Slashdot Mirror


Headset Uses Bone-Conduction Technology

Wired reports that a new headset is on the way to solve all those background noise problems you have had with your cell phone in crowded areas. This new bluetooth headset uses "bone-conduction" technology that converts vibrations from you jaw into sound. The article claims it should be available as early as later this year for around $200.

135 comments

  1. What if.. by xirtap · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if you're chewing gum while talking?

    1. Re:What if.. by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if you're chewing gum while talking?

      Not a problem ... you see, all those idiots who think they look so uber-cool using a bluetooth headset can't even chew gum and WALK, never mind talk. And for those who exceptions, it not like anyone on the other end is listening anyway ...

    2. Re:What if.. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Funny
      This reminds me of a conversation at an IETF some time ago.

      Everyone was sitting round showing of their latest geek toys. The short wave radio that fits in a matchbox, a GPS unit fitted into a pen, a working two-way pager/cell phone combo, that sort of stuff.

      So its the turn of this guy from the MIT Media Lab. He taps on the back of his hand a few times as if he is typing on a keypad, then he starts talking. Seeing that we are not at all impressed he says "oh hold on have to put them on speaker phone". And it is Nicholas Negroponte himself telling us the wonders of the subcutaneous telephone implant.

      OK so if they are so great why doesn't he have one?

      A while later they are closing up the bar and the Media Lab guy has disappeared and left his bag behind. I go off to the loo to look for him and I find him crouched over the toilet with his trousers down by his ankles and a bog roll shoved up his bum. "Are you alright", I ask. "Yeah fine, just receiving a fax".

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:What if.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lets just hope he didn't refill the toner cartridge by eating burritos :-)

    4. Re:What if.. by Who235 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What if you punch the asshole in the jaw who keeps talking through the ballgame/movie/dinner/concert?

      What will they hear on the other end?

      It's like a koan, man. . .

    5. Re:What if.. by dhanes · · Score: 1, Interesting
      While I agree that a ton of people use the darn things in the dumbest places (grocery store, mall, etc.) I have to state again that my bluetooth headset is almost the most important piece of technology I use every day. I just hope it doesn't bite me in the ass years down the road when scientists discover that its radio signals are causing cancer on that side of the head.

      I drive through 3 counties about 3 days a week visiting clients and fixing network/software/hardware issues, logging ~90 miles a day. Frequently I'm speaking with clients while driving, or the office. Being able to push one button and say 'Call so-n-so', without ever looking away from the road is well worth the 100bux spent on the HS. How many people do you see driving holding a phone and sometimes a drink and not paying a bit of attention to what is going on around them? Usually in those f'ing H2's or Navigators.

      Additionally, when I'm onsite, it may look strange, and I do get smart-assed comments every so often, I usually wear the HS. This frees up my hands to do whatever I'm working on and allows me to talk to the boss or other support people.

      Once I'm done with work and am heading into a grocery store/bar/anyplace where I don't want to use a phone, I leave the BT HS in the truck.

      I'd rather look like a cheap borg imitation than hold that brick of a phone (i730) up to my head all the time, and using the wired HS just sux (except for the MP3s and streaming radio/TV)

      --
      Wait, What?
    6. Re:What if.. by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 0

      using a phone while driving is dangerous even if it is a wireless hands-free.

      even meaningless conversations distract you, let alone talking to clients who you need to pay extra attention too.

      and having a phone conversation is more distracting than a real-life one with a passenger. studies have shown the lower-quality audio from a phone requires more concentration to interpret than live speech.

      just some facts, not judging you. I've driven while drunk which is only a little bit more responsible than your actions.

    7. Re:What if.. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I've driven while drunk which is only a little bit more responsible than your actions.

      I saw the headline for that study recently. I don't think it applies in this situation - he said that he drives between 3 counties. In most states, that would be a LOT of straight-stretch uninterrupted driving. Not much thinking required, and the only thing to injure would be a stray deer or birro. Using a cellphone wouldn't affect his ability to drive in a straight line (not as much as a drunken person, at least), and he'd be able to recover his reflexes fairly quickly if need be. UNlike, say, a drunken driver - who has to wait until the intoxication passes from his system to get back up to a proper level of comprehension and reflexive response.

      So, I'm just saying that I find your comment to be inaccurate - it, in my opinion, is *worse* to drink and drive than to use a wireless headset while driving. Now, you and I can both agree that both are dumb things to do, but my own position is that drunkenness is a recipe for disaster, whereas cellphone use at least stands a chance of not being as serious.

    8. Re:What if.. by deficite · · Score: 1

      Can you honestly say you've never spoken a word to the passengers of your vehicle while behind the wheel?

    9. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      studies show that talking on a phone is far worse than talking to a passenger.

    10. Re:What if.. by ZoCool · · Score: 2

      . . . only in America . . .

    11. Re:What if.. by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      Yes I can. I'm too busy posting to slashdot. *Ba dum Ting!* Thanks folks, I'll be here all week...

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    12. Re:What if.. by Shadowlore · · Score: 1
      How many people do you see driving holding a phone and sometimes a drink and not paying a bit of attention to what is going on around them? Usually in those f'ing H2's or Navigators.


      This is simply a matter of seeing what you are looking for. My ride is low enough to the ground I don't really see the faces of larger SUV drivers. At least not without looking up there specifically. As a result, nearly every single time I see someone on a cell phone in a vehicle, it's someone in a minivan or sedan. Oddly enough, I rarely see someone else in a Vette or other sportscar/musclecar using them.

      You, like many of the masses, expect someone driving "a big bad SUV" to do things you think are stupid or dangerous, so you see it more than in other vehicles. Just like becoming very aware of a particular model will make you "see more" of them on the road. Vette owners as a group notice each other and wave at each other, so we do see more of the other Vette owners on the road in comparson to say Camry owners. Yet the incidence (around here) of Vette owners driving while on their cell phone is less than that of other vehicles I've noted (yes I do keep track... yeah I'm a nerd). I'm not saying Vette drivers are "more responsible", just that your attention is directed elsewhere (the fun of driving the car, for example).

      Similarly, I rarely see "ricers" on their phones while driving. Maybe its because the "fart can" exhaust or the thumping stereo pretty well makes such attempts useful, or perhaps they too are merel yenjoying their ride.

      Another likely explanation for the perception of SUV owners on their phone while driving is that most of them are women. Women do tend to talk more on the phone in general than men. Of this subset of drivers, mothers tend to be on the phone more often than non-mothers. Often this is due to keeping appointemnts, making them, and coordinating events for their children.

      I understand that for most of the vocal masses it is much more entertaining and self-promoting to blame "SUV drivers" as a group rather than think about things. But that still doesn't make it right.
      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  2. great! by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead, it uses bone-conduction technology to convert the vibrations from your jaw into sound, making it perfect for ballgames, concerts and any other noisy public place you like to hold your private conversations.

    Wonderful! We needed more ways for people to hold their private conversations at ballgames, concerts, theaters, etc..

    I wonder if you have to keep the volume turned down to keep the vibration from shaking your teeth loose.

    1. Re:great! by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only the microphone part utilises vibrations, the sounds are still outputted with standard soundwaves-into-your-eardrum technologies...

    2. Re:great! by cnettel · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, we always hear our own voice partly through bone-conduction (and that's why this works), so it wouldn't be that drastic to put in external vibrations that way, as well.

    3. Re:great! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Exactly. The ear itself already uses bone induction "technology".

      Wake me when they develop a bone induction foot-set for my shoe phone.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:great! by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why they(the people who invented the device in TFA) bothered, I don't know but here's a device that lets you hear through your skin, it is NOT bone conduction. http://neurophone.com/

      I actually have one of these and they work as described.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    5. Re:great! by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      A excellent Science Fiction writer named David Drake wrote a series of stories about a future inteplanetary mercenary corp. -VERY good stuff, highly recomended, but as a throw-away plot device in the series he had the officers of "Hammer's Spammers" use a transmitter/receiver implanted in their mastoid for easy and discrete communication with home base. Like Robert Hienlien inventing the waterbed (and other tech), Engineering (eventually) imitates art..

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    6. Re:great! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      They had it, but the tester dropped a crate on his foot.

      Would you beleive a small toy drum, two soup cans, and a spool of thread?

    7. Re:great! by Sandor+at+the+Zoo · · Score: 1

      Ha. Characters in Heinlein's Puppet Masters had implanted phones. And I don't know that they were original with him even at that.

    8. Re:great! by Silver+Gryphon · · Score: 1

      They already have them on construction sites. I hear the steel-toe boot is an effective communication device.

    9. Re:great! by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that looks pretty slick. I can just imagine people strapping this brick to their belt. Surely it'll supplant the Bluetooth headset as the fashion accessory of choice.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    10. Re:great! by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      It's only a "brick" because these are being developed by a small company and size is not an issue for their market. The circuit is so simple that it could fit inside a headphone speaker, with room for the speaker, if it were miniaturized. But we point at the moon and others still choose to look at our fingers.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  3. Effects of external noise? by popo · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Wouldn't external noise also cause your bones to vibrate?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:Effects of external noise? by zlogic · · Score: 3, Informative

      No.
      The skull acts the same as a loudspeaker's enclosure (or a guitar body) - greatly amplifying low and medium frequency waves (try saying aaaa or mmmmmm with your hand on top of your head).
      So if you pick up sound directly from the bone, you'll be recording the sound directly from its source, and background noises would be too weak compared to your own voice (except when a plane flies really low or you are at a really loud rock concert).
      That's like putting a microphone inside a loudspeaker. Of course it will record noises, but only really loud ones will be of any significance.

    2. Re:Effects of external noise? by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

      But you hear that noise no matter what headset or phone you use. This just makes it so no one else can hear the person talking to you, by transferring noise through physical touch, rather than over the air. I guess the real question is, are normal headsets so loud that the guy next to you can hear the person speaking?

  4. Has been available outside the US for a while now by bravni · · Score: 5, Informative
  5. Awwww! by TemplesA · · Score: 0

    But you still get cancer.

  6. Science Museum Exhibit by Jazzer_Techie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw an exhibit with this kind of technology about 10 years ago in a science museum. In their variation, you put your forehead on a postage-stamp sized metal plate, and then you suddenly heard a voice. I remember thinking that it was pretty cool. Definitely a good idea to put it in a cellphone headset. I do wonder a bit about ensuring sufficient contact with the jaw. In the exhibit I saw, you bent over to put your head on the plate, and thanks to the heaviness of the human head, there was a decent amount of pressure against the plate. No idea exactly how much you need to make sure it gets transferred to the bone, but I could see that being a bit of an issue.

    If you combined that with the sub-vocalization technology that can detect what you say as you speak silently, we might be able to rid society of noisy cellphone users. Now that's tech I can appreciate.

    1. Re:Science Museum Exhibit by lixee · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the same spirit, tie a string to a spoon (with the spoon being at the middle of the string). Then, hold both ends of the string onto both ears and kick the spoon against a table. Church bells!

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    2. Re:Science Museum Exhibit by Dekke · · Score: 1

      It'd be interesting to see cell phones broken up into two sensors/transmitters the size of a stamp and attached to adhesive. One would connect to your jawbone or throat and let you speak while the other would connect to the antenna near your ear.

      Or you could have it like bluetooth phones today with the phone itself in your pocket with the aforementioned speaker/receiver attached to your body.

    3. Re:Science Museum Exhibit by SaffronMiner · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you saw was probably a Neurophone, http://www.csonline.net/bpaddock/nurofone/default. htm , by Dr. Patrick Flanagan http://www.phisciences.com/ . With his old Mark-XII model you could put the transducers on your feet and 'hear' the voices in your head.

  7. This picture not to scale by Sandor+at+the+Zoo · · Score: 1

    The image in TFA is incomprehensible to me. How big is that thing? Does it fit in your ear, do you hold it with two hands, does it attach to your head somehow?

    This is one of those items for which I have no referent. A picture of someone using one would be most welcome.

    1. Re:This picture not to scale by stjobe · · Score: 1
      From http://blog.scifi.com/tech/archives/2006/07/05/q7_ bluetooth_he.html:
      the Q7 fits inside your ear without a clip going over it; it has a small rubber piece that bends within the contours of your ear to keep it stable, which looks kind of strange but is actually quite comfortable.

      So it's not that big, and the part with the "antenna" goes in your (outer) ear.
      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  8. What you jawing about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What you jawing about?

  9. Two Hundered? by drspliff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Atleast two or three years ago in the UK a new type of lollypop started being sold, basicly you stick it in your mouth and it plays some cheesy music that only you can hear, this tech has been around for a while and is well developed enough to be made into a cheap throw away childrens toy.

    Personally, $200 for this seems a bit expensive, and I can get closer to appearing more schizophrenic than when I'm wearing a bluetooth headset :D Nothing like raising your arms in anger and shouting 'what the fuck did you do that for!' to yourself in the middle of a crowded train carriage to get attention.

    1. Re:Two Hundered? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Atleast two or three years ago in the UK a new type of lollypop started being sold, basicly you stick it in your mouth and it plays some cheesy music that only you can hear, this tech has been around for a while and is well developed enough to be made into a cheap throw away childrens toy.

      RTFA, this is for SPEAKING, not listening: It's sound FROM your jaw, to the headset.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  10. The Original Bone Phone by El+Torico · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone else think of the original Bone Phone?

    http://www.pocketcalculatorshow.com/magicalgadget/ index3.html#bonefone

    Looks like it could make a comeback as a combination mobile phone and mp3 player; then again, probably not.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    1. Re:The Original Bone Phone by TheIndifferentiate · · Score: 1

      Yup, a friend of mine had one. He wore it under his clothes in school during class. I don't remember him having it around for very long though. Must not have been comfortable. He was the only person I ever saw with one. So, I guess they didn't sell very well.

      That page you point out has a 1972 Gruen Teletime LCD Watch. I think they have the year wrong. Those things came along after LED watches. Real cool site though. Brings back memories...

    2. Re:The Original Bone Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. First thing I thought of too. Would be pretty funny if they marketed "Bluetooth Bone Fones" to the current post-rockNroll mySpace kids. Maybe they could have Paris do the commercial for it...

    3. Re:The Original Bone Phone by Colonel+Blimp · · Score: 1
      I remember the bone phone! Omni Magazine adverts in the late 70's.

      Always wondered if it was any good.

    4. Re:The Original Bone Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, the bone phone, using the collar bone. not to mention that there was another cellphone the japanese put out that you held to your forehead from samsung? i swear i saw a pic of that once. and well i swear this jawbone headset was put out atleast a year ago

  11. Old news by m.dillon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This stuff has existed for decades. I had one of these for my cellphone ten years ago. It works great, sounds like you are talking from a quiet room instead of a car whipping down the freeway, even when you ARE in a car whipping down the freeway.

    It certainly isn't worth $200, though. We are talking about maybe $2 worth of materials here, probably even less.

    -Matt

    1. Re:Old news by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      A high-end bluetooth headset today already costs 200+, so having a bluetooth with bone conduction technology in the same ballpark is hardly unreasonable.

    2. Re:Old news by Silverstrike · · Score: 1

      Yea! I agree. Why the hell did I have to pay so much money for this computer anyway? I can go to the beach and get all the silicon I want for free!

      /idiot

  12. 26 Years Later by derubergeek · · Score: 0, Redundant
    In 1980 we also had a Bone Fone.

    But our's was way cooler... Shozbot! Nanoo nanoo.

    --
    Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.
    1. Re:26 Years Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, in 1990 I bought a pair of radio walkie-talkies from Radio Shack(tm) which featured this. It was great for noisy environments.

  13. It's a bit conspicuous... by Krokus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bone microphone technology has been around for quite some time in the two-way radio communications biz, and it's much more discreet.

    Bone microphones are sometimes used in the movie industry to communicate with actors/stunt people while on camera, when the person is too far away to reliably hear direction (if the person is dangling from a construction crane, for example).

    1. Re:It's a bit conspicuous... by munpfazy · · Score: 1
      Bone microphone technology has been around for quite some time in the two-way radio communications biz, and it's much more discreet.


      Yup. I remember trying out a few different consumer grade models marketed to ham radio operators in the mid 1990's.

      As I recall, most of the cheap ones worked really badly. It took a great deal of fiddling to get them seated correctly, and when they were incorrectly seated one heard *only* hints of background noise and rustling. In order to insure that they worked, you basically had to walk around with your finger in your ear, more or less totally defeating the point of having an earphone in the first place.

      The expensive, professional grade ones worked great. I carried on many a long conversation with a guy on a motorcycle using one. I don't know what sort of tricks they had to play in processing the audio to get a natural sounding voice, but he sounded like he was using a studio microphone in a quiet room. As I recall, he said he had to use wax to seat the thing in his ear - not exactly the sort of thing one would expect the average cell phone user to do on the subway - although that may have had more to do with keeping road noise out of his ear than coupling the mic to his skull.
    2. Re:It's a bit conspicuous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want them to be too inconspicuous? You already get funny looks using a bluetooth headset when you suddenly start talking to yourself in a public space. People look away now when they see the headset, what if they can't? I don't want to get locked up in the loony bin!

  14. Do the 10 or 12 people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..who already posted not get it?

    It doesnt replace the speaker, so 'only you hear it' it replaces/enhances the microphone so the person you're talking to can hear you instead of the loud area you're in. And i didnt even rtfa

    1. Re:Do the 10 or 12 people... by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      Yes, we got it. We then proceeded. You didn't.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  15. old stuff, new application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago there was a portable radio called a BoneFone that was essentially a radio in a fabric tube that you wore around your neck. The speakers were supposed to resonate the sound through your bones to your inner ear providing the listener with breathtaking sound. I'm not sure how well this device worked since it was a little pricy for me as an early teen to consider buying. More recently an mp3 player has been selling that offers to do the same thing but in a waterproof housing that can be used by divers.

  16. Impact on Hearing Loss by sourbrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have long wondered whether or not technologies like this might be a way to combat the inevitable hearing loss that we will be seeing from the increase in popularity of gadgets like the iconic ipod. Perhaps with a set of these one could rock out at what you thought was a loud volume without damaging the ear drum.

    1. Re:Impact on Hearing Loss by adamgolding · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure hearing loss happens mainly through damage to the cochlea, not the ear drum. that's certainly where titinnus happens (that's why it's a specific frequency)

  17. Motorola has this already? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Does this thing use the same tech? Looks a lot smaller though, and doesn't have an ugly antenna...

    1. Re:Motorola has this already? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Nope, from a quick glance it seems to be using the (relativly) simple in-ear technology, similar to these isolating earphones.

    2. Re:Motorola has this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, your link is to earphones designed for listening to music. The Motorola H5 is a microphone/headset. It does capture that sound from the vibrations from inside your ear. This is no different than the bone conduction in practice because it picks up the vibration of your voice coming from the bones in your skull, not your jaw.

  18. not new, other headset since years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know of at least one headset using bone-conduction for 2 or three years. I don't know since when they sell it.

    cb

  19. Certainly nothing new... by TwinTurboMike · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a corded earpiece for my cellphone many years ago which was made by Jabra (http://www.jabra.com) and I believe it worked on the same principle. It had no external microphone and when I talked on it people said it sounded as if I was talking from a landline even when blasting down the freeway under high road and engine noise. The people at the other end had no idea. I loved this earpiece, but sadly I can't seem to find many of these types anymore in a wireless configuration.

  20. Been around for a while by RedDirt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A fellow that I go swimming with is big into music and so has tried a variety of different devices for having music while doing laps - one of which is a bone-conduction headset. It works indifferently well for music - certain frequencies transfer better than others, but I could see that it might do better for phone communication. I'd think that a canalphone (shure or etymotic) would provide a more discreet and less bulky solution. Plus it won't pulverize your teeth or brain - though a canalphone might blow out your eardrum if you've got it up loud and get a burst of static or something.

    --
    James
  21. Not new by pvera · · Score: 1

    1. An ex-coworker purchased a pair of swimming googles with a built-in mp3 player that used bone conduction instead of earplugs. This was at least one year ago.

    2. Why not put bandpass filters that cut off outside of the dynamic range that can be generated by a human voice? This should cut a hell of a lot of the background noise.

    A year later and I still think those googles were dorky as hell.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why not put bandpass filters that cut off outside of the dynamic range that can be generated by a human voice? This should cut a hell of a lot of the background noise.

      This is what cellphones do, by design. Ever notice how you can't hear music or anything but the loudest and closest sounds through a cell conversation? This is especially true if both parties are using one. The problem here is that it is to save bandwidth, and also seems to fluctuate wildly as the call takes place or the users move their cellphone hand while walking around. The filtering is not necessarily good.
  22. sending a little message? by yagu · · Score: 1

    I love this! From the article:

    Instead, it uses bone-conduction technology to convert the vibrations from your jaw into sound, making it perfect for ballgames, concerts and any other noisy public place you like to hold your private conversations.

    Perhaps a little tongue-in-cheek?, tongue-in-cheekbone? I don't know what I am going to find more irritating... the fact that cell phone users can now more easily and efficiently annoy everyone else in loud environments, or the fact that they paid $200 for that privelege. At least Wired got it right and got their little dig in in the process of informing. Sigh.

    (Also interesting from the Wired article, the picture of this gadget has nothing to offer up scale, how frigging big is this thing? Looking at the picture, I can scale it a few different sizes and come up with some pretty interesting ideas about how it is worn and how comfortable it might or might no be.)

  23. Wife just slapped me... by JustASlashDotGuy · · Score: 5, Funny


    I just asked my wife if she'd be interested in talking on the bone phone....
    ...she didn't find it nearly as funny as I did.

    1. Re:Wife just slapped me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...she didn't find it nearly as funny as I did. That's funny, she was quite enthusiastic about talking on mine.

    2. Re:Wife just slapped me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooo wait?!!? You've installed servos into your RealDoll so it can slap you when you make a bad joke? You are pure geek. I envy you.

  24. New? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Ever hear of the 'bone radio' thing back in the 80's? Was some sort of radio thing you could get at DAK that draped over your shoulders.

    Never tried one myself.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:New? by ChildeRoland · · Score: 1

      My dad used to have one. I loved it. Wonder whatever happened to it...

      --
      The mark of a mature person is not creating arbitrary criteria for considering others mature.
  25. They were sold as far back as the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They used to sell the things in the back of magazines and even comic books back in the 70s. Furthermore, a guy named Glen T. Poss that used to frequent the defunct netslaves and f#ckedcomany.com boards was trying to sell something similar in conjunction with an F#ckedcompany board moderator named Ross Rojek (Google him for lots of fun stories).

  26. Swimming googles? by LordEd · · Score: 3, Funny
    a pair of swimming googles with a built-in mp3 player

    Google's getting into everything these days. Is that swim.google.com?

    Do they sell goggles there?
  27. This headline. by JKConsult · · Score: 1

    Has so many possibilities for juvenile jokes.

  28. \o/ by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    Talk about buying the cow before doing your research!

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  29. Old tech revived by Kavli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I did my military service in Norway back in 1987, we used (among others) the SEM 52N variant tactical radio. This was fitted with a head piece with a bone conduction microphone. I'm unable to find a picture of the head piece, but the radio-set can be viewed at http://www.armyradio.com/publish/Articles/SEM_52A/ SEM-52A.htm

  30. Re:Has been available outside the US for a while n by Desert+Raven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heck, bone conduction earsets have been available for at least 15 years now for two-way radios. Motorola made them for tactical radios for police use back then.

  31. Someone has to say it! by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

    Does the reception improve when one has an erection ??

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    1. Re:Someone has to say it! by zaphod_es · · Score: 1
      Does the reception improve when one has an erection ??

      Did you mean if one has a boner?
    2. Re:Someone has to say it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually no one really had to say it.

    3. Re:Someone has to say it! by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      I guess this gives a whole new meaning to phone-bone ??

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
  32. No Patent! Prior Art Exists! by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the Bone Phone from the late '70s and early '80s. It draped around your shoulders like a towel. Everything old is new again. I can't wait for the new Sinclair ZX82 kit.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    1. Re:No Patent! Prior Art Exists! by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      Yup, roller skated around the Charles River in the late 80's. Pre dated the cheap rare earth headphones routinely thrown out today. Worked better than you thought it should !

  33. One Step Closer by mcguiver · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is an earpiece that cancels out the noise that starts when peoples jaws start vibrating. That would be something really useful for the concert or theater.

  34. SwiMP3 by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    Been around for a couple years now. Reviews are mixed - I ordered one but it has not arrived yet.

    See here.

  35. How do you reach the bone ? by dargaud · · Score: 1

    Question is: how do you touch the bone with the sound transmitter ? Either you surgically implant it in there or you press the skin very hard to get close enough to the bone. Friends of mine have bone-conduction helmets for use in mountain rescue helicopters. Reception is on top of the head, below the helmet, emission is on the jawbone sling of the helmet. In order for that thing to work the helmet needs to be worn very tight (very uncomfortable). And the frequency response makes it so weird you have to concentrate hard to understand, although I guess it could be solved with the right amount of signal processing.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  36. Do you sound like a stranger with a better voice? by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the article, this device is for transmitting your speech (not listening).I've always heard that the reason why we're shocked when we hear our own recorded voices, because we hear our own voice through bone-conduction... and the bone-conducted version sounds better.

    If so, the person at the other end might not recognize you, because you would sound like a stranger... a stranger who has a richer, deeper voice than you.

    If that's correct, the implications are interesting.

  37. Does my voice really sound like that? by Magus2501 · · Score: 1

    This would take some getting used to. You hear your own voice through bone conduction, but others' voices conducted through the air. This is the origin of that phenomenon where your voice sounds different when it's played back from a recording. The bone mic would let others hear my voice like I hear it (conducted through my jaw), not like they're used to (through the air).

  38. Re:Has been available outside the US for a while n by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would be afraid if Japan didn't have this already.

  39. Old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Back in the 1800's, the deaf actually used bone-conducting devices as hearing aids. They'd have a harp like instrument and it would have a mouth piece they'd bite into. The vibrations of sounds would be caught by the harp and then received by the listener through their teeth due to the bone conduction.

    1. Re:Old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is still used as a hearing aid. At least one implantable bone conduction device is available commercially. It's called BAHA, or the bone-anchored hearing apparatus. Has been around since 1977, and it is FDA approved in the states.

    2. Re:Old tech by dripool · · Score: 1

      Take a look at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAHA My 24 month old daughter has the implant, and digital processor. It takes her prfound hearing loss to normal levels. There is even a blue tooth attachment that she can hook into as well.

    3. Re:Old tech by stuboogie · · Score: 1

      I am working for a company called Ear Technology Corporation and we have just recently started marketing a new alternative to the BAHA system. It is a hearing aid called TransEar http://transear.com/ . It uses a behind-the-ear processor/microphone that drives an oscillator in a custom-fit ear shell. The shell is designed to reach the bony portion of the ear canal in the "dead" ear and uses bone conduction to transfer sound through the skull to the good ear. We are FDA approved and just started commercial production at the beginning of June. This is a much cheaper alternative to the surgical procedure required by the BAHA system. So far we have seen great improvements in the patients that have been fitted with the TransEar unit, including the ability of the wearer to discern the direction of sound. I suggest anyone who has single-sided deafness take a look at this product when considering their options.

      We are also looking into other uses of this technology such as high-noise environments.

    4. Re:Old tech by NightWhistler · · Score: 1

      Do you happen to have a link for the bluetooth attachment? My dad has a BAHA as well, but he still has problems talking on cellphones. A bluetooth link would be the perfect solution.

      --
      PageTurner Reader: open-source e-reader for Android with cloudsync. http://pageturner-reader.org
  40. Your .sig by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.

    The way I heard it: In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is skiing.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  41. Listen, hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen here, bonehead. Are you listening? I can see you've got 2 ears. Are you listening?

  42. I can hear it now vibrating through my jaw bone by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    Yea this should be beyond funny in a few years when we hear about all the weird degenerative conditions resulting from vibrating your jaw bone constantly.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  43. Great! by UltraAyla · · Score: 2

    Now I can finally subvocalize to Jane!

  44. Not exaclty new by Evil+Al · · Score: 1

    There's already something similar on the market (no bluetooth though).

    Now if only they would ship to Europe...

    --
    Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
  45. Re:Has been available outside the US for a while n by Bastian · · Score: 1

    And I've used a wired one on a cell phone before.

    The only thing about this that might be new is that it uses Bluetooth.

  46. What are the tech specs? by PxM · · Score: 1

    How good are bone conduction mics compared to regular ones? I found one that is listed as having 70dB S/N ratio. I'm not sure what the average noise cancelation for normal headsets, but the one I have from that company has a X dB S/N. That's about an order of magnitude better than regular headsets based on my experience. They have some cool demos (check the Blackhawk demo) on their site (annoying popup and quicktime warning). Given that the standard models are only $150, I expect the bone conduction one to be much better to be worth it.

  47. Alternatave Mics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the early 90's, I remember using a comms device with a strange kind of mic. It was like an elastic band that went around your neck, and had a couple of guitar-like pickup looking things in front on either side and just below the adam's apple. Not too tight, just enough to hold itself in place. I got used to it pretty fast and forgot I was wearing it, and it worked pretty well - never had any clarity problems.

    I had to use it because I was wearing an air-fed hood (basically a big clear plastic bag on my head with an air line) working inside an empty radioactive liquid tank.

    I'm having trouble getting any hits on google for something like this.

    1. Re:Alternatave Mics by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Google for "throat microphone" You'll get plenty of hits for what you're looking for.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:Alternatave Mics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very similar to the one. Holy crap! At $450 a pop (probably more, since it was govt. work and 15 years ago), I should have stolen, uh, I mean, "saved" that sucker for "future jobs".

  48. Solves a couple of headset problems too by Clinton · · Score: 0

    Whenever I wear my bluetooth earpiece, I get two common complaints:

      - Echo (microphone picking up what the speaker is emitting)
      - Wind noise ( windows down in car, riding bicycle, etc. )

    This seems to be common among all but some highly priced bluetooth earpieces.

    If TFA's subject actually works, I'll be first in line to get one!

    --
    Half the time I'm right, the other half you're wrong.
  49. Codec by FoXDie · · Score: 1

    Colonel, this is Snake. I'm at the sneakpoint.

    Yes, this looks a lot like the same idea as the Codec from Metal Gear Solid. :D

    1. Re:Codec by Axe+336 · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for someone to mention it. If no one had I was going to be very disappointed and mention it myself. But seriously it was the first thing that came to mind. All we need now is a Ninja and a guy who uses an anime convention as his code name.

  50. sollution to MP3 hearing damage? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1, Interesting
    90% of the comments are how "old" this technology is...

    How is that relevant? I think it's very usefull.. and would love it for my MP3 player instead of wering a big headset to protect my ears!

    If it'd be a bit more compact, I'd certainly go out and buy one and enjoy my music without worrying to lose my hearing before I'm 30.

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:sollution to MP3 hearing damage? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      So how was that offtopic?

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    2. Re:sollution to MP3 hearing damage? by shinma · · Score: 1

      The article is about a MICROPHONE that picks up the vibrations from your jawbone.

      It has nothing to do with your hearing.

      --
      Shinma
  51. All those words in the same sentence... by master_p · · Score: 1

    ...bone, head, crowded areas, vibrations, jaw, $200...it reminds me of something...

    1. Re:All those words in the same sentence... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      ...like the back of a truck stop parking lot?

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    2. Re:All those words in the same sentence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmao

  52. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was published in Popular Science last year.

  53. Same as bone conduction hearing aids? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I am mostly deaf due to lack of ear canals, so I have to wear an analog bone conduction hearing aid (Oticon 380p). I wonder if this technology is the same as used in cellphone as noted in the story. It's awful and confusing when I have background sound, noises, etc. and trying to hear. Hence, why I request a quiet area/place to hear. The hearing aid cannot distinguish which sound/voices I want to hear. It's basically like a microphone and amplified all audio it can detect up.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  54. Bone MICROPHONE. Not Speakers by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would say a good 50% of the people posting seem to think the $200 device transmits sound via the bone.

    No, it's picking up sound from your skull when you speak - thus a bone MICROPHONE. As far as listening to calls, that still uses a speaker.

    That's why sound is so clear - for the person listening to YOU talk, not the other way round.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  55. very old tech? by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

    Isn't this like the throat mikes used by panzer crews in the second world war?
    I don't see why 50 year old tech should cost more than a few dollars. (Yes, sure they might be better than a WW2 tank mike, but USD 200 is preposterous).

  56. Re:Doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, the technology you used a decade ago must function exactly as the technology of today. I tried one of them computers back in '96, slow as molasses! worthless, it was!

  57. The more things change... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    Any of the old-timers here remember the Bone Fone from the 1980s?

    A walkman the way it shoulda been - with good quality sound, under a pound! My father had one, and I loved it when I was a wee lad. (Alas, I could never remember to turn it off when done, so I wasn't allowed to use it much)

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:The more things change... by GrpA · · Score: 1

      I had a bone fone.

      Basically, they didn't work that well using "Bone Conduction" unless pressed hard against a bony surface.

      And even then the audio quality suffered. I got the feeling that the developers didn't really understand it.

      It's not that bone conduction is that suprising... You can see how it works by pressing your finger against a floppy drive to see if it's seeking. An old technique I learned long ago in noisy colocation environments to tell me if the disk really was being read. (You can head a floppy drive quite clearly when you press your finger against it.). Not that I do a lot with floppies anymore...

      But not all frequencies transfer well and audio quality with bone conduction was never the best.

      If you can't hear the sound from a bluetooth earpiece that's stuck right in your ear, then the problem is the environment you're working in. It's loud enough to cause permanent ear damage.

      GrpA

      --
      Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
  58. Perfect! by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    Now I can subvocalize and communicate with Jane without my wife hearing.

    ("Speaker for the Dead" reference)

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  59. Phone etiquette by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
    Wired reports that a new headset is on the way to solve all those background noise problems you have had with your cell phone in crowded areas.

    Here's an idea, learn some fucking manners and don't use your phone in a crowd or while driving. And if you do use a phone while driving, consider drunk driving instead, it's safer.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  60. This wouldn't work for me... by Bruitist · · Score: 1

    My jaw clicks whenever I move it a fair amount. I doubt anyone I was talking to would like to hear "Hey Bob! *CRACK!* How are *CRACK!* you?"...

  61. But is bone conduction very good for you? by the+nerdy+duo · · Score: 1

    In a barn somewhere deep in Connecticut sometime in the mid-90's (think Mac Lc II), Hatter sits in some relative stranger's home recording studio recieving alternative therapy for one of his more exotic afflictions (read: the relatively unknown world of dyslexia at that time). Some sort of trendy auditory "treatment" based on "solid scientific fact" perhaps read through a crystal ball. This therapy was based on sonic frequency and bone conduction. I don't remember much, but I do remember the "therapist" saying, amongst other things, that long term exposure to bone conducted sound was detrimental to not only hearing, but the nervous system in general. Hatter says: I'm inclined to believe her because my experience using her devices was both uncomfortable and unsettling and also left me with sharp headaches. I've heard a lot of people say that Bluetooth gives them a headache. I can only wonder what kind of monster migraines this will cause. Ruby says: I can't imagine that anything that causes direct vibrations to the skull will feel very different from snuggling up to a belt sander after a while.

    --
    Take what we say with salt, for it is likely both hearsay and conjecture. Do your own research-come to your own opinion.
    1. Re:But is bone conduction very good for you? by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      I haven't RTFA, but the way I understand it then it's not causing any vibrations, rather it reads the vibrations that ocurr in the jaw when you talk and translates them into speech.

      --
      Error: No error occurred
  62. bone/sound usefull medical tool by stimpleton · · Score: 2, Informative

    While this articles replies often tivialize the bone/sound phenomon, The way bone affects sound is interesting, and is still used today by skilled ear/nose/throat surgeons to detect tumors.

    Where initial diagnosis of acoustic neuroma(tumours on nerves) need to often be made before referral to MRI test, the skilled doctor can actually detect changes in tuning fork pitch, when placed against the skull, when a tumor is present.

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:bone/sound usefull medical tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please expand on the description of these "changes in tuning fork pitch"? Any literature on this? Most ENTs I know will get an MRI for pretty much anyone with an asymetric sensorineural hearing loss or unilateral tinnitus. Up until about 10 years ago the stadard of care for screening was an ABR (an evoked electric response), but ther have been a few economic analyses now which show it is actually more cost effective to skip the ABR and order and MRI.

  63. Seems like its gonna be a Jaw-dropping invention by unity100 · · Score: 1

    first it was our brains, now jaw, god knows what is next.

  64. I don't have a link to prove it but.... by HalfNormalForm · · Score: 1

    Radio Shack has sold a wired version of this in the past.

  65. It's going to be funny..... by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

    ... When all your friends sound like Darth Vader over a mobile call.

    --
    Your ad could be here!
  66. you are a stupid trollbitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stupid trollbitch

  67. Bone phone? by Geminii · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that what's used to make... booty calls?