Slashdot Mirror


Practical Applications of Smell Recordings

ozmanjusri writes to mention a Tokyo Institute of Technology project to record scents for later playback. The New Scientist article suggests this technology could be used in commercials and medical applications. From the article: "Simply point the gadget at a freshly baked cookie, for example, and it will analyse its odour and reproduce it for you using a host of non-toxic chemicals. The device could be used to improve online shopping by allowing you to sniff foods or fragrances before you buy, to add an extra dimension to virtual reality environments and even to assist military doctors treating soldiers remotely by recreating bile, blood or urine odours that might help a diagnosis."

172 comments

  1. Smell-o-vision by dubmun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yay! Now I will be able to smell decomposing bodies when I watch CSI...

    --
    (end of post)
    1. Re:Smell-o-vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay! Now I will be able to smell decomposing bodies when I watch CSI...

      You think THAT's heavy? Wait till the slashdot trolls find a use for this one!

    2. Re:Smell-o-vision by jerkmark · · Score: 2, Informative

      Smell-o-vision is right. This idea has been cropping up every few years or so since at least the 1960's, and every time they start trying to list practical applications, the concept veers off into ridiculousness. Maybe the medical uses are valid (I don't know how many diagnoses are odor-critical), but as far as online shopping is concerned, smell is simply not an important enough factor in 99% of my purchases, and I don't know how much I would trust a machine to reproduce the sublties of, say, a fine wine, or something where smell was particularly telling or vital. These cookies smell like porn.

      --
      Pain is God trying to be funny. That's how out of touch It is. -- Jeff Lint
    3. Re:Smell-o-vision by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The important application for this is going to be as a blogging tool for dogs. Also, I (finally!) won't have to read my dog his email and he can check his MySpace page on his own.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Smell-o-vision by tmossman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I don't know how much I would trust a machine to reproduce the sublties of, say, a fine wine, or something where smell was particularly telling or vital."

      I'm not a medical expert, but how useful could this really be? I mean, there's no question that this won't catch on with wine connoisseurs. They're a pretty picky bunch by nature; I doubt if they'd trust a machine over their refined noses. Not to mention that there's more to selecting a wine than its scent.

      But medical diagnosis? Seriously? I mean, if someone is going to go to the trouble of examining a biological substance so closely that its odor can be reproduced to medically-valuable standards by a remote machine, why not just spend that time & effort doing real medical tests?

      Don't get me wrong, I don't doubt that the Japanese will find fantastically weird ways to use this technology, but I suspect it'll end up in a lot more video arcades than hospitals.

    5. Re:Smell-o-vision by packeteer · · Score: 1

      I think your exactly right. If the exact smell can be diagnosed by a machine why cant you just have the machine give a readout of what chemicals it detected. The human nose is not a very good way for doctors to make a diagnosis.

      The human scent of smell lets us know about immediatly dangerous or immediatly apetizing food and other things. We dont use our nose to track animals or anything much more than warn us when we are putting something in our mouth.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:Smell-o-vision by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > The human nose is not a very good way for doctors to make a diagnosis.

      Actually, the sense of smell has been an invaluable medical tool for centuries. Cyanide poisoning can look like a dozen other medical emergencies, so a smart trauma doc will remember to take a smell of the patient's breath. Smells like almonds? It's cyanide. For years the smell of a wound that had gone gangrenous (but still looked okay) was how war theatre surgeons triaged out the ones who had a better chance of surviving. I've heard many anecdotes about doctors and surgeons who swear that many conditions have a specific smell attached to them. The nose may not be the *best* way for a doctor to make a diagnosis, but the best medical practitioners will use *all* of their senses to do their jobs.

      (disclaimer - I am not a medical professional in any way, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night. Oh, I also watch a lot of "Scrubs.")

    7. Re:Smell-o-vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyanide poisoning can look like a dozen other medical emergencies, so a smart trauma doc will remember to take a smell of the patient's breath. Smells like almonds? It's cyanide.
      Or perhaps the poisoner added some other almond-scented chemical to the actual poison they used, to reduce the chances of successful treatment.

      Or perhaps the patient had been eating almonds before she collapsed.

      Call me cynical, but I'd rather my doctors were using blood tests, not sniffing my breath.

    8. Re:Smell-o-vision by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      ...I don't doubt that the Japanese will find fantastically weird ways to use this technology, ...

      Three words for you : Used Girls Underwear

      /crawls off to shudder in the corner, murmuring to himself quietly

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    9. Re:Smell-o-vision by Geosota · · Score: 1

      I am anosic meaning I have no sense of smell. Well, practically none. Among the lost senses, this is the least discussed. The way I explain this to people is that I'm blind in one nostril and deaf in the other. (Yes, I know how lame that joke is.) We have schools for the blind and deaf, but anosics are pretty much expected to suck it up and play along like we're normal. Recently, my wife and I broke up and I often find myself wondering what sort of odor I am putting off especially if I am to be around women, a notoriously sniffy gender. An amplifier for smells would be very useful.

    10. Re:Smell-o-vision by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Becuase you know how often people are poisoned with cyanide. So often in fact we need to train all doctors to diagnose it without anything but their own senses.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    11. Re:Smell-o-vision by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      Did you willfully go out of your way to miss the point of my post? I never even remotely claimed that doctors should diagnose with nothing but their own senses. However, the doctor's senses - including smell - are just as valuable a part of the diagnostic process as any laboratory work will ever be. If you can't wrap your brain around that simple concept then that's your problem. I won't waste another moment of your valuable time trying to have an above retarded-level conversation.

  2. Viruses by Ledsock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Imagine what a computer virus attacking that could do. Now in addition to having pop-ups, loud noises, and other issues, your computer can smell like vomit when you visit that unscrupulous porn or warez site!

    --
    What is mankind really? Well, it's just two words put together Mank, and ind.
    1. Re:Viruses by Julz · · Score: 2, Funny

      And they would make it smell like vomit because ....?

      Perhaps other smells might be more appropriate. Then again you could have a kids filter that changes all those nasty pron smells to something really terrible so the kids don't want to be in there.

      Warez could be burning plastic or perhaps the smell of blood, sweat and tears or maybe money.

      --
      When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
    2. Re:Viruses by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Now in addition to having pop-ups, loud noises, and other issues, your computer can smell like vomit when you visit that unscrupulous porn or warez site!

      You computer would smell like vomit when visiting a porn site?

      I don't want to know what kind of porn you're looking for.

    3. Re:Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I was thinking. Ass, putang, cock, BO, various "love emissions" - sure, but vomit?

      I suppose though, now that I've typed that out and read it, that the vomit we smell could end up being our own.

    4. Re:Viruses by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Finally, we have the Internet equivalent to "pull my finger".

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:Viruses by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      However, if these became commonplace perhaps standard pop-ups should use pheromones to change how people react? For example, firewall pop-ups release an odour which makes people feel cautious and hence more likely to read the warning.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    6. Re:Viruses by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      pheromones are not just a collection of scents, unless the thing has a custom protein assembler (hello mad cow over the internet) you don't have to worry about that

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:Viruses by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      (mad cow waves back at Lehk228) Moo.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:Viruses by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the internet one redirects you to goatse.cx, which happens to be exactly the last thing I would want to smell.

  3. Cue the "Pull My Finger" virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

    1. Re:Cue the "Pull My Finger" virus by kcbanner · · Score: 1

      I hate that "Press the fart button" ad. Now its come to life! AAAGH!

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    2. Re:Cue the "Pull My Finger" virus by ross.w · · Score: 1

      They did say they used non-toxic chemicals for this...

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  4. Literally! by PavementPizza · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is literally vaporware!

    --
    Viper is the preferred editor of the Emacs operating system.
    1. Re:Literally! by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is literally vaporware!

      Actually, I think the MPAA has prior art - they've been releasing expensive stinkers for decades.

  5. Workout videos? by Phantombrain · · Score: 0

    Whoa... This could be dangerous! Think of the BO!

    --
    echo YOUR_OPINION > /dev/null
  6. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "reproduce it for you using a host of non-toxic chemicals"

    i lol'd

  7. Obligatory futurama quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Think of the astronomical odors you'll smell thanks to me!"

  8. Next gen fart machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be great for the next generation fart machine. You hear it and smell it.

    1. Re:Next gen fart machine by Gyga · · Score: 1

      They already sell fart spray.*

      *Note when aiming at chest of big dude make sure you don't hit face- My friend

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
  9. For the love of humanity please don't ever do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a "recording" of my ex-coworker. Let's just say that he brought a whole new meaning to "old fart." I'll leave it at that. Your imaginations can fill out the rest, but they definitely won't do it justice. Nothing can. Except a "smell recording." That alone would give me nightmares.

  10. Funk-o-vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yay! Now I will be able to smell decomposing bodies when I watch CSI..."

    That's also known as "con funk".

  11. Advertising dollars in the making. by kneppercr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    God knows the Big Mac doesn't look good unless it is on TV, so do you think they wil give you the real smell? I find most intrusions in my home annoying and this will go on the list as well. Limited applications? Sure. But please, PLEASE do not assault my sense of smell with what market research shows to be your grandma's fresh baked cookie scent. I don't even like scented candles for God's sake.

    1. Re:Advertising dollars in the making. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful
      God knows the Big Mac doesn't look good unless it is on TV, so do you think they wil give you the real smell?

      There was an outcry here recently when an advertiser proposed modifying the advertising signs on bus stops to smell like the alcoholic drinks they were advertising.

      Smell is a much more intrusive medium than sound or vision. Advertising alcohol or tobacco (if such were legal here) by smell would definitely be wrong. IMO.

    2. Re:Advertising dollars in the making. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... advertising alcohol or tobacco by scent would definately be wrong. Who actually think those products smell good?

      But this advertising method would probably quadruple the sales of bacon. All you have to do to dodge this advertising is remember one key fact about bacon: bacon does not really taste all that good. Hear me out now... yes, I said bacon doesn't really taste very good. But the smell of bacon makes anything you are eating taste better. You smell bacon the strongest when you are eating it, so it seems that it tastes much better than it actually is. You would reach culinary nirvana if you had some bacon frying and ate as tall of a stack of Ritz crackers as you could, because we all know that everything tastes better on a Ritz, and this must include another Ritz cracker, so by recursion a stack of Ritz crackers would also taste better on a Ritz. I figure the rule only applies for stacks of food that fit in your mouth. Someone should experiment on this effect, preferable at like 3 or 4 in the morning when they are deliriously giggly tired because at this time it would be hilarious to see someone spit out a huge mouthfull of partially chewed ritz because they started laughing.

    3. Re:Advertising dollars in the making. by relifram66 · · Score: 1

      I do. As a matter of fact, I quite like the smell of both tobacco and alcohol. Also, regarding the GP, I'm not sure that smell is more invasive than sound. Can you demonstrate this?

    4. Re:Advertising dollars in the making. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      silent but deadly farts..

      enough said

    5. Re:Advertising dollars in the making. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      The smell might cause an alcoholic to relapse. It's tough enough to have to avoid certain parties etc, but if they couldn't even go outside life would pretty much turn to hell for alcoholics.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:Advertising dollars in the making. by nametaken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For once I might be happy about a device that requires consumables. :)

    7. Re:Advertising dollars in the making. by ross.w · · Score: 1

      If they put the actual smell in the ad, no-one would buy them.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  12. Re:For the love of humanity please don't ever do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scooter, which one is it? Dick or George? I am sure that it can not Karl.

  13. DigiScents?? by Nexzus · · Score: 4, Informative

    A Company named DigiScents tried this during the boom. Shockingly enough, the company folded. From Wired, Nov. 99/a.

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    1. Re:DigiScents?? by cy_a253 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep. And calling their product iSmell probably didn't help much either.

    2. Re:DigiScents?? by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

      Recording a smell for playback is a little bit different than designing a smell for playback...

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    3. Re:DigiScents?? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Would be the same thing. You just record them beforehand.

    4. Re:DigiScents?? by pr0digy25 · · Score: 1

      But no doubt the Japanese will do it right this time.

  14. lordy by caffiend2049 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I smell a rat.

    --
    Pandering to the lowest common denominator would be less frequent if more people were prime numbers.
    1. Re:lordy by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > I smell a rat.

      Really? You're supposed to be smelling pine freshness. Please file a bug report.

  15. Smell-o-vision replaces television! by Dachannien · · Score: 1
  16. Just Imagine the applications for this in... by in_repose · · Score: 2, Funny

    PORN! You could smell her! Thinking about this further, it seems hilarious, insightful, scary, invigorating, fulfilling, unclean, erotic, and brilliant! TIGHT.

    1. Re:Just Imagine the applications for this in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Untill you happen to come across a site with girls eating poop and drinking piss staight out of another girls ass, or worse, from a guys ass. I know it might look nice (dirty), but once you get to smell it, you probably wont be looking at that stuff anymore.

      *irronicially, the word i have to type in is "killed", its irronic because thats what will happen if you have to smell fresh poop, or girls fucking barnyard animals, or girls in bondage so long they piss on themselfs, or...*

  17. Arr, me maties! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring on the perfume pirates. If you can record it, you can pirate it!

  18. Flicked past A&E the other night by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They were advertising the "sex suit" only for women, it's crazy that they are trying to put sex on the internet before something useful.

    Ah well, sex sells. Even weird kinky smell sex, just include a "urine smell" and you'll sell to perverts everywhere!

    1. Re:Flicked past A&E the other night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? Pretty much every technology related to the internet exists because of the sex industry (pornography in particular.)

      Streaming live video? What other purpose does that really serve?
      High speed internet? It only reached critical mass because it allows people to download their porn faster and in higher resolution.
      Newsgroups? If you every actually used one, you'd see what they were used for.

      Hell, you know the reason that someone coded the first graphical web browser was to make it easier to put up pictures of naked chicks.

      The anonymous feel of the internet makes the whole ordeal much more private, which means the PC guilt trip put on guys who want to look at girls without clothes on can be avoided.

      Just like one of the oldest pictures in existance is of a naked girl. A porno was among the first movies made. You know the REAL reason why VHS won the format war? That's right... Sony refused to liscense Beta to pornographers. I'd be willing to bet that once man figured out how to paint on a cave wall, some of the very first images created were of naked females. And you can bet that some of the first sculptures had boobs or a penis, and you can find examples of sculptures that even had both! (Just as you can find examples of pictures of people with both all over the internet. It's really unsettling when you are trying to get aroused by pictures of naked women, and all of a sudden there's wang hangin down there.) If you need proof of the last existing, click here note: DO NOT CLICK LINK AT WORK OR ON A SHARED COMPUTER. Unless you want to get busted looking at pictures of chicks with dicks photoshopped on.

    2. Re:Flicked past A&E the other night by SocialEngineer · · Score: 1

      Just think about those poor souls with foot fetishes! No longer will they have to steal their neighbor's high heels in order to get a sniff - they can just point, click, download, and sniff in the privacy of their own home! Family Guy needs to spoof this. Bad.. "It's Quagmire!"

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    3. Re:Flicked past A&E the other night by Seven+Sided+Snowflak · · Score: 1
      >> it's crazy that they are trying to put sex on the internet before something useful.

      There's something more useful than sex? Are you kidding? I bet the reason that this hasn't caught on yet is that nobody has pornified it.
    4. Re:Flicked past A&E the other night by et764 · · Score: 1
      it's crazy that they are trying to put sex on the internet before something useful.

      In the Road Ahead, Bill Gates made pretty much this same observation. He said that historically when a new medium comes around, pretty much the first thing people put on it is sex. Apparently some of the first uses of paper were erotic drawings.

    5. Re:Flicked past A&E the other night by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Streaming live video? What other purpose does that really serve?

      Sport and teleconferencing.

      Actually, is streaming live video even used for porn at all? What's the point of broadcasting porn live? I'd have thought most people would want it prerecorded, so they can get a guaranteed quality level.

      High speed internet? It only reached critical mass because it allows people to download their porn faster and in higher resolution.

      Actually, downloading music and sharing digital photos (of grandchildren etc., not porn) are probably more common factors. Porn might have driven early adopters, but not the general public.

      Newsgroups? If you every actually used one, you'd see what they were used for.

      In my experience, mostly technical discussion, homework questions, and general social banter. Note that the vast majority of news servers (including Google Groups) do not carry the binaries groups, so the vast majority of users have no idea that you can get porn on Usenet at all.

      Sorry to burst your bubble and all, but while I realise the belief that porn drives technology is somehow appealing to many people, it just doesn't hold up to scrutiny when you start looking at facts instead of fantasy.

  19. FARTS.. by Boap · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a device like that you could record and leave the stinkiest farts around and play great pratical jokes.

    1. Re:FARTS.. by Chris+Daniel · · Score: 1

      " ... and play great practical jokes." I think you misspelled childish.

      --
      Don't blame me -- I voted for Roslin.
    2. Re:FARTS.. by Joebert · · Score: 1

      If you think someone can use the words "Practical" & "Smell Recordings" in the same story & get away without at least one fart joke, you're a damn, oh, oh god, quick sombody click my finger !!

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    3. Re:FARTS.. by rjshields · · Score: 1

      Missing: Chris Daniel's sense of homour. Last seen: unknown.

      Pull my finger!

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  20. What about toxic smells? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What about toxic smells? If those could be reproduced it could act as a passive barrier defense (note I am NOT in flavour if this).

    I think it was in one of the Feist books where the guild of thieves kept one of their headquarters' secret entrances concealed by throwing a dead cat into it once per week, which I find rather clever.

    Would the smell of rotting meat be more effective than a loud siren as a burglar alarm? ("Call the police, honey, I think somebody died in there").

    Would stores buy "smell printers" to pipe the smell of popcorn or fresh-baked bread near the high-margin retail shelves? Conceal the true value of a shelf of wines by piping in the smell of Grange Hermitage over the top? Bad smells near the cash office or complaints desk?

    Could we truly be led around by our noses by people who installed these things commercially? Niven and Barnes made low-grade smell manufacture ("Neutral Scent") a plot element in the original Dream Park, which I think was some sort of unscented pheremone base. It's value was in the fact that the effect was totally and completely stealthy.

    I'd be scared, if I had a sense of smell left.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:What about toxic smells? by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      "Would stores buy "smell printers" to pipe the smell of popcorn or fresh-baked bread near the high-margin retail shelves? Conceal the true value of a shelf of wines by piping in the smell of Grange Hermitage over the top? Bad smells near the cash office or complaints desk?"

      Funny you should say that, because there are artifcial scents on the market with the smell of "fresh bread", for instance, used to entice customers in buying bread.

      B.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    2. Re:What about toxic smells? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Informative
      Would the smell of rotting meat be more effective than a loud siren as a burglar alarm?

      It is more effective in certain applications. Underground mines use Ethyl Mercaptan (stench gas) to warn workers to evacuate the mine http://www.zacon.ca/stench-gas.asp. If you've ever experienced it, you'll know there's a strong incentive to get the hell out of there.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:What about toxic smells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note I am NOT in flavour if this

      No, it doesn't change the taste.

    4. Re:What about toxic smells? by dargaud · · Score: 2, Informative
      Would stores buy "smell printers" to pipe the smell of popcorn or fresh-baked bread near the high-margin retail shelves?
      Smell generators have been in use for about a decade outside of some shops, mainly bakeries. Have you ever walked down a street, smelled a good freshly baked bread scent, only to walk into the bakery where the smell is mostly absent and the bread has been sitting in the shelves since the early morning, long baked ? I don't have a reference or name for those items, but they do exist, google for them. The difference is that they usually do only one specific smell.
      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    5. Re:What about toxic smells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could we truly be led around by our noses by people who installed these things commercially?
      A wise thing once said... "Follow your nose, WHEREVER IT GOES!"
    6. Re:What about toxic smells? by Robmonster · · Score: 1

      I never thought I'd see a site advertising Stench Injection Products...

      --
      I have no sig yet I must scream.
    7. Re:What about toxic smells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally I could fart in the grocery store and blame it on the food! OMG honey, do you smell that? We better not buy these. I suppose well timed farts could get you outta eating the food you hate too!

  21. perfume? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if this could be used to recreate perfume. imagine a $200 bottle of the stinky stuff being cheaply cloned by this device.

    It shouldn't be hard to hack it up for mass production.

    1. Re:perfume? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You can bet the perfume industry would be the next RIAA.

    2. Re:perfume? by utnapistim · · Score: 1
      I wonder if this could be used to recreate perfume. imagine a $200 bottle of the stinky stuff being cheaply cloned by this device.

      It shouldn't be hard to hack it up for mass production.

      I don't know if it's that simple. For example, rose essential oil contains around a hundred chemical compounds composing it's fragrance. This is why it is usually obtained naturally for use in perfumes, instead of artificially. I'm not sure it can be synthesised actually.

      In short, it would depend on the perfume.

      --
      Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    3. Re:perfume? by SorryTomato · · Score: 1

      You are SOL, I am already working on a nanorobot verification system that checks for Yves Saint-Laurent Genuine Advantage Certificate on each perfume molecule.

    4. Re:perfume? by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

      Smells can be trademarked, like the distinctive scent of Singapore Airlines cabin interiors (no, I'm not kidding--it's actually really nice). Actually, it looks like it's a patent instead. Shouldn't this sort of thing fall under trademark, not patent, law?

    5. Re:perfume? by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      You're assuming synthetic smells have a 'high-fidelity'. I don't know how accurate these smells really are. Do cheetos really taste cheesy? Can you make a soy or tofu burger taste or smell like beef? Sometimes knock-offs work, sometimes they don't. Incidentally, they already sell low-cost imitations of famous perfumes.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    6. Re:perfume? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      you can't copyright a smell, and trademark law does not protect against private copying

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:perfume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't copyright a smell, and trademark law does not protect against private copying

      Surely you're joking.

      If I had the cash (and wanted to badly enough) I could buy a law making it illegal for you to use the letter 'c' in your /. postings.

    8. Re:perfume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't copyright a smell
       
      ...yet.

      You used not to be able to copyright simple statements of fact, but that didn't stop them introducing database protection. You used not to be able to patent abstract ideas, but that didn't stop them introducing software and business-method patents. Rest assured, if the perfume industry feels threatened, they'll buy a law to protect their business model.

  22. What about reverse engineering it.. by apoKalypse · · Score: 1

    And extracting those chemicals that make it up? Then you could have all the cheap perfumes for alot less. Maybe you'd even be able to synthetically 'taste' what you smell. Cooking for guests and screw up the chicken? Just baste with synthetic smell and nobody will know the truth!

  23. Prepare for an onslaught... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    of copyrighting smells. Can't use it, because it reproduces smells without authorization. There will be lawsuits if this gets off the ground

    At least one smell will suffice for Microsoft, the Bush Administration, the RIAA/MPAA, and AT&T.

    I think I'll call it 'Brown'.

    1. Re:Prepare for an onslaught... by nbannerman · · Score: 1

      Anyone wanting to copyright the smell of some of the patrons here at /. should be allowed; we can file a class action for all the health problems it'll cause...

      I think I need some fresh air just *thinking* about it.

    2. Re:Prepare for an onslaught... by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      Dear Sir,

      As the legal representatives of the Perfume Industrial Trade Association (PITA), we hereby order you to cease and desist from reproducing the scent of one of our represented products, specifically, "Putrid". We have determined that your sweat glands contain the same olfactory composition as "Putrid", which is copyrighted in the U.S. the E.U., China, Japan, and Hell and its environs (incl. Detroit). Pursuant to this order, you are hereby enjoined to:

      • Prevent raising your arms such as to expose your armpits and thus release the copyrighted odors;
      • Change your underwear at least once per day so that the copyrighted odors are not emitted;
      • Wash thoroughly on a regular basis with soap sufficient to remove or mask the copyrighted odors

      To ensure compliance with this order, a PITA representative will on a weekly basis inspect your domicile, your motor vehicle, your place of business, and any locations you frequent to detect any olfactory residue that might allow the transmission of copyrighted odors.

      PITA reminds you that without stern enforcement of copyright law, the public would not be able to enjoy the fruits of the research laboratories of the perfume industry, including such products as "Putrid", "Rancid", "Nauseating", and "Ecch!".

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  24. I love the smell... by dj245 · · Score: 1

    of bile in the morning. Smells like... Diagnosis.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  25. All fart jokes aside, this smells useful by FractalZone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Think about how an odor producing agent, mercaptan, is added to natural gas so that people can more easily detect dangerous gas leaks. Likewise, think of how silly those scenes in movies where someone is doused in or surrounded by a liquid that is gasoline without realizing it are not very plausible -- you just know that person would smell the fumes and not light a match or do anything to create a spark.

    There are certain smells that get our attention, not because they are unpleasant, but because they signify something important, perhaps even life threateningly dangerous! When you smell something burning, you almost automatically look around to see where the odor is coming from or if there is visible smoke or fire; unless, of course, you are the sort who can burn almost anything (water?) when trying to cook a meal. :-)

    Olfactory signals might be terribly useful if they could be produced on demand in a very controlled manner. Animals can often tell a lot more about the world around them because they have well developed senses of smell. Humans lack great sniffers for the most part, but we are good at creating tools (machines) to enhance our natural abilities far beyond what nature has given us. Why not make smells more useful?

    Think about the possibility in cosmetics alone. Instead of trinkets such as mood rings, people might wear scent generators that convey specific meanings/moods in a decidedly non-verbal manner. Isolating scents and producing complex odors on demand is a technology that just reeks of potential!

    --
    "You're young, you're drunk, you're in bed, you have knives; shit happens." -- Angelina Jolie
  26. Dear Old Dad by madgeorge · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm blacklisting Dad now. Whatever you do, don't open that email with the subject line "Barking Frog"

    1. Re:Dear Old Dad by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Poster said "non toxic"...

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
  27. Pheromones by tsa · · Score: 1

    Imagine what you can do if instead of the 96(!) chemicals mentioned in TFA you use pheromones to 'enhance' your movie!

    --

    -- Cheers!

  28. Analysing a smell recording... by s-twig · · Score: 0

    In regards to analysing a smell recording for medical diagnosis, couldn't you just record the smell and analyse it with software rather than having to recreate it?

  29. He He by drspliff · · Score: 1

    He he.. Hey .. Bevis.. He He.. Pull My Finger!

    Nuff said!

  30. Overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and even to assist military doctors treating soldiers remotely by recreating bile, blood or urine odours that might help a diagnosis.

    Surely if these can be measured it will be less complicated to produce a bar graph of the scent categories that can be read, or even auto-interpreted (e.g. this smell + this smell + this smell = cancer).

    I can't imagine a medical situation that could be diagnosed by smell that couldn't be quantified. On the other hand IMNAD so please let me know if I'm wrong.

  31. Smellovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, the ability to artificially record and reproduce smells is really cool.
    Smellovision is not.

    By the way, smells were used with some movies before I was even born. They failed utterly. Apparently they couldn't ventilate the theaters fast enough and they were stench pits before the first intermission. Somebody recently tried to add smells to the web. That also failed. I'm guessing that the same reason may have had something to do with it. But that's just a guess.

    Now a more domestic use, would be more like current sensory recordings. Picture a rose, smell a rose. Picture the Corpsebloom, smell something that makes you want to throw up. But have it under the users control and limited in scope, not a moronic director or ad exec ideas of what they want. Our houses would be unlivable if they had their way. And if a prick added it to phones (nobody knows why anyone would do that) can you imagine the prank calls you'd get...

    A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, except when the transmission gets corrupted and makes it smell like burnt cookies.

  32. Dot Com? by dcapel · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Was there not a famous dot com company that bombed trying to use this idea?

    Anything that has dot bombed increased my BS-o-meter level.

    --
    DYWYPI?
    1. Re:Dot Com? by Leomania · · Score: 1
      --
      You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
  33. so what's next? by navsan · · Score: 1

    @sumdumass That won't work. The chemicals that are used to recreate the smells are probably themselves as expensive. After all they are "perfumes" too. I wonder if the smell will last for some time. That could be, in a way, disastrous to channel surfing on TV. Also would this mean that new media codecs will come into existence to standardize this? Will there be a flurry of copyrights for all kinds of smell? Would these allow the reproduction of smells for purposes other than digital entertainment? And what about new portable players like "iSmell"? And think about making "avatars" that even smell like you! I am sure lots of people like me are going to block it just like popups and only allow them through when it's something like my mom's cookies.

    1. Re:so what's next? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      @sumdumass That won't work. The chemicals that are used to recreate the smells are probably themselves as expensive. After all they are "perfumes" too.

      Well, then all forms of carbon should be too expensive to use anywhere - after all nanotubes are made of the stuff.
      Perfumes are compositions of prefabricared standard odors. The exact composition is created by highly paid, highly trained artisans. The raw material is not that expensive; what you're paying for is development costs and exclusivity.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    2. Re:so what's next? by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      So solvent extraction of the miniscule amounts of volatile substances from a large amount of delecate flowers is cheap?

    3. Re:so what's next? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the amount of mass flower farming you do. Most perfumes aren't exactly liquid gold - if they're affordable enough for regular people to buy them that means they're cheap enough to produce for the price making sense.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  34. Awesome by gunfunny · · Score: 0

    I can record the smell of my farts so my buddies can smell them when they gety home!

  35. Thanks Emeril! by Arcaeris · · Score: 1

    Now I finally can complain to my cable company that I don't have smell-o-vision!

    BAM!

    Now if I could only figure out these knobs...

  36. Fragrance industry's nightmare? by lamasquerade · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "...allowing you to sniff foods or fragrances before you buy..."

    I would have thought this kind of tech would be as much a nightmare for the fragrance industry (perfumes etc.) as easy and cheap reproduction of music is for the music industry.

    Like the music industry the fragrance industry is selling something fairly low on utilitarian value, and very high in 'cool' (or sign) value. With the music industry people figured out some time ago that the actual product could be attained without the charge. In the fragrance industry, which is so reliant on sign value over use value that you don't even see or hear references to the supposed use value in advertisements (e.g. "CK One smells so good..."), I can imagine that they would really not want to make use of this technology. They'd want to keep the 'mystique' that surrounds the industry and probably would trot out a line like "Our fragrances are so complex and use the purest hopogo-oil and other exotic ingredients which simply can't be replicated by nasty chemicals".

    It's also similar to the challenge that hopefully the diamond industry will face some day, when synthetic diamonds become acceptable to the idiots that pay for real ones. A bit of a waste of technology, but anything that causes less money to flow into these cesspools of human idiocy the better. But IMO, it won't happen with fragrances, really these companies don't even sell the barest shred of a product, just the image, so tech can't really bring them to their knees. Diamonds and music are different while still relying on sign value - you do get something in the end, and if it serves it's main purpose just as well (looking expensive/sounding cool) then the consumer will probably go to the cheaper source.

    --

    // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

  37. If this takes off... by NexFlamma · · Score: 1

    ... which I don't think it will, I can only imagine the horrors of playing through a game like Doom 3 with this sort of thing added in. It's bad enough that I have to see the terrible creatures of hell as I cut them to pieces with my chaingun, but I can only wince in fear at what they must smell like.

    And, for that matter, this is going to require yet another PCI card, isn't it? Like I have all that many slots left after putting 2 GPU's, a PPU and a sound card in!

    1. Re:If this takes off... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      I don't see it using PCI. Low overhead and the need to be near the user makes me think a drive bay is more likely.

    2. Re:If this takes off... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      So I'll just have to figure out how to fit a HD-DVD burner, a BluRay burner, a 89-way card reader and a stenchotron into my shuttle PC...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:If this takes off... by Psycosys · · Score: 1

      This clearly seems like an application in which a USB device would be much more reasonable than a PCI interface.

    4. Re:If this takes off... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but there maybe USB ones, too. Not sure how big this thing is, is it drive size or "bigger then the computer in the first place" size? Guess that really determines where it gets put.

  38. AMD should ramp this up by IlliniECE · · Score: 2, Funny

    Using our NextGen microFartchitecture, we were able to process 4 smells a second, including the one of an old AMD cpu with the heatsink removed.

  39. Education Applications by the_mystic_on_slack · · Score: 1

    You know how you're always told, "Don't smell the test tubes directly!! Waft instead!" Well, wouldn't it be cool if instead of opening up a chemistry handbook, you could pull up a compound on a computer and as part of the entry it could generate its smell for you? It's a lot safer and a lot more practical than having kids huffing off a test tube to find out what the sulfur dioxide they just created smells like.

    1. Re:Education Applications by reason · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the only thing that's really going to smell like sulfur dioxide is sulfur dioxide.

    2. Re:Education Applications by the_mystic_on_slack · · Score: 1

      It was probably a bad example, but I'm sure there are cases where you wouldn't want to actually inhale the gas because it's toxic, but it could be educational (and possible) to recreate the smell using other non-toxic compounds?

    3. Re:Education Applications by Admiral+Justin · · Score: 1

      Hey now, I smelled a LOT of chemicals during my chemistry studies, and they've had no ill effec... ...

      I forgot what I was sayi... ...

      Ooh, shiny!

      --
      You will be baked, and there will be cake.
    4. Re:Education Applications by munpfazy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It was probably a bad example, but I'm sure there are cases where you wouldn't want to actually inhale the gas because it's toxic, but it could be educational (and possible) to recreate the smell using other non-toxic compounds?


      Not a bad idea. You could imagine using the same technique to train soldiers to detect chemical agents, or to train emergency response workers to detect chemical hazards. I sure as hell wouldn't want to be the fireman who has to search our lab after a major earthquake. I *know* what xenon difluoride and sulfuric acid smell like, and I'd still be scared to set foot in that place after a major shakeup.

      The article makes it sound as though their device can hit 96 of 347 possible signatures. The question is whether it's possible to accurately reproduce the scent of dangerous substances with harmless ones. (I'm no biologist, much less an expert on olfaction - it could well be that the set of smells we actually encounter involve a much smaller basis that's spanned by the 96 already included.)

      But, if you ask me, the "practical applications" the article mentions are still pretty far from practical. The only possibility that seems viable in the short term is being able to accurately reproduce a scent in order to add a single specific scent to an environment or product without spending hours of trial-and-error work in the lab. Bake fresh bread with a hundred slightly different recipes, find out which one is most appealing, and then copy it and add the smell to your vending-machine-biscuit production line. (I can only imagine that happens already, just less efficiently.)

      By the time immersive virtual reality gets to a point where adding scent is anything but a dumb, distracting gimmick, I suggest that it will be far easier to throw a bit of scent directly at our brain rather than messing around with our noses.

    5. Re:Education Applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the same time though, training can be accomplished with a perfume-or-simular scent...

  40. VR by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    This may have downsides, and will probably bomb, but I wish it would work well. We cannot have real VR, for games, movies, etc, without smell. Now all we need is particle systems that don't suck and some type of way to "feel" the world.

  41. hackability by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i really don't want to get an email with a worm or virus that makes my cell phone/ computer smell like bayonne new jersey... or makes it produce sarin gas

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  42. Think this through... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your wife, g/f can smell her, too...

    this isn't going anywhere...

    1. Re:Think this through... by bytesex · · Score: 1

      No. This is slashdot.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    2. Re:Think this through... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first thought was: This is the only way 95% of Slashdotters are ever going to experience the scent of a woman...

  43. Wipe out the planet by email by dindi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..or a broadcast of a smell sample on national TV ...

    Non toxic .. hmm well let's see how long it takes for some chemistry guru to create toxic or narcotic smells from those non-toxic materials ...

    This is no surprise to you if you are over 3rd grade, and visited one single chemistry class, but here is a refresher : there are some very basic elements out there that are completely harmless until you start mixing them together ....

    oh great i will be able to download a bunch of funky smells, or smell the rottening flash while playing doom ... or receive Pron spam with stuff that smells like sex ...

    thanks but no thanks ....

  44. Drugs anyone? by __aaijsn7246 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about recording the smell of marijuana or cocaine and launching a massive Denial Of Service attack against Customs and the DEA?

    Woot! I hope I can read Slashdot from my cell in Gitmo. :(

    1. Re:Drugs anyone? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1
      Woot! I hope I can read Slashdot from my cell in Gitmo. :(

      You can, but it'll have been 16 seconds since you hit 'reply'. Forever.

    2. Re:Drugs anyone? by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I think selling crackheads the smell of crack has more potential.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  45. Re:Fragrance industry's nightmare? [OT - diamonds] by Tim+Colgate · · Score: 1
    It's also similar to the challenge that hopefully the diamond industry will face some day, when synthetic diamonds become acceptable to the idiots that pay for real ones. A bit of a waste of technology, but anything that causes less money to flow into these cesspools of human idiocy the better. But IMO, it won't happen with fragrances, really these companies don't even sell the barest shred of a product, just the image, so tech can't really bring them to their knees. Diamonds and music are different while still relying on sign value - you do get something in the end, and if it serves it's main purpose just as well (looking expensive/sounding cool) then the consumer will probably go to the cheaper source.

    Fake diamonds are already here. De Beers are trying to counteract the "problem" by saying things like:

    "If people really love each other, then they give each other the real stone," ... "It is not a symbol of eternal love if it is something that was created last week."

  46. Good news everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with this smell recorder/player I can finally finish the automatic object tracker for my smell-o-scope.

  47. Alzheimers [was Re:Dear Old Dad] by saitoh · · Score: 1

    yeah, i thought of my dad too.

    One practical application I can think of this late/early is in Alzheimers cause the memory of smell for a few certain objects is the first to go. Peppermint and cinnamon are two of I think 12... I'd like to say what the others are... but I forgot ;p

    --
    We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
  48. Not as crazy as it sounds by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Well, that's not such a bad idea. Viewers certainly want an enhanced sense of realism in their movies/TV, and it has been argued (and personally, I agree) that the reason violence on TV is so popular is that it's NOT realistic enough. That is, by seeing people shot on TV, but not seeing the horrible aftermath, like crying friends and devastated families etc., the attack isn't seen to do the harm that it really does. Perhaps if viewers understood the situations that such things lead to a little more, they'd be less likely to see it as glamorous. This probably applies to army recruitment too ;)

    1. Re:Not as crazy as it sounds by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Viewers certainly want an enhanced sense of realism in their movies/TV

      Key word: "sense". A sense of realism does not mean they want their entertainment to be realistic.

      Example: with only a handful of exceptions, practically every space opera ever made has sound effects in space -- because whatever the scientific facts, viewers get a better sense of "being there" if engines roar and explosions go "bang" and lasers go "zap" as they whizz through space slower than the average bullet.

      If you make a show that's actually realistic, you're unlikely to get many viewers. (Even shows that are supposed to thrive on the everyday, like soap operas, have to constantly introduce extraordinary events to keep the viewers watching.)

      Good luck persuading people to watch your dream show, which would presumably flood their living-room with the stench of decomposing bodies or something. Somehow I don't see you getting very good ratings, even from the people who supposedly hunger for "realism"...

    2. Re:Not as crazy as it sounds by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      That's a good point actually. Based on that, I'd retract what I said and agree with you. You did demonise my points a bit with words like "dream show" and "flood", which was disappointing, but yeah, good point overall :)

  49. Paradigm shift by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    I can't see this sort of technology being used for things like games - I think it's one of those things where people are using an outdated concept to reproduce a sense - i.e. we presently fool the eyes into believing things that are not there by showing them a picture. We fool the ears by playing back a recorded sound, so lets fool the olfactory nerves by physically making a smell.

    I think the only way smell will be work as part of a virtual environment such as a game will be to electronically stimulate the brain somehow to make it hallucinate the smell. If the technology existed to do that however I think we'd have bigger problems to worry about.

  50. Forumlation requires staying power though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    A real perfume/aftershave has binding agents to stick the scent to you, which such a device would not have - it would be a window into other smells, not necessarily a replacement for perfume.

    In the future though scents will probably be like MP3 files and you can buy something to brighten your room.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Forumlation requires staying power though by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Use the same principle as custom tinted paint. Have unscented bases that contain the proper vehicle and scent fixatives to which the scent (and possibly color) is added, e.g.; soap, shampoo, aftershave, cologne, air freshener, lube, body oil, whatever.

  51. Technology - it's a wonderful thing! by NoMaster · · Score: 1
    "The device could be used to improve ... add an extra dimension ... assist ... help ..."
    Noble ideals, indeed.

    But you already know the real purposes such technology will be put to - SUV ads will smell of pristine forests, cordite, and female pheremones (rather than stale beer, city smog, and unwashed children); McDonalds ads will smell of freshly-cooked Wagu beef, strawberries, and fresh apples (instead of rancid fat, rancid beef, and little pus-filled pastries); Coke ads will smell of ... well you get the picture.

    Already, fresh-bread scent is added to the bakery section of the supermarket; roast beef scent is added to the meat section; vanilla scent is added to the frozen foods section.

    Never underestimate the power of technology to exploit you. This is one of those cases where things might be better in Soviet Russia...

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    1. Re:Technology - it's a wonderful thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never underestimate the power of technology to exploit you. This is one of those cases where things might be better in Soviet Russia...
      That's because in Soviet Russia, scents smell YOU!
  52. Ahh the satisfaction by ikarys · · Score: 1

    I can only dream of the satisfaction gained by getting friends to navigate to tubgirl or goatse!

  53. Can anyone else see marketing jerk off over this? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Smell is one of the most "direct" and unfiltered senses the human has. It doesn't go to our sensible brain, it appeals instantly to our emotional areas. Everyone has memories of certain scents, and they're often linked to very emotional states, simply because there is no "picture", no abstract ideal that we can connect to it usually, since it is not such an important sense to us. When we see something, we remember it as an abstract picture of the original, reducing it to the parts required to remember it.

    Smell is recorded in whole, and only on a subconscious level. When you cuddle with your loved one, you will remember his or her scent, not consciously but on a purely emotional base. If you meet someone who uses the same fragrance, you immediately find him or her attractive, too, for the simple reason that he/she smells like the person you love.

    Can anyone else see marketing go crazy over this idea? Bypass our rational filter and hit our emotions directly? I really hope you can turn that smell thingie off as soon as it becomes available for TV. Or the ads will stink even more than they already do.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  54. Introducing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adobe SmellShop CS2, for when you need your cookies to smell better than the rivals.

  55. Joke by Fengpost · · Score: 1

    Someone should start telling the blindman in the fish market joke about now.....

    --
    The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity....Calvin
  56. Good news, everyone! by Sagachi · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...what if we want to smell distant objects? Well now we can! Thanks to my new invention ... the Smell-o-scope!"

    "If a dog craps anywhere in the universe, you can bet I won't be out of the loop!"

  57. Bad example by Sagachi · · Score: 1

    ...if you actually have a real fresh-baked cookie, presumably you can already smell it...so why would you need an expensive, bleeding-edge, super-smelling techno-toy?

    Although if you're a Slashdot reader, I guess it's a rhetorical question.

  58. Isn't smell the third sense (besides sight and sound) the "tricorder" recorded?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  59. The ingredients in the average French perfume by AftanGustur · · Score: 1


    The ingredients in the average $200 French perfume bottle only cost around 2 euros (~3 dollars), and they already are synthesized. The most expensive "ingredient" in the box is the glass bottle itself.

    That's also why the "old" genre of parfume masters like Artisan Parfumeur are making a comeback, using only "pure" smells.

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  60. Air freshener and perfume industries by Secrity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this sort of technology works, it would be great for the air freshener industry. My first question is, if "they" still can't make strawberry air freshers that actually smell like strawberrys, how can they claim to be able to create other smells on demand? The next question is, if this does work, how long before we see copy protection technology applied to perfume? Seriously, if it works, this technology could be very disruptive to the perfume industry, which has the money to buy whatever laws it wants.

    1. Re:Air freshener and perfume industries by Syrrh · · Score: 1

      That's valid, up to the point of the perfume 'industry' having that kind of influence.

      This isn't DeBeers or the **AA media giants you're talking about, there is no giant evil manipulative force being wielded by an elitist circle of perfume manufacturers. Copyright agents from Glade aren't going to bust down your door if they find out you've been analyzing the smells from their newest products.

    2. Re:Air freshener and perfume industries by Secrity · · Score: 1

      The major cologne and perfume makers, such as Estee Lauder, Chanel, Coty, Procter & Gamble, Henkle, Unilever, and Lalique are major corporations with major financial backing and lawyers.

      You may be correct that copying air freshener would probably not be an issue, they all pretty much suck anyway. Air freshers are made by a few very large international chemical companies with very deep pockets and legions of lawyers; Reckitt Benckiser (Air Wick, Lysol, Neutra-Air, Wizard), S. C. Johnson & Son (Glade), Henkel (Renuzit).

  61. Seriously, by hummassa · · Score: 1

    I do understand that smell recordings have practical uses -- what I don't believe for a second is that smell playbacks have practical uses other than making CSI audience faint and/or vomit.
    For instance: if you get a really qualified doctor to smell some wound and say "whoa! we got a problem here", and then you record the smell (and analyse it) then you know what to search with an electronic nose when a soldier needs to play doctor in the battlefield.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Seriously, by Syrrh · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty farfetched application of technology. It's assuming an unskilled medic actually has this equipment on him, and has time to set it up, take a sample, and get a response back from someone who knows what's up. There's no sense in taking an electronic nose, and then turning its results back into a potentially flawed interpretation, only to be analyzed by a nose that's not perfect either. A better application would be the reverse. Use it to reproduce smells that are not easily recreated on demand. So in basic training, everyone gets a whiff of what the onset of ganrene is like so they know what to watch out for. I'm still skeptical that it'll be able to create smells that are a close enough match. Most volatile compounds are very complex molecules, it depends on how well they be imitated by constructing fake smells 'phonetically'.

  62. This would enable education about the olfactory by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems that while humans are pretty good at smelling things, though maybe not as talented or intereste in smells as say a cat or a dog, we have a limited ability to create smells.

    A massively trained organic chemist, food chemist, chef, patissier, etc. can do it in a given limited field, but we have no ability to create output in the smell spectrum that is so amazingly versatile and broadband as our bodies can sense input (including not just the nose but also connected senses of taste, heat, and reactions like eye watering or itching).

    If such a thing existed as a piano or a programmatic interface to a smell generator this would let people train their sense of smell to a fine degree, perhaps enough even to sense explosives, or water, or poisonous gases at low concentrations. It could be really important in space habitats, where it is likely that telltale scents might be in the air at low concentrations before full failure of a system, especially a hydroponic or recycling system.

    It would also be very useful for training people in diagnosis of disease as smell is apparently a big factor there too. You might find some interesting correlations between how well people score on smell tests and how effective they are in a given field where it is important.

  63. Fun with smell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially if it smells of, say, a fresh baked handgrenade or some tasty C4. I guess these machines will have a hard time then...

  64. Great implications for porn. by DoctorDyna · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nuff said.

    --
    Windows has more viruses because linux has more virus coders.
  65. ah, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tokyo Institute of Technology, aka TIT, a highly desired but unattainable destination for many nerds.

  66. Smell-o-verts by kentmartin · · Score: 1

    The advertising guys will love it.... Imagine it, a Pizza Hut advertisement comes on, yummy smells wafting through the air get the stomach acids pumping - call and order now! Consumers will be forced to learn yet another sales resistance technique.

    1. Re:Smell-o-verts by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The advertising guys will love it.... Imagine it, a Pizza Hut advertisement comes on...

      And my Smell-o-matics nozzel for the supply of chemical-372, and chemical-441 has clogged and instead of mixxing up a yummy baked pizza smell I'm treated to a vomit inducing fecal odour...

      I wouldn't have been so bad if it was just once, but Pizza Hut ran the same commercial 6 times in the next hour ...

      Tangentially that brings up a real issue with this technology. It sounds like an inkjet printer business model gone out of control How many chemicals am I going to need to fuel this? A 100 chamber 'chem-cartridge' that will need be replaced in its entirety as soon as even one single chemical is low?

      Count me out. I already have no patience for the scam that is color inkjet printers.

  67. typical by m874t232 · · Score: 1

    And like so much Bill Gates does, he didn't come up with this observation, he probably didn't attribute it to the original source either, and afterwards people like you still attribute it to him.

    1. Re:typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Shove 640k up that fanbboi's ass.

  68. How about by aquabat · · Score: 1

    a virtual planetarium? Everything in space has its own unique smell.

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  69. Sure, get closer to the product by Baavgai · · Score: 1

    I work at a sewage treatment plant. We have a website. 'nuff said.

  70. Copying smells? by thecheatah · · Score: 1

    Great now were gono have copyright laws and drms for smells. You can only smell George Bush's fart ONCE. You cannot skip through the commercial smells in the middle HEHEHEHEHHEH. poo jokes are funny :-D.

    Also, I know that perfumes are going to have big problems with people stealing the smell and posting it online. I wonder what format it will be in...

  71. Won't work well for all by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
    I have perfume allergies, there are some chemicals used in the creation of scents that really do a number on me, I can see this device either a) providing trhe simulated smell as advertised and then when I purchase the product find the compounds that make it up really make me react or b) everything it productes triggers a reaction.

    Also it may get the smell right but is that all there is to it, I guess I am skeptical as I haven't seen any scales, charts or guide to quantify and measure the units of odor, where light and color has a spectrum (which can be quantified in RGB or CMYK) sound has pitch timbre, etc, does odor have a scale? Smelling a rose and smelling something with a rose scent can be two different things (not to mention the variety of roses).

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  72. End result by ripcrd · · Score: 1

    They really want the end result, which is the smell of my butt.

    Sorry, watched 2 hrs of Beavis and Butthead on DVD last night and there were butt jokes galore.
      Fart knocker.

    --
    --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
  73. Non-toxic reproductions of toxic smells? by Myself · · Score: 1

    I was thinking that you could use this for training industrial workers. By coming up with a "pretty close" reproduction of a toxic smell, you could tell the workers exactly what to be on the lookout for, without having to resort to "sort of like almonds" generalizations.

    Of course, having cheap gas monitors that warn the workers in advance would be even better, but equipment has safety guards on it already, and they're not 100% effective. Lives are saved when humans notice something amiss and react promptly. As a second line of defense, training and recognition could kick in when electronic monitors fail.

  74. Already done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company called ScentAir sells contraptions to try to make food smell better: http://www.newsobserver.com/104/story/413546.html "Bakeries have a similar issue. They typically bake breads and pastries in the morning. By late in the day, that warm, fresh-baked smell has faded. Some bakeries blow an oven-baked-bread scent all day."

    They sell smells including "French Bread", "Fresh Brewed Coffee", and "Dinosaur Dung": http://www.scentair.com/products/index.cfm?subSect ionID=1 (warning: Flash site that is a serious pain to navigate)

    They link to articles like "It's Beginning to Smell (and Sound) a Lot Like Christmas: The Interactive Effects of Ambient Scent and Music in a Retail Setting" and their clients include Au Bon Pain, Food Lion, and Kroger. The marketers have found another venue--is that *really* fresh bread you're smelling?

  75. Dear old mom... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    unless, of course, you are the sort who can burn almost anything (water?) when trying to cook a meal. :-)

    If I didn't know better, I would think you had met my mother!

    Dear old forgetful mom would often put water on to boil and completely forget about it. Later one of us children.. she had 8 *gasp* would find a "cherry red" pot on the stove and manage to toss it into the sink to cool off with a big cloud of steam. I imagine she still has that old warped pot as it was her favorite one. So yes in a way she could "burn water" with the best of them.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  76. Another method of storing scents... by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

    I had a friend who farted into a jar, put a dollar in it, and give it to his little brother.

    The reaction was worth the dollar.

  77. I want this technology badly... by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1

    How cool would it be to email farts to people.

    --
    "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
    don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

  78. perfumes? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
    sniff foods or fragrances before you buy

    This thing either has a supply of _all_ possible smells (unlikely) or tries to synthesize something 'similar'. Is this really interesting for perfume stores, where the $$$ are exactly in the subtle details. IMHO this is comparable to letting a prospective Ferrari buyer do a test drive in a Skoda.

  79. Obligatory Futurama Quote: by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Prof: "Here is my latest invention, the smell-o-scope. We can smell Saturn, Jupiter, and my favorite..."

    Fry: "Oh no, I am not going to sniff Uranus"

    Prof: "huh"

    Fry: "Uranus, the planet?!"

    Prof: "Oh, yes, we changed that planet's name in 2026 to get rid of that joke once and for all."

    Fry: "What did you change it to?"

    Prof: "Urectum"

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  80. Re:What about toxic smells?ethyl mercaptan by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

    Smelliest substance known to man, I think this is present in rotting meat. It is used to give natural gas a distinct and unpleasant smell. Also found in skunk's spray. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethyl_mercaptan

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  81. Immortality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want to fart in the mic and email it around as a practical joke. How much more practicality does a smell-o-meter or smell-o-ceiver need.

  82. Some possibilities by David's+Boy+Toy · · Score: 1

    Smell based ad's and porn of course:

    Hot sweaty musky construction workers sitting down for a cold
    beer after a long hard day of steel erection. The sweaty sock smell
    when they take off those boots for the first time all day.
    Or maybe its firemen, the smell of fresh cold beer, man musk,
    and wet fireplace. mmmmmm so sexy. Enough to have you on your knees
    offering gratitude for heroism... The smell of ummm well I'll leave
    that to the imagination.