Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Claims P2P Has Been Contained

Magorak writes "USA Today is reporting the RIAA now claims that the issues surrounding P2P and piracy have been contained and are no longer as big an issue as they once were. From the article; 'The problem has not been eliminated,' says association CEO Mitch Bainwol. 'But we believe digital downloads have emerged into a growing, thriving business, and file-trading is flat.'"

74 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Phew... by jbirdkerr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like Grandma and her illegal downloads of the "Happy Birthday" song can rest easy once again.

  2. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mission accomplished!

    1. Re:In other words... by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Funny
      Declare victory and go home.

      (I hope they don't forget the "go home" part this time.)

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    2. Re:In other words... by bakes · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not stealing. It's copyright infringement.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  3. Yarrrr Matey! by spahn · · Score: 4, Funny

    We won!

  4. i tried really by rritterson · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried hard to come up with a serious comment to this article, I really did. But every time I started writing one, I starting giggling. The RIAA is just too much. So, then, let me be the first to say:

    BAHAHAHAHAHAAH

    --
    -Ryan
    AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    1. Re:i tried really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried hard to come up with a serious comment to this article, I really did. But every time I started writing one, I starting giggling

      And yet, you clicked the 'Submit' button anyway. I think this sums up 90% of the comments on Slashdot.

    2. Re:i tried really by KU_Fletch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, if you can't really achieve victory, just change the goalposts to something easier and calim you won.

      --
      It's not stupid. It's advanced.
    3. Re:i tried really by IAmTheDave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right - so now that they ARE victorious, will they stop filing 20k John Doe lawsuits per month? Or is that whole thing still "game on"?

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    4. Re:i tried really by rob1980 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And half of the remaining 10% comes from snarky bastards like you.

      And me.

  5. So... by nicholaides · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So you're going to stop sueing college kids?

    --
    http://ablegray.com
  6. that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by LM741N · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can still get on Gnutella and find almost every song that exists. What a bunch of nonsense. I believe they are just saying this so they can save face in the midst of their defeat.

    1. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by richieb · · Score: 4, Funny
      Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

      Don't tell them! Let them declare victory and leave....

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    2. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by moranar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be "fair", what they seem to be saying is that even though every existing song can be found on p2p, the money they're making is still increasing while p2p downloads aren't.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    3. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can still get on Gnutella and find almost every song that exists. What a bunch of nonsense. I believe they are just saying this so they can save face in the midst of their defeat.

      Or, they're trying to use it as a tactic to convince people that everybody else has given up on using p2p, and they're better off switching to the 'legit' ways of doing it.

      Sometimes, trying to affect people's perceptions is as effective as trying to affect their actions.

      Everything the *AA's says is all about spin and perception!
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by frenetic3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think about *casual* piracy, though -- average people who formerly bought CDs but then turned to file sharing in the past 5 or 6 years -- the segment that cost the RIAA most dearly.

      Yeah, people who can name 5-10 file sharing programs off the top of their head, or know what warez or IRC are, will always be able to track down what they're looking for (and probably weren't formerly spending as much cash on CDs anyway). But think about your less computer-savvy friends. The fear mongering by the RIAA et al (suing of 12 year olds, raiding of college dorms) has spurred an impressive level of paranoia among casual file sharers. A lot of my friends don't use file sharing anymore for this reason (who really wants to go to jail for downloading Dani California), and I think the availability of legal (i.e. guilt/paranoia-free) and affordable alternatives like iTunes has also been a big factor.

      I think the RIAA has acheived resounding success in reducing both file-sharing demand (through PR and paranoia) and supply (by continuing to aggressively shut down pirate sites.) Their adversary is about as tough as one could imagine -- an anonymous army of millions of smart, connected users flagrantly ignoring copyright laws that governments are pretty lax to enforce -- how would *you* fight such an enemy?

      The RIAA's success is pretty impressive (remember, the goal wasn't to eliminate piracy, but to cut it down to only the most hardcore/defiant subset, so that the rest of the general population goes back to paying $), but at the same time makes me die a little inside. :P

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    5. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know anyone who's been scared off of file sharing. I know a few who aren't into mainstream and stopped because they had all they wanted. I know a few more who moved to allofmp3.com because it was worth 2 bucks an album to not have to search to find stuff. But I don't know anyone who stopped because they're afraid of being sued. A conservative estimate syas there were 1 million US file sharers- they sued a few hundred. I'd take those odds any day of the week.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it was a few thousand.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    7. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait... is RIAA French?

      /me ducks

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    8. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can still get on Gnutella and find almost every song that exists.

      It rather seems that p2p shaped your notion of what exists.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    9. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by BAKup · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, They're the president of the US. /Mission Accomplished

    10. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by griffjon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quiet! My remote Jedi Mind Trick finally worked!

      "These are not the nodes you're looking for"

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    11. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by Skreems · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So basically, they finally realized what the OSS/P2P/Hippie/Thief community (yeah yeah, flame on) has been saying for years: that "illegal" downloads are not actually depriving them of any money, since people use it to test out bands they're unsure of, or discover new music, as often as they just download without paying? But even though the rest of us have been trying to stuff this idea into their tiny little skulls, they have to declare moral victory so they don't lose face?

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    12. Re:that is ridiculous- e.g. Gnutella by metasecure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually it was Canadians who won the battle at normandy.

  7. If you cannot win... by HRogge · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you cannot win, claim victory.

    1. Re:If you cannot win... by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, it worked for the US in Iraq after all ;)

  8. Meanwhile... by Lithgon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pirate 1: Arrr! The RIAA ship has been swashbuckled! Pirate 2: Ayye! The fools even think they sunk us! ARRR!

  9. RIAA says its contained? by LDMackSAE · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that like a /.er's parent saying "My child doesn't spend that much time on the computer"?

  10. Not flat by Himring · · Score: 5, Funny

    file-trading is flat.

    I actually think of it more as a rectangular prism....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Not flat by sidfaiwu · · Score: 2, Funny

      file-trading is flat.

      I actually think of it more as a rectangular prism....

      No! It's round. If we sail far enough, we'll end up on the other side! All I need is more funding to sail the P2P seas and I'll bring back free digital music from India.

    2. Re:Not flat by duggie · · Score: 4, Funny

      file-trading is flat.

      I actually think of it more as a rectangular prism....


      And if the RIAA had its way it would be a rectangular prison.

  11. was the guy... by Churla · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was the guy who made this press release doing so on the deck of a ship with a big "Mission accomplished" sign behind him?

    Any chance there?

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    1. Re:was the guy... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. It was a pirate ship. Or, at least, it should have been.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  12. If you were the RIAA... by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What would you do?

    Seriously...

    1. Re:If you were the RIAA... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd try to squeeze as much money outta the organisation as I legally can before it sinks. Because it will. They're sitting on the horse cart and the automobile came into play.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:If you were the RIAA... by tbmcmullen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shoot myself in the face sixteen times for the betterment of society as a whole.

      Seriously...

    3. Re:If you were the RIAA... by happyemoticon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The perception that the *AA is going away is somewhat flawed. Sure, like many companies in the past, they are hanging onto outmoded business models and many individual companies are doomed to shrink. But the 800 lb gorillas of the past, such as IBM and Xerox, didn't go away - they just reinvented themselves and shrank somewhat, while other companies took innovations that the gorillas were too thick to see as viable and ran with them.

      To say that their entire business is going to disappear is to overlook the fact that most people like the music that they sell, and like buying their albums. Sure, I have friends who can record songs that sound as good as any studio-polished single in their bedrooms on commodity equipment. Certainly, I watched Star Wreck: The Pirkinning, and I know that fan films can be made at a fraction of the cost of a real motion picture, with more thigh-high boots and miniskirts, and still look great. But if you indulge in these things, it means you're an avant-garde free content nerd, and you are in the minority. I know exactly how out-of touch I am, because I'm looking at last year's top 50 and I don't have a clue what 95% of them are. But clearly somebody's buying them, and I suspect that these people would be more than happy to download portions of these songs as ringtones onto their Verizon mobile phone. Whole droves of teenagers are listening to something with the nonce-words "Numa, Numa" in it, and buying it on ITMS as well.

      Imagine that. I'm 23 this Thursday, I have about five computers, I write for a living, play the guitar, have a reasonably active social life, and I feel like both a luddite and a hermit. I'm two steps away from Abe Simpson. Is this what all of adulthood is like?

      Anyway, what is going to contract is the retail distribution channels, such as movie theaters and music stores. The cable companies and the telcos will pick up the slack like I've hinted at above. However, since the content owners still have the majority of the market and you still have to do business with them to have a prayer of making it anyway, they will continue to snatch up new artists and buy their souls.

    4. Re:If you were the RIAA... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Imagine that. I'm 23 this Thursday, I have about five computers, I write for a living, play the guitar, have a reasonably active social life, and I feel like both a luddite and a hermit. I'm two steps away from Abe Simpson. Is this what all of adulthood is like?

      I dunno, but I've felt that way since before I was 23. Then again, I'm a recluse anyway, I've never been all that social, although I do very well in most highly social situations. (Slashdot doesn't count, this isn't the real world, it's a roleplaying game.)

      I think it's more about what maturity is like than "adulthood" which is based on age and little more. Once you grow up a bit, you realize what crap all that is, and start shaking your fist at those darned kids and their mangy dog.

      I've always been a weirdo, though, so what do I know? Besides how to be weird, that is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Nice to see wrong statistics propagated by jhill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Would appear that the writer of the story does what writers do best, not research facts. Appears that they're still using the same old sorry BS of CD sales dropped 30% in whatever year it was. When in fact, what has been shown is that it was singles that dropped ( you know, the things you can't find any more, because people aren't willing to pay 5 dollars for 1 song on a CD ), during that year CD sales actually increased.

    Overall the article is rather blah, I'm sort of surprised that they didn't throw in there something about the lose of some umpteen billion dollars that they would have made if it weren't for illegal file sharing...the good myth of each download is a lost sale.

    1. Re:Nice to see wrong statistics propagated by ZombieWomble · · Score: 5, Funny
      Heck, if you think that statistic is bad, look at this one:

      "Nearly 10 million people are online, swapping media, at any given time," he says. That May figure is up from 8.7 million people in 2005, he says.

      Apparently a 15% growth rate per year is what the music industry calls 'contained'. I wish someone would come and 'contain' my savings account...

    2. Re:Nice to see wrong statistics propagated by shark72 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think a lot of people who've read the article are making a few assumptions:

      1. The RIAA has an agenda to promote, and thus, the things that they say should not be trusted.
      2. The things that BigChampagne state are factual, and can be trusted.

      The RIAA probably believes that it's in their interest to state that file trading is flat, as their agenda is to curb piracy and increase sales.

      But keep in mind that BigChampagne is a for-profit company. Tracking P2P usage is what they do. They generate reports on P2P usage, which they sell for thousands of dollars. "File trading is flat" would not be an exciting story for them. "More people are using P2P than ever before" is great for them. It makes it clear that there's a continued need for their services, and that customers should continue to pay them to get reports on the growth of the P2P industry.

      The point here is that everybody is liable to spin and distort things to support their own interests (anybody who has children already understands this). Even "good guys" like BigChampagne.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  14. /. has been hacked by kfstark · · Score: 5, Funny

    A story about Microsoft calling a truce with the GPL followed by the RIAA saying P2P is not a problem.

    It's not April 1st.

    Hmmm... Only logical explanation is that /. has been hacked and someone is posting bogus stories.

    --Keith

    1. Re:/. has been hacked by JavaTHut · · Score: 5, Funny

      > It's not April 1st.
      >
      > Hmmm... Only logical explanation is that /. has been hacked and someone is posting bogus stories.

      We'll find out soon enough ... if we see this same story appear five times before week's end, we'll know only the real slashdot editors could acomplish that.

  15. It's completely and utterly true by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's true - because everyone who is going to do P2P download is now doing it.

    So he is right; P2P growth is flat - in exactly the same way TV purchase growth is flat.

    Note any shortage of TVs around the first world? alas not...

    1. Re:It's completely and utterly true by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In fact, thinking about it, what I find interesting is the implied equivelence of legal and illegal downloads.

      There appears to exist in the RIAA mind the notion that if legal downloads rise, illegal downloads must fall.

      I think the derives from a failure to understand that the majority of illegal downloads *would never have otherwise been a legal purchase*.

      Naturally, if you imagine the two are precisely correlated, if you see that the rate of illegal download growth has leveled out, you might - if you wanted to imagine it were so - consider that the problem had been "contained", especially since the number of legal downloads is rising (naturally, since it began recently at zero).

      In reality of course it simply means the problem has maximized and naturally, with no relation to the RIAA in any way, the number of users has levelled out.

      The RIAA just doesn't get it, it seems.

      Of course, we have to consider how the RIAA are measuring numbers - absolutely nothing is said about this. Are they still fixated on the now-defunct Kazaa network? looking on eMule right now, there appear to be approximately 19 (nineteen) million concurrent users. On one P2P network, just at this moment. In the evenings UK time it's about 26 (twenty-six) million.

      It's quite likely their measuring method is deliberately deceptive, in which case the statement means even less that it does.

    2. Re:It's completely and utterly true by shark72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I think the derives from a failure to understand that the majority of illegal downloads *would never have otherwise been a legal purchase*."

      Failure to understand, or failure to acknowledge? It's fun to say "The RIAA is a bunch of doodyheads" and all, but I think they're capable of hiring people who tell them the truth. How they spin this, however, is a different matter. I think it's very dangerous to assume that the collective employees of the RIAA are simply too stupid to understand this. Underestimating your enemy is a big mistake.

      At any rate, "would not have otherwise been a purchase" is a tautology. Nowadays, many people don't purchase music not because it's not worth the money, but because the general idea isn't something they'd consider, whereas a generation before, this wouldn't even be an issue. Their concern is that the new generation simply doesn't consider purchasing music to be worth serious consideration. Why would they, when music is readily available for free? The RIAA is not working on the micro level (let's incent 15-year-old Johnny to buy that track instead of downloading it) but on the macro level (attempting to maintain the belief that music is worth paying for).

      "In reality of course it simply means the problem has maximized and naturally, with no relation to the RIAA in any way, the number of users has levelled out."

      If I understand you correctly, you're of the strong belief that the various carrots and sticks (the lawsuits, the education programs, the growing availability of legit only music), have not had any effect? They have not caused a single person to stop pirating?

      This sounds preposterous to me, but you used phrases like "of course" and "no relation to the RIAA in any way" so you sound pretty sure of yourself. Am I misunderstanding you?

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  16. There's actually a little truth in this. by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If file trading is measured in terms of ease of use, then the number of available outlets has dropped. Things like Napster and the WinMX utility used to make file swapping incredibly easy even for people who weren't computer savvy. Now it takes a little work to get what you want. Plus, the major public file sharing networks are full of incomplete files, viruses and other garbage that most people don't want to deal with. In that way, people are either turning to harder-to-use file sharing techniques or giving up and getting a "real" copy of the media from a service that you know is good.

    Your average user is using LimeWare and used to typing words into a search box. Doing this these days will usually yield you one or two real copies, and hundreds of viruse files or trojans.

    1. Re:There's actually a little truth in this. by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why you stick to emule (brain-dead easy to use) or bittorrent (almost as, but harder to find stuff).

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:There's actually a little truth in this. by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doing this these days will usually yield you one or two real copies, and hundreds of viruse files or trojans.

      I just tried this on Gnucleus: I searched for "Hips Don't Lie" from "Shakira". I'm not a fan or so, it was just the first popular thing that popped up in my mind. After a few seconds waiting I got over 3000 hits, then I just sorted on size in reverse order. Those 200KiByte zip files and exe files won't fool anyone that knows that a regular MP3 is about 3MiByte. Now sort on "Distribution" (number of hosts having the same file), and downloaded it. (

      For sure, it was indeed the correct song. I have now deleted it again, since I do not care much about the song, but frankly it's not as if it's unmanagable for a non-technical person. I have given Gnucleus to some non-tech-friends and they use it all the time without any problem (of course, they are behind a hardware firewall and have antivirus software installed and up to date)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:There's actually a little truth in this. by Spinalcold · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Untrue, there are still many programs out there that newbies can use. Soulseek is extremely easy to use, and while it's still a bit buggy, the networks are clean.

      But in all honesty, I don't really care about that type of filesharing as much anymore. File sharing has moved beyond that into social networking, how many people now send MP3's over AIM or MSN. I constantly recommend albums to friends and they recommend them to me. Maybe it has to do with me already having a lot of music and I'm just searching for the new thing, but look at how many bands are offering their songs on My Space. Also, the new chat clients like Qnext have music browsing built right in so you can look at your friends music collection.

      Just my 2 cents though.

  17. Re:First Contained Post by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently your grammar has been "contained" as well.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  18. Snrk by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But we believe digital downloads have emerged into a growing, thriving business

    ...yeah, after Apple dragged your sorry asses kicking and screaming into the digital age. After you tried everything in your power to make digital downloads as locked down, expensive, and all but impossible to effectively implement.

    Digital downloads have emerged into a growing, thriving business despite your lot's best efforts to screw it all up.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Snrk by linefeed0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean Apple's digital downloads aren't also locked down, too expensive (and jeezus, $2 for a single music video or SNL skit?!), and a pain in the ass for everyone involved? That's news to me!

  19. Good: we want them to think they have won by KWTm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know what? Maybe they have won, if student pirating has been curbed to the extent that they want. And if more digital downloads are legal now than before, then that's great. It probably means that more companies are getting a clue about how to take advantage of the business model, but we'll let the RIAA save face.

    All we want them to do is quit trying to stomp out every conceivable method of information transfer in the name of stopping piracy, and go back to their executive boardrooms and golf courses.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
    1. Re:Good: we want them to think they have won by flibuste · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, they would have won if former users of P2P were now downloading songs from paying sites, which is probably not the case. Have all the people willing to "illegaly" (meaning "against MAFIAA rules") download music moved to ITunes or such? I doubt it. What we'll see is an upcoming huge drop in CD sales in favor of downloaded music, but will the gross income increase? I am not sure.

      They're losing the battle they started. Just as in project management, to keep face when a project is majorly failing, declare a success mid-course then terminate the project before big money gets lost.

  20. Mission accomplished! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just... where have I heard that before...

    Well, if you can't win, just say you won and rely on your opponent to not contradict you.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Re:Translated from "Suitese"... by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, I don't actually care. If they're trying to convince the public that filesharing is no longer a threat to them... HOORAY! I can share without guilt or fear of reprisal!

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  22. Re:Translated from "Suitese"... by robertjw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, I'm guessing it's more along the lines of
    Most people are downloading from iTunes, and we are making money so we don't care much anymore.

  23. PP2P2P2PP2P by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny
    So you're going to stop sueing college kids?

    Yeah, as soon as they stop downloading and listening to inane anime music.

  24. Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    First, MS declares a truce with Open Source.
    Then, the RIAA stops chasing P2P downloaders.
    Next, Hell freezes over.

    What a day!

  25. Re:They won? by daVinci1980 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait, so you're saying that because the RIAA claims to have 'crushed Indy artists' (which doesn't explain my CD case, but okay), that it's time for us to bomb a federal building, killing civilians and children in the process?

    I just want to make sure that that's really what you're saying. Because that might actually be the stupidest, most misguided statement I've ever read in all of my years on the internet. I suddenly understand why the draw of 27 virgins is capable of convincing men to kill themselves in the process of bombing other people!

    Actually, that might be the stupidest thing I've heard in my entire life. I... I think you're causing me to have an aneuerysm.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  26. Related joke by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some prankster let free all the dangerous animals on a zoo. The public was in panic, so the zoo chief gathered all the people inside the lion's cage. Then they locked it from inside.

    "We're safe! The animals are contained!"

  27. I for one... by azemute · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...welcome our oblivious overlords.

  28. Hmmmm.... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That number is huge but hasn't grown substantially, while video piracy has. "The music industry isn't seeing double-digit growth in piracy anymore, but Hollywood is," Garland says.

    So in other words, they're handing over the job of showering their customers with lawsuits to the MPAA. What's that, a relay race? Share the bad press for stomping on people's rights so nobody gets hurt too much?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. It's a trick. Get an axe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course they've won. They've got the "get rid of allofmp3.com" as one of the requirements for Russia to join the WTO, and they've got Sweden raiding (apparently against Swedish law) ThePirateBay just because the U.S. asked! Seriously, this isn't about P2P. This is about controlling distribution channels. You don't go after BitTorrent because you people are using it to pirate your copyrighted material. You go after the people distributing the copies. (Just like you don't go after Ford because people use cars to move drugs around the country. On the other hand, if you are a cartel of taxi drivers, removing private cars from the road is a great way to guaranteed revenues.) They only way I'll believe this is the end of it is if I see sales figures for RIAA members dropping drastically (and then they'd just blame pirates...).

  30. Watch more movies... by PC-PHIX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Clearly some people have not [downloaded and] watched enough movies to know better than to be this foolhardy.

    RIAA Claims P2P Has Been Contained

    That's they said about the Aliens too...

    --
    Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
  31. Re:First Contained Post by cHiphead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone SHUT THE HELL UP and let them believe it is contained. SHHHHH. Seriously.

    Cheers.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  32. Good Project Managers are always successful by vinn01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if you can't really achieve victory, just change the goalposts to something easier and calim you won.

    I used to have a Project Manager who did that for his trainwreck projects. His projects were *always* successful. Unfinished requirements became "future enhancements". Non-working projects became "proof of concepts". Half-baked projects became "prototypes".

    The wonderful thing about project schedules and requirements is nobody saves the previous version.

    Nobody has ever underestimated the gullibility of upper-managers.

    And nobody has ever underestimated the gullibility of people who read industry press releases.

    1. Re:Good Project Managers are always successful by mypalmike · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfinished requirements became "future enhancements". Non-working projects became "proof of concepts". Half-baked projects became "prototypes".

      This reads like a summary of "eXtreme Programming Explained".

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  33. Sound familiar? by SEMW · · Score: 2

    "Their infidels are committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Baghdad! Be assured, Baghdad is safe, protected!"
    "We have retaken the airport. There are NO Americans there. I will take you there and show you. IN ONE HOUR!"
    "We defeated them yesterday!"

    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  34. Kind of like this... by geobeck · · Score: 5, Funny

    TMS - Typical Movie Scientist
    TMG - Typical Movie General

    TMG: Doc, what's the status of the plague?
    TMS: As of an hour ago, the virus has infected every living thing on Earth.
    TMG: But it hasn't spread since then?
    TMS: Well, no, but--
    TMG: Then it's been contained! Victory is ours!

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  35. Yes, they do have to do it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But even though the rest of us have been trying to stuff this idea into their tiny little skulls, they have to declare moral victory so they don't lose face?

    Yes, they do.

    Their company exists to protect the interests of their member copyright holders against widespread unauthorized copying.

    Up to now their members/customers/owners have been interpreting the "internet piracy" as lost sales - or at least more sales lost than sales gained by free advertising, etc. - and they didn't have a download business model.

    In this atmosphere, if they were to declare surrender, their members/customers/owners would just let them die - or replace their execs with new ones who would attempt to carry on the fight.

    But now "this stuff" is beginning to percolate into the skulls of the RIAA's customers. And many of them do have a way to profit directly from authorized downloads (thanks to iTunes and the like). So it's now possible for both the RIAA and its clientele to look at things more rationally. They can entertain the possibility that unauthorized downloading, like pre-Betamax-decision videotaping of broadcasts, might not be an unmitigated disaster - and may even be a Good Thing (especially once the for-pay alternative is available for honest people who are more than browsing.)

    So the RIAA can now back off its enforcement efforts and go back to more reasonable functions, such as hunting down mass-production pirates, collecting royalties from broadcasters and those creating commercial public performances, and so on.

    But on their way out they still need to declare victory - not just to save their own tails, but to keep some pressure on downloaders to go to the commercial services and pay the 99 cents, and to keep in the public mind the idea that they SHOULD do so.

    (Of course they can claim to their clientele (with some justification) that their efforts to date are what branded this concept into "the public mind" in the first place.)

    Meanwhile, now that the clients see that the "piracy" isn't going to sink their ships they can get on with the job of making product and making money off it, and taking advantage of the new medium to make even more profit.

    New media mean new opportunities for profit, and these opportunities are greater than the (largely illusory) "losses" from the unauthorized copying they enable. This was shown with piano rolls, wax tube recordings, disk recordings, radio broadcasting, and tape recordings.

    Now it has been shown with digital recordings and network distribution. But it's sufficiently counter-intuitive to The Suits that they have to learn it fresh every time.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  36. I think you're right, but go a little further... by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What I see is a classic erosion of an unnecessary middleman. RIAA proved themselves really good, until 1990, at packaging and distributing music. Now there's an easy-to-implement strategy for just hooking artists directly up with listeners.

    But this doesn't kill the "music industry". There will always be a need for a legitimation structure -- an industry that sifts the amateurish crap from the high-quality art. But it won't be done through "push" marketing: "Britney is the next Madonna (as if Madonna was a major artist anyway)! Coldplay is the next U2!" No, listeners will want good information about who's doing what, and they'll decide who's the next what. RIAA has got so distracted shrieking about "piracy" that they've forgotten their core competency: put simply: telling good from bad. That's a service people will always want and pay for.

    I don't neglect the obvious fact that the RIAA not been a bastion of good taste recently; they've focused for over a decade on making the bad look good, in order to simplify their lives by stamping formula music out of a mold and just marketing it all to hell so that people buy it. Or payolizing it so that people don't realize there's anything else out there. But those days are numbered.

    But getting audio files (in whatever format) into the hands of listeners? Sorry, the mechanism there is well-understood and staggeringly efficient.

    Comments on movies in another post. Maybe.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  37. Ever wonder why piracy is "flat." by 12Iceman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am curious to see if the RIAA ever considered that the reason music piracy levels are not increasing is because everyone already has all the songs they want. It's not like the RIAA is flooding the market with an excess of quality releases.