Slashdot Mirror


Origami Feedback Mixed, says Samsung

Ben Camm-Jones writes "Citing a mixture of reactions from customers who bought its Q1 device, Samsung has said that the pre-launch teaser campaign run by Microsoft about the Origami project may have been misleading."

121 comments

  1. May have been? by GundamFan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft misleading? Naw...

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
    1. Re:May have been? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Oh my God! Next they will say Terrorists are the good guys. Freedom fighters.

      Wait....that's been done.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:May have been? by rwven · · Score: 1

      Microsoft didn't mislead anyone with this... They launched a campaign about it and didn't give any real details about the thing...so people assumed it would be the greatest thing ever...and were disappointed. It's the idiot's own fault that they didn't do their own research about it so they knew what to expect when they bought it...

  2. What I expected by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always feared that project would fold.

    1. Re:What I expected by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      It looked good on paper....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:What I expected by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Funny

      But the angles were too hard...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:What I expected by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      I got a paper cut... ouch.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    4. Re:What I expected by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      just wait for the next line of software: Microsoft Bandage: Express Edition.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    5. Re:What I expected by HunterZ · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard the pre-launch details were a little thin.

      --
      Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    6. Re:What I expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft update: The Origami project has been cut up and the useful bits will be put to use in Project Pepakura while the rest will be liquidated and merged with Project Mache

    7. Re:What I expected by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      This thing is going to get Microsoft beaten to a pulp.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    8. Re:What I expected by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1

      If they don't learn to think outside of the box profits will be paper thin. They are really going to get creased by the competition.

    9. Re:What I expected by ErZo · · Score: 1

      I think this is giving/will give them papercuts.. y'ouch

      --
      In the Soviet Union, signatures writes you!
  3. Waste of bandwidth by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nowhere in the article does it mention exactly HOW it fell short of the advertizing. Does its handwriting recognition fall short? Is its reported collaboration short of the mark? This article is about as worthless as it comes to getting any real information. Perhaps they modelled their article writing on the Microsoft advertizing campaign?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Waste of bandwidth by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, I got to play with one over the weekend. The handwriting recognition was excellent. Without training, it read my chicken scratch quite accurately (not a single misread). The voice recognition required more training, so I didn't use that. Battery life was, as expected, about 2 hours, which was fine for me. There's supposed to be an extended battery coming out for it in the next few months, and i'm almost always near an outlet when i'd be using it.

      Weight was fine. I didn't find it too heavy at all. It even played WoW quite well. The digitizer was a little slow to react, but that was about it. I was VERY impressed, considering it's half the cost of tablet PC and provides far more functionality than a pocket pc. Exactly what I was looking for.

      I think i'll buy one when the LED backlit version comes out.

    2. Re:Waste of bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, I got to play with one over the weekend. The handwriting recognition was excellent. Without training, it read my chicken scratch quite accurately (not a single misread).

      Do you actually write faster than you type or is the advantage in saving the space/weight of a keyboard? Not being sarcastic, I'm honestly tryng to understand the appeal of these.
    3. Re:Waste of bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half the price of a tablet? The only price I seem to find anywhere for this is around $1000, and you can get low end tablets for around $1200-$1400 now. Not to mention tablets convert to laptops and have more processing power, upgrades, and storage available.

    4. Re:Waste of bandwidth by metsrok · · Score: 1

      There is only a touch screen keyboard, and even that is undergoing different prototypes - it's not a normal qwerty straight layout, it's on the bottom corners to by typed on with your thumbs - hard to explain.

    5. Re:Waste of bandwidth by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The advantage is in being able to draw diagrams in the midst of your notes.

      Incidentally, I second the O.P. -- the handwriting recognition in Windows Tablet PC Edition is really great. I tried it on a full-size Tablet PC, of course, but it should be exactly the same for an Origami device

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Waste of bandwidth by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      I guess I was referring to a tablet that's either a slate or a "hybrid". The Laptop convertibles are just stupid in my opinion, they're heavy and clunky. I would do better with a regular laptop and a portable wacom tablet.

      I was comparing this against the Compaq tc1100, which is probably closest in my opinion to functionality.

    7. Re:Waste of bandwidth by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      No, I don't write faster than I type, but I write faster than I can use a fingerboard or the dial-keys. So, when i'm using it without a keyboard, handwriting recognition is very important.

      Also, you can use a good bluetooth keyboard with this as well, so if you're going to be typing at a table or something, you can pull that out and use that instead. Also, the Q1 has a USB keyboard option that fits well in their carrying case, but I didn't get a chance to play with this configuration (I did use the Think Outside Stowaway Bluetooth Keyboard).

      All in all, it was pretty impressive.

    8. Re:Waste of bandwidth by Bertie · · Score: 1

      On mine it's a bog-standard qwerty laid out in the normal fashion.

    9. Re:Waste of bandwidth by Serapth · · Score: 1

      The UI in question isn't actually from Microsoft. They licensed it from a company called Fortune Fountain ( yeah... lame name ), its called DialKeys(www.dialkeys.com). Its actually a very neat piece of technology.

      As to the Origami's, I am actually fairly interested. There is a model coming soon that is 800$, includes a GPS built in. I have been interested in a good car based GPS device for a long time and this might just fill the need ( plus satisfy my geek fetish side nicely ).

  4. what the article says by Tearfang · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you who don't want to read the article this is the section detailing how people felt mislead:
    "someone [with prior] understanding of Origami, [they have been] saying 'We expected this and expected that' and comparing specification and price with laptop computers," said Steel. But even though a laptop can deliver more, it comes at a price, Steel noted."

    1. Re:what the article says by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      But even though a laptop can deliver more, it comes at a price, Steel noted.

      The price of paying less?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
  5. Re:MS Vaporware??? Never! by ExKoopaTroopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nor have they ever released vaporware.

    By definition vaporware is never released ...

    --
    Don't Tell Me What I Can't Do!
  6. surprising by yagu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Any success at all for the Origami would have been a surprise. It was (is) much too small to be a PC in any context (especially with an anemic screensize, heck lots of tiny devices approach the resolution and quality of the Origami) and way too big to be a portable device like an mp3 or video player.

    For those trying to make it PC-like, the device short-shrifted users on usability like keyboard functionality. For those wanting portable devices, the Origami was way overpowered and cumbersome (who the f*** wants to fire up Windows to play an mp3 or a video?!?).

    In between someone must have envisioned a niche market -- there likely is one, it's just not very big, and not noteworthy beyond the demographic for which it might be useful (hospitals, shops, warehouse grocery stores, etc.).

    The Origami wasn't that much different (IMO) from the notepad type portables, except it was lighter in features, but still heavy in the wallet requirements. Sometimes these devices seem to be brain farts -- "what if"s, and they get run up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes. Hats off to Microsoft for a clever attempt at "mystery" marketing the Origami. Sometimes the buying public has a clue before the marketers.

    1. Re:surprising by kansas1051 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well put, the Q1 retails for around $1,100, which is more than most entry level Dell notebooks. If one is looking for a light and portable Wi-Fi equipped device, the Palm TX retails for around $300. Its never been clear to me what market MS was targeting, as for 99% of users, it would be cheaper to buy a standard laptop or palm.

    2. Re:surprising by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      You seem to think there isn't a market for geeks who don't mind carrying a bag for extra gadgets and want the ability to pull out a small "handheld" computing device and be able to play WoW on the go without the need for a hugely expensive laptop.

      Per this post earlier in the comments for this story:

      "Weight was fine. I didn't find it too heavy at all. It even played WoW quite well. The digitizer was a little slow to react, but that was about it."

      Sounds more to me you have a consumer group who might definitely be interested in this product.....and maybe more if all the chinese gold farmers decide they want to be able to work on the go.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  7. Re:Slow news day? by christopherfinke · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This isn't Digg; if an article doesn't interest you, you don't need to let the world know - just don't read it.

  8. Hype? NO WAY! by ELProphet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Microsoft hyped a product (that seems to do take a good jab at it's niche), and someone says it *looked* like it might have done something else. When I see an add for a BigMac on TV, and go in to buy one, it's not *as* big or *as* juicy as in the commercial, but still worth it. So, marketers promoted a product? Big deal.

    1. Re:Hype? NO WAY! by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      But a Big Mac is $3, and you've probably eaten them before so you know what you're getting into. If I was going to pay $1100 for a brand new sandwich, it sure as hell better look like the picture.

    2. Re:Hype? NO WAY! by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ELProphet wrote:
      So, Microsoft hyped a product (that seems to do take a good jab at it's niche), and someone says it *looked* like it might have done something else. When I see an add for a BigMac on TV, and go in to buy one, it's not *as* big or *as* juicy as in the commercial, but still worth it. So, marketers promoted a product? Big deal.

      The issue was that the hype raised expectations higher than what an actual product could deliver. The buzz about Oragami was that it was going to be a revolution in portable computing. This was going to be the device that made the PDA market irrelevant and that would make traditional laptops seem arcahic. It was going to be a birth of a new form factor that would solve the most difficult compromises of moblile computing and consolidate the market rather than fracture it further. It wasn't going to be just another way to package the cooked cow carcass we're so familiar with.

      Were the orgami companies developing the actual products completely suckered by the hype themselves? Or was the company doing the marketing simply out of touch with what the market could deliver? Though backwards, it's like NASA getting the writers of Star Trek to write up their annual budget to justify their funding from Congress. Star Trek writers could come up with enchanting arguments and get lawmakers on the edge of their seats to throw money at NASA technologies, but without being able to produce holodecks, transporters, and phasers, they'd never be able to meet the hype.

    3. Re:Hype? NO WAY! by ELProphet · · Score: 1

      But when I try the new McDonalds sandwich (for $5, because it's new), I don't expect to get the same sandwich as in the picture. Marketing in our society has become such a science that I naturally expect less of the product when it is released, wether it's a sandwich, a new computer, or an OS. I take that into account when making my purchase, and that decides any feelings of Buyer's remorse. The amoutn of money isn't the point, it's the collective disregard of Caveat Emptor we take for the excuse of a chance to bitch. Not that I should complain, I take advantage of it to bitch myself... but still! ;)

    4. Re:Hype? NO WAY! by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1
      I don't see the similarity in marketing beyond "It's mass produced. Actual product may vary." between burgers and computers.
      • Taste and aroma don't market easily, but a computer doesn't have those problematic senses. Computers are actually easier to market in their raw form. You don't actually try to lick the screen in Apple's OS X do you?
      • Risking a disagreeable meal is simple, common, individual decision. Risking the price of an Origami device means checking bank statements, arguing with your spouse, and saving from paycheck to paycheck. People are screaming bloody murder about scratches on their iPods because it's a $300 device rather than a $30 device.
      • Computer advertising inevitably raises questions. Will this help me? Can I afford it? Is it compatible? Fast food advertising is in the group that provides an answer to questions they know you're already considering at just the right time (before their competition suggests an alternative answer).
      • Food items are easily modifiable and improvable. If you don't like onions on your burger, you can order it that way or just scrape them off yourself. Computers are not modifiable or improvable to the mass market. A buyer has few ways to vent their frustrations other than return the product and/or bitterly complain about it to others.
    5. Re:Hype? NO WAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I bought this new fangled product that claimed to be both a floor wax and a dessert topping, but it was just icky. Worst of all, it sealed my taste buds and I can't taste anything, now!

  9. Too expensive!!! by MikeRT · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If they had actually kept to the original price specs, maybe it would have done better. Still, the machines are probably a much better buy than a Nokia 770 right now.

    1. Re:Too expensive!!! by rhedin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure I can agree here-- I spent $299 + tax on my Nokia 770 as opposed to about $1200 for the Q1; while the Q1 is running Windows and has a more powerful processor, it's also much bigger. I can carry my linux based 770 with me wherever I go very easily (fits in a shirt pocket) and have had no problem using it anywhere. For me at least, the extra $800 isn't worth it.

      rob.

    2. Re:Too expensive!!! by shdragon · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I can agree here-- I spent $299 + tax on my Nokia 770 as opposed to about $1200 for the Q1; while the Q1 is running Windows and has a more powerful processor, it's also much bigger. I can carry my linux based 770 with me wherever I go very easily (fits in a shirt pocket) and have had no problem using it anywhere. For me at least, the extra $800 isn't worth it.

      I've been intrigued by the 770 but I don't know anyone that has one. What do you think of your 770? What do you primarily use it for? What things annoy you about it? What's typing like on the thing? How hard is it compile/use linux apps for the thing?

      -shd

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    3. Re:Too expensive!!! by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      I'd also like to hear more about your experience with the 770. Is it all useful in a PDA/Notetaking role, or is it pretty much a portable web browser and media device only?

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    4. Re:Too expensive!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my 770. I've had it for about 3 months now. The main thing I use it for (and it's intended function) is browsing the web; at a coffee shop or other location when wifi is available, and also through my cell phone with bluetooth. I've used it to access google maps on a roadtrip while on the interstate. (yes, someone else was driving).

      Other things I use it for:
      -Sudoku
      -e-book reading using FBreader and gutenberg.org (also usefull for very long html pages since FBreader will save your place)
      -pdf file reading (but this could be better)
      -Playing movies(properly encoded) and music. I primarily use this functionality at home
      by nfs mounting the disks on my home computer over wifi or bluetooth(with PAN). But with
      the $50 1GB rsmmc card I bought from buy.com you can copy them over too to take them with you.
      -ssh
      -small enough to always have with me, but since it is NOT my cell phone, I don't always have to have it with me.

      Annoyances:
      -mail application currently sucks (read unusable). I am expecting a complete overhaul of this
      in the next os release when they include instant messaging and google talk (which can also be
      used as a sip phone).
      -news reader is flaky (but can be killed using xterm for people like us). I expect this will
      improve or be replaced with by an open source alternative.
      -video player is somewhat limited. file has to be encoded just right to some extent. so it's
      not very flexible. In general it can't play mpeg4 files created for ipod or psp. But again I
      think this will improve too.
      -Up until the last os update about a month ago, there were fairly frequent os crashes. Now it's more stable and considerably snappier.

      Typing:
      It's not too bad. I think it would be interesting to try some non-qwerty layouts such as have been developed for palm. I look forward trying out the onscreen thumbpad in the next os release due very soon. Handwriting recognition sucks, word completion sucks (I've disabled it since it reduces the size of the spacebar as it tries to match your word and I sometimes press on the incorrect suggestion when trying to press the spacebar). Extensive text entry would be cumbersome, but there are external bluetooth keyboards that people have gotten to work, and I think the new onscreen thumbpad will help.

      Compiling:
      I am embarrassed to say that I have had this thing for 3 months and haven't yet installed the development environment. :( I've been extremely busy, hey I live in New Orleans. But the devel environment has been released for the next os version and it is said it is easy to install if you have a debian like environment. There are many comments about gtk apps compiling out of the box, though they don't integrate into the hildon interface. X over ssh tunnel works too, though again no integration to hildon interface.

      My impression is that Nokia is doing a fair job of adopting the open source paradigm of "release early, release often". Check out the mailing lists on maemo.org. I think Nokia will allow and encourage every use of this device that you can think of. What I mean is, (I've been keeping up on the maemo mailing lists) I haven't seen any arbitrary limitations. And I see Nokia expanding there interaction with the online developer community and being more open with the development process.

      Oh, sometimes I see people bringing up the 3 hour battery life. Well that's 3 hours of constant wifi usage. using bluetooth instead will give you much longer life, and not using any wireless gives much much longer life. I haven't found it to be limiting.

      In short, if you're interested in the things I mentioned above as my uses, I recommend the 770.

      If you're interested in this device because it runs linux and has an open development environment and hence you can do anything you want with it (not just what is "allowed"/"intended"), again I recommend it. This device is a little computer that runs linux and the 2006OS

    5. Re:Too expensive!!! by Psiven · · Score: 1

      Its great as a portable web browser. It doesnt like flash sites but mounting a swap helps with that, and the other memory issues it has. SSH works great, and it can even connect to a VNC server or MS windows terminal.

      Movies work great when encoded down to a playable size (240x320 or so). The email client is a little shody and many use web based gmail. Battery is great and the sleep mode is very effective. The HCI is crap, you need the stylus for everything. Its role as a PDA is limited as it doesnt sync with Outlook unless youre willing to pay $10/month. On the other hand, if youre fine entering all you appointments onto the PDA yourself, it has capable software to serve as a PDA.

      That said, I'd wait for the new model this fall. It'll get a much needed memory bumb and apparently they'll use a much more capable processor. I even expect Nokia to take a swing at Sony and Nintendo with games. I really think it could be the N-Gage's Pheonix rising.

    6. Re:Too expensive!!! by Psiven · · Score: 1

      I responded to the ither request for feedback in the 770.

      Please look here: http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=18888 9&cid=15563473

    7. Re:Too expensive!!! by shdragon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the honest review. All the reviews I found online seemed like either kowtowing or bitching about trivial things. Is the upgraded proc/mem the only major revisions announced? Where might I find more (better) info? I'm really looking for a limited-use web(mail)/im/gps device . I think I'll wait for the version 2.0.

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    8. Re:Too expensive!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, I'd wait for the new model this fall. It'll get a much needed memory bumb and apparently they'll use a much more capable processor.

      any references for this? I'm sure a new model will be released eventually as long as this model is successful, but I haven't heard anything about a fall release, and given what I have heard Nokia say, I don't expect one.

      -b

    9. Re:Too expensive!!! by Psiven · · Score: 1

      What has Nokia said? Ofcourse they're not going to announce anything now. It'd kill any sales up till then.

      I'm looking for the diagram that detailed the 2 procs versus each other. The memory upgrade is assumed though and I have not seen any announcements.

  10. Feedback Mixed? by jcr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gee, they actually found someone who liked it?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Feedback Mixed? by justkarl · · Score: 1

      I like it, what with all the paper swans and folded designs...

      Oh, wrong origami news discussion site...SOrry!

  11. Battery Life by VikingThunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it all comes down to battery technology. We don't have the battery tehnology to make something like Origami really useful yet. IMO, it needs to have at least 8 hours of battery life at the minimum.

    1. Re:Battery Life by EvanED · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IMO, it needs to have at least 8 hours of battery life at the minimum.

      Why? Your typical work day is what, 8 hours. Are you gonna be using the thing all day? Samsung's website says that the battery life of the Q1 should be about 3.5 hours. Even if you're using the thing half the time, that should be plenty. And it seems to me like the half would be high.

      There are times when a longer battery would be really nice, like for plane rides and stuff, but for day to day operation, 3.5 hrs isn't low enough to be a deal breaker. I mean, laptops have battery lives of under that often, and I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone say they're
      not useful.

    2. Re:Battery Life by misterhypno · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Coinsider people who actually work in the field, as opposed to the cublcle-bound workers. With a battery life of only two hours, this thing is essentially useless for these folks. Another issue seems to be the problem of having to power up Windows simply to run the mp3 player, which, in this day and age, is pretty silly, not to mention wasteful.

      So, until this critter actually has a useful battery life, people who actually work in the field, away from the office, like sales professionals, engineering types, inspectors, law enforcement professionals, utility workers, field service agents, and the like will have little use for Origami. Even people who attend trade shows would have a hard time using this thing as they would have to find outlets on a pretty regular basis, instead of being able to wander the show and actually make USE of it for taking notes, like it's supposed to be used. Origami seems to be a bit flat yet for any practical field use. Lee Darrow, Chicago, IL
    3. Re:Battery Life by darthservo · · Score: 1
      I think the point you're getting at is that these devices would obviously not appeal to those who are stuck in cubes all day. Why pay the extra for portability if John Doe is just sitting at his desk doing data entry all day, right? Save the extra cash and get a cheap tower instead. And if Johnny needs to move around the office to, say, a meeting room, get a cheap laptop. For this scenario, the Origami would obviously not be an economical decision.

      Yes, the typical work day is about 8 hours. However, for some, work doesn't end immediately after leaving the office - bus/subway/train ride home, heading to the airport, finishing up projects in various locations, what have you.

      Also, what if those people were too busy/mobile during the course of their day at the office that they didn't have time to worry about plugging it in somewhere and remaining stationary while the thing charged just to be used for 2/3 more hours until the process has to be repeated again? Employees that worry about mobility would look at a device like this and say, "I expect to not have to worry about battery life." 2-3 hours of uptime for a device that is supposedly designed for on-the-go type work is pretty pathetic IMO. An additional battery is obviously always optional, but then you start defeating the mobility aspect - "Now I have to carry something else?"

      Just think of cell phones for moment. Would they be near as popular if people could only use them for 2 hours at a time?

      --

      Prove it.

  12. Origami project... by pubjames · · Score: 4, Interesting


    My theory is that the whole Origami project teaser campaign was a tactical spolier campaign by Microsoft that didn't work out. I think they assumed that Apple would come out with some fancy new product on their 30th anniversay, and so timed the campaign to coincide with that to spoil, or at least taint, anything Apple did. But then Apple didn't launch anything, and Microsoft was left running a spolier campaign without anything to spoil. I bet if Apple had released a new product, Microsoft would have made a lot more noise.

    1. Re:Origami project... by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      Either that or the Origami devices that actually showed up are all underwhelming, ugly, and expensive. Really not much to hype right now ... wait for version 3.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  13. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, seriously, if he doesn't care I don't care. Warning bells should sound, and the story should be removed, folded and burned.

    It's not like a poor product launch, due to misrepresentation, could hamper what could otherwise be a growing industry.

    Not having time to keep up on all the new devices coming out anymore, I like to be able to pop by /. and see what's going on in the tech industry.

  14. Smooth move Samsung? by SimpleBinary · · Score: 1

    Because this form of tablet PC doesn't appear to be living up to it's hype, is Samsung just using Microsoft as a scape-goat?? I mean, come one, we all believe that Microsoft can be misleading...

    --
    ...am I supposed to put something here?
  15. Too impractical by Wootzor+von+Leetenha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first saw the Oragami teaser site, and read articles speculating what it was, i thought it was that blue and white cell phone looking thing that folded into a few different combinations (i can't find a picture right now...can someone help?). Then when the countdown was over, they showed this honking thing, basically a bit smaller than a tablet pc. There is no market for that. It's still too big. Anything bigger than a cell phone is too big to be convenient. Similarly, anything bigger than a cell phone should probably have been designed and marketed as a non-portable device, since if most people can't fit in in their pocket or a small clip on their belt, it just can't be called "portable". I don't carry my laptop clipped to my belt. It would have been time better spent if they modified a PDA to do everything these things do.

    --
    My name is Wootzor von Leetenhaxor
    1. Re:Too impractical by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Similarly, anything bigger than a cell phone should probably have been designed and marketed as a non-portable device, since if most people can't fit in in their pocket or a small clip on their belt, it just can't be called "portable".

      Maybe it's just my age showing, but to me the word "portable" means any device that can more or less be moved easily from one building to another. All this means is that the unit must be self-contained and include some feature that makes it easier to carry (like a handle). What comes immediately to mind are the original Compaq computers that came in a case about three times the size of a lunch box. Because of this, anytime I see the word "portable" used in the description for a computing device, I immediately assume that it would require strength-training for several months just be be able to lug the thing around. It's a warning sign to me.

      On the other hand, I believe the word "mobile" has the same meaning to me as your interpretation of "portable". I would expect mobile devices to either fit in my pocket, or clip to my belt in some way to make it easy to carry them without using my hands. I realize this all comes down to semantics, though.... Does anybody else feel the same?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:Too impractical by Wootzor+von+Leetenha · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. My mind has been warped into thinking mobile and portable are the same... But now that I think about it... Just picture this phrase... Mobile home :) Either way, when I think of device being portable or mobile, then it fits on my belt. Unless it's a "Portable computer desk"... It's relative to the original size of the non-portable non-mobile version of that device. Good points though.

      --
      My name is Wootzor von Leetenhaxor
    3. Re:Too impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe it's just my age showing, but to me the word "portable" means any device that can more or less be moved easily from one building to another.


      On the other hand, I believe the word "mobile" has the same meaning to me as your interpretation of "portable".

      I actually think of "mobile" as meaning "something that has wheels and can use them effectively".

  16. Re:MS Vaporware??? Never! by insanarchist · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would tell you, but I don't think I'd finish before

  17. Mixed reviews by bubba451 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some reviews say Origami's unusable; some say it's overpriced.

  18. A mishandled teaser campaign and a duff product by 99luftballon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At the end of the day the teaser campaign was mishandled. This kind of product is a tough sell at the best of times - as shown by the relative failure of the tablet PC. Samsung have a good product, but at the price of a very good laptop it's a near impossible sell. People like keyboards for serious work and there still isn't enough processing power or good enough software to make handwriting recognition a suitable alternative.

    But it was the teaser campaign that really hurt the product. Trying to run a teaser campaign that would grasp the news agenda at the same time as the world's biggest trade show like CeBIT might have sounded good but it annoyed a lot of journalists. At the same time the hints we did get on features were so inflated that when the final product came out it was a big let down.

    Teaser campaigns are notoriously difficult to pull off. Look at the Segway for example. 'Ginger' ,as was, was hyped to the moon and back but at the end of the day disappointed. Maybe it's a sign of the tech market - we tend to like less fluff and more hard facts?

  19. I've got one by Bertie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Work bought it for me, for a very specific purpose. I suspect we're the only people that have a job that it's just perfect for.

    It's slow, it's heavier than you'd like, it gets really hot in use, it's fiddly to interact with, and it's not worth anything like the money. I know you should expect nothing else from first-generation hardware, but it really is almost entirely pointless for nearly everybody (it's absolutely perfect for what I need it for, but that's an extremely niche market, believe me, and if Pocket Internet Explorer on a PDA was anything more than a toy, I wouldn't need it at all).

    The hype was extremely misguided - it's just a very small tablet PC, it was never going to set the world on fire. But that's neither here nor there - hype or no hype, my main criticism of it is that it's not even very good at what it's meant to do, never mind all the things people imagined it would do before it came out.

    1. Re:I've got one by MarsBar · · Score: 1
      and if Pocket Internet Explorer on a PDA was anything more than a toy, I wouldn't need it at all)

      What about Opera for Windows Mobile?

    2. Re:I've got one by faedle · · Score: 2, Funny

      The hype was extremely misguided - it's just a very small tablet PC, it was never going to set the world on fire.

      As hot as it gets, it might not set the world on fire, but it might set your hands ablaze.

    3. Re:I've got one by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I suspect we're the only people that have a job that it's just perfect for.

      It's slow, it's heavier than you'd like, it gets really hot in use, it's fiddly to interact with, and it's not worth anything like the money. I

      I'm going to need more clues. I can't begin to guess what job that's perfect for.
      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    4. Re:I've got one by nchip · · Score: 1
      if Pocket Internet Explorer on a PDA was anything more than a toy, I wouldn't need it at all
      Nokia 770 with 800x480 screen + Opera? ..and you can BBC watch world cup streams at office toilet too ;)
      --
      signatures pending - ansa@kos.to - (dont mail there)
    5. Re:I've got one by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the job I'm using it for depends on Microsoft's SALT browser extension thingy, and Opera supports IBM's rival X+V standard. Yes, the people that made this decision are fools, but I'm afraid it was decided before my time and I'm stuck with it.

    6. Re:I've got one by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Well, I meant more the size and the functionality it offers - it's the best thing for the job that exists. I can only hope it'll get cooler and faster, and that the batteries will last a bit longer, in the next version, which rumour has it might use AMD processors.

      Cant really say too much about the job, I'm afraid, it's an application that's at an early prototype stage, but read the posts I've made here and use your imagination (and you'll be miles off...).

    7. Re:I've got one by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      Three words. Killing Underpants Gnomes.

    8. Re:I've got one by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      if Pocket Internet Explorer on a PDA was anything more than a toy, I wouldn't need it at all

      Have you tried Opera for Pocket PC?

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    9. Re:I've got one by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      The job of a pregnant woman.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  20. I should add by Bertie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That actually it does have another thing going for it. It's absolutely perfect for is watching the BBC's streaming World Cup webcasts from the office toilet...

    1. Re:I should add by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      The absolute last thing I wanna hear emanating from the bathroom: "GOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!"

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:I should add by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than hearing them miss...

    3. Re:I should add by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than hearing some nice 'dribbling'

    4. Re:I should add by ironring2006 · · Score: 1

      But if he's using the Wee Goal and scores, at least it means he's hitting the target and not pissing on your leg. Of course, I wouldn't extend that courtesy to the celebration antics that follow after. Let's just hope he puts his equipment away before he grabs the closest "teammate" next to him and starts jumping up and down.

    5. Re:I should add by dkone · · Score: 1

      Better to hear that, then:

      "He shoots,... and he misses"

    6. Re:I should add by Wordplay · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the -last- thing you want to hear is "Ohhhh, a near miss!"

  21. Why do we continue these coming soon... ads by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ads should not be about building excitement. It should be about establishing a consumer need for a product that they do not yet know they need. Furthermore, it should not make the customer expect more real aspects than the product can deliver. With these coming soon ads the expectations are free to form uncontrolled so naturely consumers are disappointed. For things like laundry detergent expectation can be overstated, and that does not present an investment, but with compters where purchasing decisions are often driven by word of mouth, such unmanaged expectation is deadly.

    Oragami was not a revolutionary product. It was is not even an xbox. What it is is a product that really doesn't exist, and the initial marketing was done for the benifit of the fer vendors who took a chance to manufacture it. Not that MS did not take that risk.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Why do we continue these coming soon... ads by MrWGW · · Score: 1

      A few flaws with your argument: 1. Advertising cannot create needs, only wants. These wants are based on showing how a particular brand satisfies pre-existing needs . 2. Advertising that creates a buzz around a product can be hugely successful, if you have a product that lives up to its expectations. Look at Apple as a classic example of that. Their 1984 commercial for the Macintosh provided virtually no information about the product or its benefits, but created a huge amount of excitement around the laucnh. When the product was unveiled, it was of course outstanding, and the result was that the Apple brand grew in strength by a huge margin that year. The problem here is that the Samsung Q1 just isn't a good implementation of the Origami concept. We were shown pictures of prototypes on CNBC and elsewhere featuring show-stoppers such as laser-projector keyboards, and the Q1 doesn't have any of that, its just an unusually small, glorified slate (keyboard-less TabletPC). Until an Origami appears which actually offers some meaningful differentiation from the smaller tablets produced by companies like Motion Computing and Fujitsu, the UMPC concept just won't take off.

    2. Re:Why do we continue these coming soon... ads by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Ads should not be about building excitement. It should be about establishing a consumer need for a product that they do not yet know they need."

      There exist in the industry many different types of ads that seek to accomplish a variety of things for a variety of reasons. Building excitement and informing about the product are just two possibilities. Ads should not be a certain specific thing. They should be whatever works.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  22. Re:MS Vaporware??? Never! by mcho · · Score: 1

    Oh no...looks like the hitman got another one, maybe I should stop before

  23. I call it duh by zanderredux · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA, we conclude that the degree of disappointment is inversely proportional to the exposure to hype you got.

    It seems that the real problem was how badly Microsoft marketing managed the release of Origami, giving too little information at a time, which causes people to guesstimate wildly.

    Despite this obvious rant, the only thing I liked in TFA is how I misread the sentence:

    Microsoft collaborated with Intel to create Origami, which combines a tablet edition of Windows XP with a pen-based tablet computer similar in specification to a laptop.

    For a split second, I read:

    Microsoft collaborated with Intel to create Origami, which combines a tablet edition of Windows XP with a pen-based toilet computer similar in specification to a laptop.
    What do you do with a toilet computer? How (and where) do you put the pen away????
    1. Re:I call it duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called the iLoo.

  24. Nokia 770, anyone? by Pecisk · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Samsung device looks like total rip-off of Nokia 770, Web tablet. However, it costs much less and doesn't overheat.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  25. Re:Slow news day? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    No, I was actually hoping someone would point out some ramifications I didn't pick up on.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  26. Re:MS Vaporware??? Never! by Wootzor+von+Leetenha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Nor have they ever released vaporware."

    I think vaporware, by definition, is never released.

    --
    My name is Wootzor von Leetenhaxor
  27. Product X feedback mixed, product Y feedback mixed by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sheesh... Some people didn't like the iPod when it lauched.. Some people don't like Palm's Treo.. Some people don't like the XBox, or the PSP, or the Gameboy.. Some people liked New Coke..

    Can anybody name a product launch without "mixed" feedback?

    The article has slim to no details as to what the problems were, and I suspect this is only on slashdot because of the dig at microsoft.

    Does anybody have any real info on the device?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  28. The article was /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. good for drawing by kisrael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm vaguely considering getting some hardware like this (or perhaps one of those dinky if overpriced Fujitsu lifebooks) as a doodling/art tool.

    I'm hoping someday touchscreens will be the standard, not the exception. Or, conversely, that drawing on a blank pad on your lap or on the table while looking at what you're drawing on separate screen will be considered some weird anomaly.

    Any suggestions for hardware? I don't need a huge "canvas" but Palm is a little too small (often with flakey digitizers as well)

    I'd love to see Apple get on this.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    1. Re:good for drawing by hords · · Score: 1

      I bought the LE1600 slate tablet PC from motioncomputing.com. It's just awesome. Light, powerful, bright, great viewing angles, and good battery life. I like their convertible keyboard too, you just snap it on when/if you want to make it more like a laptop. The price is spendy, but it's quality worksmanship. If you're interested, here's a few reviews: review1 review2 (w/video)

    2. Re:good for drawing by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      If you want something for art/drawing then do not get an Origami device, or the Fujitsu P1510 either. You need an Active Digitizer, not a passive touch screen. With an active digitizer you can rest your hands on the screen, and it provides pressure feedback - press down harder and get a thicker or darker line. Since you're looking for a small device, maybe you could try the Motion LS800 tablet. It has a small 8" screen with an active digitizer, I would expect it to be a great sketchpad.

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    3. Re:good for drawing by kisrael · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how I feel about Active Digitizers.
      Most of my "work" is very cartoonish. Active Digitizers freak me the hell out as the mouse pointer starts moving when I haven't even touched the drawing surface.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    4. Re:good for drawing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a P1510D (Euro spec - BT, 60GB, 512MB, 8-hour hicap battery, decent 3-year warranty, assembled in Germany) and love it. Portable SketchUp, WoW, etc. Great little machine.

    5. Re:good for drawing by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      I use a Toshiba M200 tablet and got used to that after a very short adjustment period. As long as you keep in mind nothing happens until you press down on the screen you'll do just fine :) It sure beats the problems you get with a passive digitizer and brushing a knuckle or a palm against the screen.

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  30. Re:Product X feedback mixed, product Y feedback mi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, that's a load of crap. Nobody ever liked New Coke.

  31. Missed Opportunity by Moki_man · · Score: 1

    You know, I and thousands of others have paid close to half the cost of these in purchasing Epson Photo Viewers for downloading pictures from our cameras while traveling, on assigment, etc. If these "PCs" had slots and reasonable speed for off loading cameras in the field and allowing us to do some editing and forwarding by wireless, they would certainly find a niche among photographers.

    1. Re:Missed Opportunity by sulfur_lad · · Score: 1

      agreed entirely. I had hand to play with one last week (outside the context of photography) and all I could think was "I wish they'd gone just an extra 10 milimeters," in my head thinking about photography. Just a little more disk space and a little more capability, and awesome!!! The form factor is fine and the screen is a great size to go through your photos on the fly.

  32. OQO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may be more expensive, but i'd much rather have a OQO Model 01+. http://www.oqo.com/hardware/basics/

  33. Off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Re:MS Vaporware??? Never! by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

    What aboot WHOOOOSHware?

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  35. Re:Product X feedback mixed, product Y feedback mi by V1b3s · · Score: 1

    Can anybody name a product launch without "mixed" feedback? Windows ME and the Catwoman movie. The reviews were pretty much unanimous on both of those.

  36. iPod Origami by RahoulB · · Score: 1

    I think the origami was an attempt at an iPod killer. iPods have iTMS lock-in, but the Origami will run iTunes, bypassing that.

    Of course they forgot the hardware lock in (will it work with your Bose thingies?) - and more importantly they forgot the three clicks to my music part.

  37. Misleading? Not as much as you would think. by eXtra+heavy · · Score: 1

    I am using the Q1 to submit this post and I have to admit it has exceeded my expectations so far. The device is comfortable to use, has great handwriting recognition and is just fun to play with. I haven't had heat problems and the battery is consistantly in the 3 to 3.5hr range. It suits my needs rather well. The drawbacks I have seen are few. The price point is all wrong and the stylus is too small but for the realm of work I do, education support, it has been a great tool. Was the campaign too forward thingking? Sure. That said, the Q1 is a device that shows and meets its potential. It made me a believer and I will most likely stick to the UMPC platform when a new device with an improved feature set becomes available.

    --
    -- As it was eXtraheavy in the beginning, is now and forever shall be
  38. Microsoft new marketting strategy, flood the media by kinglink · · Score: 1

    Viral marketing seems to be their tool of choice. And when that doesn't work, flood the media with the same information.

    I'm sick of hearing about the Origami. I was sick of it when it was just a rumor, then it was confirmed, then it was profiled, then it was abscent from E3, it's been 6 monthes and it's just basically vaporware. Jesus, this is what they WANT you to do. You already are overhyping it by just talking about it more and more.. Is it a game system, is it a handheld, is it just a small laptop.

    Personally I think we all should just say screw you to microsoft and stop handling their free advertising with all their rumors and shit. Viral marketing might work, but do we really need to help it along with stories that allow their new name become household words?

  39. Not as portable as a PDA. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . yet not as usable as a laptop. Gee, it's hard to figure why it's going to tank.

  40. I like 'em. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    A key problem here was how Microsoft handled the marketing. This was essentially an effort by Microsoft to create acceptance for small tablet PCs. This is basically round 2 in the marketing effort. But they sold it like it was going to be something new and innovative, which it certainly wasn't.

    I recently got a used Sony Vaio U70, through work. The thing is essentially identical to these current Origami PCs. It has a 1ghz Pentium M processor, 512mb of RAM and a basic Intel 3D card. I get about hour and a half of battery life if I'm using the thing continuously.

    I think these devices are great. I like having what is essentially a complete PC I can easily carry around anywhere. However, there are a few glaring issues.

    The first is the screen. Everyone who's seen it is shocked by how tiny everything looks. The display is 5 inches diagonally, but its running at 800x600. The real culprit is Windows, which isn't really designed to accomodate these displays. I suppose Origami was supposed to help, but I doesn't seem like it has.

    The second problem is text input. A seperate keyboard is cumbersome; it can't be used with the device anywhere other than on a desk. Integrated keyboards are better, but still too small to be used quickly and reliably. Then there's handwriting which is decent, but I think too slow compared to typing.

    One other thing is battery life. I agree that these devices should be able to run a good eight hours. Maybe the newer units have improved, but mine won't go very far on a long flight. Although, even three hours isn't very good. It's fine for a commute, but not for travelling at least not until you're at your destination.

    Ultimately, the problem is that these things are useless for the majority of the population. If you commute via public transportation or travel a lot I do think these devices are ideal. They're more portable than laptops and are powerful enough to do anything most people need them for. They wont run the latest games, but that's about the only drawback.

    To become a realistic desktop replacement I they need to be significantly more powerful. But I do think it's very appealing to be able to disconnect the PC from it's docking bay and easily carry it around the house, or stuff it in a small backpack and take it with me. The thing is small enough that I barely notice it.

    I think the technology just needs time to be refined.

  41. I know what job! by pavon · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is the perfect tool for Origami Software Developers :)

  42. Death by a thousand paper cuts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And in Soviet Russia...oh never mind!

  43. Yeabutt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard nothing but bad reviews on the Nokia 770.

    So I'm not sure I want either of them.