First Look at Sony's Tiny Vaio UX180p
An anonymous reader writes "MobileTechReview has posted a first look at the Sony Vaio UX180P Micro PC and comparison of it with UMPC and OQO. "When I first heard about the Sony UX series, I nearly dismissed it because I just couldn't imagine that 1024 x 600 on a 4.5" screen could ever be readable. Yes, the price is certainly another issue-- consumers don't flock to spend twice as much on a "notebook" that's less than half the size of a standard ultralight. At least not in the SUV-lovin' US. Well, happily I was wrong. That tiny XBRITE display is easily readable, despite the number of pixels squeezed into close company""
You mean OQO right? QOQ doesnt sound quite as....eloquent ;)
His number one and biggest complaint is screen resolution. How hard could it possibly be to turn it down a bit?
Google: "All your data are belong to us."
I know that fonts sizes are easily adjusted in most web browsers, but what about images? Do any popular web browsers offer an option to scale all images a certain amount? Without this feature, the future of very small dot pitches on LCDs looks dim.
I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
What's up with all the Sony bashing lately?
This just goes to show that the Consumer Electronics division still puts out great products!
I wonder if it comes with the rootkit preinstalled?
in Tokyo, and I was very impressed... my x51v PDA is just a bit smaller overall then this and only runs WM5. However it's not something u can easily stick in your pocket so not sure when i'd use it... Still I drooled over it :P
That tiny XBRITE display is easily readable, despite the number of pixels squeezed into close company
He means "because of" the number of pixels. Presumably Sony is doing some anti-aliasing on the fonts to improve readability.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
I actually work with it in the lab. It was quite fun trying to read the tiny little terminal windows on the screen. Eventually, I just kicked the font size up and it looked beautifully crisp. Unfortunately, for some reason, MATLAB had defaulted to the super large font size, and made it temporarily impossible to use now that I switched back to a smaller dpi display.
Screw the screen - can you imagine typing on this? IMHO, the "ultra-mobile" line of computers will not succeed because of keyboard issues. The tablet PC's have already dealt with that effectively by becoming "notebooks" in the real sense of the word (you write directly on the screen with a pen). UMPC's are the worst of both worlds. Just go for a small laptop or tablet if you want mobility.
So... it's SUX for short? At least they are getting more honest. (Can't wait to buy a "Sony 0wnz J00!1!")
sic transit gloria mundi
I think plenty have heard of it. I own two.
A couple corrections. The display is 22.2" diagonal and 13HZ is the slowest refresh when using a single DVI. There several versions of the monitor but all can do at least twice that refresh rate. I operate mine at 30Hz.
I'm an electronics salesman at staples, and we got them in today. We're one of the few stores in the nation to carry them, and even staples only has a few in.
I played with it for a bit today, and I have to say I love the design. The screen is crisp and clear with a high framerate, the two cameras are amazing, the touch screen is very responsive, and even the thumbstick is nice. The fold out qwerty keyboard is nice, but it takes some getting used to.
What strikes me is HOW small this thing really is. The original Origami concept was massive compared to this. It is barely bigger than two IPAQs glued together, and it weighs 1.4 lbs.
Not to mention it comes with EVDO support.
I'm impressed. Not 1700 dollars worth of impressed, but impressed none the less.
In my oppinion the resolution isn't really an issue. You can read standard 10 point with no real problems. You have to consider that this is a handheld device and so it would be held closer to your face than say, a laptop. They've had these things out for quite a while here in Japan. My biggest gripes with it is the size and price. The thing is really thick (bulky) and I just can't justify spending that much money. However, considering that's it's ligtweight and generaly easy to use it seems to be a good all around portable machine for those of us with deep pockets.
And yes, it can run Linux.
What Apple needs is a 2lb, 10" convertible tablet. I'd buy that in a heartbeat!
"[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz
This is neat, but if I bought something like this it would be to write on, and that means the keyboard isn't good enough, the battery doesn't last long enough, and it's too heavy. We're still reinventing the wheel, poorly.
If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
This Vaio will suck.
Nintendo will Wiin the console wars.
Can I please have my mod points now?
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
I played with this device, but grew to dislike it. The thing is too big, runs too hot, eat batteries for breakfast, and the keyboard is barely usable. Nice that it runs WinXP and has two cameras.... but so what? Sorry, but the Zaurus still fits in your pocket, has a usable keyboard, and lasts 7 hours at a time.
READY.
PRINT ""+-0
Linux on UX180p
I'll sell you my Newton...It's close to those dimensions.
available here.
:-)
Looks like a neat little unit. Pretty powerful, but the keyboard isn't super. If course, on any portable, there is a tradeoff between overall size and display & keyboard size.
That said, I miss my Libretto.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
-b.
Normally I hate reading the "cool, but I would never use it" posts... but I'm really curious, what do you guys think is the target market for this device?
Too small for all day computing, too big to drop in most pockets... the thickness particularly seems to be a kicker.
Anyway geek factor, very high... practical factor, I'm wracking my brain and can't think of the application.
Would you be happy spending that much money and discover that half of the hardware that makes it useful doesn't work?
http://mozy.org/vaio/
I call bullshit!
While you may have played with a few VAIO's, I actually own a VAIO laptop for 4 years. I have not experienced any of the deficiencies that you have cited. I work with fellow VAIO users who have the latest notebooks, and they are happy with their purchase.
Out of the 4 years (so far!), I only had two problems.
1. Hardrive died on the 2nd year and was easily replaced.
2. My cat clawed off the keyboard and turned the laptop into an expensive paperweight. A call to Sony and 72 hours & $80 dollars later, I am back in business with a new keyboard. (I will go on record that I did scream, but the cat remained unharmed).
Because of my experience with #2 above, I am now a loyal customer of Sony.
But don't let the facts get in the way of you trying to show your coolness by being an Apple fanboy.
Bill
These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
I'm one of the people blessed with above-average vision (20/10 rather than the standard 20/20). This means I can see the individual pixels in a normal LCD monitor from several feet away. Gets annoying at times, especially anti-aliasing, which just looks to me like a bunch of gray pixels surrounding the actual letters.
However, with the new smaller pixels in things like this 4.5" 1024x768 screen (And the 17" 1920x1280 monitor in my Dell d810 laptop), I finally am not annoyed by the pixels. I have to get within a foot of the screen now to see the individual pixels. I think it rocks.
My apologies to those with lesser vision, but imagine what it would be like for those of you to look at a screen with 1/10 inch (or bigger) pixels. Yuck.
I've been hoping for this since a few years ago IBM announced their ($20000!!) monitor with pixels 1/5 the size of normal ones.
Now if we could just get to the resolution of paper! Bring back vector graphics technology rather than relying on pixels.