Slashdot Mirror


The Ultimate Net Monitoring Tool?

Wired News is reporting that the equipment found in the "secret" NSA room at AT&T wasn't some elaborate device designed by Big Brother. Rather, it is a commercially available network-analysis product that any company could acquire. From the article: "'Anything that comes through (an IP network), we can record,' says Steve Bannerman, marketing vice president of Narus, a Mountain View, California, company. 'We can reconstruct all of their e-mails along with attachments, see what web pages they clicked on, we can reconstruct their VOIP calls.'"

65 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Error Page by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 3, Funny

    The error page of "Nothing to see here. Move Along." that showed up when first clicking on the comments link was hilarious.

  2. Oh well, by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny
    At least it's running under Linux.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Oh well, by geoffspear · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Free as in Freedom Fries."

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Oh well, by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Funny
      At least it's running under Linux.

      This is one of those time you wish it were a Microsoft product...

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:Oh well, by xineax · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, when I am being raped in political prison because of the next-generation of this thing, I'll say, "At least Hugo is taking my man-cherry as a result of Linux." *Thumbs up*

    4. Re:Oh well, by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Funny
      *Thumbs up*

      I don't think it will be thumbs that will be up.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  3. oh, in that case... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh. Well, since the NSA bought the software that it's using, then that makes everything okey with me... :-/

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:oh, in that case... by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful


      What makes it okay is that:

      THE INTERNET IS NOT SECURE

      You have been told this from the moment you first entered the Internet.

      Anyone and everyone can see and record every byte you emit from your computer.

      The only detail is that the NSA, being a government entity, can not use the information as evidence in a court action against you, nor can they use any information that they gather only because they had this information.

      So I don't understand why people are outraged about the privacy issue. It's the issue of being able to prosecute those caught using this method that's the real problem. The existence of this intelligence program taints every case against anyone accused of any crime involving information transiting the internet.

  4. Encryption? by cwalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I somehow doubt that they are just using a "commercially available network-analysis product". I mean what "commercially available network-analysis product" breaks encryption?

    1. Re:Encryption? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I somehow doubt that they are just using a "commercially available network-analysis product". I mean what "commercially available network-analysis product" breaks encryption?

      Is this really news to anyone? I thought the original report showed they were using a Narus box. If I recall correctly it does not break encryption, but it will automatically make copies of matching encrypted flows for later analysis and cracking. My guess would be they just make copies of encrypted traffic they are interested in then move on to the big guns if it is really, really important (which they may or may not have ever actually done).

    2. Re:Encryption? by Aspirator · · Score: 2, Informative

      doesn't each hop need to at least decrypt the header to get the routing informaiton?

      No. The header is not encrypted, only the payload.

      It is unlikely that without huge resources that an intermediary could decrypt an otherwise
      intact communication (i.e. no man-in-the-middle attack took place).

    3. Re:Encryption? by Noryungi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean what "commercially available network-analysis product" breaks encryption?

      Except, of course, that breaking encryption is the Holy Grail of Signal Intelligence. Sometimes, Traffic Analysis -- which is exactly what the NSA is doing here acording to the Wired article -- is just as interesting, and a lot easier to do.

      Knowing that person A is talking to person B, and that the number of messages between the two is increasing, and where and when each message has been sent (not to mention what type of traffic is taking place) is also very informative. If you know A, a known terrorist, is exchanging a lot of messages with B, a PhD student in nuclear physics in a top-notch university, is enough to raise red flags all over the place, regardless of what kind of encryption is used to protect the messages themselves. Which is why NSA has illegally gone fishing in the first place.

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    4. Re:Encryption? by Nutria · · Score: 2, Funny
      If he's not in the country, why isn't he wearing a cruise missle as a hat yet?

      It's Bad Form to drop missile on viable states, even when they disagree with you.

      Nuking France does sounds tempting, though.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Encryption? by carrier+lost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for the link! Interesting reading.

      I'm a little baffled by your comments about "political correctness" and Bill Clinton, however. According to the article you linked:

      "This decision to deny a warrant gave rise to the myth that 'The Wall' between overseas intelligence and criminal investigations made the PATRIOT Act necessary. To this day this myth is cherished among right-wing radio talkers and has, just now, morphed into a clumsy justification for the White House's sidestepping the FISA court and directing its own wiretap frenzy via the NSA. This is all pure fantasy.

      "Instead of clueless Carter-era restrictions on domestic spying or insufficient distrust of civil liberties, Samit cited 'obstructionism, criminal negligence and careerism' by top FBI officials as what stopped his investigation."

      and:

      "Minneapolis, Phoenix, New York. Three different Bureau offices were hot on the terror plot in the days leading up to 9/11 and all were stiffed by Washington. If that is not institutional incompetence, Stalin purge-worthy stuff, heaven help the next 3,000 martyrs to J. Edgar Hoover's über-suits."

      MjM

  5. Functional Spec and Deliverables by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From TFfunctional specification:
    The Semantic Traffic Analyzer received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live--did live, from habit that became instinct--in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."

    Orwell, G. Functional Specification, Narus STA 6400 (rev. 1984)

    From TFA, the deliverable:

    We can reconstruct all of their e-mails along with attachments, see what web pages they clicked on, we can reconstruct their VOIP calls.

    AT&T. Your world, delivered.

  6. Hm. by DoctorDyna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does it make anybody else nervous that there is a market for these products? "off the shelf" products that can scale to this degree?

    If enough large companies are purchasing these to the degree that a company manufactures this equipment...exclusively.. doesn't that strike an interesting chord?

    --
    Windows has more viruses because linux has more virus coders.
    1. Re:Hm. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does it make anybody else nervous that there is a market for these products? "off the shelf" products that can scale to this degree? If enough large companies are purchasing these to the degree that a company manufactures this equipment...exclusively.. doesn't that strike an interesting chord?

      Supply and demand is somewhat elastic. Where I work right now we build fairly specialized traffic monitoring servers for the core and edge routers of ISPs. While we don't manufacture our own hardware, we do make use of hardware designed for traffic analysis like this and sold to numerous companies that create devices needing the same basic characteristics. Whether you are making a packet analyzer, a high-level forensic tool, a firewall, an IDS, a traffic shaper, or something else, you may very well need basically the same hardware. So maybe 50 customers want something as expensive as what Narus makes for the high end, that can handle that much throughput. If they are willing to pay enough, someone (like Narus) will build it. Regulation compliance budgets are pretty large this year.

      Of course Narus probably did not start out selling a "snooping" device. Look at their customers. They are all major ISPs and telecoms. The smart money says they started as a way to track traffic for billing and expanded as their customers needed to comply with more government regulations.

  7. Time enough by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Insightful
    'Anything that comes through (an IP network), we can record'

    Great! So, do you get the Amazing PauseTheUniverseTechnology free with this nifty gadget? Because it'll take some time to review "anything that comes through".

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Time enough by LilWolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      'Anything that comes through (an IP network), we can record'

      Not to worry. The RIAA will soon sue them for being able to record illegally downloaded songs. Problem solved.

    2. Re:Time enough by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, this is an interesting point. If I send an email containing a copyright document (e.g. a draft of an article I have written, sent to my editor), and it passes over their connection, then they will copy it. This copying involves making an unauthorised copy of a copyrighted work. Since I live in the UK, my email is copyrighted in the UK, and the copyright works in the USA via the Berne convention. If a private company is violating this copyright then they owe me significant damages (thanks to certain paid-for legislation). If it is the US government, then they are in violation of the Berne convention. If the USA is violating the Berne convention, then we can regard all works originally copyrighted in the USA as being in the public domain in the rest of the world. Either way, it sounds like I win...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Time enough by KnightStalker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great! So, now all we need is news that the UK is surveilling all of your network traffic and US citizens can enjoy the same benefits!

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    4. Re:Time enough by josh82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You, sir, are a genius. (And, no, I am not being sarcastic, though I may be easily impressed)

      While some might want to fight reactionary and all-too-corporate-backed legal policies with pithy appeals to such things as the "rule of law" and "human rights", this method pits such reactionary, corporate-backed legal policy against (drum roll...) corporate-backed legal policy!

      Turning the overlord's law against itself, however, is something that will only get you figuratively crushed, if you don't know what you're doing. Are you sure you know what you're doing?

  8. The evidence by op12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wired News has posted the AT&T whistleblower's evidence, which AT&T is trying to get returned to them and out of court documents: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70908-0.htm l?tw=wn_index_3

  9. One of the perks of living in Mt. View... by AriaStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is that we hear about stuff like this as fact before the rest of the world even hears it as rumor. I believe it's been a while that companies have been using this to keep track of what their employees are doing on work time (where I work, we had to sign a document stating that we knew that any and all communications at work, from VOIP to e-mail to webpages, regardless of encryption, could be recorded with no further notice) and to follow court-ordered tracking. The internet is not a secure place to be by any means, and it's best to proceed as if someone is watching. Because, chances are, someone is.

  10. Well, I feel better now! Not. by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm so happy to know that the product the NSA - with the help of AT&T - used to analyze phone number patterns and the like can be purchased by any citizen.

    But - that's not the problem as I see it. The problem, to borrow and massacre a line from "Jurrasic Park", is that they were so eager to see if they could they didn't consider if they should.

    Take the domestic to international wiretap thing. Under US law, listening in on foreign conversations is A-OK (whether that's legal in other countries I'm not even going to worry about). But the law is clear: the second there's a domestic person on that call, the NSA has to get permission from the courts. And not only that, it can be a secret court. And not only a secret court, but they can do it up to 3 days after they start - so there's no issue of "Dang, we'd listen to this call from an Al Queda agent, but we can't because Michael Moore's on the phone, and the warrant will take too long!" No - they can start now, get the warrant later.

    Then there's the domestic phone call tracking. Even if this is not strictly illegal, it still smacks of wrong. (Yes, I think there are things not illegal that are still wrong. Like Mint Oreos. Very wrong, just not illegal.) Why? Because there's no independant, "checks and balances" oversight. And yes, I have things to hide, before you ask, so I don't want the government picking that out. Like people in politics I call because I disagree with their politicies, or calls to an abortion clinic for a friend of mine who's husband is abusive and says he'll kill her if she calls the clinic, or to a reporter because my place of work is doing illegal things (note for the clueless: the former might or might not be true, but they are examples of why people might not want the government tracking calls) - the list goes on. So I don't want the government snooping in on, especially when there's no guaruntee that Joe Politician can't look in and try and use that data against me or my family or the very government system itself.

    So, great to know that there are over the shelf components to track log files. I'm more interested in making sure that another branch of the government is at least watching out to make sure that this data is not being abused. No, I don't need all of the details - that's why we have elected leaders whom I (hopefully) trust enough to look out for my interests - I just want to make sure those interests are protected by the process.

    Which said process, so far, seems to be either willingly ignored, or outright violated.

    Of course, this is all just my opinion, and I could be wrong. And to the NSA folks tracking this post - Hi!

  11. Err... by cperciva · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the equipment found in the "secret" NSA room at AT&T wasn't some elaborate device designed by Big Brother. Rather, it is a commercially available network-analysis product that any company could acquire.

    Sure, anybody could acquire the hardware used. The trick is to get the equipment onto AT&T's network without ending up in jail.

    1. Re:Err... by hacker · · Score: 2, Funny
      The trick is to get the equipment onto AT&T's network without ending up in jail.

      Hey, if the NSA can do it without warrants, why can't we?

  12. Tor by wpegden · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is why we should all use Tor. The more people that use it (and setup their node as a server) the faster it gets.

    1. Re:Tor by republican+gourd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are there any estimate as to what percentage of the Tor (or Freenet, or etc etc) nodes are actually run by the Three-Letter-Agencies themselves? Considering that just about every nation has its own intelligence/security type agencies, thats easily a couple hundred nodes right there, probably on 'decent enough' links to get a decent share of traffic but not so fast as to attract suspicion.

      I remember reading about the Freenet Guy's planned changes (moving freenet to a friend-based system where you connect along lines of trust rather than completely anonymously, and immediately thought that the unstated goal was to cut *those* people out as much as possible rather (or in addition to) than the scalability reasons given.

      Hmm, better post this anonymously...

  13. These are the tools or databases by anandpur · · Score: 5, Informative

    From http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/faq.php#15
    What is Daytona?
    Daytona is a database management technology originally developed and maintained by the AT&T Laboratories division of AT&T, and is used by AT&T to manage multiple databases. Daytona was designed to handle very large databases and is used to manage "Hawkeye," AT&T's call detail record (CDR) database. Daytona is also used to manage AT&T's huge network-security database, known as "Aurora." As of September 2005, all of the CDR data managed by Daytona, when uncompressed, totaled more than 312 terabytes.
    http://www.research.att.com/projects/daytona/

    What is Hawkeye?
    Hawkeye is AT&T's call detail record (CDR) database, which contains records of nearly every telephone communication carried over its domestic network since approximately 2001, records that include the originating and terminating phone numbers and the time and length for each call.

    What is Aurora?
    Aurora is a network-security database that had been used to store Internet traffic data since approximately 2003. The Aurora database contains huge amounts of data acquired by firewalls, routers, honeypots and other devices on AT&T's global IP (Internet Protocol) network and other networks connected to AT&T's network.

  14. Yawn. by BigMattyC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    News: that the US Government is monitoring all the traffic flowing through the internet backbones provided by major US service providers. Not News(tm): that a company produces a device that can *GASP* *SHOCK* *HORROR* monitor network traffic. Get a grip.

  15. Re:Spying by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I wonder how this will make people feel now that everyone is complaining about how the "government" is listening and recording phone calls and what have you

    Except that people aren't. I read in TIME magazine last night that over 50% of the people interviewed think that the NSA call database is justified in the War On Terror (TM). Most people will only care if it influences thier ability to watch American Idol, and if not, oh well.

  16. Monitoring Users? Nawww. by 10100111001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Anything that comes through (an IP network), we can record'

    I'm sure they are just using it to get free porn.

  17. I am starting not to care anymore... by harshmanrob · · Score: 2

    To be honest, I am starting not to care about all of the this post-911/coup attempt to takeover the US government that failed. I will surf where I want, say what a want, and if the government is truly stupid and sends me one of those National Security Letters (NSLs), I will post it right here on slashdot.org as well as rense.com, infowars.com, and anyone else who will post it on their site because I just do not care. Those pentagon photos of "flight 77" was just more smoke and mirrors to keep people distracted from the real problems. Just say it was a shoulder fire missle and the plane is at the bottom of the Atlantic so we can all move on with our lives. The Leo Straussion Neocon facists (Republicans) can come kiss my ass, it's not like anyone can do anything about what they are doing anyway.

  18. Why is this news? by dannyelfman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course you can reconstruct any information that flows across a network thay you have access to. That is unless it's encrypted and you don't know the key.

  19. And this is supposed to make me feel better? by i+am+kman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, article starts with:

    The equipment that former AT&T technician Ed Klein learned was installed in the NSA "secret room" in AT&T's San Francisco switching office isn't some sinister Big Brother box designed solely to help governments eavesdrop on citizens' internet communications." ... - it's a commercial product!

    Oh great - I feel so much better about that. I was just worried that the government might have EXCLUSIVE rights to spy on me! But, as long as it's all shared and everyone can do it, then I guess it's ok.

    Thanks for the post - I'll sleep so much better now.



    Damn - where's the sarcastic emoticon when you need it.

  20. No by nonlnear · · Score: 4, Insightful
    By sending IP packets, you are distributing your work. Narus could make a fair use argument that would be a chilling parody of the arguments posted by folks who troll around slashdot arguing that fair use covers anonymous torrents.

    If you don't like it, encrypt it.

    --
    argumentum ad fallacium: Fallacy of defining a fallacy which allows one to dismiss the argument in question.
  21. You're kidding !?!?! by iXiXi · · Score: 2, Funny

    So you mean that if you take a IP packet stream and analyze the headers you can reconstruct the communications??? When did this madness start? What kind of voodoo magic are they using up there?

  22. Bellyaching by crossmr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and all I hear is a bunch of bellyaching and "ooh they're evil!". As I stated a few weeks ago, Who is going to do anything about it? Evertyime we turn around the American government or corporations come up with a new way to spy on us, restrict our rights or do something else to make the world a little less pleasant.

    If they can't come up with anything specific that day, W. calls the RIAA and has them sue a dead woman. They want to make people so damn paranoid that one day they'll just turn around and say "Okay we're taking over your life, here is your itinerary for the day, don't alter this schedule. You have a bowel movement scheduled in 15 minutes". The vast majority will think its an awesome idea.

    These stories are great to remind us what a wasteland this place has become, but they serve no real purpose if no one actually does anything about it.

  23. Anything that comes through , we can record by McGiraf · · Score: 4, Funny

    And the RIAA does not get a cent on royalties! shocking

    In other new, the RIAA sue the NSA!

  24. Not just easily available, but free! by mustafap · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Ethereal. Excellent tool, even for non black hats!

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  25. Field Proven! by endernet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the Key Benefits section of their web site... Field-proven ability to meet the most stringent requirements of the world's largest networks such as AT&T, KDDI, Vodafone and Korea Telecom.

  26. Re:Spying by Jtheletter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I read in TIME magazine last night that over 50% of the people interviewed think that the NSA call database is justified in the War On Terror

    Was the article getting those numbers from Time's own poll, or the recently released telephone poll of 502 (IIRC) Americans which there are plenty of problems with? This is exactly why the saying "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics" is applicable. This single - IMHO flawed - poll is being used at every media outlet to show people there isn't a problem and 'see, most Americans think this is ok so You Should Too.'

    Well that's not what democracy is about, it's not about groupthink, otherwise there would be no wheelchair access to most places, plenty of towns would probably still have public buildings segregated by race/class/religion, etc, etc. Majority - or mob - rule is something that democracy tries to prevent, just because the majority thinks one way does not mean they are right. And yet people allow themselves to be coerced by one stupid poll after another. Let's face it, anyone who is willing to answer a 50 question telephone poll is likely not terribly interested in their privacy, that fact alone should invalidate the poll as it introduces an unmeasurable - but likely significant - bias. My thought is that a more thorough, in-person poll with a larger sampling will show that in fact most Americans don't think this program is ok. But until such a less biased poll is conducted then all that will be referenced is this stupid poll that forwards the government's agenda. And if I'm proven wrong then so be it, in that case then this poll should no longer be quoted to assauge people's fears of this domestic spying program, but should be used as an alarm that this country is asleep! The populace needs to be woken up. Until 100% of the people are screaming mad at a warrantless datamining/spying program undertaken by the government against anyone and everyone regardless of guilt, then it means we have some educating to do! You wouldn't let a government agent swing by every morning and look at all the mailing addresses on letters going to/from your house, why the hell would you let them do the same to your phone records? Because you can't see it? Because "it doesn't affect me"? If nothing else the whole program is stupid because the government is looking for a needle in a haystack in these communications and thus far all their efforts are doing is adding more hay! Some of the 9-11 hijackers' calls were intercepted before 9-11, but they weren't translated in time to be of any use. Now we're expected to believe that fewer agents sifting through more data will somehow prevent another attack of the same sort? Laughable if it weren't so damn unfunny.
    [/rant]

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  27. Can reconstruct emails? Not this one. by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "We can reconstruct all of their e-mails along with attachments"

    Dear Narus,

    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

    jA0EAwMCiGG6wLlc/6tgyUeJGySx1Ccd8lGe3ugi35iwgMr2yi PxHsoCwtOeytve
    r8fdeb237gtWNHzaen4DpYF9ibJ4E6DCxm8+yGpYcoP7bgEnzJ H49A==
    =BJEi
    -----END PGP MESSAGE-----

    (created with "gpg -a -c"). Just a reminder that if you don't like people reading your email, you and your recipient can rather easily make sure nobody can practically do so.

    The NSA could probably break one PGP message's encryption in a matter of hours (or maybe even minutes), but they couldn't break one million. How about we all really press our friends to get PGP keys made+signed and the software installed...and ENCRYPT EVERY SINGLE PERSONAL EMAIL to them? Good luck to the NSA trying to sift through all that crap.

  28. Narus customer touting -- AT&T at top of list by js7a · · Score: 2, Informative
  29. Re:Spying by woolio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Was the article getting those numbers from Time's own poll, or the recently released telephone poll of 502 (IIRC) Americans which there are plenty of problems with? This is exactly why the saying "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics" is applicable.

    Is doesn't matter if the polls are inaccurate.... What is the majority of the masses *believe* the poll? They will change their opinions if they think that idea "X" is generally supported. Remember, most of the registered voters didn't even vote!

    This is just an old marketing trick... Present the *image* that something is popular and that's what it will become (bandwagon advertising).

    So the numbers that 60% of Americans would give up every constitutional right for the war on terrorism doesn't even matter.... What really matters is that 75% of Americans, upon hearing the 60% number, **WILL** give up their rights.

    THAT's the real problem.

  30. Tor Risks by finkployd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just to play devil's advocate.....

    Use Tor, why? So I can get investigated/exposed in the media/arrested when someone uses my node for something illegal? No thanks. Acted as a server node for a while, then decided it was not worth the risk with all this homeland security paranoia.

    Law Enforcement (in this day and age of 0wned PCs, insecure wireless access points, Tor, RIAA tracking IPs to people who don't have computers, etc) STILL considers IP addresses to be valid and accurate identifiers of people. If something got traced to it and the ISP told them you had it at the time, guess what? You did it. The burden of proof would really be on YOU to prove that it was not you who was sending out a threatening email, communicating with a known terrorist, uploading child porn, or whatever. If they do know about Tor, they probably consider it more evidence that you are up to something illegal (just like PGP)

    Perhaps you would be able to create enough reasonable doubt (assuming it was a real trial and not a secret government trial) to get off. I'm sure that would make you feel a little better after having your "crimes" written about at length in the local paper, your picture up on the local (maybe national?) news media, and possibly your money, job, family, and friends gone. Just because you won a court case does not mean everyone will not still assume you are guilty. How many people think OJ is innocent?

    I'm not advocating being spineless and not taking a stand with technology, just remember what the risks are and ask yourself if you are really willing accept them. Today the population trusts anything that law enforcement tells them, especially if it is an internet related crime and even more so if it involves terrorism. Some geek whining about something called "tor" isn't going to convince your community you are not a dirty stinking terrorist.

    Finkployd

  31. Increase the use of SSL dramatically by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought about buying a SSL setup for my blog so that people coming and going from it can do so in encryption-provided peace. It would be a bold move for civil liberties if hosting services would provide cheap access to SSL for their shared hosting customers. I'd pay an extra $5-$10/month for it, even if the certificate was shared with 20 other blogs at my host. The government just doesn't need to know these things. It's sick and perverted that they would even ask. The only place that it's considered doing your job to be a peeping tom is in the federal government.

  32. There is oversight ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then there's the domestic phone call tracking. Even if this is not strictly illegal, it still smacks of wrong. ... Why? Because there's no independant, "checks and balances" oversight ... I'm more interested in making sure that another branch of the government is at least watching out to make sure that this data is not being abused. No, I don't need all of the details - that's why we have elected leaders whom I (hopefully) trust enough to look out for my interests - I just want to make sure those interests are protected by the process.

    There is oversight. Congressional committees were informed years ago. However election season is upon us so there is a lot of fake outrage and posing for the cameras and microphones going on.

    1. Re:There is oversight ... by Politburo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This "oversight" canard is such a joke. Yes, some select members of Congress were told (anywhere from 4-8 people). First off, this disclosure was in violation of the law. The full committees must be notified except for black ops (can't remember the TLA for this right now), which this does not qualify as. Second, these Congressmen are only told. The "oversight" has no approval or veto component. Furthermore, they are sworn to absolute secrecy and cannot under any circumstances divulge anything, at all, to anyone (including their spouses and most trusted staffers and colleagues), about the disclosures until they are made public by other means. This is why you have a very small number of people who have known about it for several years but are just now talking about it.

      Furthermore, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) wrote a hand-written letter to Cheney years ago saying he objected to the program when it was disclosed to him. The letter was, of course, ignored by the Adminstration.

  33. Used by Chinese telcos, too by kmike · · Score: 2, Informative
    From http://www.narus.com/press/news/index.html
    Shanghai Telecom, which has 6.2 million landlines, plans to use Narus Inc.'s system to improve its ability to block "unauthorized" Internet calls that connect to its phone system, bypassing its toll structure.

    Great to know that the same Big Brother software is being used in USA and China. Invokes some warm fuzzy feeling of union...
  34. Re:Narus customer touting -- AT&T at top of li by Mr.+Mindless · · Score: 2, Informative

    for those who may not scroll all the way down the customer profiles:

    Saudi Telecom, the preeminent telecommunications provider in the region, is employing the NarusInsight Discover Suite's VoIP detection application module to recover revenue that would otherwise be lost through unregulated VoIP traffic. Deployed by Narus Partner Giza Systems, NarusInsight captures and analyzes all VoIP traffic in the Saudi Telecom network. The VoIP detection module provides the real time information necessary for Saudi Telecom to block traffic destined for unregistered international VoIP gateways, thereby enforcing tariffed gateway regulations. NarusInsight is the leading choice for managing IP services in the Middle East largely because of its ability to successfully address critical business issues like VoIP detection in real-time.

    wow...

    --
    - MM
  35. Expectations by ulpilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The law of the land (the USA anyway) says that if you have a conversation in a restaurant, there is no expectation of privacy. If you have a conversation at home, you do have an expectation of privacy, unless I consent to having my conversation recorded. As soon as you send/receive information in a public place there is no expectation of privacy, from a legal perspective.

    If you send/receive packets of data over a public connection, i.e. the internet, somehow you are expecting privacy? Hmmm. (notice the thoughtful pause) If you want or need privacy over a public medium, it seems simple to me. Use encryption.

    Don't get me wrong, I hate big government and big government's intrusion into my personal life. But, I also do not see my internet activity as a personal/private activity. There are just too many people involved. Webmasters see me visiting their site. My ISP knows where I go and what I do. So, I assume there will be others knowing that stuff too. There may be dozens of people 'knowing' what my internet activity looks like. No, I do not like big brother recording everything. It will, however take an amazing database to house all the data while waiting to be filtered and I am doubtful that the end result will accomplish what they are striving for.

  36. Fear by vodkamattvt · · Score: 2, Informative
    I dont know what I fear more ... the increasingly easy way any (evil) corporation can compile all my communications or the idea that the government can. I think its pretty clear that as technology gets more advanced, so do privacy concerns.

    I think the most frightening part is that when I talk to my more conservative family members and most people who only casually know about these issues or politics, they see NOTHING wrong with everyone and their brother recording all the information they can on them and their family/friends. Their reasoning .. I have nothing to hide, why should I care? It is catching the "evil dooers".

    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

  37. Re:Spying by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Tried to state that myself and then I just sort of flew off the handle, heh. Anyway, I totally agree. This poll is being touted to make everyone get in line and stop questioning the program.

    Anyone who blindly changes their mind over a poll with a slim majority difference deserves what they get. Unfortunately for the rest of us we'll be getting it too. :-/

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  38. Re:Encryption? Why decrypt later? by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am suspecting that the ISPs who INSISTS the newbie/uninformed windoze users and Mac users install that ISPs crackware CD masquerading as an 'experience enhancing/improving' software tool is really just a Trojan to facilitate later offline decryption.

    Just call them up. Make up your own scenarios. But, if LINUX users DON'T need the damned CD, why do windoze and Mac users need it. If you posit that you rebuild your machine every 6 weeks and you always lose your ISPs disk, or broke it by mistake, do you still need it? some of them will say, well, no, not ALWAYS, or no you don't NEED it...

    Why is there no lobby against this bald-face lying on the part of ISPs?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  39. Re:Encryption? Why decrypt later? by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was so heavy into my rant that I forgot to include my other two suspicions:

    -- the ISPs are getting marketing dollars by deploying the disks, and when each one is installed, it calls back to mshaft to verify that the ISP is entitled to marketing dollars, which then enables mshaft to bolster their OS useage counts (which can be negated or deflated when users successfully log in without the disk ever being installed, which means an employee NOT pushing the disk installation might lose commissions or deprive the ISP of marketing dollars....)

    or,

    -- the ISPs use the disk to gain access to unwary users' machines, and then use the validated information or sell pieces or all of the information (maybe de-identified?) to "third party partners" and such

    As for those damned disks, I say if you SHIP the modem to the subscriber, and it is logically assumed there is no cloning of the MAC address, and the machine is directly connected to the C/M or DSL modem, then WHY WHY WHY on Earth is it a **MUST** that the end user install that disk? WHY?

    I guess gates and henchmen are going to put a full-on press against the ISP, now, or again... Sounds like ripe anti-trust/anti-competitive territory.

    US Government: This is MORE fodder for you in your quest to put a clamp in ms ass. Use this for ALL it's worth!

    Until Linux/Open Source is a genuine WMD or bigger threat to the world than windoze is, I will NOT give up my OS of choice, and nor should any other individual, company, or government....

    (There are SOME people who think I'm anti-government, that I'm an evil threat; far from it. I say what I think is right, and I reFUSE to suffer political bullshit just because some politico is afraid of losing eminence or turf or whatever. I call it like I see it. I am anti-effing-stupid-government, not anti-government. But, I suppose someone will try to explain that the two distinctions are by definition functionally equal and therefore I am still "totally" anti-government. WHEW!!!!)

    Now, where o-h hwhere are those rit, lith, umm, chlo, umm.... PILLS???!!!!

    adjusts EM-shielded strontium-coated tin foil hat...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  40. Re:Encryption? Why decrypt later? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am suspecting that the ISPs who INSISTS the newbie/uninformed windoze users and Mac users install that ISPs crackware CD masquerading as an 'experience enhancing/improving' software tool is really just a Trojan to facilitate later offline decryption.

    I seriously doubt this, but it is easy enough to find out. Make a vm of windows and save it. Install the software save it. Take a look at the bits and figure out what has changed. Has it touched any of the encryption libraries or programs? Just copy them off and checksum them even.

    But, if LINUX users DON'T need the damned CD, why do windoze and Mac users need it.

    They don't of course. Most of those CDs just run a script, some are even easy to look at. In fact, the one time I had to setup a mac for a cable modem I just looked at their script, grabbed the DNS server, mail server, and netmask, etc. from it and input them by hand in my config. It worked just fine. The reason they tell you have to run the CD is because they hire support moneys working minimum wage to read a script into the phone when you call. It is easier for them to tell you to double click a script then walk you through making manual configuration changes.

  41. Bush Signed Executive Order Allowing Telcos To Lie by Lokni · · Score: 3, Informative

    You guys might want to check this out: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/17/new-executive- order/ Bush has signed an executive order that allows the Telcos to lie on their financial statements. It would be almost impossible to prove these programs existed without access to classified information. Another way to prove them, however, would be to detail how much money the telcos receive from the federal government. They are required to report this information to the SEC beecause they are publically traded companies. Bush has signed an order that allows them to violate securities law. Worse off, he did this just a few days preceeding the USA Today article which implies that they had notice ahead of time that they were about to be exposed. We are in for a world of hurt people. Say bye bye to the United States of America as we know it. This is fascism by definition.

  42. Re:Article Is Spin, Of Course by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This device as designed and built for spying, and was placed into telcos everywhere on the PRETEXT of being useful for traffic analysis. Then the NSA came calling and bulldozed the telcos into giving them everything that goes through it.

    Well, sort of. This device is (I believe) a modified version of what the ISPs have been using for a long time to let them accurately bill people for the services they offer and negotiate peering agreements and QoS contracts.

    The fact of the matters is that Narus the company is run by an "Israeli immigrant" and is financed by, among others, an Israeli investment company, one of the partners of whom happens to have worked for the Israeli government, including a stint developing optical devices for the Israeli military.

    Whoa, whoa, whoa there cowboy! Now I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but you're making some pretty big and likely unwarranted leaps here. A whole lot of the traffic shaping, modeling, and balancing technology came out of Israel. The university there had a top notch network engineering program with a lot of smart people and patents coming out of it. Most moved to the US, where they could make money off of the .com boom and the aftermath. I know because I work with one of the professors who came over here to do that and let me tell you, he giggles way to much to be a mossad agent. I imagine anyone working in high-tech in Israel probably did some work for the military, especially if they were in academia.

    And one of the directors on the board happens to be an "ex-" NSA guy...

    So? I'm sure it helped them get the contract, and maybe helped them decide on the feature set. This is very common in the security industry. The company I work for has ex Microsoft people and ex-Cisco people. Surprise, surprise we sell to both of them. Another company we do a lot business with has ex Naval intelligence and NSA people. Guess who two of their big customers are? That is just the way the industry works. If you know people, you have an in and and often an advocate who helps to make the sale.

    The reality is that this device was designed and built for spying by the Mossad, in collaboration with the NSA, and then sold to the telcos under a pretext, which was then altered by arm-twisting or payment to the telcos to sell out the US Constitution.

    The reality is, some people found a niche and they filled it. This same type of functionality is needed for billing services and compliance with a number of government acts regarding lawful intercept, financing, security, and privacy assurance. Now maybe the NSA or AT&T requested added features to make this sort of activity easier. Maybe Narus came up with them on its own and sold them on it.

    I certainly think it is being misused and in a way that violates the founding principals of our government. That does not mean it is some grand conspiracy and running off half-cocked spouting this sort of unsupportable nonsense isn't helping anything. All it is doing is reducing the credibility of those who argue to have this sort of thing stopped and distracting people from the real issue.

    ..or is that your intention? You certainly do enough rabble rousing and insulting. If you really want to help, stick to the facts, not the wild speculation.

  43. Re:Encryption? Why decrypt later? by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, you are both wrong, you have no idea how far down the rabbit hole we already are. These disks contain tiny nanomachines that embed themselves in your skin and change your DNA so that you will only bear Republican children. Of course, the Republicans aren't the Final Masters here, they are nothing more than patsies of the Rand Corporation, who are of course controlled by the Boy Scouts of America, who are under the dominion of the Reverse Vampires. We're through the looking glass, people.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  44. Nonsense! TIA is operated against the law. by twitter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There is oversight. Congressional committees were informed years ago. However election season is upon us so there is a lot of fake outrage and posing for the cameras and microphones going on.

    When informed of Total Information Awareness, Congress loudly and firmly killed it, but the NSA did it anyway in secret.

    This is a scandal of first order. The goal is unconstitutional, the attitude is nuamerican and the means are illegal. This is the kind of shit we fought the Cold War to avoid. I'm furious and you should be too.

    As the American Taliban tightens it's grip on your reading, conversations and whereabouts, the terrorists win. A few bandits flying into buildings, even the destruction of an entire American city is not an excuse to destroy the things this country stands for. A few more slips down the slope and you wont be able to tell the difference between the Axis of Evil and home.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  45. Could the government log all postal activity? by martyb · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You wouldn't let a government agent swing by every morning and look at all the mailing addresses on letters going to/from your house, why the hell would you let them do the same to your phone records?

    This got me thinking... according to this link: Handwritten address interpretation :

    Handwritten address interpretation research began at CEDAR in 1987 through funding from the United States Postal Service (USPS). The objective was to automate mail sorting through a system that could read a handwritten street address and ZIP code and encode each envelope with the destination address for machine sorting.

    This research ultimately led to the development and deployment of system that automates mail sorting through image analysis, digit recognition, word recognition, postal directory lookup, and a barcode assignment that designates the destination address. Since field-testing began in 1996, the Handwritten Address Interpretation System (HWAI) has been implemented at all USPS mail processing centers.

    (emphasis mine.)

    So, it's only a small step to record all that metadata for every letter sent within the USA. Just have postmasters general submit the day's scan logs to the gov't for review for possible terrorist links, and, by the way, archive all th information received. This information could include:

    • Who received mail.
    • Who sent it (from the return address).
    • When it was sent.
    • How much it weighed.
    • How urgently it was sent (overnight, first class, parcel post, etc.)

    So, maybe you were just joking, but from what I've seen lately, I'd have to suspect that this may already in place... can anyone corroborate this?

    1. Re:Could the government log all postal activity? by kabz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sweet! I never put a return address on anything. In your face NSA !!

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    2. Re:Could the government log all postal activity? by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wow, scary. I knew that most of the mail system had this kind of automation but I failed to put 2 and 2 together on it. I'm willing to bet that this information is probably already being collected and mined according to the points you outlined, especially after the anthrax scare in 2001. (BTW: wtf ever happened to that? IIRC no one was ever caught and it sort of just fell off the public radar, but I don't think there's been closure on that act of terrorism that could in theory happen again, even with whatever safeguards are in place.)

      My point about the mail was more of an argument to give to people who think that the NSA having all their phone logs w/o a warrant is OK. I'm willing to bet that once they hear the parallel idea of a physical agent showing up daily and writing down their mail addressing info in a log all of a sudden a light will go on - gee maybe this is a bit invasive. People need to be change their thinking from "This is ok by me because I have done nothing wrong" TO "Why am I being searched/tracked when I have done nothing wrong?"

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --