Slashdot Mirror


Futurama Returns

GrumpySimon writes "Good news everyone! Straight from a one-eyed alien's mouth - 13 new episodes of Futurama have been confirmed by Katey Sagal on Craig Ferguson's Late Late Show. All the original actors have signed up too."

118 of 553 comments (clear)

  1. YAY! by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love the smell of Slurm in the morning - it smells like ... walrus!

    1. Re:YAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Considering that the recent thread on global warming is about to reach 600 posts, I think I should remind everyone that there is hope:

      Fry: This snow is beautiful. I'm glad global warming never happened.
      Leela: Actually it did. But thank God nuclear winter cancelled it out.

    2. Re:YAY! by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Informative

      in a rare (*snigger*) continuity error there were two explanations for global warming not destroying the planet in Futurama. The other being that they drop a huge ice cube in the ocean once a year. /pedantic obsessive fan

      "glowbal wopple?"

    3. Re:YAY! by BakaHoushi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think Futurama actually even tries to have a real continuity. In the beginning of the series, they make references to Star Trek all the time, but later on the name becomes a "forbidden word."

      I just think of it like I did the Simpsons in some jokes. Lisa once stated the Springfield Oil Field is 3 times the size of Texas. This means either they live in Alaska (possibly, I need to consult a map for scale) or it's a joke because it's too ridiculous to be true.

    4. Re:YAY! by tolan-b · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah that was kinda what I was getting at.

      I suppose there's no real need for that sort of continuity, as long as the continuity for the main characters broadly fits together, and it gives them more room for humour without being penned in by what they did before.

  2. Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I applaud it, I remember the resurrection of Ren & Stimpy and how it just wasn't quite the same anymore. The making of a popular series can often rest on the frenzy of creating the episodes and the chemistry of those at work on it. Add an interruption, time for other projects and influences, what will become of pulling the team back together? Will it be the same, or will it be like, "well, Bender saying, 'bite my shiny metal asee' doesn't totally suck, but it's just, you know, different now."

    Other news in the It's About Time Department:
    In other good news, finally on DVD, Yellowbeard! Arr! July 27 for USA & Canada or July 10 for UK No word yet on extras, like Group Madness, the documentary of making of the film.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...but see I remember watching the old episodes of Ren and Stimpy and thinking, "why did I like this? This is horrible." Especially those two minute ultra-grotesque stills.

      It's not because the writers got worse. It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.

      Just like Family Guy, Futurama still cracks me up. If they make more, I'll still like 'em.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember watching the old episodes of Ren and Stimpy and thinking, "why did I like this? This is horrible."

      Ah, well, I bought the 3 dvd set of the originals and still get a big laugh out of them. Some are kinda weird, but I think they were weird back in the day, too. Best of the series were the Cmdr Hoek and Cadet Stimpy space serial send ups.

      I've been to a Spike and Mike's Festival of Animation and have thought, "Whaaaattt? This stuff is supposed to be funny?" Then I realise about 75% of the audience smoked a bong before coming in.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by alshithead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unlike Family Guy, Futurama is funny. I'm off now to eat my lobster self.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    4. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

      *shakes head*

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    5. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by misleb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I seem to remember reading that the Ren and Stimpy characters were sold to Nickelodeon or the creator was fired or something like that after the first batch of episodes. So there is good reason why it changed dramatically. As long as Futurama keeps the same creative bunch, there is a good chance that it will be good as ever.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    6. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by GersonK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, they won't make the same mistake they did with the new R+S - I'm sure they'll get Billy West back. Seriously, there are a lot of factors that led to the failure of the Ren and Stimpy's adult swim or whatever it was called that aren't present here. There wasn't the bloody custody battle like John K. had with Nick and the resultant split of the creative staff. The show's not going from "a kid's show written for the adults who make it" to "a show for adults. or at least, not for anybody under 18". The gap in production, while long, is nowhere near a decade. While David X. Cohen hasn't gotten a lot of (any?) projects of the ground in the iterim, he and Matt Groening are not the "do not play well with others" personalities who had to spend the post Fuuturama time coasting on their past success. Though, I will agree that there's a good chance the show will not come back on track, but there's little chance it won't come out better than Drawn Together (Damning with faint praise, I know). Anyhow, this is probably the first time I've had a good feeling towards Comedy Central since they canned MST.

    7. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by mysteryvortex · · Score: 2, Informative
      I seem to remember reading that the Ren and Stimpy characters were sold to Nickelodeon or the creator was fired or something like that after the first batch of episodes.
      Yes sir, you are correct!

      John Kricfalusi creater and the original voice of Ren was fired after Nickelodeon started rejecting many of his ideas for being inappropriate. I still have the Kricfalusi episode on a VHS tape, good stuff.

      From the Wikipedia article:
      Nickelodeon eventually fired Kricfalusi from his own creation and systematically censored the cartoon down to little more than a remnant of its former self. Eventually, several episodes were deemed unairable and have never been broadcast by Nickelodeon again.
    8. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Kremmy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Onward and Upward.
      "This episode was originally written for the original series' second season. It was conceived as an answer to the fans who wrote to Spümcø, wanting to see an episode made purely out of gross-out gags, but not originally as "adult" as this version became."
      While it doesn't say whether That Scene was in the original cut ... it doesn't say it wasn't. I'm afraid this may not have been them fucking it up - just letting us know how bad it would have been if Nickelodeon had let it.

    9. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by bjb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...but see I remember watching the old episodes of Ren and Stimpy and thinking, "why did I like this? This is horrible." Especially those two minute ultra-grotesque stills.

      It's not because the writers got worse. It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.

      I bought seasons 1-3½ on DVD which contains the original John K. episodes and the obvious downfall episodes after he was fired and Nickelodeon took over. All I can say is that the original first season still cracks me up, but everything afterwards is a sharp downwarn decline.

      The interesting thing is to watch the episodes with the audio commentary by John K. Suprisingly, he does commentary on episodes after his departure, and he really gives a lot of insight to help understand why anything after season 1 simply was garbage. To hit a specific comment of yours, "two minute ultra-grotesque stills": it was something new and unique to R&S. In the early episodes, you can see how those scenes helped build storyline, express context or otherwise simply drive a concept home. However, most people took these scenes at face value and just thought, "ooh! he's got a booger!" or something like that. Yeah, it is accessible at that level. Unfortunately, this is the level that the post-Spümcø felt they needed to continue and exaggerate. To put it in John K's words when seeing a gross close up of Stimpy in a season 2 commentary, "ugly for the sake of being ugly". In other words, no purpose to the scene like there would have been in season 1 episodes.

      Of course, this is a cartoon we're talking about, so it wasn't trying to save the world or teach you to eat your vegetables or anything; it was meant to be stupid humor for you to laugh at. All I'm trying to say is that this really was a groundbreaking show in cartoons and the first season was really something special in its own way. Unfortunately, that "magic" (if you will) was completely mis-interpreted and lost in subsequent episodes once John K. no longer oversaw production.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    10. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I like Family Guy and American Dad...

      The difference is that Family Guy and American Dad are funny the first time you watch them while the Simpsons and Futurama are funny every time you watch them.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    11. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by rwhamann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I rented Dangermouse to watch with my kids, and it was sad for me not to get the same kick out of them. Sometimes memories are best left as memories.

      --
      seg fault
    12. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by kimvette · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Family Guy humor comes from their making jokes which are so repetitious that they aren't funny any more, but annoying, and then taking it a step further until it becomes funny that they're dragging the joke out, then they drag it out just a little more to make it that much more annoying.

      Futurama humor and plot development is actually quite clever, especially since (like Arrested Development) some of the jokes and plot twists aren't revealed until later episodes (e.g., Nibbler's being present but unseen in the first episode but upon subsequent viewings after seeing "The Why of Fry" (4ACV10) it becomes obvious Nibbler was there and that plot line was planned from the beginning).

      Oh, and the Dave Matthews Band does not rock.

      Anyway, if this is actually true, I shall no longer refer to Fox as Faux and I shall no longer say that Faux can bite my shiny metal ass. Furthermore, I shall have to now watch Fox's crap reality shows because I've repeatedly sent them emails promising to watch their crap reality shows and buy from their crappy sponsors if they bring Futurama back as a series. I wonder if watching just one episode of American Idol or whatever crap they're airing now will fulfill that obligation, or is that like making a deal with the devil?

      Anyway, here is what I really posted to say:

      <Amy>Yay!</Amy>

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    13. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually it would have been great if that was the case. Unfortunately Nibler is not present in episode 1 and is only added later.

      Watch the scene where Fry falls into the cryochamber frame-by-frame. A mysterious shadow will be seen.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Durinthal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually.. when Fry falls out of his chair and into the pod, it briefly cuts to a view of the bottom of the chair with his noisemaker falling to the floor. You can see Nibbler's shadow on the left side of that shot.

    15. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But I still get a huge kick out of Log (tm), Powdered Toast Man, Lummox herds, lambasting the materialism and exposing the fetishism in western society, and the fact that the show could ever have been marketed as a kid's cartoon to start with.

      Thank you. The thing a later half generation doesn't seem to get is this was fairly cutting edge, underground stuff. Why Nick even picked it up is beyond me, it should have played late evening on Viacom's other network MTV, as Beavis and Butthead did. RnS (as it was referred to back in the day) was a huge hit with the college age group. Little kids could laugh at the nose-goblins or Mr. Horse sniffing a pan of Gritty Kitty, but the content wasn't really intended for them. John K. waged epic battles with Vanessa Coffey, who would eventually get him the sack, which dramatically altered many finished cartoons, which then went back to the shop for some modification and as John once said, just to mock Coffey, they'd make no sense, like the butchered PC Looney Tunes of the 70's.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    16. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not because the writers got worse. It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.

      You call losing your sense of humor "better"? I feel sorry for you. Ren and Stimpy is brilliant beyond words. Not only that but it's been hugely influential. Spongebob Squarepants would not exist without Ren and Stimpy leading the way.

      I don't understand why people change what they like. Ren and Stimpy, Rocko's Modern Life, Eek the Cat, all are as entertaining today as they were 10 years ago. And they're still better than most of the drek they play today.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    17. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative
      Nibbler's shadow was, however, added in the flashback scene in an entirely unrelated episode earlier that season. You can see his eyestalk if you look for it. (But you can't see Fry's shadow, because presumably that didn't happen 'yet'. Actually, that didn't happen at all.)

      I.e., they did plan it out. Just not that far in the past.

      The story of The Why of Fry is hilarious. One of the writers came in and pitched it, and they all just stared at each other in shock, because it completely explained two completely unrelated episodes they'd already done, the flying brain episode, aka Fry's-brain-thing, and the Fry's-his-own-grandfather episode, and linked in stuff from the first episode, like what Fry was doing at the cryogenic place in the first place and the 'almost fall into the tube right before he actually did it' gag.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  3. Better News Everybody! by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    All thirteen episodes will come in a suppository!

  4. YES ! by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Complete with New shinier, easily bitable metal ass.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  5. Three cheers for Comedy Central by King+Shazbot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hip, hip, huzzah! Hip, hip, huzzah! Hip, ah screw it.

  6. choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet Zombie Jesus!!!!

    1. Re:choice quote by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was gonna do this as a Halloween costume. I was going to paint my face up all gray/green and rotting, sores and all, wear a white robe, and a crown of thorns, and get a couple broken 4x4s tied to my arms like I broke my way down from the cross... but every time I described it, all I got was this look of horror, even from non-Christians.

      Same thing with the Christopher Reeve loose fitting Superman suit and a wheelchair idea. This was before he was dead, of course, I know poor taste when I giggle uncontrollably at it.

      Trick or treat
      Feel my feet
      I can't.

      *sigh*

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:choice quote by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is what happens when those of us who moderate correctly aren't given points. You're stuck with the asshats who mode people as Flamebait and Troll simply to drive down the post.

      But hey, what do I know. I haven't had mod points in probably a year no matter how much I meta-mod (which I've stopped) and can't get stories accepted.

      As people keep telling me, the systems broke. Accept it. Once you do you'll be better off.

      Or, to put it in terms a geek should understand, "It's dead Jim."

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:choice quote by 14CharUsername · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah its really time to pull the feeding tube out of those jokes.

    4. Re:choice quote by Will_Malverson · · Score: 5, Funny
      Sweet Zombie Jesus!!!!

      As an avid watcher of the reruns on TBS and CN, I just gotta say, you're misquoting. The correct quote is

      "Sweet Zombie <weird, unnatural silence while the lips keep moving>"
    5. Re:choice quote by snowballs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh. Your. God.

      - Bender

  7. Santa is real! by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and apparantly, he's finally gotten around to having that *talk* with the folks at Fox.

    They've been VERY naughty this year. Now they must be trying to make up before Xmas.

    Ryan Fenton

  8. I believe it 100%!!! by denebian+devil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cuz the actors never get it wrong.

    P.S. I feel like it's some futurama reference that my CAPTCHA was "breeder." Is Slashdot trying to say something about the human race?

    1. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by CamDawg · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's now posted on Reuters and confirmed by Comedy Central, if it makes you feel any better.

  9. Movies? by CompSciStud4U · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if this will affect the 4 movies that are currently being planned. Ride the Walrus!

  10. HYPNOTOAD LIVES by Asbradley21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    HYPNOTOAD LIVES!!!!

    1. Re:HYPNOTOAD LIVES by Durinthal · · Score: 4, Funny
  11. *sigh* by Jethro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's too bad. Sure, I'm sad it ended, but it DID end well. Go figure what'll happen now.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:*sigh* by SoapDish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you listened to the DVD commentaries, you'd know that they actually had much more planned in the underlying plot of the series, but it got cut short. The final episodes were in no way a conclusion to the series.

  12. I have a reason to live again by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know, that sounds sad, even for a geek, but what can I say: Futurama is my favorite show and if you don't like it, you can bite my shiny metal ass.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  13. Re:Good news everybody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I disagree.

    -Richard M. Nixon's head

  14. Re:All the original actors? by OzRoy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Phil Hartman was never in Futurama. He died in 1998. Futurama started in 1999.

  15. Re:Futurama by CompSciStud4U · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the issue is exactly that they don't have to worry about what happened last week if the writers don't want to. That the characters don't have to age. I live in the real world. When I watch TV I don't want reality. I want something different. Something to tickle my imagination. And the surreal world of many cartoons is great for that. A show like Doctor Who doesn't appeal to me as much, because I would much rather pick up a book and supply a much cooler image of a sci-fi world in my own head.

    That being said, Futurama isn't the best example to be picking on for nothing ever changing. The series did have an advancing plot and the important events of previous episodes did matter in future ones. Individual events didn't matter as much, but the evolution of the character's relationships to each other definitely progressed based on the events of the show. I also felt it was much better written then other popular cartoons and didn't rely as much on mind-numbing pop-culture references.

  16. Re:Futurama by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is that everyone thinks they have a sense of humor, even when they don't.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  17. Re:Futurama by Se7enLC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Futurama does have order to it, and I can't think of any time where it just leave you right where you started with no explanation. Some examples of things that carry between episodes:

    - Nibbler shows up and sticks around, the order of those episodes has some significance
    - Leela's parents are discovered, then are characters on the show after that.
    - Farnsworth's clone is created and is in future episodes.

    Just to name a few.

    typically everything that happens is straightened out by the end of the episode as needed. It's just not in the typical cartoon genre to have numerous-episode-arcs, because reruns are not often shown in order.

    And PS, the "OMG PONIES! AND NEW FUTURAMA EPISODES!!" is *really* old news. I assume this number of episodes is really just the dvds that were mentioned months ago. It's been on adult swim bumps for awhile now.

  18. Does this make me happy? by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this make me happy?
    Is the space pope reptilian?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
  19. Re:Futurama by afaik_ianal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop. So WTF?

    Dude - It's just a cartoon.

    Someone please explain to me how this sort of thing is more popular than something with a real plot or something which is really funny?

    Noone's really saying that Futurama is better than Dr Who, but that doesn't mean it's not enjoyable. Plot? No way. Funny? Absolutely! More importantly, it's just entertaining.

    it seems to be more "Well theres nothing better to watch" than "wow! I must catch it this week" as other series

    That's something I love about these kind of shows. You don't need to make the investment to watch them. I hate it that I can't watch a lot of "running plot" shows because I know I'm going to miss a bunch of them. With Futurama/Simpsons, I can just watch them if I'm free.
  20. Re:Futurama by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Humour is like colour; I can't explain to you WHY I like blue, I just do.
    Even if you try to persuade me for hours that red is a much better colour, you won't be able to win me over.

    In short, nods to classic bits of comedy coupled with a great sense of absurd and sprinklings of science make a cartoon I love to watch. I love the voice-work in Futurama too, great characterizations.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  21. Re:Futurama by alunduil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's funny simply becuase it is. I enjoy the more scientific humour of the show. Things like winning by a quantum difference (I know I'm misquoting this) being responded with things like: "No fair! You changed the result by measuring it" It adds a humour for the physicist in me. Regards, Alunduil

  22. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Someone please explain to me how this sort of thing is more popular than something with a real plot or something which is really funny?

    You're missing something really obvious: different people have different tastes, and having different tastes than yours does not make somebody stupid or wrong. Just because you don't like these shows doesn't mean they are not "really funny".

    You don't like them, and that's fine. Your tastes simply don't line up with the majority, and there's nothing wrong with that. Where it becomes wrong is when you become a condescending ass about it.

  23. Re:Futurama by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'll attempt a response.

    In a nutshell, shows like Simpsons, Family Guy, The Critic, and Futurama make me laugh, and greatly entertain me for their 30 minute duration. Okay, there's a dud episode every now and then, but for the most part they're really fun. And funny. There have been a few scenes from these that would just make me laugh a few days later when I would think about it, for instance.

    The fact that it bothers you that Lisa's mental acuity isn't entirely consistent from one episode to the next sort of implies you're greatly outside the demographic they're looking for, in which case I'd suggest stick with the shows that really make you happy. I watch these shows for their comedic value, not for a consistent basis upon which to do a comparative literary analysis.

    Similarly, there are shows that other people love that I can't stand at all (eg Everybody Loves Raymond). it's all your own personal tastes. Regarding not liking the Simpsons, my Mom cannot get into the Simpsons either. She's tried and either doesn't get the jokes or just doesn't think they're funny whatsoever.

    That said, at the end of your post you mention other shows that are 'really funny'. Can you give an example? I'm not trolling you either, just curious what you find funny.

  24. Re:Futurama by Durinthal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You apparently didn't watch much of Futurama, in that case. Time actually did advance over the course of the show, starting in 3000 and ending in 3004. Relationships between characters also changed over time.

    As for why Futurama is popular.. you may not find it funny, but a lot of people do. I, for one, like that there's a lot of geek jokes in there. One that I can think of off the top of my head was that there were a pair of books in the background of one scene labeled P and NP.

  25. Re:Why so long? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

    We'll I'm sure they'll post a dupe to make up for it.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  26. Welcome back! by tkarr · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's about time! I love Futurama but you can only watch that show so many hundreds of times.

    1. Re:Welcome back! by 0racle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except Jurassic Bark. You can only watch that once unless you have no heart.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Welcome back! by fuzzix · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ha ha ha ha... oh wait, you're serious... Let me laugh even harder!

    3. Re:Welcome back! by the+Brightside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The progression of the plot provides us a reason for Fry not to clone his dog. It isn't a revival, it isn't a resurrection, it's cloning. The dog he knew was in every sense of the word already dead. Cloning his dog won't get his dog back. It's the same pattern but a different animal. That the actual biology of the situation reinforces what Fry already believes to be true is the setup for the kick in the gut. He would have gotten a representation of it; and it was the idea that his dog loved him that drove his desire for the representation, and a misguided desire at that. But the kick in the gut is that the dog lived on, waiting for Fry's return, while to Fry it looks as if he was abandoned. The dog is Fry's nascent wish to return to the life he had, to return to "the way things were" as you scornfully put it, but that wish is nothing more than delusion. He can never return to the way things were. When a family member dies, if you were given the option NOT of having them back, but of having a simulacrum of that loved one again, what would you choose? What would be psychologically healthier? To continue to believe that this stranger is the person you loved who is never returning, or to accept that there are things you cannot and will never change? And "death-affirming"? It's an inexorable part of existence that living things die. Part of growing up is accepting that fact, because to rail against the inevitable is simply a waste of the short amount of time you've got. If Fry cloned his dog, what would he have? Would he have his dog back? No. He'd have a pale representation of his old dog in a new form. The episode isn't "death-affirming." It's about Fry learning to cope with the basic reality of being human. At some point you have to turn away from mindlessly gazing back into your memory and deal with what's in front of you. Fry didn't kill the dog. Fry just didn't clone the dog. He was already dead--hell, he was already a fossil, almost entirely dolomite. To create a new life as your own mnemonic device or to fuel your delusions is a horrible act. What Fry does is what everyone must do to heal from grief.

  27. Re:Futurama by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe its just me, but I don't get why there is always one guy who feels the need to ask questions like this, or alternatively state that he hates a particular obscure thing. Its not like anyone is trying to shove Futurama down someone's throat. It is like going to a Star Trek convention and standing around saying, "You know, I really don't understand the appeal of this show!" There are a ton of shows on TV that are not Futurama - why not go watch one of them instead of commenting here to the effect that you don't like Futurama?

    Hell, there are a ton of other Slashdot articles you could be commenting on. Perhaps you could have found one that interested you. But no, you had to click on the Futurama article just so you could post a comment musing about the lack of appeal Futurama has for you.

    It kind of reminds me of people who love Windows and hate the Macintosh. OK, your favorite computer platform has 90+ percent of the market, so why go seek out places online where Mac people congregate and try to rain on their parade? They have less than 5% of the market. Leave them alone. Hell, I've seen people go onto Atari ST forums and say ridiculous things to the effect that the Atari ST is long dead and ST enthusiasts should just move on and get a Windows PC. Was that you?

    When you see a kid playing with a balloon, do you have an uncontrollable urge to go and stick a pin in it?

    There are a lot of things that do not appeal to everyone. Sane people ignore them. Personally I have no interest in Chritianity. That doesn't mean I show up to church every Sunday and say, "You know, I just don't understand the appeal...could you explain it to me?" It would be gouche and idiotic to do so.

    "Not trolling"? Bite my shiny metal ass!

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  28. Everyone must hear this news! by dark_requiem · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps I'll breed some kind of albino shouting gorilla...

  29. Re:Futurama by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    flamebait...

    My take was that it was consistant that Lisa was a little hippie shitdisturber. Maybe you watched an OLDER episode where they haven't yet developed that trait? Simpsons is popular because it's older than most of the audience. It came out in the late 80s. I was babysitting kids born in the 90s who liked the show even though their first memories of the show were probably from 1996 onward.

    Futurama is funny because it's silly and creative. Family guy is funny because it's a bit more adult and off the wall. South park is funny because they're highly objective and use hyperbole.

    That doesn't mean EVERY episode is comedy gold. But normally people tend to watch the series not just specific episodes which means watching the occasional shit-fill-the-season-out episode.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  30. Who needs comedy central? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok that's indeed great news... the sad news is Futurama is still dependent on Comedy Central. Why do shows still need this kind of deals? Idealy this would happen: There is an official Futurama web-site, they say they want a new season, they need US $ X to produce it. They sell shares on their website or through ebay using a dutch auction in order to finance the project. Geeks buy them. They make the episodes. They realase them on the internet in a non DRM format and using bittorrent so they don't have to pay for bandwith. People pay a small amount of money to download the .torrent file. If they want to pirate it anyway nothing will stop them so why bother with protection. Many people download that great show, the benefits are given to the shareholders. Everyone is happy. That's really what the RIAA really is affraid of. Artists now have a way to have vertical control, marketting, distribution etc. They claim to fight piracy but really want to make this come as late as they can. Once the artists realize they can actually make more money by short circuiting the distribution cartels a) price will also fall for the consummer b) more competition of works, more quality

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Who needs comedy central? by dfjghsk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it costs 1-2 million dollars to produce each episode of Futurama. We could debate whether they could raise that kind of money over the internet..

      also, your model doesn't work for new shows.. if your model was in place before Futurama, it would have never been created.. people won't donate to a show they've never heard of and have no idea if they'll even like it.

      --
      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    2. Re:Who needs comedy central? by servognome · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's really what the RIAA really is affraid of. Artists now have a way to have vertical control, marketting, distribution etc. They claim to fight piracy but really want to make this come as late as they can.

      How does this pertain the RIAA? The people they go after are the ones sharing material to which the RIAA has rights to. Nothing is stopping individual artists from doing what you describe, in fact there are many independent artists on the net doing their thing and the RIAA/MPAA leaves them alone. Stephen King did his own online distribution of "The Plant" and while it did disturb the publishers, there wasn't a frenzy of lawsuits to shut him down.
      The strength of the labels, studios, and publishers isn't distribution itself. It's the hype machine, that creates markets and encourages people to try something and like it (even though it sucks). Distribution control of their material, is merely a method to collect money from people. The labels are also changing, to capitalize on their marketing strength. American Idol is a perfect example. Not only do they make money selling CDs by some no talent pop singer, they are making money on the show whose main purpose is to create a frenzy around a disposable one-hit wonder.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:Who needs comedy central? by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Informative

      Idealy this would happen: There is an official Futurama web-site, they say they want a new season, they need US $ X to produce it. They sell shares on their website or through ebay using a dutch auction in order to finance the project. Geeks buy them. They make the episodes. They realase them on the internet in a non DRM format and using bittorrent so they don't have to pay for bandwith. People pay a small amount of money to download the .torrent file. If they want to pirate it anyway nothing will stop them so why bother with protection. Many people download that great show, the benefits are given to the shareholders. Everyone is happy.

      You bitch needlessly. All the tools you need are but a few hundred dollars away!

      1) Registering a domain name and getting cheap-ass hosting costs less than a few hundred dollars per year.

      2) You can put a link to your project on your slashdot sig and get surprising amounts of attention that way.

      3) You only need to come up with an idea for a show, and recruit some star talent. Really, you're on your way already, since you have a business plan that's pretty detailed!

      Unless you aren't serious about your business plan. Maybe you wouldn't know a real business plan if it kicked you in the nards. Maybe the idea of actually doing anything outside your mother's basement scares you. In which case, your post is just so much whining and incoherent noise on a populate public blog. There's lots of that already.

      The proof of whether or not you have a good idea is in your ability to make it reality. Otherwise, it's just so much hot air, and thanks to global warming, we have more than enough of that.

      But, I suggest you give it a try. You'll either succeed, or learn lots about how the world around you works - either way, you win, and win BIG.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Who needs comedy central? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      it costs 1-2 million dollars to produce each episode of Futurama

      That's because some episodes are painstakingly drawn before a live audience!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  31. requesting more snoo snoo by saurabhdutta · · Score: 4, Funny

    and brannigans antics

  32. Re:Futurama by Mikya · · Score: 2, Funny

    One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop. So WTF?

    It's less confusing if you watch the episodes in order. ;)

  33. Re:Futurama by 0racle · · Score: 2

    It's funny because it's poisonous.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  34. Re:Get yer facts straight! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Spoilers, dude!!!!

  35. Re:Futurama by Infernal+Device · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me but, I don't get why futurama is popular.

    Because it's not about you.

    --
    "My God...it's full of trolls!"
  36. Re:Futurama by Elminst · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually... I find the container labelled "Condensed Milt" much more interesting, and very disturbing.
    Milt, for the non-biologists, is the sperm and seminal fluid of fish.

    --
    No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  37. 2 F's down, 1 to go! by CharAznable · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First Family Guy, then Futurama. Where's Firefly?

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by batkiwi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It wouldn't be the same, which is the point. Firefly is a moving show where things happen. Neither Wash nor the Sheperd were in the original concept.

    2. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

      firefly is taking a bit longer because of the extra F.

    3. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude! At least give spoiler alert!

    4. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by mshiltonj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. The cancellation of Firefly was one of the catalysts of me dropping cable a few years ago. If shows like Friends stay on the air for 9 or 10 years, but Firefly gets cancelled after 9 *episodes* -- then I obviously don't fit into whatever demographic group that most tv networks are looking for. I opted out.

    5. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny
      Where's Firefly?
      Right here. What do you want?
    6. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Dan+Slotman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be pretty comfortable with Wash and Sheperd magically reappearing without explanation.

  38. Re:Hang on... by OzRoy · · Score: 4, Informative

    My reply was in response to the GP's post suggesting Phil Hartman was one of the actors who worked on Futurama. He wasn't.

    The character Zapp Branigan was written for him, but he died before they started production, so Billy West took the part instead and happen to play the character in a similar way to Phil Hartman's audition.

  39. But what about...? by mlow82 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, so all of the original actors have signed up. But what I'd like to know is if all of the original writers have signed up.

    1. Re:But what about...? by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How come no one is asking the questions that would interest us nerds the most? "Will it be in HDTV format?"

  40. Future Futurama to be... by Hymer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...DRM'ed. "Geeks don't want DRM, geeks want Futurama (just see @ the Internet) so we will release new episodes of Futurama to sell DRM to those bloody nerds..."
    This is the only reason for Fox to start it again.

    --

    This is not a flamebait... this is bloody serious... Just wait'n'see.

  41. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass by trogdor8667 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Professor: Good news everyone. While Fox's quality programming is out of our reach, Comedy Control has decided to take us for some new episodes.
    Fry: Don't you mean Comedy Central?
    Leela: No, Comedy Control. Comedy was outlawed in the year 2045, during the Great War with the Neptutians. Comedy Control comes around and kills everyone involved with animated shows.

  42. "Good news everyone!" by Mike+Peel · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I don't get it. Where's the usual downside following "Good news everyone!"? Do we have to go and wrest the episodes from giant killer bees, or something?

  43. Re:Futurama by kv9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    yadda-yadda, I'm too good for animation

    perhaps its the big stick up your shiny metal ass?

  44. Obligatory Futurama reference by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quoth the Incompetent Robot Elders:

    Silence!!!

  45. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Futurama does indeed have long-term plot elements, more so than most live action television shows (and at least comparable with Doctor Who and its Daleks and Cybermen). Generally the plot centers around Fry.

    - Fry and the Brains (and the Nibblonians)
    During the series it transpires that Fry is the only human being capable of resisting the psionic attacks of the Brains, a group of free-flying brain beings that want to take over/destroy the universe. Fry's brain waves are different from other peoples because Fry, as a result of events in the episode "Roswell that Ends Well", is his own grandfather.

    In the first encounter with the Brains Fry is abducted by Nibbler, who is not only Leela's pet, but also an agent of the ancient and stupendously powerful Nibblonians (which explains why he was the only one of his kind on the planet where he was found). Nibbler explains Fry's abnormality and assists him in fending off the Brains' attack on earth. After Fry succeeds Nibbler wipes Fry's memory (everyone else was too stupefied by the Brains to remember what happened) and resumes his life as Leela's pet.

    Later, in The Why of Fry, we learn that Fry was not frozen by accident. In fact Fry was brought into the future by Nibbler, whose much younger self was present on New Years' Eve '99, and who gave Fry the nudge that tipped him backwards into the cryogenic chamber. In this episode Fry is press ganged into service to destroy the Brains' ultimate project, a device that will acquire all knowledge in the universe and then destroy the universe to prevent its knowledge from becoming outdated.

    Once Fry is inside the Mega-Brain and has activated the bomb with which he is to destroy it, the Brains reveal what Nibbler did to Fry and offer Fry a choice - he can stay there, blow up the Mega Brain and vanish along with it due to the failure of his escape scooter, or he can let the Mega Brain catapult him back in time to the space-time nexus centred on his own fall into the cryochamber.

    Fry elects to travel back, and in fact initially prevents Nibbler from knocking him into the tube, until Nibbler persuades him that he should sacrifice himself and fulfill his predestined mission, because...

    - Fry Loves Leela
    Fry has an unrequited passion for Leela throughout most of the series. In a sense there is a lack of follow through here, because they do pull kind of a "will they/won't they?" thing, but Fry does succeed in communicating the depth of his feelings at times, and when he wins the devil's hands and uses them to make a holophoner opera in Leela's honour Leela realises that Fry has a depth of character and feeling that is concealed by his physical and social clumsiness.

    - Leela and Her Parents
    As someone else mentioned here, Leela's parent enter the series late in the piece and stick around. In fact I was surprised that nobody responded to the "straight from the alien's mouth" in the article by pointing out that Leela, as we discover when her parents emerge, is not an alien but a mutant, whose xenolinguist parents left her at an orphanage with a note in an invented alien script, so that she would be taken for an alien and avoid the apartheid-style restrictions places on mutants. This is a major shift for Leela both in the sense that earlier episodes made much of her search for her species and homeworld, and in that at least two episodes towards the end of the series are heavily concerned with her relationship with her newfound parents.

    - Amy and Kif
    Amy, the engineering student from Mars, and Kif, Zapp Brannigan's XO, fall in love early in the series and their developing romance is the subject of multiple episodes throughout subsequent seasons.

    i'm sure there are other examples of long-term continuity that have slipped my mind, but really nobody could accuse Futurama of forgeting its past.

  46. Re:Futurama by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 5, Funny
    When you see a kid playing with a balloon, do you have an uncontrollable urge to go and stick a pin in it?

    Dude, why would you want to stick a pin in a kid?

  47. Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stirring defence of Futurama and the Simpsons there. But I think you're pretty much wrong in everything you say. To respond to your three main points:

    1. The characters in the Simpsons are surprisingly consistent; the clearly distinct characters and their traits are one of the shows great strengths. Lisa is BOTH intelligent AND a member of the archetypal working class family; these are not mutually exclusive, and the show is subtle enough to deal with this.

    2. Futurama IS better than Dr Who whichever way you spin it (allowing for taste), and its PLOTS are amongst its great strengths. When you compare the Simpsons to Futurama, one thing that is very apparent is that Futurama has much more comprehensive, less formulaic, better written storylines. The episodes, and the series, feature an internal logic which is stronger than the Simpsons, or indeed almost any other comedy other than Seinfeld or Arrested Development.

    In many cases the humour is directly derived from the strength of the plot. For example, Fry travels back in time and becomes his own grandfather. As a result, he is unique in the universe, and his uniqueness ties in to the whole Nibblonian vs Brains subplot. Similarly, Leela's origins story is tightly woven throughout the various episodes and across the series. I know for a fact that Groening, Cohen and co set out to write lengthy thematic arcs which in some cases spanned series 1-4 inclusive.

    If you think it's a plot-less cartoon with jokes, you're not really watching it.

    3. Well, this basically explains why you think what you think. I agree to the extent that each episode of Futurama is self-contained. However, they are also intricately linked with other episodes, and you miss a lot of important context and detail from some episodes if you treat them as a one-off 'adventure'.

      Try watching Futurama, in order, from start to finish. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by afaik_ianal · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The characters in the Simpsons are surprisingly consistent

      I never said otherwise - I was just hassling my PP for overanalysing. What next? "Oh, but at the end of The Simpson's 3D, homer ends up in the real world, but then in the next episode he's back in the Simpson's universe!". Or "Buffy is just so fake: There's no such thing as vampires!"

      Futurama IS better than Dr Who whichever way you spin it

      No. Like many people here (yourself included), I prefer Futurama to Dr Who. Anyone who tries to argue that one successful show is better than another successful show is an idiot, and you might as well be trying to prove the existence or non-existence of god, or the general superiority of one OS over another. It's a personal thing. One is better than the other for you.

      Try watching Futurama, in order, from start to finish. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

      I have - many times. The first time I watched it, I watched it out of order. Yes, I didn't pick up on the exact history behind each character, but I didn't miss out on any important story-line elements. (Ok - so the same is probably actually true for Dr Who, but there are many other shows where missing a couple of episodes makes the later ones not worth watching).

    2. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by stinerman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I know for a fact that Groening, Cohen and co set out to write lengthy thematic arcs which in some cases spanned series 1-4 inclusive.
      In fact, when it is revealed that Nibbler pushes Fry into the cryogenic freezer, they show his (Nibbler's) shadow on the wall. If you go back to the pilot episode when it originally happened, Nibbler's shadow is on the wall.

      I was amazed that the writing team had thought that far ahead.
  48. Actors? by Trojan35 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great. Good to see the Actors are on board. What about the writers though? I have to imagine the highly talented futurama writers found new homes that have been enjoying their talent for a while.

  49. Holy Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy crap! I can't believe it-- someone was actually watching Craig Ferguson!

  50. Re:Futurama by wheany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On the other hand, having a sense of humor does not mean that you laugh at everything.

  51. *crosses fingers* by SamSim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    please not have jumped the shark please not have jumped the shark please not have jumped the shark

  52. Re:Futurama by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd have to say mostly - you can't compare Futurama to the Simpsons.

    The second of the two jumped the shark a while ago - although it came back from the groaner pile a bit it never compared to Futurama which was just getting a decent groove when Fox pre-empted it into oblivion.

    After Futurama came out - the Simpsons seemed just wholesale tame by comparrison and even in some of the comentator tracks on the DVDs you could see where Matt G.'s passion was going (or at least more of it). It's not just the geek factor - it's the ubber geek factor that made it great among other things. Plus not having to be tied down to earth led to a much broader swath of possiblities - continuity be damned. Or at least horribly twisted if one recalls brain-burners like the Farnsworth parallel universe boxes. That was a particularly fun episode.

    I don't really know where I'm going with this so I'll just stop now.

  53. Re:That's great and all... by OzRoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see...

    Um... Promise me you aren't one of the writers on the new series.

  54. Here here! by Rhinobird · · Score: 5, Funny

    If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  55. Good news... kind of. by Arimus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good news on the surface but until it is confirmed the original writers have signed up I won't be keeping too many expectations of the new series.

    The actors can be replaced, the writing team can not - not if you want to keep the same style of humour.

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  56. De ja vu by Mantrid42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ooooohhhh no. I fell for this one before...

  57. When you see the robot, drink! by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Let the feast of a thousand hams begin!"

    -----

    Sig Sauer

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  58. Re:Futurama by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, why would you want to stick a pin in a kid?

    Spoken as someone who has never tried it. Geesh. ;)

  59. Re:Futurama by bitt3n · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The problem is that everyone thinks they have a sense of humor, even when they don't.

    that's why I love the Slashdot 'Funny' mod. It always lets me know when to laugh at a joke, so I don't feel left out.

  60. Re:Futurama by Metostopholes · · Score: 2

    Mod parent up... or down. I need someone to tell me which.

    --
    "With rare exceptions people cannot use that picture to masturbate, therefore it is not the internet."
  61. That's not good news by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Professor: That's not good news. That's not good news at all!

  62. Re:You're Welcome, Guys... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Funny

    You think maybe you could pickup Invader Zim on the way home? I've been craving some new episodes of that as well....

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  63. Fool's Gold by kahrytan · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The last time /. posted on Futurama coming back, it was a hoax. I suggest you all keep your cool until 'Comedy Central' posts a on it's site.

    On that note, I would personally love for Futurama to return but I won't get my hopes up.

    --
    \
  64. Re:Good news everybody! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ah but the whole use of celebrity heads was lame. Discuss

    It was a plot device so that they could have guest stars playing themselves without resorting to overused time travel plots like some other serious Sci-Fi shows. It sucked most of the time, but cameos often do elsewhere. It certainally had it's moments with some people though.

    I'm not holding my breath. Series 4 and 5 of Family Guy suffered by having different writers etc and it just wasn't the same show. For example, Stewie has lost his "kill lois, take over the world" zeal which for me was one of the highlights of the show. I expect the same sorts of disappointment with Futurama, but the talent is there to surprise us if they put their heads together.

  65. Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as they don't try too hard like Family Guy is doing. I have to say, Family Guy these days is boring as anything. First three seasons were mint, but what they're coming out with now is total crap. Previously it was edgy, but funny. Now they just go for offensive for the sake of offensive. The plots are horrible, and just aren't trying.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. by Senzei · · Score: 2, Funny
      So I'm confused are they trying too hard or not trying at all?

      Yes.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
  66. Logic? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most shows have some kind of continuity and Futurama does. Sure they'll be a bit random and break rules at times (take that Bender is made of 40% of Zinc, 40% of Titanium and 40% of Dolomite- 120% for those of you who are reading this early in the morning), but in general unlike the Simpsons, the show progresses. The characters age, have different birthdays, refer to events in the past. You'll also notice the love between Fry and Leela developing. Take the later episodes like 'The Sting' where Fry takes a giant bee for Leela, and the many loving things they do that continues to bring them closer, as well as the same thing on the Amy side.

    PS: best episode ever: Jurassic Bark.... poor Seymour the dog.

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:Logic? by stinerman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      PS: best episode ever: Jurassic Bark.... poor Seymour the dog.
      I have trouble watching that one and "Luck of the Fryish". They are both really, really sad, but excellent episodes.
    2. Re:Logic? by vostok4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jurassic Bark was easily one of the most touching comics I have seen. It's right up there with the Pinky and the Brain Christmas Special.

    3. Re:Logic? by CyDharttha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      unlike the simpsons? how about lisa becoming a vegetarian in season 7; apu getting married, later having kids, then cheating on his wife and going to marriage counseling (this story spanned 4 seasons). or barney going sober in season 11, and not relapsing till season 14? cripes, maud died in season 11 or so, and flanders spent the next year getting over it and then started dating. there is tons of progression happening in the show, its one of the things that makes the simpsons world so great. there is story, depth, history.

    4. Re:Logic? by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a certain amount of progression that keeps the show interesting, and a certain amount that ruins it. For example, would we really want to see a teenage Bart, or college student Lisa? I think that would ruin the show. Especially since these characters would be too hard to replace. Thank God the writers realize this, or the Simpsons would go the way of Saved By The Bell.

    5. Re:Logic? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Luck of the Fryish is one of the top 10 episodes of any TV show ever.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  67. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by SamSim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And now for the unresolved plot lines of Futurama, all of which I am hoping to see picked up in the new series:

    -Fry loves Leela

    The most obvious over-arching story during the series was Fry's adoration of Leela and Leela's continuous indifference to Fry. Obviously this IS something which is meant to work out with a happy ending. Episodes such as "Parasites Lost", "The Farnsworth Parabox", "Time Keeps On Slippin'" and the series finale, "The Devil's Hands Are Idle Playthings" make this pretty clear.

    The question is how they'll eventually get together. Leela keeps rejecting Fry because he doesn't have a lot to offer. He's a dumb, dropout delivery-geek - she's a smart, attractive spaceship pilot. Alternate/previous Frys have managed to get close to Leela with romantic gestures: a diamond scrunchie, a holophonor serenade, a love message written in stars. There's another key point, and that's Leela's oft-mentioned but never-seen ex, Sean. In "Devil's Hands", she describes Sean as pasty, unambitious individual whose redeeming feature was his skill as a jazz saxophonist. So it seems like creativity, specifically musical creativity, is the key. The problem is, even though he works hard at it, Fry doesn't even have musical skill. Not as far as his hands are concerned, at any rate. Nor can he sing. Or draw. And he won't artificially enhance his skills if this distorts his personality - "Parasites Lost" makes this clear.

    The solution? Either Fry will come up with some other amazing romantic gesture, or he'll find a musical instrument he CAN play well. Or perhaps he'll find some other, more successful creative outlet.

    -Fry is the single most important person in the universe

    This arc was intended to occur from the very beginning of Futurama's production. "Space Pilot 3000", act three of "Anthology Of Interest", "The Day The Earth Stood Stupid", "Roswell That Ends Well" and "The Why Of Fry" are the relevant episodes. Thanks to his being his own grandfather, Fry is the only person in history to lack the delta brainwave, making him the only person able to fight the evil brainspawn on behalf of the Nibblonians. Fry has twice defeated the brains, but as Nibbler wiped his memory of the events of "The Why Of Fry", he doesn't remember the second time and possibly not the first either.

    At the end of said episode, Fry remarks, "If you ever need a saviour again, just ask." Nibbler replies, "Oh, we will. We will." Presumably Fry will need to fight the brains at least once more. And obviously it must be the brains that he fights: against any other foe, Fry is all but useless.

    Earlier in that same episode, Fry mentions Leela and Nibbler remarks, "Ah. She must be the other. You must not give up on her..." and promises to help Fry make things work with her. This suggests not only that Leela has some critical part to play in saving the universe next time around, but also that much more hangs on Fry and Leela getting together than just Fry's happiness. These two arcs are obviously strongly linked together.

    Side note: while "Anthology Of Interest" is mostly non-canon, the spacetime warp which tears open as a result of Fry failing to be frozen is very important. During "The Why Of Fry" the enormous brain explains: "There is a nexus point between universes at the space-time where you entered the cryogenic tube." Here's why: if Fry fails to enter the tube, he fails to go to the future. If he does that, he isn't present at the supernova and doesn't go back in time, where he doesn't sleep with his grandmother, meaning Yancy Fry is never born and so Fry himself is never born either. The result is a paradox which, as seen in the "Anthology Of Interest" story, destroys the whole universe.

    How Fry and Leela's fates are linked, and what shape the next (final?) brainspawn threat will take, remains to be seen.

    -Morbo

    Newsmonster Morbo is an extremely poorly-disguised spy for his (unnamed) home planet. His race is plotting to take over the Earth. Will they ever do it? Will