do not need grouding: the two systems do not use the same principles. One is based on electromagnetisme, the other on earth conductivity. So, I was a bit hasty at meaning they are similar. That is also the reason why one is limited to 500 feet range while the other can reach through up to 3000 thick rock.

      Bye. Z.

  20. Underground radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio Free Mines?

  21. Re:I am reporting all disgusting posts! by Edna_Bambrick · · Score: 0

    You have been REPORTED!

  22. Wouldn't help by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    A standing wave is just a traveling wave that gets reflected. It would have all the same aborption problems as any radio system on the same frequency going through the smae materials.

  23. In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, your tax dollar at work via the US Navy and HAARP Project.

  24. Re:I am reporting all disgusting posts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to my freaks' list!

  25. Re:Roland spams Digg too by mindtriggerz · · Score: 1, Funny

    Rationality is not permitted on Slashdot.

  26. Coming from a coal mining area.. by Winlin · · Score: 1

    it's good to see any new advances in mine safety. I'm only about 50 miles from the sago mine area, and i live literally a stones throw from an old ( now reclaimed) deep mine. A walk through any graveyard around here will show how dangerous mining has been over the years.
        On a side note, am i the only one who saw the article title and wondered what some pirate radio station would have to do with safety??? Probably so.

  27. Make that armored copper by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Refine that further, and combine copper with radios. I was chatting with someone on another site who pointed out that you could use badly shielded coax to extend the range of radios. If you're trapped away from the nearest phone but have intact leaky coax within range, then when you key your radio the signal leaks into the coax, and then leaks out everywhere else including (maybe-let's-hope) the area where uninjured personnel are.

    Leaky coax is a commercial product, sold under the name Radiax. I know someone who got the same effect for less money by buying allegedly fully shielded coax from Radio Sh***.

    1. Re:Make that armored copper by solitas · · Score: 1

      You'll probably still find "leaky coax" hanging on the streets of some universities - low-power FM broadcasting used to use it: as long as you didn't exceed a certain field strength at a certain distance from the wire you could run 'em as far as you could afford to cover an area/street/campus.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    2. Re:Make that armored copper by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's exactly what we use undergound - leaky feeders with repeater/amp modules every thousand feet or so. Coupled with standard VHF radios it works ok. It also carries a "PED" - a one-way text pager that's embedded in the battery pack for my caplamp.

      But yet, it's still a pain in the ass. If you cant see a leaky feeder hanging from the roof, there's no comms. It's strictly line-of-sight. Even though it's armoured cable, a ton of rock will easily crush it.

      So forget using leaky feeder cable for rescue.

      If I could just get a text pager that worked outside the range of a leaky feeder, I'd be happy. This looks like it might be a solution.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  28. These are not radios by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    They work by induction loops (ie are magnetic). They are not radio. Induction loop comms predates Marconi. The big challenge with VLF is to make a big enough antenna.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  29. Re:I am reporting all disgusting posts! by mindtriggerz · · Score: 0

    I LOVE YOU EDNA! You did such a good job on The Superficial!

  30. Can be made to work by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and mines in South Africa go much deeper than that.

    Most rockfalls leave the main shaft ok. You could run a cable down the shaft and have "access points" at vaious depths etc. The VLF only has to cover the last bit to the actual miner.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  31. Lifesaver for commuters, too by ozbird · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As loss of radio contact was one of the factors the resulted in Jean Charles de Menezes being shot dead by police, radios that work in the Underground ("tube") as well as underground would be a good thing.

    1. Re:Lifesaver for commuters, too by AB3A · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uhh, radios DO work in the "underground." The Metro in Washington DC does this, as do many other subway systems. The technology has been around since at least the late 1970s. It's really quite simple: A leaky coaxial cable (Andrew Corporation makes one called Radiax) can be used for both receiving and transmission. If what you say is accurate, the folks managing the London Underground could really use an education.

      Now as for mines, such systems are useful for tunnels which don't change much, such as underground railway tunnels. Engineering these systems on an ad-hoc basis isn't simple, nor cheap. Mines need to use something better. A robust digital modulation scheme which can survive multiple repeating nodes with less than ideal signal to noise ratios is something which needs development. Ideally this system would use something robust like turbo-codes, where a damaged packet could be recovered with some delay.

      This could result in some messages taking many seconds to get to and from the surface, but at least they'd get there...

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    2. Re:Lifesaver for commuters, too by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Conventional police radios will work in the subway system if the proper equipment is installed. The Washington, D.C. Metro system has a radio system that works in the underground stations. They string "leaky coax" through the stations and tunnels.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  32. Three cave radios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm aware of these three underground radios:

    - The MolePhone
    - The HeyPhone
    - System Nicola

    I believe they all operate at around 87 kHz. The Mole Phone has been around for 30 years or so; the others are newer and more high-tech, with greater range.

  33. Grintek Mine radios by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mine radios used to be manufactured by SAAB Grintek, but was sold to a company called Guduza, which promptly disappeared without trace.

    These radios used a 100kHz carrier and was basically inductive radios, using the shoulder strap as an antenna. It could penetrate 100m of solid rock. During that journey, it would typically find some piece of metal - pipes, railway tracks, whatever - couple to that and provide communications throughout an underground mine.

    So it seems that this guy is re-inventing 1970s technology. It is a proven concept and should work well.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  34. Re:Roland spams Digg too by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Maybe a slip-up - do a Digg search for 'primidi' (his blog site) and see how many 'different' people have submitted stories to Digg linking to that site (I counted 18). Surely Roland isn't posting under numerous different account names? I'm shocked, SHOCKED!

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  35. Alternative solution by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    I believe using RFID in mines would be beneficial.
    For every 10 metres of tunnel dug a scanner is placed.
    Every miner has a tag about their person which triggers the scanner by moving past it.

    If an incident occurs, the miners exact location in the *old* tunnel network is ascertained.
    Sure, the rock might have moved since, but its a much better starting point than nothing.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Alternative solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This seems like a great idea until you think about:

      - the fact that every scanner will need a hard line back to whatever computer system is collating the data (or at least a radio bearer which it can communicate with).
      - the maintenance overhead of say an average small mines crew of about 150 undergrounders needing to make sure their RFID tag is working every day and fixing them if they are not.
      - All this gear having to work in an environment which is incredibly tough on equipment. For example, your RFID scanners would need to be able to withstand nearby explosions, or your miners would fall into the habit of not placing them on freshly blasted areas because when they blast the next section they would destroy the previous area's scanner - but the sections being blasted are usually the most hazardous.

      In *good* mines the crews already have good knowledge of where their mates are working, the supervisors track the locations of their crews well enough, and in the event of accidents usually it is known approximately where the trapped miners are. In bad mines - well they aren't going to fork out millions of bucks for a fancy RFID setup are they.

      There are three places to focus the technology that are useful IMO:
      1. Technology to help manage risks and prevent accidents (for example - tele-mucking where remote controlled diggers are used in dangerous locations, better understanding and monitoring of seismic activty etc).
      2. Technology to help detect exactly where people are - when you are blasting and drilling through a cave-in 10 metres is actually a long long way. Some sort of PSD which could be activated in the event of an emergency (perhaps based on ELF or this device) could also be very handy in pinpointing location.
      3. The mine managers notebook - so that he/she can't deny they saw the 10 emails from the supervisors about their concerns with respect to tunnel 12 etc.

  36. VLF for data transmission is old hat... by csoto · · Score: 1

    http://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwvb.htm

    Devices could easily be designed to carry data such as percent oxygen, number of heartbeats present, nearest locator beacon, etc. Very low data rate, but still good enough to get this sort of quick-and-dirty textual stuff through...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  37. I don't know why I bother but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These aren't actually radios because they don't use radio waves. They use an inductive field. There are a couple of good posts. Check the link in the Trogloradio post. "It might not be radio" also explains it.

    The biggest misery with VLF is the antenna. Unless you have a gargantuan antenna you can't get any bandwidth. With an inductive field, you just need an inductor. You can get the equivalent of ultra wideband easily. With VLF, this means you can transmit voice.

    The downside with inductive fields is that it is hard to get ranges greater than a few thousand feet.

  38. 60s radicals had underground radio by Jerry · · Score: 1

    and they used it to communicate their activities to each other. It could reach for miles and had the police confused since they couldn't figure out how the radicals were communicating.

    It was easy. They took high powered audio amplifiers and connected the wires which would have gone to speakers to steel rods driven into the ground several feet apart. I don't remember exactly how far apart they were. One could recieve the signals by attaching a sensitive audio applifier to a similar set of rods. IIRC, with 250 watts of output power they were able to communicate 10-15 miles "underground".

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  39. Re:I am reporting all disgusting posts! by Edna_Bambrick · · Score: 0

    Thank you, I am trying to clean up the internet. I shut down the Superficial and if this site doesn't stop the disgusting posts, I will shut it down also. I already have 5 names and counting!

  40. Locating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As important as communication in such incidents, how about locating the people? How difficult would it be to set up a mock-GPS of raio towers onground, and all miners have transmitters interpolating and then sending back their 3-D location. These "radio" towers / devices could be based on this technology, and achieve this purpose.