Slashdot Mirror


Super-fast Transistors On the Way

nbannerman writes "The BBC is reporting about a new kind of transistor, that recently set a world record of 110Ghz. From the article: 'To achieve the speed gain, researchers at the University of Southampton added fluorine to the silicon devices. The technique uses existing silicon manufacturing technology meaning it should be quick and easy to deploy.' The apparent applications for this process include mobile phones and digital cameras."

172 comments

  1. Faster? by Asm-Coder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe we should just get faster software.

    1. Re:Faster? by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's cheaper to pay a few top engineers to make faster hardware then to pay a mountain of top computer scientists to write stable, fast code. Corel learned that the hardway.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    2. Re:Faster? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's cheaper to pay a few top engineers to make faster hardware then to pay a mountain of top computer scientists to write stable, fast code.

      Yeah, because if the cpu is fast enough, even unstable code works better!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Faster? by exley · · Score: 1

      Coming from someone in the semiconductor industry, hardware (at least, when we're talking chips), is quite often MUCH more expensive than software. Chip designers make a decent buck, and manufacturing is expensive. Not only is fabbing chips expensive, it is frequently time consuming (we're talking weeks of turnaround time in many cases for a new spin of a chip). And of course, time is money. If something can be fixed in software, that has the potential to be done much quicker than hardware changes. This can even be said for non-silicon issues (boards, etc.).

      Obviously, things depend on the scale of the project, and the quality of those involved. But from my experience software is cheaper and faster to fix. If Corel found a way to reverse things, it's their fault for hiring shitty code monkeys :)

    4. Re:Faster? by Carthag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the old "stable, fast, on schedule; pick two" -- the faster the chip is, the more likely you can concentrate on writing stable code on schedule and make up for the slowness with processor speed.

    5. Re:Faster? by sjwt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Due to economic downsizing, you now have a choice of 'pick one, so long as its fast'

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    6. Re:Faster? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should just get faster software.

      What?!? You should be glad to have Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office and other fine software products from Microsoft and other bloatware producers. It's the All-American, Blown-V8, 4x4 of software!

      just because you don't like the gas mileage, don't hate the toy

      My biggest problem with these super fast transistors is soldering them into my ArcherKit P-Box

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Faster? by Alternator · · Score: 1

      But if we had faster more responsive software where would we get our micro-pauses to prevent oos??

    8. Re:Faster? by x2A · · Score: 1

      On widely used software, yeah, it'd be quicker/cheaper to fix the software. But for all the one-offs out there, running individual shops/businesses/etc, it costs less to pay one company to design/build a faster processor, than it does to pay hundreds of thousands of software developers to be able to improve the hundreds of thousands of pieces of software out there.

      Comes down to numbers.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    9. Re:Faster? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Maybe we should just get faster software."

      That takes more time and more talent to write. It'd be a pain in the butt if mobile phone or digital camera processors were so slow everything had to be super optimized just to be useful. Heck, I remember using one of the first digital cameras. Relatively speaking, it took forever just for it to capture, encode, and save the image to memory. Nowadays you can get cameras that take the pictures super fast. I say we should have faster processing AND better software. Not just one or the other.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:Faster? by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Programmer: There is no speed issue that cannot be solved through the use of better hardware.
      Engineer: There is no hardware issue that cannot be solved through the use of well-written software.

      Discuss.

      Meanwhile, they have this notion that an improvement in transistor speed is an advance specifically for mobile peripherals. What about shattering moore's law? Have these guys not considered that, you know, maybe, your computer's circuitry is made up almost entirely out of transistors and capacitors?

      Honestly, this means faster anything used for logic. Fuck yo' beowulf clusta; a single computer built of these would operate at ungodly speeds.

      You know, if Intel decides to license the tech. Still, it would be a small change in their existing manufacturing process if they include it, little extra cost in chip manufacturing, and they'll probably be able to charge a mint a piece for 11GHz cores.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    11. Re:Faster? by TheShadowzero · · Score: 1
      Computer scientists should just do things right the first time...
      What do you mean "first time?" They never got it right, any time. With Windows, anyway.
      --
      If history repeats itself, why can't we study the future?
    12. Re:Faster? by cartel · · Score: 1
      What do you mean "first time?" They never got it right, any time. With Windows, anyway.

      True.

      And I was modded flaimbait - as I expected - but I have good reasons for posting what I did. Here are a few of them:

      • Microsoft does not very well follow common, tried and true programming concepts, such as encapsulation and layering. For instance, much of the time security in their application is handled at the application level rather than at a lower level - like the kernel. Then when their application bypasses the kernel (rather than letting it do it in its time) deadlock situations can (and often) occur.
      • There are things in the kernel that _do not_ belong there, like code dealing with graphics (I believe you can see graphics calls if you look at it in a hex editor).
      • They over overcomplicate things for developers (i.e., people that do not only know how to use a WYSIWYG editor). For instance, at work I ran into some VB code for an ASP application, and the vb file that handled the processing for one page was 3000+ lines long. In PHP, Perl,or Python I do not doubt that the same functionality could have been implemented in less than 500 lines.
      • The fact that Windows Vista requires a minimum of a 128MB video card for "decent" performance. This makes it so that everyone has to upgrade their computers every couple years.e
      My point is this: if you are going to do a job, then Do IT RIGHT - and do it right the first time - or you have no business doing (or managing) it at all. Time crunch or not, don't do just enough so that it "works". Oh, you won't earn as much money if you take the time to do a good job, huh? I'm sorry, but that's just flat out laziness, and there is no excuse for that. If you learn and continue to do something the right way then you will get better and more efficient over time.
    13. Re:Faster? by jthill · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check this out. TFA's stuff is slow, and pisses away power like it was water. This stuff... they can make a functional transistor by bouncing a single electron off force-field walls. One electron. To test it at full speed, they first need to figure out what to use as a THz scope.

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    14. Re:Faster? by master_p · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is. Checking the logical consistency of code takes a long time, because the program's execution paths have to be analysed one by one. By having faster computers, maybe code testing will become a reality.

    15. Re:Faster? by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      I would rather opt for 'on schedule' than 'so long as it's fast'. The other two options combined seem to form a synergy called 'crashing fast', which is usually a more painful experience than 'on schedule'. *

      * Depening on the product itself of course :o

    16. Re:Faster? by Zediker · · Score: 1

      Neither did Linux, or are those thousands of helpful Open Source coders considered purely immaginary.



      P.S. - this isnt an attack at linux, just showing you a flaw in your argument.

      --
      I love to slaughter the english language.
    17. Re:Faster? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      TFA's stuff is easy to implement using current manufacturing equipment, which is what will make it quickly ubuiquitous.

      Just one look at the design shows it's not 'bouncing'. It's passing through the dielectric portion of a capacitor. The pyramid isn't even present in the SEM view of the device.

      Which is not to say it's not a good idea for memory; you end up having a transistor and capacitor coupled in such a way as to make for a single self-maintaining bit.

      Meanwhile, it doesn't look that revolutionary. They make the bucket comparison with a capacitor - that's true, but they're not talking about replacing the capacitor. They're talking about an alternative transistor that appears to use a small capacitor to enable switching; this is not the most efficient way I can think to do things.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    18. Re:Faster? by miro+f · · Score: 1

      it seems this technology is only for bipolar transistors, whish I thought were not used in microchips at all in favour of MOSFET transistors which tend to have less power usage when switching. Definitely your PC uses CMOS and I would have thought that the microchip in your phone would as well.

      so yeah, I am a little confused on this point...

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    19. Re:Faster? by tigersha · · Score: 1

      It is better! It crashes faster! Think of all the time wasted on programs that crash. Now, you will not waste as much timme since the end result iis reached much quicker!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    20. Re:Faster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one goes to (11)0

    21. Re:Faster? by sfm · · Score: 1

      There is a corollary to Moores law that applies to Software:
      Every 18 months, the speed of software is cut in half

  2. Mobile Phones? by terminateprocess · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now remind me why exactly we need 110GhZ moblie phone processors?

    --
    int cents = 0;
    cents += 2;
    1. Re:Mobile Phones? by BSonline · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because faster is better. Don't you remember high school cheerleaders?

      --
      PS: That is what part of the alphabet would look like if the letters "Q" and "R" were removed.
    2. Re:Mobile Phones? by Formica · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're talking about transistors, not entire processors. High speed transistors are needed for the RF front-end, where analog signals up to 1 GHz or so are encountered. These signals require devices that can switch at speeds significantly faster than the signal frequency. Formica

    3. Re:Mobile Phones? by sgbett · · Score: 0

      I've no idea, not only do they they appear to be 11GHz short, but they've screwed up the units AND the decimal places.

      --
      Invaders must die
    4. Re:Mobile Phones? by Trouvist · · Score: 5, Informative

      The faster the chip cycles, the higher the communication frequency can be. It is difficult to do noise-reduction calculations on ultra-high frequency communications without chips that cycle at the rate of data transmission.

    5. Re:Mobile Phones? by terminateprocess · · Score: 1

      Yes, but those same transistors are used to create processors. The article claims that 70GhZ transistor technology allows the potential for 7GhZ chips. 110GhZ technology would allow 11GhZ chips. I meant the first post sarcastically, but why would mobile phones be one of the primary applications for faster transistors?

      --
      int cents = 0;
      cents += 2;
    6. Re:Mobile Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So my shiny new video-enabled phone will respond instantaneously to button-presses.

      Like my LCD-based phones from 10 years ago used to.

    7. Re:Mobile Phones? by Formica · · Score: 3, Informative

      11 GHz chip != 11 GHz processor. They're mainly talking about analog chips - i.e. op-amps, oscillators, high speed muxes, etc. Chips like these: http://www.maxim-ic.com/solutions/cellular_handset s/index.mvp?pl_pk=14 http://www.analog.com/en/subCat/0,2879,770%255F851 %255F0%255F%255F0%255F,00.html

    8. Re:Mobile Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that you posted the misinformation, Microsoft will raise their system requirements beyond what processors are capa.....

      On second thought, post all kinds of misinformation like this, then Microsoft will spec themselves out of business. ;)

    9. Re:Mobile Phones? by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      So when you are out cheating on your wife she can imput a special code and melts your nuts. Its DRM, Dick rights managment.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    10. Re:Mobile Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Jesus fucking Christ, it's GHz not GhZ, you babboon.

    11. Re:Mobile Phones? by swg101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the article says that they created a BJT transistor
      "The research was carried out using a simple type of transistor known as a silicon bipolar transistor."
      Processors use FET transistors because BJT transistors need current to bias them all the time. These transistors would consume way too much power to make any sort of processor (especially for mobile devices). As others have commented, this would only be useful for the analog processing of the output transmitter.

      --
      Like pi? Try 10,000 digits.
    12. Re:Mobile Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You must be new here... nobody here got that close to a cheerleader in high school.

    13. Re:Mobile Phones? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Hmm, in that case, substitute 'NG Resonance' for cheerleader.

      NOW you see why you'd want faster phones to run the distributed AI?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    14. Re:Mobile Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GhZ ??

      GigahertZ?

      GHz.

    15. Re:Mobile Phones? by justthisdude · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are looking at a little more clarity on why mobile phones, you need to think about radios and signal processing. To digitally sample a signal, you need to sample it at least twice the highest frequency (this is the Nyquist frequency). If you want to create or receive a cell phone signal (around 2 GHz) you need to sample it around 5 GHz, and to digitally process what you receive, you need to be processing at these higher speeds. Without such speeds, receivers and transmitters need to use analog electronics to modulate slower digital signals up to 2GHz, and analog electronics are not flexible. I said 2 GHZ, but some cells are 1.8GHZ, some 1.9GHz, and so on. If you do it all digitally, then changing cellular systems and frequencies becomes a software issue rather than a hardware issue. Now you can use a single phone for CDMA and GSM networks. Carriers can upgrade or switchover their networks without having to get people to trade in their phones. The people really salivating over this are probably the DOD's JTRS software radio people who are trying to make a single radio to handle all military waveforms under 2 GHz (assuming the war didn't swallow their funding).

      --
      "I love his boyish charm, but I hate his childishness" - Leela
    16. Re:Mobile Phones? by modecx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry? Using "ultra-high frequency communications" would serve no purpose as an application to cell communication, unless you cherish the idea of cell companies needing to put a tower every few hundred yards, having your phone put out enough radiation to cook your brains, having your signal blocked by a little bit of rain, and not being able to use your phone whilst inside buildings with walls thicker than cellophane.

      Cellphones use the frequencies they use not because it's the best that technology can do, they use those frequencies because it's the most practical way to do it.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    17. Re:Mobile Phones? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny
      it's GHz not GhZ, you babboon.

      It's baboon not babboon, you buffoon.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    18. Re:Mobile Phones? by willijar · · Score: 1

      For cheap millimetre wave RF frontends for e.g. future picocell wirless broadband systems operating at > 60GHz. Currently electronic components operating at those frequencies are not compatible with standard fabrication processes and so are expensive. Having Silicon CMOS compatible devices would be a big step forward.

    19. Re:Mobile Phones? by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      No, it'll respond instantly.
      (Or rather, it won't as this isn't the CPU we're talking about. You've just tripped my latest semantics-nazi pet-hate. Sorry.)

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    20. Re:Mobile Phones? by eraserewind · · Score: 1
      Now remind me why exactly we need 110GhZ moblie phone processors?
      To record & postprocess hi def video of course :)
    21. Re:Mobile Phones? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      off topic, but what is the proper use for instantaniously? is there one?

    22. Re:Mobile Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      instantaneous (adjective) [from the OED]
      Occurring or operating in an instant; done, completed, or reaching completion without any perceptible lapse of time.

      But thanks for playing.

    23. Re:Mobile Phones? by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      Check your numbers -

      WiFi sits in the ISM band at 2.7GHz
      Cellular service is in assorted bands all over 500MHz and under 3GHz
      Collision avoidance radar (now going into fancy new cars) is up around 40-60 GHz (not sure on the exact number, haven't designed one yet)

      Any and all of that can be done with 0.18um CMOS, (excepth the radar) nothing fancier required.

      For RF front end there are a lot of secialty transistors, SiGe, GaAs. IndP and others.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    24. Re:Mobile Phones? by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      What you are describing is commonly known as a "software defined radio" -- Google it and you will find plenty on the subject.

      Minor detail with respect to "Mr Nyquist" - If you want to do as you describe, you need an ADC that runs at (lets say RF at 2GHz to make the numbers easy) 4GHz sampling rate.

      Ok, well that is do-able, although it takes ***amps*** of current and you need to really know what you are doing to get it to work.

      Now a minor detail - due to the dynamic amplitude range of the signal, (on the order of 40dB to 90dB, a lot of cell phones require around 90) You need to be able to resolve a signal down in microvolt land.

      Ooops!!!

      I did all the math out once and it was something like a 24Bit converter running at 4GHz.

      That, is not going to happen in the near future. Not with the present state of the art technology. Most ADC's that work at these frequencies are so specialized, nobody offers them as a standard off the shelf product, and I do not know of any with more than 6 bits of resoluton.

      RF front ends will remain analog for the forseeable future.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    25. Re:Mobile Phones? by rrkbogie · · Score: 1

      So they can force more commercial advertising data through the link before you have a chance to hang up....

    26. Re:Mobile Phones? by odourpreventer · · Score: 1

      We already have those problems. It's called "3G".

      Seriously though, I'm waiting for PM, polarisation modulation. Unlimited bandwidth, yay!

  3. Maybe. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    newbies will use this technology to grab the first post in every thread on ./?

    1. Re:Maybe. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you could use it anyway :P

  4. As an added benefit... by nebaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    added fluorine to the silicon devices

    Not only will the transistors be faster, but whiter and shinier, they won't need to floss.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:As an added benefit... by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .the fluorine creates small clusters of vacancies. . .

      Apparently transistors aren't made of teeth. Go figure.

      KFG

    2. Re:As an added benefit... by GeckoX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, sure, but you've got the wrong substance in mind.

      Fluorine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorine

      Fluoride: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoride

      There would be some pretty serious differences betweent the two. Neither is good for you to ingest, but one is just REALLY BAD to get anywhere near you at all!

      --
      No Comment.
    3. Re:As an added benefit... by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      Fluoride is a form of fluorine. If you add trace amounts of fluorine to silicon you're going to end up with fluoride anyhow.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    4. Re:As an added benefit... by lubricated · · Score: 2, Funny

      they are both the same element. Just a slightly differenet amount of electrons. You really are nitpicking over a joke. Fluoride is still Flourine.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    5. Re:As an added benefit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's more, your microwave hardware will never have tuned cavities...

    6. Re:As an added benefit... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      You just go ahead and start rinsing your teeth with Fluorine then mmkay? Enjoy :)

      --
      No Comment.
    7. Re:As an added benefit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My toothpaste contains flourine. Not elemental flourine, but there is still flourine in it.

    8. Re:As an added benefit... by crulx · · Score: 1

      The "fluoride" you are thinking of is Sodium Fluoride. The "ide" at the end of the word means that the fluorine has reacted with something. Remember your chemistry. *grin*

      Hydrogen fluoride is what you would get if you put fluorine in your mouth. That would kill you much faster than the toothpaste "fluoride" ever could hope to.

      If you are going to rebut an argument, you had best get your facts straight! *giggle* A slightly different amount of electrons is the reason you got that answer wrong! *laugh*

  5. Mobile Phones?-PADs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Now remind me why exactly we need 110GhZ moblie phone processors?"

    So the future will get here faster.

    1. Re:Mobile Phones?-PADs by telchine · · Score: 2, Funny

      I keep waiting for the future to come, but all I ever see is the present.

  6. But use of such mobile phones and cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...might taint your precious bodily fluids.

    1. Re:But use of such mobile phones and cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop worrying and learn to love it. I for one welcome our new flourinated overlords.

    2. Re:But use of such mobile phones and cameras... by shotgunsaint · · Score: 1

      That's why I cool my electonics with only pure grain alcohol and rain water.

      --
      The future isn't here until I can type "car keys" into Google and have it say "You left them in your pants last night."
  7. Real-world benefits? by FlyByPC · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...so this means that Flight Simulator X will run at 10fps instead of 5?

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:Real-world benefits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about software I work on?

  8. These are bipolar devices by tool462 · · Score: 1

    TFA didn't mention what effect this process has on CMOS devices, which is probably more relevant since this is what is used in most digital design these days (and a lot of analog as well). Bipolar devices take up more area and tend to consume a lot more power, among other things. But if this speeds up MOSFETs, then they're really on to something...

    1. Re:These are bipolar devices by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Couldn't they add some Lithium too?

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:These are bipolar devices by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

      Ufff....they are making transistors and not exploding batteries!!

    3. Re:These are bipolar devices by edrobinson · · Score: 1

      That's funny! No it's not! Yes it is! No it's not! Yes it is! ...

  9. CPUs and Data Compression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the days of 486 I couldn't decode fullscreen MPEG1. MPEG2 couldn't be done at all because the processor wasn't fast enough. Are there any compresison codecs that we could use with a ridiculously fast phone CPU (or home computer, actually?)

    1. Re:CPUs and Data Compression by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Phones don't do all of the codec in software. Imagine a hardware assited CELP codec :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  10. Power Consumption by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember that when a CMOS gate is switching the current flowing through it increases. The faster the gate is able to switch, the less power will be used in the state change. Now the processor doesn't have to run at anywhere near that speed, but the fast transistor switch will minimize the power per cycle.

    1. Re:Power Consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Shame this is for bipolar transistors, not FETs, and the contribution of the effect you're talking about is pretty small anyway. :-\

    2. Re:Power Consumption by dunkers · · Score: 3, Informative

      The gate will only switch faster for the same, or less, current if the gate capacitance is decreased - i.e. you make the device physically smaller. If the capacitance stays the same then you must bung in current faster to achieve faster switching. Faster switching may reduce the power cycle (time), but on its own it doesn't reduce the power requirements.

    3. Re:Power Consumption by dpilot · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're both right.

      You are talking about basic c*v**2 current, and he's talking about shoot-through current during the transition. Though one normally doesn't fuss too hard about shoot-through unless slew rates are really slow. But then again, it wasn't that many years ago that device standby leakage was nearly negligible, instead of being a substantial fraction of the active current, like it is today. For that matter, the scope traces I've seen of high-speed clocks look a heck of a lot more like a sine wave than a logic pulse, but at this point we're stressing capabilities of the measurment electonics, too.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:Power Consumption by wontonenigma · · Score: 5, Informative
      From the article:
      The research was carried out using a simple type of transistor known as a silicon bipolar transistor.
      RTFA

      This isn't about CMOS, for a change. This is about analog power amplification and the 100GHz figure quoted is either the maximum frequency of current or power amplification. Too bad the BBC doesn't say.

      Most cell phones contain one Gallium Arsenide bipolar transistor to amplify the signal going to the antenna. This faster Silicon transistor would open up other transmission frequencies but it wouldn't make that game of Alchemy play any faster.
      --
      A sig! What kind of person do you think I am?
    5. Re:Power Consumption by 1zenerdiode · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, except TFA says the gains were achieved with modified BJT technology, which is not CMOS. In addition, the faster that you switch COMPLIMENTARY (that's the C) MOS structures, the larger the shoot-through current (this is the current that flows between the power supply rails as each transistor in the complimentary structure is temporarily partially conducting). In microprocessors and memory cells, these are responsible for huge transient current requirements, and get worse as the clock frequency is increased.

      The reason that the development is significant is not from a microprocessor standpoint - it means that the front end amplifiers and mixers that have to run at the highest frequencies can be fabricated using more cost-effective manufacturing techniques. This is assuming that the article is correct in stating the development concerns BJT's. Hell knows why they showed a photo of a non-populated circuit board, but hey, it's the media. Guess you have dial your expectations lower.

    6. Re:Power Consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you get both sides running at this speed, you run into the problem of particle gates switching so fast that the apex of the thru put curve is both on(1) AND off(0). Fixing that is feasible but expensive...

    7. Re:Power Consumption by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Ever scoped a tunnel diode?

      *hides

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    8. Re:Power Consumption by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1

      Oh, right (nodding head appreciatively), now I...Zzzzzzz

    9. Re:Power Consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are still using tunnel diodes? For what purpose (just curious), and where do you buy them (if it's not a secret).

      I do use germanium tunnel diode for temperature stable high sensitivity RF detectors. The number of manufacturers is basically down to 2 (Metelics and M-Pulse microwave) and they are not (in my opinion) quite as good as the tunnel diode I bought 15 years ago from another company, but they closed shop.

    10. Re:Power Consumption by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      Um, read the article. This is about Bipolar transistors using Flourine as a dopant.

      Not CMOS, it is a different world.

      As for switching speed being faster, well, yes, but at 90nm and down gate dielectric leakage plays into it in a big big ugly way...

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    11. Re:Power Consumption by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      Um, no...

      GaAs is a FET, not a bipolar, although there are some GaAS bipolars as well.

      Also the RF PA in a cell phone is generally GaAs although there are some exception. Never been a single transistor ever to my knowledge, the classic architecture is a three stage device.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    12. Re:Power Consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that when a CMOS gate is switching the current flowing through it increases.

      A CMOS gate can feel the force flowing through it.

  11. Not for processors by ja · · Score: 1

    This transistor is for modulating the radiowawes, not for driving your java-games.

    --

    send + more == money? ...
  12. bipolar transistors by dlenmn · · Score: 1

    The article says they did this with bipolar transistors. I recall from my intro electronics class that most integrated circuits are CMOS (built with field effect transistors) because in general they are faster and use less power than equivalent TTL circuits (built with bipolar transistors). If this is true, does this new process make TTL chips more attractive for (at least some) applications?

    1. Re:bipolar transistors by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, because whenever Slashdot covers these ultra-high-frequency transistors, they never bother mentioning that there's a huge difference between transistors optimized for logic (always on/off, usually very high drive levels and low gain, fast switching of square waves) and transistors designed for RF signal amplification (Usually designed for linear amplification of sinusoidal or modulated sinusoidal signals, lower drive levels with higher gain, and no one cares about the switching time, just the highest frequency sinusoid at which the device exhibits gain.) In essentially every case, the article is covering amplification of a signal at the record-setting frequency, not operation of a logic gate at that frequency.

      There is also a very good chance that while the manufacturing process may be suitable for single (relatively) large tranistors (perfectly suitable, and often desireable for RF), it is not suitable for integrated circuits with multiple tranistors and other components on a die. Gallium Arsenide is a perfect example of this - The IC industry gave up on it pretty quickly because it was simply too difficult to make integrated circuits with it and the performance benefits for logic circuits weren't worth the costs, but manufacturers of RF transistors are still putting large amounts of effort into GaAs and plenty of commercial products exist. (Yes, there are still issues with GaAs technology and a lot of companies still don't trust GaAs in their products except in low-volume high-performance applications, but it's not like logic circuits where nothing exists on the market.)

      Same thing with IBM's big SiGe push - great for RF but doesn't seem to have made any inroads to logic, probably due to cost issues and technical problems that make SiGe potentially unsuitable for logic but don't really affect their RF performance.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:bipolar transistors by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Informative

      And before anyone brings up that TFA does mention "clocking", the impression I get is that the writer of the article isn't very technically literate and doesn't really understand the difference between RF circuitry and clocked logic circuitry. See the comment about mobile phones operating in the 1 GHz range - even the fastest smartphones have a CPU clock speed of only 400-500 MHz at most, but mobile phones have been operating with RF carriers close to 1 GHz (specifically 800 and 900 MHz) for 15-20 years, and the 1.8 and 1.9 GHz bands have been in use for close to a decade too. Satellite communications systems frequently operate in the 10-20 GHz region. I don't see any case where the researchers are directly quoted talking about using their new developments for logic circuitry, but a few where they are implying using the new stuff for RF.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:bipolar transistors by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      Andy:

      Excellent commentary - a couple of addendums -

      GaAs has all kinds of problems with defect density yield loss, this is another reason it is friendly to the RF PA (under 20 transistors) and not for the next Pentium-27 (2 zillion transistors) :)

      SiGe (from IBM & Jazz anyhow) is sold as BiCMOS, CMOS and SiGe Bipolars on the same chip. However BiCMOS tends to be a few generations in size behind CMOS.

      SiGe (and Strained Silicon, but thats another story) does get used in specialized locations inside of big-iron (mainframe)computers, but not as a general purpose logic device.

      It has been widely used in RF front ends, SerDes Data links, optical, and similar niche areas.

      - Jerry

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
  13. Nonono by jd · · Score: 1

    The vacancies are clearly left when the transistor dentists lose their jobs. The clusters are an obvious reference to the dentists all going by the name Beowulf.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  14. Apparent applications? by MasterC · · Score: 1
    The apparent applications for this process include mobile phones and digital cameras.


    Tell me, what digital device would not benefit from shorter switching times?
    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Apparent applications? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I'm onclear on that too. I thought the main limitation on processors these days was 1) energy dissipation and 2) latency between transistors, as in, the time it takes light to travel 1 or 2 cm. Is that true, and do faster transistors help with those issues?

    2. Re:Apparent applications? by vistic · · Score: 1

      An old style videogame machine.

      You'll be dead before your finger can push the button.

    3. Re:Apparent applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The devices here are BJTs, not MOSFETS. Virtually no digital devices are made with BJTs these days, due to their high power draw.

      Interestingly, most early supercomputers (such as many Cray systems in the 70s and 80s) were made with BJTs because of the faster switching time. This was before MOSFETS were up to snuff there, and they didn't really care about power consumption.

  15. Call General Jack D. Ripper on this one... by Cade144 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds like a plot to sap our vitality by adding Flourine to impurify our sacred bodily fluids ^H^H^H^H^H transistors.
    Oh, for those who have never seen it, the silly reference is from Dr. Strangeglove.

  16. Mod the parent upwards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    So the future will get here faster.


    Precisely! We agree completely.

    Signed,
    SACFTF
    Slashdot Anonymous Cowards For The Future

    -----EQUAL REPRESENTATION-----

    Listen you "big A-C" Anonymous Cowards, we're against the future. Technology ruined our lives, remember when trolls used to live under bridges? Now we live in basements or apartments. We should go backwards, not forwards!

    Signed,
    SACATF
    Slashdot Anonymous Cowards Against The Future.
  17. Floride in children's ice cream? by cpopin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ripper: A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual, and certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard core commie works. Mandrake: Jack... Jack, listen, tell me, ah... when did you first become, well, develop this theory. Ripper: Well, I ah, I-I first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love. From Dr. Strangelove

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  18. MOSFET Application by dduardo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe this technique would speed up MOSFETs as well because they are saying that the added fluorine doesn't allow the boron to diffuse into the silcon as much. This means you'll have a cleaner line between the p-type and n-type dopped regions. In terms of MOSFETs you could inject the flourine under the gate so when you dope the silicon to create the source and drain you won't have overlap you normaly get under the gate. This means you could reduce the gate to drain and gate to source capacitances which kills the high frequencies.

    1. Re:MOSFET Application by dcapel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Truely now, how many people modded this insightful because they didn't understand it?

      --
      DYWYPI?
    2. Re:MOSFET Application by strider44 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Two. The other two people who modded it modded it informative because they didn't understand it.

    3. Re:MOSFET Application by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Informative

      A MOSFET is a type of transistor which is very common in integrated circuits because it's very easy to make using the most common IC fabrication techniques (which basically boil down to making holes in a silicon base, filling those holes with stuff and depositing lines of other stuff on top of it).

      One of the physical features of a MOSFET is that there are places where silicon dopped to be of the type P (ie, a substance was added to it so that it is missing electrons in it's crystaline structure by comparisson with pure silicon) is in direct contact with silicon dopped to be of type N (ie, a substance was added to it so that it has extra electrons in it's crystaline structure by comparisson with pure silicon).

      Now, as many of us know, solids are just very slow liquids ... stuff embedded in a solid tends to move around, though slowly. The higher the temperature, the faster the moving.

      In the specific case of a MOSFET, we have junctions between the silicon dopped with a specific material to make it type-N (ie more electrons) and silicon dopped with a different material to make it type-P (ie fewer electrons). In this situation, some of the dopping atoms in the type-N silicon will move to the type-P side and vice versa, thus making the junction less "sharp" (in terms of the difference between both sides).

      Some very complicated formulas (which i forgot all about) can be used to show that the "sharper" the junction, the more efficient it is.

      This is what the GGP is going about.

      Consider that maybe there are enough people in /. with an EE degree or a deep interest in electronics to actually understand the issue at hand, and maybe, just maybe, they're extra attracted to articles about new kinds of transistors !!???

    4. Re:MOSFET Application by davros-too · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Definitely not modded insightful by someone who understands. There's no engineer designing MOSFETs who is going to slap his or her forehead and say 'why didn't I think of that?'. CMOS design/fabrication is incredibly complex and doping profiles are optimised using multiple techniques. Silicon bipolar transistors are large and unsophisticated in comparison to the CMOS devices in your computer. I'm not saying these researchers aren't doing good work - but their techniques are not directly applicable to chip manufacture.

      --
      In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice; in practice there is.
  19. Not really the fastest transistor... by Manchot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sure, it might be the fastest silicon BJT, but as TFA alludes to, there are InGaAs HBTs that are functionally equivalent to BJTs and have cutoff frequencies of 710 GHz. Specifically, I'm talking about the one discussed in this paper by Milton Feng's group at the University of Illinois.

    1. Re:Not really the fastest transistor... by swg101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From your link:
      The performance of a 0.25×3 m2 pseudomorphic heteojunction bipolar transistors achieves peak fT of 710 GHz (fMAX=340 GHz)... (emphasis mine)

      So, maximum achievable frequency is actually quite a bit lower than 710GHz.

      Also, the article acknowledges that faster transistors exist ("Alternative approaches for building fast transistors exist but they use other materials, such as gallium arsenide or a silicon germanium mix, which require more expensive manufacturing techniques."), but this is a method that can be adapted to existing silicon manufacturing processes.

      The article also qualified the claim ("...set a new world record for the fastest transistor of its type."), but of course this is not as sensational of a headline, so did not make it into the summary.

      --
      Like pi? Try 10,000 digits.
    2. Re:Not really the fastest transistor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's not what fMAX means. At all. fmax a figure of merit that indicates the maximum frequency where a device has *power* gain. The other figure of merit, fT, is the highest frequency where a device exhibits current gain (i.e. gain = 1 at freqency=ft). The paper above indeed operates at 710 GHz, with a current gain of 1. Gain will increase by 20 dB for every order of magnitude of lower frequency (i.e. gain = 20 dB at frequency = 71 GHz). The most useful devices will have a balanced ft and fmax. Ft is typically more favorable for digital circuit design, and fmax more useful for analog design (as a general rule of thumb)

      Since you don't design amplifiers with a gain of 1, you don't see circuits operating at frequencies around ft. One also has to account for loading of the interconnects and the overhead of driving other components, which also reduces the maximum frequency of operation for chips. Transistors in the latest and greatest pentiums are well above 200 GHz (silicon CMOS), and IBM has SiGe HBTs (a variant of a BJT) above 350 GHz.

      But I'm sure you already knew that. After all, what else can fmax mean but the *MAXIMUM* frequency of operation (emphasis mine).

  20. how does it work? by thePig · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The article is very less on details.
    Anybody can explain on the process here?

    --
    rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
  21. Re:Faster? not funny !! by tuomoks · · Score: 1

    Maybe OT but so true.. Just came home from work, someone asked me to write a test program for our product. So - 1h with Delphi ( works in Wine perfectly and compiles in Kylix for Linux people ) and I had a test performance program emulating 5000+ ( any number IP addresses.. ) terminals through raw sockets ( you build the headers.. ) creating tunneled test traffic and keeping statistics/timings/random test patterns/,, Now - the product doesn't do much except route the requests / replies, etc.. --- My 2.4GHz dual system is ~2% busy when the product running in a decent size IBM / AIX system tops 100%, 110tx / sec ( not bad BUT..) So - it is the sad truth, we do need faster programs !! It is not difficult, just KISS ! But unfortunately I have heard that faster HW solves the problem, what!!, 35+ years in this busines and never seen it - still waiting..
    Now, of course as so many have said, this technology is ( at least ) not yet valid for faster computers but for digital processing ( big difference. ) Anyway - I think that the SW skills have somehow gone "a little" down lately - just IMHO.. And, of course, this is OT..

  22. Purpose? by treak007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would the prime purpose of this be cameras and cell phones, rather then computers.

    --
    Klingon Software is not released, it escapes, inflicting terrible damage onto the enemy as it does
  23. OMG that would be hard to use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At 100 GHz the wavelength is 3 cm. A quarter wave line would be 0.75 cm. This thing is operating at a frequency well above that at which it is easy/feasible to use a printed circuit board. To operate at this frequency I would have to spend a whole pile of money so I could use hybrid IC techniques. Or I could figure out how to couple this device to waveguide. AARGH!

    The magic word Slashdot asks me to type to prove that I'm not a robot is 'hospital'. How very appropriate 'cause that's where I would end up if I tried to use this sucker.

    1. Re:OMG that would be hard to use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you missing a zero?
      I calculate around 3mm wavelength for 100GHZ.

        299,792,458 / 100,000,000,000 Hz = approx 0.00299 m

    2. Re:OMG that would be hard to use. by olman · · Score: 1

      At 100 GHz the wavelength is 3 cm. This thing is operating at a frequency well above that at which it is easy/feasible to use a printed circuit board.

      More like 3mm when we get down to it.

      Basically you have to use balanced transmission lines such as LVDS and start learning how to define trace impedance for PCB. Oh and stop putting unrelated power/GND planes on same sections of the PCB..

      Easy? No. Feasible? Oh definitely.

  24. Bi-polar not CMOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA, this is talking about bipolar trannies, not CMOS.

    1. Re:Bi-polar not CMOS by Ig0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Bipolar trannies" sound very scary.

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
  25. BJTs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have transistors that can operate at 100GHz - we have for a while. They're called BJTs. Only problem is it would cost waaaaaay more to manufacture a 50M transistor chip than other semiconductor designs. You never know, but really I am highly doubtful of the cost of this.

  26. W Band by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_band

    Apparently this freq is known as W-band microwave radiation. Useful for millimetre wave radar apparently - you know the machine that can see through clothes at the airport? Wonder if this is why they are researching it? Anyone know better than me? Will my kids have real X-ray specs?

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  27. But these are BIPOLAR transistors! by PaulBu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, it is "standard" "silicon" process, but they compete with other GaAs/InP/SiGe bipolar transistors, not yoru garden variety CMOS FETs -- and for other technologies Ft of more than 100GHz is not unheard of. Neat trick, and you will see them in your cellphone front-end, maybe soon, but do not hold your breath for 20GHz processors (and if someone makes 'em, please *do not hold them with your bare hands*! -- they gonna be HOT!) ;-)

    Paul B.

    1. Re:But these are BIPOLAR transistors! by evanspw · · Score: 1

      Well, I think InP HBTs (indium phosphide heterojunction bipolar transistors) are up to around 500GHz these days. The number is the transistor's ft (big f, little t) which denotes the frequencey are which the transconductance falls to unity, all other things being perfect. I assume that's the same numebr the Southhampton guys are using, since the ft/10 figure of merit is commonly used for respectable high efficiancy power amplifiers (what you want in a mobile phone), though you make them work at even ft/2.

      -p

      --
      Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
    2. Re:But these are BIPOLAR transistors! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think that 110GHz was Ft (everyone would be reporting THAT for a transistor, right?) -- I am wondering what a ring oscillator frequency would be. And I did spend a year of my life not too long ago messing with top-of-the-line InP HBTs, your 500GHz figure for experimental stuff is rather accurate (one can get above 300GHz for "production" devices).

      Paul B.
      \

  28. What about heat? by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

    I'm curious to see what kind of heat these transistors would generate, as thats a growing problem already.

    1. Re:What about heat? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      As far as I am aware, the faster a gate is able to switch, the less heat it should produce. One of the main sources of heat comes from the transition between conducting/non conducting, so speeding up the transition would help.

  29. That's right by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

    because if the CPU is fast enough then the software just won't have any time to fail, because it will be very occupied trying to not fall behind the processor. All of the software failures are due to high stress that software is experiencing and the faster the computers are the less time there is for the software to stress, thus it doesn't think about being bloated with all that dead weight and terrible algorythms that much and doesn't get depressed that easily.

    1. Re:That's right by budgenator · · Score: 1

      i loaded an old word processor that ran in a window manager layer running on top of msdos 6.22 from a 12 MHz '286 on a 1 GHz pentium, it was just insanely fast; this new break-through might make the next new version of windows ship on time.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  30. Guess what else by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

    I'd like to speculate about some uses for these new goodies....

    1. Faster Cash Registers (Wal-mart, are you listening???)
    2. Faster ATM's (though I admit it's usually the dufus in front of me & not the machine that's the problem)
    3. Faster calculators (for all you toe counters out there)
    4. Faster gas pumps (so we can fund the terrorists we're fighting more effectively)
    5. Faster Coffee makers (I don't know if making the programmable stuff faster will actually make the brew faster, but one can only hope)

    2 cents,

    QueenB

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
  31. Listen Up You Primitive Screwheads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This here's my BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR. I design analog circuits with it and it's got an Ft of 110 GHz.

    I don't design digital circuits with bipolar devices. I design digital circuits with CMOS devices. Bipolar sucks power but it runs fast. CMOS sips power but it run's slower.

    And if I'm going to design anything usefull with it, that thing is going to operate at about 1/10th of the cut-off frequency (Ft).

    This ain't about 110 GHz CPUs.

    This is about Op Amps and Phase Lock Loops.

    I know that Circuits 101 was a long time ago for some of you folks, but really.

    1. Re:Listen Up You Primitive Screwheads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you forgot that many in CS were EE rejects.

    2. Re:Listen Up You Primitive Screwheads... by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      hm, your "bedside manner" when dealing with IT, S/W and digital folks needs some refinement.

      Oh, and BTW, if you think you are doing op-amps at these frequencies, then please go sit in the corner for a 10 minute time-out...

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
  32. Yikes! Flourine is nasty stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flourine is about as nasty a substance as you'll find anywhere. It's used in oil refineries. Even a slight exposure to the gas will cause all the calcium to leech out of your bones and you'll die screaming in agony as you very literally turn to a jellyfish. Not to worry though, the process only takes 4-6 hours.

    You REALLY don't want to live anywhere near an oil refinery. Seriously.

    1. Re:Yikes! Flourine is nasty stuff by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah right, boy that sounds like one for mythbusters right after they do the 15Kt bic lighter/welder spark episode. Exposure to large amount of fluorine gas is a bad thing and probably fatal, but that's mostly do the extreme oxidising potential of fluorine and poisoning multiple emzymes rather than decalcification in fact fluorine is added to teeth to recalcify them and to turn some of the calcium hypatite into calcium flourite to increase the teeth's decay resistance, literally turning some of the tooth into the rock fluorite.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Yikes! Flourine is nasty stuff by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes it is - but molten silicon is also hazardous to your health. If you keep nasty things contained with a lot of care they cease to be nasty.

    3. Re:Yikes! Flourine is nasty stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes it is - but molten silicon is also hazardous to your health. If you keep nasty things contained with a lot of care they cease to be nasty.


      Like pr0n collections?
  33. Am I the only one... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    ...who reads something like this, and hearkens back to the days when people thought stuff like this would lead to some sort of golden age, and then to hear that it will simply make "better phones and cameras" is kind of disappointing. I know the prior attitude was a lot of idealistic pie-in-the-sky, flying-car, jet-pack, white building, monorail nonsense. Still though. I miss it. Oh... bring back Donald Duck with his doors to the future, and the nuclear powered airplane. Please? For just a moment?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

  34. OMG that would be hard to fit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Or I could figure out how to couple this device to waveguide. AARGH!"

    I work in satellite communications and couple waveguides all the time.*

    *Alright now! Get your mind out of the gutter.

    --
    "The magic word Slashdot asks me to type to prove that I'm not a robot is 'hospital'."

    Mine's "unproven".

  35. IBM SiGe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Same thing with IBM's big SiGe push - great for RF but doesn't seem to have made any inroads to logic, probably due to cost issues and technical problems that make SiGe potentially unsuitable for logic but don't really affect their RF performance."

    IBM SiGe is a BiCMOS process. This means it integrates SiGe bipolar transistors with standard CMOS. The bipolar component of the technology is not intended for logic, except perhaps for low-density, very-high-speed logic in limited patches. Rather, the bipolar is intended as an analog/RF device, with the integrated CMOS handling the logic. Ideal applications include chips that combine an RF or high-speed analog front end with a digital baseband, which is why the technology has made great inroads into cellular front ends, WiFi, GPS, optical transceivers and test instrumentation circuits (i.e. front ends for high-speed oscilloscopes). The reason you don't see SiGe making huge logic inroads is two-fold: (a) the bipolar doesn't do enough in such applications to justify the cost of the extra processing steps needed to add the bipolar and (b) since the technology leverages existing CMOS baseline processes, the CMOS is typically a generation behind the most state-of-the-art CMOS only process. In summary, SiGe is best suited to chips that require integrating very high performance RF/analog with logic but where the logic doesn't need to be the very fastest.

    That said, SiGe bipolar transistors hit the 110GHz (referring to an RF metric known as f-sub-T) point about 5 years ago and it's not clear that these devices are really that much cheaper (much of the cost of SiGe comes from other add-ons such as resistors, capacitors and the like, required to make complete RF circuits, rather than from the growth of the SiGe layer).

  36. Where does that expression come from, anyway? by PapayaSF · · Score: 1
    It's the old "stable, fast, on schedule; pick two"
    Very true, and at the risk of drifting offtopic, I first heard this "three qualities, pick two" proverb over 30 years ago under the title of "The Printer's Triangle": the corners were labeled Good, Fast, and Cheap and the caption was "Pick any two." Does anyone know the origin of this bit of wisdom? Do other businesses have other versions?
    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:Where does that expression come from, anyway? by majikenny · · Score: 1

      At my college, the adage is "social life/friends, grades, sleep". Of course, most people don't know they're allowed 2 choices. Everybody goes for grades hardcore. Amazing how silly my fellow engineers can be.

      Going to college to learn things..... Golly, what'll they think of next?

      --
      No bastard ever won a war by dieing for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb, bastard die for his.
    2. Re:Where does that expression come from, anyway? by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The "triangle of Expectation" has been used in the construction industry for a long time as well.
      often the sides are labeled Time, Cost and Quality, but the idea is still the same. I've even seen builders put the diagram in tender submissions.

      Some management guru has even gone on to say that for any given project the area of the triangle is always the same. so that the most effective project will be an equal angle triangle.
      The management guy was from the 70's so the idea has to be at least a 100years older than that. ;-)

      It is strange that is such a common thing yet it doesn't google an orgin.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    3. Re:Where does that expression come from, anyway? by miro+f · · Score: 1

      Women: Single, Good looking, Mentally stable.

      Pick two

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    4. Re:Where does that expression come from, anyway? by gfody · · Score: 1

      Smart, Pretty, Monogamous

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    5. Re:Where does that expression come from, anyway? by mlrtime · · Score: 1

      I like to use:

      1) Personality
      2) Looks
      3) Money (family or income)

      Pick two

    6. Re:Where does that expression come from, anyway? by Carthag · · Score: 1

      I heard that one as "My ideal date is female, human, & alive. But hell, two out of three isn't so bad!"

  37. What About IBM+Georgia Tech @ 500ghz? by raftpeople · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a few weeks ago there was an article about IBM in conjunction with Georgia Tech, supercooled reaching 500ghz, room temp was at about 300ghz.

    Hos is this new one a world record at 110ghz?

    1. Re:What About IBM+Georgia Tech @ 500ghz? by SheeEttin · · Score: 1
      Just about to hit "Moderate" when I saw this...
      1. This is a bipolar, not a CMOS. If you'd look up at the multiple posts correcting the others, you'd see this.
      2. This is a record for the bipolars.
      3. How warm is 300 Ghz? It's 69F in here...
    2. Re:What About IBM+Georgia Tech @ 500ghz? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Yah, but Tomshardware.com then overclocked it and cooled it by filling the case with cooking oil.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  38. DSDM by remmelt · · Score: 1

    As part of my CS education I had a course in DSDM or the Dynamic Systems Development Method. The triangle consisted of money, time, features. Two corners were fixed (usually money and time) and with this triangle we could make the customer see that the feature part can't also be fixed. In comes the MoSCoW treatment, etc, etc.

  39. The *real* article is here. fT = 110GHz by viking2000 · · Score: 2, Informative
  40. Oh, In addition to arsenic, we will have halogens by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    That's what we need in our landfills. Flourine. It goes will with the other hazardous chemicals found in modern electronic devices. Maybe in the future, you will have to pay to throw away an old pda like we do today with desktop machines.

  41. Re:Oh, In addition to arsenic, we will have haloge by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Get a sense of proportion. There's very little fluorine in these new transistors, and it's chemically bound to the silicon. There's more fluorine in toothpaste, and a lot more fluorine in common refrigerants.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  42. Get an editor by fmaresca · · Score: 1

    Maybe the BBC could get a technical editor, with the minimum amount of knowledge necessary to match the caption of the picture with the photograph, because I can't see how a bare printed circuit board has millions of transistors.

  43. Understanding is a Three-Edged Sword by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Programmer: There is no speed issue that cannot be solved through the use of better hardware.
    Engineer: There is no hardware issue that cannot be solved through the use of well-written software.

    Discuss.


    It's not plugged in?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  44. Adequate beats excellent by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
    I've been noticing a trend in technology markets. The public seems to go through a process something like this when deciding which product in a category gets to be dominant:
    1. Eliminate all products that are completely unusable
    2. Favor the buggiest and most poorly implemented but still usable product
    I am not just talking about Microsoft. If I studied the history more closely, there might be an underlying principle like "first to market" that would explain this apparent stupidity. On the money making side, it seems to be a huge advantage to have a *usable* product out first. If you misjudge your corner cutting, and it isn't actually usable, you lose. But presenting a polished product later, even at a lower price, seems to be doomed.

    The problem for Microsoft is that while they succeeding in emancipating themselves from the chains of DOS and Win16, Win32 is still mired in bad design decisions of Win95 - which live on in the name of backward compatibility. The "shattering Windows" attack exemplifies the problem. If I were them, I would create a new Win64 API that at least doesn't repeat the same mistakes as Win32, and run Win32 applications in a virtual machine in their new OS. The compatibility VM can have efficient multimedia by providing pass through drivers a la Xen and Win4Lin.

  45. Bipolar not CMOS by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    The transistors fabricated in the article are bipolar, not CMOS. Bipolar transistors don't have gates, they have a bases.

    Anyway, back to CMOS. Assuming equal voltage (which isn't true as voltages are decreasing with smaller processes), if the gate can be modeled as a capacitor, the power consumed would be larger for a higher frequency since voltage would be the same, but current would increase due to the lower impedance of a capacitor at a higher frequency. You can think of it as having to pull of the same amount of charge, but at a faster rate, thereby requiring more current. I believe the decreased power typically comes from the fact that the faster transistors are usually created with a smaller process and therefore use a lower voltage.

  46. Faster processing by l33tfr33k · · Score: 1

    A pity we can make 110 Ghz transistors and we can't solve the hard drive bottleneck.

    --
    I AM MAN!!!
  47. Fluorine??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... so then they are 'Commie' transistors...?! I jest I jest :)

  48. Fluorine is for mind control! by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that the only reason you add fluorine to anything is for mind control! Soon, my tin-foil hat will need a anti-fluorine upgrade

  49. Why bother with 110Mhz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with 110Mhz when you can get 1-3Thz:P
    http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=2585

  50. We had those thirty years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mil spec Galliuim Arsenide, but still.

    Fluorine doped silicon should be allot less hassle to manufacture and a butt load more eco friendly to boot assuming it all works as reported.

  51. Re:Oh, In addition to arsenic, we will have haloge by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I have a sense of proportion. The isn't that much arsenic either, but millions of chips together might be a problem, INABCL.

  52. BS dude by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    But why is the hardware CPU chip itself STABLE, and FAST, and released on SCHEDULE?

    Maybe software engineers should do some basic hardware engineering to learn the processes of making good stuff tm

    So use stable/schedule software guys to write 90% of your software, and use a few smarty pants guys to write
    the core speed deamon code for the specifics that require it.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:BS dude by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      But why is the hardware CPU chip itself STABLE, and FAST, and released on SCHEDULE?

      At one place I worked, one of the hardware engineering rooms had a poster on the wall which read: "Software will be as stable and as bug-free as hardware the day it costs a software engineer five million dollars and three months to run his compiler".

      That probably goes some way towards answering your question.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

  53. Wrong disorder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's (the layman's view) of schizophrenia - not bipolar (manic depresive).

    But still funny. Making fun of the misfortunes of others is still great material.

    1. Re:Wrong disorder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mark me OT, but:
      Making fun of the misfortunes of others is still great material.
      SCHADENFREUDE! S-C-H-A-D-E-N-F-R-E-U-D-E
  54. they feed those only ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... they feed that toostpaste only to Anonymous Cowards ;)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..