Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches PayPal Rival

Google Checkout Launched Roy van Rijn informs us that Google's new online payment system is now online. "Under the name Checkout, the venture offers an incorporated manner to search, advertise and pay. If you buy something on Checkout, 2% and $0.20 go to Google. Paypal, the biggest competitor uses 1,9% and $0,30. Analysts compare Google/Paypal to for example Visa/Mastercard living peacefully together, while others predict the end of Paypal." W3K adds "You can use your Google account to store an unlimited number of credit cards and addresses. The service allows you to track all your orders and shipping in one place," and adds a link to a quick video tour.

106 of 449 comments (clear)

  1. End of Paypal ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, I'm sure eBay will let that happen.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:End of Paypal ? by grazzy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure gBay agrees.

    2. Re:End of Paypal ? by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just like GMail meant the end of Yahoo Mail, Hotmail, and the myriad of other online mail services. And how Google Maps meant the end of Mapquest andd MS Maps (??). I know that Google has created some welcome competition to many online services, forcing them to improve their offerings, but it hasn't completely killed the competition. Most people I know haven't switched from their current providers. However, I'm sure they would have if Hotmail stuck to 2MB, and Mapquest didn't touch their interface. I'm happy google's here, because it makes everyone else have to try harder. Let's hope the same happens to E-Bay. They haven't changed their interface since their inception.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:End of Paypal ? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, killing an email service is very difficult. Nobody wants to go through the hassle of sending a new e-mail address to everybody they know. So it is expecte that there would be a very slow change on this front.

      But changing their mapping service as well as who they pay through, that is a whole other issue. Mapquest and MSN maps have been losing business. In light of the continual growth of the net, that is very telling. I would guess that Google is not going to kill off paypal tomorrow or over the next 10 years. But I would also bet that paypal will lose more than half of their business within five years and continue a downward trend unless they make a major change. Since ebay has taken over paypal, they have abused stores as well as users. Their attitude may start to change back to what it was.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:End of Paypal ? by grapeape · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Big difference between paypal vs google and the competing mail services. People have had a choice for years. No one complains about free email its reliable, its there, its ubiquitous. What irritates people with Paypal is the rather random enforcement of buyer and seller protection coupled with their stranglehold on ebay that pretty much makes any other method of payment impossible. After paying listing fees, final value fees, paypal fees, extra paypal fees if you want to be able to take credit cards, and dealing with buyers protection which is in my experience used in scam attempts as much as in real disputes, the ebay/paypal racket is hardly a bargain.

      After all that, I still use it on occasion because I have no choice, thats the difference.

    5. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference between 1.9% + 30 cents (ebay) and 2.0% + 20 cents (google) might not strike you as significant, but google now works out to be cheaper for all sales under $100.00

      Don't think that the "ebay power sellers" aren't keenly aware of the difference. They know how ebay nickel-and-dimes them to death, and if they can save a few dollars a week AND stick it to ebay, they will.

      Example - item at $10.00

      eBay: 49 cents, google:40 cents. Difference: 9 cents.

      Do 100/week, and over the course of a year you're looking at $468.00 in savings ...

    6. Re:End of Paypal ? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everybody had a problem with Hotmail before GMail came around. But they thought it was the only service available, and they needed the account anyway to use MSN (I know you can sign up for MSN with another email address, but it's really hard to find that site). Hotmail still has terrible spam filtration (blacklisting everyone except your contacts is not spam filtration), and thankfully, they've gone up from their original 2MB of storage. People used Hotmail because it was there, but I don't think that many people liked it. They were all looking for a change, but It's hard to switch email addresses.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:End of Paypal ? by Andrew+Nagy · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the record, if you (the seller) advertises on Adwords, they give you $10 free transactions for every $1 you spend in Adwords advertising. So if you spend $500 a day on advertising costs, they allow $5,000 worth of sales go through for free.

      --
      Yes, you can dance to Radiohead.
    8. Re:End of Paypal ? by hlh_nospam · · Score: 4, Interesting
      There's nothing wrong with either Ebay or PayPal... that a dose of viable competition wouldn't cure in a heartbeat. PayPal has pissed off enough people that CheckOut is virtually guaranteed to be an immediate success, but probably won't kill PayPal immediately. PayPal will simply clean up its act, which is long overdue. (Thanks, Google!!) As for ebay, they are on the downhill slide anyway. They have grown too big to effectively manage, they have become a fraud magnet, and they are chasing a business model that has some curious shortcomings (most of what is currently sold on Ebay is not really well-suited to the auction format). A combination of GoogleBase and CheckOut will eventually reduce ebay to a footnote in internet history (Something along the lines of, "For those of you that don't remember Ebay, it was once the largest auction/ecommerce site by a factor of more than 10").

      I will be checking out the new CheckOut, with some initial testing in my violin business, and if the results are good, I may move all of my business away from Ebay.

    9. Re:End of Paypal ? by kabocox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since ebay has taken over paypal, they have abused stores as well as users. Their attitude may start to change back to what it was.

      I'm confused why people ever really use PayPal in the first place. Oh yes because it's "easy." I wouldn't mind Google, MS, or heck even SGI to go into this. My thing is that they should start off as declaring themselves as doing banking and being properly regulated. I want PayPal to die a swift death just because of that. PayPal is doing banking and should be regulated as such. I honestly think that MS, Google, or some other IT company should produce a set of software that makes it as easy as using PayPal for your existing bank to do business over the internet. The big PayPal killer will be when my 4+ local city banks can do business with each other and your local banks as easily as PayPal transactions happen.

    10. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You, like some other posters, seem to think that PayPal's prices are fixed in stone forever.

      Don't put words in my mouth - I never said that. Here's the reality ...

      1. finally, paypal has some real competition
      2. a lot of people would pay more to switch from paypal
      3. this will shrink ebay's customer base no matter what, so they're going to be hit with both lower demand and lower prices
      4. for google, on the other hand, their market share can only grow - and they've got tie-ins to a lot more stuff than ebay

      Then there's the whole regulatory issue - ebay has had to make deals with regulators in almost 20 states ... google will just go out and BUY a bank. Then they'll issue their own credit cards, etc.

    11. Re:End of Paypal ? by mishkon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paypal is NOT 1.9%. It is likely to be around 2.5% (over $3k in sales a month) or 2.2% (over 10k in sales) dpending on volume. many paypal uses pay around 3%. Google being 2% regardless of volume, makes it significantly cheaper then paypal for most sellers.

    12. Re:End of Paypal ? by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I would be shocked if any of them die. Just because they are losing business does not mean that either is in danger of dieing. The problem is that they did not improve. Of course, now that MS live is out and with a similiar interface to Google, it will probably gain some traction. As to the interstate exit numbers, please send in a request. I no longer own (and very rarely use) a printer, so I have never noticed that. That would be helpful.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:End of Paypal ? by Khuffie · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Canada, you can send money through your bank accounts via email, as long as both of you have access to your bank's online banking. Unfortunately it's something not many people know about.

    14. Re:End of Paypal ? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The thing people like about PayPal is it lets you pay with a credit card. If I buy something using PayPal with a credit card and I don't receive it then one email to my credit card company will see the money returned. I could just as easily send money from my Internet banking site, but then I don't get the buyer protection.

      The US, sadly, has one of the most backwards banking systems I have ever had the misfortune to do business with. Most US banks seem to regard sending money by telegraph as a horrible new-fangled concept, while banks in the EU and Japan have been allowing customers to do it for free for well over a decade. I have two UK bank accounts and one US account. The amount of stuff the US bank seems to think they can get away with charging me for is staggering; they even charge for doing a balance enquiry at a cash machine!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:End of Paypal ? by TasteeWheat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing people like about PayPal is it lets you pay with a credit card. If I buy something using PayPal with a credit card and I don't receive it then one email to my credit card company will see the money returned.

      Sure, you can do that, but then you'll get screwed by Paypal. I had an issue where the seller never shipped the item to me, and I first went through Paypal's dispute option in order to get my money back. However, they were either unable or unwilling to give me a refund, so I disputed the charge with my credit card company. Once Paypal got the chargeback, they permanently froze my service until I paid THEM the amount of my chargeback. Give money back to Paypal for an item I never received, and had just disputed? I don't think so. Needless to say, I haven't used them since (nor will I ever).

    16. Re:End of Paypal ? by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Australia, they charge you for typing a PIN incorrectly.

      They had to dig deep for this charge as they have already been charging for everything else for years.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    17. Re:End of Paypal ? by sshore · · Score: 2, Informative
      In Canada, you can send money through your bank accounts via email, as long as both of you have access to your bank's online banking. Unfortunately it's something not many people know about.


      It's several dollars per transaction, and it's not offered by all banks. It's no replacement for Paypal et al.
    18. Re:End of Paypal ? by RDW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is that in at least some countries this only applies until you reach your lifetime 'sending limit' (read the small print). Once this limit is reached (I think this is $2000 in the US, but only £500 at most in the UK) you have to give PayPal direct access to a bank account, losing the 'insulation' provided by your credit card. This is the thing I hate most about PayPal, and they aren't exactly up-front about it either (the help information about account 'verification' just has some vague language about the supposed benefits to the buyer, and nothing about the very real advantages to PayPay of being able to suck cash straight out of your bank account).

    19. Re:End of Paypal ? by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I once heard a joke about how, "One day, you'll drive your Sony to the Sony to buy more Sony for your Sony".

      We need a new one that goes, "One day, you'll Google for some more Google for your Google, and pay Google with Google"

    20. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anawrahta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's available to all the chartered Canadian banks. And the cost is $1.50 for any transfer up to $1000 (which is the 24 hour limit). It is FAR cheaper than Paypal or Google Checkout. 2% vs. 1% on any transfer over $150

  2. NYT article by ems2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NYT times also has a interesting article on this with quotes about Google's plans on what they want to do with this product.

    1. Re:NYT article by novus+ordo · · Score: 3, Funny
      "The goal here is to make it be one nanosecond from the time the customer decides to buy to the time the transaction is complete and the product is on the way," Mr. Schmidt said.
      Impulsive shopping here we come!
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    2. Re:NYT article by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Wright 5 dollars"

      Does it have an old plane as the background image??

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:NYT article by alexmin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably the last thing I want is to "use payment and shipping information they keep on file with Google" (quote from TFA). Keep my info in vast searchable financial database which makes it attractive to black hats and goverment?

      No thanks , I'd prefer to spend a minute to create one-off credit card number each time I shop.

    4. Re:NYT article by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

      One nanosecond? But I want it NOW!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:NYT article by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Face it, our lives are for the most part not like that of James Bond. We're dull.

      Sure, you're dull right up until the moment you're not. And then you're defenseless. There is an old saying in Chess - the threat is better than the execution. Meaning that as long as your opponent has the power to do something, you have to expend your efforts in worrying about it and preventing it rather than doing what you'd like to do. If all of your "secrets" are laid bare at the whim of someone in power then you are oppressed - even if nothing actually happens to you. And everybody has secrets, especially when they can be skillfully twisted to present a certain picture.

  3. paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at eBay by joe545 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter how much I dislike PayPal, I'm forced to use it if I want to buy something from eBay. Until GoogleCheckout tries to break PayPal's monopoly at eBay (it surely can't be legal) I can't see the demise of PayPal happening. This isn't the beginning of the end but the end of the beginning.

  4. Good for the customers by BigDuke6_swe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's hope there won't be a need to create more sites like this, http://www.paypalsucks.com/. Because Paypal works pretty good and what seems to be what people complain the most about is the poor handling of fraud and disputes.

    --
    Zere vere zwei peanuts valking down der Straße, and von vas assaulted...peanut
    1. Re:Good for the customers by flatcat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, I actually asked PayPal a policy question once on their defination on gambling. It seems that a website that has a contest that pays in PayPal payments constitute gambling, even though there is no cost for entry. But both PayPal and Ebay have had contests that pay in PayPal payments and this is not gambling. I asked them for a clarification on this and the promptly suspended my account and froze my money for "violation of TOS". An example: Here.

  5. monopoly at eBay by giorgiofr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Monopoly? I can accept payments in about 3615 different ways on eBay. What are you talking about?

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
    1. Re:monopoly at eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Name 412 of them.

    2. Re:monopoly at eBay by andrewman327 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people have no idea what a money order is, although they are sometimes the best means of paying on EBay and cost less than . People seem to think that they can only pay through PayPal.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    3. Re:monopoly at eBay by SYRanger · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet you don't accept African Express.

  6. Money transfers? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My biggest question is if I can use my checkout funds to pay for stuff. I live in Greece, so I can't withdraw PayPal funds (cheaply, anyway), but I can use it to pay for my hosting/online shopping. If I can't do this with Google Checkout, it's all but useless to me.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Money transfers? by mgblst · · Score: 3, Funny

      Larry Page: Alright everybody, I have some bad news for you.
      Staff: What is it Larry?
      Larry: Apparently the new Gpay system is no good to some guy in Greece, so scrap it.
      Staff: Oh no, all that work for nothing.
      Larry: Yeah, I know, but what can you do. Guys, I am heading back to the Garage.

      Just kidding, really, your opinion is important to us!

    2. Re:Money transfers? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Learn the difference between "Gpay is useless" and "Gpay is useless to me". I would pay for your English lessons, if I could use Gpay to transfer funds from Greece.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    3. Re:Money transfers? by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Recently stuff offered to USA and Canada only has started bothering people as they see it as a way of "We don't give a f to you" attitude.

      For example I know it is not only Apple to blame but iTunes Greece store existing and there is no iTunes Turkey store while countries has similar markets (wonder where enemy brothers term come from?) makes you think like "Oh well, Apple doesn't give a heck to our country" and get eMusic.com subscription.

      Same goes for Rhapsody of Real Networks.; You see story on Slashdot, immediately click the URL with a list of rare stuff you have in your mind, you see "Available to USA only". It is like you go to a store and a bodyguard pushes you out because where you live.

      I hope I could explain the background of "Why not available to my country?!" types of postings a bit.

      btw, I know it is RIAA to blame for those "music" stores.

  7. Credit Card Replacement? by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I watched the video.. didn't RTFA though. Does anyone think this it is weird that google is advertising this as a replacement for credit cards?

    Paypal markets itself as a "safe" alternative for things like ebay, and easier to use for things like donations and small online stores that might not be able to use credit card facilities. Yet google is advertising this as a replacement for credit cards on all of your purchases. Would you be prepared to pay 2% on every single purchase you made at an online store just so you don't have to "fill out forms"? This seems silly to me at best.

    I can't imagine ever using paypal for any real purchase. This sort of thing should only be needed for small and unsafe purchases.

    Also, considering how long it took paypal to have Australian checking account support, I'm not going to hold my breathe on Google!

  8. Ebay? by dohcvtec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, can it be used as a method of payment for Ebay auctions and other person-to-person transactions?

    And...

    I don't think PayPal will be going away anytime soon. PayPal's business is driven by Ebay, and PayPal is part of Ebay.

    --
    -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
  9. Hooray! by chrismcdirty · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now Google can keep all of my credit cards on file for me! Maybe the NSA should contract them for a new domestic spying program.

    --
    It's like sex, except I'm having it!
  10. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > No matter how much I dislike PayPal, I'm forced to use it if I want to buy something from eBay

    I think, with this and other online payment systems, you won't actually need to use eBay for much longer. The combination of eBays shocking lack of regard for blatant scams, their stock - ineffectual and often incorrect or irrelevant - replies to complaints, and the way they push their inherently unsafe PayPal* system has put me off using them.

    *When is the money mine? As a seller I mean? For how long afterwards can someone just take the money out of my account? How have PayPal managed to piss off so many people so quickly?

  11. New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by kthejoker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the most important thing about this entire endeavor is that it is the first Google product that plans on actually introducing a revenue stream besides advertising to the company (especially since the Google Pay Video system has more or less fell through at this point in time.)

    I'm not quite sure what that means for the long-term health of the company, but I suspect that the more streams of revenue a company has, the more likely they are to become conservative, entrenched, and reluctant to embrace change. Google has managed to avoid all that because they've had a strong beam focus on a single revenue stream (ad dollars) - as they start matriculating, I suspect that beam focus will dissipate.

    But then again, they're Google - they just work smarter than basically every other company out there today. So I put nothing out of their reach.

    1. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by Dannon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you reach this conclusion, that many revenue streams==conservatism==entrenched attitudes?

      Take the New York Times, for example. Revenue from advertising, classifieds, subscriptions, sidewalk sales, and now, subscription services on their web site.

      I would also be inclined to say that they've got an "entrenched" attitude. Government regulations on the news media are just fine, even welcome, as long as they don't apply to the printing press media. Also, they managed to wrangle the NY city government into eminent-domaining a fine piece of property for their new HQ.

      But I would definitely not call their politics "conservative", not by a long shot.

      It's the people that make the company. As long as Google continues to hire people that share the views of its original managers, you need not fear the doom of a change in politics.

      And I'd put to you that it's not either conservatism or liberalism that needs to be feared, but rather, lobbyistism. And I think it's just a bit late for that.

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    2. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read their pricing scheme; sellers get free transactions if they use adwords, and the more they spend on adwords, the more free transactions they get. So, while this is definitely a new revenue stream, it is *also* a way to further bolster their main revenue stream.

  12. Paypal has one thing on google... by JumperCable · · Score: 3, Interesting

    4.7% interest on money contained in paypal accounts, no minimum. That's hard to beat for a pretty liquid fund of money.

    1. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by Mr.123 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/messageview.php?st art=0&catid=52&threadid=478098 Citibank is now offering 5%. FDIC insured and will not lose value like a money market fund.

    2. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except they can confiscate your money at any time for violating their terms of service. So liquid it might just slip through your fingers...

    3. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out this blog Bank Deals. While a lot of the CD specials on there are for local credit unions, there are also a lot of great online bank deals. Etrade, for example, currently has 3-month CD at 4.75% and the longer-term CDs going up from there.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    4. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends where you are. In the UK, investing Pounds Sterling, it is pretty hard to get anything over 4.5%, even on a relatively long-term investment. The important thing to note here is that the rate of inflation in the UK is around 2% for 2006, while in the US it is 3.7%. This means that you need an interest rate of 3.7% on a US Dollar just for your money to be worth the same amount, while you would only need 2% if your money is in Pounds Sterling (or close to 0% if it's in Swiss Francs).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  13. PayPal isn't going anywhere anytime soon by Whafro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While we all love Google and everything it produces over here on slashdot, I don't think that they are going to crash PayPal's party in the too near future.

    This is what they said when Blockbuster started competing with NetFlix, but NetFlix is doing quite alright by themselves, and PayPal is, in my opinion, in better shape in their space than NetFlix was. PayPal and eBay are pretty good bed buddies, and PayPal is already accepted on thousands of other websites. People know the name, people have used it before, people know it works.

    Regardless of how great the product Google produces turns out to be, people will still use PayPal as long as PayPal remains competitive, which I imagine it will. I mean, for all the people who rave and rant about how amazing Gmail is, the mailing list that my mom's quilt shop has accumulated is saturated with yahoo, hotmail, and aol addresses, with not a single gmail address to be found out of a few thousand names.

  14. just great by BugDoomBug · · Score: 2, Informative
    An additional spam header coming your way

    "Dear Valued Customer, In an effort to protect your security and combat identity fraud we need to periodically confirm your account activity and identity. Please click here, login using your google account information, and complete the highly detailed personalized questionaire.

    Sincerely,
    Not a Phishing Attempt

    So anyone grab checkoutgoogle.com for this yet?

  15. Interconnected services by SolitaryMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, I acknoledge that I'm paranoid, but the thing that makes me nervous about google services is that thay use single account for all purposes. This not only allows to keep track of my whole life, but also allows a person, who hijacks my email account, take control over my mail, internet messenger (IM was used for several famous frauds in Russia), and now money directly!

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
    1. Re:Interconnected services by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah - I don't like that my gmail password would now give someone access to my credit card if I were to sign up for Google checkout. I like to keep things more compartmentalized than that. For things like e-mail and other lower security things I use one set of passwords, but for PayPal I use a unique, much longer, and more secure one and make sure never to have my Browser store it.

      Also, it's convenient to stay logged into Google for gmail, but I wouldn't want to do that at work if it gave access to my credit card! I think a seperate password, required each time you buy something, would be better than using your one password to the Googleplex.

    2. Re:Interconnected services by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know that you don't have to sign up for all these services under the same account, right?

    3. Re:Interconnected services by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do if you pay attention to Google's Terms of Service.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Interconnected services by dave1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know that you don't have to sign up for all these services under the same account, right?

      Only if you want to be legal about it. When it comes to my cash, I prefer to do stuff above the table.

      Google's TOS doesn't allow multiple accounts.

    5. Re:Interconnected services by Sanga · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay let us create an account B for GBuy; account M for GMail; account T for gtalk; O for orkut. That should work and be compartmentalised. Right?

      No. Now OP receives GBuy email in B -- and has to login as B to see what is going on. Wants to hang out on orkut -- logout and login again.

      Either do a lot of cookie-editor plugin dancing or just stick to having one GCompartment for all!!

  16. Customers DON'T pay... by jsharkey · · Score: 5, Informative
    Would you be prepared to pay 2% on every single purchase you made at an online store just so you don't have to "fill out forms"?
    Remember, the $0.20 + 2% is paid by the seller and is taken out of the actual price. Consumers will see no price difference.
    1. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Fnord666 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Does anyone know what Visa and the others charge for their service?
      The amount charged to merchants for a sale varies greatly depending on the agreement between the merchant and the card processor. Factors can include the number of monthly transactions, total monthly dollar amount, number of chargebacks, swiped vs. manually entered transactions, etc. In general the google figure is probably in line or a bit lower than what most small business merchants are charged per transaction.

      The interesting things will be how chargebacks are handled, what fraud prevention measures are in place, and who eats the cost of fraud. With a credit card I get a lot of protection and infrastructure that handles all of this. Google will have to at least match this before I will consider using it.

      Personally I still don't know how Paypal manages to avoid being classified as a bank by the government.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a frame of reference: I was charged $0.25 + 2.25% for Visa/MC transactions. Merchants with higher volume can save money over PayPal, but for small fries like me I saw no competitve advantage in keeping a "regular" merchant account (especially after you factor in a monthly fee of ~$25).

      I heard many horror stories about PayPal, but so far they've been good to me. And considering the total lack of customer support I got from the "real bank", the support factor was moot (IMO).

  17. Micropayments by Threni · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > 2% and $0.20

    So they didn't want to just take the 2% so it could be used by websites to charge tiny amounts of money per page/hour etc? $0.20 blows that intriguing possibility out of the water. They could accrue the amounts spent until it reached some value where the transaction was worth performing, if they're worried about thousands of $0.001 hits slowing down their system or costing too much to run.

  18. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are not forced to use Paypal to pay for eBay auctions. Each seller, for each item they list, can choose what payment methods they accept. Some accept PayPal, some don't. Some accept only PayPal. Some will accept Money orders. Even for sellers that only accept PayPal, you can usually pay them through PayPal using your CC without creating a PayPal account - in effect just making PayPal their CC processor.

  19. US residents only! by dapyx · · Score: 5, Informative
    Has anyone noticed it's only for US residents?
    By agreeing to this Terms of Service for Buyers, you represent that you are: 18 years old or older; capable of entering into a legally binding agreement; and a resident of the United States.
    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    1. Re:US residents only! by psycln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny thing, I just signed up for checkout with my G Account and all I had to do is specify a different country.

      I even tried buying something from Buy.com and got the Oops from Google.

  20. Correction. by Funkcikle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The service allows you to track all your orders and shipping in one place"

    Should read as:

    "The service allows Google to track all your orders and shipping in one place"

  21. Need more payment options! by RemovableBait · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before Google Checkout has much hope of usurping PayPal, they'll need to accept more payment options.

    Paypal currently allows payment direct from a bank account (I don't expect Google to need this), Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Delta, Maestro, Visa Electron, Solo, Discover, and more if you count their other services. That's at least 10 ways to pay.

    Google, on the other hand, accept Visa, Mastercard, Amex and Discover. With only 4 ways to pay, I suspect Google Checkout is not an option for many people.

    Disclaimer: I live in the UK and this is based on my experience with the UK PayPal service. I also agree with the sentiments of paypalsucks.com, and would like to see Google smash PayPal to pieces if they can Do No Evil. YMMV.

    1. Re:Need more payment options! by Software · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I disagree. From a US perspective, Visa, Mastercard, Amex and Discover have approximately 100% penetration. OK, there's a few people (privacy nuts, mostly -- no offense) who don't have a CC, but you're far more likely to find someone without a bank account than you are to find someone without one of these credit card accounts. I've never heard of Delta, Maestro, Visa Electron, or Solo.

      A bank account may be more useful for sellers (how exactly do you add money to your Visa account, anyway?), but I don't know why a buyer would prefer to have eBay withdraw from a bank account. I know people can go both ways, so to speak, but for people who mostly buy, I think Checkout is fine.

  22. more info by feamsr00 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It would seem I wasnt fast enough to post this story, but I had a couple more links and useful info, so here it is:

    Google Checkout has been released today. From their blog: We've heard time and again from users: "I find great stores through Google search, but every time I try to buy from an online store, I have to re-enter the same billing, shipping, and credit card information. There are too many steps. Why can't it be as fast as a Google search?" This motivated us to improve the online purchase process, and so today we're announcing Google Checkout, a checkout option that makes buying across the web fast and easy."
    Google CheckOut includes single signon and badges on adwords of merchants that use Google CheckOut.
    Features include using many addresses and many different cards for buyers and a "Payment Guarantee" against chargebacks for sellers.
    AdWords users get $10 in sales processed for free for every $1 spent on AdWords.

    For those of us text weary, there are videos for buyers and sellers

  23. Re:Huh? by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kinda looks pretentious,

    It doesn't look pretentious if you're European, it looks normal. There is a world outside the evil empire! I will, however, agree that one shouldn't mix standards.

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  24. Differing Features by jascat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't look into it very hard, but it seems like Paypal has same major features that Google Checkout doesn't have; direct access to bank accounts and person to person transfers. I have used direct transfers several times for transfering money between family members. We are all pretty lazy and it has become easier to use Paypal than it is to write a check and put it in the mail. Also, Paypal seems to be more convenient to the casual seller on Ebay. Also, what about the folks on sites like Rent-a-coder that like to get paid through Paypal. I can see how they would compete on the business side, but for regular joe's, Paypal is still the answer.

  25. Google Checkout !Paypal by d3bruts1d · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If by "Google launches PayPal Rival" you mean, "Google launches a service for merchants to process credit cards". Then yes, this is a PayPal rival. This service does not allow you to transfer money from person-to-person, nor does it allow you to pay by check, bank draft, etc.

  26. Google - my secret lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have my secrets.
    You have my money.
    But where can I upload my soul? Yes, I have googled.

  27. Only in the USA by Roy+van+Rijn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember, when you sign up for Google Checkout you can fill in any country you like, but the Terms of Service says:

    - 18 years old or older;
    - capable of entering into a legally binding agreement; and
    - a resident of the United States.

    So only people from the United States are allowed to use it yet :( And most supporting companies don't even ship outside the US.

    1. Re:Only in the USA by fatted · · Score: 2, Funny
      And most supporting companies don't even ship outside the US.
      I think you'll find many U.S. companies ship overseas. Unfortunately most of them define overseas as consisting of Canada AND Mexico.

      Europe who?
  28. Re:huh? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Different parts of the world use different symbols for numeric representations, comma is used as a decimal separator in sme locales, I suspect that it is in The Netherlands, where apparently the submitter comes from. He probably just typed it in the second time out of habit, the rates for Google perhaps he copy and pasted, or specifically remembered he's talking to a predominatly American audience.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  29. So if they want to be banks... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, you won't find me going near most of the services offered by the likes of Paypal and now Google until organisations that are acting like banks or credit companies are regulated like them as well. My high street bank and credit card have pretty crappy customer service at times, but compared to some of the things Paypal's been accused off, the other guys are saints.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:So if they want to be banks... by crowemojo · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they are accepting credit cards, then they must be affiliated with a merchant bank. It is not possible to accept a credit card without this affiliation. If they are considered a Level 1 merchant by Visa, then they have to go through an annual independent PCI compliance review.

      A level 1 merchant is defined as the following:
      Any merchant-regardless of acceptance channel-processing over 6,000,000 Visa transactions per year.
      Any merchant that has suffered a hack or an attack that resulted in an account data compromise.
      Any merchant that Visa, at its sole discretion, determines should meet the Level 1 merchant requirements to minimize risk to the Visa system.
      Any merchant identified by any other payment card brand as Level 1.

      The PCI Data Security Standard consists of twelve basic requirements and is actually very similar to what is regulated at most banks as per FFIEC guidelines. Every Level 1 merchant must have the following:
      Annual On-site PCI Data Security Assessment performed by QDSPs that are working for a QDSC (individuals that have been certified to perform the review that are working for companies that have qualified to attest to the compliance to the standards)
      Quarterly Network Scan by a qualified scanning vendor. The qualified scanning vendors are screened by Mastercard and are only able to qualify by scanning a controlled environment and producing results that meet the standard that has been established.

      Finally, if there are any doubts, PayPal-Verisign is on the published list of qualified service providers, indicating that they have complied with the standard I mentioned before as a service provider, not just a merchant.

    2. Re:So if they want to be banks... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Question I've been meaning to ask: are debit cards as risky? I'm sure I read somewhere that you can't do chargebacks with them.

      Ten years ago, when electronic debit transactions were still new, that was the case. Now most financial institutions offer protections similar to credit cards. That's not to say that debit card protection is as convenient as credit card protection, though. The disadvantage is that, unlike a straight credit card, you start off with the money gone and must wrangle with the bank to get it back. Credit cards, it's the bank that's out the money and you need only refuse to pay.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  30. All you need to know by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Informative


    10. Disputes

    GPC will provide various tools to assist Customers in communicating with each other to resolve a dispute that may arise between Buyers and Sellers with respect to their transaction. If Customers are unable to resolve a dispute, we can mediate disputes between buyers and sellers if either party requests assistance. If this occurs, we will review the dispute and propose a non-binding solution, if appropriate. For more detailed information, please see our Frequently Asked Questions.

    GPC may offer a feedback or other ranking system on the Service to assist you in evaluating other Customers of the Service. You acknowledge that any such feedback or ranking system represents solely the opinion of other Customers of the Service, and is not an opinion, representation, or warranty by GPC with respect to other Customers of the Service.

    You agree to release, GPC, Google, and other GPC affiliates, and their agents, contractors, officers and employees, from all claims, demands and damages (actual and consequential) arising out of or in any way connected with a dispute. You agree that you will not involve GPC in any litigation or other dispute arising out of or related to any transaction, agreement, or arrangement with any Seller, other Buyer, advertiser or other third party in connection with the Service. If you attempt to do so, (i) you shall pay all costs and attorneys' fees of GPC, Google, and other GPC affiliates and shall provide indemnification as set forth below, and (ii) the jurisdiction for any such litigation or dispute shall be limited as set forth below. However, nothing in this Terms of Service shall constitute a waiver of any rights, claims or defenses that you may have with respect to a Payment Transaction under the Buyer's card issuer agreement, the card association rules or applicable state and federal laws, such as the federal Truth in Lending Act or the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.

    If you are a California resident, you hereby expressly waive California Civil Code 1542, which states: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if not known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor."

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:All you need to know by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When's the last time you called a credit card processor to resolve a disputed charge? You deal with the card issuer. This is no different from any other card processor agreement. Get a grip.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  31. Typo by pr0nbot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The service allows you^H^H^H them to track all your orders and shipping in one place"

    Regards,

    The nation's #1 tinfoil hat supplier!

  32. Re:Huh? by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Odd, my maths says Google would be cheeper for anything under $100.

    Buy why O' why no micropayments, wake me up when they have a 10% + $0 option.

  33. 1,9% and $0,30 ? by mochan_s · · Score: 5, Informative

    The 1,9% and $0,30 rate for Paypal is if you recieve more than $100,000 to your account and you have a merchant account!

    Normally, it's 2.9% + $0.30 USD. https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display -receiving-fees-outside

    1. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Drew-NC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is 100% correct. I run a small web store and we use PayPal to process orders. We are paying 2.9% + $.30 per transaction. I would love to switch to google, but I see one issue. With PayPal people can place orders on my site, pay with a credit card, and not have a PayPal account. PayPal just processes the card. When google will let my customers pay without having a google account I will switch.

    2. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ALso, The only way you can accept money from Google is to either purchase ads for your web site, OR sell your item directly via google's interface. At least that is how I see it.

      Not having a google account to accept purchase is a big problem.

      --
      Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
    3. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least Google accounts are easy to sign up for and manage. I have a PayPal account. I think it even has some money in it still (a few bucks). I have the hardest time getting any PayPal transactions to work - and I work in enterprise web development, so its not as if I'm a stranger to the system. I couldn't imagine forcing someone to sign up for a PP account, and I agree that a Google account is still too much of a requirement, but at least its a lot more reasonable.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    4. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When google will let my customers pay without having a google account I will switch.

      I don't understand "switch." You make it sound like an either/or decision. Can't you offer both? "If you have a Google Checkout account, go here, if you don't, go to PayPal - Thanks and come again." That way, every time someone does use Google, you'll save .9% and when they don't, you'll see no difference. It will have two benefits - you'll save the .9% immediately, and you'll be encouraging people to find out about Google so that more people will use it in the future.

    5. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Drew-NC · · Score: 3, Informative

      True but it will require a major re-write of my web site, the use of a separate shopping cart software, find a way to move money from google to PayPal (we use PayPal as a checking account too) and upgrading to PayPal Payments Pro at $20 a month. PayPal Payments Standard does not integrate with external shopping cart software, you use PayPal form code and they provide the shopping cart. I expect many small web stores are in the same boat I am in. I remember that not too long ago PayPal required customers to sign up for accounts too. I expect google will change their ways before too long.

  34. GTip, GMicropay ? by mjpg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With a decent micropayment system Google could really change the web. It's a shame this is not it. It's likely Google could blend micropayments into sites pretty well with their AJAX skills - and their infrastructure should mean that the implementation cost was marginal (for them). And search could benefit. A micropayment is a pretty good vote for a site.

  35. $10 chargeback risk for sellers. by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was interested in this as a seller, but I'm somewhat wary of the $10 chargeback cost they charge the seller if a buyer either ask refund or is just defrauding you.
    Typically this means that if a seller is the victim of fraud, (s)he loses the item sold AND has to pay $10 because of it.
    Using this for "micro"-payments of, say, $5, would be pretty dangerous considering the risk of fraud.
    I've been selling through another service for years now and thus have some indication of the amount of fraud happening on the internet. I may still try google CheckOut, but probably only for $10+ payments so valid orders may cover the risk of fraudulent ones.

    Besides, the service is only available in the U.S.A. anyway, so I'd have to wait for it. Odd, considering AdWords and AdSense are available pretty much worldwide.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  36. Sticking with Paypal... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dig Google, man do I ever but I think I have reached my limit as to how tightly I integrate myself with Google, inc. Google IS a publicly traded company and it's only a matter of time before "Do no evil"(tm) becomes "We do less evil than everyone else" (tm). Why? Because Google is publicly traded and their only real obligation is to their stockholders. No matter of hipster-doofus-coolness culture trumps that. Just look at Apple...

    They have transitioned themselved from being cool to being fairly evil (sweatshops for iPod manufacture, closing off the Darwin source)

    Besides do you think for one second that eBay will make integrating auctions easy with Google? Of course not....

    Paypal does suck but all of these services do and odds are Google's will too.

  37. Re:Not only that by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder why Google and Paypal don't want porn to be sold using their service.

    Just think of the huge market they're abandoning; if porn sites could use paypal or google for payment, many more folks might be willing to to pay for porn since they won't be giving their credit card info to seedy companies!

    But for some odd reason they forbid it. Strange...

    -Z

  38. GPC Not A Banking Institution by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It says it is not a banking institution. So, it has lower rates and has "Google" in its name.

    No other difference from Paypal?

    It seems they use their brand value and lower rates against Paypal. Hope we won't have another Google Groups in hand since this thing is purely related to real life money.

    On Google Groups, you can pollute usenet with any kind of criminal scams, pyramid schemes and they send "Google does not censor groups" type of "we don't care" message in politically correct way. Deja could handle abuse while usenet was really huge compared to today but as a billion dollar company they can't.

    I hope they start working with Spamcop.net , Antiphishing.org and fraudwatchinternational.com right now. I hope they recorded all their URLs/IPs as interested parties and we (reporting users) don't see "ISP does not want to receive reports regarding" type of stuff at spamcop.net as first days of Paypal.

  39. US Only by ggeens · · Score: 3, Informative

    The registration form lets you choose a country, but the terms and conditions state that you must be a US citizen. I didn't click on the "I agree" button.

    Flashback to the early days of Paypal: Someone pointed me to this new service, and when I get to the registration form, it had "Country: USA" hard coded in the HTML.

    --
    WWTTD?
    1. Re:US Only by dshk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sellers must be from the USA too, and "Country: USA" is actually hard coded HTML on the vendor signup form...
      Btw. PayPal still don't accept vendors from the new EU member countries. You can buy but not sell if you live there. Considering that the percentage of credit card fraud is significantly lower in these countries then in the old member countries I feel this diffenentiation is quite unashamed.
      Not that it makes too much difference, in our shop customers can pay using about 6-7 different payment services depending on their country (including Paypal although indirectly), but 90% of the purchases are done using credit cards.
      Anyway, PayPal made me so angry that I intended to integrate Google's payment service as soon as possible.

  40. Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by turnstyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google Checkout lets buyers hide their email addresses from sellers -- but, it seems fair that sellers should get buyers' email addresses (PayPal doesn't similarly hide emails).

    It also seems like hiding the email address from the seller may also encourage more fraud (especially for digially distributed works).

    So, at first glance, Google Checkout seems worse than PayPal from the seller's perspective -- it'll be interesting to see if sellers choose to stick with PayPal for reasons such as these...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by IAmTheDave · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So, at first glance, Google Checkout seems worse than PayPal from the seller's perspective

      Actually, I'm inclined to disagree. There is a full API, and you can practically (as a seller) hide the fact you're using Google to process payments from the user if you wish. I'm writing an online store right now, and integration with Google appears to be less costly than having to get a merchant bank account and integrate with annoying APIs like Paymentech.

      I like that Google placed the service on both a Paypal and full-out merchant level. Now I can do all payment processing on my site via the available web API, but still put the Google badge on the site to put buyers at ease.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
  41. simplify by kurtis25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google wants to track data flow; they want to see how you get to sites, what you look at and what you buy. This system allows them to watch how money flows in a controlled market place. I would assume eventually they will hold money and you can buy and sell with it. IE you could give your kids 100$ in their account, they could buy a DVD for 15$ and now have 85$ but sell two CDs at 10$ each and have 110$. This will eventually eliminate the $.20 fee (or make it Google profit). It will be come a commodities market of sorts, I will watch Tom Cruise jump up on a couch and decide TC movies will become hot sellers so I will quickly move my money to take ownership of his films and put them up for sale at a higher price. You people will buy them from me and I will have a profit which I will re-invest in Hillary for President bumper sticker because I think those will become popular. No transactions will appear on my credit card statement, I will have essential bought a commodity with Google money, which I can cash out like stocks.

  42. One again, analysts know sh*t in computing... by pierreact · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and prove it !
    Analysts compare Google/Paypal to for example Visa/Mastercard living peacefully together, while others predict the end of Paypal.


    Any one of you ever compared Visa/Mastercard ? I asked around me after reading this to some people around... a card is a card, as long it works...

    A site like paypal is different it's more like a bank you choose from, people will choose on this differently, an other thing is abot security, do you feel safe with paypal ? I don't. So much that i certainly will close my paypal account (There's years i want to close it but they don't let me) and go to google.

    Is google more secure ? I don't know, but the fact is i never seen google down.
  43. Your wrong about why... by Serapth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Paypal isnt so much the most popular service because it's "easy"

    Many other services are just as easy to use as Paypal. No the biggest reasons are:
    - Its "the brand" so far as online payments go. Most people use paypal, so other people get brought in my default.
    - Its trusted. For online payments, this is a HUGE deal.
    - Its cheap. Really, look at what people have to pay for online banking. If you want to setup an e-commerce website, alot of payment gateways charge a monthly fee, then take a huge percentage of your revinue. Plus, payout rates ( how fast you get your cash )are much higher with Paypal then most gateways.
    - It acts as a credit card proxy, so if you have a MC or Visa, you can pay with Paypal without the fear of giving out your credit card number.
    - Its in bed with eBay. Alot of peoples first need for a payment service is because they bought something on eBay. Once they have an eBay account, if they buy something else online, why sign up for a different service when the one you use already works?

    So, there are many reasons beyond "it's easy" that Paypal is popular.

  44. Correction!!!! by Zelph · · Score: 2, Informative

    PayPal charges 2.9%, not 1.9%. The only people who get the 1.9% rate are those who deal over 100,000 PER MONTH.

  45. Use one of the online gold repositories instead by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    People use PayPal because Ebay demand that they do. Crucially paypal means that you don't have to give bank details to customers/suppliers.

    There's e-gold, GoldMoney etc. They're basically banks, can do instant payments. The difference being you can actually get your hands on the gold.

    --
    Deleted
  46. The economics of it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who pays depends on the slope of the demand curve, which is a fancy way of saying whether the merchants can raise prices without losing business.

    Put a 50% tax on scrub brushes, and the price won't go up because no seller would risk having all his customers buy mops instead. Put a 50% tax on gasoline, and the sellers will cheerfully pass it along in full.

    In general the burden of a tax gets split between seller and buyer in a ratio that depends on how much the market will bear.

  47. Even better, no minimum Savings up to 4.95%... by Optic7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bankrate.com keeps track of the highest yeld savings accounts in the country, along with many other rates, like mortgage, credit card, car loan, etc.

  48. can you pay FRIENDS? by linuxlover · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing we (at work) use paypal for is to pay each other. When we go out for lunch/drinks, one guy in the group picks up the tab for the whole group and he sends paypal requests to the rest of us. We just pay him with a click. So simple, no need to scramble for cash or trying to break a $20 bill (b/c every one has 20s) to pay $11.34 :-)

    Does Google Checkout has this? I can't spot this from the 'take a tour' plug

    This is a real nice feature and would really like to see it in GOOG version