Slashdot Mirror


Historic Microcomputer Restoration?

Pojodojo asks: "I am doing an independent study next semester with my computer science professor which we decided to call Historic Microcomputer Repair and Restoration. I will be working with such classics as the Altair 8080 and the Apple II. After I have repaired and or restored these machines, I will put them in a display for others to see. I have the opportunity for a modest budget to get equipment to put in the display, and would like to know is, what sort of things would you as fellow comp sci geeks like to see in a Historic Computer exhibit?"

170 comments

  1. Duh by baldass_newbie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ascii pr0n, obviously.
    *sheesh*

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
    1. Re:Duh by camusflage · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yah. Like you need to go to a museum to see it when you can just go here!

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  2. Porn. by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not kidding. I remember having a disk of porn for the BBC Micro. That computer only had 32k of ram, and the porn I had was for a mode that used about 5k..perhaps 10, something like that. It was animated too - two frames of it. Amusing.

    1. Re:Porn. by chiller2 · · Score: 1

      I had a lot of Beeb software but never stumbled across porn. It could have been mode 4 (2 colours, 320x256, 10k) or 5 (4 colours, 160x256, 10k). The only one using less ram was mode 7 (teletext, 1k) and somehow I don't think the pr0n would have looked too good in that, though I guess you'd have gotten plenty of frames.

      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  3. Really old stuff by Idol_Handzz · · Score: 1

    I am a REALLY old geek, but I cut my teeth on the Z80 processor running in a TRS80 model III. You can pick them up on EBay for next to nothing compared to the original asking price of $1999. You could even step up the the model 4 with 64K of RAM for about the same price. Don't know if you can still find it, but back in the day, you could get a version of MS-DOS that would run on these beasts. I personally coded a nice BBS on one of these. It was faster at processing information than most of the Apples and C64s of the time. Worth a look Idol

    1. Re:Really old stuff by John+Hasler · · Score: 1
      I am a REALLY old geek, but I cut my teeth on the Z80 processor running in a TRS80 model III.
      No. You're not a really old geek.
      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Really old stuff by spun · · Score: 1

      Hah! I cut my teeth on a teletype hooked up to a university mainframe. I was six, my friend's dad was a comp-sci professor. He let me play lunar lander and hunt the wumpus on his uni account.

      After that, it was a TRS-80 model I my dad bought in'79 or '80. We had an account with CompuServ and Genie and a 300 baud modem. Later he got the expansion interface with floppy drives, woot!

      My first computer was a TI99 4/A. After that I owned a Commodore 64, and that was when I really go into the BBS scene. My friends had Apples. Later, I got some generic IBM compatible, and then an Macintosh+ with two floppies and no hard drive.

      The only kind of home computer I never owned but really, really wanted was an Amiga.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Really old stuff by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If he were a really old geek he'd have mentioned that he and Ada Lovelace used to sip tea whilst bragging about staying awake until the sun came up weaving towels out of nothing but some thread and the quadratic formula.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    4. Re:Really old stuff by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

      "you could get a version of MS-DOS that would run on these beasts."
      No you couldn't.
      Not unless there was an 8088 or 8086 card you could put in them. I guess it is possible such a beast was sold but they would have been rare.
      You could get CP/M for them and maybe ZPCR. I also remember a OS called LDOS I think was available as well.
      Now the Model 16 could run Xenix which was very cool.
      The first computer that Tandy made that ran MS-DOS I think was the Model 2000. It was better than the IBM CP but it wasn't PC compatible and failed in the marketplace.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Really old stuff by Arker · · Score: 1

      Uhh yes, actually you could. It was called MSX-Dos. Microsoft put it out for a few years in the early 80s.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    6. Re:Really old stuff by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      That required an MSX computer. The TRS-80 Model 3 and 4 where not MSX systems. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSX As you can see the TRS-80s didn't meet the MSX specs and Radio Shack had no interest making it. For the home/game market they where betting on the CoCo.
      Not to mention that MSX-Dos isn't MS-DOS.
      So no it didn't.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Really old stuff by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      okay for you OLD GEEKS complete the poem

        He died at the console
            Of hunger and thirst.
            Next day he was buried,

      (bonus points if you can pull the complete reference)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    8. Re:Really old stuff by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      Face down, 9-edge first.

      I'll have to pass on the bonus points, though...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    9. Re:Really old stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. The abacus by luder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After all, it was one of the first calculating devices.

    1. Re:The abacus by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      Actually that's the updated model - the original was "your hand".

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    2. Re:The abacus by Mr+Z · · Score: 1
  5. well... by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. I don't know the extent to which it fits your definition, but if I was to think of a bitchin' computer (insomuch as it could do some level of computing). It would be an Amiga 500, god I loved that... if you want something a little more in the line of "computer" I would say collosus, the original bletchly park beast... it could still out perform a P4....

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:well... by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've got to love it that when a computer is so efficent that it's only limited by the speed at which data can be fed into it.

      When testing to see how fast the Colossus could perform reliably, engineers found that it would perform flawlessly until it was running so fast that the paper tapes that fed the input data into Colossus caught fire, at which point they abandoned the experiment for fear that they'd burn the wood-framed building down. A true testament to Turing and the other fine scientists at Bletchly Park.

      Pity Churchill ordered it destroyed after the war was over. It was decades ahead of its time.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:well... by Boone^ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You've got to love it that when a computer is so efficent that it's only limited by the speed at which data can be fed into it.

      Well, considering Moore's law doesn't apply to DRAM and Hard Disk Drives, I'd say almost all machines these days are thusly limited when given a problem set larger than its L3 cache.

    3. Re:well... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "I would say collosus, the original bletchly park beast... it could still out perform a P4...."

      Huh?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:well... by hughk · · Score: 1
      No, the Colossi were not all destroyed, some continued into the late 50s where they were replaced by more modern equipment at GCHQ Cheltenham. The techniques used by Colossus remained applicable until well into the sixties are the Russians were using ciphers similar to the German Lorenz system.

      The fact that Colossus existed was heavily guarded until Winterbotham's book (about 1974) so the remains were carefully destroyed as were most records of its construction. However Tony Sale managed to reconstruct it based on notes obtained from the original designers including Tommy Flowers as well as interviews.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:well... by cowbutt · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the Amiga 500 would be the most appropriate example; maybe either the 1000 (at one end of the scale) or the 4000 (at the other). I'd say the Amiga has a significant place in the history of home/personal microcomputers, as I regard it as the last in the line before x86 PCs took over.

  6. The Amiga 500 by scenestar · · Score: 4, Informative

    this thing is mroe important seeing as it was used for years for video editing.

    But who am I to judge.....

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:The Amiga 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are likely referring to the Video Toaster. The Video Toaster was a Hardware card (with software of course) that could be installed in an Amiga 2000 (or 3000). The Amiga 500 did not have any of these slots.

    2. Re:The Amiga 500 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Amiga 1000 (the original Amiga) is the better historical computer, IMO. Hey - any movie used in The Price of Darkness has gotta have it goin' on!

      "I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! " ...
      "IN FACT...YOU WILL NOT BE SAVED!"

      Classic.

      Definitely the computer Matthew Broderick used in WarGames (IMSAI?) should be in there.

      Scrounging up a working Apple Lisa and Apple /// would be good, same for a Kaypro and an Osborne. All the classic 8-bits: Atari 400 and 800, Commodore PET, Commodore 64 (and weird ones like the SX64, etc.), TI-99 4/a, and if you have an Amiga, you can't skimp at avoid the Atari ST line. Coleco Adam.

      There's actually a little museum of this type here in Seattle in the SODO area Re-PC store. Some really awesome stuff, though the machines are all turned off. It'd be more fun if you could mess with them. There are actually working older computers for sale there pretty often, such as Apple //gs, etc. I'm sure glad I didn't buy that piece of shit, and went for an Amiga 500 at the time. *whew*

    3. Re:The Amiga 500 by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      As I understood it, the Amiga 500 could gen-lock, and was used for countless video-titling tasks. Not the full up Video Toaster, but sufficient for basic NLE and titling with an external VCR controller.

      --Joe
    4. Re:The Amiga 500 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe there was an external genlock for the Amiga 500. However, the Amiga 2000 was by far the more popular platform for business use, with or without the toaster. I used to have an A2000 with the internal genlock (used the video slot, same place the toaster taps into for video, while it also goes into a normal slot) and the only thing I ever used it for was to chat over television (output from my vcr, which has a tuner of course) but it was pretty spiffy and fairly decent-quality.

      A friend of mine always wanted someone to ask him to hack a video toaster onto an Amiga 500, but no one ever did. He thought he could do it, based on the schematics of both systems, which were thoughtfully included with 'em.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:The Amiga 500 by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      The Apple II was arguably the micro with the greatest historical impact.

      The first flight simulator was written for the Apple II, which triggered the imagination of a lot of people. But more importantly, the first electronic spreadsheet was written for the Apple II, and became an instant hit with accounting firms. Suddenly these micro computers were no longer just toys for guys who spent too much time with Popular Science; there might be money to be made with them, somehow...

    6. Re:The Amiga 500 by anubi · · Score: 1
      "Definitely the computer Matthew Broderick used in WarGames (IMSAI?) should be in there.

      Yes, it was the IMSAI 8080. I have one. Bought as kit.

      As far as I know, it was the upgrade to the original ALTAIR machine, S-100 bus. Except the IMSAI was more of the "industrial" version which had ample power supply, fans, fixed the clock problem, and the front panel interface was streamlined to be far easier to build.

      Yet, it was still relatively inexpensive to manufacture. All stamped steel, plexiglass, and looked really cool.

      The fun part was getting to design and build your own S-100 boards. There were lots of prototype boards available which had only the bus driver chips already in place, and you did the rest - usually with a wirewrap gun, of if you were really masochistic - a soldering iron. You really learned a lot about hardware design and how drivers worked by getting your BASIC interpreter linked through a homebrew 765 Floppy disk controller chip to drive those 8" floppy drives you lucked out to find at a swap meet.

      No matter what you wanted, there was always some way to do it with a combination of software and hardware. Those were the good old days when even Radio Shack had walls of TTL chips available...

      It wasn't the good old days for power consumption... those old TTL chips consumed noticable amounts of power when you got several handfuls of 'em up and running in the same box... as evidenced by how hot everything got. It seemed as bad sometimes as the old vacuum tubes. The power transformer in the IMSAI was by far the heaviest component in the whole machine. 16 volts AC secondary at 30 AMP Center-tapped. The filter capacitors were larger than beer cans.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    7. Re:The Amiga 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Video Toaster was a Hardware card"
      As opposed to a Software card, of course.

  7. Variety of platforms by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was an amazing variety of 8-bit platforms manufactured between 1976-1985, the more you have the better. But take my advice, having refurbished a number of these machines: Plan on buying 3 for every one you get working, Ebay is your friend, no single machine is worth more than $5. You should be able to pick up core cpu/keyboards for $15 following these rules. Use a modern audio cable switch box and a single composite monitor to switch between them- Composite monitors are hard to find and expensive, but many modern cheap 15" TV sets have the correct RCA inputs.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Variety of platforms by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I would think narrowing the range to 1976-1979 might be far more interesting. It was when the 'plastic box, bought in department store' stuff came on the scene that things became less interesting.

    2. Re:Variety of platforms by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on how you look at it- 1976-1979 certainly had the big names come in (Commodore Pet, Vic 20 & 64; TI-99/4 and /4a, Apple I, II, II+, IIe, Altair, the Tandy Radio Shack series, and of course, who can forget the precursor to the BBC micro, the Timex Sinclair Z80?), all of which were TECHNICAL leaps forward. But the real explosion came in with the merging of the Home Video Game Industry with the Home Computer industry: Coleco Adam; Atari 400, 800, 1600. And of course the business machines from IBM and Compaq both came out in 1980, as did a variety of "luggable" CPM machines. Plastic boxes in department stores were the start of the real Home Computer and Personal Computer, as opposed to the Micro Computer for hobbyists and businesses that could afford the expense and schools.

      But certainly, I'd cut it off at about 1986 or so- almost everything since then has been Windows, Mac, or Linux, the choice in platforms as far as hardware is concerned is almost dead.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Variety of platforms by The+Optimizer · · Score: 1

      Quite a few other, lesser known, computers were made during that time as well. Finding techinal information and replacement parts (unique ones, like keys) on those machines is a real challenege

      I've got about 3 Exidy Sorcerers (2 working), a couple APF imagination Machines (working), and a non-working Compucolor II (circa 1979).

      Supposedly, only 4,000 Compucolor IIs were made, and I have to find any technical info on them. If any /. reader knows anything about them, drop me a line!

    4. Re:Variety of platforms by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends on your model of an exhibition.

      People have a tendency to look at history of technoloy in a teleological sense: let's portray technology as an inexorable march towards the modern machines: for airplanes, you start with the Wright Flyer and you end with the A380. For Micros, you'd start with the Altair/Sol sort of stuff, and end with a dual-core dual-LCD screen workstation, some glowing riced-out gaming rig, a laptop, PDA and tablet PC.

      But there are many other interesting stories to tell that make computers "historic". Let's limit it to Micros

      Social History: how do these machines fit into the lives of the people who use them, and the lives of those who have to deal with those people? The ultra-hobbyist machines of the late-seventies appeared and were used very differently than later micros. What sort of impact on the office did the replacement of the dedicated word processors with micros have? The millions of Commodore 64s that were sold -- what did people actually do with them?

      Business history: what about the people who made these machines. What were they trying to do? The Microcomputer field is fascinating as various companies try to mix and blend technologies and capabilities to achieve a "winning formula". There are some real oddball computers out there.

      Intellectual History: tied to these computers are all kinds of software, and software development methods. How did the platforms and cultures interact to facilitate the exchange of software, and what modalities were used?

    5. Re:Variety of platforms by Llamalarity · · Score: 1

      But certainly, I'd cut it off at about 1986 or so- almost everything since then has been Windows, Mac, or Linux, the choice in platforms as far as hardware is concerned is almost dead.

      Please don't. I have a Magnavox Headstart 300 from 1990. True it runs on DOS, but at least it is not Windows.

      (sniff) I want be an old geek too.

    6. Re:Variety of platforms by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      who can forget the precursor to the BBC micro, the Timex Sinclair Z80?

      No, the Sinclair ZX80 was the precursor to the ZX81 and ultimately the Sinclair Spectrum. The BBC Microcomputer was built by Acorn Computer, who were rivals of Sinclair Research in the competition for the BBC contract, and won because of clearly superior engineering. This rivalry became something of a personality clash between the founders of the two Cambridge-based companies: I remember reading reports of an altercation in a Cambridge pub or restaurant on New Years Eve 1982 or 83 when Sir Clive Sinclair ran into Acorn's Chris Curry and Hermann Hauser and reportedly got a little hot under the collar (although all parties refused to comment on the incident). The precursor to the Beeb was the Acorn Atom, which itself grew out of Acorn's early work on fruit machine controller boards.

      Worthy of note is that Acorn went on to produce the ARM processor to power the third generation of BBC Micros, which is now used in many portable devices including the iPod. So the BBC Micro can be seen as the precursor of Apple's music player - if you stretch the facts a bit.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    7. Re:Variety of platforms by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I suggested buying them in threes- most of the computers of this time period had three basic circuit boards in them: Keyboard, Power, Motherboard. IF you're lucky and don't have any hand-patched RevB boards, these three boards are usually interchangeable with a little work even without a tech manual of any sort; and by buying three units, you can usually cobble together one working machine between the three.

      But I agree- some of these are INCREDIBLY hard to find even one of- your Compucolor is almost as rare as a TI-99/8 or a TI-99/2.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Variety of platforms by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Please don't. I have a Magnavox Headstart 300 from 1990. True it runs on DOS, but at least it is not Windows.

      That ran Windows. You just need to find a copy of Windows 1.0 to run on it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Variety of platforms by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's laughable to see people who seem to accept that 'DOS' machines are 'historic microcomputer' machines. It goes to show that there be young folk here.

      It's a rising phenomenon. 'Vintage' copies of Windows 3.1 on eBay, etc. etc.

    10. Re:Variety of platforms by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I thought the Timex Z80 was a computer that an organization of enteupreurs in Singapore designed, and when it was successful, Clive Sinclair bought the rights from Timex to produce a local version of in England.

    11. Re:Variety of platforms by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      No, the ZX80 and ZX81 were both Sinclair Research in-house achievements, born and bred in Cambridge, England (as were all Sinclair products). Timex licensed the rights from Sinclair to manufacture and market the machines in the United States under the Timex Sinclair name.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    12. Re:Variety of platforms by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to see somebody sell a "vintage" copy of Office 6.0- on all 25 floppies.....and Win95 when it first came out was also on floppy, took 15 of them.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:Variety of platforms by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I have Windows 95 diskettes in my collection of old Microsoft junk. I have both the 5-1/4" and the 3-1/2" release. If you copy all the 5-1/4" diskettes into a directory and burn it to CDROM you have a complete no-frills copy of the Windows 95 installer that doesn't have Internet anything on it (no Internet Explorer). Further, it doesn't ask for a CD-Key or try to 'fingerprint' itself like images of the 3-1/2" install set does. But that's just deep arcana about Windows 95 install binaries.

      I once happened upon one disk out of an install set of Microsoft Office (probably 4.2) on low density 5-1/4" disks. It was numbered something like 'Disk 47.' What a HORROR it would have been to install Office from that huge pile of diskettes. ("Error reading diskette 58. Abort, Retry, Fail?")

    14. Re:Variety of platforms by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I know. I was just trying to post as ridiculous a distortion of history as I could and stir up some Britsh pride in the process. I know that the Sinclair machines were designed and produced in the UK, and that the 'Timex' machines were kind of a bastardization.

      I had a Sinclair 2068 at one point, right in the middle of America.

  8. Isn't it obvious? by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    what sort of things would you as fellow comp sci geeks like to see in a Historic Computer exhibit?

    Booth babes, of course.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Isn't it obvious? by J_Darnley · · Score: 0

      I'd rather not gaze on antique women thank you.

    2. Re:Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah...but sadly, gravity always wins...

      For myself, I'd like to see a Digi-Comp I

  9. repair? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    I realize that you're doing this as an independent study project for which the repair aspect is certainly a valuable learning tool. However, is repairing these machines particularly necessary? Will you power them up and leave them running in the display? I mean, unless you've got some decent demos running (and maybe I'm missing the point and that's exactly what you're asking for here), the machines will be sitting idle behind some plexi. In which case all you really need to do is clean them up to be presentable.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:repair? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Back around '93 me and a group of friends embarked on a project like this. Half the fun was actually getting the computers up and running. We were able to scrounge all manner of old computers and videogame consoles.
      Among our finds was a Commodore 64 with a blown VIC graphic chip. When turned on this computer just displayed a constantly changing flow of colors similar to those "plasma" color demos that were popular at the time.
      We had computers from houses near the ocean with corroded motherboards from the salty air. Salvage work was fun since these early systems mostly had socketed chips and could be worked on with a standard soldering iron if necessary.
      We had C64s, TRS-80s, a TI99, a working Bally Astrocade, Ataris etc. And then there was the Mac.
      This poor beat up Mac Plus had a broken hard disk. We tracked down a 20MB SCSI drive for it and were able to get the operating system up and running. After finally getting it runnning we sat down to watch TV, leaving the Mac on the table behind us. About 10 minutes later we hear a high pitched whining sound. Turning around just in to hear *POP* and see a large cloud of smoke waft up from the Mac. The screen slowly shrank to a single glowing dot . Poor Mac, I guess it realized it was obsolete.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  10. Re:Really old Geek ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you wouldn't remember the Motorola 6800 (no - not the 68000), or the Cosmac VIP, or the 8080, or all the real precursor computers.

    Heaven's forbid you had used a PDP7 where you had to toggle the bootloader in via the front panel so you could pull the monitor in off paper tape.

    You're not that old :-)

  11. I think your best bet... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 4, Informative

    is to stick with well documented hardware. The two you've picked so far ought to more than fit the bill, but considering you've added "repair" to the title of the class, I assume you'll be doing pcb level hardware repair. This is a LOT of fun and frustration at the same time, but if you start digging into machines that nobody's thought of, cared about, or kept track of over the past 30+ years you probably will start getting into headaches of trying to diagnose some seriously weird bugs. Not to discourage you from this course of action, in fact far from it, it sounds like something I would have enjoyed in my public schooling days (or at least getting credit for it). Find clubs that support the machines and can give you advice, don't try to go it alone, after all, the machines were built by teams, teams should help you rebuild them. Most of all remember to have fun!

    1. Re:I think your best bet... by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      Until I picked up a digital storage scope and a logic analyzer it could take me days to track down stuck inputs and other wierd things that TTL does when it dies. Since you're in college, you should have access to these things in your lab. If you haven't learned how to use them yet, take this opportunity to do so. As a bonus, you'll get a double education from the experience and brownie points with the prof.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    2. Re:I think your best bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always the bad techs who need the biggest tools. Seriously, a multimeter, a logic probe and a piece of brain stuck in your head is all you need to repair these old machines.

  12. Computer History Museum by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you haven't already done so, you and your professor need to contact the Computer History Museum in San Jose.

    Next week's big festivities involve a restored PDP-1.

    Their collection of hardware is pretty much unmatched, and is open to the public. What's on display is the tip of their collection's iceberg. Who knows what might be kicking around in the background, just waiting for a small team of geeks to restore?

    And conversely, who knows what might be kicking around in your classmates' basements that's on CHM's wish list?

    1. Re:Computer History Museum by ak_hepcat · · Score: 1

      Seconded and bumped +5. I was down there 3 weeks ago and have a CD full of pictures and videos
      from the tour.

      Run, don't walk, to this museum. And if you really feel the need, Google is a few blocks away, Apple is a 10 minute drive, and a bunch of other fine folks. There's even the local Sports Bar, right across the street.

      Go for the Museum. It's so worth the effort.

      --
      Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
    2. Re:Computer History Museum by ZOP · · Score: 1

      I have to whole heartedly agree. Helping out an existing project is a FAR better idea than trying to start ones own. Especially when you're considering the amount of effort involved in just obtaining some of these pieces of hardware!

    3. Re:Computer History Museum by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      If you haven't already done so, you and your professor need to contact the Computer History Museum in San Jose.
      Minor correction: it's in Mountain View (in the old SGI building), not San Jose.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  13. Kpro, IIGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a Kpro, and a II GS running "Tunnels of Armageddon" or "Journey"

  14. muhahaha by Evoluder · · Score: 1

    TRS80 FTW!!!!11

  15. Illustrate the speed of change by sfjoe · · Score: 1


    While most people don't think of them as "historic", displaying a 5 to 10 year-old computer and comparing it with a modern computer highlights the rapid pace of change in the industry and is interesting to see.

    --
    It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    1. Re:Illustrate the speed of change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you're being sarcastic, because there isn't much difference.

  16. so many milestones... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's some computers I'd recommend you try to get. Each represents one or more milestones to what we now consider commonplace. (I've left out some of the more obvious ones; please forgive me if I've named some you consider obvious.)

    Desktops:
    Commodore PET 2001 (color chicklet keyboard).
    Sinclair ZX-80/81.
    Coleco Adam.
    DEC Rainbow 100.
    Amiga 2000.

    Portables:
    TRS-80 Model 100/102.
    Osborne 1.
    Compaq suitcase PC.
    HP 200LX.
    Apple Newton.
    Toshiba T1000.

    1. Re:so many milestones... by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Atari 400/800/XL series. One of the first computers to feature separate programmable chips for CPU, I/O, sound and graphics, and much more sophisticated multi-mode interrupt-driven video than either of its 6502 peers, the Apple ][ and the C64. The first digitized video I was on was connected to an 800 and the first computer playback of music I ever heard came from it (10 scratchy seconds of "You Really Got Me" by Van Halen).

      Remarkably hackable OS for ROM firmware. Arguably the truest random number generator (derived from multiple hardware sources like timing and voltages rather than a seed). G:, the Epson-compatible graphics printer device. And a level of hardware incompatibility that paved the way for the first Macintosh.

      --
      "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    2. Re:so many milestones... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      One of them. The TI-99/4A did as well- and then they gunked it up by abstracting BASIC behind two levels of interpreters. If you were lucky enough to have the Editor/Assembler Cartridge and learn 16-bit Assembly, you quickly found out that the darned thing actually had 4 sub processors (Graphics/Video, Mathematical, Sound, Memory/Peripherial) with their own memory spaces, and that almost every peripherial you added to it added a small amount of memory + another processor. If you were intelligent about it, you could have several tasks going on at once, all managed by the CPU.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:so many milestones... by wkitchen · · Score: 1

      An interesting and somewhat rare one in the portable's category is the Commodore SX-64. This would would be a great historic machine to have on display.

    4. Re:so many milestones... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      An interesting and somewhat rare one in the portable's category is the Commodore SX-64

      Yes it is. I keep one on a table in my office for others to take notice of. I don't get as many questions about it as I first thought I would. I need to interface it with my office computer to give people something to "fiddle" with.

    5. Re:so many milestones... by karnal · · Score: 1

      Actually, the video/graphics processor was the main CPU in the heart of that beast, right? In addition, it used video memory for main ram, rather than having dedicated memory for each.

      I only had the "mini memory" cartridge, and no good documentation, so I never learned a whole lot about the different things I could do with the TI. I really wanted the Editor/Assembler... later, I graduated to a CoCo3 with it's Assembler - that 6809 was a dream to program on.... (and since the Basic wasn't interpreted 6 ways to Sunday, Basic applications actually ran FAST!)

      --
      Karnal
    6. Re:so many milestones... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the video/graphics processor was the main CPU in the heart of that beast, right?

      Nope, the 16-bit TMS9900 was the main CPU, but the video/graphics processor was given the most memory (the main CPU only had 256 BYTES of memory dedicated to it's processing- 128 words- but could read/write indirectly the 16kbytes attached to the TMS9100A VPU). In addition to that- the sound processor had 128 bytes of dedicated memory (just enough for those insipid little songs that came with the games cartridges- you could just load up the memory with sound data and instruct the sound processor to play it in a continuous loop forever); the peripherial processing unit (a TMS9901 chip) had a 1k buffer that was split between keyboard, joysticks, and tape output; the math co-processor had a whopping 16 1-word registers for a total of 32 bytes of memory.

      The really stupid bit was that use of the Video memory as Main Memory- it forced EVERY memory read/write from the CPU to go through the VPU, which slowed the 4Mhz 16-bit processor down to the equivalent of a 1Mhz 8-bit. Got a little bit better with the Minimemory cartridge (but that still had to go through the VPU, they didn't call it a GRAM cartidge for nothing) or with the Peripherial Expansion Box and the 32k Memory Expansion Card (which had it's own memory managing processor that addressed memory by Words instead of Bytes, thus allowing the CPU to finally grab 2 bytes on a read or write cycle).

      I only had the "mini memory" cartridge, and no good documentation, so I never learned a whole lot about the different things I could do with the TI. I really wanted the Editor/Assembler... later, I graduated to a CoCo3 with it's Assembler - that 6809 was a dream to program on.... (and since the Basic wasn't interpreted 6 ways to Sunday, Basic applications actually ran FAST!)

      I actually stuck with the TI architecture through the 1988 sell-off-to-South-Africa of the Myarc Geneve 9640 (the 32 bit version). But I admit, the 68xx series was much easier to program in Assembly on- a single processor with only 3 registers instead of registers up the wazoo and a CPU that is limited to accessing memory through OTHER peripherial processing units. That and only half the slow speed of TI-Basic was due to the fact it was programed in GPL, which itself was an interpreted language, that had to be line-by-line assembled into the VPU's native machine code, which then fed the memory to the CPU for actual processing. The other half was that there was only an 8-bit data bus between the CPU and VPU; thus strangling the power of the CPU.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  17. How about... by EnigmaticSource · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A DEC PDP-11/73, my personal favorite.

    Probably the easiest computer to rebuild from the classic era as there is only one bus (Unibus), and nothing but traces and some very simple electronics on the backplane. Well that and you could hit them with a hammer.

    The PDP-11 series, along with the PDP-8's were some of the first nodes on the ARPANET and you can still get working Ethernet adapters for them.

    Hell, I still miss mine (Viper tape drive, RSX/11, RSTS/E 10, BASIC Plus2, 512MB EDSI drive).

    (You can still find these things running if you look hard enough... (Try asking old medical/dental offices, most of them ran PDP/11's))

    --
    The Geek in Black
    I know my BCD's (when I'm Sober)
    1. Re:How about... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

      The PDP-11/73 does NOT use Unibus. It uses Qbus. And there weren't any PDP-8 computers as ARPANET hosts.

    2. Re:How about... by EnigmaticSource · · Score: 1
      And there weren't any PDP-8 computers as ARPANET hosts

      Well, I might be mistaken, but I could have sworn that the UC Berkley node I dialed into was a PDP-8. And you're right, I was in a hurry and Mixed up my DEC busses (I was thinking about the PDP-11/44 that I wrote medical software on)
      --
      The Geek in Black
      I know my BCD's (when I'm Sober)
    3. Re:How about... by kbob88 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if the PDP-8 and 11 qualify as microcomputers; I always thought they were minis, but they sure were great boxes.

      Cut my teeth on a PDP-8/E (http://www.pdp8.net/) running ETOS (a 16-user timesharing OS) in 64KB of memory. It had a great, powerful, simple assembler language. I remember the day we got a 1MB hard disk -- wow what an upgrade from (small) mag-tapes and paper-tape!

      The PDP-8 would be a good box to play with too. It's fairly simple inside (AFAIR); and not too large. You wouldn't need a hard disk to run it, especially not for an exhibit. Just use the small mag tapes.

      Plus it will really look good in an exhibit, better than the later micros. It's got a good set of blinking lights on the front (and LED numbers too, depending on the model), which always looks more impressive in an exhibit. And you could set it up to spin the tape reels back and forth too, which looks good.

      If you're really ambitious, there were some assembler programs that controlled CPU in a way that its electrical interference would play music over nearby radios. Now that would be a cool exhibit - blink lights and LEDs, tape drive moving back and forth, and music playing over an old transistor radio nearby!

    4. Re:How about... by Temkin · · Score: 1

      I don't know if the PDP-8 and 11 qualify as microcomputers; I always thought they were minis, but they sure were great boxes.



      I have a Heathkit badged PDP-11/03 sitting at my parents house. It's no bigger than the original IBM PC, though I admit, I don't have a 8-inch dual disk unit that is supposed to be paired with it. The bigger Unibus machines were mini's. I'd consider the Q-Bus systems to be micros.



      The Heathkit version is rather rare, I wonder if I need to find a collection to donate it to...



    5. Re:How about... by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      I too started out (at school) on a PDP-8/e with paper tape and teletypes and you are correct - it and the PDP-11 were minicomputers. Witness the fact that rather than containing a microprocessor they had multiple-board processors: "The first 6 cards is the CPU". (Don't blame me for the grammar, folks; I'm quoting.)

      DEC did produce a PDP-11-on-a-chip called the T-11. For a while in the mid-80s I had a system based on it, which a friend who had a combination of too much scrap hardware and too much free time put together for me, together with a VT-05 terminal. Eventually he replaced it with his PDP 11/34, once he'd found himself a VAX...

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    6. Re:How about... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      Yes, the 11/44 is a great machine. The last of the all-TTL PDP-11s. It was even designed to support multiprocessing, though such a configuration was never actually offered.

      Unfortunately the H7140 power supply is very prone to failures. And it uses 35V AC fans for which replacements are not readily available.

      Terry Kennedy reported back in 1996 that he'd found a bug in the CPU that allowed unprivileged users to crash the machine, but I haven't been able to track down the details.

  18. Old school Unix... by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There were people bragging about running these at home in the "How Pointlessly Excessive Is Your Home Network?" Ask Slashdot, but -- I'd be curious to play with a PDP-11 running circa-1970 Unix.

    And a Xerox Star.

    1. Re:Old school Unix... by Otter · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I now notice you specified "microcomputer". I'll have to email the clowns from the Ask Slashdot and see if I can come over to their home.

    2. Re:Old school Unix... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A VAX system can run a fairly old-school UNIX, and Microvaxes use microprocessors, not discrete logic, so are on-topic to this discussion. A machine capable of 'old school UNIX' (like, say, 4.3BSD-Quasijarus) is fairly easy to bring up.

      And some of the later-model Vaxen are easy-to-handle desktop boxes. Look up a MicroVAX 3100 or something of that nature.

    3. Re:Old school Unix... by Temkin · · Score: 1



      You can simulate it. There's a couple PDP-11 simulators that you can run on Linux that will actually boot V7 Unix images. I had it running back in 1996 or so... Always amusing to tie it to port 23 and leave it on the net for the script kiddies to play with....

    4. Re:Old school Unix... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A VAX system can run a fairly old-school UNIX, and Microvaxes use microprocessors, not discrete logic, so are on-topic to this discussion. A machine capable of 'old school UNIX' (like, say, 4.3BSD-Quasijarus [harhan.org]) is fairly easy to bring up.

      And some of the later-model Vaxen are easy-to-handle desktop boxes. Look up a MicroVAX 3100 or something of that nature. They're just as 'historic' as a lot of the stuff (Amiga 500s ?!?!) people are rambling about here.

  19. cardiac by MrRobahtsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously.

    You haven't really lived until you've run a multiplication (by repetitive addition) manually on a cardboard computer simulator.

    1. Re:cardiac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or you could live vicariously with cinc, the cardiac cardboard computer emulator.

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/cinc/

  20. BASIC by conJunk · · Score: 1
    my favorite feature of the Apple ][ was the built-in BASIC on the rom, and man, you could do *so* much stuff with that basic...

    i've actually been getting back into it, and i'm writing a BASIC interpreter in my new language of choice, and i've been picking up old applesoft BASIC manuals on ebay... really fun

    once you've got them looking pretty, you should let users play with them via some fun BASIC program you've written

    1. Re:BASIC by russellh · · Score: 1

      i've actually been getting back into it, and i'm writing a BASIC interpreter in my new language of choice, and i've been picking up old applesoft BASIC manuals on ebay... really fun

      what language? is it working?

      I still have all my apple ][ disks with all my basic programs from those days, and my beagle bros peeks & pokes chart. it was good, indeed. but those days are long gone, and all that work is hidden away on disk, on fading cheap fanfold paper, etc. I've been thinking over the years of ways to keep/store/present old projects. analogous to how you might hang a picture on a wall, or photograph an event. This, of course, is a perpetual ongoing problem.

      It'd be cool to add an applesoft basic interpreter that doesn't require a hardware emulator to the options.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:BASIC by dbIII · · Score: 1
      my favorite feature of the Apple ][ was the built-in BASIC on the rom ... applesoft BASIC
      Even back then Microsoft were the cheaper option with less features. Another BASIC for the Apple, integer BASIC, had an assembler and probably a lot of other good features I can't remember.
    3. Re:BASIC by conJunk · · Score: 1

      i'm writing it in ruby... it's kind of my 'let's learn ruby!' project... i haven't decided how to handle all the peek/poke/call stuff yet, since obviously the memory addresses are completely irrelevant... one option would be to give the more common peek/poke things named procedure statements, or i could just hardcode all the old apple ][ memory addresses to their functionality :)

    4. Re:BASIC by russellh · · Score: 1

      i'm writing it in ruby... it's kind of my 'let's learn ruby!' project...

      Sounds cool. I think it would be exceptionally cool if it were a web application. Since you're not emulating hardware, it could be very fast. With ajax on the web, network operations would probably slow it down enough to feel like the real thing.

      i haven't decided how to handle all the peek/poke/call stuff yet, since obviously the memory addresses are completely irrelevant... one option would be to give the more common peek/poke things named procedure statements, or i could just hardcode all the old apple ][ memory addresses to their functionality :)

      yeah, well I guess it depends on what you want to run on it. peek and poke, probably functions that do a lookup table. some are just flags, others are more procedural triggers since you're probably not going to write a 60Hz vertical blanking interrupt routine to pick up those changes. or whatever it was.

      good luck. if you get something working or want some ideas, send me an email.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  21. PDP-10/11 - Early VAX models by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    Find some of the early ports of Unix to run.

    Good luck on this. I expect this won't be an easy chore. I hope you have LEET soldering skills - you will need them

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  22. If you consider an Apple II "historic"... by nutsy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... then you should try to get your hands on a KIM-1, the original testbed for the 6502 CPU. A mid-1970s kit built around Chuck Peddle's baby... now that's historic!

    1. Re:If you consider an Apple II "historic"... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A SYM-1 is a reasonable alternative, since Synertek was the second-source producer of the 6502.

      Not as cultish a single-board and fairly easy to acquire on eBay.

  23. relay computer by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    This isn't something one could easily acquire or build, but I recently saw a demo of an 8-bit relay computer built by one of the professors at my school. It is constructed from 415 relays (electrically actuated mechanical switches) wired together, and is capable of addition, and, or, xor, not, conditional jumps, shift left and a few other misclaneous instructions I can't recall.

    1. Re:relay computer by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I built something like that while in high school, which really dates me.

  24. Tandy 1000 by Who235 · · Score: 1

    I got a Tandy 1000 off my brother-in-law when I was a kid after my Commodore 64 went to the dogs. Maybe not as antique as you're looking for, but I could still own any one of you at King's Quest. . . if there was a way to own someone at King's Quest that is.

    1. Re:Tandy 1000 by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1
      I could still own any one of you at King's Quest. . . if there was a way to own someone at King's Quest that is.

      Sadly, shouting "Give flowers to MERMAID!!" at the top of your lungs just doesn't have the same oomph as a modern "BOOM, Headshot!"

  25. Re:Really old Geek ? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Damn straight he's not that old. I don't even want to hear about "old computers" unless they have core memory or better yet, a drum.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  26. Re:Really old Geek ? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    Core memory? Drums? If your first computer's name didn't end in "iac" I don't want to hear from you.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  27. The best old computers by tfinniga · · Score: 1

    I think I speak for many of us when I say that the most historically significant computers are whatever ones I happened to have access to.

    Also, thundercats rule.

    --
    Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
  28. NeXT cube by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Mr. Lee worked out the server methodology for serving up the web and it was the forerunner of the operating system and dev-tools of the current OSX environ. Plus you don't see many working cubes these days - at least with working Magneto-Optical drives. Another triva note - the engine for the first iteration of Doom was sussed out on NeXTstep. I have the binaries around somewhere...

  29. Commodore 64 by Spit · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't the c64 get more kudos as a historically important system? At the time of its release it had unbeatable specs and value and was the driver of much innovation in the 80s. It is also eclipsed the competition becoming the best selling computer system and introduced more people to computing than any other.

    --
    POKE 36879,8
    1. Re:Commodore 64 by markimusk · · Score: 1

      uhhmmm, hear, hear! and Kudos I say!

    2. Re:Commodore 64 by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1
      Agreed. The C64 has played a major role in the evolution of home computers. It sold a lot, sure, but most importantly, it was fun to learn, program and play with.

      Of course, I'm biased. I remember when we went to the store in 1985 my parents and I, to buy our C64. It was supposed to be a much better system than the old TI-99 I had learned to type my name on, before I could even write it with a pen. When we got home, with the precious box, after many hours late at night, my father had to give up because the disk drive was not working. You have no idea how long was the day after, until finally, my father went to the store to get a new one. Again, defect. The other day, we exchanged the disk drive for a 1541. And then, the magic began.

      I remember using GEOS with a joystick (hehe), drawing, writing texts and trying about anything in GEOS just for the fun of it (and because it looked very serious!) I remember that fishing game, which came with the computer. You had to pick the trout (fish #4, iirc) to beat almost any other fish. There's also all those Epyx games I remember. GI Joe was lots of fun too. We ended up with a huge lot of game copies, taken from an uncle and I'd spend hours going through them ("Still loading..."). Then there were the BBSes, the computer magazines (I think I remember seeing a screenshot of the first image scanner for the C64), the BASIC books I got from school (and I always ended up with some syntax error when I was about to launch the game)...

      Ahh... The good ol' days. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's got so much fun with that nice piece of computer. As the parent said, it's strange the C64 didn't get more kudos (yet).

      I know my C64 is in some box in my parent's basement, with a collection of floppies, broken joysticks and other junk. I'll have to try it out some time.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    3. Re:Commodore 64 by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      I remember that fishing game, which came with the computer. You had to pick the trout (fish #4, iirc) to beat almost any other fish.

      Odell Lake. It was far better on the Commie than on the Apples at school.

      --saint

    4. Re:Commodore 64 by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      Bingo! That's the one. Hehe, just reading the name gives me shivers. I've spent lots of time playing that game. I've never played it on other computers though. Thanks for reminding me of the name!

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  30. Nerd Setups Through Time? by mac.convert · · Score: 1

    Perhaps to help draw interest from the non comp-sci crowd, you could set up one "recreation" of a nerd's setup from pop culture, i.e. David Lightman's setup in wargames with the IMSAI 8080 computer, modem, etc. Of course, empty cans of soda, bags of chips, and Playboy magazines scattered around the desk would be necessary for the full effect as well.

    --
    "Every time a bell rings, a Dell laptop bursts into flame."
  31. Tandy CoCo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Tandy Color Computer running OS-9 would be of historic interest, I think.

  32. Age related bugs vs design flaws by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    All of those old machines had one flaw or another, something that came up even when brand new as a result of bad design -- having to lift and drop the LISA on occasion, for instance, or having to reseat the memory cards in Atari 800s every few days to keep 'em running.

    Given the premise of your work, I'd want to know what you fixed on each machine that was due to age and neglect, versus what you did (or didn't) fix because it was a side-effect of a known design flaw (such as impact damage to the bottom of the LISA over time, or whatnot.)

    1. Re:Age related bugs vs design flaws by 0racle · · Score: 1

      having to lift and drop the LISA on occasion
      Hang on there. Do what to Lisa?

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  33. TI-99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used to have a TI-99/4A. Pretty fun stuff.

  34. Things I've seen that amuse people.. by technos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a fair amount of, shall we say, junk.

    The stuff that amuses folks the most?

    Hand modified "rev b" boards.. Every major manufacturer had em. So thick with a spiders web of enamelled wire patching flaws you were amazed they functioned.

    Drive platters. I have a few the size of small car tires. People always get wowed when I explain they hold far less data than a floppy disc.

    Memory boards. I have a Hewlett Packard board that holds 128 megabytes of memory. At 18x12x2 and a couple pounds, setting it next to a DRAM chip stripped from a modern DIMM usually elicits a 'WHOA'.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
    1. Re:Things I've seen that amuse people.. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      Hand modified "rev b" boards...

      I used a Texas Instruments PC (similar but not compatible with IBM PC).
      It had a disk controller board that had to go
      to double character revision markings and *still*
      had an unholy rat's nest of wires. The motherboard
      was not much better.

  35. I hate it when by wjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    People start talking about "historic" computers, and I look around and see I have most the ones they mention still plugged in and running on various tables in my home office.

    It makes me feel old.

    --
    my old sig is obsolete, and I haven't come up with a stupid enough new one yet
  36. Re:Really old Geek ? by orangesquid · · Score: 1

    Is that you, Charles Babbage? :-D

    A good exhibit mentions Multics... and not just as the father of unix.

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  37. Sol by ArmpitMan · · Score: 1
    Processor Technology's Sol, obviously. The first prebuilt personal computer -- yes, before the Apple II. Can't think of many microcomputers more historic than that.

    Also, for the love of God, don't put them behind glass. These things were meant to be hacked with.

  38. more of a mini, but... by astrashe · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a PDP-11.

  39. I found a by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

    RS 6000 desktop under a desk at my job at IBM. Don't know much more about it, but it was good for a "woa...um, I don't support those" comment.

    My old roommate used to cart around some huge spark box from apartment to apartment...had like 8 processor boards. He never got it running, but it would boot. We almost had a computer museum in our 3rd bedroom "NOC"...thank god for all-bills paid apartments with a good net connection. I think he had some Amiga box, maybe even a commodore 64. I remember him playing Leather Goddesses of Phobos on the amiga.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  40. hello, computer by croddy · · Score: 1

    y'all NEED to have an acoustic coupler.

    1. Re:hello, computer by Temkin · · Score: 1



      True! A 300 baud acoustic modem is a must. In the late 70's and early 80's, these were just barely legal. You leased you phone from "ma bell", and were not supposed to attach unapproved devices to "their wiring". The acoustic coupler skirted these rules quite effectively.

  41. Re:Really old Geek ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Core memory? Drums? If your first computer's name didn't end in "iac" I don't want to hear from you.


    Allright bitches, you've forced me to put the smack down.

    I started with a Mark 0 Abacus. No, we didn't have pr0n for it, but if you rub it on your personal bits just right you do get an acute case of "my pants are tight!!"...
  42. Macintosh? by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one's mentioned this. No 'historical computer' collection is complete without an original Macintosh. The amount of things that we take for granted in modern computers (especially in terms of interface) which were introduced to the general market with the Macintosh is astounding. It may not have been the first to do a lot of those things, but it was the first to really bring them to light. Additionally you're far more likely to be able to find an old Mac for cheap than an old Lisa or similar.

    1. Re:Macintosh? by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen an original mac go cheap in a long time, but I have seen a Lisa go for under $100 recently. Aside from Ebay, Hamfests (ham radio version of a computer show and sale) frequently are great places to look for older equipment.

  43. Re:Really old Geek ? by stevew · · Score: 1

    Yes I am ;-)

    Or typing in your code into the keyboard of an Ollevetti Programma 101. Then there was "Gotran" for the 1620 - or the ORIGINAL Fortran IV for the IBM 1130.

    Experience with a Papertape is required also to really qualify here. We ASSUME you can program an 029! If you tell me you can't program an 029 - you don't qualify!

    To answer the guy's original question. Certainly an Apple II, IBM-PC Version 1 with the tape cassette, and the Altair 8080 are all good things to display. They were mainstream stuff. The TRS-80 someone mentioned would also be a definate addition to the collection.

    If you can locate a SWTPC TV TTY - well - that would also be a major find.

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
  44. A Lisp Machine by siegesama · · Score: 1

    Find a TI Explorer or one of the MIT Lisp Machines. Those are something I'd love to see restored!

    TI Explorer Brochure

    --
    what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
  45. It depends. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    It depends on the degree of anality the museum displays in the choice and care of their exhibits. This will severely restrict your options if you have to replace components to make the computers operable.

    Over the last 28 years I've worked at several railroad museums (as a volunteer), and one was extremely anal about the "originality" of the rolling stock.

    For example, about 40 years ago they were given a functionning 100 year old steam locomotive, but they totally neglected it because over it's century of service, it was rebuilt several times, so they deemed it to be "not original".

    Likewise, I was once involved in repairing a streetcar that was carrying passengers. We were redoing the air-brake system, and whenever we wanted to replace a part (down to a goddammed frigging bolt), some jerk would complain that it made the streetcar "less authentic".

    The kicker was a secondary (but vital) air pipe that was totally rotten. We were told that it had to stay as is, even though the proper functionning of brakes depended on it.

    Sadly, though, when I was working on the adjoining union, my pipe wrench slipped and totally shatted the "historic" pipe in a thousand crumbs of rust, and we had to replace the pipe itself...

  46. Apple peripherals of the time by toybuilder · · Score: 1

    Dot matrix and daisywheel printers.
    Paddle wheels and joysticks (good lord they were so primitive!)
    Green phosphor and amber phosphor CRTs
    Cassette tape
    Acoustic coupler modem
    Mockingboard sound card
    External keyboard (with lowercase letters!) that attached via an umbilical.
    CP/M Card
    80-column card

    Oh, and a box of 5 1/4" floppy disks, and a flippy-notcher to use the back, and a Beagle Bros poster to complete the scene.

    This make me nostalgic for the CP/M card and the Videx 80-column conversion that let me run WordStar on my Apple ][+. I knew one guy that even had an 8" floppy on his CP/M-enabled Apple...

    Oh, and I'd love to see a collection of Apple clones, too... I actually owned such a bootleg... I had a friend with a Franklin, and there were others that I read about over the years.

    1. Re:Apple peripherals of the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i still have my doubler card
      it raised that paragon of power, the II,
      to 2 mhz

      i still remember the proud day i brought home MY first computer
      no more hanging out at the computer center at 2 am coding
      i could code at home!

      when did i get old ?

  47. Try something less typical. by soward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I feel like the altair / apple / C= stuff has all been done over many times....
    Someone mentioned the sinclair, that might be interesting, especially if you could find one of the color ones. PDPs and the like fall in with one of my favorites, the Pr1me, as being mini-computers.

    How about an Alpha-Micro? It dates to about 1982, so while not _super_ old, it's no spring chicken. The company still exisits in some form, so you might be able to get docs, schematics, etc. And that whole 'write your backups to a VHS tape' trick still raises eyebrows today.

    --
    John Soward...University of Kentucky
  48. Maybe one of the GRiD laptops? by martinultima · · Score: 1

    If I remember right there were a lot of cool GRiD laptops from around that time... I never actually saw the 80's since I was born in 1990 but I've got a GRiD 1720 – one of the last models they made after being bought out by Tandy, it's about the same age as me – truly amazing machine, still runs beautifully too. Probably a bit too new for your project but one of their older ones like the Compass would be worth looking into...?

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
    1. Re:Maybe one of the GRiD laptops? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I never actually saw the 80's since I was born in 1990

      After reading this, I mysteriously heard every joint CRACK on my aging skeleton!!!

      To give you an idea of my age, I still have one of the first production VIC-20's (with the 9VAC P/S) that I got as a teenager.

  49. Next by wandazulu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would argue a NeXT computer should be part of any display, only because you can show it to people familar with MacOS X and then tell them that this machine has been around since *1990*.

  50. Please don't tell me the Apple II is historic... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    It seems like just yesterday I was using one. I hear historic computing, I think at least pre-diskette. For this to be "historic"... Makes me feel old...

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  51. The LINC speed control... by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure whether this can be easily retrofitted into other computer designs, but one of the coolest things on the LINC--sometimes billed as "the first personal computer"--was the adjustable speed.

    The LINC had a pair of dials on it: one was a (continuous) potentiometer, like a volume control, the other was a four-position "decade" switch. The pair of dials joint produced a signal that could be used to make any of a number of front-panel functions auto-repeat at a variable rate. In particular, you could make the "single-step" function auto-repeat. The pot adjusted the repeat rate continously over about a ten-to-one range. Each switch position was a factor of ten faster than the last. The slowest speed was about two per second.

    This means that you could make the LINC single-step through its programs at an rate from about 2 to 200,000 steps per second... the later being about half of its full speed.

    So, you could take a program... run it at 2 steps per second and watch the lights flash... then gradually speed it up over a five decades to 200,000 steps per second. At 2 steps per second if you watched closely from time to time you'd see one dot on the screen flash momentarily. As you sped it up the, the flashes would occur more rapidly... then you could see it was forming characters... then lines of text appearing at about the speed of a dot matrix printer... then finally a whole screen of flicker-free text.

    Meanwhile, the LINC's speaker, attached to bit 6 of the accumulator, would gradually change from ticks to a buzzes to beeps.

    I never saw anything that gave you such a feeling for just how incredibly goddam fast a computer was. Even one running at about 0.5 megahertz clock rate.

    You actually could build a LINC from scratch, I suppose, since it was discrete components and the design was public domain. But it would be equally interesting to take a "stock" computer of almost any vintage and give it a continuously variable clock, a la the LINC.

  52. Outperform a P4?! What an absurd notion. by toby · · Score: 1

    You need to check your facts sir, you're out by several orders of magnitude. Also spelled "Colossus".

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Outperform a P4?! What an absurd notion. by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The claim probably comes from this incident:
      (quote)
      A simulation of Colossus which Sale ran on a top-of-the-range Pentium PC took twice as long as the real thing.

      or this:
      If you wanted to program a modern computer to do what Colossus does, you'd need a 2GHz Pentium to match it.

      Don't forget Colossus was massively parallel:
      At 5,000 cps the interval between sprocket holes is 200 microsecs. In this time Colossus will do up to 100 Boolean calculations simultaneously on each of the five tape channels and across a five character matrix.

  53. Re:Really old Geek ? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Program an 029? Correct me if I'm wrong, but since an 029 is a keypunch, you must have meant 'write a program on an 029'. Either that or you're a poser. And yes, I did.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  54. 286 + Wing Commander by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    In Some respects, this may seem a little too new for what you're trying to do, but I'm going to throw it out anyway: A 286 with Wing Commander with an original Sound Blaster. I think a lot of people here would agree that WC was a major milestone in PC Gaming. For a while, Wing Commander was the game you built your machine around.

    Erm, this would appeal to *ME*, but I don't know how well it'd work for you. The pre-Wolfenstein days are pretty interesting.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:286 + Wing Commander by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of people here would agree that WC was a major milestone in PC Gaming.

      Yes, I remember watching the frames "paint" onto the screen during the FMV segments. They were really pushing the limits at that time. Otherwise, the gameplay was pretty good.

      But, I got bored easily and went back to my Amiga for some more games.

  55. Better yet, create a troubleshooting repair guide by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've got many emails over the years on asking verious questions on repairing old PETs (I have a couple simple fixes like check the sockets, clean contacts etc. but I'm not a hardware guy). The popular classic computers like the Atari 800, Apple II, VIC, C64, etc. have some really nice troubleshooting cheatsheets and guides, usually with text like 'if this is the symptom, check and/or replace these items..' Unfortuantely for the less popular machines (PET, Coleco Adam, etc, etc) there are no or very few guides.

    If you did your repairs and also worked up some rudimentary troubleshooting guide (or better set up a Wiki) for others I think you would be doing a bigger service to the classic computer communtity than just some me-too restorations.

    If you want a challenge for a restoration I would go and get a classic system restored and running, then gather a bunch of choice apps for the system and code up some easy front end (on that system or use a virtual drive, something friendlier) to demonstrate the actual programs in an "exhibit environment" (easy reset/reload, nice menu, etc.), a computer that successfully lights READY. is one thing, but one that also presents a menu of some of the popular games or programs of the time to experience is something way better.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  56. Lest we forget by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    There are other commendable historic computer that are worth being restored:

          PET Computer
          MultiVac
          Radio Shack Model I
          Commodore 64
          ENIAC
          DEC 2060 w/ TOPS20
          PDP-11/70
          C/30
          C/70
          VAX-11/780 (and 750)
          H-316
          H-516
          DEC-1090T
          ALTO
          PERQ
          IBM-360/67
          IBM-370/145
          CDC Cyber 7600
          Gould 9000
          Cray 2

    Me? I'm partial to the PDP-11/70 where one can actually WATCH the HUGE magnetic drum spin EVER SO SLOWLY. I'm still amazed that the capacity of these drum was an impressive 32 MegaBYTES in 1979!

  57. Radio Shack by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    You know, I completely forgot the Radio Shack lines. The TRS-80 series were very popular, but let's not forget about the Color Computer series (CoCo) - which actually ran arguably the most sophisticated OS of the day - OS9. This system is still being developed for today (both new hardware and OS updates), amazingly enough. Very impressive.

    The Atari 800 design seems to be quite advanced in concept, but lackluster in execution. If you look at it, it's basically a badly-done Amiga. Custom chips, etc. The insistence on cartridges, the memory limitations, etc., all helped to consign this machine to quick obsolescence. Jay Miner went on to work on the Amiga.

    1. Re:Radio Shack by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the venerable Trash Eighty, another home-made tool of the times was a keycap popper, so you could clean the dang keyboard and get the frickin "S" key to work again.

    2. Re:Radio Shack by karnal · · Score: 1

      Ah, Coco. My second (and probably best) learning tool for assembly.

      Also, who else remembers typing quickly a space l enter a space l enter a space l enter....

      good times.

      --
      Karnal
  58. Model III? That's NEW stuff! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    Hey, the model III is. like MODERN. I still have a Model I, serial number in the low 2000's. Also a Wang VS Mini.

    --
    This space available.
  59. Include photos of really ancient machines by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Be sure to include a photo gallery of "famous" then-large machines, including Crays, early IBM mainframes, Eniac, Univac, and the like. Also photos of computers that were designed but never built at the time, such as the Babbage Engine.

    If they are available, include emulators for those machines. If they are not available, write one, or get a CS friend to write one for school credit.

    An online gallery of emulators for "classic" machines is also a good add-on. Most "home" computers of the '80s have emulators and software repositories available.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  60. What about embedded systems? by Slithe · · Score: 1

    The x86 won the desktop war, but what about embedded systems? In this arena, there are more choices. Sure there are three major architectures: MIPS, ARM, PowerPC, but there are some lesser used systems, such as the Z80 and Motorola {6,8}800 (some), SPARC (a few). Most of these systems are nanos, and the moniker 'personal computer' may not apply to them, but computer geeks can still tinker with them. The lament, 'x86 is the only processor line left', is SO 1990's. Also, I think that most of the 'micro' computers were based on either the z80, 8080, or 6800, so you have approximately the same number of choices you had in 1977.

    --
    ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    1. Re:What about embedded systems? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      True enough- all these chips are still being manufactured. I hadn't actually thought about my PDA fitting into this idea- not even the old Hitachi SH-3 Windows CE 1.0 machine I have at home.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  61. Suggestions for platforms by jd · · Score: 1
    I agree 100% with the parent post. Some suggestions for computers and why:


    • Sinclair ZX80 - Start of European craze for personal computers
    • Sinclair QL - An 8-bit computer that emulated a 32-bit computer, hated it at the time but it was significant
    • PET 2001 - Built-in tape deck & monitor!
    • PET 8032, but you'd want the 256K RAM pack and possibly the PIC chip (which gave it basic graphics capability)
    • BBC Micro (either model A or B) - Massive I/O capacity
    • Acorn Archimedes - Early GUI, early RISC home computer
    • Transputer (any model) - Entire 32-bit parallel computer on a chip & usu. on eBay. Most times was stand-alone or as a processor board for a PC, but also came as a plug-in module for the Amiga to boost some games
    • Sun Sparcstation I - Computer in the monitor
    • Osborne 1 - First portable computer
    • Not sure who made the All-In-One (computer, modem, printer, keyboard and monitor in one semicircular unit)


    And my challenge to you... Most of these computers had at least a serial port. I don't believe the ZX80 did, though it may have had a tape port. Find a way of building a gigantic network using these random archaic technologies. The difficulty in building something that can convert between the myriad of formats and speeds would be a nightmare. So why do it? Partly to get a better appreciation for the internals, partly because many who were familiar with the machines would tell you it's impossible, but mostly because running a gigantically networked fishtank program across an impossibly diverse set of machines never built for parallel activity would completely f with the minds of computer historians.


    (This idea is not unlike the person who, for the 50th anniversary of the Manchester Mk. 1, wrote a program to turn the status registers, which were displayed, into a scrolling banner. Totally sick and inappropriate usage of such a machine - so much so it was brilliant!)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  62. Three indispensible tools for the geek of 1981 by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    These were all the rage in the late '70s and early 80s:

    1. A chip puller (looked like an oversized tweezer with prongs bent inward)
    2. A chip setter. Get the complete set that would handle small, medium and large chips (8, 16, and 32 leg chips)
    3. The classic memory testing tools: a hair dryer with the nozzle stepped down with duct tape and cardboard so you could reliably heat just one chip at a time, and a can of freon spray with the long tube so you could cool the chip you just brought to failure temperature before moving to the next one
    4. The assortment of hemostats, forceps, scalpels and other surgical paraphenalia that we used to use to clear tractorfeed jams and snarled ribbons [So I don't count so good any more... Four is close enough to three when you consider very small values of the larger integer...]

    In the mid 80s, tennis balls with strings attached were added to the Compleat Geek's toolkit. These were used when installing cheapernet cable in false ceilings.

    1. Re:Three indispensible tools for the geek of 1981 by eUdudx · · Score: 1
      I do not disagree, but I would add:

      1 - a manual keypunch (looks like a 3-hole device but does 12-column)
      2 - the binder we all carried before the internet with the tables of the instruction set of the computer at hand plus an ASCII/EBCDIC lookup
      3 - an original TI (as in texas instruments) LED watch

      am I on target?

    2. Re:Three indispensible tools for the geek of 1981 by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      A chip puller (looked like an oversized tweezer with prongs bent inward)

      This is an essential tool. If you need to remove a chip from a DIP socket whilst leaving a variable number of pins still in it, it just can't be beat.

  63. Re:keycap popper by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    another home-made tool of the times was a keycap popper, so you could clean the dang keyboard and get the frickin "S" key to work again.

    I actually went to some trouble to find one of those a few years ago to keep my venerable IBM Model M keyboards going. Works like a charm.

  64. What to see in the museum? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Classic software, historically important like Visicalc, demos of what you could do on tiny hardware (like any Apple ][ game), or conceptually important like the late Jef Raskin's Swyftcard.

  65. O RLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [nt]

    1. Re:O RLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YA RLY!!!

  66. Refunds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    what sort of things would you as fellow comp sci geeks like to see in a Historic Computer exhibit?
    A form where taxpayers can ask that none of their taxes go to further your 'education'.
  67. The BBC Micro by rmathew · · Score: 1

    The BBC Micro was quite popular in the UK and in India. "The BBC Lives" has extensive information about this microcomputer.

  68. Emulations are fun too. by pentalive · · Score: 1

    Hell, I still miss mine (Viper tape drive, RSX/11, RSTS/E 10, BASIC Plus2, 512MB EDSI drive).

    It would also be very good if, as a part of your exibit you had for sale a CDROM with various emulators. You might have to get permission for a for sale CD..

    If you miss PDP11 with RSTS/E.. try simh.

  69. Dulmont Magnum - arguably the first laptop, IIRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one, and the memory/disk expansion unit and it's yours for $10 + postage.

    A couple of catches: I'm in Australia so the postage won't be cheap, and it's not currently working. However I can supply circuit diagrams and documentation that should enable you to get it going. I still have some diskettes for it but I don't know whether they're readable.

    The Magnum was released in 1983 with an 8-line display, mine is a 1985 model with a 16-line display. 6MHz 80186 CPU; DOS, wordprocessor, terminal and spreadsheet programs in ROM. I think they eventually released an 8MHz model with a 40-line display. Interestingly, the BIOS was written in C. Some big manufacturers (Toshiba and Hewlett Packard) came into the market with their 80286 models and took away market share and they (Dulmont or Time Office Computers) stopped development on the Magnum (Kookaburra) and it died.

    On the back of the unit there are 2 serial ports, 1 parallel port, RCA for external mono monitor and a bus for the external memory and disk expansion unit. Battery was 5 D cells, originally NiCd (now dead), but NiMH should be fine.

    If you're interested, reply to this and let me know how I can get in touch with you, perhaps by editing your slashdot profile to show an email address.

    Regards, RGC.

  70. RS 6000s under the desk - good clean fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly not rare. Some admins live in fear of them, since they are impossible to keep secure on the open internet due to an outdated patch management system - that and in many labs 'we don't support AIX' implies that they don't *get to* - ie: some RA has root rather than the admins. :)
      They might be running some bizarre research service for some knob Phd who's been in Greece for the last two years, but will be dammed if he's gonna give up one of his expensive 'grant perimeter' machines.
        Politics keep them in place - the office might be re-used several times over by different researchers, but those boxen stay put. Ultimately staff turnover exceeds peoples ability to track them and they end up getting accidentally plastered into walls.

        Me? I just steal their keyboards whenever I find one. Reliable, clicky, tough and heavy enough to stun a moose.

  71. Just gather EVERYTHING!!! by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    Get everything you can find that remotely resembles a classic computer. You can sort it out later. If space is a problem, split the collection across the basements/closets of several people in your group. I got a lot of stuff (mostly broken) that is sitting in storage, waiting for my retirement so that I may fix them in about 25 years.

    Whatever you do, think about it as saving the stuff from going to a landfill overseas, which is where this stuff is heading. You'd be surprised as to who may want to buy some of your leftover "junk". You may not get much for it, but the proceeds can be useful to buy displays and shelves for your collection. You may also make some 'ol "geezer" (my next evolution in this life) happy to have found something for sale for their collection. Something they grew up with, but forgot about.

    1. Re:Just gather EVERYTHING!!! by J.Y.Kelly · · Score: 1

      I think this is the best suggestion. You probably don't need to buy stuff, just let it be known that you're prepared to take the old bits that loads of people will have sitting in a back room somewhere.

      A great example of what can be done this way is the computing museum at Bletchley Park in the UK. It's basically just a big shed where they've set up all the donated equipment they could get hold of. It's laid out roughly in chronological order and everything that can run does.

      It's all very hands on. The volunteers are keen to know if you can get anything working which currently doesn't and many of the machines are set up to actually do something which the public can interact with. It all feels very amateur - but all the better for that.

      Anyone who gets the chance to visit should do so. Their web site is at http://www.retrobeep.org/

  72. If you're in the northeast US..... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might want to contact MARCH, The Mid-Atlantic Retro Computer Hobbyist group. They've only been around for a very short time, but they're gathering a lot of informative members. They are running an exhibit this weekend (May 13) in Wall, NJ. Their website is still just basic info, but they have a discussion forum on Yahoo as linked on their main page.

  73. Shout out for the TI-99 4/A by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    I didn't see it mentioned, so I have to plug my first and my favorite, ye olde TI-99 4/A.

    Be sure to have the classic black and silver with real keys not those chiclet, flat keys. It should also have the 13" RGB monitor, the expansion box with a floppy drive, the speech synthesizer, the twin joysticks, the tape data drive and the accoustic coupler modem.

    I'd also suggest having the original IBM PC. Should have a green monochrome monitor, two floppy drives, no hard drive and a wide carriage, 9 pin dot matrix printer.

    How about an Atari 800?

    I'm still waiting for these to become valuable antiques since I have one of each in my attic. I just wish I had all the TI accessories I listed here. Think I'll go play Tunnels of Doom. :-)

  74. Don't just have them sit there by IL-CSIXTY4 · · Score: 1

    Please do more than just have the machines sitting there, or just let people play games on them. The importance of these machines is obvious to you, because you know them and the communities that sprouted around them. But to an outsider, they're just computers, and outdated ones at that. You can post their specs to show how quaint they are by today's standards, but that doesn't give a sense of what they meant to the people of the time, or what they mean today.

    Check sites like The Commodore Billboard for ads showing how these computers were sold to people. You might also want to look for Computer Chronicles episodes or training videos on archive.org or Google Video.

    And when you're done, be sure to let the Commodore community know about it. We'd love to see it if we're local, or even just look at pics over the net. Best of luck, it sounds like a fun project!

  75. Exidy Sorcerer by Pope · · Score: 1

    Wow. Back in the day, I knew ONE person with an Exidy Sorcerer. No one else had even heard of the damn thing back then, and they're certainly not the first name that comes to mind these days either! :)

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  76. Insightful by marcus · · Score: 1

    Nice observation.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  77. I'm way too late by marcus · · Score: 1

    But that's how you loaded your cards. I don't know what other reference he's after.

    Other than that, some of us have actually laid hands and been paid while working on binary front panels, core, paper tape, cards, disk packs, 9-track tape, 300 baud modems!

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  78. Pascal Microengine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Pascal MicroEngine running the UCSD p-System is definitely a historical curiosity.

  79. Re:Really old Geek ? by dunng808 · · Score: 1
    A good exhibit mentions Multics.

    Multics running on an Apple ][, now that would be something to brag about!

    I learned to program in BASIC on a North Star Horizon. It was a Z-80 box. The hi-lite was North Star Basic, which the machine booted into directly. Possibly the first built-in support for 5 1/4" floppy disks, at a time when Apple was limited to audio cassette tape.

    IMSAI had some nice looking equipment, with lots of toggle switches. Always wanted one of those, because it LOOKED like a computer. But that beautiful hardwood case on the Horizon, nothing like it today unless you build it yourself.

    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project