Slashdot Mirror
AllofMP3.com May Hinder Russia Joining WTO
gitana writes "The New York Times is reporting that American trade negotiators may demand the shutdown of AllofMP3.com as a condition of Russia joining the World Trade Organization." From the article: "Music industry officials say AllofMP3, which first came to their attention in 2004, is a large-scale commercial piracy site, and they dismiss its claims of legality. "It is totally unprecedented to have a pirate site operating so openly for so long," said Neil Turkewitz, executive vice president of the Recording Industry Association of America, who is based in Washington ... AllofMP3.com says on the site that it can legally sell to any user based in Russia and warns foreign users to verify the legality within their countries for themselves. The site features a wide selection of Russian music, but is written in English with prices listed in United States dollars."
"The site features a wide selection of Russian music, but is written in English with prices listed in United States dollars"
Goddamnit, how can we, as Americans, allow such a site to exist?!? Russian sites must be written in a native (or, at the most, european) language, and they'd better show prices in rubles. Well, I guess, euros would be okay as well, as long as they don't directly link to a currency conversions site.
I'd like to call, once and for all, for all sites not located within the US (or, um, England) to stop putting up sites in English.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
If it seems to good to be true, it probably is.
Long ago as Napster faded into the sunset (in its old form, at least) a friend turned me onto allofmp3. Promised me it was only $.10 a track and the selection was amazing. I went there, I signed up, I think I even may have purchased a few tracks.
But the more I looked at it, the more uneasy I felt about how legitimate it could be. This latest story confirms my hunch... they aren't. This other related article from Wired goes into further detail. Apparently allofmp3 is already offering downloads for the latest Red Hot Chili Peppers' as are tracks from the latest Shakira album (you can tell I'm from the vinyl age, still calling them "albums"). The prices are 1/10 the iTunes rates, and while the article doesn't say, it would seem allofmp3 has no contract or agreement to sell these tracks.
(From the Wired article: "..., World music downloading leader iTunes charges a fixed 99 cents per song, but the Russian site offers tracks for a 10th of that price. Songs from the Red Hot Chili Peppers' new double album, Stadium Arcadium, cost between 10 and 16 cents. The whole of Oral Fixation, Vol. 2, the latest album by Colombian pop star Shakira, can be had for just $1.40...., ")
I like what allofmp3 has tried to do, offer a vast array of music at much more reasonable prices than the rest of the world, but it does them, and the rest of us who would demand a more fair distribution model irreparable damage. The more "we" are labeled as criminals by our own actions, the more fodder for their argument. And, the more likely DRM becomes more onerous and intrusive and constraining.
Also interesting is the focus of the article, the barrier for Russia to enter into the World Trade Organization. I couldn't care less about that aspect, it seems a big stick and out of proportion that Russia should bear... but that's political schtick. I think the even bigger issue is this has put allofmp3 on everybody's radar, which of course means the RIAA, Congress, progress (i.e., the opposite of congress), etc. And if allofmp3 is selling rogue mp3s, it's bad for the anti-DRM community.
It's an eternal adage, and how true it always seems to be: "If it seems to good to be true, it probably is."
Russia is better off going isolationlist and not joining the WTO. Look at the mess we have here in America as an example. Our politicians have an incessent need to butt their noses in everyone else's business, despite the citizen base not wanting them to do so. We (meaning our government) has no right to tell other countries how to handle their business at all. Our influence should end at the border and tariffs, unless assistance is a) explicitly requested from others and b) supported/approved by citizens.
Don't listen to the US. Show a backbone like so few other countries have and tell Duhbya to fuck off already. Don't cooperate with the current administration one iota; wait and see what the 2008 election brings. Hopefully the next administration will be far less corrupt.
The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
unless it impacts on corporate America of course
Our copyright system is very peculiar, but very good for business so it will be imposed on the whole world.
"It is totally unprecedented to have a pirate site operating so openly for so long," said Neil Turkewitz
It is only piracy according to our intellectual property laws, which have very little philosophical or pragamtic basis.
Democracy Now! - your daily, uncensored, corporate-free
Copyright infringement isn't theft. Anyone claiming it is automatically loses all credibility.
Who is running your country?
"The result is that numerous organizations in Russia receive royalties for the use of foreign artistic works, but never pass on that money to the artists"
With the way a lot of the music industry works, it looks like they'll fit right in.
"These collecting agencies are thieves and frauds because they accept money while pretending to represent artists", said Eric Baptiste
Yeah, well, pot, meet kettle, you two will get along fine.
this is a country where for 70 years everyting belonged to the public domain, this whole american copyright stuff is a bit alien
;) by that stage WTO will be begging the russians to join
anyways russians can always play the energy card, switch off gas to whole of europe and watch the shit hit the fan
we use us dollars in a big amount of places. So it is just called as "Standart Unit" in price lists (mostly in internet and computer hardware shops), in russian (Uslovnaya Edinitsa). So about piracing mp3's, not to much people use such sites (mostly called bydlosites). There are a lot of free sources and home networks
As a career sideman, I feel no pain for the old industry passing (especially the lawyers), but the job of recording engineer is going the way of the hatmaker. Actually that analogy breaks down: The job of recording artist and recording engineer are being merged and will not pay very well. There used to be more work for painters, too.
OT: There's a bigger issue here about labor and specialization - the best singer I've ever knew (hits in the 60s) was taking an occasional plumbing job in the 80s and wasn't bitter: The way he put it was: $30 an hour. This while commanding $2-$4k for 20 - 40 oldies shows a year. I didn't quit playing during the 90s net boom and still work a lot now. I also stay buzzword compliant - this year: AJAX(ugh) and psych-folk(cool).
Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
Everybody's opionion is that all this site sells is pirated music from the US. This is wrong. This site sells completely legal Russian music and audio otherwise unavailable in the United States or Europe: to 10 to 30 million Russian diaspora abroad. The problem with RIAA demands is that they demand a closing of a completely legitimate resource for such content for all of us, Russian speakers forced to look at empty shelves of RIAA storefronts and desperate to find hits of Russian music. The model of selling songs by burning them on bulky things called DVDs or CDs is completely dead, when you look at it from the prospective of a Russian speaking teenager trying to find a Russian 2005-2006 hit in the stores owned by RIAA in the US. There are none. Typically this stores sells some junk from the last century, so the only place we can get that music is from the sites like allofmp3.com. Russian showbusiness is booming now: have you seen any Russian movie from 2005-2006 in the stores owned by MPAA/RIAA? If Hollywood can't make decent movies for the last 5 years, it doesn't mean it's like this everywhere in the world. So, to cut it short: no: Russian courts are right, ignore RIAA.
**AA have obviously decided to go full speed ahead, push the envelope a bit. See if their interests can be made to trump even national sovereignty. I put it at 50/50 whether the "civilized world" will accept this.
My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
English is well understood in russia, atleast among computer literate people, and dollars are as valid currency there as rubie. Claiming that only reason www-page using english and dollars as currency and located outside uk/usa just to ease piracy is bad excuse.
Russia has over 30 official languages, so maybe english(although its not one of official ones) is used just for compatibility reasons?
Perhaps dollars are used just to ease the price comparison against iTunes et al?
There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
Should stop imposing illegal tarrifs on goods from other countries before it starts making demands?
Is it legal to download music from AllOFMP3.com? The availability over the Internet of the ALLOFMP3.com materials is authorized by the license # LS-3?-05-03 of the Russian Multimedia and Internet Society (ROMS) and license # 006/3M-05 of the Rightholders Federation for Collective Copyright Management of Works Used Interactively (FAIR). In accordance to the licenses' terms MediaServices pays license fees for all materials downloaded from the site subject to the Law of the Russian Federation "On Copyright and Related Rights". All these materials are solely for personal use. Any further distribution, resale or broadcasting are prohibited. The works available from ALLOFMP3.com are protected by the Law of the Russian Federation "On Copyright and Related Rights" and are for personal use of a buyer. Commercial use of such material is prohibited. Recording, copying, distribution on any media is possible only upon special consent of a Rightholder. The user bears sole responsibility for any use and distribution of all materials received from AllOFMP3.com. This responsibility is dependent on the national legislation in each user's country of residence. The Administration of AllOFMP3.com does not possess information on the laws of each particular country and is not responsible for the actions of foreign users. http://music.allofmp3.com/help/help.shtml?help=on# top
Let's take a look at a sample album (randomly picked - I'm not a DC fan):
Dixie Chicks: Taking The Long Way
#tracks: 14
Cost to purchase in crappy/lossy 192kb MP3 or AAC: $1.87
Cost to purchase in good lossy 320kB MP3 or AAC: $3.12
Cost to purchase lossless (flac, in this case): $8.78
Cost to purchase from Amazon, (lossless), with case, disc, and liner notes: $9.98
The difference between lossless at AllofMP3 and buying a physical disc is very small. It's not much of a bargain, quite honestly, to get the product from AllofMP3. It would make sense that to get a digital copy of the album from a US supplier would be less expensive than the physical article. Except, for some reason, it isn't. Somehow, the degraded quality copies cost more than the physical version here in the US (I'm assuming that iTunes is still 99c/track, or $13.86 for the whole album). They should be noticably less expense. That's what we were told when CDs were more expensive than cassette tapes: the CD, although less expensive to produce, provides a higher quality sound and therefore commands a premium price.
Once again, the RIAA seems to be paranoid that they might lose a stranglehold on the distribution system (i.e.: would have to compete).
I'm not saying that AllofMP3 are totally innocent here - they are just as guilty of exploiting the system as, say, the oil companies are of exploiting the increase in demand for oil, or small business owners buying a $50,000 Ford King Ranch pickup truck and writing it off on their taxes.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
The site features a wide selection of Russian music, but is written in English with prices listed in United States dollars."
That's a bit misleading. The truth is it has both a Russian and English language option. First time users are able to select the langauge of their choice.
I'll be one of the first to admit that I buy songs from allofmp3.com. So far I've loaded my account with 10 dollars twice, and have maybe a couple bucks of that left. I have, from time to time, actually downloaded some of the Russian songs (I find MC Vspyshkin to be rather funny and I can't even understand a word he says, it just popped up as a recommended 'similar artist' one day). But, primarily, I download music that that otherwise would be considered piracy.
Why do I do it? Simple. The alternatives suck. Itunes has come a long way, I'll admit, but I do not want DRM on my music. I do not want restrictions on how and where I can listen to my music for which I've spent perfectly good money. Allofmp3.com not only offers mp3, which unlike itunes songs is practically universal, as well as a wide-range of other formats including *lossless* formats.
When the music industry wisens up and offers a real alternative, a low-priced non-drm way for people to buy music off the internet, then I will switch over. But as long as they keep trying to fight the market and refuse to give the market what it wants, they will never see another one of my consumer dollars. It's called capitalism and the easiest way to put the pirates out of business is to offer a legal alternative. It's ridiculous and anti-capitalist to refuse to sell the product I want to buy then to cry foul when I find someone who will sell it to me.
Stop being pedantic. You know what they meant. Semantic nonsense over what is and isn't theft doesn't change the argument, just the verbage. Take every instance of "theft" and replace it with "copyright infringement" and the arguments will all be the same.
Besides, "theft" is a fairly wide definition that applies to more than just larceny. In US the theft of services is indeed considered theft and charged as larceny. If something as non-tangible as services can be stolen, surely the definition can extend to intellectual property such as music.
I've copied plenty of music, and my doing so has led me to the legitimate purchase of lots of music I would have never otherwise. Overall I'd say that the free distribution of music in many ways helps the artist more than it hinders. That does not however, change the laws. Copyright infringement is still illegal, whether it's theft or not. The whole "copyright infringement isn't theft" thing seems to be a crutch of an argument people fall on to ignore the issue.
The RIAA is now influencing US foreign policy! Scary country...
I remember reading a website published by the canadian authorities detailing their conclusions regarding the DMCA and the filesharing debate in general.
It is highly unlikely they will adopt such laws for the forseeable future, as this website basically said "yeah we know theyre lying their asses off"
VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
It's not a crutch to ignore the issue, it is a clarification of what we are discussing. There are important differences between copyright infringement and theft. There are entirely separate laws dealing with each of them. In sensible countries, one (copyright infringement) is a civil offence, and the other (theft) is a criminal offence. You cannot seriously claim that they are the same thing without dismissing a whole slew of important differences.
You stated that you have copied music before. Does that mean that you consider yourself a thief? Is the only thing that is stopping you from robbing stores the increased risk of being caught?
Wouldn't the world be a safer place, for wage-slave citizens and mega-corporations alike, if the U.S. just attacked the every other country and created one global government? Then we wouldn't have to worry about the difficulty of enforcing U.S. law in foreign countries. There would be no foreign countries! Problem solved! I nominate G.W. as our first global dictator, er... I mean first elected president of the United Countries of Freedom-World!
"American trade negotiators may demand the shutdown of AllofMP3.com as a condition of Russia joining the World Trade Organization"
WHAT THE F**K?!
I think America is getting too big for its boots lately, I won't mention Iraq, but they basically told the Swedes to shut down The Pirate Bay and now they think they can blackmail Russia too - and over such an important thing as the WTO?
OK then America, you shut down Microsoft or we'll kick you out of the UN.
#include <sig.h>
I dunno... You'd think if they would deny Russia entry to the WTO... It would be... I duno... Say... Their support of Iran's nuclear program and their threat to veto any resolution against them?
Although, maybe pirated MP3s are much more of an existensial threat than nuclear weapons.
"I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
-Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
Why not just replace the word republican with "nazi", democrat with "commie", "homosexual" with "fag", white with "racist", or black with "nigger" too. oh yeah, that is unacceptbile.. how hyppocritical.
what they meant was to slander the idea of fair use and imply that it is immoral to do what the AHRA allows us to do in copying music with home recording devices and handing the tape off to friends. Just because it involves silicon and wires instead of dual cassette decks and magnetized ribbons doen't make it any different.
They continue to use this term to slander and demonize vast swaths of innocent people and innocent actions in their greedy pursuit of control, and do not have a right to use such slanderous language.
VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
"Take every instance of "theft" and replace it with "copyright infringement" and the arguments will all be the same."
Um, no. Depriving someone of their property seems very immoral, copying information not so much. In fact I argue that using the government force to prop up the business model that is scarcity of information is the behaviour that is immoral - unless you (anyone) have an arguement justifying the morality of using that force.
"Copyright infringement is still illegal, whether it's theft or not."
Yes, an since when is legality equilivant to morality? Since you bring legality up, I remind everyone that the copyright act could be repealed tommrow. Suddenly what was immoral yesterday would be totally ok today?
"The whole 'copyright infringement isn't theft' thing seems to be a crutch of an argument people fall on to ignore the issue."
Not so much as a crutch as they are very different things. As I said above, I think the concept of copyright (i.e. using government to enforce a scarsity of information business model) is itself of dubious morality when applied to individuals (which is a recent phenomenon). I have near nil hesitation over copying information, i have large hestitation over taking or depriving someone of their property - that is the difference and it is huge.
I have seen a few of these stories and NOWHERE in any of them are there any statements from any controlling legal authorities; just a bunch of FUD from the RIAA and it's cronies. Is it or isn't it legal? No one seems to know and if they do, they aren't saying. It does seem pretty cut and dried as to whether or not it is legal there. I have used it and plan on using it again.
The arguement that it is illegal or should be illegal because the Russian equivalent of the RIAA is NOT paying the artists does not make me a bad person for buying their products. If they aren't paying them...and nobody has produced any evidence that that have or have not...how does this make me in the wrong? I have no idea whether any store I have ever been too has justly compensated everyone back up the supply chain adequately if at all. If my job description is to include researching these things then the RIAA owes me a fortune for doing their work; and you had better believe I charge a fortune for my services.
Let's look at it from a different perspective. Shopping at this place is like going to the mall. It is out in the open. It operates like every other store in the mall. It has been there for several years. AND!...it even provides what looks to be like pretty legitimate documentation allowing it to be open. If I go down the causeway and eat at a restaurant that has done the same thing but has forged it's business license...is that something I should be taken to jail for? If I go into a clothing store and buy a couple of shirts and a pair of jeans...only to find out later that they are counterfeits, should I go to jail or be fined exhorbitant amounts? Here is another funny perspective on this. Over the years more and more companies have been offshoring..why? It is cheaper...not a little bit but bunches and bunches cheaper. We are told time and time again that it is WISE to patronize these other nations as they have a superior product to offer. In this case of MP3's, they are 100% correct. So what is the problem here? It would seem that they need to better police the Russian RIAA there.
Remember the time about 2 years ago when Chevy didn't pay the steelworkers for making the screws that hold radios in place in their cars and everybody who bought a car from Chevy between the dates of January and June of that year went to jail? Neither do I. Do you remember last year when the American cattle farmers didn't pay for the corn in the cows feed and everybody who bought beef last year had to pay a $25,000.00 fine? I don't either.
Now, if the site is legal, if I were the guy, guys, gal, or gals running this site I would sue the RIAA in court till they bled. Since the only thing it seems to understand is lawsuits...I would sue them, the people in it, any supporters of the RIAA and any others I may have forgotte right out of existence. The RIAA would become the multimedia version of SCO. A small little shadow of it's former self.
They, the RIAA, are screaming for this site to be shutdown. It is still up. I imagine it is legal and THAT is the whole problem here as far as they are concerned.
I don't see how oppression helps fight oppression. By not giving musicians their due, both the RIAA and AllOfMP3 are harming the musician's ability to use their skills as they see fit, especially if they see fit to make a career of it. I'm not the person to say that musicians should give their music away for free or at subsistence pricing. I wouldn't want someone taking my work and giving it away for free or a pittance unless I was getting properly paid for it and I don't see that happening.
And no, I am not a musician or in the audio field whatsoever.
RIAA is a monopoly and should be broken up as such.
Why is it illegal for American Car manufacturers to combine together to conduct shared research, while it is legal for Music morons to combine together to sue a 90 yrs old grandma?
"Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
So wait - selling Cold War NBC leftovers doesn't even muster a UN slap on the wrist, but pirating trivial pop culture content is a showstopper?
Please explain to me how it is a recording industry group concerned about its monopoly could hold up a former world superpower, a nation of significant landmass, natural resources, goods, services and consumers, from joining the World Trade Organization?
While the WTO itself is a seperate subject of discussion, what part of reality did world leaders abandon to put such significance on any one single market as to exclude an entire nation's industry?
What a supereme coup these guys and their ilk have pulled off - the world now cow-tow to the notion owning and controlling ideas, instead of not just preserving and protecting, but fostering the creation of new ones. How shameful, and how disappointing, I see so little concern for this insane set of priorities.
Sorry for the bad spelling and words - I only started learning English 3-4 years ago. Ironically I started to learn so I could come to America, after reading my country man Alexis de Tocqueville and listening to my Dad's old college stories of how independant and voiceful Americans where - so why have not Americans been the first country to say no to what is clearly short sighted greed?
This is egregious. Think about this. China belongs to the WTO. They use slave labor, actively kill and imprison union organizers. They allow massive pollution. They built the environmental holocaust the three gorges dam which now clogs itself with Yangtze river silt. They ban its citizens from owning firearms and use the military and as a police force. They use Yahoo and Google and Cisco technology, services and infrastructure to imprison and execute political dissidents. China executes over 10,000 people a year in an undocumented fashion with a maximum of two appeals.
China can barely call itself anything but a state holding its people hostage with fear and brainwashing. Recently someone in China who was being interviews by Nova or front line was shown a picture of "Tank Man" from Tiananmen square and they DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE IMAGE WAS OF! Maximum censorship OR total fear of even admitting that something against the government ever even happened. This was 4 students in the interview either feigning not knowing what "Tank Man" is or genuinely not knowing about the incident.
Russia who has valuable oil resources and a more European disposition and a moratorium on the death penalty sells a few MP3s in accordance with their local laws - something the pricks at Google (Schmidt) and Yahoo (Terry "Terrorist" Semel) say makes their anti-Chinese citizen policies in assisting the totalitarian authoritarian government with their persecution - and they cant join the WTO.
WHAT A JOKE. This is a total sick joke.
Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
This is what I'm talking about. The "IP" nutcases throw accusations and threats at anyone who isn't also a nutcase. They see 'Pirates' and 'Theives' behind every tree. I simply point out that AllOfMP3.com (to the best of my knowledge) is a legal business, and that calling them theives is liable. What happens? I get accused of commiting a crime, and a threat that I will end up in jail is made.
Given that I have never purchased anything from AllOfMP3.com, I certainly have not broken any copyright, and I certainly will not go to jail for it. (Well... given the current political climate, the lack of commiting a crime is no guarantee of not going to jail for copyright violation.) But, somehow the "IP" zelots seem to think that recognizing Russia as a soveriegn nation makes you a criminal.
Seriously, until the "IP" folks can start to carry on conversations without seeing the boogie man around every corner, they cannot be taken seriously.
That's the same site, you're just instructing it to quit autodetecting your language preferences and use Russian.
You get the same thing from the beginning if your browser indicates it's in russian.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
Yeah, I'm having trouble understanding why this is so "scandalous."
The WTO has already warned the US about outlawing online gambling, but congress is prepared to do just that. You think the WTO is going to kick the US out? I doubt it.
I guess it's just another NYT jourmammal being sensational. Nothing new here, move along.
In economics, things have value because they are scarse. Bits are not scarse.
Original bits are scarce. The problem is there is no good economic method yet to reconcile high costs to create with low cost to reproduce.
So the RIAA puts special limitations to make it scarse.
No the government elected by the people makes special limitations to create artificial scarcity of reproductions. You can say the politicians are in the pocketbook of the RIAA, but that is more a reflection of an apathetic voting populace who only cares about which politician is on TV most (if they even vote at all).
This artificially raises the prices, and as anyone who has taken a basic economics course, is not efficient. ANY artificial restriction to a market makes it less efficient than free trade. So yes, copyright is an anti free trade aberration.
Yes, it does artifically raise prices, which at the same time artificially raises the number of suppliers. There is a positive effect on society to have more inventors, musicians, authors, moviemakers. Not saying that currently things are balanced (copyright has been extended too long, limitations of fair use, etc), but I don't agree that copyright is completely bad for society.
Talent on the other hand IS scarse, but that's hardly the issue here.
I never understood this. If music protected by the RIAA sucks, why do you care if you can get free access to it?
D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
i'm with you on this one, russia should `pull a china` block access to aomp3 for people outside of russia untill they get into the WTO then open it back up again, that my friends is called `pulling a china` or `to pull a china` is to make policies and never inforce them, like the piracy one in china... plenty of `dvd street vendors` and `whore houses` and `everyone is still ripping everything off` in shanghai.
oh sh!t they are at my door.....*(bang)* - brains over the floor
The economics surey dictate that everyone should pay for what they consume. By this system we encourage artists to produce content that people like. If the people who make content arent paid, even if they are wildly popular, then the market cannot react to demand. Thats not good news. I'm glad Half Life 2 made money, that sends a signal to game makers that this is what gamers want.
If we had been able to download high quality DRM-free copies of the first ever series of star trek, and none of us had paid a penny for them, then the show would have made a huge loss. No series II, no Next Gen, No Voyager. Apply this to whatever music / movie / book you really like.
DRM sucks, but people enjoying content they dont pay for also sucks. In a capitalist system, its the payment in dollars from the consumer to the producer that enables the market to function. Take that away and the system will mean no more production.
Until now, its been academic, because with physical goods, free-riding wasnt possible. Now we live in an age where it IS possible for people not to pay for what they consume in some industries. There has to be a solution. I think DRM is a crap solution, but unfortunately I can't think of a better one that actually works, and removes the free-rider problem.
DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
This is egregious. Think about this. China belongs to the WTO. They use slave labor, actively kill and imprison union organizers. They allow massive pollution. They built the environmental holocaust the three gorges dam which now clogs itself with Yangtze river silt. They ban its citizens from owning firearms and use the military and as a police force.
But how many dollars do US lose on these activities?
This is about the World Trade Organization -- making money.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Original bits are scarce. The problem is there is no good economic method yet to reconcile high costs to create with low cost to reproduce. That cost is now cheaper than ever. The thing is that it's now possible to create a professional sounding CD very cheap. Equipment is cheap, the software is cheap. This is specially true for electronic music. The companies behind the RIAA held the funds to enable artists to create music which otherwise they couldn't. Now they can. What's left? Control of the distribution channels. And they're fighting to their last breath to keep them. Artist make little money from CDs (unless it's a huge seller). They make much more on tours and with merchandise. There's a way to pay back to the artist. Look at iTunes. Why does the RIAA want different prices? To keep the control of the distribution channel, and therefore keep control of the artist. the government elected by the people We can narrow it down even more to the US Government. The US has pushed for more and more global copyright. And for longer and longer terms. And for less and less importance to public domain. a reflection of an apathetic voting populace who only cares about which politician is on TV most (if they even vote at all). That's a different problem. I did vote on my last chance (not in the US, but my in Costa Rica). I voted for the Libertarian Party. We lost the the presidential race ending up third but got 6 senators elected (out of a total of 47). The US democracy has huge problems, but that's another topic. I don't agree that copyright is completely bad for society Neither do I. It's a noble idea. Just like Marxism. But taken to extremes it gets to what we have now. Do any DRM system revert to unDRM once copyright exprires and the work goes into public domain ? No. Are any courts interested in hearing about it? No, since it'll probably get extended to "forever less one day" as Jack Valenti wants. artificially raises the number of suppliers That's good, but the RIAA group still controls airways, retail distribution channels, and they want to control Internet distribution channels as well. To put up a larger barrier of entry, to keep new players out. They were just trying to regulate podcasts. So I'm not sure that the number of suppliers is going up as fast as it could/should. Talent on the other hand IS scarse, but that's hardly the issue here. What I mean here is that there are fewer people that can create "original" bits compared to those that can duplicate existing ones. I don't mean that RIAA protected music sucks. I'm willing to pay for music, in the past month I've bought to CDs. One I had already downloaded, but I went and bought it any way ("Clone your lover" by Zeromancer) The other one was the new Tool CD, basically the only band that I blindly buy CDs from nowadays.
please excuse my apathy
I'm sorry sir you seen to have an improper understanding of value in current American culture. Let me illustrate:
value of song copyright > value of human life
Now is it clear?
Sometimes my arms bend back.
Yeah, but if you stop paying full price, Jimi Hendrix will stop producing albums!
"A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
> Dear US citizen,
> Who is running your country?
The same entities that will soon be running yours.