Slashdot Mirror


HL2 Episode One Panorama Shots

An anonymous reader writes to mention that Panogames has released 17 new fullscreen panoramic screenshots inside HL2: Episode One. There are even more HiRes shots available from HL2 Lost Coast and Half-Life 2.

54 comments

  1. FLASH WARNING by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0

    (no text)

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    1. Re:FLASH WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like quicktime to me

    2. Re:FLASH WARNING by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      They aren't even flash. They're quicktime. Won't show on my Linux computer. It's a frickin' screen shot. Why would I need quicktime?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:FLASH WARNING by grub · · Score: 2, Informative


      They're QuicktimeVR, not plain vanilla screenshots. You can pan, zoom and tilt the camera.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:FLASH WARNING by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Oops, I just assumed it was flash because it was a plugin and the majority of those are flash. Either way it annoys me because neither of those can be used on 64-bit *nices.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:FLASH WARNING by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I'm running 64-bit Linux (Mandriva) and I have no problem running flash. Yeah, I'm running the 32 bit binaries for firefox, but who really cares. It's a frickin web browser. I don't need uber performance out of it. I just want it to show web pages. And if running in 32 bit gets me that, then that's what I'm going to run it in. 64 bit is nice, and I use it for all the applications I can, but if it doesn't run in 64 bit it's not the end of the world. That's the nice thing about x86-64, and the whole reason why 64 bit computing is actually catching on finally. You can still run all your old programs, and run new 64 bit programs. At the same time.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:FLASH WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have java installed, you can click java vr and view them.

    7. Re:FLASH WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, back in the day, Quicktime and RealPlayer RULED the internet!

    8. Re:FLASH WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      William S Teenager is one of the more sensitive adherents of the cult of Slashdot. He will not get any sleep unless he knows as many applications as possible are using the full 64-bit's of his processor, which as he states, runs '64-bit unices'. He is also a tedious mindless lackey and I bore of him so..

    9. Re:FLASH WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been running a 64-bit firefox for almost 2 years and I think Flash is garbage and would never install it on any platform. Regardless, the fact that moronmedia don't have 64-bit linux binaries availiable, 2 years after the fact should really be telling you something.

    10. Re:FLASH WARNING by bezzer · · Score: 1

      You may not be able to run Quicktime, but you should be able to run Java.

      There's a button for Java VR in the bottom corner when you open the panorama. Unfortunatly it's restricted to a smaller window than the Quicktime panoramas, but you still should be able to see what the game looks like.

    11. Re:FLASH WARNING by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      On Gentoo, to have a 32-bit Firefox you have to use the binary package. Binary packages, by default, have a different compiled-in featureset than your USE flag default, meaning that it often excludes features you want or includes those you don't. The hassle of a binary package isn't worth the majority of Flash on the web. If I want to watch Homestar Runner that badly I can go into Windows.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    12. Re:FLASH WARNING by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Yay! I have a SlashStalker now too!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  2. Well ...... by FragHARD · · Score: 1

    The pics just aren't what I expected. :-(((( Not to say they are not good but I guess I just expect too much.

    --
    FragHARD or don't frag at all
    1. Re:Well ...... by TommydCat · · Score: 1
      The pics just aren't what I expected. :-(((( Not to say they are not good but I guess I just expect too much.

      No doubt.. I couldn't find a poster-worthy panaromic view of Alex anywhere...

      *excitement level drops*

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
  3. Nice but short. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Episode One is fun, but fairly short. I wish they'd come out with more episodes quickly, or some longer games ( Blue-Shift 2 ?). They've already got a great game engine. Anyone else wish they'd concentrate more on generating new content than adding new 'extra-shiny' bling for the new graphics cards out there?

    1. Re:Nice but short. by UMNbandgeek · · Score: 1

      Forget Blue Shift, I want Opposing Force 2.

    2. Re:Nice but short. by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      I think I'd prefer Opposing Force 2...

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    3. Re:Nice but short. by matt328 · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer more content to bling any day, especially when the bling requires 2 $700+ GPUs, AMD's $2000 chip, 2 gigs of ram, and still doesn't run right.

      --
      Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
  4. It looks OK... by posterlogo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...but come on...hi-res shots? A little dissapointing. How about some more anti-aliasing? Everything looks like a box. It's like the old star wars trilogy and the new star wars trilogy. You can tell when stuff is drawn by a computer -- too sharp, not enough dust, grime, grit. That's the problem with all these new games with "beautiful" graphics. They look beautifully drawn, not starkly real. How about using more actual photography to cover those textures rather than generating everything.

    1. Re:It looks OK... by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Although I'm sure realism is what they're aiming for, there's no reasons games should always strive to look realistic. Metropolis was hardly "starkly real," but it wouldn't have been nearly as good of a film otherwise.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    2. Re:It looks OK... by Taulin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with what you are saying, only it is just bland statement of what needs to be done next. For example, first there were single colored polys. To simulate higher polygon counts, textures came along. We have reached the point where textures are not needed, and their purpose has shifted to paterns, verses drawing every detail like mouths and such. You know what I mean. It is AWESOME that people still have a goal, like yourself, to look foward to in graphics rather than just higher poly counts. I think HDR is just a small step in the right direction. I personally still want my games to look like games rather than real life. I still want a suspension of reality. I want things to look slightly surreal.

    3. Re:It looks OK... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      HL2 is already making heavy use of photos, you just can't throw them on there unedited and I think HL2 has a pretty low texture resolution for today's standards.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:It looks OK... by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      Meh - they just need to spend more on the artists.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  5. Jaggies! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Haven't the guys at Valve heard of antialiasing?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Jaggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you just want to flip it on in the graphics options in HL2.

      The problem was the person taking the screenshots didn't have it on.

    2. Re:Jaggies! by abandonment · · Score: 1

      don't think they show the hdr lighting as well either?

  6. Quit complaining... by Red+Samurai · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought they were pretty cool. Nothing pleases you people.

    1. Re:Quit complaining... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Well I was going there thinking, "Finally, a site with a lot of images I can use as wallpaper for my Matrox TripleHead2Go system running at 3840x1024," then find they're all .mov files. I might as well just use Gerry's Mod and make my own.

      Is there any way to do a Google Image Search for images a specific size or larger only, other than imgsz=xxlarge? Or just sorting the results by area, largest first?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  7. HL2, a puzzle game? by miscz · · Score: 0, Troll

    Each screen shows a green piece of puzzle. Pretty boring and not worth 20$ IMO.

  8. Bad karma rating question. by fregare · · Score: 0

    I used to have bad karma now I have terrible Karma. I have a question. Is bad karma worse than terrible karma? Or is the other way around? Anybody know all the levels of bad Karma? What is exactly is the worse Karam you can get? Is getting the worse karma possible a sign of skill in that very few people can reach this level. IF I do reach this exalted level of bad karamhood, what exactly do I win? Do I win 1000 PS3's or what exactly? Thank you for your time. I'll go back and sulk.

    1. Re:Bad karma rating question. by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    2. Re:Bad karma rating question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once upon a time, karma was visible as a number. From the names, sounds like terrible is worse than bad. I believe the worst level karma will buy you a limit of 2 posts/day (even less than AC from a particular IP) and a starting score of -1.

    3. Re:Bad karma rating question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrible is worse than bad.

      I think that's as bad as it gets. I tried to get worse ages ago, but you just get sin-binned

  9. It looks OK...Larger $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How about using more actual photography to cover those textures rather than generating everything."

    Hope you got the money, because your requests will certainly be reflected there.

  10. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..they are non-moving shots of a 3d engine wrapped into Quicktime's panoramic photo job to give them a psuedo 3D look?
    How is this more impressive than just loading the actual game and moving about in it?

  11. Nice pics but... by NexFlamma · · Score: 1

    Yay for pretty pictures and all, but I'm still a bit miffed at Valve for not having released Team Fortress 2 yet.

    It's been almost a decade since it was first announced, and we haven't heard anything about it for, at least, 5 years.

    Valve, I will personally buy each of you a signed copy of Duke Nukem Forever if you can have a copy of Team Fortress 2 on my hardrive by the end of the year.

  12. ugh by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    Moving around the panoramic screen shots makes me more queasy than moving inside the game at low FPS. Yeck *green*

  13. Eye Candy... by MatrixManiac · · Score: 1, Troll

    Oooohh look eye candy... Because that is what makes the game!

    1. Re:Eye Candy... by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      You forgot the word "sell" at the end there.

  14. Re:They Mean Quarter Life! by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    I have this mental image of you starting to play solitaire, then stopping after two moves, picking up all the cards, and putting them in order.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  15. Re:They Mean Quarter Life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that's bad, try playing the "Lola Rennt" game.

  16. Texture reuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Check out the blatant reuse of textures in the shot "Lost Coast 04..." The secco frescos in the church are worn in the exact same places on both walls.

    That's the kind of thing you no longer expect to see in modern games.

  17. JPEGs? by BlueboyInky · · Score: 1

    What about using a very wide JPEG (like 2560x1024) instead of QuickTime? I would've liked a decent dual-monitor background...

  18. Meh by Tyrion+Moath · · Score: 1

    It looks better on my computer actually playing the game, rather than those pictures...

  19. Me too by idonthack · · Score: 1
    The pics just aren't what I expected.
    Especially considering they're not even pics. Wtf is this?
    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  20. Re:They Mean Quarter Life! by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd hardly call that extraordinary. Look at these, you can do that with almost any game and only the longest ones take 2 hours.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  21. erm great.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Spiffy, but when the hell is Valve going to patch Ep1? I can't even get beyond the opening scene because theres one uber error effecting a lot of pre-Windows XP installs. So while I'm sure this is great personally looking at anything ep 1 is like rubbing salt in the wound.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:erm great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had problems with it too: every other time it loads a new level from the HD, it stays frozen at the 'loading' screen, and there's no way out of it but to reboot. Damn weird bug, and every other game on here seems to run OK (including Oblivion).

  22. But does it run Linux? by bottlerocket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How can I view a QuicktimeVR image on Linux? MPlayer doesn't appear to work...

    --
    where the comment ends and sig begins
    1. Re:But does it run Linux? by crossmr · · Score: 1
  23. Well by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 1

    The one thing that has always got me about Episode One is how Valve are going to get it onto consoles, which I know a lot of people played Half Life 1 and 2 through (granted, not the majority, but still a large number). Releasing one episode at a time wouldn't be too satisfying to the consumer given the length of gameplay that they offer and does that mean that people who use consoles to game will have to wait until there are a number of episodes (who knows how long that could be) available until they can get their hands on the game.

    That being said, those panoramic views are awesome and I think those guys have a very original idea. I hope they keep them archived for a long time, and maybe go back to do a few of the more classic games from the past.